Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/16/1976M I N U T E S REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 1976 - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL: CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 990 PALM.STREET Roll Call Councilmen PRESENT: Myron Graham, Jesse Norris, Steve Petterson, and Mayor Kenneth E. Schwartz ABSENT: T. Keith Gurnee City Staff PRESENT: J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; Jim Stockton, Director of Parks and Recreation; R.D. Miller, Administrative Officer; Rudy Muravez, Finance Director; Don Englert, Police Captain; Allen Grimes, City Attorney; Rob Strong, Director of Community Development 1. The City Council held a public hearing to consider revisions to Ordinance-No: 614', the" Electioh,Campaign!Regulations .Ordinance. Mr. Harry Woolpert, Chairman of the Citizens' Adhoc Committee, appointed by the City Council to review Ordinance No. 614, the Election Campaign Regulations Ordinance, reviewed with the City Council the proposals of the committee in updating and amending the Election Campaign Ordinance. He reviewed the proposed changes section by section for the City Council and discussed the reasoning behind each change. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. Dorothy Conner, President, League of Women Voters, appeared "before the City Council stating that the League of California Cities is still in support of an adequate equitable Election Campaign Ordinance which would protect individuals running for office but also would make full disclosure of those people behind the various candidates. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Petterson stated that he was in support of the proposed changes in the ordinance, felt they were more practical and easier to work with, and that he would support the ordinance and also wished to thank the members of the Citizens' Committee who worked on it and gave so much time to this ordinance. Councilman Graham stated that he too is in support of the changes made in the ordinance. He felt they were much more fair and a much better ordinance than previous, and he too thanked the Committee for their work. Councilman Norris thanked the Committee for the hours spent but stated he.is opposed to any conditions levied by a City Council that would limit contri- butions and expenditures in elections. He is also opposed to the definition of "one man committee", he felt that it was unconstitutional. Councilman Gurnee, although he was absent, wrote a letter to the City Council stating that he is opposed to any provisions in the ordinance which would t allow for anonymous contributions, otherwise he felt the ordinance was an excellent addition to the City's record. Mayor Schwartz also thanked the committee for their work. He said he realized the hours that were spent as the City Clerk had sent him minutes of all their meetings. He stated he supported the proposal to:•amend.the ordinance, and felt the Committee had supstitued a more workable ordinance which he felt should be adopted by the City Council. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 2 On motion of Councilman Petterson,.seconded by Councilman Graham, the following ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 678 (1976 Series), an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Municipal Code by repealing Article IV, Chapter 5, Seciton 4500 -4415, and adding Article II, Chapter 8, Election Campaign Regulations. Passed and adopted on the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Petterson, Graham and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Norris ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee 2. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider the adoption of an ordinance to increase transient occupancy tax from 5% to 6 %. Richard Miller, Administrative.. Officer, recommended that.the`City Council increase the tax from 5% to 6% on all motel and hotel rooms as he felt the city was in dire need of additional funds for capital spending. He stated this one of the ways to raise funds without hurting the local tax payer. Mayor Schwartz opened the public hearing. No one appeared before the..City Council for or against the proposed increase. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Norris stated that he was opposed to any increase to taxes or revenues to the city strictly in view of the fact that they had received a balanced budget, a budget that was well prepared, and showed it did not need additional revenues and still would do a good for the.public.. Councilman Petterson stated he was in support of increasing the said tax as he felt this was a good source of revenue which would not hurt individual citizens of the community. Councilman Graham stated he too was in support, but he felt that the any increased funds should not be used for promotion but for facilities only. Mayor Schwartz agree that he too was in support of increasing the said tax, but he agreed that the funds should go to facilities and not to additional promotion. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Petterson, the following ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 679 (1976 Series), an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending Section 2552 of Part 2, Article II, Chapter 5 of the Municipal Code, Transient Occupancy Tax Rate. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Petterson, Graham and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Norris ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee 1 3. