HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/06/1964REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL
April 6, 1964 - 7:30 P. 14.
CITY HALL
Invocation was given by Mayor Clay P. Davidson.
Roll Call
Present: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
City Staff
Present: P. Chapman, Director of Planning & Building; J. H. Fitzpatrick,
City Clerk; W. Flory, Superintendent of Parks & Recreation;
W. M. Houser, City Attorney; R. D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; D. F. Romero, City Engineer; L. Schlobohm, Fire Chief;
J. Wainscott, Fire Battalion Chief; W. Schofield, Policf Chief;
E. P. Thompson, Water Superintendent.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Councilman Graves, the minutes of
March 16 and 23, 1964, were approved as presented.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Councilman Graves, claims against
the City for the month of April, 1964, were approved, subject to the approval of
the Administrative Officer.
1. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the following
salary step increases were approved:
' BROWN, David L., Police Officer, from Step 1 at $435 to Step 2 at $460 per
month, effective May 1, 1964.
DELLA BITTA, Jack, Laborer- Equipment Operator, from Step 2 at $390 to Step 3
at $412 per month, effective May 1, 1964.
GONZALES, Jesse G., Laborer, from Step 4 at $412 to Step 5 at $435 per month,
effective May 1, 1964.
HILEMAN, Helen B., Senior Librarian, from Step 3 at $488 to Step 4 at $515
per month, effective May 1, 1964.
RALICICR,I, Robert C., Jr., from Step 1 at $435 to Step 2 at $460 per month,
effective May 1, 1964.
MORRISSEY, Winston B., Police Officer, from Step 1 at $435 to Step 2 at $460
per month, effective May 1, 1964.
SALAS, Edward S., Laborer - Equipment Operator, from Step 4 at $435 to Step 5 at
$460 per month, effective May 1, 1964.
SESENA, Leo J., Janitor, from Step 1 at $330 to Step 2 at $330 per month,
effective May 1, 1964.
2. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graves, the following
pay estimates were approved:
HOWIE & SHELTON
Broad Street Widening Est. #4 $225.00
J. A. ROBERTS
Higuera Street Tree Planting Holes Est. #2 $22099.25
Est. #3 (final) $593.25
A -1 ELECTRIC
Traffic Signals Est. #1 $7,938.99
J
1
City Council Aiionutes
April 6, 1964
Page -2-
FRED J. EARLY, JR., CO., INC.
Water System Improvements
TRIAD PIPING & CONSTRUCTION CO.
Whale Rock Pumping Plant Additions
W. M. LYLES COMPANY
Water System Improvements
Est. #7 $147,390.49
Est. #4 $8,674.66
Est. #1 $29,352.45
The Council requested that in the future the percentage completed be added
also.
$. J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, reported on the following bids received for
chlorination and metering equipment for iieservoir No. 2:
Item #1 Item #2 Item #3
Wallace & Tieruac, Inc. $2,628.06 $3,690.00 $522.00
items #4 Item -k5 Item #6 TOTAL
$13565.Ua $1,6710.00 $150.00 $10,233.0
Deviations from specifications: No deviations
Item #1 Automatic chlorinator
Item #2 Residual recorder with controller
Item #3 3 hp booster pump, complete
Item #4 One forward & reverse 14 inch water meter
Item #5 Two indicator - totalizer recorders
Item #6 Inspection fee to inspect installation
adjust and calibrate equipment.
E.. P. Thompson, Water Superintendent, recommended that the bid of
& Tiernan be accepted.
On motion of Councilman ililler, seconded by Councilman Graves, the bi,: was
accepted.
4. J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, reported on the following � '.&; receivel for
furnishing one (1) Pneumatic Tired Roller (111ew) to the City of San Luis Obispo
Deviations
No bid deposit
Cal -Res Machinery $7,045.00 1. Minimum outside turning
radius is 221
2. Transmission shall be hydra
torque converter, 4 forwar'
reverse speed
Crook Company 5,937.00 Bros model SP 54 B -No devi
Santa Fe Equipment Company 7,745.00 Tamp model SP 312
1. Minimum outside turning
radius is 221
Shaw Sales & Service 69879.27 1. No spin differential - not
available
2. Will supply "lock out" brake
selection
Hanson Equipment Company 6,330.00 Galion 9 - wheel pneumatic
roller
D. F. Romero, City Engineer, recommended that t'-,e low bid be accepted.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -3-
1
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the low bid
of Crook Company was accepted.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1273, a resolution increasing the
1963 -64 budget. (Account No. 214.6, Street - Capital Outlay, be increased by
$1,650.88 and the unbudgeted reserve be decreased by $1,650.88.)
