Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-18-2020 ARC Agenda Packet Agenda Architectural Review Commission Monday, May 18, 2020 5:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING TELECONFERENCE Broadcasted via Webinar Based on the threat of COVID-19 as reflected in the Proclamations of Emergency issued by both the Governor of the State of California, the San Luis Obispo County Emergency Services Director and the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as well as the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 issued on March 17, 2020, relating to the convening of public meetings in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of San Luis Obispo will be holding all public meetings via teleconference. There will be no physical location for the Public to view the meeting. Below are instructions on how to view the meeting remotely and how to leave public comment. Additionally, members of the Architecture Review Commission (ARC) are allowed to attend the meeting via teleconference and participate in the meeting to the same extent as if they were present. Using the most rapid means of communication available at this time, members of the public are encouraged to participate in ARC meetings in the following ways: 1. Remote Viewing - Members of the public who wish to watch the meeting can view: • View the Webinar ➢ Registration URL: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/2197413977368163599 ➢ Webinar ID: 446-319-019 ➢ Telephone Attendee: (562) 247-8422; Audio Access Code: 579-559-191 2. Public Comment - The ARC will still be accepting public comment for items within their purview. Public comment can be submitted in the following ways: • Mail or Email Public Comment ➢ Received by 3:00 PM on the day of meeting - Can be submitted via email to advisorybodies@slocity.org or U.S. Mail to City Clerk at: 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 ➢ Emails sent after 3:00 PM and up until public comment is opened on the item – Limited to one page emailed to cityclerk@slocity.org and will be read aloud during the public comment period on the item specified. • Verbal Public Comment ➢ Received by 3:00 PM on the day of the meeting - Call (805) 781-7164; state and spell your name, the agenda item number you are calling about and leave your comment. The verbal comments must be limited to 3 minutes. All voicemails will be forwarded to ARC Members and saved as Agenda Correspondence. ➢ During the meeting – Comments can be submitted up until the Public Comment period is opened for the item when joining via the webinar (instructions above). Please contact the City Clerk’s office at cityclerk@slocity.org to more information. Architectural Review Commission Agenda for May 18, 2020 Page 2 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Allen Root ROLL CALL: Commissioners Richard Beller, Michael DeMartini, Mandi Pickens, Micah Smith, Vice Chair Christie Withers, and Chair Allen Root PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The general public has been encouraged to submit comments on any subject within the jurisdiction of the Architectural Review Commission that does not appear on this agenda. Although the Commission will not take action on any item presented during the Public Comment Period, the Chair may direct staff to place an item on a future agenda for formal discussion. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of May 4, 2020. PUBLIC HEARINGS Note: Any court challenge to the actions taken on public hearing items on this agenda may be limited to considering only those issues raised at the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of San Luis Obispo at, or prior to, the public hearing. 2. Project Address: 1035 Madonna Road; Case #: ARCH-0796-2019; Zone: Neighborhood- Commercial Zone (N-C) San Luis Ranch Specific Plan; Arris Studio, Thom Jess, applicant. Review of a four-story, 200 room dual brand hotel in the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan area; The project is consistent with the previously certified FEIR and SEIR for the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan and no additional environmental review is required per CEQA. (John Rickenbach – 30 minutes) Recommendation: Make a recommendation to the Planning Commission regarding the project’s consistency with the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines and Community Design Guidelines. Architectural Review Commission Agenda for May 18, 2020 Page 3 COMMENT & DISCUSSION 3. Staff Updates ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission is scheduled for Monday, June 1, 2020 at 5:00 p.m., via teleconference. APPEALS Any decision of the Architectural Review Commission is final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the action. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Commission may file an appeal with the City Clerk. Appeal forms are available on the City’s website (www.slocity.org). The appropriate appeal fee must accompany the appeal documentation. The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 781-7100 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410. Agenda related writings or documents provided to the City Council are available for public inspection on the City’s website: http://www.slocity.org/government/advisory-bodies Meeting audio recordings can be found at the following web address: http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/Browse.aspx?startid=26289&row=1&dbid=1 Page intentionally left blank. Minutes - DRAFT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION Monday, May 4, 2020 Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order on Monday, May 4, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. via teleconference, by Chair Allen Root. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Richard Beller, Michael DeMartini, Mandi Pickens, Micah Smith, Christie Withers and Chair Allen Root Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Shawna Scott and Deputy City Clerk Megan Wilbanks PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None --End of Public Comment-- ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR 1.Elect the Chair and Vice Chair to serve a one-year term. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SMITH, CARRIED 6-0-0 to elect Allen Root to the position of Chair. ACTION: MOTION BY CHAIR ROOT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PICKENS, CARRIED 6-0-0 to elect Christie Withers to the position of Vice Chair. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.Consideration of Minutes of the Regular Architectural Review Commission Meeting of April 20, 2020. ACTION: MOTION BY VICE CHAIR WITHERS, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SMITH, CARRIED 5-0-1 (Commissioner Pickens abstaining) to approve the minutes of the Regular Architectural Review Commission meeting of April 20, 2020. Item 1 Packet Page 1 DRAFT Minutes – Architectural Review Commission Meeting of May 4, 2020 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING 3. Project Address: 487 Leff Street; Case #: ARCH-0506-2019 & PDEV-0507-2019; Zone: R-2-PD; Housing Authority of San Luis Obispo (HASLO), applicant. Continued development review of a new, two-story, 13,084-square foot office building as part of an existing Planned Development (PD 0274). The project includes an amendment to the adopted Precise Plan approved through Resolution No. 2249 (1971 Series) to address the new office development as it relates to the Planned Development. The project also includes exceptions for parking and trash enclosures within the street yard setback (0 feet where a 20-foot setback and 10-foot setback, respectively, are normally required), exceptions to sign regulations, and a 40% parking reduction and offsite parking. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review (CEQA). Associate Planner Kyle Bell presented the staff report and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Applicant representatives, David Gibbs and Darin Cabral with RRM Design Group, responded to Commissioner inquiries. Public Comments: None --End of Public Comment-- ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SMITH SECOND BY VICE CHAIR WITHERS CARRIED 6-0-0 to recommend that the Planning Commission approve the project as presented. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION Senior Planner Shawna Scott provided a brief agenda forecast. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:52 p.m. The next Regular meeting of the Architectural Review Commission is scheduled for Monday, May 18, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. via teleconference. APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION: XX/XX/2020 Item 1 Packet Page 2 Meeting Date: May 18, 2020 Item Number: 2 Item No. 1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SETTING The proposed project is a four-story hotel within the approved San Luis Ranch Specific Plan (SLRSP). One side of the hotel will be branded Springhill Suites and the other half will be branded Residence Inn. Up to 200 guest rooms are proposed. The project site would occur on a 3.41 -acre parcel, which corresponds to Lot 8 of an approved tentative map (VTTM 3096) that covers the entire San Luis Ranch Specific Plan area. The project site is within the NC (Neighborhood Commercial) zone of the SLRSP. The ground floor of the hotel will consist of a lobby, dining area, living room area, fitness room, guestrooms, laundry and hotel back of house. The project is designed to comply with the California Green Building Code and will incorporate several measures consistent with that code, including low flow plumbing fixtures, LED light fixtures, ample insulation, energy efficient windows and doors, provision for future solar panels and drought tolerant landscaping. The following are the key proposed project components: •200 hotel rooms •132,940 square feet (SF) of building area in four stories (0.89 FAR, when up to 2.0 FAR is allowed) •Lot coverage of 23.5% (up to 80% is allowed) •Landscaped area of 35,308 SF, or 24% of the site (at least 20% is required) •Maximum Building Height of 50 feet (up to 50 feet is allowed) •198 automobile parking spaces (inclusive of 6 accessible; 2 EV stations; 16 Clean Air Vehicle spaces) •10 motorcycle parking spaces •30 bicycle parking spaces (20 short-term, 10 long-term) FROM: Brian Leveille, Senior Planner BY: John Rickenbach, Contract Planner PROJECT ADDRESS: 1035 Madonna Road FILE