The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About108 Broad - Variance Ap V0823Board of Adjustments Minutes Meeting of September 5, 1980 Page 3 Ordinance, except for the two f encroachment, Sylvia Drucker and Jerry Kenny encroach felt that the two foot e would not appreciably affect the building design. It was noted that the i' rior stairway encroached into required parking i - J14 spaces inside the garage. Mr. Ht said that this could be corrected by reducing the width of the stairway. A maoltion ovias made by Sylvia Diuc�-' approvin� use permit 43-80, subjd --The stairway be relocated or re the required p6rking spaces ins Item number 5 was taken out of not present. seconded by Jerry Kenny and passed unanimously to the following condition: ed in width so that it does not encroach into the garage. because the applicant for item number 4 was Use Permit _8ppl. 44-80. Request flow commercial recreation use (electronic and pinb games); 1520 Los Osos Valley Road; C -N zone; James Ja n, applicant. James and Nancy Jackson were prase and explained their request. They want to obtain permission for a com.ercia creation use in the proposed Laguna Lake Shopping Center. Dan Smith noted that the use permi' or this shopping center has expired and thereby the plan for this use pe is not a valid approved plan. The applicant for the shopping i.enter must reappq for a n&.,t use permit. Until the use permit is obtained from the Planning C � ion to construct the commercial center, this 001. use permit cannot be considered. Dan Smith said that if this use isrmitted, he feels that the only entrance allowed should be to the interior` za of the shopping center and not to the Los 0sos Valley frontage or to theirking lot. A motion was mpde by Dan Smith, se nded by Sylvia Drucker, and passed unanimously continuing use permit 44-80 to pe t the applicant to submit a site plan based on an approved shopping center de n (Planning Commission use permit approval) or six months, whichever comes firstj The applicant concurred with Variance A pl. V0823 -A, Request to amend approved variance application to delete construction of parking space and trellis in front yard setback; 108 Broad Street; R-1 zone; Keith Gurnee, applicant. KO th Gurree was present and explained his request. He said that a variance was previously granted to permit a parking space and trellis to be located in the street yard as a part of his plans to expand his house. He said that he has re-evaluatled the plans and would prefer to amend hi-, request for a variance to allow tht- addition to his house without providing ary parking. This would obviously preclude the request for a setback variance. This variance is a request to j I 7,-w no parking spaces wnere two -iould be required by a greater than 50-;2 adc' ;,cm tr, an ex i s ti rq, "-cu,;e w, no 7a; -king. Board of Adjustments Minutes Meating of September 5, 1980 Pag-I 4 Dan Smith noted that the parking previously proposed would have eliminated one space on the street for construction of a driveway ramp. The board concurred with the applicant that this alternative would be more attractive. A motion was made by Dan Snaith, seconded by Sylvia Drucker, and passed unanimously approving Variance Appl. V0823 -A, subject to the following findings: i<indings 1. There are exceptional circumstances applying to the site it that a creek occupies a significant portion of the lot making it impossible to construct a conventionally size:d house with parking, without using portions of the required street yard setback. 2. The variance does not constitute a grant of special privilege in that the request is to enlarge the existing house to a size enjoyed by most of the people in the immediate neighborhood who do not have similar natural constraints on their property. 3. The variance will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood because the house addition is attractive, fits the design of the existing house, limits the total size of the house to a size similar to the existing neighborhood. There being no further business, the Board of Adjustments adjourned at 3:20 p.m. _QlA Albr Dan Smith, Associate Planner Corr.nunity Development Department DS:drs 46 BOARD OF ADJUSTi4ENTS OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBI APDLICATIO;I FOR VARIANCE I, the undersigned owner or lessee of the property described a variance to allow zil.�.,i dilrr�ct' lei �G�tt�r, The legal description (as shown on deed, official county records, or title report): . *4P Gly � .-c-4- The property is zoned- / The following attachments are mandatory for this application to be processed: A. A SITE PLAN TRACING in dark pencil or ink (not ball point) not larger than 88- 1%2" X 11" drato scale and fully dimensioned showing the following: the entire lot as described in the legal description; all existing and proposed buildings and uses; walls and fences (location, height and materials); existing and proposed parking (number of spaces, striping and wheel stops); method of ingress and egress; signs (area and elevations); loading areas; street dedications and ipr vements• ex sting trees (location and size). (Elevations may be required �y tie D1rec�Lr.j B. WRITTEN STATEMENT (see reverse side). C. FILING FEE. The Municipal Code requires a filing fee of $100.00 to process this application. All checks and money orders shall be made payable to the City of San Luis Obispo.