HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6a. Introduce an Ordinance to amend the Parking Permit Program for Commercial Properties Item 6a
Department: Public Works
Cost Center: 5101
For Agenda of: 1/11/2022
Placement: Public Hearing
Estimated Time: 60 Minutes
FROM: Matt Horn, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Alexander Fuchs, Parking Services Supervisor
SUBJECT: INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY’S PARKING
PERMIT PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
RECOMMENDATION
Introduce an Ordinance entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California, amending Title 10, Chapter 36 (Stopping, Standing and Parking for
Certain Purposes or in Certain Places), of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code” to revise
the City's parking permit program allowing for the formation of preferential permit parking
districts in commercial areas to address on-street parking impacts in those areas.
DISCUSSION
Background
The California Vehicle Code and the City’s Municipal Code provide the necessary
authority for the City to manage parking in public rights of way. The City uses a system
of on-street parking, parking lots and parking structures to provide parking to the
community. The City also restricts on-street parking in areas where no parking is allowed,
limit time parking is allowed, and preferential parking is allowe d. Preferential parking is
provided in the form of parking districts and is currently limited to areas that are
predominately residential. This report provides a recommendation to Council to expand
these preferential parking areas to include predominately commercial areas and provides
staff the tools necessary to manage parking in these areas.
The City’s Access and Parking Management Plan (APMP), last updated in 2011, provides
the City the guiding principles, policies, and direction for parking in the City. The City is
scheduled to release a Request for Proposals in February 2022 to update the APMP.
Implementation of preferential parking district in commercial areas now will allow the City
to manage emergent needs in commercial areas as the updated APMP is developed.
The updated APMP will benefit from actual experience with commercial parking districts
and recommendations for preferential parking districts refined with this plan that address
residential areas, commercial areas, and those areas that function as a transition between
residential to commercials areas.
Page 227 of 466
Item 6a
Parking District Historical Overview
The first parking permit district was established in 1979 in what is referred to as the Alta
Vista Parking District near the southern boundary of the Cal Poly campus. The purpose
of the district was to limit the parking of vehicles not associated with or conducting
business at properties in the neighborhood and to improve the overall ‘quality of life’ for
the residents. Since then, the City has established ten additional parking districts,
expanded existing districts multiple times, and received requests to establish many more.
Parking districts historically have been limited to areas that are predominately residential
and participation is restricted to residential properties.
In the Spring of 2021, staff began to receive requests from business owners to establish
a parking district in a non-residential area located along and near South Higuera, Tank
Farm, and Suburban Road area. These businesses were being faced with limited parking
on City streets and an overabundance of dumping in the area. Vehicles, trailers,
equipment, and other items were beginning to be stored in the area with no regard to the
business that were trying to operate in the area and provide parking for custome rs and
employees alike. After meeting with stakeholders, Staff determined the best path forward
was to develop a commercial parking district to address these issues.
Establishment of a district in nonresidential areas is not possible without amending the
City’s Municipal Code but it is within the City’s authority in compliance with the California
Vehicle Code section 22507. The allowance of commercial parking districts is a means
to address the immediate needs of our community while the Parking program works
towards updating the APMP which will provide best practices to address these types of
issues as they arise. Staff will also be returning in March to address parking issues where
residential and commercial areas intersect, like the Dana Street Residential Parking
District, and will ensure that any adjustments to accommodate commercial properties
does not significantly impact parking for residential properties.
Why allow businesses to participate in the district formation process?
The City is encouraging the construction of more mixed-use developments that makes
implementation of traditional residential only parking districts difficult and parking
invariably spills into commercial parking districts, creating parking management issues.
Additionally, commercial areas throughout the City are now starting to experience a
significant increase in parking demand from persons not working or residing in the area.
Allowing businesses to participate in the process creates a more comprehensive program
and improves the City’s ability to address parking issues for all community members.