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider the adoption of the proposed City Charter for the 1976 Election. Foster Gruber, Chairman of the Charter Revision Committee, reviewed the major changes in the proposed Charter with the City Council. He said it was primarily a rewrite of the Charter, bringing it up to date in wording of the Charter to modern day language, recodifying the Charter, putting the same items in the same area, and hopefully make it easier for the public to understand. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 3 The key changes that are being recommended would be: 1) Increasing the term of the office of the Mayor from a two year term to a four term. 2) Number the Council seats. 3) Limiting the terms of office. 4) Mandatory personnel board. 1 5) Eliminating the references to all boards, commissions and committees allowing the cities to appoint these by council ordinance or resolution. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. Harry Woolpert objected to the method of selection of the Charter Review Committee by the Council and not by the people. He felt that the City Charter is really a city constitution and in this case, the people of the city should have some say into the Charter rewrite and not by a Council appointment. He thought the City Council should call an-election to elect a freeholders board to come up with a new dynamic Charter for the people of San Luis Obispo. He then listed some of the things that should be considered in a new Charter to govern the people of San Luis Obispo in the eighties and nineties. He felt that San Luis Obispo needs a new Charter badly as the present Charter and the proposed Charter are poorly written, follow poor archaic rules of administration, and he urges a freeholders election in order to get the public involved. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Norris stated that he was in support of an updated Charter but-was opposed to five alternatives:. 1) The Mayor's term increased to four years. 2) A manditory personnel board in the Charter. 3) The bids into wholesale price index. 4) Vacancies on the Council should be filled by election. 5) Opposed to increases in Councilmen's salary during their term in office. Councilman Gurnee submitted a letter to the City Council stating that with the exception of his previous opposition to the clause in the Charter which.pertains to vacancies, he believed that all vacancies should be filled by election. He stated he would support the Charter as written, and would support placing it on the ballot in November. Councilman Petterson felt the proposed Charter was a compromise by all persons and that he would support the proposed rewrite even though he might not agree with each individual section. He felt what was being submitted was much better than what the city had at the present time. Councilman Graham felt the Charter was well done by the Committee, felt the Committee represented the people of San Luis Obispo, and felt the.update and revision was excellent. Although he did not agree with all the changes, he would go along with the Committee's recommendations. Mayor Schwartz stated he agreed in general with Mr. Woolpert's comments, although he felt the Committee update was well done and that he could support it as presented. Although he too would support the election of a freeholders board to review the Charter, he felt this Charter was better than the existing one and that if the people wished to have a freeholders election, a petition would be all the Council would need. The City Council then discussed with Foster Gruber and some of the public interested, various sections of the proposed rewrite. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 4 On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Graham, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3100 (1976 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo calling a special Municipal Election in said city on Tuesday, November 2, 1976 for the purpose of voting on the adoption of a new City Charter. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Norris ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee 4. Council consideration of the appeal of the Environmental Center by the approval of the Planning Commission of the E.I.R. for Tract No. 465 (continued from 7/6/76). Rob Strong, Director fo Community Development, reviewed the action to date on the appeal of the E.I.R. (see Council minutes of 7/6/76). It was the recommendation of the City staff that the City Council take action as follows: 1) certify that the project E.I.R. is sufficient to comply with city and state E.I.R. guidelines and to thereby deny the appeal contending that it was not sufficient; 2) approve the zone change request to change that portion of the subject tract now zoned "unclassified" to be zoned R -1, residential consistent with the adopted General Paln; and 3) approve the tentative tract map subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Mac Deasy, Meyer, Merriam & Associates and consultant on the E.I.R., reviewed for the City Council the revisions and refinements made to the E.I.R. for Tract 465 including amended alternatives dated July 28, 1976. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. Charles Flanagan, Oceanaire Drive, stated he was still opposed to this development due to its flood inducing potential with its large building surfaces and paving. He felt the E.I.R. was inadequate as it did not address the flood problem. Don Smith, E.C.O.S.L.O., stated that he did not feel the amended E.I.R. was adequate as it did not address the problems brought to the Council's attention. He felt that three of the six new alternative proposals could be combined into one. Herb Filloponi felt the E.I.R. did not address the matter of adequate potable water to serve the proposed tract and its attendant population and, therefore, he felt it was inadequate. Lewis Verdugo felt the E.I.R. was inadequate as it did not address traffic conditions such as parking, circulation, etc. Dorothy Conners, President of the League of Women Voters, asked the City Council to consider the objections that were brought up at the meeting of July 6, 1976. Celest Brooks, Foothill Blvd., objected to the E.I.R. as she felt it did not address the flood problems in the Laguna Lake area. She felt that 1 this was the wrong development for the lake. She urged the City Council to flood zone the entire lake area and forbid further development. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Petterson stated that he felt that the E.I.R. as supplemented was adequate and he would be willing to accept it. Councilman Graham said he would support the E.I.R. as being adequate and he felt very confortable with the plan. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 5 Councilman Norris felt that the original E.I.R. was adequate and the supplemental information just reinforced his opinion. Mayor Schwartz felt the E.I.R. as supplemented was now adequate and should be accepted by the City Council. J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, read the following statement on behalf of Councilman Gurnee as follows: "The E.I.R. appears to me to be adequate at this time, however, I am opposed to the project as proposed but I will have ample time to state my reasons at the second hearing of the rezoning should the Council decide to adopt the Curci development." On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Graham, that the City Council accept the E.I.R. as supplemented as adequate. Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Petterson, Graham, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman T. Keith Gurnee Mayor Schwartz called a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m., all Councilmen except T.K. Gurnee present. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. Andrew Merriam, Meyer, Merriam & Associates, submitted for the Council's consideration the effects R -1 zoning would have on the property and urged that the City Council accept the Planning Commission's recommendations to rezone the property to R -1. He briefly reviewed the development plan for this area showing that all prior objections had been mitigated. Don Smith opposed the R -1 development. He felt that if it needed to be zoned it should be done through the planned development process. Blair Scherkle Broad Street, opposed the rezoning as he felt that this development was against the best interest of the people of San Luis Obispo. He felt that each new development caused the existing taxpayers to support out -of -town developers. He felt that this particular development would hurt the quality of life in San Luis Obispo. Janet Karakis opposed the rezoning. She felt that this property was being developed prematurely. She did not feel the public facilities available were adequate to support this development. Charles Dills opposed the rezoning as he felt that this was just a small part of the potential area to be rezoned and that the taxpayers should see the full development before doing it piecemeal. Jim Lopes spoke in support of R -1 density but hoped that the City Council would look at other alternatives other than the one in the proposed tract by the developer. He also hoped that no development would be allowed until all the other alternatives had been studied. 5. The City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission to rezone 1000 Los Osos Valley Road (Tract No. 465 from "U" to "R -1 "). Rod Strong, Director of Community Development, presented the recommenda- tions of the Planning Commission that the Council approve the zone change to change that protion of the subject tract now zoned "U" to "R -1" consis- tent with the adopted General Plan. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. Andrew Merriam, Meyer, Merriam & Associates, submitted for the Council's consideration the effects R -1 zoning would have on the property and urged that the City Council accept the Planning Commission's recommendations to rezone the property to R -1. He briefly reviewed the development plan for this area showing that all prior objections had been mitigated. Don Smith opposed the R -1 development. He felt that if it needed to be zoned it should be done through the planned development process. Blair Scherkle Broad Street, opposed the rezoning as he felt that this development was against the best interest of the people of San Luis Obispo. He felt that each new development caused the existing taxpayers to support out -of -town developers. He felt that this particular development would hurt the quality of life in San Luis Obispo. Janet Karakis opposed the rezoning. She felt that this property was being developed prematurely. She did not feel the public facilities available were adequate to support this development. Charles Dills opposed the rezoning as he felt that this was just a small part of the potential area to be rezoned and that the taxpayers should see the full development before doing it piecemeal. Jim Lopes spoke in support of R -1 density but hoped that the City Council would look at other alternatives other than the one in the proposed tract by the developer. He also hoped that no development would be allowed until all the other alternatives had been studied. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 6 Don Smith again stated that he agreed with the statement for a long, slow study of all development potentials in the area before changing the zoning. John Curci, developer, said that R -1 was the zoning shown on the 1972 General Plan and is also proposed on the 1976 General Plan and he felt that the City should follow their own General Plan in making this type of decision. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Norris stated that this zoning was proper and he felt there was a need for R -1 lots in the City in order to develop housing for the citizens andhe would favor R -1 over the planned development. Councilman Petterson felt the rezoning should be R -1 as shown on the 1972 and 1976 General Plans. He did not feel that planned development was adequate for this site. Councilman Graham felt R -1 was the proper zone as it is in agreement with the 1972/76 General Plan. Mayor Schwartz felt that the 1972 and 1976 General Plan showed this area as a low density area. He felt the past history and the recently approved E.I.R. showed this.is a very sensitive area of the community. He felt that the key to this whole question was how did the design fit the land and the area. He felt that the only zoning he could support was over the planned development option. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Graham, the following ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 680 (1977 Series), an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the zone map to rezone 1000 Los Osos Valley Road, Val Vista Estates, applicant (Tract 465). Introduced and passed to print: AYES: Councilmen Norris, Graham and Petterson NOES: Mayor Schwartz ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee 6. The City Council considered the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the tentative map for Tract No. 465, Val Vista Estates. Rob Strong, Director of Community Development, presented the recommendations of the Planning Commission in approving the tentative map of Tract No. 465. He reviewed the seven findings of the Planning Commission and also reviewed the 35 conditions for the development of the tract. He presented a letter on behalf of the Architectural Review Commission stating that the A.R.C. generally endorsed the plan as being sensitive to the shoreline environment and hoped that some public access would be.made to the public through this development and if not, then the city should consider purchasing some lakeshore property to preclude development and preserve the shoreline for public use. If the City Council decided not to purchase the shorline, the A.R.C. has conceptually and conditionally approved the residential development proposal. The Park and Recreation Commission made the following suggestions as 1 conditions for approval of the tentative map: 1) The City should allow the developer to dredge the Perfumo Creek Channel and utilize materials as proposed in his plan. The developer should dedicate the Perfumo Creek Channel to the city, and city accept maintenance: This area is inclusive as Lots 36 through 42 on the tentive map proposal. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 7 2) The developer dedicate the lake property and the city accept it for maintenance. Also, the developer be given favorable credit for this item in relationship to park land dedication, including Lots 73 and 74 which are not included in this development at the present time. 3) That Lot 85 remain in private ownership and city be given an easement access for maintenance and emergencies. The ownership to remain with 1 the developer, and developer to maintain Lot 85 to remain primarily as a maintenance easement under private ownership with city having access. 4) That Lot 84 be dedicated to the city as an open space area including Lot 35 with an adjusted or modified property line between Lots 34 and 35. 5) That Lots 43 through 56 from the lake property line to the 126' elevation remain in private ownership (as shown) and city be given a flood easement up to the 126' elevation after construction. 6) That the developer dedicate the marsh and lake area behind Lots 28 through 34 with no access being allowed in this area. Andrew Merriam, architect for the developer, reviewed the proposed tenta- tive map for Tract 465 including public use, etc. He also reviewed some of the 35 conditions listed by the Planning Commission. John Curci, developer, reviewed the history of this property and his attempts to develop the property under city regulations. Mac Deasy, representing Meyer, Merriam & Associates, reviewed for the City Council a list of dates that their firm has made presentations to the City Council onthis project starting with August 1, 1975 through August 1, 1976. Don Smith objected to the dual role of Meyer, Merriam and Associates working for both the developer Curci, designing the tract and also as the consultant.to the Planning Commission and the city staff on the E.I.R. He hoped the City Council would take this under consideration when listening to this consultant. He continued by stating that in his opinion the design of the tentative map.was poor, particularly, the area west of the Junior High School site as a number of the homes were in flood plane. John Curci stated that due to the restrictions placed on him by the school district, this was the only way the land could be developed. He felt that this was the best plan he could come up with and still meet all the objec- tions of the citizens and city agencies. He urged the City Council to support the Planning Commission and city staff