HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-16-2020 City Council PresentationsCity Council: Attendee Participation
Open and close your control panel using
the orange arrow
Join audio:
•Choose Mic &Speakers to use VoIP
•Choose Telephone and dial using
the information provided
Your Participation
•Please submit your name and Item
#in the Questions panel
•When Public Comment is opened
for the Item your name will be
called and your mic unmuted
Public Comment
City Council
Regular Meeting
June 16, 2020
Webinar Information:
Registration URL: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/4374581141425931023
Webinar ID: 675-638-075
Audio access by phone: (631) 992-3221; Audio Access Code: 910-024-452
Public Comment:
•Verbal Public Comment
➢Participants of the webinar can provide Public Comment by:
•Submitting a ‘question’that includes your name and item number (or public comment)
for the item you would like to speak on.
•Once public comment for the item is called,your microphone will be unmuted,and you
will have three minutes to speak.
Item #1
PROCLAMATION
Mayor Harmon
will proclaim
June 19, 2020 as
“Juneteenth”
Item #2
PRESENTATIONS
2.Monterey Bay Community Power Presentation
__________________________________________________
Recommendation:
Receive a presentation from J.R.Killigrew,Director of
Communications &Energy Programs,about Monterey Bay
Community Power.
MBCP Annual Member
Agency Update
(soon to be Central Coast Community Energy)
City of San Luis Obispo
June 16, 2020
WHO WE ARE
MBCP ACCOMPLISHMENTSLocal
Choice
Economic
Vitality
Local
Support
Financial
Stability
Clean
Energy
•MBchoice –
carbon free
offering
•MBprime –100%
renewable
offering
•94% enrollment
•Contracts with Local
Vendors Over
$800,000
•28 full time
employees
•2 offices –Monterey
& San Luis Obispo
•Over $120 Million
in Reserves
•Service and Loans
Paid Off
•Pursuing Credit
Rating
•221 MWs of New
Renewables
including 75 MWs of
geothermal
•Est. 560,000 metric
tons of GHG
Emissions offset
•$12 million –
Energy programs
•$17.2 million –
Customer savings
•$25 million –
Resiliency Fund
SERVICE OFFERINGS
PRIMARY OFFERING AT A SAVINGS $0.008/kWh MORE THAN MBchoice
UPDATE ON ENERGY PROCUREMENT
128MW Solar, 40MW Storage
•Rosamond, Kern County -California
•Online: 2021
•Term: 20 years
150MW Solar, 45MW Storage
•Lemoore, Kings County -California
•Online: 2021
•Term: 15 years
60MW Solar, 12MW Storage
•Kern County -California
•Online: 2022
•Term: 15 years
Kern
UPDATE ON ENERGY PROCUREMENT
75MW Solar, 39MW Storage
•Clark County -Nevada
•Online: 2022
•Term: 20 years
60MW Storage
•Monterey County -California
•Online: 2022
•Term: 10 years
75 MW Geothermal
•Mammoth & Inyo Counties -California
•2 PPAs:
•Online: 2021
•Term: 15 years
Inyo
By 2025, MBCP estimates 40% of our energy
demand will be met by new renewable energy
projects
SAN LUIS OBISPO BY
THE NUMBERS
•22,979 enrolled accounts
•97.23% enrollment
City Accounts Savings
•2020 -$27,120
Community Savings
•2020 -$1,740,861
MBCP RESPONSE TO COVID-19
•Unanimous support from boards
•All customers benefit
•No action needed
•50% of MBCP Electric
Generation Charges
deferred in May and June
2020
•Cumulative bill
reduction estimated $22.4
Million
•$6.45 million for
residential customers
•$10.95 million for
commercial customer
•$5.03 million for
agriculture customers
Programs from FY 19/20
CALeVIP EV infrastructure program
Affordable Housing/MUD Electrification Grants
School Bus Electrification
Agriculture Electrification
Residential Electrification
Residential Resiliency
GHG inventories for member agencies
Reach code incentive for member agencies
MBCP ENERGY PROGRAMSOverview:
•4% of gross
revenue set
aside per year
to focus on
electrification,
fuel-switching
and resiliency
UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS) FUND PROGRAM$25 Million Total Investment
Public Sector ($20 million) –
Available now
•Low cost financial support
•Open to public
customers i.e member agencies,
schools, hospitals, water
district etc.
