HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09 - COUNCIL READING FILE_f_Draft Froom Ranch Specific Plan
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 15, 2020
TO: City Council
BY: Shawna Scott, Senior Planner
Emily Creel, Contract Planner
FROM: Michael Codron, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: SPEC-0143-2017, SBDV-0955-2017, GENP-0737-2019, ANNX-0335-2020, EID-
0738-2019 (12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road) – Staff-Recommended
Clarifications and Minor Edits to the Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Staff-Recommended Clarifications and Minor Edits to the Froom Ranch Specific Plan
In additional to the changes to the Froom Ranch Specific Plan directed by the Planning
Commission at its regularly noticed meeting on August 12, 2020, and described Planning
Commission Minutes and the Council Agenda Report, Staff also recommended several additional
clarifications and minor edits to the Specific Plan, which were described in Staff’s presentation to
the Planning Commission on August 12, 2020, and which the Planning Commission also directed
Staff to incorporate. Those clarifications and minor edits have been incorporated into the Specific
Plan and are summarized below.
1. Clarify Policy 2.2.4 (page 2-5) to reflect that a life plan community in the Specific Plan
area is an allowed use. Major Development Review would be required, but not a use
permit.
2. Delete “Homeless Shelter” from the list of prohibited uses in the R-3 and R-4 zones
(Specific Plan page 2-6) based on further review of State law.
3. Amend Section 2.4 Airport Compatibility to identity potential density only (578 units).
4. Clarify Section 5.1 (Circulation) to reflect that Local Road B is also an interior public
road.
5. Amend Figure 5-11 (Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Network) to show that Froom Creek
Trail would not extend into the 300-foot wildlife corridor and to clearly show a sidewalk
along the project’s entire frontage along Los Osos Valley Road.
6. Amend the discussion preceding Table 6-3 (Project Wastewater Generation) to correctly
reflect the wastewater flow identified in Table 6-3 (242.4-acre feet/year).
7. Amend the noise discussion on pages 4-13 and 4-16 to correctly reflect the findings of the
EIR and clarify that dense vegetation planting as a noise mitigation strategy should only
be utilized in combination with other identified mitigation measures for noise attenuation.
SPEC-0143-2017, SBDV-0955-2017, GENP-0737-2019, ANNX-0335-2020, EID-0738-2019
Additional Clarifications and Edits Incorporated into the Specific Plan
Page 2
8. Amend text on page 6-1 to correctly reference an 8-inch public water main within
Madonna Froom Ranch.
Froom Ranch
SPECIFIC PLAN
August 2020REVISED DRAFT
[i]
The City of San Luis Obispo
RRM Design Group
Mr. John Madonna
John Madonna Construction C o ., Inc.
PO Box 5310
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
[ii]
Victor Montgomery, Principal Michael Codron, Director
Pamela A. Ricci, AICP, Principal Planner Emily Creel, SWCA, Project Manager
Debbie Jewell, Landscape Architect Shawna Scott, Senior Planner
Tim Walters, Civil Engineer
Heidi Harmon, Mayor Derek Johnson, City Manager
Aaron Gomez, Vice Mayor Greg Hermann, Deputy City Manager
Carlin Christianson, Council Member Bob Hill, Office of Sustainability
Erica A. Stewart, Council Member
Andy Pease, Council Member
Hemalata Dandekar, Chairperson
Robert Jorgensen, Vice Chair
Mike Wulkan
Michelle Shoresman
Steve Kahn
Michael Hopkins
Nicholas Quincey
[iii]
1.1 Scope of Specific Plan for Froom Ranch Area
1.2 Specific General Plan Guidance for Froom Ranch Area
1.3 Plan Goals & Consistency with the General Plan
1.4 Relationship to Other Adopted Documents
1.4.1 Zoning Ordinance
1.4.2 Subdivision Regulations
1.4.3 City of San Luis Obispo Bicycle Transportation Plan
1.4.4 Community Design Guidelines
1.4.5 San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan
1.5 Specific Plan Format
1.6 Location of Froom Ranch Area
1.7 Planning Area Character
1.8 Specific Plan Features
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Land Use Designations and Zoning
2.2.1 Residential Goals, Policies, and Programs
2.2.2 Residential Development Standards
2.2.3 Commercial Goals, Policies, and Programs
2.2.4 Conservation/Open Space
2.2.5 Public Facilities
2.3 Affordable Housing
2.4 Airport Compatibility
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Natural Open Space
3.2.1 Creeks and Wetlands
3.2.2 Protected Plant Species
3.2.3 Fault Lines
3.2.4 Wildlife Corridor
[iv]
3.3 Historic and Cultural Resources
3.3.1 Historic Resources
3.3.2 Pre-Historic Resources
3.4 Recreation Resources
3.4.1 Trailhead Park
3.4.2 General Principles
3.4.3 Life Plan Community Recreation
3.5 Scenic Resources
4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 Purpose of the Design Guidelines
4.1.2 Goals for Quality and Character
4.2 General Site Design Guidelines
4.2.1 Views and Transitions
4.2.2 Grading Principles
4.2.3 Landscaping Principles
4.3 General Architectural Design Guidelines
4.3.1 Architectural Styles
4.3.2 Authentic Materials
4.3.3 Wind Protection
4.4 Multi-Family Residential Guidelines
4.4.1 Site Design
4.4.2 Building Form and Design
4.4.3 Roof Design
4.4.4 Fencing
4.4.5 Lighting
4.5 Commercial Design Guidelines
4.5.1 Site Design
4.5.2 Building Form and Design
4.5.3 Roof Design
4.5.4 Signage
4.6 Noise
4.7 Energy Conservation & Sustainability
4.8 Security Planning
[v]
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Circulation Network
5.3 Street Cross Sections (New Roads)
5.3.1 Parkway Arterial (Los Osos Valley Road Widening)
5.3.2 Commercial Collector
5.3.3 Local Roads
5.3.4 Roundabouts
5.3.5 Secondary Access Roads
5.4 Bicycle Network
5.5 Pedestrian Network
5.5.1 Sidewalks
5.5.2 Public Trails
5.5.3 Private Trails
5.5.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Safety
5.6 Transit Network
5.7 Streetscape Beautification Guidelines
5.7.1 Streetscape Design
5.7.2 Gateway and Entry Design
5.7.3 Streetscape Accent Paving Design
5.7.4 Streetscape Landscape Design
5.7.5 Bioswale Design
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Water
6.3 Recycled Water
6.4 Wastewater
6.5 Drainage & Storm Water Facilities
6.5.1 Existing Conditions
6.5.2 Froom Creek Proposal
6.5.3 Froom Creek Geomorphology
6.5.4 Off-Site Drainage Basin
6.5.5 Storm Water Strategy
[vi]
6.6 Telecommunications
6.7 Energy
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Schools
7.3 Police
7.4 Fire/Emergency Services
7.4.1 Wildland Urban Interface
7.5 Solid Waste and Recycling
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
8.2.1 Transportation Improvements and Pedestrian and Bicycle Paths
8.2.2 Parks and Recreation, Land, and Improvements
8.3 City Development Impact Fees
8.4 Facility Phasing and Project Cash Flow
8.4.1 Implementation Assumptions
8.4.2 Public Facility Phasing
8.5 Implementation
8.5.1 Updates and Revisions
9.1 Specific Plan Authority and Adoption
9.2 Environmental Review
9.3 Annexation
9.4 Development Review Process
9.4.1 Zoning Boundaries and Subdivisions
9.4.2 Architectural Review
9.4.3 Building Permits
9.5 Phasing
9.6 Construction and Maintenance of Required Improvements
9.7 Amendment to the Specific Plan
9.7.1 Interpretations
[vii]
9.7.2 Adjustments
9.7.3 Amendments
A. General Plan Consistency Analysis
B. Architectural Review Commission FRSP Comments & Applicant
Responses
C. EIR Mitigation Measures included in FRSP
[viii]
1-1 Regional Map
1-2 Implementation of the General Plan
1-3 Site Location Map
1-4 Existing Site Conditions
1-5 Conceptual Site Plan
2-1 Zoning/Land Use Map
2-2 Site Plan with Building Heights
3-1 Site Constraints Map
3-2 Open Space Plan
3-3 Froom Creek Historical Alignment
3-4 Froom Creek Corridor Enlargement
3-5 Froom Creek Setback Standards
3-6 Froom Creek Corridor Enhancements
3-7 Wildlife Corridor
3-8 Map of Historic Buildings
3-9 Trailhead Park Plan
3-10 Life Plan Community’s Recreational Areas
4-1 Scenic Resources from Los Osos Valley Road
4-2 Fencing Plan
4-3 Fencing Types
4-4 Noise Contours from the Noise Element
4-5 Noise Contours from the 2017 Noise Study
4-6 Noise Contours from the 2020 Noise Study
5-1 Circulation Plan
5-2 Parkway Arterial (Los Osos Valley Road Widening)
5-3 Los Osos Valley Road & Auto Park Way Intersection
5-4 Commercial Collector “A” (Public)
5-5 Local Road “A” (Public)
5-6 Local Road “B” (Private)
[ix]
5-7 Local Road “B” Transition
5-8 Local Road “C” (Private)
5-9 Roundabout at Commercial Collector
5-10 Private Secondary Access Roads
5-11 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Network
6-1 Water Supply Plan
6-2 Recycled Water Supply Plan
6-3 Wastewater Plan
6-4 Existing Drainage Conditions
6-5 Existing Flood Plain Boundary
6-6 Conceptual Post Development Project Flood Plain Boundary
6-7 Drainage Plan
7-1 Fuel Modification Plan
9-1 Phasing Plan
[x]
1-1 Project Summary
2-1 Land Use/ Zoning Summary
2-2 Development Standards
2-3 Open Space Calculations
3-1 Contributing Historic Structures
3-2 Other Structures
6-1 Project Water Use
6-2 Project Recycled Water Use
6-3 Project Wastewater Generation
7-1 Student Generation
8-1 Infrastructure Cost Estimate
8-2 Detailed Infrastructure Cost Estimate
8-3 Summary of City Development Impact Fees
8-4 Summary of City Development Impact and School Fees by Year
8-5 Summary of City Development Impact Fees by Phase
INTRODUCTION
01
[1-1]
The Froom Ranch Area is currently under County of San Luis Obispo (County) jurisdiction, but is
located immediately southwest of the City of San Luis Obispo (City) limits. The site is
designated in the City’s Land Use Element (LUE) as Specific Plan Area # 3, which is subject to
preparation of a Specific Plan to accommodate development proposals and address pertinent
issues (identified as SP-3 on LUE Figure 10). The General Plan requires that a Specific Plan for
the Froom Ranch Area be adopted prior to annexation of the Plan Area to the City.
Figure 1-1 Regional Map
[1-2]
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan provides a comprehensive land use program to guide future
public and private development in conformance with the requirements set forth in California
Government Code §65450 through §65457. The Specific Plan provides a bridge between the City’s
General Plan and detailed plans such as development plans and subdivisions. It directs all
facets of future development within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area including:
▪ Classification of land uses, including the proposed housing mix.
▪ Establishment of general site planning and development standards.
▪ Provision of supplementary design guidelines tailored for the Specific Plan area.
▪ Designation of required access and circulation elements.
▪ Location and sizing of infrastructure.
▪ Phasing of development; and
▪ Financing methods for public improvements.
Section 8.1.5 of the Land Use Element (LUE) of the City’s General Plan includes the following
specific guidance for Specific Plan Area SP-3:
“The purpose of the specific plan is to provide design flexibility that will secure the appropriate
development of the site while protecting sensitive environmental resources on the site.
Development on the site should be a compact, mixed use project that provides workforce
housing options and neighborhood commercial uses that support pedestrian and bicycle
access. The specific plan for this area should consider and address the following land use and
design issues.
a. Develop a design that is sensitive to environmental constraints and adjusts accordingly through
design. Constraints include wetland protection, slope protection, historic structures, and open space
protection.
b. Maintain viewshed of surrounding mountains and secure steeper hillsides as protected open space
areas.
c. Variable height limits will be required to protect views of adjacent hills.
d. Provide access to trails.
e. Provide a plan for adequate and safe infrastructure, including appropriate points of access to Los
Osos Valley Road.
f. Address neighborhood commercial needs of new neighborhood.
g. Provide connectivity to adjacent development.”
In addition, Section 8.1.5 of the LUE requires that the Specific Plan area include 50% open space
and identifies ranges of square footage for commercial development (50,000 minimum – 350,000
maximum) and numbers of housing units (200 units minimum – 350 units maximum). The LUE
chart with the performance standards for the area includes the caveat that “there can be a
reduction in the minimum requirement based on specific physical and/or environmental
[1-3]
constraints”. Both the Planning Commission and City Council through the General Plan
Amendment Initiation process supported the intended mix of uses with increased residential
units related to the Life Plan Community and a lower level of commercial development. The Land
Use Summary in Table 1.1 in Section 1.8 summarizes the proposed number of residential units as
well as commercial floor area.
The Hillside Planning Area Section 6.4.7 of the LUE provides the upper limits of development that
affects the site, which is part of the Irish Hills Area. That upper limit is the 150-foot elevation. In
conjunction with project entitlements, the applicant requested modification of the text of the LUE
to allow some development above the 150-foot elevation, subject to certain performance
standards. Through the Environmental Impact Review (EIR) review process, the project
development proposal was modified to eliminate proposed residential development within the
Life Plan Community on the upper terrace area located in the southwestern portion of the site
above the 150-foot elevation. A small area in the northwestern portion of the site near an existing
quarry that has changed in elevation over the years from mining operations, but is currently
above the 150-foot elevation, is proposed for a trailhead park and the development of some
residential dwelling units.
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is designed to meet the goals established in the City’s General
Plan by providing a framework for future development of the Froom Ranch Area. The
Specific Plan is designed to be consistent with, and serves as an extension of, the City’s
General Plan. The policies and standards in the Froom Ranch Specific Plan will take
precedence over more general policies and standards during the review of public and
private development projects within the Specific Plan area. In situations where policies or
standards relating to an aspect of development have not been provided in the Specific Plan, the
existing policies and standards of the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance will apply.
Consistent with cited General Plan guidance in Section 1.2 above, the overall goals of the
Specific Plan are to:
1. Develop new residential housing to meet the City’s housing needs.
2. Provide a variety of housing types and costs to meet the needs of renters and buyers with a
variety of income-levels, including affordable housing for residents with low income levels.
3. Develop a Life Plan Community (LPC) to meet Housing Element goals to address special
housing needs for retirement aged residents of San Luis Obispo.
4. Provide new retail commercial and offices adjacent to the existing Irish Hills Plaza shopping
center to achieve land use synergy and enhance services available to residents.
5. Protect and enhance creek/wetland habitats, and maintain visual resources in open space
areas.
6. Provide a trailhead park that addresses the recreational needs of Specific Plan area residents,
neighboring residential areas, and supports the open space trails bordering the site.
[1-4]
7. Evaluate historic buildings within the proposed City trailhead park with adaptive reuse of
some buildings and historical identification where appropriate.
8. Phase the proposed development so that public facilities are developed concurrently with
each new phase in a rational and cost-effective fashion.
9. Encourage the use of bicycles and walking within the Specific Plan area by incorporating
pedestrian paths and bicycle lanes along the roads and providing connections to the trailhead
park and open space areas beyond the site.
[1-5]
Figure 1-2 Implementation of the General Plan
Appendix A provides a comprehensive analysis of the
project’s consistency with the City’s General Plan.
[1-6]
The City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) provides standards for site-specific
development and land use regulations that govern the size, shape, and type of use for
development within the City. This Specific Plan document customizes some of the standards
and regulations found in Title 17 to help implement the Specific Plan vision. In any instance
where the Specific Plan conflicts with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, the Specific
Plan provisions will take precedence. Where the Specific Plan is silent on a topic, the City of
San Luis Obispo Zoning Ordinance requirements shall prevail.
The subdivision process within the Specific Plan area shall be governed by the City of San Luis
Obispo’s Subdivision Regulations and Municipal Code as well as the State Subdivision Map
Act (California Government Code §66410 et. seq.). Processing procedures, submittal
requirements, and findings required by the City’s Subdivision Ordinance (Title 16) will be
regulated as set forth therein.
Updated in 2013, the Bicycle Transportation Plan provisions apply to the planning,
development, design, and maintenance of bicycle facilities and activities within City limits.
The document identifies an existing Class II bike facility along Los Osos Valley Road adjacent
to the Specific Plan area.
The City of San Luis Obispo Community Design Guidelines (2010) describe and inform project
designers and applicants of the City’s expectations and preferences for the quality and
character of new development. These guidelines are considered by the Architectural Review
Commission as a basis for evaluating the suitability and appropriateness of individual project
design and help achieve attractive and environmentally sensitive development. The design
guidelines provided herein supplement the Community Design Guidelines.
[1-7]
The San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) document regulates various aspects of
airport operations throughout San Luis Obispo County. The San Luis Obispo County Airport Land
Use Commission (ALUC) acts as the governing body for coordinating the airport planning of
public agencies within the County. The ALUP includes safety zones/area that restrict the type and
density of development. The Specific Plan area is currently in Airport Safety Area S-2. The airport
compatibility of the project with the ALUP is discussed in more detail in Section 2.4 of Chapter 2.
The Specific Plan provides discussion of the Froom Ranch area, its anticipated future
development, and the goals, policies, programs, and standards that will guide aspects of
development. The issues addressed in this Plan are:
• Land Use and Development Standards (Chapter 2);
• Conservation, Open Space and Recreation (Chapter 3);
• Design Guidelines (Chapter 4);
• Circulation (Chapter 5);
• Infrastructure and Public Utilities (Chapter 6);
• Public Services (Chapter 7);
• Public Facilities Financing (Chapter 8); and
• Implementation and Administration (Chapter 9).
In the following chapters, goals for specific issues are followed by policies specific to the Froom
Ranch Area. These policies will be implemented through various programs presented in the
Specific Plan. Standards will define actions or requirements that must be fulfilled by new
development.
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan area consists of two parcels, totaling approximately 110 acres,
located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road within the County of San Luis Obispo’s
jurisdiction, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits (APNs 067-241-030 and 067-241-
031). The site is located just south of the Irish Hills Plaza in the southwestern portion of City, and
across Los Osos Valley Road from the auto park.
The northeastern portion of the Specific Plan area is located within the City’s Urban Reserve
Line, and the entire site is within the Land Use Element (LUE) Sphere of Influence (see Figure 1-3).
Ultimately the Urban Reserve Line would be adjusted to reflect the approved land use map
contained in the Specific Plan.
[1-8]
Figure 1-3 Site Location Map
The Specific Plan area is characterized by relatively flatter grassland areas which transition to
steeper slopes before approaching City open space property at the base of the Irish Hills. The
bulk of the property is undeveloped, but includes an assemblage of historical ranch and dairy
structures on part of the site directly to the south of Home Depot, which is included in the
adjacent Irish Hills Plaza shopping center. John Madonna currently uses the property as an office
(main ranch house) and equipment storage yard to support his construction business (John
Madonna Construction Co., Inc.). The site also includes unimproved roads, staging and materials
storage, a quarry area, and a stormwater detention facility for the neighboring Irish Hills Plaza.
[1-9]
Figure 1-4 Existing Site Conditions
[1-10]
The Natural Setting
The site is composed of a variety of plant communities including annual and native grasslands,
coast live oak/California bay woodland, and coastal scrub/chaparral habitats. Non-native annual
grassland was the dominant plant community on the ranch, primarily occurring in the flatter
portions of the Specific Plan area where past activities such as cattle/horse feeding occurred. The
southwestern part of the Specific Plan area contains the federal and state endangered Chorro
Creek bog thistle, other special status plant species, and some native bunchgrass grassland areas
where rock outcrops and thinner soils are present.
The site is bisected by natural drainages in the northeastern flank of the Irish Hills of the San Luis
Range. Froom Creek traverses the Specific Plan area in a mostly north to south direction and
joins San Luis Obispo Creek south of the Specific Plan area before flowing towards the Pacific
Ocean in Avila Beach. Wetland habitat occurs in flat grassland areas where surface and
subsurface water is impounded by Los Osos Valley Road and Calle Joaquin. The Los Osos Valley
Road roadside channel is dominated by arroyo willow monoculture. The Specific Plan area also
includes three other small, unnamed intermittent watercourses in the southwestern part of the
site.
Historic Setting
The property was used as a dairy from the 1850s to 1977 and included a complex of buildings
such as a dairy barn, creamery, granary, four-bedroom house, and bunkhouse. In 1976 Alex
Madonna purchased the property and raised beef cattle on the property for several years. John
Madonna purchased the property in 2011 and as previously mentioned, uses it for his
construction business.
Froom Ranch is envisioned as a primarily residential project with some commercial development
in the northeast corner of the site closest to the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. The project is divided
into main components:
1) The Madonna Froom Ranch; and
2) The Life Plan Community (Villaggio).
The Madonna Froom portion of the site is in the northern portion of the Specific Plan area, just
south of the Irish Hills Plaza. It will contain the project’s commercial uses, which are envisioned
as a hotel and some retail with offices above. Residential development will be multiple-family
workforce housing possibly subdivided into small lots. The High Density residential (R-4) portion
of the site is planned to accommodate an affordable housing project as well as additional units. A
trailhead park will provide a staging area and connection to open space trails and other park
amenities. The park area will also include some historic structures which are adaptively reused for
City facilities.
[1-11]
A major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community known as Villaggio.
Villaggio provides a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as
access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, if they
are eventually needed. The community will include ancillary services for residents such as a
common areas, recreational facility, restaurants, and movie theaters.
Open Space is the other predominant land use and occupies about 58% of the net site area,
consistent with the annexation requirement of providing at least 50 percent of the site as open
space. Details on the open space calculations are included in Table 2-3 of Chapter 2 and open
space, goals, policies and programs are included in Chapter 3.
Table 1-1 below provides a summary of the land uses planned in the Froom Ranch Specific Plan.
Table 1-1 Project Summary
Madonna Froom Ranch
Land Uses Size
Multi-Family Housing 174 units
Commercial 30,000 sq. ft.
Hotel 70,000 sq. ft.; 120 rooms
Trailhead Park 3.6 acres
Life Plan Community
Land Uses Units Floor Area
Independent Living 366 units
Assisted Living Units 38 units 31,025 sq. ft.
Memory Care 17 beds 13,880 sq. ft.
Skilled Nursing 34 beds 35,006 sq. ft.
Wellness Center & Pool 15,390 sq. ft.
Commons Building 34,481 sq. ft.
Auditorium 8,004 sq. ft.
Maintenance & Welcome/Security 9,610 sq. ft.
The careful placement of various land uses that consider the site’s physical and environmental
characteristics was a critical first step in designing the Specific Plan Area Land Use Plan. The
Conceptual Site Plan, as shown in Figure 1-5, illustrates the relationships between land uses
within the Specific Plan area.
[1-12]
Figure 1-5 Conceptual Site Plan
LAND USE, ZONING,
& DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
02
[2-1]
The City’s General Plan Land Use Map (LUE Figure 3) designates the Froom Ranch Area as a new
Specific Plan Area, which is labeled on the map as “SP-3 Madonna on LOVR”. The Land Use Element
(LUE) requires specific plans for areas with complex development parameters, such as the land use
mix, infrastructure requirements, and environment site constraints, prior to development. LUE
Policy 8.1.1 requires the completion and approval of a specific plan prior to annexation of this area
into the City. This Chapter contains the land use goals, policies, and standards applicable to Froom
Ranch once it is annexed into the City and describes the overall development program.
Froom Ranch will be primarily residential with some commercial development planned in the
northeast corner of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza.
Residential uses in the northern part of the site will be multiple-family.
A major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community known as Villaggio.
Villaggio provides a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as
guaranteed access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled
Nursing, when they are needed. This is the first project of its kind in San Luis Obispo County, but
Life Plan Communities are an established and growing type of senior housing development in other
parts of California and across the United States.
Land use represents the intended future use of each parcel of land with the Specific Plan area.
Zoning describes the associated development standards applied to each parcel. Within the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan Area, the zoning category and land use designation are consistent with one
another.
The formation of the Zoning/Land Use Plan (Figure 2-1) for the site responds directly to the City’s
General Plan Land Use Element directives contained in LUE Section 8.1.5, including:
1. Provision of a minimum of 50 percent of the site as open space for the benefit of all
residents;
2. Compliance with land use performance standards for commercial, residential and parks;
and
3. Provision of new commercial uses that connect to and complement adjacent retail uses
and serve both local and regional residents.
Table 2-1 includes various land uses proposed within the Specific Plan area. This summary allows
for a comparative analysis of development and corresponds to the Zoning/Land Use Plan (see
Figure 2-1). The Froom Ranch Specific Plan includes the following land use/zoning designations:
[2-2]
• Residential Land Use Zones
o R-3-SP – Medium-High Density Residential
o R-4-SP – High-Density Residential
• Non-Residential Land Use Zones
o C-R-SP – Retail-Commercial
o C/OS-SP – Conservation/Open Space
o PF-SP - Public Facilities
Table 2-1 Land Use/Zoning Summary
Land Use Zoning Acres Density
Range
Potential
Units
Potential
Square
Feet/Beds
RESIDENTIAL
Medium-High Density Residential
Madonna Multifamily Units R-3-SP 6.2 13-20
du/ac 130
Medium-High Density Residential
Life Plan Community
R-3-SP 23.0 13-20
du/ac
Villas 61
Garden Apartments 108
Apartments 150
Village Suites 47
Assisted Living Units 38
Memory care and skilled nursing 51 beds
Ancillary facilities such as recreation
center, restaurants, and theaters. 67,485 sf
High-Density Residential
Multifamily apartments R-4-SP 1.8 21-24
du/ac 44
RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL 31.0 5781
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Retail-Commercial C-R-SP 3.0 100,0002
Conservation/ Open Space C/OS-SP 66.23
Public Facilities P-F-SP
Neighborhood Park 3.6
Other (Roads) 5.9
NON-RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL 78.7
TOTAL 109.7
1 Exceeds LUCE range of 200-350; consistent with guidance that maximizing housing units is consistent with
City goals.
2 Consistent with LUCE range of 50,000-350,000 square feet of commercial development.
3 Includes proposed project open space (58.4 acres) as well as an open space easement (7.8 acres).
[2-3]
Figure 2-1 Zoning/Land Use Map
[2-4]
Figure 2-2 Site Plan with Building Heights
[2-5]
Consistent with the cited General Plan guidance from LUE Section 8.15 for Specific Plan Area #3
and the overall project goals contained in Section 1.3 of this Specific Plan, the following goals,
policies, and programs are intended to guide the range and density of residential development
envisioned in the project.
Goal 2.2a: Provide multiple housing types to attract a variety of households, with
incomes ranging from low to above moderate.
Policy 2.2.1: The Froom Ranch Specific Plan includes Medium-High Density Residential (R-
3), and High Density Residential (R-4). The allocation of area in each zone is
shown in Figure 2-1.
Policy 2.2.2 Affordable housing shall be constructed within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan Area (see additional discussion in Affordable Housing Section 2.3).
Goal 2.2b: Development of the Froom Ranch Area as a neighborhood with
footprints and densities to make efficient use of land, while maintaining
appropriate open space and park areas for the enjoyment of all City
residents.
Policy 2.2.3: The zoning/land use designations included herein shall supersede the City’s
zoning ordinance that applies to similar designations found elsewhere in the
City, except where specifically referenced or where the Specific Plan is silent. In
such cases, existing City zoning standards apply.
Policy 2.2.4: Uses allowed in the Froom Ranch Area residential land use designations shall
be consistent with the City’s Zoning Regulations except for those stipulated uses
which are listed as prohibited because they were found to be incompatible with
planned uses at this location.
Policy 2.2.5: Density in the Froom Ranch Area shall be calculated as prescribed by
Section 17.16.010 of the City’s Zoning Regulations except that dwellings with
two or more bedrooms shall account for 1.0 density unit.
Program2.2.2a: Create development standards that are customized for site development to
realize residential project goals.
Most of the residentially zoned land within the Specific Plan area is included in the Medium-High
Density Residential (R-3-SP) zoning category. R-3-SP zoning will be utilized for two major land use
purposes in this Specific Plan:
1) Non-Restricted Housing – These units are available to all age groups and are located in the
northwestern portion of the Specific Plan area.
2) Life Plan Community – This is the gated senior residential community in the southern
portions of the site.
[2-6]
R-3-SP – Medium-High Density Residential
6.2 acres of R-3-SP are designated within the Madonna portion of the Specific Plan area. Per the
City’s Zoning Regulations, this designation is intended primarily to provide housing opportunities
for smaller-scale, multiple-family housing clusters. These areas are generally close to commercial
uses and provide common public/private facilities for use by neighborhood residents.
23.0 acres of R-3-SP are designated for the proposed Life Plan Community (Villaggio). The R-3-SP
zoning category is appropriate for the planned residential density of garden apartments and villas,
as well as accommodates specialized residential facilities, such as skilled nursing and memory
care. Ancillary services such as restaurants for communal dining, theaters, and recreation centers
would be allowed as accessory uses, which are “clearly subordinate and directly related to a
permitted use”, per the City’s Zoning Regulations since they are intended to serve on-site residents,
rather than the general public. Villaggio is considering a childcare center for the benefit of its
employees which is allowed in the R-3-SP zone and addresses trip reduction strategies discussed
in Section 4.7.
R-4-SP - High Density Residential
1.8 acres of R-4-SP zoning are included within the Specific Plan area. This designation is committed
to high-density residential development which provides housing opportunities for smaller
households. It is further intended to allow for concentrations of housing close to employment,
transportation networks, and commercial services.
This area is located south of the proposed C-R-SP zoning in the northeast corner of the site. A
portion of this area is set aside as a potential affordable housing site (see further discussion in
Section 2.3).
Uses shall be as provided consistent with the City’s Zoning Regulations for the R-3-SP and R-4-SP
Zones, except that the following are prohibited:
▪ Bed and Breakfast inn
▪ Hostel
▪ Convents and monasteries
▪ Fraternity, sorority
▪ Mobile home park
▪ Cemetery, mausoleum, columbarium
The following policies are provided with the intent to guide development in R-3 and R-4 zones:
Goal 2.2c: Develop new residential development which creates private spaces for
individuals, but also through site planning, includes areas for socializing
and neighborhood interaction.
Policy 2.2.6: Multifamily units shall have private open space areas, such as balconies or
patios, and have access to common outdoor areas.
[2-7]
Policy 2.2.7: All common outdoor areas within multifamily projects shall be privately
maintained by a method acceptable to the Community Development
Department.
Goal 2.2d: Create a pedestrian-friendly community with attractive views,
pleasant parks, open space areas, and linkages within the development
area and to the adjacent open space areas.
Policy 2.2.8: Multifamily developments shall provide connections to pedestrian paths in
the Specific Plan area for access to commercial, park, and open space areas.
This policy includes the Life Plan Community which will include controlled
access points within the development to connect to the pedestrian paths
within the overall Specific Plan area and adjacent open space areas.
Development standards ensure that new development is consistent with San Luis Obispo’s
community character and provide direction to developers, property owners, architects, and
designers. These standards, in conjunction with R-3 and R-4 zoning standards in the City’s
municipal code, serve as the zoning code for development within the Specific Plan area. Along with
design guidelines, these standards are the primary development criteria that City Staff, the
Architectural Review Commission (ARC), the Planning Commission, and City Council will use to
evaluate project proposals.
Table 2-2 Development Standards4
Standard R-3-SP R-4-SP
Maximum Density 20 du/ac 24 du/ac
Minimum Density 13 du/ac 21 du/ac
Maximum Building Coverage 60% 60%
Maximum Building Height5 35’; up to 50’ for multi-story Life
Plan Community buildings6
35’
Minimum Street Yard Setback 15’ 15’
Minimum Other Yard Setback 5’ 5’
Minimum Lot Size7 1,000 sq.ft. 1,000 sq.ft.
Minimum Lot Width 20’ 20’
Minimum Lot Depth 50’ 50’
4 Density and height standards apply to the Life Plan Community (Villaggio) development area, but since
there are not individual lots for residences, coverage, setbacks, and lot standards do not apply.
5 Building heights are measured from finished grades established at time of completion of subdivision
grading.
6 Components of solar energy systems, towers, and mechanical equipment screening may extend up to 10
feet above the maximum building height.
7 Small lot standards intended to allow “building footprints” to define separate ownerships (PUD type of
common interest subdivisions).
[2-8]
C-R-SP – Retail-Commercial
Froom Ranch includes 3.0 acres of C-R-SP, located on the northeast side of the Specific Plan area,
adjacent to Los Osos Valley Road and abutting Irish Hills Plaza on the north. The C-R-SP
designation is intended to provide for a wide range of retail sales, business, personal and
professional services, as well as recreation, entertainment, transient lodging, and some residential
uses. The C-R zone implements and is consistent with the General Retail land use category of the
General Plan. The following goals have been established for these land uses:
Goal 2.2.e: Create commercial, office, and retail services that connect to and complement adjacent retail uses and serve both local residents and regional visitors.
Goal 2.2.f: Accommodate mixed-use development through the allowance of upper floor offices and residential units.
Uses shall be provided consistent with the Zoning Regulations for the C-R Zone, except that the
following are prohibited due to potential land use conflicts or incompatible scale and intensity of
development:
▪ Nightclub
▪ Auto and vehicle sales and rental
▪ Auto parts sales, with installation
▪ Building and landscape materials sales, outdoor
▪ General retail – More than 60,000 sf, up to 140,000 sf
▪ Service station
▪ Warehouse stores - more than 45,000 gross floor area
▪ Cemetery, mausoleum, columbarium
▪ Mortuary, funeral home
▪ Vehicle services, repair and maintenance – minor
▪ Vehicle services – carwash
▪ Transit station or terminal
Property development standards shall be consistent with the City’s Zoning Regulations for the
C-R Zone.
[2-9]
C/OS-SP – Conservation Open Space
The project provides a total of 66.2 acres of C/OS-SP Zoning, which includes a 7.8-acre open space
easement. Consistent with the City’s General Plan performance standard of providing a minimum
of 50% of the Specific Plan area as Open Space/Agriculture (LUE Section 8.1.5. SP-3, Madonna on
LOVR Specific Plan Area), 58.4 acres or 58% of the net site area within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan is allocated as open space. The net site area of 101.2 acres excludes the 7.1 acres of a
previously dedicated open space easement, as well as 1.4 acres of developed street right-of-way
for Calle Joaquin, from the total site acreage of 109.7 acres. With the development of the site, the
size of the open space easement was increased from 7.1 to 7.8 acres and reconfigured to better
define the extent of on-site wetlands.
Table 2-3 Open Space Calculations
Area Acres Notes
Entire site 109.7
Existing Open Space - 7.1 Dedicated via easement
Improved Road Area - 1.4 Calle Joaquin
Net Site Area 101.2
Required Open Space 50.6 50% of net site area
Open Space Provided
Project Open Space 58.4 58% of net site area
The C/OS zoning has been applied to areas containing natural resources such as creek corridors,
wetlands, serpentine outcroppings, and rare plant species. The intent is to create contiguous
spaces that add a natural backdrop to proposed development and a seamless transition to
adjacent open space areas within the Irish Hills. Chapter 3 discusses site resources in greater
detail and provides goals, policies, and programs to ensure that these resources are protected
with the planned development of the site.
PF-SP – Public Facilities
The Public Facility designated area is 3.6 acres in size and is intended to provide for public
recreation uses on public property. The PF-SP designation would apply to the proposed trailhead
park.
Policy 2.2.9: Authorized uses in the PF-SP designated area include park/playgrounds, adaptive
reuse of historic structures for City uses, and associated public recreation facilities.
Policy 2.2.10: Development in the PF-SP zone is subject to the City’s PF Property Development
Standards included in the City’s Zoning Regulations (Section 17.36.020).
[2-10]
The City's General Plan Land Use Element requires that specific plans for residential expansion
areas include sites suitable for affordable housing. The minimum requirement states that a total of
15% of new housing within the Specific Plan area be affordable, and that affordable housing be
provided onsite. This 15% consists of 5% of the new units being rented or sold at prices affordable
to low income households and 10% to moderate income households.
The affordable housing requirement will be met either by dedicating land to the San Luis Obispo
Housing Authority, or other City recognized low-income housing developer, or by building
affordable units as part of the development. When land is dedicated in-lieu of providing affordable
housing units, all frontage improvements and off-site improvements required to serve affordable
housing development shall be installed by market-rate housing developers.
Froom Ranch Area Affordable Housing
Goal 2.3: Provide deed-restricted housing for low and moderate-income households
consistent with General Plan guidance, and State Affordable Housing standards.
Policy 2.3.1: The City’s inclusionary housing requirements shall be met by building affordable
units within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area.
Policy 2.3.2: 15% of housing units within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan area shall be
affordable; consisting of 5% being rented or sold to low income households, and
10% to moderate income households.
Policy 2.3.3: Developers of residential developments may dedicate land to the Housing
Authority, or other City recognized low-income housing developer, in-lieu of
constructing the required affordable housing units. Land that is dedicated for
developing affordable housing must be of sufficient size to construct at least the
number of low and/or moderate-income units required by the Inclusionary
Housing Ordinance.
Program 2.3.3a: With the dedication of land to a qualified low-income housing developer for a
future affordable housing project to meet Inclusionary Housing requirements,
the market-rate housing developer shall install all frontage improvements and
off-site improvements to serve the affordable housing site.
Policy 2.3.4: Affordable housing units are exempt from growth management
requirements.
An affordable housing project constructed by a qualified low-income housing developer is
proposed on a portion of the R-4-SP site near Los Osos Valley Road. This project is intended to
satisfy the Inclusionary Housing requirements of the entire Specific Plan area, including R-3-SP
housing and commercial development proposed in the northern portion of the site, as well as the
Life Plan Community. Final Inclusionary numbers will be dependent on actual residential units
developed within the project.
