Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6a - Adoption of FY 2022-23 Supplemental BudgetCity of San Luis Obispo, Council Memorandum Council Agenda Correspondence DATE: May 31, 2022 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Matt Horn, Director of Public Works Gaven Hussey, Parking Program Manager VIA: Derek Johnson, City Manager SUBJECT: Staff Agenda Correspondence Item 6.a - ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET Purpose of this Agenda Correspondence- Parking Rate Focus The purpose of this Agenda Correspondence is to provide some additional details and background about the status of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure, new cost estimates, and the impact of the construction and financial markets which have prompted staff to make a recommendation for adjusted parking rates beyond those forecasted in June 2021 as part of the 2021-23 Financial Plan (pages 339 through 342). Each section of this memo covers crucial decision points and the footnotes that supports each section provide historic or other technical details or considerations. Furthermore, the purpose is to answer some initial questions received and provide additional details about the proposed adjustments to parking rates recommended for adoption on June 7, 2022, so that the Parking Fund can support the construction of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure (at Palm and Nipomo Streets). Advancing the construction of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure is a key Capital Improvement Project in the City’s adopted 2021-2023 Financial Plan and the Major City Goal Economic Recovery, Resiliency and Fiscal Sustainability1. Why is the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure Needed Now? The Cultural Arts District Parking Structure is a high priority project for both the Parking Fund and the City to be able to provide adequate off-street parking to the community as well as create the necessary infrastructure for future implementation of the Downtown Concept Plan including space for the future SLO Rep Theatre. Parking utilization has seen a steady increase returning to similar pre-pandemic levels of operation with structures experiencing capacity issues Thursday through Saturday evenings. Specifically, all three of the City’s current parking structures exceed 85 percent2 occupation during these times and close on Thursday evenings when capacity is 1 Supplemental Budget Pg. 128 2 85% occupancy is generally considered in the parking industry to be a saturation point that parking supply is impacted that can has a negative perception on the availability of parking and a point that new parking supplies are needed to meet demand. Cultural Arts District Memorandum Page 2 exceeded. On June 21, 2022, Council will consider authorizing staff to advertise for construction bids for the first phase3 of work for the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. What is the connection between parking rates, the pandemic, and the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure? The City’s Downtown Concept Plan incorporates the community’s vision for downtown and guides both public and private actions and investment through 2042. Better parking that is easily accessible is key to promoting an inclusive and easy-to-navigate downtown. At the same time, the city is seeking to expand cultural, historical, and artistic opportunities, including enhancing the downtown Cultural Arts District. Since the early 2000s4, the Community and city have been working on this fourth structure. During this time, the Parking Fund purposely conserved revenues to build up working capital funds to reduce future debt impacts arising from the construction of the Cultural Art’s District Parking Structure. This was done using rate adjustments and careful programming of ongoing operating expenses. This strategy was a highly effective long-term strategy which allowed the Parking Fund to buildup it’s unreserved working capital to roughly $13.9 Million. With the March 2020 shutdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Parking Fund deferred revenue in the approximate amount of $4 Million through fee deferrals, incentives, and other initiatives to support the urgent and immediate needs for downtown businesses. As noted in the Budget (page 48) variables have caused these increases to be greater than forecasted to Council with the adoption of the 2021-22 Budget. Those variables include unprecedented cost increases in the construction industry, increased costs for borrowing money, and the need to demonstrate to funding entities the City’s plans for maintenance and preservation of existing assets5. 3 Phase 1A PG&E Relocation – Project Design is 90% complete. Phase 1A expected to advertise for construction in Summer 2022, with construction work on this phase beginning Fall 2022. Phase 1B Site Clearing and Demolition – Project is at the 95% design completion level. Staff will be applying for reviews for building permits for Phase 1B in the Spring of 2022. Construction is scheduled to begin Spring 2023. 4 A simple search of the City’s website shows over 390 results for “Palm Nipomo” parking that dates back to the early 2000’s with dozens of hearings on the project. 5 The City has historically under invested in parking structure maintenance and deferred maintenance issues need to be addressed to preserve life of the existing three assets and to modernize equipment to match customer needs and maximize technological integration. Cultural Arts District Memorandum Page 3 Why Do Rate Adjustments Need to Be Approved in June 2022? To secure debt financing for the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure before the vertical construction of Phase 2 requires proof of an approved long term rate structure that will ensure financing and other operational obligations are achieved. The bottom line is that the conclusion based on the analysis of variables is that it is necessary to increase parking rates in 2023 and 2025 to demonstrate to future finance lenders that the Parking Fund has an approved and long-term rate strategy to be able to continually fund the long-term debt and operations that will be taken on to construct the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Some important information related the Parking Fund’s ability to fund the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure, necessary rate adjustments, and the need to move this project forward include: What are the Rate Adjustments Proposed and How do they Compare Locally? Staff have previously conveyed to Council with the 2021-23 Financial Plan, the 2021-22 Mid- Year update, and now with the 2021-22 Budget Supplement that rate adjustments are necessary to ensure the Parking Fund’s health, ability to support existing and future debt obligations, required infrastructure improvements and safety upgrades, while continuing to modernize the program. With these forecasted rates, Council also approved the elimination of the first hour of free parking in the parking structures with the 2021-23 Financial Plan (see page 340) beginning in fiscal year 2022-23. Without these rate adjustments, the Parking Fund will not be able to build the new Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Table 1 below details the proposed rate adjustments and effective dates for on-street and surface parking lots. Table 2 below details the proposed rate adjustments and effective dates for the public Parking Fund lost over $4 million to support downtown during the pandemic Construction is immient for City and its community partner SLO Rep March 28, 2022 Received revised project cost estimate based upon current market conditions and forecasted out to time of construction resulting in increased cost for parking structure Construction cost increases of 27% between January 2021 to May 2022 and expected to continue to increase May 10, 2022 Forecasted interest rates for debt financing adjusted to reflect inflationary trends Bond Counsel advise staff to have debt ratio at a minimum of 130% Rate adjustments are needed to meet debt ratios and must be approved prior to debt issuance Majority of rate adjustments take effect in July 2023 Cultural Arts District Memorandum Page 4 parking structures. Table 3 compares local rates which shows that the City’s current parking rates are $1.02 below the average parking rate for on-street parking and $1.40 below the current average parking rate for parking structure parking rates. After the July 2023 parking rates are in place, the city will slightly exceed the average parking rate for on-street but will be $0.75 below the average current parking structure rates assuming other areas do not increase parking rates. As indicated in the Budget Supplement (page 48) staff is aware that both Cal Poly and Paso Robles are considering rate adjustments. Table 1 below shows the proposed parking rate adjustments that are recommended as part of the 2022- 23 Budget Supplement. As a reminder, parking rate adjustments were forecasted to Council in the 2021-23 Financial Plan (see page 342) but are required to be revised due to inflation and cost of construction increases. Table 1: Proposed Street Parking Rates and Effective Dates Proposed Parking Hourly Rates Current Parking Rate Effective Jan 2, 2023 Effective July 1, 2023 Effective July 1, 2025 1 On-Street and Lots         2 Tier 1 (Super Core) $2.00 $2.00 $4.00 $5.00 3 Tier 2 (Core) $1.75 $2.00 $4.00 $5.00 4 Tier 3 (Outlying Areas) $1.25 $1.50 $3.00 $3.00 Table 2: Proposed Parking Structure Rates and Effective Dates Proposed Parking Structure Rates Current Parking Rate Effective July 1, 2023 1 Parking Structures     2 Hourly $1.50 $3.00 3 Max Daily $6.00 $12.00 4 Lost Ticket $6.00 $12.00 Cultural Arts District Memorandum Page 5 What is next for communications with the Community? Staff are focused on the following efforts to communicate about these rate changes. 1. Targeted outreach using local media, print and digital platforms in addition to City accounts on proposed changes between May 27th and June 7th. 2. Ongoing efforts such as in person meetings and publications for community partners to address the concerns of downtown businesses and customers. 3. Expanded outreach on the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure and community benefits of this resource. 4. Using consultant communication services to aid staff over the next year with a consistent and comprehensive messaging on parking rate changes, program enhancements, and the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure construction. Alternatives to adjusting parking rates. 1. Do not adjust parking rates per staff recommendation: If Council chooses to not increase parking rates or adjust parking rates at a lower amount this would effectively halt the city from constructing the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. The parking rates as proposed are necessary to both secure and service the debt funding required to construct the parking structure. 2. Council could direct staff to reduce the cost of the parking structure: If Council directed staff to look at reducing the cost of the parking structure that would require that Council use Parking Fund working capital to hire a consultant to audit the design for ways to decrease cost. This audit is commonly referred to as Value Engineering. This will likely take approximately 12 months to complete as it is necessary to prepare a Request for Proposal, have Council approve the Request for Proposal to advertise, review proposals and select the desired consultant, the time necessary for the consultant to review the project plans and make recommendations to staff, and the time necessary for the City’s design consultant to update the plans for construction. Since January 2021 through May 2022, California has seen a 27% increase in construction cost which equates to approximately 1.58% per month. Assuming that the construction climate near future is much like the recent past, that would require the City to find in excess Table 3: Comparable Agency Rates w/ Proposed Rates Average Parking Hourly Rate Current Parking Rate Effective January 2, 2023 Effective July 1, 2023 Effective July 1, 2025 1 On-Street 2 San Luis Obispo $1.63 $1.75 $3.50 $4.00 3 Cal Poly $2.50 --- --- --- 4 Pismo Beach $5.50 --- --- --- 5 Paso Robles $1.00 --- --- --- 6 Parking Structures 7 San Luis Obispo $1.50 $1.50 $3.00 $3.00 8 Cal Poly $2.50 --- --- --- 9 Pismo Beach $5.00 --- --- --- Cultural Arts District Memorandum Page 6 of $10 million in construction cost savings prior to realizing any fiscal benefits and the consultants will most likely recommend the removal of environmental sustainable and community amenity/benefit features of the garage such as 1) solar panels and electrical vehicle charging, 2) aesthetic detailing, 3) frontage and site readiness costs for the SLOREP building6, 4) frontage and site readiness for affordable housing development area7 and 5) rooftop community viewing areas8. Staff’s does not recommend this alternative as costs would likely increase during the redesign phase and the structure would provide less benefit to the community. 3. Council could direct staff to explore other avenues and defer construction to same date in the future: Any direction that defers construction of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure to a later date in the future will likely increase the overall cost of the parking structures construction. 6 Cost estimates are anticipated to be over a million dollars 7 The assumption is that the City would not seek to recover any of these costs, or the land costs associated with development affordable housing and the Council could direct Staff to recover all or some of these costs to defray the costs to the parking fund visa vi the Affordable Housing Fund. 8 The rooftop viewing area requires the structure to be built to a different load bearing standard which is approximately 25% above the traditional costs for supporting vehicles. Item 6a Department: Finance Cost Center: 2002 For Agenda of: 6/7/2022 Placement: Public Hearing Estimated Time: 120 minutes FROM: Derek Johnson, City Manager Brigitte Elke, Finance Director Prepared By: Natalie Harnett, Principal Budget Analyst SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE 2022-23 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget” as presented; and 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving the allocation of $13,564,467 in State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds in accordance with the U.S. Treasury Final Rule” including $1,564,467, as recommended by the Council Ad-Hoc Committee; and 3. Introduce an Ordinance entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, amending Title 10, Chapter 52 (Parking Meters), of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code” modifying the on-street and surface parking lot hourly rates and establishing paid parking in the upper Monterey Street area ; and 4. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, establishing parking rates for the City’s parking structures”; and 5. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving modifications to the Parking Citation Penalty Schedule.” DISCUSSION REPORT-IN-BRIEF This report and attached documents present the 2021-23 Financial Plan Supplemental Budget which is the official budget appropriation for the second year of the Financial Plan. The Supplemental Budget focuses on changes in financial position and needed adjustment to the approved second year budget. Unlike in past years, Council adjusted the approved budget with the 2021-22 Mid-year Review – these adjustments are reflected the budget presented in this report. The report details the use of the $1.5 million as recommended by the Council Ad-Hoc Committee. Page 449 of 652 Item 6a Lastly, the report also brings forward recommendations to modify the on-street and surface parking lot hourly rates and established paid parking in the upper Monterey Street area. It also recommends establishing new parking rates for the City’s structures and modifying the Parking Citation Penalty Schedule. These changes are being recommended because of the significant escalation in projected costs of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure and the need for rate increases to meet the required debt service obligation and maintain a balanced budget. Background Per the City Charter, Article XIII, Section 802, the City Council must appropriate a budget for the upcoming fiscal year by July 1st. The City’s budget policy allows for a two-year budget to be adopted. However, the appropriation of funding is only given for one fiscal year, necessitating an annual budget hearing for subsequent appropriation. Consistent with the City’s two-year budgetary process, the 2022-23 Budget presented for adoption was prepared using the adopted 2021-23 Financial Plan as its foundation. However, unlike a typical budget cycle, the City’s fiscal forecast changed so drastically after initial adoption in June 2021 that Council adopted changes to the 2021-22 as well as the 2022-23 budget with the Mid-year Review on February 15, 2022. These adjustments are now incorporated in the Financial Plan Supplement and long-term forecasts (Attachment A). Mid-year Adjustments Over the first half of FY 2021-22, the City experienced a surge of economic activity that corresponded with the lifting of COVID-19 lockdowns and stimulative fiscal and monetary policy. Given the positive revenue trends, Council approved mid -year requests for immediate action and resource allocation for one-time efforts as well as ongoing needs to position the City in a place of proactive engagement. With this action, the Council also allocated approximately $2 million in additional budget for 2022-23, which have now been included in the Supplemental Budget presented here. The Mid-Year Council actions also authorized an additional payment of $10.2 million from the General Fund and $2.2 million from the enterprise funds, which will put the City back on track with its schedule to pay down the pension obligation over 20 years. Compensation Adjustments The increases in General Fund revenue forecasts also allowed Council to quickly address compensation shortfalls identified with the 2021 Benchmark Compensation Report for Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association (SLOCEA) and Unrepresented Management and Confidential Bargaining Units. On February 1, 2022, the Council approved negotiation parameters for equity adjustments and cost of living increases are now included in the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget. Page 450 of 652 Item 6a Overall Financial Forecast All of the City’s Major Funds are in a good fiscal condition and are balanced throughout the five-year forecast with the need to make some changes to parking rates to fund planned capital expenditures and related debt service. Current assumptions are cautiously optimistic, and the forecast does not assume a recession only a cool-down of current economic activity. The impacts of high inflation on the City’s forecast are still unclear and one of the looming concerns is that the cost of providing services will outpace revenue growth in the near future. Changes with the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget Operating Budgets: Given the significant Mid-year adjustments, there are only a handful of Significant Operating Budget Changes (SOBCs) included in the recommended budget. The General Fund operating budget increased mainly due to the addition of a Capital Maintenance Supervisor position and a new Solid Waste program position. Both positions are offset by revenue and do not impact the bottom -line General Fund balance. The Enterprise Funds increased their budgets to account for the rise in costs of chemicals, utilities, and supplies. A breakdown of all SOBCs can be found in Attachment A. Table 1: Significant Operating Budget Changes One-time Ongoing General Fund $ (48,775) $ 412,156 Water Fund $ 115,980 $ 864,290 Sewer Fund $ 24,480 $ 246,287 Parking Fund $ 44,800 $ 81,825 Total $ 136,485 $ 1,604,558 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) There are several CIP changes proposed that reflect changes identified at the mid -year review or to address urgent needs. General Fund changes are reflective of cost increases and staffing constraints. Following an analysis and prioritization exercise, several projects are recommended for deferral to 2023 -25 as they are either not “shovel” ready, or added grant funds are being sought, or they can be paused until staff resources are available and design or other consulting services are ready to deliver the project. Deferred projects will remain on the five-year CIP list and return to Council for funding with the 2023-25 Financial Plan. Deferred project funds are in turn recommended to be used for cost increases for the Summer 2022 roadway sealing project and to fund the capital reserve which is in place to keep projects moving given the volatile bidding climate . As staff anticipates with the global economic conditions impacting costs of goods and services it is important to bring the Capital Reserve to policy levels so that it may be applied to construction projects in 2022-23. Historically, after significant cost increases, price increases have tended to stabilize and absent a recession or huge constructi on slow down, costs don’t return to previous levels, the increases simply flatten out. Page 451 of 652 Item 6a The FY 2022-23 Supplement does not recommend an overhaul of the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. However, staff is recommending the establishment of a few new projects to address emergent needs, as well as budget changes to several existing projects. For detailed changes, see Section 7 in Attachment A. New projects are summarized in the table below and were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its Meeting of May 25th for General Plan Conformity: Fund Table 2: New CIP Projects* 2022-23 Budget Parking Installation of Pay Stations in the Railroad Square $ 66,200 Parking Installation of Pay Stations on Upper Monterey $ 122,000 Public Safety Equipment Fund Fire Department Extractors $ 135,000 Sewer Chorro-Palm to Monterey Pipeline Replacement $ 60,000 Transit Tenant Improvements at 1260 Chorro $ 250,000 Water Johnson-Iris to Bishop Pipeline Replacement $ 180,000 Water Recycled Water System Retrofits $ 200,000 Water Water Treatment Plan Major Facility Maintenance $ 245,000 Total New Projects $ 1,258,200 *Some new projects are offset by decreases in other project budgets. See report for detail. 2022-23 Budget Document – Attachment A The attached document gives greater detail on the City’s financial condition, updated revenue and expenditure trends, and assumptions for FY 2022 -23. The report is organized as follows: Section 1: City Manager Message Section 2: Changes from Financial Plan & ARPA Appropriations Section 3: Consolidated Financials Section 4: Budget Detail Section 5: Local Revenue Measure Section 6: Debt Section 7: Capital Improvement Plan Section 8: Major City Goals Section 9: Department Updates Section 10: Appropriation Limit State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) – Attachment D On March 1, 2022, the City Council received a presentation regarding the applicable uses of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds provided through the American Rescue Plan Act. The staff recommendation incorporated the City’s Major City Goals objective for the $4,664,467 that had not been allocated with the 2022-23 Financial Plan. At that meeting, the Council approved the following action: Page 452 of 652 Item 6a 1) $1 million to be appropriated to the Infrastructure Investment fund for a total allocation of $9.9 million. 