• 0. APPEALS. A decision of the Board of Adjustments may be appealed to the Planning O0113oi5slon within ten (10) working days of the date of t: a Board of Adjustments action. PLEASE RED CAREFULLY -Br -FORE SIGNING OR FILING Submission J this application does not imply approval of this permit request by the Depart .ent. Applicant %'_ YN-99 Signature 7Please type or print %,d rc, 5 .phone JR Signature o leasr= type or printf — Phone - THE FOLL011-1ING I5 SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT THIS APPLICATIOU 9 In order to approve your application the Board of Ad,;ustments must make ALL i of the following findings. After each finding state how your variance request application meets these requirements. H (2) The variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. A t SS C Aft d . rimes!,. 11/10kel"y� 9(dwe Ile 10; At rilc r ` ' Wi Ar.� ifs fs r �► anew *A-04 A a P,ezv .rte !j .►rt rloo ' AT > �Qa ,,��► arra 1`'�t��'1��rb (3) The grantinq of such application will not adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. arra. 00r, 51�IjX; 0 Ze Avmlde�wf &/;ae r .0d rrC d�'�dr�tad. a� cir�� r r Tei WIP arm rode uric x'023 yr We i 1.� �1 $ Trip jr7p OVA -4k —IT 'tz", :iwZ AMR 9X/:57 fflix.. 71--teR LA"I A'L A Alnco PlAe—, LIZ' Z) Fg15, 1) . IWM�g - i UO 1FA' Ad) - XN7v m Z 1% 7,fi=w fJ � 1 i I pillul '6 1 1 AEaVO V4C1AAI1,E AP,-416417ON 0893 t RES. XOMACC40 -,�PPIIG,GAIl: T. f!flTH GG"4t1�E, GwNER � LacAf!>.ti: /08 8lr0AD sl. , SANLLs'S OB/SPO, G+, NOTE; CSE PERM/T 5-5f' �1COl�/NG "TROT YAC°.O�NC�O�JCfiM�+lT.!' h`AS.41AVO)ee15Eti',,AWt1FDertleaRDCFs�D Na{v IW40F? A1lb- P1,t* VlAK/A,V� ON PYOU/0/NG .� P.4R.Y/N� aACf hV -477rEfT YgQD-5.0rA4e„, r-4rE: .-!/( 217, /96a Jaruar,I 29, 198)" Ke 0 vh Gu r net. 108 Lr )ad Strne'-. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 SUBJEM Varial°ce Appl. V0823 - Request to allow l parking space (instead of two r-quired) and trellis :n front yard setback, 108 Broad Street Dea i, E �': th e Tid% i-. to let .ou know that the Board of Adjustments, at their regular meeting of 4,anuary 18, 1980, approved your variance request to allow 1 parking space and trellis in the front yard setback at 108 Broad Street, subject to the findinjs and coo-ditions listed in the attached minutes. 1.1 %,ou have any questions, please call me. Sinc;er !ly, Dan, �'ti i th Assc ci ate Planrn r ')S:drs Attt-chiient: Mi,,utes of January 18, 1980 MEt`iBERS PRESENT: Sylvia Drucker, Planning Commissioner Jerry Kenny, Engineering Associate Dan Smith, Associate Planner GUESTS PRESENT: Bruce Heimlich C. Dewair Culver Keith Gurnee Meri Kay Gurnee Michael Hurst Variance Appl. V0823. Request to allow 1 parking space and trellis in front yard setback, 108 Broad Street, R-1 zone, Keith Gurnee, applicant. Use Permit Appl. 5-80. Request to allow reduced street yard setbacks from 20 -feet to 11 -feet and from 20 -feet to 16 -feet, 108 Broad Street, Keith Gurnee, applicant. Mr. and Mrs. Gurnee, applicants, were present and explained the request. They stated that they wanted to increase the area of the house and because of the confining characteristics of the lot with a creek occupying a significant portion of it, they are requesting permission to build in part of the required street yard setback. They also stated that there is insufficient room on the property to conform to the parking requirements of two spaces. They propose to provide one parking space, but it would have to encroach into the required street yard, requiring a variance for the parking space and the trellis cover. Dan Smith stated that he felt the building encroachment of 9 feet into the street yard was acceptable but did not like the parking space and trellis extending to the front property line. The car would appear to be half -way in a garage. If the trellis were tc be made more massive to cover the car, it would also serve to diminish the open feeling of the front yard. He also noted that the house is being improved more than 50% of its value, and thereby is required to meet all zoning regulations including providing two parking spaces. The applicant is asking for a variance to provide one space only. Sylvia Drucker felt that the request was reasonable and that if planting were provided against the trellis, it would soften its presence in the setback. She felt than covered parking would be a convenience for the applicant. All the Board members felt that the design of the addition was complimentary to the existing house and the neighborhood. A motion was made by Sylvia Drucker, seconded by Jerry Kenny and passed unanimously approving use permit appl No. 5-80, to permit expansion of the house to encroach 6 feet and 9 feet into the required street yard setback. A motion was made by Sylvia Drucker, seconded by Jerry Kenny and passed unanimously approving Variance Appl. 40823, subject to the following findings and conditions: Board of Adjustments Minutes Meeting of January 18, 1980 Page 2 1. There are exceptional circumstances applying to the site in that a creek occupies a significant portion of the lot making it impossible to construct a conventionally sized house with parking without using portions of the required street yard setback. 