•Project funding, ownership, and
asset management will be
determined on a case-by-case
basis
Private Sector ($5 million in loan
guarantee) –Launch TBD
•Low-interest financing
•First-come, first-serve basis
•Funding loan at discretion of
selected bank
A UNIFIED CENTRAL
COAST CCA
Key Updates:
•Establishment of Annual Meeting ON Sept 2 & 3, 2020
•Name Change to “Central Coast Community Energy”effective Sept. 4, 2020
•Opened Satellite Office in San Luis Obispo –April 2020
•Launch of new cost-plus rate structure in January 2021
STAY CONNECTED WITH MBCP
Follow us online, join our newsletter and board agenda notification list, and
check our extensive FAQ section on the website.
www.mbcommunitypower.org
info@mbcp.org
1.888.909.MBCP
montereybaycommunitypower
mbcommunitypwr
mbcommunitypower
Amendment Item A
PRESENTATIONS
A.Police Department Presentation Regarding “8 Can’t Wait”
and Community Request for Information
__________________________________________________
Recommendation:
Receive a presentation from Police Chief,Deanna Cantrell.
Community Response
President Obama’s TF on 21st
Century Policing
•59 recommendations/92 action items
•6 Pillars
•Building trust and legitimacy
•Policy and Oversite
•Technology and Social Media
•Community Policing and Crime
Reduction
•Training and Education
•Officer Wellness and Safety
8 Can’t Wait
Remaining Questions
3.Transport lying down –No
10. Vetting –Extensive BG process including interviews,
psychological, polygraph -5 to 8 week process
11. Provide basic first aid and seek medical attention –Yes
12. Early intervention system –Yes
How many complaints before reprimanded or
terminated?
13. BWC policy –Lexipol 480
-Uniformed officers must have camera
-Must make every reasonable effort to activate
14. Educational Requirements –HS graduate or GED,840-
hour POST academy, 16-week field training program
Black Leadership Demands
D:All Future interactions with protestors must focus on
the protestor safety regarding traffic control, and not
impede on the direction of peaceful marches or
demonstrations.
A:Duty to protect protestors and public from inherent
dangers of marching on unplanned routes. Duty to keep
high priority facilities as well as major
thoroughfares accessible and passable.
D: All criminal charges against the protestors arrested
during BLM protests must be dropped immediately and
expunged
A:Prosecution decisions are within the prosecutorial
discretion of the District Attorney’s office.
Black Leadership Demands
D:No tear gas, rubber bullets, flash grenades, pepper
spray or other violent tactics will be used against
protestors.
A:Achieve safe outcome
Respect and assist with peaceful protest
If de-escalation attempts fail, and force is determined to
be necessary, only that amount of force that reasonably
appears necessary given the facts and totality of the
circumstances
Protests/protestors declared to be an unlawful
assembly per PC 407 are required to disperse.
Use of force will not be used against peaceful
protestors
Black Leadership Demands
D:Reallocate funding from policing and incarceration to
long term safety strategies such as education, local
restorative justice services, and employment
programs.
A:Budget and Policy direction is provided by the City
Council.
D:Continue follow-up and communication with the
community regarding long-term reform regarding
decriminalization, surveillance, facial recognition, use
of force policies, de-escalation, and other concerns.
A:This is the focus of PACT and our hope is to have
that work continue.
Citizen Oversight
Potential Federal and State legislation
Research regarding multiple different Models
One size does not fit all
Presidential Executive Order that needs reviewed
State and local regulations
Determine specific needs for SLO
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS
NOT ON THE AGENDA
•Verbal Public Comment
➢Participants of the webinar:
•Submit a ‘question’that includes their name
and item number (or public comment)for the
item they would like to speak on.
•Once public comment for the item is
called,your microphone will be unmuted and
you will have three minutes to speak.
•You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to
indicate that you would like to speak.
