HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-26-13SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
Council Chamber
City Hall - 990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
June 26, 2013 Wednesday 6:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Commissioners John Fowler, John Larson, Michael Multari, Airlin
Singewald, Charles Stevenson, Vice -Chairperson Eric Meyer, and
Chairperson Michael Draze
ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: Commissioners or staff may modify the order of items.
MINUTES: Minutes of June 13, 2013, Approve or amend.
PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Commission about items
not on the agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their
name and address. Comments are limited to five minutes per person. Items raised at
this time are generally referred to staff and, if action by the Commission is necessary,
may be scheduled for a future meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
NOTE: Any court challenge to the action taken on public hearing items on this agenda
may be limited to considering only those issues raised at the public hearing or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of San Luis Obispo at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
Any decision of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed to the City Council
within 10 days of the action (Recommendations to the City Council cannot be appealed
since they are not a final action.). Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Commission
may file an appeal with the City Clerk. Appeal forms are available in the Community
Development Department, City Clerk's office, or on the City's website (www.slocity.org).
The fee for filing an appeal is $268 and must accompany the appeal documentation.
If you wish to speak, please give your name and address for the record. Please limit
your comments to three minutes; consultant and project presentations limited to six
minutes.
1. City -Wide. GPI/ER 45-13: Review of proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning
Regulations — Safe Parking Ordinance) of the Municipal Code and Negative
Declaration of Environmental Impact; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Tyler
Corey)
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this
agenda will be made available for public inspection in the Community Development, 919 Palm Street,
during normal business hours.
Planning Commission Agenda
Page 2
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast
3. Commission
ADJOURNMENT
Presenting Planners: Tyler Corey
usThe City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and
activities. Please contact the City Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM # 1
BY: Tyler Corey, Housing Programs Manager DATE: June 26, 2013
FROM: Kim Murry, Deputy Director of Community Development
FILE NUMBER: GPI/ER 45-13
PROJECT ADDRESS: Citywide
SUBJECT: Review of amendments to Title 17 (Zoning Regulations — Safe Parking Ordinance)
of the Municipal Code.
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached Planning Commission resolution which recommends that the City Council
approve the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and adopt the proposed amendments
to Title 17 (Zoning Regulations — Safe Parking Ordinance) of the Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND
In recent years, RVs and automobiles have increasingly emerged as a form of shelter for persons
unable to obtain transitional or permanent housing and seeking to escape the elements. Some
people have found themselves in this position because of the economy, the scarcity of transitional
and affordable housing, and/or limited shelter beds. Strained social service resources make it
increasingly difficult to assist people who find themselves without homes and shelter. As health
and safety issues have occurred, interest has grown in a safe parking program that could help
mitigate the impacts of people living in vehicles on City streets by providing a safe place to park
and access to case management with the goal of eventual transition to permanent housing.
On March 20, 2012, the City Council authorized Community Action Partnership of San Luis
Obispo County, Inc. (CAPSLO) to operate a safe parking pilot program for up to five vehicles on
a portion of the property located at 43 Prado Road adjacent to the Prado Day Center (Attachment
1). On June 22, 2012, CAPSLO initiated the pilot program that provides homeless persons with
vehicles a safe place to temporarily park with the goal of eventually transitioning them into
permanent housing. Based on reports from CAPSLO and the Police Department, the program is
accomplishing its goal of providing a safe place for those living in their vehicles to sleep while
working towards transitioning into permanent housing.
On October 2, 2012, Council received a presentation on CAPSLO's safe parking pilot program,
including its operations, participant success, and lessons learned through the initial months of
operation. At that meeting, Council extended the pilot program for an additional six month
period and directed staff to develop amendments to the Municipal Code to allow safe parking
facilities at compatible locations (Attachments 2 & 3).
DISCUSSION
The City's Municipal Code prohibits people from sleeping in vehicles on both private and public
(i.e. streets) property. The proposed amendments would allow safe parking facilities on private
property in certain zoning districts subject to performance standards and permit requirements
GPI/ER 45-13 (Safe Parking Ordinance)
Page 2
(Attachment 4). These standards and requirements are intended to erasure that safe parking
facilities are compatible with surrounding uses and effective at facilitating participants' transition
to permanent housing.
Consistency with 10-Year Plan
The 10-Year Plan lays out a vision that focuses on ensuring that everyone has access to affordable
housing. The proposed amendments are consistent with and implement Strategy 1.2 of the 10-
Year Plan. This strategy seeks to increase the supply of short-term "interim" and transitional
housing as a supplement, and not an alternative, to permanent supportive housing. Perinanent
housing should be provided "first" when possible and appropriate to the individual's needs, and
interim and transitional housing should be used only as a stop gap measure for those in housing
crisis. Interim housing should be linked with the community services centers and structured so
that it connects clients with support services and a case management plan to help them rn. ove
toward greater stability.
Implementation of the 10-Year Plan will close gaps in the continuum of care for homeless
individuals and families and will link and improve the use of limited finding resources to
achieve the plan goal of ending homelessness. The homeless Services Oversight Council
(HSOC) supports the establishment of safe parking programs for homeless in the County
(Attachment 6).
Case Studies and Safe Parking Ordinance
In an effort to review best practices and lessons learned regarding safe parking programs, staff
researched programs currently operating in the City/County of Santa Barbara, City of Ventura
and City of San Diego. Staff contacted both the social service providers and jurisdictions to
solicit specific input on what to consider in a local program, what to avoid, and how to craft a
program with the best chances of success. The table below provides details of these operating
programs and a comparison of key program elements with the Draft Ordinance.
GPI/ER 45-13 (Safe ]Parking Ordinance)
Page 3
1 Number of vehicles allowed at each safe parking facility location would be determined by the Planning
Commission as part of the Use Permit review process on a case -by -case basis.
2 Social service providers shall give preference to those with proof of residency in San Luis Obispo County for a
minimum period of six months within the last two years.
3 Evidence of residency may include, but not limited to, items such as rental agreements, mortgage, utility, hotel and
medical facility bills, paystubs and intake from homeless service programs.
4 vehicle requirements include current registration, insurance and license.
s Prospective participants shall submit to a criminal history background check. Participant exclusion shall be
determined by the social service provider on a case -by -case basis.
Public Outreach
The City contracted with Flint Strategies to provide assistance in the development of a public
engagement plan and to identify key audiences for the public outreach process. The outreach
summary is included as Attachment 7. The primary goals of the Safe Parking Ordinance outreach
effort were to:
1) Actively engage the diverse populations of the City in the discussions about a Safe
Parking Ordinance and how safe parking facilities should be operated, located and
managed.
2) Educate residents about the background and purpose of the Ordinance.
3) Ensure that all affected stakeholders including those representing homeowners,
businesses, homeless individuals/families and social service/faith based organizations are
actively involved in the process.
Workshops and Meetings
Staff facilitated two rounds of workshops and meetings (total of 12); the first in the fall of 2012
and the second in the spring of 2013. The first round was focused on gathering community input
on how safe parking facilities should be operated, located and managed. The second round
provided an opportunity for the community to review public input received and how it was
incorporated into the Draft Ordinance.
Online Survev
Staff conducted an online survey, which was completed by 347 people between October- and
December 2012. The survey included a series of questions regarding how safe parking facilities
should be operated, located and managed. Links were provided on the City's website and
notifications were sent to approximately 5,000 residents, business owners and local
GPI/ER 45-13 (Safe Parking Ordinance)
Page 4
organizations. The survey was also promoted via local news media with articles in The Tribune
and New Times.
Outreach Results
Staff compiled feedback received from the workshops, meetings, other correspondence and
online survey into three categories of criteria: program, location and operational. These
categories were used throughout the public outreach process for consistency. The following is an
overview of public feedback and comments received for each category, which have been
incorporated into the Draft Ordinance:
Program Criteria
• Require individualized case management
• Give preference to individuals with ties to community
• Require background checks
• Maintain drug & alcohol free environment
Location Criteria
• Require use permit to ensure compatibility
• Buffer residential areas
• Number of vehicles at each site should be compatible with surrounding neighborhood
density
• Separation between safe parking sites
• Locate sites near public transit
Operational Criteria
• Facilities managed by social service providers
• Require restroom and trash facilities
• Allow site flexibility (hours, number of vehicles, buffers)
• Develop mechanism to respond to complaints (noise, trash, etc.)
• Require monitoring and oversight (camera feeds, on -site presence, etc.)
• Ensure appropriate lighting
Human Relations Commission Action
On June 5, 2013, the Human Relations Commission, on a 6-0 vote (Simon absent) recommended
the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the proposed amendments to
Title 17 (Zoning Regulations — Safe Parking Ordinance) without modification (Attachment 5).
Staff responded to questions from the Commission regarding the proposed amendments. Six
members of the public spoke on the item, including both past and present safe parking pilot
program participants. Overall, comments received were in support of establishing a permanent
safe parking program to address the growing community need for programs providing safe
accommodations for individuals and families utilizing vehicles for temporary shelter in order to
facilitate the transition to permanent housing.
GPI/ER 45-13 (Safe Parking Ordinance)
Paize 5
Conclusion
The Draft Ordinance seeks to balance community input with the need to provide expanded
services and programs for those that want to transition into permanent housing. It incorporates
community input by establishing specific permit requirements, performance standards and use
permit considerations to ensure that safe parking facilities will be compatible with surrounding
uses and effective at facilitating participants' transition to permanent housing. The proposed
amendments are consistent with the San Luis Obispo Countywide 10-Year Plan to End
Homelessness (10-Year Plan) and further the City's 2013-15 Financial Plan Major City Goal:
"Implement Comprehensive Strategies to Address Homelessness".