2) $100,000 to augment the Human Relations Commission’s Grant-In-Aid cycle for grants in support of non-profit organizations. 3) Allocate $2 million to affordable housing that targets extremely low & very low income and/or homeless persons most impacted by COVID -19. 4) $1,564,467 to be reviewed by a Council ad-hoc committee for most appropriate use in accordance with City Major City Goals and objectives. The Council ad-hoc committee was staffed by Mayor Stewart and Councilmember Shoresman. The committee met on three separate occasions and the details of this meetings and options analyzed are included as Attachment C. March 21, 2022: The ad-hoc committee received a brief overview of the American Rescue Plan Act and the Council action to-date; funding option under the U.S. Treasury Final Rule; the timeline for adoption of applicable uses with the Financ ial Plan Supplement; and next steps. The ad-hoc committee requested to receive additional information on broadband coverage in San Luis Obispo and research on other jurisdictions’ approach to premium pay for essential employees. April 20, 2022: The ad-hoc committee had received information on broadband coverage and possible options to provide premium pay for those impacted by COVID-19 . 20 cities responded of which five did not provide premium pay, three were considering the option, and 12 provided some form of pay mainly to their city essential employees. Only two jurisdictions provided premium pay to grocers and pharmacy workers. Further research confirmed that they are thus far the only cities taking this approach. The ad-hoc committee requested to receive additional information regarding the complexities in administering programs in Oxnard and Port Hueneme that advanced pay for Grocery Workers. On April 27, 2022, the ad-hoc committee received information gathered from the Finance Director in Oxnard which showed that the programs in Port Hueneme mirrored the Oxnard approach, albeit at a much smaller scale. After consideration of the information and discussion, the ad-hoc committee recommends that the City adopt the following use of the $1,564,467 of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: a. $600,000 toward a broadband study and subsequent implementation of recommended action. b. $964,467 toward affordable housing that targets extremely low & very low income and/or homeless persons most impacted by COVI D-19 Page 453 of 652 Item 6a Insurance Fund The Insurance Fund serves to pay the City’s annual premiums for liability, workers’ compensation, special events, volunteer, and property insurance needed to protect the City and to manage fluctuations in claims-related expenses. The City has received notification that its required contribution for 2022 -23 will be higher than the amount adopted with the 2021 -23 Financial Plan. The increase in insurance costs this year is attributable 3 factors: 1) There were some high -cost claims within the membership pool to which the City belongs and shares expenses; 2) increases in payroll and the number of employees also increased exposure and associated costs; 3) a recent appraisal increased the valuation of the City’s properties and costs to i nsure them. In order to keep within the adopted transfer to the fund, available fund balance will be used to cover the change in cost for 2022-23. The Fund balance is currently $1,757,013; sufficient to cover the increase of $314,000. However, the City’s fiscal policies under Section 7. Fund Balance and Reserves (F) stipulate that the reserve will be based on a 75% confidence level of the previous five-year average claims experience, which amounts to approximately $1,500,000. The use of fund balance wi ll leave 1,443,013 which dips slightly below the policy required level. The approach will be to replenish the 75% reserve levels as part of the 2023-25 Financial Plan to ensure the levels are appropriately funded and adequate for foreseeable and reasonable risk exposure. Appropriation Limit Under Article XIII B of the California Constitution, the City is required to calculate and adopt an appropriation limit to guide the budget appropriations. The limit restricts appropriations from tax revenues by State and local governments. Under its provisions, no local agency can appropriate proceeds of taxes in excess of its “appropriation limit”. The recommended budget for fiscal year 2022-23 remains within those limits. The City is approximately $20 million below the appropriations or Gann limit as shown in Budget Report Section 10. Table 3: FY 2022-23 Appropriation Limit Appropriations Limit 2021-22 $79,470,558 Consumer Price Index 7.50% Population Factor: County Population Growth 0.28% Compounded Percentage Factor (multiplicative not additive) 1.025% Appropriations Limit 2022-23 $85,666,375 Appropriations Subject to Limit $65,610,162 Appropriation amount under/(over) Limit $20,056,213 Page 454 of 652 Item 6a Amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code (Attachment E) Discussed in greater detail in the Parking Fund review is the identified need for the parking services program (which funds operations through rates and fees) to increase parking hourly rates. The need for Parking rate increases have been discussed in 1) 2021 -23 Financial Plan (where Council approved paid parking in the upper Monterey Area beginning in 2022-23), 2) Mid-Year 2021-22 Financial Plan, and again in this 3) 2021-22 Budget Supplement. During the pandemic rates were not increased, although they should have been. As foreshadowed for several years, the assistance the Fund provided to local businesses during the pandemic (lost revenues given free parking, free parklet use, and expanded loading zones) combined with costs associated with building the fourth parking structure, the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure (located at Palm and Nipomo Streets) and the debt associated with this require rate increases beginning in 2022 -23. Unfortunately, the drastic escalation in projected costs for the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure require significant rate increases to meet the required debt service obligation and maintain a balanced budget. The proposed rate increases were calculated by forecasting the Parking Program’s operating expenditures, debt service, and parking demand over the next five fiscal years, and looking at other local “parking districts” (Cal Poly, Pismo Beach and Paso Robles). Notably San Luis Obispo is certainly not the most expensive today nor following the proposed increases. Based on these factors, increases are necessary to meet the 130% revenue to expenditure debt service ratio as required by prospective lenders for the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure construction costs. Table 4 below details the proposed rate increases and effective dates for on -street and surface parking lots. Staff is recommending an introduction of an Ordinance (Attachment E) modifying the Municipal Code to include the proposed on-street and surface parking lot rate increases effective January 2, 2023 and July 1st in 2023 and 2025. The proposed rate increase to Tier 2, if approved is, will not be implemented until January 2, 2023. Staff intend to utilize the time between adoption and implementation to communicate all rate increases and expansions to paid parking areas. Table 4: Proposed Parking Hourly Rates Current Parking Rate Effective Jan 2, 2023 Effective July 1, 2023 Effective July 1, 2025 1 On-Street and Lots 2 Tier 1 (Super Core) $2.00 $2.00 $4.00 $5.00 3 Tier 2 (Core) $1.75 $2.00 4.00 $5.00 4 Tier 3 (Outlying Areas) $1.25 $1.50 $3.00 $3.00 Page 455 of 652 Item 6a Figure 1 – Map showing locations of Tiered Parking Rates Establishing Parking Structure Rates (Attachment F) Similar to the discussion above regarding the proposed on-street and surface parking lot rate increases, an increase in parking structure rates is also necessary to meet the debt service obligations for construction of the new parking structure while maintaining a balanced Parking Fund. Staff is, therefore, also recommending the adoption of a Resolution (Attachment F) establishing parking structure rates effective on July 1st, 2023. The Resolution does include the removal of the first free hour of parking as previously approved by Council in June 2021 as part of the 2021-23 Financial Plan adoption. Table 5 below details the proposed rates for the public parking structures. Without rate increases to the on-street, lot, and structure rates; the Parking Fund will not be able to support the additional debt obligation for the escalated costs of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. There is a strong need for the Parking Fund to implement previously Council approved reduction of free parking at the parking structures and the adoption of rate increases previously foreshadowed for Council and the Community while maintaining the hours of operation approved by Council with the 2021-23 Financial Plan. The need for Parking rate increases have been discussed in 1) 2021-23 Financial Plan, 2) Mid-Year 2021-22 Financial Plan, and again in this 3) 2021-22 Budget Supplement. Page 456 of 652 Item 6a Table 5: Proposed Parking Structure Rates Current Parking Rate Effective July 1, 2023 1 Parking Structures 2 Hourly $1.50 $3.00 3 Max Daily $6.00 $12.00 4 Lost Ticket $6.00 $12.00 Modifying Parking Citation Penalty Schedule (Attachment G) Staff is also recommending the adoption of a Resolution (Attachment G) modifying the parking citation penalty schedule increasing fine amounts for three different parking violations (expired parking session, parking within an intersection, and parking on roadside of vehicle). Parking fines are meant to be high enough to deter unwanted behavior and the fine amounts for the violations listed in the Resolution are no longer effective at deterring said behavior, so staff is recommending an increase effective Ju ly 1st, 2022. Previous Council or Advisory Body Action The 2021-23 Financial Plan was adopted by Council on June 1, 2021, and Mid -year changes were approved by Council on February 15, 2022. The Local Revenue Measure (LRM) Budget allocations for 2022-23 were presented to the Citizens’ Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission (REOC) on May 12, 2022. After that meeting, as discussed previously in this report, bids were received for the Summer Paving project highlighting cost increases and staffing constraints which led to a prioritization exercise and recommended focused project deferrals to the 2023 -25 Financial Plan. Staff has communicated this emergent need and planned approach to the REOC. The proposed budget remains in line with the LRM priorities. Policy Context Although the City adopts a two-year Financial Plan, the budget (also known as appropriations) is adopted annually under this process. Pursuant to Section 804 of the City Charter, the City Council must adopt the 2022-23 Budget by June 30, 2022 in order for the appropriations to be in place when the 2022-23 fiscal year begins on July 1, 2022. This action is accomplished by Resolution and a Budget Resolution is provided as Attachment B to this report. Public Engagement Public comment on the item can be provided to the City Council through written correspondence prior to the meeting and through public testimony at the meeting. The 2022-23 Supplemental Budget (Attachment B) was posted on the City’s website for public review on May 25, 2022. CONCURRENCE All departments participated in the development of the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget and concur with the information and budgets presented in the financial plan. Page 457 of 652 Item 6a ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply to the reco mmended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. FISCAL IMPACT The 2022-23 Financial Plan Supplement and Budget appropriates the budget required for the City organization to deliver its work programs and services. It is balanced between revenues and expenditures and retains its operating reserve levels as set by policy. The following budget levels are being appropriated: *Includes ARPA allocation as recommended by the ARPA ad-hoc subcommittee. Table C1: Total Revenue by Fund (in thousands) 2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 Tax & Franchise Revenue $70,896 $87,092 $84,379 $90,156 7% 2 Service Charges & Other Revenue 3 General Fund $16,749 $19,937 $19,369 $20,194 4% 4 Water Fund $29,435 $26,224 $21,534 $26,980 25% 5 Sewer Fund $21,784 $23,885 $21,058 $20,836 -1% 6 Parking Fund $3,349 $4,611 $6,494 $6,533 1% 7 Transit Fund $7,243 $7,707 $4,950 $11,133 125% 8 Assessment Revenue $1,631 $1,689 $1,812 $2,002 10% 9 10 Proceeds from Debt Financing 11 Water Fund $11,030 $3,270 -- 12 Sewer Fund $20,212 $89,916 $4,865 $427 -91% 13 Total $182,329 $264,331 $169,326 $178,261 5% Table C2: Total Expenditures by Fund (in thousands) 2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 General Fund* $ 79,125 101,731$ 103,621$ 108,614$ 5% 2 Business Activities 3 Water Fund $ 31,396 39,679$ 27,632$ 28,340$ 3% 4 Sewer Fund $ 48,754 123,584$ 24,367$ 18,125$ -26% 5 Parking Fund $ 4,837 7,125$ 11,520$ 14,347$ 25% 6 Transit Fund $ 5,857 8,293$ 4,895$ 8,027$ 64% 7 Special Revenue 8 Tourism Assessment $ 1,027 1,640$ 1,582$ 1,577$ 0% 9 Downtown Assessment $ 249 245$ 275$ 275$ 0% 10 Total $ 171,244 282,297$ 173,893$ 179,304$ 3% Page 458 of 652 Item 6a ALTERNATIVES Do not adopt the budget and give direction to the City Manager on desired changes and budget reallocations. The item would have to be continued to June 21, 2022, as the Council is required to adopt a budget by July 1, 2022. ATTACHMENTS A – 2022-23 Supplemental Budget B – Draft Resolution – Budget Appropriations C – Draft Resolution – American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) D – Draft Ordinance – Amending Title 10 Chapter 52 of the Municipal Code E – Draft Resolution – Amending Parking Fee Rates F – Draft Resolution – Amending Parking Citation Schedule Page 459 of 652 Page 460 of 652 Financial Plan Supplement 2021-23 2022-23 Adopted BudgetPage 461 of 652 2021-23 Financial Plan ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET 2022-23 June 2022 ERICA A. STEWART, MAYOR CARLYN CHRISTIANSON, VICE MAYOR ANDY PEASE, COUNCIL MEMBER JAN MARX, COUNCIL MEMBER MICHELLE SHORESMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER DEREK JOHNSON, CITY MANAGER Preface The City of San Luis Obispo follows a nationally recognized two- year Financial Plan process. The Financial Plan links goals and objectives with resources needed to accomplish them. 2022-23 marks the second year of the City’s 2021-23 Financial Plan. This Supplemental Budget focuses on changes in financial position and an updated fiscal forecast. Council approval is required for each year of the budget cycle in order to appropriate the funding. For complete budget information and details on Budget Process, Major City Goals, Department Objectives, the Capital Improvement Plan, and City policies, please review the full 2021- 23 Financial Plan located HERE. Budget Document Pg. 2 Page 462 of 652 Table of Contents (hyperlinked) Section 1: Intro City Manager Message 4 Section 2: Changes from Financial Plan Adoption ARPA Details Mid-year Approved Budget Changes 8 10 Section 3: Consolidated Financials Total Revenue/Expenditures Reserve Levels Transfers 13 14 15 Section 4: Fund Overviews/ Detailed Financials General Fund Special Revenue & Other Funds Enterprise Funds: Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund: Parking Fund Enterprise Fund: Transit Fund 16 32 33 48 61 Section 5: Local Revenue Measure 68 Section 6: Debt Service 77 Section 7: Capital Improvement Plan 78 Section 8: Major City Goals Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Housing and Homelessness Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainability 111 114 117 122 Section 9: Department Updates Admin/IT City Attorney Community Development Department Finance Fire Human Resources Parks & Recreation Police Public Works Utilities 141 144 146 148 149 151 153 156 158 160 Section 10: Appropriation Limit 161 Budget Document Pg. 3 Page 463 of 652 City Manager Message Section 1: City Manager Message It is my pleasure to present the 2022-23 supplemental budget that is consistent with the adopted 2021-23 Financial Plan and augmented with important investments for emergent community and organizational needs. The adopted budget was generated through the Council approved strategic budgeting approach and allocated additional resources to Major City Goals to address the community’s economic recovery, further invests in sustainability efforts to combat climate change, and invests in community livability through citywide improvements. The lens of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion has been incorporated into every aspect of the City’s work and we look forward to making further progress on making San Luis Obispo a welcoming and inclusive place. Going into the 2021-23 Financial Plan, the City maintained a cautious outlook in light of the worldwide pandemic and associated economic activities. However, with new challenges on the horizon, the forecasts have been updated based on the current economic landscape. With new revenue from the passage of Measure G, the effect of the Fiscal Health Response Plan, and the awarded allocation of ARPA funding to cover lost revenue during the pandemic, the City will enter the new fiscal year in a positive and optimistic financial position. At the 2021-22 Mid-year Review, the Council approved budget changes that immediately addressed the needs of the community and utilized available resources without delay. This is why the supplemental budget contains very few additional changes and continues to strategic trajectory of allocating resources towards the five Major City Goals. Even at this time, the worldwide pandemic brought on by the COVID-19 virus is still being monitored and the City is poised to adjust as needed. The lessons learned from the pandemic will be with us forever and yet we find ourselves preparing for new challenges with hyperinflation, labor and supply chain shortages, and related cost increases . 2021-22 in Review In so many ways, the 2021-22 Fiscal Year was an anomaly due to the COVID-19 pandemic that influenced the City’s fiscal affairs and the variety of services needed to assist with the recovery in addition to providing all its regular programs and projects. By the time we were halfway 2021, the City experienced a surge of economic activity that corresponded with the lifting of lockdowns and stimulative fiscal and monetary policy. Given the positive revenue trends, Council approved mid-year requests for immediate action and resource allocation for one-time efforts as well as ongoing needs to position the City in a place of proactive engagement. With this action, the Council also allocated approximately $2 million in additional budget for 2022-23, which are included in the Supplemental Budget presented here. The $2 million appropriation was part of other Council actions that authorized a total pre-payment of $10.2 million from the General Fund and $2.2 million from the enterprise funds, which will put the City back on track with its schedule to pay down the pension obligation over 20 years. Though another turbulent year, 2021-22 saw many accomplishments and improvements for and around the community such as: Budget Document Pg. 4 Page 464 of 652 City Manager Message • Expansion of childcare services to serve all five City school sites (C.L. Smith, Hawthorn, Pacheco, Sinsheimer, and Bishop’s Peak) • Opening of Miossi Open Space and upgrades to existing trails throughout the City’s Open Space • Completion of an outdoor fitness court at Emerson Park as part of a National Fitness Campaign grant • Completion of the summer downtown paving project • Lighting and landscape improvements at Mission Plaza • Continued efforts toward the restoration of Laguna Lake through a two-week dredging project • Completion of the Railroad Safety Trail project • Addition of staff positions to deliver on the adopted Capital Improvement Plan, which has grown in size, scope, and complexity due to voters’ passage of Measure G-20 • Completion of the 2021 Benchmark Compensation Study • Successfully recruited for and promoted 165 employees, equivalent to 35% of the City’s headcount • Implemented the Mobile Crisis Unit • Expanded Fire Technical Rescue Team Membership from three to six • Welcomed the City’s first Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Manager who will continue to advance DEI priority initiatives in the City organization and community. • Led the second year of the Buy Local Bonus program resulting in $868,522 in direct local spending from 4,400 shoppers at 120 unique, local businesses during the holiday season, a 19% increase from the previous year. • Adoption of Lead by Example: A Plan for Carbon Neutral Municipal Operations. The plan will enable the City to achieve carbon neutral municipal operations by 2030. • Received the GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the 2021-23 Financial Plan and the GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. • Transitioned Downtown Bike Patrol Team to E-Bikes which will help increase mobility and contribute to the City’s Climate Action Major City Goal 2022-23 Budget Highlights Into the Future with focus and determination As adopted in June 2021, the second year of the Financial Plan provides investments into Council adopted strategic initiatives and 74 established service programs while maintaining a carefully balanced budget. These ambitious work plans continue to bring new challenges. Several of the challenges that the City addresses with the second-year budget are some of the most pernicious issues facing society, but the solutions are neither easy nor inexpensive. In order to make progress and achieve meaningful outcomes, the organization must stay focused and disciplined. Workforce – the Great Reshuffle First dubbed the “Great Resignation” is now more accurately labeled the “Great Reshuffle”. Globally, millions of people are reconsidering and reconfiguring their careers and lives and leveraging the current Budget Document Pg. 5 Page 465 of 652 City Manager Message labor market to find opportunities and positions that fit with their desired lifestyle. The City is not immune from this phenomenon and has seen record number of transitions. The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to provide competitive compensation to continue to attract and retain talented, qualified, and experienced employees who provide the high-quality public services the community requires and expects. In order to do so, the City will need to prioritize competitive compensation. To that end, the City Council received and filed the 2021 Benchmark Compensation Report for the San Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association (SLOCEA) and Unrepresented Management and Confidential Bargaining Units on February 1, 2022. Immediate action was taken to address compensation shortfalls found by the report on April 19, 2022 for confidential and unrepresented management. As of the writing of this message, the City is currently meeting with represented labor partners on the potential wage and benefit increases identified in the benchmark study. The increases in General Fund revenue forecasts allowed Council to quickly address this need and the Council approved negotiation parameters for equity adjustments and cost of living increases are now included in the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget. Moving forward, the City will need to be flexible and creative in order to attract and retain well-qualified employees. More broadly, there is a need region- wide for a concerted strategy to attract and retain employees and the absence of an effective strategy likely portends less than optimum growth and, in the case of the City, struggles to meet service demands. Investment into the Community The City’s ongoing services have been developed over many years with the input from the community, resulting in programs that provide the envisioned quality of life in San Luis Obispo. After years of “tightening the belt” to face challenges and pension obligations head-on, the 2021-23 Financial Plan allowed the City to allocate much needed resources back into ongoing services, programs, and infrastructure and this effort continues with the Financial Plan Supplement and 2022-23 budget. Capital While the City has made significant progress on delivering capital projects, it is constrained by unprecedented conditions that are affecting the entire nation. These obstacles include labor market shortages, significant construction activity in our area due to Federal stimulus monies (increasing local competition for design, inspection, and construction services), supply chain issues, and inflation. While the construction phase of projects is often the community’s first view of the improvements that are being made, it is really the result of months and sometimes years of planning, outreach, study, and design work that must be completed prior to making visible progress on a project. In light of this, the City must ensure that operating resources are right sized to deliver projects and continue meaningful progress for the community in the maintenance and improvements to its infrastructure. American Rescue Plan Act & the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund The State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds allocated through the American Rescue Plan Act provided much needed fiscal relieve to state, county, and municipal governments. The City stands to receive $13.5 million from the fund that it will use to backfill its Infrastructure Investment Fund to advance critical capital projects, invest in affordable housing and homelessness, as well as fast and reliable broadband access for Budget Document Pg. 6 Page 466 of 652 City Manager Message the entire community. Page 8 in the 2022-23 Budget Supplement document provides additional detail regarding the funding and the Council’s decision making regarding its use. CalPERS With the $12.4 million catch-up payment to CalPERS made in March 2022, the forecast maintains its pre- pandemic commitment to address the long-term pension liability by making additional investments each year. In July 2021, CalPERs reported a 21.3% net return on investments for the 12-month period that ended June 30, 2021. Under the Funding Risk Mitigation Policy, approved by the CalPERS Board of Administration in 2015, the double-digit return triggered a reduction in the discount rate used to calculate employer and Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) members contributions. The discount rate, or assumed rate of return, has now dropped from 7% to 6.8% on ongoing basis. The lowering of the discount rate will increase both employee and employer normal cost and also influence the unfunded liability. However, the double-digit gains should largely mitigate the impact of the lower discount rate on the unfunded liability. The City’s commitment to annually pay additional contributions will serve the organization in the long run. Long Term Outlook and the Path Ahead In many ways, the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget will mark a transition period for the City organization. The 2021-23 Financial Plan restored the work postponed by the pandemic and allowed the City to re- invest in its core services and important Major City Goal efforts and strategic initiatives. The next several years will concentrate on transforming the City’s role as an attractive employer and finding a balance between the delivery of service and programs and capital programs. Due to the current economic and geo-political circumstances, uncertainty continues to be the one certainty in economic forecasting. However, the updated long-term forecast considers many of the current trends and conditions and remains balanced but this and future Councils will need to be mindful that expansion of programs or new programs will likely require tradeoffs. The City will need to remain agile and cautious as it moves through this challenging economic and fiscal climate. As we embark on another year of this “strange routine”, we will need to remain focused and committed to making San Luis Obispo the kind of resilient, dynamic, and sustainable community we want to live and thrive in and advance the key initiatives and tasks the Council set forth in the City’s Major City Goals. With gratitude, Derek Johnson City Manager Budget Document Pg. 7 Page 467 of 652 Changes from Financial Plan Section 2: Significant Changes from the Financial Plan Adoption American Rescue Plan Act & the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund The 2021 American Rescue Plan Act provided much needed fiscal relief to State and local governments through the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. From the $350 billion allocated, the City of San Luis Obispo will receive $13,564,467. The second tranche of the payment is expected in July 2022. The 2021- 23 adopted Financial Plan considered $8.9 million in receipts that coincided with the revenue loss the City experienced in 2020. The City Council approved using the funding to backfill capital projects that were put on hold and to assist with any unforeseen developments in the construction environment. The funding was therefore placed in the Infrastructure Investment Fund for flexibility in addressing adverse circumstances. The U.S. Treasury’s Final Rule released in January 2022, provided final guidance to governments as to the use of the funding under four separate categories. It also clarified that cities can use a flat amount of $10 million for revenue loss without further proof or calculation of loss. Not all of the categories are applicable to a municipal corporation such as San Luis Obispo, but on March 1, 2022, the City Council received a presentation regarding the applicable use and a staff recommendation that incorporated the City’s Major City Goals objective for the $4,664,467 that had not been allocated with the Financial Plan. Council Agenda Report - March 1, 2022 At that meeting, the Council approved the following action: 1.$1 million to go toward the Infrastructure Investment fund for a total allocation of $9.9 million. 2. $100,000 to augment the Human Relations Commission’s grant-in-aid cycle for grants in support of non-profit organizations. 3.Allocate $2 million to affordable housing that targets extremely low & very low income and/or homeless persons most impacted by COVID-19. 4. $1,564,467 to be reviewed by a Council ad-hoc committee for most appropriate use in accordance with City Major City Goals and objectives. The Council ad-hoc committee was staffed by Mayor Stewart and Councilmember Shoresman. The committee met on three separate occasions. March 21, 2022: The ad-hoc committee received a brief overview of the American Rescue Plan Act and the Council action to-date; funding option under the U.S. Treasury Final Rule; the timeline for adoption of applicable uses with the Financial Plan Supplement; and next steps. The ad-hoc committee requested to receive additional information on broadband coverage in San Luis Obispo and research on other jurisdictions’ approach to premium pay for essential employees. April 20, 2022: The ad-hoc committee received information on broadband coverage within the City of SLO as well as information on efforts in other jurisdictions and possible investment options. They also received information staff had gathered from cities through a California Cities list serve request on premium pay for essential workers. 20 cities responded to an inquiry, of which five did not provide premium pay, three Budget Document Pg. 8 Page 468 of 652 Changes from Financial Plan are considering the option, and 12 provided some form of pay mainly to their city essential employees. Only two jurisdictions (Oxnard and Port Hueneme) provided premium pay to grocers and pharmacy workers. Further research confirmed that they are, thus far the only cities taking this approach. The ad-hoc committee requested to receive additional information regarding the complexities in administering the program in Oxnard and Port Hueneme. As background, Oxnard appropriated $2.5 million and each worker was eligible for up to $1,000 in payment. The City of Port Hueneme appropriated nearly $175,000 and workers were also eligible for $1,000 payments. April 27, 2022: The ad-hoc committee received information gathered from the Finance Director in Oxnard. The program in Port Hueneme mirrored the Oxnard approach, albeit at a much smaller scale. After consideration of the information and discussion, the ad-hoc committee recommended that the City adopt the following use of the $1,564,467 million of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: 1.$600,000 to improve the broadband coverage in San Luis Obispo a.$100,000 for a digital fiber strategic plan and the remaining $500,000 to leverage state and grant funding with the goal of advancing more digital fiber in the City with an emphasis on closing the equity gap. 2.$964,467 toward affordable housing for at-risk population or very low to extremely low-income classes most impacted by Covid-19. Final Allocation of State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funding included in the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget Revenue Loss - $10 million $9.9 million to the Infrastrucutre Invement Fund $100,000 for grants to health & human services programs/projects via the HRC grants-in-aid program $3,564,467 million tied to Final Rule $2,964,467 for Affordable Housing (low and very low income) $600,000 for 1. Citywide broadband study 2. Implementation of findings. Budget Document Pg. 9 Page 469 of 652 Changes from Financial Plan Mid-Year Report and Approved Changes to Budget Appropriations The mid-year report the City Council receives, provides a thorough review of the City’s financial condition halfway through the fiscal year. It reports out on work programs, capital projects, and reviews the current revenue and overall expenditure trends. It also serves to approve possible one-time allocations of unassigned fund balance as reported through the City’s audit and Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and allows the Council to adjust revenue and expenditure assumptions should the need arise. 2021-22 Mid-Year Review - February 2022 Though in most years the mid-year review is a check-in and discussion about the one-time use of unassigned fund balance, the 2021-22 Fiscal Year was anything but “most years”. With the ongoing pandemic-related rollercoaster or, as others have characterized it, Pandemic Flux, the City organization found itself in a situation to address emerging needs of the community and utilize available resources without hesitation or delay. The mid-year therefore included requests for immediate action and resource allocation for one-time efforts as well as ongoing needs to position the City in a place of proactive engagement. The approved ongoing expenditures have now been included in the 2022-23 Financial Plan Supplement and considered in the long-term forecast (page 23) The following actions were taken that will influence year-end balances and adjust previously adopted programs and services budgets in FY 2022-23. 1.Additional CalPERS payments consistent with the Fiscal Health Response Plan (FHRP). The total payment equates to $10.2 million from the General Fund and $2.2 million from the enterprise funds, which will put the City back on track with its schedule to pay down the pension obligation over 20 years. Fund Down-Payment General Fund 10,200,000 Water Fund 840,685 Sewer Fund 864,037 Parking Fund 311,114 Transit Fund 64,031 Whale Rock 109,229 TBID 40,678 Total $12,429,774 Budget Document Pg. 10 Page 470 of 652 Changes from Financial Plan 2.One-time and ongoing operating expenditure that are now incorporated into the Financial Plan Supplement and the long-term forecast: Table 1: General Fund Operating Budget Requests FY 21-22 FY 22-23 Available Balance $ 2,273,520 $ 911,925 1 2nd Legal Assistant Ongoing - 73,400 2 One-time Contingency: Benchmark Study Adjustments One-time 250,000 - 3 Conversion of City Attorney Contract Positions(3 FTE)1 Ongoing - - 4 Hybrid Public Meeting Support (0.5 FTE) Ongoing - 60,888 5 Monsido - ADA Compliance Software Ongoing - 4,900 6 Temporary Office Leasing and Equipment One-time 197,040 7 Transitional Legal Services Ongoing - 32,000 8 Virtual Meeting Software Ongoing - 6,200 9 Part-time Fire Inspector (0.5 FTE) (Revenue Offset) Ongoing 11,025 33,410 10 Part-time, Contract Attorney Resource Ongoing - 94,100 261,025 501,938 Remaining balance 2 $2,012,495 $409,987 Table 2: LRM Operating Budget Requests FY 21-22 FY 22-23 Available Balance $ 1,531,000 $ 1,304,870 1 Housing/Homelessness Contract Position One-time 40,000 80,000 2 Increase in Mission Plaza Maintenance Ongoing 27,000 27,000 3 Convert Mobile Crisis Unit to Permanent (1 FTE)3 Ongoing - - 4 Accelerate New Streets Position One-time - - 5 Additional Pressure Washing Ongoing 25,000 25,000 6 Additional Pruning/Watering Ongoing 200,000 200,000 7 Additional Streets Maintenance Staff (2 FTE) Ongoing 60,750 243,000 8 Additional Supplies for Downtown Maintenance Program Ongoing - 25,000 9 CAPSLO Programming – Railroad Square Safe Parking One-time 64,633 - 10 Centralized Resident Inquiry Platform Ongoing 40,000 40,000 11 CIP Staff Augmentation Study – Conversion of Existing Funding to Positions (4 FTE) Ongoing - - 12 Community Services Coordinator (1 FTE) Ongoing - 9,728 1 The fiscal impact for this request was already included as “ongoing” in the 2021-23 Financial Plan. This is only a request to add Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions. 2 Given the remaining uncertainty and volatility that the economy is facing, staff recommend not appropriating any additional expenditures at this time. 3 The fiscal impact for this request was already included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan as “one-time”. This is only a request to add Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions and approve the request as “ongoing”. The ongoing fiscal impact is included in the revised long-term forecast. Budget Document Pg. 11 Page 471 of 652 Changes from Financial Plan Table 2: LRM Operating Budget Requests FY 21-22 FY 22-23 Available Balance $ 1,531,000 $ 1,304,870 13 Public Safety Customer Engagement Ongoing 17,000 12,000 14 Mobile Data Computers One-time 14,200 - 15 Supplemental Overtime for Farmer’s Market Support Ongoing 15,000 15,000 16 Contract Volunteer Coordinator P&R One-time 32,850 101,508 17 Converting Contract Homelessness Response Manager to FTE (1 FTE)3 Ongoing - - 18 Emergency Manager (1 FTE) Ongoing 38,627 143,061 19 Facilities Additional Contract Funding Ongoing 25,000 20 Parks Additional Contract Funding Ongoing - 40,000 21 Parks Maintenance Beautification Gardner (1 FTE) Ongoing 48,600 97,200 Total 623,660 1,083,497 Remaining balance $907,340 $221,373 Budget Document Pg. 12 Page 472 of 652 Consolidated Financials – All Major Funds Combined Section 3: Consolidated Financials – Major Funds Combined Consolidated Financials – Revenues and Expenditures *Includes ARPA allocation as recommended by the ARPA ad-hoc subcommittee (See Budget Section 2). Table C1: Total Revenue by Fund (in thousands)Footnote2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 Tax & Franchise Revenue $70,896 $87,092 $84,379 $90,156 7% 2 Service Charges & Other Revenue 3 General Fund $16,749 $19,937 $19,369 $20,194 4% 4 Water Fund $29,435 $26,224 $27,794 $26,980 -3% 5 Sewer Fund $21,784 $23,885 $21,058 $20,836 -1% 6 Parking Fund $3,349 $4,611 $6,494 $6,533 1% 7 Transit Fund 1 $7,243 $7,707 $4,950 $11,133 125% 8 Assessment Revenue $1,631 $1,689 $1,812 $2,002 10% 9 10 Proceeds from Debt Financing 11 Water Fund $11,030 $3,270 -- 12 Sewer Fund 2 $20,212 $89,916 $4,865 $427 -91% 13 Total $182,329 $264,331 $169,326 $178,261 5% 1 - Increase due to additional Federal Grants. See budget section 4c for more detail 2 - Decrease due to timing of long-term debt proceeds reciepts Table C2: Total Expenditures by Fund (in thousands) 2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 General Fund* $ 79,125 101,731$ 103,621$ 108,614$ 5% 2 Business Activities 3 Water Fund $ 31,396 39,679$ 27,632$ 28,340$ 3% 4 Sewer Fund $ 48,754 123,584$ 24,367$ 18,125$ -26% 5 Parking Fund $ 4,837 7,125$ 11,520$ 14,347$ 25% 6 Transit Fund $ 5,857 8,293$ 4,895$ 8,027$ 64% 7 Special Revenue 8 Tourism Assessment $ 1,027 1,640$ 1,582$ 1,577$ 0% 9 Downtown Assessment $ 249 245$ 275$ 275$ 0% 10 Total $ 171,244 282,297$ 173,893$ 179,304$ 3% Table C3: Expenditures by Category (in thousands)2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 Staffing $ 64,014 69,732$ 73,810$ 76,920$ 4% 2 Contract Services $ 11,619 16,379$ 13,759$ 14,333$ 4% 3 Other Operating Expenses $ 29,850 28,851$ 27,457$ 32,694$ 19% 4 Capital Investment $ 58,518 160,651$ 46,390$ 48,690$ 5% 5 Debt* $ 7,244 6,685$ 12,476$ 6,667$ -47% 6 Total $ 171,244 282,297$ 173,893$ 179,304$ 3% * Reduction in debt due to an update to the timing of the first debt payment for the Sewer Fund SRF Loan. The first payment is now due in FY 2023-24. Budget Document Pg. 13 Page 473 of 652 Consolidated Financials – All Major Funds Combined Consolidated Financials – Reserves and Fund Balances (see fund sections for detail) Consolidated Financials – Transfers between funds Continued on next page Table C4: Operating Reserve (in thousands)2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 General Fund 2 Operating $ 11,830 12,014$ 11,916$ 13,035$ 9% 3 Capital 3,426$ 3,592$ $ 3,809 6 % 4 Water Fund $ 4,106 4,652$ 4,483$ 4,651$ 4% 5 Sewer Fund $ 2,160 2,496$ 3,549$ 2,477$ -30% 6 Parking Fund $ 732 921$ 731$ 970$ 33% 7 Transit Fund $ 673 981$ 837$ 850$ 2% Table C5: Unassigned Fund Balance (in thousands)2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 General Fund $ 512 2,095$ 2,493$ 301$ -88% 2 Water Fund $ 23,569 10,428$ 12,668$ 9,241$ -27% 3 Sewer Fund $ 28,273 21,022$ 25,954$ 20,588$ -21% 4 Parking Fund $ 12,454 9,750$ 5,396$ 2,929$ -46% 5 Transit Fund $ 3,411 1,148$ 1,523$ 4,373$ 187% Table C6: Reimbursement Transfers In/(out)2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 General Fund Transfer In 4,578,402$ 4,717,442$ 4,811,791$ 4,461,578$ -7% 2 Water Fund (1,729,965)$ (1,722,409)$ (1,756,857)$ (1,535,175)$ -13% 3 Sewer Fund (1,632,521)$ (1,712,752)$ (1,747,007)$ (1,497,395)$ -14% 4 Parking Fund (710,211)$ (869,887)$ (887,285)$ (872,976)$ -2% 5 Transit Fund (321,727)$ (226,183)$ (230,707)$ (365,544)$ 58% 6 Whale Rock (183,978)$ (186,211)$ (189,935)$ (190,488)$ 0% Budget Document Pg. 14 Page 474 of 652 Consolidated Financials – All Major Funds Combined Consolidated Financials – Transfers between funds Consolidated Financials - Capital Transfers 1 - Reduction due to the updated ARPA allocation. Original budget assumed the allocation of $8.9M split equally across FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23, with $4.465 million being deposited into the Infrastructure Investment Fund in 2022-23. With the updated ARPA allocation ($13.5M), Council took action on March 1, 2022, to move $9.9 million into the Infrastructure Investment Fund. ($6.7 million was transferred in FY 2021-22 and $3.1 million will be transferred in FY 2022-23). 