2. The variance does not constitute a grant of special privilege in that the request is to enlarge the existing house to a size enjoyed by most of the people in the immediate neighborhood who do not have similar natural constraints on their property. 3. The variance will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood because the house addition is attractive, fits the design of the existing house, limits the total size of the house to a size similar to the existing neighborhood and is provided with landscape planting to soften its pressence in the required street yard. 1. Applicant shall install landscape planting next to the carport trellis to soften its appearance consistent_ with a landscape plan approved by staff. Use Permit Appl. 1-80. Reques busine appl is Mr. Heimlich was present and ex attached to his application for allow a home occupation Tor ousn cod 134 Mill Street, R-2 zone, Bruce Heimlich, ned the request as elaborated in use description e occupation. Dan Smith said he observed the tler rig at the property during a site inspection and felt that it was much too la and obtrusive to be kept in a residential area, and felt that the home occ ion would be acceptable if that piece of equipment were stored in another ation. All members of the Board agreed. Sylvia Drucker stated that the that paving the driveway should rig was not permitted to be sto Mr. Heimlich said that all of hi Roebuck Inc., and therefore then agreed not to advertise his adds A motion was made by Dan Smith, s approving use permit appl. no. 1- 1. This use permit authorizes bu 2. Applicant may not advertise 3. Sandblasting/coating trailer 4. There shall be no storage of cant should be aware that she didn't feel equired by this use permit if the trailer t the site. The Board agreed. sidential work would be on contract with Sears uld be no customers coming to his house. He so that customers would not come to the house. nded by Jerry Kenny and passed unanimously subject to the following conditions: ess office use of home only. addres of this bu_,iness. shall not be kept on the premises. er equipment or coating material on the site. The legal description (as shown on deed, official county records, or title reporte7' 4ol',jr 77af Ae, lRovKf' x iptk 1- a14 -- 5.4 Tile property is zoned g—/ The followirig attachments are mandatory for this application to be processed: A. A SITE PUJI TRACING in dark pencil or ink (not ball point) not larger than E-1%2" X 11"'draan to scale and fully dimensioned showingthe following: the entire lot as described in the legal description; all existing and proposed buildings and uses; walls and fences (location, height and materials); existing and proposed parking (number of spaces, striping and wheel stops); method of ingress and egress; signs (area and elevations); loading areas; street dedications and imprgvem�nts ,x2 sting trees (location and size;. (Elevations I.,ay be required by the D1 reci or.; B. .-IRITTEII STATEMENT (see reverse side). C. FILING FEE. The Municipal Code requires a filing fee of S100.00 to process this �N+?i1CaCr'ji. Aii checks and money oiU'ErS Sildli be mciue payctule to i;irb City of San Luis Ubisl:o. D. APPEALS. A decision of the board of Adjustments may be appealed to the 1" anning Cor..u�iss r:.r. within ten (10) working days of the date of the Board of AdjusLoents action. i'L�r"t�L PLAD Cil.P.E FULL. Y BEFORE SIGNIiIG OR FILING Sub7ri-cion of this app;icution does not imply approval of this permit request uy the Depart,,-.---nt. f,ppl icant 7 f FP .�_�li��U�L� Signature (i''.ease type or print A :dr ss_ t�DQ1v�UrnPG� Phone //r>rl�Sdr_yl/R t.2U!�' � _ Si gra. ^' �Pi�asv tyre or print) AJdre .., lG:? .✓'CAD �'T. ��ti (1:/'� LrP PhoneMr . io n tj i LTO SUPPOR "T THIS APPLICATION' app i ca t i orl the Board of Adj us U;en ts mucs t make ALL After each finding state how ycur variance ,hose requirements. a,,e e1xre,,--'ional circui-nistances -applying to the sitc,, such as size., or topography, which do riot apply generally to land in the VIci- j ty wi L-1 the same zoning. & rim 74o14 1174 1h 11 *102 , 76, vikn- Z-f);qeZ AX eWW i• f2The variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. I I^ ORrrlv� er e 0 0 X 0 let V 7' ex r; 4m. 0 V r -r a'o ez 'elt4 C qtr 1,;Wwe �/: r/i '::4CL' Cti%1 tll .�Ytj 1tf1 SI dlrLlNtC Z s'hvw 6f -A� 6 A R,-00- No,-, 1C ;IA .0" r not adv,�rFely affecL; I � e a {are or persons residing or working in the 7D x7A,;4- eAe Ca'- qCC are 0� W11,xv m Ycc l��M�f �RI�+ �i ��(�L��• •Ir '+��Gl ri'�� Ilf li��^� CONI: T.>?i QZI41£, OdvtA LeWrION : /40e AW44jO St c Co W, y .ey: 7:A&Th'IWAVAF F.V Wf-'• Z9ft,,07iY COAl".57AWAIWI T dP 37,/07UAKT AN sr46,07-X.49P S&T a., �8 q , G7