HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/06/1981City Council Minutes
January 6, 1981> '- 7:30 p.m.
Page 2
Roll Call
Councilmembers
Present: Melanie Billig, Ron Dunin, Gerald Munger, and
Mayor Lynn Cooper
Absent: Alan Bond
City Staff
Present: Lee Walton, Administrative Officer; J.H. Fitzpatrick,
City Clerk; George Thacher, City Attorney; Henry Engen,
Community Development Director; Roger Neuman, Police
Chief; D.F. Romero, Public Services Director; Geoff
Grote, Legal Assistant
R -4369 1. At this time the City Council held a public hearing for the purpose
of confirming costs for the sidewalk construction pursuant to the Municipal
Code on the following properties:
OWNER LOCATION AMOUNT
A.L. & S.G. Willard 3121 Johnson $1,094.50
L.T. Gonan 3133 Johnson 1,117.28
J.R. & K.D. Mitchell 3169 Johnson 1,476.50
A. & C.E. Gernert 3173 Johnson 1,189.75
D.F. Romero, Public Services Director, reviewed the work that had been
accomplished under this proposal which was forcing the property owners to
install curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the frontage on Johnson Avenue.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open.
Charles Andrew, Planning Commissioner, objected to the city only charging
3 percent interest for those who wish to carry construction costs over a
period of three years. He felt it was unrealistic. He felt it should be
more in the line of 15 to 20 percent as the present interest rates in
the commercial banks.
D.F. Romero, Public Services Director, explained that when the policy was
adopted by the City Council they adopted a 6 percent maximum interest rate
but in an attempt to encourage people to go along with the sidewalk improve-
ments, a minimum of 3 percent was established by the City Council.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed.
Mayor Cooper stated he was in support of confirming the costs but agreed
that the interest should be increased in the future.
Councilman Dunin
also agreed
with the
cost of the project but agreed that
the interest rate
should be
increased
as authorized by ordinance.
It was moved by Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Dunin, that
Resolution No. 4369 (1981 series), a resolution of the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo confirming costs of sidewalk construction pursuant to the
Municipal Code.
402
City Council Minutes
January_ 6; 1981 7:30 p.m.
Page 3
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Billig, Dunin, Munger, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT:
Councilmember Bond
On motion
of Councilwoman Billig, seconded
by Councilman Dunin,
that in the
future the
city use the 6 percent interest
rate allowed by the
existing city
ordinance.
Motion carried.
2. At
this time the City Council held
a public hearing to
consider an.
appeal of
James Ward from a decision of the
Architectural Review
Commission
to deny the
final approval of a residential
unit located at 251
and 253
Sandercock
Street.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, explained that the applicant was
appealing the ARC denial on his proposal to build a new one - bedroom house and
garage on his property. On December 1 the ARC voted 5 - 0 with two
absent to deny the project as submitted, which would add a third residential
unit on the lot. He continued that the council adopted the'standards and
guidelines for the functioning of the ARC indicate as follows with respect
to appeals of the City Council: "An appeal may be based only on inconsistency
between ARC action and the procedures and criteria established by law or
stated in the booklet. These alleged inconsistencies must be.explained in
detail in the appeal."
Henry Engen continued, in his appeal Mr. Ward listed three points as-follows:
1) The ARC failed to advise him to what would be acceptable to them. Henry
Engen stated the ARC reviews architect's design but does not specify solutions.
Rather, the Commission notes concern with the project and lets the applicant
respond if there is a problem. 2) The ARC's decision was based on material
and input from staff which may have wrongly influenced them. Henry Engen
stated the staff report that's attached, it should be noted the staff recommen-
dation was for schematic approval but noted concern with regard to provisions
for open space, the need to make the front area one - bedroom unit in order
to meet the zoning dense requirements and raise questions on the color scheme.