[2-11]
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area is currently subject to the requirements of the San Luis Obispo
County Regional Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP). Figure 3, Aviation Safety Areas, of the current ALUP
shows that portions of Airport Safety Areas S-1b and S-1c are in the northeastern portion of the
Specific Plan area. However, with two recent Specific Plan projects reviewed by the City of San Luis
Obispo, a corrected version of the analog map used in ALUP Figure 3 has been utilized to review
the consistency of projects with the ALUP. That new map has corrected the locations of the safety
areas to the true GIS bearings of Runways 7-25 and 11-29.
When the project site is overlain on the corrected safety areas map, it is located outside of both
Safety Areas S-1b and S-1c, but is included in Safety Area S-2. The Airport Land Use Commission
(ALUC) conceptually reviewed the project on April 19, 2017 and determined that the use of the
corrected map was appropriate. On July 15, 2020, the ALUC considered a mandatory referral from
the City of San Luis Obispo regarding proposed amendments to the City’s General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance to implement the Froom Ranch Development Plan. The ALUC determined that that the
amendments are consistent with the ALUP, based on findings, and subject to conditions.
Conditions of consistency for the project site include:
1) The residential density is limited to 630 dwelling units.
2) The non-residential density is limited to 750 persons.
3) The maximum building coverage is limited to 20%.
The ALUP is currently being updated. A draft Safety Areas map included as part of the ALUC’s May
20, 2020 agenda packet shows the project site is entirely outside of ALUP safety zone areas.
Types and Intensities of Land Use
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is consistent with the current version of the ALUP because it
complies with the density and coverage restrictions of Safety Area S-2. The residential potential
density (578 units) is below the 630-unit threshold based on the Safety Area S-2 standards (6
units/acre x 105 acres). Non-residential density would be 750 persons (150 persons/acre x 5 acres).
Proposed site coverage is estimated to be about 19%, which is under the standard of 20%. ALUP
Figure 1, Airport Noise Contours, shows that the site is outside of the airport noise contours. The
project will comply with City General Plan noise requirements.
The following goal and policies are intended to provide for on-going consistency between the
Froom Ranch Specific Plan and ALUP.
Goal 2.5. Develop the Froom Ranch Area consistent with the County’s Airport Land Use
Plan.
Policy 2.5.1: Ensure that no structure, landscaping, apparatus, or other feature, whether
temporary or permanent in nature shall constitute an obstruction to air
navigation or a hazard to air navigation.
[2-12]
Policy 2.5.2: This specific plan shall serve as the Detailed Area Plan as required by the
Airport Land Use Plan and development shall comply with Airport Land Use
Commission conditions.
Policy 2.5.3: If required, avigation easements shall be recorded at the time of subdivision development for each affected parcel in a form approved by the County of San
Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Commission.
CONSERVATION.
OPEN SPACE &
RECREATION
03
[3-1]
A key vision of this Specific Plan is to provide additional open space within the Specific Plan
area to protect natural resources and to augment the dedicated City open space area of the
Irish Hills adjacent to the site. This chapter of the specific plan sets the framework for protecting
the open space and sensitive resources and for providing recreational opportunities. The
Specific Plan identifies areas for recreational facilities in a public park, and provides for the
preservation of approximately 60% of the total Specific Plan area as Open Space.
The City’s Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) defines open space as:
…any land or water area that remains in a predominantly natural or undeveloped state and
which is generally free of structures, inside or outside City limits, within the San Luis Obispo
Planning Area ... such lands protect and preserve the community’s natural and historical
resources, define the urban boundary, and provide visual and physical relief from urban
development. (Conservation and Open Space Element, Chapter 8)
Open space areas create visual tranquility and provide a sense of calm while the park, historic
structures, and trail systems provide opportunities to promote education of the local area and
foster a healthy community though exercise, play, and social interaction. This Chapter
discusses the provision of open space, recreational spaces, and protection of historic and scenic
resources, as well as includes goals, policies, and programs for ensuring conservation and
protection of these valuable resources.
[3-2]
Figure 3-1 Site Constraints Map
[3-3]
Open space is the predominant land use occupying 66.2 acres or 60% of the total Specific Plan
area. This 66.2-acre total includes the proposed project open space of 58.4 acres, as well as the
reconfigured open space easement of 7.8 acres (see Figure 3-2 below).
Natural open space areas include wetlands, creek corridors, areas with significant slopes, and
development buffers. At Froom Ranch, open space is woven throughout the Specific Plan area
giving residents and visitors a feeling of openness and visual serenity. Consistent with policy
direction, the open spaces provided in the project are contiguous and often directly abutting
adjacent open space areas.
Figure 3-2 Open Space Plan
[3-4]
The project site is a total of 109.7 acres. However, the net site area is 101.2 acres, which is the total
site area of 109.7 acres less 8.5 acres, comprised of 7.1 acres of an e existing agriculture/open space
easement, as well as 1.4 acres of undedicated Calle Joaquin roadway.
The proposed 58.4 acres of project open space is 58% of the net site area, which complies with the
City’s General Plan performance standard of providing a minimum of 50% of the Specific Plan Area
as Open Space/Agriculture (LUE Section 8.1.5. SP-3, Madonna on LOVR Specific Plan Area). Table
2-3 in Chapter 2 provides detailed open space calculations.
With project development, the existing 7.1-acre agriculture/open space easement area would be
reconfigured. The reconfigured easement area would be increased in size to 7.8-acres and will
incorporate the on-site wetland areas. The relationship between the existing and proposed
easement areas is shown on the previous page in Figure 3-2.
The original easement agreement was recorded in May 2010 as a condition of development of the
Irish Hills Plaza project to provide permanent open space (Document # 2010023616). Although
originally created to mitigate for the loss of prime agricultural farmland, the easement agreement
specifically references that the easement area may be used for wetland and biological resources
mitigation banking. The reconfigured area encompasses on-site wetland areas in a more efficient
pattern than the existing easement area based on the wetland delineation reviewed by the Army
Corps of Engineers in their Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.
Froom Creek is an intermittent stream with a relatively small watershed that originates in the Irish
Hills southwest of the Specific Plan area. Within the Specific Plan area, Froom Creek is a relatively
narrow channel with incised banks that bisects the Specific Plan area in a north to south direction,
and ultimately flows beneath U.S. Highway 101 via two concrete box culverts, heading to its
confluence with San Luis Obispo Creek. Due to the lack of dominant wetland vegetation within or
adjacent to the channel, Froom Creek was classified as a non-wetland waters of the U.S. and state
of California subject to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board and
California Department of Fish and Wildlife jurisdiction pursuant to the Clean Water Act (Sections
401 and 404) and California Fish and Game Code (KMA, 2016).
[3-5]
Photograph of the existing Froom Creek corridor
The Specific Plan area also includes three other small, unnamed intermittent watercourses that
contribute to the overall watershed network. They absorb significant amounts of rainwater and
runoff that are vital to groundwater recharge, pollution reduction, wildlife habitat, and flood
control. In addition, the Specific Plan area includes jurisdictional wetland habitat located on the
southeastern part of the site near Los Osos Valley Road and Calle Joaquin. These areas are
dominated by willows and other aquatic plants. The area also provides habitat value for birds and
other wildlife. The wetland area will continue to be set aside as permanent open space with project
development.
Froom Creek has a history of periodic flooding with estimated overbank flows occurring every five
to six years (Balance Hydrologics, 2005). Studies have shown that while some overbank flow
contributes to wetland habitat along Calle Joaquin, the primary function of Froom Creek appears
to be groundwater recharge, and subsurface maintenance of the Calle Joaquin wetland area.
Historically, Froom Creek had a different alignment from what is currently on the site today. Based
on review of an 1895 U.S. Geological Survey topographic map, the creek channel took a more direct
northeasterly path as it exited the Irish Hills and ultimately connected with Prefumo Creek and San
Luis Obispo Creek.
[3-6]
Figure 3-3 Froom Creek Historical Alignment
With this information, and taking into consideration the unique characteristics of the Specific Plan
area, a program has been developed (Program 3.2.2a) to restore Froom Creek to be closer to its
historic location on the property, keeping its current hydrologic connection to San Luis Obispo
Creek and connection to the wetlands habitat near Calle Joaquin. Development of the Specific Plan
area will enhance and restore the historic creek corridor alignment, and allow it to traverse future
development areas. The restored creek corridor will be enhanced with native plant communities
that will thrive, be non-invasive, and require little maintenance. This would increase the functions
and values of the riverine system including enhancing wildlife habitat and resolving the periodic
flooding issues, while also providing an opportunity for people of all ages and abilities the chance
to experience the unique ecological and pastoral qualities of the creek setting.
Goal 3.2a: Protect and enhance creek, riparian, and wetland habitats in the Specific Plan
area.
Goal 3.2b: Ensure circulation improvements and development envelopes within the
Specific Plan area minimize impacts to creeks and wetlands.
Policy 3.2.1: Designate and set aside creeks, wetlands, and riparian vegetation as Open
Space.
Policy 3.2.2: Avoid and minimize impacts to wetland, creek, and riparian areas.
[3-7]
Program 3.2.2a: Froom Creek may be restored to be closer to its historic drainage pattern
with City and jurisdictional agency approvals. Froom Creek shall meet the
following performance standards:
1) Include a natural bottom, and utilize existing boulders and cobbles that
are relocated from the existing creek corridor.
2) Contain a low-flow channel that allows for pooling, deposition, and
load transport.
3) Incorporate stepped pools and terraces to control fish migration
patterns.
4) Be designed so that storm drainage will overflow into the adjacent
existing wetlands during storm events.
5) Accommodate 100-year storm flows within the creek banks.
Figure 3-4 Froom Creek Corridor Enlargement
Program 3.2.2b: Development is subject to a 35-foot creek setback from Froom Creek. The
setback shall be measured from top of bank (see Figure 3-5). The location
of top of bank shall be shown on all proposed project plans.
[3-8]
Figure 3-5 Froom Creek Setback Standards
Program 3.2.2c: Landscaping along creeks and drainages shall include native riparian plants,
located in naturalistic spacing and groupings to enhance and blend with the
surrounding open space.
Program 3.2.2d: Plant species that are listed by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC)
as invasive are prohibited within riparian corridors. Existing invasive plants
and noxious weeds shall be removed prior to landscape installation.
Program 3.2.2e: Development shall be set back from all on-site wetland habitats on the
project site. The location of wetland vegetation shall be shown on all
proposed project plans.
Policy 3.2.3: Impacts to wetland, creek, and riparian areas shall be mitigated consistent
with the City’s Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE), and other
regulatory agency requirements as appropriate.
Policy 3.2.4: Roadway crossings over Froom Creek should be accomplished by use of natural
bottom culverts.
Policy 3.2.5: Given that the creek corridor will be realigned and reconstructed as part of site
development and adjacent areas will not contain substantial sensitive riparian
habitat or other sensitive areas at the time of construction, recreational trails
installed with a pervious material may be placed within the setback area prior
to re- establishment of vegetation and restoration activities (see Figure 3-6).
Program 3.2.5: The Froom Creek setback area may contain a pedestrian trail that is six-feet
wide and surfaced with pervious materials. Rest areas should be provided
in key locations along the creek corridor and contain benches.
[3-9]
Figure 3-6 Froom Creek Corridor Enhancements
A Biological Resources Inventory Report was prepared for the Specific Plan area (KMA, November
2018) along with a rare plant update (KMA, July 2019) to determine the presence of special status
plants. The Report includes survey results for those species that are known to occur on serpentine
based soils and as having potential to occur within Froom Ranch. The Survey identified 204 plant
species of which 13 are designated as special status species. The special status species are listed
below:
• Blochman’s dudleya (Dudleya
blochmaniae)
• Brewer’s spineflower (Chorizanthe
breweri)
• Cambria morning glory (Calystegia
subacaulis ssp. episcopalis)
• Chaparral ragwort (Senecio
aphanactis)
• Chorro Creek bog thistle (Cirsium
fontinale var. obispoense)
• Club hair mariposa lily (Calochortus
clavatus ssp. clavatus)
• Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia
parryi ssp. congdonii)
• Eastwood’s larkspur (Delphinium
parryi ssp. eastwoodiae)
• Jones’s layia (Layia jonesii)
• Mouse-gray dudleya (Dudleya
abramsii ssp. murina)
• Palmer’s spineflower (Chorizanthe
palmeri)
• San Luis mariposa lily (Calochortus
obispoensis)
• San Luis Obispo owl’s-clover
(Castilleja densiflora ssp.
obispoensis)
[3-10]
Nine of the special status plants listed above are California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) List 1B species,
and one is a List 2 species (Chaparral Ragwort). List 2 means that the species is rare in California
but more widespread elsewhere. The federal and state endangered Chorro Creek bog thistle was
also identified on-site but was confined to the wetland areas in the southwestern part of the
Specific Plan area. The remaining species are CRPR List 4 species that are on a watch list but are
relatively common to the area.
Goal 3.2.c: Preservation of unique plant communities, particularly those that support
special status species.
Goal 3.2.d: Protect important biological resources including “Plant Communities of Local
Concern” such as the Serpentine Bunchgrass Grassland to the extent feasible
with development.
Policy 3.2.6: Protect and enhance habitat through re-introduction of native California
vegetation and removal of non-native species.
Policy 3.2.7: Avoid or minimize impacts on sensitive natural communities, special-status plant
species and habitats through the implementation of mitigation measures and/or
at the discretion of the Community Development Director. Special status species
include those identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or the City of San Luis Obispo.
Program3.27a: Place development footprints beyond primary occurrences of plants. Where
impacts are unavoidable, establish elsewhere on site or in the adjacent open
space area (particularly successful with Congdon’s tarplant).
Fault traces of the Los Osos Fault occur on-site. Lineaments as seen on aerial photographs and
geologic maps, along with field observation of surface topographic expression, were used to
determine where exploratory site work, including trenching, should occur. Fifteen individual
trenches were excavated to locate the fault traces and determine their approximate age (see Figure
3-1, Site Constraints Map, for locations). In addition, published technical reports were referenced
to further define the characteristics of fault traces.
The Los Osos fault zone is a reverse thrust type fault that dips to the south and maint ains a
discontinuous rupture pattern. Due to differences in deformation, development setbacks
consistent with seismic report recommendations have been established at the site.
Seismic Goals, Policies and Programs:
Goal 3.2.e: Minimize impacts to future residents from potential seismic activity.
Policy 3.2.3: Comply with applicable State and local standards for development near fault
traces.
[3-11]
Program 3.2.3: Habitable structures, residences, critical support facilities, care facilities, and
buildings occupied more than 2,000 hours per year shall be developed outside
of required setbacks. Roadways and utilities may occupy areas of active faulting.
The Draft EIR identified that the area in the vicinity of the confluence of Drainage 1, 2, and 3 and the
realigned Froom Creek is a diverse and biologically rich area. While development is not proposed
in the upper terrace area of the site and it will be kept in open space uses, there are portions of the
Villaggio development that are near this area. Mitigation Measure MM BIO-13 requires the project
to establish a 300-foot development buffer on the centerline of the confluence of Drainage 1, 2, and
3 to maintain natural vegetation, ecological, hydrologic, and wildlife connectivity between the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve and the Froom Creek corridor. The mitigation measure requires the buffer to
extend from the point at which the proposed realigned Froom Creek exits the Specific Plan area ,
upstream along the centerlines of Drainages 1, 2, and 3 for 600 linear feet and that residential uses
be relocated to areas outside of this buffer.
Goal 3.2.f: Minimize impacts to wildlife corridors.
Policy 3.2.4: Leave the area on the southwestern side of the Villaggio project above the 150-foot
elevation as open space to preserve rare plant species and allow for wildlife
movement.
Program 3.2.4a: Consistent with Mitigation Measure MM BIO-13, a 300-foot buffer shall be
established on the centerline of the confluence of Drainage 1, 2, and 3 from the
location where the realigned Froom Creek exits the Specific Plan area upstream
for 600 feet to maintain natural vegetation, ecological, hydrologic, and wildlife
connectivity between the Irish Hills Natural Reserve and the Froom Creek corridor
(see Figure 3.7).
Program 3.2.4b: Consistent with Mitigation Measure MM BIO-14, proposed roadway/pathway
crossings over any drainage shall be designed to ensure adequate passage for
wildlife, consistent with the design standards and guidelines of the Federal
Highway Administration Wildlife Crossing Structure Handbook.
[3-12]
Figure 3-7 Wildlife Corridor
[3-13]
Cultural resources refer to the potential presence of significant historical, and/or archaeological,
resources. The Specific Plan area includes several historic structures developed in the late 1800s
and early 1900s as part of a ranching and dairy farm complex. The site also includes two recorded
prehistoric sites.
John Madonna, the applicant, and property owner for the project, commissioned several technical
reports which covered both archaeological (pre-historic) and historic resources associated with the
site. The principal comprehensive reports for the project site are entitled “Froom Ranch Specific
Plan Cultural Resource Assessment” and “Froom Ranch Specific Plan Historic Resource Assessment”;
they were prepared by the firm First Carbon Solutions in conjunction with Chattel Inc. and are
dated July 2017. A Supplemental Phase I Cultural Resources Report (First Carbon Solutions, August
2018) and Limited Phase II Cultural Resources Assessment (Condor Country Consulting, Inc.,
September 2018) were prepared to evaluate a prior demolished homestead that existed on the off-
site drainage basin area. In addition, Chattel, Inc. prepared a historic resource evaluation dated
July 2018 to evaluate a series of linear rock features located beyond proposed development sites.
Site History
The property was used as a dairy from the 1850s to 1977, and includes a complex of buildings,
constructed at various times, such as a dairy barn, creamery, granary, four-bedroom house, and
bunkhouse. These buildings remain standing in the northwestern portion of the Specific Plan area,
just south of Home Depot, but several are in very poor structural condition and are not habitable.
The namesake for the ranch is its original developer, John Froom, a native of Canada. He came to
the area in the 1870s as a laborer. He leased 500 acres of the ranch in 1890 and began dairying with
50 cows. After John Froom’s death in 1929, Bill Froom, one of the sons of John, took over the ranch
and ran it until 1977. Alex Madonna purchased the property in 1976, and Bill Froom continued to
live on the ranch until 1998. Mr. Madonna raised cattle beef on the property for several years. The
property is currently used by John Madonna as an office and storage yard for his construction
business.
Existing Historic Structures
The Historic Resource Assessment prepared the for Froom Ranch Specific Plan area identifies the
complex of historic structures as potentially eligible for consideration as local, state, and federal
resources and meets National Register criteria for a historic district. The report notes that the
complex is an excellent example of early 20th century ranching and dairy industry development in
San Luis Obispo County and the structures represent predominant Craftsman and vernacular styles
of that era.
[3-14]
The following table provides a summary of the existing historic buildings on the site, date
constructed (when known), condition, and proposal for the building once the site is further
developed. The current conditions and proposals for the historic structures are based on site
inspections, and input from technical experts, including a structural engineer, Greg Stork of Stork,
Wolfe & Associates, and an architectural historian, Robert Chattel of Chattel, Inc. The existing
locations of all these buildings is shown on Figure 3-8.
Table 3-1 Contributing Historic Structures
# Name Year Built Architecturally
Significant
Condition
Summary
Proposal
1 Main
Residence
1915 Yes Good, most
recently used as
office for
Madonna
Construction.
Rehabilitate and relocate as
building for City Parks and
Recreation:
• Structurally reinforce roof
and walls;
• Provide new foundation;
and
• Install utilities to building.
2 Old Barn 1900 No Good;
extensively
renovated.
Remove and document per
Secretary of the Interior (SOI)
standards.
3 Bunk
House
1915 No Good Remove and document per SOI
standards.
4 Round-
Nose Dairy
Barn
1913 Yes Cantilevered
front end
sagging; gaps in
exterior siding.
Reconstruct and relocate
building out of fault setback
consistent with SOI standards
for adaptive reuse in park.
5 Creamery/
House
Unknown,
likely prior
to 1900
Yes Poor, serious
structural
deficiencies,
and dry rot; not
habitable.
Reconstruct western portion of
the building as City park
restrooms. Re-imagine eastern
portion for use as a covered
area for picnics and events.
6 Granary 1913 No Poor, serious
structural
deficiencies,
and dry rot; not
habitable.
Reconstruct per SOI standards
for adaptive reuse in park.
7 Shed
Building
1913 No Very poor Remove and document per SOI
standards.
Buildings listed in Table 3-1 would be assessed and documented consistent with Secretary of the
Interior (SOI) Standards and Guidelines for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Interpretative
signage that provides information on building history and function should be provided to inform
the public.
[3-15]
There are several other small buildings as well as a modern, telecommunications tower that is
camouflaged to look like a water tower to appear visually compatible with adjacent ranch
buildings. These buildings are inventoried in the following table.
Table 3-2 Other Structures
# Name Year Built Condition Proposal
9 Cell
Tower
2013 Good Retain in place.
10 Storage
Building
Unknown
(post 1970)
Good Remove, not historic per historic
report.
11 Outhouse 2000 Not
functional
Remove, modern building
repurposed as bathroom.
Figure 3-8 Map of Historic Buildings
[3-16]
Historic Goals, Policies & Programs:
Goal 3.3.a: Where feasible per City Historic Preservation Ordinance Section 14.01.020 (#18),
identify, preserve, and adaptively reuse historic resources that embody the
ranch character of the Specific Plan area.
Policy 3.3.1: Assess and document historic buildings consistent with the Secretary of the Interior
(SOI) Rehabilitation Standards and Guidelines.
Policy 3.3.2: Install interpretative signage about historic buildings to provide information and
documentation to the public about their history and function.
Program 3.3.2a: Include historic dairy equipment in onsite displays or donate to local historic
society.
Program 3.3.2b: Harvest old wood and other building features from demolished or refurbished
buildings for use elsewhere on-site.
Significant Historic Buildings Proposal
Based on guidance from the historic report, input from the applicant’s architectural historian,
feedback from City staff members, and the conceptual review of the Specific Plan area by the City’s
Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC), the proposal is to incorporate the most significant historic
structures into the project plans, which were identified as the Round-nose Dairy Barn, Main
Residence, and Creamery/House. The three buildings would be relocated to the 3.6-acre public
trailhead park as a complex (see Figure 3-9, Trailhead Park Plan). In addition, the Granary building
would also be incorporated into plans. Although not as historically or architecturally significant as
the other three structures, this small structure provides a good example of a specialized building
for the dairy business that used to occupy the site.
Because a portion of the Round-nose Dairy Barn is located over an earthquake fault, the locations
of the three structures would be moved uphill to be reused in the trailhead park. The goals of the
site plan are to keep the three most significant historic buildings (the Round-nose Dairy Barn, Main
Residence, and Creamery/House ) grouped together in the same relative horizontal configuration,
and create grade changes between buildings to mimic proportionately the existing vertical
relationship, but also provide for required accessibility. The Granary is proposed to be kept in close
proximity to the Round-nose Dairy Barn as it currently is.
The building proposals are as follows:
Round-nose Dairy Barn – The building reconstructed to SOI standards, and adaptively reused. The
building would not be fully sealed and would have open beams without internal drywall. Some
existing siding would be harvested and reused for rebuilt facades.
Main Residence – The building would fall under the SOI rehabilitation standards and
improvements would include the structural reinforcement of the roof and walls, installation of a
new foundation, and installation of utilities to the building.
[3-17]
Creamery/House – The proposal for the final product is to be more interpretative, rather than a full
reconstruction. The main goal with the rebuilding is to preserve the overall building form and
rooflines. The western portion of the building would be rebuilt to house the restrooms within a
custom footprint with the same dimensions as the existing building. The plan for the eastern
portion of the building beyond the restrooms would be to capture the silhouette and be more
open. The area is envisioned as a covered picnic area within the park.
Granary Building - The building would be reconstructed to SOI standards, and adaptively reused,
likely for storage purposes in the vicinity of the Round-Nose Barn.
The final details and proposals for use of the buildings will be developed with consultation with the
City Parks and Recreation Director and Parks and Recreation Commission. Further details of the
proposed uses for the relocated historic structures and trailhead park development are included
in the following Section of this chapter.
The Specific Plan area includes two previously recorded prehistoric resources. The design for the
proposed project would completely avoid the area surrounding these two sites. Therefore, neither
of the previously recorded prehistoric sites would be affected by project development.
In addition, several isolate prehistoric artifacts and historic features were discovered, and their
locations mapped during the project survey. A small concentration of stone artifacts, including a
projectile point, a core, and chert waste flake was found on a hilltop of the project. In addition,
isolate waste flakes were encountered along the west bank of Froom Creek in the northern portion
of the project, and an isolate biface was mapped in the southeastern portion of the project area.
Pre- Historic Goals, Policies & Programs:
Goal 3.3.b: Long-term protection of pre-historic cultural resources.
Policy 3.3.3: Provide for the protection of known archaeological resources.
Policy 3.3.4: Section 4.30 of the City of San Luis Obispo’s Archeological Resource
Preservation Guidelines, Mitigation Methods, and Avoidance, are hereby
included by reference.
The City of San Luis Obispo requires a minimum dedication of ten (10) acres of parkland per 1,000
residents. Based on the estimated 130 Specific Plan area dwelling units outside of the Life Plan
Community at 2.29 persons per unit, a total of 2.9 acres of parkland is required. The Specific Plan
area meets this requirement by providing 3.6 acres of parkland in the form of a public trailhead
park. Villaggio will be meeting their parkland commitment by paying in-lieu fees as discussed in
Section 3.4.3 on Page 3-21.
[3-18]
As discussed in the previous section of this Specific Plan, the Froom Ranch project site includes a
complex of historic structures that are typical of early 20th century ranching and dairy industry
development in San Luis Obispo County. The Trailhead Park will preserve and maintain the
existing historic character of Froom Ranch by retaining the most architecturally significant historic
structures on the property and incorporating them into the park for adaptive reuse. A key part of
the park’s vision is to celebrate the site’s history and to educate the public about the former dairy
and ranching uses. This will be accomplished through signage, kiosks, and displays regarding the
site’s ranching and dairy history.
A principal goal of the park is to provide connections to the surrounding public trails. The Trailhead
Park is designed to conveniently link the project and the park to the surrounding public trails along
Froom Creek and the adjacent Irish Hills Natural Reserve, and to provide off-street parking to
accommodate trail users. In addition, the park will provide typical support features such as
benches, picnic tables, restrooms, an active play lawn area, and a playground. The Froom Ranch
Trailhead Public Park parcel is approximately 3.6 acres in size. The entire parcel would be
dedicated to the City of San Luis Obispo.
Trailhead Park Areas & Features
The Trailhead Park is proposed to include areas for recreation and play, as well as offices and
storage areas for the City’s Park and Recreation Department including the ranger staff . The
following includes a summary of anticipated facilities that are shown graphically in the Trailhead
Park concept (Figure 3-9):
1) Main Residence – The historic building would be rehabilitated and potentially used as a
ranger station/interpretive center. A small parking area is provided through a maintenance
driveway that would provide a place for guests and ranger service vehicles.
2) Creamery/House – The historic building would be reconstructed and reimagined and
would provide restroom facilities and a sheltered picnic area.
3) Round-Nose Barn - The historic building would be reconstructed and used for storage and
a mini corporation yard. To accommodate the City’s Park and Recreation Department’s
maintenance vehicles, a separate driveway is provided off the public street cul-de-sac.
4) Granary - The historic building would be reconstructed and used for storage.
5) Trailhead Plaza - A trailhead plaza is proposed in a key location to conveniently link the
parking areas with the Froom Creek and adjacent Irish Hills Natural Reserve trail systems.
It will contain benches, bike parking, directional signage, and trail maps.
6) Playground - The fenced playground will contain informal play features made from natural
elements such as wood, rope, and boulders.
7) Picnic Area - An informal picnic area is proposed to provide group picnic opportunities and
will contain picnic tables, and trash and recycling receptacles.
[3-19]
8-10) Vehicular Access and Off-Street Parking - The Trailhead Park will provide off-street parking
spaces, which includes at least 30 spaces and bus parking. At the end of the cul-de-sac,
there will be a 12-foot wide driveway apron with bollards to allow the City’s Fire & Parks
and Recreation Departments to have access to the open space.
12) Active Play Lawn Area – A large lawn area will be provided to accommodate a variety of
active outdoor games and play. Trees and other vegetation will be planted along the
perimeter to provide a buffer to neighboring residential uses.
Figure 3-9 Trailhead Park Concept
[3-20]
1. Parks should provide pedestrian linkages to the existing trail system within the adjacent
Irish Hills Natural Reserve.
2. Primary pedestrian pathways in the parks should be six-feet wide and paved with concrete
surfacing.
3. Paving for parking in the parks would be asphalt. Paved plaza areas should be decorative
permeable pavers, brick, and/or colored and scored concrete.
4. Ranch style wire fencing should be used to delineate the boundaries of the parks and
adjacent open space areas.
5. Lighting should be minimal and placed within the parking areas and primary plaza areas
only if required for safety purposes. Fixture styles should be historically accurate to the
Froom Ranch setting.
6. Park landscaping should primarily consist of drought-tolerant trees, shrubs, and native
grasses to mimic the historic setting of the ranch.
7. Dense evergreen vegetation should be used when necessary to screen unsightly views such
as service areas. Screening vegetation should also be utilized between the park and
residential lots where needed to provide privacy and to soften fence lines and walls.
The Life Plan Community includes many types of active and passive recreational opportunities for
its senior residents, such as: an outdoor swimming pool, spa pool, gym, trails, pickle ball, bocce
ball, community gardens, resident gardening plots, theater, outdoor seating areas, library, and
craft rooms. Generalized references to potential recreational outdoor areas, recreational indoor
facilities, and community gathering areas are shown in Figure 3-10.
The Life Plan Community will also have a connection to Irish Hills trails. For security reasons, these
would be controlled access linkages to trails beyond the Life Plan Community, which would be
provided by coded gates in fencing. Appropriate signage will be added at key locations to properly
direct hikers to public trails and avoid confusion with entry points to the privately secured Life Plan
Community (see Figure 5-12). See additional discussion in Section 5.5.3 and a fencing guideline in
Section 4.4.4.
The Draft EIR has identified that the projected population of the Life Plan Community which reside
in independent living units will have an impact on Citywide parkland demands. Therefore, the Life
Plan Community will pay parkland-in-lieu and park development fees to offset impacts of the
population on City parkland needs.
[3-21]
Figure 3-10 Life Plan Community’s Recreational Areas
[3-22]
The Specific Plan area is characterized by relatively flat grassland areas near Los Osos Valley Road
which transitions to steeper slopes before approaching open space property at the base of the Irish
Hills. The City’s General Plan states the Specific Plan area should “maintain viewshed of
surrounding mountains and secure steeper hillsides as protected open space areas” and that
“variable height limits will be required to protect views of adjacent hills” (LUE Section 8.1.5. SP-3,
Madonna on LOVR Specific Plan Area b, c).
The street corridor of Los Osos Valley Road that provides the eastern boundary of the Specific Plan
area is identified in the City’s Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE Figure 11) as a scenic
roadway of high scenic value. This designation attests to the scenic value and beauty of the Irish
Hills that are aptly named for the emerald green hue they display in the winter and spring months.
Scenic Resources Goals, Policies & Programs:
Goal 3.5.a: Retain scenic corridors of hillside areas throughout the City.
Policy 3.5.1: Minimize impacts to public views of backdrop hillside views from scenic roadway
corridors.
Program 3.5.1a: During the development review process , the Architectural Review
Commission (ARC) shall approve landscaping plans for the City’s landscaped
setback areas along the site’s Los Osos Valley Road scenic corridor. Trees shall
be clustered to allow some backdrop view corridors.
Goal 3.5b: Allow limited development of residential units above the 150-foot elevation in
the area of the existing quarry in the northwestern portion of the project site.
Policy 3.5.2: The quarry area has changed in elevation over time, has been disturbed by
mining activities, and does not contain rare plant species or other sensitive
habitats. Therefore, potential environmental impacts are minimized while
allowing some limited development at this location and this area is
distinguished from the area above 150 feet in elevation in the southwestern part
of the site.
Program 3.5.2a: Strategies to limit any impacts of new buildings above 150-feet to visual
resources include, but are not limited to:
1) Minimizing the use of retaining walls with over 8 feet of exposed face.
2) Using earth tone colors for main building walls.
3) Limiting exterior lighting and requiring that all fixtures be shielded and
directed downward in compliance with the City’s Night Sky Preservation
Ordinance.
4) Following specific architectural guidance for this area as provided in
Design Guideline 3 in Section 4.3.1.
DESIGN
GUIDELINES
04
[4-1]
The purpose of the design guidelines is to describe the expectations and preferences for quality
and character for new development within the Specific Plan area. The design guidelines are
tailored for the unique characteristics of the project site and provide tools to evaluate potential
projects beyond the regulatory requirements contained in the goals, policies, and standards
contained in the Specific Plan. These guidelines are intended to direct the desired character and
style of new development in the Specific Plan area and not to fully replace, but augment and
complement, the City’s Community Design Guidelines.
These guidelines will be used by design professionals, builders/developers, or property owners
when designing, developing, and implementing projects in the Specific Plan area, as well as City
staff and the Architectural Review Commission when reviewing and evaluating projects.
The Specific Plan area has the dichotomy of being located adjacent to very urban development in
the form of retail shopping centers, car dealerships, and hospitality uses, but also backing up to
the Irish Hills open space. The site itself has various environmental resource areas including
wetlands, flat grasslands, undulating terrain, and steeper hillsides. From some of the upper areas
of the site above 150-foot elevation there are dramatic open vistas and view corridors. These
circumstances provide both opportunities and constraints, and influence the design guidelines for
different areas of the site.
Goal 4.1: Provide design guidelines for high quality development that is attractive
and distinct, but also respects the site’s setting and natural features.
Goal 4.2: Provide for a mix of architectural styles of the current time and place that
complement one another.
These design guidelines are intended as a resource for developing design strategies for all buildings
in the Specific Plan area. Design goals for the Specific Plan are to encompass a variety of
architectural styles, and maintain a high level of craftsmanship by using authentic building
materials, design elements, materials, and colors.
[4-2]
1. Site design through gaps in buildings and placement of structures should retain views
to the upper elevations of the Irish Hills (see Figure 4-1 below).
2. Transitions, such as open space, setbacks, and buffers, should be provided between
Irish Hills open space areas and adjacent developed land uses.
3. Screening landscaping should be provided between the Madonna Froom portion of
the project site and the Irish Hills Plaza.
Figure 4-1 Scenic Resources from Los Osos Valley Road
[4-3]
The topography of the site varies from flat near Los Osos Valley Road (LOVR) to more
undulating terrain. Most of the development area will be in the flatter, low-lying areas of the
site near LOVR. Site grading operations associated with Froom Creek restoration activities and
floodplain management will build up the site from 5-10 feet in this lower area. In steeper areas
of the site, construction techniques will be utilized to minimize exposed grading slopes
(maximum of 1:1 slope to rock, and 2:1 to soil). Building placement should respect site
topography and be integrated to minimize visual impacts.
Finished grade will be established with subdivision grading in Phase 1. Building heights shall
be based on these finish grade elevations for measurement (see Table 2-2).
1. Consistent with the character of other development in the vicinity, project landscaping
along the Los Osos Valley Road corridor should provide a visual transition between the
public street network and project site that is visually pleasing, protects wetland
features to the extent practicable, complements building architecture, and allows for
views to the upper hillsides beyond.
2. The project’s plant palette and landscape plan shall not wall off the project site with a
dense stand of trees along Los Osos Valley Road, but include riparian plants and trees
within the Froom Creek corridor that ensure a vegetated site boundary of sufficient
height and density to provide some visual screening of the proposed development
from public views.
3. Native landscaping shall be planted along Project site boundaries visible from public
views which includes some tree species and shrubs capable of reaching or exceeding
the heights of the adjacent proposed structures.
4. Screening planting selection and location shall emphasize the ability to interrupt the
massing of structures as experienced from area roadways and scenic vistas.
5. Screening planting selection shall emphasize the planting of species to effectively
establish and thrive over the life of the Project, such that smaller sizes shall be
considered rather than exclusively larger box sizes. Planting establishment rates shall
be considered but shall not preclude the use of slower-growing species, such as coast
valley oak and willows.
6. Native tree specimens capable of reaching or exceeding the heights of adjacent
structures shall be planted adjacent to multi-family and commercial structures
located within the interior of the Specific Plan area consistent with the specifications
above.
[4-4]
7. A bond for screening landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to ensure
establishment of plantings. The bond shall be removed upon satisfactory
establishment of screen planting vegetation according to the plan.
8. Shade trees shall be provided in surface parking lots consistent with City standards
contained in the Zoning Regulations and Parking & Driveway Standards. A minimum
of 50% of proposed parking spaces shall be shaded by tree canopy, carports, or a
combination of the two.
9. Landscape maintenance for Villaggio, commercial developments, and residential
developments with a HOA or on-site manager, shall have contract provisions requiring
use of electric equipment. Projects shall be developed with adequate numbers of
outdoor plugs for electric powered landscape equipment.
10. The use of mulch and gorilla hair in landscaping plans shall be minimized to reduce
receptive fire embers (see also Program 7.4.1b discussion of fire resistive landscape
requirements).
1. No specific architectural style is required for the Specific Plan area, however;
architectural design shall incorporate features that are authentic to the style selected
and compatible with the setting.
2. Modern interpretations of common San Luis Obispo styles, such as Mediterranean,
Ranch, Craftsman, and California Mission, are permitted if the design incorporates
forms and some design details that are true to the traditional style.