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
5. a. Grant Deed and street widening agreement from Archie Rodriguez ano
Betty Rodriguez for street widening on Johnson Avenue.
b. Grant Deed, Deed of Easement and street widening agreement from C;'.ayton
E. Fluitt and Clair M. Fluitt for Foothill Boulevard Street widening.
C. Grant Deed, Deed of Easement and widening agreement from I. L. Hc:?ver
for Foothill Boulevard widening.
d. Grant Deed and street widening agreement from R. Dean Robinson
Ramona Robinson for street widening on Foothill Boulevard.
e. Grant Deed, Deed of Easement and street widening agreement from ;:aymond
1 E. Madgett and Charmie E. Madgett for street widening on Foothill Boa:'z. =yard.
The City Council discussed the matter of accepting Grant Deeds and agreement.
from the property owners under the old street widening policy when the Counc
is contemplating a new more lenient policy to be adopted later this eaening.
Mayor Davidson stated that these property owners should be considered under
the new policy.
Councilman Miller stated that the City should go ahead under the present
policy and then go ahead and mace up new agreements under the new proposed
policy.
City Attorney Houser explained that the property owners had accepted the Ci.,
present offer and that if the Council made any changes, then it would be
necessary to contact property owners to see if they would agree to tree
changes.
Councilman Graves asked if the City could accept the Deed and agreement u:•'.:
the present policy and if the new policy was adopted, then present a new
agreement to be signed within thirty (30) days if the new policy is adopt=
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that the .
be authorized to accept and record the deeds on behalf of the City and acc.:e.�
' the existing agreements, provided that any of the property owners who wish
to be included under the new policy would be given the right to do so before
the documents were recorded. Notion carried.
5f. Covenant for temporary erection of improvements with the public right of
way on La Entrada and Ramona Streets from Myrna S. Johannes and Marion H. Bain,
was presented.
City Engineer Romero explained the owner proposes to construct a fence rather
than a retaining wall, therefore the Public Works Department had no means
of enforcing a heavier construction.
The Building Department requested to inspect and see if the block wall is
constructed in a safe manner in City right of way.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -4-
On motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, that the
Building Department make an inspection of said block wall. motion carried.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, that the Mayor
be authorized to accept and record the Covenant on behalf of the -City.
Motion carried.
9. At this time the City.Council held a public�.hearing on-the recommendation
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearin3 closed.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Mayor Davidson, the following
ordinance was introduced. An ordinance rezoning from R -4 c'';aneral lienitiple
Family Residential District) to C -1 (Neighborhood Commerci::i. Districei that
property located at the northwest corner of Santa Rosa and 14alnut Streets.
Councilman Graves stated that he disagreed with the Planning Commission
recommendation on this rezoning as this was making Santa Rosa Street into
a strip zone which is poor planning and that the way things are goii:g Sant?
Rosa Street will be strip business from College Square to the centre:_ busi;.-.:..
district.
Councilman Miller stated he believed that this was a good use for t?-..- prop:: .:.
as studies have proved that residential development along the freeways ar,.
unsuccessful and that land along freeways should be zoned for business,
particularly when the property adjacent to the freeways are well sr.-viced
by access roads. Further, he believed that in the near future all of thi..
block of Walnut will be rezoned to C -1.
Mayor Davidson suggested that the Council should consider adding the "S"
classification to the C -1 in order to control the area.
Councilman Whelchel stated he agreed with Councilman Graves' statement, part-
icularly when the Commission and Council have recently turned down another
request for a restaurant across the freeway.
Councilwoman McNeil agreed with Councilman Graves also.
Mr. Nelson gave a brief history of the various rezoning on Santa Rosa from
residential to commercial use. He further stated that the parallel of this
application with a prior application was not the same. He also stated that he
believed that the Council should follow the advice of the Planning Commission
and if they thtnk they know more than the Planning Commission, then they should
let them go and do the planning themselves.
of the Planning Commission to rezone from R -4 (General Multiple Family
Residential District) to C -1 (Neighborhood Commercial District) that property
located at the northwest corner of Santa Rosa and. Walnut Streets.
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing open.
Douglas Lewetlow protested the rezoning and presented a letter from
Mrs. Mabel G. Hansen objecting the rezoning. He objected on behalf of ten
(10) of the twelve (12) property owners who objected to the rezoning due
to traffic congestion and noise.
Mr. Kroll appeared on behalf of his requested rezoning and presented :: sketch
of the restaurant he plans to place on the property. He stated it woT:_d be
a model operation and kept very clean.
Stan Nelson appeared on behalf of property owners who wished to have :'.ie
property rezoned so that some business use can be made of the propert_..,
The following letter was received from Mis. Mable G. Hansen:
'
"I wish, at this time, to protest the zoning change from R -3 to C -1 r_ the
1000 Block on Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, for reasons of traffic congests ; -.n
and general noise."
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearin3 closed.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Mayor Davidson, the following
ordinance was introduced. An ordinance rezoning from R -4 c'';aneral lienitiple
Family Residential District) to C -1 (Neighborhood Commerci::i. Districei that
property located at the northwest corner of Santa Rosa and 14alnut Streets.
Councilman Graves stated that he disagreed with the Planning Commission
recommendation on this rezoning as this was making Santa Rosa Street into
a strip zone which is poor planning and that the way things are goii:g Sant?