ALTERNATIVES
1. The Commission may modify the proposed amendments to the Municipal Code. Specific
direction should be given to staff regarding any modifications.
2. The Commission may continue action, if more information in needed. Direction should
be given to staff regarding additional information needed to make a decision.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Council Resolution No. 10342 (2012 Series)
2. Council Resolution No. 10401 (2012 Series)
3. October 2, 2012, City Council meeting minutes
4. Text amendments (Legislative Draft)
5. HRC June 5, 2013, meeting minutes
6. HSOC Resolution
7. Outreach summary prepared by Flint Strategies
8. Letter of support from the San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce
9. Initial Study
10. Planning Commission Resolution
G:\CD-PLAN\Tcorey\LR\Safe Parking Program\Staff Reports\Safe Parking Ordinance\PC\PC Staff Report.doc
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 10342 (2012 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAWN LUIS OBI PO SUSPE NDING
ENFORCEME NT QF THE REQUIREMENTS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL
CODESECTION 17.16.015 FOR A PORTION OF 43 PRADO ROAD AND
AUTHORIZING A SAFE PARK JNG PILOT PRO GRAM AT PRADO DAY CENTER
(43 PRADO ROAD)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearinS
in the Council Chamber of City Wall, 990 Palm. Street, San Luis. Obispo, California, on March
20, 2012jor the purpose of considering a, safe parking pilot program to allow overnight sleeping
invehicles at the'Prido Day Center at 43 Prado Road; and
WHEREAS, the City's Municipal Code, 17,16,015 prohibits sleeping in vehicles except
in lawfully operated mobile home parks, travel trailer parks, or campgrounds; and
WHEREAS, there is a, growing community need for programs providing safe
accommodatioms for individuals and families utilizin S or to po ar ShO C: n order
. g vehicle f ra r y t r i o d to
facilitate the transition to permanent housing; and
WHEREAS, CAPSLO has requested to eslabil'sh a s4fe parking pilot program at the
Prado Day Center; and
WHEREAS, the established homeless services program and facilities at the Prado Day
Center is an appropriate location for a temporary, pilot program to accommodate people sleeping
invehicles overnIght as temporary shelter, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the. testimony
of the applicant, interested.parti0s, and the evaluation and reeommendations by staff, presented at
said hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, IRE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of flie City of Sate Luis
Obispo as follows -
SF,CTION 1, Figd-into, Based upon all the. evidence, the City Cotuicit makes the
following ffixdiTigs:
1. A safe parking pilot program advances a key component of the goal to provide afOrm of
trw-sstfional housing consistent with the San I'luis Obispo Countywide 10-year Plan to End
I - tome Icssness.
2, There is a growing cornrawfity need -for a safe parking pilot program for those looking
for a safe place to temporarily sleep in their vehicles while they transition to pennanent housing.
3. A pilot program will allow CAPSLO and the City to evalu.ate the success of the program
prior to deciding -whethcr to rnove forward with a long -terra City-wide program.
R 10342
2
Resol twon No, '10342 (2 012 Series)
gage
Attachment I
4. As conditioned, a safe parking pilot program within the parking area for the Prado Day.
Center'as show on Exhibit A, is a logical addition to the homeless services currently provided
and nianaggcd by CAPSLO.
SECTION 2. Cwi4Ajg9& Ihe City Council hereby authorizes the Pmdo Day Center to
operate a safe parking pilot program at 43 Prado Road in the location Specified in Exhibit A and
subject to the following conditions-
L Tbe pilot, program shall be valid only for the Prado Day Center parking, area located at 43
Prado Road and only as shown on attached Exhibit A.
2. The pilot progrmn shall be valid for a six (6) month period from the date of program
implementation,
3, The, number of vehicles glowed to participate in the pilot program shall be limited to five
(5),
4. Pilot program participants inust be enrolled :in programs to facilitate the transition to
more permanent housing and paired with a case manager,
5. Restroom facilities shall be provided by CAPSLO.
6. No drugs or alcoholmay be contained in program vehicles or possessed or consumed on
City Property,
7. No weapons or firearms of any kind may be contained in program vehicles or used or
possessed on City property at 43 Prado Road.
8. No fires of any kind shall be permitted on City property.
9. Ito music may be played that is audible outside vehicles,
10, No cooking or food preparation shall be performed outside of the participant's vehicle.
11, Cramping tarps or equipment beyond the top of the vehicle are prohibited.
12, Only one vehicle is allowed per participant or household at the site.
13, A. monitoring ul,d oversight program -Ior t
.. i shall be provided to the City pi o
con-unence-ment,of the pilot program,
14. Provide program hours,
a, Location of trash and recycling bins
b. Location of restroom facilities
C4 parking plan..
d.. Any lighting or security facilities
16. Program participants sba.14 possess a current driver's license, vehicle, registration, and
insurance for the vehicle that will be parked in the designated space. CAPSLO shall keep a copy
of aJI three on record.
17. CAPS1.0 shall provide a recognizable parking permit for vehicles registered in the
prograrn- This will assist CAPSLO staff and police officers to recognize vehicles which are
authorized to participate in the program.
18. Utilities such as water, electricity or gas shall not be connected with RVs or other
vehicles.
19. Vehicles may only be occupied by clients and approved registered household:members.
Guests shall not, be allowed,
20. Program participants and all hottschold tnembers who will be staying in vehicle must sign
an indenitti4wation and waiver inderanifying and waiving all clainis or causes of action against
the City, including relocation benefits. The City will provide a standard indemnification and
waiver forma
21. Program participants sball. keep barking dogs in their vehicles and dogs demonstrating
aggressive behavior shall not be permitted to be maintained on City property, Pets shall be kept
on a leash at all times on the property. Animal waste shall be picked up imimediatV.-ly and
disposed of properly.
22. Program participants shall corn.ply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules
and regulations,
21 Failure of program participants to follow all pro ream. rules will result in termination from
theprograrn,
24. Program rules shall be distributed to all program participants.
SECTION 3. SLj§pen§iQri of Miiniciggl Coe E-nforceni-q2t, In, order to facilitate the
operation of the pilot program, the City Council hemby suspends enforcement of Section
17A6.015 of the City of S= Luis Obispo Municipal Code prohibiting the uw of recreational
vehicle as a dwelling unit as it applies to the City property located at 43 Prado Road, as shown in
Exhibit A. Enforcement of Section 17.16.015 on this property shall be suspended only 1br such
time period - as the pilot program is authorized by the, City to operate and enforcement sball
resume at such time as the pilot prog.rain is terminated,
SECTION 4� City Manager Agthority.'Fhe, City Manager is authorimd to act on behalf
Of. the City in. executing any occasary agmemeats or other relatod actions to implement the Safe
parkingpilot pro rain at the Prado Day Center.
On motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Carter, and
cats the following Vote,:
AYES: Council penile Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Carpenter
and IMayor Marx
NON & None
ABSENT: Nonc
the foregoing resolution was pissed and adopted this i. 20:"' day of March 2012
4
May Jin Marx
ATTEST:
Elain a Cano
City Clark
APPROVED
Attomey
agp
Exhibit A
Attachment I
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION NO.,10401 (2012 Series)
A .RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN.LUIS OBISPO
EXTENDING THE; SUSPENSION OF ENFORCEMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF
SAN LU.IS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 17.16.015 AND 9.18
FOR A PORTION OF 43 PRADO ROAD
WHEREAS, on March 2.0, 2012, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
temporarily suspended enforcement of the requirements of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
Section 17.16.015 (Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit) and authorized Community Action
Partnership of San Luis Obispo County, Inc. (CAPSLO) to operate a safe shelter pilot program to
allow overnight sleeping in vehicles at the Prado Day Center at 43 Prado Road; and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2012, CAPSLO implemented a six month safe parking pilot
program for up to five vehicles at the Prado Day Center at 43 Prado Road; and
WHEREAS, on July 3, 2012, the City received a ruling Superior Court issued a ruling
granting a motion for preliminary injunction against the City's enforcement of San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code (SLMC) Section 17.16.01 S to prohibit the use of vehicles as living and sleeping
quarters on local streets; and
WHEREAS, on July 10, 2012, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopted
an emergency ordinance declaring and reaffirming the scope and intended enforcement of the
City's ordinance prohibiting the use of vehicles as living and sleeping quarters throughout the
City of San Luis Obispo and added Chapter 9.18 (Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit) of the
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code in order to ensure enforceability of vehicular occupancy
prohibitions on public streets; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2012, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
temporarily suspended enforcement of the requirements of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
Section 9.18 (Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit) to allow the safe shelter pilot program to
continue consistent with Council''s previous approval; and
WHEREAS, there is a growing community need for programs providing safe
accommodations for individuals and families utilizing vehicles for temporary shelter in order to
facilitate the transition to permanent housing; and
WHEREAS, CAPSLO has requested that the safe shelter pilot program be extended an
additional six months at 43 Prado Road; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony
of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at
said hearing.
R 10401
Attachment 2
Council Resolution No. 10401 (2012 Series)
Page 2.