3. Consistent with Mitigation Measure CR-13, development plans for the new multi-family
residential development on the south side of the Trailhead Park containing the
relocated historic structures, and west of the point where the secondary access road
intersects Local Road A, shall be subject to the following additional design guidelines:
a. New construction shall be compatible with the historic structures through
selected exterior materials and design features, as well as their scale, proportion,
and massing.
b. A more traditional architectural style shall be utilized such as Farmhouse
vernacular.
c. Roof styles, window details, trim features, and exterior materials shall be
consistent with the selected traditional architectural style.
[4-5]
1. Based on the selected architectural style, materials should be carefully selected to be
authentic to that style.
2. All stucco and plastered surfaces shall not be a sprayed-on product and have a smooth
hand-finished appearance.
3. While natural materials such as brick, stone, and wood are encouraged, composite
products that look like real materials are acceptable. If artificial stone-like materials
are used, they should look like local natural materials (for example, stacked ledge
stone, serpentine stone, etc.).
4. Veneers should be of enough depth not to appear tacked-on and terminate at logical
points along building walls, turning outside corners, terminating at inside corners and
avoiding exposed edges.
1. Public gathering places such as courtyards within the development shall be designed
to be protected from prevailing winds through the placement of buildings.
2. Other smaller outdoor use areas shall be protected from winds to the degree
practicable through building wall or fence placement and other features such as
screens.
1. Site design should include design elements that facilitate neighborhood interaction
such as courtyards and entryways facing public walkways.
2. Higher density housing should incorporate individual storage areas and provide small
private outdoor use areas for residents such as patios, decks, and balconies.
3. Residential developments are encouraged to cluster dwellings around a shared
common open space area.
4. Encourage zero lot line development as a means of creating more usable outdoor area
with small lots.
5. Parking lots shall be designed to reduce vehicle queueing and improve the pedestrian
environment.
[4-6]
1. Minimize building mass using varied wall planes and material changes.
2. Where horizontal or vertical siding is used, at a minimum, it should wrap around the
outside corners of buildings to a fence line or interior corner.
3. Compatible with the architectural style of the building, windows should either be
recessed or articulated with accent trim, sills, and other features that add interest and
depth to wall surfaces.
4. Features such as trellises and roof line changes compatible with the architectural
style of the dwelling are encouraged to create a well-defined entry (front door) and
appropriate interface with the public street.
5. For individual villas within the Villaggio development, garage doors shall be set back
five feet from the front façade of the living area of the residence.
1. Building designs with varied roof planes, accent details, and colors and materials, are
encouraged to enhance the diversity and character of the neighborhood.
2. A portion of upper stories should be set back to create a variety of roof lines and
pitches.
3. Roofing colors should be in earth tones to minimize reflective glare and visual impacts.
4. Roof-mounted equipment should be screened from off-site views.
1. For perimeter fencing between development and open space areas at the locations
shown on Figure 4-2, Fence Type 1 should be used, which is a wire strand style (see
Figure 4-3). To provide for wildlife movement, there should be a minimum of 18 inches
between the bottom of fencing and the grade below.
2. For the perimeter fencing for the Villaggio project adjacent to Froom Creek at the
locations shown on Figure 4-2, Fence Type 2 should be used, which is a metal picket
fence style (see Figure 4-3).
3. Along the Public Park in the Madonna Froom portion of the project at the locations
shown in Figure 4-2, Fence Type 3 should be used, which is a solid wood privacy style
fence (see Figure 4-3).
4. Yard area fencing within residential areas shall be reviewed along with project plans
and approved by the relevant City review authority.
[4-7]
Figure 4-2 Fencing Plan
[4-8]
Figure 4-3 Fencing Types
[4-9]
1. All exterior lighting fixtures should be consistent with the architectural style of the
building and enhance building elements and special landscape features.
2. Detailed lighting information, including manufacturers’ cut sheets, shall be included in
project plans for architectural review and building permits and show consistency with
the City’s Night Sky Preservation Ordinance (Section 17.23.050 of the Zoning
Regulations).
3. To promote walkability, connectivity, and safety, pedestrian level lighting shall be
provided along pathways and street corridors where appropriate.
The following guidelines apply to all commercial projects in the Specific Plan area, including
retail and hotel developments.
1. Site design should accomplish an integrated pedestrian network linking the
surrounding residential and open space areas through the thoughtful placement of
pedestrian connections and public spaces such as plazas, seating areas, etc.
2. Buildings should be oriented toward streets. Building design should incorporate
pedestrian walkways, outdoor seating, and landscape areas where possible.
3. Outdoor spaces such as plazas, courtyards and outdoor cafes should be integrated
into the site design and encourage pedestrian use. Outdoor spaces should be inviting
and include ample pedestrian amenities such as benches, lighting, public art,
decorative paving, recirculating fountains, shade trees, and arbors.
4. Entries, site corners, and other highly visible locations should provide focal points to
establish a sense of place and entry. These focal points could include elements such
as accent planting, public art, and recirculating fountains.
5. Restaurants should provide outdoor seating areas protected from prevailing winds.
6. Parking lots shall be designed to reduce vehicle queueing and improve the pedestrian
environment.
1. Buildings should be designed so that all sides have been detailed to complement the
primary street elevation in architecture, massing and materials.
[4-10]
2. One or more of the following design strategies should be used to reduce the perceived
height, bulk, and massing of a building:
a. Variation in the wall plane (projection and recess).
b. Variation in wall height.
c. Roofs located at different levels.
3. Buildings on corner lots and elevations with high visibility should incorporate vertical
architectural elements and focal points that accent the horizontal massing and provide
visual interest.
4. Varying setbacks on upper floors to accommodate balconies and other architectural
treatments should be considered.
5. Architectural details should be used to enhance buildings by adding color, shadows,
patterns and interesting forms. Consider the use of wall surfaces constructed with varying
patterns and changes in materials, and designing building pop-outs, columns, and
recessed areas to create shadow patterns and depth on the wall surfaces.
6. Human scale architectural elements that are integrated into the building design should
be included to provide visual interest at the pedestrian level.
7. Material changes should occur at intersecting planes to appear substantial and integral
to the façade. Material or color changes at the outside corners of structures should be
avoided.
8. The main entrance to a building should be clearly identifiable through a change in the
wall plane, projecting roof element, or other appropriate architectural detailing.
9. New corporate development should be designed for the building site’s scale and
character, and not as a copy of a generic building type that might be used anywhere.
10. Storefront windows are encouraged on all ground floor facades on commercial/retail
buildings.
1. Pitched roof styles, such as hips and gables, should either cover the entire building or
should appear so from the street. On larger scale buildings, roofs should have multiple
planes to minimize bulk and scale.
2. Parapets should appear integral to the building design and be articulated to complement
the architectural style.
3. Roof-mounted equipment shall be screened from pedestrian level views from adjacent
properties where practicable.
[4-11]
1. Wall signs shall utilize more innovative and attractive solutions such as raised, backlit
metal letters, halo lighting or external lighting rather than typical strip mall type plex letters
with internal illumination. Internally illuminated cabinet signs are prohibited.
The main noise sources to the project are from Highway 101 and Los Osos Valley Road (LOVR)
traffic. The City’s Noise Element (last revised May 7, 1996) includes noise contours based on a
generalized citywide study by Brown-Buntin Associates, Inc., showing 1990 and build-out
conditions. These contours are expressed in Ldn which is the day-night average level. The Noise
Guidebook, which is a companion document to the Noise Element, qualifies that the noise contour
information reflects conservative (worst case) assumptions so that significant noise exposure
concerns are not likely to be omitted or understated. The guidebook also notes that the
generalized contours do not consider shielding by buildings or landforms to further attenuate
noise levels.
Noise-sensitive uses such as residences and hotels have maximum noise exposure levels of 60 dB
for outdoor use areas and 45 dB for interior spaces. Noise Element contours for 1990 show that the
60-dB noise contour is outside all planned building footprints. However, the Noise Element 60-dB
noise contour at build-out does affect the footprints of two tiers of housing units closest to the
Highway 101 noise source. Figure 4-4 shows how the 1990 and build-out noise contours from the
Noise Element affect the project site.
Figure 4-4 Noise Contours from the Noise Element
[4-12]
Consistent with Noise Element Policy 1.13, which directs an applicant to provide a noise study early
in the review process where a project may expose people to projected build-out noise levels
exceeding acceptable limits, the applicant team commissioned a noise study prepared by 45 dB
Acoustics (June 2017) to evaluate actual current noise levels at the site from roadways, as well as
projected noise levels at build-out. Sound level measurements were conducted at six different
locations close to the LOVR, Calle Joaquin, and Highway 101 noise sources. The noise contours
plotted for existing and buildout conditions from the noise study are shown in Figure 4-5; these
contours show that all planned building footprints are located beyond the 60-dB noise contour in
both current and projected City build-out conditions. The noise analysis assumed that building
heights of 40-55 feet were proposed.
Differences between the generalized Noise Element contours and noise study contours can be
attributed to:
• The precise noise level information provided by actual field measurements; and
• Noise attenuation to the site provided by intervening buildings and improvements
associated with the LOVR and Highway 101 interchange.
Figure 4-5 Noise Contours from the 2017 Noise Study
[4-13]
In addition to roadway noise sources previously described, the Draft EIR noted that loading
activities at the adjacent shopping center (Irish Hills Plaza) could create intermittent noise impacts
to residential units and park patrons located in the northern portion of the Madonna Froom Ranch
area of the project. 45 dB Acoustics prepared another noise study (April 2020) to evaluate potential
impacts from this noise source. The noise study acknowledged that there would be intermittent
noise impacts from truck loading and other activities at the adjacent shopping center, but that the
noise levels would not exceed thresholds included in the City’s Municipal Code. With a maximum
exterior noise level of 66 dBA for the northernmost portion for the R-3 area closest to the shopping
center, standard exterior wall-window assemblies can reduce interior noise levels to be less than
45 dBA CNEL. The report suggested that outdoor use areas not face north to provide complying
sound levels of less than 60dBA CNEL. The 60 dB and 66dB noise contours are shown on Figure
4-6. Consistent with Mitigation Measure NO-4, as development projects are proposed in the
northernmost part of the site, specific solutions for how complying noise levels for interior and
outdoor use areas can be achieved shall be reflected in project plans and documented by project-
specific noise studies.
Figure 4-6 Noise Contours from the 2020 Noise Study
[4-14]
The following policies, programs, and standards are intended to minimize impacts to existing and
future sensitive receptors.
Noise Reduction Techniques
Goal 4.6: Residential Development consistent with the General Plan Noise
Element and City Noise Ordinance.
Policy 4.6: New residential and hotel development shall comply with City Noise
Element noise level standards of 60 dB or less for outdoor areas and 45 dB
for indoor areas.
Program 4.6.a: Major recreational and outdoor gathering areas within the Life Plan
Community should be sheltered by structures.
Program 4.6.b: Development shall follow normal construction practices and City and State
Building Code requirements. Use of noise reducing building materials, such
as special noise attenuating wall and window assemblies, shall be used, if
necessary, to reduce indoor noise levels by insulating against outdoor noise
sources.
Program 4.6.c: In accordance with Mitigation Measure NO-4, prior to approval of park and
residential development within the Madonna Froom Ranch area of the
Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a project specific noise study that
evaluates the potential for noise exposure from adjacent commercial uses
and identifies project-specific design measures to attenuate exterior and
interior noise consistent with the City’s Noise Element and Noise Ordinance.
If necessary, to reduce noise within acceptable levels, noise reduction
measures may include a planted earthen berm, sound wall, or similar noise
attenuating feature along the site boundary with the Irish Hills Plaza,
consistent with Policy 1.8.2 of the Noise Element.
[4-15]
The Specific Plan is committed to creating a sustainable community that respects the site’s natural
resources and setting. Froom Creek will be a centerpiece for the development with a restored creek
corridor as a site amenity and pedestrian only corridor. On-site pedestrian trails will provide
linkages within the community, as well as off-site connections to the adjacent shopping center and
open space trails. Neighborhood connectivity is a key tool to reducing vehicle trips and related
greenhouse gas emissions.
The commitment to sustainability also translates to site design and development practices. This
includes building orientation to maximize solar exposure, use of recycled construction materials,
water conservation measures, efficient appliances, and energy conscious heating and cooling
systems. The following narrative includes policies to guide sustainable practices and project
programs to implement them. These policies and programs were developed based on guidance
from the City’s Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) and Climate Action Plan (CAP).
Sustainable Goals, Policies & Programs
Goal 4.7a: To the extent feasible, new buildings will be oriented to maximize solar exposure to improve daylighting and overall energy efficiency efforts.
Policy 4.7.1: Consistent with COSE Policies 4.5.1 & 4.5.2, subdivision design, site planning and building design should take advantage of all reasonable opportunities to reduce energy and other resource consumption, in compliance with the
General Plan COSE’s Solar Access Standards and Policies for subdivisions
and property development.
Policy 4.7.2: New development in the Specific Plan area will follow energy efficient
project design in conformance with the California Building Code, with the
goal to be at Net Zero, and shall meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 1 standards for
building efficiency.
Program 4.7.2a: The placement of a building on a site and the building itself should be
designed to maximize opportunities for the optimal operation of passive
systems for heating, cooling, and lighting. Sunlight should be used for direct
heating and illumination whenever possible. Natural ventilation and
shading should be used to cool a building.
Program 4.7.2b: The use of exterior shading devices, skylights, daylighting controls, high
performance glazing that allows the transmission of light with minimal heat
gain, and high thermal mass building components is encouraged.
[4-16]
Program 4.7.2c: Consistent with COSE Policy 5.5.7, residential developments with five or
more dwelling units and non- residential projects over 5,000 square feet
of gross floor area shall submit checklists detailing project components to
comply with the City’s baseline goals per the green building certification
system.
Program 4.7.2d: Consistent with COSE Policy 4.6.17, common-use facilities, such as recreation
rooms, spas or swimming pools, of multi-family residential developments
shall be built with photovoltaic solar collectors.
Program 4.7.2e: In addition to the requirement in Program 4.7.3c for most structu res to
incorporate photo-voltaic solar systems, development may also incorporate
other alternative energy systems, such as wind and geothermal, to further
offset new energy demand.
Program 4.7.2f: Individual garages are to be “EV-ready” to allow for the installation of EV
charging stations. Shared parking areas for apartment units shall
incorporate EV charging stations. All electric vehicle chargers shall be, at a
minimum, level 2 chargers.
Goal 4.7b: Reduce Project operational stationary-source GHG emissions to
achieve net zero emissions, consistent with the City’s 2035 net-zero
GHG emissions target.
Policy 4.7.3: New development shall include Best Available Mitigation strategies for
reducing operational emissions .
Program 4.7.3a: Electricity shall be the only energy source for the entirety of Project operations
including but not limited to space conditioning, water heating, illumination,
cooking appliances, and plug loads (exemptions to this requirement shall be
limited to appliances in commercial kitchens, emergency backup generators,
and medial end-uses that have no viable electric alternative – see related
discussion in Section 6.7).
Program 4.7.3b: Electrical power for the entirety of Project operations including but not limited to
illumination, heating, cooling, and ventilation shall be provided by alternative or
carbon-free energy sources according to the following priority:
1) on-grid power with 100-percent renewable or carbon-free source (a planned
product of Monterey Bay Community Power available to the City in 2020), or
2) a combination of grid power and on-site renewable generation to achieve
annual zero net electrical energy usage, or
[4-19]
Goal 4.7f: Reduce the Project’s operational, mobile-source emissions, and VMT to
the maximum extent.
Policy 4.7.7: Incorporate programs into the development to encourage alternative
transportation strategies and discourage individual trips.
Program 4.7.7a: Employees of commercial and institutional land uses within the Specific Plan
area shall be encouraged to participate in the San Luis Obispo Regional
Rideshare program. Commercial employers with more than 25 employees,
and residential developments with a community room or other type of indoor
common area open to all residents, shall post written/graphic materials
providing information regarding availability and contact information for
public transit, ride-sharing companies, and peer-to-peer car-sharing
opportunities.
Program 4.7.7b: The fleet of vehicles, including resident shuttle services, for the Life Plan
Community (Villaggio) shall be zero emission vehicles. Villaggio shall allow
employees to ride on the resident shuttle service, and include a mid-day out
and back option. Electric vehicle charging infrastructure for the Villaggio fleet
shall be provided onsite to support the services. Electric vehicle charging
infrastructure included to meet requirements for personal vehicles may not
be used to fulfill this requirement.
Program 4.7.7c: The FRSP shall require all personal small vehicles (e.g., golf carts) be 100
percent electric powered.
Program 4.7.7d: Provide dedicated parking for carpools, vanpools, and high-efficiency vehicles
for employees of the Life Plan Community (Villaggio) in exceedance of Cal
Green Tier 2 standards.
Program 4.7.7e: In coordination with the City and SLOCOG, the Project Applicant shall fund
and install an EV charging station at the nearby Calle Joaquin Park & Ride Lot.
If EV station has not been installed prior to occupancy, and if approved by the
Community Development Director, the applicant may provide a fair share
mitigation payment to the City not to exceed $75,000 for installation of the EV
charging station by the City or others.
Program 4.7.7f: For commercial and institutional employers with more than 25 employees,
lockers and showers shall be provided to promote bicycle and pedestrian use
consistent with Section 17. of the City’s Zoning Regulations.
Program 4.7.7g: On-site bicycle parking for all land uses in the Specific Plan area shall be
provided consistent with 2019 Cal Green Section 5.106.4, A4 106.9, A5
106.4.3m and Table A5 106.4.3 (or the Cal Green standards in effect at the time
of adoption of the Specific Plan) and the City Zoning Regulations.
[4-17]
3) purchase of carbon offsets of any portion of power not from renewable or
carbon-free sources. As a first priority, carbon-free sourced energy shall be
purchased from Monterey Bay Community Power.
Program 4.7.3c: For new buildings, onsite solar photovoltaic systems shall be required.
Nonresidential, mixed-use, and mid-rise residential buildings, a solar
photovoltaic system shall fill the entirety of the Solar Zone (as defined in
Section 110.10 and specified in Joint Appendix JA1 of the 2019 California
Energy Code). This solar system requirement shall not apply to historic
structures.
Program 4.7.3d: All proposed commercial and health care facilities shall exceed the minimum
standards of Title 24, Part 11 (Cal Green) by adopting all or some elements of
Cal Green Tier 1 and/or 2 voluntary elective measures to increase energy
efficiency in new buildings, remodels and additions. These measures shall
prioritize upgrading lighting (e.g., using light-emitting diode [LED] lights),
heating and cooling systems, appliances, equipment, and control systems to
be more energy efficient. Uses requiring the provision of emergency power
shall be allowed to use generators powered by fossil fuel sources.
Goal 4.7c: Select types of appliances and lighting in new development to improve
energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Policy 4.7.4: New residential and commercial construction shall achieve improved energy
conservation using energy efficient appliances and lighting.
Program 4.7.4a: All new residential units shall incorporate high-efficiency Energy Star
compliant appliances.
Program 4.7.4b: Where reasonably possible, new residential and commercial construction
shall incorporate energy efficient types of lighting such as compact fluorescent
light bulbs (CFLs) and light-emitting diodes (LEDs).
Program 4.7.4c: Only electric fireplaces are allowed in the Specific Planning Area.
Program 4.7.4d: In multi-family development where an indoor common area is proposed,
there shall be free wi-fi access available within the common area.
Goal 4.7d: Use materials in the project that are sustainable and healthy for people
and the planet.
Policy 4.7.5: Building and landscape products should be specified that include recycled
content and/or renewable material.
[4-18]
Program 4.7.5a: As feasible, recycled building materials shall be used in new construction
consistent with Cal Green Tier 2 standards.
Program 4.7.5b: Harvest old wood and other building features from demolished or refurbished
buildings for potential use elsewhere on the site.
Program 4.7.5c: As feasible, development in the Specific Plan area shall meet Cal Green Tier 2
standards for reducing cement use in concrete mix, as allowed by local
ordinance and conditions.
Program 4.7.5d: Roof trusses shall be designed to handle dead weight loads of standard solar-
heated water and photovoltaic panels.
Goal 4.7e: Reduce use of potable water supplies to conserve the resource and
minimize emissions associated with water delivery.
Policy 4.7.6: Plant materials used in the project shall be selected to conserve water.
Program 4.7.6a: Landscaping plans developed for the project shall use native and non-invasive
drought tolerant plant materials combined with conservative use of water and
landscape designs that prevent run-off.
Program 4.7.6b: Recycled water shall be utilized to irrigate planting areas in the Trailhead Park,
landscaped buffers, commercial areas, and common outdoor areas in multi-
family residential projects. Commercial and multi-family development
projects will include reclaimed water irrigation systems in their landscaping
plans.
Program 4.7.6c: Any irrigation needed to establish or maintain vegetation in the stormwater
detention and riparian enhancement areas would also be required to use
recycled water.
Program 4.7.6d: Hardscape areas shall be minimized to allow for site runoff to infiltrate into the
water table, rather than flowing into stormdrain systems.
Program 4.7.6e: Permeable pavers and other materials that maximize water infiltration are
encouraged.
Program 4.7.6f: Site and landscape design should integrate sustainable practices to manage
storm water on-site to the maximum extent practical. These practices may
include bioswales, rain gardens, and detention basins.
Program 4.7.g: On site water ground water source may be used during project construction
activities
[4-20]
Program 4.7.7h: Villaggio shall provide a bike share program for its residents.
Program 4.7.7i: During the City’s development review of commercial projects, a potential
hub/node for the City’s bicycle share network shall be identified on plans, and
developed, as feasible within the parameters of the program. Node locations
shall accommodate up to 5 bicycles in a rack provided by the City (or City bike
network operator/vendor).
Program 4.7.7j: Commercial employers with over 25 employees shall promote carpooling and
vanpooling, and EV vehicle facilities. At least one reserved employee ride-
share parking spot shall be provided for each 25 employees or in accordance
with Cal Green standards in effect at the time of adoption of the Specific Plan,
whichever is stricter. If a hotel use is established, it will be required to have a
shuttle service with a zero emissions vehicle.
Program 4.7.7k: Electric vehicle charging infrastructure for fleet, shuttle, or group-transport
vehicles shall be provided within the commercially zoned areas of the Specific
Plan area, in addition to the chargers required for private vehicles. All electric
vehicle chargers shall be, at a minimum, level 2 chargers.
Program 4.7.7l: Commercial employers with over 25 employees shall institute a “no Idling”
policy and provide signage on the premises to discourage idling.
Program 4.7.7m: To reduce vehicle miles traveled and for the convenience of working mothers,
on-site childcare facilities are encouraged.
The City of San Luis Obispo Police Department with its review of new Specific Plans has requested
that security guidelines be included in plan documents consistent with Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design Principles (CPTED). CPTED is the design, maintenance, and use of the built
environment to enhance quality of life and to reduce both the incidence and fear of crime.
Goal 4.8a. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of San Luis Obispo to address
potential security issues associated with the development.
Program 4.8.a: The Life Plan Community shall coordinate with the City Fire and Police
Department to assure that potential security issues are addressed through the
preparation of a comprehensive security plan prior to building permit
issuance. The plan will include discussion about on-site first responders and
private security staff.
Program 4.8.b: Emergency vehicle access shall be controlled by bollards or gates. The project
security plan shall provide details on the installation to the approval of the City
Fire and Police Department.
[4-21]
Program 4.8.c: The Life Plan Community and other multi-family development within the
project shall provide directory signage as needed and include prominent
address numbers for units and homes that are visible from adjacent streets.
Program 4.8.d: Public park spaces shall have security lighting on timers or motion-detection
devices to assist in preventing intruders from loitering in spaces after typical
park hours.
Program 4.8.e: Mailboxes for the Madonna portion of the project shall be in highly visible and
resident active areas. Cluster mailboxes shall be illuminated with a minimum
maintained one foot-candle of light, measured within a five-foot radius at
ground level, during the hours of darkness. Mailboxes for the LPC are planned
to be internal to a community building within the town square area.
Program 4.8.f: Private roads and parking areas or parking facilities when controlled by
unmanned automated parking gates shall provide for police emergency
access utilizing Click2Enter radio-controlled entry system and a Knox key
switch device.
Program 4.8.g: All lockable pedestrian gates or doors to common area walkways and
recreation areas/buildings of residential multi-family complexes shall provide
for police emergency access utilizing Click2Enter and a Knox key switch
device.
Program 4.8.h: Pedestrian gates in perimeter community walls or fencing shall utilize a key
switch if using an electronically automated type lock, or if a mechanical lock is
used, a key vault, mounted 4 feet above finished grade and within 2 feet of the
locking device.
CIRCULATION
05
[5-1]
The Specific Plan area circulation system is designed to provide a functional and efficient
circulation network for automobiles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The intent is to provide links
from surrounding streets and development into the Specific Plan area.
The street system is comprised of a network of arterial, collector, and local streets designed to
accommodate traffic generated by future residents and commercial destinations. Interior public
roads within the Specific Plan area are limited to Commercial Collector Road A, which provides
access to Los Osos Valley Road and Local Road A which provides access to the Trailhead Park.
Public roads are to be maintained by the City of San Luis Obispo. Roads within the Life Plan
Community are proposed as private roads to be maintained by the Life Plan Community. The
Circulation Plan (Figure 5-1) has been incorporated into the Froom Ranch Specific Plan consistent
with Section 65461(a)(2) of the State Government Code. This Chapter describes the overall
circulation plan and street standards. The overall goals guiding the Specific Plan area circulation
are:
Goal 5.1: Provide a circulation system that is conducive to efficiency and safety which
accommodates new trips generated by development within the Specific Plan area.
Goal 5.2: Provide bicycle and pedestrian circulation routes within the project including a
pedestrian and bicycle connection to the adjacent commercial development.
Goal 5.3: Create a direct connection to Los Osos Valley Road which provides access to other
parts of the City.
Goal 5.4: Incorporate Transportation Demand Management programs that promote alternate
modes of transportation (see detailed discussion in Chapter 4 – Section 4.7).
A variety of street widths and designs within the Specific Plan area will accommodate the range of
anticipated traffic volumes and physical conditions. Descriptions and street sections for each
street design are provided. Public and private street cross-sections are included in Figure 5-1. The
following roadway designations are planned and shall act as the street standards for the Specific
Plan area:
• Parkway Arterial (Los Osos Valley Road Widening)
• Commercial Collector Street
• Local Public Road
• Local Private Road
[5-2]
Figure 5-1 Circulation Plan
[5-3]
()
()
Los Osos Valley Road (LOVR) is immediately adjacent to the Specific Plan area and is classified as
a Parkway Arterial (see Figure 5-2 below for the street section). Widening to LOVR is proposed to
facilitate turning movements into the Specific Plan area as an intersection with Auto Park Way
(see Figure 5-3 for intersection details). LOVR improvements, including project frontage
improvements, are shown by the brown shading on Figure 5-1.
Figure 5-2 Parkway Arterial (Los Osos Valley Road Widening)
[5-4]
Figure 5-3 Los Osos Valley Road & Auto Park Way Intersection
[5-5]
The following policies and programs apply to Los Osos Valley Road as it extends along the
eastern boundary of the Plan area.
Policy 5.3.1: Los Osos Valley Road should be improved consistent with the street section
identified in Figure 5-2.
Program 5.3.1a: A 6’ wide minimum sidewalk and a 7’ wide protected bikeway shall be provided
along the west side of Los Osos Valley Road from the intersection of north to
connect to the sidewalk along the Irish Hills Plaza frontage and south to the
Calle Joaquin intersection.
Program 5.3.1b: The applicant shall signalize the intersection of Los Osos Valley Road and Auto
Park Way and incorporate protected intersection features to enhance and
facilitate safe crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians.
Program 5.3.1c: As a component of protected intersection features, the applicant shall install
ADA-compliant pedestrian signals, high visibility crosswalks, and median
refuges.
Policy 5.3.2: Project access along Los Osos Valley Road shall be provided as identified on
Figure 5-1.
Policy 5.3.3: The applicant shall finance and/or install a fair share of streetscape
improvements along Los Osos Valley Road.
Program 5.3.3a: The City shall be responsible for maintaining Los Osos Valley Road including
landscaping within the proposed median.
Program 5.3.3b: Landscaping along the site’s frontage shall be maintained by the applicant.
Policy 5.3.4: Applicants for projects within the Madonna Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area shall
pay their fair share of circulation improvements, some of which may not be 100%
attributable to development of the Specific Plan area, into the Traffic Impact Fee
Program as determined by the Director of Public Works.
[5-6]
Commercial Collector “A” is a public street, which links Los Osos Valley Road through the Specific
Plan area to residential and commercial areas. Commercial Collector “A” serves as primary
ingress/egress to Los Osos Valley Road. Local Road “B” is a private street that links the Plan area
to the neighboring Irish Hills Plaza shopping center. These two connections are joined by a
proposed roundabout.
Figure 5-4 Commercial Collector “A” (Public)
Policy 5.3.5: Street parking is prohibited on Commercial Collector “A” within the Specific Plan
area.
Policy 5.3.6: Commercial Collector “A” shall include a 73’ minimum right-of-way per Figure 5-
4.
Program 5.3.6a: Collector “A” may include additional lanes to allow for improved ingress/egress
at Los Osos Valley Road.
Program 5.3.6b: Collector “A” shall include 6’ wide minimum sidewalks that are separated from
the road by landscaped parkways.
Program 5.3.6c: Collector “A” shall include a landscaped median where practical.
Program 5.3.6d: Collector “A” shall provide 7’ wide protected bikeways on both sides of the
street.
[5-7]
There are three Local Roads proposed within the Plan area, which are located within the
development beyond the Commercial Collector street. Local Road “A” is a public roadway, and
Local Roads “B” and “C” are private.
Policy 5.3.7: Local Road “A” shall include a 44’ minimum right-of-way per Figure 5-5.
Policy 5.3.8: Detailed layout of Local Roads shall be designed and constructed as
development occurs and will adhere to standards identified in Figures 5-5 to 5-8
included in this Specific Plan.
Program 5.3.8a: Traffic calming measures (speed humps, bulb-outs, chicanes, etc.) shall be
incorporated into the design of Local Road “A” prior to development of the first
phase of Villaggio.
Policy 5.3.9: Curbside parking is prohibited on Local Roads. Typical cross-sections are
provided in Figures 5-5, 5-6, and 5-8.
Figure 5-5 Local Road “A” and “B” (Public)
Program 5.3.9a: Local Road “A” and “B” shall provide 5-foot-wide minimum sidewalks that are
separated from the street by 5-foot-wide landscaped parkways.
Program 5.3.9b: Local Road “A” and “B” shall provide 12-foot-wide travel lanes (one in each
direction) for a minimum right-of-way of 44 feet.
Program 5.3.9c: Local Road “A” shall terminate in a paved cul-de-sac with a 47-foot radius that
is surrounded by 5-foot parkway and 5-foot sidewalks.
[5-8]
Program 5.3.9d: Local Road “B” (Private) shall provide 12-foot-wide travel lanes (one in each
direction) with 5-foot-wide minimum sidewalks where feasible that are
separated from the street by 5-foot-wide landscaped parkways. In key
locations, Local Road “B” will include a central median that is approximately 10
feet for a total minimum right-of-way of 54 feet.
Program 5.3.9e: Local Road “B” (Public) will be fully built to eventually connect with the
adjacent Irish Hills Plaza Shopping Center but will terminate with bollards until
an access agreement is in place with the shopping center. The bollards will
allow for emergency vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle access, but temporarily
prevent vehicular entry.
Entry into the Life Plan Community will be controlled by a small guardhouse and gate. A median
is planned to provide an entry statement and gateway into the development. Figure 5-7 shows in
concept the transition of Local Road “B”, and the overall entry design into the Life Plan
Community, including pedestrian connections.
Figure 5-6 Local Road “B” (Private)
[5-9]
Figure 5-7 Local Road “B” Transition
[5-10]
Figure 5-8 Local Road “C” (Private)
Program 5.3.9f: Local Road “C” shall provide 12-foot wide travel lanes (one in each
direction) with 2-foot wide minimum shoulders for a minimum right-
of-way of 28 feet.
Program 5.3.9g: The street design of Local Road “C” shall provide traffic calming
features to provide consistency with the City’s General Plan
Neighborhood Traffic Management policies.
A roundabout is an intersection control device that aids in calming traffic and reducing pollution
emissions by limiting traffic delays. These circular intersections are designed to channel vehicles
in a counterclockwise direction through an intersection without the use of traffic signals or stop
signs. Traffic speeds are typically reduced to 20 mph or 15 mph or less without compromising
safety or efficiency.
A roundabout is proposed at the intersection of Commercial Collector “A” and Local Road “B” in
the Specific Plan area as identified on Figure 5-1 and illustrated on Figure 5-9. The roundabout
roadway radius width shall be 66’ with one lane of travel and a central island.
Policy 5.3.10: The proposed roundabout shall include a central island with enhanced elements,
such as landscaping, public art, and/or signage, and decorative paving that are
consistent with safety requirements.
Policy 5.3.11: Sidewalks at the Commercial Collector roundabout should be designed so that
pedestrians will be guided to cross at the designated crosswalks. A setback area
with low shrubs and/or grasses planted between the curb and the sidewalk
should be provided where feasible.
[5-11]
Policy 5.3.12: Bicycle lanes at the Commercial Collector roundabout shall be consistent with
intersection treatment in accordance with Caltrans standards with the bicycle
users having the option to share the road within the roundabout circle or
navigate around the circle via physically-separated Class I shared-use paths.
Bicyclists that choose to cross the roadway within crosswalk locations shall be
required to walk the bicycle when using the crosswalk.
Figure 5-9 Roundabout at Commercial Collector
Two private secondary access roads are proposed (refer to Figure 5-1 for locations). One road is
within the northern portion of the Specific Plan area between the northern end of Local Road “B”
and Local Road “A” before the cul-de-sac. It will provide access to the parking fields of multi-
family housing. The second is located along Los Osos Valley Road approximately 825 feet south of
the main project entry at Auto Park Way. It is intended for emergency vehicles to access the site
and will have bollards to restrict passenger vehicles from entering but will allow pedestrians and
bicyclists to pass safely though. The secondary access roads shall be paved and 24 feet wide (see
Figure 5-10).
[5-12]
Figure 5-10 Private Secondary Access Road
Consistent with the goal of promoting alternative modes of transportation, this Specific Plan
includes bicycle circulation routes adjacent to and within the Specific Plan area. Existing Class II
bike facilities are present along Los Osos Valley Road, New Class IV buffered bicycle facilities are
proposed along the project’s frontage on LOVR and will be provided on Commercial Collector “A”.
A Class III bike route is proposed along the Local Road “A” and a portion of Local Road “B”, and
will connect the bike lanes to the public park and residential areas. Local Road “B” will include
bollards on its north end to stop vehicles from entering the adjacent shopping center, but will
allow bicyclists and pedestrians to pass safely though. The conceptual bike facility network is
shown on Figure 5-11.
The City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan (November 2013) contains the following descriptions for
bikeways:
• Class I Bikeway (Bike Path) - Provides a completely separated right-of-way for the
exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with crossflow by motorists minimized.
• Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane) - Provides a striped lane for one-way bicycle travel on a street
or highway.
• Class III Bikeway (Bike Route) - A Class III bike route provides connectivity within the
overall bicycle transportation system, by filling in gaps between other identified bicycling
facilities. Class III routes are generally designated on lower volume streets where
motorists and bicyclists share the lane.
In addition, another level of bikeways that is gaining interest for its enhanced safety benefits to
cyclists is the Class IV bikeway, often referred to as a separated bikeway or cycle track. Caltrans
Design Information Bulletin 89-01 dated May 3, 2018 describes a Class IV Bikeway (separated
bikeway) as a bikeway for the exclusive use of bicycles and includes physical separation between
the separated bikeway and vehicular traffic. The separation may include, but is not limited to,
grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barriers, or on-street parking.
[5-13]
The following section includes policies and programs guiding the development of planned bike
facilities.
Policy 5.4.1: Construction of bicycle lanes and bike routes through various portions of the
Specific Plan area will be concurrent with phasing of development construction.
Policy 5.4.2: Class IV separated bikeways shall be provided along Los Osos Valley Road and on
Commercial Collector “A”, consistent with development standards in the City
Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Policy 5.4.3: Class III bicycle facilities, which allow bicyclists and motor vehicles to share the
road on low traffic streets, designate a preferred route for bicycles connecting
with nearby Class IV bikeways. The Class III routes will be linked to the public
park and residential areas and connects with multiple unpaved bike trails
located outside the boundary of the Specific Plan area.
Policy 5.4.4: Both short-term and long-term bicycle parking shall be provided within all
residential and commercial areas, and the Trailhead Park within the Specific
Plan. The numbers of required bicycle parking spaces shall be in accordance
with the City’s Zoning Regulations and to the development requirements
contained in the Bicycle Transportation Plan.
[5-14]
Figure 5-11 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Network
[5-15]
As shown on Figure 5-11, sidewalks are proposed to be located along the portion of Los Osos
Valley Road Widening, Commercial Collector “A”, and Local Roads “A” and “B”. These proposed
sidewalks facilitate safer passage between residential neighborhoods to commercial destinations
and recreational areas.
Policy 5.5.1: Pedestrian comfort shall be enhanced through the provision of amenities such as
street furnishings, lighting, enhanced paving materials, bulb-outs at
intersections, and landscape parkways that separate the sidewalk from the
street where practical.
Consistent with Overall Specific Plan Goal #9 that encourages walking and connectivity within the
Plan area, a pedestrian trail system will be accessible to the public and Specific Plan area
residents. The proposed trail system within the Specific Plan will connect to existing offsite trails
to offer extended recreational opportunities.
Froom Creek Trail
The Froom Creek trail is envisioned as a six-foot wide pedestrian trail of pervious material that
extends from the northwestern Plan area boundary to an area near the southeastern boundary
(see Figure 5-11). This trail allows the public to enjoy the natural Froom Creek environment with
minimal road crossings. The southeastern terminus of the trail would allow for wetland viewing
but would not encroach through this area to avoid wetland impacts and provide for long-term
habitat protection.
