Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/10/2020 Item 2A & 2B, Cooper Wilbanks, Megan From:Allan Cooper < To:Advisory Bodies; Combs, Ron Subject:Letters To The Tree Committee Attachments:808_08_20...letter#1totreecommittee.pdf; 808_08_20...letter#2totreecommittee.pdf Dear Ron - Would you kindly forward the two letters attached below to the Tree Committee? These letters pertain to the Committee's Monday, August 10, 2020 meeting where they will be reviewing the proposed removal of 4 trees at 1144 Chorro Street and the proposed removal of 206 trees at 650 Tank Farm Road. Would you also please place these letters in the City's correspondence file? Thanks and I hope you are keeping safe. - Allan 1 Save Our Downtown ______________________________________________________________________________ Seeking to protect and promote the historical character, design, livability and economic success of downtown San Luis Obispo. To: San Luis Obispo Tree Committee and Ron Combs Re: August 10, 2020: Business Item #1 From: Allan Cooper, Secretary Save Our Downtown Date: August 8, 2020 Honorable Chair Bate and Committee Members - We are opposed to the removal of four trees as part of a mixed-use project located at 1144 Chorro Street. One of these street trees is only slightly lifting the sidewalk (the Flame Tree) but none of the others are lifting the sidewalk (see the first photo). The applicant is asking to remove 4 trees where one of these (a palm) is within the Downtown Centre Paseo (see the second photo). We’re not sure why this palm tree, considering its small size, is being removed. Eight of the 12 replacement trees will be located on the third floor terrace - a terrace that is inaccessible to the public. As a matter of City policy, rooftop trees should not be considered replacement trees.   Thank you for all that you do! - Allan Save Our Downtown ______________________________________________________________________________ Seeking to protect and promote the historical character, design, livability and economic success of downtown San Luis Obispo. To: San Luis Obispo Tree Committee, Ron Combs and Rachel Cohen Re: Business Item #2: August 10, 2020 review of the proposed tree removal of 206 onsite trees and replanting plan of 314 trees as part of a mixed-use project located at 650 Tank Farm Road 
 From: Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo Date: August 8, 2020 Honorable Chair Bate and Committee Members - You will be reviewing the removal of 206 onsite trees as part of a mixed-use project located at 650 Tank Farm Road. 169 (or 82%) of the 206 trees have been determined to be either in good or in moderate condition. I am attaching for your convenience a view of this mature grove of trees taken from Tank Farm Road. I am also forwarding you via attachment an aerial view of the site and a site plan of the proposed building project. As you can see by comparing the aerial view with the site plan, there is hardly any justification for removing this number of trees given that nearly 2/3rds of the property surrounding the former mobile home park is unencumbered by trees. Please allow me to draw your attention to a May 27, 2020 SF Examiner article titled “Green Space: Stop Taking Trees Down” (to read more click on: https://www.sfexaminer.com/news- columnists/green-space-stop-taking-trees-down/). This article states the following: “While new trees were proposed at several of these sites (i.e., building sites within the City of San Francisco), replacements may not provide the same benefits as the ones removed. For example, older trees can capture more carbon and divert more water from sewers than younger trees. Trees that don’t shed their leaves are also better at filtering air pollution, and may help reduce communities’ vulnerabilities to respiratory diseases, such as the coronavirus”. The article goes on to state that "… too many trees were simply chopped down because they’re inconvenient. Lance Carnes, a volunteer with Healthy Trees Initiative, has compiled an archive of the Department of Public Works’ tree removals since November 2019. Out of 210 removals, 65 were authorized simply to make room for new construction projects, infrastructure improvements and private driveways.” You probably know that funding for the City’s Urban Forest Master Plan effort is currently being deferred due to the economic impacts resulting from COVID-19. However please help us address the City’s Climate Action Plan for Community Recovery by merely disallowing the wholesale removal of these trees. These trees are being removed simply because the architect was unable (or unwilling) to work around them. Thank you!