Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREDmarxph2R ECEIVE D NOV 0 9 201 0 SLO CITY CLER K MEMORANDU M To : Mayor and City Counci l From : Council Member Jan Marx Re : Item PH 2 (Historic Preservation Guidelines and Ordinance ) Date : November 9, 201 0 Please consider my comments on the proposed Guidelines and Ordinance are handwritte n on the attached pages from the documents we are considering . 4 COUNCIL "'COD d ASST CM %FIRE CIAEFFdATroRNEY ~C~ RXUORIO tPOLICE II TRIBUNE6NEW TIMES PARKS RECD B( HE R DIREILO CITY NEWS 0 COUNCIL sCIIYMGRCLERK RED FILE -- MEETING AGEND A DATE 1fff/la ITEM # Pth-- Attachment 6 City of San Luis Obispo - Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 201 0 chapteR 3 :tReatment of historic RESOU12ce s 3 .1 Construction in Historic Districts and on Properties with Historic Resource s 3.1 .1 Conformance with design standards .Construction in historic districts and on propertie s that contain listed historic resources shall conform with the goals and policies of the Genera l Plan, the Historic Preservation Ordinance, these Guidelines, the Community Design Guidelines , any applicable specific or area plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for th e Treatment of Historic Properties. 3 .1 .2 Review of development projects .The Director shall ref r :a development projec t application for a property located within a historic district .oron a prope with a listed Histori c Resource to the CHC for review, unless the Director determines the projec (a)Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act :and (b)Designed such that it would have no effect one H.istoric,or Archaeological' Resources , and _<< : :.. .. (c)Consistent with 3 .1 .1 above . 3 .1 .3 Approval conditions.The CHC may -fie'commend conditi tins or environmental mitigatio n measures for construction in historic dislbets'r onpropertiesgtl at contain listed historic resources . The Director, ARC, Planning Cori issio 'ors`.,C ty ,Council may impose conditions o f approval and or environmmntal mitigation measure for pla i g actions affecting Historic an d Archaeological Resources : 3.1 .4 Environmental re:jew.Development projects : on properties that contain listed historic resources, and on propertiea'lacate Within historic .istricts shall be considered environmentall y sensitive pur uat;,tothe Ctornia E"rivi ental Quality Act (CEQA) and require at a minimum,pi l utial st dyto eval fate the project's potential effects on the resource eictept-ss4tef e the DirpGtbr determmestb projeeti }ds„not involve ; 1)"i0ignificant change to the exterior (or interior, subject to Section 3 .4 .6) of a historic "t iieture , 2)reloca i or demolition of part or all of a historic or potentially historic structure , or ;;,3, 3)grading on~'Jjsd historic property or identified archaeological site, o r (b) is minor or incidental and has no potential to adversely affect cultural resources . (G vr)a J V L i),4 IeSJ 9 PH2-175 Attachment 6 City of San Luis Obispo - Draft Historic Preservation Program Guideline s June 201 0 3 .2 Construction in Historic Districts Figure 1 -Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo, 201 0 3.2.1 Architecturally compatible development within Historic Districts . New structures i n historic districts shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the district's prevailing historic character as measured by their consistency with the scale, massing, rhythm, signatur e architectural elements, exterior materials, siting and street yard setbacks of the district's histori c structures, as described in Figures 2 and 3 . New structures slzal copy or imitate histori c structures, or seek to create the illusion that a new building is historic . fruo-l– .'Y-44 -4a Cod y -to - (S-D Works 1''‘("'j ~'`k 145).14)PH2-176 Attachment 6 City of San Luis Obispo - Draft Historic Preservation Program Guideline s June 201 0 Figure 6 -Additions in Historic Districts AQPrtle1 t5 GuC-oP t J (Ter;lPte)MblItIC-3 cutet ~alMil~lttz•~'r,~LF ~R~tli~l.FLOP-._...,~ ?Jil?~'l ,,A4 IEtb~~ A NM APOrtlot4 tN ?~Ht~1G~L 11pi67itoR4tfr) nom "r~ 3 .4.6 Interior building changes .Interior changes tQb1icly-accessible~listed historic building s whose architectural or historic significance is swholly''or Fly based on interior architectura l characters or features shall;preserve and restore ificant ihtei1ior architectural features . 3.4.7 Acquired hist:~.K,,o_tr<k ignifici RCe.Changes IQ t listed historic resources that the Director or the CHC determines to ve acquired historic sigi fcance in their own right shall be retaine d and preserved..:.!-- 3 .5 .1 lint ►riic building cod,.Reconstruction of listed historic structures should preserve th e original historic character ti the historic resource to the maximum extent possible ; use o f California His tt*i c,Building code is encouraged to accomplish such preservation . 