The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-04-2021 ARC PresentationsArchitectural Review Commission Regular Meeting October 4, 2021 •All attendees enter the meeting muted. •You can rename yourself by following the steps below. •When Public Comment is called for an item you would like to speak on,please raise your virtual hand. •When your name is called,you will be moved to a Panelist.After a brief moment,you will be able to unmute your mic and turn on your video (optional). •Please state your first and last name and address (optional)for the record. •After providing your comments you will be moved back to an Attendee. Directions for Public Comment PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA •If you would like to speak on items NOT ON THE AGENDA,please raise your virtual hand. •When your name is called,you will be moved to a Panelist. •Before you begin speaking,unmute your mic and turn on your video. Please state your First and Last name and address (optional)for the record. •After you complete your comments, you will be moved back to an Attendee. Public Comment At this time,people may address the Commission on items not on the agenda. Items raised are generally referred to staff and,if action by the Commission is necessary,may be scheduled for a future meeting. Item #3a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of September 20,2021. __________________________________________________ Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of September 20,2021. Item #4a PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 600 Tank Farm Road (ARCH-0407-2021) REVIEW OF A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING 280 RESIDENTIAL UNITS,ACCESSORY USES,&12,500 SF OF COMMERCIAL/OFFICE WITH ASSOCIATED EXCEPTIONS, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT,AND REZONE Staff Presentation By: John Rickenbach, Contract Planner Recommendation: Review the proposed project in terms of its consistency with the Airport Area Specific Plan Design Guidelines,Community Design Guidelines,and provide comments and recommendations to the Planning Commission. 600 Tank Farm Road Residential Mixed-Use Project GENP-0814-2019; SPEC-0407-2020; EID-0608-2020; ARCH-0406- 2021; and SBDV-0407-2021 ARC Presentation for the 600 Tank Farm Road Project October 4, 2021 Applicant: Covelop, Inc. Representative: Stephen Peck Recommendation 6 ◼Review the proposed project in terms of its consistency with the Airport Area Specific Plan Design Guidelines, Community Design Guidelines, and provide comments and recommendations to the Planning Commission. Project Site and Location 7 Surrounding Land Uses 8 ◼North: Damon Garcia Sports Fields ◼East: Acacia Creek and mixed use residential development ◼South: Tank Farm Road and undeveloped land ◼West: undeveloped Chevron property Previous Review ◼Active Transportation Committee –July 2020 ◼Provided comment on conceptual design related to ◼bicycle and pedestrian safety ◼ARC –August 2020 ◼Provided comment on conceptual design related to ◼building orientation ◼site access ◼common open space areas ◼architectural style compatibility ◼Planning Commission –September 2020 ◼Provided comment on conceptual design related to ◼building orientation ◼mixed use compatibility ◼bicycle and pedestrian circulation ◼Proposed project reflects this input (see Attachment G) 9 Project Overview 10 ◼Development Characteristics ◼280 Residential Units ◼240 high density units ◼40 mixed use units ◼12,500 SF of commercial office space ◼11.7-acre site adjacent to Acacia Creek ◼1.0 acres of offsite transportation improvements ◼Within the Airport Area Specific Plan ◼Requested Entitlements ◼General Plan Amendment (to change land use designation) ◼Rezone (BP to C-S) ◼Specific Plan Amendment (AASP text amendments) ◼Major Development Review (26 new structures) ◼Tentative Parcel Map (11 lots and 280 condominiums) Proposed Site Plan 11 Project Phasing 12 Building Types ◼Residential Buildings ◼24 buildings ◼Four building types (“A” through “D”) ◼565-1,550 SF units (studios to 3BR units) ◼Three story buildings ◼Building heights up to 36 feet (46 feet for unoccupied area) ◼Mixed Use Buildings ◼2 buildings ◼Two building types (“E” and “F”) ◼450 and 625 SF units in Building E (studios and 1BR units) ◼12,500 SF ground floor commercial in Building E ◼2,574 SF Clubhouse in Building F 13 Proposed Development 14 Architectural Style ◼Reflects previous input from ARC and Planning Commission ◼Inspired by nearby agricultural and commercial uses ◼Consistent style throughout development ◼Colors and materials consistent with architecture ◼Asphalt shingle or metal roofing ◼Board and batten siding ◼Predominantly grays, black and white ◼Mixed use buildings include some brick and wood siding 15 Building Elevations 16 Building Elevations 17 Building Elevations 18 Building Elevations 19 Building Elevations 20 Building Elevations 21 Requested Design Exceptions 22 ◼Parking reduction (6.8% less than required) ◼Ground floor residential along Santa Fe Road ◼Encroachment of Buildings 14 & 21 into the 35-foot creek/riparian setback ◼No additional third floor creek setback Consistency with Regulatory Framework 23 ◼Community Design Guidelines ◼Airport Area Specific Plan ◼Staff concludes the project is consistent with these documents Discussion Items ◼General Items ◼Are the proposed site design and building designs consistent with AASP and CDG requirements? ◼Is architectural style, colors, and materials consistent with previous direction? ◼Are there other design features necessary to ensure substantial conformance with key requirements? 24 Discussion Items ◼Architecture and Site Design ◼Is the architecture appropriate and consistent with previous ARC direction? ◼Are the buildings sufficiently functional and attractive for residents of the buildings? ◼Is the proposed density of housing within the buildings an appropriate design because other city goals with respect to providing sufficient housing are more achievable with such a design? 