2 - Reduction due to the transfer of Capital Budget into Operating Budget for CIP Augmentation resources. See Budget Section 7 for more detail. Table C7: Operating Transfers In/(out)2020-21 Actual 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 Transfers in 2 General Fund Transfer in 3,538,869$ 3,426,103$ 3,602,451$ 4,190,415$ 16% 3 Insurance Fund 3,818,617$ 4,146,445$ 4,250,000$ 4,250,000$ 0% 4 Transfers Out 5 General Fund Transfer out (3,818,617)$ (4,146,445)$ (4,250,000)$ (4,250,000)$ 0% 6 Gas Tax (1,082,390)$ (1,223,937)$ (1,245,026)$ (1,377,557)$ 11% 7 Affordable Housing Fund (57,000)$ (57,000)$ (57,000)$ (57,000)$ 0% 8 TDA Fund (45,900)$ (45,000)$ (45,000)$ (45,000)$ 0% 9 TIF Fund (285,600)$ (280,000)$ (280,000)$ (280,000)$ 0% 10 TBID Fund (25,068)$ (28,852)$ (31,012)$ (34,544)$ 11% 11 IT Replacement Fund (50,000)$ (106,000)$ (109,180)$ (152,702)$ 40% 12 Water Fund (943,003)$ (794,769)$ (900,000)$ (776,578)$ -14% 13 Sewer Fund (769,208)$ (655,312)$ (700,000)$ (1,076,388)$ 54% 14 Parking Fund (280,700)$ (235,233)$ (235,233)$ (390,646)$ 66% Table C8: Capital Transfers In/(out)Footnote2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget % Change from Original 2022-23 Budget 1 General Fund 1 (7,177,916)$ (7,949,558)$ (6,602,325)$ -17% 2 LRM 2 (17,866,400)$ (18,763,050)$ (17,979,590)$ -4% 3 Capital Outlay 14,257,798$ 16,967,220$ 16,183,760$ -5% 4 Fleet 1,265,000$ 1,045,000$ 1,045,000$ 0% 5 IT Replacement 988,973$ 564,777$ 564,777$ 0% 6 Major Facilities Maint 867,500$ 593,200$ 593,200$ 0% 7 Infrastructure Investment 1 7,222,545$ 7,099,911$ 5,752,678$ -19% 8 Public Art Fund 442,500$ 442,500$ 442,500$ 0% Budget Document Pg. 15 Page 475 of 652 General Fund Section 4: General Fund Overview The City has eight service departments under the purview of the City’s General Fund. The Utilities Department, administering Water & Sewer, as well as the Parking and Transit programs are administered and accounted for as business activities and the related information is presented in the “Enterprise Fund” section of this budget document. Revenue Trying to develop a revenue forecast during a pandemic coupled with hyperinflation, looming international crises, and unpredictable labor and cost increases is a complex, dynamic and fluid endeavor. As the City approached the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget, staff used the combination of current economic trends, local data points, its own scenario modeling, and major tax revenue forecasts from multiple external sources, to present a well-informed and updated forecast for Council. Sales Tax: Like the rest of the nation, the City experienced a surge of consumption that corresponded with the lifting of lockdowns and stimulative fiscal and monetary policy and record levels of corporate and personal savings. While the U.S economy has largely recovered from the pandemic-driven downturn, new challenges arose. Higher labor and raw material costs along with inflationary pressures drive taxable good prices upward and increase the City’s sales tax revenue. However, higher prices reduce consumer demand and increase the City’s own expenditure costs. It is still unclear how these factors will influence the local economic forecast but staff forecasts a weakening of sales tax receipt growth beginning in 2023, followed by a modest 2% growth in the outer years. Property Tax: The City receives its annual property tax forecasts directly from the County Assessor. Throughout 2021 and into 2022, there was a considerable increase in home prices primary due to low Table G-1: General Fund Revenue Overview 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Tax & Franchise Revenue Sales Tax (Bradley Burns)20,067,740$ 20,790,779$ 19,086,000$ 21,789,000$ 2,703,000$ 14% LRM G-20 12,779,713$ 25,810,000$ 25,202,000$ 27,049,000$ 1,847,000$ 7% Property Tax 19,858,530$ 20,157,153$ 20,781,387$ 20,746,387$ (35,000)$ 0% Transient Occupancy Tax 6,960,035$ 9,051,000$ 7,753,000$ 8,636,000$ 883,000$ 11% Business Tax 2,937,176$ 2,832,000$ 2,547,000$ 2,889,000$ 342,000$ 13% Cannabis Tax 844,939$ 1,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,400,000$ (100,000)$ -7% Franchise Fees 1,796,829$ 1,575,000$ 1,606,000$ 1,606,000$ -$ 0% Gas Tax (SB1)851,292$ 915,000$ 941,535$ 1,049,877$ 108,342$ 12% Safety Prop 172 425,136$ 493,000$ 339,000$ 497,000$ 158,000$ 47% Utility User Tax 5,225,979$ 5,383,000$ 5,565,000$ 5,544,000$ (21,000)$ 0% Development Review 7,094,935$ 6,820,055$ 6,864,650$ 5,917,618$ (947,032)$ -14% Parks & Recreation 1,616,010$ 1,615,555$ 2,039,215$ 1,978,920$ (60,295)$ -3% Fire 1,500,759$ 1,440,260$ 1,422,086$ 1,576,322$ 154,236$ 11% Police 600,406$ 616,440$ 637,196$ 632,325$ (4,871)$ -1% General Government 1,890,201$ 1,721,726$ 2,099,853$ 1,668,952$ (460,000)$ -22% Grants & Subventions 3,114,368$ 1,204,196$ 900,000$ 587,328$ (312,672)$ -35% ARPA 6,782,234$ 4,465,000$ 6,782,234$ 2,317,234$ 52% Total 87,564,049$ 108,207,399$ 103,748,922$ 110,349,963$ 6,571,942$ 6% 2021-23 Financial Plan Budget Document Pg. 16 Page 476 of 652 General Fund inventory, high demand, and still record low interest rates. The pandemic also allowed residents in high- cost urban cores to migrate to lower density, more affordable regions for remote work. This phenomenon had a cascading effect throughout the nation, and San Luis Obispo experiences an exceptionally strong real estate market. As the Fed begins to raise interest rates throughout 2022, home sales are expected to decrease as buyers will experience diminishing purchasing power in the housing market. Similar to the Sales Tax forecast, staff expect a weakening in property tax growth back to two to three percent annually. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): Tourism along the central coast made a strong comeback as the region re- opened and benefited from being a drive-to destination. Monthly TOT receipts continue to reach all-time highs largely driven by high room rates; a trend that is expected to continue through the end of FY 2021- 22 as events like the Cal Poly graduation return to in-person. However, as inflation and gas prices increase and pent-up demand declines, the City expects to see a growth plateau and a possible decline over the next 12 months. Interestingly, when looking at the Smith Travel report data, the premier tracking source of lodging data, the region’s average daily rate (ADR) sky-rocketed, but its occupancy rate (the number of rooms booked) has actually declined. Although, it is hard to analyze the direct correlation between the two, since the room inventory in San Luis Obispo has increased, the data indicates that the increased rates are at the core driver of overall revenue growth. The long-term forecast assumes a decline in FY 2022-23 followed by modest growth in the outer years. This revenue stream will be closely monitored based on national, state, and regional travel trends. Utility User Tax (UUT): Historically, UUT revenue has grown at a slower pace than other major tax revenues. Additionally, new regulations brought on by the Federal Communications Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission, as well as legal challenges, continue to disrupt the landscape for the revenue and staff continues to evaluate possible changes to the Municipal Code to maximize UUT. The City does expect UUT revenue to increase in FY 2022-23 due to general increases in utility costs and diligent collection of late fees and penalties. Cannabis Tax: Since April 2021, the monthly cannabis tax revenue collected has stayed very consistent. This suggests that demand for cannabis retail is relatively stable and unlikely to decrease. The City’s second retail operator opened at the end of March and a non-retail storefront operator may open before the end of FY2021-22. While the new businesses will lead to additional cannabis revenue, staff expect some cannibalization to partially offset the new revenue. Staff expects to come to the City Council in Summer 2022 with proposed ordinance changes and recommend putting in place the framework for selecting an applicant for the third available retail permit. Development Review: Based on data as of the third quarter in FY 2021-22, Development Review revenues were 11 percent below the projections included in the 21-23 Financial Plan. Although Development Review revenues tend to be “lumpy” (meaning large projects with high fees have a high influence on total revenue collection), staff expect a significant revenue shortfall of approximately 15 percent ($1M) in 2021- 22.Due to the shortfall, staff conducted a revenue analysis and adjusted the 2022-23 budget downwards for several reasons: •Reduced revenues in planning and zoning are a result of fewer planning applications and building permits across all development types from the peak that occurred in FY 2019-20. Updates to the City’s Zoning Regulations in 2018 and again in 2021 included substantial efforts to streamline the City’s discretionary approval processes. These efforts are working, resulting in fewer planning Budget Document Pg. 17 Page 477 of 652 General Fund applications overall, and a shift towards applications for “Director’s Action” rather than Minor or Major Use Permits. •The total number of building permits has been trending down. The reduction is not centered in any one sector, although staff has heard anecdotally that challenges created by COVID-19 with respect to supply chain and workforce constraints as well as a raising interest rate environment has played a role. Looking forward, inflation and increased interest rates may continue to slow growth in building permits as market uncertainty plagues investor confidence. However, there are many large projects with high construction values in the permit process. This includes two hotels, several mixed-use projects, a Porsche and Tesla auto dealership, and new housing tracts. Although Development Review Fees are designed to recover 100% of staff costs, the City will be embarking on a comprehensive fee study in FY 2023-24 to ensure that development application costs are fully covered by fees. Additionally, not all of the work assigned to Community Development is under cost recovery or otherwise offset by revenues. As the City’s Housing Program expands and zoning regulations change, a lot of the policy workload in the department has shifted away from being fee-reimbursed and must be covered by general government revenue (tax and franchise fee revenue). Balancing policy initiatives with fee recovered work will be closely monitored so that both current and long-range planning efforts stay in balance. Other Department Revenue (Parks & Rec, Fire, Police): Overall, fee-generating department programs are now operating at the level projected, and budgets have been adjusted to account for the policy increase by CPI which stood at 7.9% at the end of April (Resolution 11026, June 2019). General Government/Subventions and Grants: General government and grant revenues fluctuate from year-to-year based on availability and award success. The City only budgets for grants or subventions that are highly likely to be received, but the budget is adjusted throughout the year if additional revenue is secured. Budget Document Pg. 18 Page 478 of 652 General Fund Expenditures While the City treaded very conservatively over the last two years, the trends are showing that revenue has largely returned to it is more predictable ebbs and flows and the financial forecast has improved, though new uncertainty injected by hyperinflation and labor and supply chain issues will be closely monitored and will be discussed in the quarterly reports to the City Council. Table G2 below shows the total expenditures for the General Fund by type and department. While the expenditure budget has increased significantly, it is important to note that this is primarily due to the increased cost of providing the services adopted in the budget, as well as changes made at the 2021-22 Mid-Year review (see page 23 – Significant Changes from Financial Plan Adoption). Because of the already ambitious Major City Goal work programs and existing department objectives, departments were instructed to only submit mission critical Significant Operating Budget Changes (SOBCs). This methodology is also consistent with the City’s two-year financial planning policies. Table G2: General Fund Expenditures by type *The 2021-22 Budget includes encumbrances from the prior year and the “staffing” line includes the $10.2 million additional down payment to CalPERS hence the significant drop in budget from FY 21-22 to FY 22-23. Table G3: General Fund Expenditures by Department *Includes equity adjustments and COLA parameters for the entire general fund that were approved by Council for MME, SLOCEA, and CONF employee groups. Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Staffing 53,829,187$ 71,379,892$ 62,936,199$ 66,250,502$ 3,314,303$ 5% Other Operating Costs 8,501,284$ 10,151,572$ 9,157,105$ 9,057,952$ (99,153)$ -1% Contract Services 6,415,153$ 10,761,626$ 7,483,692$ 7,816,094$ 332,402$ 4% Grand Total 68,745,623$ 92,293,090$ 79,576,996$ 83,124,548$ 3,547,551$ 4% 2021-23 Financial Plan Department 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Public Safety Police 17,618,498$ 22,842,870$ 20,066,744$ 20,866,264$ 799,520$ 4% Fire 14,024,822$ 17,103,242$ 14,440,373$ 14,515,112$ 74,739$ 1% Community Services Group CSG Administration 315,986$ 851,684$ 575,274$ 573,066$ (2,207)$ 0% CDD 6,509,806$ 8,871,312$ 6,841,955$ 6,783,059$ (58,896)$ -1% Parks and Rec 4,038,719$ 5,779,681$ 5,335,040$ 5,251,052$ (83,988)$ -2% Public Works 12,660,253$ 17,162,531$ 15,156,004$ 16,144,599$ 988,595$ 7% Solid Waste 121,078$ 355,478$ 176,280$ 317,456$ 141,176$ 80% Internal Services Administration 7,805,012$ 11,327,879$ 9,805,269$ 10,453,389$ 648,120$ 7% City Attorney 964,100$ 1,690,991$ 1,043,562$ 1,305,660$ 262,097$ 25% Finance 1,795,348$ 2,559,079$ 2,291,343$ 2,317,013$ 25,670$ 1% Human Resources 1,374,481$ 2,011,411$ 1,683,223$ 1,684,948$ 1,725$ 0% Non-Departmental*1,517,519$ 1,736,930$ 2,161,928$ 2,912,928$ 751,000$ 35% Total 68,745,623$ 92,293,090$ 79,576,996$ 83,124,548$ 3,547,551$ 4% 2021-23 Financial Plan Budget Document Pg. 19 Page 479 of 652 General Fund Staffing The majority of the 2022-23 budget changes are due to adjusted employee compensation. At the time the City re-forecasted its revenue projections, it was also finalizing a Benchmark Compensation Report for the San Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association (SLOCEA) and Unrepresented Management and Confidential Bargaining Units. It had already become clear that there was a market wage and benefit imbalance due to the turnover and attraction challenges that the City was facing and the compensation study confirmed this initial presumption. Overall, the City’s base salaries compared to other surveyed employers were on average, 8.55% below the median. The City Council approved wage and benefit changes for unrepresented and confidential employees on April 19, 2022 to provide competitive compensation in line with the City’s compensation philosophy. In order to continue to attract and retain talented, qualified, and experienced employees who provide quality public services that the community expects, the City would need to prioritize competitive compensation. The increases in General Fund tax revenue allowed Council to quickly address this need and shortly after mid-year, the Council approved negotiation parameters for equity adjustments and cost of living increases which are now included in the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget. The updated budget also includes previously negotiated staffing increases in Police and Fire. In addition to the wage increases, Council also approved 15 new FTEs with the mid-year review. These position were tied to increased demand for services, enlarging scope of services such as the City’s role in homelessness, housing, and other community focused services. Other Operating Costs Though other operating costs appear to have decreased by about 1%, this is due to a transfer of the Public Safety Equipment budget into a separate sub-fund (see page. 32). Overall, this expenditure category increased by about $150,000 due to the rising cost of utilities and several adjustments that were approved with the 2021-22 Mid-year Review (linked above). Contract Services Contract services increased by about 6% due to adjustments approved at mid-year for two main reasons: 1.Council approved about $200,000 for temporary office leasing and equipment while staff develop a long-term solution to make space for a significant number of new employees that were added with the Financial Plan. The hybrid work-from-home model has allowed for some flexibility, but more and more staff are returning to the physical office now that COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted. 2.Council approved approximately $250,000 in additional ongoing budget for the maintenance of City parks and streets (pruning, pressure washing, downtown maintenance). Budget Document Pg. 20 Page 480 of 652 General Fund Significant Operating Budget Changes Table G4: General Fund Operating Budget Changes FY 2022-23 Budget 1. Capital Maintenance Supervisor - 1 FTE (Ongoing)$ 128,170 Staff is recommending the addition of 1.00 FTE Capital Maintenance Supervisor (a new classification) to oversee critical Public Works programs including streetlights and signals, urban forestry, and maintenance contracts. The new position will increase the capacity of existing staff to supplement the efforts of the CIP Engineering group to oversee the many projects included in the City’s CIP. This position will be funded through the Local Revenue Measure and out of the $1,000,000 set aside for CIP Delivery Augmentation. 2. Developer Funds for Tree Planting (One-time)$ 18,225 The City received $18,225 from a developer in fiscal year 2021-22 for new tree planting. This money was not used before the end of the fiscal year and thus went toward fund balance. The City received these funds for the specific purpose of mitigating the removal of 50 trees by planting 100 new trees per City policy. This request would reallocate the $18,225 from fund balance to the Urban Forest Cost Center's Other Contract Services account to purchase and plant the trees in 2022-23. 3. City Employee Parking (Ongoing) $ 49,928 The City has maintained a $30,000 employee parking budget for the last five years. Actual costs have exceeded the budget for the last two years but were offset by savings elsewhere. This request will bring the budget to the level it needs to be considering the current cost of parking permits and employees that utilize the parking. 4.Housing Element Funding now reimbursable by grant funding (One-time) ($115,000) The total amount of $255,000 was approved at the start of the Financial Plan for consultant support to complete four specific Housing Element Programs ($140k in FY22 and $115k in FY23). This includes updating our Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, Missing Middle Housing and Subdivision Regulations. A reimbursable grant for the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was received and approximately $120,000 was dedicated to that effort; therefore, part of initial budget for this effort can be removed. 5. Contingency for over-hires (Ongoing) $ 100,000 Historically, the City hasn't included a budget for over-hires (hiring for an expected vacancy before it is vacant), but given the current labor market, this would be a prudent move in order to get positions filled and ensure knowledge transfer and retention. This SOBC is listed as ongoing but it will be evaluated with the 2023-25 Financial Plan to determine if still necessary. 6. Solid Waste Staffing - 1 FTE (Revenue offset) (Ongoing) $ 134,058 This request is to allocate funding to salaries in preparation for an additional FTE in the Solid Waste and Recycling program. As the program continues to expand, inclusive of SB 1383 compliance and oversight, additional resources are necessary. The cost of the new FTE will be 100% covered by the increase in revenue projected from AB939 and franchise fees. For more detail on the Solid Waste program and this request, see the Utilities section (pg. 40) 7.Contract Administrative Analyst (One-time) $ 48,000 Due to a leave of absence in the Utilities department, the City hired a contract analyst in March 2022 to assist with workload (funded by Water and Sewer). Staff would like to fund the position for an additional six months once the leave of absence in Utilities is over (Summer 2022). This position will help with important one-time special projects and analytical work for the Community Services Departments. TOTAL $ 363,381 Budget Document Pg. 21 Page 481 of 652 General Fund Long Term Forecast The long-term forecast is an essential planning tool for the City, and its ongoing service delivery. While the City adopts a two-year Financial Plan that must be balanced, the outer years of the forecast are presented to show the City’s financial condition and availability of resources into the future. The forecast is updated every six months which gives staff the opportunity to alert Council of looming imbalances and strategize appropriate actions to be taken. As the current forecast outlines, the City will have to be diligent in holding the course and assign is resources prudently. Key Takeaways Overall, the General fund is in a good financial condition and remains balanced throughout the five-year forecast. Current assumptions are conservatively optimistic, and the forecast does not assume a recession only a cooling of current economic activity. The impacts of high inflation on the City’s forecast are still unclear and a looming concern is that the cost of providing services will outpace revenue growth. Another important note is that the forecast assumes carryover, meaning that year-end balances are left untouched and remain in fund balance to protect the financial condition in the outer years. Fund balance does increase in FY 2023-24 after the removal of one-time budget allocations for the 2021-23 Major City Goals but is used in the outer years of the forecast as available revenue and required expenditure budget begin to inch closer (See line 34 in Forecast on the next page). Outer Year Expenditure Assumptions (FY 2023-24 through FY 2025-26) •Negotiated staffing increases and approved parameters for SLOCEA are included. •Assumed annual 3% increase in non-staffing operating costs. •One-time budget allocations from the 2021-23 Financial Plan are removed. •Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) and Cost of Services transfers inflated proportionally to General Fund budget increases. •Reserve maintained at 20% of operating costs (policy requirement). •An annual $2 million additional down payment to CalPERs in order to achieve a 20-year paydown goal. •$3 million set aside in a 115 Pension Trust Fund to protect the City from further changes by CalPERS. •Continued investment into the Capital Improvement Plan (see Capital Section pg 78) Budget Document Pg. 22 Page 482 of 652 General Fund In Thousands Actual 2020-21 Budget 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Projected 2023-24 Projected 2024-25 Projected 2025-26 Tax & Franchise Revenue 1 Sales & Use Tax 33,273 47,093 49,335 50,561 51,567 52,593 2 Sales Tax General 20,068 20,791 21,789 22,333 22,780 23,236 3 Public Safety (Prop 172)425 493 497 502 507 512 4 Measure G20 12,780 25,810 27,049 27,725 28,280 28,845 5 Property Tax 19,859 20,157 20,746 21,369 22,010 22,670 6 Transient Occupancy Tax 6,960 9,051 8,636 8,809 8,985 9,165 7 Utility Users Tax 5,226 5,383 5,544 5,655 5,768 5,883 8 Franchise Fees 1,797 1,575 1,606 1,638 1,671 1,704 9 Business Tax Certificates 2,937 2,832 2,889 2,946 3,005 3,065 10 Cannabis Tax 845 1,000 1,400 1,650 1,683 1,717 11 Total Tax & Franchise Revenue 70,896$ 87,092$ 90,156$ 92,627$ 94,689$ 96,797$ 12 Fees for Service & Other Revenue 13 Police Services 599 610 632 651 664 678 14 Fire Services 1,501 1,421 1,576 1,624 1,656 1,689 15 Development Review 7,174 6,551 5,918 6,095 6,278 6,466 16 Parks & Recreation 1,616 1,616 1,979 2,018 2,059 2,100 17 General Government 442 438 446 459 468 478 18 Cannabis 90 157 210 216 223 229 19 Other Revenues 2,126 1,886 2,063 2,106 2,134 2,162 20 Subventions & Grants 3,201 477 587 440 440 440 21 Federal Stimulus Funding 6,782 6,782 22 Total Fees & Other Revenue $ 16,749 $ 19,937 $ 20,194 $ 13,610 $ 13,922 $ 14,243 23 Total Revenue $ 87,646 $ 107,029 $ 110,349 $ 106,237 $ 108,611 $ 111,040 Use of Funds 24 Staffing 53,829 57,774$ 64,618$ 66,424$ 68,723$ 70,827$ 25 Contract Services 6,415 8,740$ 7,816$ 6,485$ 6,679$ 6,946$ 26 Other Operating Expenditures 13,302 8,913$ 9,058$ 9,278$ 9,369$ 9,650$ 27 Cost Allocation (4,578) (4,717)$ (4,462)$ (4,819)$ (4,963)$ (5,112)$ 28 Total Operating Expenditure $ 68,968 $ 70,709 $ 77,031 $ 77,369 $ 79,809 $ 82,312 29 Debt Service 2,541 1,997$ 1,992$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 30 Capital 6,999 28,531$ 25,632$ 24,299$ 24,801$ 25,265$ 31 Transfers Out 617 495$ 296$ 449$ 635$ 831$ 32 Total Expenditure $ 79,125 $ 101,731 $ 104,950 $ 104,117 $ 107,245 $ 110,407 33 Beginning Fund Balance $ 33,798 $ 32,118 $ 30,067 $ 29,801 $ 29,922 $ 29,288 34 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses $ 8,520 $ 5,298 $ 5,399 $ 2,121 $ 1,366 $ 633 35 Ending Fund Balance $ 42,318 $ 37,416 $ 35,466 $ 31,922 $ 31,288 $ 29,921 36 CalPERS Downpayments (10,200) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) 37 ARPA Allocations (see note 1)(3,664) 38 Carryover/encumbrances from FY21 (5,349) 39 Ending Fund Balance $ 32,118 $ 30,067 $ 29,801 $ 29,922 $ 29,288 $ 27,921 40 Policy Reserve Level - 20%11,830 12,014 13,035 12,928 13,260 13,669 41 115 Pension Trust Fund 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 42 Restricted based on Audit 17,776 13,958 13,465 11,000 11,000 11,000 43 Undesignated Fund Balance $ 512 $ 2,095 $ 301 $ 2,994 $ 2,028 $ 252 Table G-5: GENERAL FUND LONG TERM FORECAST Revised with Supplement Note 1: ARPA allocations as recommended by the ad-hoc committee: $2.9M affordable housing; $600,000 Broadband coverage; $100,000 