HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8 - COUNCIL READING FILE_c_02-26-2020 PC Staff Report & Draft MinutesPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: Development review of a 296-unit multi-family residential project within the NG-30
zoned portion of the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan area, and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Tract
3150) subdividing a portion of Tract 3096 from two existing lots into twelve to provide for 296
airspace condominiums with minor exceptions to the open space requirements for common interest
subdivisions. Includes a determination that the project is consistent with the certified Final EIR for
San Luis Ranch Specific Plan and therefore exempt from further environmental review under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1035 Madonna Road BY: John Rickenbach, Contract Planner
Phone Number: 805-610-1109
Email: JFRickenbach@aol.com
FILE NUMBER: ARCH-0459-2019 & FROM: Tyler Corey, Principal Planner
SBDV-0747-2019
RECOMMENDATION
1.Adopt the Draft Resolution (Attachment 1) approving the development plan based on
findings and subject to conditions of approval.
2.Recommend approval to the City Council of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) as
described in the Draft Resolution (Attachment 2) based on findings and subject to
conditions of approval.
SITE DATA
Applicant
Representative
General Plan and
Zoning
Site Area
Environmental
Status
MI San Luis Ranch, LLC
Jacob Grossman
Neighborhood General-30 (NG-30;
allows multi-family residential under
the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan)
10.6 acres
Exempt from CEQA pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines 15182 (Residential
Projects Implementing Specific
Plans)
SUMMARY
The applicant, MI San Luis Ranch, LLC, has proposed a 296-unit multi-family housing project on
a 10.6-acre parcel within the 131.3-acre San Luis Ranch Specific Plan area along Madonna Road,
roughly midway between Oceanaire Drive and Dalidio Drive. The parcels were established
through an approved tentative map (VTTM 3096), which includes the entire San Luis Ranch
Specific Plan (SLRSP) area. The project is intended to be consistent with the requirements of the
SLRSP. The project site is zoned NG-30, which envisions up to 30 units per acre subject to various
standards included in the SLRSP.
Meeting Date: February 26, 2020
Item Number: 2
The project site has been previously approved for grading and off-site public improvements
associated with the development of the SLRSP, the previous approvals also account for all tree
removals and utility infrastructure. This project is specific to the on-site improvements associated
with the residential development (Attachment 3, Project Plans and VTTM). The proposed project
consists of 296 residential condominiums and several accessory structures and amenities as
outlined in the list below:
•(8) three-story buildings with 12-units each, providing 96-condominium units in total.
Each 12-unit building is comprised of (6) 951 square feet (SF) two-bedroom units and (6)
1,140 SF three-bedroom units.
•(6) three-story buildings with 20-efficiency lofts, for a total of 120-condominium units
ranging in size from 380 SF to 580 SF. These are designed to be reviewed and processed
as condominiums.
•(80) three-story townhome condominium units configured in two- to six-unit attached
townhome buildings. Three different three-bedrooms plans each are proposed, ranging in
size from 1,423 SF to 1,611 SF.
•(1) One-story community clubhouse “The Harvest Club” that is 1,627 SF with associated
outdoor pool and activity areas.
•(10) Bicycle storage structures (40 bicycles per structure).
•The project also includes trash enclosures, mail kiosks, signage, fencing, pedestrian
paseos that include outdoor activity and play amenities, shared streets/plazas, a creek
walk, tot lot, children’s gardens, and natural play areas.
1.0 PLANNING COMMISSION’S PURVIEW
The Planning Commission’s role is to review for consistency with the General Plan1, San Luis
Ranch Specific Plan (SLRSP)2, Zoning Regulations3, Subdivision Regulations4, Community
Design Guidelines (CDG)5, and applicable City development standards. Planning Commission
(PC) review is required for projects which include more than 10 residential units.
