Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC-1001-20 (ARCH-0424-2019 -- 301 Prado Road)RESOLUTION NO. PC-1001-2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEVEN, TWO- STORY STRUCTURES CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 159,663 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL SPACE. THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) AND SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) ADOPTED FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #3011; AS REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED JANUARY 8, 2020 (301 PRADO ROAD, ARCH- 0424-2019) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on September 23, 2009, recommending approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map #3011 to the City Council, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under TR/ER 112-07, Prado Park, LLC, applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on November 3, 2009, approving the Vesting Tentative Tract Map #3011, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under TR/ER 112-07, Prado Park, LLC, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on March 1, 2010, granting final design approval of the Prado Road Business Park associated with the Vesting Tentative Tract Map #3011, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARC/ER 112-07, Prado Road, LLC, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director of the City of San Luis Obispo, on May 24, 2019, granted a time extension for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map #3011 that will remain valid until November 3, 2020, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under TIME-0173-2019, David Sansone on behalf of Prado Road, LLC, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on November 4, 2019, recommending approval of the project to the Planning Commission based on consistency with the Community Design Guidelines and Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP), pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARCH-0424-2018, 301 Prado Group, LLC, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on Resolution No. PC- 1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 2 January 8, 2020, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARCH-0424-2019, 301 Prado Group, LLC (previously known as Prado Road, LLC), applicant; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Planning Commission hereby grants final approval to the project (ARCH-0424-2019), based on the following findings: 1. The project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of those working or residing in the vicinity since the proposed project is consistent with the site's Business Park Zoning designation, and will be subject to conformance with all applicable building, fire, and safety codes. 2. The proposed use conforms to the General Plan, Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP), and meets Zoning Regulations requirements for the Business Park Zone. 3. As conditioned, the project design maintains consistency with the City's Community Design Guidelines and Chapter 3 (Community Design) of the MASP through its placement of buildings, parking, and pedestrian amenities that is compatible with the design and scale of neighboring structures, and by providing significant articulation, varied structure heights/roof heights, and framed entries in project buildings. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is consistent with the MASP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and supplemental Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) adopted for VTTM #3011. On October 12, 2004, the City Council certified the FEIR for the MASP through Council Resolution No. 9615 (2004 Series). On November 3, 2009 the City Council approved a MND of environmental impact for the subject property through Resolution No. 10124 (2009 Series) along with the approval of VTTM No. 3011. On March 1, 2010, the ARC approved the design of the project with findings of consistency with the MND and the approved VTTM. The project has been found to be in substantial conformance with the previously approved project design in terms of size and placement of building footprints, layout of parking areas and landscaping, as well as project phasing. The project does not include any changes within or around the designated wetland restoration area at the southern edge of the site or the drainage and detention basin along the western edge of the site. The project does not include any changes from the previous approvals that would have any effect on the existing easements that address the two oil plumes on the property, or the avigation easement along the southern portion of the property (the property is in the S-lb Airport safety zone). The project is consistent with the Resolution No. PC- 1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 3 adopted MND, all mitigation measures adopted as part of the MASP EIR and subsequent MND that are applicable to the proposed project are carried forward and applied to the proposed project to effectively mitigate the impacts that were previously identified. SECTION 3. Action. The project conditions of approval do not include mandatory code requirements. Code compliance will be verified during the plan check process, which may include additional requirements applicable to the project. The Planning Commission hereby grants final approval to the project with incorporation of the following conditions: Planning Division 1. Final project design and construction drawings submitted for a building permit shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans approved by the Planning Commission (ARCH- 0424-2019 & ER/TR 112-07). A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that lists all conditions and code requirements of project approval listed as sheet number 2. Reference shall be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. The project shall comply with all mitigation measures and conditions, applicable to the project site, established under City Council Resolution No. 10124 (2009 Series). 