Grants-in-aid. Budget Document Pg. 23 Page 483 of 652 Table G‐7: Detailed General Fund  Operating Expenditures 20‐21 Actuals  21‐22 Budget   22‐23 Original Budget   22‐23 Revised  Budget Change % Change 1 Administration 7,805,012$       11,327,879$     9,805,269$       10,453,389$     648,120$           7% 2 Administration 1,115,952$       1,670,286$       1,314,380$       1,374,415$       60,035$             5% 3 Staffing 878,527$           1,261,115$       1,148,180$       1,193,995$       45,815$             4% 4 Other Operating Costs 30,981$             96,800$             45,200$             54,520$             9,320$               21% 5 Contract Services 206,444$           312,371$           121,000$           125,900$           4,900$               4% 6 City Clerk 567,513$           676,553$           657,638$           704,704$           47,065$             7% 7 Staffing 416,383$           511,958$           457,293$           498,159$           40,865$             9% 8 Other Operating Costs 15,737$             53,180$             49,345$             49,345$             ‐$0% 9 Contract Services 135,392$           111,414$           151,000$           157,200$           6,200$               4% 10 City Council 173,273$           241,611$           216,352$           221,756$           5,405$               2% 11 Staffing 159,005$           210,861$           186,952$           192,356$           5,405$               3% 12 Other Operating Costs 9,930$               29,449$             29,400$             29,400$             ‐$0% 13 Contract Services 4,339$               1,301$               ‐$‐$‐$ 14 Community Promotion 417,721$           444,088$           405,826$           405,609$           (217)$                 0% 15 Staffing 37,639$             44,275$             38,826$             38,609$             (217)$                 ‐1% 16 Other Operating Costs 7,150$               53,427$             39,000$             39,000$             ‐$0% 17 Contract Services 372,931$           346,386$           328,000$           328,000$           ‐$0% 18 Cultural Activities 332,351$           347,632$           357,963$           357,963$           ‐$0% 19 Other Operating Costs ‐$3,250$               3,250$               3,250$               ‐$0% 20 Contract Services 332,351$           344,382$           354,713$           354,713$           ‐$0% 21 Economic Dev 588,878$           1,245,541$       907,271$           906,219$           (1,051)$              0% 22 Staffing 172,391$           217,118$           184,621$           183,569$           (1,051)$              ‐1% 23 Other Operating Costs 10,606$             37,650$             27,650$             27,650$             ‐$0% 24 Contract Services 405,881$           990,773$           695,000$           695,000$           ‐$0% 25 Information Services 1,105,991$       1,446,942$       1,290,790$       1,277,224$       (13,566)$           ‐1% 26 Staffing 1,007,912$       1,364,042$       1,207,890$       1,194,324$       (13,566)$            ‐1% 27 Other Operating Costs 96,166$             71,500$             71,500$             71,500$             ‐$0% 28 Contract Services 1,913$               11,400$             11,400$             11,400$             ‐$0% 29 Natural Resource Protection 646,613$           1,235,729$       791,226$           814,543$           23,317$             3% 30 Staffing 484,679$           709,349$           617,767$           641,084$           23,317$             4% 31 Other Operating Costs 101,125$           87,834$             73,459$             73,459$             ‐$0% 32 Contract Services 60,809$             438,545$           100,000$           100,000$           ‐$0% 33 Network Services 2,856,721$       3,485,098$       3,261,983$       3,502,642$       240,660$           7% 34 Staffing 1,069,069$       1,351,358$       1,277,990$       1,321,609$       43,620$             3% 35 Other Operating Costs 1,338,327$       1,600,271$       1,540,014$       1,540,014$       ‐$0% 36 Contract Services 449,325$           533,469$           443,979$           641,019$           197,040$           44% 37 Office of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion ‐$534,399$           601,841$           888,313$           286,472$           48% 38 Staffing ‐$184,399$           165,341$           326,813$           161,472$           98% 39 Other Operating Costs ‐$59,000$             59,000$             64,000$             5,000$               8% 40 Contract Services ‐$291,000$           377,500$           497,500$           120,000$           32% 41 City Attorney 964,100$           1,690,991$       1,043,562$       1,305,660$       262,097$           25% 42 City Attorney 964,100$           1,690,991$       1,043,562$       1,305,660$       262,097$           25% 43 Staffing 836,951$           1,263,898$       992,802$           1,217,800$       224,997$           23% 44 Other Operating Costs 97,965$             330,794$           19,365$             24,465$             5,100$               26% 45 Contract Services 29,185$             96,299$             31,395$             63,395$             32,000$             102% 46 Community Development 6,509,806$       8,871,312$       6,841,955$       6,783,059$       (58,896)$           ‐1% 47 Building and Safety 2,506,262$       3,283,056$       2,321,228$       2,133,870$       (187,358)$         ‐8% 48 Staffing 1,321,670$       2,086,812$       1,973,054$       2,015,696$       42,642$             2% 49 Other Operating Costs 476,449$           611,244$           83,174$             83,174$             ‐$0% 50 Contract Services 708,142$           585,000$           265,000$           35,000$             (230,000)$         ‐87% 51 Commissions and Committees 15,291$             34,939$             34,939$             34,948$             9$   0% 52 Staffing 15,141$             23,739$             23,739$             23,748$             9$   0% 53 Other Operating Costs 150$11,200$             11,200$             11,200$             ‐$0% 54 Community Dev Admin 901,725$           1,144,375$       917,631$           968,991$           51,360$             6% 55 Staffing 697,490$           767,665$           678,771$           653,411$           (25,360)$            ‐4% 2021‐23 Financial Plan General Fund Budget Document Pg. 24 Page 484 of 652 Table G‐7: Detailed General Fund  Operating Expenditures 20‐21 Actuals 21‐22 Budget   22‐23 Original Budget   22‐23 Revised  Budget Change % Change 2021‐23 Financial Plan 56 Other Operating Costs 204,235$           193,110$           185,260$           221,980$           36,720$             20% 57 Contract Services ‐$183,600$           53,600$             93,600$             40,000$             75% 58 Engineering ‐$783,878$           688,625$           839,745$           151,120$           22% 59 Staffing ‐$713,378$           618,125$           769,245$           151,120$           24% 60 Other Operating Costs ‐$13,500$             13,500$             13,500$             ‐$0% 61 Contract Services ‐$57,000$             57,000$             57,000$             ‐$0% 62 Housing Policy and Programs ‐$1,154,044$       941,144$           950,332$           9,188$               1% 63 Staffing ‐$527,085$           443,318$           602,506$           159,188$           36% 64 Other Operating Costs ‐$10,000$             10,000$             10,000$             ‐$0% 65 Contract Services ‐$616,959$           487,826$           337,826$           (150,000)$         ‐31% 66 Human Relations 579,489$           66,045$             5,000$               ‐$(5,000)$              ‐100% 67 Other Operating Costs ‐$3,000$               5,000$               ‐$(5,000)$              ‐100% 68 Contract Services 579,489$           63,045$             ‐$‐$‐$ 69 Planning 2,507,040$       2,404,974$       1,933,388$       1,855,172$       (78,215)$           ‐4% 70 Staffing 2,068,912$       1,681,166$       1,616,517$       1,423,301$       (193,215)$         ‐12% 71 Other Operating Costs 7,914$               35,200$             35,200$             35,200$             ‐$0% 72 Contract Services 430,214$           688,608$           281,671$           396,671$           115,000$           41% 73 CSG Administration 315,986$           851,684$           575,274$           573,066$           (2,207)$              0% 74 Community Services Group 315,986$           851,684$           575,274$           573,066$           (2,207)$              0% 75 Staffing 300,686$           610,324$           560,440$           517,213$           (43,228)$            ‐8% 76 Other Operating Costs 3,554$               12,413$             12,000$             13,021$             1,021$               9% 77 Contract Services 11,745$             228,948$           2,833$               42,833$             40,000$             1412% 78 Finance 1,795,348$       2,559,079$       2,291,343$       2,317,013$       25,670$             1% 79 Accounting 710,210$           969,640$           932,335$           898,785$           (33,550)$           ‐4% 80 Staffing 572,059$           794,619$           762,215$           728,665$           (33,550)$            ‐4% 81 Other Operating Costs 2,290$               10,218$             10,100$             10,100$             ‐$0% 82 Contract Services 135,861$           164,803$           160,020$           160,020$           ‐$0% 83 Budgets 190,579$           208,648$           185,543$           173,883$           (11,660)$           ‐6% 84 Staffing 163,319$           179,756$           161,043$           142,383$           (18,660)$            ‐12% 85 Other Operating Costs 518$2,500$               2,500$               9,500$               7,000$               280% 86 Contract Services 26,743$             26,392$             22,000$             22,000$             ‐$0% 87 Financial Admin 482,451$           622,367$           492,334$           557,524$           65,190$             13% 88 Staffing 464,588$           549,977$           459,234$           524,884$           65,650$             14% 89 Other Operating Costs 4,086$               20,600$             20,600$             22,640$             2,040$               10% 90 Contract Services 13,777$             51,791$             12,500$             10,000$             (2,500)$              ‐20% 91 Purchasing 132,221$           264,692$           236,398$           218,874$           (17,525)$           ‐7% 92 Staffing 118,270$           242,232$           218,188$           198,164$           (20,025)$            ‐9% 93 Other Operating Costs 1,880$               4,500$               4,500$               4,500$               ‐$0% 94 Contract Services 12,072$             17,960$             13,710$             16,210$             2,500$               18% 95 Revenue Mgmt 279,887$           493,732$           444,732$           467,947$           23,215$             5% 96 Staffing 196,720$           328,352$           264,792$           288,007$           23,215$             9% 97 Other Operating Costs 6,398$               16,200$             16,200$             16,200$             ‐$0% 98 Contract Services 76,769$             149,181$           163,740$           163,740$           ‐$0% 99 Fire 14,024,822$     17,103,242$     14,440,373$     14,515,112$     74,739$             1% 100 Emergency Management 38,550$             92,048$             37,175$             180,217$           143,042$           385% 101 Staffing ‐$35,696$             3,360$               146,402$           143,042$           4257% 102 Other Operating Costs 22,559$             13,458$             3,815$               3,815$               ‐$0% 103 Contract Services 15,991$             42,894$             30,000$             30,000$             ‐$0% 104 Emergency Response 11,494,300$     13,586,646$     11,073,299$     11,419,286$     345,987$           3% 105 Staffing 11,371,826$     13,422,698$     10,921,531$     11,267,518$     345,987$           3% 106 Other Operating Costs 113,636$           147,936$           135,593$           135,593$           ‐$0% 107 Contract Services 8,838$               16,012$             16,175$             16,175$             ‐$0% 108 Fire Admin 1,258,603$       1,249,968$       1,233,678$       1,057,173$       (176,504)$         ‐14% 109 Staffing 953,613$           1,035,766$       843,017$           844,011$           995$0% 110 Other Operating Costs 298,431$           208,223$           385,111$           207,612$           (177,499)$         ‐46% 111 Contract Services 6,558$               5,979$               5,550$               5,550$               ‐$0% General Fund Budget Document Pg. 25 Page 485 of 652 Table G‐7: Detailed General Fund  Operating Expenditures 20‐21 Actuals  21‐22 Budget   22‐23 Original Budget   22‐23 Revised  Budget Change % Change 2021‐23 Financial Plan 112 Fire Apparatus Services 377,035$           528,761$           474,223$           466,131$           (8,092)$              ‐2% 113 Staffing 222,771$           319,878$           267,650$           259,558$           (8,092)$              ‐3% 114 Other Operating Costs 145,250$           183,491$           179,338$           179,338$           ‐$0% 115 Contract Services 9,014$               25,392$             27,235$             27,235$             ‐$0% 116 Fire Station Facility Support 38,314$             45,418$             42,305$             41,675$             (630)$                 ‐1% 117 Staffing ‐$‐$630$‐$(630)$                 ‐100% 118 Other Operating Costs 22,343$             38,968$             28,875$             28,875$             ‐$0% 119 Contract Services 15,971$             6,450$               12,800$             12,800$             ‐$0% 120 Hazard Prevention 735,525$           1,027,329$       898,617$           915,290$           16,673$             2% 121 Staffing 651,818$           951,818$           828,275$           844,948$           16,673$             2% 122 Other Operating Costs 64,631$             69,768$             68,842$             68,842$             ‐$0% 123 Contract Services 19,076$             5,743$               1,500$               1,500$               ‐$0% 124 Mobile Crisis Unit ‐$269,000$           300,000$           314,190$           314,190$           5% 125 Staffing ‐$91,612$             95,014$             109,204$           109,204$           15% 126 Other Operating Costs ‐$72,053$             99,651$             79,314$             79,314$             ‐20% 127 Contract Services ‐$105,335$           105,335$           125,672$           125,672$           19% 128 Recruit Academy ‐$120,300$           ‐$‐$‐$0% 129 Staffing ‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$0% 130 Other Operating Costs ‐$102,300$           ‐$‐$‐$0% 131 Contract Services ‐$18,000$             ‐$‐$‐$0% 132 Training Services 82,496$             183,773$           381,076$           121,150$           (259,926)$         ‐68% 133 Staffing ‐$52,346$             259,926$           ‐$(259,926)$         ‐100% 134 Other Operating Costs 32,867$             83,545$             72,420$             72,420$             ‐$0% 135 Contract Services 49,629$             47,882$             48,730$             48,730$             ‐$0% 136 Human Resources 1,374,481$       2,011,411$       1,683,223$       1,684,948$       1,725$               0% 137 Human Resources Admin 1,365,254$       1,993,161$       1,665,812$       1,667,537$       1,725$               0% 138 Staffing 1,055,161$       1,415,874$       1,308,129$       1,309,854$       1,725$               0% 139 Other Operating Costs 49,104$             50,063$             48,800$             48,800$             ‐$0% 140 Contract Services 260,989$           527,224$           308,883$           308,883$           ‐$0% 141 Wellness 9,226$               18,251$             17,411$             17,411$             ‐$0% 142 Other Operating Costs 1,688$               2,500$               2,500$               2,500$               ‐$0% 143 Contract Services 7,539$               15,751$             14,911$             14,911$             ‐$0% 144 Non‐Departmental 1,517,519$       1,736,930$       2,161,928$       2,912,928$       751,000$           35% 145 Finance NonDepart 292,146$           1,569,473$       1,809,228$       2,593,228$       784,000$           43% 146 Staffing 101,575$           1,499,473$       1,739,228$       2,513,228$       774,000$           45% 147 Other Operating Costs 190,571$           70,000$             70,000$             80,000$             10,000$             14% 148 Finance Support Services 1,225,373$       167,457$           352,700$           319,700$           (33,000)$           ‐9% 149 Other Operating Costs 1,225,237$       167,457$           352,700$           319,700$           (33,000)$            ‐9% 150 Contract Services 137$‐$‐$‐$‐$ 151 Parks and Recreation 4,038,719$       5,779,681$       5,335,040$       5,251,052$       (83,988)$           ‐2% 152 Aquatics 579,746$           678,084$           624,832$           633,304$           8,472$               1% 153 Staffing 516,123$           592,084$           538,033$           546,505$           8,472$               2% 154 Other Operating Costs 25,030$             47,500$             47,500$             47,500$             ‐$0% 155 Contract Services 38,592$             38,500$             39,299$             39,299$             ‐$0% 156 Community Services 384,912$           744,552$           674,700$           657,382$           (17,319)$           ‐3% 157 Staffing 323,079$           504,687$           443,890$           483,972$           40,081$             9% 158 Other Operating Costs 28,596$             101,490$           107,210$           98,110$             (9,100)$              ‐8% 159 Contract Services 33,237$             138,375$           123,600$           75,300$             (48,300)$            ‐39% 160 Golf Course 599,587$           807,410$           721,608$           738,756$           17,148$             2% 161 Staffing 402,896$           514,443$           462,650$           479,798$           17,148$             4% 162 Other Operating Costs 170,705$           271,067$           237,245$           237,245$           ‐$0% 163 Contract Services 25,986$             21,900$             21,713$             21,713$             ‐$0% 164 Jack House ‐$10,500$             10,500$             10,500$             ‐$0% 165 Other Operating Costs ‐$10,500$             10,500$             10,500$             ‐$0% 166 Ranger Service 508,601$           927,415$           864,055$           826,321$           (37,735)$           ‐4% 167 Staffing 443,446$           868,763$           805,275$           757,541$           (47,735)$            ‐6% General Fund Budget Document Pg. 26 Page 486 of 652 Table G‐7: Detailed General Fund  Operating Expenditures 20‐21 Actuals  21‐22 Budget   22‐23 Original Budget   22‐23 Revised  Budget Change % Change 2021‐23 Financial Plan 168 Other Operating Costs 22,444$             30,882$             26,380$             26,380$             ‐$0% 169 Contract Services 42,711$             27,770$             32,400$             42,400$             10,000$             31% 170 Recreation Admin 759,597$           913,884$           797,183$           770,190$           (26,993)$           ‐3% 171 Staffing 659,086$           800,596$           702,368$           673,135$           (29,233)$            ‐4% 172 Other Operating Costs 11,620$             84,510$             79,560$             81,800$             2,240$               3% 173 Contract Services 88,892$             28,777$             15,255$             15,255$             ‐$0% 174 Recreation Facilities 234,614$           308,533$           310,676$           325,907$           15,231$             5% 175 Staffing 214,505$           290,518$           292,661$           271,892$           (20,769)$            ‐7% 176 Other Operating Costs 7,833$               12,915$             12,915$             18,915$             6,000$               46% 177 Contract Services 12,276$             5,100$               5,100$               35,100$             30,000$             588% 178 Youth Services 971,662$           1,389,305$       1,331,486$       1,288,694$       (42,792)$           ‐3% 179 Staffing 914,213$           1,226,328$       1,185,716$       1,142,924$       (42,792)$            ‐4% 180 Other Operating Costs 44,817$             142,677$           125,470$           125,470$           ‐$0% 181 Contract Services 12,633$             20,300$             20,300$             20,300$             ‐$0% 182 Police 17,618,498$     22,842,870$     20,066,744$     20,866,264$     799,520$           4% 183 Investigations 2,923,797$       4,119,381$       3,623,590$       3,521,262$       (102,328)$         ‐3% 184 Staffing 2,898,386$       3,990,409$       3,484,598$       3,382,271$       (102,328)$         ‐3% 185 Other Operating Costs 23,882$             29,100$             29,100$             29,100$             ‐$0% 186 Contract Services 1,529$               99,872$             109,892$           109,892$           ‐$0% 187 Neighborhood Services 228,265$           299,296$           277,062$           282,674$           5,612$               2% 188 Staffing 191,784$           242,225$           221,662$           227,274$           5,612$               3% 189 Other Operating Costs 21,268$             28,400$             28,400$             28,400$             ‐$0% 190 Contract Services 15,213$             28,671$             27,000$             27,000$             ‐$0% 191 Patrol 9,753,373$       11,474,557$     10,065,018$     10,684,397$     619,378$           6% 192 Staffing 9,634,380$       11,289,495$     9,883,837$       10,561,497$     677,659$           7% 193 Other Operating Costs 118,993$           185,061$           181,181$           122,900$           (58,281)$            ‐32% 194 Contract Services ‐$‐$‐$‐$ 195 Police Admin 1,469,923$       2,495,129$       2,171,555$       2,103,633$       (67,922)$           ‐3% 196 Staffing 786,455$           1,492,652$       1,323,998$       1,246,076$       (77,922)$            ‐6% 197 Other Operating Costs 267,205$           390,048$           318,790$           318,790$           ‐$0% 198 Contract Services 416,263$           612,429$           528,767$           538,767$           10,000$             2% 199 Police Support Services 2,381,005$       3,420,512$       3,019,376$       3,198,032$       178,655$           6% 200 Staffing 2,243,549$       3,189,365$       2,832,341$       2,998,997$       166,655$           6% 201 Other Operating Costs 21,740$             45,912$             42,700$             42,700$             ‐$0% 202 Contract Services 115,716$           185,235$           144,335$           156,335$           12,000$             8% 203 Traffic Safety 862,135$           1,033,995$       910,143$           1,076,266$       166,123$           18% 204 Staffing 851,537$           997,791$           884,543$           1,050,666$       166,123$           19% 205 Other Operating Costs 9,905$               27,268$             19,400$             19,400$             ‐$0% 206 Contract Services 693$8,936$               6,200$               6,200$               ‐$0% 207 Public Works 12,660,253$     17,162,531$     15,156,004$     16,144,599$     988,595$           7% 208 CIP Project Eng 2,269,244$       2,900,277$       