Rosa Street will be strip business from College Square to the centre:_ busi;.-.:..
district.
Councilman Miller stated he believed that this was a good use for t?-..- prop:: .:.
as studies have proved that residential development along the freeways ar,.
unsuccessful and that land along freeways should be zoned for business,
particularly when the property adjacent to the freeways are well sr.-viced
by access roads. Further, he believed that in the near future all of thi..
block of Walnut will be rezoned to C -1.
Mayor Davidson suggested that the Council should consider adding the "S"
classification to the C -1 in order to control the area.
Councilman Whelchel stated he agreed with Councilman Graves' statement, part-
icularly when the Commission and Council have recently turned down another
request for a restaurant across the freeway.
Councilwoman McNeil agreed with Councilman Graves also.
Mr. Nelson gave a brief history of the various rezoning on Santa Rosa from
residential to commercial use. He further stated that the parallel of this
application with a prior application was not the same. He also stated that he
believed that the Council should follow the advice of the Planning Commission
and if they thtnk they know more than the Planning Commission, then they should
let them go and do the planning themselves.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -5-
Councilman Graves explained that the Council could honestly have a difference
of opinion with one of their Commissions without firing anyone.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, that the
motion be amended to defer action until a study session can be held with the
Planning Commission.
Councilman Miller disagreed and asked the Council to proceed and make a
decision.
City Attorney Houser explained that the resolution setting forth the Council
procedure provides that a motion to refer the matter to a committee takes
precedence over any other motion of the Council and if properly seconded
should be voted upon before the primary motion.
Councilman Miller stated that he believed the Council should vote on
original motion at this time.
Oil motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Councilman Graves, that a joint
study session be set up between tha Planning Commission and the City Council.
Passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
10. At this time
a resolution
Boulevard to
Drive from Fi
Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr., Clell W. Whelchel
Clay F. Davidson, Donald Q. Miller
None
the City Council held a public hearing on Resolution No. 1257,
requiring sidewalk improvements on La Entrada from Foothill
the Deeter Tract, a portion of Catalina Street, and Patricia
)othil.l Boulevard to Highland Drive.
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing open.
The City Clerk, J. H. Fitzpatrick, read the resolution the properties -evolved
and improvements to be made.
D. F. Romero, Citv Engineer, presented a map showing what pr perties ~ere
involved, what improvements were to be made and any deviation from na r.:al
development.
The following letter was received from Joseph F. Days, Jr., 4 La Entr.•da
Avenue:
"I live at 4 La Entrada Avenue, on the corner of La Entrada and Footi::_11
Boulevard. I wish to request permission to continue an existing integral
sidewalk in front of our house to Foothill Boulevard.
This would necessitate the removal of a small tree which is located i:z fro; -
of our house. The diameter of this tree at the base is approximately 42
inches,
To coincide with the City Council's decision for sidewalks on La Entrada
Avenue, I hereby request permission to remove this tree."
City Engineer Romero explained to the Council that no special cousideratio::
was needed because the tree is smaller than 4 inches in diameter when meat:.::.:.
2 feet above ground. Therefore, under the City policy, the tree can come
out.
Mrs. Cowdrev, 22 La Entrada, had no objection and was agreeable to the sic, -
walk installation.
Mr. Martin, 200 La Entrada, had no objection, but believed that the sidew,;.k
should be continued on Ramona and he would like to put in a four (4) foot
integral sidewalk.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -6-
Mr. Romero pointed out that Council policy would call for..a.4•foot detached
sidewalk to match sidewalk already constructed in the block.
Councilman Miller stated he believed that special••cousideration should 6e
given and allow Mr. Martin to place a 6 foot sidcuclk to his property -on
Ramona Street.
Councilman Graves agreed that a six (6) foot integral sidewalk at 202
Ramona Street should be placed.
Mr. Martin stated that he asked for the special consideration so that he
could keep his house attractive due to narrow setback and closeness of his
residence to Ramona Street.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graves, that 6 =•lot
integral sidewalk on Ramona Drive be placed if Mr. Martin so desires. Lotion
carried, Mayor Davidson voting no.
Mr. J. Farris had no objection; but asked for a 6 foot integral sidewait-. along
Ramona Drive.
Mr. Romero pointed out that Council policy would call for a 4 foot detached
sidewalk to match that already constructed in the block.
On motion of Councilman Miller, secorded by Councilman Graves, that t`.. Counc1
&-ant Mr. Farris the option of 6.foot integral sidewalk on Ramona Driv-: Zrom
La Entrada. Motion carried.
1 L. H. Eckrote, 83 La Entrada, objected to the installation of sidewalk due to
t'r..e fact that there is little or no oedestrian traffic or motor traffic on th5:.
portion of La Entrada as he believes that tizere are areas that need sidewalk
more than such an isolated area as La :untrada. He also askee if he hh:: to
fo- sidewalk installation on the drainage easement.
City Attorney Houser stated that the property owner would.