who spent many hours in arriving at the configuration of the tract. Councilman Petterson felt that the developer, the architect, and engineer had studied every possible alternative to develop this property and he felt that this proposal was the best alternative and he would support approval of the tentative map. Councilman Graham was not completely happy with this design, felt that the plan west of the school property was inadequate with the long cul -de -sac. ' He felt that the developer had granted some open space park land which was a good trade -off for the public in order that he be allowed to develop. He felt that he could live with the tract. Councilman Norris stated that he was in support of the tentative map, felt that the grading as proposed would take care of any flood protection housing needed. D.F. Romero, Director of Public Services, stated that in his opinion the work done on the Madonna Road had flood proofed all the area west of the drainage culvert. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 8 Mayor Schwartz felt that the tentative map was unsatisfactory. He said that some of.the developer's proposals were good but overall not good enough for the environment. He did not feel this would be a good devel- opment for the people living in the area west of the school property. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, that the tentative map consideration be continued for redesign of the tentative map in the northwest segment. Motion lost on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilman Graham and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilmen Norris and Petterson ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee On motion of Councilman Petterson, seconded by Councilman Norris, that the City Council accept the tentative map as recommended by the Planning Commission including the seven findings and 35 conditions. Motion lost on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Norris and Petterson NOES: Councilman Graham and Mayor Schwartz ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Petterson, that the City Council accept the tentative map as recommended by the Planning Commission for Lots 36 through 84 only and that Lots 1 through 35 be referred back to the developer for redesign. 1 Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Petterson, Graham, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee 7. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the appeal of Donald Smith from a decision of-the,Planning Commission not to require an Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) for the addition of 88 mobile home spaces to the Laguna Lake Mobile Home Park, 1801 Prefumo Canyon Road. Donald Smith, 1750 Prefumo Canyon Road, felt that the addition of 88 additional mobile homes to Laguna Lake Mobile Home Park would have a severe impact on the environment of the area by itself, but when combined with at least six other new developments in the general area, would have a severe impact on the environment and on City facilities. He felt that the proposed project would have a serve negative aesthetic effect on a relatively pristine area. Finally, he stated this development with others proposed would have a severe cumulative impact on the already badly over- loaded water plant and it is questionable whether the sewer plant and sewer lift pump could handle the additional people planned for the area. He felt that it was important that an E.I.R. be prepared to adequately describe the environmental impact to explore mitigating measures and various alternatives to the development proposed. Donald Smith then presented 37 separate letters of support that an E.I.R. be required for the proposed addition to the mobile home park. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 9 Rob Strong, Community Development Director, reported that the City's Environmental Review Committee did not feel that the project as proposed would cause significant adverse environmental impact and ordered the filing of a negative declaration on the E.I.R. This E.R.C. decision was appealed to the City Planning Commission, who agreed with staff recommend- ation and not require an E.I.R. on the project. He concluded by stating that staff studies revealed no adverse effect from the development, no present utility deficiencies or other serve problems not already identified by study, or other E.I.R.s. Further, the project will be subject to A.R.C. approval to assure compliance with Planning Commission Use Permit conditions. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing open. Steve Kennedy felt that the impact of 88 mobile home units on City services was quite serve as there are more mobile home units per acre than normal housing units on one acre of land. Further he stated they pay a much lower amount of taxes per unit than single family homes do, but need the same service per unit. He felt that mobile homes have a greater impact than single family homes on the environment and services. He urged the Council to require the preparation of an E.I.R. for the project and, further, that the E:I.R. should consider the economic effect that mobile homes have on City facilities, schools, etc. George Kennedy, owner /operator of the Laguna Lake Mobile Home Park, reviewed the proposed expansion of his mobile home park by 88 units. He questioned some of the comments made on taxes paid by mobile home owners and park owners as he felt that mobile homes do not need the same services that are provided single family developments and he concluded that everyone pays their share of taxes one way or the other. Mayor