The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-20-2021 ARC PresentationArchitectural Review Commission Regular Meeting September 20, 2021 •All attendees enter the meeting muted. •You can rename yourself by following the steps below. •When Public Comment is called for an item you would like to speak on,please raise your virtual hand. •When your name is called,you will be moved to a Panelist.After a brief moment,you will be able to unmute your mic and turn on your video (optional). •Please state your first and last name and address (optional)for the record. •After providing your comments you will be moved back to an Attendee. Directions for Public Comment PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA •If you would like to speak on items NOT ON THE AGENDA,please raise your virtual hand. •When your name is called,you will be moved to a Panelist. •Before you begin speaking,unmute your mic and turn on your video. Please state your First and Last name and address (optional)for the record. •After you complete your comments, you will be moved back to an Attendee. Public Comment At this time,people may address the Commission on items not on the agenda. Items raised are generally referred to staff and,if action by the Commission is necessary,may be scheduled for a future meeting. Item #1 CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1.Minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of August 16,2021. __________________________________________________ Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of August 16,2021. Item #4a PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 1656 Monterey (ARCH-0352-2021) 4.REVIEW OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE (SUNBEAM MOTEL).THE PROJECT INCLUDES A 1,273-SQUARE-FOOT,SECOND-STORY ADDITION AND A 94-SQUARE-FOOT,FIRST-FLOOR ADDITION TO THE STRUCTURE Recommendation: At the request of the project applicant,staff recommends the Architectural Review Commission continue this item to a date uncertain.The applicant has requested this continuance to further consider the scope and design of the project in light of increasing construction costs. Item #4b PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 1035 Madonna (ARCH-0253-2021) 4.REVIEW OF THE AGRICULTURAL HERITAGE AND LEARNING CENTER IN THE SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN Staff Presentation By: John Rickenbach, Contract Planner Recommendation: Review the proposed project in terms of its consistency with the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines,Community Design Guidelines,Sign Regulations,and provide comments and recommendations to the Planning Commission. San Luis Ranch Specific Plan 1035 Madonna Road ARCH-0253-2021 Public Hearing for the Agricultural Heritage and Learning Center September 20, 2021 Applicant: Coastal Community Builders Representative: Jacob Grossman Purpose of ARC Review ◼Review whether the Project is consistent with the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines, Community Design Guidelines, and other City standards ◼Provide Comments and Recommendations to the Planning Commission 7 Requested Feedback from ARC ◼Review the Project in the context of previous ARC direction ◼Confirm whether the Project is consistent with the San Luis Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines, Community Design Guidelines, and other City standards ◼Provide Comments and Recommendations to the Planning Commission 8 Project Site and Location 9 Project Description 10 ◼Ag Heritage Learning Center within 53.5-acre AG zone of 131-acre SLRSP ◼Specific Plan guides land use, circulation, parks and open space, infrastructure, and architecture/design Project Site in Surrounding Context 11 Project Description ◼53-acre site; part of approved SLRSP ◼Designated and zoned AG (Agriculture) under SLRSP ◼Currently vacant land ◼Surrounding Uses ◼East: Agriculture ◼West: Planned Residential ◼North: Planned Hotel and Commercial Retail ◼South: Agriculture 12 Project Components 13 •Five main buildings, with a total area of 31,236 SF •Farm Market •Restaurant •Retail/Historic Barn (two buildings joined as one) •Agricultural Processing •Historic Wood Residence •Interpretative/Educational Displays •Ag Accessory Buildings •Community Garden Project Components 14 Project incorporates three relocated historic structures into the AG Heritage Center, including: •Wood Residence •Hay Barn •Racetrack Grandstand (remaining wall) Project Plan View 15 Project Rendering 16 Market -Building Elevations 17 Market –Colors and Materials 18 Restaurant -Building Elevations 19 Restaurant –Colors and Materials 20 Ag Processing -Building Elevations 21 Ag Processing –Colors and Materials 22 Retail and Historic Barn -Building Elevations 23 Retail and Historic Barn –Colors and Materials 24 Historic Residence –Colors and Materials 25 Ag Accessory Structures –Colors and Materials 26 Signage 27 Signage 28 Consistency with City Regulations ◼SLRSP is consistent with General Plan; therefore, project consistency with SLRSP is the benchmark ◼Chapter 3 of SLRSP -Neighborhood Form ◼Table 3-10. Agricultural Development Standards ◼Table 3-11. Sign Requirements ◼Section 3.7.3. Ag Heritage Facility and Learning Center Design Guidelines ◼Section 3.8. Architectural Style Reference Guide ◼Section 3.9. Plant Palette 29 Consistency with City Regulations ◼Building height and setbacks are consistent with AG zone of the SLRSP ◼Project consistent with the intent of the Community Design Guidelines ◼Signage concept appears consistent; City staff to review formal sign program ◼Plant palette generally consistent, but not all plants are on the SLRSP plant list 30 Discussion Items ◼Key Issues for Discussion ◼Is design consistent with SLRSP and other city requirements? ◼Are there other design features that would improve the project? 31 Recommendation/Next Steps ◼If ARC recommends approval to the Planning Commission, this could be done with or without conditions or further guidance ◼Planning Commission to consider project approval based on ARC recommendations 32 Comments and Questions 33 Applicant Presentation By: Scott Martin Randall Russom Jacob Grossman Rachel Kovesdi Item #4b PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 1035 Madonna (ARCH-0253-2021) CREATING ENVIRONMENT S PEOPLE ENJOY® rrmdesign.com SAN LUIS RANCH AG HERITAGE CENTER ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 2021 AGENDA Site Overview Architectural theme Historic Guidance Building Design Landscape concept Details Next Steps SITE PLAN SAN LUIS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN HAY BARN ARCHITECTURAL THEME HISTORICAL GUIDANCE: The Wood Residence, viewing barn, racetrack, et.. BUILDING DESIGN Agrarian nature Engaging at Pedestrian level Derived from traditional forms Functional and aesthetically appropriate BUILDING DESIGN ▪Iconic from the freeway ▪Flexible interior space ▪Relationship to Ag Fields RETAIL AND HISTORIC BARN •Clearly differentiate the historic from the new •Recreate Massing/scale •Preserve Materials EXTERIOR •Corrugated metal roof planes •Large-dimension vertical wood siding •Siding applied in “units” •Doorways and door systems •Weathered whitewash and lichen INTERIOR •Voluminous •Filtered light •Partitioning •Hay fork track •Structural system GRANDSTAND WALL HAY BARN THE CONCEPT RELATIONSHIP TO THE TRACK GRANDSTAND WALL HAY BARN CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES EXTERIOR •Roofline •Siding •Porch •Windows INTERIOR •Woodwork •Floor plan •Brick masonry fireplace •Cabinetry •Leaded glass •Finger pulls •Light fixtures GATHERING SPACE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT Details and Signs Details and Signs THANK YOU QUESTIONS? PUBLIC COMMENT •If you would like to speak on this item,please raise your virtual hand. •When your name is called,you will be moved to a Panelist. •Before you begin speaking,unmute your mic and turn on your video. Please state your name and address (optional)for the record. •After you complete your comments, you will be moved back to an Attendee. Public Comment Item #5 COMMENT & DISCUSSION 5.Staff Updates and Agenda Forecast Senior Planner Shawna Scott will provide an update of upcoming projects and the agenda forecast. ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission has been rescheduled to Monday, October 4, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. via teleconference The Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission will resume shortly *Recess in Progress*