NOW, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the City Council makes the
following findings:
1. Extending the safe shelter pilot program for an additional six months will advance a key
component of the goal to. provide. a form of transitional housing consistent with the San
Luis Obispo Countywide 10-year Plan to End Homelessness_
2. There is a growing commuiuty need for programs providing safe accommodations for
individuals and families utilizing vehicles for temporary shelter in. order to facilitate the
transition to permanent housing.
3. A safe shelter pilot program within the parking area for the Prado Day Center, as show
on Exhibit A, is a logical addition to the homeless services currently provided and
managed by CAPSLO.
SECTION 2. Suspqnsion of Municipal Code. Enforcement. In order to allow the
continued operation of the pilot program, the City .Council hereby suspends enforcement of
Sections 17.16,015 & 9..18. (until repealed) of the City of San. Luis Obispo Municipal Code
prohibiting the use of recreational vehicles as a dwelling unit as those sections would otherwise
apply to the City property located at 43 Prado Road, as shown in Exhibit A. Enforcement of
Sections 17.16.01 S & 9.19 on this property shall be suspended only for such time period as the
pilot program is authorized by the City to operate and enforcement shall resume at such time as
the pilot program is terminated. All conditions established by Council Resolution No. 10342
(2012 Series) shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. City Manager Authority. The City Manager is authorized to act on behalf
of the City in executing any necessary agreements or other related actions to extend the safe
shelter pilot program for an additional six months at the Prado Day Center.
Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Smith,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Carpenter
and Mayor Marx
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Attachment 2
Council Resolution.No. 10401 (2012 Series)
Page 3
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2°d day of October, 2012.
Maylza Marx
ATTEST:
1k, 4 0- �' � V�
Maeve edy Or& s
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FO
Attorney
'a'
�" sx
7
Attachment 3
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5
October 2, 2012
B2. SAFE SHELTER PILOT PROGRAM UPDATE AND DIRECTION FOR A SAFE
SHELTER PARKING ORDINANCE.
Community Development. Director Johnson and Housing Programs Manager Core
presented the report and responded to Council questions.
CAPSLO Program Manager, Dee Torres was available to participate and responded to
Council questions.
Public Comments
Donald Hedrick, San Luis Obispo, spoke regarding various needs of the homeless.
Adam Stowe, San Luis Obispo, spoke regarding the balance of human rights and public
safety. Supports this item and wants to see it expanded to other areas.
Kevin Rice, San Luis Obispo, reviewed his opinions regarding the issues. He supports
an extension and wants to see it extended to other parking lots.
Michelle Tasseff, San Luis Obispo, The Good Sam shelter in Santa Maria is a positive
example and does have rules and regulations individuals must follow. A large number
of the homeless are from outside the area and outside the state. She supports the
Prado day center; the rules and the limited numbers in the lot; she stated that more
study is needed before it is expanded.
Bill Thoma, San Luis Obispo, asked the question, how do we distribute the parking lots
through the City and put them close to services? He is in favor of continuing the
program, but doesn't want to see it expanded until further study is completed.
Courtney Kienow, San Luis Obispo, representing the Chamber of Commerce, supports
the efforts to expand the safe parking program in our community. There are difficult
challenges to overcome and is hopeful the program can be a viable solution.
Rev. Cynthia R. Eastman, San Luis Obispo, is appreciative of all the work the Council is
performiiVk on this matter.
Jason Reed, San Luis Obispo, Deputy Director at the Women's Shelter, homeless
advocate, commends the Council for their work.
---end of public comments ---
Council discussion followed. Each Council Member expressed support for this project
and appreciation of the work performed by Dee Torres and members of CAPSLO,
Council discussed suggestions for proceeding forward, including management of the
program, case management, residency requirements, background checks, prohibition of
those who have been convicted of violent crime, and possible expansion locations.
The following additional points were raised:
Council Member Carter stated the three groups are valid and need to be addressed for
their own needs. He felt it needs to be made clear to everyone what is expected of
Attachment 3
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6
October 2, 2012
people in this community, whether they live in a home or are homeless. Council
Member Ashbaucih expressed his feelings that there needs to be a range of solutions.
He stressed that we need to find a way to empower people, not just manage them.
Council Member Smith agreed with statements made by other Council Members and
stated that we have drawn a lot of homeless to our community and are now dealing with
the issues surrounding that. Vice Mayor Carpenter struggles with clumping all people in
one category. He feels CAPSLO is doing an excellent job, but cannot stretch forever.
Mayor Marx stated it would be foolish to think that expanding the safe shelter program
would solve the problem in its totality; however, this is a significant step forward.
ACTION: Motion by Council Member Ashbaugh / Council Member Smith to
1) Receive a presentation on Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo
County, Inc. (CAPSLO) safe shelter pilot parking program and Adopt Resolution
No. 10401 (2012 Series) to extend the temporary suspension of enforcement of
Municipal Code Chapters 17.16,015 & 9.18 (Recreational vehicle as dwelling
unit) at 43 Prado Road for an additional six months; and 2) Direct staff to develop
amendments to Title 17 of the Municipal Code to allow a permanent safe shelter
parking program.
Roll Call Vote: 5-0. Motion Carried.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Ashbaugh indicated that he represented the Council at the opening of
Savor the Central Coast. He also distributed reusable bags outside of grocery stores on
Saturday and Monday.
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Marx
adjourned the meeting at 9:53 p.m.
Maev"ennedyt4imes
City Clerk -
APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 11/07/12
E
Attachment 4
17.08.115 Safe Parking.
A. Purpose and Intent. Safe parking provides homeless individuals and families with vehicles a safe
glace to temporarily park overnight in order to facilitate the transition to permanent housing. The
provisions -set forth in this Section enable safe parking in certain zoning districts in the city subject to
specific performance standards and permit requirements. These standards and requirements are
intended to ensure that safe parking facilities will be compatible with surrounding uses and effective
at facilitating participants' transition to permanent housing.
B. Definitions.
1. Safe Parking. A parking program, operated on private property and managed by a social
service provider, that provides individuals and families with vehicles a safe place to park
overnight while working towards a transition to permanent housing_
2. Social Service Provider. An agency or organization licensed or supervised by any federal,
state or local health/welfare agency that participates in the federal Homeless Management
Information System (HMIS) and has demonstrated experience with the homeless population
by assisting individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and self-determination
through a comprehensive array of programs and actions.
3. Case Management. A system for arranging and coordinating care and services whereby a
case manager assesses the needs of the client and client's family and arranges coordinates
monitors, and advocates for services to meet the client's needs.
4. Self -Sufficiency Program. A program designed to assist individuals and families in meeting
their basic needs and address any substance -dependency and mental health issues so that
they do not need to rely on emergency public or private assistance.
5. Background Check. A criminal records check from a variety of public sources that would
provide information regarding an individual's possible criminal history.,
C. Permit Required.
1. Planning Commission Use Permit Required. The establishment of a safe parking use shall
require Planning_ Commission Use Permit approval where allowed, consistent with Table 9.
D. _Application Requirements. Whenever a social service provider submits a Planning Commission
Use Permit application for con
sideration, nsideration, as_a part of said application, sufficient information shall be
submitted to the Community Development Department to determine whether the proposed safe
parking facility complies with the provisions of this Section. In addition to the required Planning
Commission application checklist items, the application shall include the following:
1. Site plan indicating the location of trash and recycling facilities, restroom facilities, exterior
light fixtures, location and distances to residential properties, public transportation, and
location of designated overnight parking spaces.
2. Hours of operation.
3. Monitoring and oversight program.
4. Neighborhood relations plan.
5. Sufficient information to determine that the applicant is a social service provider that is
ualified tooperate a safe parking program.
6. Any other information the Community Development Director may determine is necessary to
ensure compliance with the provisions of this Section.
E. Performance Standards.
1. Social Service Provider. Safe parking facilities shall be managed by a qualified social
service provider, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director.
2. Case Management. Participants must be paired with a case manager and enrolled in a self-
sufficiency program to facilitate the transition to permanent housing.
Attachment 4
3. Background Check. Prospective participants shall submit to a criminal history background
check. Participant exclusion shall be determined by the social service provider on a case -by -
case basis.
4. Restroom and Trash Facilities. Restroom and trash facilities shall be provided, maintained
and accessible to participants during safe parking facility hours.
5. Residency Preference. Social service provider shall give preference to those with proof of
residency in San Luis Obispo County for a minimum period of six months within the last two
years. Evidence ofresidency may _ include, but not limited to, items such as rental
p
agreements, mortgage, utility, hotel and medical faality bills,aystubs and intake f _. rom
homeless service programs.
6. Buffer from Residential Use. Participant vehicles shall maintain a minimum buffer of 50 feet
fromany propertythat contains a residential use. Buffers greater than 5 et 0 feet may be
necessary for neighborhood compatibility, which will be determined on a case -by -case basis
as part of the Use Permit review process.
7. Authorized Vehicles Only. Social service provider shall ensure that only vehicles registered
in the program are parked overnight during program hours. A parking permit shall be
provided to all participants to be displayed in vehicle windows in a form to be approved by the
Public Works Director.
8. Participant Information. At all times, the social service provider shall maintain a roster of the
names and vehicle license numbers of each participant who is authorized to park overnight.
9. Written Agreement with Participants. Only participants. who have entered into a written
agreement with a social service provider shall be allowed to use parking spaces overnight.
