HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/3/2019 Item 10, Yost
Wilbanks, Megan
From:Jenn Yost <jyost@calpoly.edu>
Sent:Tuesday,
To:E-mail Council Website
Cc:Hill, Robert; Read, Chris; Combs, Ron
Subject:Comments on CAP Item 10 tonight's agenda
Attachments:Letter to Council Item 10 Dec 2 2019.pdf
Hello Council,
Please see the attached letter with my comments regarding the CAP being discussed tonight.
Thank you all for your service.
Best,
Jenn
---
Jenn Yost, Ph.D.
Fall 2019 Office Hours Wed 10-12, Wed 1-3
Associate Professor of Botany
Director, Hoover Herbarium
Biological Sciences Dept
Fisher Bldg 33-359
Cal Poly State University
San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407
jyost@calpoly.edu
805-756-5869
1
December 3, 2019
Dear City Council,
Thank you for your public service and for addressing important problems like climate
change.
I am a professor of botany at Cal Poly and my research is focused on trees and native
plants of California. I also currently help coordinate the ReLeaf Grant awarded to
EcoSLO to plant 120 trees in town over the next year. I have spent the last decade
working with urban forest professional throughout the state.
I am writing to provide input to Agenda Item 10: The Climate Action Plan and
specifically Pillar 6: Natural Solutions. I think this section is incomplete and can be
expanded to address a larger offset of carbon emissions.
Currently Natural Solutions has three components, 1) carbon farming with the addition of
compost to range lands, 2) preparation of a City Urban Forest Master Plan, and 3) tree
planting.
Generally, I support these three measures.
Measure 1 - I encourage the City to proceed with carbon farming with caution. The
application of fertilizer to rare plant communities, serpentine soils, or near wetlands
would be damaging to biodiversity and should be avoided at all costs. Farm land is an
excelling choice for this type of project and I encourage careful study so that we might
understand the any unanticipated consequences of these actions.
Measure 2 - Urban Forest Master Plan. Trees are important for cities for a diversity of
reasons. However, if the urban forest is not cared for, bad interactions between humans
and trees occur. To avoid this, the urban forest MUST be supported in the city budget
with staff and funding for contract labor. In SLO, given our extensive City Open Space
and the number of trees we have, I estimate that there is work for 4 employees running
chainsaws and chippers full time. There is a lot of work to do that is currently not being
done. The Master plan would help the City figure out how to manage and sustain the
workforce needed for a healthy urban forest. This plan would help to articulate how
Measure 3 (and others), would be accomplished and sustained. Finally, most cities that I
work with have a such plan in place and it is a useful tool.
Page ! of 41
Measure 3 - 10Tall: Planting 10,000 trees by 2035. This is an excellent idea and for this
to be successful, the City will need to be strategic about what support you will provide in
terms of staff and infrastructure. Trees both sequester carbon, but they also offset heating
and cooling emissions. Additionally, trees provide many ecological benefits outside of
carbon offsets making this measure all the more important. As the New York Times just
reported, “shade [is] “an index of inequality, a requirement for public health, and a
mandate for urban planners and designers.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/01/us/los-angeles-shade-climate-change.html
A student of mine, Kyle Nessen, did an analyses of San Luis Obispo for a seminar I am
currently teaching. In it he used LiDAR (height) data from 2013 and NDVI (greenness)
from 2012 to calculate canopy cover in the City Urban Reserve. The images below are
from his draft analyses. Overall the City has only 13.2% canopy cover.
Page ! of 42
Even if all 6 pillars are achieved, there is a carbon gap. I propose adding the following
measures to the Natural Solutions Section and in doing so, we can reduce the carbon gap.
—
Proposed measure 4: City Open Space - Aquire and preserve open spaces surrounding
the City. Land preserved from development is the most important contribution against
future carbon emissions. The City shall prioritize increasing the green belt surrounding
the City via conservation easements or other methods.
—
The value or contribution of City Open Space can be calculated as the amount of
emission you avoid by not converting that land into development (avoided land use
conversion) and the avoided vehicle trips from that avoided development. These
calculations could/should be done per unit area of newly acquired open space consistent
with the models used by the State Department of Conservation and The Strategic Growth
Council.
Additionally, the City should consider open space acquisition outside the City limits to
offset and mitigate for carbon emissions within the City.
—-
Page ! of 43
Proposed measure 5: Urban tree recycling program. Establish a program to utilize trees
removed from urban environments for their highest potential economic value. This effort
increases environmental benefits by diverting wood that would otherwise populate
landfills and reduce greenhouse gas emissions that are released through traditional
disposal processes. Co-benefits include sourcing local raw materials for construction,
maximizing benefit from trees being removed, and displaying urban wood products in the
community - telling the story of the City in which the trees matured.
—-
There are local mills such as Pacific Lumber on Prado Rd. and Deadwood Revival on
South Higuera St. that could participate in these efforts.
Thank you again for leadership on this front. I look forward to seeing the plan developed
and carried out.
Best,
Jenn Yost, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Botany
Director, Hoover Herbarium
Biological Sciences Dept
Cal Poly State University
San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407
jyost@calpoly.edu
805-756-5869
Page ! of 44