NUMBER: ARCH-0796-2019 APPLICANT: SLO HHG SCM Hotel Development REPRESENTATIVE: Heather Wiebe ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ For more information contact: John Rickenbach at 805-610-1109 or jfrickenbach@aol.com Item 2 Packet Page 3 ARCH-0796-2019 (1035 Madonna Road – Residence Inn and Springhill Suites) Page 2 General Location: The 3.4-acre project site is located on a vacant parcel along the south side of Madonna Road, midway between Oceanaire Drive and Dalidio Drive. Access will be via the future extension of Froom Ranch Way. Present Use: Vacant Land Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) General Plan: Neighborhood Commercial (San Luis Ranch Specific Plan) Surrounding Uses: East: Commercial Retail West: Agriculture; planned residential North: Planned Commercial Retail South: Agriculture PROPOSED DESIGN Architecture: Draws from Modern Agrarian elements, with design as described in Section 3.7.2 of the Specific Plan (Commercial, Office, and Hotel Design Guidelines). Design details: As described in Section 3.7.2 of the Specific Plan. Details include articulation on all sides, outdoor seating areas, outdoor pool, BBQ pit, fitness center, landscaped courtyard, pedestrian pathways with decorative paving and landscaping , screened trash enclosures, decorative lighting and signage. Design is intended to preserve views of the Irish Hills from neighboring development. Lighting features are intended to avoid spillover and are downward oriented to preserve the night sky and minimize potential impacts related to aircraft operations. Materials: Smooth stucco, board & batten siding, lap siding, and tile. Colors: Earth tones consistent with Modern Agrarian architecture. Figure 1: Subject Property and Surrounding Area Figure 2: Location in the Context of approved Specific Plan land uses Item 2 Packet Page 4 ARCH-0796-2019 (1035 Madonna Road – Residence Inn and Springhill Suites) Page 3 FOCUS OF REVIEW The ARC’s role is to 1) review the proposed project in terms of its consistency with the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan (SLRSP), Community Design Guidelines (CDG), Sign Regulations and applicable City Standards; and 2) provide comments and recommendations to the Planning Commission. San Luis Ranch Specific Plan: https://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=24679 Community Design Guidelines: https://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=2104 Sign Regulations: https://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=2116 4.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES/DISCUSSION ITEMS The proposed development must be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, SLRSP, and CDG. Notably, upon its adoption the SLRSP was found to be consistent with the General Plan (see Appendix A of the SLRSP for an analysis), and the guidelines contained in the SLRSP were found to be consistent with the CDG. Therefore, consistency with the SLRSP is the key consideration for ARC with respect to this project. In certain instances, the SLRSP defers to other existing City regulations, and these are noted below. Staff has identified the discussion items below related to consistency with relevant provisions of the SLRSP (Chapter 3—Neighborhood Form: Section 3.6, Sign and Monument Development Standards; Table 3-7, [Neighborhood Commercial Development Standards]; Section 3.7.2 [Commercial, Office, and Hotel Design Guidelines]; Section 3.8, Architectural Style Reference Guide; and Section 3.9, Plant Palette. For reference, this staff report includes a discussion of the applicability of portions of the CDG (Section 3.1, Commercial Project Design Guidelines; Chapter 6, Site Planning & Other Details), and Sign Regulations Article 4 (Sign Standards). Figure 3: View from the north toward the Hotel entry Item 2 Packet Page 5 ARCH-0796-2019 (1035 Madonna Road – Residence Inn and Springhill Suites) Page 4 Highlighted Sections Discussion Items SLRSP Chapter 3 – Neighborhood Form § Table 3-7: Neighborhood Commercial Development Standards The ARC should focus on compliance with lot coverage, building height, setback, landscaping, lighting, and building facade requirements for the NC zone; other architectural and design standards are referred to elsewhere in the SLRSP or other city regulations. Sheets A1.2 and A1.3 of the applicant’s submittal provides a summary of design-related information in the context of various City regulations. Key issues for ARC consideration may include building architecture, lighting, landscaping, and visual presentation from neighboring streets. § Section 3.6: Sign and Monument Development Standards Table 3-11 describes standards for monument, pole and pylon signs, wall signs and directional signage. Each sign type has a maximum allowed area and height, with pylon signs being the most prominent (up to 16 feet in height and 72 SF in area). As noted in Section 3.6, the standards in the SLRSP are to be used in conjunction with those in the City’s Sign Regulations. When the two standards conflict, the standards in the SLRSP prevail. Where the SLRSP is silent, the City’s Sign Regulations apply. Proposed signage is included on Sheet A7.1 and A7.2. As proposed, the project’s sign program appears to be consistent with applicable sign regulations. § Section 3.7.2: Commercial, Office and Hotel Design Guidelines This section provides general guidance for site planning and design, building form, building elements and articulation, lighting, signs, building materials, exterior colors, utilitarian features, parking lot design/screening, bicycle/pedestrian circulation, landscape/hardscape, screen walls and fences, and noise. Proposed design information related to these issues may be found on Sheets A1.2, A1.3, A2.1, A5.0, A5.1, A5.2, A6.0, A6.1, A6.2, A7.0, A7.1, A7.2, A8.0, A8.1, A8.2, SL0, SL1, SL2, L1.0 and L2.0. As proposed, the project appears to be consistent with the intent of the Design Guidelines in the Specific Plan. § Section 3.8: Architectural Style Reference Guide This project is designed with a Modern Agrarian architectural theme, which is described in Section 3.8.4. This section provides guidance on massing, building form and composition, materials, colors, and various architectural features. The ARC should focus on consistency with these guidelines. Proposed building elevation and architectural inspiration are shown on Sheets A3.0 through A3.4, and A5.0 through A5.2. § Section 3.9: Plant Palette Section 3.9 discusses the appropriate plant palette to be used in project landscaping, with a focus on native and drought-tolerant plants. Table 3-12 provides a plant list, which ARC can refer to in order to determine consistency. The project’s proposed plant palette information may be found on Sheets L1.0 and L2.0. In most respects, the proposed plant palette is consistent with that included in the Specific Plan. However, there may be concerns within the ALUC “No Build” zone, where tree heights need to be limited. It appears the applicant’s intent with parking lot trees in the ALUC “No Build” zone is for tree species that would not exceed 15 feet in height. Two species are included. However, note that the Bronze Loquat (one of the two tree species) could reach 30 feet, based on information included on Sheet L2.0. In addition, Cercis occidentialis (western redbud) is not on your list of Item 2 Packet Page 6 ARCH-0796-2019 (1035 Madonna Road – Residence Inn and Springhill Suites) Page 5 proposed species shown on Sheet L2.0. Please clarify how you intend to keep trees to less than 15 feet in height in the ALUC “No Build” zone, and provide information about Cercis occidentialis. Note also that in addition to Cercis, Magnolia grandiflora, Quercus palustris and Ulmus parvifolia are not on the plant palette included on Table 3-12 of the Specific Plan. Applicant should justify why these species are included in lieu of other suitable species on the list. CDG Chapter 3 – Commercial and Industrial Project Design § Section 3.1: Commercial Project Design Guidelines The SLRSP was previously found to be consistent with the City’s Community Design Guidelines. However, the CDG provides a framework upon which the SLRSP builds, and provides additional direction with respect to basic design issues. The applicant has provided an analysis of how the proposed design meets the intent of the CDG (Sheets A1.2 and A1.3 of Attachment 1). Thus, ARC does not need to determine the project’s consistency with the CDG. However, these are identified for reference, in the event ARC needs further clarification when evaluating the project’s consistency with the SLRSP. Sign Regulations Article IV. Sign Standards § 15.40.430. Illumination For wall signs, directory or informational signs, the SLRSP refers to Section 15.40.430 of the Municipal Code in order to determine consistency with respect to illumination. § 15.40.470.A Wall Signs; and F. Monument Signs These sections of the Sign Regulations provides additional detail regarding sign design that expand on those included in the SLRSP. The ARC should use this section to evaluate the design of proposed signage. 5.0 PROJECT STATISTICS Site Details Proposed Requirement Land Use Designation NC NC regulations apply from SLRSP Hotel Rooms 200 Up to 200 (SLRSP Table 2-1) Setbacks Street Fronts: 10-18 feet; Adjacent to agriculture: 7 feet (see Sheet A2.1 of Attachment 1) Street Front: 5-foot minimum; Side – Interior Lot: no minimum Street side corner lot: no minimum Parking: 15-foot minimum (with landscaped setback adjacent to public street) Rear – 10-foot minimum (per SLRSP Table 3-7) Building Height 50’ (see Sheets A5.0 through A5.2) 20’ minimum; 50’ maximum (Per SLRSP Table 3-7) Item 2 Packet Page 7 ARCH-0796-2019 (1035 Madonna Road – Residence Inn and Springhill Suites) Page 6 Lot Coverage 23.5% 80% maximum (per SLRSP Table 3-7) Monument Sign Max Height Max Area Wall Sign Max Height Max Area Pylon/Pole Sign Max Height Max Area 1 6 feet 17.2 SF 5 Surface Signs 2-foot letters; 3’4” with two rows 50 SF each none - - (see Sheets A7.1 and A7.2 of Attachment 1) 1 per street frontage 6 feet 24 SF 3; additional 2 allowed per porte- cochere 2 feet (lettering); 3’4” for all wording 50 SF each 1 16 feet 72 SF (per SLRSP Table 3-11) Public Art Not provided Public art only required for commercial portion of SLRSP; project subject to Municipal Code 17.70.140 Parking Automobile spaces Electric Vehicle Parking Bicycle Parking Motorcycle Parking Clean Air Vehicles 198 (6 ADA) 2 charge stations (+10 future) 30 (20 short-term; 10 long-term) 10 16 (see Sheet A1.1 of Attachment 1) 200 (1 per guest room); 6 ADA 10 (future) 20 10 16 (per SLR SP Table 3-7 and Municipal Code 17.72.030 and 17.72.040) 1 parking space may be eliminated by providing 5 additional bike spaces Environmental Status Project is consistent with the certified Final EIR for San Luis Ranch Specific Plan and exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects). The project is also exempt pursuant to Section 15182(b) as a project in a commercially-zoned area with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of at least 0.75 (project FAR is 0.89), is consistent with a Specific Plan and accompanying certified Final EIR, and is in a “transit priority area” pursuant to PRC Section 21099(a)(7) (i.e., within 0.5 miles of a planned major transit stop). 