The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRe Taylor Workshop1 Christian, Kevin From:Scott Romaine <scottr@studio-2g.com> Sent:Friday, May 22, 2020 4:25 PM To:Oetzell, Walter Subject:Re: Taylor Workshop Walter, We are on the same page regarding the agreement. There was something in the terms the owner had an issue with which is why she reached out to Hal to figure out some type of concession to make that she could agree to. On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:05 PM Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Scott, I am in receipt of your message and voice mail. You have a Word copy of the draft agreement, in which the amendments Hal and the owner propose can be effected. It doesn’t hold up submittal of drawings, but is to be provided prior to issuance of construction permits, according to Zoning Regulations. This is a standard agreement that discloses the structure’s approved floor plan and status as an “accessory structure” which cannot contain living space, including bathing facilities or a kitchen, and it’s unusual that it would need amendment. I’d recommend double-checking with the owner and Hal to make sure we’re referring to the same agreement. -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 From: Scott Romaine <scottr@studio‐2g.com> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 2:39 PM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Taylor Workshop 2 Walter, I'm following this email up after I just phoned you. The owner spoke with Hal and they were going to amend the conditions of use agreement in some way for this project. Hal had said that it wasn't a reason to hold up resubmitting the drawings. That if it came to it, we could take care of it over the counter. I contacted the owner and she is reaching out to Hal to get to figure out how getting the conditions of use is going to work at this point. Don't be surprised if you hear from Hal regarding this issue. Thanks for letting me know it still hasn't been resolved. Just I knew the client and figured it out with Hal it she made it sound like it was good to go. Best, On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:10 PM Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Again Scott, Had to indicate “Needs Resubmit” on your latest submittal, as we’re still lacking the information requested in the email sent to you back in March (see below). You are the only contact I have for this work, although you are not indicated as a contact for the construction permit application. Can you be sure whoever needs to be made aware of this is made aware? This is also reflected in the “plan check comments” made on this round. 3 Let me know what I can do to help this along… -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 From: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 5:19 PM To: Scott Romaine <scottr@studio‐2g.com> Subject: Re: Taylor Workshop Hi Scott, Before a construction permit can be issued, we will need to arrange recordation of a Conditions of Use of Structure (Accessory Structure) agreement, following the form of the example I've attached to this email. I note that a couple of other departments have indicated that additional information or materials will be necessary, and so I've jumped on board and updated Planning to "Needs Resubmit" pending completion of the agreement. There are two pieces of information that I do not have at this time: definitive name(s) of the property owner(s); and a legal description of the property. I would typically look for a deed document which would show this information, but cannot access that at this time, from home. That is also my typical source for a legal description. But if you and the property owner(s) have this information handy, and have an accurate legal description ready to go, we can work with that, as long as I can verify it. Let me know and we can update the agreement accordingly to finalize it so you can have it signed (notarized) and ready to go with your next plan submittal. I'll give it a look‐over to verify the information and get City signature (from the Director), and I will take care of the recording. 4 That's where we're at, hope it makes sense. We'll keep in touch, and we've got time to draft and finalize that agreement, while you're working through addressing other departments' comments. You can include the agreement, once ready, with your next submittal and I'll review it and update permit review status accordingly... Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org From: Scott Romaine <scottr@studio‐2g.com> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 9:17 AM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Taylor Workshop Walter, I hope you're well and hold up good and tight. I'm testing the waters to see how are are looking for the Taylor workshop review completion. Is it likely today or tomorrow? I'm planning projects and allocating work to support staff and was wondering when to figure that project coming back. ‐S ‐‐ 5 S c o t t R o m a i n e J o b C a p t a i n studio 2G Architects, LLP 1540 Marsh street, suite 230 san luis obispo, ca 93401 P : 805.594.0771 ext 113 W : http://www.studio-2g.com E : scottr@studio-2g.com FB : studio2G Architects ‐‐ S c o t t R o m a i n e J o b C a p t a i n studio 2G Architects, LLP 1540 Marsh street, suite 230 san luis obispo, ca 93401 P : 805.594.0771 ext 113 C : 415.301.1998 W : http://www.studio-2g.com E : scottr@studio-2g.com FB : studio2G Architects ‐‐ S c o t t R o m a i n e 6 J o b C a p t a i n studio 2G Architects, LLP 1540 Marsh street, suite 230 san luis obispo, ca 93401 P : 805.594.0771 ext 113 C : 415.301.1998 W : http://www.studio-2g.com E : scottr@studio-2g.com FB : studio2G Architects