Visitors and residents will be able to access the trail from a variety of entry points. The proposed
trail alignment has the unique opportunity to link with existing destinations surrounding the
Specific Plan area. Specifically, trail linkages are proposed to connect with the existing Irish Hills
trail network and to the Irish Hills Plaza. Trail amenities may include benches, signage, trash
cans, landscaping, and dog waste stations. Appropriate signage will be added at key locations to
properly direct hikers to public trails and avoid confusion with entry points to the privately
secured Life Plan Community and Madonna Froom Ranch residential lots (see Figure 5-11).
[5-16]
Trailhead Park Trail
Within the Trailhead Park there would be additional six-foot wide minimum connecting trails
linking the existing open space trails to the public park sidewalks.
Public Trail Policies & Programs:
Policy 5.5.2: A public trail system consistent with Figure 5-11 shall be implemented within the
Specific Plan area.
Program 5.5.2a.: Trail locations shall take into consideration access opportunities, topographic
features, creek setbacks, and other environmental features. Designated trails
shall be in areas where they will have the least amount of impact on
environmental resources to the extent practical.
Program 5.5.2b.: Public access to open space shall be limited to the trails identified in this
Specific Plan.
Program 5.5.2c: Trail connections to the Irish Hills Natural Reserve area shall be available to
hikers and bicyclists.
The Life Plan Community includes a system of private trails for the use of its residents and visitors.
The trails would be privately maintained and promote healthy lifestyles for residents.
Private Trail Policies & Programs:
Policy 5.5.3: A private trail system consistent with Figure 5-11 shall be implemented within the
Life Plan Community area.
Program5.5.3a: Sidewalks within the Life Plan Community shall provide connectivity and safe
places for residents to walk.
Program 5.53b: Access linkages to trails beyond the Life Plan Community shall be provided,
which would be controlled by coded gates in fencing. These include: the
project’s public trail system along Froom Creek and the City open space trails
beyond the development. See additional discussion in Section 3.4.3 and a
fencing guideline in Section 4.4.4.
The secondary access road off Los Osos Valley Road will be controlled by bollards or gates to
allow for emergency vehicles to enter the site, but restrict passenger vehicles from entering. This
road provides an additional access point for pedestrians and bicyclists.
[5-17]
The Draft EIR evaluated the project’s bicycle and pedestrian facilities and made certain
recommendations. In accordance with Mitigation Measure TRANS-24, these improvements are
incorporated into the Specific Plan and will be reflected in on-site design refinements as detailed
plans are developed:
• Install pedestrian refuges within center medians at north and south legs of the LOVR/Auto
Park Way intersection.
• Install a single northbound left-turn lane at the LOVR/Auto Park Way intersection in lieu of
dual left-turn lanes, as currently proposed, to shorten pedestrian crossing distance at the
south leg of the intersection.
• Install a bulb-out at the southwest corner of the intersection to shorten pedestrian
crossing distance at the south leg of the LOVR/Auto Park Way intersection.
• Install Lead Pedestrian Intervals at all pedestrian crossings at the LOVR/Auto Park Way
intersection.
• Install protected bicycle intersection features as part of signalization and intersection
improvements at the LOVR/Auto Park Way intersection, consistent with planned
improvements at the nearby LOVR/Froom Ranch Way and Madonna Road/Dalidio Drive
intersections.
• Provide physically protected bicycle lanes (Class IV bikeway) along LOVR
approaching/departing the Auto Park Way intersection and along Commercial Collector
“A”. The Class IV bikeways shall be installed on-street with a physical barrier between
cyclists and vehicular traffic or by constructing raised bicycle facilities at the sidewalk
level adjacent to pedestrian sidewalks.
• Sidewalks shall be provided within the Madonna Froom Ranch development area of the
Project site as per City standards.
• Sidewalk design shall meet ADA requirements for a comfortable walking environment.
Public transit service to the Specific Plan area is provided by SLO Transit via routes 2A and 2B.
Route 2B stops at Irish Hills Plaza once an hour between 7:13 a.m. to 6:13 p.m. Route 2A is
referenced for weekend and evening service stopping at Auto Park Way. These stops are within a
five-minute to ten-minute walk from most of the Specific Plan area (see Figure 5-11 for existing
transit stop locations).
The project proposes a new transit stop just south of the Los Osos Valley Road and Auto Park Way
intersection to improve access to existing transit services for Plan Area residents, employees, and
visitors (see Figure 5-11 for proposed transit stop location).
[5-18]
Policy 5.6.1: Provide and/or enhance existing bus stop(s) within or adjacent to the Specific
Plan area for inclusion on existing City bus routes or future bus routes.
Program 5.6.1a: Final details of the bus stop and addition to the bus routes will be determined
in conjunction with SLO Transit at the time of development approvals. Figure
5-11 shows existing and proposed transit stop locations.
Program 5.6.1b: The Life Plan Community (Villaggio) will have a dedicated zero emissions
vehicle to provide shuttle service for its residents (also see Program 4.7.7b).
Streetscapes refer to public roads, entryways, public trails adjacent to public roads, and
landscaped areas near streets. It is the character of the streets that ultimately sets the framework
for a cohesive neighborhood character.
The following streetscape design guidelines apply to all roadway development within the Specific
Plan area. All other applicable area wide design guidelines should be incorporated where
appropriate.
a) Streets should conform to the natural topography of hills and where feasible should
be curvilinear in nature.
b) Streetscapes within the Specific Plan area should include landscaped parkways
wherever practical and utilize a consistent unified planting palette.
c) Streetscapes should provide gateway enhancements at project and neighborhood
entries to facilitate a sense of arrival.
d) Hardscape materials such as cobble, stamped concrete, bricks, pavers, or
decomposed granite paving should be utilized in medians where maintenance
access is needed or where median width is less than eighteen inches.
e) Public streetlights shall be installed per City standards. Where appropriate,
pedestrian-scale lighting shall be added along on-site public streets (also see Section
4.4.5 #3).
[5-19]
a) A hierarchy of gateways should be provided throughout the project to accentuate
entries and welcome visitors and residents (refer to Figure 5-1 for locations). Where
practical gateway features should be placed on both sides of the roadway or
driveway.
• Primary Gateways should be provided at the project entry where accessed from
Los Osos Valley Road.
• Secondary Gateways should be provided at neighborhood entries.
b) Easily identifiable and aesthetically pleasing entrances designed to complement the
style of the Specific Plan area should be provided.
c) Entries should utilize high-quality materials and fixtures that reflect the Specific Plan
Area’s architectural character.
d) A combination of the following accent features should be incorporated into Primary
Gateway entries where practical:
• Landscaped medians
• Primary gateway signage
• Decorative walls
• Enhanced paving (colored and textured)
• Ornamental landscaping
• Lighting
e) A combination of the following accent features should be incorporated into
Secondary Gateway entries where practical:
• Secondary gateway signage
• Decorative walls or rail fencing
• Enhanced paving (colored and textured)
• Ornamental landscaping
• Lighting
a) Entry paving at gateways and roundabouts should be unified and consistent in color,
texture, and materials throughout the Specific Plan Area.
b) Crosswalk areas should be accented with decorative pavers or similar material that
contrast in color from the adjacent roadways and sidewalks.
[5-20]
a) Streetscape landscaping should present a unifying design that enhances the built
environment.
b) Medians and parkways should be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and hardy
groundcover. A variety of plant heights and species should be provided to avoid a
continuous shrub wall.
c) Cobbles, boulders, and rock mulch is encouraged in parkways and medians.
d) Parkways should include shrubs and groundcover, and turf is not permitted.
e) Parkways and medians should utilize low maintenance, long-lived, and durable
plantings. The use of perennials should be minimized and are suggested at key focal
points and gateways only.
f) Street and parkway trees shall be provided to form the canopy, provide shade,
introduce seasonal color, and define the street edge.
g) Flowering trees should be used in areas such as project entries, intersections,
pedestrian crossings, and other focal points that deserve visual emphasis.
a) Bioswales bottoms should be planted with grasses, and shrubs and groundcovers
located along banks and perimeters.
b) Plants located within bioswale areas should be able to thrive during periods of
inundation and flooding.
c) Bioswales grasses should not be cut except as required to maintain the health and
effectiveness of these areas or for fire suppression.
d) Trees should not be in areas that may obstruct bioswale flow.
INFRASTRUCTURE
& PUBLIC UTILITIES
06
[6-1]
This Chapter outlines the major backbone infrastructure and utilities required to support
development of the Specific Plan Area. Public utilities include a potable and recycled water system,
a wastewater system, stormwater facilities and utilities such as natural gas, electrical, telephone,
and cable service. Additionally, developers in the Specific Plan Area will pay City established water
and wastewater development impact fees. All on-site and off-site infrastructure and utility
improvements, as well as the repaving of damaged roads, will be the responsibility of the
developer. The size, location, and alignment of all on- and off-site water supply, recycled water,
wastewater, and energy infrastructure shall be subject to review and approval by the City’s Public
Works and Utilities Departments. Specific approvals (e.g. building permits) can be issued only
when adequate wastewater, water supply, and stormwater facilities and supplies are available for
the proposed development.
Potable water for the Specific Plan Area will be supplied from the existing City infrastructure. Table
6-1 on the following page describes the water use factors and demand calculations for the
anticipated land uses in the project, including private landscaping for the Madonna Froom Ranch
R-3 housing and the Life Plan Community independent living units. The demand is estimated at
134.5 acre-feet per year (AFY). An estimated 37.4 acre-feet of recycled water would be used for
landscaping in the R-4 residential developments, commercial component, Trailhead Park, and the
Life Plan Community common area. Recycled water demand is detailed in Table 6-2 on Page 6-4.
The City has reviewed water demands for the Specific Plan Area and has determined that there is
an adequate and reliable water supply for complete buildout of the Specific Plan Area. New
development will incorporate water conservation features such as low-flow faucets and
showerheads, drought-tolerant landscaping, and drip irrigation systems.
The water system is proposed to be comprised of 8” public water main lines to provide fire
suppression to the development areas outside of the Life Plan Community and will be routed in
the public roads. The fire suppression / domestic water system within the Life Plan Community will
be private and include a 6” main line routed throughout the community from the public main in
Los Osos Valley Road via public collector roads to the main private entry street to the development.
The private main line system is proposed to be protected at each connection to the public system
with a reduced pressure backflow preventer.
[6-2]
Domestic service for the development sites outside of the Life Plan Community are proposed to
utilize City standard water services and meters. The Life Plan Community is proposed to include a
6” water meter at the point of connection to the public main with a system of 6” domestic / fire
suppression system water main lines for distribution within the community. Service connections
to the various facilities and residential units will connect to the 6” domestic main line. Waterlines
are proposed to be routed within streets or easements. Fire hydrants will be located adjacent to
travel ways and spacing will be no greater than 500 feet.
Table 6-1 Project Water Use
Land Use Category Quantity Units Water Use Factor
(ac ft/yr) 1
Potable Water Demand
(ac ft/yr)2
Madonna Froom Ranch
R-3 Housing 130 dwellings 0.3/unit 39.0
R-4 Apartments 44 apartments 0.18/unit 4.7
Commercial - Retail 30,000 square feet 0.06/1,000 sf 1.3
Hotel with restaurant 120 rooms 0.43/1,000 sf 36.1
Subtotal 81.1
Life Plan Community
Independent Living 61 dwellings 0.3/unit 18.3
Garden, Village Suites and
standard apartments
301 Units 0.1/unit 18.3
Assisted Living Units 40 apartments 0.1/unit 2.4
Memory Care and Skilled
Nursing (beds)
51 occupants 0.08/unit 2.4
Commercial - mixed use 51,500 square feet 0.06/1,000 sf 2.2
Maintenance Office 5,300 square feet 0.032/1,000 sf 0.1
Restaurants 8,000 square feet 1.32/1,000 sf 7.4
Fitness Facility with pool 13,000 square feet 0.26/1,000 sf 2.4
Subtotal 53.4
Project Total 134.5
1 Water Use factors: City of San Luis Obispo, September 1999; factors include both interior and outdoor
landscaping needs.
2 Potable water demand for Froom R-3 housing & Life Plan Community independent units includes both
interior and landscaping water needs. Other uses will rely on recycled water for landscaping; various uses
have different percentage factors used for determining recycled water needs.
[6-3]
Figure 6-1 Water Supply Plan
[6-4]
Non-potable water for public landscaping will be provided through the City’s water reuse project.
Point of connection to the City’s water reuse system and location of the reclaimed water main are
shown in Figure 6.2. New development will also utilize a dual-water system to allow use of City
recycled water for public landscaping in parks, landscaped buffers, the commercial mixed-use
area, and common outdoor areas in multifamily residential projects. Commercial mixed-use and
multifamily development projects will include reclaimed water irrigation systems in their
landscaping plans. Any irrigation needed to establish or maintain vegetation in the stormwater
detention and riparian enhancement areas will be required to use recycled water.
Table 6-2 Project Recycled Water Use
Land Use Category Quantity Units Recycled Water Demand
(ac ft/yr) *
Madonna Froom Ranch
R-4 Apartments 44 apartments 1.0
Commercial - Retail 30,000 square feet 0.7
Hotel with restaurant 120 rooms 1.2
Basin Planting 2.8 acres 3.8
Parks, Trails, Parkways & Open
Space (including creek planting)
11.3 acres 18.9
Subtotal
25.4
Life Plan Community
Common Area landscaping 8.7 acres 12.0
Subtotal
12.0
Project Total
37.4
________
* Recycled water demand is based upon preliminary landscape plans and calculations prepared for this project, dated July 3, 2020.
[6-5]
Figure 6-2 Recycled Water Supply Plan
[6-6]
Wastewater generated within the Specific Plan Area will be conveyed to existing City connections
along Los Osos Valley Road. See Figure 6-3 for proposed sewer service lines in the Specific Plan
Area. Buildout of the development would generate an estimated 97 acre-feet of wastewater per
year based on average flow rates (see Table 6-3). A calculation was also included for potential peak
water flows; that number was 242 acre-feet based on a City provided peaking factor of 2.5.
Table 6-3 Project Wastewater Generation
Land Use Category Quantity Units Wastewater Use
Factor
Annual
Demand
(ac ft/yr)3
Gallons per
Day (GPD)4
Madonna Froom Ranch
R-3 Housing 130 dwellings 150/unit 21.8 19,462
R-4 Apartments 44 apartments 105/unit 5.2 4,642
Commercial - Retail 30,000 square feet 60/1,000 sf 2.0 1,785
Hotel with restaurant 120 rooms 70/1,000 sf 9.4 8,392
Public Park Restroom 1 unit 400/unit 0.4 357
Subtotal 38.9 34,728
Life Plan Community
Independent Living 61 dwellings 150/unit 10.2 9,106
Garden, Village Suite and
Standard apartments
301 units 105/unit 35.4 31,603
Assisted Living Units
(apartments)
38 units 105/unit 4.5 4,017
Memory Care and Skilled
Nursing (beds)
51 occupants 70/unit 4.0 3,571
Commercial - mixed use 51,500 square feet 54/1,000 sf 3.1 2,767
Maintenance Office 5,300 square feet 54/1,000 sf 0.3 268
Restaurants 8,000 square feet 60/1,000 sf 0.5 446
Subtotal 58.1 51,868
Project Wastewater Average
Flow Total
97.0 86,596
Project Wastewater Peak
Flow Total5
242.4 216,400
3 Wastewater flow rates are in gallons per day (GPD) and are based on City of San Luis Obispo, Infrastructure
Renewal Strategy (Dec. 2015
4 Gallons per day were converted to acre feet per year (ac ft/yr). 1 ac ft is equal to 325, 851 gallons.).
5 Peaking Factor of 2.5 provided by City of San Luis Obispo, Utilities Dept. 04/13/17 .
[6-7]
The City’s recent wastewater treatment plant expansion has enough capacity to serve
development needs anticipated through General Plan build-out. The cost of providing the
additional capacity is incorporated into the City’s Wastewater Impact Fee structure.
Figure 6-3 Wastewater Plan
[6-8]
The Specific Plan Area is located within the watershed of Froom Creek, which is a relatively small
watershed that originates in the Irish Hills. Froom Creek flows across the site in a north to south
trajectory ultimately passing through two box culverts beneath Calle Joaquin and US 101 before
its confluence with San Luis Obispo Creek. There are three small ephemeral tributaries to Froom
Creek in the southwestern portion of the site. In addition, there is a manmade drainage ditch that
parallels Los Osos Valley Road (LOVR).
An approximately 3.2-acre detention basin currently exists in the southeastern grassland area of
the site to receive runoff from the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza development fronting LOVR. It consists
of a de-siltation forebay, a main basin and spillway, and was sized to contain runoff from the Irish
Hills Plaza. This basin releases water to the LOVR drainage ditch by a storm drain and swale. During
large storm events, the main basin discharges runoff into the wetland area along Calle Joaquin via
a concrete spillway. Otherwise, water leaves the basin through evaporation and percolation into
the ground.
[6-9]
Figure 6-4 Existing Drainage Conditions
The existing Froom Creek channel does not have adequate capacity to convey 100-year storm
events to the Highway 101 culverts. Froom Creek overtops the existing banks and flows in a sheet
flow manner towards LOVR and Calle Joaquin. The resulting condition is that the low-lying area
between LOVR and the Irish Hills is designated as a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
flood plain, Zone A, no base flood elevation established (FEMA Map Panel No. 06079C1331G). The
existing flood zone A is shown in Figures 6-5 and 6-6.
[6-10]
Figure 6-5 Existing Flood Plain Boundary
[6-11]
Figure 6-6 Conceptual Post Development Project Flood Plain Boundary
[6-12]
With development, the proposal is to restore Froom Creek to a more historic drainage pattern
where it will flow east across the site toward LOVR before it curves to parallel the Calle Joaquin
corridor on the border of the site’s jurisdictional wetlands (see Figure 6-6). The creek channel will
be sized to handle up to a 100-year storm event with one foot of freeboard. The creek corridor is
proposed to be developed in a manner consistent with the City of San Luis Obispo Waterways
Management Plan.
The San Luis Obispo Waterways Management Plan (WMP) sets forth criteria for drainage design for
the Specific Plan areas tributary to San Luis Obispo Creek. The WMP indicates that storm water
detention should be used in areas where there are downstream capacity limitations, which has
been an issue in this area of the City.
The drainage plan proposed for the Specific Plan Area complies with the WMP. The restored Froom
Creek corridor conveys flows from the project and the offsite upper reaches of the existing creek to
the southeast corner of the property to connect to the existing creek bed that ultimately leads to a
double box culvert going under Highway 101. Implementation of the Specific Plan drainage
program will remove the site development areas from the FEMA flood plain. The project proposes
to formalize the removal of the project development area from the FEMA flood plain through the
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)/Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process.
The proposed Froom Creek corridor includes a low flow channel throughout the reach of the
channel and a large overbank area to convey larger flows. The low flow channel will provide a
meandering conveyance designed to control fish migration patterns through stepped pools and
terraces throughout the reach. At the jurisdictional wetlands, adjacent to Calle Joaquin, the
overbank area is proposed to be flattened allowing storms larger than a two–year event to migrate
into the existing wetland.
100–year storm event flows are proposed to be contained below the top of Calle Joaquin and
conveyed to the southeast corner of the property where it will connect to the offsite corridor that
conveys flows under Highway 101. The existing reach between Highway 101 and the southeast
corner of the restored creek corridor will be modified to act as the low flow corridor for the creek
and a new overbank area will be added to convey larger flows to a large offsite storage basin
located on the neighboring property.
Development areas within the project are required to provide point source water quality treatment
of storm water prior to discharge into the creek corridor. Runoff entering the property from the Irish
Hills Plaza will be conveyed in a vegetated ditch parallel to LOVR and parallel to the westerly
boundary of the project for the purposes of treating runoff prior to discharging into the Froom
Creek corridor. The westerly property line ditch also includes a biofiltration component to capture
and treat runoff from the existing Home Depot project that discharges to the Froom Ranch
property.
[6-13]
The restored Froom Creek corridor is proposed to consider geomorphic processes in its design
features. The creek design proposes to manage velocities through varying corridor widths, gradient
controls, varying the bank slopes to promote root zones along the creek banks and includes
boulder placement and plantings that promote a healthy riparian environment and reduce
erosion. Sediment transport is anticipated to be managed using ponds, a sinuous low flow channel
and through use of boulder entrapment areas. During mass grading activities, erosion control,
sediment barriers and temporary sediment basins will be constructed to minimize potential for
construction site impacts to the creek corridor.
A component of the proposed development plan is to remove the existing Irish Hills Plaza
detention basin on the Froom Ranch property and replace it with a new off-site basin. A Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination was prepared in August 2015 by Kevin Merk Associates and submitted
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The USACE responded that the existing
basin is not located within existing jurisdictional wetlands.
The proposed basin will be adequate to meet storage volume of runoff consistent with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirements for the developed project as well as storage
volume to accommodate the Irish Hills Plaza. The off-site basin is anticipated to assist in metering
flows to the box culverts and enhance the box culvert functionality while providing larger area and
volume within the existing flood plain. The off-site basin is proposed to be placed in a drainage and
maintenance easement and maintained by the project.
The off-site basin is located on property owned by the Mountainbrook Church adjacent to Calle
Joaquin, south of the Specific Plan Area (see Figure 6-7, Drainage Plan, on Page 6-15). Access to the
basin will be provided via an existing access road from Calle Joaquin. An access easement will be
created to allow City and applicant maintenance of the access road and the basin as needed. A
basin access ramp will be provided into the bottom of the basin and a walkable graded bench at
the top of the basin embankment will be provided to allow access around the perimeter of the
basin.
Applicant team members met with County Public Works staff to discuss the off-site drainage basin
located on the Mountainbrook Church property, which is under County jurisdiction. The City and
County would do a joint review of the basin design, with the City taking the lead with the plan review
process, and the County performing the final approval sign-off.
[6-14]
Storm water runoff quality will be addressed for both construction and post-construction phases
of the Specific Plan area. Sediment control during construction will be important and a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared for each grading project over one acre in
disturbance. Construction Phase impacts will be addressed by the implementation of Best
Management Practices (BMPs) during construction, by the preparation and implementation of
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) and through Storm Water Management Plans
(SWMP).
Development within the Specific Plan Area will utilize BMPs for pre- and post-construction storm
water management. The program for managing storm water runoff is comprised of three
components. First, the Specific Plan backbone infrastructure and roadways will be developed
including the restored Froom Creek corridor and implementation of the storage basin to comply
with the volume requirements associated with the built environment of the Specific Plan Area.
Second, point source water quality treatment components associated with roadways and mass
grading of the backbone components will be implemented. Third, individual project-based water
quality treatment will be implemented with each individual development application.
Performance requirements for storage volumes are handled through the basin construction
described above. Water quality treatment elements are proposed to treat runoff from roadways,
other hardscape features and developed projects near or adjacent to the source of the constructed
environment. Generally, water quality treatment components consist of vegetated swales,
bioswales, pervious paving, rain gardens and other elements designed to promote biofiltration.
Water quality and volume controls are proposed to follow RWQCB Resolution 2013-0032, Post –
Construction Stormwater Management Requirements for Development Projects in the Central
Coast.
BMP Strategies
a) Site and landscape design should integrate sustainable practices to manage stormwater
on-site to the maximum extent practical. These practices may include bioswales, rain
gardens, and drainage basins.
b) Implementation of best management practices for water quality treatment is required for
each development area prior to discharging to a storm drain system or into the Froom
Creek corridor.
c) Stormwater retention areas should be designed to be visually attractive and functional,
and fencing should be avoided to the extent possible.
d) Stormwater runoff should be diverted from impervious areas such as roofs and paths, to
landscape areas and infiltration basins where water can seep into the ground.
e) Site drainage may be designed to integrate a decentralized system that distributes
stormwater across a project site to replenish groundwater supplies. In addition, various
devices that filter water and infiltrate water into the ground should be considered.
[6-15]
Figure 6-7 Drainage Plan
[6-16]
American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) currently provides telephone service to the
Specific Plan Area via overhead lines located along Los Osos Valley Road. Cable television is
provided by Charter Communications. These City-franchised private companies will extend their
facilities into the Specific Plan Area as it develops. All new telecommunications lines within the
Specific Plan Area will be placed underground. The expanding range of broadcast, including
satellite, services will be available for the Specific Plan Area to the extent they are available
throughout the San Luis Obispo area.
Consistent with Program 4.7.3, Monterey Bay Community Power is the City’s source of electrical
energy which is 100% carbon neutral. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and SoCal Gas will provide
electricity and natural gas distribution. PG&E electrical service is currently available to the Specific
Plan Area along Los Osos Valley Road. New service will be placed in the right-of-way of Commercial
Collector streets, Local Roads and Private Roads. New electric lines will be placed underground.
Gas service lines currently exist along Los Osos Valley Road and adequate volumes are available to
serve the proposed uses in the Specific Plan Area. There are no existing gas mains located within
the Specific Plan Area. It is anticipated that a new gas main will be constructed in one of the
Commercial Collector streets to serve new development in cases where natural gas is needed for
power backup, medical devices, or other limited needs as outlined in Program 4.7.3a in Chapter 4.
PUBLIC
SERVICES
07
[7-1]
The Specific Plan Area and the surrounding area within the City limits are served by several public
services including schools, fire and police protection, public transportation, solid waste disposal
and recycling.
Public education in the City is provided by San Luis Coastal Unified School District (SLCUSD), which
includes preschool, primary, secondary, and adult education. The Specific Plan Area falls in the
boundary area for C.L. Smith Elementary School, Laguna Middle School, and San Luis Obispo High
School.
Given that much of the site is dedicated to the Life Plan Community which accommodates senior
citizens, impacts to local schools is less than many new development projects. At full build-out, the
project would have about 37 school-age children based on SLCUSD generation rates.
Table 7-1 Student Generation
Grade Level Generation Rates Multi-Family Units Additional Students
K-6 0.116 174 20
7-8 0.032 174 6
9-12 0.066 174 11
Total (K-12) 0.214 174 37
Source: Froom Ranch Draft EIR (November 2019)
Based on 2018 data, the Froom Ranch EIR identified that the closest schools to the project site, C.L.
Smith Elementary, Laguna Middle School, and San Luis Obispo High School had adequate capacity
for additional students.
[7-2]
Police services for the Specific Plan Area will be provided by the City of San Luis Obispo and will be
based out of the San Luis Obispo Police Department (SLOPD) offices located at 1042 Walnut Street
in San Luis Obispo. The Department divides the City into 13 neighborhoods and assigns officers
dedicated to assist with a variety of issues including public education, crime prevention, and
neighborhood specific problems. Currently, two such officers are assigned to the neighborhood in
which the Specific Plan area occurs. Based on the Draft Froom Ranch EIR dated November 2019,
there are currently 1.30 police officers per 1,000 San Luis Obispo residents.
Existing SLOPD staff levels exceed the City’s Safety Element standard of 30-percent available-sworn
officer time for patrol response with levels at 32-34 percent. Current and projected police staff
levels would be sufficient to serve development at Froom Ranch.
The San Luis Obispo City Fire Department (SLOFD) will provide fire protection services to the
Specific Plan Area. Development will primarily be served by Fire Station No. 4 located at the
intersection of Madonna Road and Los Osos Valley Road, approximately one-half mile away from
the Specific Plan Area. This station is staffed by a 3-person paramedic engine company. However,
the Department deploys resources and personnel from up to four fire stations to maintain a
response time goal of a four-minute travel time to 95% of all emergencies. The City’s current levels
of fire protection are sufficient to serve the Specific Plan area.
The San Luis Obispo Fire Department provides paramedic services from all four fire stations. In
addition, San Luis Ambulance has two crew stations located within the City of San Luis Obispo.
Ambulances respond to emergency, non-emergency, and Critical Care Transport calls. As a senior
citizen community, it can be anticipated that residents of the Life Plan Community will generate
calls for both paramedic and ambulance services. This will increase the call volume and have an
incremental impact on fire services to the community. However, the proximity of Fire Station No.
4, as well as the provision of on-site skilled nursing and other medical staff at the Life Plan
Community, will address the anticipated demand for services.
The City’s Safety Element of the General Plan designates most of the Specific Plan Area where
urban development is proposed as a Low or Moderate Wildland Fire Hazard Area. However, the
area along the base of the Irish Hills open space is designated a Local Very High Fire Hazard Severity
Zone. Given that some development areas border the open space, a fuel modification area map
was generated showing buffer areas adjacent to development where fuel management activities
would be conducted to address fire safety concerns and create defensible spaces (see Figure 7-1).
This map is consistent with guidance from the Hazards analysis included in the Froom Ranch EIR
and the City’s Fire Marshal.
[7-3]
Policy 7.4.1: Development will not occur in the Local Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
(formerly Extreme Hazard Area). Any development in the moderate hazard area
will comply with the City’s Safety Element Wildland Fire Safety Policies, which
require non-combustible exteriors and defensible space. The Safety Element
defines defensible space as “accessible space free of highly combustible
vegetation and materials.” (Safety Element Policy 3.1).
Program 7.4.1a: Residential buildings shall include shelter in place design features such a fire-
resistive materials, fire sprinkler systems, Class-A non-combustible roofs, and
dual pane or tempered glass windows.
Program 7.4.1b: All buildings determined to be located at the urban-wildland interface shall
provide a fire-resistive landscape and hardscape with a designated defensible
space around all structures to the approval of the City’s Fire Marshal. Consistent
with MM HAZ-3 in the Froom Ranch EIR, the use of mulch and gorilla hair in
landscaping plans shall be minimized to reduce receptive fire embers.
Program 7.4.1c: Consistent with MM HAZ-1 in the Froom Ranch EIR, a Construction Impact
Management Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City of San Luis
Obispo Fire Department (SLOFD) prior to the issuance of grading permits. The
Plan shall list measures taken during construction to reduce the potential for
brush or grass fires from use of heavy equipment, welding, vehicles with catalytic
converters, and other potential activities.
Program 7.4.d: Consistent with MM HAZ-2 in the Froom Ranch EIR, a Community Fire Protection
Plan shall be prepared to design the creation and maintenance of required fire
buffers and fuel management zones around developable areas and detail
methods for achieving fire safety around new buildings while preserving the
integrity and function of affected native plant communities to the maximum
extent feasible, and that ensures that consistent fire fuel management practices
are applied throughout the City.
Policy 7.4.2: Development of the Specific Plan area will conform to the most recent California
Fire Code with City of San Luis Obispo Amendments (formerly Uniform Fire Code)
and City fire protection standards.
Program 7.4.2a: Road widths and internal circulation, as well as the placement of fire hydrants,
shall be designed with the guidance of the Fire Department. All primary internal
access ways allow Fire Department access and maneuvering during
emergencies and shall be designed as fire lanes with adequate width, vertical
clearance, grades, and turning radius.
[7-4]
Policy 7.4.3: Consistent with MM HAZ-3 in the Froom Ranch EIR, development shall designate
smoking areas, located away from onsite fire hazards areas and within acceptable
locations consistent with Chapter 8.16, Smoking Prohibition and Secondhand
Smoke Control, of the City Municipal Code.
In addition to fuel management, defensible space, and fire-resistive construction and landscaping
guidance, the Froom Ranch EIR also identifies the need for additional access points from the
development to the adjacent open space to provide locations for the Fire Departm ent to improve
fire-fighting capabilities.
Policy 7.4.4: Fire Department access to the Irish Hills Natural Reserve is essential to ensure the
safety of the community.
Program 7.4.4 a: Fire access routes in at least two locations shall be created from the Project site
to the Irish Hills Natural Reserve on at least 12-foot wide paths, one extending
from Villaggio and one from Madonna Froom Ranch. Fire access routes shall be
designed to allow emergency response to wildland area in the Irish Hills to
support direct access for firefighting personnel and equipment (see Figure 7-1).
[7-5]
Figure 7-1 Fuel Modification Plan
[7-6]
The Life Plan Community will have a centralized trash compactor and will perform its own pick-up
of trash and recycling from the independent living housing units, assisted units, and other ancillary
facilities within the development. San Luis Garbage will collect materials at the centralized facility
at least once a week, and more often if demand warrants it.
For the Madonna development located in the northern portion of the site, typical enclosures that
provide areas for trash, recycling, and food waste materials will be required. Specific design of
these facilities will be reviewed along with detailed project plans as site are developed out in the
future.
Solid waste generated by new development will be delivered to Cold Canyon Landfill. Based on
current disposal rates, this facility has a capacity to accept solid waste until at least the year 2040
(SLO LUCE EIR, Appendix D pg. 5-63). San Luis Garbage has reviewed conceptual plans and will
provide solid waste, recycling, and green waste pick-up service to the Specific Plan area.
PUBLIC
FACILIITES
FINANCING
08
[8-1]
Chapter 8 analyzes the financing of public facilities associated with the land uses proposed in the
Froom Ranch Specific Plan (“FRSP” or “Project”) and presents a “pay-as-you-go” financing strategy.
The focus of the analysis is on infrastructure and related costs necessary to serve the Project
directly, plus development impact fees that would be imposed on the Project for other City-wide
capital improvements that the Project must contribute to. “Pay-as-you-go” refers to the fact that
the phasing of public improvements has been designed to ensure that funds will be available to
cover the cost of facilities when they are required. The facilities covered by this financing plan do
not include in-tract improvements for subdivisions within the FRSP; it is expected that these costs
will be privately funded by the FRSP developers.
In summary, Chapter 8 includes the following information:
• A description of public facilities required to serve future development in the FRSP
area.
• An overview of the costs of required public facilities, including an allocation of the
costs to the proposed project phases.
• Identification of the total one-time burdens (impact fees) to be collected within the
Project area to fund facilities on a pay-as-you-go basis.
• A summary of implementation measures that must be enacted by the City.
The phasing plan for public facilities described later in Section 8.4.2 of this chapter was developed
to accomplish two key goals. First, to ensure that the public facilities needed to serve Specific Plan
Area development are constructed as soon as possible for the benefit of future FRSP residents. And,
second, to ensure that facilities are phased in as fees become available to pay for their
construction, which will reduce financing costs and help lower the cost of constructing new
housing in the FRSP Area.
[8-2]
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan describes the water, wastewater, storm drainage, roads,
parks, and miscellaneous improvements proposed to meet the needs of the community.
The City currently has a development impact fee program in place that the project will
participate in to fund regional water and wastewater and road improvements. Drainage
improvements for the Project include an off-site drainage basin which will have a separate
cost-sharing agreement between the participating property owners. The City will be granted
an easement allowing for access and for the City to perform maintenance if the owners
should fail to maintain the basin. The remaining Project specific costs for roads, creek
culverts, pedestrian paths, and parks and recreation that are not covered by existing
development impact fees or other funding mechanisms are the focus of Chapter 8. The total
cost for the improvements required for the FRSP is estimated to be approximately $12
million as summarized in Table 8-1. Detailed costs for improvements are included in Table
8-2. Final mitigation fee costs may be adjusted in the future based on the sizes and numbers
of units ultimately developed in the project and the actual construction costs of
improvements.
Table 8-1 Infrastructure Cost Estimate
Improvement Gross Cost Net Cost Financing Responsibility/ Liability
Transportation $ 9,699,541 $ 3,787,677 $ 92,500
Pedestrian and Bicycle $ 4,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000
Parks and Recreation $ 6,175,000 $ 6,175,000 0
Total $ 20,374,541 $ 11,962,677 $ 2,092,500
The circulation plan for the Project provides direct connections between the existing
arterial (LOVR) and the new roads within the FRSP. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation
routes will provide access through the interior of the Project and will connect to t he existing
pedestrian and bicycle network outside the FRSP area. Table 8-2 provides a list of
circulation system projects required to serve the FRSP.
As shown on Table 8-2, the total cost for public street improvements is estimated to be
approximately $9.7 million and the Project’s fair share of these improvements is estimated
to be $3.8 million. An additional $2.0 million is anticipated for the FRSP’s fair share of
bicycle and pedestrian improvements, which are estimated to cost a total of $4.5 million.
[8-3]
Table 8-2 Detailed Infrastructure Cost Estimate
TRANSPORTATION
MITIGATION
MEASURES
PROJECT
TOTAL
COST
FAIR
SHARE
%
FROOM
RANCH COST
PHASE#
or
FAIR
SHARE
(FS)
ELIGIBLE
FOR
REIMB
COMMENTS
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
TRANS MM# 2
LOVR/ US 101 SB
Ramps
$250,000 31% $77,500 Phase 3 N SL Ranch required to fund 100%
and construct WBL turn pocket
widening (Cost = $250K per SL
Ranch Development
Agreement). Likely to be built
prior to FRSP Phase 3. FRSP may
be responsible for fair share;
however, SL Ranch does not
have reimbursement agreement
for this improvement.
SBR turn pocket widening
required by FRSP. Cost in excess
of fair share reimbursable via
private reimbursement
agreement.
$70,000 $70,000 N
TRANS MM# 3
S Higuera/Vachell
$5,263,541 18% $947,437 FS N Avila Ranch required to
construct before Phase 2.
Design for Vachell/Higuera
approved by City. Design for
Buckley complete or nearly
complete with County.
Anticipated to be completed
prior to FRSP Phase 3. FRSP
required to pay fair share per
Avila Ranch reimbursement
agreement.
TRANS MM# 4
S Higuera/Suburban
$40,000 18% $7,200 FS N Avila Ranch required to
construct before Phase 1.
Design approved. Anticipated to
be completed prior to FRSP
Phase 2. FRSP may be
responsible for fair share;
however, Avila does not have
reimbursement agreement for
this improvement.