2.0 PREVIOUS REVIEW
The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) reviewed the proposed project design (ARCH-
0459-2019) on December 2, 2019 for consistency with the SLRSP Design Guidelines and
Community Design Guidelines (CDG). The ARC determined that the project was consistent with
applicable design guidelines, and recommended approval to the PC (Attachment 4, ARC Staff
Report and Meeting Minutes). The ARC’s purview does not include review of the subdivision
component of the project (SBDV 0747-2019).
1 General Plan: Land Use Element Chapter 2 (Conservation and Development of Residential Neighborhoods),
Housing Element Chapter 3 (Goals, Policies and Programs)
2 SLRP: Chapter 3 (Neighborhood Form)
3 Zoning Regulations Article 3 (Regulations and Standards Applicable to All Zones) and Article 8 (Housing -Related
Regulations)
4 Subdivision Regulations: Chapter 16.12 (Vesting Tentative Maps) and Chapter 16.17 (Common Interest
Subdivision, Airspace Subdivisions, and Condominium Conversions)
5 CDG: Chapter 2 (General Design Principals), Chapter 5 (Residential Project Design), and Chapter 6 (Site
Planning and Other Design Details
3.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
The proposed project must conform to the standards and limitations of General Plan, SLRSP, and
any applicable aspects of the Zoning Regulations, and Engineering Standards that are not
otherwise addressed in the SLRSP which apply to the overall development plan approval including
the subdivision component. Staff has evaluated the project and identified discussion items for the
PC to consider, including direction provided by the ARC related to design guidelines.
3.1 Consistency with the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan
Upon its adoption in 2017, the SLRSP became the
primary guiding land use regulatory document for
the area it encompassed. Figure 2 shows the land
use map within the SLRSP, and the proposed
project area coincides with the NG-30 land use
designation shown on that map.
A specific plan is a tool for the systematic
implementation of a general plan. It effectively
establishes a link between implementing policies
of the general plan and the individual
development proposals in a defined area. In the
case of the SLRSP, it addresses the broad range
of planning issues and policies typically covered
in the City’s General Plan or zoning ordinance,
from land use, circulation, site planning
standards, design guidelines, landscape design
requirements, project phasing, and infrastructure
requirements.
Figure 1: Condominium (12-pack) concept character rendering
Figure 2: San Luis Ranch Specific Plan
Land Use Map
In many cases, it establishes standards that go beyond those included in the General Plan, or that
are tailored to the needs of the project site. For that reason, the project will be evaluated against
the requirements of the SLRSP to determine consistency with City planning policies. In certain
instances, the SLRSP defers to the City’s zoning requirements, and where this is the case, it is
noted in the analysis that follows. The applicant’s analysis of project’s design consistency is found
on Sheet A2 of the project plans.
The project has been reviewed for consistency with the SLRSP policies, in order to present a
project that meets the intent of the Specific Plan and fully implements the goals for development
of the San Luis Ranch Area. The ARC has reviewed the project and recommended the PC find
the project consistent with Community Design and Specific Plan Guidelines.
The proposal provides a variety of public/community open space features, including a central
green area, shared streets and plazas, a creek walk, children’s gardens, a tot lot, natural play area,
and pedestrian paseos. Conceptually, the Specific Plan shows a more centrally located open space
component. The proposed project includes more dispersed open spaces and a community center.
The project provides 263 SF of community open space per unit, while the SLRSP requires only
100 SF per unit. The project also has access to the proposed park in the single-family neighborhood
(NG-10 within the Specific Plan) to the south and has improved access to Laguna Lake Park.
3.2 Consistency with Affordable Housing Requirements
The City has recognized housing as an important issue. The City’s 2017-19 Financial Plan
identifies affordable housing as a Major City Goal. The City’s Housing Element includes
numerous policies and programs that support incentives, such as density bonuses, to provide
housing for low, very low and extremely low-income households. The SLRSP as conceived
accounts for a 20% density bonus for achieving affordable housing goals, and the project as
proposed reflects this.
