Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/19/2021 Item 7a, Schmidt Delgado, Adriana From:Richard Schmidt <slobuild@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, October To:E-mail Council Website Subject:Agenda Correspondence Night Use general comment This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Oct. 18, 2021 Dear Council Members, The earth and life on it teeter in the balance. Humans have become so adept at manipulating the earth for their own pleasure and convenience that calamity awaits. No, I’m not talking about the climate catastrophe caused by GHG releases. That is common physics, we all acknowledge it, and yet we as a city can figure out little more to do than tilting at windmills. Meanwhile, despite the verbal histrionics of politicians the city continues business as usual (tree cutting, huge unnecessary carbon-releasing municipal construction projects that lock us into more of the same in the future, designing a city that locks in vehicular traffic as the best transportation, failing to mandate buildings that capture “free” energy and don’t need to be grid dependent for everything, etc.). Lost in all of this is the extinction crisis – the vast destruction of life on earth due to our callous disregard for others. With the future of millions of species hanging in the balance, the City Council can be on the right side of history, or it can be part of the problem. The permanent implementation of night use of San Luis Mountain is part of the problem – one silly little human indulgence that kills other species for no good reason. The project’s Environmental Review would have you believe that local extinctions don’t matter. But they do. Every habitat degradation, every local extinction matters. What is global extinction if not the sum of local extinctions? Is the convenience of a few selfish people wanting night use legitimate justification for extinction? 1 I think the answer is obvious. I hope it is equally obvious to you. Be on the right side of history and kill this project. Thank you. Richard Schmidt 2