2,221,737$       2,717,592$       495,854$           22% 209 Staffing 2,179,185$       2,653,837$       2,074,736$       2,572,191$       497,454$           24% 210 Other Operating Costs 76,241$             105,152$           122,501$           120,901$           (1,600)$              ‐1% 211 Contract Services 13,818$             141,288$           24,500$             24,500$             ‐$0% 212 Facilities Maintenance 1,235,984$       1,525,747$       1,389,285$       1,375,065$       (14,220)$           ‐1% 213 Staffing 628,462$           752,017$           667,785$           590,030$           (77,755)$            ‐12% 214 Other Operating Costs 375,409$           502,508$           463,500$           502,035$           38,535$             8% 215 Contract Services 232,113$           271,222$           258,000$           283,000$           25,000$             10% 216 Fleet 1,011,969$       1,586,950$       1,389,493$       1,395,387$       5,894$               0% 217 Staffing 479,063$           724,727$           643,393$           649,287$           5,894$               1% 218 Other Operating Costs 454,862$           663,860$           585,800$           598,300$           12,500$             2% 219 Contract Services 78,045$             198,363$           160,300$           147,800$           (12,500)$            ‐8% 220 Parks Maint 2,926,353$       3,716,247$       3,399,785$       3,478,283$       78,498$             2% 221 Staffing 1,182,262$       1,553,758$       1,372,385$       1,383,883$       11,498$             1% 222 Other Operating Costs 1,177,785$       1,533,073$       1,447,400$       1,447,400$       ‐$0% 223 Contract Services 566,307$           629,415$           580,000$           647,000$           67,000$             12% General Fund Budget Document Pg. 27 Page 487 of 652 Table G‐7: Detailed General Fund  Operating Expenditures 20‐21 Actuals  21‐22 Budget   22‐23 Original Budget   22‐23 Revised  Budget Change % Change 2021‐23 Financial Plan 224 Public Works Admin 606,828$           1,068,079$       872,405$           1,089,021$       216,616$           25% 225 Staffing 534,534$           953,906$           834,205$           1,044,634$       210,429$           25% 226 Other Operating Costs 19,499$             46,801$             37,200$             42,888$             5,688$               15% 227 Contract Services 52,795$             67,372$             1,000$               1,500$               500$50% 228 Stormwater and Flood Control 944,270$           1,257,484$       1,186,536$       1,083,704$       (102,833)$         ‐9% 229 Staffing 708,203$           866,429$           849,680$           746,848$           (102,833)$         ‐12% 230 Other Operating Costs 64,976$             94,840$             93,531$             93,531$             ‐$0% 231 Contract Services 171,091$           296,215$           243,325$           243,325$           ‐$0% 232 Streets Maint 1,313,626$       2,148,128$       2,089,464$       2,423,871$       334,407$           16% 233 Staffing 958,355$           1,332,218$       1,214,264$       1,498,671$       284,407$           23% 234 Other Operating Costs 314,058$           464,374$           556,600$           581,600$           25,000$             4% 235 Contract Services 41,212$             351,536$           318,600$           343,600$           25,000$             8% 236 Swim Center Maint 449,101$           615,828$           602,752$           595,198$           (7,554)$              ‐1% 237 Staffing 141,978$           180,999$           160,852$           143,218$           (17,634)$            ‐11% 238 Other Operating Costs 287,910$           407,732$           416,800$           426,880$           10,080$             2% 239 Contract Services 19,212$             27,098$             25,100$             25,100$             ‐$0% 240 Traffic Signals and Lighting 553,073$           607,877$           519,510$           535,973$           16,463$             3% 241 Staffing 227,066$           296,129$           263,110$           256,709$           (6,401)$              ‐2% 242 Other Operating Costs 311,621$           235,299$           241,400$           264,264$           22,864$             9% 243 Contract Services 14,387$             76,449$             15,000$             15,000$             ‐$0% 244 Transportation Plan and Eng 891,289$           1,288,538$       1,027,502$       995,326$           (32,176)$           ‐3% 245 Staffing 853,858$           1,074,576$       964,002$           925,269$           (38,733)$            ‐4% 246 Other Operating Costs 32,175$             47,300$             48,500$             55,057$             6,557$               14% 247 Contract Services 5,256$               166,662$           15,000$             15,000$             ‐$0% 248 Urban Forest Services 449,130$           447,375$           457,534$           455,180$           (2,354)$              ‐1% 249 Staffing 403,563$           315,635$           376,584$           356,005$           (20,579)$            ‐5% 250 Other Operating Costs 15,515$             30,192$             26,950$             26,950$             ‐$0% 251 Contract Services 30,052$             101,549$           54,000$             72,225$             18,225$             34% 252 Solid Waste Recycling 119,370$           355,478$           176,280$           317,456$           141,176$           80% 253 Solid Waste Recycling 119,370$           355,478$           176,280$           317,456$           141,176$           80% 254 Staffing 113,337$           227,664$           129,770$           270,946$           141,176$           109% 255 Other Operating Costs 6,033$               36,510$             36,510$             36,510$             ‐$0% 256 Contract Services ‐$91,304$             10,000$             10,000$             ‐$0% 257 General Fund Total 68,745,623$     92,293,090$     79,576,996$     83,124,548$     3,547,551$       4% General Fund Budget Document Pg. 28 Page 488 of 652 Table G‐8: Detailed General Fund Revenue 20‐21 Actuals  21‐22 Budget  22‐23 Original  Budget   22‐23 Revised  Budget Change % Change 1 Tax & Franchise Revenue 71,747,369$         88,006,932$         85,320,922$         91,206,264$         5,885,342$    7% 2 Sales Tax (Bradley Burns) 20,067,740$         20,790,779$         19,086,000$         21,789,000$         2,703,000$    14% 3 Local Revenue Measure G 12,779,713$         25,810,000$         25,202,000$         27,049,000$         1,847,000$    7% 4 Property Tax 19,858,530$         20,157,153$         20,781,387$         20,746,387$         (35,000)$         0% 5 Transient Occupancy Tax 6,960,035$           9,051,000$           7,753,000$           8,636,000$           883,000$        11% 6 Business Tax 2,937,176$           2,832,000$           2,547,000$           2,889,000$           342,000$        13% 7 Cannabis Tax 844,939$               1,000,000$           1,500,000$           1,400,000$           (100,000)$      ‐7% 8 Franchise Fees 1,796,829$           1,575,000$           1,606,000$           1,606,000$           ‐$                0% 9 Gas Tax (SB1) 851,292$              915,000$              941,535$               1,049,877$           108,342$        12% 10 Safety Prop 172 425,136$              493,000$              339,000$              497,000$              158,000$       47% 11 Utility User Tax 5,225,979$          5,383,000$          5,565,000$          5,544,000$          (21,000)$        0% 12 Development Review 7,094,935$          6,820,055$          6,864,650$          5,917,618$          (947,032)$     ‐14% 13 Building Permits 3,583,995$          3,510,000$          3,600,000$          2,921,700$          (678,300)$     ‐19% 14 Code Enforcement Fines 90,879$                90,000$                100,000$              60,000$                (40,000)$        ‐40% 15 Development Review Fees 508,373$              400,000$              467,000$              341,228$              (125,772)$     ‐27% 16 Encroachment Permits 327,948$              305,000$              315,650$              323,340$              7,690$           2% 17 Engineering Development Review Fees 116,097$              135,000$              140,000$              123,803$              (16,197)$        ‐12% 18 Infrastructure Plan Check & Inspection 829,252$              1,200,000$          1,236,000$          1,432,352$          196,352$       16% 19 Plan Check Fees 1,140,509$          871,776$              400,000$              299,000$              (101,000)$     ‐25% 20 Planning & Zoning Fee 506,162$              600,000$              606,000$              416,195$              (189,805)$     ‐31% 21 TIPP‐ Contra Revenue Account (8,279)$                 (291,721)$            ‐$‐$‐$                22 Parks & Recreation 1,616,010$          1,615,555$          2,039,215$          1,978,920$          (60,295)$       ‐3% 23 Adult Athletic Fees 46,307$                122,400$              122,400$              154,362$              31,962$         26% 24 Aquatics Daily Use Fees 50,361$                73,075$                121,132$              115,175$              (5,957)$          ‐5% 25 Driving Range Fees 12,561$                11,715$                11,715$                12,900$                1,185$            10% 26 Golf Cart Rentals 12,429$                28,262$                28,262$                29,675$                1,413$           5% 27 Golf Greens Fees 198,058$              200,000$              224,400$              235,180$              10,780$         5% 29 Golf Rental Fees 7,889$  10,566$                10,566$                11,232$                666$               6% 30 Indoor Rental & Use Fees 12,201$                39,532$                54,331$                65,100$                10,769$          20% 31 Instruction Fees 56,152$                61,400$                70,000$                97,830$                27,830$          40% 32 Junior Ranger Camps 4,210$4,500$4,500$4,982$482$               11% 33 Library Rental ‐$6,500$  21,500$                16,290$                (5,210)$           ‐24% 35 Multi Day Swim Passes 56,387$                41,753$                41,753$                44,383$                2,630$           6% 36 Other Parks & Recreation Revenue 41,780$                45,000$                60,641$                58,482$                (2,159)$          ‐4% 37 Outdoor Rental & Use Fees 61,033$                88,867$                118,850$              129,960$              11,110$         9% 38 Sales Taxable 14,741$                10,000$                10,000$                10,000$                ‐$                0% 39 Special Events ‐ City Sponsered 3,564$  50,000$                50,000$                13,583$                (36,417)$        ‐73% 40 Special Events App/Permit 4,333$  20,000$                30,600$                33,293$                2,693$           9% 41 Special Events Insurance 884$6,000$9,600$6,000$(3,600)$           ‐38% 42 Swim Instruction Fees 49,997$                20,923$                69,160$                75,108$                5,948$           9% 43 Therapy Pool Fees 9,553$8,627$  10,096$                16,304$                6,208$            61% 44 Youth Athletic Fees 36,071$                48,000$                53,709$                55,000$                1,291$           2% 45 Youth Services Camps 86,776$                106,650$              149,300$              154,275$              4,975$           3% 46 Youth Services Childcare 849,552$              611,785$              766,700$              639,806$              (126,894)$     ‐17% 47 Fire 1,500,759$          1,440,260$          1,422,086$          1,576,322$          154,236$       11% 48 Cal Poly Fire Services 315,241$              273,567$              314,122$              361,684$              47,562$         15% 49 CUPA Inspection Fees 146,953$              160,000$              160,000$              172,800$              12,800$         8% 50 Fire Alarm Permits 8,962$10,010$                10,010$                10,010$                ‐$                0% 51 Fire Department Permits 101,572$              100,000$              100,000$              108,000$              8,000$           8% 52 Fire Plan Check & Inspection 361,415$              368,800$              350,000$              350,000$              ‐$                0% 53 Medical ER Recovery 198,103$              201,993$              202,064$              216,938$              14,874$         7% 54 Other Fire Department Revenue 41,426$                5,890$5,890$5,890$  ‐$                0% 55 R1 Inspection Fees 327,088$              320,000$              280,000$              351,000$              71,000$         25% 56 Police 600,406$              616,440$              637,196$              632,325$              (4,871)$          ‐1% 57 Accident Reports 1,977$2,000$3,400$3,400$  ‐$                0% 58 Administrative Citations ‐ Safety 149,065$              125,000$              152,833$              152,833$              ‐$                0% 59 Alarm Permits ‐ Contract (Police)107,717$              90,000$                90,000$                90,000$                ‐$                0% 2021‐23 Financial Plan General Fund Budget Document Pg. 29 Page 489 of 652 General Fund Table G‐8: Detailed General Fund Revenue 20‐21 Actuals  21‐22 Budget  2021‐23 Financial Plan  22‐23 Original  Budget   22‐23 Revised  Budget Change % Change 60 Collision Investigation $1,848 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $‐ 3,000 $                0% 62 DUI Cost Recovery $                18,968 $                16,417 $                16,417 $               ‐ 16,417 $                0% 63 Other Police Revenue $              218,768 $              256,335 $              250,000 $             ‐ 250,000 $                0% 64 Police Department Permits $2,635 $ 7,511 $ 7,511 $‐ 7,511 $                0% 65 Police Issued Parking Fines $                61,057 $                75,000 $                75,000 $                (5,000) 70,000 $         ‐7% 66 Property Release Fees $ 33 $500 $                 (1,642)$                ‐ (1,642)$                0% 67 Second Response Fees ‐$$1,071 $ 1,071 $1291,200 $               12% 68 Tobacco Permits $                29,247 $                29,000 $                29,000 $               ‐ 29,000 $                0% 69 Tow Release Fees $7,441 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $‐ 9,000 $                0% 70 Witness Fees $1,650 $ 1,606 $ 1,606 $‐ 1,606 $                0% 71 General Government $          1,890,201 $          1,721,726 $          2,099,853 $          (460,000)1,668,952 $     ‐22% 72 Business Licenses $              442,200 $              418,443 $              426,812 $             ‐ 445,911 $                0% 73 Cannabis Operator License $                90,449 $              157,000 $              388,000 $             (178,000) 210,000 $     ‐46% 75 Impact Fees and Special Assessments $             ‐ 147,070 $‐$‐$‐$                76 Interest on Investment $                54,464 $              230,000 $              500,000 $             (282,000) 230,000 $     ‐55% 77 Misc Fines & Fortfietures $                95,371 $                17,596 $                37,596 $               ‐ 37,596 $                0% 78 Miscellaneous $              676,867 $              625,437 $              471,100 $             ‐ 469,100 $                0% 79 Motor Vehicle Fines $                75,677 $              118,500 $              118,500 $             ‐ 118,500 $                0% 80 Other Rent & Lease Revenue $              308,103 $              154,750 $              157,845 $             ‐ 157,845 $                0% 81 Grants & Subventions $          3,114,368 $          7,986,429 $          5,365,000 $          7,369,562 $   2,004,562 ‐35% 82 AB939 Reimbursement $             ‐ 181,338 $‐$$              327,328 327,328 $       83 Federal Stimulus Grants $             ‐ 566,680 $‐$‐$‐$                84 Law Enforcement SB229 Grant (COPS SLESF $             ‐ 156,727 $‐$$              140,000 140,000 $       85 Mutual Aid Reimbursements $          1,833,347 $             ‐ 684,264 $‐$‐$                86 Other Grants/Subventions $              178,185 $              447,000 $             ‐ 900,000 $(900,000)$     ‐100% 87 Police Training Grant (POST)$  6,001 $               ‐ 64,485 $‐$‐$                88 State Grants & Subventions $              192,091 $‐ 8,447 $‐$‐$                89 Zone 9 Streambed Clearance ‐$‐$‐$$              120,000 120,000 $       91 ARPA Allocation $          6,782,234 $          4,465,000 $          6,782,234 $   2,317,234 52% 92 Total General Fund  87,564,049$        108,207,398$      103,748,922$      110,349,963$     6,571,942$   6% Budget Document Pg. 30 Page 490 of 652 Special Revenue & Other Funds Section 4: Special Revenue and Other Funds Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID) The Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID) assessment is set at 2% of the lodging industry’s gross receipts. The program annually aligns its operating budget with its anticipated revenues. Tourism along the Central Coast made a strong comeback as the region re-opened and revenues are reaching all-time highs as new hotels drive up the average daily rate and available inventory. Staff expect the growth to slow and likely decline moving into FY 2022-23 once pandemic driven demand is fading. Table S-1: TBID Budget Downtown Business Improvement District The Downtown Business Improvement District assessment is collected annually with the Business Tax renewal from businesses located within the geographical boundary of the Downtown District. Business tax certificates are renewed at the beginning of each fiscal year based on prior calendar year gross receipts. The revenue is then remitted to Downtown SLO monthly via contract services. Table S-2: Downtown Business Improvement District Budget Boysen Ranch Conservation Fund Boysen Ranch consists of approximately 116 acres bounded by Los Osos Valley Road, Foothill Boulevard, and O’Connor Way. The funding was set up as an endowment to fund monitoring and maintenance of the restored wetland area. No changes in financial position were made for this fund. Table S-3: Boysen Ranch Conservation Fund Budget Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Contract Services 769,214$ 1,245,420$ 1,229,436$ 1,232,968$ 3,532$ 0% Other Operating Costs 25,546$ 97,627$ 89,100$ 89,100$ -$ 0% Staffing 203,149$ 268,258$ 232,064$ 219,993$ (12,071)$ -5% Transfers 29,498$ 28,852$ 31,012$ 34,544$ 3,532$ 11% Total 1,027,407$ 1,640,157$ 1,581,612$ 1,576,605$ (5,007)$ 0% 2021-23 Financial Plan Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Contract Services 249,074$ 245,000$ 260,400$ 275,000$ 14,600$ 6% Total 249,074$ 245,000$ 260,400$ 275,000$ 14,600$ 6% 2021-23 Financial Plan Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Contract Services -$ 22,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ -$ 0% Grand Total -$ 22,500$ 7,500$ 7,500$ -$ 0% 2021-23 Financial Plan Budget Document Pg. 31 Page 491 of 652 Special Revenue & Other Funds Public Safety Equipment Fund The Public Safety Equipment Fund (PSEF) was created with the 2019-21 Financial Plan to help budget and forecast the replacement of Public Safety equipment that has expired or become damaged. The Fund had received an original seed amount with the 2019-20 budget and, going forward, an annual allocation is made from the Local Revenue Measure (see pg 68). The current balance of the fund is $1,165,124. At the time of Financial Plan adoption, this dedicated funding was accounted for as a restricted balance within the General Fund and budget was drawn out on an as-needed basis. The fund is now a stand-alone fund and expenditures will be budgeted and paid for directly out of the new fund. This methodology will help with expenditure tracking and overall fund management. In 2022-23, planned expenditures include the replacement of gas masks, drones, AEDs, breathing apparatus sets, and a cardiac monitor. Table S-4: Public Safety Equipment Fund Budget Insurance Fund The Insurance Fund serves to pay the City’s annual premiums for liability, workers’ compensation, special events, volunteer, and property insurance needed to protect the City and to manage fluctuations in claims-related expenses. The City has received notification that its required contribution for 2022-23 will be higher than the amount adopted with the 2021-23 Financial Plan. The increase in insurance costs this year is attributable 3 factors: 1)There were some high-cost claims within the membership pool to which the City belongs and shares expenses; 2) increases in payroll and the number of employees also increased exposure and associated costs; 3) a recent appraisal increased the valuation of the City’s properties and costs to insure them. In order to keep within the adopted transfer to the fund, available fund balance will be used to cover the change in cost for 2022-23. The Fund balance is currently $1,757,013; sufficient to cover the increase of $314,000. However, the City’s fiscal policies under Section 7. Fund Balance and Reserves (F) stipulate that the reserve will be based on a 75% confidence level of the previous five-year average claims experience, which amounts to approximately $1,500,000. The use of fund balance will leave 1,443,013 which dips slightly below the policy required level. This will be reconsidered with the 2023-25 Financial Plan to ensure the reserve levels are appropriately funded. Table S-5: Insurance Fund Budget Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Other Operating Costs -$ -$ -$ 445,978$ 445,978$ - Grand Total -$ -$ -$ 445,978$ 445,978$ - 2021-23 Financial Plan Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Liability/Other Insurance 1,323,824$ 2,002,059$ 2,055,128$ 2,193,116$ 137,988$ 7% Worker's Comp Insurance 2,037,611$ 2,181,044$ 2,668,844$ 2,844,913$ 176,069$ 7% Grand Total 3,361,435$ 4,183,103$ 4,723,972$ 5,038,029$ 314,057$ 7% 2021-23 Financial Plan Budget Document Pg. 32 Page 492 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Section 4:Utilities Department – Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds Overview The City’s water and sewer operations are paid for by service rate revenues and cover all costs for operations, maintenance, infrastructure replacement, and debt service. Taxes, including utility user taxes, do not support these services. When preparing annual budgets, the Utilities Department analyzes past financial results, reviews upcoming operational and capital needs, and current and future debt obligations to assess the financial position of each of the funds. The 2021-23 Financial Plan adopted balanced Water and Sewer Fund budgets that considered all these factors. In June 2021, the City Council also adopted a two-year rate increase that was anticipated to cover expenses related to replacement of aging water and sewer lines, increasing regulatory requirements, and increased equipment, maintenance, and operational costs. Recommended water and sewer rate increases for 2021-22 and 2022-23 are lower than originally projected. The most recent rate study, conducted in 2018, had projected rate increases would need to be 5.5 percent in 2021 and 5.5 percent in 2022. However, following a 2021 rate confirmation study, rates were adopted by the City Council as follows: Year Adopted Water Rate Increase Adopted Sewer Rate Increase 2021-22 3.5% 3.5% 2022-23 3.5% 3.5% Revenue Post-Pandemic Revenue Normalization Emerging from the Covid-19 pandemic, utilities revenues are tracking on-pace for 2021-22 and are also anticipated to meet 2022-23 projections. Data used in this analysis is current as of April 2022, and includes the following notable details: 1.Distribution of water use amongst customer classes has returned to a pre-pandemic norm as businesses have reopened, remote work has decreased, schools have opened, and Cal Poly has resumed in-person classes. 