Both the SLRSP and the Development Agreement for the project require that development within
the Specific Plan area include sufficient affordable housing to be consistent with Housing Element
policies related to this issue (the SLRSP and Development Agreement are consistent with one
another). In both documents, development in the NG-30 zone is required to provide 26 deed-
restricted units that are affordable to very low-income households. The Housing Plan within the
Development Agreement also requires that the project provide 10 deed-restricted workforce
housing units (i.e., affordable to households earning from 121-160% of the area’s median income)
within the NG-30 zone.
The proposed project provides the required affordable and workforce housing units, and their
location is shown on Sheet A54 of the applicant’s plan set, but also shown in Figure 3 below.
As shown in Figure 3, all 26 affordable units would be the smaller “efficiency units” and would
be clustered in two adjacent buildings as shown in green in the figure. Although the number of
deed restricted units in this NG-30 portion of the SLRSP is consistent with the SLRSP and
Development Agreement, the cluster concept which keeps the dedicated “very low” units within
the “efficiency unit” portion of the project is not consistent with Housing Element Policy6. The
mix of deed restricted affordable units should be representative of the overall product mix in the
NG-30 portion of the project including size, basic quality, appearance, and amenities. Condition
No. 14 (Draft Resolution, Attachment 1) has been provided to require the locations of the 26 deed-
restricted “very low” income level affordable units to be dispersed throughout the development
and be representative of the overall product mix consistent with Housing Element Policy. With
respect to the workforce housing requirement, the affordable housing proposal appears to
demonstrate the 10 deed-restricted workforce units are sufficiently intermixed among the housing
products among the different housing products throughout the project site. Condition No. 14 also
includes language to ensure the sizes of the workforce units are comparable to the market mix.
6 Housing Element (HE) Policy 4.1: “Within newly developed neighborhoods, housing that is affordable to various
economic strata should be intermixed rather than segregated into separate enclave s…” HE Policy 4.2: “Include both
market-rate and affordable units in apartment and residential condominium projects and intermix the types of units.
Affordable units should be comparable in size, appearance and basic quality to market -rate units.”
Figure 3: Proposed Location of Affordable and Workforce Housing
3.3 Consistency with the Zoning Regulations
The SLRSP includes standards and requirements that in many cases supersede those in the Zoning
Regulations. These include issues such as allowed land uses, setbacks, building heights,
landscaping, and signage, among others. In other cases, the SLRSP defers to the zoning
regulations, notably for issues such as lighting, parking (in some cases), walls/fences. Table 1
summarizes the project’s characteristics, providing context within the framework of both the
SLRSP and application zoning regulations. The project is consistent with applicable Zoning
Regulations.
3.4 Consistency with the Subdivision Regulations
The subdivision component of the project (Vesting Tentative Tract Map - VTTM) requires a
Planning Commission recommendation and final approval by the City Council. The VTTM
provides for private ownership of the various multi-family housing products. The SLRSP includes
lot requirements within the NG-30 zone, however the Subdivision Regulations also include
additional requirements for common interest subdivisions. As the project is an airspace
condominium project, additional requirements of the Subdivision Regulations address issues
related to private open space, common open space, common recreational facilities, storage and
laundry facilities. The differences between what is proposed and required under the City’s
subdivision requirements are summarized in Table 2 under Section 4.0 of this staff report.
With the exception of the minor exceptions discussed below for open space, the proposed project
meets or exceeds these requirements, especially with respect to common open space and recreation
facilities, storage and laundry facilities (see Section 3.1 of this staff report for additional discussion
related to public/common open space). The applicant requests two exceptions to the subdivision
requirements that relate to private and common open space. These include:
1. Private open space dimensions to be 10 feet by 5 feet, rather than the required 10 feet by 6
feet for Unit Types B and D within the Efficiency Buildings (totaling 48 units).
2. Total combined private and common open space for the entire development to be 391 SF
per unit, rather than the required 400 SF per unit.