3 .5.2 Consistency hdards .Reconstruction shall follow the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, and shall be ll,sed on conclusive evidence such as architectural plans, photos, as-buil t drawings and other reliable and accurate information . 3 .5 .3 Minor variations .The Director or the ARC, on recommendation by the CHC, ma y approve minor variations from the original design to meet code requirements ; provided the overall architectural character is maintained and character defining features are accuratel y recreated . -17 - PH2 .183 City of San Luis Obispo - Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 6 June 201 0 chapteR 4 :pReseRvatton toots am!)incentive s 4 .1 Cultural Resource Preservation Incentives and Benefit Program s The City intends to establish and maintain incentives to support and encourage the identification , preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction and continued use of historic and cultura l resources . The City Council may offer these or additional preservation .incentives to property owners of listed historic resources, as budget and/or funding sources allow: 4 .1.1 Reconstruction after loss .Subject to Director approval,historic resources damaged o r destroyed by fire or natural disasters may be reconstructed tonatch their historic appearance a s existing before the damage without complying with development standards for setback, lo t coverage, height, parking requirements or other Zoning Regulations . 4 .1 .2 Modified development standards .Property;;; develop ent standards in ,the Zoning Regulations and Parking and Driveway Standards may'erelaxed by an Administrative Us e Permit, following procedures set forth in SLOMC Chapter V7 .58,if the modifications facilitat e the preservation and/or rehabilitation of a historic resource ;or serve to reduce or eliminat e impacts of development to a historic resourc e 4.1 .3 Additional uses .The following additional uses may he allowed on Historic Propertie s by an Administrative Use Permit: (a)Bed and Breakfast ;?ins with -oss floor area not exceeding 2,500 square feet or thre e guest rooms in the R4 LR 4 zones . (b)Re-establishment_ of the prop rty s l s oone use defined as the historic resource's origina l use when it .openei r the use'ttwhich the resource was designed), provided the Directo r detemnn;such uses ar?e compatible, with adjacent used and a equ Zoning Code ,.;:...: ::ylalk t,or-kCjLctr4 C 4.1 .4 Use permit review.(A) To apply for a Use Permit under this Chapter, the property owner or owner's agent shall submit a planning application, fee and supporting information to th e Department. The application shall include a historic preservation report, as described in thes e Guidelines . The CHC shall evaluate whether the proposed land use and related buildin g modifications are consistent with these guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standard s for the Treatment of Historic Properties conformance reasonably necessary to preserve o r rehabilitate the historic resource, and shall report its findings to the Director . (B) In granting a Use Permit, the Director shall make the findings pursuant to SLOMC Chapter 17 .58, includin g these specific findings : -19 - PH2-185 Attachment 6 City of San Luis Obispo - Draft Historic Preservation Program Guideline s June 201 0 (a)Impacts of the use, including traffic and parking, would not be detrimental to the surrounding area . (b)Flexible development standards and/or uses conform to an approved historic preservatio n report and are necessary for the preservation and/or rehabilitation of an historic resource . (c)Preservation agreements, contracts or facade easements between the property owner an d City that would provide for preservation, restoration or rehabilitation of ,exterior or interior features of an historic resource may be required as a condition of thense Permit . 4 .1 .5 Rehabilitation tax credits and grants .Historic resources ma.e eligible for the Stat e Historical Building Code, Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits ,.Mills Act P operty Tax Reductio n Program, Community Development Block Grant and other programs that y be established b y state, federal, or non-profit agencies, or by the City Council . 4 .1 .6 Historic and facade easements .Property -"o wners may :,dedicate historic or facade easements to the City or to a non-profit organization to x etve cultural and historic resources . Such dedication may qualify for fee waivers, rehabilitation iits,permit streamlining, Mills Act program participation or other incentives <subject to the approval o_f the city council. 