The written agreement between the social service provider and participant must include, but
not limited to, the following terms and conditions:
a. Only one vehicle is allowed per participant.
b. At least one participant per vehicle shall possess a current driver's license, vehicle
registration, and insurance for the vehicle that will be parked overnight. Social
service provider shall keep a copy of all three on record.
c. Vehicles may only be occupied by participants and approved registered household
members. Guests shall not be allowed.
d. Participants shall not use or possess any drugs or alcohol either on their person or
in their vehicle.
e. Participants_ shall not use or _possess any weapons or firearms of any kind in
program vehicles.
f. No fires of any kind shall be permitted.
g. No music may be played that is audible outside participants' vehicles.
h. No cooking or food preparation shall be performed outside of the participants'
vehicles. Cooking inside vehicles is prohibited unless the vehicle was manufactured
with cooking appliances.
i. Campine tarps or equipment beyond the participant's vehicle are prohibited.
j. Participants shall maintain control of dogs. Pets shall be kept on a leash at all times
and animal waste shall be picked up immediately and disposed of properly.
k. Participants shall not dump sewage or other waste fluids or solids, deposit human
excreta outside a vehicle or park vehicles that leak excessive fluids i.e. gasoline,
transmission or radiator fluid, or engine oil).
F. Use Permit Considerations. Items to be determined by the Planning Commission as part of the Use
Permit review process on a case -by -case basis shall include, but not limited to, the following
Attachment 4
1. Number of Vehicles Allowed. The total number of vehicles allowed at each safe parking
facility location.
2. Hours of Operation. The days and hours of safe parking facility operation.
3. Separation between Facilities. Sufficient distance between existing and proposed safe
parking facilities,
4. Neighborhood Relations Plan. A neighborhood relations plan shall be provided for each
safe parking facility location to address any complaints in a timely manner.
5. Monitoring and Oversight. Monitoring and oversight shall be provided during safe parking
facility hours.
G. Revocation of a Permit. The Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission if the City
receives substantiated written complaints from any citizen, Code Enforcement Officer, or Police
Department Officer, which includes information and/or evidence supporting a conclusion that a
violation of the Use Permit, or of City ordinances or regulations applicable to the property or operation
of the facility, has occurred. At the time of Use Permit review, to ensure on -going compatibility with
surrounding uses conditions of approval may be added deleted modified or the Use Permit may be
revoked.
17.16.015 Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit.
No recreational vehicle, camper shell, automobile or similar device shall be used for living or sleeping
quarters on private property, except in a lawfully operated mobile home park, travel trailer park, eF
campground, or safe parking facility, except as provided in Section 17.08.010(C)(4) et seq. Within city
streets, areas of the public right-of-way, and city -owned parking areas, parking of vehicles for purposes of
overnight camping or sleeping is prohibited by and shall be subject to enforcement in accordance with
Chapter 10.34. (Ord. 1584 § 3, 2012: Ord. 1484 § 14, 2005: Ord. 1277 § 5, 1995).
Chapter 17.100: Definitions
SafeParking. A _parking program, operated on private property and managed by a social service
provider, that provides individuals and families with vehicles a safe place to park overnight while working
towards a transition to permanent housing.
Notes to Table 9:
13._Safe Parking. Safe parking is only allowed in the R-1, R-2, R-3 and R4 zones when accessory to a
ublic assembly -use, such as a club lodeprivate meeting hall or religious facility. Safe parking is
prohibited as a primary use in the R-1, R-2, R-3 or R-4 zones and in all applicable zoning districts on
Properties that contain residential uses as the primary use.
f CBIZUaRy 2012
TABLE 9 - USES ALLOWED BY ZONE
Attachment 4
city Of son lugs OBISPO
zoninc, Izcqutatlons
AGRICULTURE
Crop production and grazing A A I A A D D
Greenhouse, commercial PC PC
Livestock feed lot PC PC
INDUSTRY, MANUFACTURING & PROCESSING, WHOLESALING
Bakery, wholesale
A
A
PC
Furniture and fixtures manufacturing, cabinet
shop
D
A
Industrial research and development
PC
D
D
Laboratory - Medical, analytical, research,
testing
PC
A
A
A
A
Laundry, dry cleaning plant
A
A
Manufacturing - Heavy
PC
PC
Manufacturing - Light
D
A
A
Petroleum product storage and distribution
D
Photo and film processing lab
A
A
Printing and publishing
_
A
A
A
Recycling facilities - Collection and processing
facility
D
Recycling facilities - Scrap and dismantling yard
D
Recycling facilities - Small collection facility
D
D
D
A
Storage - Personal storage facility
A
A
Storage yard
D
A
Warehousing, indoor storage
A
A
PC
Wholesaling and distribution
A
A
PC
LODGING
Bed and breakfast inn
D
PC
I PC
A
A
A
Safe Parking
pC 13
PC 1
PG 3
PC 13
PC
:PC
'PC
PC
P.C.
PC
PC
PC
PC
97.08 115
Homeless shelter
PC
PC
A
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
17.08.110
Hostel
PC
PC
A
A
A
Hotel, motel
A
A
A
PC
Recreational vehicle (RV) park accessory to hotel, motel
PC
Vacation Rental
17.22.G
Key: A = Allowed D = Director's Use Permit approval required PC = Planning Commission Use Permit approval required
AID = Director's approval on ground floor, allowed on second floor or above
Note: Footnotes affecting specific land uses follow the table.
Attachment 5
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION (HRC)
MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
June 5, 2013
5:00 p.m.
990 Palm St — Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER: 5:00 PM
PRESENT: Chairperson: Hillary Trout; Vice Chairperson: Louise Matheny
Commissioners: Robert Clayton, Janet Pierucci, John Rollefson, Ronald
Tilley, Hillary Trout
ABSENT: Ivan Simon
STAFF
PRESENT: Greg Zocher, Human Resources Manager; Tyler Corey, Housing Programs
Manager
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES:
ACTION: Moved by Matheny/Pierucci to approve the minutes of May 1, 2013 as
submitted; motion carried 6:0.
PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment for items not on the agenda.
BUSINESS ITEMS
Item 1. DRAFT SAFE PARKING ORDINANCE (COREY)
Corey presented the draft ordinance and the commissioners discussed.
Public Comment was received from the following community members:
Barbara and Susan - Clients of Prado Day Center
Alicia Nowicki and Heinz Huebner - Hope's Village
Stew Jenkins - Resident
Mary Lou Zivna - CAPSLO
ACTION: Moved by Clayton/Matheny to support the draft ordinance as
presented; motion carried 6:0.
Atta
v tir r itr
. e inerdoocoWhomloss resaden has increasedIn recent
whfektr
years dite to th:e recessi nark taTnes,
'UVIi R a � xmka r .hA les residents slee�i; jn their vehicles
Attachment 7
Attachment 7
Table of Contents
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary..................................................................... 1
October 2012-May 2013 Prepared by Flint Strategies..................................................... 1
KeyAudiences................................................................................................................. 2
KeyMessages.................................................................................................................. 2
Strategies......................................................................................................................... 3
Tactics............................................................................................................................. 4
OnlineSurvey............................................................................................................... 4
Workshops................................................................................................................... 4
Business Presentations.................................................................................................. S
OutreachResults.............................................................................................................. 6
ProgramCriteria........................................................................................................... 6
LocationCriteria.......................................................................................................... 6
OperationalCriteria...................................................................................................... 7
Appendix
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies ii
Attachment 7
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary
October 2012-May 2013
Prepared by Flint Strategies for
The City of San Luis Obispo
The City of San Luis Obispo participated in the development of a County -wide regional 10-year
plan to end homelessness, Path to a Home, that laid out a vision that focuses on ensuring that
everyone has access to affordable housing. The Plan was endorsed by Council in January 2009
and is being used by the City, the County, and community partners to make appropriate decisions
regarding how best to use housing and service resources to assist those in need.
As of 2012, there were approximately 1,592 homeless in the City of San Luis Obispo. This
number includes both children and adults. Of those, approximately 20% have been identified as
people with a desire to actively participate in programs that can transition them out of
homelessness.
In February of 2012, Council approved a safe shelter pilot program at the Prado Day Center
parking lot. The idea was to try a pilot program to be managed by Community Action
Partnership of San Luis Obispo (CAPSLO) that would provide a safe place for those living in
their vehicles to sleep provided they participate in case management and take an active role in
working towards transitioning into permanent housing.
The pilot program has operated at or near capacity and has been deemed a success. On October
2, 2012, the City Council directed staff to explore the development of an ordinance that would
provide opportunities for safe parking and consider appropriate locations and management
options. The City's role is to provide appropriate zoning regulations and opportunities to
facilitate the development of these safe parking facilities.
Our outreach effort provided a framework for communitywide outreach efforts to help guide the
development of the ordinance.
The primary goals of this outreach effort were to:
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies
Attachment 7
Actively engage the diverse populations of the City in the discussions about a
Safe Parking Ordinance and how safe parking facilities should be operated,
located and managed;
Educate residents about the background and purpose of the Ordinance; and
Ensure that all affected stakeholders including those representing homeowners,
businesses, homeless individuals/families and social service/faith based
organizations are actively involved in the process.
Key Audiences
The City identified several Key Audiences that were targeted as part of this outreach effort.
Implementation of a Safe Parking Ordinance will likely come from non-profit and faith -based
organizations and social service providers. These were all key audiences for this effort. We
prepared comprehensive contact lists for all regional churches, non -profits and social services
agencies that may have had an interest in providing services.
