Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/12/2020 Item 2, Brooks Wilbanks, Megan From:Lea Brooks < To:Advisory Bodies Subject:Planning Commission Aug. 12 Agenda, Item 2 Aug. 11, 2020 To: San Luis Obispo Planning Commission Chair Dandekar and Commissioners Wulkan, Kahn, Hopkins, Jorgensen, Quincey and Shoresman: From: Lea Brooks, San Luis Obispo resident Re: Review of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project, Item 2 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. I am commenting as an individual and not as a member of the Active Transportation Committee. Please consider the following issues seriously before taking action: 1. The Project Person Trips by Mode of Travel estimates 88.2 percent of overall trips associated with Froom Ranch will be by passenger vehicle, 4.6 percent by bicycle, 5 percent by pedestrian and 2.2 percent by transit. No matter how you spin these numbers, the issue before you is why a project that is 88.2 percent dependent on motor vehicles is acceptable in the year 2020 when the goal should be to reduce dependency on automobiles and greenhouse gases. You should address why a project that will significantly contribute to Climate Change should not be required to implement more mitigations to reduce dependency on passenger vehicles. This is a wrong direction and other applicants will expect the same exemptions. 2. Under existing plus project conditions, the addition of project traffic would exacerbate existing queuing and peak hour traffic for automobiles, and poor levels of service for pedestrians and bicycle modes of transportation, causing transportation deficiencies in the project vicinity. Why are these significant and unavoidable environmental impacts to pedestrians and bicycle modes of travel acceptable when San Luis Obispo’s goal is to increase active transportation and reduce greenhouse gases? 1