HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 04 - Consideration of a Regional Surface Transportation Block Grant Cooperative Agreement with SLOCOG Department Name: Public Works
Cost Center: 5010
For Agenda of: October 20, 2020
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Matt Horn, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Luke Schwartz, Transportation Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
(RSTP) EXCHANGE / SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BLOCK GRANT
(STBG) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SLOCOG)
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the SLOCOG RSTP Exchange /
STBG Cooperative Agreement No. SLO-FAST-01; and
2. Approve the priority of projects proposed for use of discretionary Urban State Highway
Account (USHA), funding allocations (Table 1); and
3. Authorize the Assistant City Manager or their designee to prepare and submit future grant
applications for projects eligible for competitive grants administered by SLOCOG; and
4. Authorize the Assistant City Manager or their designee to execute SLOCOG grant
reimbursement requests and other related grant documents on behalf of the City; and
5. Authorize the Finance Director to augment the budget and appropriate grant funds and
approve budget amendments on a project-by-project basis to appropriate Regional State
Highway Account (RSHA), Urban State Highway Account (USHA), and Saf e Route to
Schools (SRTS) grant funds administered by SLOCOG.
DISCUSSION
Background
As the Metropolitan Planning Organization and Regional Transportation Planning Agency for
the San Luis Obispo County region, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG)
handles a variety of responsibilities, including administering funding from State, federal, and
regional sources to local agencies. The Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program, a
Federal-aid funding program, provides flexible funding that may be used by states and localities
for transportation projects; however, use of federal funds can often prove challenging for local
entities, as use these funds often requires non-federal match requirements, burdensome
administrative obligations, and additional environmental analysis for compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Item 4
Packet Page 7
For this reason, the State of California established the Regional Surface Transportation Program
(RSTP), which allows agencies such as SLOCOG to exchange its apportionment of federal
STBG program funds for non-federal RSTP exchange funds, thereby eliminating many of the
burdensome obligations associated with use of federal funds.
SLOCOG distributes RSTP funds to the local jurisdictions within the San Luis Obispo County
region both on a competitive basis, in the form of Regional State Highway Account (RSHA) and
Safe Route to School (SRTS) grant funds, and as “local choice apportionments” in the form of
Urban State Highway Account (USHA) funds, which are distr ibuted on a fair-share basis to each
locality within the County based on population. From FY2013-14 through FY2020-21,
SLOCOG has programmed up to $2.4 million in STBG/RSTP grant funds to be used for eligible
transportation projects within the City of San Luis Obispo. To date, approximately $400,000 has
been reimbursed or is reflected in in-progress reimbursement requests to SLOCOG, leaving an
available balance of approximately $2.0 million for eligible City projects.
In order for local agencies to request reimbursement for work performed on eligible
STBG/RSTP funded projects, a Cooperative Agreement must be executed between the local
agency and SLOCOG. A Cooperative Agreement is a general agreement regarding the
responsibilities of each agency in relation to administration of these funds. While the City of San
Luis Obispo has been successfully receiving reimbursements for eligible grant -funded work
through an existing Cooperative Agreement with SLOCOG from 2009, SLOCOG has requested
that the City enter into an updated Cooperative Agreement in order to continue to receive
reimbursement for work performed on eligible projects. The updated Cooperative Agreement
identifies the current USHA/RSHA funding allocations, current instructions and standardized
forms for reimbursement requests. For this reason, staff recommends that the Council adopt a
Resolution (Attachment A) authorizing the City manager to execute the SLOCOG RSTP
Exchange/STBG Cooperative Agreement No. SLO-FAST-01 (Attachment B).
Projects Identified for Use of STBG/RSTP Grant Funds
Table 1 below summarizes the capital improvement projects proposed for use of STBG/SRTS
grant funds. RSHA and SRTS grant funds are allocated to specific projects based on a
competitive process involving SLOCOG Board approval—the City does not have discretionary
authority to use these funds for other projects without explicit approval by SLOCOG. USHA
grant funds are administered by SLOCOG as “local choice” apportionments, where the City has
more discretionary flexibility to allocate funds to projects of the City’s choosing, as long as these
projects provide operational and/or safety improvements along eligible Federal-aid Urban
System (FAUS) routes.