TRANS MM# 11
Local Road A
$2,100,000 100% $2,100,000 Phase 1
& 3
N Entry road A, Roundabout and
Cul-de-sac to Park
[8-4]
Table 8-2 – Continued
TRANSPORTATION
MITIGATION
MEASURES
PROJECT
TOTAL
COST
FAIR
SHARE
%
FROOM
RANCH COST
PHASE#
or
FAIR
SHARE
(FS)
ELIGIBLE
FOR
REIMB
COMMENTS
TRANS MM# 12
LOVR/Foothill
$500,000 6% $30,000 FS N Fair share payment towards
future intersection operational
improvements.
TRANS MM# 15
S Higuera/Tank Farm
$850,000 N/A N/A Satisfied by TIF.
TRANS MM# 16
LOVR Descanso to S
Higuera
$50,000 100% $50,000 Phase 3 N Prepare traffic study to identify
recommended signal timing
refinements.
TRANS MM# 17
LOVR / Madonna
$20,000 14% $2,800 Phase 2 N Fair share towards restriping
SB left-turn pocket
TRANS MM# 18
Madonna/Dalidio
$6,000 4% $240 Phase 3 N Minor traffic signal
modification. Cost in excess of
fair share reimbursable via
private reimbursement
agreement.
TRANS MM# 19
LOVR Median
$500,000 100% $500,000 Phase 1 N Installation of median along
LOVR project frontage
TRANS MM# 23
LOVR/Royal
$50,000 5% $2,500 FS N Fair share payment towards
future intersection operational
improvements.
SUBTOTAL COST $9,699,541 $3,787,677
[8-5]
Table 8-2 – Continued
TRANSPORTATION
MITIGATION
MEASURES
PROJECT
TOTAL
COST
FAIR
SHARE
%
FROOM
RANCH COST
PHASE#
or
FAIR
SHARE
(FS)
ELIGIBLE
FOR
REIMB
COMMENTS
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
TRANS MM# 8, 9
LOVR from Diablo to S.
Higuera
$3,500,000 14% $1,500,000 Phase 2 Y TIF includes a portion of this
project (Froom Ranch Way to
Calle Joaquin @ $2M) -- costs
for this segment would be
eligible for TIF
credits/reimbursement. Other
segments would require
reimbursement agreement for
costs in excess of project's fair
share. Costs in this item do
not include sidewalks along
project frontage.
Much of corridor already
includes striped bike buffers --
project would install raised
curb within buffer. South of
Calle Joaquin, would require
restriping to provide width for
bike buffers, then install raised
curb within buffer.
TRANS MM# 22
LOVR/Auto Park
Ped/Bike Safety
$1,000,000 100% $500,000 Phase 1 Y LOVR/Auto Park signal is in TIF
program, so a portion of the
LOVR/Auto Park signalization
costs are eligible for TIF
credits/reimbursement
($500K). Other features will be
100% attributed to project.
SUBTOTAL COST $4,500,000 $2,000,000
[8-6]
Table 8-2 – Continued
ITEM PROJECT
TOTAL
COST
FAIR
SHARE
%
FROOM
RANCH COST
PHASE#
or
FAIR
SHARE
(FS)
ELIGIBLE
FOR
REIMB
COMMENTS
PARKS AND RECREATION
City Trailhead Park
Historic Building
Improvements
$1,500,000 100% $1,500,000 Phase 3 N Froom Ranch Historic Building
Rehabilitations (3) and
Reimagined Building (1)
City Trailhead Park
Site Improvements &
Equipment
$1,500,000 100% $1,500,000 Phase 3 N Parking lots, driveways,
lighting, site amenities, bike
racks, signage, etc.
City Trailhead Park
Land Dedication
$1,225,000 100% $1,225,000 Phase 3 N 3.5 Acres at $350,000.
Dedication of land at the end
of Road A
Froom Creek Trail
Improvements
$1,250,000 100% $1,250,000 Phase 1 N linear park and trails at the top
of Froom Creek
Froom Creek Trail
Public Access
Easement
$700,000 100% $700,000 Phase 1 N 2.0 Acres at $350,000. Public
access trail easement
SUBTOTAL COST $6,175,000 $6,175,000
TOTAL COST - ALL
ITEMS
20,374,541 $11,962,627
The FRSP provides for approximately 3.6 acres of improved parkland as a trailhead park in the
northwestern of the site. The park will serve as a trailhead for the Irish Hill Natural Preserve Trails,
include various park amenities, and incorporate historic structures for various facilities. In addition,
a linear park is proposed along Froom Creek within the FRSP area. The following list summarizes
the parks and recreation projects planned to serve the Project:
• Trailhead Park – 3.6 acres
• Froom Creek Trail – 2 acres
The total cost of park and recreation improvements to be funded by the Project is estimated to be
approximately $6.2 million.
The total land cost for the Trailhead Park will be approximately $1,225,000 assuming costs of about
$350,000 per acre. Land cost for the approximately 2-acre Froom Creek Trail will be approximately
$700,000. Froom Creek Trail will have a public access easement offered by the property owner.
[8-7]
Development impact fees are monetary exactions (as opposed to taxes or special assessments)
that are charged by local agencies in conjunction with approval of a development project. The fees
are paid by builders or developers, typically at the time a building permit or occupancy permit is
issued however at the request of the developer(s) and subject to approval of the City some fees
may be payable prior to occupancy. Impact fees are included in an adopted City fee schedule and
are levied to defray all or a portion of the costs of a public facility, improvem ent, or amenity that
benefits the project. Development Impact Fees for development within the Specific Plan area
based upon density, unit count, square footage, etc. shall be based upon the actual development
that is submitted for implementation permitting.
Development in the FRSP is expected to participate in the existing City-wide development impact
fee program s for transportation, water, and sewer facilities that are charged to all development
projects. Additional Project-specific impact fees may be tied to FEIR mitigation measures for any
potential project impacts to City-wide public facilities beyond those anticipated by the adopted
development impact fees charged to all projects. Table 8-3 provides a summary of City
development impact fees.
Table 8-3 Summary of City Development Impact Fees
Land Uses
Parkland
In-lieu
Fees*
Parkland
Develop-
ment* Police* Fire*
City Wide
+LOVR
Traffic
Impact*
Water/
Sewer
Recycled
Water
School
Fees Total
Villaggio
Residential $618,249 $879,690 $215,870 $184,062 $1,049,515 $754,606 $65,776 $1,169,628 $4,937,395
Institutional/
Common
Area
$29,693 $26,130 $0 $774,226 $0 $71,206 $901,256
Madonna
Residential $114,630 $97,670 $1,657,861 $3,903,560 $75,000 $920,970 $6,769,690
Commercial $25,438 $22,385 $1,673,940 $250,348 $41,414 $61,000 $2,074,525
Total $618,249 $879,690 $385,630 $330,247 $4,381,315 $5,682,740 $182,190 $2,222,804 $14,682,865
* Includes 1.75% administration fee
[8-8]
Development in the FRSP is anticipated to occur in three phases. This is consistent with the City’s
Growth Management objectives. Phase 1 of the Project is assumed to be construction of site
improvements including the realignment of the Froom Creek corridor. Phases 2 and 3 include
development of planned residential and commercial uses.
Table 8-4 provides an estimate of projected City development impact fees and school fees by year
during the projected project development period of approximately seven years.
Table 8-4 Summary of City Development Impact and School Fees by Year
Year
Total City Development
Impact Fees*
Project
2022 $1,594,608 Villaggio Phase I
2023 $3,656,138 Villaggio Phase I
2024 $1,587,660 Madonna MF (24du/ac)
2025 $2,074,525 hotel / commercial
2026 $0
2027 $587,905 Villaggio Phase II
2028 $5,182,030 Madonna MF (20du/ac)
*Note: Paid at building permit issuance
[8-9]
Public Facilities will be required at various stages of Project development. Project frontage
improvements are linked to the Villaggio development; for example, the LOVR transportation
improvements are required to be completed prior to the occupancy of the first living unit in
Villaggio.
A conscious effort was made during the design of these phasing assumptions to ensure funding
would be available for these improvements on a pay-as-you-go basis. As noted in the cash flow
section below, no cumulative funding gaps are projected because of these phasing assumptions.
Therefore, lump-sum financing with bonds or other mechanisms does not appear to be necessary;
however, such programs may be used in conjunction with city advice and consent. Table 8-5
delineates the phasing assumptions for the FRSP public facility costs.
Table 8-5 Summary of City Development Impact Fees by Phase
FRSP Phases
Parkland
In-lieu
Fees*
Parkland
Develop-
ment* Police* Fire*
City Wide
+LOVR
Traffic
Impact*
Water/Sewer/
Recycled
Water
School
Fees Total
Phase 2A $425,429 $605,331 $180,402 $154,626 $1,049,515 $1,594,608 $1,240,834 $5,250,746
Phase 2B $192,820 $274,359 $65,161 $55,566 $0 $0 $0 $587,905
Phase 3 $140,067 $120,055 $3,331,801 $4,270,322 $981,970 $8,844,215
Total $618,249 $879,690 $385,630 $330,247 $4,381,315 $5,864,930 $2,222,804 $14,682,865
*Includes 1.75% administration fee
[8-10]
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan identifies a program for senior housing and transitional
care facilities, residential uses, and limited nonresidential components, within the City of
San Luis Obispo and will be subject to updates and revisions in future years as
development applications are submitted and processed. This financing strategy for public
improvements is based on assumptions of land use, facility demands, facility standards
and design, and cost estimates.
As noted above, changes may occur in facility plans, land use plans, or cost estimates.
When these items are revised, there will be a corresponding change in the fair share cost
allocation to each land use in the FRSP. Land use and facility changes may result in
revisions to the corresponding cost allocation to each land use. To the extent some
projects in the FRSP will have been developed and will have paid their fair share as defined
at the time they were built, revisions will apply only to future new development.
Pursuant to Section 66006 of the Government Code, the City will establish a separate FRSP
capital facility account and a unique fund for each type of public facility for which fees are
collected. Establishment of this account will prevent commingling of the FRSP fees with
other City revenues and funds. Interest income earned by fee revenues in this account will
be deposited in the account and applied to facility construction costs. Within one hundred
eighty (180) days of the close of each fiscal year, the City will make information pertain ing
to the account [as required by Section 66006 (b)(1)] available to the public and will review
this information at a regularly scheduled public hearing.
To maximize the efficiency of the capital improvements program, the City may borrow
money from one fund within the FRSP account to pay for facilities financed by another fund
within the account. This borrowing will occur when one type of facility is needed
immediately, while another type is not needed for several years. The City will monitor such
borrowing on an ongoing basis and will repay funds from which fee revenues were
borrowed in a timely manner and in an amount equal to the original amount borrowed
plus the interest that would have accrued had the money not been borrowed from the
fund.
As this Specific Plan represents the best information available at the time the FRSP is
prepared these improvement and fee projections may change as the project is
implemented and actual project design plans are submitted. Chapter 8 of the FRSP will not
require amendments or adjustments to reflect changes that occur as project
implementation proposals come forward. Chapter 8 will guide the overall funding of
community infrastructure required to serve the Specific Plan.
09 IMPLEMENTATION
& ADMINISTRATION
[9-1]
Specific plans must comply with California Government Code Sections §65450 through §65457.
These provisions require that a Specific Plan be consistent with the adopted General Plan for the
jurisdiction in which the specific plan area is located. In turn, all subsequent development
proposals, such as tentative subdivision maps, site plans, improvement plans, and all public works
projects, must be consistent with the adopted specific plan.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section §65453, a specific plan may be adopted by
resolution or by ordinance. Past City practice has been to adopt a specific plan and certify the FEIR
concurrently through a resolution. This practice is consistent with direction from State law where
a plan adopted by resolution is primarily implemented by separately adopted ordinances and
programs, which is the case with the Froom Ranch Specific Plan that mirrors existing zoning with
minor adjustments to limited property development standards. In situations where the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan conflicts with the requirements of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, the
Froom Ranch Specific Plan provisions shall take precedence. Where the Froom Ranch Specific Plan
is silent on a topic, the Municipal Code requirements remain in force.
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan addresses land uses, densities, and types of development
proposed, as well as the streets and infrastructure anticipated to serve the area. It provides a
detailed description of the project that was evaluated in the Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR) for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the FEIR has assessed the potential direct and indirect environmental effects associated with the
land use program described in this specific plan.
Although the FEIR analysis is included in a separate document, the environmental review process
has been an integral component of the planning process from the very beginning to ensure that
the Specific Plan respects natural site constraints and minimizes environmental impacts. The FEIR
addresses the development of the Specific Plan Area as a single project which is projected to be
developed in increments over a period of several years. This approach enables the City to
comprehensively evaluate the cumulative impacts of the Specific Plan and consider alternatives
and mitigation measures prior to adoption of the Specific Plan.
Development within the Specific Plan area shall comply with all conditions of approval and
mitigation measures identified in the certified Specific Plan FEIR (Froom Ranch Specific Plan FEIR
SCH No. 2017071033) and any subsequent CEQA document (e.g., Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Subsequent EIR, or Supplemental EIR). The Specific Plan FEIR is intended to expedite the
[9-2]
processing of future projects that are consistent with the Specific Plan. If, when considering
subsequent development proposals, the City determines that the proposed development will not
result in new effects or require additional mitigation, the City can approve the project without
additional environmental review (California Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines
Section 15182). In addition, if there are significant changes proposed to the approved Specific Plan
that the City concludes may result in new impacts, any additional environmental review need focus
only on those specific areas or topics affected by the change.
The Froom Ranch Area is currently under County of San Luis Obispo (County) jurisdiction but is
located immediately southwest of the City of San Luis Obispo (City) limits. The site is designated
in the City’s Land Use Element (LUE) as a Specific Plan Area, which is subject to preparation of a
Specific Plan to accommodate development proposals and address pertinent issues (identified as
SP-3 on LUE Figure 10). The General Plan requires that a Specific Plan for the Froom Ranch Area
be adopted prior to annexation of the Plan Area to the City. The northeastern portion of the
Specific Plan Area is located within the City’s Urban Reserve Line, and the entire site is within the
Land Use Element (LUE) Sphere of Influence.
Along with the processing of the FEIR and other City Planning entitlements, the City Council will
adopt a resolution to initiate annexation of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan property to the City.
Following City Council action on project entitlements including adoption of the Specific Plan and
certification of the FEIR, the project will be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO) for the formal annexation review process. LAFCO works with the City and County of San
Luis Obispo to negotiate tax sharing and to ensure that a proper plan of services is in place to guide
orderly development of the annexed property.
The Specific Plan Area will be zoned consistent with the land uses identified by Figure 2-1, the Land
Use/Zoning Map. The “SP” overlay will be added to the City zone category applied to each property.
City zoning designations will take effect upon annexation. The designated residential zone
boundaries may be adjusted slightly to reflect subdivision maps as they are approved if the
Community Development Director makes a finding that the adjustment is consistent with the
intent of the Specific Plan.
The precise location of streets, utilities, and boundaries of development sites will be determined
upon approval of tentative subdivision maps. Along with the review of the final map before
recording, subdivision improvement plans will be reviewed and approved, which show compliance
with the Specific Plan, the Environmental Impact Report, and any associated project conditions of
approval.
[9-3]
Commercial, multifamily residential and single-family tract construction will undergo architectural
review per City requirements. For projects subject to architectural review, the Community
Development Director may authorize application of the “minor or incidental” procedure to those
projects meeting this Specific Plan’s design guidelines and standards.
The City building permit process of plan-check, inspection, and occupancy release will typically be
the final and most detailed step in City review of private site development. Impact fees are due at
the time building permits are issued.
Figure 9-1 identifies the areas anticipated to make up the Froom Ranch Specific Plan
development phases. These phases address goals to accommodate orderly development and
provision of services. They represent a reasonable approach to extending services and
infrastructure throughout the Specific Plan Area. In some cases, property owners may wish to
develop in an earlier phase than identified. This may be permitted provided the necessary
infrastructure to serve the proposed development is already in place, or if the project can construct
the required infrastructure prior to development.
[9-4]
Figure 9-1 Phasing Plan
[9-5]
Public facilities required to serve Specific Plan Area development will be funded as discussed in
Chapter 8. Property in the Specific Plan Area that is annexed into the City will receive the same
public services as other neighborhoods in the City, including police, fire, and street maintenance,
as described in Chapter 7. Facilities such as utility lines, park components, and stormwater facilities
will be constructed by the developers of the area, and dedicated to the City upon completion and
inspection. Once public facilities are constructed and the dedication is accepted by the City, future
maintenance will be managed by the responsible City department. Local streets, infrastructure,
and utilities within the proposed Life Plan Community portion of the Specific Plan Area are private
and will be privately maintained.
It is the intent of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan (FRSP) to present a comprehensive set of standards
and guidelines for the development of the Specific Plan area. These standards and guidelines
promote a high-quality development that allows for creativity and flexibility in the design process.
However, changes in market conditions or developer interests may result in the need for
amendments to the FRSP. Over time, various sections of this Specific Plan may need to be revised
to respond to changing technical, environmental, and economic conditions.
This section addresses the process for amending the FRSP, acknowledging that there are a range
of potential amendments, from minor interpretations that could be handled by a D irector
approval, to more complex requests that impact the density and land use in a more substantial
way that require approval by the City Council. Amendments to the Specific Plan may be initiated
by a developer, an individual, or by the City, and are not limited to a certain number per year.
Interpretations are judgments that evaluate whether a specific project feature or minor change is
consistent with the intent and goals of the Specific Plan. These are generally limited to details
where the features of the plan appear to conflict with other features in the plan, with adopted City
policy, or with the requirements of other agencies. Interpretations may be necessary during
discretionary development application (such as subdivision map) or ministerial development
applications (such as building permits).
[9-6]
Adjustments are minor changes to specific features of the FRSP that do not significantly alter the
development type and still meet the intent of the Plan. The FRSP allows for refinement of Plan
features if any change is clearly consistent with the relevant goals, policies, programs, and
standards. The City anticipates that street and pedestrian path locations may be slightly modified
through approval of subdivision maps, and zoning boundaries may also be modified to match new
property lines created through the subdivision process.
The Community Development Director is responsible for interpretations and adjustments made
relative to FRSP policies and standards to insure consistency in implementation as development
progresses. In making such an interpretation, the Community Development Director will consult
with any other affected City departments. Decisions involving City facilities may be within the
authority of the Public Works Director or the Utilities Director, who likewise would make th e
interpretation after consulting with any other affected departments.
Interpretations and adjustments made by the Community Development Director are subject to
appeal. The Director may also refer a matter to an advisory body such as the Architectural Review
Commission or Planning Commission if deemed warranted.
Amendments are changes to features of the plan involving difference in development type or
capacity (including public facilities). Amendments typically involve a question of consistency with
the original intent of the FRSP or with the General Plan. Amendments require a hearing and
recommendation by the Planning Commission, with final action to be taken by the City Council.
1) Eliminating or reclassifying major streets;
2) Increasing the number of street intersections on Los Osos Valley Road;
3) Changing zoning on a parcel as indicated in the Specific Plan;
4) Significantly altering residential densities from the proposed range; or
5) Significantly altering the regional stormwater detention basin design or its capacity.
IMPLEMENTATION
& ADMINISTRATION APPENDIX A
10
APPENDIX A
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
City of San Luis Obispo General Plan Consistency Analysis –
Relevant Goals, Policies, and Programs
Land Use Element (2014)
Circulation Element (2014)
Housing Element (2015)
Noise Element (1996)
Safety Element (2012)
Conservation & Open Space Element (2006)
Parks & Recreation Element (2001)
Water & Wastewater Element (2016)
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 2
Land Use Element
1.1. Overall Intent
1.1.1. Growth Management Objectives: The City shall manage its growth so that:
A. The natural environment and air quality will be protected.
B. The relatively high level of services enjoyed by City residents is maintained or
enhanced.
C. The demand for municipal services does not outpace their availability.
D. New residents can be assimilated without disrupting the community's social
fabric, safety, or established neighborhoods.
E. Residents' opportunities for direct participation in City government and their
sense of community can continue.
1.1.2. Development Capacity and Services: The City shall not designate more land for
urban uses than its resources can be expected to support.
Analysis: The purpose of the Specific Plan is to provide a strategy for land use, services, and
environmental protection that meets stated General Plan goals identified for the site. In
determining the locations of proposed land uses, the site constraints have been identified
through detailed technical analyses that include biology, geology, hydrology, cultural resources,
and seismology. Development has been sited to avoid known protected resources and to
preserve about one-half of the site area as open space. The impacts of site development on
City utilities and services, such as water, wastewater, drainage, and public safety, have also
been evaluated.
1.2. Urban Separation
Broad, undeveloped open spaces should separate the City from nearby urban areas.
This element establishes a final edge for urban development.
Analysis: The site is immediately south of the highly urbanized Irish Hills Shopping Center.
Urban development will be directed to the Los Osos Valley Road corridor toward US Highway
101. The uppermost portions of the site will be left as open space transitioning to the City’s
green belt beyond.
1.3. Build-out Capacity
There should not be major expansion of the urban reserve line because the urban
reserve provides adequate capacity for new housing and employment up to the City’s
desired maximum. This element seeks to establish an ultimate population capacity.
Analysis: This site was identified in the LUE as an urban expansion area requiring the
preparation of a Specific Plan. The urban reserve line will be modified to reflect the land use
development pattern included in the approved version of the Specific Plan. The population
potential for development at this site was anticipated with the update of the LUE in 2014.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 3
1.4. Urban Edges Character
The City shall maintain a clear boundary between San Luis Obispo's urban development
and surrounding open land. Development just inside the boundary shall provide
measures to avoid a stark-appearing edge between buildings in the city and adjacent
open land. Such measures may include: using new or existing groves or windrows of
trees, or hills or other landforms, to set the edge of development; increasing the required
side-yard and rear-yard setbacks; and providing open space or agricultural transition
buffers.
Analysis: The transition between the developed portions of the site and surrounding open
space areas will be gradual. For the Life Plan Community, this is achieved by placement of
larger and taller buildings nearer Los Osos Valley Road and locating smaller bungalows
beyond. Between residential portions of the Life Plan Community, there are significant open
spaces that visually tie into the dedicated City open space area that is located between the
north and south portions of the overall Specific Plan area. The southwestern corner of the
Specific Plan area will be entirely left as open space.
With the Madonna/Froom portion of the project on the north side, development will appear as a
continuation of the urbanized pattern along Los Osos Valley Road. Maintenance of the required
setback along the restored Froom Creek corridor will provide a soft, vegetated edge to the
transition to the open space beyond.
1.7 City Size and Expansion
1.7.1. Urban Reserve
The City shall maintain an urban reserve line containing the area around the city
where urban development might occur (Figure 3, Land Use Diagram).
Urban uses within this line should only be developed if consistent with City-
approved plans. Non-urban agricultural, open space, and wildlife corridor uses are
also encouraged within the urban reserve, as interim or permanent uses shown on
City-approved plans.
1.7.2. Expansion Areas
The City shall designate expansion areas adequate for growth consistent with these
policies within the urban reserve line (Figure 3, Land Use Diagram).
Analysis: The LUE designated the Specific Plan Area as an appropriate site for the expansion
of urban development. The prepared Specific Plan is consistent with LUE requirements.
1.7.3. Interim Uses
Expansion areas should be kept in agriculture, compatible with agricultural support
services, or open-space uses until urban development occurs, unless a City-
approved specific plan provides for other interim uses.
Analysis: The site will be developed consistent with the phasing plan included in the Specific
Plan.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 4
1.8. Greenbelt
(See also Section 6, Resource Protection)
1.8.1. Open Space Protection
Within the City's planning area and outside the urban reserve line, undeveloped
land should be kept open. Prime agricultural land, productive agricultural land, and
potentially productive agricultural land shall be protected for farming. Scenic lands,
sensitive wildlife habitat, and undeveloped prime agricultural land shall be
permanently protected as open space.
1.8.2. Greenbelt Uses
Appropriate greenbelt uses include: watershed; wildlife habitat; grazing; cultivated
crops; parks and outdoor recreation (with minimal land or landscape alteration,
building, lighting, paving, or use of vehicles, so rural character is maintained); and
home sites surrounded by land of sufficient size and appropriately located with
respect to topography and vegetation to maintain the open character.
Analysis: Portions of the site identified as open space will be placed in open space easements.
Open space areas are of sufficient size to maintain the open character. See previous discussion
regarding Policy 1.4., Urban Edges Character. Figure 10 of the Conservation and Open Space
Element shows that portions of the lower elevations of the site near LOVR are classified as
“farmland of local potential”. The site was used as a dairy between the late 1800s and the
1950s, and for cattle ranching in more recent decades, but has not been used for arable
production. A portion of the area shown in this category is now jurisdictional wetlands.
1.8.5. Building Design and Siting
All new buildings and structures should be subordinate to and in harmony with the
surrounding landscape. The City should encourage County adoption of regulations
prohibiting new structures on ridge lines or in other visually prominent or
environmentally sensitive locations, and allowing transfer of development rights from
one parcel to another in order to facilitate this policy.
Analysis: The Specific Plan includes Program 3.5.2a, which provides strategies to limit any
impacts of new buildings above 150-feet to visual resources include, but are not limited to:
1) Minimizing the use of retaining walls with over 8 feet of exposed face;
2) Locating development behind natural landforms to screen buildings;
3) Limiting the roof heights of buildings to that of the adjacent Mountainbrook Church
(238’);
4) Use of earth tone colors for main building walls; and
5) Limiting exterior lighting and requiring that all fixtures are shielded and directed
downward in compliance with the City’s Night Sky Preservation Ordinance.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 5
1.10. Residential Clustering for Open Space Protection
1.10.2. Means of Protection
The City shall require that open space be preserved either by dedication of
permanent easements or transfer of fee ownership to the City, the County, or a
responsible, nonprofit conservation organization.
Analysis: Portions of the site identified as open space will be placed in open space easements.
1.10.3. Public Access
Areas preserved for open space should include public trail access, controlled to
protect the natural resources, to assure reasonable security and privacy of
dwellings, and to allow continuing agricultural operations. Public access through
production agricultural land will not be considered, unless the owner agrees.
Analysis: The proposed trail system within the Specific Plan will connect to existing offsite trails
to offer extended recreational opportunities. Because of the unique development style and
population characteristics of the Life Plan Community, there will be security fencing with
controlled access linkages to trails beyond the Life Plan Community boundaries.
1.10.4. Design Standards
The City shall require cluster development to:
A. Be screened from public views by landforms or vegetation, but not at the
expense of habitat. If the visually screened locations contain sensitive habitats
or unique resources as defined in the Conservation and Open Space Element
(COSE), development should be avoided in those areas and instead designed to
cluster in the form of vernacular farm building complexes, to blend into the
traditional agricultural working landscape.
B. Be located on other than prime agricultural land and be situated to allow
continued agricultural use;
C. Prohibit building sites and roads within stream corridors and other wetlands, on
ridge lines, rock outcrops, or visually prominent or steep hillsides, or other
sensitive habitats or unique resources as defined in the Conservation and Open
Space Element.
D. Preserve historic or archaeological resources.
Analysis: The project will address the noted design standards as follows:
A. As stated in the analysis for Policy 1.8.5. on the previous page, the Specific Plan
provides strategies to limit any impacts of new buildings above 150-feet to visual
resources, such as limiting their scale and using natural landforms to provide
screening. Site planning for the Life Plan Community groups buildings together
with intervening open space areas to protect natural resources.
B. The project site does not contain prime agricultural land.
C. The project site plan has been designed to protect site resources. The restored
Froom Creek corridor and site wetlands will be site amenities and protected
with required setbacks. These areas provide travel corridors and habitat value
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 6
for wildlife. In addition, serpentine rock outcroppings, and areas containing bog
thistle, riparian scrub, oak woodlands, and tree groves will be protected in
open space easements. Large portions of the serpentine bunchgrass plant
community will be protected in place as part of open space easements. Where
there are any impacts to the special status plants within the serpentine
bunchgrass grassland areas mapped on the site, a combination of mitigation
strategies such as onsite and offsite habitat restoration and creation will be
followed.
D. Archaeological resources will be left in situ and development will avoid
disturbing those parts of the site where resources were identified. Significant
historic resources are proposed to be rehabilitated, reconstructed, and
adaptively reused in the project.
1.11. Growth Rates & Phasing
1.11.3. Phasing Residential Expansions
Before a residential expansion area is developed, the City must have adopted a
specific plan or a development plan for it. Such plans for residential expansion
projects will provide for phased development, consistent with the population growth
outlined in Table 3, and taking into account expected infill residential
development.
Analysis: The Specific Plan will be adopted and include a phasing plan for all proposed site
development.
1.13. Annexation and Services
1.13.1. Water and Sewer Service
The City shall not provide nor permit delivery of City potable water or sewer services
to the following areas. However, the City will serve those parties having valid
previous connections or contracts with the City.
A. Outside the City limits;
B. Outside the urban reserve line;
C. Above elevations reliably served by gravity-flow in the City water system;
D. Below elevations reliably served by gravity-flow or pumps in the City sewer
system.
Analysis: This site is a designated expansion area that will be entitled to both City water and
sewer services as identified in the Specific Plan.
1.13.3. Annexation Purpose and Timing
The City may use annexation as a growth management tool, both to enable
appropriate urban development and to protect open space. Areas within the urban
reserve line which are to be developed with urban uses should be annexed before
urban development occurs. The City may annex an area long before such
development is to occur, and the City may annex areas which are to remain
permanently as open space. An area may be annexed in phases, consistent with
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 7
the city-approved specific plan or development plan for the area. Phasing of
annexation and development will reflect topography, needed capital facilities and
funding, open space objectives, and existing and proposed land uses and roads.
Analysis: The Specific Plan anticipates annexation to the City closely following its adoption with
construction of early project phases soon thereafter.
1.13.6. Required Plans
The City shall not allow development of any newly annexed private land until the City
has adopted a specific or development plan for land uses, open space protection,
roads, utilities, the overall pattern of subdivision, and financing of public facilities for
the area.
Analysis: Annexation to the City will closely following Specific Plan adoption.
1.13.7. Development and Services
The City shall approve development in newly annexed areas only when adequate City
services can be provided for that development, without reducing the level of public
services or increasing the cost of services for existing development and for build-out
within the City limits.
Analysis: The Specific Plan provides a plan for City services. This will be analyzed in the EIR
and by LAFCO with their review of the annexation proposal.
1.13.9. Costs of Growth
The City shall require the costs of public facilities and services needed for new
development be borne by the new development, unless the community chooses to
help pay the costs for a certain development to obtain community-wide benefits.
The City shall consider a range of options for financing measures so that new
development pays its fair share of costs of new services and facilities which are
required to serve the project and which are reasonably related to the new growth
attributable to the development.
Analysis: Public Facilities Financing is discussed in Chapter 8 of the Specific Plan. The
developer will pay applicable City development impact fees and privately finance its share of
required on-site and off-site improvements.
1.13.10. Solid Waste Capacity
In addition to other requirements for adequate resources and services prior to
development, the City shall require that adequate solid waste disposal capacity exists
before granting any discretionary land use approval which would increase solid waste
generation.
Analysis: San Luis Garbage Company has reviewed the preliminary development plan and
has committed to serving the development.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 8
2.3. Residential Location, Uses, and Design 2.3.1. Mixed Uses and Convenience
The City shall promote a mix of compatible uses in neighborhoods to serve the daily
needs of nearby residents, including schools, parks, churches, and convenience
retail stores. Neighborhood shopping and services should be available within about
one mile of all dwellings.
Analysis: The Specific Plan area is immediately south of the Irish Hills Shopping Center
which includes a variety of services to serve the needs of residents. In addition, the Life Plan
Community will have a variety of ancillary on-site facilities such as a health club, restaurants,
and theater to serve its residents. The Specific Plan area will include both public and private
recreation areas.
2.3.2. Separation and Buffering
The City shall seek to protect Residential areas from incompatible and detrimental
non-residential activities and facilities.
2.3.2. Residential Next to Non-residential
In designing development at the boundary between residential and non-residential
uses, the City shall make protection of a residential atmosphere the first priority.
Analysis: In the northern portion of the project, new residential uses will be separated from
adjacent commercial uses by a neighborhood park area and landscape buffer areas.
2.3.3. Street Access
The City shall ensure new residential development and redevelopment involving
large sites are designed to orient low-density housing to local access streets, and
medium- or high-density housing to driveways accessible from collector streets.
Major arterials through residential areas shall provide only limited private access or
controlled street intersections.
Analysis: Residential development is primarily served by local streets. The R-4 site near
Los Osos Valley Road will be served by driveways off the commercial collector street.
2.3.4. Neighborhood Pattern
The City shall require that all new residential development be integrated with
existing neighborhoods. Where physical features make this impossible, the new
development should create new neighborhoods.
Analysis: Development anticipated by the Specific Plan is a new integrated neighborhood.
2.3.5. Housing and Businesses
The City shall encourage mixed use projects, where appropriate and compatible
with existing and planned development on the site and with adjacent and nearby
properties. The City shall support the location of mixed use projects and community
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 9
and neighborhood commercial centers near major activity nodes and transportation
corridors / transit opportunities where appropriate.
Analysis: The Specific Plan area is a mixed-use project adjacent to major retail development.
The northeastern corner of the site will be commercially developed. Potentially upper floors of
the commercial spaces could be used for either offices or apartments. Transit service is
available for residents.
2.3.6. Natural Features
The City shall require residential developments to preserve and incorporate as
amenities natural site features, such as land forms, views, creeks, wetlands, wildlife
habitats, wildlife corridors, and plants.
2.3.10. Site Constraints
The City shall require new residential developments to respect site constraints such
as property size and shape, ground slope, access, creeks and wetlands, wildlife
habitats, wildlife corridors, native vegetation, and significant trees.
Analysis: The project site plan has been designed to accommodate site constraints. The
restored Froom Creek corridor and site wetlands will be site amenities and protected with
required setbacks. In addition, serpentine rock outcroppings, and areas containing bog
thistle, riparian scrub, oak woodlands, and tree groves will be protected in open space
easements. Large portions of the serpentine bunchgrass plant community will be protected in
place as part of open space easements. Where there are any impacts to the special status
plants within the serpentine bunchgrass grassland areas mapped on the site, a combination
of mitigation strategies such as onsite and offsite habitat restoration and creation will be
followed.
2.3.11. Residential Project Objectives
A. Privacy, for occupants and neighbors of the project;
B. Adequate usable outdoor area, sheltered from noise and prevailing winds, and
oriented to receive light and sunshine
C. Use of natural ventilation, sunlight, and shade to make indoor and outdoor
spaces comfortable with minimum mechanical support.
D. Pleasant views from and toward the project;
E. Security and safety.
F. Bicycle facilities consistent with the City’s Bicycle Plan;
G. Adequate parking and storage space;
H. Noise and visual separation from adjacent roads and commercial uses. (Barrier
walls, isolating a project, are not desirable. Noise mitigation walls may be used
only when there is no practicable alternative. Where walls are used, they
should help create an attractive pedestrian, residential setting through features
such as setbacks, changes in alignment, detail and texture, places for people
to walk through them at regular intervals, and planting.)
I. Design elements that facilitate neighborhood interaction, such as front
porches, front yards along streets, and entryways facing public walkways.
J. Buffers from hazardous materials transport routes, as recommended by the City
Fire Department.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 10
Analysis: The proposed residential developments will meet all the identified objectives. The site
includes vantages to desirable view corridors and buildings will be oriented to take advantage of
this. New construction will comply with codes and requirements for outdoor use areas,
ventilation, security, bicycle facilities, noise attenuation, and neighborhood interaction elements.
2.3.12. Non-Residential Activities
Residential areas may accommodate limited non-residential activities which generally
have been compatible, such as child day care, elementary schools, churches, and home
businesses meeting established criteria.
Analysis: The Life Plan Community will include ancillary services such as restaurants for
communal dining, theaters, craft classes, and recreation centers.
3.1. Commercial Siting
3.1.1. Slope
Commercial and industrial uses should be developed in appropriate areas where the
natural slope of the land is less than ten percent.
3.1.2. Access
The City shall require that commercial and industrial uses have access from arterial
and collector streets, and be designed and located to avoid increasing traffic on
residential streets.
Analysis: Proposed commercial development within the Specific Plan Area will be in the
northeastern portion of the site near the Irish Hills Plaza. This part of the site has slopes less
than 10% and is accessed by collector streets.
6.2. Overall Resource Protection Programs 6.2.2. Resource Protection
The City shall seek to protect resource areas deemed worthy of permanent protection
by fee acquisition, easement, or other means.
Analysis: The project site plan has been designed to protect site resources as previously
described for the discussion of LUE Policy 1.10.4 on Page 5-6, and LUE Policies 2.3.6 &
2.3.10 on Page 9 of this document. Portions of the site classified as open space will be placed
in open space easements.
6.3. Open Space Policies (See also the Growth Management section)
6.3.1. Open Space and Greenbelt Designations
The City shall designate the following types of land as open space:
A. Upland and valley sensitive habitats or unique resources, as defined in the
Conservation and Open Space Element, including corridors which connect
habitats.
B. Undeveloped prime agricultural soils which are to remain in agricultural use as
provided in Policy 1.9.2. Those areas which are best suited to non-urban uses due
to: infeasibility of providing proper access or utilities; excessive slope or slope
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 11
instability; wildland fire hazard; noise exposure; flood hazard; scenic value; wildlife
habitat value, including sensitive habitats or unique resources as defined in the
Conservation and Open Space Element; agricultural value; and value for passive
recreation.
D. A greenbelt, outside the urban reserve, that surrounds the ultimate boundaries of
the urban area, and which should connect with wildlife corridors that cross the
urbanized area.
E. Sufficient area of each habitat type to ensure the ecological integrity of that habitat
type within the urban reserve and the greenbelt, including connections between
habitats for wildlife movement and dispersal; these habitat types will be as
identified in the natural resource inventory, as discussed in the "Background to this
Land Use Element Update" and in Community Goal #8.