4.1 .7 Transfer of development credit.Fo ,project , on site, the City may enter into an agreement to transfer - u,N l appropriate site proportion . the commerctale ;1toor area develop under current zq iug f eresource wer removed . '%dumber of dwellings possible to 19-4-:4),4f)'bill 4.1 .8 Fee waiver or r [fiction .'property ownek iay apply for the waiver or reduction o f planning, building and en.ge pphca?tion =andpermit fees for designated historic resource s The City Cq y;waiver s&or aII.'fo if it can be demonstrated that the waiver will assis t in the preervationtsignatestoric resource . `Council approval, the City may use the Historic an d 4 .1 .9 Historic plaque program .Upon available funding, the City may provide standard histori c plaques for designated historic properties and at no or reduced cost to property owners . High quality bronze historic plaques will be available to purchase through the City at manufacturer's cost plus handling . 4 .1 .10 Historic library .Property owners of historic properties shall have use of the CH C reference library in the Department . - 20 - 4.1 .$ 1♦"Iicial assistanc e Cultural l gtce Preservaticl Trust''Fund, State or Federal grants, affordable housing funds o r other fundingZt achieve hista c preservation objectives, especially for exceptional preservatio n projects where le community objectives such as affordable housing, historic preservation, removal of spot bhg1 t,. or'pore sustainable property development can be achieved with suc h assistance . t preservereultural or historic resource s elopmient credit or density to another ^o"—G'S PH2-186 Ordinance No . (2010 Series) Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinanc e Page 3 14 .01 .070 Evaluation Criteria for Historic Resource Listin g 14 .01 .080 Historic District Designation Purpose and Applicatio n 14 .01 .090 Process for establishing or amending a Historic Distric t 14 .01 .100 Demolition of Historic Resource s 14 .01 .110 Relocation of Historic Resources 14 .01 .120 Unpermitted Demolition or Destruction of Historic Resource s 14 .01 .130 Historic Preservation Fund 14 .01 .140 Enforcemen t 14 .01 .150 Appeals 14 .01 .160 Severability 14 .01 .010 Findings and Purpose . A . Findings . 1.The City of San Luis Obispo has a distinctive physical character and rich history tha t are reflected in its many cultural resources, such as historic structures and sites . These irreplaceable resources are important to the community's economic vitality, quality of life, an d sense of place, and need protection from deterioration, damage, and inappropriate alteration o r demolition . 2.The City of San Luis Obispo has been fortunate to have owners who care abou t the history of their community and have undertaken the costly and time-consuming task o f restoring, maintaining and enhancing their historic homes and commercial buildings . Their efforts have enhanced the distinctive character and sense of place of the community . 3.The California Environmental Quality Act requires special treatment of histori c resources and the establishment of clear local guidance for the identification and preservation o f such resources lends clarity and certainty to the review of development applications involvin g historic resources .S e~ceck o '^3 .L . Lt ai'"d4 1-h r+O v c- erese,-3it fi'o r -,Projra-‘s- B . Purpose .The broad purpose of this ordinance is to promote the public health, safety an d welfare through the identification, protection, enhancement and preservation of those properties, structures, sites, artifacts and other cultural resources that represent distinctive elements of Sa n Luis Obispo's cultural, educational, social, economic,. political and architectural history . Specifically, this ordinance sets forth regulations and procedures to : 1.Identify, protect, preserve, and promote the continuing use and upkeep of San Lui s Obispo's historic structures, sites and districts . 2.Foster the retention and restoration of historic buildings and other cultural resource s that promote tourism, economic vitality, sense of place, and diversity . P112-250 Ordinance No . (2010 Series ) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 5 dwkk' Attachment 7 odel, modification, or new construction to : (1 ) ent building, (2) the structural elements whic h r elements of the historic resource or adjacen t (4) character defining features of the interior of a ce is wholly or partially based on interior feature s "Alteration" does not include ordinary landscap e maintenance, unless the landscaping is identified as significant at the time a property is listed . "Alteration" also does not include ordinary property maintenance or repair that is exemp t from a building permit, or is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards fo r Treatment of Historic Properties . 5.Archaeological Site :those areas where archaeological resources are present and may be large r or smaller than the project site . An archaeological site may include prehistoric Native America n archaeological site, Historic archaeological sites ; sites or natural landscapes associated wit h important human events ; and Native American Sacred Places and Cultural landscapes . 6.ARC : the Architectural Review Commission as appointed by the City Council . 