6.0 ACTION ALTERNATIVES 6.1 Recommend the Planning Commission find the project consistent with the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines, Community Design Guidelines, and City Sign Regulations. The Architectural Review Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for final action. This action may include recommendations for conditions to address consistency with the SLRSP Design Guidelines and Community Design Guidelines. Item 2 Packet Page 8 ARCH-0796-2019 (1035 Madonna Road – Residence Inn and Springhill Suites) Page 7 6.2 Continue the project. An action continuing the application should include direction to th e applicant and staff on pertinent issues. 6.3 Recommend denial the project. An action recommending denial of the application should include findings that cite the basis for denial and should reference inconsistency with the General Plan, SLRSP, CDG, Zoning Regulations or other policy documents. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Plans Item 2 Packet Page 9 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A1.0 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA COVER SHEET - 03/23/2020 RESIDENCE INN + SPRINGHILL SUITES SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA Item 2 Packet Page 10 PROJECT SITELAGUNALAKEHIGHWAY 101LO S O SO S VA LLEY RO A DMADONNA RDPRADO RDDateScaleSheet24x36:11x17:1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401THOMAS E. JESSARCHITECT (CA) #C27068STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT (CA) #C33672ADDRESS805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COMCONTACTA1.1RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BYMARRIOTTSAN LUIS OBISPO, CAPROJECT DATA-03/23/2020PROJECT DESCRIPTIONSHEET INDEXPROJECT DATAPROJECT DIRECTORYVICINITY MAPCIVILC1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONSC2 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLANC3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANC4 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLANR C40 REFERENCE ONLY - DALIDIO & FROOMROUNDABOUTELECTRICALSL 0 ELECTRICAL SITE PLANSL 1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLANSL 2 DATA SHEETLANDSCAPEL1.0 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANL2.0 WELO WORKSHEET & LANDSCAPE DESIGN NOTESARCHITECTURALA1.0 COVER SHEETA1.1 PROJECT DATAA1.2 DESIGN CONSISTENCY MATRIXA1.3 DESIGN CONSISTENCY MATRIXA1.4 GARBAGE COMPANY LETTERA2.0 EXISTING SITE PLANA2.1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANA3.0 PERSPECTIVESA3.1 PERSPECTIVESA3.2 PERSPECTIVESA3.3 PERSPECTIVESA3.4 PERSPECTIVESA4.1 FIRST FLOOR PLANA4.2 SECOND FLOOR PLANA4.3 THIRD FLOOR PLANA4.4 FOURTH FLOOR PLANA4.5 ROOF PLANA5.0 BUILDING ELEVATIONSA5.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONSA5.2 BUILDING ELEVATIONSA6.0 BUILDING SECTIONSA6.2 SITE SECTIONA7.0 SITE DETAILSA7.1 SIGNAGE PROGRAMA7.2 SIGNAGE PROGRAMA8.0 COLORS & MATERIALSA8.1 COLORS & MATERIALSA8.2 COLORS & MATERIALSADDRESS:SE CORNER OF FROOM RANCH WAY & DALIDIO DRIVEAPN:TRACT:3096 / LOT 8SITE AREA:148,540 SF (3.41 ACRES)ZONING:NC (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL)(SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN)EXISTING USE:VACANTPROPOSED USE:HOTEL W/ SURFACE PARKING*GROSS FLOOR AREA:HOTEL:35,023 SFHOTEL AREAS:FIRST FLOOR:35,023 SFSECOND FLOOR:32,639 SFTHIRD FLOOR:32,639 SFFOURTH FLOOR:32,639SFTOTAL AREA:132,940 SFNUMBER OF GUEST ROOMS:SPRINGHILL SUITES KING:44 ROOMS (22%)SPRINGHILL SUITES DOUBLE QUEEN:47 ROOMS (24%)RESIDENCE INN STUDIO:93 ROOMS (46%)RESIDENCE INN 1-BEDROOM:16 ROOMS (8%)__TOTAL:200 ROOMS **FLOOR AREA RATIO (F.A.R.):ALLOWED:2.0 MAXIMUMPROPOSED:0.89 (132,940 SF / 148,540 SF)LOT COVERAGE:ALLOWED:80% MAXIMUMPROPOSED:23.5% (35,023 SF / 148,540 SF)LANDSCAPE AREA:REQUIRED:20% MINIMUMPROPOSED:24% (35,308 SF / 148,540 SF)TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:TYPE V-ASPRINKLERS:YES (NFPA-13)OCCUPANCIES:A-2, B & R-1BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED:50 FEETBUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED:50 FEETNUMBER OF STORIES ALLOWED:4 STORIESNUMBER OF STORIES PROPOSED:4 STORIESPROJECT APPLICANT SLO HHG SCM HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LP105 DECKER COURT, SUITE 500IRVING, TX 75062ATTN:EDWARD YU PHONE:(972) 510-1208 EMAIL:EDWARDY@HHGDALLAS.COMARCHITECT ARRIS STUDIO ARCHITECTS 1327 ARCHER STREET, SUITE 220 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ATTN:THOM JESS PHONE:(805) 547-2240 EMAIL:TJESS@ARRIS-STUDIO.COMCIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY1160 MARSH STREET, SUITE 150ATTN: KELLY DRUSEPHONE:(805) 544-0707EMAIL:KDRUSE@RICKENGINEERING.COMLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT JIM BURROWS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREATTN: JIM BURROWSPHONE: (805) 439-3209 EMAIL:JIM@JBLA-SLO.COMSURVEYOR CANNON CORP.1050 SOUTHWOOD DRIVESAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401PHONE: (805) 544-7407THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF A NEW, 4-STORY, DUAL BRAND HOTEL AS PART OF THE SAN LUIS RANCH DEVELOPMENT.ONE SIDE OF THE HOTEL WILL BE BRANDED SPRINGHILL SUITES AND THE OTHER HALF WILL BE BRANDED RESIDENCE INN.THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE HOTEL WILL CONSIST OF A LOBBY, DINING, LIVING ROOM AREA, FITNESS, GUESTROOMS, LAUNDRY AND HOTEL BACK OF HOUSE. THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE AND WILL INCORPORATE SEVERAL GREEN BUILDING MEASURES. THESE MEASURES INCLUDE LOW FLOW PLUMBING FIXTURES, LED LIGHT FIXTURES, AMPLE INSULATION, ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS AND DOORS, PROVISION FOR FUTURE SOLAR PANELS AND DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPING.THE HOTEL IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO THE MAXIMUM SIGNAGE HEIGHT. SIGNAGE IS BEING PROPOSED ABOVE THE 25 FT (ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE) HEIGHT LIMIT. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE AN IN LIEU FEE FOR 7 UNITS OF INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PER THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITESSAN LUIS OBISPOCALIFORNIAPARKING SPACES REQUIRED:200 SPACES (1 SPACE PER ROOM)***PARKING SPACES PROPOSED:198 SPACES ****ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED:6 SPACES (1 VAN & 5 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE)ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED:6 SPACES (1 VAN & 5 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE)ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGING STATIONS:2 SPACES (1 VAN & 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE)CLEAN AIR VEHICLES REQUIRED:16 SPACES (CA)CLEAN AIR VEHICLES PROVIDED:16 SPACES (CA)FUTURE EV CHARGING STATIONS:10 SPACES (EVC)FUTURE EV CHARGING STATIONS:10 SPACES (EVC)MOTORCYCLE PARKING REQUIRED: 10 SPACES (1 PER 20 PARKING SPACES)MOTORCYCLE PARKING PROPOSED: 10 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED:20 SPACES (1 PER 10 GUESTROOMS)BICYCLE PARKING PROPOSED:30 SPACES (20 SHORT TERM/10 LONG TERM)*****PER SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 3-6 HOTEL IS AN ALLOWED BY RIGHT USE**PER SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 2-1 HOTEL ALLOWS A 200 ROOM HOTEL***PER SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 3-7 PARKING IS REQUIRED AT 1 SPACE/GUESTROOM PLUS 1 SPACE PER MANAGER'S QUARTERS (NO MANAGER'S QUARTERS PROVIDED)****PER 2019 ZONING REGULATIONS 17.72.050.C.3.b PARKING REDUCTIONS -ONE PARKING SPACE REDUCED FOR EACH FIVE BICYCLE SPACES PROVIDED IN EXCESS OF REQUIRED PARKING.Item 2Packet Page 11 A. OVERALL DESIGN OBJECTIVES FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS 3.1 COMMERCIAL PROJECT DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. CONSIDER SAN LUIS OBISPO'S SMALL TOWN SCALE A5.0 & A5.1: THE USE OF MATERIAL CHANGES TO CREATE SMALLER MASSING AND AWNINGS AT THE GROUND FLOOR TO CREATE HUMAN SCALE. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINE DESCRIPTION REFERENCE SHEET / DESCRIPTION OF COMPLIANCE 2. AVOID "BOXY" STRUCTURES WITH LARGE FLAT WALL PLANES BY ARTICULATING BUILDING FORMS & ELEVATIONS. A5.0 & A5.1: MATERIAL CHANGES AND PLANE BREAKS BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL WITH A VARIATION IN ROOFLINE TO BREAK DOWN THE ELEVATION INTO SMALLER MASSING 3. PERSERVE THE DESIGN INTEGRITY OF ARCHITECTURALLY OR HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURES AND NEIGHBORHOODS ADJACENT TO SITE. A5.0 & A5.1: THE USE OF ELEMENTS FROM THE SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE ELEVATIONS. A2.1: PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION BETWEEN PROJECT SITE AND ADJACENT HISTORIC BUILDINGS 4. PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AS A PROJECT AMENITY, AND TO HELP SCREEN PARKING, EQUIPMENT AND STORAGE AREAS. L1.0 & L2.0: TREE LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE TO PROVIDE SHADE IN THE COURTYARD AREA AND PARKING LOT, AND A VISUAL BUFFER OF THE PARKING LOT ALONG BOTH FROOM RANCH WAY AND DALIDIO DR. 5. PROVIDE LOGICAL & SAFE ACCESS TO THE SITE, AND DESIGN PARKING AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION AREAS TO AVOID AWKWARD OR CRAMPED TURNING MOVEMENTS. ON-SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAYS SHOULD BE LOCATED AWAY FROM STREET INTERSECTIONS TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS WITH TURNING MOVEMENTS FROM TRAFFIC ON ADJACENT STREETS, A2.1: THE SITE ENTRY WAS LOCATED AWAY FROM THE ROUND ABOUT AND HALFWAY DOWN THE FROOM RANCH WAY FRONTAGE. THE ENTRY LOCATION PROVIDES CLEAR VISIBILITY OF THE HOTEL ENTRANCE AND LOADING/DROPOFF AREA. THERE IS ALSO A FLUID CIRCULATION AROUND THE SITE WITH NO DEADEND AREAS. 