Public lands suited for active recreation will be designated Park on the General Plan
Land Use Element Map. The City may establish an agricultural designation. (See the
Conservation and Open Space Element for refinements of these policies.)
Analysis: The project site plan has been designed to protect site resources, including creek
corridors, site wetlands, serpentine rock outcroppings, and areas containing bog thistle,
riparian scrub, oak woodlands, and tree groves. Large portions of the serpentine bunchgrass
plant community will be protected in place. These areas of the site will be classified as open
space and placed in open space easements.
The Madonna portion of the Specific Plan Area will include a neighborhood park which will be
designated as a Public Facility on the Land Use map.
6.4. Hillside Policies
As noted in the open space section of this element and in the Conservation and Open
Space Element, San Luis Obispo wants to keep open its steeper, higher, and most
visible hillsides. Some of the lower and less steep hillside areas, however, are seen as
suitable for development, particularly where development is coupled with permanent
open space protection of the more sensitive areas. This section focuses on where and
how some hillsides may be developed.
6.4.2. Development Limits
The City shall establish and maintain clear development limit lines for hillside
planning areas, and special design standards for the hillside areas. The location of
the development limit and the standards should cause development to avoid
encroachment into sensitive habitats or unique resources as defined in the
Conservation and Open Space Element, and public health and safety problems
related to utility service, access, wildland fire hazard, erosion, flooding, and
landslides and other geologic hazards. Also, the development limit line and the
standards should help protect the city’s scenic setting. (Locations of hillside planning
areas are shown in Figure 7.)
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 12
Analysis: The Froom Ranch site was first identified as Specific Plan Area #3, an urban
expansion area, in the adopted LUE in 2014. Prior to that only a small portion of the
northeastern portion of the site was identified for urban development. For over 30 years the site
has also been identified as part of the Irish Hills Planning Area. Policy 6.4.7.H. for the Irish Hills
Planning Area established a development limit of 150 feet in elevation.
With the designation of the site as Specific Plan Area #3, a specific development limit line for
the Froom Ranch property was not identified. Therefore, the 150-foot elevation identified for the
Irish Hills Hillside Planning Area in Policy 6.4.7.H. prevails without the benefit of a detailed
reconnaissance and analysis of resources unique to this site. Properties included within the
Irish Hills area vary from one another in terms of topographical changes and site resources.
Unique to the project site are the proximity of the drainage channel and wetlands to Los Osos
Valley Road.
Consistent with Policy 6.4.2., topography above the 150-foot limit in some locations of the
Specific Plan area is gentler and more suitable for residential development. The Specific Plan
demonstrates that the requisite 50% open space standard for Froom Ranch is satisfied even
with limited development beyond the 150-foot elevation contour. In addition, sensitive site
resources, such as protected plant species and serpentine rock outcrops, have been carefully
mapped and will be avoided while still allowing for development to occur.
The project site plan has been designed to protect site resources, including creek corridors,
site wetlands, serpentine rock outcroppings, and areas containing bog thistle, riparian scrub,
oak woodlands, and tree groves within areas classified as open space. Large portions of the
serpentine bunchgrass plant community will be protected in place as part of open space
easements. Where there are any impacts to the special status plants within the serpentine
bunchgrass grassland areas mapped on the site, a combination of mitigation strategies such
as onsite and/or offsite habitat restoration and creation will be followed.
As noted in Specific Plan Area Program 3.5.2a, development above the 150-foot elevation
contour will be limited in scale, use appropriate earth colors for wall surfaces, and shield light
fixtures, to blend in with its surroundings. Photo simulations were prepared for decision-makers
to evaluate that potential visual impacts associated with development above the 150-foot
elevation contour were mitigated.
6.4.3. Development Standards
The City shall require development – including buildings, driveways, fences
and graded yard areas – on hillside parcels to:
A. Be entirely within the urban reserve line or development limit line, whichever is
more restrictive (though parcel boundaries may extend beyond these lines
when necessary to meet minimum parcel-size standards), unless one of the
following three exceptions applies:
a) A location outside the urban reserve line or development limit line is
necessary to protect public health and safety.
b) New wireless telecommunication facilities may be appropriate on South
Street Hills inside the three- acre leasehold already developed with
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 13
commercial and municipal radio facilities, subject to use permit approval
and architectural review and approval. Applicants shall comply with all other
provisions of this section, and demonstrate that (a) new facilities will not
individually or additively interfere with City radio equipment necessary for
emergency response coordination, and (b) will not cause on-site radio
frequency radiation levels to exceed exposure standards established for the
general public by the American National Standards Institute.
c) Where a legally built dwelling exists on a parcel which is entirely outside the
urban reserve line or development limit line, a replacement dwelling may
be constructed subject to standards B through H below.
B. Keep a low profile and conform to the natural slopes;
C. Avoid large, continuous walls or roof surfaces, or prominent foundation walls,
poles, or columns;
D. Minimize grading of roads;
E. Minimize grading on individual lots; generally, locate houses close to the street;
minimize the grading of visible driveways;
F. Include planting which is compatible with native hillside vegetation and which
provides a visual transition from developed to open areas;
G. Use materials, colors, and textures which blend with the natural landscape and
avoid high contrasts;
H. Minimize exterior lighting.
Analysis: The urban reserve line will be modified to reflect the land use development pattern
included in the approved version of the Specific Plan so development will be included within
both the urban reserve line and development limit line. As noted in Specific Plan Area Program
3.5.2a, development above the 150-foot elevation contour will be limited in scale, use
appropriate earth colors for wall surfaces, and shield light fixtures, to blend in with its
surroundings.
6.4.7. Hillside Planning Areas - The project is part of the Irish Hills (H) Hillside Planning Area.
The City shall urge the County to implement the following hillside policies. Specific policies to
address particular concerns for the areas as shown on Figure 7 are listed below. For each of
these areas, land above the development limit line should be secured as permanent open
space.
H. The Irish Hills area should secure permanent open space with no building sites above
the 150-foot elevation, in conjunction with any subdivision or development of the lower
areas. (See also Section 8, Special Focus Areas.)
Analysis: Part of the project application will be to amend the Specific language in LUE 6.4.7 H.
to allow development above the 150-foot elevation. As noted in Specific Plan Area Program
3.5.2a, development above the 150-foot elevation contour will: minimize the use of tall retaining
walls, limit roof heights to 238’ (height of adjacent Mountainbrook Church), use appropriate
earth colors used for wall surfaces, and shield light fixtures.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 14
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 15
6.6. Creeks Wetlands, and Flooding Policies
San Luis Obispo's aquatic ecosystems consist of creeks, Laguna Lake, floodplains,
marshes, wetlands, serpentine seeps, and springs. These aquatic ecosystems provide
habitat, recreation, water purification, groundwater recharge, and soil production as well as
natural flood protection by reducing the force of floodwaters as they spread and decelerate
over floodplains. Creeks, which are the most obvious of these systems because they flow
under and through the City, provide wildlife habitat, backyard retreats, and viewing and
hiking pleasures, in addition to carrying storm water runoff. When some creeks overflow
during major storms, they flood wide areas beyond their channels (Figure 8). San Luis
Obispo wants to avoid injury or substantial property losses from flooding, while keeping or
improving the creeks' natural character, scenic appearance, recreational value, and fish and
wildlife habitat.
6.6.1. Creek and Wetlands Management Objectives
The City shall manage its lake, creeks, wetlands, floodplains, and associated
wetlands to achieve the multiple objectives of:
A. Maintaining and restoring natural conditions and fish and wildlife habitat;
B. Preventing loss of life and minimizing property damage from flooding;
C. Providing recreational opportunities which are compatible with fish and wildlife
habitat, flood protection, and use of adjacent private properties.
D. Recognizing and distinguishing between those sections of creeks and Laguna
Lake which are in urbanized areas, such as the Downtown core, and sections
which are in largely natural areas. Those sections already heavily impacted by
urban development and activity may be appropriate for multiple use whereas
creeks and lakeshore in a more natural state shall be managed for maximized
ecological value.
Analysis: Froom Creek has a history of periodic flooding. With this information, and taking into
consideration the unique characteristics of the Specific Plan area, a program has been
developed (Specific Plan Program 3.2.2a) to restore Froom Creek to its historic location on the
property, keeping its current hydrologic connection to San Luis Obispo Creek, connection to the
wetlands habitat near Calle Joaquin, and function as corridor for steelhead.
Development of the Specific Plan area will enhance and restore the historic creek corridor
alignment, and allow it to traverse future development areas. The restored creek corridor will be
enhanced with native plant communities that will thrive, be non-invasive, and require little
maintenance. This would increase the functions and values of the riverine system including
enhancing wildlife habitat and resolving the periodic flooding issues, while also providing an
opportunity for people of all ages and abilities the chance to experience the unique ecological
and pastoral qualities of the creek setting.
6.6.2. Citywide Network
The City shall include the lake, creeks, and wetlands as part of a citywide and
regional network of open space, parks, and – where appropriate – trails, all fostering
understanding, enjoyment, and protection of the natural landscape and wildlife.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 16
6.6.3. Amenities and Access
The City shall require new public or private developments adjacent to the lake,
creeks, and wetlands to respect the natural environment and incorporate the natural
features as project amenities, provided doing so does not diminish natural values.
Developments along creeks should include public access across the development
site to the creek and along the creek, provided that wildlife habitat, public safety, and
reasonable privacy and security of the development can be maintained, consistent
with the Conservation and Open Space Element.
Analysis: A public pedestrian trail is proposed along Froom Creek in the Specific Plan Area.
6.6.4. Open Channels
The City shall require all open channels be kept open and clear of structures in or
over their banks. When necessary, the City may approve structures within creek
channels under the limited situations described in the Conservation and Open Space
Element.
Analysis: Froom Creek will be restored through the site as a public amenity with an improved
riparian corridor habitat value. The creek will be maintained as an open channel with a 35-foot
setback.
6.6.5. Runoff Reduction and Groundwater Recharge
The City shall require the use of methods to facilitate rainwater percolation for roof
areas and outdoor hardscaped areas where practical to reduce surface water runoff
and aid in groundwater recharge.
Analysis: Best Management Practices (BMPs) to facilitate percolation are discussed in Section
6.5.5 of the Specific Plan. They include rain gardens and diverting roof drainage to onsite
landscaped areas.
6.6.6. Development Requirements
The City shall require project designs that minimize drainage concentrations and
impervious coverage. Floodplain areas should be avoided and, where feasible, any
channelization shall be designed to provide the appearance of a natural water
course.
Analysis: Figure 6-7 in the Specific Plan conceptually illustrates the overall drainage plan for the
site. Development will be set back from the restored Froom Creek and areas in the floodplain
built to Code requirements above the flood elevation. Water quality treatment areas for
stormwater are intended to naturally treat runoff from roadways and other hardscape areas, near
or adjacent to the sources of development. An offsite detention basin is proposed to
accommodate runoff storage volume.
6.6.7. Discharge of Urban Pollutants
The City shall require appropriate runoff control measures as part of future
development proposals to minimize discharge of urban pollutants (such as oil and
grease) into area drainages.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 17
Analysis: Section 6.5.5 of the Specific Plan identifies water quality treatment components
consisting of vegetated swales, bioswales, pervious paving, rain gardens and other elements
designed to promote biofiltration.
6.6.8. Erosion Control Measures
The City shall require adequate provision of erosion control measures as part of new
development to minimize sedimentation of streams and drainage channels.
Analysis: The creek channel design will be relatively wide with undulating sloping banks (2:1
maximum). Substantial riparian planting and strategically placed boulder clusters are proposed to
minimize erosion.
6.7. Creeks and Flooding Programs
6.7.1. Previously Developed Areas
To limit the potential for increased flood damage in urbanized areas, the City shall
ensure new development complies with the City’s flood plain ordinance, setbacks,
specific plans, and design standards to minimize flood damage and flood plain
encroachment.
Analysis: The Specific Plan includes Program 3.2.2a, which includes performance standards to
accommodate 100-year storm flows within the creek banks, and to direct storm drainage
overflow into the adjacent existing wetlands during storm events.
7.4. Airport Safety Zones
Density and allowed uses within the Airport Safety Zones shall be consistent with the
San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport Land Use Plan unless the City overrides a
determination of inconsistency in accordance with Section 21676 and 21676.5 et.
seq. of the Public Utilities Code. If the City overrides a determination, all land uses
shall be consistent with the State Aeronautics Act and guidance provided in the
California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook guidelines, City policies, and noise
standards as substantiated by the San Luis Obispo County Airport Master Plan
activity forecasts as used for noise planning purposes.
7.5. Airport Noise Compatibility
The City shall use the aircraft noise analysis prepared for the Airport Master Plan
Environmental Impact Report as an accurate mapping of the long-term noise impact
of the airport’s aviation activity that is tied to the ultimate facilities development
depicted in the FAA-approved Airport Layout Plan. The City shall use the 60 dB
CNEL aircraft noise contour (FAA and State aircraft noise planning standard) as the
threshold for new urban residential areas. Interiors of new residential structures shall
be constructed to meet a maximum 45 dB CNEL.
Analysis: Figure 3, Aviation Safety Areas, of the current Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) shows
that portions of Airport Safety Areas S-1b and S-1c are in the northeastern portion of the Specific
Plan area. However, with two new Specific Plan projects being reviewed by the City of San Luis
Obispo, a corrected version of the analog map used in ALUP Figure 3 has been utilized to review
the consistency of projects with the ALUP. That new map has corrected the locations of the
safety areas to the true GIS bearings of Runways 7-25 and 11-29.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 18
When the project site is overlain on the corrected safety areas map, it is located outside of both
Safety Areas S-1b and S-1c, but is included in Safety Area S-2. The Airport Land Use
Commission (ALUC) conceptually reviewed the project on April 19, 2017 and determined that
the use of the corrected map was appropriate. The ALUP is currently being updated. A draft
Safety Areas map has a compressed S-2 safety area boundary. On this map, the project site is
entirely outside of the S-2 safety area.
The proposed project complies with the density and coverage restrictions of Safety Area S-2.
Residential proposed density (534 units) and potential density (578 units) are below the 660-unit
threshold based on the strictest interpretation of Safety Area S-2 standards (6 units/acre x 110
acres). Non-residential density would be 750 persons (150 persons/care x 5 acres). Proposed
site coverage is about 21%; allowable density under the strictest standard would be 22%.
Through the adoption of the Specific Plan (identified by the term Detailed Area Plan in the
ALUP), additional density allowances would be possible and building coverage restrictions
would not apply.
ALUP Figure 1, Airport Noise Contours, shows that the site is outside of the airport noise
contours. The project will comply with City General Plan noise requirements.
8.1. Specific Plan Areas
8.1.1. Specific Plan / General Plan Amendment
The City shall require the completion and approval of a specific plan and associated
General Plan Amendment prior to annexation (if applicable) and development of land
within an area designated as a Specific Plan Area on Figure 10. The required
General Plan Amendment will modify the General Plan Land Use Diagram to reflect
the land use diagram from the approved specific plan, based on the land uses listed
under “Performance Standards” for each site.
Analysis: Chapter 2 of the Specific Plan includes a land use proposal for the site. With
annexation, the land use designations and corresponding zoning categories for site areas would
be implemented with annexation (Pre-Zoning) in keeping with the Specific Plan. A General Plan
Amendment is proposed to allow development based on the land uses shown on Figure 2-1 in
the Specific Plan. Another component of the General Plan Amendment will be to amend the
Specific language in LUE 6.4.7 H. to allow development above the 150-foot elevation.
9.7. Sustainable Design
The City shall promote and, where appropriate, require sustainable building practices
that consume less energy, water and other resources, facilitate natural ventilation, use
daylight effectively, and are healthy, safe, comfortable, and durable. Projects shall
include, unless deemed infeasible by the City, the following sustainable design features.
A. Energy-Efficient Structure
Utilize building standards and materials that achieve or surpass best practices for
energy efficiency.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 19
B. Energy-Efficient Appliances
Utilize appliances, including air conditioning and heating systems that achieve high
energy efficiency. Incorporation of alternative energy systems (e.g. passive and/or
active solar, heat pumps) is encouraged.
C. Natural Ventilation
Optimize potential for cooling through natural ventilation.
D. Plumbing
Utilize plumbing fixtures that conserve or reuse water such as low flow faucets or
grey water systems and implement a builder incentive program that will encourage
new homes to be built with onsite water/heat recycling systems to help achieve the
goal of net zero water and energy use.
E. Efficient Landscaping
Include landscaping that reduces water use through use of drought-tolerant / native
plant species, high efficiency irrigation (drip irrigation), and reduction or elimination of
the use of turf. Collection and use of site runoff and rainwater harvesting in
landscape irrigation is encouraged.
F. Solar Orientation
Optimize solar orientation of structures to the extent possible.
G. Privacy and Solar Access
New buildings outside of the downtown will respect the privacy and solar access of
neighboring buildings and outdoor areas, particularly where multistory buildings or
additions may overlook backyards of adjacent dwellings.
H. Solar Ready
The City shall encourage new development to be built “solar ready” so that owners
may easily install solar infrastructure, as appropriate.
I. Solar Canopies
The City shall encourage the inclusion of solar canopies that include solar panels
(such as structures over parking lots) on new construction, as appropriate.
Analysis: Chapter 4, Design Guidelines, of the Specific Plan provides a discussion of how the
project will incorporate energy saving and sustainable features into the development areas.
10.1. Neighborhood Access
All residences should be within close proximity to food outlets including grocery stores,
farmers’ markets, and community gardens.
Analysis: The Specific Plan area is immediately south of the Irish Hills Shopping Center which
includes grocery stores and a variety of other services, to serve the needs of residents. In
addition, the Life Plan Community will have convenience foods and restaurants to serve its
residents.
10.4. Encouraging Walkability
The City shall encourage projects which provide for and enhance active and
environmentally sustainable modes of transportation, such as pedestrian movement,
bicycle access, and transit services.
Analysis: As shown in Specific Plan Figure 5-12, the Specific Plan area will include on-site
pedestrian trails with connections to off-site trails in the open space area beyond, and Class II
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 20
& III bicycle lanes along project public streets. All residents will have access to transit service,
and residents of the Life Plan Community will have other group transportation options.
Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access to the adjacent shopping center is accommodated,
but is subject to the approval of the adjacent land owners.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 21
Circulation Element
4.1.4 New Development
The City shall require that new development provide bikeways, secure bicycle storage, parking
facilities and showers consistent with City plans and development standards. When evaluating
transportation impacts, the City shall use a Multimodal Level of Service analysis.
Analysis: As shown in Specific Plan Figure 5-12, the Specific Plan area will include Class II &
III bicycle lanes along project public streets. Bicycle parking and other facilities to meet City
standards will be developed for all components of the project.
5.1.2 Sidewalks and Paths
The City should complete a continuous pedestrian network connecting residential areas with
major activity centers as well as trails leading into city and county open spaces.
5.1.4 Pedestrian Access
New or renovated commercial and government public buildings should provide convenient
pedestrian access from nearby sidewalks and pedestrian paths, separate from driveways and
vehicle entrances.
Analysis: As shown in Specific Plan Figure 5-12, the Specific Plan area will include on-site
pedestrian trails with connections to off-site trails in the open space area beyond. In addition,
there may be a pedestrian linkage to the Irish Hills Plaza from the Specific Plan Area. Individual
projects within the development will include pedestrian pathways to connect with the larger
network.
5.1.5 Pedestrian Crossings
To improve pedestrian crossing safety at heavily used intersections, the City should institute the
following:
• Install crossing controls where warranted by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD) that provide adequate time for pedestrians to cross the street.
• On Arterial Streets, Parkways or Regional Routes with four or more travel lanes, install
medians at pedestrian crossings where roadway width allows.
Analysis: The controlled intersection for the project at LOVR and Auto Park Way will include
crossing controls as mandated by the City.
9.1.1. New Development
The City shall require that new development assumes its fair share of responsibility for
constructing new streets, bike lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian paths and bus turn-outs or
reconstructing existing facilities.
Streets Classification Diagram (Figure 1) shows Los Osos Valley Road (LOVR) as a Parkway
Arterial.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 22
9.2.6 Streetscapes and major roadways.
In the acquisition, design, construction or significant modification of major roadways (highways /
regional routes and arterial streets), the City will promote the creation of “streetscapes” and
linear scenic parkways or corridors that promote the City’s visual quality and character, enhance
adjacent uses, and integrate roadways with surrounding districts. To accomplish this, the City
shall:
A. Establish streetscape design standards for major roadways.
B. Establish that where feasible roundabouts shall be the City’s preferred intersection
alternative due to improved aesthetics, reduction in impervious surface areas, and
additional landscaping area.
C. Encourage the creation and maintenance median planters and widened parkway
plantings;
D. Retain mature trees in the public right-of-way.
E. Emphasize the planting and maintaining California Native tree species of sufficient
height, spread, form and horticultural characteristics to create the desired streetscape
canopy, shade, buffering from adjacent uses, and other desired streetscape
characteristics, consistent with the Tree Ordinance or as recommended by the Tree
Committee or as approved by the Architectural Review Commission.
F. Encourage the use of water-conserving landscaping, street furniture, decorative lighting
and paving, arcaded walkways, public art, and other pedestrian-oriented features to
enhance the streetscape appearance, comfort and safety.
G. Identify gateways into the City including improvements such as landscaped medians,
wayfinding and welcoming signage, arches, lighting enhancements, pavement features,
sidewalks, and different crosswalk paving types.
H. Encourage and where possible, required undergrounding of overhead utility lines and
structures.
I. When possible, signs in the public right-of-way should be consolidated on a single, low-
profile standard.
Analysis: The project will fund roadways and utilities, and comply with City requirements for
new streets, bike lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian paths and bus turn-outs. Chapter 5, Circulation,
of the Specific Plan provides streetscape beautification guidelines.
Figure 3, Scenic Roadways, shows LOVR as roadway of medium scenic value. Highway 101,
near the site, is considered to have high scenic value; the highway has some intermittent views
of the project.
15.0.1 Views
The City will preserve and improve views of important scenic resources from streets and roads.
In particular, the route segments shown in Figure 6 and the Conservation and Open Space
Element are designated as scenic roadways.
• Development projects shall not wall off scenic roadways and block views.
• Development projects, including signs, in the viewshed of a scenic roadway shall be
considered “sensitive” and require architectural review.
15.1.2. Development Along Scenic Routes
The City will preserve and improve views of important scenic resources form streets and roads.
Development along scenic roadways should not block views or detract from the quality of views.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 23
A. Projects, including signs, in the viewshed of a scenic roadway should be considered as
"sensitive" and require architectural review.
B. Development projects should not wall off scenic roadways and block views.
C. As part of the city's environmental review process, blocking of views along scenic
roadways should be considered a significant environmental impact.
D. Signs along scenic roadways should not clutter vistas or views.
E. Street lights should be low scale and focus light at intersections where it is most needed.
Tall light standards should be avoided. Street lighting should be integrated with other
street furniture at locations where views are least disturbed. However, safety priorities
should remain superior to scenic concerns.
F. Lighting along scenic roadways should not degrade the nighttime visual environment
and night sky per the City’s Night Sky Preservation Ordinance.
Analysis: The project will not create a solid wall of development obstructing views of the upper
hillside open space beyond. Visual simulations prepared illustrate how the height and scale of
proposed development will include visual gaps in massing to provide view corridors.
15.1.3 Public Equipment and Facilities
The City and other agencies should be encouraged to avoid cluttering scenic roadways with
utility and circulation-related equipment and facilities.
A. Whenever possible, signs in the public right-of-way should be consolidated on a single
low-profile standard.
B. Public utilities along scenic highways should be installed underground.
C. The placement of landscaping and street trees should not block views from Scenic
Routes. Clustering of street trees along scenic roadways should be considered as an
alternative to uniform spacing
D. Traffic signals with long mast arms should be discouraged along scenic roadways.
Analysis: The site will be limited to the one street intersection along LOVR which limits the
visual impacts to the corridor and the need for multiple road signs. Clustering of street trees will
be utilized to promote open view corridors.
16.0.7 Development Project Costs
Development projects should bear the costs of new transportation facilities or upgrading existing
facilities needed to serve them.
Analysis: The developer will pay applicable traffic impact fees and bear its fair share of the
costs of new transportation facilities.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 24
Housing Element
• Goal 2. Affordability - Accommodate affordable housing production that helps meet the
City’s quantified objectives.
• Program 2.10.: Continue to coordinate public and private sector actions to encourage the
development of housing that meets the City’s housing needs.
Analysis: Consistent with Program 2.10, the applicant team is working closely with the City of
San Luis Obispo to provide a Life Plan Community which provides a unique type of housing that
addresses pressing housing needs for retirement aged residents of San Luis Obispo. There are
presently 107 Life Plan Communities in the state of California, including four in nearby Santa
Barbara, but none yet in San Luis Obispo. The project serves senior households of various
income levels, including some that would meet City affordability requirements.
The Madonna portion of the project will also address workforce housing need by providing for-
sale and rental multiple family units with an average flor area of about 1,500 square feet. In
addition, an affordable housing project is proposed on a portion of the R-4 zoned property near
LOVR.
Program 2.14.: In conjunction with local housing providers and the local residential design
community, continue to provide technical assistance as requested by the public, builders,
design professionals and developers regarding design strategies to achieve affordable housing.
Analysis: The project will meet the City’s Inclusionary Housing requirement within the project.
The affordable housing requirement will be met either by dedicating land to the San Luis Obispo
Housing Authority, or other City recognized affordable housing developer, to develop and
provide ongoing management for an affordable housing project.
Policy 3.3.: Encourage seismic upgrades of older dwellings to reduce the risk of bodily harm
and the loss of housing in an earthquake.
Policy 3.5.: Preserve historic homes and other types of historic residential buildings, historic
districts and unique or landmark neighborhood features.
Program 3.11.: Continue to identify residential properties and districts eligible for local, State or
Federal historic listing and prepare guidelines and standards to help property owner’s repair,
rehabilitate and improve properties in a historically and architecturally sensitive manner.
Analysis: A historic and a structural analysis was done to evaluate the condition of the
historical ranch buildings and their ability to be adaptively reused in the project. Some of those
buildings that can be rehabilitated and re-purposed as habitable structures will be structurally
reinforced to meet seismic requirements. Others may be reconstructed consistent with City and
Secretary of the Interior Guidelines.
• Goal 4. Mixed-Income Housing - Preserve and accommodate existing and new mixed-
income neighborhoods and seek to prevent neighborhoods or housing types that are
segregated by economic status.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 25
Policy 4.1: Within newly developed neighborhoods, housing that is affordable to various
economic strata should be intermixed rather than segregated into separate enclaves.
Policy 4.2.: Include both market-rate and affordable units in apartment and residential
condominium projects and intermix the types of units. Affordable units should be comparable in
appearance and basic quality to market-rate units.
Analysis: The Life Plan Community provides a range of sizes and types of residential units to
attract seniors of different income levels. The Madonna portion of the project will provide a mix
of workforce housing units, some of which will be deed-restricted affordable units to meet
Inclusionary Housing requirements in the project.
Goal 5. Housing Variety & Tenure - Provide variety in the location, type, size, tenure, and style
of dwellings.
Policy 5.1.: Encourage the integration of appropriately scaled, special needs housing into
developments or neighborhoods of conventional housing.
Program 5.5: Review new developments for compliance with City regulations and revise
projects or establish conditions of approval as needed to implement the housing variety and
tenure policies.
Analysis: Inherent to the design of the Life Plan Community is providing of range of sizes and
types of residential units to house seniors through various stages of life. Consistent with Policy
5.1, the Life Plan Community component will be part of a larger community, but also semi-
contained for the safety and security of its residents.
• Goal 6. Housing Production - Plan for new housing to meet the full range of community
housing needs.
Program 6.14.: Specific plans for any new expansion area identified shall include R-3 and R-4
zoned land to ensure sufficient land is designated at appropriate densities to accommodate the
development of extremely low, very-low and low income dwellings. These plans shall include
sites suitable for subsidized rental housing and affordable rental and owner-occupied dwellings,
and programs to support the construction of dwellings rather than payment of in-lieu housing
fees. Such sites shall be integrated within neighborhoods of market-rate housing and shall be
architecturally compatible with the neighborhood.
Program 6.15.: Consider General Plan amendments to rezone commercial, manufacturing or
public facility zoned areas for higher-density, infill or mixed use housing where land
development patterns are suitable and where impact to Low-Density Residential areas is
minimal. For example, areas to be considered for possible rezoning include, but are not limited
to the following sites (shown in Figure 1 and further described in Appendix D, Table D-2):
• Area K. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road (adjacent to Home Depot)
Program 6.17.: Encourage residential development through infill development and densification
within City Limits and in designated expansion areas over new annexation of land.
Analysis: The project site is a designated expansion area in the LUCE and will be developed
principally with residential development.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 26
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 27
• Goal 7. Neighborhood Quality - Maintain, preserve and enhance the quality of
neighborhoods, encourage neighborhood stability and owner occupancy, and improve
neighborhood appearance, function and sense of community.
Policy 7.2.: Higher density housing should maintain high quality standards for unit design,
privacy, security, on-site amenities, and public and private open space. Such standards should
be flexible enough to allow innovative design solutions in special circumstances, e.g. in
developing mixed-use developments or in housing in the Downtown Core.
Policy 7.4.: Within expansion areas, new residential development should be an integral part of
an existing neighborhood or should establish a new neighborhood, with pedestrian and bicycle
linkages that provide direct, convenient and safe access to adjacent neighborhoods, schools
and shopping areas.
Policy 7.7.: The physical design of neighborhoods and dwellings should promote walking and
bicycling and preserve open spaces and views.
Policy 7.8.: Encourage strategies and programs that increase long-term residency and
stabilization in neighborhoods.
Program 7.10.: Continue to work directly with neighborhood groups and individuals to address
concerns. Identify specific neighborhood needs, problems, trends and opportunities for
improvements.
Analysis: Consistent with Policy 7.2, the Life Plan Community portion of the project will be of a
superior design quality and includes a variety of amenities for its residents including restaurants,
a theater, meeting rooms, recreation facilities, and a range of services catered to seniors.
Consistent with Policies 7.4 & 7.7, the project is adjacent to an established City open space
area that includes trails and will include internal pedestrian linkages that will connect to the open
space trails. In accordance with Policy 7.8, residents are entering to a contract to be able to live
the remainder of their lives within the project, which is consistent with the policy goals of long-
term residency and a stable neighborhood.
The Madonna portion of the project will provide workforce housing with services provided by the
adjacent shopping center, proximity to employers, and opportunities for active recreation with
open space trails for biking and hiking.
• Goal 8. Special Needs Housing - Encourage the creation and maintenance of housing for
those with special housing needs.
Policy 8.1.: Encourage housing development that meets a variety of special needs, including
large families, single parents, disabled persons, the elderly, students, the homeless, or those
seeking congregate care, group housing, single-room occupancy or co-housing
accommodations, utilizing universal design.
Policy 8.8.: Disperse special needs living facilities throughout the City where public transit and
commercial services are available, rather than concentrating them in one district.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 28
Policy 8.10.: Encourage a variety of housing types that accommodate persons with disabilities
and promote aging in place, including a goal of “visitability” in new residential units, with an
emphasis on first-floor accessibility to the maximum extent feasible.
Program 8.15.: Continue to look for opportunities in specific plan areas suitable for tenant-
owned mobile-home parks, cooperative or limited equity housing, manufactured housing, self-
help housing, or other types of housing that meet special needs.
Analysis: Consistent with Policy 8.1, the project meets the needs of seniors; and Consistent
with Policy 8.8, the project will have access to bus and other transit facilities and disperses,
rather than concentrates senior housing. The Life Plan Community by design will promote aging
in place as called for in Policy 8.10.
Policy 9.2.: Residential site, subdivision, and neighborhood designs should be coordinated to
make residential sustainability work. Some ways to do this include:
A. Design subdivisions to maximize solar access for each dwelling and site.
B. Design sites so residents have usable outdoor space with access to both sun and
shade.
C. Streets and access ways should minimize pavement devoted to vehicular use.
D. Use neighborhood retention basins to purify street runoff prior to its entering creeks.
Retention basins should be designed to be visually attractive as well as functional.
Fenced-off retention basins should be avoided.
E. Encourage cluster development with dwellings grouped around significantly-sized,
shared open space in return for City approval of smaller individual lots.
F. Treat public streets as landscaped parkways, using continuous plantings at least six feet
wide and where feasible, median planters to enhance, define, and to buffer residential
neighborhoods of all densities from the effects of vehicle traffic.
Analysis: The project will address the noted residential design goals as follows:
A. Specific Plan Policies 4.7.1 & 4.7.2 call for subdivision and site design in the Specific
Plan area to follow energy efficient design with an emphasis on daylighting and solar
exposure.
B. Specific Plan Section 4.4.1, Site Design, provides guidance for residents in the higher
density housing projects within the Specific Plan area to have private outdoor use areas,
as well as common shared open spaces. Sun exposure to both these types of spaces
would change over the course of the day, but shading would be afforded by roof
overhangs, trellises, and canopies.
C. Local streets throughout the development utilize a narrower section to minimize the
amount of pavement needed in the development.
D. Water quality treatment elements are proposed to treat runoff from roadways, other
hardscape features and developed projects near or adjacent to the source of the
constructed environment. Generally, water quality treatment components consist of
vegetated swales, bioswales, pervious paving, rain gardens and other elements
designed to promote biofiltration.
E. The site plan for the Life Plan Community groups buildings together with intervening
open space areas to protect natural resources. Within the Madonna portion of the
project, smaller lot sizes are utilized to allow individuals to purchase their own homes for
more reasonable prices and to minimize the need to maintain large yards.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 29
F. All of the proposed streets within the development include parkways, except for the
private streets that service the Life Plan Community residences. Commercial Collector
“A” will include a 5-foot wide median and buffered bike lanes.
Policy 9.4.: To promote energy conservation and a cleaner environment, encourage the
development of dwellings with energy-efficient designs, utilizing passive and active solar
features, and the use of energy-saving techniques that exceed minimums prescribed by State
law.
Policy 9.11.: Continue to promote building materials reuse and recycling in site development
and residential construction, including flexible standards for use of salvaged, recycled, and
“green” building materials. Continue the City’s construction and demolition debris recycling
program as described in Chapter 8.05 of the Municipal Code.
Analysis: Overall sustainability goals, including energy efficient designs and using recycled
materials, are discussed in Chapter 4 of the Specific Plan.
Policy 11.2.: Prevent new housing development on sites that should be preserved as dedicated
open space or parks, on sites subject to natural hazards such as unmitigatable geological or
flood risks, or wild fire dangers, and on sites subject to unacceptable levels of man-made
hazards or nuisances, including severe soil contamination, airport noise or hazards, traffic noise
or hazards, odors or incompatible neighboring uses.
Analysis: The site plan for the Life Plan Community groups buildings together with intervening
open space areas to protect natural resources.
Appendix A
1. Population Trends and Characteristics a) Age Composition
San Luis Obispo’s age profile is shown in Table A-4 and graphically in the form of a population
pyramid in Figure A-1. When compared with the County and State, San Luis Obispo has
significantly lower percentages of children, teens and adults in the primary childbearing years of
25-44. The City however has a relatively high proportion of senior citizens. While smaller than
the County, there are 1.0 percent more seniors age 65 years or older in the City than in the
State.
Analysis: The Life Plan Community provides a unique type of housing that addresses pressing
housing needs for retirement aged residents of San Luis Obispo.
e) Possible Rezonings
Table D-1 shows the location of parcels which may be appropriate for rezoning to accommodate
housing development within the planning period, including 12165 Los Osos Valley Road. All of
these properties have residential development capacity and are served by streets, utilities, and
public services. Most of these areas are suitable for higher residential density development (R-3
and R-4) or mixed uses.
Through zoning, the City sets the range of allowed uses, residential and commercial density,
building height, and other development standards. Where sites are appropriate for multiple
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 30
uses, including residential, the City’s General Plan emphasizes housing development over
development of non-residential uses.
Analysis: The Specific Plan area with the level of residential development planned will fulfill
Housing Element goals to look to underutilized sites for housing projects. The site was
identified as an expansion area in the 2014 LUE. Providing a greater level of housing is
consistent with earmarking the site for further development potential.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 31
Noise Element
1.9 Sound Walls
In the Irish Hills Special Design Area and the Margarita and Orcutt expansion areas, dwelling
shall be set back from Regional Routes and Highways, Parkway Arterials, Arterials, Residential
Arterials, and Collector streets so that the interior and exterior noise standards can be met
without the use of noise walls.
1.13 Noise Studies
Where a project may expose people to existing noise levels or projected build-out noise levels
exceeding acceptable limits, the City shall require the applicant to provide a noise study early in
the review process so that noise mitigation may be included in the project design. The City will
maintain standards and procedures for the preparation of noise studies.
Analysis: Noise-sensitive uses such as residences and hotels have maximum noise exposure
levels of 60 dB for outdoor use areas and 45 dB for interior spaces. Noise Element contours for
1990 conditions show that the 60-dB noise contour is outside all planned building footprints.
However, the 60-dB noise contour at build-out does affect the footprints of two tiers of housing
units closest to the Highway 101 noise source. Specific Plan Figure 4-1 shows how 1990 and
build-out noise contours from the Noise Element affect the project site.
Consistent with Policy 1.13, which directs an applicant to provide a noise study early in the
review process where a project may expose people to projected build-out noise levels
exceeding acceptable limits, the applicant team commissioned a noise study to evaluate actual
noise levels at the site. The contours plotted for current (2017) and buildout (2037) conditions
from the noise study prepared by 45 dB Acoustics are shown in Specific Plan Figure 4-2 and
show that all planned building footprints are beyond the 60-dB noise contour. The project will
comply with Policy 1.9 as no noise walls are required to create complying outdoor noise levels
at the site.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 32
Safety Element
Flooding
A portion of the project is within the 100-year flood zone (Figure 1 - Flood Hazards Map).