We also worked closely with groups representing the interests of residents and businesses in the
City including Residents for Quality Neighborhoods, San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce
and the Downtown. Association.
We also contacted agencies and individuals representing the interests of the City's homeless
population. Our plan included outreach to this and other disadvantaged populations to ensure
inclusion in the process.
Finally, local news media provided a conduit to the community for information about local
issues.
Key Messages
Key Messages guided the overall tone of this outreach effort and clarify the purpose of the
Ordinance itself. Our Key Messages included:
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies 2
Attachment 7
The development of a Safe Parking Ordinance, implements strategies contained
in the Countywide 10-year Plan to end homelessness, Path to Home, to
transition homeless individuals and families into permanent housing.
The City's role is to provide appropriate zoning regulations and opportunities to
facilitate the establishment of these facilities - not manage homeless services
programs or properties directly.
The City seeks to balance the concerns of residents and businesses with the
need for homeless services for people who want to transition into permanent
housing.
The City is working collaboratively with social service providers, homeless
advocates, law enforcement and other agencies to develop an Ordinance with the
best chance of success based on research examining other programs.
Strategies
Strategies are general approaches to be used as part of the Communications Plan. Tactics, which
will be discussed later in this document, were the specific actions we took to implement the Plan
itself.
Strategies for this project included:
Leveraging existing and developing new relationships with non-profit
organizations, social service agencies and faith -based organizations that serve
homeless populations.
Leveraging partnerships with local community groups with direct interaction
with homeless, senior and youth populations that may take advantage of services.
Developing a proactive media program to educate journalists about the purpose
of the Ordinance.
is Use electronic and social media to maximize engagement opportunities.
Meetings with small groups of stakeholders representing Key Audiences.
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies 3
Attachment 7
Focusing on solutions and strategies from municipal agencies, individuals and
groups with proven success in similar programs.
Tactics
Online Survey
The City conducted an online survey, which was completed by 347 people between October
and December of 2012. Links were provided on the City's website and splash page and
notifications were sent to approximately 5,000 residents, business owners and local
organizations. The survey was also promoted via local news media with stories placed in
The Tribune and New Times.
The survey results indicated strong support for case management and drug and alcohol free
clients. The complete results are attached for your reference.
Workshops
Two rounds of workshops were held; the first in the fall of 2012 and the second in the spring
of 2013. The first round was focused on gathering community input on how safe parking
facilities should be operated, located and managed. The second round provided an
opportunity for the community to review public input received and how it was incorporated
into the Draft Ordinance.
The workshops were tailored to individual group needs to allow for broad input:
General Public
November 27, 2012 & April 15, 2013
Notification via news media, City website and eBlast to 5,000 residents. Each
attended by 30-35 people.
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies 4
Attachment 7
IM Faith -based Organizations
November 28, 2012 & April 16, 2013
Invitations to all faith based organizations in the City of San Luis Obispo and the
surrounding area. These workshops were structured as brown bag
lunch/roundtable discussions.
Social Service Providers
November 28, 2012 & April 16, 2013
Invitations to CAPSLO and Prado Day Center Board Members and other
regional social services providers. These workshops were structured as brown bag
lunch/roundtable discussions.
11 Current and Potential Program Clients (Homeless Individuals)
January 24 & April 16, 2013
This was a roundtable discussion at the Prado Day Center.
(Clients participated without CAPSLO staff to ensure that their answers, comments and
opinions would not be influenced by their case managers).
Residents for Quality Neighborhoods
February 20, 2013 & May 15, 2013
Presentation and discussion with the RQN Board members.
An additional roundtable workshop was held in the fall of 2012, our consultant and staff
met with more than a dozen individuals who identified themselves as unwilling to
participate in the program due to the requirements for case management.
Business Presentations
Representatives from the San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce and the San Luis Obispo
Downtown Association were contacted and asked to participate in this process. Both groups
preferred to meet with staff once the Draft Ordinance was developed and provide comments
at that point. Presentations for each Board and members were held as follows:
San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce
May 9, 2013
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies 5
Attachment 7
Downtown Association
May 14, 2013
Outreach Results
Public feedback and comments received from the workshops, meetings, other
correspondence and online survey were compiled into three categories of program, location
and operational. These categories were used throughout the public outreach process for
consistency. The following is an overview of the public feedback and comments received for
each category.
Program Criteria
Require individualized case management,
Give preference to individuals with ties to community,
Require background checks, and
11 Maintain drug & alcohol free environment.
Individuals currently participating in the CAPSLO Safe Parking program were the most
vocal in their support for the need for case management and an alcohol and drug free
environment. Both were considered key to their ability to successfully transition into
permanent housing.
Location Criteria
Require use permit to ensure compatibility,
Buffer residential areas,
Number of vehicles at each site should be compatible with surrounding,
neighborhood density,
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies 6
FUM . • IT i�iTWA
11 Separation between safe parking sites, and
Locate sites near public transit.
Members of the public and Residents for Quality neighborhoods expressed interest in
establishing buffers between existing and proposed sites, and residential uses. There were
also concerns expressed regarding how wide the City's notification should be when
considering a proposed site as part of the Planning Commission review.
Operational Criteria
Facilities managed by social service providers,
Require restroom and trash facilities,
Allow site flexibility (hours, number of vehicles, buffers),
Of Develop mechanism to respond to complaints (noise, trash, etc.),
Require monitoring and oversight (camera feeds, on -site presence, etc.), and
Ensure appropriate lighting.
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies 7
Attachment 7
Appendix
Safe Parking Survey Analysis Report
Safe Parking Ordinance Outreach Summary Prepared by Flint Strategies
Attachment 7
L® Safe Shelter Survey
",,tea. „ $' �,s `= °"' p n i9
v
answered question 346
skipped question 1
2. Should proof of community ties (family, previous residency etc.) be a requirement for
participants?
Response
Response
Percent
count
Yes
,
29.6%
102
No, but those with ties should
r
..�_
53.3°la
184
be given priority or preference
N o
_ `: :
17.1 %
59
Other (please specify)
18
answered question
345
skipped question
2
Other (please specify)
33
.......
answered question
339
skipped question
6
4, Should the Police Department conduct background checks to verify participant
eligibility?
Response
Response
Percent
Count
Yes
37.4%
129
Yes, on a case by case basis
48.4%
167
No
14.2%
49
answered question
345
skipped question
2
At a church or non-profit facHity
p � r�"k4pbila;''.I ., .:P �ErtE �.:d3ti ItI R.,€Hip ( €?k...E f
7�.� ®A®
��3
oe
Bn a non-resldentW area
In business/industrial areas
�,. �
49.8%
155
In government and public facility
62.1 °1°
193
areas
Other (please specify)
67
answered question
M
skipped questaora
36
5. What is your opinion of , _, Programs and what are yoideas and/ry, €
J am a student at Cal Poly
„a;;
5.3%
18
answered questiena
342
skipped question
5
Bo Please indicate your age.
Response
Response
Percent
Count
18-25
8.7%
30
26-45
34.4%
1119
46-65
37.3%
129
65+,Ex,
.;
19.7%
68
answered question
346
skipped question
1
skipped quesVon 6
Response
Response
Percent
Cunt
Employed
67.7%
235
Retired
22.2%
77
Student
4.9%
17
Currently not working
5.2%
18
answered question
347
skipped questlon
0
Attachment 8
995 Monterey `vt'eet
Sm Luis Odspo, CA
93,40 -*2
Ert itia K,,dn'�. Pre<Aen CE=S
June 3, 2013
City Council
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm St.
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Subject: City of San Luis Obispo Safe Parking Program
Dear City Council Members,
The San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce wishes to state its support for the continued development of the
City's draft Safe Parking Program ordinance.
We are pleased to hear that the current pilot program has demonstrated success in providing homeless
individuals and families that have vehicles a regulated place to temporarily park overnight, and that some
participants have moved into more permanent housing. The Chamber is in favor of key principles outlined in
the draft Safe Parking Program ordinance, including requi.renients of client case management, background
checks, an alcohol and drug -free envixonanent and a preference for prioritizing local residents for admittance
into the program, The Chamber also recommends that time limits for participation be considered as an
important requirement of the program.
We recognize that the Safe Parking Program is just one of the tools that the City has identified to help transition
individuals and families into permanent housing and we encourage further development of the program. We
do urge that any proposed expansion of the program from Prado Day Center to new sites be carefully
considered and occur with surrounding neighborhood input,
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Charlene Rosales
Director of Governmental Affairs
Cc: Derek Johnson, Community Development Director
Tyler Corey, Housing Programs Manager
Greg Zocher, Human Resources Manager
Attachment 9
city of san Luis osIspo
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
For ER # 45-13
1. Project Title:
Safe Parking Ordinance; File # ER 45-13
2, Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of San Luis Obispo
Community Development Department
919 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
3. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Rachel Cohen, Planning Intern
(805) 781-7169
4. Project Location:
Citywide, City of San Luis Obispo
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
City of San Luis Obispo
Community Development Department
919 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
6. General Plan Designation:
N/A
7. Zoning:
N/A
S. Description of the Project. (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
In recent years, RVs and automobiles have increasingly emerged as a form of shelter for persons
unable to obtain transitional or permanent housing and are seeking to escape the elements. Some
people have found themselves in this position because of the economy, the scarcity of transitional
and affordable housing, and/or limited shelter beds. Strained social service resources make it
increasingly difficult to assist people who find themselves without homes and shelter. As health
and safety issues have occurred, interest has grown in a safe parking program that could help
mitigate the impacts of people living in vehicles on City streets by providing a safe place to park
and access to case management with the goal of eventual transition to permanent housing.