D. P. Romeo, City Engineer, showed sketches of existing s. ::•:- =1k on P:.;ricia
from Foothill Boulevard to Highland Drive and also showed wh:,t sidewalks
installations were required.
Mrs. Waite, 152 Patricia Drive, requested a 6 foot integral sidewalk -c 152
Patricia Drive.
Mr. Norton, 176 Patricia Drive, agreed with a 6 foot integral sidewai:: for
176 Patricia Drive and asked what was to be done with sidewalk, curb cad
gutter along the City owned property for future extension of Cerro Romauldo
S�reet.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Mayor Davidson, that 6 f..-` in-.
sidewalk be placed on City owned property on Cerro Romauldo. Motion carri:
Councilman Whelchel voting no.
Mrs. Aa son 214 Patricia Drive, had no objection and would like the most
1 reasonable development cost -wise.
Mr. Philbrick, 226 Patricia Drive, had no objection and would also like th.
most reasonable development.
Mr. Warren, 298 Patricia Drive, requested that 4 foot integral sidewalk be:
continued around to the edge of his property.
Mr. R. Patrick, 356 Patricia Drive, ask for 4 foot separate sidewalk or
most reasonable development cost -wise.
Mr. Twitchell asked for a clarification of City requirement for installac�:•:
of sidewalk.
City Council Minutes
April 69 1964
Page -7-
D. V. Inwerson, 301 Patricia Drive, asked if he would be required to continue
the sidewalk around Craig Way and asked that it be included and he will-
request that the City include Craig Way improvement at this time.
City Engineer Romero recommended a 4 foot separate sidewalk for both sides of
Patricia Drive from Craig Way to Highland Drive and for the west side of
Patricia between Cerro Romauldo and Craig Way.
Mr. Romero explained the procedure for having the sidewalk installed under
City financing after the Council tares action this evening.
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Graves, that 4 foot
detached sidewalk be installed on Patricia Drive from Craig to Highland Drive.
Motion carried.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilwoman Mcxleil, that 6 foot
integral sidewalk be installed on Patricia from Foothill Boulevard to Cerro
Romauldo and 4 foot detached sidewalk on the ::est side of Patricia frog Cerro
Romauldo to Craig Way and install transition to save trees at 226 Patr_ -.pia
Drive. Motion carried.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Killer. the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. i274, a resolution ordering
construction, reconstruction acid /or repair of sidewalks on La Entrada :tom
Foothill to Deeter Tract, a portion of Catalina Street, and Patricia
Ecothill to Highland Drive.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
1 AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. TOhelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
11. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on phi -- -� one of the
precise plan for the planned development of a shopping center at the northease.
corner of Los Osos and Madonna Roads.
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing open.
Mr. Ray C. Skinner, developer, urged the adoption of phase one of the ?reci-
plan of the shopping center at the northeast corner of Los Osos Road and
Madonna Road.
P. Chapman, Director of Planning, explained exactly what is proposed by tb..
Skinner Company and what was approved by the Planning Commission.
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the folle
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1275, a resolution approving Pt
1 of Skinner Shopping Center development.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr, Miss Margaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Direct access to shopping center from adjacent recreation area to be
approved by the City Engineer.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -8-
29. The following communication was received from V -e Fianning Commission
forwarding the proposed S-ign Ordinance for the Council's consideration:
"The Planning Corni.ssion has prepared the attached sign ordinance at the
request of the Council to replace the en.sting ordinance. It incorporates
the policies which the Commission and Council have followed in recent years
and also eliminates many anomalies which rresently exist.
Numerous meetings have been held with iepresentati.ves of the sign industry,
local businessmen and yourselves. Mary amendmen;:s were made to the original
draft in the light of suggestions made at t1.ese meetings. Because of this
and the fact that the Commission is not legally requi-red to 'hold public
hearings, they have referred this ordinance directly to the Council and
recommend that it be adopted."
The following statement was made by Mayo: Davidson:
"After reviewing the proposed sign ordinance ;repared by a committee of the
Planning Commission and the statement of intent in the introduction o
sign ordinance, it is cleer from this statement of intent that the P1:-..-Zing
Commission has embarked on a drive to legi-!&:.e the esthetics of this -,.qty.
I submit that no legislation can be enforced avaiust the will of the *.aople.
To further explore this statement, in the trip .made to Palo Alto it w-cs
stated that the original ordinance written to control signs was over .'• ". years
cid and because of the severe requi.rements was never enforced; then by
general action of t..e people it was liberstlizea and because the people :.ante.:
to make the change or improvement the nrogras is moving ahead.
Another aspect to this action '.s the Planning Comission is telling us on
one hand that we must do things to encourage the development of retail busirF�:r
in San Luis Obispo, as it can be and is one of our best supporters eccnomiceTY-
Then on the other hand a mandatory action is taken which will definitely
limit the ability of this segment to properly identify ena advertise Laeir
business. This ordinance as presented would, I am sure, discourage the auto-
mobile daaler from developing in San Luis Obispo, and the automobile industry
is the very heart of a successful retail business in any ctty.