7.California Register :California Register of Historical Resources defined in California PR C 5024.1 and in CCR Title 14 Chap 11 .5, Sec 4850 et seq . as it may be amended . 8.CHC : the Cultural Heritage Committee as appointed by the City Council . 9.Character Defining Features :as outlined in the U .S . Department of the Interior's National Register Bulletin 15 and Preservation Brief 17 : "How to Identify Character Defining Features", the architectural character and general composition of a resource, including, but not limited to , type and texture of building material; type, design, and character of all windows, doors, stairs , porches, railings, molding and other appurtenant elements ; and fenestration, ornamenta l detailing, elements of craftsmanship, finishes, etc . 10.City : the City of San Luis Obispo . 11.Community Design Guidelines :the most recent version of the City's Communit y Design Guidelines as adopted and amended from time to time . 12.Contributing Resource or Property :Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute either b y themselves or in conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole .. They need not be located in a historic district,. In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less tha n 50 years old, but are nonetheless significant based on architecture, craftsmanship or other criteri a as described herein maybe designated as a Contributing resource 4 .Alteration :change, repair, replacement , the exterior of an historic resource or adj support the exterior walls, roof, or exte: building, (3) other construction on a lot,o historic resource if the structure's signifi and the resource is publicly-accessibl e (?6o/1,1,tok o ) .;,chw/ef A,,$) PH2-252 Ordinance No . (2010 Series) Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 6 13.Council :the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo . 14.Cultural Resource :any prehistoric or historic district, site, landscape, building, structure, o r object included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation , including artifacts, records, and material remains related to such a property or resource . 15.Demolition :for the purpose of this ordinance, "demolition" refers to any act or failure to ac t that destroys, removes, or relocates, in whole or part a historical resource such that its historic o r architectural character and significance are materially altered . 16.Deterioration :the significant worsening of a structure's condition, architectural or histori c integrity, due to lack of maintenance, organisms, neglect, weathering and other natural forces . 17.Director :the Director of the Community Development Department, or another perso n authorized by the Director to act on his or her behalf . 18.Feasible:capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable perio d of time, taking into account cultural, economic, environmental, historic, legal, social an d technological factors .Structural feasibility means that a building or other structure can b e repaired or rehabilitated so as to be safe and usable without significant loss of historic fabric . Factors to be considered when making this determination include the existence of technology that will allow the design of the work and the ability to repair, supplement or replace load-bearin g members and the thermal and moisture protection systems required for continued use of th e structure; and the physical capacity of the structure to withstand the repair and/or rehabilitatio n process without the danger of further damage . 19. Historic Building Code :the most recent version of the California Historical Building Code , Title 25, Part, 8, as defined in Sections 18950 to 18961 of Division 12, Part 2 .7 of Health and Safety Code (H&SC), a part of California State law . 20.Historic Context :Historic context are those patterns, themes or trends in history b y which a specific occurrence, property, or site is understood and its meaning and significanc e is made clear . 21.Historic District/Historical Preservation District :areas or neighborhoods with a collectio n or concentration of listed or potentially contributing historic properties or archaeologicall y significant sites, where historic properties help define the area or neighborhood's uniqu e architectural, cultural, and historic character or sense of place . Historic districts siatjfthe?.LL`.rd, delineated on the official zoning map as Historic (H) overlay zone under San Luis Obisp o Municipal Code Chapter 17 .54 . PH2-253 Ordinance No . (2010 Series)Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinanc e Page 9 44.Rehabilitation :the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a propert y through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features whic h convey its architectural, cultural,or historic values. 