The Safe Parking Ordinance provides homeless individuals and families with vehicles a place to
temporarily park overnight in order to facilitate the transition to permanent housing. The intent
of the ordinance is to allow safe parking facilities in certain zoning districts subject to specific
performance standards and permit requirements. These standards and requirements are intended
to ensure that safe parking facilities will be compatible with surrounding uses and effective at
facilitating participants' transition to permanent housing. No new construction is anticipated as a
result of the ordinance. The ordinance is consistent with the San Luis Obispo Countywide 10-
Year Plan to End Homelessness (10-Year Plan) and strategies to coordinate homeless services
and address housing and service needs. A copy of the ordinance and related text amendments are
included as Attachment 1.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings (Briefly describe the project's surroundings):
Citywide
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement.):
None
CITY OF SAN LUIS CBISPO 2 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2010
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Population / Housing
Agriculture Resources
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Public Services
Air Quality
Hydrology / Water Quality
Recreation
Biological Resources
Land Use / Planning
Transportation / Traffic
Cultural Resources
Mineral Resources
Utilities / Service Systems
Geology / Soils
Noise
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
FISH AND GAME FEES
The Department of Fish and Wildlife has reviewed the CEQA document and written no effect
X
determination request and has determined that the project will not have a potential effect on fish, wildlife,
or habitat see attached determination).
The project has potential to impact fish and wildlife resources and shall be subject to the payment of Fish
and Wildlife fees pursuant to Section 711.4 of the California Fish and Wildlife Code. This initial study has
been circulated to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for review and comment.
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
This environmental document must be submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review by one or more
State agencies (e.g. Cal Trans, California Department of Fish and Game, Department of Housing and
Community Development). The public review period shall not be less than 30 days (CEQA Guidelines
15073(a)).
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 3 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2010
DETERMINATION �To be completed by the Lead Agency):
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
X
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been
made, by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant" impact(s) or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has
been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects (1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (2) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions
or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
h, bm
Signature , 0
Printed Name
.5 / zg /
Date
Kim Murry _
Deputy Community Development Director
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2010
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained
where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive
receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well
as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must
indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant.
"Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If
there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact."
The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than
significant level (mitigation measures from Section 19, "Earlier Analysis," as described in (5) below, may be cross-
referenced).
Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier FIR or negative declaration (Section 15063 (c) (3) (D)). In this case, a brief
discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects
were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe
the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they
addressed site -specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,
where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted
should be cited in the discussion.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 5 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2010
The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significancc
issues, Discussion and Supporling lnforrnat0on Source-s
Sources
Nientially
Less Than
Less Than
1v10
Significant
Significant
Significant
hupact
ER ff 4 1 3
Issues
with
Impact
Mitigation
Urcorporated
I, AESTHETICS. Would the vroiecte -- - I
0
In
Evaluation
a)b) The project would not impact scenic vistas or damage scenic resources as the project would use existing improved
parking lots.
c)d) The project would allow vehicles to park in existing, improved parking lots for extended hours as permitted by the
ordinance. The ordinance would require that safe parking facilities receive approval of a use permit to ensure compatibility
with surrounding uses and that specific performance standards are adequately met Potential impacts related to aesthetics and
views would be addressed through the use permit review process. Any additional required lighting would be subject to the
City's Night Sky Ordinance, which includes operational and development standards that mitigate light or glare impacts to a
less than significant level.
I Conclusion: Less than significant impact.
1 2, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. Would the nroiecta _.... �
1,2
0
M
M
Evaluation
a)b)c) No impacts to agricultural resources would occur as no specific site is under consideration. Safe Parking facilities
would be located in urban areas within existing improved parking lots.
Conclusion: No ina act.
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air duality management or
air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project.
1,9,10 1 1 1 1 x
ai
x
M
X
CITY OF SAN Lws OBispo 7 BNI E I AL STUDY F-NQd9RONMEP+ TAL CHECKLOsT 2010
Issues, Discussion and Supporting hformation Sources
! Souroes
PotesAially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
hupact
�5
iSSlles
Vvith
Impact
Mitigation
Mcorporated
CITY OF SAN Luis Oeispo WTIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 201
Issues, Discussion and Supporting information Sources
Sources
Potentially
tess"Tinaii
Less Than
hVo
Significant
Significant
Sigiuficant
unl act
�� �� 13
issues
with
hnpact
Mitigation
tricorporated
X,
0
k1l
Evaluation
a) San Luis Obispo County, including the City of San Luis Obispo, is located within the Coast Range Geomorphic Province,
which extends along the coastline from central California into Oregon. This region is characterized by extensive folding,
faulting, and fracturing of variable intensity. In general, the folds and faults of this province comprise the pronounced
northwest trending ridge -valley system of the central and northern coast of California.
Under the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act, the State Geologist is required to delineate appropriately wide special
studies zones to encompass all potentially and recently -active fault traces deemed sufficiently active and well-defined as to
constitute a potential hazard to structures from surface faulting or fault creep. In San Luis Obispo County, the special Studies
Zone includes the San Andreas and Los Osos faults. The edge of this study area extends to the westerly city limit line, near
Los Osos Valley Road. According to a recently conducted geology study, the closest mapped active fault is the Los Osos
Fault, which runs in a northwest direction and is about one mile from the City's westerly boundary. Because portions of this
fault have displaced sediments within a geologically recent time (the last 10,000 years), portions of the Los Osos fault are
considered "active". Other active faults in the region include: the San Andreas, located about 30 miles to the northeast, the
Nacimiento, located approximately 12 miles to the northeast, and the San Simeon-Hosgri fault zone; located approximately 12
miles to the west.
b)c)d)e) The project would not expose people or structures to geologic hazards as Safe Parking facilities would be located
within existing improved parking lot areas.
Less than
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the prooect:
a) Create a signnfioant.hazard lQ the pubinc or`tihe envirazammwnf 340 X
3; through the routine transtivr„ use, or disposal of haardousi 11
X
a
X
0064 CITE" OF SAN Luis OBISPO NMAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 20i10.
Issues, Discussion and Supporting �nf crmation Sowces
Sources
Potentially
i.ess "Iron
Less Than
No
Signficant
Significant
Significant
Impact
ER 9 �F� ,�
Issues
with
Impact
Mitigation
lsacospos aied
QTY OF SAN Luis Oisispo 16 kTIAL STUDY ENVI ONMEIi4TAL CHECKLIST 2010
9ssues, Discussion and Supporting �nferrnation Sources
Sources
Potentially
]Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
significant
Significant
Rupact
ER -� 3
issues
'Nith
hupact
Mitigation
incoi orated
Evaluation
a)b)c)d)e)g)h)j) No impacts to water resources will occur as the project does not involve ruadifacalions to the City's policies
on water and drainage and no specific site is under consideration. In addition safe parking facilities are required to provide
access to restroom and trash facilities during hours of operation.
f) The Safe Parking ordinance requires participant vehicles to be registered and prohibits vehicles that leak excessive fluids
G,e. gasoline, transmission or radiator fluid, or engine oil).
i) Improved parking areas exist within flood zones that could be considered for Safe Parking, The ordinance requires that
applicants submit a use permit which would -evaluate the proposed site's suitability and identify potential health and safety
concerns of the site prior to issuing a permit.
Conclusion: Less than significant impact.
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proiecte
1-7
Evaluation
0
a)b)c) The Safe Parking Ordinance is consistent with the 10-Year Plan and the City's General Plan housing Element, which
contains policies and programs that support housing and service agencies whose mission it is to develop programs for the
City's homeless population. No land use and planning impacts would occur as no specific site is under consideration. Safe
Parking facilities would be located within existing improved parking lot areas.
Conclusion: No Impact.
11. IN1INERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
I
11
r
Evaluation
a)b)c) No impacts to mineral resources would occur as the project does not involve modifications to the City's policies on
mineral resources and no specific site is under consideration. Safe Parking facilities would be located within existing
improved parking lot areas.
Conclusions No impact.
12. NOISE. Would the project result in.
7
X
X
X
X
QTY GE SAN Luis CiQ9Si:,o i I hFA a AL -STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL GHECKLB T 2DI0
Issues, Discussion and Supporting �nforma-tion Sources
Sources
boteii6ally
1LessThau.
Less`llim
No
Sig iificant
Siguiflomt
Significant
Iriipact
�� ��_�
Issues
with
hupact
Mitigation
Incorporated
v
YL
a
Evaluation
a) b)c)d)e)fl Safe Parking facilities are subject to the City's Noise Ordinance and must comply with established thresholds. In
addition, the Safe Parking ordinance requires the applicant submit a neighborhood relations plan, monitoring and oversight
plan as well as meet specific performance standards to ensure Safe Parking facilities operate in compliance with City
ordinances and are compatible with surrounding uses. Implementation of the Safe Parking Ordinance would not conflict with
the City's Noise Element or Noise Ordinance as no specific site is under consideration. Safe Parking facilities would be
located within existing improved parking lots.
Conclusion: Less than significant impact.
13. POPUL,AT'ION AND HOUSING. Would the proiect:
2,6
X
X
M
Evaluation
a)b)c) No impacts to population and housing would occur as the project does not involve modifications to the City's policies
on residential densities.