The proposed project exceeds open space requirements identified for the Specific Plan (Table 1,
below) and deviations from the standard Subdivision Regulation open space requirements are very
minor. The project also provides a desirable range of unit configurations and units sizes including
efficiency units which range from 380-580 square feet and which are the only units that do not
fully meet the standard Subdivision Regulations for private open space. Findings for the requested
exceptions to the Subdivision Regulations, pursuant to Section 16.17.110.C have been
incorporated into the Draft Resolution (Attachment 2) recommending final approval of the
Subdivision to the City Council.
3.5 Architectural Review Commission Directional Items
The ARC recommended three directional items to be reviewed and evaluated prior to taking final
action on the project design. The applicant has made the following changes in response to the
directional items:
ARC Directional Item #1: The applicant should revise the proposed signage on the Condo
Buildings to be better integrated into the architectural character of the structures.
Response: The applicant has eliminated the signage above the entries for the Condo Buildings, as
the entries do not face any street or parking area and signage was determined to be unnecessary at
this location.
ARC Directional Item #2: The applicant should revise the proposed signage plan to provide
illumination on the proposed directional signage.
Response: The applicant has added a note to the project plans (Sheet A7) that the directory signage
will include illumination that is compliant with the City’s Municipal Code.
ARC Directional Item #3: The applicant should consider providing a lighter color palette and
more variation related to articulations and materials of the townhome buildings.
Response: The applicant has revised the townhome buildings to provide a lighter color scheme
and improved variation between materials. The ARC was specifically concerned with the contrast
between board and batten, trim boards, and stucco with no variation in roofing materials. The ARC
was also concerned with the articulation of the townhomes in specific locations, the ARC made a
recommendation to replace a portion of the vertical lap siding with horizontal siding in the center
of the building (Figure 4 & 5). The applicant has responded to the ARC concerns and incorporated
the comments into the project plans.
Figure 4: Rendering of Townhome Building 300, revised (left) previous ARC review (right)
Figure 5: Rendering of Townhome Building 600B, revised (left) previous ARC review (right)
4.0 PROJECT STATISTICS
Table 1 - Development Review Project Statistics
Site Details Proposed Allowed/Required
Number of Dwellings 296 Up to 299
Building Setbacks 10 feet along Madonna Road 5 feet
Creek Setbacks 35 feet from Prefumo Creek;
20 feet from Cerro San Luis
Channel
35 feet from Prefumo Creek;
20 feet from Cerro San Luis
Channel
(per Municipal Code 17.70.170)
Maximum Height of Structures 40 feet; 3 stories 40 feet; 3 stories
(Per SLRSP Table 3-3)
Maximum Building Coverage 70.5% 100% (per SLRSP Table 3-3)
Private Yard/Outdoor Space
Multifamily
118 SF per unit, 60 SF for upper
level units
100 SF per unit, 50 SF for upper
level units
Townhomes 191 SF per with at least one
space with min dimension of 8
feet
100 SF per unit with at least one
space with min dimension of 8
feet
(Per SLRSP Table 3-3)
Community Open Space 77,765 SF (360 SF/unit) 21,600 SF (100 SF/unit)
(Not required for Townhomes,
per SLRSP Table 3-3)
Signage Compliant with Table 3-11 SLRSP Table 3-11
Parking
Automobile spaces
491 (322 covered; 11 ADA)
394 (80 covered; 8 ADA)
Bicycle Parking (Long Term)
Short Term
600
70
592
60
Motorcycle Parking 25 25
Electric Vehicle Parking 26% EV ready; 61% EV capable 10% EV ready; 50% EV capable
Table 2 – Common Interest Subdivision Project Statistics
Site Details Proposed Allowed/Required
Private Open Space 100 SF per unit, 50 SF for upper
level units (SLRSP)
Minimum dimensions of 10
feet by 5 feet
100 SF per unit, 50 SF for upper
level units (SLRSP)
Minimum dimensions of 10 feet
by 6 feet
Common Open Space 263 SF per unit 100 SF per unit
Combined Total Open Space 391 SF per unit 400 SF per unit
Common Recreation Facilities 263 SF per unit of outdoor
recreation facilities
40 SF per unit of outdoor
recreation facilities
Storage 200 cubic feet per unit 200 cubic feet per unit
Laundry Facilities Washer and dryer provided
within each unit
One washer and dryer per each
10 units
