Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
REDwalterhudsonb1
i~~~~iiilllllllllll council mEmoRanbu m 1/101-12 -COUNCIL G'DDD DI RC7"-6A G- 0 r'4 14io',1B-FIN DI P13-AGA -Cr c ne IRE CHIE F2-ATTORNEY W DI P2ttLERK/ORIG OLIDS DH FqDET HEADS SEC b R Ia"UTIL DI R tot-1J -rl 'Tics ~-C (~ZK It has come to Staff's attention that the language in Sections 6 .0 & 6 .1 of the Majo r Investment Study does not clearly indicate that growth assumptions were based on a comprehensive study incorporating all projected development throughout the County . Therefore staff has revised this language to the following : 6.0 Future Condition s The future traffic conditions within the study area are identified in this section . Study area traffic volumes are based on the City's 2035 TransCAD travel demand model . The City's TransCAD travel demand model assumes projected developed for all of San Luis Obisp o County including but not limited to North County, South County, Los Osos, Cal Poly , Cuesta California Mens Colony, etc Projected growth rates have been developed in cooperation with SLOCOG, SLO County, CalTrans, and CalPoly and each of thes e agencies have accepted these growth rates for the purposes of this study . These growth rates are consistent with the City's growth management policies . 6 .1 Future Traffic Volume s The projected 2035 traffic volumes for the study area reflect relatively low growth rates . Based on regional and local growth trends, little traffic volume growth is to be expected . Residential development is only anticipated to grow at 0 .78 percent annually until 203 5 throughout the County . Non-residential development is anticipated to grow a total of 6.4 0 percent between now and 2035 throughout the County . Figure 6.1 summarizes the 203 5 traffic volume projections and the intersection operations for the study area . It has also come to Staff's attention that the graphic in Attachment 5 of the Staff report is i n error, the graphic shows a traditional diamond interchange while is should depict a singl e point interchange . The corrected attachment 5 is provided as the attachment to this memo . Manager Jake Hudson a t RED FILE –MEETING AGENDA DAT G /© ITEM #If Jay Walter, Public Works Directo r Jake Hudson, Traffic Operations Manage r SUBJECT : Item B-1 : Hwy 1 Major Investment Stud y July 6, 201 0 TO :City Counci l VIA :Katie Lichtig, City Manage r FROM : RECEIVE D g :\staff-reports-agendas-minutes\_ccmemos\2010Utem b1 -highway 1 mis .doc JUL.0 6 111 0 SLO CITY CLER K Any further questions can be directed to Traffic Operation s 805 .781 .7255 . ATTACHMENT 5 SR 1 & FOOTHILL CONCEPT D - SINGLE POINT INTERCHANG E ----------------- EXISTIN G ROW MEINECKE AVE