Item 4
Packet Page 8
Table 1 – Projects Recommended for Use of STBG/RSTP Grant Funds
Funding Source Project Name Programmed
thru FY2020-21
Available Balance
thru FY2020-21
RSHA Railroad Safety Trail (Taft to
Pepper Segment)
$300,000 $300,000**
RSHA Signal & Intersection
Improvements Citywide –
Orcutt/Tank Farm Roundabout
$370,000 $370,000
Subtotal RSHA $670,000 $670,000
USHA Previous Completed Projects $295,330 $0*
USHA Broad/Woodbridge Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon
$140,000 $140,000**
USHA Orcutt/Tank Farm Roundabout $994,670 $994,670
Subtotal USHA $1,430,000 $1,134,670
SRTS Cycle 2 Ramona to Foothill SRTS Path
& HAWK (Anholm Phase 1A)
$100,000 $0*
SRTS Cycle 3 Anholm Neighborhood
Greenway Phase 1B
$200,000 $200,000
Subtotal SR $300,000 $200,000
TOTAL ALL FUNDING SOURCES $2,400,000 $2,004,670
*Funds have already been reimbursed, or reimbursement request has been approved by SLOCOG and is in process
under previous 2009 Cooperative Agreement.
**Funds already reflected in the City’s currently adopted FY2019-21 Financial Plan and/or FY2020-21
Supplemental Budget
As shown in the table above, the proposed funding allocation would apply $1.36 million in new
funding (RSHA and USHA funds) to the Orcutt Road/Tank Farm Road Roundabout Project,
which is planned for construction in spring of 2021. This would allow for the deprogramming of
an equivalent amount of local funds currently allocated to this project. Staff would seek separate
approval by Council for future projects from that deprogramming.
Policy Context
The recommended actions are consistent with the City of San Luis Obispo’s Financial
Management Manual, Section 740 – Grant Management Policy. The policy states that the
Council will approve grant applications in excess of $5,000 and delegates receipt and contract
execution authority to the City Manager. The competitive grants administered via the SLOCOG
Cooperative Agreement—projects funded through RSHA funds and SLOCOG SRTS grant funds
as shown in Table 1 above—have already been solicited and awarded to the City.
Public Engagement
This item is on the Council Agenda for the October 20, 2020 meeting and will follow all required
postings and notifications. The public may have an opportunity to comment on this item at or
before the meeting.
Item 4
Packet Page 9
CONCURRENCE
The Director of the Finance Department concurs with the staff recommendation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the recommended action in
this report because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Section
15378. The individual projects funded with grant funds administered under the Cooperative
Agreement will include the necessary environmental reviews and studies prior to
implementation.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2020-21
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding Sources
Current FY
Cost
Annualized
On-going Cost
Total Project
Cost
General Fund
State STBG/RSTP – RSHA Grant
Funds
$670,000 $670,000
State STBG/RSTP – USHA Grant
Funds
$1,134,670 $1,134,670
State STBG/RSTP – SLOCOG SRTS
Grant Funds
$200,000 $200,000
Federal
Fees
Other:
Total $2,004,670 $2,004,670
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with executing the Cooperative Agreement itself.
Of the $2,004,670 in available STBG/RSTP grant funds programmed for the City of San Luis
Obispo, $300,000 in RSHA funds have already been allocated to the Railroad Safety Trail (Taft
to Pepper) project and $140,000 in USHA funds have already allocated to the Broad/Woodbridge
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon project in the current FY2019-21 Financial Plan and FY2020-21
Supplemental Budget. The remaining available balance of $1,564,670 in STBG/RSTP grant
funds has yet to be appropriated by the City to individual projects and would represent new
funding not included in the FY2019-21 budget. As grant funds are appropriated to individual
projects (per Table 1), this will allow for the de-programming of equivalent local funds (General
Fund, Local Revenue Measure, Transportation Impact Fee) currently committed to these
projects.
Item 4
Packet Page 10
ALTERNATIVES
Do not authorize execution of the Cooperative Agreement. This is not recommended as this
action allows for the use of alternative funding (non-local) to further leverage existing local
funds.