3) There were some areas on the staff report. Henry Engen stated a corrected
copy of the staff report was also attached. Under the evaluation section the
language had been: "the existing house in front is used as a temporary church
as well as a residence." In fact, Mr. Ward advised that the house in front
was not presently used as a residence. This has now been deleted.. The fact
that this dwelling was being used as a temporary church without necessary per-
mits was the essential stumbling block in evaluating the project and how it
functioned. The second error that has been corrected has to do with the
type that goes on the density which should not detract from the fact that the
front house would have to be reduced with a one - bedroom unit in order
to accomodate the proposed edition. By deleting the church issue from the
project and proceeding as a straight R -2 project, the staff is in the opinion
that this.project could be modified to resolve ARC concerns. Staff do not see
any inconsistencies between the commission's action and established procedures
and criteria. Hence, we would recommend the appeal be denied and that the
applicant be referred back to the ARC with a straightforward, residential
project with fees for this project waived.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open.
Jim Ward, 253 Sandercock Street, reviewed for the City Council the problems '
he felt he was forced into by the staff and ARC on his request for a third
unit on his property. He concluded that he had been referred back to the
ARC or to the ARC staff to solve his problem. He asked the council to uphold
the appeal, order the building permit issued so that he can proceed. He
stated that the church use would continue if he could get a use permit from
the city to operate; if not they would cease the operation of the church.
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1981 1— 7:30 p.m.
Page 4
Russ Johnson spoke in support of the appeal, felt the city was wrong in
trying to require color, types of siding, etc. He felt they should only
look to the safety items, not the aesthetics.
ARC Commissioner, Jerry Reiss, reviewed the action of the ARC in this matter
in denying this project which did not-meet the minimum criteria set by the
ARC. He again stated the ARC motion on this matter as follows: "Commissioner
Orr - Cahall made a motion for denial of the project as submitted on the basis
that the project did not work as an integrated unit, functionally or
aesthetically, did not show::.concern for the neighbors visually, and had
serious proportional, scale, color, and textual problems. Motion seconded by
Commissioner Rademaker and carried." Upon question of the council, he
stated the ARC does not counsel applicants but it does counsel actions within
limits and time constraints on their projects. He urged council to deny
the appeal.
Charles Andrews, Planning Commission member, stated he felt the confusion
in this matter was that this item was not a land use matter but a conditions
of building only.
Jim Moore again objected to the ARC denial based on color, type of siding,
etc. He feels.that except for that he meets all,-.,of the criteria for expansion
on his - property.
'Commissioner Orr- Cahall, ARC Commissioner, spoke in support of ARC denial.
She felt the ARC acted properly, but she felt the applicant did not understand
the staff or the ARC suggestions.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed.
Councilman Dunin stated there was some confusion on the part of the
applicant as to the duties and responsibilities of the ARC and ARC staff.
This could have been avoided with professional help. He felt in this case
the applicant should go back to the ARC with his project. He would deny
the appeal and waive the fee for going back to the ARC.
Councilwoman Billig agreed with Councilman Dunin's comments and would also
deny the appeal but waive the fees if the applicant wishes to go back to the
ARC with his project. She also suggested that Ward should work with the
staff person prior to coming back to the ARC to clarify the problems.
Councilman Munger stated he would support the appeal, felt the applicant
was confused on the procedures of the ARC. He felt that the city staff did
not seem to help him or with his problems and he could support the appeal.
Mayor Cooper stated that while he was in sympathy with the applicant he would
deny the appeal but asked the applicant to reapply with the ARC and waive
all fees on the second application.
On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilwoman Billig, the City
Council denied the appeal but recommended that the applicant.again proceed
through the ARC and that-all fees be waived. Motion carried.
AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Billig, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: Councilmember Munger
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
408 3. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider an
appeal by Robert Strong of a decision of the City Planning Commission to
impose conditions 414 and 417 of the use permit as a condition of approval
for property located at 2424 Los Osos Valley Road.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that the Planning Commission
at their meeting of December 10, on a 4 - 1 vote, recommended approval of the
applicant's request subject to nine conditions. The use permit was to convert
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1981 -.- 7:30 p.m.