6. CONSIDER THE NEED FOR SIGNS AND THEIR APPROPRIATE SCALE AND LOCATIONS EARLY IN THE DESIGN PROCESS. A5.0 & A5.1: BUILDING SIGNAGE SHOWN IN THE ELEVATION FOR SCALE ON BOTH SPRINGHILL SUITES & RESIDENCE INN SIDE, ALONG WITH SIGNAGE ON THE ENTRY AWNING. A2.1: MONUMENT SIGN LOCATED AT SITE ENTRY FOR VISIBILITY AND WAYFINDING. 7. LOCATE OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT, TRASH RECEPTACLES, STORAGE, AND LOADING AREAS IN THE LEAST CONSPICUOUS PART OF THE SITE. A2.1: OUTDOOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS LOCATIONS ON A LOW ROOF IN THE COURTYARD, SO NOT TO BE SEEN FROM THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. THE TRASH IS LOCATED ALONG THE REAR OF THE SITE AND OUT OF VIEW FROM FROOM RANCH WAY. THERE ARE NO DESIGNATED LOADING AREAS, BUT SUPPLIES WILL BE DELIVERED ALONG THE REAR OF THE SITE AND OUT OF VIEW FROM THE HOTEL ENTRY. B. GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: THE GOAL IS TO PRESERVE THE HISTORIC FLAVOR OF THE COMMUNITY. (REFER TO SPECIFIC PLAN FOR MORE DIRECTION) A5.0 & A5.1: THE MATERIAL AND COLOR PALETTE ARE EARTH COLORS AND PULL ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS FROM A MODERN AGRARIAN STYLE, TO COMPLIMENT THE ADJACENT HISTORIC BUILDINGS. 2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY a. APPROPRIATE DESIGN THEME b. PROPORTIONAL BUILDING SCALE c. APPROPRIATE SETBACKS & MASS d. APPROPRIATE COLORS, TEXTURES, AND MATERIALS A5.0 & A5.1: THE MATERIAL AND COLOR PALETTE ARE EARTH COLORS AND PULL ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS FROM A MODERN AGRARIAN STYLE, TO COMPLIMENT THE ADJACENT HISTORIC BUILDINGS. THERE ARE BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MASSING TRANSITIONS AND A VARIETY OF TEXTURES AND MATERIALS. 3. DESIGN CONSISTENCY A5.0 & A5.1: THE MATERIAL AND COLOR PALETTE ARE EARTH COLORS AND PULL ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS FROM A MODERN AGRARIAN STYLE. BOTH THE SPRINGHILL SUITES AND THE RESIDENCE INN ELEVATIONS PULL FROM SIMILAR COLOR/MATERIAL PALETTES AND APPEAR AS ONE COHESIVE BUILDING. 4. FORM AND MASS A5.0 & A5.1: THE BUILDING MASSING AND PROPORTIONS PROVIDE A SENSE OF HUMAN SCALE AND THE USE OF A VARIETY OF MATERIALS, PLANE BREAKS, RECESSED WINDOWS, AWNINGS AND ROOF OVERHANGS ARTICULATE THE ELEVATIONS. 5. ROOFLINES A4.5, A5.0 & A5.1: THE USE OF BOTH FLAT ROOF WITH PARAPETS AND SHED ROOF WITH OUTLOOKER DETAILS VARY THE ROOF LINE. 6. EQUIPMENT SCREENING A6.0 & A6.1: THE SECTIONS SHOW THE EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH THE VARIOUS ROOF LINES. 7. PARAPETS A5.0 & A5.1: THE PARAPET DESIGN FINISHES EACH VERTICAL MASSING AS ONE INTEGRAL BUILDING ELEMENT. 8. ENTRIES A5.0 & A5.1: THE HOTEL ENTRY IS DEFINED BY A LARGE CANOPY AND SIGNAGE TO DRAW THE GUESTS TO THE LOBBY ENTRANCE. 9. ADDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES N/A: THERE ARE NO ADDITIONS OR EXISTING STRUCTURES. 10. BUILDING MATERIALS A5.0 & A5.1: THE MATERIALS PROPOSED ALIGN WITH A MODERN AGRARIAN STYLE WITH THE USE OF BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, LAP SIDING, STUCCO AND ACCENT TILE TO RESEMBLE CORTEN METAL. 11. WINDOWS N/A: THERE ARE NO EXISTING WINDOWS. ALL PROPOSED WINDOWS HAVE VISION GLASS AND ARE USED TO PROVIDE LIGHT AND AIR INTO THE BUILDING. 12. COLORS A5.0 & A5.1: THE BUILDING COLORS ARE EARTH TONES AND ADHERE TO A MODERN AGRARIAN ASTHETIC. COLOR CHANGES OCCUR AT MASSING TRANSITIONS AND MATERIAL CHANGES. 13. SIGNS A5.0 & A5.1: BUILDING SIGNAGE SHOWN IN THE ELEVATION FOR SCALE ON BOTH SPRINGHILL SUITES & RESIDENCE INN SIDE, ALONG WITH SIGNAGE ON THE ENTRY AWNING. C. SITE PLANNING 1. CONSIDER NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENT A2.1: THE COURTYARD ACCESS TO THE HOTEL WAS DESIGNED ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROJECT FACING THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, SO THE MASSING IS REDUCED AND MORE SUNLIGHT REACHES THE NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENT. A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION BETWEEN THE HOTEL AND NEIGHBORING SITE IS PROPOSED, AND THE VIEW OF IRISH HILLS IS MAINTAINED FROM THE NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENT. 2. BUILDING & PARKING LOCATION A2.1: THE BUILDING IS PLACED PARALLEL TO THE STREET AND AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE WITH STILL MAINTAINING FIRE ACCESS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT. THE SITE HAS A 200 FOOT WIDE NO BUILD EASEMENT, THAT WAS UTILIZED FOR THE MAJORITY OF PARKING ON SITE. A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE PROJECT TO THE NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENT IS PROVIDED TO ENCOURAGE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN ADJACENT SITES. THE PARKING ON SITE WILL BE SCREENED FROM THE STREET BY LANDSCAPE AND BERMS ALONG THE STREET. THE USE OF ENHANCED PAVING CONNECTS THE PARKING TO THE BUILDING AND DELINEATES THE DEFINES THE LOBBY ENTRANCE. 3. LANDSCAPING L1.0 & L2.0: LANDSCAPE IS USED TO SCREEN PARKING FROM THE FROOM RANCH WAY AND DALIDIO DRIVE. THERE IS A VARIETY OF TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS PROPOSED TO ENHANCE THE BUILDING AND PROVIDE VISUAL INTEREST THROUGHOUT THE SITE. 4. ON-SITE LIGHTING A2.1: SITE LIGHTING AND EXTERIOR BUILDING LIGHT FIXTURES ARE DESIGNED TO ADEQUATELY ILLUMINATE THE BUILDING, PARKING LOT AND WALKWAYS, WHILE PRESERVING THE NIGHT SKY. 5. SCREENING A2.1: A LANDSCAPE BERM IS PROPOSED ALONG BOTH FROOM RANCH WAY AND DALIDIO DRIVE TO SCREEN THE PARKING LOT FROM THE STREET. 6. REFUSE, STORAGE, AND EQUIPMENT AREAS A2.1: THE SITE TRANSFORMER WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH TREES AND SHRUBS. THE TRASH ENCLOSURE ALONG THE REAR OF THE SITE WILL BE SCREENED WITH A STUCCO WALL TO MATCH THE MAIN BUILDING AND A WOOD TRELLIS TO MATCH THE WOOD OUTLOOKERS ALONG THE ROOFLINE. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 3.7.2. COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, HOTEL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. BUILDINGS SHOULD BE ORIENTED TOWARD EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR STREETS. DESIGN SHOULD INCORPORATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, OUTDOOR SEATING, AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE. A5.0 & A5.1: THE BUILDING IS ARTICULATED ON ALL SIDES SO THERE IS NO REAR TO THE BUILDING. THERE ARE PROMINENT CORNER MASSING AND A PROJECTED CANOPY AT THE ENTRANCE TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE LOBBY ENTRY. LANDSCAPE AND SEATING AREAS ARE DESIGNED THROUGHOUT THE HOTEL COURTYARD AND A VARIETY OF LANDSCAPE ACCENTS THE BUILDING PERIMETER. SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN STANDARDS DESCRIPTION REFERENCE SHEET / DESCRIPTION OF COMPLIANCE B. OUTDOOR SPACES TO PROVIDE PLAZA SPACES WITH DEFINED EDGES, BENCHES, AND LIGHTING THAT ESTABLISH A SENSE OF PLACE. A2.1: THE HOTEL COURTYARD IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A VARIETY OF SEATING AREAS AND SPACES DEFINED BE SPECIFIC PROGRAM. THERE ARE LOUNGE AREAS, A FIRE PIT, A BBQ AREA, A FITNESS CENTER AND POOL DECK AND SEATING. C. PLAZAS, COURTYARDS, POCKET PARKS, AND OUTDOOR CAFES SHOULD BE DESIGNED IN AN INVITING MANNER THAT ENCOURAGES PEDESTRIAN USE THROUGH THE INCORPORATION OF TRELLISES, FOUNTAINS, ART, SEATING, AND SHADE TREES. A2.1: THE HOTEL COURTYARD IS DESIGNED TO DRAW THE GUEST IN WITH THE USE OF TRELLISES, LANDSCAPING, SEATING AND ACTIVITY. THE COURTYARD IS ENGAGING ON ALL SIDES WITH THE HOTEL LOBBY AND DINING AREA OPENING UP ONTO A LOUNGE AND FIRE PIT AREA, WHILE THE OPPOSITE END OF THE POOL IS ACTIVATED BY THE FITNESS CENTER. D. PUBLIC ART SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS AN ON-SITE AMENITY FOR ALL PROJECTS. A2.1: THE CLIENT WILL EITHER PROVIDE ON-SITE PUBLIC ART OR CONTRIBUTE TOWARD PUBLIC ART IN A NEIGHBORING LOCATION. BUILDING FORM A. 360-DEGREE ARCHITECTURE A5.0 & A5.1: THE BUILDING IS ARTICULATED ON ALL SIDES SO THERE IS NO REAR TO THE BUILDING. THERE ARE PROMINENT CORNER MASSING AND A PROJECTED CANOPY AT THE ENTRANCE TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE LOBBY ENTRY. EVEN THOUGH THE HOTEL HAS TWO HOTEL BRANDS, THE ELEVATION ASTHETIC IS COHESIVE ACROSS ALL SIDES. B. ROOFS COVERING THE ENTIRE BUILDING SUCH AS HIPS AND GABLES, ARE PREFERREED OVER MANSARD ROOFS. A4.5, A5.0 & A5.1: THE USE OF BOTH FLAT ROOF WITH PARAPETS AND SHED ROOF WITH OUTLOOKER DETAILS VARY THE ROOF LINE. C. THE APPEARANCE OF SEVERAL SMALLER BUILDINGS, RATHER THAN ON LARGER BUILDING. A5.0 & A5.1: THE VARIETY OF MASSING CREATES THE APPEARANCE OF SEVERAL BUILDINGS INSTEAD OF ONE MONOLITHIC BUILDING. THE COLOR AND MATERIAL VARIATIONS ALSO CREATE VISUAL INTEREST. D. VERTICAL ELEMENTS SUCH AS TOWERS SHOULD BE USED TO ACCENT HORIZONTAL MASSING AND PROVIDE VISUAL INTEREST, ESPECIALLY ON CORNER BUILDINGS. A5.0 & A5.1: STAIR TOWERS EXTEND ABOVE THE SURROUNDING ROOFLINE AND ACCENT MASSING AT THE BUILDING CORNERS CHANGE TO SHED ROOFS FOR VISUAL INTEREST. BUILDING ELEMENTS AND ARTICULATION A. HUMAN SCALE SHOULD BE CREATED THROUGH ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS. THESE ELEMENTS SHOULD BE INTEGRATED INTO THE BUILDING DESIGN. A5.0 & A5.1: THE USE OF AWNINGS AND MATERIAL CHANGES ON THE FIRST FLOOR ARE USED TO CREATE HUMAN SCALE. THE DESIGN ALSO HAS POTTED PLANTS AND BUILDING LIGHTING ALONG THE FIRST FLOOR TO MAINTAIN VISUAL INTEREST AT STREET LEVEL. B. STOREFRONT WINDOWS, DISPLAY CASES, AND OTHER ELEMENTS THAT PROVIDE VISUAL INTEREST TO FACADES SHOULD BE PROVIDED. A4.1, A5.0 & A5.1: STOREFRONT WINDOWS LINE THE FIRST FLOOR LOBBY AND DINING AREA FOR VISIBILITY INTO THE HOTEL COMMON AREAS. THERE ARE ALSO STOREFRONT ON THE COURTYARD SIDE OF THE LOBBY, SO THERE IS DIRECT LINE OF SIGHT TO THE AMENITY COURTYARD. C. DETAILS SUCH AS WALL SURFACES CONSTRUCTED WITH PATTERNS, CHANGES IN MATERIALS, BUILDING POP-OUTS, COLUMNS, AND RECESSED AREAS SHOULD BE USED TO CREATE SHADOW PATTERNS AND DEPTH ON THE WALL SURFACES. A5.0 & A5.1: AWNINGS, RECESSED WINDOWS, ROOF OVERHANGS AND MATERIALS, SUCH AS BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING CREATE SHADOWS AND DEPTH TO THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. D. BUILDING MATERIALS AND FINISHES SHOULD BE TRUE/AUTHENTIC TO THE STRUCTURE'S ARCHITECTURAL STYLE. A5.0 & A5.1: THE MATERIAL PALETTE PULLS FROM A MODERN AGRARIAN STYLE WITH THE USE OF BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING, RUSTIC