HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 07 - 2020 Affordable Housing Nexus Study Department Name: Community Development
Cost Center: 4003
For Agenda of: April 21, 2020
Placement: Consent Item
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Michael Codron, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Rachel Cohen, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE THE 2020 AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEXUS STUDY
RECOMMENDATION
Complete a significant Housing Major City Goal Task and r eceive and file the 2020 Affordable
Housing Nexus Study (Attachment A).
DISCUSSION
Housing Major City Goal – Nexus Study Task
Housing was identified as a Major City Goal for the 2019-21 Financial Plan. The adopted goal
language states, “Facilitate the production of housing with an update of the Housing Element,
including an emphasis on affordable housing (including unhoused people) and workforce
housing through the lens of climate action and regionalism.” A core priority identified in the
MCG work scope and action plan is to complete an Affordable Housing Nexus Study to evaluate
the current nexus between new commercial and residential development and the City’s
requirements for affordable housing embodied in its Inclusionary Housing Requirements
(SLOMC 17.138). The last time a study was completed was in 2004.
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
The City’s first Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was adopted in 1999 and since that time, the
City has focused on ensuring that a percentage of all new housing units are affordable to income
eligible households. The inclusionary housing requirement can be met by 1) building affordable
dwellings as part of a development project, 2) dedicating real property, improved or not, for
development of affordable housing by the City’s Housing Authority or by a non-profit housing
provider, 3) paying an in-lieu fee which is used to assist with the development of new affordable
housing throughout the City, or 4) a combination of the above methods, to the approval of the
Community Development Director. To date, more than 850 deed-restricted or otherwise secured
affordable dwellings have been planned for, entitled, or built since the adoption of the
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance in 1999. Additionally, the City has granted, loaned, or
committed $10,450,954 of affordable housing in-lieu funds to assist with the development of 464
new deed-restricted affordable housing units.
Item 7
Packet Page 53
Why Complete a Nexus Study?
A nexus study is necessary to establish the relationship between market-rate residential
development and non-residential development and the need to support and construct new deed-
restricted affordable housing in the City. This nexus study analyzes if new market-rate residential
and non-residential development in the City increases demand for affordable housing. A nexus
study is intended to determine whether: (1) those subject to the fee are contributing to the
demand that the fee will be used to address; and (2) that the amount of the fee is reasonably
related to the magnitude of the fee-payer’s contribution to the problem.
Nexus Study Finding
The Nexus Study determined that both residential and commercial development are creating
demand for affordable housing that is not being met by the housing market. The study’s findings
verify that there is a nexus that justifies the City having an inclusionary housing requirement as it
is applied to both residential and commercial development.
Recommendations from the Nexus Study
An update to the Inclusionary Housing Requirement will be pursued following adoption of the
City’s Housing Element Update. The updated ordinance will implement policy direction
included in the Housing Element Update.
Consultants David Paul Rosen & Associates (DRA) has provided recommendations for updates
to the City’s existing Inclusionary Housing Requirement. These recommendations are
summarized below and can also be found in the Executive Summary Section of the Nexus Study.
1. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO) and Geographical Variation
Based on comparable cities and an analysis of San Luis Obispo’s economic/market data, the City
should consider different requirements based on whether the residential project is for sale or rent,
and should discontinue differentiating between housing projects located within the City Limits
and Expansion Areas.
Recommended City-Wide Affordable Housing Requirement for Residential Development:
▪ Rental: Build 5% of units at very low income (50% Area Median Income (AMI)1 and
10% of units at low income (80% AMI)
▪ Owner: Build 5% of units at low income (80% AMI) and 10% of units at moderate
income (120% AMI)
Current Affordable Housing Requirement for Residential Development (both rental and owner):
▪ In City Limits: Build 3% low (80% AMI) or 5% moderate (120% AMI) income
Affordable Dwelling Units
▪ In Expansion Area: Build 5% low (80% AMI) and 10% moderate (120%
AMI) income Affordable Dwelling Units.