Attachments:
a - Draft Resolution
b - Exhibit 1 to Resolution - Draft FAST Cooperative Agreement
Item 4
Packet Page 11
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2020 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EXCHANGE / SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION BLOCK GRANT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
NO. SLO-FAST-01
WHEREAS, the City and the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) are
authorized, pursuant to requirements of Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act)
§ 1109(a), to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for any transportation purpose within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the SLOCOG Board approved allocation of urban and regional Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program funds for projects within the City of San Luis
Obispo; and
WHEREAS, SLOCOG intends to exchange its apportionment of Federal Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds for Regional Surface Transportation Exchange (RSTP
Exchange) funds for the projects within the City, therefore eliminating the non -federal match and
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) allows lead agencies to adopt
thresholds of significance for the lead agency’s general use in its environmental review process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. The Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the San Luis
Obispo Council of Governments RSTP Exchange/STBG Cooperative Agreement No. SLO-FAST-
01 (Exhibit 1).
SECTION 2. The Council hereby authorizes the Assistant City Manager or their designee
to prepare and submit future grant applications for competitive grant programs administered by
SLOCOG.
SECTION 3. The Council hereby authorizes the Assistant City Manager or their designee
to execute SLOCOG grant reimbursement requests and other related grant documents on behalf of
the City.
Item 4
Packet Page 12
Resolution No. _____ (2020 Series) Page 2
R ______
SECTION 4. Environmental Review. No environmental review is required for execution
of a Cooperative Agreement or grant submittals, as the proposed actions are not a “project” under
CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.
Upon motion of Council Member ______________, seconded by Council Member
____________, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _____________________ 2020.
____________________________________
Mayor Heidi Harmon
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City
of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________.
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
Item 4
Packet Page 13
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 1
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
Agreement No. SLO-FAST-01
RSTP EXHANGE/STBG COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON THE DATE BELOW STATED is between the San Luis Obispo
Council of Governments, referred to herein as "SLOCOG", and the
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
a municipal corporation and
political subdivision of the
State of California, referred
to herein as the "CITY".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, SLOCOG and the CITY are authorized, pursuant to requirements of the Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation (FAST Act), FAST Act § 1109(a), to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for any
transportation purpose within the CITY; and
WHEREAS, The FAST Act’s Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, acknowledging that this
program has the most flexible eligibilities among all Federal-aid highway programs, and aligning the
program’s name with how FHWA has historically administered it; and
WHEREAS, the SLOCOG Board approved allocation of regional Surface Transportation Block Grant
Program (STBGP) funds for the projects identified on the attached Table 1 (summary table and project
summary sheets) and STBGP Program continues all prior STP eligibilities (see in particular 23 U.S.C.
133(b)(15), as amended, each of the individual project is herein referred to as “PROJECT”; and
WHEREAS, SLOCOG intends to exchange its apportionment of Federal Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program (STBGP) funds for Regional Surface Transportation Exchange (RSTP Exchange) funds
for the PROJECTs, therefore eliminating the non-federal match and compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); and
WHEREAS, all applicable laws, regulations, and policies relating to the use of Regional Surface
Transportation Program Exchange (RSTP Exchange) funds for the PROJECTs, shall apply
notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, all obligations of the CITY under the terms of this Agreement are subject to funding
appropriation by the Legislature, and the receipt and allocation of funding by SLOCOG; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above noted findings and considerations, the parties
agree as follows:
1) The CITY agrees to administer each PROJECT and conduct the applicable environmental process
required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for each PROJECT.
2) The CITY agrees to advertise, open and review bids, and to award the contract for each applicable
PROJECT (or combination of projects) as needed, in accordance with State laws.
3) The CITY agrees that all phases of each PROJECT will be developed in accordance with policies,
procedures, practices, standards, regulations, and laws that apply to the CITY, Caltrans (where
appropriate), and SLOCOG General Programming Requirements, the 2016 Annual Exchange
Agreement and subsequent STBGP annual exchange agreements between SLOCOG and the State
of California (Department of Transportation). If in the judgment of SLOCOG a project may impact a
street, road or highway owned or controlled by a jurisdiction other than CITY (including without
limitation the County, another city, or the State of California), SLOCOG may require the CITY to
establish a project development team (PDT) composed of representatives of such jurisdictions, as
well as SLOCOG.