Page 5
an existing Arco service station into a self- service station and 24 -hour
mini - market at the corner of Calle Joaquin and Los Osos Valley Road. Of
the nine conditions the applicant is contesting two as follows: Condition
X64 "require that the planning be brought into conformity with current
regulations." Condition #7 - "prohibiting beer, wine, and liquor sales on
the.premises." .
Henry Engen continued that the Planning Commission's discussion focused on
the fee and the neighborhood nature of this use being requested for this
,
tourist commercial area. With respect to signage, it has been common practice
in other use permits to bring about compliance with the current codes of
the city at the time of an entitlement request. The amortization period
applicable to this party without any discretionary reviews of it.is.four
years. With respect to the question of alcoholic beverage sales:at such
location, this too was a.Planning Commission discretionary call. The location
in question is clearly freeway oriented in nature as contrasted between
neighborhood related service stations. The zoning and general plan designation
attest to that. It's the recommendation of the staff that the City Council
uphold the conditions of approval established by the Planning Commission and
deny the appeal.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open.
Rob Strong, Planning Consultant, appeared on behalf of Arco stating he was
submitting the appeal in regard to the nine conditions imposed by the Planning
Commission. Condition #4 and #7 - he stated with regard to the free - standing
Arco sign, the present location noted that the sign ordinance provides for a
uniform and reasonable amortization schedule for removal or modification of
non - conforming signs. He felt that condition #4 discourages and penalizes
Arco for proposed remodeling and improvements by requiring immediate additional
cost for early removal of its freeway identification sign which similarly
would remain at the Texaco, Chevron, Denny's, and Howard Johnson's
restaurants. Secondly, the prohibition of beer and wine sales is an incidental
but an important part of the proposed convenience food store; it's also an
arbitrary and unfair restriction. Their presentation before the Planning
Commission noted that liquor stores and bars are both familiar uses in the
C -2 zone and that the control of alcoholic beverage sales is separately
regulated by the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. Although three of
the five Planning Commissioners present were inclined to approve the use permit
excluding these two unreasonable conditions, the technical requirement that
four votes constituted a legal majority of the seven member commission frustrated
such action. He therefore appeals the City Council to modify these two conditions
by eliminating them completely.
Al Olson, Arco representative, urged the council to allow the sale of beer
and wine in the convenience store portion which he stated would represent
about 17 percent of the gross sales of this convenience store.
Tom Schumman, opposed to the sale of beer and wine at the same place where
supplies gas and oil are sold.
GlennaDeane Dovey. stated she questioned the sale of alcoholic beverages at
a service station particularly when oriented to the freeway.
Charles Andrews, Planning Commission member, stated he opposed the issuance
of this use permit before the Planning Commission of allowing beer and wine
sales catering to highway traffic. He did not feel that this particular
operation would serve any neighborhood for convenience market items. He
continued that the conversion is not allowed in C -2 zones with or without
use permits.
Roy Hanff, Lawrence Drive, felt the service station use was not appropriate
for the sales of alcoholic beverages along the highway.
Ernie Petelli opposed the Planning Commission action on existing signing
on the Arco station.
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1981 = 7:30 p.m.
Page 6
Rob Strong felt that the existing zoning ordinance allows sale of wine and
beer in the C -2 zone, both on -sale and off -sale. He felt Arco's request was
for a convenience store to serve the public for gasoline products and food
products.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed.
Councilman Munger stated he would support the appeal and approve the sign
and sale of wine and beer for a mini - market offered twenty -four hours a
day. He felt it would be an asset to the Laguna Lake residential area.
Councilman Dunin stated that while he originally opposed the sign ordinance,
he felt that after adoption by a majority of the council he would support
its enforcement. He felt the sign should be amortized in accordance with the
city ordinance, not a change at this time. He would oppose the beer and wine
sales in the service station along a major highway.