Item #3 –10 and Amendment Items B & C
CONSENT AGENDA
Matters appearing on the Consent Calendar are
expected to be non-controversial and will be acted
upon at one time.A member of the public may
request the Council to pull an item for discussion.
Pulled items shall be heard at the close of the
Consent Agenda unless a majority of the Council
chooses another time.The public may comment on
any and all items on the Consent Agenda within the
three-minute time limit.
11.CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY
FOR CLEAN ENERGY CHOICE FOR NEW BUILDINGS AND
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES INCLUDING AN ORDINANCE
APPROVING LOCAL AMENDMENTS TO THE ENERGY CODE
AND AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATORY
FLEXIBILITY FOR A LIMITED TERM TO SUPPORT ALL-
ELECTRIC NEW BUILDINGS
Item #11
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
Staff Presentation By:
Greg Hermann, Deputy City Manager
Michael Codron, Community Development Director
Chris Read, Sustainability Manager
Clean Energy Choice Program for
New Buildings
City Council Public Hearing –June 16, 2020
29
Recommendations
1.Adopt a Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo,California,establishing a “Clean Energy
Choice Policy for New Buildings”to guide the reduction of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and use of Fossil Fuels for buildings and
transportation;”and
2.Introduce an Ordinance entitled,“An Ordinance of the City Council of
the City of San Luis Obispo,California,establishing the Clean Energy
Choice Program by amending the City of San Luis Obispo Building
Code to require higher energy performance for newly constructed
structures;”and
3.Introduce an Ordinance entitled,“An Ordinance of the City Council of
the City of San Luis Obispo,California,amending Title 17 (Zoning
Regulations)of the Municipal Code supporting the Clean Energy
Choice Program (PL-CODE-0062-2020)”to provide regulatory
flexibility through December 31,2022 in support of the Clean Energy
Choice Incentive Program;and
4.Direct staff to return to Council in June 2021 with a summary of
program performance and the Carbon Offset Program for deliberation
and action.
30
Background
Carbon neutrality by 2035 with a focus on equity and
economic development
Statewide effort to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045
Local building decarbonization initiatives since 2018
Rapidly evolving appliance, building, and
generation/storage technology allow cost effective
and carbon neutral all-electric buildings.
31
Program Overview
Policy Resolution
Local amendments to California Energy Code
Enhanced efficiency/performance requirements for new mixed -fuel
buildings
Pre-wiring requirements for new mixed -fuel residential buildings
Solar requirements for all new non -residential and mid-rise residential
buildings
Cost effective and uses less energy
Incentive Program
Technical Support
Financial Incentives
Telling the Story
Regulatory Flexibility
32
33
Program Overview
Low-rise Residential and Single-Family Residential
34
Program Overview
Nonresidential Policy Approach
Timeframe & Next Steps
35
Task Timeframe
Second reading of the Clean Energy Choice
Program for New Buildings ordinances and
submittal of local amendments to the California
Energy Code to the California Energy Commission.
July 7, 2020
Receive approval from the California Energy
Commission July-August 2020
Energy code amendments go into effect September 1, 2020
Recommendations
36
1.Adopt a Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo,California,establishing a “Clean Energy
Choice Policy for New Buildings”to guide the reduction of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and use of Fossil Fuels for buildings and
transportation;”and
2.Introduce an Ordinance entitled,“An Ordinance of the City Council of
the City of San Luis Obispo,California,establishing the Clean Energy
Choice Program by amending the City of San Luis Obispo Building
Code to require higher energy performance for newly constructed
structures;”and
3.Introduce an Ordinance entitled,“An Ordinance of the City Council of
the City of San Luis Obispo,California,amending Title 17 (Zoning
Regulations)of the Municipal Code supporting the Clean Energy
Choice Program (PL-CODE-0062-2020)”to provide regulatory
flexibility through December 31,2022 in support of the Clean Energy
Choice Incentive Program;and
4.Direct staff to return to Council in June 2021 with a summary of
program performance and the Carbon Offset Program for deliberation
and action.
