HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/26/19761
L,
Pledie
Roll Call
MINUTES
ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
MONDAY, JULY-26, 1976 - 7:30 P.M.
. CITY HALL
PRESENT: Myron Graham,.Jesse Norris, Steven Petterson, and
Mayor Kenneth E. Schwartz
ABSENT: T. Keith Gurnee
City Staff
PRESENT: J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk;. R.D. Miller, Admin-
istrative Officer; R. Strong, Director of Community
Development;. T. Sanville, Planning Associate; G.
Matteson, Planning Assistant
Others
PRESENT: Planning Commissioners: A. Settle, L. Schneider,
and D. Johansen
1. The City Council continued their public hearing on the recom-
mendation,-of the Planning Commission that the City Council adopt the 1976
General Plan Revision.
The City Council started.their discussion with Part Three - Recommended
Policies and Proposals.Page 51, Par.c - Goals and Objectives, Sub -par.l
Growth Management Objectives, Sub -sub Par.c.
-The City should promote infill,.intensification, and redevelopment of
committee urban areas and provide for phased, orderly and minimized out-
ward urban expansion within the -urban reserve and urban service areas
which can be efficiently served by urban "infrastructure" improvements.
Urban development should be programmed to assure that adequate water
supply, sewage.treatment, fire arid.police, schools and recreation facilities
and other public_facilities.will be.available to serve the compositionaand
configuration of uses provided in a safe and efficient manner.
The County should discourage scattered rural residential, industrial or
other non - agricultural developments outside the urban reserve and urban
service areas. Within the unincorporated portions of the urban reserve
and urban service .areas the County.-should delegate to (or coordinate with)
the City to assure.that development proposals are consistent with growth
management and land use objectives of the General Plan.
The City should.coordinate its annexation of any substantial additional
territory. and its - approval.of any urban developments in expansion areas
within the corporate-limits.-with the phased improvements of urban service
systems. No major annexations or commitments to urban development of
Phase II and IV expansion areas - should be authorized until water supply
and treatment and sewage collection.and..treatment facilities are assured.
The City should require approval of specific development plans and pro-
grams for phased urban development and incremental improvement of urban .
infrastructure and public facilities prior to annexation of new territory
or authorizing initial urban developments in proposed expansion areas.
City Council Minutes
July 26, 1976
Page Two
Although the substantial-phased growth, residential expansion areas,
located.to the southwest, south and southeast have prerequisite public
improvements prescribed-.in the implementation section, certain limited
areas -to the northwest, northeast'and'east of-the City should be con-
sidered for relatively minor additional annexation.'-and-urban development
provided.infrastructure improvements are concurrently.constructed to
enable adequate urban.service. Specifically, portions of the Ferrini
property in the.vicinity of Patricia Drive at the northwest edge of the
City;. portions-.of the.Miossi property in.the.vicinity of Cuesta Park
at the northeast edge of the City; and.several small ownerships in
the Santa Lucia Foothills between the High School-and Southwood Drive
alignment.at the-.east edge of the City - all involving areas below the
460 ft. elevation - may be considered for s6me..additional, limited,
low density urban residential expansion or.clustered residential rural
planned development, consistent with the intent of this plan. Similar
minor adjustments in urban reserve boundary areas adjoining the City
should not be precluded where it can be determined.that.utility service,
access, geologic and.environmental..problems.can be.resolved.as.a part
of.a development proposal - without City expense..particularly where pro -
visions are also offered:for.open.space preservation-of remaining acreage
in exchange for.annesation and:.urban service.to. residential clustered
development areas.
Councilman Norris moved that Par.c, Sub- par.l, Sub -sub Par.c be adopted
by the City-Council without the fourth paragraph.
Motion lost for lack of a second.
On motion-of Mayor Schwartz; seconded by Councilman Graham that the City
Council adopt all of.Par:c, Sub- par.l, Sub -sub Par.c,as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
Motion carried.
Ayes: Councilmen Graham, Norris,.Petterson.and Mayor Schwartz
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Gurnee
Mayor Schwartz called a recess at 9:35 P.M.
City Council.reconvened at 9:45 P.M. with all councilmen present, Council-
man Gurnee. absent.
The City Council then discussed Par.c, Sub- par.l, Sub -sub Par.d.
2. On motion-of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson,
the.meeting adjourned-at 10:30 p.m:; to 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, July 27, 1976..
Motion carried, Councilman Gurnee.absent.
APPROVED: August 16, 1976._,
J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk
F
�J
11