George Thacher stated the council could deny a permit to sell beer and wine
as a land use condition.
Councilwoman Billig stated that she would support the Planning Commission
review of all signs when a change in use is being applied for. She did not
feel that the sale of alcoholic beverages was compatible with the sale of
automobile services. She questioned that this was a proper use for the
proposed mini - market store at this location. She did not feel that drinking
and driving mix.
Police Chief Neuman upon questions felt that without the beer and wine sale
this location would not exist. He felt that the location is a poor one and
felt that it would end up as a rob and hold -up location. He would oppose
the combination of beer and wine sales in a service station.
On motion of Mayor Cooper, seconded by Councilman Munger, the following
resolution was introduced: A resolution supporting the appeal granting the
use permit, etc.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Munger, Dunin, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: Councilmember Billig
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
406 4. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider an
appeal by Mr. Gary Holdgrafer of a Planning Commission decision to require
a complete soils report as a condition of a use permit and tentative tract
map creating a 26 -unit commercial air -space condominium in five buildings
for automobile uses located at 1449 and 1489 Auto Park Way, C -H -PD zone,
Mel Smith, subdivider.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that Gary Holdgrafer is
appealing the Planning Commission denial requesting that a soils report not
be required before processing his development entitlement. On December 10, 1980
the Planning Commission on a 4 - 1 vote denied the applicant's request to
put off obtaining of a soils report until the building permit stage at this
1 development request, and continued the use permit and tract map. Henry Engen
stated that it was the staff's recommendation that the City Council uphold
the Planning Commission action and deny the appeal.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open.
David Brannon, architect for the project, stated that they are not appealing
the use permit or use permit conditions, but are only appealing the EIR
staff condition that a soils report be prepared prior to the issuance of a
City Council Minutes
January 6,.1981..'- 7:30 p.m.
Page 7
use permit. He urged the City Council to uphold the appeal and not require
a soils report until the project has been approved and the buildings spotted.
He continued that as a professional architect he would never develop or
recommend to a client that they develop a building on soils that have not
been thoroughly checked by a soils engineer. He also stated that there have
been additional soil reports prepared on adjacent properties and that he has
no fear that the soil under the proposed project would be adequate for
spotting the buildings. But he again reiterated he's not objecting to the
soils report; it's just preparing it at a time before they know how the
project would proceed.'
Charles Andrews, Planning Commissioner, reviewed the Planning Commission's
action on this action which was based on an EIR call for a soil report early
in the process and not later in the development stage.
Gary Holdgrafer, developer, explained that the project was envisioned for
auto related uses. He felt that the project might not be feasible if the
city use permit conditions were so strict that it would be uneconomical
for them to proceed. He did not wish to spend $3,000.00 on a soils report
if the project does not go ahead. He stated that they would prepare
the soils report prior to the spotting of the buildings on the property.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed.
Councilman Dunin stated he would support the requirement for a soils report
as a condition of the use permit rather than at the EIR stage.
Councilwoman Billig felt the soils report is needed, felt this was a good
project, felt the concept was good. She felt the soils report was needed
at the use permit stage.
David Brannon, architect, again stated they are not trying to get out of a
soils report but only the timing. They asked for a delay in submitting the 1
report until they see if the project is viable.
Councilman Munger stated he would support the appeal, felt it was a good
project, the concept was good.
On motion of Mayor Cooper, seconded by Councilman Dunin, that the City
Council support the appeal and require the soil report at a later stage in
the project.
Motion carried.
AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Munger, Billig, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
420- 5. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider the
80 -128 recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve a tentative map for
Minor Subdivision No. 80 -128 for a lot line adjustment for street abandonment
located at 350 and 355 Woodbridge Street, King and Kuden, applicants.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, felt that the Planning Commission
on a 4 - 0 vote, recommend that the City Council approve the tentative map for
Minor Subdivision No. 80 -128 subject to four findings and eight conditions.