45.Relocation :removal of a resource from its original site and its re-establishment( at anothe r locatio -nessentially the s .s ,..:earance and architectural deta i 46.Responsible party :any person, business, corporation or entity, and the parent or legal guardian of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years, who has committed, permitted , directed or controlled any act constituting a violation of this ordinance . 47.Restoration the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features fro m other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period . 48.Scale :the proportions of architectural design that relate to human size or other relative siz e measure . 49.Secretary of the Interior's Standards :the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for th e Treatment of Historic Properties as published by the U .S . Department of the Interior and as amended from time to time . 50.Setting :the physical area, environment or neighborhood in which a resource is located . 51.Sensitive Site :a site determined by the Community Development Director, Plannin g Commission, Architectural Review Commission or Council, upon recommendation of th e Cultural Heritage Committee, to have special characteristics, constraints or community valu e such as: historic significance, historic . context, creek side location or visual prominence , requiring more detailed development review than would otherwise be required for other similarly zoned lots . 52.Site :as used in this ordinance, the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or histori c occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, wher e the location itself possesses historic, cultural, or archeological value regardless of the value o f any existing structure . 53. Siting:the placement of structures and improvements on a property or site . 54. Stabilization :the act or process of applying measures designed to reestablish a weathe r resistant enclosure and the structural stability of an unsafe or deteriorated property whil e maintaining the essential form as it exists at present . P112-256 Ordinance No . (2010 Series) Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 1 1 2.Properties for inclusion on the City's List of Historic Resources - those properties, areas, sites , buildings, structures or other features having significant historical, cultural, architectural , community, scientific or aesthetic value to the citizens of San Luis Obispo . 3.The Master and Contributing Properties Lists of Historic Resources, and Historic Property an d Archaeological Site Inventories. 4.Actions subject to discretionary City review and approval that may affect significan t archaeological, cultural or historic resources . 5.The application of architectural, historic, and cultural preservation standards and guidelines t o projects and approvals involving historic sites, districts, and structures . 6.Consolidation of information about cultural resources and promotion, participation in, o r sponsorship of educational and interpretive programs that foster public awareness an d appreciation of cultural resources . 7.Quidanee-eftTe restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping and maintenance related t o development or demolition applications involving listed resources, and properties within histori c preservation districts . 8.Incentive programs approved by the Council that are directed at preserving and maintainin g cultural resources . 9 Information for property owners preparing local, state and federal historic nominations t o utilize preservation incentives, including the Mills Act and federal tax incentives, such a s rehabilitation tax credits . ?a C FE C cW f~--*function within the guidelines and policies of the Advisory Body Handbook and perform 4'0 1 030I other duties as assigned by Council .(/t,ou .a 5'(stt'4- , fe H ce i -, a 3,€~~o -) C . Actions Subject to Cultural Heritage Committee Review . The Committee shall review and make recommendations to the Director, Architectural Revie w Commission, Planning Commission or City Council on applications and development revie w projects which include any of the following : 1.Changes to the Inventory of Historic Resources . 2.Changes to historic districts and applications to establish new historic districts . ('P-Y OG (/P~..Ser ~--s-5Lr4 ^e) PH2-258 Ordinance No . (2010 Series)Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinanc e Page 1 2 3.Statements of historic significance and historic inventories for existing and proposed histori c districts . 4.New construction,additions or alterations located in historic districts, or on historically liste d properties, or sensitive archaeological sites . 