Conclusion: No Impact
14. PUBL,IC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response tinges or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Evaluation
a)b)c)d)e)f) No new construction is anticipated as a result of the Safe Parking ordinance. Safe Parking facilities would be
located within existing improved parking lots. Health; safety- and welfare factors will be evaluated through the use pen -nit
review process on a case -by -case basis.
Conclusion: No Imp,
15. RECREAT'ION.
X
Grry op SAN Luis Oadspo 12 MEAL STUDY �NVIROMMENTAL CHECKLIST 2010
issues, Discussion and Supporting Wormation Sources
Sources
Potentially
Uss Than
i,essThan
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Lnpact
�� �� -13
tssness
with
Innpact
Mitigation
Incorporated
CITY OF SAN Luis Cswc 13 GNISIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHEC°KLiS T 2010
issues, Discussion and Supporting, h-ifoVf ation Sources
Sources
Potentially
Less Than
rsss Tlxan
1d0
Significant
Significant
Signifficani
linpact
�� �� -13
Issues
with
Lnpact
Mitigation
Hacoa orated
19, EARLIER ANALYSES,
N/A
N/A
N/A
Q Y of Stars Luis Omspo 14 Arai T IAL S d Uuy ENviRoNMENTAL GHECKLls o- 201
Issues, Discussion and Supporting Information Sources
Sources
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
impact
ER # 45-13
Issues
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
20. SOURCE
REFERENCES.
1.
City of SLO General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, April 2006
2.
Oy of SLO General Plan Land Use Element, June 2010
3.
City of SLO General Plan Safe Element, March 2012
4.
City of San Luis Obispo Water and Wastewater Management Element, July 2010
5.
City of San Luis Obispo Circulation Element, Aril 2006
6.
City of San Luis Obispo Housing Element, April 2010
7.
City of San Luis Obispo Noise Element and Noise Guidebook, May 1996
8.
City of San Luis Obispo Parks and Recreation Element, Aril 2001
9.
City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations, August 2012
10.
CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Air Pollution Control District, April 2012
11.
1 City of San Luis Obispo Land Use Inventory and Geographic Information S stem, current database
Attachments:
Draft Safe Parking Ordinance
CITY OF SAN Luis Owspo Is INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2010
17.08.115 Safe Parking.
A. Purpose and Intent. Safe parking provides homeless individuals and families with vehicles a safe
place to temporarily park overnight in order to facilitate the transition to„permanent housing. The
provisions set forth in this Section enable safe parking in certain zoning districts in the city subject to
specific performance standards and permit requirements. These standards and requirements are
intended to ensure that safe parking facilities will be compatible with surrounding uses and effective
at facilitating_ participants' transition to permanent housing.
B. Definitions.
1. Safe Parking. A parking program, operated on private property and managed by a social
service provider, that provides individuals and families with vehicles a safe place to park
overnight while working towards a transition to permanent housing.
2. Social Service Provider. An agency or organization licensed or supervised by any federal,
state or local healthtwelfare agency that participates in the federal Homeless Management
Information Systems MISLand has demonstrated experience with the homeless population
by assisting individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and self-determination
through a comprehensive array of programs and actions.
3. Case Management. A system for arranging and coordinating -care and services whereby a
case manager assesses the needs of the client and client's _f_a_m_ ily and arranges, coordinates,
monitors, and advocates for services to me h en et the client's needs.
4. Self -Sufficiency Program. A program designed, to„assist „individuals and families in meeting
their basic needs and address any substance dependency and mental health issues so that
they do not need to rely on emergency public or private assistance.
5. Backgroundeck. A criminal records checkfrom
a variety of public sources that would
„
provide information regarding an individual's possible criminal history.
C. Permit Required.
1. Planning Commission Use Permit Required. The establishment of a safe parking use shall
require Planning Commission Use Permit approval where allowed consistent with Table 9.
D.Application Requirements. Whenever a social service provider submits a Planning Commission
Use Permit_ application for consideration as a part of said application sufficient information shall be
submitted to the Community Development Department to determine whether the proposed safe
parking facility complies with the provisions of this Section. In addition to the required Planninq
Commission application checklist items, the application shall include the following:
1. Site _plan indicating the location of trash and recycling facilities, restroom facilities, exterior
light fixtures, location and distances to residential properties, public transportation, and
location of desianated overnight parking spaces.
2. Hours of operation.
3. Monitoring and oversight program.
4. Neighborhood relations plan.
5. Sufficient information to_determine _that the applicant is a social service provider that is
_qualified to operate a safe parking program.
6. Any other information the Community Development Director may determine is necessary to
ensure compliance with the provisions of this Section.
E. Performance Standards.
1. Social Service Provider. Safe parking facilities shall be managed by a qualified social
service provider, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director.
2. Case Management. Participants must be paired with a case manager and enrolled in a self-
sufficiency program to facilitate the transition to permanent housing
3. Background Check. Prospective participants shall submit to a criminal histo back round
check. Participant exclusion shall be determined by the social service provider on a case-bv-
case basis.
4. Restroom and Trash Facilities. Restroom and trash facilities shall be provided, maintained
and accessible to participants durinq safe parking facility hours.
5. Residency Preference. Social service provider shall give preference to those with proof of
residency in San Luis Obispo County for a minimum period of six months within the last two
years. Evidence of residency may include, but not limited to, items such as rental
agreements, mortgage, utility, hotel and medical facility bills, paystubsand intake from
homeless service programs.
6. Buffer from Residential Use. Participant vehicles shall maintain a minimum buffer of 50 feet
from any property that contains a residential use. Buffers greater than 50 feet_ maybe
necessary for neighborhood compatibility, which will be determined on a case -by -case basis
as part of the Use Permit review.process.
7. Authorized Vehicles Only. Social service provider shall ensure that only vehicles_ registered
_
In the program a _ _ re parked overnight during program hours. A parking permit shall be
,
provided to all participants to be displayed in vehicle windows in a form to be approved_ by the
Public Works Director.
8. Participant Information. At all times the social service provider shall maintain a roster of the
names and vehicle license numbers of each participant who is authorized to park overnight.
9. Written Agreement with Participants. Only participants who have entered into a written
agreement with a social service provider shall be allowed to use parking spaces overnight.
The written agreement between the social service provider and participant_ must include, but
not limited to, the following terms and conditions:
a. Only one vehicle is allowed per participant.
b. At least one participant per vehicle shall possess a current driver's license, vehicle
registration, and insurance for the vehicle that will be parked overnight- Social
service provider shall keep a copy of all three on record.
c. Vehicles may only be occupied by participants and approved registered household
members. Guests shall not be allowed.
d. Participants shall not use or possess any drugs or alcohol either on their person or
in their vehicle.
e. Participants shall not use or possess any weapons or firearms of any kind in
program vehicles.
f. No fires of any kind shall be permitted.
g. No music may be played that is audible outside participants' vehicles.
h. No cooking or food preparation shall be performed outside of the participants'
vehicles. Cooking inside vehicles is prohibited unless the vehicle was manufactured
with cooking appliances.
i. Camping tarps or equipment beyond the participant's vehicle are prohibited.
j. Participants shall maintain control of dogs. Pets shall be kept on a leash at all times
and animal waste shall be picked up immediately and disposed of properly.
k. Participants shall not dump sewage or other waste fluids or solids, deposit human
excreta outside a vehicle, or park vehicles that leak excessive fluids (i.e. gasoline,
transmission or radiator fluid, or engine oil).
F. Use Permit Considerations. Items to be determined by the Planning Commission as part of the Use
Permit review process on a case-b -case basis shall include but not limited to the following:
1. Number of Vehicles Allowed. The total number of vehicles allowed at each safe parking
facility location.
2. Hours of Operation. The dated hours of safe parkinq facility operation.
3. Separation between Facilities. Sufficient distance between existing and proposed safe
parking facilities.
4. Neighborhood Relations Plan. A neighborhood relations plan shall be provided for each
safe parking facility location to address any complaints in a timely manner.
5. MonitoringLand Oversight. Monitoring and oversight shall be provided during safe parking
facility hours.
G. Revocation of a Permit. The Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. if the City
receives substantiated written complaints from any citizen Code Enforcement Officer, or Police
Department Officer, which includes information and/or evidence supporting a conclusion that a
violation of the Use Permit, or of City ordinances or regulations applicable to the property or operation
of the facility, has occurred. At the time of Use Permit review, to ensure on -going compatibility with
surrounding uses conditions of approval may be added deleted modified or the Use Permit may be
revoked.
17.16.015 Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit.
No recreational vehicle, camper shell, automobile or similar device shall be used for living or sleeping
quarters on private property, except in a lawfully operated mobile home park, travel trailer park, of
campground, or safe parking facility, except as provided in Section 17.08.010(C)(4) et seq. Within city
streets, areas of the public right-of-way, and city -owned parking areas, parking of vehicles for purposes of
overnight camping or sleeping is prohibited by and shall be subject to enforcement in accordance with
Chapter 10.34. (Ord. 1584 § 3, 2012: Ord. 1484 § 14, 2005: Ord. 1277 § 5, 1995).
Chapter 17.100: Definitions
Safe Parking. A parking program, operated on private „property and. managed by a social service
provider, that provides individuals and families with vehicles a safe place to park overnight while working
towards a transition to permanent housing.