Schwartz declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Petterson felt that a full E.I.R. should be prepared on the expansion of Laguna Lake Mobile Home Park so that the full impact of this development on the community would be known. Councilman Graham agreed that an E.I.R. should be prepared so that the impact of 88 mobile home spaces on the neighborhood would be known. Councilman Norris felt that a full E.I.R. was not needed as he felt everyone in town knew what the.impact of. this project would have on the area. He would not support the appeal for an E.I.R. He also stated that the City should have a fee for appeals for a full E.I.R. so that the taxpayers would not have to pay for the report. He felt the nuisance effect should be paid for. Mayor Schwartz felt that a full E.I.R. should be required on the proposed expansion of the mobile home park in order that the economic effect of additional mobile home spaces on the City would be known. He stated that until the full economic information on this expansion is known, he would not vote for any new or additional mobile home spaces until their economic impact on the City is known. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, that the appeal be upheld and that a full E.I.R. be prepared on the proposed expansion of the Laguna Lake Mobile Home Park with particular emphasis on the economic effect of the proposed expansion. ' Motion carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Norris ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 10 8. Continued to September 7, 1976. 9. Continued to September 7, 1976. 10. Continued to August 19, 1976. 11. Continued to August 19, 1976. 12. Continued to August 19, 1976. 13. Continued to August 19, 1976. 14. Continued to August 19, 1976. 15. Continued to August 19, 1976. 16. Continued to August 19, 1976. 17. Continued to August 19, 1976. 18. Continued to August 19, 1976. 19. Continued to August 19, 1976. 20. Continued to August 19, 1976. 21. Continued to August 19, 1976. 22. Continued to August 19, 1976. 23. Continued to 24. Continued to CONSENT ITEMS C -1 On motion of that claims against subject to the appr August 19, August 19, Councilman the City f Dval of the 1976. 1976 Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, 3r the month of August, 1976 were approved Administrative Officer. Motion carried. C -2 On motion of Councilman Graham,. seconded -by Councilman Petterson the following minutes of Council Meetings were approved as presented February 9, 1976 July 26, 1976 March 8, 1976 July 27, 1976 July 20, 1976 Motion carried. C -3 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, a petition by the residents near the intersection of Marsh Street and the Railroad right -of -way, requesting that warning bells for the railroad be restricted to ring only during the period when the gates are bein lowered and raised was referred to the City Attorney for investigation. C -4 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, a petition by property owners requesting that the name of Prado Road be changed to Padre Road was referred to the Planning Commission. C -5 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, the request for Council consideration to sign agreement with SUA, Inc. for space analysis of the corporation yard was withdrawn. Motion carried. C -6 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 3109 (1976 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an agreement with the county Employment and Training Office for employment of CETA trainees and authorize the man who executes that agreement. City Council Minutes August 16, 1976 Page 11 Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Petterson, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee C -7 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, a memorandum from the Director of Parks and Recreation asking Council consideration of members to serve on the Swimming Pool Task Force was referred to the Council Study Session of Wednesday, August 19, 1976. Motion Carried. C -8 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, the communication from Anne Brown, San Luis Obispo Mozart Festival Associa- tion, requesting to meet with the City Council in order to make their presentation for need of public funding was set for a future Study Session. Motion Carried. C -9 On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson the following salary step increases were approved: Vicki L. Ashby - Typist Clerk I From Step l or $600 to Step 2 or $632 Ellis B. Berliner - Fire Captain From Step 3 or $1278 to Step 4 or $1350 Randall S. McMillian - Fireman From Step 2 or $1002 to Step 3 or $1058 ' Roger Reyes - Maintenance Man II From Step 1 or $802 to Step 2 or $844 Lewis Santos - Heavy Equipment Operator Longevity increase Michael W. White - Maintenance Man II From Step 3 or $892 to Step 4 or $938 Motion carried. BID ITEMS B -1 The City Clerk reported on the following bids received for "STREET RESURFACING PROJECT ", City Plan No. 14 -77, bids opened August 10, 1976 at 2:00 p.m. Engineer's Estimate: $62,000. 4) M.J. Hermreck, Inc. 56,815.00 Box 217 Nipomo, CA 93444 5) Paso Constructors 62,806.00 Route 1, Box 14 -D Paso Robles, CA 93446 1) Southern Pacific Milling Company $55,132.00 3555 Vineyard Avenue Oxnard, CA 93030 2) R. Burke Corporation 56,395.00 Post Office Box 957 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 3) A.J. Diani Construction Company 56,725.00 295 North Blosser Road Santa Maria, CA 93454 4) M.J. Hermreck, Inc. 56,815.00 Box 217 Nipomo, CA 93444 5) Paso Constructors 62,806.00 Route 1, Box 14 -D Paso Robles, CA 93446