The City’s Flood Damage Prevention Regulations and Federal Flood Insurance standards
require new building floors to be above the 100-year flood level, while not displacing floodwaters
in a way that would raise flood levels.
2.1 Policy S: Flood Hazard Avoidance and Reduction
• No new building or fill should encroach beyond, or extend over, the top-of-bank of any
creek.
• Within new development areas, such as the potential expansion areas shown in Figure 2
of the Land Use Element, substantial displacement of flood waters should be avoided
by:
o Keeping a substantial amount of flood-prone land in the vicinity as open space;
o Enlarging man-made bottlenecks, such as culverts, which contribute to flood
waters backing up from them;
o Accommodating in such places uses which have relatively low ratios of building
coverage to site area, for which shallow flooding of parking and landscape areas
would cause minimum damage.
o Requiring new buildings to be constructed above the 100-year flood level.
• Creek alternations shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative, consistent
with the Conservation and Open Space Element.
• Development close to creeks shall be designed to avoid damage due to future creek
bank erosion. Property owners shall be responsible for protecting their developments
from damage caused by future bank loss due to flood flows.
Analysis: A key component of the project proposal is to restore Froom Creek to its historic
drainage pattern as a public amenity with an improved riparian corridor habitat value. The creek
channel design will be relatively wide with undulating sloping banks (2:1 maximum). Substantial
riparian planting and strategically placed boulder clusters are proposed to minimize erosion and
provide habitat.
To address the potential for periodic flooding from Froom Creek, the Specific Plan includes
Program 3.2.2a, which includes performance standards to accommodate 100-year storm flows
within the creek banks, and to direct storm drainage overflow into the adjacent existing wetlands
during storm events.
All new buildings will be developed to comply with the City’s Flood Damage Prevention
Regulations and Federal Flood Insurance standards so that their finish floor level is above the
100-year flood elevation. In addition, all structures will be set back 35 feet from the top of bank.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 33
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 34
Fire
Portions of the project site contain local moderate and very high fire hazard severity zones for
the State Area of Responsibility (Figure 2 – Fire Hazard Severity Zones).
Policy 3.0: Adequate Fire Services
Development should be approved only when adequate fire suppression services and facilities
are available or will be made available concurrent with development, considering the setting,
type, intensity, and form of the proposed development.
Policy 3.1: Wildland Fire Safety
New subdivisions shall be prohibited in areas of “Very High” wildland fire hazard as shown in
Figure 2 unless part of conservation or open space acquisition program. Development of
existing parcels shall require a development plan to manage fuels, maintain a buffer zone, and
provide adequate fire protection to the approval of the Chief Building Official. The development
plan must be consistent with Policies required by the City’s Conservation and Open Space
Element.
Analysis: Portions of the site in the Local Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone will be left as
open space. As appropriate, and consistent with Fire Safe Design Principles, project
landscaping and maintenance will comply with fuel modification requirements, and building
construction will utilize ignition resistant materials.
Earthquakes and Other Geologic Hazards
Faults
A portion of the project contains active faults (Figure 3 - Earthquake Faults – Local Area Map)
5.5 Policy S: Avoiding Faults
Development shall not be located atop known faults. Applications for the following types of
discretionary approvals within 100 meters (330 feet) of any fault that is previously known or
discovered during site evaluation shall be subject to review and recommendation by a State-
registered engineering geologist: change to a more intensive land-use designation; subdivision
into five or more parcels; development of multifamily, commercial, industrial, or institutional
buildings.
Analysis: Reference documents, including Figure 3 in the Safety Element, show the Los Osos
Fault near the proposed project. Because of the potential for the fault to extend across a portion
of the site, a Subsurface Fault Investigation by a State-registered engineering geologist was
conducted. That report found traces of the Los Osos Fault through the site and includes
recommendations for setbacks of occupied buildings from the surveyed fault. The fault setbacks
recommended are based on industry standards for this type of fault and reflect the unique
deformation patterns, rock types, and soil characteristics discovered with trenching activities
conducted on the site.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 35
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 36
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 37
Landslide/Liquefaction
A portion of the project has moderate landslide potential, and high liquefaction potential (Figure
5 - Ground Shaking & Landslide Hazards Map).
5.6 Policy S: Avoiding Slope Instability
Development shall not be located on or immediately below unstable slopes, or contribute to
slope instability. Any development proposed in an area of moderate or high landslide potential
shall be subject to review and recommendation by a State-registered engineering geologist.
Analysis: A Preliminary Engineering Geologic Investigation by GeoSolutions dated 4-14-17
noted that slopes at the site appear generally stable and the potential for rockfall at the overall
site is considered low. However, one area of the site near the border of the Life Plan Community
shows a potential rockfall hazard. This occurs where the Franciscan complex intersects
Quaternary stream deposits. Mitigation is recommended in the report for loose rocks in the area
to be removed and minor grading conducted to protect proposed buildings.
5.7 Policy S: Avoiding Liquefaction Hazards
Development may be located in areas of high liquefaction potential only if a site-specific
investigation by a qualified professional determines that the proposed development will not be at
risk of damage from liquefaction. The Chief Building Official may waive this requirement upon
determining that previous studies in the immediate area provide sufficient information.
Analysis: The Soils Engineering report by GeoSolutions dated 6-28-16 concluded that the
potential for seismic liquefaction of soils at the site was low given the consistency and relative
density of in situ soils. The report also notes that the potential for seismically induced and
differential settlement at the site is low assuming all the recommendations of the report are
followed in terms of site preparation and foundation design.
Airport Hazards
8.0 Policy S: Airport Land Use Plan
Development should be permitted only if it is consistent with the San Luis Obispo County Airport
Land Use Plan. Prospective buyers of property that is subject to airport influence should be so
informed.
Analysis: As previously discussed, the project site is located within the S -2 safety
zone. The proposed project complies with the density and coverage restrictions of the
S-2 zone. However, it is likely that the site will be comple tely outside of ALUC
jurisdiction when an updated ALUP is eventually adopted.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 38
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 39
Conservation & Open Space Element
CULTURAL HERITAGE
3.3.1. Historic preservation.
Significant historic and architectural resources should be identified, preserved and rehabilitated.
3.3.2. Demolitions.
Historically or architecturally significant buildings should not be demolished or substantially
changed in outward appearance, unless doing so is necessary to remove a threat to health and
safety and other means to eliminate or reduce the threat to acceptable levels are infeasible.
Analysis: The condition of onsite historic structures varies considerably. Some, like the farm
house, are currently habitable and adaptively reused. Others are barely standing (structurally
unsound) with dry rot and other condition issues. A structural analysis was commissioned by
Stork, Wolf, & Associates to determine the feasibility of rehabilitating certain structures for reuse
in the project.
3.3.3. Historical documentation.
Buildings and other cultural features that are not historically significant but which have historical
or architectural value should be preserved or relocated where feasible. Where preservation or
relocation is not feasible, the resource shall be documented and the information retained in a
secure but publicly accessible location. An acknowledgment of the resource should be
incorporated within the site through historic signage and the reuse or display of historic
materials and artifacts.
Analysis: A pre-historic and historic report for the property dated 2-20-15 was completed by
First Carbon Solutions. The historic portion of the report documents all the remaining on-site
buildings of the dairy complex in detail. All buildings will be properly documented consistent with
Secretary of the Interior standards (Specific Plan Policy 3.3.1). Specific Plan Policy 3.3.2 notes
that interpretative signage will be installed to provide information on historic buildings for
information and documentation to the public. Program 3.3.2a states that historic dairy
equipment may be used in onsite displays or donated to local historic society. Program 3.3.2b
stipulates that old wood and other building features from demolished or refurbished buildings
will be harvested for potential use elsewhere on-site.
3.3.4. Changes to historic buildings.
Changes or additions to historically or architecturally significant buildings should be consistent
with the original structure and follow the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOI) Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Buildings. New buildings in historical districts, or on historically significant
sites, should reflect the form, spacing and materials of nearby historic structures. The street
appearance of buildings which contribute to a neighborhood's architectural character should be
maintained.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 40
3.3.5. Historic districts and neighborhoods.
In evaluating new public or private development, the City should identify and protect
neighborhoods or districts having historical character due to the collective effect of Contributing
or Master List historic properties.
Analysis: The project site contains an assemblage of structures that were part of the Froom
Ranch dairy operations. Those buildings that can be structurally reinforced and adaptively
reused will be rehabilitated consisted with SOI standards.
3.5.1. Archaeological resource protection.
The City shall provide for the protection of both known and potential archaeological resources.
To avoid significant damage to important archaeological sites, all available measures, including
purchase of the property in fee or easement, shall be explored at the time of a development
proposal. Where such measures are not feasible and development would adversely affect
identified archaeological or paleontological resources, mitigation shall be required pursuant to
the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines.
3.5.2. Native American sites.
All Native American cultural and archaeological sites shall be protected as open space
wherever possible.
3.5.3. Non-development activities.
Activities other than development which could damage or destroy archaeological sites, including
off-road vehicle use on or adjacent to known sites, or unauthorized collection of artifacts, shall
be prohibited.
3.5.4. Archaeologically sensitive areas.
Development within an archaeologically sensitive area shall require a preliminary site survey by
a qualified archaeologist knowledgeable in Native American cultures, prior to a determination of
the potential environmental impacts of the project.
3.5.12. Cultural resources and open space.
Within the city limits the City should require, and outside the city limits should encourage the
County to require, public or private development to do the following where archaeological or
historical resources are protected as open space or parkland:
1. Preserve such resources through easements or dedications. Subdivision parcel lines or
easements shall be located to optimize resource protection. Easements as a condition of
development approval shall be required only for structural additions or new structures,
not for accessory structures or tree removal permits. If a historic or archaeological
resource is located within an open space parcel or easement, allowed uses and
maintenance responsibilities within that parcel or easement shall be clearly defined and
conditioned prior to map or project approval.
2. Designate such easements or dedication areas as open space or parkland as
appropriate.
3. Maintain such resources by prohibiting activities that may significantly degrade the
resource.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 41
Analysis: Archaeological resources will be left in situ and development will avoid disturbing
those parts of the site where resources were identified.
3.6.8. Promote adaptive reuse of historic buildings.
The City will, consistent with health, safety and basic land-use policies, apply building and
zoning standards within allowed ranges of flexibility, to foster continued use and adaptive reuse
of historic buildings.
Analysis: Some historic resources are proposed to be rehabilitated and adaptively reused in
the project.
ENERGY
4.2. Goal. Sustainable energy use.
Increase use of sustainable energy sources such as solar, wind and thermal energy, and reduce
reliance on non-sustainable energy sources to the extent possible with available technology and
resources.
4.4.1. Pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly design.
Residences, work places and facilities for all other activities will be located and designed to
promote travel by pedestrians and bicyclists.
4.4.3. Compact, high-density housing.
The City will promote higher-density, compact housing to achieve more efficient use of public
facilities and services, land resources, and to improve the jobs/housing balance.
4.5.3. Solar Access Easements.
Solar access easements will be required in all new subdivisions, as provided in the State of
California Solar Rights Act, unless any of the following applies:
A. The subdivision incorporates a building development plan that will assure desirable solar
access.
B. Desirable solar exposure will be protected by the City’s Zoning Regulations.
C. The subdivision establishes yard or height standards designed to assure desirable solar
access, supplementary to the Zoning Regulations, which would make a system of
easements for each lot unnecessary.
4.5.5. Solar access exceptions.
Exceptions to the standards for desirable solar access may be made if any of the following
applies:
A. Shading would be an insignificant part of the total solar exposure, in terms of area,
duration or both.
B. Structures on protected properties have an insignificant probability of being modified or
replaced, and likely collector locations are sufficiently protected, in spite of shading that
would normally be unacceptable, or such structures already have adequately protected
collectors.
C. Shading is between lots in a subdivision for which a customized system of solar access
easements will provide an adequate level of protection.
D. Use of solar energy is unfeasible due to topographical conditions.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 42
4.6.17. Require solar power for new dwellings.
Within new single-family residential projects of 20 or more dwelling units, 5% of the total number
of dwellings shall be built with photovoltaic solar collectors beginning in 2008; this percentage
shall increase 4% each year until 2020. Multi-family residential developments shall be exempt
from this requirement, except for common-use facilities such as recreation rooms, spas or
swimming pools. In these cases, the common facilities shall be built with photovoltaic solar
collectors.
MATERIALS+
5.5.7. Energy efficiency and Green Building in new development.
The City shall encourage material and energy-efficient “green buildings” as certified by the U.S.
Green Building Council’s LEED
5.5.8. Recycling Facilities in New Development.
During development review, the City shall require facilities in new developments to
accommodate and encourage recycling.
Analysis: Chapter 4, Design Guidelines, of the Specific Plan provides a discussion of how the
project will incorporate energy saving and sustainable features into the development areas.
NATIVE MATERIALS
6.3.1. Old mineral-extraction sites.
The City will implement the following policies and will encourage other agencies with jurisdiction
to do so:
A. Land use designations for old mineral-extraction sites shall reflect risks associated with
them, and should generally be limited to “Open Space”, “Agriculture”, or “Park”
designations on the Land Use Element map.
B. Previously active mineral-extraction sites should be secured and reclaimed in
conjunction with any development approvals for the land on which they are located.
Securing them means preventing access that entails unacceptable risk. Reclamation
means re-establishing ground contours and vegetation to the extent feasible, use of
erosion control measures to enhance and protect soil stability, water and air quality,
wildlife habitat values and views.
Analysis: The project site includes a red rock quarry. The property owner continues to keep an
active Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) permit and performance bond. Prior to any
construction activities near the mine, the pit area would be fenced off for security and public
safety. Remediation activities include pit reclamation, removal of or grinding of the concrete
rubble, recontouring, surface scarification and hydro-seeding.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
7.3.1. Protect listed species.
C. The City will comply with State and Federal requirements for listed species.
E. City actions that could impact listed species shall be consistent with mitigation policies in
Chapter 8.25.3. Subject to the approval of agencies with jurisdiction, the City may
approve a project where mitigation requires relocation of listed species, but only if there
is no practical alternative and relocation is limited to individuals or small parts of a larger
population, not the entire remaining population of a species. (If an agency with
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 43
jurisdiction determines that relocation of an entire population is needed for its survival
regardless of a project’s development, the City will help with the relocation)
7.3.2. Species of local concern.
A. Maintain healthy populations of native species in the long term, even though they are not
listed for protection under State or Federal laws. These “species of local concern” are at
the limit of their range in San Luis Obispo, or threats to their habitat are increasing.
7.3.2. Wildlife habitat and corridors.
• Require public and private developments, including public works projects, to evaluate
animal species and their movements within and through development sites and create
habitats and corridors appropriate for wildlife.
• Plan for connectivity of open spaces and wildlife habitat and corridors using specific area
plans, neighborhood plans, subdivision maps or other applicable planning processes,
consistent with Open Space Guidelines
7.5.1. Protection of significant trees.
Significant trees, as determined by the City Council upon the recommendation of the Tree
Committee, Planning or Architectural Review Committee, are those making substantial
contributions to natural habitat or to the urban landscape due to their species, size, or rarity.
Significant trees, particularly native species, shall be protected. Removal of significant trees
shall be subject to the criteria and mitigation requirements in Chapter 8.6.3. Oak Woodland
communities in the Greenbelt and in open space areas shall be protected.
Analysis: The project site plan has been designed to accommodate site constraints. Froom
Creek and site wetlands will be site amenities and protected with required setbacks. These
areas provide travel corridors and habitat value for wildlife. In addition, serpentine rock
outcroppings, and areas containing bog thistle, riparian scrub, oak woodlands, and tree
groves will be protected in open space easements. Large portions of the serpentine
bunchgrass plant community will be protected in place as part of open space easements.
Where there are any impacts to the special status plants within the serpentine bunchgrass
grassland areas mapped on the site, a combination of mitigation strategies such as onsite
and offsite habitat restoration and creation will be followed.
7.5.2. Use of native California plants in urban landscaping.
Landscaping should incorporate native plant species, with selection appropriate for location.
Analysis: Specific Plan Program 4.7.5a calls for landscaping plans to use native and non-
invasive drought tolerant plant materials. These principles are reiterated for riparian corridors in
Specific Plan Programs 3.2.2c/d.
7.5.4. Preservation of grassland communities and other habitat types.
Grassland communities and other habitat types in the Greenbelt and in designated open space
areas shall be preserved.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 44
Analysis: Specific Plan Policy 3.2.7 notes that impacts to the serpentine bunchgrass plant
community containing special status plant species will be avoided or minimized. Where there is
any habitat area lost, there would be mitigation required to offset the impact.
7.7.6. Replace invasive, non-native vegetation with native vegetation.
The City and private development will protect and enhance habitat by removing invasive, non-
native vegetation that detracts from habitat values and by replanting it with native California
plant species. The Natural Resources Manger will prioritize projects and enlist the help of
properly trained volunteers to assist in non-native vegetation removal and replanting when
appropriate.
Analysis: Specific Plan Policy 3.2.6 reiterates habitat will be protected and enhanced through re-
introduction of native California vegetation and removal of non-native species.
7.7.7. Preserve ecotones.
Condition or modify development approvals to ensure that “ecotones,” or natural transitions
along the edges of different habitat types, are preserved and enhanced because of their
importance to wildlife. Natural ecotones of particular concern include those along the margins of
riparian corridors, marshlands, vernal pools, and oak woodlands where they transition to
grasslands and other habitat types.
7.7.8. Protect wildlife corridors.
Condition development permits in accordance with applicable mitigation measures to ensure
that important corridors for wildlife movement and dispersal are protected. Features of particular
importance to wildlife include riparian corridors, wetlands, lake shorelines, and protected natural
areas with cover and water. Linkages and corridors shall be provided to maintain connections
between habitat areas.
Analysis: Specific Plan Figure 3-1, Site Constraints Map, identifies the boundaries of different
natural plant communities and water features. Preservation of oak woodland areas, and creek
corridors and wetlands with appropriate setbacks, allow for natural ecotones and wildlife
corridors to be maintained.
7.7.9. Creek Setbacks.
As further described in the Zoning Regulations, the City will maintain creek setbacks to include:
an appropriate separation from the physical top of bank, the appropriate floodway as identified
in the Flood Management Policy, native riparian plants or wildlife habitat and space for paths
called for by any City adopted plan (Figure 4). In addition, creek setbacks should be consistent
with the following:
A. The following items should be no closer to the wetland or creek than the setback line:
buildings, streets, driveways, parking lots, aboveground utilities, and outdoor commercial
storage or work areas.
B. Development approvals should respect the separation from creek banks and protection
of floodways and natural features identified in part A above, whether or not the setback
line has been established.
C. Features which normally would be outside the creek setback may be permitted to
encroach where there is no practical alternative, to allow reasonable development of a
parcel, consistent with the Conservation and Open Space Element.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 45
D. Existing bridges may be replaced or widened, consistent with policies in this Element.
Removal of any existing bridge or restoration of a channel to more natural conditions will
provide for wildlife corridors, traffic circulation, access, utilities, and reasonable use of
adjacent properties.
Analysis: Froom Creek will be restored through the site as a public amenity with an improved
riparian corridor habitat value. The creek will be maintained as an open channel with a 35-foot
setback. Other site drainages will maintain a 20-foot setback. A public pedestrian trail is
proposed along the Froom Creek corridor.
OPEN SPACE
8.2.2. GOAL: Open space within the urban area.
Within the urban area, the City will secure and maintain a diverse network of open land
encompassing particularly valuable natural and agricultural resources, connected with the
landscape around the urban area. Particularly valuable resources are:
A. Creek corridors, including open channels with natural banks and vegetation.
B. Laguna Lake and its undeveloped margins.
C. Wetlands and vernal pools.
D. Undeveloped land within the Urban Reserve not intended for urban uses.
E. Grassland communities and woodlands.
F. Wildlife habitat and corridors for the health and mobility of individuals and of the species.
G. The habitat of species listed as threatened or endangered by the State or Federal
governments.
H. Prime agricultural soils and economically viable farmland (Figure 10).
I. Groundwater recharge areas.
J. Historically open-space settings for cultural resources, native and traditional landscapes.
K. Hills, ridgelines and the Morros.
L. Scenic rock outcroppings and other significant geological features.
M. Unique plant and animal communities, including “species of local concern.”
8.3.1. Open space within the urban area.
The City will preserve the areas listed in Goal 8.2.2, and will encourage individuals,
organizations, and other agencies to do likewise. The City will designate these areas as Open
Space or Agriculture in the General Plan.
Analysis: Approximately one-half of the project site will be protected and zoned as open
space. Creek corridors, wetland areas, serpentine outcroppings, oak woodlands, and most
unique plant communities will be included in the dedicated open space areas. Figure 10 of the
Conservation and Open Space Element shows that portions of the lower elevations of the site
near LOVR are classified as “farmland of local potential”. The site was used as a dairy between
the late 1800s and the 1950s, and for cattle ranching in more recent decades, but has not been
used for arable production. A portion of the area shown in this category is now jurisdictional
wetlands.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 46
8.3.2. Open space buffers.
When activities close to open space resources within or outside the urban area could harm
them, the City will require buffers between the activities and the resources. The City will actively
encourage individuals, organizations and other agencies to follow this policy. Buffers associated
with new development shall be on the site of the development, rather than on neighboring land
containing the open space resource. Buffers provide distance in the form of setbacks, within
which certain features or activities are not allowed or conditionally allowed. Buffers shall also
use techniques such as planting and wildlife-compatible fencing. Buffers shall be adequate for
the most sensitive species in the protected area, as determined by a qualified professional and
shall complement the protected area’s habitat values.
Buffers shall be required in the following situations:
A. Between urban development -- including parks and public facilities—and natural habitats
such as creeks, wetlands, hillsides and ridgelines, Morros, scenic rock outcrops and
other significant geological features, and grassland communities, to address noise,
lighting, storm runoff, spread of invasive, nonnative species, and access by people and
pets (see also the Safety Element for “defensible space” next to wildland fire areas).
D. Between new development and cultural resources, to address visual compatibility and
access by people.
E. Between new development and scenic resources or the greenbelt, to address view
blockage, lighting and noise, and visual transition from urban character to rural
character.
F. Urban development or uses located adjacent to the Urban Reserve Line (URL) to
provide a transition to open space or greenbelt areas. Transition areas should add to the
preservation of open space lands or resources. At a minimum, a 50 foot transition area
(preserved in essentially a natural state) shall be provided within the project along the
project boundary with the URL, unless the transition area is defined elsewhere in this
Element.
Analysis: Restored Froom Creek will have substantial setbacks providing buffers and
protection for the riparian corridor. Historic buildings will be adaptively reused within a trailhead
park which will provide an appropriate separation from new development in the nearby vicinity.
Most of the southwestern portion of the site will be preserved as open space with development
well set back from property boundaries allowing for a natural and subtle transition to the
adjacent open space areas.
8.3.3. Open space for safety.
Secure open space where development would be unsafe. Generally, the following locations are
considered to be unsafe:
A. Areas within the most restrictive aviation safety zone as defined in the Airport Land Use
Plan.
B. Land straddling active or potentially active earthquake faults.
C. Land where risks of ground shaking, slope instability, settlement, or liquefaction cannot
be adequately mitigated.
D. Areas subject to flooding, where the frequency, depth, or velocity of floodwaters poses
an unacceptable risk to life, health, or property.
E. Areas of high or extreme wildland fire hazard.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 47
Analysis: The project will address the noted safety concerns as follows:
A. The site currently is in the S-2 Airport Safety Zone and proposed development will
conform to applicable standards.
B. Development will be set back from the traces of the Los Osos Fault through the site. The
recommended fault setbacks are based on industry standards for this type of fault and
intended to protect people and structures from damage during a seismic event.
C. A Preliminary Engineering Geologic Investigation by GeoSolutions dated 4-14-17 noted
that slopes at the site appear generally stable and the potential for rockfall at the overall
site is considered low. However, one area of the site near the border of the Life Plan
Community shows a potential rockfall hazard. This occurs where the Franciscan
complex intersects Quaternary stream deposits. Mitigation is recommended in the report
for loose rocks in the area to be removed and minor grading conducted to protect
proposed buildings.
The Soils Engineering report by GeoSolutions dated 6-28-16 concluded that the
potential for seismic liquefaction of soils at the site was low given the consistency and
relative density of in situ soils. The report also notes that the potential for seismically
induced and differential settlement at the site is low assuming all the recommendations
of the report are followed in terms of site preparation and foundation design.
D. A key component of the project proposal is to restore Froom Creek to its historic
drainage pattern. To address the potential for periodic flooding from Froom Creek, the
Specific Plan includes Program 3.2.2a, which includes performance standards to
accommodate 100-year storm flows within the creek banks, and to direct storm drainage
overflow into the adjacent existing wetlands during storm events. All new buildings will
be developed to comply with the City’s Flood Damage Prevention Regulations and
Federal Flood Insurance standards so that their finish floor level is above the 100-year
flood elevation. In addition, all structures will be set back 35 feet from the top of bank.
E. Portions of the site in the Local Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone will be left as open
space. As appropriate, project landscaping and maintenance will comply with fuel
modification requirements, and building construction will utilize ignition resistant
materials.
8.5.1. Public access.
Public access to open space resources, with interpretive information, should be provided when
doing so is consistent with protection of the resources, and with the security and privacy of
affected landowners and occupants. Access will generally be limited to non-vehicular
movement, and may be visually or physically restricted in sensitive areas. Public access to or
through production agricultural land, or through developed residential lots, will be considered
only if the owner agrees (Land for active recreation is typically designated “Park” in the General
Plan Land Use Map). The City shall also designate open space areas that are not intended for
human presence or activity.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 48
Analysis: The project site borders dedicated City open space that is popular with hikers and
mountain bikers and ultimately connects to the Johnson Ranch property to the south. A pubic
trailhead park is planned within the northern portion of the project site that is intended to serve
as a connection to the adjacent open space areas and established trail system.
8.6.2. Extent of open space loss.
The extent of loss or degree of harm to the resource shall be minimized, consistent with the
justifications for any loss provided above. Where creeks must be modified for flood protection or
bank stability, the modification shall be patterned after natural conditions to the maximum extent
feasible.
Analysis: A key component of the project proposal is to restore Froom Creek to its historic
drainage pattern site as a public amenity with an improved riparian corridor habitat value. This
planned restoration is consistent with this policy to pattern changes after natural conditions and
improve flood control.
8.6.3. Required mitigation.
Loss or harm shall be mitigated to the maximum extent feasible. Mitigation must at least comply
with Federal and State requirements. Mitigation shall be implemented and monitored in
compliance with State and Federal requirements, by qualified professionals, and shall be funded
by the project applicant.
G. Any development that is allowed on a site designated as Open Space or Agriculture, or
containing open-space resources, shall be designed to minimize its impacts on open
space values on the site and on neighboring land.
1. Hillside development shall comply with the standards of the Land Use Element,
including minimization of grading for structures and access, and use of building
forms, colors, and landscaping that are not visually intrusive. (See also Chapter
9.2.1)
2. Creek corridors, wetlands, grassland communities, other valuable habitat areas,
archaeological resources, agricultural land, and necessary buffers should be within
their own parcel, rather than divided among newly created parcels (Figure 8). Where
creation of a separate parcel is not practical, the resources shall be within an
easement. The easement must clearly establish allowed uses and maintenance
responsibilities in furtherance of resource protection.
Analysis: Any impacts to wetlands or plant communities will be mitigated per the EIR analysis
and required mitigation measures. Specific Plan Goal 3.5.a and associated programs reiterate
General Plan LUE policies for hillside development in terms of building massing, grading, and
visual impacts. Creek corridors and wetlands will remain as open space. Easements will be
created for proposed open space areas within the project.
8.7.1. Protect open space resources.
The City will take the following actions to protect open space, and will encourage individuals,
organizations, and other agencies to take the same actions within their areas of responsibility
and jurisdiction:
A. Maintain the urban reserve line location, except where a relatively small enlargement of
the urban area is tied to permanent protection of substantial open land that did not
previously have assured protection.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 49
B. Promote open space protection by annexing and applying Conservation and Open
Space (C/OS) and Agriculture zoning to private property where appropriate and
consistent with General Plan goals and policies.
Analysis: The urban reserve line will be amended with project approval to encompass the
developed portions of the property. Open space areas will be zoned as Conservation and Open
Space (C/OS).
8.7.2. Enhance and restore open space.
The City will do the following in support of open space enhancement and restoration, in
coordination with other agencies and organizations, and will encourage individuals,
organizations, and other agencies to take the same actions within their areas of responsibility:
B. Establish self-sustaining populations of native species that were historically found in
natural habitat areas.
1. Revegetate disturbed and over-grazed upland areas, including grassland
communities, using site-specific or region-specific plants so far as practical.
2. To reverse historical trends of creek channelization and modification, re-establish
native riparian vegetation.
Analysis: To the greatest extent feasible, the project attempts to preserve natural communities
in place. Where there is any take to rare plants, the project will incorporate mitigation
requirements of the EIR. The planting palette for the restored creek corridor will re-establish
native riparian vegetation.
VIEWS
9.1.1. Preserve natural and agricultural landscapes.
The City will implement the following policies and will encourage other agencies with jurisdiction
to do likewise:
A. Natural and agricultural landscapes that the City has not designated for urban use shall
be maintained in their current patterns of use.
B. Any development that is permitted in natural or agricultural landscapes shall be visually
subordinate to and compatible with the landscape features. Development includes, but is
not limited to buildings, signs (including billboard signs), roads, utility and
telecommunication lines and structures. Such development shall:
1. Avoid visually prominent locations such as ridgelines, and slopes exceeding 20
percent.
2. Avoid unnecessary grading, vegetation removal, and site lighting.
3. Incorporate building forms, architectural materials, and landscaping, that respect
the setting, including the historical pattern of development in similar settings, and
avoid stark contrasts with its setting.
4. Preserve scenic or unique landforms, significant trees in terms of size, age,
species or rarity, and rock outcroppings.
Analysis: Rare and sensitive plant species, rock outcroppings, and significant trees will be
protected. Where there are significant impacts to listed plant species or species of local
concern, mitigation strategies such as onsite and offsite habitat restoration and creation will
be followed. Specific Plan Goal 3.5.a and associated programs reiterate General Plan LUE
policies for hillside development in terms of building massing, grading, and visual impacts.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 50
9.1.2. Urban development.
The City will implement the following principle and will encourage other agencies with
jurisdiction to do so: urban development should reflect its architectural context. This does not
necessarily prescribe a specific style, but requires deliberate design choices that acknowledge
human scale, natural site features, and neighboring urban development, and that are
compatible with historical and architectural resources.
Analysis: Specific Plan Section 4.3 notes that no specific architectural style is required for the
Madonna Froom Specific Plan area, but that architecture selected should incorporate features
that are authentic to the style selected and compatible with the setting.
9.1.4. Streetscapes and major roadways.
In the acquisition, design, construction or significant modification of major roadways
(highways/regional routes and arterial streets), the City will promote the creation of
“streetscapes” and linear scenic parkways or corridors that promote the City’s visual quality and
character, enhance adjacent uses, and integrate roadways with surrounding districts. To
accomplish this, the City will:
A. Establish streetscape design standards for major roadways.
B. Encourage the creation and maintenance median planters and widened parkway
plantings.
C. Retain mature trees in the public right-of-way.
D. Emphasize the planting and maintenance of California Native tree species of sufficient
height, spread, form and horticultural characteristics to create the desired streetscape
canopy, shade, buffering from adjacent uses, and other desired streetscape
characteristics, consistent with the Tree Ordinance or as recommended by the Tree
Committee or as approved by the Architectural Review Commission.
E. Encourage the use of water-conserving landscaping, street furniture, decorative lighting
and paving, arcaded walkways, public art, and other pedestrian-oriented features to
enhance the streetscape appearance, comfort and safety.
F. Encourage and where possible, require undergrounding of overhead utility lines and
structures.
Analysis: Minor widening to Los Osos Valley Road is proposed to facilitate turning movements
into the Specific Plan area as an intersection with Auto Park Way. Section 5.7 of the Specific
Plan includes guidance about streetscape design standards including medians and landscaping.
9.2.1. Views to and from public places, including scenic roadways.
The City will preserve and improve views of important scenic resources from public places, and
encourage other agencies with jurisdiction to do so. Public places include parks, plazas, the
grounds of civic buildings, streets and roads, and publicly accessible open space. In particular,
the route segments shown in Figure 11 are designated as scenic roadways.
A. Development projects shall not wall off scenic roadways and block views.
B. Utilities, traffic signals, and public and private signs and lights shall not intrude on or
clutter views, consistent with safety needs.
C. Where important vistas of distant landscape features occur along streets, street trees
shall be clustered to facilitate viewing of the distant features.
D. Development projects, including signs, in the viewshed of a scenic roadway shall be
considered “sensitive” and require architectural review.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 51
9.2.2. Views to and from private development.
Projects should incorporate as amenities views from and within private development sites.
Private development designs should cause the least view blockage for neighboring property that
allows project objectives to be met.
Analysis: Photo simulations have been produced to show the visual impacts of the scale,
height and massing of proposed development. The goal of planned massing is to have variation
in building heights and adequate spacing between structures to retain view corridors and
minimize visual impacts.
9.2.3. Outdoor lighting.
Outdoor lighting shall avoid: operating at unnecessary locations, levels, and times; spillage to
areas not needing or wanting illumination; glare (intense line-of-site contrast); and frequencies
(colors) that interfere with astronomical viewing.
Analysis: Specific Plan Program 3.5.2a notes that all lighting will comply with the City’s Night
Sky Preservation Ordinance.
9.3.4. Environmental and architectural review.
Conduct environmental review and architectural review consistent with General Plan goals and
policies regarding visual impacts and quality.
9.3.5. Visual assessments.
Require evaluations (accurate visual simulations) for projects affecting important scenic
resources and views from public places.
Analysis: Photo simulations have been produced to show the visual impacts of the scale,
height and massing of proposed development. An EIR will be prepared which thoroughly
evaluates the project’s visual impacts. The Architectural Review Commission will review all
proposed development plans for the area.
WATER
10.2.2. Ahwahnee Water Principles.
In planning for its water operations, programs and services, the City will be guided by the
Ahwahnee Water Principles and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to
follow these policies:
A. Community design should be compact, mixed use, walkable and transit-oriented so that
automobile-generated urban runoff pollutants are minimized and the open lands that
absorb water are preserved to the maximum extent possible.
B. Natural resources such as wetlands, flood plains, recharge zones, riparian areas, open
space, and native habitats should be identified, preserved and restored as valued assets
for flood protection, water quality improvement, groundwater recharge, habitat, and
overall long-term water resource sustainability.
C. Water holding areas such as creek beds, recessed athletic fields, ponds, cisterns, and
other features that serve to recharge groundwater, reduce runoff, improve water quality
and decrease flooding should be incorporated into the urban landscape.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 52
D. All aspects of landscaping from the selection of plants to soil preparation and the
installation of irrigation systems should be designed to reduce water demand, retain
runoff, decrease flooding, and recharge groundwater.
E. Permeable surfaces should be used for hardscape. Impervious surfaces such as
driveways, streets, and parking lots should be minimized so that land is available to
absorb storm water, reduce polluted urban runoff, recharge groundwater and reduce
flooding.
F. Dual plumbing that allows grey water from showers, sinks and washers to be reused for
landscape irrigation should be included in the infrastructure of new development,
consistent with State guidelines.
G. Community design should maximize the use of recycled water for appropriate
applications including outdoor irrigation, toilet flushing, and commercial and industrial
processes. Purple pipe should be installed in all new construction and remodeled
buildings in anticipation of the future availability of recycled water.
H. Urban water conservation technologies such as low-flow toilets, efficient clothes
washers, and more efficient water-using industrial equipment should be incorporated in
all new construction and retrofitted in remodeled buildings.
Analysis: The project will address the Ahwahnee Water Principles as follows:
A. Development areas are clustered and about half of the site will be dedicated open space
maintaining site permeability which is vital to groundwater recharge. Pedestrian paths
are provided within the development and connect to off-site trails to promote walkability
and encourage exercising.
B. Froom Creek, other site drainages, and wetlands will be retained with development.
C. Project plans include an off-site detention basin to meet storage volume demands of
runoff from the project as well as that of the Irish Hills Plaza. Froom Creek will have a
sinuous low flow channel that allows for pooling and be designed so that storm drainage
will overflow into the adjacent existing wetlands during storm events. Individual projects
will utilize a variety of techniques to manage and treat stormwater on-site such as
bioswales, rain gardens, and detention basins.
D. Specific Plan Policy 4.7.5 requires plant materials in the project to be selected to
conserve water; the programs that follow the policy describe how to implement it.
E. Specific Plan Program 4.7.5c directs that hardscape areas be minimized; Specific Plan
Program 4.7.5d encourages the use of permeable pavers and other materials that
maximize water infiltration.
F. The use of grey water systems may be considered for specific developments within the
project consistent with City requirements.
G. New development will utilize a dual-water system to allow use of City recycled water for
public landscaping in parks, landscaped buffers, the commercial mixed-use area, and
common outdoor areas in multifamily residential projects.
H. Specific Plan Policy 4.7.3 calls for new residential and commercial construction to use
energy efficient appliances and lighting to achieve improved energy conservation.
10.3.1. Efficient water use.
The City will do the following in support of efficient water use, and will encourage individuals,
organizations, and other agencies to do likewise:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 53
A. Landscaping:
1. Choose plants that are suitable for the climate and their intended function, with
emphasis on use of native and drought-tolerant plants.