Page 228 of 466
Item 6a
Preferential Parking Permit Areas Needed
The City’s current municipal code requires (u nless amended by City Council with this
report) that properties that participate in parking districts be residential in nature and be
limited to two (2) parking permits regardless of the districts’ parking capacity or the
residential properties’ needs. The limit of two parking permits per residential property
does not allow for the formation of a preferential parking permit area in a
commercial/business area due to the number of employees and customers that would
need access to a parking permit and the restriction to residential uses.
It is important to note that the proposed language does not differentiate between
commercial properties that have off -street parking versus those that do not have off -street
parking. Restricting business participation to only those properties that do not have off -
street parking could impact commercial properties’ ability to conduct business and the
City’s ability to implement commercial parking districts in areas that are experiencing
significant on-street parking impacts from people that do not work or have business to
conduct in the area.
As proposed with this report, commercial properties are recommended to be issued
parking permits based upon the individual needs of each property within the preferential
parking permit area boundaries as approved by the Public Works Director or their
designee.
Amendments to the Municipal Code
Staff reviewed Municipal Code Sections 10.36.170 through 10.36.232 and recommends
language changes that would allow for the creation of preferential parking permit district
in commercial areas. Existing residential districts would continue as presently formed;
however, the term ‘preferential parking permit area’ would apply to both residential and
commercial areas. The recommended Municipal Code revisions would not allow for the
formation of parking districts with commercial and residential properties mixed together.
The revisions also would not affect the number of permits issued to existing or future
residential parking permit districts. Lastly, a process must be followed engaging affected
properties, to form a preferential parking permit district.
Previous Council Action
New parking permit districts and changes to existing districts requires Council approval
via resolution while changes to the district formation process requires ordinance adoption
to amend the applicable Municipal Codes. Below are the dates of previous Council action
to amend the district formation process that have occurred over the past two decades:
1. April 16, 2002 – Council adopted an ordinance to allow greater flexibility when
considering the merits of proposed districts and increased the required resident
support to recommend establishing a district.
Page 229 of 466
Item 6a
2. September 7, 2004 – Council adopted an ordinance to address various
interpretations of specific process elements and to add clarifying language.
3. April 6, 2021 – Council adopted an ordinance to allow multi-family properties of
five to eight units on Dana Street to participate in the parking district and to receive
permits.
Policy Context
The California Vehicle Code section 22507 allows local authorities to restrict or prohibit
parking on certain streets except for permitted residents, merchants, and their guests.
The language of this Vehicle Code section has been interpreted to allow cities to establish
parking districts exclusively for residents, businesses, or both. The City currently only
allows parking districts in residential areas but has the authority to establish parking
districts in commercial areas.
Public Engagement
Staff have discussed the recommended changes with businesses in the South Higuera
area; both of which support the changes.
CONCURRENCE
The City’s Attorney’s office has reviewed the ordinance and determined that the
amendments to the applicable Municipal code sections are within the authority of the City
to enact and enforce.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply to the recommended action in
this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines
Sec. 15378.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: Ongoing
Funding Identified: N/A
Page 230 of 466
Item 6a
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing Cost
Parking Fund N/A
Total N/A
There are no direct costs associated with adoption of this ordinance. Costs associated
with the establishment or expansion of parking permit districts, under these amendments,
will be funded through the Parking Fund service rates and incorporated into the annual
budget appropriation. The Fund’s current budget can accommodate one-time and on-
going costs associated with the establishment and expansion of parking permit districts.
The Fund receives multiple requests each year and staff has included an annual b udget
for establishing districts in the non-staffing operating expenditure line items.
If the proposed Municipal Code language changes result in an abnormally high number
of district requests that cannot be accommodated within the Fund’s existing budget , then
staff will return to Council at future budget hearings or upon Council’s formation of the
district to appropriate funds from the Parking Fund’s working capital to fund the cost of
parking district formation.