I would like to call your attention to some areas of this ordinance that to
mee seem out of order.
First, may I call your attention to Section 8600.1 - Definitions
A. Sign: A representation by means of words, diagrams, symbols o:
models situated in a place visible to the general public and intender:
to publicize any activity, person or tiling.
B. Attached Sign: A sign painted on or attached directly to a building
or part of a building.
Now that we have defined the word, lets review Section 8600.3
Height. No part of a free standing sign shall be higher than the eaves
or parapet of the tallest building on the same lot or twenty five feet
whichever is the higher.
This part of the ordinance limits one person's right to designate his bus'
by the type of building. For instance if one building has eaves which al
15 feet off the ground he could only go to a 15 foot height, with a free
standing sign, however, the fellow next door may be able to go to 25 fee.
because his building is that heighth, - and further, is 25 feet high enc..:,..
Section 8600.3 under C. Illumination. paragraph 2 states Signs in other
districts may be illuminated, provided that vehicle drivers or the occur•- •-�: :,,
of buildings are not subjected to excessive ig are. Who is going to dec_:.•
what excessive glare is or will it depend upon the condition of the builds;
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1464
Page -9-
inspector's eyes and how he feels on that particular day, or night.
Now lets try Section 8600.3 under F. Obstructions. Signs shall not
obstruct any windo%y or door required by the Building Code, or be attached
to or obstruct a fire escape. Webster says obstruct means anything that
cuts off an object from view, or blocks the view. As I read this part then
a business could not have a sigr of any kind on a door or window such
as "Open" or "Closed" or the hours of the store or the name of the firm,
or could a sign be attached to the railing of a fire escape or even a sign
that would designate that it was a fire a;cape.
Under Section 8600.3 G. Traffic Safety. Paragraph 2 states signs visible
from a street shall not contain an arrow or the word "stop" or otherwise
resemble traffic signs or signals. If a firm had a name like STOP b SHOP
MARKET, would he have to appeal to the Council and could the Council grant
the appeal without changing the ordinance?
In paragraph 3 of this same section it stated that illuminated signs zl-all
not cause excessive glare which could dazzle the drivers of motor vehicies.
What is the definition of excessive. I -, -ho says it's excessive.
Under H. Prohibited Signs. Can we rig;:tly prohibit any type of movement
in signs of one tyre= and allow it in otier cases. Also, what is the
difference in the objection to a sign wait;, may indicate a restaurant a to
a sign which indicftes time a =x1 temperature?
To go further Section 8600.6, Paragraph C. Signs in C -1 and C -2 Districts,
the size limitation is completely out of reason and unacceptable, incl7iling
tae formula which in my opinion should have a high minima of 100 squera
feet, and rather than building frontage should consider property frontage
with a maximum of at least 600 square feet for such a sign. Roof signs
' should be allowed in these areas.
Under Paragraph D of Section 8600.(,. Signs in C -3 and M Districts. Size
limitations should be raised as for C -I and C -2 and calling attention to
Paragraph D - 3 -(c) which states that a sign must be on a solid board
or background (Free Standing Letters in silhouette not permitted.) Who can
say there cannot be a sign of letters in silhouette well constructed. This
should be crossed out.
Under Section 8600.7. Removal of Signs. If it is agreed that projecting
signs are not desirable and that signs of some non - conforming uses are not
esthetically proper, is it fair to require their removal on the basis of
esthetics.
If it is should we tear down all buildings in San Luis Obispo that do not
conform with our present building codes. No, Ladies and Gentlemen, i say
we should not holy a public hearing on this proposed ordinance but we shot.
appoint a committee which can present a sign ordinance that is acceptable
to the people of the City and beneficial to the economic development of th.
City.
May I suggest that this committee be composed of representatives as follor
2 from the Council, 2 from the Sign Industry, 2 from the Plannin; Commiss4
and 3 from the Business Community (1 from Tourist and Convention, 1 from
' General Merchandising and 1 from the Automobile Industry,) and one from o::
industry.
I move the appointment of this committee and that they be charged with the
formulation of a sign ordinance which is sympathetic to the needs and
desires of the people of San Luis Obispo and beneficial to the general
development of the City. "
Councilman Miller objected to the Mayor's suggestion at this late date any
suggested that a public hearing be held and that the public be heard after
copies have been made available to them.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -10-
Mayor Davidson read the minute3 March 25, 1963, page 2, regarding the
appointment of a Sign Committee by the Council to cooperate with the
Planning Commission's Sign Committee in preparing a new sign ordinance.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, that action
be deferred until the Havor's statement has been studied or set a public
hearing on the presented ordinance at the meeting of April 20, 1964.
Mr. Moerman stated that the only ones who are interested in the sign ordinance
are the businessmen in the City and they agree with the Mayor's statement.
W. Freeman agreed with the Mayor's statement and asked that the proposed
ordinance be cancelled.