2. Prepare soils for water penetration and retention.
3. Design and operate suitable and efficient irrigation systems.
Analysis: Specific Plan Policy 4.7.5 requires plant materials in the project to be selected to
conserve water; the programs that follow the policy describe how to implement it.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 54
Parks & Recreation Element
1.0 VISION
This section discusses the growth of the senior citizen population with the aging of the “Baby
Boomer” generation and the need for specialized recreational facilities to serve them.
1.1 Executive Summary
Senior citizens are mentioned as one of the groups that the City’s recreation facilities and
activities need to address.
Analysis: The proposed Life Plan Community (LPC) will have an exclusively senior population
(62 years of age and older). The LPC includes many types of active and passive recreational
opportunities, such as: an outdoor swimming pool, spa pool, gym, trails, pickle ball, bocce ball,
community gardens, resident gardening plots, theater, outdoor seating areas, library, and craft
rooms. The LPC will also have a connection to Irish Hills trails. While this is a private
community, the project is addressing the recreational needs of its senior population consistent
with documented goals and policies.
Policy 3.13.1.
The City shall develop and maintain a park system at a rate of 10 acres of parkland per 1,000
residents. Five acres shall be dedicated as a neighborhood park. The remaining five acres
required under the 10 acres per 1,000 residents in the residential annexation policy may be
located anywhere within the City’ s park system as deemed appropriate.
Policy 3.15.3.
All residential annexation areas shall provide developed neighborhood parks at the rate of 5
acres per 1,000 residents.
Analysis: Based on the estimated 130 Specific Plan area dwelling units outside of the Life Plan
Community at 2.29 persons per unit, a total of 2.9 acres of parkland is required. The Specific
Plan area meets this requirement by providing 2.9 acres of parkland in the form of a public
trailhead park.
Policy 3.13.2.
Parks shall be maintained in such a manner that priority will be given to the preservation of the
natural beauty and safe use of the land within the system.
Policy 3.13.3.
Parks shall be designed to meet a variety of needs depending on park size, location, natural
features and user demands.
Policy 3.13.8.
Park site acquisition should enhance the City's recreational trails, pedestrian transportation, and
open spaces in keeping with adopted policies.
Analysis: The park has been designed as a trailhead park taking advantage of its location
bordering open space (Irish Hills Natural Reserve) with many popular biking and hiking trails.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 55
The park will include facilities for trail enthusiasts as well as parking, restrooms and a tot lot.
The intent of the design will be naturalistic honoring the beauty of its setting.
Policy 3.15.1
San Luis Obispo residents shall have access to a neighborhood park within .5 to 1.0-mile
walking distance of their residence.
Analysis: The neighborhood park will be within the requisite distance cited above to project
residents.
Policy 3.19.2
Needed special facilities are identified as off-leash dog area, disc golf, lighted tennis courts,
bicycle motocross, bocce ball, community garden, and sand volleyball courts.
Analysis: The size and location of the neighborhood park is not suitable for some of the
facilities listed. However, a small dog park area or community garden might be accommodated
consistent with Policy 3.19.2.
Policy 3.20.2
Public trails shall be provided where appropriate to provide public access to City-owned open
space. Use of trails for hiking, mountain biking or equestrian activity shall be determined as
posted.
Policy 3.20.6
Open space and parks shall be connected where possible by trails or bike paths.
Analysis: The project will provide connections to existing open space trails as well as amenities
to serve them. In addition, internal trails will link residents to these facilities.
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
General Plan Consistency Analysis
Page 56
Water and Wastewater Element
MULTI-SOURCE WATER SUPPLY
A 2.2.2 Water Service within the City
• Appropriate use of privately-owned wells is allowed on individual parcels. The use of the
water from a well shall only be utilized on the parcel on which it is situated.
Analysis: On-site wells are proposed to be used as a water source during construction
activities.
A 5.2.5 Paying for Water for New Development
New development shall pay its proportionate or “fair share” for water supplies, expanded
treatment and distribution system capacity and upgrades.
RECYCLED WATER
A 7.0 Background
The Water Reuse Project also included the initial eight miles of the recycled water distribution
system with two main branches, as described below:
• West Branch: The west branch extends west from the WRF under Highway 101, then
along Calle Joaquin to Los Osos Valley Road (LOVR) to near the westerly city limits on
LOVR. There is a secondary branch which extends from LOVR along Madonna Road to
Laguna Lake Park.
Analysis: Recycled water will be used for public landscaping in parks, landscaped buffers, the
commercial mixed-use area, and common outdoor areas in multifamily residential projects. Any
irrigation needed to establish or maintain vegetation in the stormwater detention and riparian
enhancement areas will be required to use recycled water.
WASTE WATER
B 2.2.1 Service Outside the City Limits
To receive City wastewater service, property must be annexed to the City. The City Council may
authorize exceptions to this policy provided it is found to be consistent with the General Plan.
Analysis: The property will be annexed to the City prior to wastewater service and other utilities
being operational to serve new development.
B 2.2.3 Wastewater Service for New Development
New development shall pay its proportionate or “fair share” of expanded treatment and
collection system capacity and upgrades. New development will only be permitted if adequate
capacity is available within the wastewater collection system and/or Water Reclamation Facility.
Analysis: The City’s recent wastewater treatment plant expansion has enough capacity to
serve development needs anticipated through General Plan build-out. The cost of providing the
additional capacity is incorporated into the City’s Wastewater Impact Fee structure.
APPENDIX B
10
Minutes
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
Monday, December 2,2019
Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order on Monday,
December 2, 2019 at 5:02 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
California, by Chair Allen Root.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Richard Beller, Michael DeMartini, Mandi Pickens, Christie Withers,
and Chair Allen Root
Absent: Commissioner Micah Smith and Vice Chair Amy Nemcik (arrived at 5:04 p.m.)
Staff: Senior Planner Shawna Scott, Associate Planner Kyle Bell and Deputy City Clerk
Megan Wilbanks
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None.
--End of Public Comment--
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.Consideration of Minutes of the Regular Architectural Review Commission Meeting of
October 21, 2019 and November 4, 2019.
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
PICKENS, CARRIED 5-0-1 (Commissioner Smith and Vice Chair Nemcik absent) to approve
the minutes of the Regular Architectural Review Commission meeting of October 21, 2019.
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
PICKENS, CARRIED 5-0-1 (Commissioner Smith and Vice Chair Nemcik absent) to approve
the minutes of the Regular Architectural Review Commission meeting of November 4, 2019.
Vice Chair Nemcik joined the ARC meeting at 5:04 p.m.
Appendix B - ARC Comments & Responses
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 2, 2019 Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Project Address: 1035 Madonna Road; Case#: ARCH-0495-2019; Zone: C/OS-SP, R-4-
SP; MI San Luis Ranch, owner; Coastal Community Builders, applicant. Review of the
296-unit multi-family component of the approved San Luis Ranch Specific Plan, known
as The Orchard at San Luis Ranch, including proposed signage. The project includes a
variety of unit types, a common amenity clubhouse and common area, and community
open space. Project is consistent with the certified Final EIR for San Luis Ranch Specific
Plan and exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Residential Projects Implementing Specific Plans).
Associate Planner Kyle Bell presented the staff report and responded to Commissioner
mqumes.
Applicant representative, Scott Martin with RRM Design Group, responded to Commissioner
mqum es.
Public Comments:
None.
--End of Public Comment--
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
DIMARTINI, CARRIED 5-1-1 (Commissioner Withers dissenting and Commissioner Smith
absent) to forward the project to the Planning Commission with the following direction to the
applicant:
• The applicant should revise the proposed signage on the Condo Buildings to be better
integrated into the architectural character of the structures.
• The applicant should revise the proposed signage plan to provide illumination on the
proposed directional signage.
• The applicant should consider providing a lighter color palette and more variation
related to articulations and materials of the townhome buildings.
RECESS
The Commission recessed at 6:30 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 6:40 p.m. with all ARC
Commissioners present.
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 2, 2019 Page 3
3. Project Address: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road; Case #: SPEC 0143-2017 /
GENP 0737-2019 / EID 0738-2019; General Plan (Land Use Element) designated:
Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on Los Osos Valley Road Specific Plan); JM
Development Group, Inc., applicant. Review of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Draft
Land Use and Development Standards and Design Guidelines, including review of the
Aesthetics and Visual Resources evaluation in the Draft Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) prepared for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan during the 45-day public review
period (State Clearinghouse No. 2017071033).
Senior Planner Shawna Scott and contract planner Emily Creel presented the staff report and
responded to Commissioner inquiries.
Applicant representative, Victor Montgomery with RRM Design Group, responded to
Commissioner inquiries.
Public Comments:
None.
--End of Public Comment--
ACTION: THE COMMISSIONERS PROVIDED THE
RECOMMENDATIONSFOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRAFT EIR
FOLLOWING
• Incorporate another emergency access road through the wetlands area, connecting to Calle
Joaquin
This suggestion will cause significant impact to an existing jurisdictional wetland. It will also
conflict with the existing Ag easement covering the wetlands.
• Building heights in AA and BB (page 5.2) show some layering between the apartments,
but could allow for additional layering between the other apartment buildings
The Villaggio building heights are varied. They include 1, 2, 3, and 4 story buildings. The
apartment buildings are setback approximately 200 feet from LOVR. This setback area
includes visual screening landscape along LOVR, the realigned, restored, and re-vegetated
Froom Creek banks and channel and a setback from the west bank of Froom Creek to the
apartment buildings. The first layer of apartment building heights vary, they are lower at the
ends reaching 3 stories toward the middle. There is a landscaped area between the first tier of
apartments and the second tier of apartments. The second tier of apartments are a mixture of
3 and 4 story buildings. Between the 2nd tier of apartments and the 4 story Commons
building there is a landscaped area. There is a courtyard feature in the middle of the
Commons building separating it into 2 wings. Other layers of buildings west of the commons
building reduce in height with the Villas being single story buildings adjacent to the Irish
Hills Reserve and project open space parcel above the 150 foot elevation. The Villaggio
healthcare, wellness and maintenance facilities are 1 and 2 story buildings.
• Include images showing the relationship of the relocated Froom Creek to Calle Joaquin so
the Commission can get a better feeling for the accuracy of KVA 1 and 3
The DEIR contains visual images of the project prepared by the City EIR consultant. In KVA
#1 – the upper terrace development area is deleted in the applicant’s alternative plan. The
upper terrace area is proposed be open space. In KVA #3 – the foreground of the KVA will
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 2, 2019 Page 4
remain the same as the 1.4ac wetland area located south of Calle Joaquin will be proposed to
remain as open space. In the distant portions of KVA #3 the housing at the quarry site would
be replaced by a public trailhead park.
• Explore means of ventilating the subterranean parking lot without mechanical
mechanisms
Subterranean garages located under the apartment buildings will likely be mechanically
ventilated. Ventilation systems are controlled by linkage to carbon monoxide detectors that
automatically activate the ventilation equipment. These systems have backup redundancy.
The ventilation equipment (electric fans) will be located on the roof of the buildings (or
possibly garage side walls). The Villaggio parking garages are expected to have low turnover
rates resulting in limited use of the ventilation systems.
• Do not consider moving the park to the upper location; having it in a remote area could
become a nuisance.
The alternative preferred by City staff is to have the park located at the quarry area.
Alternative locations have been designed and evaluated therefore the City Council will
ultimately decide on the public trailhead park location.
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 2, 2019 Page 5
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
Senior Planner Shawna Scott provided a brief agenda forecast.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m. The next Regular meeting of the Architectural Review
Commission is scheduled for Monday, December 16, 2019 at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room,
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California.
APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION: 03/02/2020
Minutes
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
Monday, December 18, 2017
Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order on Monday,
December 18, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San
Luis Obispo, California, by Vice Chair Soll.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Amy Nemcik, Brian Rolph, Allen Root, Richard Beller, and Vice-Chair
Angela Soll
Absent: Commissioner Micah Smith and Chair Greg Wynn
Staff: Doug Davidson, Deputy Director, Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, Emily Creel,
Contract Planner, Kip Morais, Planning Technician and Jennifer Hooper, Recording
Secretary. Other staff members presented reports or responded to questions asindicated
in the minutes.
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None.
--End of Public Comment--
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of the Architectural Review Commission Meetings of December 4, 2017.
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROOT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ROLPH,
CARRIED 5-0-2, to approve the minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meetings of
December 4, 2017 as presented.
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 18, 2017 Page2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. 3897 South Higuera Street; Final review of the Public Art submittal for the Public Market at
Bonetti Ranch project. Case #: ARCH-0941-2017; M-SP zone; John Belsher, PB Companies,
applicant.
Associate Planner Shawna Scott and Parks and Recreation Public Art Program Manager
Melissa Mudgett presented the staff report with the use of a PowerPoint presentation and
responded to Commissioner inquiries.
Applicants Michael Reddell, Artist, and Peggy Sonoda, Project Assistant responded to
commissioner inquires .
Public Comments:
Jamila Haseeb, Project Consultant.
--End of Public Comment--
Commission discussion followed.
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROOT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NEMCIK
CARRIED 5-0-2 to adopt a Resolution entitled:
A Resolution of the San Luis Obispo Architectural Review Commission
finding that the proposed public art entitled "Obispo Town Musicians"
meets the City's Guidelines for public art in private development for
the public market at Long Bonetti Ranch project, as represented in the
staff report and attachments dated December 18, 2017, 3825 and 3897
South Higuera Street (ARCH-0941-2017)
With the following amendments:
Condition 4: Delete signage reference, add the following language: "could include raising
sculpture and use of motion sensor lighting."
3. 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road; Preliminary review of the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan Design Guidelines Chapter and conceptual design review of the proposed Life Plan
Community. Case #: SPEC-0143-2017, Madonna on LOVR Specific Plan Area 3; JM
Development Group Inc., applicant
Contract Planner Emily Creel presented the staff report with the use of a PowerPoint
presentation and responded to Commissioner inquiries.
Applicant Representatives Scott Martin and Pam Ricci presented with the use of PowerPoint and
responded to commissioner inquires.
Applicant Bob Richmond responded to Commissioner inquiries.
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 18, 2017 Page3
Public Comments:
Ray Walters.
Don and Gwen MacLane.
Neil Havlik.
--End of Public Comment--
Commission discussion followed.
ACTION: Commissioners provided the following comments:
1. Mediterranean style architecture is appropriate for the Villaggio Life Plan Community.
Applicant agrees.
2. Draft Froom Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines should incorporate the following:
a. Illustrations of view sheds and site plan sections/elevation renderings with special
attention to the 150-foot elevation line on the hills.
The DEIR contains several KVA’s (Key Viewing Areas) prepared by the City’s
Environmental Impact Report consultants. These KVAs were prepared based upon the
Proposed project not the applicants currently proposed project with no development
proposed above the 150 foot elevation in the area adjacent to Mountainbrook Church. This
significantly reduces impacts in KVAs 1, 3 and 5. Visual impacts at KVA 4 are significantly
reduced as the residential area previously proposed in replaced by a park. KVA 2 remains as
depicted in the EIR.
b. Discussion of honesty and integrity of building materials.
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan (Chapter 4) contains goals for both Quality and
Character of development. These include sections discussing Site Design, Grading,
Landscaping, Architecture, Authentic Materials, Wind protection as well as design
guidelines for Multi-family residential including fencing and lighting. There are also
commercial building design guidelines.
c. Show plans for garages at the rear of villas; show where cars would go; supportive of
the concept of a non-car centric design and careful garage design.
The Villas are not fully designed at this time and they are subject to subsequent ARC
project review. A requirement for placement of garages at the rear of the Villas is not
practical due to the slopes present in the area of the Villas. Additionally, because the
villas will be accessed from the street side the placement of garages at the rear would
require long paved driveways along the side of each unit. The streets within the Villaggio
portion of the Specific Plan are private with required access control so public views of
the street frontage are limited to residents and visitors. To reduce the potential visual
impact of residential garage doors the specific plan requires the garage be setback a
minimum of 5 feet behind the front façade of the residence.
d. Throughout Chapter 4, use the term "guideline(s)" consistently rather than
"guidance."
With edits made in 2020, the text was updated to replace "guidance" with "guidelines"
in most instances.
e. Clarify intention behind lot sizes within Table 2: Residential Development Standards
for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan; suggestion that additional detail could be helpful.
See Table 2-2, footnote 6 regarding the 1000sf minimum lot size.
f. Design Guideline 4.1 add: "Provide design guideline for high quality development that
is attractive and distinctive but also respects the site's natural features."
The applicant has agreed to an Alternative design moving all development off the area
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 18, 2017 Page4
above 150 elevation in the vicinity of Mountainbrook Church (MBC) and to designate that
approximately 46 acre area above 150ft as Open Space.
g. Design Guideline 4.2.1: Specifically, identify distinct natural features and key views
of the site to preserve/retain.
The current project design eliminates development above 150 foot elevation in the
area near Mountainbrook Church. This approximately 46 acre area are will be
permanent open space. As such key views from trails, rare plant individuals and
communities, trees rock outcrops, archaeological features and other features located
predominately in this area are not disturbed or impacted. Wetland present on site
below the 150 foot elevation are retained and protected in an expanded protective
easement. A 300 foot wide wildlife corridor is reserved for access from the upper
areas of the site to Froom Creek.
h. Design Guideline 4.2.2: Add diagram/graphics including average natural grade, how
to measure average natural grade, how to determine upper story setbacks; graphically
show the size of terraces, possibly including min/max cut and fill slopes; show 10%
and 20% slopes; dig into grading principles.
This comment appears to be in relationship to the area above 150ft in the vicinity of MBC.
The applicants proposed Alternative deletes this development area and designates
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 18, 2017 Page5
it as Open Space without development. The lower area of the site will be filled for flood
prevention therefore average natural grade will not be applicable. Building heights will be
measured from finish grade as established as part of the site grading. Determining upper
story setbacks is premature at the Specific Plan design level when the buildings have not
yet been designed and are subject to City ARC review. Likewise determining sizes of
terraces prior to building design is premature. The grading design has been done in the
context of the Froom Creek realignment & restoration, flood protection, habitat protection
(wetlands), habitat improvement (fisheries), drainage, Low Impact Design approach, City
Drainage Design Manual and other factors. The information requested is contained in the
Vesting Tentative Tract documents. Repeating information from different documents
increases the potential for conflicting information.
i. Section 4.3 General Architectural Design Guidance: add design guidelines for
wind protection (building placement, larger courtyards).
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan (Chapter 4) contains goals for both Quality and
Character of development. These include sections discussing Site Design, Grading,
Landscaping, Architecture, and Authentic Materials. Wind protection is directly
addressed in the design of the project by creation of the primary outdoor gathering area at
the Commons building being a courtyard design enclosed on the sides protecting it from
the Los Osos Valley wind that blows primarily from north/west to south/east. The
courtyard is open on the south side to allow sunshine and warming of this protected
outdoor gathering area. A similar courtyard approach is used in the design of the Health
Center. Wind Design Guideline - See FRSP Chapter 4, Section 4.3.3.
j. Add Landscape Design Guidelines (soil types, slopes, plants); be receptive to landscape;
identify fencing types (wildlife passage).
See FRSP Section 4.4.1 and Figure 4.1 for fencing designs and locations. See section
4.2.3 for Landscaping principles. Selection of plant materials in the FRSP document is
premature, it is more appropriately part of the required information as part of ARC review
of the actual proposed project design.
k. Discussion regarding the need for an actionable alternative (as requested by the City
Council) that would locate all development below the 150-foot elevation and
commented that it would be helpful to see both alternatives at the same level of detail
to be able to compare them equally.
The applicant has proposed an alternative with no development above 150ft elevation in
the vicinity of Mountainbrook Church.
1. Chair summary:
i. Show viewshed lines from the street
The EIR contains viewshed analysis.
ii. Emphasize truth in materials
See comment 2b above.
iii. Address parking. Where are the cars going?
See FRSP.
iv. Use guidelines, not guidance
Guidelines is the Chapter Title and used
extensively.
v. Consider a wind study to reduce cold
The proposed site layout reflects wind
considerations.
vi. Development over 150 feet and realignment
Minutes - Architectural Review Commission Meeting of December 18, 2017 Page6
of Froom Creek may be hard sells
No response required.
vii. These are good first steps
Thank you.
Architectural Review Commission takes Recess at 6:52 - 6:58 p.m.
4. 257 Madonna Road; Review of new sign program for the Madonna Plaza shopping center.
Case #: ARCH-1149-2017; C-R zone; Schottenstein Property Group, applicant. (Kip
Morais)
Planning Technician Kip Morais presented the staff report with the use of a PowerPoint
presentation and responded to Commissioner inquiries.
Applicants Emily Ewer and Carol Florence presented with the use of PowerPoint and responded to
commissioner inquires.
Public Comments:
None.
--End of Public Comment--
Commission discussion followed.
ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROLPH, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
BELLER, CARRIED 3-2-2 (COMMISSIONER ROOT AND NEMCIK NO) to adopt a
Resolution entitled:
A Resolution of the San Luis Obispo Architectural Review Commission approving a
master sign program for the Madonna Plaza Shopping Center with a categorical exemption
from environmental review, as represented in the staff report and attachments dated
December 18, 2017 (257 Madonna Road ARCH-1149-2017).
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
Deputy Director Davidson provided a brief agenda forecast.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:54 p.m. The next Regular meeting of the Architectural Review
Commission is scheduled for Monday, January 29, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing
Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California.
APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION: 01/18/2018
APPENDIX C
10
Appendix C - EIR Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
July 2, 2020 (updated August 19, 2020)
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
MM VIS-1
Include the following Landscape Screening Guidelines to
provide effective screening of proposed structural massing
as experienced from public views along LOVR and the
LOVR Overpass.
Added landscaping
screening guidelines of
MMVIS-1 to Section 4.2.3.
MM AQ-4
#1 (Table 3.3-9)
Install gas or electric fireplace in place of U.S. EPA-certified
Tier 2 residential wood burning appliances.
Program 4.7.4c added –
only electric fireplaces
allowed.
MM AQ-4
#2 (Table 3.3-9)
The Project shall provide a range of transit options and
incentives to employees and residents of Villaggio, and
commercial and residential developments within
Madonna Froom.
Transportation Demand
Management (TDM)
strategies are detailed in
programs under Policy
4.7.7 & Goal 5.4 is
included in Chapter 5
promoting TDM programs.
MM AQ-4
#3 (Table 3.3-9)
Provide a pedestrian-friendly and interconnected
streetscape with good access to/from the development for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users to make
alternative transportation more convenient, comfortable,
and safe.
Section 4.4.1 (multi-family
site design) & Section
4.5.1 (commercial site
design) encourage
walkability and linkages.
Chapter 5 includes
provision and guidance for
the development of
pedestrian paths and
trails, bikeways, and a
transit stop.
MM AQ-4
#4 (Table 3.3-9)
Provide shade over 50 % of parking spaces to reduce
evaporative emissions from parked vehicles.
Section 4.2.3 #8 - added
requiring shade trees in
parking lots and 50%
coverage in surface
parking lots.
MM AQ-4
#5 (Table 3.3-9)
Reduce fugitive dust from roads and parking areas with
the use of paving or other materials.
Not applicable - no
unpaved roads, driveways,
or parking areas are
proposed as part of the
Project.
MM AQ-4
#6 (Table 3.3-9)
Implement driveway design standards (e.g., speed bumps,
curved driveway) for self-enforcement of reduced speed
limits on unpaved driveways.
Not applicable - There are
no unpaved roads or
driveways in the
development.
Appendix C – EIR Mitigation Measures in FRSP
Page 2
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
MM AQ-4
#7 (Table 3.3-9)
Use an APCD-approved suppressant on private unpaved
roads leading to the site, unpaved driveways and parking
areas.
Not applicable - no
unpaved roads, driveways,
or parking areas are
proposed as part of the
Project.
MM AQ-4
#8 (Table 3.3-9)
Incorporate traffic calming modifications to Project roads
to reduce vehicle speeds and increase pedestrian and
bicycle usage and safety.
Consistent with MM-
TRANS-11, added Program
5.3.8a.
MM AQ-4
#9 (Table 3.3-9)
Work with SLOCOG to create, improve, or expand a nearby
‘Park-and-Ride’ lot with car parking and bike lockers in
proportion to the size of the Project.
Program 4.7.7e added to
fund and install an EV
charging station at the
nearby Calle Joaquin Park
& Ride Lot.
MM AQ-4
#10
(Table 3.3-9)
Implement onsite circulation design elements in parking
lots to reduce vehicle queuing and improve the pedestrian
environment.
Added requirement in
Sections 4.4.1#5 (mfr) &
4.5.1#6 (comm’l.) that
parking lots shall be
designed to reduce
vehicle queueing and
improve the pedestrian
environment.
MM AQ-4
#11
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide employee lockers and showers to promote bicycle
and pedestrian use. One shower and five lockers for every
25 employees is recommended.
Added Program 4.7.7f
requiring lockers &
showers for commercial
and institutional uses with
more than 25 employees.
MM AQ-4
#12
(Table 3.3-9)
Increase bicycle accessibility and safety in the vicinity of
the Project; for example: provide interconnected bicycle
routes/lanes or construction of bikeways.
Chapter 5 provides details
of all the planned
pedestrian & bicycle
facilities.
MM AQ-4
#13
(Table 3.3-9)
Exceed Cal Green standards by 25% for providing onsite
bicycle parking: both short-term racks and long-term
lockers, or a locked room with standard racks and access
limited to bicyclists only.
Added Program 4.7.7g
regarding bicycle parking
requirements.
MM AQ-4
#14
(Table 3.3-9)
Develop recreational facility (e.g., parks, trails, gym, pool,
etc.) within 0.25 mile from site.
Trailhead Park of 3.6 acres
proposed, a pedestrian
trail along Froom Creek,
and various recreational
amenities in Villaggio.
MM AQ-4
#15
(Table 3.3-9)
If the project is located on an established transit route,
provide improved public transit amenities.
Section 5.6 of Chapter 5
includes discussion of the
new transit stop planned
in the project and Figure
Appendix C – EIR Mitigation Measures in FRSP
Page 3
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
5-11 shows the proposed
location.
MM AQ-4
#16
(Table 3.3-9)
Identify the location of a hub/node of the City’s bicycle
share network at the Project site.
Program 4.7.7h added to
provide a bike share
program in Villaggio.
Program 4.7.7i added to
identify a potential
hub/node for the bicycle
share network on plans
with development review
of commercial projects.
MM AQ-4
#17
(Table 3.3-9)
Requires fleet vehicles to be zero emission vehicles. Program 4.7.7b requires
Villaggio fleet vehicles to
be zero emissions and
install electric charging
infrastructure.
Program 4.7.7k requires
electric vehicle charging
infrastructure for fleet,
shuttle, or group-
transport vehicles within
commercial zones.
MM AQ-4
#18
(Table 3.3-9)
Project includes alternative fuel fleet vehicle(s). Program 4.7.7k requires
electric charging
infrastructure for
commercial fleet, shuttle,
or group-transport
vehicles.
Program 4.7.7b provides
similar requirements for
Villaggio’s fleet vehicles.
MM AQ-4
#19
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide neighborhood EV/car-share program for the
development.
Determined that a car
share program is not
feasible.
MM AQ-4
#20
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide dedicated parking for carpools, vanpools, and/or
high-efficiency vehicles to meet or exceed Cal Green Tier
2.
Program 4.7.7d added for
Villaggio to meet
requirement. Program
4.7.7j provided for
commercial uses.
MM AQ-4
#21
(Table 3.39)
Provide vanpool, shuttle, minibus service (alternative
fueled preferred).
Program 4.7.7j added.
MM AQ-4
#22
(Table 3.3-9)
Work with SLO Regional Rideshare to educate occupants
with alternative transportation and smart commute
information.
Program 4.7.7a added.
Appendix C – EIR Mitigation Measures in FRSP
Page 4
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
MM AQ-4
#23
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide childcare facility onsite. Program 4.7.7m added.
MM AQ-4
#24
(Table 3.3-9)
Implement programs to reduce employee vehicle miles
traveled.
Program 4.7.7j provided
for commercial uses.
MM AQ-4
#25
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide a lunchtime shuttle to reduce single occupant
vehicle trips and/or coordinate regular food truck visits.
Program 4.7.7b added.
MM AQ-4
#26
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide delivery service in clean fueled vehicles. Program 4.7.7k requires
electric charging
infrastructure for
commercial fleet, shuttle,
or group-transport
vehicles.
MM AQ-4
#27
(Table 3.3-9)
At community event centers, provide free valet bicycle
parking.
Not applicable.
MM AQ-4
#28
(Table 3.3-9)
Implement a “No Idling” vehicle program which includes
signage, enforcement, etc.
Added Program 4.7.7l.
MM AQ-4
#29
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide free-access telework terminals and/or wi-fi access
in multi-family projects.
Added Program 4.7.4d.
MM AQ-4
#30
(Table 3.3-9)
Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for providing
EV charging infrastructure.
Program 4.7.2f requires
EV-ready garages and that
shared parking areas for
apartments have EV
charging systems.
MM AQ-4
#31
(Table 3.3-9)
Install 1 or more level 2 or better EV charging stations. Program 4.7.2f requires
EV-ready garages and that
shared parking areas for
apartments have EV
charging systems. Where
electric vehicle chargers
required noted that they
shall be, at a minimum,
level 2 chargers.
MM AQ-4
#32
(Table 3.3-9)
Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 1 standards for building
energy efficiency.
Modified Policy 4.7.2.
MM AQ-4
#33
(Table 3.3-9)
Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for building
energy efficiency.
Modified Policy 4.7.2
(Tier1).
MM AQ-4
#34
(Table 3.3-9)
Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for utilizing
recycled content materials.
Consistent with Program
4.7.5a.
Appendix C – EIR Mitigation Measures in FRSP
Page 5
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
MM AQ-4
#35
(Table 3.3-9)
Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for reducing
cement use in concrete mix as allowed by local ordinance
and conditions.
Added Program 4.7.5c.
MM AQ-4
#36
(Table 3.3-9)
All built-in appliances shall be Energy Star certified or
equivalent.
Added Program 4.7.4a.
MM AQ-4
#37
(Table 3.3-9)
Utilize onsite renewable energy systems (e.g., solar, wind,
geothermal, biomass and/or bio-gas) to offset at least 10
% of energy use.
Added Program 4.7.2e
which acknowledges the
photovoltaic system
requirement for all new
buildings of Program
4.7.3c, and encourages
the use of other
alternative energy
systems.
MM AQ-4
#38
(Table 3.3-9)
Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for the use of
greywater, rainwater or recycled water.
Included Programs 4.7.6b.
and 4.7.6c.
MM AQ-4
#39
(Table 3.3-9)
Provide and require the use of battery powered or electric
landscape maintenance equipment for new development
and adequate outdoor plugs to accommodate their use.
Added Section 4.2.3 #9.
MM AQ-4
#40
(Table 3.3-9)
Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for using
shading, trees, plants, cool roofs, etc. to reduce “heat
island” effect.
Section 4.2.3 #8 - added
requiring shade trees in
parking lots and 50%
coverage in surface
parking lots.
MM AQ-4
#41
(Table 3.3-9)
Design roof trusses to handle dead weight loads of
standard solar-heated water and photovoltaic panels.
Added Program 4.7.5d.
MM AQ-5 Include measures necessary to reduce Project operational
stationary-source GHG emissions to achieve net zero
emissions, consistent with the City’s 2035 net-zero GHG
emissions target.
Added Goal 4.7.b, Policy
4.7.3 and listed programs
in response.
MM AQ-6 Include measures necessary to reduce the Project’s
operational, mobile-source emissions, and VMT to the
maximum extent feasible, such as encouraging/
incentivizing residents and employees in the SLO Regional
Rideshare program and require all personal small vehicles
(e.g. golf carts) be 100% electric-powered.
Program 4.7.7a –
encourage SLO Regional
Rideshare.
Program 4.7.7b - senior
shuttle service with onsite
charging infrastructure.
Program 4.7.7c – all golf
cart 100% electric.
Programs 4.7.7 d & 4.7.7j
– dedicated parking for
carpool, vanpools, and
EVs.
Appendix C – EIR Mitigation Measures in FRSP
Page 6
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
MM BIO-
13
Establish a 300-foot development buffer on the centerline
of the confluence of Drainage 1, 2, and 3 and the realigned
Froom Creek to maintain natural vegetation, ecological,
hydrologic, and wildlife connectivity between the Irish Hills
Natural Reserve and the Froom Creek corridor. The buffer
shall extend from the point at which the proposed
realigned Froom Creek exits the Specific Plan area,
upstream along the centerlines of Drainages 1, 2, and 3 for
600 linear feet. Relocate residential uses outside this
buffer.
Added Section 3.2.4,
Wildlife Corridor, with
Goal 3.2.f, Policy 3.2.4,
and Program 3.2.4a and
updated Figure 3-7.
MM BIO-
14
Design any proposed roadway/pathway crossings over on-
site drainages to ensure adequate passage for wildlife.
Added Program 3.2.4b.
MM HAZ-3 Designate smoking areas, located away from on-site fire
hazards areas and consistent with the CMC, otherwise
smoking shall be prohibited on-site. Include policies
requiring the allowed use of fire-resistant
landscaping/hardscaping in areas to reduce mulch and
gorilla hair, which is the receptive embers.
Included Policy 7.4.3
requiring designated
smoking areas in project
developments. Added
Program 7.4.1b requiring
fire-resistant landscaping
and hardscapes and
minimizing use of mulch
and gorilla hair. Also
included Landscaping
Principle #10 in Chapter 4
calling for minimal use of
mulch/gorilla hair.
MM HAZ-5
Designate fire access routes in at least two locations from
the project site to the Irish Hills Natural Reserve on at least
12-foot wide paths. One from Villaggio and one from
Madonna Froom Ranch. Designed to allow emergency
response to wildland area in Irish Hills to support direct
access for firefighting personnel and equipment.
Added Fire Department
staging access locations in
Figure 7-1 and narrative in
Chapter 7 regarding
requirements, including
Policy 7.4.4 and Program
7.4.4a.
MM-
TRANS-9
The Project Applicant shall design and install ADA-
compliant curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side
of LOVR to complete the sidewalk connection between the
Irish Hills Plaza and Calle Joaquin. The Project Applicant
shall also design and install Class IV bikeways (protected
bike lanes) along LOVR to provide a physical buffer
between the sidewalk and vehicular traffic lanes in the
northbound and southbound directions between
Madonna Road and South Higuera Street.
LOVR sidewalk and
protected bikeway
requirements between
Irish Hills Plaza and Calle
Joaquin is included in
Program 5.3.1a. and
illustrated in Figures 5-2 &
5-3.
MM
TRANS-11
Incorporate traffic calming measures (speed humps, bulb-
outs, chicanes, etc.) into the design of Local Road “A”.
Added Program 5.3.8a.
Appendix C – EIR Mitigation Measures in FRSP
Page 7
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
MM-
TRANS-21
Include a landscaped median along LOVR from the
terminus of the existing median at northern Project
frontage to Calle Joaquin.
See Figures 5-2 and 5-3 for
details of the raised
landscaped median.
MM
TRANS-22
Include an emergency access point from Villaggio’s Lower
Area to the Irish Hills Natural Reserve to provide access to
the existing dirt road network to fight fires in Irish Hills,
specifically to Neil Havlik Way, which connects to the four
utility power line structures. This access point may be
gated to ensure site security in consultation with SLOFD.
Included in Chapter 5 &
referenced in Section 7.4
MM
TRANS-23
Integrate access to project site perimeters for defending
site development. Address access to the wildland area
abutting the western boundary of Villaggio’s Lower Area,
including access from the proposed Local Road “C” to the
Irish Hills, which may include use of space between
proposed buildings for firefighting vehicle access, ramps
up proposed retaining walls, and similar vehicle
infrastructure to maintain access to base of Irish Hills.
Figure 5-1 shows
emergency vehicle access
points, including those
adjacent to hillside open
space areas. Included in
Chapter 7 is Policy 7.4.4
and Program 7.4.4a
regarding access
requirements to the Irish
Hills Natural Preserve.
MM
TRANS-24
Refine the preliminary project concept designs to address
pedestrian and bicycle circulation safety issues.
Added text to Section
5.5.4.
MM NO-4 Prior to park/residential approval, within the Madonna
Froom Ranch area, a project-specific noise study
evaluating noise exposure potential from adjacent
commercial uses shall be submitted. It must identify
project-specific design measures to attenuate exterior and
interior noise consistent with City’s Noise Element and
Ordinance
Program 4.6.c added to
describe need for project
specific noise studies to
evaluate impacts and
identify design measures
to attenuate noise.
MM PS-1 Modify the FRSP to demonstrate the provision of
recreational facilities to meet the demand of Villaggio
residents if an onsite option is selected.
Added text to Section
3.4.3
MM PS-2 Modify the FRSP to demonstrate the provision of
recreational facilities to meet the demand of Madonna
Room Ranch residents if an onsite option is selected.
Added text to Section
3.4.1
MM UT-1 The Applicant shall amend the FRSP to require that the
size, location, and alignment of all on- and offsite water
supply, recycled water, wastewater, and energy
infrastructure shall be subject to review and approval by
the City’s Public Works and Utilities Departments. The
Applicant shall be responsible for constructing all required
onsite and offsite utility improvements, as well as for
repaving of damaged roadways.
Added narrative to
Section 6.1 incorporating
the mitigation language.
Appendix C – EIR Mitigation Measures in FRSP
Page 8
Mitigation
Measure #
Reference
Summary of Mitigation Specific Plan Directive
MM CR-13 The Applicant and historic architect shall prepare design
guidelines and a review process for new construction
proximate to historic structures. New construction shall be
undertaken in such a manner that the essential form and
integrity of relocated historic structures and their setting
would be unimpaired. The design guidelines and review by
City Community Development Director shall ensure new
construction is compatible with historic structures main
residence in material, features, size, scale and proportion,
and massing.
Added Design Guideline 3
to Section 4.3.1,
Architectural Styles.