EXHIBIT 1 Item 4
Packet Page 14
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 2
4) The CITY agrees to construct each PROJECT in accordance with the plans and specifications of the
CITY (and Caltrans when PROJECT involves state highway facilities), and in accordance with the
conditions of funding adopted by SLOCOG.
5) The CITY agrees to maintain the facilities constructed, improved, or otherwise modified.
6) The CITY agrees to utilize, for each PROJECT, an amount of Regional or Urban RSTP Exchange
funds equal to or less than that adopted by SLOCOG, and that SLOCOG’s total obligation shall not
exceed the amounts shown in Table 1 unless a greater amount has been authorized in advance in
writing by SLOCOG.
7) The CITY agrees to account for all costs for the PROJECTS to be paid by SLOCOG pursuant to this
Agreement and agrees to perform all the reimbursable work for each project according to the billing
period identified in the project summary sheets.
8) After the opening of bids on applicable PROJECTS, the CITY shall notify SLOCOG of any cost
overruns or underruns to the original cost estimate. The following will be assumed and reflected in
SLOCOG's RSTP Exchange accounting spreadsheets:
a) If less funding than what was programmed is required for a PROJECT, the cost savings will be
made available for reprogramming into another CITY project as approved by SLOCOG.
b) If more funding than what was programmed is required for a PROJECT, the CITY will be solely
responsible for providing the additional funding, which can be comprised of various non-regional
funding sources, including cost savings from other CITY RSTP Exchange projects.
9) The CITY may submit an invoice for reimbursement of funds expended for each PROJECT no more
than once a month, using the attached Reimbursement Request Form (Exhibit A). All Payments will
be prorated between CITY and SLOCOG based on the agreed percentages of funding, as adopted by
SLOCOG and listed on each project summary sheet. All invoices must contain the following:
a. RSTP Exchange PROJECT number and name
b. A brief description of work accomplished during the billing period.
c. A copy of the consultant’s bill to the CITY (if applicable).
d. Amount expended by the CITY during the billing period, with evidence of funds expended (e.g.
a copy of a CITY check to consultant or accounting documentation, etc.)
e. Amount requested for reimbursement for the billing period
10) SLOCOG agrees to reimburse the CITY within 30 days of receipt of a completed reimbursement
request form (Exhibit A) with all applicable attachments and signatures or as funds become available
on a “1st come, 1st served” basis, an amount expended by the CITY during the invoices' billing period
less the aforesaid proration. If a PROJECT receives both Regional and Urban Regional Surface
Transportation Exchange funding (referred to in Exhibits hereto as “Regional” and “Urban”
respectively), reimbursements shall be made on a pro rata basis from each source for SLOCOG’s
share. SLOCOG's total obligation for each PROJECT cost shall not exceed the amount shown in
Table 1,” unless SLOCOG has in writing authorized a greater amount per adopted SLOCOG policy.
11) Within two months of either the execution of this agreement or each PROJECT’s completion and all
work incidental thereto, whichever comes later, the CITY must provide SLOCOG certification in the
form provided in Exhibit B hereto, of completion in accordance with the provisions in this Agreement,
and a final invoice containing those items listed above. In the event that final project costs are less
than those listed on Table 1, hereto, the funds shall be reallocated in accordance with SLOCOG
RSTP Exchange policy Exhibit C.
12) If this project has been paid for either entirely, or in part with Regional RSTP Exchange funds, and
CITY, or any of its officials, chooses to publicly memorialize participation in said project, then CITY
shall also memorialize SLOCOG’s financial participation in said project in a manner agreeable to
SLOCOG. This paragraph shall apply to, but is not limited to, signage during construction,
representation at dedications and placement of plaques or other objects of memorialization, whether
at or near the project site or not.
Item 4
Packet Page 15
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 3
13) The CITY grants to the State of California and/or SLOCOG access to the CITY's books and records
for the purpose of verifying that RSTP Exchange funds paid are properly accounted for and the
proceeds are expended in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. All documents shall be
available for inspection by authorized Caltrans and/or SLOCOG agents at any time during the
PROJECT development and for a four-year period from the date of completion, or for one year after
the audit is completed or waived by Caltrans and/or SLOCOG, whichever is later.
14) Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to all materials will
automatically be vested in the CITY and no further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership
to the CITY.