12.REVIEW OF A PROTEST (FILED BY MR.WILLIAM
WALTER)FOR PAYMENT OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
FEES AND FOR A CONDITION OF APPROVAL
REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF A DECORATIVE
PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING FIXTURE
Item #12
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
Staff Presentation By:
Michael Codron, Community Development Director
Daniel Van Beveren, Senior Civil Engineer
Item #12
PUBLIC HEARING
Review of a Protest for Payment of
Encroachment Permit Fees and for a
Condition of Approval Requiring the
Installation of a Decorative Pedestrian
Lighting Fixture (679 Monterey Street)
Recommendation
39
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution (Attachment A)
denying the protest of Encroachment Permit Fees, and the
Conditions of Approval requiring the installation of a
decorative pedestrian lighting fixture associated with
ARCH-1236-2017 (679 Monterey Street).
Project Site –679 Monterey Street
40
Background
41
Building A
Building B
•2017, Mr. William Walter, owner of 679 Monterey Street, submitted a
planning application to the City of San Luis Obispo for the construction
of a new dwelling and deck.
Background
42
Building A
Building B
•City response letter dated August 1, 2018, approved the application
subject to Conditions of Approval listed in the response.
•Conditions of Approval included the requirement for the replacement of
frontage improvements including Mission Style Sidewalk, driveway
approaches, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, tree wells, and the installation of a
decorative pedestrian lighting fixture.
•These Conditions are based on the 2018 Engineering Standards which
were adopted on May 15, 2018, and are still in effect today.
•Conditions #8 through #13 can be reviewed on pages 226 & 227 of the
Agenda Packet.
Notice of Protest
43
Building A
Building B
•On April 24, 2020, a written Notice of Protest was submitted by William
Walter. Two items of protest were stated:
1. Encroachment Permit Fee in the amount of $2,036.22
2.The Condition of Approval requiring the installation of a
decorative pedestrian lighting fixture.
Encroachment Permit Fee
44
Driveway Approach Base Fee:$912.54
plus $10.06 per linear foot of driveway approach ($10.06 x 35’):$352.10
plus $5.76 per linear foot of sidewalk ($5.76 x 45’)$259.20
plus $10.06 per linear foot of curb and gutter ($10.06 x 45’):+$452.70
Subtotal:$1,976.54
plus IT surcharge of $3.05%($1,976.54 x 3.05%):+$60.28
Total: $2,036.82
Fee Study conducted in 2017.
•Study Session February 21, 2017
•Public Hearing April 18, 2017
•Adopted by Resolution.
Fees calculated per the approved Master Fee Schedule, approved 6/18/2019.
Decorative Pedestrian Lighting Fixture
45
•Program Established in 2005.
•Required as a Condition of Approval for
679 Monterey
•City Municipal Code Chapter 17.126.020
requires an appeal to be submitted within
ten days following receipt of approval.
•August 1, 2018 Approval Letter.
Recommendation
46
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution (Attachment A)
denying the protest of Encroachment Permit Fees, and the
Conditions of Approval requiring the installation of a
decorative pedestrian lighting fixture associated with
ARCH-1236-2017 (679 Monterey Street).
WALTER
PROTEST 679
MONTEREY
ST
•OLD DOWNTOWN PLAN
DEMOLISHED BELLO HOUSE FOR
AMPHITHEATRE
•SUPPRESSED INVESTMENT/OLD
FAMILIES LEFT
•EMINENT DOMAIN ALWAYS
LOOMED
•CITY INITIATED EMINENT DOMAIN
AGAINST WALTER IN 1993 FOR
CREEKWALK
•REZONING TO DOWNTOWN
COMMERCIAL ALLOWED
RESTORATION
•PRESERVATIONISTS’ HAVE WON
WITH LEITCHER AND BELLO (1917)
REMOVE
AND
REPLACE 30
FOOT CITY
COBRA
STREET
LIGHT
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM #12
•Verbal Public Comment
➢Participants of the webinar:
•Submit a ‘question’that includes their name
and item number (or public comment)for the
item they would like to speak on.
•Once public comment for the item is
called,your microphone will be unmuted and
you will have three minutes to speak.
