The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-01-2021 ARC PresentationsArchitectural Review Commission Regular Meeting March 1, 2021 Public Comment: •Verbal Public Comment ➢Participants of the webinar: •Submit a ‘question’that includes your name and item number (or public comment)for the item you would like to speak on. •Once public comment for the item is called, your microphone will be unmuted and you will have three minutes to speak. •You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to signal that you would like to speak. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time,people may address the Commission on items not on the agenda. Items raised are generally referred to staff and,if action by the Commission is necessary,may be scheduled for a future meeting. Public Comment: •Verbal Public Comment ➢Participants of the webinar: •Submit a ‘question’that includes your name and item number (or public comment)for the item you would like to speak on. •Once public comment for the item is called, your microphone will be unmuted and you will have three minutes to speak. •You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to signal that you would like to speak. Item #1 CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1.Minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of February 1,2021. __________________________________________________ Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of February 1,2021. Item #2 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 3985 Broad Street (ARCH-0571-2020) 2.Review of the commercial component of the Northwest Corner (NWC)mixed-use project consisting of four buildings with a total of 61,000 square feet of commercial space,with an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration previously adopted for the overall Northwest Corner (NWC)mixed-use project site;Project address:3985 Broad Street;Case #:ARCH-0571-2020;Zone:C-C-SP-SF;Nick Tompkins,NKT Development LLC,owner/applicant. Staff Presentation By: Brandi Cummings, Contract Planner Recommendation: Review the proposed project in terms of its consistency with the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP)Guidelines,Community Design Guidelines (CDG),and Sign Regulations and provide comments and recommendations to the Planning Commission. 3985 Broad Street ARCH-0571-2020 Review of the 3985 Broad Street Commercial Center Project March 1, 2021 Applicant: NKT TFB I, LLC Representative: Oasis Associates, Inc. Requested Feedback from ARC ◼Review the Project for Consistency with the Airport Area Specific Plan Design Guidelines, Community Design Guidelines, and other City standards ◼Provide Comments and Recommendations to the Planning Commission 6 Project Location 7 Project Site Tank Farm Road Airport Area Specific Plan area C-C-SF-SP Project History 8 •2018 –assisted living facility and grocery center •2020 –site designation changes, assisted living facility, and tract/frontage improvements approved •2021 –ALUC review of proposed commercial center Project Description ◼5.28-acre site; part of approved AASP ◼Designated and zoned C-C (Community Commercial) under AASP ◼Currently vacant ◼Surrounding Uses ◼East: Marigold Shopping Center ◼West: Development underway for Westmont Living Facility ◼North: SESLOC Federal Credit Union ◼South: Mindbody, Edna Valley Market & Gas Station 9 Project Site Plan 10 Project Rendering -ICCC 11 Project Rendering -ICCC 12 Building Elevations –ICCC 13 Building Elevations –ICCC 14 Project Rending –Retail/Restaurant 15 Building Elevations –Retail/Restaurant (bldg. 2) 16 Building Elevations –Retail/Restaurant (bldg. 2) 17 Building Elevations –Retail/Restaurant (bldg. 3) 18 Building Elevations –Retail/Restaurant (bldg. 3) 19 Building Elevations –Retail/Restaurant (bldg. 4) 20 Building Elevations –Retail/Restaurant (bldg. 4) 21 Materials and Colors ◼Metal facia and siding ◼Stucco ◼Living vertical green screen ◼Glass ◼A mix of neutral earth tone colors complimentary to stucco and metal 22 Materials and Colors 23 Sign Program 24 Sign Program 25 Sign Program 26 Sign Program 27 Sign Program 28 Consistency with City Regulations ◼AASP is consistent with General Plan; therefore, project consistency with AASP is the benchmark ◼Chapter 5 of AASP –Community Design ◼Goal 5.9. Architectural Character ◼Goal 5.10. Scale and Massing ◼Goal 5.1.1 Building Heights ◼Goal 5.12. Architectural Façade and Treatment ◼Goal 5.14. Materials and Colors ◼Goal 5.19 Lighting 29 Key Discussion Items ◼Is design consistent with AASP requirements? ◼Are materials and colors appropriate? ◼Is the height and massing of the ICCC building appropriate? ◼Does the project adequately support pedestrians? ◼Does the master sign program visually integrate signs with the development and landscaping and are the signs of appropriate quantity/size/scale? ◼Are there other design features that would improve the project? 30 Recommendation/Next Steps ◼If ARC recommends approval to the Planning Commission, this could be done with or without conditions or further guidance ◼Planning Commission to consider project approval based on ARC recommendations 31 Next Steps Comments and Questions 32 Applicant Presentation By: Emily Ewer Carol Florence Item #2 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 3985 Broad Street (ARCH-0571-2020) PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM #2 Public Comment: •Verbal Public Comment ➢Participants of the webinar: •Submit a ‘question’that includes your name and item number (or public comment)for the item you would like to speak on. •Once public comment for the item is called, your microphone will be unmuted and you will have three minutes to speak. •You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to signal that you would like to speak. Item #3 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 302 South Street (ARCH-0380-2020) 3.Review of two new duplex buildings and associated site improvements to be constructed on a residential site currently developed with a single-family dwelling and Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU);this project is categorically exempt from environmental review (CEQA);Project address:302 South Street;Case #:ARCH- 0380-2020;Zone:R 2;Christina Pires,applicant. Staff Presentation By: Shawna Scott, Senior Planner Recommendation: Review the proposed project in terms of its consistency with the Community Design Guidelines (CDG)and provide comments and recommendations to the Planning Commission. 302 South Street ARCH-0380-2020 Review of a residential project consisting of two new duplexes, conversion of an existing residential unit to an accessory dwelling unit (ADU). March 1, 2021 Applicant: Christina Pires Recommendation Provide comments regarding consistency with the Community Design Guidelines and recommend direction on the project’s design to the Community Development Director. Project Site 0.2 acre in the R-2 zone 38 Project Description 39 Multi-unit residential project consisting of: ▪Two duplex buildings (two units each) ▪Conversion of existing single-family dwelling to an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) ▪Retention of one existing ADU Proposed Site Plan 40 Background 41 Floor Plans 42 Floor Plans –Units 3 and 4 43 Elevation –Units 3 and 4 44 Elevations –Units 5 and 6 45 Units 3 and 4 46 Units 5 and 6 47 Discussion Items 48 •Material palette and contemporary design –consistency with neighborhood character •Dominance of the Branch Street view by garages and driveway area •Location and detailing of building entries •Use of landscaping and site features •Placement/arrangement of required parking spaces •Location and screening of solid waste collection bins Recommendation Provide comments regarding consistency with the Community Design Guidelines and recommend direction on the project’s design to the Community Development Director. 50 Site Plan 51 Existing Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Applicant Presentation By: Dustin Pires Christina Pires Item #3 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 302 South Street (ARCH-0380-2020) Minor ARC Review Application ARCH-0380-2020 (302 South) PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEM #3 Public Comment: •Verbal Public Comment ➢Participants of the webinar: •Submit a ‘question’that includes your name and item number (or public comment)for the item you would like to speak on. •Once public comment for the item is called, your microphone will be unmuted and you will have three minutes to speak. •You can also click the “Raise Hand”icon to signal that you would like to speak. Item #4 COMMENT & DISCUSSION 4.Staff Updates ____________________________________________ Recommendation: Receive a brief agenda forecast from Senior Planner, Shawna Scott. ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission is scheduled for Monday, March 15, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. via teleconference The Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission will resume shortly *Recess in Progress*