15) If existing public and/or private utilities conflict with the PROJECT construction or violate the CITY’s
encroachment policy (as applicable), the CITY shall make all necessary arrangements with the
owners of such utilities for their protection, relocation or removal. The CITY shall review the plans for
protection, relocation or removal. If there are costs of such protection, relocation, or removal which
the CITY must legally pay, the CITY shall pay the cost of said protection, relocation or removal, plus
cost of engineering, overhead and inspection. If any protection, relocation or removal of utilities is
required, such work shall be performed in accordance with CITY policies and procedures.
16) The CITY shall defend, indemnify and save harmless SLOCOG, its officers and employees from all
and any claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, judgments, attorneys’ fees or any liability
arising out of this Cooperative Agreement to the performance or attempted performance of the
provisions hereof, or any project referred to in the Exhibits hereto. Nothing contained in the foregoing
indemnity provision shall be construed to require CITY to indemnify SLOCOG against any
responsibility of liability in contravention of Civil Code section 2782.
17) If the CITY transfers its risk connected with design or construction of this project to independent
contractors, CITY agrees to use its best efforts to obtain the independent contractor’s inclusion of
SLOCOG as an indemnitee and in any insurance procured by such independent contractor(s) for the
project, to name SLOCOG as an additional insured.
18) Both the CITY and SLOCOG shall designate a Project Coordinator who shall represent the respective
agencies and through whom all communications between the parties to this agreement shall occur.
19) Both parties agree that if, in the course of carrying out the PROJECT, there is a disagreement among
the Project Coordinators over the direction of the project, the matter will be forwarded through a three
step conflict resolution process. First, resolution will be attempted between the CITY Manager and
SLOCOG Executive Director. If a dispute continues, a determination shall be made by the SLOCOG
Executive Committee, and, if required, final determination by the full SLOCOG Board.
20) Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties, obligations, or rights for third
parties not signatories to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party of the Agreement by
imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of local roads different from the
standard of care imposed by law.
21) No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and
signed by the parties thereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein or in
the attached Table 1 shall be binding on any of the parties thereto.
22) This Agreement may be terminated or provisions contained therein may be altered, changed, or
amended by mutual consent, in writing, of the parties hereto.
23) Prior to award of a contract for any PROJECT, SLOCOG may terminate the applicable PROJECT in
the Cooperative Agreement by written notice, provided SLOCOG pays the CITY for all PROJECT-
related costs reasonably incurred by the CITY prior to termination. Also, prior to award of a contract
for any PROJECT, the CITY may terminate the applicable PROJECT in the Cooperative Agreement
by written notice, provided the CITY pays SLOCOG for all costs reasonably incurred by SLOCOG
prior to termination.
Item 4
Packet Page 16
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 4
SIGNATURES:
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
By: ___________________________________ By: ___________________________________
Derek Johnson, City Manager Peter Rodgers, Executive Director
Date: _______________ Date: _______________
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________________
Teresa Purrington, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
By: ____________________________________ By:___________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick, City Attorney Nina Negranti, SLOCOG Counsel
Date: _______________ Date: _______________
Item 4
Packet Page 17
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 5
TABLE 1
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PROJECTS
for
Agreement No. SLO-FAST-01
SLOCOG# Program Project Name Programmed Balance
SMAPSL02R RSHA
Railroad Safety Trail - Taft
to Pepper Segment - ATP-
5016(057)
$300,000 $300,000
SMAPSL03R RSHA Signal & Intersection
Improvements Citywide $370,000 $370,000
SMAPSLO1U USHA USHA - City of SLO (FY
13/14 - 20/21) $1,430,000 $1,134,670
SMAPCG04R SRTS Cycle 2
Ramona to Foothill SRTS
Path & HAWK (Anholm
Phase 1A)
$100,000 $0
SMAPCG04R SRTS Cycle 3 Anholm Neighborhood
Greenway Phase 1B $200,000 $200,000
Total $2,400,000 $2,004,670
Item 4
Packet Page 18
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 6
EXHIBIT A
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
Regional Surface Transportation Program Exchange (RSTP Exchange)
REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST FORM
Agency Name: Date:
Contact Person:
Project Number(s): Regional: Urban:
Project Title:
This Invoice Covers Work Completed from: / / to: / /
Project Budget Information: (complete box below - refer to cooperative agreement
“Table 1” for budget information)
Total SPENT This invoice -$ When using electronic format: fill in unshaded areas only
Regional Urban
Other Sources
Non Regional
TOTAL
(must equal 100%)
Reimbursement Rate by Fund
Source (must be consistent with Exhibit
A Project Sheet)
0%
Pro-rata Reimbursement by
Funding Source
(Regional/Urban)
-$ -$ -$ -$
Please send a check for $
Total RSTP Exchange share due this invoice (total of heavier shaded
boxes above)
Attachments: 1) A brief description of work completed; and
2) Consultant invoices
3) Proof of payment (e.g. copy of City check to consultant).