•You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to
indicate that you would like to speak.
13.CEQA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT THRESHOLDS
UPDATE:TRANSITION FROM AUTO LEVEL OF SERVICE
TO VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
Item #13
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
Staff Presentation By:
Matt Horn, Public Works Director
Luke Schwartz, Transportation Manager
CEQA Transportation Impact
Thresholds Update: Transition from
Auto Level of Service (LOS) to
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
Luke Schwartz, P.E.
Transportation Manager
Public Works Department
lschwartz@slocity.org
June 16, 2020
Agenda
1.Background
2.LOS vs. VMT
3.Proposed CEQA Impact Thresholds
4.Process for Evaluating Projects
5.Staff Recommendations
Background
CA Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) signed into law in 2013
Replaces Level of Service (LOS) with Vehicle
Miles Traveled (VMT)
Promotes reduction in GHG emissions:
Diversity & mixing of land uses
Develop multimodal transportation networks
Incentivize growth where users have more
efficient access to housing, jobs, destinations
Technical Guidance Published December 2018
Requires statewide implementation by July 1, 2020
Background
CALIFORNIA GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCE
Source: California Air Resources Board, 2016
Total % Related to Transportation ≈ 50%
LOS vs. VMT
What is LOS and what are the advantages & disadvantages?
Measures driver congestion/delay (A –best; F –worst)
Prioritizes car mobility, not person mobility
Disincentivizes infill, incentivizes sprawl
Leads to more road widening, more GHG, more $$$
LOS vs. VMT
What is VMT and what are the benefits & disadvantages?
# of Auto Trips X Trip Length
Better indicator of GHG emissions
Removes a key barrier to infill, transit and active
transportation projects
More difficult to visualize
LOS vs. VMT
Source: CA Governor’s Office of
Planning & Research
LOS vs. VMT
Source: CA Governor’s Office of
Planning & Research
LOS vs. VMT
Source: CA Governor’s Office of
Planning & Research
LOS vs. VMT
Source: CA Governor’s Office of
Planning & Research
LOS vs. VMT
Source: CA Governor’s Office of
Planning & Research
LOS vs. VMT
Source: CA Governor’s Office of
Planning & Research
Recommended VMT Thresholds for
Land Use Projects
Residential
15% below existing regional (County)
residential VMT per capita
Work (Office, Business Park, Industrial, etc.)
15% below existing regional (County) VMT
per employee
Retail
No Net Increase in existing regional
(County) VMT
Mixed-Use
Evaluate each component
Recommended VMT Thresholds for
Land Use Projects
Source: City of San Luis Obispo Travel Demand Model (SLO TDM)
8.51
17.98
16.76
14.65
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
Residential (Daily VMT/capita)Office (Daily VMT/employee)VMT per capita/employeeCity Average Regional (County) Average
14.2515% below
15% below 12.45
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE VMT AVERAGES
VMT Screening for Land Use Projects
Small Projects: < 110 daily auto trips (< 11 peak hour trips)
11 SF homes / 18 MF homes
10,000 sqft. office
2,000-3,000 sqft. retail
Medium Residential & Work Projects: <100 peak hour trips
Map-based screening
Locally-Serving Retail: < 50,000 sqft.
Reasonable justification that use is locally -serving
Transit-Oriented Development
< ½-mile from major transit stop or high -quality transit
corridor (No locations w/ frequency of 15 min or less)
Evaluating Transportation Projects
Increases auto capacity (adds thru lanes on existing or new
thoroughfare)?
Requires quantitative analysis for induced travel
Reduced or negligible change in VMT?
EXEMPT
Bicycle, pedestrian and transit projects
Maintenance
Road diets
Transit projects
Safety improvements
New local streets w/ pedestrian facilities
New traffic signals, roundabouts
Process for Evaluating Projects
CEQA Transportation Analysis Multimodal Operations Analysis
(General Plan Conformity)
VMT Analysis Auto LOS
Safety Analysis Pedestrian LOS
Plan/Policy Consistency Bicycle LOS
Outcome:
Impacts & Mitigation Measures
Transit LOS
Access Management
Neighborhood Traffic
Outcome:
Local Policy Deficiencies &
Recommended COAs to Address
Deficiencies
If required, Transportation Impact Study (TIS) will include 2
parts:
Case Study A
Hypothetical residential development on Laurel Lane
consisting of 100 apartment units.