TILE THAT RESEMBLES CORTEN METAL, STUCCO, AND LAP SIDING. E. BUILDING FACADES FACING PASEOS SHOULD BE ARTICULATED WITH DETAIL AND DISPLAY WINDOWS. A5.0 & A5.1: THE ELEVATIONS FACING THE STREETS HAVE A VARIETY OF COLOR AND MATERIAL CHANGES ALONG WITH ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS LIKE AWNINGS, ROOF OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES FOR VISUAL INTEREST. F. MURALS, TRELLISES, OR VINES SHOULD BE PLACED ON LARGE EXPANSES OF WALLS AT THE REAR OR SIDES OF BUILDINGS TO SOFTEN THE APPEARANCE AND CREATE VISUAL INTEREST. A5.0 & A5.1: A TRELLIS ADDS SHADE AND A SENSE OF SCALE IN THE COURTYARD FOR SEATING, WHILE VINES ARE PROPOSED AT THE LOBBY ENTRY AND SOUTH END OF THE BUILDING TO SOFTEN BUILDING MASSES. COMMERICAL PLAZAS A. OUTDOOR SPACES SHOULD HAVE CLEAR, RECOGNIZABLE SHAPES THAT REFLECT CAREFUL PLANNING AND SHOULD NOT BE A RESULT OF "LEFTOVER" AREAS BETWEEN STRUCTURES. A2.1: THE COURTYARD HAS A VARIETY OF PROGRAM FROM LOUNGE SEATING, A FIRE PIT, BBQ AREAS, POOL DECK AND SEATING, AND A FITNESS CENTER. B. SITE AMENITIES, INCLUDING BENCHES, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, PROVISIONS FOR BICYCLISTS, WATER FEATURES, AND PUBLIC ART, SHOULD BE UTILIZED AND SHOULD COMPLEMENT THE PROJECT'S ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER. A2.1: THE COURTYARD PROVIDES A VARIETY OF SEATING OPTIONS, BIKE RACKS, FIRE PITS, AND DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE FOR VISUAL INTEREST. THE FITNESS CENTER FACES THE POOL AREA WITH LARGE STOREFRONT WINDOWS FOR VISIBILITY AND TO ACTIVATE THE COURTYARD ON BOTH ENDS. C. PEDESTRIAN LINKS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE AND CONSISTENT WITH TITLE 24 AND ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. A2.1: THERE IS A STRONG CONNECTION BETWEEN THE HOTEL LOBBY / COMMON AREA AND THE COURTYARD. THERE ARE CLEAR PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS WITH DECORATIVE PAVING AND LANDSCAPING, WHICH LEAD PAST THE POOL AREA AND TO THE FITNESS CENTER. THE COURTYARD IS ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED TO BE WELL LIT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. SIDEWALK CAFES N/A: THERE ARE NO SIDEWALK CAFES PROPOSED Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A1.2 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA DESIGN CONSISTENCY MATRIX - 03/23/2020 DESIGN CONSISTENCY MATRIX -1 Item 2 Packet Page 12 3.7.2. COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, HOTEL DESIGN GUIDELINES SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN STANDARDS DESCRIPTION REFERENCE SHEET / DESCRIPTION OF COMPLIANCE LIGHTING A. PROVIDE AMBIANCE, SAFETY AND SECURITY WITHOUT SPILLOVER OR GLARE. B. APPROPRIATE LIGHTING LEVELS AND USE OF ENERGY EFFICIENT FIXTURES. C. ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING STYLE. D. ACCENT LIGHTING ON KEY ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS WITH SCREENED LIGHT SOURCES E. PEDESTRIAN AREAS, PASEOS, SIDEWALKS, AND BUILDING ENTRANCES SHOULD BE ADEQUATELY LIT TO PROVIDE SAFETY AND SECURITY. E1.0 THE BUILDING LIGHTING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE BUILDING STYLE AND THE SITE AND PARKING LOT LIGHTING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. THE FIXTURES ARE NIGHT SKY COMPLIANT. SIGNS A. SIGNS SHOULD BE TO SCALE AND IN PROPORTION WITH PRIMARY BUILDING FACADES. B. SHOULD REFLECT THE TYPE OF BUSINESS THROUGH DESIGN, SHAPE, OR GRAPHIC FORM. C. THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT SHOULD BE INTEGRATED INTO OVERALL SIGN DESIGN. D. SIGNS SHOULD NOT COVER UP WINDOWS OR IMPORTANT ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. E. WHERE SEVERAL TENANTS OCCUPY THE SAME SITE, INDIVIDUAL WALL MOUNTED SIGNS SHOULD BE USED IN COMBINATION WITH A MONUMENT SIGN IDENTIFYING THE DEVELOPMENT AND ADDRESS. F. FLUSH MOUNTED SIGNS SHOULD BE POSITIONED WITHIN ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES SUCH AS THE WINDOW PANEL ABOVE THE STOREFRONT OF FLANKING THE DOORWAY. G. PROJECT ARCHITECT SHOULD BE CONSULTED WHEN PREPARIING A SIGNAGE PROGRAM TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROJECT ARCHITECTURE AND CHARACTER. H. SIGN CONSTRUCTION SHOULD REFLECT A HIGH LEVEL OF CRAFTSMANSHIP. A7.1 THE SIGNAGE ON THE BUILDING FACADE AND THE MONUMENT SIGNAGE IS PROPORTIONATE TO THE BUILDING AND REFLECTS THE BRAND STANDARDS FOR THE HOTEL. THE SIGNAGE IS THOUGHTFULLY PLACED TO BE CENTERED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL MASSING AND IS INTEGRATED INTO THE HOTEL DESIGN. THE SIGNAGE IS DESIGNED AS INDIVIDUAL LETTERING FOR A CLEAN ASTHETIC. BUILDING MATERIALS A. BUILDING MATERIALS SHOULD CONSIST OF AUTHENTIC MATERIALS COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE BUILDING. B. SMOOTH PLASTER FINISHES ARE PREFERRED OVER ROUGH, TEXTURED STUCCO. STUCCO MAY BE USED IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER MATERIALS SUCH AS SIDING AND BRICK. A5.0 & A5.1 A VARIETY OF MATERIALS ARE PROPOSED ON THE ELEVATIONS, WHICH INCLUDE SMOOTH STUCCO, BOARD & BATTEN SIDING, LAP SIDING, AND TILE. EXTERIOR COLORS A. EXTERIOR COLORS SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE BUILDING. COLOR SCHEMES THAT INVOLVE A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) COLORS SHOULD BE UTILIZED. B. DIFFERENT COLORS ACCENTUATING DIFFERENT ASPECTS AND DETAILS OF THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE SHOULD BE UTILIZED. EXCEPT FOR ACCENTING DIFFERENT ASPECTS AND DETAILS OF A BUILDING, BRIGHT COLORS SHOULD BE AVOIDED. C. CERTAIN MATERIALS, SUCH AS STONE AND BRICK, HAVE DISTINCT COLORING IN THEIR NATURAL STATE AND SHOULD BE THOUGHT OF AS AN ELEMENT OF THE COLOR PALATTE USED. A5.0 & A5.1 THE COLORS OF THE BUILDING ARE EARTH TONES AND FOLLOW A MODERN AGRARIAN STYLE PER THE SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN STANDARDS. THE MASSING IS HIGHLIGHTED THROUGH THE USE OF DIFFERENT COLORS AND MATERIALS, WHICH ACCENTUATES THE ARCHITECTURE. UTILITARIAN ASPECTS OF BUILDINGS A. OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS, INCLUDING TRASH AND RECYCLING, SHOULD BE LOCATED TO THE REAR OR SIDES OF A BUILDING AND SHOULD BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW WITH WALLS, BERMS, OR LANDSCAPING. B. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF OR GROUND, INCLUDING AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEATERS, SHOULD BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW. SCREENING ELEMENTS SHOULD BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE IN COLOR, SHAPE, SIZE, AND MATERIAL WITH THE PRIMARY BUILDING AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY INTEGRATED INTO THE OVERALL BUILDING DESIGN. C. UTILITY SERVICE AREAS, SUCH AS ELECTRICAL PANELS, SHOULD BE PLACED WITHIN ENCLOSURES THAT ARE ARCHITECTURALLY INTEGRATED INTO THE BUILDING DESIGN. D. TRASH ENCLOSURES AND LOADING AREAS SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH PRIMARY BUILDING. E. TRASH ENCLOSURES SHOULD BE COMBINED WITH OTHER BUILDINGS WHERE POSSIBLE. F. A PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO THE TRASH ENCLOSURE SHOULD BE PROVIDED SO THE LARGE ACCESS GATES DO NOT HAVE TO BE OPENED AS OFTEN. G. SHEET METAL VENTS, PIPE STACKS, AND FLASHING SHOULD BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT ROOF OR WALL MATERIAL. H. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING SHOULD BE DECORATIVE OR DESIGNED TO INTEGRATE WITH THE BUILDING FACADE. I. ROOF ACCESS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. A2.1 THE TRASH ENCLOSURE IS SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW BY LANDSCAPE, AND THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED ON THE ROOF AND SCREENED FROM VIEW. THE SCREENS WILL MATCH THE PRIMARY BUILDING FACADE. A4.1 THE UTILITY SERVICE AREAS ARE PLACED IN THE MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, WHICH IS WITHIN THE MAIN BUILDING AND PART OF THE OVERALL ELEVATIONS. A7.0 THE TRASH ENCLOSURE ARE DESIGNED TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE MAIN BUILDING. THERE IS A PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO THE TRASH ENCLOSURE, SO THE LARGE ACCESS GATES ARE ONLY OPENED ON TRASH PICK- UP DAY. ALL VENTS, PIPE STACKS AND FLASHING WILL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ADJACENT COLOR OR MATERIAL. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS, WILL BE DECORATIVE IN NATURE. A4.5 THE ROOF ACCESS STAIR IS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. PARKING LOT DESIGN AND SCREENING A. PARKING SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OF BUILDINGS. B. LARGE AREAS OF PARKING SHOULD BE AVOIDED. IT IS PREFERABLE TO CREATE SMALL, CONNECTED PARKING LOTS UTILIZING SHARED DRIVEWAYS, PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS, AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. C. PARKING LOTS SHOULD PROVIDE AREAS FOR BICYCLE AND MOTORCYLE PARKING AND ARE ENCOURAGED TO INCORPORATE ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS. D. DECORATIVE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING WILL ENHANCE PARKING AREAS AND REDUCE THE VISUAL IMPACT. E. PARKING AREAS ABUTTING A PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR STREET SHOULD PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE STOP OR PLANTER THAT INCLUDES A COMBINATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS. F. PATTERNS AND COLORS SHOULD BE INSTALLED IN PAVING TREATMENTS USING TILE, BRICK, OR TEXTURED CONCRETE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CLEAR IDENTIFICATION OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINTS INTO BUILDINGS AND TO HIGHLIGHT PARKING FEATURES. A2.1 THE PARKING LOT IS LOCATED TO THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING WHEN ENTERING THE SITE DUE TO A 200 FOOT NO- BUILD EASEMENT. THIS EASEMENT DROVE THE PLACEMENT OF THE BUILDING WITH FIRE ACCESS AROUND THE BUILDING AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT. L1.0 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS A VARIATY OF TREES AND SHRUBS ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF BOTH FROOM RANCH WAY AND DALIDIO DRIVE TO PROVIDE A BUFFER BETWEEN THE PUBLIC WAY AND THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT. LANDCAPING IS ALSO PROVIDED ALONG A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE BUILDING THROUGH THE PARKING LOT AND AT THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE ADJACENT COMMERCIAL SITE. E1.0 DECORATIVE SITE LIGHTING IS PROPOSED TO ENHANCE THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL AS WELL AS TIE INTO THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. A2.1 ENHANCED PAVING IS PROPOSED FROM THE SITE ENTRY ALONG THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE HOTEL TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINTS INTO THE BUILDING. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION A. DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL AREA OF SAN LUIS RANCH SHOULD PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING PER THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO'S STANDARDS. B. BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD BE CONVENIENT, BUT SHOULD NOT CONFLICT WITH PEDESTRIAN OR AUTO CIRCULATION. C. ALL BUILDINGS WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL AREA OF SAN LUIS RANCH SHOULD PROVIDE PAVED ACCESS TO THE STORES FROM ADJACENT WALKS ALONG PARKWAYS AND STREETS. A2.1 BICYCLE PARKING IS LOCATED NEAR THE COURTYARD AND ALONG THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE ADJACENT COMMERCIAL SITE. PROJECT LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE A. LANDSCAPING WILL BE COMPRISED OF THE PLANTS LISTED IN TABLE 3-12. B. TREES AND SHRUBS SHOULD BE LOCATED AND SPACED IN ALLOW FOR MATURE AND LONG-TERM GROWTH. C. TREES SHOULD BE SELECTED BASED ON PERFORMANCE BASIS WITH THE OBJECTIVE OF PRODUCING FRUIT, MINIMIZING WATER USE, PROVIDING SHADE, MINIMIZING HAZARDOUS LITTER, MINIMIZING ROOT INTRUSION, AND PROVIDING COLOR AND CONTRAST. D. VINES AND POTTED PLANTS SHOULD BE INCORPORATED TO PROVIDE WALL, COLUMN, AND POST TEXTURE AND COLOR, AS WELL AS FOR ACCENTUATING ENTRYWAYS, COURTYARDS, AND SIDEWALKS. E. PLANTINGS SHOULD BE USED TO SCREEN OR SEPARATE LESS DESIRABLE AREAS FROM PUBLIC VIEW, SUCH AS TRASH ENCLOSURES, PARKING AREAS, STORAGE AREAS, LOADING AREAS, AND PUBLIC UTILITIES. F. A MINIMUM 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. L1.0 THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PALETTE IS BASED ON THE LIST IN TABLE 3-12 OF THE SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN. TREE AND SHRUB SELECTION AND PLACEMENT ARE PROVIDED FOR MATURE AND LONG-TERM GROWTH. THERE ARE A VARIETY OF TREES AND SHRUBS PROPOSED TO ADD COLOR AND CONTRAST TO THE HOTEL AND SITE. VINES AND POTTED PLANTS ARE PROPOSED AROUND THE HOTEL EXTERIOR AS WELL AS THE COURTYARD IN COMBINATION WITH IN-GROUND PLANTERS. THE LANDSCAPE IS DESIGNED ALONG THE FRONTAGES OF FROOM RANCH WAY AND DALIDIO DRIVE TO SCREEN THE PARKING LOT AND PUBLIC UTILITIES, AS WELL AS THE TRASH ENCLOSURE IN THE REAR OF THE SITE. LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATES ALL AREASTO BE COVERED AND INCLUDES AREA CALCULATION DEMONSTRATING THAT LANDSCAPE EXCEEDS 20%; REFER TO NOTE, SHEET L1.0 AND WELO CALCULATION, SHEET L2.0. STREET FRONTAGE LANDSCAPE SCREENING IS PROPOSED TO BE GROUND COVERS, SHRUBS AND TREES; BERMS ARE NOT NEEDED TO ACHIEVE DESIRED SCREENING AND VISIBILITY. PLANT PALETTE, PROPOSED TREE SIZE AND CHARACTER, AND OTHER LANDSCAPE MATERIALS ARE DEMONSTRATED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS; REFER TO SHEETS L1.0 AND L2.0. FOR FENCING, REFER TO A2.1 FOR POOL ENCLOSURE. SCREEN WALLS AND FENCES A. WHERE SERVING AS A VISUAL OR NOISE BARRIER FOR ENCLOSURE OF STORAGE AREAS, OPEN WORK AREAS, OR REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS, WALL AND FENCE HEIGHTS AND MATERIALS SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE THAT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC STREETS ARE PROTECTED FROM VISUAL OR NOISE IMPACTS. B. PARKING AREAS SHOULD BE SCREENED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE FROM OUTSIDE STREETS. THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH THE USE OF LOW WALLS, HEDGES, BERMS AND GRADE CHANGES. THIS SCREENING DOES NOT NEED TO OBSURE SIGHT LINES TO COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES. C. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF WALLS AND FENCES SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY CODE AND SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBMITTAL. L1.0 LANDSCAPE IS USED TO SCREEN THE PARKING LOTS ALONG THE TWO FRONTAGES AND THE TRASH ENCLOSURE. NOISE A. NOISE SHOULD BE MINIMIZED AS PRACTICAL TO REDUCE IMPACTS ON ADJACENT USES. THE FOLLOWING MITIGATION MEASURES RELATE TO NOISE FOR THE SPECIFICIED BUILDING TYPES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN APPENDIX B. - N-4(b). PARKING LOT/LOADING DOCK ORIENTATION AND NOISE BARRIER. - N-5(a). INTERIOR NOISE REDUCTION. - N-5(b). RESIDENTIAL OUTDOOR ACTIVITY AREA NOISE ATTENUATION. - N-5(d). U.S. HIGHWAY 101 NOISE BARRIER AT HOTEL. REFER TO THE ACOUSTICAL REPORT FOR NOISE IMPACTS ON THE SITE. THE USE OF PERIMETER TREES SCREEN NOISE FROM U.S. HIGHWAY 101 ALONG THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY LINE. THE LOADING AREA IS ALONG THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE TRASH ENCLOSURE AND THE DELIVERY SCHEDULE IS MINIMAL DUE TO NOT KITCHEN AT THE HOTEL. REFER TO THE ACOUSTICAL REPORT FOR NORMAL NOISE LEVELS IN THE COURTYARD, SINCE THE BUILDING SCREENS THE COURTYARD FROM THE HIGHWAY. Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A1.3 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA DESIGN CONSISTENCY MATRIX - 03/23/2020 DESIGN CONSISTENCY MATRIX -2 Item 2 Packet Page 13 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A1.4 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA GARBAGE COMPANY LETTER - 03/23/2020 Item 2 Packet Page 14 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A2.0 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT NO SCALESAN LUIS OBISPO, CA EXISTING SITE PLAN - 03/23/2020 GENERAL NOTES EXISTING & DEMOLITION PLAN FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CHAPTER 33. THIS CHAPTER PRESCRIBES MINIMUM SAFEGUARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS TO PROVIDE REASONABLE SAFETY TO LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE DURING SUCH OPERATIONS. -SEE SURVEY FOR MORE INFORMATION ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH Item 2 Packet Page 15 PARKING 198 SPACES POOL / LANDSCAPED COURTYARD TRASH F R O O M R A N C H W A Y DALIDIO DRIVENO BUILD EASEMENT 200'-0" WIDE SPRINGHILL SUITES RESIDENCE INN 36 6 25 7 17 12 5 23 2221 25 HOTEL DROP OFF/ PICK UPPROPERTY LINE 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT MONUMENT ENTRY SIGN PEDESTRIAN PATH PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION/ ENHANCED PAVING 4M 6M (10) LONG TERM BICYCLE LOCKERS SMOKING AREA 40'-8" 9 '-0 "5 '-0"9 '-0 "9'-0"8'-0"TYP. 16'-0" TYP. 24'-0"16'-0"26'-0"26'-0" 24'-0"24'-0"16'-0"EV CAPABLE TYP.8'-7"10' STREET TREE EASEMENT9'-0"5'-0"9'-0"18'-0"26'-0"S 2 9 °08'1 4 "W 31 5 .5 2'S48°31'05"E308.18'S43°28'47"W 9.25' S88°28'47"W 14.14' S43°28'47"W 20.11' S55°08'09"W 34.54' N16°44'15"W 20.62' N56°54'33"E 22.84' N35°20'07"E 431.69' ∆=20.19 L=95.50' R=271.00' ∆ =21.99 L=28.70' R=74.79'∆=51.78L=30.73'R=34.00'∆=10.42L=122.35'R=672.58'∆=6.06L=68.86'R=650.50'∆=5.87L=78.83'R=770.00'LOADING (8) SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING 18'-0"9'-0"18'-0"18'-0" ENHANCED PAVING NO PARKING - FIRE LANE NO PARKING - FIRE LANE NO PARKING - FIRE LANE FIRE SPRINKLER FLOOR CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE CO-LOCATED IN THE RISER ROOM (4) SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING CABANAS GENERATOR 11'-6"14'-5 1/2" OUTDOOR FITNESS (4) SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING 24'-0"10'-0"(4) SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING EV CAPABLEEV CAPABLE16'-0" 7'-0" 34'-3"53'-9 1/2"7'-0"9'-4"18'-0 1/2"11'-11"TRANSFORMER Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A2.1 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 1" = 20'SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN - 03/23/2020 PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH -FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE CIVIL FOR MORE INFORMATION Item 2 Packet Page 16 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A3.0 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA PERSPECTIVES - 03/23/2020VIEW FROM NORTH (HOTEL ENTRY) Item 2 Packet Page 17 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A3.1 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA PERSPECTIVES - 03/23/2020VIEW FROM WEST (SPRINGHILL SUITES) Item 2 Packet Page 18 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A3.2 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA PERSPECTIVES - 03/23/2020VIEW FROM EAST (RESIDENCE INN) Item 2 Packet Page 19 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A3.3 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA PERSPECTIVES - 03/23/2020VIEW FROM SOUTH (RESIDENCE INN) Item 2 Packet Page 20 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A3.4 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA PERSPECTIVES - 03/23/2020VIEW OF AMENITY COURTYARD AND POOL Item 2 Packet Page 21 1 A5.0 3 A5.0 2 A5.1 1 A5.1 3 A5.2 SS KING 101 SS KING 103 SS DBL QUEEN 107 SS DBL QUEEN 111 SS DBL QUEEN 113 SS KING 119 SS KING 104 SS KING 106 SS DBL QUEEN 112 RI 1-BEDROOM 154 RI DBL QUEEN 152 RI DBL QQ w/MOBILITY FEATURES 150 RI STUDIO 148 RI STUDIO 146 RI 1-BEDROOM 155 RI 1-BEDROOM 153 RI STUDIO W/MOBILITY FEATURES 151 RI STUDIO 149 RI STUDIO 147 RI STUDIO 144 RI STUDIO 142 RI STUDIO 140 RI STUDIO 141 RI STUDIO 143 RI STUDIO 145 STAIR #1 CORRIDOR #4 153 SF HOUSEKEEPING 283 SF ENGINEER'S OFFICE 192 SF M RESTROOM 185 SF OFFICE 117 SF F.F. 453 SF MEETING ROOM POOL FIRE PIT 1 A6.1 SS KING 105 1 A5.2 2 A5.2 2 A6.1 1 A6.0 2 A6.0 SS DBL QUEEN 109 SS DBL QUEEN 108 SS DBL QUEEN 110 SS DBL QUEEN 114 SS DBL QUEEN 116 SS KING W/MOBILITY FEATURES 118 SS DBL QUEEN W/MOBILITY FEATURES 117 SS DBL QUEEN 115 166 SF STO. 869 SF FITNESS 2790 SF LOBBY TYP. 22'-3" TYP. 23'-1" 362 SF ELECT./ RISER STAIR #2 TYP. 15'-7"TYP. 15'-7" 372 SF MECH. ICE DISP. 191 SF GUEST LAUNDRY 230 SF W RESTROOM 156 SF PANTRY 1432 SF DINING DRYERS 79 SF ELECT. 103 SF GM OFFICE 66 SF AGM 133 SF SALES 120 SF MDF/STG. 40 SF STOR. 63 SF REST. 63 SF REST. 277 SF POOL EQUIP. 