HomeMy WebLinkAboutREDvessely2ph2RECEIVE D
NOV 0 5 201 0
°CLER K
RED FIL E
ME NG AGENDA
DATE l1 tOITEM #91Z
hard copy :
email :
o COUNCIL a CDD DI R
o CITY MGR a FIT DI R
o ASST CM a FIRE CHIE F
o ATTORNEY a PW DI R
o CLERIUORIG 0 POLICE CHIEF
o PIB a PARKS &AEC DIR
o TRIBUNE o UTIL DI R
o NEW TIMES o HR DIR
o SLO CITY NEWS a COUNCIL
o CITY MGR
o CLERK
From :Richardson, Apri l
Sent :Friday, November 05, 2010 8 :26 A M
To :Chippendale, Sue
Subject :FW : Historic Preservation Ordinance
April Richardso n
Administrative Assistan t
City of San Luis Obisp o
805-781-712 3
Visit our website at www .slocity .org
From :Council, SloCity [mailto :slocitycouncil@slocity .org ]
Sent:Thursday, November 04, 2010 6 :07 P M
To :Richardson, Apri l
Subject :FW : Historic Preservation Ordinance
-------------------------------------------
From :Bob Vessely[SMTP :RVESSELY@CALLAMERICACOM .NET]
Sent :Thursday, November 04, 2010 6 :07 :20 P M
To :Council, SloCit y
Subject :Historic Preservation Ordinanc e
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Mayor Romero & Council members ,
I wasn't planning on writing you again but I've just heard that Peg & all have hired Saro Rizzo &
he has sent a letter to the council requesting postponement of the Historic Preservatio n
Ordinance . Obviously Saro is just parroting Peg's lines : "inadequate notice" based on the fac t
(as she admits) that she didn't read the back of the post cards sent to her; "failure to follow th e
General Plan" based on ignorance of the General Plan ; "more time to analyze", the publi c
workshop called by staff at the request of Ms . Pinard was held in AUGUST! How much time d o
they need?!? Clearly the opposition has no intention of anything other than obstructing th e
process and Ms . Pinard has an irrational need to stir up controversy where none need exis t
(shades of Measure H?). I urge you to honor those who invested the time to participate in th e
process & move this ordinance along .
Thank you ,
Bob Vessely