Costs to implement a new parking district or expand an existing district varies based on
the size and extent of the approved district boundaries. Recently established or expanded
districts including the Dana Street Parking District, Anholm Parking District , and the
expansion of the Monterey Heights Parking District have ranged in costs from $5,400 to
$10,650 depending on the number of signs needed to properly enforce the district.
On-going costs for the annual hangtag permits run about $2.50 per permit when ordered
for all districts. The cost of permits and staff time to administer the parking district program
is largely offset by the annual permit cost of $20 per permit which accounted for $35,125
in revenue in FY2021. Staff is pursuing digital permit technology which will reduce on-
going costs and staff time to administer the program. Digital permit technology is
anticipated to be implemented by Fall 2022.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not amend the Municipal Code. Staff does not recommend this alternative since the
existing Municipal Code sections (10.36.170 et al.) which governs the City’s parking
permit district program is outdated and no longer meets the needs of the community.
Denying the amendments restricts the City’s ability to effectively manage on -street
parking in commercial areas.
Page 231 of 466
Item 6a
ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Ordinance amending the Municipal Code to amend the City’s Parking Permit
Program
Page 232 of 466
O ______
ORDINANCE NO. _____ (2022 SERIES)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 36
(STOPPING, STANDING AND PARKING FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES OR
IN CERTAIN PLACES), OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code section 22507 provides cities the authority to
restrict stopping, standing, or parking of vehicles on certain streets upon which
preferential parking privileges are given to residents and merchants adjacent to the street
for their use and the use of their guests; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo’s Municipal Code contains sections
detailing the formation process for residential parking permit districts within city limits; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that the
existing formation process is outdated, and revisions are necessary to meet the needs of
commercial and residential properties within the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 10.36.170 (designation of residential parking permit areas –
Adoption of resolution) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
10.36.170 Designation of residential preferential parking permit areas—
Adoption of resolution.
A. The council should, by resolution, designate an area of the city as a residential
preferential parking permit area if the council finds that:
1. The area is predominantly residential;
1. 2. The streets in the area are congested with vehicles parked by persons not
residing or working in the area and the designation is supported by a sixty percent
majority of the affected households addressed units as indicated by a city survey
of the affected households addressed units in which a sixty percent majority of
participating households is required; or
2. 3. Limiting the parking of vehicles along the streets in the area to vehicles
registered or controlled and exclusively used by persons residing in an area or
working in the in the area is necessary in order to preserve the character and
manage parking demand of the existing neighborhood area as defined in resident
petition and approved by a sixty percent majority of households addressed units in
the area. Households Addressed units will be determined using the city’s address
database (there may be more than one household unit per parcel) and will be
Page 233 of 466
Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 2
O ______
limited to either commercial units or residential units, including non-multifamily
units of less than five dwelling units with the exception of the residential preferential
parking permit district on Dana Street which allows for multifamily units of five to
eight dwelling units to be eligible to receive permits. This exception will be in effect
until the completion of construction of the Palm-Nipomo parking structure or until
nullified by city council action.
B. In determining whether limiting the parking of vehicles along the streets in the
area to vehicles registered to or controlled and used excl usively by persons
residing or working in the area is necessary in order to preserve the character of
the existing neighborhood area for the persons residing or working in the area, the
council shall consider the negative effect of vehicles parked by perso ns not
residing or working in the area on:
1. Environmental characteristics such as ambient noise levels and air pollution
levels;
2. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic safety in the area; and
3. The burden on persons residing or working in the area gaining access to their
residences or places of employment.
C. The council may, by resolution, designate an area of the city as a residential
preferential parking permit area after holding a public hearing and making a finding
that the establishment of the district represents the desire of a majority of the
households addressed units of the area. The hearing on any such resolution
should only be held after the council receives a request, in a form acceptable to
the council. (Ord. 1694 § 1, 2021; Ord. 1454 § 1, 2004: Ord. 1412 § 2 (part), 2002;
Ord. 1264 § 1, 1994: prior code § 3209.17)
SECTION 2. Section 10.36.180 (designation of residential parking permit areas –
Content of resolution) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
10.36.180 Designation of residential preferential parking permit areas—
Content of resolution.