25 Discussion Items ◼Architecture and Site Design ◼Does the project appropriately orient to the two adjacent major streets such that the primary entrance from Santa Fe Road is obvious and easy to read? ◼Is the visual analysis provided sufficient to determine whether proposed development would maintain hillside views from public roadways? ◼Does the project provide for sufficiently unobtrusive trash and storage areas? 26 Discussion Items ◼Parking Design ◼Is the parking design functional, efficient and attractive? ◼Does the shared parking concept “work” for project residents in the mixed use building? ◼Is the proposed parking design appropriate, or should more covered parking be required? 27 Discussion Items ◼Pedestrian Circulation ◼Is the mixed use building sufficiently integrated into the rest of the development to allow for easy onsite pedestrian connection? ◼Does the project provide sufficient pedestrian orientation or connectivity to open space areas? 28 Next Steps ◼ARC recommendations will be forwarded the Planning Commission for consideration ◼Planning Commission hearing tentatively scheduled for November 17, 2021 ◼Planning Commission recommendations will be forwarded to City Council for possible approval in early 2022 29 Questions and Comments 30 Applicant Presentation By: Scott Martin Damien Mavis Item #4a PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 600 Tank Farm Road (ARCH-0407-2021) CREATING ENVIRONMENT S PEOPLE ENJOY® rrmdesign.com 600 TANK FARM MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTRAL REVIEW HEARING OCTOBER 2021 MAJOR CITY GOALS HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS In order to expand housing options for all, continue to facilitate the production of housing, including the necessary supporting infrastructure, with an emphasis on affordable and workforce housing. Collaborate with local non-profit partners and the county, the state, and federal governments to discover and implement comprehensive and effective strategies to reduce chronic homelessness CLIMATE ACTION, OPEN SPACE & SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION To proactively address the climate crisis, continue to update and implement the Climate Action Plan for carbon neutrality, including preservation and enhancement of open space and the urban forest, alternative and sustainable transportation, and planning and implementation for resilience. WHY FILLING A NEED FOR OBTAINABLE HOUSING AGENDA Conceptual Review Site Plan concept Mixed use building Residential Buildings Open space amenities The Creek Next Steps CONCEPTUAL REVIEW •Updates to Mixed use Area •More cohesive architecture throughout project •Drive isle patterning •Creek relationship SITE PLAN MIXED USE BUILDING: More cohesive to over all architectural theme •Tank farm frontage •More cohesive architecture •Private out door space •Materials and details RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS STACKED FLATS •Roofline •Siding •Porch •Windows REAR OF SITE STACKED FLATS / TOWNHOMES •Roofline •Siding •Porch/Decks •Windows THE CLUBHOUSE MATERIALS AND DETAILS OPEN SPACE PLANT PALETTE THE CREEK BUILDING SETBACK AND AMINITIES THANK YOU QUESTIONS? PUBLIC COMMENT •If you would like to speak on this item,please raise your virtual hand. •When your name is called,you will be moved to a Panelist. •Before you begin speaking,unmute your mic and turn on your video. Please state your name and address (optional)for the record. •After you complete your comments, you will be moved back to an Attendee. Public Comment Item #4b PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 130 High Street (ARCH-0535-2021) REVIEW OF A 1,813-SF WAREHOUSE ADDITION AND ADDITION OF AN AMMONIA DIFFUSION TANK,RECEIVER TANK,AND COOLING TOWER TO THE EXISTING 3,743-SF GLACIER ICE WAREHOUSE FACILITY Staff Presentation By: Kyle Van Leeuwen, Associate Planner Recommendation: Review the proposed project in terms of consistency with the Community Design Guidelines (CDG)and applicable City Standards and provide comments and recommendations to the Community Development Director. 130 High Street ARCH-0535-2021 REVIEW OF A 1,813-SF WAREHOUSE ADDITION AND ADDITION OF AN AMMONIA DIFFUSION TANK, RECEIVER TANK, AND COOLING TOWER TO THE EXISTING 3,743-SF GLACIER ICE WAREHOUSE FACILITY. October 4, 2021 Applicant: Tony Horzen Focus of Review 50 ARC review due to: ◼Addition to Existing Commercial Structure ARC Purview: ◼Review the project in terms of its consistency with the Community Design Guidelines, and applicable City standards ◼Provide comments and recommendations to the Community Development Director for final action Context Map 130 High Street Project Description 52 ◼Addition to Existing Commercial Warehouse Structure ▪Existing 3,743-square foot Glacier Ice warehouse ▪Addition of 1,813 square feet (enclosed structure) ▪Addition of ammonia diffusion tank, receiver tank, and cooling tower (exterior) ▪31 Feet –Maximum Height ▪Site improvements Building/Site Design 54 ◼The proposed structure is contemporary in character ◼The proposed project includes raised concrete foundations, vertical and horizontal metal wall panels ◼Colors: Grey & Blue ◼Tanks and cooling tower to facilitate ice production ◼New trash enclosure Recommendation/Next Steps Provided a recommendation to the Community Development Director as to the project's consistency with the Community Design Guidelines Applicant Presentation By: Item #4b PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 130 High Street (ARCH-0535-2021) PUBLIC COMMENT •If you would like to speak on this item,please raise your virtual hand. •When your name is called,you will be moved to a Panelist. •Before you begin speaking,unmute your mic and turn on your video. Please state your name and address (optional)for the record. •After you complete your comments, you will be moved back to an Attendee. Public Comment Item #5 COMMENT & DISCUSSION 5.Staff Updates and Agenda Forecast Senior Planner Shawna Scott will provide an update of upcoming projects and the agenda forecast. ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission is scheduled for Monday, October 18, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. via teleconference The Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission will resume shortly *Recess in Progress*