Mrs. Bernie Lochran objected to obnoxious signs and that she would not shop
at any store that had such a sign.
Mr. Kimball, auto dealer and member of t':e Chamber Board of Directors, is
against the proposed ordinance and agreed witi? Mayor Davidson's statement
regarding signs and tilat such a committee would do a good job for the city
and that a fair and equitable ordinance would oe prepared when the businessmen
and sign people are consulted.
Mt. Blake, businessman and member of the Planning Commission, urged the
adoption of the proposed ordinance for the good of the City.
MayorDavidson read a letter from the Council appointing three ex- officio
members to help in formulating this ordi_nence.
I W. Blake gave reasons for the preparation of the ordinance presented to the
Council for adoption.
The previous motion was carried.
Councilman Miller left the meeting at 10:30 P.M.
R. At this time the City Council considered the request of the San Luis Ubisyo
Historical Society for permission to erect a sign on the City right n.� way
to direct attention to the Dallidet Adobe, at the corner of Marsh and
Toro Streets in order to guide visitors to the Adobe.
On motion of Coun,ilman Graves,seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, permission
was granted subject to the exact location being established by the Traffic
Committee.
Y. Mr. James Frisby appeared before the Council and presented the following
letter:
"I would like to request that the City place at public auction the parcel
' of land located adjacent to the railroad underpass on Johnson Avenue in th..
Breck Tract, part of lots 1, 2 and 3, that are owned by the City of San Lr
Obispo, and also, that you establish a minimum price, taking into consider
that a large amount of compaction work is necessary and that there is only
an alley entrance. "
Mr. Frisby asked that the City put up the property for sale at the minimur.
value set by the City.
The City Assessor stated that the recommended minimum bid be $10,585.00
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman T&elchel. the Council
declared the property surplus and authorized sale of property at public
auction, subject to Mr. Frisby paying the cost of the legal advertising
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -11-
and no access on Johnson Avenue. His deposit would be refunded if the
property were sold. Motion carried.
20. Communication from the Mission Plaza Committee recommending that the City
Council accept the offers for financial contribution front the Soroptimist
Club towards the construction of the 6irectional sign in the Hission Plaza
area.
On motion of Councilman 4Thelchel, seconded by Councilwoman ItNeil, the oifer
was accepted. Motion carried.
21. Communication from the Mission Plaza Committee forwarding its initial report
containing recommendations and suggestions for the %fission Plaza development
for the Council's consideration and implementation.
The City Council discussed the report of the Mission l'laza Committee and
recommendations and suggestions of the IwAssion nlaza Committee for imp.ementa-
tion of the plan. The Council also discussed what the next step would be
for development of the Plaza,
Mrs. Louphtan stated that the Smith & WiTliams deport should be followed for
dynamic City development.
The Council discussed what further studies are needed to accomplish the
development.
Mr. J. Carter objected to the Passion Plaza development and stated that if
this proposal was put on the ballot, it would go down in defeat because the
taxpayers and property owners just won't pay for it. But, he suggested that
the City build a big, good auditorium so that many conventions can came to
town and this is the kind of money maker that the City can use and would help
the central business district davelox,ment.
Mayor Davidson explained the Committee's reasons for recommending a develop-
ment of this type.
Eton Bowman asked what was going to happen to the creek in this proposed
development as she objected to leaving the creek in its present state and
urged that the City Council follow the development recommended by Smith &
Williams.
Councilman Graves stated that a careful reading of the Mission Plaza Committ .
initial report stated that this was lust to be a starting of the overall
development portion.
Burt Fugate, Mission Plaza Committee member, explained some of the re =sons
and discussion of the Mission Plaza Committee in forwarding its initial
report and current activities of the various sub - committees of the Hission
Plaza Committee and that a key is the updating of the parking and traffic
studies of the City.
Councilman Wheichel objected to the hiring of anymore experts from outside
the City to tell us now the City can grow. He stated that he believed the
any required studies and plans can be prepared by. local citizens and resic
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that the
report be accepted and :gold for further study on April 27, 1964. Notion c .
8. John Ross made a progress report on the City Hall renovations, and reporter.
on problem of different elevation of the floor in the enlarged conference
room due to the original floor finish in both rooms being of a different
material causing the difference in finished floor level. Mr. Ross sugges -J.
that a change be authorized to allow the conference room to be completed i::
parquet floor at an extra cost of $350.00.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman btNeil,that the
change order be approved at a maximim extra cost of $350.00 and proceed
with installation of hardwood floor in the conference room. Motion carried.
City Oonncil mutes
April 6, 1964
Page -12-
6. an motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilman Graves, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1268, a resolution increasing
the 1963 -64 budget. (Account No. 251.13)
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr.,
Miss Margaret McNeil, Clell W. F.iheichel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Donald Q. Miller
12. Communication from Warren A. Sinsheimer requesting Council interpretation
of City regulations relative to connection of a fire protection system to
his new building on Marsh Street, was held over to April 20, 1964, at the
request of Mr. Sinsheimer due to request of the building inspector and
fire marshall.
13. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the following
ordinance was introduced. Ordinance No. 23 ^4, an ordinance amending Section
3210 of the San Luis 079ispo Ykni.cipal Code to provide 12, 24 and 36 minute
parking restrictions.
Finally passed on the follcwing• roll call vctc:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr.,
Miss Margaret McNeil, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Donald Q. Miller
14. At this time the City Council considered the Cable T. V. Franchise Agreement.
City Attorney Houser explained that the award of the Cable T. V. Franchise
consisted of an enabling ordinance, a resolution of intention, a formal bid
by the Central California Communications Corporation, and n resolution award-
ing the franchise. In order to reduce the separate documents to one agree-
ment, the resolution required the execution of a formal contract between
the franchise holder and the City incorporating the terms and conditions
of the various documents.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the :Mayor
was authorized to sign and execute said franchise agreement on behalf of th,.
City. Motion carried.
15. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the follo,
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1270, a resolution giving notic:
of proposed annexation to the City of San Luis Obispo of uninhabited
territory described herein and designated "Calvary Baptist Church Parcel"
and giving notice of the time and place for hearing of protests thereto.
' Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr.,
Miss Margaret McNeil, Clell W. Umelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Donald Q. Miller
Z. At this time Mr. Hoffman, representing the Pacific Gas & Electric Company,
presented the Council with a franchise check in the amount of $7,321.05
for the calendar year 1963.
On motion of Councilman 14helchel, seconded by Councilman Graves, the payment
was accepted. Motion carried.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -13-
16. Communication from the Engineering and Grading Contractors Association
protesting the manner in which the contract was ataarded to Jost Floor
Company, recently by the City of San Luis Obispo, was ordered received and
filed.
Councilman Graves suggested that the Council policy be to award the low
bidder regardless of location.
Mayor Davidson suggested that the City endeavor to get bids under $500 from
only businesses and contractors within the City.
17. Communication from the Union Oil Company requesting ;permission from the City
to move their cathodic protection system from on part of the City property
to another ®hich is reeuired due to improvements of the sewer farm fields
by the City.
City Attorney Houser stated that the present contract protects the City
and recommends that Council approve the request.
On motion of Councilman Grave -,, seconded by Councilman thelchel, permission..
was granted for.Union Oil Company to move their cathodic protection equipmW.:..
as requested. Motion carried.
18. Communication from Union Oil Company requesting permission to use the City
Sewer Farm Road to sere.. <.ce a valve manifold and meter along the freeway.
The Mayor was authorized to sign the agreement on motion of Councilman Graves,
seconded by Councilman W"relchel. Motion carried.
19. Administrative Officer R. D. Miller, presented the request of Councilman
Miller that all complaints on aniast. shelter service be referred to the
Police Department so that he could follow through on these complaints, and
make the necessary investigation.
Mr. Joseph Schneider stated he had discussed this with Councilman Miller and
he was sure something could be worked cut and he is ready to cooperate.
The Council had no objection to the request of Donald Q. Miller and suggested
that all complaints regarding animal control be referred to the Administrative.
Officer.
22. Communication from Price Thompson, Water Superintendent, requesting approva:
for the purchase oY extra switching gear to protect the Whale Rock Pumping
Station during the period when no water will be available from Salinas Dam.
Said gear will cost $495.
On motion of Councilman Vhelchel, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the regt:
was approved.
23. At this time the City Council reviewed the plans and specifications for
widening of Foothill Boulevard between Santa Rosa and Casa Street.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchei, the plans
specifications were approved and authorization was given to call for bids.
The project is to start June 15th and finish September 15th and cost
$100,000.
D. F. Romero, City Engineer, presented a sketch showing requested traffic
sigas to be used during the Foothill Boulevard construction period,
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman M,elchel, City Engine
Romero was requested to see if a directional sign can be placed on Cal Poly
property at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Santa Rosa Street during
the construction period.
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1964
Page -14-
24. The City Council discussed the appointment of a screening committee for the
hiring of personnel for the summer Youth Corps work program.
Councilman ,Miller suggested a small committee of citizens to assist in
screening applicants. Be was pa,ticularl;r anxious for "need` to be taken
into consideration. City: Engineer, D. F. Romero, urged that members of the
Youth Corps be picked on theft., merit not on a we "fare basis.
On motion of Councilman -rhelchel, seconded by Councilman Graves, the selection
will be the same as last year. Motion carried.
25. Communication from Mrs. Beverly Rich notifying the City Council that she is
starting a local welcoming service called Hi Neighbor, a::d requesting that
the City Council waive her business license as she will be performing a
community service for San Luis Obispo.
Mrs. Hill, the Welcome Wagon hostess, appeared before the Council stating
that she did not believe that Mrs. Rich would dr.. a good job due to her
family responsibilities and also was afraid that a new venture of this
type would mare it difficult fo= both groups to do business.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded b•• Mayor Davidson, that the City
grant a free licence to Mrs. Zich as was done ia the casr, of the Welcome
Wagon. lotion carried, Councilman Whelche?. voting no.
