HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/1976 (2)1
1
MINUTES
ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1976 - 4:10 P.M.
HEARING ROOM, CITY HALL
Roll Call
PRESENT: Councilmen Gurnee, Graham, Norris, Petterson and Mayor
Schwartz
ABSENT: None
City Staff
PRESENT: J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; R.D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; Glen Matteson, Planning Assistant; Terry Sanville,
Planning Associate; Rob Strong, Director of Community
Development
1. The City Council continued their consideration of the Planning
Commission's recommendated General Plan Update, concentrating on infill,
intensification and expansion.
The City Council approved the following: Part.3, Recommended Policies
and Procedures, Section C, Goals and Policies, 1. Growth Management and
Objectives, Page 52 et sequence, 'c':
"The City should provide for infill, intensification, and redevelopment
of committed urban areas and provide for orderly and minimized outward
urban expansion within the urban reserve which can be efficiently
served by urban "infrastructure" improvements. Urban development should
be programmed to assure that adequate water supply, sewage treatment,
fire and police, schools and recreation facilities and other public
facilities will be available to serve the composition and configuration
of uses provided in a safe and efficient manner."
On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, that the City
Council approve the following:
"The County should prevent scattered rural residential, industrial or
other non - agricultural developments outside the urban reserve areas.
Within the unincorporated portions of the urban reserve areas the County
should work jointly with the City to assure that development proposals
are consistent with growth management and land use objectives of the
General Plan."
Motion carried, all ayes.
On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Petterson, that the City
Council approve the following:
"The City should coordinate its annexation of any additional territory
and its approval of any urban developments in expansion areas within
the corporate limits with the improvements of urban service systems.
No annexations or commitments to urban development of unincorporated
expansion areas should be authorized until water supply and treatment
and sewage collection and treatment facilities needs can be met."
' The City Council then approved the following as amended:
"The substantial residential expansion areas, located to the southwest,
south and southeast have additional prerequisite public improvements
prescribed in the implementation section. Certain limited areas to
the northwest, northeast and east of the City could be considered for
relatively minor additional annexation and urban development provided
infrastructure improvements are concurrently constructed to enable
adequate urban service. These minor unincorporated expansion areas
are generally indicated on the map and may be considered for some
additional, limited, low density urban residential expansion or clustered
City Council Minutes
November 10, 1976
Page 2
residential rural planned development, consistent with the intent of this
plan. Similar minor adjustments in urban reserve boundary areas adjoining
the City should not be precluded where it can be determined that utility
service, access, geologic and environmental problems can be resolved as
part of a development proposal.without City expense, particularly where
provisions are also offered for open space.preservation of remaining
acreage in exchange for annexation and urban service to residential clus-
tered development areas.
The City shall require approval of specific plans for major expansion
areas and refined programs for urban development and incremental improve-
ment of urban infrastructure and public facilities for minor expansion
areas prior to annexation of new territory or authorizing initial urban
developments in proposed expansion areas'.'.
A.J. Shaw, Attorney, after reviewing the definition of the specific plan as
presented by the Planning Department, submitted for the Council's consideration
sections of state law dealing with authority for their scope of specific plans.
The City Council asked the City Attorney.to review legal citations submitted
by Attorney Shaw.
There being no further business to.come before the meeting, the meeting adjourned
at 6:00 p.m.
APPROVED: December 7, 1976
. Fitzpatrick., City.Clerk
1