HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/16/2020 Item Public Comment, Cooper
Clerk, Intern
From:Allan Cooper <allancoope@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, June 16, 2020 11:48 AM
To:CityClerk; E-mail Council Website; Codron, Michael; rcohn@slocity.org
Subject:June 16 2020 City Council Meeting - Items Not On The Agenda
Attachments:06_16_20...lettertocc.pdf
Dear City Clerk -
Would you kindly place this letter into the City Council's
correspondence file under the heading "items not on the
agenda"? I am hoping Council will have an opportunity to
read this before today's 6:00 P.M. meeting and I am
hoping that the Council may see fit to agendize this topic
for discussion purposes sometime in the near future.
Thanks!
- Allan
1
Save Our Downtown
______________________________________________________________________________
Seeking to protect and promote the historical character, design, livability and economic
success of downtown San Luis Obispo.
To: San Luis Obispo SLO City Council and Michael Codron and
Re: Items Not On The Agenda - June 10, 2020 Planning Commission Meeting;
Review of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
From: Allan Cooper, Secretary Save Our Downtown
Date: June 16, 2020
Honorable Mayor and Council Members -
When staff presented their draft version of SLO’s Housing Element Update to the Planning
Commission on June 10, 2020 there was a conspicuous and surprising omission. No mention
was made of this pandemic’s and future pandemic's new social distancing requirements. Social
distancing will have a profound impact on housing density, housing layout and on
neighborhood density in general.
Commissioner Mike Wulkin correctly expressed concern with the deletions made to Goal 7
“Neighborhood Quality”. The deleted passages read as follows: “… encourage neighborhood
stability and owner occupancy, and improve neighborhood appearance, function and sense of
community.” Commissioner Wulkin was particularly concerned with the deletion of
neighborhood stability and owner occupancy. Subsequently, Commissioner Michelle
Shoresman proposed revisions to Goal 7’s policy statement. These revisions were accepted by
all of her fellow commissioners. Pursuant to Goal 7’s original policy statement, Commissioner
Shoresman proposed the following additions: ”Neighborhood quality is especially needed
during pandemics.” She stated that this goal “should make reference to walkability, to health
and to climate change. The City should encourage residential design that improves our health
through the creation of community gardens, though avoiding “food deserts”, through ensuring
that housing is free of auto exhaust and that there are opportunities for recreational exercise."
Why should this Housing Element Update, as Commissioner Shoresman suggested, address
pandemics and health? Atlantic Magazine has an excellent article titled "How Pandemics Will
Change The Face of Retail" (click on: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/how-
pandemic-will-change-face-retail/610738/). But this article goes further to discuss how this
pandemic and future pandemics will reshape housing and cities as well.
While the YIMBY’s and State Senator Scott Wiener are pushing for higher density housing, we
should be reminded of the fact that high-density, dormitory-style housing (like 1144 Chorro)
may never again be safe or even habitable because of the likelihood that we will almost certainly
be beset with multiple pandemics in the future.
Should you wish to dispute this future scenario then I would like to refer you to two more
articles:
“Though the COVID-19 pandemic is still unfolding, it offers a warning of what lies in store as
zoonotic diseases proliferate at greater rates due to climate change. Empty streets and
upended lives could become more frequent occurrences as disease outbreaks, both life-
threatening and relatively benign, swarm the globe.”
(click on: https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2020/02/24/coronavirus-climate-induced-pandemics/
"Over the past few decades, the number of emerging infectious diseases that spread to people
— especially coronaviruses and other respiratory illnesses believed to have come from bats and
birds — has skyrocketed. A new emerging disease surfaces five times a year. One study
estimates that more than 3,200 strains of coronaviruses already exist among bats, awaiting an
opportunity to jump to people.”
(click on: https://www.propublica.org/article/climate-infectious-diseases)
Commissioner Mike Wulkin also expressed concerns with the following additional deletions:
7.1 Prohibition on building in parks. Staff stated that this is covered in the Open Space Element.
8.3 Encouraging manufactured housing. Staff stated that higher density developments are more
efficient from a sustainable point of view and that developers are not interested in doing mobile
home parks.
9.3 Scale, density of older neighborhoods. Staff stated that this is covered in the Historic
Element.
11.2 Preventing new housing on hazardous sites. Staff stated that this is covered in the Safety
Element.
The reason I’m raising these additional points made by Commissioner Wulkin is that many of
these deletions pertain to the preservation of parks, maintaining existing neighborhood (i.e.,
lower) density and avoiding placing housing in areas susceptible to wildfires and floods. All of
these considerations have direct bearing on how we are going to cope with both social
distancing and climate change.
Staff’s assurances that these policies are covered elsewhere is patently untrue. This wording is
neither found in the Open Space Element, the Historic Element or the Safety Element. I
challenge staff to find the passages that are supposedly duplicating these policies.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
- Allan