2.The City’s Water Fund received a payment of $225,015.67 in 2021-22 from the State of California for pandemic-related past-due water bills. An additional $190,752.46 is anticipated to be received during Fiscal Year 2021-22 to fund past-due sewer bills. These funds were and will be used to offset or “forgive” past due balances held by customers during the pandemic. 3.Cal Poly’s water and sewer use has returned to a pre-pandemic level, and revenues are projected in alignment with budget projections. Budget Document Pg. 33 Table U1: Utility Rates Page 493 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Utilities Revenue Overview (Excludes Debt Proceeds) Table U2: Water Revenue 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget Change % Change 1 Water Sales 13,785,100$ 16,328,641$ 16,328,641$ -$ 0% 2 Utilities Base Charges 5,559,695$ 5,754,284$ 5,754,284$ -$ 0% 3 Prop 1B Revenue 256,395$ 1,395,000$ 1,395,000$ -$ 4 Sales to Cal Poly 971,788$ 1,005,801$ 1,044,673$ 38,872$ 4% 5 Reclaimed Water Sales 961,817$ 995,481$ 995,481$ -$ 0% 6 Cal Poly Capacity & Resilience 223,000$ 224,795$ 259,490$ 34,695$ 15% 7 Development Impact Fees 1,548,200$ 1,370,400$ 1,370,400$ -$ 0% 8 Miscellaneous Penalties 118,000$ 118,000$ 118,000$ -$ 0% 9 Utilities Set-up Fees 217,000$ 217,000$ 130,000$ (87,000)$ -40% 10 Interest on Investment 407,600$ 423,500$ 50,000$ (373,500)$ -88% 11 Development Review Fees 26,000$ 26,000$ 26,000$ -$ 0% 12 Miscellaneous Revenue 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ -$ 0% 13 Credit Collections 14,000$ 14,000$ 14,000$ -$ 0% 14 Other Utilities Charges 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ -$ 0% 15 Low Income Subsidy (100,000)$ (100,000)$ (100,000)$ -$ 0% Totals 24,009,595$ 27,793,902$ 27,406,969$ (386,933)$ -1% Table U3: Sewer Revenue 2021-22 Budget 2022-23 Original Budget 2022-23 Revised Budget Change % Change 1 Sewer Service Charges $12,359,499 $12,792,082 $12,792,082 $0 0% 2 Utilities Base Charges $4,652,807 $4,815,655 $4,815,655 $0 0% 3 Sales to Cal Poly $991,741 $1,026,452 $1,026,452 $0 0% 4 Cal Poly Capacity & Resilience $243,568 $243,568 $243,568 $0 0% 5 Development Impact Fees $1,383,900 $1,190,200 $1,190,200 $0 0% 6 Miscellaneous Penalties $119,000 $119,000 $120,000 $1,000 1% 7 Industrial User Permits $85,000 $0 $85,000 $85,000 8 Other Utilities Charges $1,000 $0 $70,000 $70,000 9 Utilities Set-up Fees $217,000 $217,000 $60,000 -$157,000 -72% 10 Interest on Investment $401,514 $608,300 $50,000 -$558,300 -92% 11 Development Review Fees $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $0 0% 12 Miscellaneous Revenue $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 0% 13 Credit Collections $14,000 $14,000 $10,000 -$4,000 -29% 14 Waterways Management Fees $0 $85,000 $0 -$85,000 -100% 15 Low Income Subsidy -$100,000 -$100,000 -$100,000 $0 0% Totals $20,415,029 $21,057,257 $20,408,957 -$648,300 -3% Budget Document Pg. 34 Page 494 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Water Shutoff Moratorium The Covid-19 pandemic and resulting California State water shut-off moratorium had resulted in an increase in past due water accounts. The moratorium on water shutoffs for non-payment expired on December 31, 2021. Over the course of the pandemic Utility Department staff worked with residents, business owners, and community members to “catch up” on past due accounts with the option of payment plans for outstanding account balances. In additional to payment options for outstanding balances, staff highlighted the Customer Assistance Program (CAP) which provides discounted water and sewer rates to income-eligible customers. Following the extended moratorium on shutoffs, shutoffs for non-payment were reinitiated in early April with volumes equivalent to pre-pandemic levels. Key Assumptions and the New Normal The Utilities Department used the above data and the following assumptions to forecast revenues for the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget. These assumptions will continue to be monitored and updated as more information becomes available. 1.Consumption revenue will track as originally projected. This estimate is derived from year-to- date water production and consumption data. 2.The already approved 2022-23 rate increases (3.5 percent water and 3.5 percent sewer) will be enacted as previously scheduled. As noted prior, recommended water and sewer rate increases for 2021-22 and 2022-23 are lower than originally projected in the 2018 rate study. 3.Fiscal impacts from drought are anticipated to be minimal when compared to prior drought periods due to the City having an already-low per capita water use. Impacts will be further limited by the changes to the rate structure that were made following the 2012-2015 drought which resulted in a higher portion of a customer’s bill being fixed (a base fee), and a lower portion being variable in nature (consumption charges). Expenditures Inflation and Supply Chain Interruptions Historical methodologies used to forecast Water and Sewer Fund expenditures have been challenged as the department has experienced uncharacteristically high increases in the prices of raw materials, specifically those related to construction materials and chemicals. The Utilities Department has compiled available data and performed an analysis to develop a strategy for accommodating the significant increase in projected expenditures to the Water and Sewer Funds. Data used in this analysis is current as of April 2022 and is discussed in greater detail below. Chemical Price Increases 1.Due to a drastic change in purchasing cost, the chemical budget increased by approximately 50 percent at the City’s Water Treatment Plant, resulting in ongoing increases in projected expenditures of approximately $186,000 compared to 2021-22 budgeted levels in the Water Fund. In years past, typical chemical cost increases ranged from five to ten percent. Due to the current supply chain shortages, specific chemical prices have increased by as much as 106 percent compared to the prior fiscal year. Budget Document Pg. 35 Page 495 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer 2.Similarly in wastewater treatment, the chemical budget increased by approximately 29 percent at the City’s Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF), amounting to an increase of approximately $180,000 when compared to the 2021-22 levels budgeted in the Sewer Fund. Increases at the Water Resource Recovery Facility would have been substantially higher, if not offset by new equipment coming online that requires less chemical use when compared to the older equipment. 3.When establishing a new contract for chemical deliveries in 2021, significant price instability existed in the chemical market. To keep vendors from artificially inflating bid amounts to account for this uncertainty, staff worked with chemical vendors to allow for prices to be reexamined and renegotiated mid-way through the contract. Chemical prices are subject to renegotiation in August of 2022 and could increase further should the chemical market remain unstable. Significant cost increases due to the upcoming chemical price renegotiations in August would require the Utilities Department to return to the Council with additional funding requests. Electrical Price Increases 1.Electrical costs for the department’s non-Community Choice Energy (CCE) operations are projected to increase as much as 20 percent over original projections. The facilities that are unable to utilize CCE, “non-CCE”, are located outside of the City limits and include the City’s Water Treatment Plant, Whale Rock Reservoir, Salinas Reservoir, and Nacimiento Reservoir. Total electrical increases for those four facilities are projected at approximately $505,000 for the Water Fund over original 2022-23 budget projections. These increases are entirely due to source water pumping cost increases. 2.Electrical increases of $85,000 were originally anticipated at the City’s Water Treatment Plant; however, these have been offset in full by electrical savings realized from the recent Water Treatment Plant Energy Efficiency Project that replaced the facility’s ozone disinfection system with a more energy-efficient system. 3.All Sewer Fund electricity use is located within the City and therefore provided by the CCE1 Program and is not anticipated to increase in 2022-23. 1 The March 1, 2022, transition to new rates coincides with a ten-year high in national energy costs. Despite these challenging energy market conditions, the CCCE Policy Board of Directors on December 15, 2021, finalized a CCCE Electric Generation Rate anticipated to be 3% – 25% lower than PG&E’s anticipated Electric Generation Rates. These rates are through December 2022. CCCE customers have the same access to rate assistance programs as customers of PG&E. Rate relief provided through the CARE, FERA, AMP, HEAP or Medical Baseline programs also apply to CCCE customers. Budget Document Pg. 36 Page 496 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Drought-Related Increases In March 2022, the Governor of California issued an executive order related to statewide drought conditions. The executive order outlined a series of actions, which as of this writing, are still being considered for adoption by the State Water Board. The most impactful of these actions could require all of California’s urban water suppliers to implement the water saving measures outlined in Level 2 of their Water Shortage Contingency Plans, regardless of local water supply conditions. Notable actions that the City would be required to implement from Stage 2 of its Water Shortage Contingency Plan include requirements for additional community outreach, a restriction of allowable irrigation hours, implementation of rebate programs, an increase in proactive conservation audits and inspections. The extent of the impacts of the executive order will be largely dependent on the specific actions approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the implementation timeline that the State approves. Regardless of the specific actions of the State Water Board, City staff anticipate substantial increases in drought and water conservation-related work as a result of the State’s messaging about ongoing drought and water shortages across the State. Should the State Water Board implement less significant actions than outlined by the Governor, the department may not need the full amount of additional budget requested. 1.Utilities Department staff are anticipating a higher volume of drought-related work as the City enters its third consecutive year of less than average rainfall and as it implements programs associated with the recent executive order. Additional support is being requested in the Utility Billing and Water Resources sections to accommodate increased drought-related workloads. Total temporary and contract staffing increases amount to $131,200 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and provide one full-time contract Water Resources Technician, two part-time supplemental Water Resources Technicians, and one part-time supplemental Utility Billing Assistant. 2.In alignment with the request for additional staffing budget, staff are anticipating the need for additional public outreach-related drought funding. Total supplemental outreach funding being requested is $40,000 for FY 2022-23. 3.To support water conservation program expansion during drought, staff are requesting $30,000 in additional funding for water conservation-related materials. 4.During the 2012-2015 drought, the Water Fund experienced a significant reduction in revenue due to drought and state-mandated conservation actions. While staff acknowledge that there is likely to be some reduction in Water and Sewer Fund revenues due to the drought, it is not anticipated to be as substantial as what was previously experienced due to two major factors. First, the water rate structure was updated following the 2012-2015 drought with a higher share of a customer’s monthly bill now being fixed, and not dependent on monthly water consumption. Therefore, variation in consumption has a smaller impact on the total revenue brought in from water sales. Second, water use within the City never returned to its pre- drought levels following the 2012-2015 drought and staff do not anticipate that impacts from Stage 2 measures will have as substantial of an impact as they did during the last drought. Measures outlined within Stages 3-5 of the Water Shortage Contingency Plan require more Budget Document Pg. 37 Page 497 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer significant mandatory water conservation measures and would have more substantial impacts on revenues. 5.Although drought is often only considered a domestic water supply issue, there is also a major impact on the wastewater treatment processes during periods of extended drought. The concentration of waste within wastewater are often much higher as indoor water use decreases. As a result, the City’s wastewater system treats and processes waste with much higher levels of waste concentrations, placing major stress on the system and operations. In addition, during drought, it becomes more difficult to meet state wastewater quality standards with increased pollutant strength due to greater concentrations resulting from less water being discharged. Staff will continue to monitor drought impacts on the wastewater treatment process. 6.The City is undertaking a Recycled Water Maximization Study that will be presented to Council at the end of the calendar year. This study draws from the conclusions of the City’s 2017 adopted Recycled Water Master Plan, the treatment design aspects incorporated into the current construction of the Water Resources Recovery Facility (WRRF), and the recently adopted Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the San Luis Obispo Basin. This study will evaluate opportunities for utilization of any remaining available recycled water until a point in time in which the City may utilize this resource for potable reuse. Potential uses for available recycled water during this interim period could include expanding uses within the City and short-term contract sales outside of the City. The Recycled Water Maximization Study will also evaluate seasonal availability of recycled water, cost of production and delivery, policy analysis and General Plan conformance, and the City’s water rights. Budget Document Pg. 38 Page 498 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Table U4: Utilities Operating Expenditures by Program (excludes Debt & Capital) Table U5: Utilities Expenditures by Type (excludes Debt & Capital) Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Water Fund 1 Water Admin and Eng 5,622,752$ 1,563,537$ 1,290,850$ 1,348,534$ 57,684$ 4% 2 Water Source of Supply 9,803,475$ 10,945,103$ 10,233,233$ 10,818,843$ 585,610$ 6% 3 Water Treatment 2,720,989$ 3,609,374$ 3,229,196$ 3,461,885$ 232,690$ 7% 4 Water Distribution 1,612,549$ 1,985,097$ 1,869,866$ 1,861,907$ (7,959)$ 0% 5 Water Resources 256,913$ 579,126$ 465,257$ 571,228$ 105,971$ 23% 6 Utilities Revenue -$ 292,433$ 276,100$ 308,054$ 31,954$ 12% 7 General Government/Non- Departmental 2,799,424$ 2,677,546$ 2,747,226$ 2,441,375$ (305,851)$ -11% 8 Water Fund Total 22,816,102$ 21,652,217$ 20,111,728$ 20,811,827$ 700,099$ 3% 9 Sewer Fund 10 Wastewater Admin and Eng 4,873,327$ 1,753,310$ 1,419,224$ 1,390,945$ (28,279)$ -2% 11 Wastewater Collection 1,106,185$ 1,496,082$ 1,261,897$ 1,331,027$ 69,130$ 5% 12 Environmental Programs 224,631$ 317,393$ 274,771$ 282,237$ 7,466$ 3% 13 Water Resource Recovery 3,371,998$ 4,552,817$ 4,062,458$ 4,182,465$ 120,008$ 3% 14 Utilities Revenue 474,350$ 335,148$ 284,879$ 310,113$ 25,234$ 9% 15 Water Quality Lab 668,269$ 966,653$ 827,721$ 832,235$ 4,514$ 1% 16 General Government/Non- Departmental 2,528,185$ 2,539,416$ 2,538,928$ 2,676,437$ 137,509$ 5% 17 Sewer Fund Total 13,246,945$ 11,960,818$ 10,669,878$ 11,005,459$ 335,581$ 3% Expenditure Type 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change Water Fund 1 Staffing 4,143,709$ 5,551,424$ 4,900,833$ 4,968,326$ 67,493$ 1% 2 Contract Services 396,688$ 765,881$ 602,515$ 665,420$ 62,905$ 10% 3 Other Operating Costs 10,856,297$ 12,817,734$ 11,951,523$ 12,866,328$ 914,805$ 8% 4 Transfers 2,672,968$ 2,517,178$ 2,656,857$ 2,656,857$ -$ 0% 5 Water Fund Total 18,069,662$ 21,652,217$ 20,111,728$ 21,156,931$ 1,045,203$ 5% Sewer Fund 6 Staffing 4,413,273$ 5,775,389$ 4,951,456$ 4,889,494$ (61,962)$ -1% 7 Contract Services 691,314$ 1,081,706$ 822,931$ 863,361$ 40,430$ 5% 8 Other Operating Costs 1,903,669$ 2,735,659$ 2,448,484$ 2,678,821$ 230,337$ 9% 7 Transfers 6,238,684$ 2,368,064$ 2,447,007$ 2,573,783$ 126,776$ 5% 10 Sewer Fund Total 13,246,940$ 11,960,818$ 10,669,878$ 11,005,459$ 335,581$ 3% Budget Document Pg. 39 Page 499 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Significant Operating Budget Changes The Utilities Department is recommending significant operating budget changes (SOBCs) in 2022-23 in response to the chemical and electricity rate increases noted prior, implement required drought response, as well as the ongoing need for safety equipment and security services at the City’s water and wastewater facilities. The full SOBC write ups are detailed in Appendix U1 (pg. 46). Table U6: Recommended Operating Budget Changes: One-time Ongoing 1 Water $ 115,980 $ 864,290 2 Source of Supply $ 3,500 $ 582,797 3 Water Admin $ 40,000 $ 1,500 4 Water Distribution $ 18,000 $ 29,475 5 Water Resources $ 30,000 $ - 6 Water Treatment Plant $ 20,000 $ 232,268 7 Utility Billing $ 4,480 $ 18,250 8 Sewer $ 24,480 $ 246,287 9 Wastewater Admin $ -$ 2,500 10 Wastewater Collections $ 20,000 $ 15,000 11 WRRF $ -$ 210,537 12 Utility Billing $ 4,480 $ 18,250 13 Grand Total $ 140,460 $ 1,110,577 Solid Waste Recycling Program The Solid Waste and Recycling Program is funded by the General Fund and AB 939/SB 1383 fees passed through San Luis Garbage Company customers and remitted monthly to the City. With the approval of the 2022 Solid Waste Rate Setting adopted by City Council on April 19, 2022, 1.55 percent of the total rate increase will be allocated to the City via additional AB 939/SB 1383 fees. The additional revenue is approximately $100,000 annually. For FY 22-23, the Solid Waste and Recycling Program operates with approximately $327,000 in revenues, and just over $317,000 in expenses, including personnel. The program is currently managed by one full-time equivalent (FTE) staff member, with support from a contract position expiring in August of 2022. The proposed budget for FY 22-23 includes the addition of a permanent FTE position, as mentioned below, due to the expansion of monitoring and compliance with regulatory state mandated programs. Included in the General Fund section of the budget (pg. 41) is a request to allocate the funding for an additional position (1 FTE) to the Solid Waste and Recycling Program. In 2022, California’s SB 1383, the largest adopted solid waste bill in nearly 30 years, became effective and as a result, local government solid waste sections are expanding to comply. The expanded workload includes but is not limited to: 1.Adopting an organics procurement policy. 2.Acquiring and submitting organics diversion data to the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) for regular reporting to the State. 3.Mediating customer issues and complaints. 4.Ensuring contract compliance between the IWMA, City, and San Luis Garbage Company. 5.Developing an enforcement methodology by January 1, 2024. Budget Document Pg. 40 Page 500 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Continued conversations with Human Resources regarding the program's expansion are occurring to determine the appropriate position and pay grade. Unassigned Working Capital It is the City's policy to maintain a reserved working capital balance of 20 percent of operating expenditures in the Water and Sewer Funds, this reserve is known as the “Operating Reserve”. This is considered the minimum level necessary to adequately provide for: 1.Economic uncertainties, local disasters, and other financial hardships or downturns in the local or national economy. 2.Contingencies for unseen operating or capital needs. 