The resolution designating an area of the city as a residential preferential permit
parking area shall describe the designated area in which parkin g will be limited to
vehicles displaying a parking permit issued by the public works department for that
purpose and shall set forth the hours and days, as specified by a sixty percent
majority of the households addressed units in the district, when parking will be
limited to those vehicles. (Ord. 1454 § 2, 2004: Ord. 1412 § 2 (part), 2002: Ord.
1264 § 2, 1994: prior code § 3209.18)
Page 234 of 466
Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 3
O ______
SECTION 3. Section 10.36.190 (designation of residential parking permit areas –
Sign posting) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
10.36.190 Designation of residential preferential parking permit areas—Sign
posting.
Upon adoption of a resolution by the council designating an area of the city as a
residential preferential parking permit area, the public works director Director of
Public Works or their designee(s) shall cause appropriate signs to be erected along
the streets identified in the resolution which shall give notice of the limitation on the
parking of vehicles in the area as provided in Section 10.36.170, and shall indicate
the hours and days when such limitations shall be in effect. (Ord. 1628 § 25, 2016:
prior code § 3209.19)
SECTION 4. Section 10.36.200 (Limitations on parking in a residential permit
parking area) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
10.36.200 Limitations on parking in a residential preferential permit parking
area.
It is unlawful for any person to stop, stand, or park a vehicle on any street identified
in a resolution adopted by the council designating a residential preferential permit
parking area during the hours and on the days set forth in such resolution except:
A. Those vehicles described in Section 10.36.180 displaying a valid permit issued
as provided for by Section 10.36.220 and parked within the street block in front of
the household addressed unit to which the permit is issued or within one adjoining
district block; or
B. Any emergency vehicle, including, but not limited to, an ambulance, fire engine,
or police vehicle; or
C. A vehicle with commercial plates which is under the control of a person, who
does not reside within the district, providing service for hire to property located in
the designated residential preferential permit parking area, including but not limited
to a delivery vehicle. Such vehicles cannot be parked within the area for more than
twenty-four consecutive hours; or
D. Preferential permit parking area residents participants wishing to sponsor
guests special one-day events which will exceed the number of parking permits
available may contact the city parking manager and request a temporary permit,
special-event exemption to the residential permit requirement. If the temporary
exemption is granted by the parking manager, all vehicles which have as their
destination a qualified residential permit preferential permit address, shall display
in clear view on the dashboard, written confirmation of the street address and date
Page 235 of 466
Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 4
O ______
and time of the event that the permit is valid. Further, special events Issuance of
sponsored guest permits shall be deemed infrequent occurrences and any regular
requests for parking sponsored guest permits exemption will not be authorized.
This section shall not be interpreted to allow the daily parking of vehicles. Any
vehicle not displaying the proper or authorized identification shall be subject to
citation. (Ord. 1454 § 3, 2004: Ord. 1264 § 3, 1994: prior code § 3209.20)
SECTION 5. Section 10.36.220 (Residential parking permit - Issuance) of the San
Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
10.36.220 Residential Preferential parking permit—Issuance.
The Director of Public Works, or their designee, will annually issue two preferential
parking permits to the registered property owner, or the registered property
owner’s representative, as authorized in writing, of each residential property shown
with a unique number on the latest county of San Luis Obispo assessment roll
within each residential preferential parking permit area established by resolution
as set forth in Section 10.36.180. Qualified households parcels that have multiple,
separate dwelling addressed units shall be eligible for additional to receive permits
for each addressed unit, providing the total number of permits issued to one parcel
does not exceed twice the number of residential dwelling units on the parcel. All
parking permits may be picked up in person at the office of the city parking
manager or will be mailed to the address of the property on written request of the
property owner.