6 .to the Committee by the Community Development Directo r ("Director"), Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission, or Council . ro Pos of public agencies that may affect historic or cultural resources within the City . or lack 0 f--aCh'03t 14.01 .040 Community Development Director Rol e The CHC is assisted by staff of the Community Development Department . The Community Development Director ("Director") is responsible for interpreting and implementing thi s ordinance and helping the CHC carry out its duties . Notwithstanding Section 14 .01 .030C 1-5 and 7 of this ordinance, the Director may determine that CHC review is not required for action s or projects that : 1) do not adversely affect historic resources, or 2) are consistent with thi s ordinance, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and the Historic Preservation Progra m Guidelines and no public purpose would be served by requiring CHC review . 14 .01 .050 Historic Resource Designatio n The following classifications shall be used to designate historic resources and properties . The primary categories of historic significance are "Master List" and "Contributing" properties . Contributing properties include those properties that by virtue of their age, design an d appearance, contribute to and embody the historic character of the neighborhood or histori c district in which they are located . A.Master List Resources .The most unique and important resources and properties in terms o f age, architectural or historical significance, rarity, or association with important persons or events in the City's past, which meet one or more of the criteria outlined in Section 14 .01 .070 . B.Contributing Resources or Properties .Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute, either b y themselves or in conjunction with other structures, to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole. They need not be located in a historic district, but should be visible to the public . In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less tha n 50 years old, but are nonetheless significant based on architecture, craftsmanship or other criteria as described in Section 14 .01 .070 may be designated as a Contributing Resource . 5 . Applications to demolish or relocate listed historic resources or structures . e.Pt-r~aa/i-- PH2-259 Ordinance No . (2010 Series)Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinanc e Page 18 (1)A map (8-1/2" x I1") from the official zoning map, with the area to be change d shaded or outlined in a heavy, black line, with the proposed area to be changed clearl y labeled, and (2)Information showing how the application meets the criteria to establish or alter a historic district designation. (3)A Statement of historic significance . A statement of historic significance shall be prepared by a qualified professional, as listed in the City's List of Qualified Historians . The Director may waive the requirement that the statement be prepared by a qualified professional if the applicant provides adequate information to enable informed review of the proposed district . C . Contents .Statements of Historic Significance shall include, but not be limited to th e following ; (1) A visual and written description of the district's boundaries . (2) A description of the district's architectural, historic, and cultural resources, characte r and significance, including a historic survey documenting the period of significance an d how historic properties meet adopted local, state and where applicable, federal criteria for historic listing. (3) Preservation goals and concerns for the district including but not limited to ; q Identification of preservation priorities, important features, goals and objectives , and b.Identification of potential obstacles to preservation, an d c.Identification of historic land use policies and goals for future land use, an d d.Special considerations for development review of projects both involving and not involving historic resources . (4) Graphic and written design guidelines applicable to the district's preservation goals , historic character and features which shall include, but not be limited to : (a)Guidelines for projects involving historic resources, focused on preserving th e district's character and significant archeological, architectural, and historic features ; and (b)Guidelines for projects within the district but not involving historically designate d properties, focused on maintaining street character and compatibility with th e district's historic character while not lmimicking historic styles . YIQCQJfa r,(y P112-265 Ordinance No, (2010 Series) Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinanc e Page 2 1 G. Historic acknowledgement .An acknowledgment of demolished resources shall be provide d through historic signage and/or the reuse or display of historic materials and artifacts on site, a t the owner's expense, to the Director's approval . IL Code requirements .Demolitions shall follow standards and procedures in the Demolition and Building Relocation Code and California Building Code as locally amended . I.Expiration of demolition approval .Demolition approval of a listed historic resource shal