Signed:
(Agency Rep.)
Shaded boxes below for SLOCOG Use
Regional Planner Approval Accounting Initials
Item 4
Packet Page 19
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 7
EXHIBIT B
PROJECT COMPLETION FORM
for
RSTP Exchange Projects
This form notifies SLOCOG of project completion in accordance with the provisions in the Cooperative
Agreement noted below. Our records indicate that the project listed below, funded all or in part with
RSTP Exchange funds, has been completed:
Project Name:
Project Number(s):
Cooperative Agreement Date (Recipient Agency):
Approved RSTP amount:
I certify, on behalf of the City/County
name of authorized official
of , that the project named above was completed
name of jurisdiction
on_____________________ in accordance with the provisions set forth in the cooperative
approximate date of completion
agreement dated ___________________________. It is my understanding that all savings
date jurisdiction representative signed
from a cost underrun will be returned to for
City/County or SLOCOG
reprogramming in accordance with the cooperative agreement.
Signed: Date:
signature of authorized official date signed
Return completed and signed Project Completion Forms within 2 months of the completion of each
project to:
SLOCOG
1114 Marsh Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Attn: Stephen Hanamaikai
Item 4
Packet Page 20
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 8
EXHIBIT C
Project Eligibility by Fund Program - Project eligibility requirements by funding program are
summarized below.
I. Regional Surface Transportation Program. The Surface Transportation Program
(STP) provides flexible funding that may be used by States and localities for projects to
preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge
and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit
capital projects, including intercity bus terminals. SLOCOG’s 2014 RTP will provide
guidance on priority routes for regional funding consideration.
The STP program supports national performance goals as defined in FAST-Act, but there
are no measures tied specifically to this program. Eligible costs for funds under these
programs include pre-project initiation documents (Pre-PID), project study reports (PSR),
preliminary engineering (PE), right-of-way acquisition (RW), capital costs, and construction
costs associated with an eligible activity.
Eligible Project Activities:
• Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, preservation, or
operational improvements for highways, streets, and roads; bikeways and other surface
transportation improvements.
• Replacement, rehabilitation, and preservation of bridges on any public road, including
construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate other modes.
• Construction of new bridges on a Federal-aid highway.
• Capital costs for transit projects eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49,
including vehicles and facilities used to provide intercity passenger bus service.
• Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, including electric
and natural gas vehicle charging infrastructure, bicycle transportation and pedestrian
walkways, and ADA sidewalk modification.
• Highway and transit safety infrastructure improvements and programs, installation of
safety barriers and nets on bridges, hazard eliminations, mitigation of hazards caused
by wildlife, railway-highway grade crossings.
• Highway and transit plans research and development.
• Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management and control facilities and
programs, including advanced truck stop electrification.
• Surface transportation planning.
• Transportation Alternatives; newly defined, includes most transportation enhancement
eligibilities with the exception of landscaping.
• Transportation control measures (e.g. as defined by region’s APCD Clean Air Plan)
• Development and establishment of transportation management systems.
• Environmental mitigation efforts
• Modifications to intersections with high accident rates or levels of congestion.
• Infrastructure-based ITS capital improvements consistent with the Central Coast ITS
Implementation Plan.
• Environmental restoration and pollution abatement.
Item 4
Packet Page 21
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 9
• Control of noxious weeds and establishment of native species.
• Congestion pricing projects and strategies, including electric toll collection and travel
demand management strategies and programs.
• Recreational trails projects.
• Construction of marine terminals.
• Truck parking facilities.