26. Communication from the League of California Cities announcing a meeting to
consider a statewide polio? �n watex quality criteria, was ordered received
and filed.
' 27. Communication =rom Kenneth R. Lewis, President of Farm Management Club at
California State Polytechnic College, requesting Council permission and support
of a fund raising project to paint i- esiden`ial addresses upon the street
curbs in front of residences in the City.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, that the
fee be waived and the request be approved. 1-7tion carried.
27a. Report of the Street Widening C3mmittee, was ordered held over..
28. The following communication was received from the Planning Commission regard:..
Laguna Lake Shopping Center - Shell Service Station and was presented for
the Council's consideration:
"Shell Oil Company submitted a plan of a service station at the above
shopping center. The Cosiss on considered the application as an amend-
ment to W. Skinner's approved tentative plan.
Resolution 3C -64 recommends approval of the service station subject to the
following conditions (agreed by Shell representatives):
1. A 40' joint access to the shopping center and service station from ear.
road.
' 2. Six foot integral sidewalks,
3. Ground cover planting at back of sidewalk.
4. Street improvements and widening to City Standards.
5. Boundary line between service station and shopping center to
be delineated on the ground.
6. Variances in setbacks as shown on the plan are approved.
7. Signs to be resubmitted."
City Council Minutes
April 6, 1464
Page -15-
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1276, a resolution amending
Skinner's preliminary planned development.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr.,
Miss Margaret McNeil, Clel' R. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Donald Q. Miller
30. Communication from the Planning Commission notifying the City Council that
they have approved the use of a trailer as a sales office at the Laguna
Lake shopping center for a period of one year.
City Council had no objection and the communication was ordered received
and filed.
31. The following communication was received from the Planning Commission
regarding the 701 Program aprli:ation, was presented to the City Council:
"Mr. Wise has sent an application for the ^ity to submit for the second
phase of the 701 Program. If the Council approves this application a
resolution should be passed similar to the suggested one attached and the
Mayor be authorized �o sign the application."
The City Council discussed tae proposal as presented by Mr. Chapman.
A resolution was introduced by Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman
McNeil, to approve the application for the 701 Program.
Not passed on the following roll cP1.1 vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr.
NOES: Clay P. Davidson, Ciell W. Whelchel
ABSENT: Donald Q. Killer
32. The following communication was received from the Planning Commission
regarding swimming pools and was presented to the City Council:
"A committee of the Planning Commission is studying the zoning ordinance
with the Planning Consultant. The committee has considered the problem
of swimming pools and feels that it would be desirable for the city to
adopt an ordinancL for the control of public and private pools. They sugge.
that the Council set up a committee to study and recommend such an ordinanr
and suggest that it include at least the following:
1. Contractor
2. Representative from the Public Health Department
3. Building Inspector."
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, that a
committee be appointed made up of Mr. Volny, Nm. Gates, and Mr. Skiles
and Planning Director Chapman. Motion carried.
33. Communication from C. A. lisino urging that the City Council neither sell or
trade any property to Mr. Skinner, was ordered received and filed.
34. City Council to set date for inspection tour of the new water treatment
facilities, was ordered held over for further consideration.
35. Annual report of the County Museum from Louisiana Clayton Dart, Curator
of the Yaseum, was ordered received and filed.
City Council Minutes
April 6,1964
Page -16-
36. Communication from the U. S. ArmSngineer District, Los Angeles, regarding
an application made by the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company for a
permit to install submarine coaxial telephone and telegra;)h cable, etc.,
at the south entrance of Morro Bay, was ordered received and filed.
37. Communication from the League of California Ci.ticza notifying the City Council
of the 8th Biennial Institute for Mayors ..nd Councilmen, was ordered received
and filed.
38. Copies of letters addressed to the Council regarding the tax rate reduction,
was ordered received and filed.
39. Communication from the San Luis Obispo Art Assoc-i ation urging the City Council
to continue to encourage the cultural growtiu of the Cf.ty, was ordered received
and filed.
Z. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded byjLaaos Davidson, that the Hawaiian
students club be allowed to use a mobile public address stistem to advertise
their club Luaon April 11, 1964. Motion carr:--:d.
2 -1. On motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded r,y Councilman Graves, that the City
participate in the San Luis Obispo Art Association and that Peter Chapman
be instructed to see to it t::at the Mission Plaza models are placed on display
during the art show. Notion carried.
40. On motion of Councilman Graves, sec ,)nded by Councilwoman McNeil, the CiLy
Council adjourned at 1:2j M., April 7, 1964 to 5:00 P. M. Monday, April 13,
1964, at Laguna Lake area with the members of the Planni.kg Commission and Park
and Recreation Commission for presentation by Ray C. Skinner of his proposed
development of tNe City ownad Laguna Lake property.
Approved: April 27, 1964
H, F PATRICT'; CITY CLERK
I