l expire two years after its date of approval, unless a building permit has been issued an d construction has begun . A one year extension may be granted by the Director . Additional tim e extensions shall require reapplication to, and approval by the CHC . J.Economic Hardship.An economic hardship provision is established to ensure that denial o f a demolition permit does not impose undue hardship on the owner of a historical resource . If the applicant presents evidence clearly demonstrating to the satisfaction of the CHC or the Cit y Council that the action will cause an extreme hardship, the CHC may recommend approval, an d the Council may approve or conditionally approve a demolition or other application to modify a listed historic resource even though it does not meet one or more standards set forth herein . The applicant shall be responsible for providing substantiation of the claim to the Director, who shal l review the information with the Director of Finance and make a joint recommendation to th e CHC on the hardship request . The CHC shall consider and make a recommendation to th e Council regarding the financial impacts of denial of the demolition permit . Private financial information shall be maintained in confidence by the City . The CHC is authorized to request that the applicant furnish information, documentation and expert testimony, the cost of which shall b e paid by the applicant, to be considered by the Committee in its related findings . All additional required information shall be provided by a qualified individual or firm approved by the Director . In determining whether extreme hardship exists, the Committee and Council shall conside r evidence that demonstrates : (1)Denial of the application will diminish the value of the subject property so as to leav e substantially no economic value, after considering other means of offsetting the costs of retainin g the istroic esource, including, but not limited to, tax abatements, financial assistance, buildin g code mo . i cations, changes in allowed uses, grants,; or (2)Sale or rental of the property is impractical, when compared to the cost of holding suc h property for uses permitted in the zoning district ; or (3)Utilization of the property for lawful purposes is prohibited or impractical ; 14.01 .110 Relocation of Historic Resources . Relocation has the potential to adversely affect the significance of a historic resource and i s discouraged . Relocation applications shall be evaluated as follows : P112-268 Ordinance No. (2010 Series) Attachment 7 GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 2 6 warranted. Additional time to correct the violation may be allowed where the property owner i s exercising due diligence in acting to correct noticed violations . The Director shall have th e authority to place reasonable conditions on such an extension . Notwithstanding these provisions , if the Director or the Chief Building Official determines there is an imminent threat to a liste d historic or cultural resource, the Director shall notify the property owner of the imminent threa t and property owner shall be required to provide urgent measures deemed reasonable an d necessary to protect the public health and safety and for the protection of the resource within 7 2 hours of notification . C.Work stoppage.In addition to any other fines, penalties or enforcement provisions set fort h in this ordinance, failure to comply with an approved application shall constitute grounds fo r immediate stoppage of the work involved in the noncompliance until the matter is resolved . D.Violation - Penalty .Every property owner and/or responsible party, as defined in thi s chapter who violates provisions of this chapter is subject to penalty as set forth in chapter 1 .12 or administrative enforcement as set forth under chapter 1 .24 of the Municipal Code . 14 .01 .150 Appeals Decisions of any city official or body under the provisions of this chapter are appealable i n a rdance with the provisions of Ordinance 1 .20 of the Municipal Code ..ex ~f -f e S a rPeals v nDte^r ms's pier iv y Gn ~.j et's-1 (----cooctrku '/l 14 .01 .160 Severability .`MAS,4er l eT e - u~N r6~i4 Pi'VQ, +'~l.•i~in ch-S .cs d re r14 .lbtt reS 4nrf a f-~,nee Should any section or other portion of this ordinance be determined unlawful or unenforceable by -a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining section(s) and portion(s) of this ordinance shal l be considered severable and shall remain in full force and effect . Sw C l0-e .SECTION 4 . A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council i ja i ve,i members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City . This ordinance shal l go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage . INTRODUCED on the 9th day of November, 2010 AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the day of , 2010, on the following rol l call vote: PH2—273