• Surface transportation infrastructure modifications within port terminal boundaries, only
if necessary to facilitate direct intermodal interchange, transfer, and access into and out
of the port.
• Construction and operational improvements for a minor collector in the same corridor
and in proximity to an NHS route if the improvement is more cost -effective (as
determined by a benefit-cost analysis) than an NHS improvement and will enhance
NHS level of service and regional traffic flow.
Available Funding
• Direct urban and rural apportionment up to minimum required equal to 110%, plus
15%, of the FY 1990/91 allocation of Federal Aid Secondary (FAS) based upon 2010
census data (initiated in 2015). Final apportionment tables will be developed for the
August 2017 Board meeting.
• Regional discretionary funds of $5.0M through FY 2021.
Item 4
Packet Page 22
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 10
EXHIBIT D
General Programming Policies - All Fund Programs
SLOCOG’s 2014 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy identifies an
overall goal to develop a multi-modal transportation system which is balanced, coordinated,
safe, cost effective, environmentally sound, economically supportive, me eting all the financially
reasonable transportation needs of all citizens in San Luis Obispo County. General
programming policies affecting the decision making and project selection of the surface
transportation system are summarized as follows:
1. SLOCOG will strive to be fair and equitable in the allocation of funding between the various
subregions in the county and among member jurisdictions.
2. SLOCOG will adhere to the federal and state statutes, policies, regulations and guidelines
applicable to each fund being allocated, and require recipients of grants to do the same.
3. SLOCOG will recommend projects for funding that are:
• Deliverable
• Consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the 2014 Regional Transportation
Plan
• Regionally Significant
• Responsive to immediate funding and project needs
• Consistent with specific criteria of a particular funding program
• High likelihood of leveraging other funding (state, federal and/or local)
4. SLOCOG will seek to implement all programs in a timely and efficient manner.
5. SLOCOG will seek to maximize the use of the funds for general public benefit, and will
marshal other funds when possible to complete funded projects by prioritizing joint -funded
projects.
6. SLOCOG will integrate social equity factors in to the decision making process by applying
the findings generated from the Disadvantaged Communities Assessment that is now
amended in to the 2014 RTP/SCS.
7. SLOCOG will, to the extent feasible, assure the integration of all projects with jurisdiction,
region and statewide tra nsportation plans, providing a comprehensive, systematic approach
to resolving transportation problems in the region.
8. SLOCOG will retain maximum flexibility of federal programs under FAST ACT, where
feasible, and will also seek to exchange Surface Transpo rtation Block Grant Program
(STBGP) (federal) funds for Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Exchange
(state) funds, for reasons of cost efficiency and simplicity in administration. Through the
RSTP Exchange funds ultimately become (local) funds.
9. SLOCOG will retain a continuing commitment to emphasize quality and promote excellence
in the development of competitive proposals, seeking to fund the best possible projects in
terms of cost effectiveness, public benefit and regional and local significance.
10. SLOCOG will reserve discretionary funds for advance development work to ensure
regionally significant projects are well scoped, alternatives assessed, accurate estimates
prepared, and a finance plan for implementation is developed.
Item 4
Packet Page 23
SLOCOG RSTP Exchange/STBG General Cooperative Agreement page 11
11. SLOCOG will reserve off-the-top funding for programs identified in the 2014 RTP/SCS,
including Transportation Demand Management (i.e. Rideshare), Active Transportation
Partnership Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program and Safe Routes to School.
12. SLOCOG will maintain funding commitments for existing programmed projects as long as
those projects have achieved the project delivery milestones set out at the time of
programming. Unavoidable delays to the project delivery milestones will be considered on a
case by case basis.
13. SLOCOG will commit a portion of discretionary funding to match and leverage other
competitive state-wide grant programs (e.g. new SB1 programs, State of CA Active
Transportation Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) for projects of
regional significance.)
14. SLOCOG may consider using the above referenced fund sources to address surface
transportation needs as identified in the June 7th 2017 SLCOOG Board Staff Report item B-3
2018 RTIP Fund Assumptions Programming Approach - Table 2 Sections 1, 2, and 3, and
defer the programming of funds on needs identified in Section 4 (Other Multi -Modal Needs,
including bicycle, pedestrian, and public transit related needs).
Item 4
Packet Page 24