On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4370 (1981 Series), a resolution
of the coundil of the City of San Luis Obispo granting approval of the
tentative map for Minor Subdivision No. 80 -128 located at 350 and 355 Wood-
bridge Street.
City Council Minutes
January 6; 1981..- 7:30 p.m.
Page 8
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Billig, Dunin, Munger, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
430- 5b. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider
T 955 a recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the tentative map
for Tract No. 955, a 26 -unit residential air -space condominium located at
2975 Rockview Place, R -2 -S, John King, Subdivider.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that on December 17 the
Planning Commission on a 4 - No - 1 absent approved the use permit for the
project and recommended approval of the tentative tract map subject to eight
findings and fifteen conditions.
D.F. Romero, Public Services Director, stated that from the Public Services
Department point of view, the most desirable arrangement for the water meters
was the installation of one master meter in the public sidewalk on Rockview.
The second most desirable alternate would be installation of individual
meters in the public sidewalk on Rockview. The least desirable alternate,
from a maintenance and operation standpoint, is individual meters located
within the site. He stated that it was his understanding that the developer .
had agreed to the installation of individual meters in the public sidewalk on
Rockview as a compromised measure and that this was acceptable to the Public
Services Department.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open.
Keith Gurnee, representing the developer, John King, stated that the developer
1 agreed with the Planning Commission recommendations and conditions and that
he was available to answer questions of the City Council.
Tom Schumann objected to the development due to the increased traffic on
adjacent streets, not only from this development but also from the Stoneridge
development. He felt that there was too much density on this development
and he would oppose and urged the council to also oppose.
Leonard Lenger stated he supported this project, it was a good project that
was needed by the city and also felt that individual water meters were a
necessity.
Roy Hanff, Lawrence Drive, stated he was opposed to too much development
in this area of the city. He objected to Mike DeNeve being chairman of
the Planning Commission and also developing property. He felt there was no
question of a conflict of interest and hoped that someone would look into it.
He also objected to any further development in the general Lawrence Drive area.
Charles Andrews, Planning Commission member, reviewed considerations given by
the Planning Commission to the project and its approval on it.
Ila Harmon, Highland Drive, stated there was a real need in the city for this
type of development; it was a good project that would be used by singles,
aged, and young people.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4371 (1981 Series), a resolution
of the council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting approval of a tentative
map for Tract No. 955 located at 2975 Rockview Place.
City Council Minutes
January 6', • 1981 -.. - 7:30 p.m.
Page .9
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Billig, Munger, Dunin, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
R 4372 5c. At this time the City Council held a public hearing to consider the
recommendation of the Planning Commission to abandon a public utility easement
within the abandondd portion of Henry Street, 1101 Ella Street, R -2 zone,
Arthur Silvers, applicant.
Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that the Planning Commission
on a 5 - 0 vote recommend that the council abandon the subject utility easement
as it is no longer necessary for present or future public purposes.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing open:-
No one appeared before the City Council for or against the abandonment.
Mayor Cooper declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilwoman Billig, the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4372 (1981 Series), a resolution
of the City of San Luis Obispo City Council found that an easement for public
utilities is unnecessary for present or future public purposes in Henry Street.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Billig, Munger, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None '
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
0874 6. At this time the City Council considered the final passage of
Ordinance No. 874, an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending
Part 1, Chapter 4 of Article II of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to
provide the Planning Commission shall consist of five members.
George Thacher, City Attorney, again reviewed the.provisions of the ordinance
amending the membership to five members and establishing terms of office.
Allen Settle asked that the City Council not take any action on this ordinance
but to wait until after municipal elections in March so that the new City
Council may make the decision on this matter.
Councilman Dunin stated he had no comment.
Councilwoman Billig stated she would not support, but had no comment on the
ordinance.
Councilman Munger stated he would support adoption of the ordinance.