3. Plans submitted for a building permit shall call out the colors and materials of all proposed building surfaces and other improvements. Colors and materials shall be consistent with the color and material board submitted with Architectural Review application. The applicant shall note the use of smooth finish stucco on the building plans to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 4. Plans submitted for a building permit shall include recessed window details and all other details including but not limited to awnings, and railings. Plans shall indicate the type of materials for the window frames and mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds recesses and other related window features. Plans shall demonstrate the use of high -quality materials for all design features that reflect the architectural style of the project and are compatible with the neighborhood character, to the approval of the Community Development Director. 5. The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining and updating the current parking calculation for the commercial component of the project upon the submittal of Planning and Building permits for tenant changes or improvements, and/or each business license, to ensure the site does not become under -parked. 6. Plans submitted for a building permit shall clearly depict the location of all required short and long-term bicycle parking for all intended uses, plans submitted for construction permits. Sufficient detail shall be provided about the placement and design of bike racks and lockers Resolution No. PC-1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 4 to demonstrate compliance with relevant Engineering Standards and Community Design Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Community Development Directors. 7. Plans submitted for building permit shall include a photometric plan, demonstrating compliance with maximum light intensity standards not to exceed a maintained value of 10 foot-candles. The locations of all lighting, including bollard style landscaping or path lighting, shall be included in plans submitted for a building permit. All wall -mounted lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. All wall -mounted lighting shall complement building architecture. The lighting schedule for the building shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut -sheets on the submitted building plans. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to ensure that light is directed downward consistent with the requirements of the City's Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Chapter § 17.70.100 of the Zoning Regulations. 8. Mechanical and electrical equipment shall be located internally to the building. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of the building, which clearly show the sizes of any proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment. If any condensers or other mechanical equipment is to be placed on the roof, plans submitted for a building permit shall confirm that parapets and other roof features will adequately screen them. A line -of -sight diagram may be required to confirm that proposed screening will be adequate. This condition applies to initial construction and later improvements 9. The storage area for trash and recycling cans shall be screened from the public right-of-way consistent with §17.70.200 of the Zoning Regulations. The subject property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner at all times; free of excessive leaves, branches, and other landscape material. The applicant shall be responsible for the clean-up of any landscape material in the public right-of-way. 10. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan containing an irrigation system plan with submittal of working drawings for a building permit. The legend for the landscaping plan shall include the sizes and species of all groundcovers, shrubs, and trees with corresponding symbols for each plant material showing their specific locations on plans. The surfaces and finishes of hardscapes shall be included on the landscaping plan. 11. Plans submitted for construction permits shall include elevation and detail drawings of all walls and fences. Fences, walls, and hedges will comply with the development standards described in the Zoning Regulations (§ 17.70.070 —Fences, Walls, and Hedges). 12. The location of any required backflow preventer and double-check assembly shall be shown on all site plans submitted for a building permit, including the landscaping plan. Construction plans shall also include a scaled diagram of the equipment proposed. Where possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, equipment shall be located inside the building within 20 feet of the front property line. Where this is not possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, the back -flow preventer and double-check assembly shall be located in the street yard and screened using a combination of paint color, landscaping and, if deemed appropriate Resolution No. PC- 1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 5 by the Community Development Director, a low wall. The size and configuration of such equipment shall be subject to review and approval by the Utilities and Community Development Directors. 13. Prior to final map recordation, each affected parcel shall be made subject to an avigation easement, in a form approved by the County of San Luis Obispo. 14. Prior to building permit issuance, a comprehensive sign program for the project shall be developed to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. The sign program shall include information on the sizes, locations, colors, materials, type, and illumination of signage proposed for the building and the overall site. Project signs shall be designed to be compatible with the architecture of proposed buildings and to complement the site's setting. Any new proposed signage shall be reviewed by the Planning Division to ensure appropriateness for the site and compliance with the Sign Regulations. Signage shall coordinate with building architecture and the type of land use. The Director may refer signage to the ARC if it seems excessive or out of character with the project. Engineering Division — Public Works/Community Development 15. The building plan submittal(s) and separate Public Improvement Plan (PIP) submittal(s) shall show and note compliance with the codes and standards in effect at the time of plan submittal. 