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project, including the VTTM and development facilitated by that VTTM, is consistent with
the certified Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for SLRSP and exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182
(Residential Projects Implementing Specific Plans). On July 18, 2017, the City Council certified
the FEIR for the SLRSP and approved the SLRSP through Council Resolution 10822 (2017
Series). A Final Supplemental EIR to address modifications to the phasing plan within the SLRSP
was certified by the City Council on July 17, 2018, through Council Resolution 10927 (2018
Series). All mitigation measures adopted as part of the SLRSP FEIR and FSEIR that are
applicable to the proposed project are carried forward and applied to the proposed project to
effectively mitigate the impacts that were previously identified. The project is exempt from the
provisions of the CEQA under Government Code §65457 because the project consists of a
residential development and is consistent with the SLRSP, which was approved following
certification of the SLRSP FEIR in 2017. No Supplemental Environmental Impact Report is
required pursuant to Public Resources Code §21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
because: 1) the project does not include or require any revisions to the certified SLRSP FEIR or
FSEIR; 2) no substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is being undertaken, and no revisions to the SLRSP FEIR or FSEIR are required; and 3)
no new information of substantial importance is available that was not already known at the time
the SLRSP FEIR and FSEIR were certified.
With respect to the requested exceptions to the Subdivision Regulations, these exceptions are
minor as described in Section 3.4 of this staff report and do not conflict with the Subdivision Map
Act and do not have the potential to result in any adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, the
project is in substantial conformance with the intent of the SLRSP, including requirements related
to project design, including open space. For that reason, the existing certified CEQA
documentation related to the SLRSP and VTTM is adequate to address issues related to the
requested exceptions to the Common Interest Subdivision Development Standards as outlined in
the Subdivision Regulations.
6.0 OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
The project has been reviewed by various City departments and divisions including; Planning,
Engineering, Transportation, Natural Resources, Building, Utilities, and Fire. Comments have
been incorporated into the draft resolution as conditions of approval.
7.0 ALTERNATIVES
1. Continue project. An action to continue the items should include a detailed list of additional
information or analysis required.
2. Deny the project. An action denying the application should include findings that cite the
basis for denial and should reference inconsistency with the General Plan, Community
Design Guidelines, SLRSP, Zoning Regulations or other policy documents. Should the PC
want to pursue this alternative, Staff recommends that the specific findings under
Government Code § 65915(d)(1)(B) and (d)(3) are adequately addressed.
8.0 ATTACHMENTS
1.Draft Resolution – Development Plan Approval
2.Draft Resolution – Vesting Tentative Tract Map
3.Project Plans & Vesting Tentative Tract Map
4.ARC Staff Report and Draft Meeting Minutes 12-2-19
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Minutes - Draft
Planning Commission
Minutes - Draft
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
Wednesday, March 11, 2020
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Planning Commission was called to order on
Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at 990 Palm Street, San
Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Wulkan.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Robert Jorgensen, Steve Kahn, John McKenzie, Nicholas Quincey,
Charles Stevenson, Vice-Chair Hemalata Dandekar and Chair Mike Wulkan
Absent: None
Staff: Community Development Director Michael Codron, Principal Planner Tyler Corey,
Assistant City Attorney Charles Bell, and Deputy City Clerk Kevin Christian
Pledge of Allegiance
1. PRESENTATION
City Manager Derek Johnson provided a presentation on “SLO Forward”.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
John Fowler
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Prior to introduction of the item, Commissioner Kahn recused himself and left the Chamber.