The Director of Public Works, or their designee, will annually, issue any number of
preferential parking permits requested for commercial properties, to the registered
property owner, or the registered property owner’s representative, as authorized
in writing, of each property shown with a unique number on the latest county of
San Luis Obispo assessment roll within each preferential parking permit area
established by resolution as set forth in Section 10.36.180. Qualified parcels that
have multiple, separate addressed units shall be eligible to receive permits for
each addressed unit.
All parking permits may be picked up in person at the office of the city parking
manager or will be mailed to the address of the property on written request of the
property owner.
Parking permits may be transferred by the residents occupant to any vehicle that
is to be parked on the street and will be recognized by the city, providing they are
displayed clearly. The parking permits shall be issued annually. Fees for residential
parking permits shall be established by city council resolution. The permits shall
be considered part of the residential occupancy of the property and shall be
transferred to the new occupant property owner upon sale of the residence
property or upon lease of the property. New applicants must present proof of
occupancy within the preferential parking district prior to permit issuance. (Ord.
Page 236 of 466
Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 5
O ______
1694 § 2, 2021; Ord. 1565 § 1, 2011: Ord. 1454 § 4, 2004: Ord. 1264 § 4, 1994:
prior code § 3209.21)
SECTION 6. Section 10.36.221 (Lost, stolen, or defaced permit replacement) of
the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
10.36.221 Lost, stolen, or defaced permit replacement.
Any permit lost, stolen, defaced or otherwise altered shall be deemed invalid and
a replacement permit shall be issued to the qualified property owner for a fee of
twenty dollars. If the replacement permit is again lost, stolen, or defaced, a
replacement permit will be issued for an additional fee of thirty dollars. No
additional replacement permits shall be issued within a twelve-month period. All
permits shall be picked up by the property owner or a representative authorized in
writing by the registered property owner, with proof of occupancy identification, at
the office of the city parking manager. The property owner or a representative
authorized in writing by the owner shall certify that the original permit was lost,
stolen, or in the case of damaged permits shall submit the damaged permit, stating
the permit shall be used by qualified residents occupants and their bona fide
visitors.
Any resident occupant and/or property owner found to misrepresent themselves
for the purposes of fraudulently obtaining residential preferential parking permits
shall lose their right to said permits and no permits will be issued to the household
until the beginning of the next permit year and shall be guilty of an infraction. (Ord.
1694 § 3, 2021; Ord. 1454 § 5, 2004: Ord. 1264 § 5, 1994)
SECTION 7. Section 10.36.230 (Residential parking permits – Display required)
of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
10.36.230 Residential Preferential parking permits—Display required.
Parking permits issued under Section 10.36.220 shall be displayed on a vehicle in
a manner prescribed by the director of public works Director of Public Works. The
method of display shall be clearly stated on the rear of the permit. (Ord. 1264 §
6,1994: prior code § 3209.23)
SECTION 8. Section 10.36.232 (Enforcement) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
10.36.232 Enforcement.
Enforcement of the residential preferential parking permit district shall be on a
regular and routine basis, and may be on a complaint basis by residents occupants
within the district boundaries. Enforcement personnel shall be dispatched on an
as-available basis as determined by the city parking manager/police department.
All parking citations issued for noncompliance with the parking permit requirement
shall be governed by the civil proceedings set forth in the California Vehicle Code.
(Ord. 1412 § 2 (part), 2002: Ord. 1264 § 7, 1994)
Page 237 of 466
Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 6
O ______
SECTION 9. Severability. If any subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or
phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unenforceable by a co urt
of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or
enforcement of the remaining portions of this ordinance, or any other provisions of the
city' s rules and regulations. It is the city' s express intent that each remaining portion
would have been adopted irrespective of the fact that any one or more subdivisions,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unenforceable.
SECTION 10. Environmental determination. These amendments to Title 10
Chapter 36 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code do not constitute a “Project”
under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378.
SECTION 11. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council
members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final
passage, in The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This
ordinance shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage.