112 SF MARKET 354 SF FOOD PREP 478 SF EMP. LOUNGE 294 SF VESTIBULE/ CART STOR. CORRIDOR #1 SS KING 120 GENERATOR ELEV. LOBBY CORRIDOR #2 CORRIDOR #3 209 SF CHECK-IN 62 SF ENG. STG. 51 SF ELEV. CTRL. 66 SF LINEN 324 SF BUFFET 693 SF HOUSE LAUNDRY STAIR #3 COMMON AREA CORRIDOR OFFICE/MANGER RI 1-BD RI STUDIO SS DBL QUEEN SS KING UTILITY OUTDOOR FITNESS OFFICE GUEST ROOMS:200 GUEST ROOM MIX: SPRINGHILL SUITES KING 44 ROOMS (22%) DOUBLE QUEEN 47 ROOMS (23%) RESIDENCE INN STUDIO 93 ROOMS (47%) 1-BEDROOM 16 ROOMS (8%) TOTAL GUEST ROOMS: 200 ROOMS Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A4.1 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 3/32" = 1'-0"SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA FIRST FLOOR PLAN - 03/23/2020 UNIT COUNT FIRST FLOOR PLAN ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH LEGEND Item 2 Packet Page 22 1 A5.0 3 A5.0 2 A5.1 1 A5.1 3 A5.2 ROOF BELOW SS KING 201 SS KING 203 SS KING 205 SS DBL QUEEN 207 SS DBL QUEEN 209 SS DBL QUEEN 211 SS DBL QUEEN 213 SS DBL QUEEN 215 SS DBL QUEEN W/MOBILITY FEATURES 217 SS KING 219 SS KING 221 SS DBL QUEEN 223 SS KING 224 SS KING 202 SS KING 204 STAIR #1 SS DBL QUEEN 208 SS DBL QUEEN 210 SS DBL QUEEN 212 SS DBL QUEEN 214 SS DBL QUEEN 216 SS KING 218 SS KING 220 SS KING 222 ENTRY AWNING BELOW COURTYARD BELOW 1 A6.1 RI 1-BEDROOM 254 STAIR #2 RI DBL QUEEN 252 RI DBL QQ w/MOBILITY FEATURES 250 RI STUDIO 248 RI STUDIO 246 RI STUDIO 244 RI STUDIO 242 RI STUDIO 240 RI STUDIO 238 ELEV. RI STUDIO 237 RI STUDIO 239 RI STUDIO 241 RI STUDIO 243 RI STUDIO 247 RI STUDIO 249 RI STUDIO 251 RI 1-BEDROOM 253 RI 1-BEDROOM 255 RI STUDIO 245 RI STUDIO 236 RI STUDIO 235 RI STUDIO 233 RI STUDIO 231 RI STUDIO 232 RI STUDIO 230 RI STUDIO 229 RI STUDIO 227 RI STUDIO 228 RI STUDIO 226 1 A5.2 2 A5.2 2 A6.1 1 A6.02 A6.0 137 SF ELECT. RI STUDIO 225 211 SF LINEN CORRIDOR #3CORRIDOR #4 CORRIDOR #2 SS KING 206 153 SF HOUSE-KEEPING CORRIDOR #1 STAIR #3 94 SF IDF RI STUDIO 234 ICE CORRIDOR RI 1-BD RI STUDIO SS DBL QUEEN SS KING UTILITY Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A4.2 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 3/32" = 1-0"SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SECOND FLOOR PLAN - 03/23/2020 SECOND FLOOR PLAN ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH LEGEND Item 2 Packet Page 23 1 A5.0 3 A5.0 2 A5.1 1 A5.1 3 A5.2 1 A6.1 SS KING 301 SS KING 303 SS KING 305 SS DBL QUEEN 307 SS DBL QUEEN 309 SS DBL QUEEN 311 SS DBL QUEEN 313 SS DBL QUEEN 315 SS DBL QUEEN 317 SS KING 319 SS KING 321 SS DBL QUEEN 323 SS KING 324 SS KING 304 137 SF ELECT. SS KING 306 SS DBL QUEEN 308 SS DBL QUEEN 310 SS DBL QUEEN 312 SS DBL QUEEN 314 SS DBL QUEEN 316 SS KING 318 SS KING 320 SS KING 322 RI STUDIO334 RI 1-BEDROOM 354 STAIR #2 153 SF HOUSE-KEEPING RI DBL QUEEN 352 RI DBL QUEEN 350 RI STUDIO 348 RI STUDIO 346 RI STUDIO 344 RI STUDIO 342 RI STUDIO 340 RI STUDIO 338 94 SF DATA RI STUDIO 337 RI STUDIO 339 RI STUDIO 341 RI STUDIO 343RI STUDIO 347 RI STUDIO 349 RI STUDIO W/MOBILITY FEATURES 351 RI 1-BEDROOM 353 RI 1-BEDROOM 355 RI STUDIO 345 RI STUDIO 336 RI STUDIO 335 RI STUDIO 333 RI STUDIO 331 RI STUDIO 332 RI STUDIO 330 RI STUDIO 329 RI STUDIO 327 RI STUDIO 328 RI STUDIO 326 1 A5.2 2 A5.2 2 A6.1 1 A6.02 A6.0 211 SF LINEN CORRIDOR #2 CORRIDOR #4 RI STUDIO 325 STAIR #1 CORRIDOR #1 SS KING 302 ICE CORRIDOR #3 RI STUDIO 334 STAIR #3 ELEV. CORRIDOR RI 1-BD RI STUDIO SS DBL QUEEN SS KING UTILITY Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A4.3 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA THIRD FLOOR PLAN - 03/23/2020 THIRD FLOOR PLAN ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH LEGEND Item 2 Packet Page 24 1 A5.0 3 A5.0 2 A5.1 1 A5.1 3 A5.2 1 A6.1 SS KING 401 SS KING 403 SS KING 405 SS DBL QUEEN 407 SS DBL QUEEN 409 SS DBL QUEEN 411 SS DBL QUEEN 413 SS DBL QUEEN 415 SS DBL QUEEN 417 SS KING 419 SS KING 421 SS DBL QUEEN 423 SS KING 424 SS KING 404 SS KING 406 SS DBL QUEEN 408 SS DBL QUEEN 410 SS DBL QUEEN 412 SS DBL QUEEN 414 SS DBL QUEEN 416 SS KING W/MOBILITY FEATURES 418 SS KING 420 SS KING 422 RI STUDIO 434 RI 1-BEDROOM 454 STAIR #2 153 SF HOUSE-KEEPING RI DBL QUEEN 452 RI DBL QUEEN 450 RI STUDIO 448 RI STUDIO 446 RI STUDIO 444 RI STUDIO 442 RI STUDIO 440 RI STUDIO 438 94 SF DATA RI STUDIO 437 RI STUDIO 439 RI STUDIO 441 RI STUDIO 443RI STUDIO 447 RI STUDIO 449RI STUDIO 451 RI 1-BEDROOM 453 RI 1-BEDROOM 455 RI STUDIO 445 RI STUDIO 436 RI STUDIO 435 RI STUDIO 433 RI STUDIO 431 RI STUDIO 432 RI STUDIO 430 RI STUDIO 429 RI STUDIO 427 RI STUDIO 428 RI STUDIO 426 RI STUDIO 425 1 A5.2 2 A5.2 2 A6.1 1 A6.0 2 A6.0 2 A7.2 4 A7.2 1 A7.2 5 A7.2 211 SF LINEN STAIR #1 ICE ELECT. CORRIDOR #1 CORRIDOR #2 CORRIDOR #3CORRIDOR #4 STAIR #3 SS KING 402 ELEV. CORRIDOR RI 1-BD RI STUDIO SS DBL QUEEN SS KING UTILITY 3 A7.2 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A4.4 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA FOURTH FLOOR PLAN - 03/23/2020 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH LEGEND Item 2 Packet Page 25 ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN CENTER OF ROOF & SCREENED FROM VIEW ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN CENTER OF ROOF & SCREENED FROM VIEW STAIR ROOF ELEV ROOF 2" / 12" 1 1/2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12" 2" / 12" 2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"ROOF ACCESS STAIR ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN CENTER OF ROOF & SCREENED FROM VIEW Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A4.5 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA ROOF PLAN - 03/23/2020 ROOF PLAN ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH Item 2 Packet Page 26 FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH TILE DOUBLE WINDOW TRIM LAP SIDING STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH ACCENT STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH TILE STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS AT SHED ROOFS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING AWNINGS AT BOARD & BATTEN AREAS WINDOW TRIM ALUMINUM STOREFRONT EXPOSED RAFTERS UNDER PORTE COCHERE CANOPYAWNINGS OVER SMOKING & SEATING AREA T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE 23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9"6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"BRAND SIGNAGE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING BRAND SIGNAGE FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR 15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 1 50'-0" BOARD & BATTEN SIDING STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH ACCENT STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISHDOUBLE WINDOW TRIM STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH ACCENT STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH TILE ACCENT STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS AT SHED ROOFS LAP SIDING ALUMINUM WINDOWS WITH INTEGRAL PTAC LOUVER, TYPICAL ON SS SIDE ACCENT STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH ALUMINUM STOREFRONTEXPOSED RAFTERS UNDER PORTE COCHERE CANOPY STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH 14'-1"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6".6'-8".T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"BRAND SIGNAGE BRAND SIGNAGE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A5.0 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 3/32" = 1'-0"SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA BUILDING ELEVATIONS - 03/23/2020ELEVATION - NORTH (FRONT) ELEVATION - WEST (SS) Item 2 Packet Page 27 FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR 35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" ACCENT STUCCO TILE STUCCO TILE EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS AT SHED ROOFS T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9"6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"CABANAS AT POOL DECK GENERATOR ENCLOSURE BIKE LOCKERS STUCCO ACCENT STUCCO TILE FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" BOARD & BATTEN SIDING TILE ACCENT STUCCODOUBLE WINDOW TRIM STUCCO LAP SIDING ACCENT STUCCO TILE EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS AT SHED ROOFSSTUCCO AWNINGS AT BOARD & BATTEN AREAS WINDOW TRIM ACCENT STUCCO TILE STUCCO ACCENT STUCCO T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9"6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"BRAND SIGNAGE Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A5.1 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 3/32" = 1'-0"SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA BUILDING ELEVATIONS - 03/23/2020ELEVATION - SOUTH (ENDS) ELEVATION - EAST (RI) Item 2 Packet Page 28 FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" DOUBLE WINDOW TRIM STUCCO ACCENT STUCCO TILE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9"6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" DOUBLE WINDOW TRIMSTUCCOLAP SIDING ACCENT STUCCO STUCCO EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS AT SHED ROOFS AWNINGS AT BOARD & BATTEN AREAS ACCENT STUCCO T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9"6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" ACCENT STUCCO DOUBLE WINDOW TRIM STUCCO LAP SIDING ACCENT STUCCO TILE EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS AT SHED ROOFS BOARD & BATTEN SIDING STUCCO WINDOW TRIM TILE T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"14'-1"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"6'-5"TILE Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A5.2 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA BUILDING ELEVATIONS - 03/23/2020 ELEVATION - COURTYARD LOBBYELEVATION - COURTYARD - EAST (SS) ELEVATION - COURTYARD - WEST (RI) Item 2 Packet Page 29 FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" SS DBL QUEEN LOBBY RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIORI STUDIO RI STUDIO T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9" RI STUDIOSS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN FITNESS SALESAGMMARKETVESTIBULE/ CART STOR. MECH.6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"RI STUDIO ELEV. LOBBY FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING RI DBL QUEEN RI DBL QUEEN RI DBL QQ w/MOBILITY FEATURES RI DBL QQ w/MOBILITY FEATURES RI STUDIO RI STUDIO W/MOBILITY FEATURES RI STUDIO RI STUDIO W/MOBILITY FEATURES COURTYARD T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1"6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"SS KING SS KING Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A6.0 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 3/32" = 1'-0"SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA BUILDING SECTIONS - 03/23/2020 SECTION B SECTION B1 Item 2 Packet Page 30 FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 1 50'-0" RI 1-BEDROOM RI 1-BEDROOM RI 1-BEDROOM RI 1-BEDROOM RI 1-BEDROOM RI 1-BEDROOM RI 1-BEDROOM RI 1-BEDROOM RI STUDIO W/MOBILITY FEATURES RI STUDIO RI STUDIO W/MOBILITY FEATURES RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO RI STUDIO T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1"6'-5"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"14'-1"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"FITNESSGUEST LAUNDRYEMP. LOUNGE FIRST FLOOR 0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0" SS KING SS DBL QUEEN SS KING SS KING SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN STAIR #2 SS KING SS KING SS KING MEETING ROOM SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN W/MOBILITY FEATURES SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KING SS KINGELECT./ RISER SS DBL QUEEN SS DBL QUEEN W/MOBILITY FEATURES SS DBL QUEEN T.O. FIRST FLR PLATE14'-1" T.O. 2ND FLR PLATE23'-11" T.O. THIRD FLR PLATE33'-9" FIRST FLOOR 0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR 0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF 8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1" FIRST FLOOR0" ROOF8'-1"14'-1"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"1'-4"8'-6"6'-5"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"MECH. Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A6.1 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 3/32" = 1'-0"SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA BUILDING SECTIONS - 03/23/2020 SECTION A SECTION A1 Item 2 Packet Page 31 FIRST FLOOR0" SECOND FLOOR15'-5" THIRD FLOOR25'-3" FOURTH FLOOR35'-1" ROOF T.O. PLATE43'-7" T.O. PARAPET 150'-0"MAX. BUILDING HT.50'-0"NO BUILD EASEMENT 200'-0" WIDE 15' HEIGHT LIMIT DALIDIO DRIVEHOTEL DROP OFF/ PICK UP Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A6.2 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SITE SECTION - 03/23/2020 SITE SECTION - NO BUILD ZONE Item 2 Packet Page 32 2 A7.0 3 A7.0 ROOF OF ENCLOSURE ABOVE, SHOWN DASHED CONCRETE APRON SURFACE (2) 6'-0" HIGH CORRUGATED METAL GATE 6" Ø STEEL PIPE, CONC. FILLED BOLLARDS 1% MIN. SLOPE TRASH ENCLOSURE 10" CURB STOP (1) 4 CU. YD. TRASH BIN (1) 4 CU. YD. RECYCLE BIN (1) 64 GALLON ORGANICS BIN 1'-0"1'-0"21'-10"11'-10"WOOD TRELLISPAINTED FINISH AT INTERIOR OF C.M.U. BLOCK WALL ACCENT STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH AT EXTERIOR OF C.M.U. BLOCK WALL 6'-0"4'-0"10'-10 1/2"ACCENT STUCCO, SMOOTH FINISH AT EXTERIOR OF C.M.U. BLOCK WALL WOOD TRELLIS 6" Ø STEEL PIPE, CONC. FILLED BOLLARDS4'-0"6'-0"10'-10 1/2"Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A7.0 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SITE DETAILS - 03/23/2020 TRASH ENCLOSURE NORTH ELEVATIONEAST ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN 0'1'2'4'8' Item 2 Packet Page 33 A7.2 1 A7.2 3 A7.2 4 A7.2 2 A7.2 7 A7.2 5 A7.2 7 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A7.1 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT -SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SIGNAGE PROGRAM - 03/23/2020 BLDG SIGN LOCATION - NORTH ELEVATION BLDG SIGN LOCATIONS - EAST ELEVATION BLDG SIGN LOCATION - SOUTH ELEVATION BLDG SIGN LOCATION - WEST ELEVATION Item 2 Packet Page 34 FABRICATED ALUM. CABINET PAINTED TO MATCH PMS 425C GRAY (SATIN FINISH) RAISED METAL LETTERING, PER BRAND STANDARDS LEDGER STONE BASE 6'-0"6"7'-6"6" 8'-6"4'-10"2"1'-0"ILLUMINATION FROM ABOVE 4'-10"2"9"5'-9"2'-6" 6"1'-6"6"2'-0"8"3'-4"16'-10" T.O. SIGN 48'-6" T.O. SIGN 46'-10" INDIVIDUAL LED CHANNEL LETTERING, PER BRAND STANDARDS 2'-0"9"3'-3"25'-4" SPECIFIC PLAN ALLOWED SIGNAGE AREA MONUMENT (1 PER STREET FRONTAGE) 24 SF WALL SIGN (3 ADDITIONAL, 2 SIGNS FOR PORTE COCHERE) 50 SF EA. ACTUAL SIGNAGE AREA SURFACE SIGN #1 (SPRINGHILL SUITES)50.0 SF SURFACE SIGN #2 (SPRINGHILL SUITES)50.0 SF SURFACE SIGN #3 (RESIDENCE INN)50.0 SF SURFACE SIGN #4 (RESIDENCE INN)50.0 SF SURFACE SIGN #5 (RESIDENCE INN)50.0 SF MONUMENT SIGN 17.2 SF FRO OM RAN CH WAY DALIDIO DRIVESPRINGHILL SUITES RESIDENCE INN SURFACE SIGNAGE #1 SURFACE SIGNAGE #2 SURFACE SIGNAGE #4 SURFACE SIGNAGE #5 MONUMENT SIGNAGE SURFACE SIGNAGE #3 15'-7"2'-0"2'-0"9"6'-4"T.O. SIGN 45'-6" T.O. SIGN 47'-4" 16'-10"3'-4"8"2'-0"INDIVIDUAL LED CHANNEL LETTERING, PER BRAND STANDARDS T.O. SIGN 45'-2" 16'-10"2'-0"8"3'-4"Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A7.2 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT 1/4" = 1'-0"SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SIGNAGE PROGRAM - 03/23/2020 MONUMENT SIGNAGE SURFACE SIGNAGE (RI) = 50 SF EA. SIGNAGE INFORMATION KEY PLAN ACTUAL NORTH PROJECT NORTH SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SURFACE SIGNAGE (SS) = 50 SF EA. SURFACE SIGNAGE #1 SURFACE SIGNAGE #2 SURFACE SIGNAGE #4 SURFACE SIGNAGE #5SURFACE SIGNAGE #3 Item 2 Packet Page 35 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A8.0 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT -SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA COLORS & MATERIALS - 03/23/2020 COLORS & MATERIALS P-1: PAINTED BOARD & BATTEN SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2819 -"DOWNING SLATE" P-2: PAINTED LAP SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2843 -"ROYCROFT BRASS" P-3: PAINTED PANEL SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7105 -"PAPERWHITE M-1: STANDING METAL SEAM AEP SPAN "COOL OLD TOWN GRAY" P-3 T-1 T-1: PORCELAIN TILE DALTILE / AMERICAN OLEAN UNION COLORBODY "RUSTED BROWN UN04" NOTE: PAINT COLOR AND MATERIAL CHANGES SHALL ONLY OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONTACT ARCHITECT. PAINT COLORS OVER STUCCO SURFACES, SEE FLOOR PLANS & WALL ASSEMBLIES. P-4: PAINTED TRIM SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2808 -"ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN" M-1P-2 P-4P-1 DW-1: DOORS & WINDOWS KAWNEER 28 -"MEDIUM BRONZE" ALUMINUM FRAMES DW-1 Item 2 Packet Page 36 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A8.1 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT -SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA COLORS & MATERIALS - 03/23/2020 SPRINGHILL SUITES - COLORS & MATERIALS P-1: PAINTED BOARD & BATTEN SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2819 -"DOWNING SLATE" P-2: PAINTED LAP SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2843 -"ROYCROFT BRASS" P-3: PAINTED PANEL SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7105 -"PAPERWHITE M-1: STANDING METAL SEAM AEP SPAN "COOL OLD TOWN GRAY" P-2 T-1 T-1: PORCELAIN TILE DALTILE / AMERICAN OLEAN UNION COLORBODY "RUSTED BROWN UN04" NOTE: PAINT COLOR AND MATERIAL CHANGES SHALL ONLY OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONTACT ARCHITECT. PAINT COLORS OVER STUCCO SURFACES, SEE FLOOR PLANS & WALL ASSEMBLIES. P-4: PAINTED TRIM SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2808 -"ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN" M-1P-4 P-3P-1 DW-1: DOORS & WINDOWS KAWNEER 28 -"MEDIUM BRONZE" ALUMINUM FRAMES DW-1 Item 2 Packet Page 37 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGOR ARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT A8.2 RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT -SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA COLORS & MATERIALS - 03/23/2020 RESIDENCE INN - COLORS & MATERIALS P-1: PAINTED BOARD & BATTEN SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2819 -"DOWNING SLATE" P-2: PAINTED LAP SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2843 -"ROYCROFT BRASS" P-3: PAINTED PANEL SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7105 -"PAPERWHITE M-1: STANDING METAL SEAM AEP SPAN "COOL OLD TOWN GRAY" P-3T-1 T-1: PORCELAIN TILE DALTILE / AMERICAN OLEAN UNION COLORBODY "RUSTED BROWN UN04" NOTE: PAINT COLOR AND MATERIAL CHANGES SHALL ONLY OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONTACT ARCHITECT. PAINT COLORS OVER STUCCO SURFACES, SEE FLOOR PLANS & WALL ASSEMBLIES. P-4: PAINTED TRIM SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2808 -"ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN" M-1 P-2P-4P-1 DW-1: DOORS & WINDOWS KAWNEER 28 -"MEDIUM BRONZE" ALUMINUM FRAMES DW-1 Item 2 Packet Page 38 © Item 2 Packet Page 39 © Item 2 Packet Page 40 © Item 2 Packet Page 41 © Item 2 Packet Page 42 LOT 8FOR REFERENCEItem 2 Packet Page 43 SSS/EC S/EC SSSSSS S S SS S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/E C S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/ECS/EC S/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/EC SSSSSAA S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/ES/ES/ES/ES/E S/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ESSSSS SVA A V S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S A S S S S S S A S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S/ECSS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSSSS S Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESSARCHITECT (CA) #C27068STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT 03/14/20RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA - SL-0Electrical Site Plan Item 2 Packet Page 44 SSS/EC S/EC SSSSSS S S SS S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/E C S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/ECS/EC S/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/EC SSSSSAA S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/E S/ES/ES/ES/ES/E S/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ES/ESSSSS SVA A V S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/EC S/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS/ECS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S A S S S S S S A S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S/ECSS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSSSS S Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESSARCHITECT (CA) #C27068STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT 03/14/20RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA - SL-1Site Photometric Plan Item 2 Packet Page 45 Date Scale Sheet 24x36:11x17: 1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 THOMAS E. JESSARCHITECT (CA) #C27068 STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 ADDRESS 805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COM CONTACT 01/14/20RESIDENCE INN & SPRINGHILL SUITES SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA - SL-2Data Sheets E:\2019 DWGS\19573\19573 SL-2.dwg, 1/14/2020 2:25:34 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3Item 2 Packet Page 46 Item 2 Packet Page 47 Item 2 Packet Page 48