2. Project Address: 1035 Madonna; Case #: ARCH-0459-2019 & SBDV-0747-2019; Zone:
C/OS-SP, R-4-SP; MI San Luis Ranch, LLC, owner and Coastal Community Builders,
applicant. Development review of a 296-unit multi-family residential project within the NG-
30 zoned portion of the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan area, and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map
(Tract 3150) subdividing a portion of Tract 3096 from two existing lots into twelve to provide
for 296 airspace condominiums with minor exceptions to the open space requirements for
common interest subdivisions. Includes a determination that the project is consistent with the
certified Final EIR (Environmental Impact Report) for San Luis Ranch Specific Plan and
therefore exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA);
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 11, 2020
Page 2 of 4
Contract Planner John Rickenbach summarized the staff report, reviewed direction given by
the Architectural Review Commission, and responded to Commission inquiries.
Applicant representative Scott Martin, Principal Architect RRM Design Group, summarized
the project focus area goals, provided a review of all components of the project, and responded
to Commission inquiries.
Chair Wulkan opened the public hearing.
Public Comments
Brett Cross
Chair Wulkan closed the public hearing.
Community Development Director Michael Codron, project developer Walter Heiberg,
applicant representative Scott Martin, and San Luis Ranch Biologist LynneDee Althouse
responded to further Commission questions, specifically addressing Lot 10.
ACTION: MOTION BY VICE CHAIR DANDEKAR, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
JORGENSEN, CARRIED 6-0-1-0 (Commission Kahn recused) to adopt a Resolution entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 296-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
WITHIN THE NG-30 ZONED PORTION OF THE SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
AREA, AND A DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
CERTIFIED FINAL EIR FOR SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND EXEMPT FROM
FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA); AS REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF
REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED MARCH 11, 2020 (1035 MADONNA ROAD,
ARCH-0459-2019);” with conditions and findings revised as presented by staff and
modification of Condition # 15 A to clarify that affordable housing may be clustered into one
or more buildings, removing the language “shall”, and Condition #15 B to add “in addition to
the 34 very-low income affordable housing units already required on the NC site through
previous project entitlements” at the end of the condition
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 11, 2020
Page 3 of 4
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER McKENZIE, SECOND BY VICE CHAIR
DANDEKAR, CARRIED 6-0-1-0 (Commission Kahn recused) to adopt a Resolution entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP WITHIN
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 3096 TO CREATE
CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP SPACE WITHIN THE 296 UNITS APPROVED BY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL ARCH-0459-2019 WITHIN THE NG-30 ZONE OF
THE SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, WITH REQUESTED EXCEPTIONS TO THE
MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, AND THE TOTAL COMBINED
PRIVATE AND COMMON OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT FOR EACH UNIT, AND A
DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED
FINAL EIR FOR SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND EXEMPT FROM FURTHER
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA); AS REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND
ATTACHMENTS DATED MARCH 11, 2020 (1035 MADONNA ROAD, SBDV-0747-
2019);” with conditions and findings revised as presented by staff and adding a condition that
Lot 10 be considered for a possible passive pocket park.
RECESS
The Commission recessed from 8:34 to 8:42. The meeting reconvened with all members present.
3. General Plan Annual Report
Housing Intern Graham Bultema presented the staff report and responded to Commission
inquiries. The Commission provided general input for clarification and clerical revisions to the
report.
Chair Wulkan opened the public hearing.
Public Comments
None
Chair Wulkan closed the public hearing
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KAHN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
QUINCEY, CARRIED 7-0-0 to receive and file the General Plan Annual Report.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
March 11, 2020
Page 4 of 4
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
4. Agenda Forecast – Principal Planner Tyler Corey provided an update of upcoming projects.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m. The next Regular Planning Commission meeting is
scheduled for Wednesday, March 25, 2020, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, 990 Palm Street,
San Luis Obispo, California.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: XX/XX/2020