INTRODUCED on the ____ day of ____, 2022, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the
Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the ____ day of ____, 20 22, on the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
__________________________
Teresa Purrington, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
J. Christine Dietrick, City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________.
___________________________
Teresa Purrington, City Clerk
Page 238 of 466
INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY’S PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
RecommendationIntroduce an Ordinance entitled, “An Ordinance of the CityCouncil of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, amendingTitle 10, Chapter 36 (Stopping, Standing and Parking forCertain Purposes or in Certain Places), of the San Luis ObispoMunicipal Code” to revise the City's parking permit programallowing for the formation of preferential permit parkingdistricts in commercial areas to address on-street parkingimpacts in those areas.
WHY ARE WE HERE TODAY?
WHY ARE WE NOTHERE TODAY?
2 permits issued per addressed unit no exceptionsCURRENT PARKING DISTRICT PROGRAM ELEMENTS
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAL CODEBusiness Participation in the District Formation ProcessIssue Permits Directly to Occupants of Business DistrictsIssue Permits Based on Businesses’ Individual Needs
BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN THE DISTRICT FORMATION PROCESSTheCity has received requests to establish a ParkingPermit District in a non-residential area.Currently the Municipal Code only allows the creation of parking districtsin predominately residential areas.Per Vehicle Code §22507, theCity has the authority to establishParking Districts in commercial areas.Improves the City’s ability to address parking issues for the community.
ISSUE PERMITS DIRECTLY TO TENANTS OF BUSINESSES Currently, the voting to establish a parkingdistrict is done by the occupants, butpermits areissued to property owners.Tenants would be required to provideproof of occupancy(lease agreement, utility bill, etc.) before purchasing permits.Residential parking districtswould notbe affected by theproposed change.
PERMITS ISSUED BASED ON BUSINESSES’ NEEDSAllow for the issuance of parking permits tobusinessesbased upon their individual needs.Permit issuance based upon need is necessary in order tomanage commercial parking areaswithout adverselyaffecting businesses’operations.The number of permits issued to existing parking districtresidentswould notchange.
WHAT WOULD REMAIN THE SAMETherecommended amendments do not affect existing orfuture residential parking districts.Multi-family properties of greater than 4 units would still notbe allowed to participate in the district formation process.Forming, modifying, and dissolvingparking districts wouldstill require +60% support from responding occupants.
RecommendationIntroduce an Ordinance entitled, “An Ordinance of the CityCouncil of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, amendingTitle 10, Chapter 36 (Stopping, Standing and Parking forCertain Purposes or in Certain Places), of the San Luis ObispoMunicipal Code” to revise the City's parking permit programallowing for the formation of preferential permit parkingdistricts in commercial areas to address on-street parkingimpacts in those areas.
Questions
1010 Marsh St., San Luis Obisp,
(805) 546-8208 . FAX (805)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Luis Obispo,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of
eighteen years, and not a party interested in the
above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk
of the printer of the New Times, a newspaper
of general circulation, printed and published
weekly in the City of San Luis Obispo, County
of San Luis Obispo, and which has been
adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California, under the date of
February 5, 1993, Case number CV72789: that
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy
(set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to -wit:
—D-e,ae.K cc 30
in the year 2021.
I certify (or declare) under the the penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at San Luis Obispo, Calif rnia, this day
of Qa4fM'��l�, Xr 2021.