16. The project shall conform to the applicable conditions of approval for the Tentative Map, MASP, City, State, and Federal Codes and Standards. The proposed construction phasing and phased conditions established with the tentative map approval shall apply unless an alternate phasing plan and construction sequencing is specifically approved by the Community Development, Public Works, and Utility department directors (Directors). 17. The City may support an alternate Phase 1 circulation and access strategy to eliminate the need to abandon the temporary driveway access off of Prado Road. The developer shall extend water, sewer, and recycled water mains down the Unocal Collector (Davis Road) as required for orderly development unless specifically waived or deferred by the Director's. The extension of a recycled water main may be contingent upon achieving the appropriate utility main separations and clearances. The clearances and separations may require an off - site dedication from the Martinelli property to the east. 18. The building plan submittal, PIP's, and project drainage report shall show and note compliance with the Post Construction Stormwater Regulations as promulgated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board per their Resolution No. 2013-0032 or any updates of these regulations. Unless otherwise exempted, the plans and reports shall include both the off -site and on -site new, altered, or replaced impervious surfaces in the analysis for treatment and retention. 19. Stormwater treatment facilities shall not be located within the public right-of-way unless specifically approved under an encroachment agreement by the City Engineer. Temporary Resolution No. PC- 1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 6 treatment facilities may be recognized for drainage from roadways that will be completed with the development of undeveloped neighboring parcel(s). 20. The building plan submittal shall show and note compliance with the City's Drainage Design Manual or the Waterway Management Plan. The building submittal shall show and note compliance with the City's Floodplain Management Regulations. The buildings shall be shown to be located outside the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) or above the Base Flood Elevation in accordance with the current regulations. If not previously approved, any proposal for the placement of fill within the SFHA shall be approved through a FEMA Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading permit issuance, if applicable. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) following any required CLOMR shall be submitted within 6 months of the completion of grading. The LOMR shall be approved prior to building permit issuance for any structures located within the SFHA. 21. The final line and grade of the public sewer main and Class I bikeway to the south shall be approved as part of the building plan and PIP submittals. 22. Any jurisdictional permits required from the Army Corp of Engineers, Fish and Wildlife Services, and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be obtained prior to grading and/or building permit issuance, if applicable. 23. Street trees will be required along both street frontages as a condition of development. Any proposal for deferring tree planting with each construction phase shall be approved to the satisfaction of the City Arborist and Community Development Director. Transportation Division —Public Works 24. Prior to issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall be responsible for paying applicable Transportation Impact Fees per the fee schedule effective at the time the vesting tentative tract map was deemed complete (August 24, 2009), subject to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 25. Building plans shall include vehicle turning path analysis to confirm adequate ingress/egress and on -site circulation for a standard garbage truck and City fire truck, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 26. Building plans shall include appropriate signage and striping to convey intended access restrictions at the Phase 1 temporary right-in/right-out access driveway. Recommended measures include a stop sign with "STOP" pavement legend and limit line, as well as "RIGHT TURN ONLY" signage to convey turn restrictions existing the site. 27. Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, the interim Phase 1 right-in/right-out access driveway and adjacent sidewalk shall be constructed using permanent materials per City Engineering Standards. Building Division — Community Development Resolution No. PC- 1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 7 28. Construction plans submitted for Building permits shall be designed in accordance with the applicable codes in effect at time of submittal. Review of the general information provided for entitlement is cursory and does not guarantee code compliance for a future construction submittal. 29. In new projects that add 10 or more vehicle parking spaces, the number of clean air vehicle spaces shall be in accordance with California Green Building code Table 5.106.5.2 (minimum 8% for 201 and over). 30. Plans submitted for a building permit that include Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations, shall identify Accessible EV spaces in accordance with California Building Code (CBC) 1IB- 812. Utilities Department 31. The project shall include the proposed sewer generation calculations, based on Section 7 of the City's 2018 Engineering Design Standards, in the permit submittal plan set. The calculations shall include in the scope of the study the minimum depth and size of the required sewer for the manhole to serve developments to the north and to the ,east of the proposed parcel map, and shall be established and approved to the satisfaction of the Utilities Director. 32. The circumstances have changed since the Tract #3011 was approved in November of 2009 that have resulted in capacity constraints in the existing sewer infrastructure as published in the 2015 Master Plan. Therefore, the sewer conditioned to be installed with Phase 2 of the original vesting tentative tract map shall now be installed with Phase 1 construction of the project, and eliminate the use of a private lift station. 