1 AMI’s listed in the recommendations are maximums for the various income groups.
Item 7
Packet Page 54
2. Affordable Housing Standards
The City should maintain its current definitions of affordable housing expense in terms of the
percent of AMI (Area Median Income) used to calculate affordable rents and sales prices. In
addition, DRA recommends that the City include utility costs as part of rent and Homeowners
Association (HOA) fees as part of the affordable sales prices.
Existing City IHO does not include utility costs as part of rent or include HOA fees as part of the
sales price.
3. Project Size and Density Adjustments
DRA recommends eliminating the project size and project density adjustments currently
contained in Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Table 2A and recommends a minimum
inclusionary requirement of one unit for projects of five or more units not otherwise exempt from
the ordinance.
4. Residential In-Lieu Fees
DRA recommends applying in-lieu fees on a per square foot basis as the estimated economic
equivalent of providing on-site units.
Existing City IHO bases in-lieu fees on building valuation. “Building valuation” is the total value
of all construction work for which a permit would be issued, as determined by the Chief Building
Official.
5. Non-Residential Nexus Fees (Commercial Development)
Based on the non-residential nexus fees adopted in other California communities (see
Attachment A, Table ES-5 and Section 7.8), DRA recommends fees in the range of $1 to $4 per
square foot for industrial uses and $2 to $5 per square foot for other non -residential uses.
Existing City IHO bases commercial in-lieu fees on building valuation.
Relation to Housing Element
Based on recommendations of the DRA Nexus study, staff anticipates that the Housing Element
update will include new policy and program language to evaluate amendments to the
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, including Table 2A, based on findings of an economic
feasibility analysis once the Housing Element has been adopted by City Council and certified by
the State.
Item 7
Packet Page 55
Next Steps
▪ April 22, 2020: Submit the Nexus Study to the Planning Commission for receive and file
▪ September 2020 (anticipated adoption date): Complete an update to the Housing Element
▪ Winter/Spring 2021: Complete an economic feasibility analysis
▪ Fall 2021: Based on recommendations of the Nexus Study, the economic feasibility analysis,
and guiding policies included in the Housing Element Update staff will evaluate amendments
to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and present its recommendations to the Planning
Commission and City Council
Policy Consistency
Housing Element Programs 2.15, 2.16 and 4.6 outline items to consider, such as evaluating Table
2A, increasing affordability options for those making above 121 percent AMI, and providing
affordable units that are consistent in size, location and character as market rate development, as
a part of the inclusionary housing ordinance (IHO). The Nexus Study is the first step in
providing information that can be used to evaluate these considerations and any other changes to
the IHO.
Consistency COVID-19 Orders and Current Fiscal Contingency Plan. The Nexus Study was
completed prior to the COVID-19 orders and the current fiscal contingency Plan. This activity is
connected to the Housing Element update which is state mandated to be completed by no later
than December 2020 and is presently allowed under the State and Local emergency orders
associated with COVID-19.
Public Engagement
The Nexus Study is an informational document and does not create nor modify any goals,
policies or regulations, therefore there is no requirement for public engagement. The public will
have an opportunity to provide comments on this item prior to the meeting. In addition, the
policies that guide how this information will be used are being developed as part of the Housing
Element Update, which is following a “consult” level of public engagement.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Since this item is informational in nature and involves no action by the City Council, the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the recommended action
because it does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2019-202
Funding Identified: Yes
2 The Nexus Study was budgeted as part of the 2018-2019 budget year, but was carried over into the 2019-20
budget cycle as a part of the Major City Goal
Item 7
Packet Page 56
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding Sources Current FY Cost
Annualized
On-going Cost
Total Project
Cost
General Fund NA $65,000
State
Federal
Fees
Other:
Total $65,000
The work completed by DRA to prepare the Nexus Study cost $65,000 and was paid from the
General Fund.
ALTERNATIVES
Continue consideration of the Nexus Study. Although no action is recommended in association
with this report, the City Council could ask staff to return during a future meeting to present
additional information.
Attachments:
a - COUNCIL READING FILE - 2020 Nexus Study
Item 7
Packet Page 57
Page intentionally left
blank.
Item 7
Packet Page 58