Auto Trip Generation: 660 daily / 62 peak hour
Does not meet screening criteria for “Small Project”
Meets criteria for “Medium Residential Project”
Eligible for Map-Based VMT Screening
Case Study A
Case Study A
Hypothetical residential development on Laurel Lane
consisting of 100 apartment units.
Auto Trip Generation: 660 daily / 62 peak hour
Does not meet screening criteria for “Small Project”
Meets criteria for “Medium Residential Project”
Eligible for Map-Based VMT Screening
Results –VMT impact assumed to be less
than significant
If Transportation Division has no other concerns with
traffic safety, access management, local policy
thresholds, no focused TIS required
Case Study B
Hypothetical office development on Tank Farm Road,
with 100,000 sqft. gross leasable area
Auto Trip Generation: 1,100 daily / 156 peak hour
Does not meet screening criteria for “Small Project”
Does not meet screening criteria for “Medium Project’
where screening maps could be used
Requires Focused TIS w/ VMT Analysis
Project VMT/employee 10% over adopted threshold
VMT Impact –Requires Mitigation
Project causes Bicycle LOS to exceed GP target
Local Policy Deficiency –Project COA
VMT Mitigation Strategies
Revise project (i.e. incorporate mix of land uses)
Locate project in lower-VMT area of the City
Improve or increase access to active transportation
facilities
Improve or increase access to transit service
Participate in an in-lieu fee program to fund City-wide
improvements to sustainable transportation
Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
Provide car-share, bike-share, EV charging
Staff Recommendations
1.Adopt a resolution (Attachment A) to replace Auto Level
of Service (LOS) with Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as
the City’s performance measure for CEQA analysis of
transportation impacts; and
2.Adopt a resolution (Attachment B) approving revisions to
the City’s Multimodal Transportation Impact Study
Guidelines
Alternatives:
1.Adopt the proposed recommendations with changes.
Council could direct staff to modify proposed VMT
thresholds and/or TIS Guidelines.
2.Continue item to a future date.
3.Decline to adopt staff recommendations at this time.
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM #13
•Verbal Public Comment
➢Participants of the webinar:
•Submit a ‘question’that includes their name
and item number (or public comment)for the
item they would like to speak on.
•Once public comment for the item is
called,your microphone will be unmuted and
you will have three minutes to speak.
•You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to
indicate that you would like to speak.
14.AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER
INTO AGREEMENTS WITH THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOR WATER AND
WASTEWATER SERVICE TO CALIFORNIA STATE
UNIVERSITY,SAN LUIS OBISPO
Item #14
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
Staff Presentation By:
Aaron Floyd, Utilities Director
Jennifer Metz, Utilities Project Manager
Jennifer Thompson, Utilities Business Manager
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM #14
•Verbal Public Comment
➢Participants of the webinar:
•Submit a ‘question’that includes their name
and item number (or public comment)for the
item they would like to speak on.
•Once public comment for the item is
called,your microphone will be unmuted and
you will have three minutes to speak.
•You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to
indicate that you would like to speak.
LIAISON REPORTS AND
COMMUNICATIONS
Council Members report on conferences or other City
activities.At this time,any Council Member or the
City Manager may ask a question for clarification,
make an announcement,or report briefly on his or
her activities.In addition,subject to Council Policies
and Procedures,they may provide a reference to
staff or other resources for factual information,
request staff to report back to the Council at a
subsequent meeting concerning any matter,or take
action to direct staff to place a matter of business on
a future agenda.(Gov.Code Sec.54954.2)
ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular City Council Meeting is
scheduled for Tuesday,July 7,2020 at 6:00 p.m.,
via teleconference.
Agendas for Council Meetings are published no
later than 72 hours before the meeting date.Refer
to the agenda for Webinar registration details and
instructions for providing public comment.