On motion of Councilman Munger, seconded by Mayor Cooper, Ordinance No.
874 was introduced for final passage.
The ordinance did not finally pass on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmember Munger and Mayor Cooper
NOES: Councilmembers Billig and Dunin
ABSENT: C6uncilmember Bond
City Council Minutes
January 6', 1981 7:30 p.m.
Page 10
7. Council consideration of a resolution amending the Planning Commission
by -laws for a five - member commission and introduction of an ordinance amending
the Municipal Code to amend Planning Commission zoning provisions dealing
with the General Plan was removed from the agenda due to the lack of passage
of Ordinance No. 874.
0875 8a. On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the
following ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 875, an ordinance of the
City of San Luis Obispo establishing parking meter zone and parking meter
rates.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Billig, Munger, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
R4373 8b. On motion of Councilman Munger, seconded by Mayor Cooper, the following
resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4373 (1981 Series), a resolution
of the council of the City of San Luis Obispo authorizing the conversion and
installation of parking meters and an increase in parking meter space rentals.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Munger, Billig, Dunin, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
R4374 9. On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4374 (1981 Series), a
resolution of the council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an
agreement between the city and Cuesta Valley properties (Terrace Hill).
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Billig, Dunin, Munger, and Mayor Cooper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Bond
Henry Engen,r�Community Development Director, submitted for the council's
consideration plans and specifications for the City Council Chamber remodeling.
The summary of the project would be remove existing wood railings, podium,
and staff table; install a new staff table, podium, and carpeting; the council
table would be refinished and the sound system would be upgraded to provide
improved sound quality and reduce feedback and distortion. Also there would
be an addition of a new taping system for the Council Chambers for use by
the City Council and the City Planning Commission.
Henry Engen estimated that the cost of construction at $7,000.00; the sound
system at $9,000.00; engineering and contingencies at $2,000.00; or a total
of $18,000.00. The City Council discussed with staff some of the improvements
to be made and also why additional improvements were not being considered such
as better seating for the public, etc.
On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the plans
and specifications wer6 approved and the staff was authorized to go to bid.
Motion carried.
City Council Minutes
January 6, 1981.•'.• - 7:30 p.m.
Page 11
C -1 On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Munger,
claims against the city for month of January, 1981, were approved and
ordered paid subject to the approval of the Administrative Officer.. Motion
carried.
C -2 On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman.Munger,
the minutes of the following council meetings were approved as amended:
November 18, 1980; December 2, 1980 - 4:00 p.m.; December 2, 1980 - 7:30 p.m.; '
and December 8, 1980 - 12:10 p.m. Motion carried.
C -3 On motion of Councilwoman Billig; seconded by Councilman Munger,
the contract pay estimates and change orders were approved subject to the
approval of the Administrative Officer. Motion carried.
On motion of Councilwoman Billig, seconded by Councilman Munger, claims
against the city by Michael O'Keefe for injuries as a result of alleged
assault and battery by police and hospital personnel were denied. Motion
carried.
At 10:40 p.m. the Mayor adjourned the council to an executive session.
At 11:10 p.m. the City Council reconvened in regular session. All council -
members present, Councilman Bond absent.
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting
adjourned to January 13, 1981 at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVED BY COUNCIL ON:
1/20/81 Fitzpatrick, City Clerk
M I N U T E S
ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1981 - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET
Pledge
Roll Call
Councilmembers
Present: Melanie Billig, Alan Bond, Ron Dunin, Gerald Munger and
Mayor 'Lynn Cooper
Absent: None
City Staff
Present: Lee Walton, Administrative Officer; George Thacher, City
Attorney; J.H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk; Henry Engen, Community
Development Director; G. Matteson; Planning Assistant
E.1 Councilman Munger introduced for the council's consideration
Ordinance No. 876 (1981 Series), an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo
amending Part I of Chapter 4 of Article II of the San Luis Obispo Municipal