HomeMy WebLinkAboutRebuttal to Argument Against Measure G-20RECEIVED
AUG 0 7 2020
Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure G-20 SLO CITY CLERK
Measure G-20's opponents acknowledge the current crisis, but they fail to offer a credible path
forward.
They are choosing to sit on the sidelines and shout NO.
The way out of a crisis is decisive action at the local level. We can't wait for Washington or
Sacramento to help us, and we don't want them telling us what to do.
By approving Measure G-20, we will support one another, invest in our community and achieve
our shared goals.
Measure G-20 revenue will:
• Support economic recovery.
• Improve fire, public safety and emergency health response.
• Ensure wildfire and natural disaster preparedness.
• Repair potholes, reduce traffic congestion, expand bike lane§.
• Protect creeks from pollution, preserve open space and natural areas.
• Retain local businesses and assist with job creation.
■ Fund homeless prevention programs.
• Support local nonprofits that assist our most vulnerable neighbors.
• Keep public areas clean and safe.
Because visitors pay 70% of sales tax revenue, Measure G-20 is the fairest and best way to
invest in our city without overburdening residents.
Other key benefits:
• SLO's tax rate will still be the same or lower than many California cities including Santa
Barbara, Santa Maria and Monterey.
• Voters can repeal Measure G-20 at any time.
These extraordinary times demand action. Measure G-20 is an affordable path forward, a way
to help ourselves, and to control our destiny.
Please join us and vote YES ON MEASURE G-20
��-
�Mi�cZ.��j fZou l
AUG 0 7 2020
�LQ QTY CLEPK I
AUTHORIZATION FOR SIGNERS OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS
To be completed by the signer(s) of the Direct Argument
The undersigned signer(s) of the Direct Argument In Favor ❑ Against
Measure G-20 at the General Municipal Election for the City of San Luis Obispo to be held on
November 3, 2020 authorize(s) the following individual(s) to sign the Rebuttal Argument in
his/her/their place:
1. 4givA Ha,((I G7 to sign instead of C 0 -LOLO
print name of Rebuttal Argument signer sig ature of Die t Argument signer date
2. TTIla �y �ro��-�— to sign instead of
print name of Rebuttal Argument signer sig atu of Direct Argument signer date
3._ Efi(, V&ILA M to sign instead of 11 oe La 4� �
print name of Rebuttal Argument signer signature of Direct Argume igner date
4. Y OL 4 to sign instead of � �Q
print name of Rebuttal Argument signer signature of ect Argument signer date
5. D to sign instead of 0
prini name of Rebuttal Argument signer signs ure of Direct Argument signer date
AUG 0 7 2920
ARGUMENTS
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY AUT OR 0 AkbUl IIE TS
The undersigned pro nent(s) or author(s) of the (circle one: primary 1 rebuttal
argument (circle on in favor r / against) ballot Measure G-20 at the General unicipal
Election for the City o an Luis Obispo to be held on November 2020 hereby state
that the argument is true and correct to the best of their kno�nd1kelief.
Print Name _KL i Yl ffa
rl�i s
Title M An ors(. DII�rw,[JJD't
If applicable, ArgW ent submitted on behalf of:
O l A n- -1 -- -#4 1
ame of urcianatition
Print Name m
Title ,
I MOL4 / C,1 rnVnIAn tj-i 6C�h�
If applicable, argument submitted on ehalf of:
Name of
ization
Print Name P liQ, tt r
Date
Signature(
Date D 7 2 b
Title �A' �j �:l f�1e.1 I �{� Signature
If applicable, argumen submitted on behalf of:
Date / V
me of Orqanization
Print Name
Title NnV/0 16fA1 tyit j
If applica le, argurneA submitted on behalf f:
of
Print Name H d -)6Vy ROA+
Title l .P01 14 lLh t2K'51W S 5
If applicable, (argument submitted on behalf of:
(Name of Orqanization
Sign t
Date
Signature _
Date O / -7 1 ato o10
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning
with Section 9200) of the Elections Code (EC) shall be accompanied by the foregoing
form statement to be signed by each proponent, and by each author, if different, of the
argument.
Attach this form to the signed and properly titled argument. See following page for
additional notes.