va &:_ 14ZZ�
Patricia Horton, New Times Legals
Proof of I
s; SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
IW NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The San Luis Obispo City Council invites all interested persons
to attend a public hearing on Tuesday. January 11, 202Z in 690
p.m. held via tele"Afiro rice. Pursuant to Executive Orders
N-60-M and N-08-21 executed by the Governor of California,
and subsequently Assembly Bill 361, enacted in response to the
sUte of emergency relating to novel coronavous disease 2019
(COVID-19) and enabling teleconferencing accommodations
by suspending or waiving specified provisions in the Ralph
M. Brown Act fGowooment Code § 54950 at seq.), Council
Members and the public may participate in tons meeting by
teleconference. Meetings can be viewed on Government
Access Channel 2D or streamed live boom the Curs YouTube
channel at h[1pV/youlube.clo.city. Public comment prior to the
.an of the meeting, may be submitted in writing vid U.S. Mail
delivered to the CM Clerk's office at 99n Palm Street San Luis
Obispo, CA 93QI or by email to ann icouni lsislit itv
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
• The CM Council will consider adopting a Resolution to uphold
the Planning Commission's decision be uphold the Community
Development Directors decision to deny a requested setback
reduction for a Property located at 1953 Choon Street Denial
of a reduction in Setback Standards is net subject to the
California Enalude mail Dan* Act (CEGA), as descrbed in
CEOA Guidelines§ ISM 'Projects Which Are Disappmved'
11953 them Street APPL-0512-2021).
Farmore information, you are invited [o contact Walter Disney
order City's Community DevelopmentDapammeM at
(805)781-75Aiar by email at weetajok2sloeftep
• A Public Hearing to review a Common Interest Vesting
Tentative Tract Map (VITM No. 3136) for a 192-i n t Mixw-
Use Development Project 93581113584 Bullock Lane, including
7 Live/Work Units, a 50bsgwm [am Commercial Unit on -
she parking, and other residential community amenities on
a 10.M3 acre site located within the 231-acre Onat Area
Specific Plan, a rec onto allow live/work units on the ground
floor within the first 50 het of floor area measured from
the building face adjacent to a street a Sign Program, the
summary abandonment of 30 feet offer of dedication for public
street and u[ilhy purposes. The project also includes review
of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project underthe
Caltomia Environmema]DualhyAct (CEDA((358VJW Bullock
Lane,ARCH-LH89-2019, SBDV`Dd9U2019, EID-0345-M).
For more information, you are invited to contact Rachel Cohen
of the Cif y's Community Development Department at
(8051781-7574 arbyemaila[ mahavogisjoix,
• As recommended by the Cultural Heritage Committee, the
City Council will consider adopting a Resolution to add the
property located at 211 Charm Street to the Master List
of Historic Resources as •The Muller-Noggle House and
Garage." This project is categorically exempt from the
provisions ofthe California Environmental Quality Act (CE13A).
Inclusion of the subject property on the city's Inventory of
Historic Resources does not have the potential for causing
a significant effect on the environment and is covered by the
general rule described in fl51)(11b)(3) older CEGA Guidelines
(211 Chorro Street, HIST-O608-20211.
For more information, you are invited to caMeet Walter Derrell
of the City's Community Development Department at
(805)781-7593 or by email at woepeloclo dv
• A Public Hearing to introduce an Ordinance to amend This
10 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 10.36 ]Stopping, Standing
and Parking for Certain Purposes or in Certain Places],
of the Municipal Code to revise the City's Parking Permit
Program. This amendment will allow commercial properties
to participate in the parking district formation process.
For more information, you are earned to corhtactAlawmater
Fuchs of the City's Parking Division atf 195)781-7553
or by email at aftechwitfmgre,v
the City Council may also discuss other hearings or business
tams before or after the hems listed above. If you challenge
he proposed project in court, you may be limbed to raising only
hose issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
]ascribed in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
o the Crry Council at or priorto, the public hearing.
;mncil Agenda Reports for this meeting will be available for
eview in the City Clerk's Office and online at wwwslorm ore
tna week in advance of the meeting date. Please call the
:iffy Clerk's Office at (805) 781-7100 for more information. The
:dY Council meeting will be televised live on Charter Cable
:hannel 20 and live streaming on the City's YouTube channel
rtmsl/ uWb 1 rtv.
AJ,N„ x n«,,.,,x/-N rAC Ad — IN Mc o1emraUSINFssr Posit. I December 30, 2021