Notes to Table 9:
13. Safe Parking. Safe parking is only allowed in the R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 zones when accessory to a
public assembly use, such as a club, lodge, private meeting hall or religious facility. Safe parking is
prohibited as a rima use in the R-1 R-2 R-3 or R-4 zones and in all applicable zoning districts on
Properties that contain residential uses as the primary use.
fCBRUARY 2012
TABLE 9 - USES ALLOWED BY ZONE
Clay Of SAn leis OBISPO
zoninG RequlAtlons
I and Use
Permit Requlreme�t by Zottgn� District
speeifc use
Regulations
AO: C1DS R1
R2 Rd Rd Pp.O i) G•N C G G-q- C R G-i C-S la
pP
AGRICULTURE
Crop production and grazing A A A A D D
Greenhouse, commercial PC PC
Livestock feed lot PC PC
INDUSTRY, MANUFACTURING & PROCESSING, WHOLESALING
Bakery, wholesale
A
A
PC
Furniture and fixtures manufacturing, cabinet
shop
_
D
A
Industrial research and development
_
PC
D
D
Laboratory - Medical, analytical, research,
testing
PC
A
A
A
A
Laundry, dry cleaning plant
A
A
Manufacturing - Heavy W
PC
PC
Manufacturing - Light _
D
A
A
Petroleum product storage and distribution
D
Photo and film processing lab
A
A
Printing and publishing
A
A
A
Recycling facilities - Collection and processing
facility
D
Recycling facilities - Scrap and dismantling yard
D
Recycling facilities - Small collection facility
_
D
D
D
A
Storage - Personal storage facility
A_
A
Storage yard
D
A
Warehousing, indoor storage
A
A
PC
Wholesaling and distribution
A
A
PC
LODGING
Bed and breakfast inn
D
PC
PC
A
A
A
agkTarkinq
a 13
10...
Pof 13
e 13
PC;
PG
PC
P9-
PC
PG
PC
PC
PC
17.08,f15
Homeless shelter
PC
PC
A
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
17.08.110
Hostel _
PC
PC
A
A
A
Hotel, motel
A
A
A
PC
Recreational vehicle (RV) park accessory to hotel, motel
L��
PC
Vacation RentalI I
17 22 G
Key: A = Allowed D = Directors Use Permit approval required PC = Planning Commission Use Permit approval required
AID = Director's approval on ground floor, allowed on second floor or above
Note: Footnotes affecting specific land uses follow the table.
paGE 83
Attachment 10
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING
REGULATIONS — SAFE PARKING ORDINANCE) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
(GPI/ER 4543)
WHEREAS, the Human Relations Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California,
on June 5, 2013, and recommended approval of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact
and amendments to Title 17 (Zoning Regulations — Safe Parking Ordinance) of the Municipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public
hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on June
26, 2013, for the purpose of considering the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and
amendments to Title 17 (Zoning Regulations — Safe Parking Ordinance) of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, staff facilitated 12 workshops and meetings with the general public, faith -based
organizations, social service providers, homeless individuals, Residents for Quality Neighborhoods,
San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce and San Luis Obispo Downtown Association to gather
community input on how safe parking facilities should be operated, located and managed; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was for the purpose of formulating and forwarding
recommendations to the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding the project; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required
by law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered all evidence, including the
testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff,
presented at said hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San
Luis Obispo as follows:
Section 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the Commission makes the following
findings:
1. There is a growing community need for programs providing safe accommodations for
individuals and families utilizing vehicles for temporary shelter in order to facilitate the
transition to permanent housing.
2. A safe parking ordinance will advance a key component of the goal to provide a form of
transitional housing consistent with the San Luis Obispo Countywide 10-year Plan to End
Homelessness.
Planning Commission Resolution No. (2013 Series)
GPI/ER 45-13 Safe Parking Ordinance
Page 2
Attachment 10
3. A safe parking ordinance will further the City's 2013-15 Financial Plan Major City Goal:
"Implement Comprehensive Strategies to Address Homelessness".
Section 2. Environmental. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend the City
Council adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact.
Secion 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend the City
Council adopt the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning Regulations — Safe Parking Ordinance)
of the Municipal Code, included as Exhibit A.
On motion of , seconded by , and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
REFRAIN:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 261h day of June, 2013.
Doug Davidson, Secretary
Planning Commission by:
DRAFT
SAN LUIS OBISPO
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 13, 2013
CALL TO ORDERIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Commissioners John Fowler, Michael Multari, John Larson, Airlin
Singewald, Charles Stevenson, Vice -Chairperson Eric Meyer, and
Chairperson Michael Draze
Absent: None
Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Doug Davidson, Planning
Technician Liz Brighton, Assistant City Attorney Andrea Visveshwara,
and Recording Dawn Rudder
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
Minutes of May 8, 2013, were approved as presented.
Minutes of May 22, 2013, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1335 Foothill Boulevard. U 47-10: Request to allow Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity
(eight occupants) and exceptions to parking and driveway standards in the R-4
High -Density Residential zone; 1335 Foothill LLC, applicant. (Liz Brighton)
Liz Brighton, Planning Technician, presented the staff report, recommending adoption of
the resolution recommending approval of the Use Permit, based on findings and subject
to conditions and code requirements which she outlined. Doug Davidson added that
staff is recommending modifications to four conditions for clarification.
Commr. Fowler questioned if staff had any information on the four police calls for
service at the subject property during 2010-2013. Ms. Brighton stated two or three of
the calls were noise complaints.
Vice -Chair Meyer questioned condition #12 the word "complaints." Doug Davidson
stated the City will investigate even one complaint.
Commr. Larson questioned the years of 2007-2010, when there were 29 police calls, if
this is the same fraternity at this location. Ms. Brighton indicated this was the fraternity
at this same location.
Draft Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 2013
Page 2
Carol Florence, applicant's representative, stated the fraternity brothers from 2007-2010
are not the same brothers living there now. She asked for support of the Use Permit.
Brian Van Vleet, President of Phi Kappa Psi, gave an idea of the fraternity in general
and their standing on campus. He stated that the property will be used for their
administrative headquarters.
Alex Larson, member of fraternity, stated the fraternity brothers are dedicated to serving
others and volunteering. He stated that, administratively, the property will serve as a
meeting place to plan events and volunteering opportunities.
Jad Adaimi, member of fraternity, read letter from another member in regard to the
fraternity's community service involvement. He also stated that the philanthropic
involvement exceeds campus requirements.
Nolan Frost, member of fraternity, read a speech by Mark Sower which spoke of
bonding, learning, and homecoming.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
George Rosenberger, San Luis Obispo, Cal Poly and Phi Kappa Psi alumnus, is in
support of the use permit for the residence for Phi Kappa Psi,
Ken Barclay, San Luis Obispo, spoke as the former Director of Student Life and
Leadership at Cal Poly for 32 years, assured the Commission that this fraternity has an
active alumni. Mr. Barclay further stated that he did have any major issues with the
subject fraternity in his tenure.
Chairperson Draze expressed that an active alumni will help monitor ongoing situations.
Virginia Kennedy, San Luis Obispo, stated this fraternity was about community service.
She stated that she is in support of the fraternity residence.
Dennis Javens, San Luis Obispo, Cal Poly and Phi Kappa Psi alumnus, stated he is
impressed with these men of the fraternity. He encouraged the Commission to approve
the fraternity residents.
Jad Adaimi stated, since 2010, the fraternity has been equipped with a committee of
advisors if they need any help. He also stated that the quality of brothers they look for
is very high.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Fowler questioned if there was an outreach to other neighbors.
Draft Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 2013
Page 3
Vice -Chair Meyer was impressed that there were no negative comments made by the
public. He stated that he would like to see the yard kept clean.
Commr. Stevenson is impressed with work they do. He encouraged they adhere to the
tandem parking and not park on the street. He is supportive of the project.
Commr. Fowler is in support of the project. He stated he was impressed by the alumni
support and charity work.
Chairperson Draze indicated parking and the progress on lawn improvements will be
evaluated next year.
Commr. Singewald is concerned with the tandem parking.
Vice -Chair Meyer questioned how many meetings were held per month, if 17 people are
allowed, and if meetings could be limited to 10 p.m.
Brian Van Vleet stated the capacity requirement is necessary during the week, and it
will be a common meeting place for administrative affairs.
Chairperson Draze asked how many meetings were done after 10 p.m. Brian Van Vleet
stated that, due to some students' schedules, it is common that they meet after 10 p.m.
Commr. Multari is also concerned with meetings after 10 p.m. and parking impacts to
the neighborhood.
Chairperson Draze supported all comments made.
Vice -Chair Meyer pointed out that condition #12 should have "Cal Poly employee"
added to verbiage.
Commr. Singewald does not believe the findings substantiate the parking concerns.
Doug Davidson stated that staff has also struggled with the parking issue, and the one-
year review was conditioned purposely to see how the parking works.
Commr. Multari suggested modifications to condition #5 and condition #8
There were no further comments made from the Commission,
n motion by Commr. Multari, sec
onded by ,Commr. Fowler, to approve the use permit
drafted by staff with modifications to condition #5, #6, #8, #12, and #13.
AYES: Commrs. Fowler, Singewald, Multari, Stevenson, Larson, Meyer, and
Draze
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: None
Draft Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 2013
Page 4
The motion passed on a 7:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff
a. Agenda Forecast
Doug Davidson presented the agenda forecast for upcoming meetings.
3. Commission
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:42 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Dawn Rudder
Recording Secretary