33. Sewer flow rates and flow velocities shall comply with the requirements of the 2016 Wastewater Collection System Infrastructure Renewal Strategy. Prior to final release of occupancy for a permitted building on -site, the project's sewer system shall include a 12" sewer main from Prado Road to the Tank Farm Lift Station installed utilizing an alignment agreed upon by the developer and the City Utilities Department. Should the developer elect to route the public sewer main through a portion of the development, the City shall be granted the appropriate easement. This condition may be considered for a private reimbursement if new developments can be serviced by the proposed sewer main. 34. The existing sewer coming from the east and flowing west of the Prado Road round -a -bout shall be rerouted south into the new 12" sewer constructed by this project along the eastern boundary of the parcel and into the Tank Farm Lift Station. This condition may be considered for a private reimbursement if new developments can be serviced by the proposed sewer main. 35. All sewer mains that encounter hydrocarbons in the existing soil during excavation shall be made of fiber reinforced concrete pipe capable of withstanding aggressive soils commonly encountered in this area, and to the satisfaction of the Utilities Director. Resolution No. PC-1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 8 36. Plans submitted for a building permit shall include the proposed water demand calculations, based on Section 6 of the City's 2018 Engineering Design Standards. 37. Water main installation shall be along the west half of proposed Davis Road per the previously approved Vested Tentative Tract Map. Water flow rates and flow velocities shall comply with the minimum requirements of the 2016 Potable Water Distribution System Operations Master Plan. Prior to issuance of a building permit the development's water system shall have: a 12- inch public water main along Davis Road extending from Prado Road and to the south terminus of Davis Road. If hydrocarbons are encountered, all water mains shall be provided with the proper hydrocarbon resistant gaskets or other protection measures approved to the satisfaction of the Utilities Director. This condition may be considered for private reimbursement if new developments can be serviced by the proposed water main. 38. Final grades and alignments of all public and/or private water, recycled water, and sewer shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Utilities Department. The final location, configuration, and sizing of on -site service laterals and meters shall be approved by the Utilities Director in conjunction with the review of the building plans, fire sprinkler plans, and/or public improvement plans. 39. A hydrant assembly shall be installed at ends of proposed potable water mains that are not looped back into the existing system. A private fire main shall be separate from the potable water system to serve the proposed development. The domestic main shall have meters along the public right of way, or shall have a public master meter with private sub -meters serving the individual parcels, under the same ownership. An alternate combined fire and domestic system may be considered during the development of the building plans that meets all code requirements, but the final design approval shall be to the satisfaction of the Utilities Director and Fire Marshall. 40. Existing well(s) planned for abandonment shall be destroyed per County Health Requirements and the California Department of Water Resources Standard Bulletin 74-81 and 74-90 and the County Health Requirements. 41. The existing well located at the southwest corner of the Parcel Map shall be abandoned prior to occupancy of the final building to be constructed. 42. Plans submitted for a building permit shall include the proposed recycled water irrigation demand calculations to meet the criteria of Section 10 of the City's 2018 Engineering Design Standards in the permit submittal, showing the City's Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) and Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) calculator table, including all inputs. 43. The recycled water main construction depicted in the VTTM from 2009 shall be eliminated if a utility easement is included for landscaping within a common interest parcel. Provisions shall be made to reconstruct the 8" recycled water stub along the south leg of the roundabout at Prado and Davis to accommodate the proposed street improvements extending to the south. Resolution No. PC- 1001-20 301 Prado Road, ARCH-0424-2019 Page 9 44. Recycled water, or another non -potable water source, shall be used for construction water (dust control, soil compaction, etc.). An annual Construction Water Permit is available from the City's Utilities Department. 45. Irrigation systems using recycled water shall be designed and operated as described consistent with the City's Procedures for Recycled Water Use, including the requirement that sites utilizing recycled water require backflow protection on all potable service connections. Three sets of irrigation plans shall be submitted for review during the City's improvement plan and/or building permit review process 46. Driveways and access routes to all trash and recycling receptacles shall be designed to accommodate the size and weight of garbage trucks. 47. Trash enclosure and refuse bins shall be sized to provide a reasonable level of service per the requirements of the San Luis Garbage Company. Large bin enclosures shall be wide enough, to accommodate trash, organic, and recycling receptacles, and shall conform to the engineering design standards. Indemnification 48. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review ("Indemnified Claims"). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim. On motion by Commissioner Stevenson, seconded by Commissioner Jorgensen, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Jorgensen, Kahn, McKenzie, Quincey, Stevenson, Vice -Chair Dandekar and Chair Wulkan NOES: None REFRAIN: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this Bch day of January, 2020. Tyler Corey, Se to Planning Commission