Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/14/2020 Item 10, Ayral1 From:Odile Ayral < Sent:Friday, January 10, 2020 9:59 AM To:E-mail Council Website Subject:Dana Permit Parking District Item 10 Mayor Harmon and City Council Members, I support the efforts of the city to create a parking permit district on Dana Street. For a long time, this street has been the target parking location for people doing business downtown, and its residents have long suffered very limited parking possibilities as a result. Therefore a well-conceived permit district would correct this situation. The caveat is “well-conceived” because Dana is not a regular residential street, and it offers a number of challenges that are not easily resolved. A few years ago, the City put in place regulations for permit districts, and one of them was to limit eligibi lity to residence compounds comprised of less than four units, thereby creating an unequal situation between condos and houses. So, on one hand, the City encourages compact living, on the other, it penalizes those who live under more compact conditions. The regulations need to be changed. The problem with the present proposal for Dana Street is that it includes the entire street except for the very end, where you find a small apartment building, and 8 condos at 415 Dana St. I am asking that you include the condos in the permit district. These condos have been there since 1984 and several residents have lived in them for more than twenty years. My husband lived there for many years before moving with me, and we turned his condo into a rental. The family who is renting it has been at this address for about ten years. This is a stable community, not a transient one. I am particularly sensitive to the plight that will happen to the residents of 415 Dana if they are kept out of the permit district because I have seen it happen to a neighbor, who was kept out of the Ferrini parking district. He or his visitors were rarely able to park in front of his home because other cars were constantly there. People looking for parking moved his garbage containers therefore his garbage did not get picked up. He finally had to line his containers across his own driveway. Fortunately, this situation has recently been corrected, but I don’t want to see anyone go through this kind of daily frustration again. Besides the above problems that could affect anyone living in a group of condos, this particular case presents aggravating circumstances. These condos are located on a cul-de-sac with a fire hydrant. They are landscaped, but all the curbs are fire lanes and there are only three guest parking on the property. I am sure you can foresee the consequences. 2 Finally, although I am sure it was not the intention of the City, I am concerned with a subtle form of discrimination against people who live in condos. You must see there is something wrong when a family who has lived in a condo for a long time cannot enjoy the same privileges as a group of people who are temporarily renting a house. I know that for practical reasons you cannot include large apartment complexes into permit districts because it would defeat the purpose of a district, but condominiums are not apartments. They are more like compact houses because each unit has a different owner, and the community is often stable. On the other hand, all the units of an apartment building are owned by one person or one corporation, and the residents are more transient. To ease the pressure on the street, you could decide to give only one permit to each condo unit instead of two, but you should not keep them out of the district. Sincerely, Odile Ayral