3.Cash flow requirements. All working capital that is not designated is considered unassigned. The current target for Unassigned Working Capital balance in the Water and Sewer Fund is $10 million per fund. Water Fund - Unassigned Working Capital The Water Fund is facing increased expenditures that are largely attributable to the chemical and electricity cost increases that started in 2021-22. As the City conducts rate setting for a two-year period, these increases were not captured as part of the previously approved 3.5% rate increase for 2022-23, resulting in a projected shortfall for the 2022-23 fiscal year. The Water Fund Unassigned Working Capital balance for 2022-23 is approximately $9.1 million, which is healthy enough to absorb these impacts for a single year; however, long-term forecasts of the use of the Unassigned Working Capital to address these increased costs shows it decreasing to approximately $4.1 million by 2030-31. The projected decrease in Unassigned Working Capital can largely be attributed to inflationary increases in material and labor costs in operating expenditures and capital improvement projects. Rather than using the Unassigned Working Capital balance, the Water Fund will first utilize Rate Stabilization Reserves to fund the budget shortfall in this fiscal year. The goal and intent of Rate Stabilization Reserves are to provide a level of stability to both the City and the customer. Consistent with the Financial Plan Process and Policies, staff will address the longer-term impacts at the 2023-25 Financial Plan with potentially higher than previously forecasted rate increases to maintain the health of the Water Fund beginning in 2023-24 and to rebuild the Rate Stabilization Reserve fund balance. The use of Rate Stabilization Reserves, currently at $2.2 million, will allow the Utilities Department to continue to deliver a high level of service during the ongoing drought, allow for the continued execution of critical CIP projects, and will preserve the Unassigned Working Capital, currently at $10.2 million, in case of a drastic or significant economic downturn. The Water Fund Unassigned Working Capital is displayed on line 40 in the Five-Year Forecast on pg. 44. Budget Document Pg. 41 Page 501 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Sewer Fund – Unassigned Working Capital Based on the long-term forecast the Sewer Fund is in a financially stable and healthy position with an anticipated Unassigned Working Capital balance of approximately $20.1 million in FY 2022-23. However, at the close of FY 2023-24 the balance is anticipated to decrease to $16 million, and down to $14 million at the close of FY 2024-25 due to significant increases in material and labor costs associated with operating programs and capital improvement projects. For FY 2022-23, the increased expenditures are largely attributable to chemical cost increases of as much as 100 percent, which started in 2021-22. For FY 2023-24, electrical accounts will have a larger impact as the WRRF transitions from chemical to ultraviolet disinfection. This larger Unassigned Working Capital balance also exists for cashflow purposes on the WRRF Project. Based on current fiscal circumstances, the Sewer Fund is in a relatively stable position. The Sewer Fund Unassigned Working Capital is displayed on line 42 in the Five-Year Forecast on pg. 45. Long Term Strategy Since adoption of the 2021-23 Financial Plan, significant inflationary and supply chain-related issues have emerged, requiring that the previously adopted 2022-23 Water and Sewer Fund budgets be revised to maintain existing operations. The Water and Sewer Funds are separate and distinct; however, the impacts of inflationary price increases and supply chain disruptions have impacted both funds similarly. In addition to these impacts, the City experienced another abnormally dry winter that has caused the Water Fund to receive an increased volume of drought-related work and staff are anticipating the need for additional staffing and operating resources as the State of California rolls out a state-wide response to the current drought. The procurement and use of chemicals is critical in delivering high quality water to the community, as well as treating wastewater in a manner to address regulatory, health, and safety standards. During FY 2022-23, staff will carefully evaluate operations and fiscal impacts related to the chemical and electricity budgets across the funds. Staffing and personnel costs are a major part of water and wastewater operations and expenses. Taking into consideration recent compensation increases and on-going negotiations with various employee groups, the Water and Sewer Funds anticipate staffing expenses to increase in FY 2022-23 as well. This will result in an on-going fiscal commitment related to personnel and staffing costs in future years, increasing total operating expenses. Due to the ongoing nature of these increased expenditures, this need must be offset by increased revenues. The Water and Sewer Fund long-term forecasts project annual revenues and expenditures, assuming a 3.5 percent rate increase each year. Initial analysis indicates that 3.5 percent increases on an ongoing basis are not adequate to accommodate increased expenditures in Water and Sewer Fund costs in outer years. Utilities Department staff will engage with a rate consultant to reexamine the revenue needed to support essential water and wastewater operations, while accounting for chemical increases, electricity increases, capital construction cost increases, and staffing related increases. In preparation of the 2023-25 Financial Plan, staff will take into consideration a new normal to ensure fund stability and long-term fiscal health to support the day-to-day operation of the water and wastewater systems. With increased operating costs seen in the areas of electricity, chemicals, staffing Budget Document Pg. 42 Page 502 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer among others including safety and security, staff is tasked with strategically navigating these factors in relation to rate setting in future years to continue operations that meet regulatory requirements and public expectations. It is important to note that these challenges are not specific to the City of San Luis Obispo, and utility agencies nationwide are facing similar challenges. Summary The City’s water and sewer operations are paid for by rate revenues and cover all costs for operations, maintenance, infrastructure replacement, and debt service. The Utilities Department is recommending significant operating budget changes (SOBCs) in 2022-23 in response to the chemical cost increases and electricity rate increases, drought response, as well as the ongoing need for safety equipment and security services at the City’s water and wastewater facilities. Due to the ongoing nature of these increased expenditures, this need must be offset by increased revenues. In preparation of the 2023-25 Financial Plan, staff will take into consideration a “new normal” to ensure fund stability and long-term fiscal health to support the day-to-day operation. Budget Document Pg. 43 Page 503 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Table U7: Water Fund Five Year Forecast 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget REVENUES BY TYPE 1 Water Service Sales (Charges)15,417$ 15,776$ 16,329$ 17,472$ 18,695$ 19,349$ 2 Utilities Base Fee Charges 5,213$ 5,560$ 5,754$ 6,157$ 6,588$ 6,819$ 3 Sales to Cal Poly 954$ 972$ 1,045$ 1,118$ 1,196$ 1,238$ 4 Cal Poly Capacity & Resilience 535$ 223$ 259$ 233$ 235$ 240$ 5 Reclaimed Water Sales (Recycled Water)1,061$ 962$ 995$ 1,065$ 1,140$ 1,180$ 6 Development Impact Fees 4,746$ 1,548$ 1,370$ 789$ 800$ 800$ 7 Investment and Property Revenue 585$ 408$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 8 Long Term Debt Proceeds 11,030$ 3,270$ -$ 700$ 6,000$ 2,000$ 9 State Grants- (Prop 1B & SGMA)326$ 480$ 1,395$ -$ -$ -$ 10 Miscellaneous (Other) Revenue 596$ 396$ 309$ 239$ 239$ 239$ 11 Rate Assistance Subsidy -$ (100)$ (100)$ (100)$ (100)$ (100)$ 12 TOTAL 40,465$ 29,494$ 27,407$ 27,722$ 34,842$ 31,814$ 13 EXPENDITURE BY CATEGORY -$ -$ -$ -$ 14 Salaries & Benefits 4,144$ 4,711$ 4,968$ 5,073$ 5,179$ 5,287$ 15 Operating Expenditures 11,253$ 13,584$ 13,532$ 13,880$ 14,136$ 14,403$ 16 Capital Outlay 10,866$ 16,419$ 5,085$ 4,386$ 10,767$ 6,182$ 17 Debt Service 2,460$ 2,449$ 2,443$ 1,870$ 1,869$ 1,866$ 18 Transfers Out 2,673$ 2,517$ 2,312$ 2,427$ 2,549$ 2,676$ 19 TOTAL 31,396$ 39,679$ 28,340$ 27,636$ 34,500$ 30,415$ 20 EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION -$ -$ -$ -$ 21 General Government 2,696$ 2,517$ 2,312$ 2,427$ 2,549$ 2,676$ 22 Water Source of Supply 10,181$ 14,159$ 10,996$ 11,220$ 11,343$ 11,469$ 23 Water Treatment 13,608$ 10,178$ 7,211$ 6,099$ 7,751$ 6,146$ 24 Water Distribution 3,618$ 10,210$ 5,442$ 5,412$ 10,158$ 7,564$ 25 Water Resources 257$ 543$ 571$ 584$ 597$ 610$ 26 Water Administration 1,035$ 1,723$ 1,370$ 1,446$ 1,643$ 1,480$ 27 Non-departmental -$ 72$ 130$ 132$ 135$ 138$ 28 Utilities Revenue (Billing)-$ 277$ 308$ 316$ 325$ 333$ 29 TOTAL 31,396$ 39,679$ 28,340$ 27,636$ 34,500$ 30,415$ $ $ 7,968$ $ $ $ 30 CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION -$ -$ -$ -$ 31 Working Capital - Beginning 20,765$ 28,503$ 17,478$ 16,380$ 16,301$ 16,479$ 32 Revenues over (under) Expenditure 9,069$ (10,185)$ (933)$ 86$ 343$ 1,399$ 33 Working Capital - Year End before CalPERS 29,834$ 18,318$ 16,545$ 16,466$ 16,644$ 17,879$ 34 CALPERS Down Payment -$ 841$ 165$ 165$ 165$ 165$ 35 Working Capital - Year End 29,834$ 17,478$ 16,380$ 16,301$ 16,479$ 17,714$ 36 Audit Adjustments (1,331)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 37 Operating Reserve 4,106$ 4,652$ 4,651$ 4,650$ 4,746$ 4,847$ 38 Rate Stabilization 2,158$ 2,231$ 2,313$ 2,475$ 2,648$ 2,741$ 39 UFL Trust Fund -$ 166$ 176$ 176$ 176$ 176$ 40 Unreserved Working Capital - Year End 23,569$ 10,428$ 9,241$ 9,001$ 8,909$ 9,951$ in thousands Revised with Supplement Budget Document Pg. 44 Page 504 of 652 Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Table U8: Sewer Fund Five Year Forecast 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Actuals Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget REVENUES BY TYPE 1 Sewer Service Charges 11,699$ 12,359$ 12,792$ 13,240$ 13,703$ 14,183$ 2 Utilities Base Charges 4,543$ 4,653$ 4,816$ 4,984$ 5,159$ 5,339$ 3 Sales to Cal Poly 639$ 992$ 1,026$ 1,062$ 1,038$ 957$ 4 Cal Poly Capacity & Resilience 244$ 244$ 244$ 473$ 473$ 473$ 5 Development Impact Fees 3,849$ 1,384$ 1,190$ 618$ 600$ 600$ 6 Industrial User Permits 9$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 7 Investment & Property Revenue 10$ 402$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 8 Long Term Debt Proceeds 20,212$ 89,916$ 427$ -$ -$ -$ 9 State Grants 258$ 3,470$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10 Miscellaneous Revenue 533$ 397$ 306$ 312$ 318$ 325$ 11 Rate Assistance Subsidy -$ (100)$ (100)$ (100)$ (100)$ (100)$ 12 TOTAL 41,996$ 113,801$ 20,836$ 20,724$ 21,326$ 21,912$ 13 EXPENDITURE BY CATEGORY 14 Salaries & Benefits 4,413$ 4,911$ 4,889$ 4,992$ 5,097$ 5,204$ 15 Operating Expenditures 2,596$ 3,817$ 3,542$ 3,968$ 4,109$ 4,257$ 16 Capital Outlay 37,956$ 111,103$ 5,738$ 9,640$ 3,498$ 4,371$ 17 Debt Service 1,388$ 1,384$ 1,381$ 1,382$ 7,006$ 7,099$ 18 Transfers Out 2,402$ 2,368$ 2,574$ 2,702$ 2,838$ 2,979$ 19 TOTAL 48,754$ 123,584$ 18,125$ 22,685$ 22,548$ 23,909$ 20 EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION 21 General Government 2,402$ 2,368$ 2,574$ 2,702$ 2,838$ 2,979$ 22 Wastewater Collection 2,837$ 21,654$ 6,529$ 5,572$ 4,103$ 6,165$ 23 Environmental Compliance 225$ 281$ 282$ 289$ 296$ 303$ 24 Water Resource Recovery 40,818$ 96,068$ 6,046$ 11,327$ 12,264$ 11,547$ 25 Utilities Revenue 474$ 320$ 310$ 319$ 327$ 336$ 26 Water Quality Lab 667$ 870$ 832$ 852$ 873$ 894$ 27 Network Services 21$ 134$ 19$ 15$ 254$ 36$ 28 Finance Non-Dept 124$ 171$ 103$ 105$ 107$ 109$ 29 Wastewater Administration 1,186$ 1,718$ 1,429$ 1,504$ 1,487$ 1,541$ 30 TOTAL 48,754$ 123,584$ 18,125$ 22,685$ 22,548$ 23,909$ 31 CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION 32 Working Capital - Beginning 40,988$ 35,237$ 24,589$ 27,131$ 25,001$ 23,609$ 33 Revenues over (under) Expenditures (6,758)$ (9,783)$ 2,711$ (1,961)$ (1,222)$ (1,998)$ 34 Working Capital - Year End before CalPERS 34,230$ 25,453$ 27,300$ 25,170$ 23,779$ 21,611$ 35 CALPers Downpayments -$ 864$ 169$ 169$ 169$ 169$ 36 Working Capital - Year End 34,230$ 24,589$ 27,131$ 25,001$ 23,609$ 21,442$ 37 Audit Adjustments 1,007$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 38 Operating Reserve - 20%2,160$ 2,496$ 2,477$ 2,609$ 3,810$ 3,908$ 39 Rate Stabilization 844$ 900$ 932$ 964$ 995$ 1,024$ 40 UFL Trust Fund -$ 171$ 180$ 180$ 180$ 180$ 41 SRF Loan Reserve 2,953$ 5,907$ 5,907$ 5,907$ 42 Unreserved Working Capital - Year End 28,273$ 21,022$ 20,588$ 15,340$ 12,717$ 10,423$ in thousands Revised with Supplement Budget Document Pg. 45 Page 505 of 652 One‐time Ongoing Water 115,980$     864,290$         1 Source of Supply 3,500$         582,797$         2 Other Contract Services  ‐ $2,560 for Irrigation Suitability Analysis for RW, needed as WRRF  processes change plus $3,500 permitting fee from RWQCB to move to Recycled Water General  Order. 3,500$           2,560$             3 Water Supply ‐ $488,829 of total increase is due to electrical cost increases as determined by  PG&E.  Approximately $70,000 of increase is related to staffing increases at Whale Rock which are  passed through as operational costs. 580,237$         4 Water Admin 40,000$        1,500$             5 Drought Outreach ‐ This budget increase is being requested to accommodate drought‐related  outreach which includes information about rebate programs, increased conservation messaging,  and messaging about potential adopted by the State.  Current budget exists to fund the Utilities  Department's standard public outreach program and is not sufficient to accommodate drought‐ related public outreach. 40,000$        6 E&P: AutoCAD Software Plans  ‐ Additional funding for AutoCAD Licenses for E&P Team (2  Licenses). This is utilized between Water and Wastewater and will be split 50/50 between Water  and Wastewater Admin.  1,500$             7 Water Distribution 18,000$        29,475$           8 Communication Services ‐ Verizon ‐ Added cost due to cell phone and communication needs for  staff. Staff originally intended that tablets and cell phones would utilize single data charge but this  was not successful when implemented in the field. 7,400$             9 Construction Materials and Supplies ‐ Raw material costs projected to increase 25% including  asphalt mix, base materials for road repair, cement and concrete mix, and sand and gravel. 5,075$             10 Contract Services ‐ Due to increased recycled water cross connection inspections and management  of City's cross connection control program by the County. Also includes increase in costs for hauling  of spoils from leak repairs, which are largely due to fuel cost increases.  10,000$           11 Education and Training ‐ Education and Training budget was removed due to COVID‐19, will  provide for approximately $1,000 per employee 7,000$             12 Office Supplies ‐ Reduction due to prior purchase of phones for operators. Funding not needed  until phones are due for replacement.(2,000)$         13 Safety Materials and Supplies ‐ $20,000 for two (2) new Self Contained Breathing Aparatus (SCBA)  packs and a spare bottle. The team uses these for safely entering confined spaces for rescue  purposes and the existing equipment has exceded its lifecycle. This will be purchased through Fire's  RFP in 22/23. 20,000$        14 Water Resources 30,000$        ‐$                  15 Materials and Supplies ‐ Additional funding related to water conservation rebate and give away  materials. Prior City programs included toilet rebate program and washing machine rebate  program. 30,000$        16 Water Treatment Plant 20,000$        232,268$         17 Chemicals ‐ Increase in chemical cost for water treatment process including Aluminum Sulfate,  Sodium Hydroxide, Polymers Coagulant, Actiflo Ballast Sand, Chlorine, Filter Aids, Sodium Silico  Fluoride, and Liquid Oxygen. 186,308$         18 Contract Services ‐ Additional costs to contract services including after‐hours security patrols  ($3,840), hazardous material removal ($2,000), diesel fuel for generator ($28,800), increases for  the Annual Water Analyses mandated by Division of Drinking Water ($2,250), and uniform and  linen services for new operator ($1,035). 38,675$           19 Protective Clothing ‐ $20,000 for two (2) new Self Contained Breathing Aparatus (SCBA) packs and  a spare bottle. The team uses these for safely entering confined spaces for rescue purposes and  the existing equipment has exceded its lifecycle. This will be purchased through Fire's RFP in 22/23. 20,000$        Appendix U‐1: Utilities Operating Budget Changes FY 2022‐23  APPENDIX U‐1: Utilities Operating Budget Changes Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Budget Document Pg. 46 Page 506 of 652 One‐time Ongoing Appendix U‐1: Utilities Operating Budget Changes FY 2022‐23  20 Solid Waste Services ‐ Increase costs due to anticipated 25% cost increase.1,285$             21 Special Equipment Replacement Parts  ‐ Due to specialized equipment there is the need for four (4)  dissolved ozone analyzer probe tips (4 per year @ 2500)6,000$             24 Utility Billing (50% Water Fund Share)4,480$         18,250$           25 Other Contract Services ‐ Ongoing cost increase of $12,500/year for 500 additional water meters in  2022‐23. One‐time cost increase of  $8,960 for contract staffing for Utility Billing support.4,480$           6,250$             26 Postage ‐ Increase due to cost of postage and increase in number of customers. 9,000$             27 Print and Reproduction Costs ‐ Increase due to material cost increases and increase in number of  customers.3,000$             28  Sewer 24,480$        246,287$         29 Wastewater Admin 2,500$             30 Software Licensing and Maintenance Agreements  ‐ Additional funding for AutoCAD Licenses for  E&P Team (2 Licenses). This is utilized between Water and Wastewater and will be split 50/50  between Water and Wastewater Admin.  2,500$             31 Wastewater Collections 20,000$        15,000$           32 Data Processing Services ‐ The team uses IT Pipes for sewer inspections. The annual software  licensing has increased due to a deferred upgrade. The prior version of the software was  approximately ten years out of date and no longer supported.  15,000$           33 Safety Materials and Supplies ‐ $20,000 for two (2) new Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)  packs and a spare bottle. The team uses these for safely entering confined spaces for rescue  purposes and the existing equipment has exceded its lifecycle. This will be purchased through Fire's  RFP in 22/23. 20,000$        34 WRRF 210,537$         35 Chemicals  ‐ Increase in chemical cost for wastewater treatment process including Sodium  hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and citric acid. Chemical costs have increased due to supply chain  shortages and there is no immediate alternative. Moving forward, the WRRF's chemical  consumption will be significantly reduced as the new facility is commissioned.  180,837$         36 Other Contract Services  ‐ Contract cost increase for security services with Spectre Security. New  vendor due to prior vendor not showing up. Additionally, security patrols at the WRRF have been  increased from once to four times nightly due to weekly security incidents. Its expected that this  frequency will be reduced after the attention associated with construction is reduced.  29,700$           36 Other Contract Services  ‐ Contract cost increase for security services with Spectre Security. New  vendor due to prior vendor not showing up. Additionally, security patrols at the WRRF have been  increased from once to four times nightly due to weekly security incidents. Its expected that this  frequency will be reduced after the attention associated with construction is reduced.  29,700$           24 Utility Billing (50% Sewer Fund Share)4,480$         18,250$           25 Other Contract Services ‐ Ongoing cost increase of $12,500/year for 500 additional water meters in  2022‐23. One‐time cost increase of  $8,960 for contract staffing for Utility Billing support.4,480$           6,250$             26 Postage ‐ Increase due to cost of postage and increase in number of customers. 9,000$             27 Print and Reproduction Costs ‐ Increase due to material cost increases and increase in number of  customers.3,000$             37 Grand Total 140,460$      1,110,577$      Enterprise Funds – Water and Sewer Budget Document Pg. 47 Page 507 of 652 Parking Fund Section 4: Parking Fund Overview As one of the City’s Enterprise Funds, the Parking Services Program finances its operations through three primary sources; 1) rates and fees charged for parking services; 2) property lease income, and 3) one- time income from payments such as “Parking in Lieu fees”. According to City fiscal policies 1, the Parking Fund’s revenues must be sufficient to cover operations, capital asset improvements, maintenance, debt obligations, and appropriate reserve levels to keep the fund healthy and prepared for unforeseen and long-term funding needs. Discussed in greater detail below, there is a strong need for the Parking Fund to implement previously Council approved reduction of free parking at the parking structures and the adoption of rate increases previously foreshadowed for Council and the Community while maintaining the hours of operation approved by Council with the 2021-23 Financial Plan. The need for Parking rate increases have been discussed in 1) 2021-23 Financial Plan, 2) Mid-Year 2021-22 Financial Plan, and again in this 3) 2021-22 Budget Supplement. These parking rate increases are needed and are largely driven by the anticipated cost increases and corresponding debt and debt ratios, for the construction of the new Cultural Arts District Parking Structure (formerly referred to by its cross-street location as Palm/Nipomo), as the costs for this structure are increasing due to unprecedented construction cost escalation. Without these rate increases, the Parking Fund will not be able to build the new Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. While rate increases are not recommended lightly, these rate increases are necessary to meet Council objectives including the Downtown Concept Plan, Economic Recovery from the Pandemic, and Downtown Vitality and even with these rates increases parking cost in the downtown are both comparable to other parking cost in the area or lower as shown below in Table P1. Staff is aware that both Cal Poly and Paso Robles are considering fee rate increasing in the coming year. In addition to parking rate increases, parking citation penalties or fines are recommended to be increased. Parking fines are meant to be high enough to deter unwanted behavior and the fine amounts for the violations listed in Table P1 are no longer effective at deterring unwanted behavior. Parking citation penalties are recommended to be effective July 1st, 2022. It should be noted that while citation do provide a revenue source for the parking fund, that revenue is offset operating cost to staff parking enforcement officers as well as $13 of every citation fine amount is directed to state and county agencies for service fees and surcharges. 1 2021 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report page xvii (located on page 23 of the PDF under Budgetary Policies) https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/31535/637758729982570000 Budget Document Pg. 48 Page 508 of 652 Parking Fund Table P1: Average Parking Hourly Rate and Fines Current Parking Rate Effective January 2, 2023 Effective July 1, 2023 Effective July 1, 2025 1 On-Street 2 San Luis Obispo $ 1.63 $ 1.75 $ 3.50 $ 4.00 3 Cal Poly $ 2.50 --- --- --- 4 Pismo Beach $ 5.50 --- --- --- 5 Paso Robles $ 1.00 --- --- --- 6 Parking Structures Hourly Rate 7 San Luis Obispo $ 1.50 $ 1.50 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 8 Cal Poly $ 2.50 --- --- --- 9 Pismo Beach $ 5.00 --- --- --- 10 Fines 11 San Luis Obispo $ 40.00 --- --- --- 12 parking after session is expired $ 40.00 $ 45.00 13 no standing, stopping, or parking within intersection $ 40.00 $ 60.00 14 no standing, stopping, or parking on the roadside of a vehicle stopped, parked, or standing at the curb $ 33.00 $ 60.00 15 Cal Poly --- --- --- --- 16 parking after session is expired $ 55.00 17 no standing, stopping, or parking within intersection $ 55.00 18 no standing, stopping, or parking on the roadside of a vehicle stopped, parked, or standing at the curb $ 55.00 19 Pismo Beach --- --- --- --- 20 parking after session is expired $ 80.00 21 no standing, stopping, or parking within intersection $ 35.00 22 no standing, stopping, or parking on the roadside of a vehicle stopped, parked, or standing at the curb $ 54.00 23 Paso Robles --- --- --- --- 24 parking after session is expired $ 33.00 25 no standing, stopping, or parking within intersection $ 139.00 26 no standing, stopping, or parking on the roadside of a vehicle stopped, parked, or standing at the curb $ 33.00 Budget Document Pg. 49 Page 509 of 652 Parking Fund The FY2022-23 budget was developed based on a review of previous years’ revenues and expenditures, forecasting tied to approved revenue enhancement strategies, operating and capital needs, and future debt obligations. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Fund expenditures have exceeded revenues and are projected to do so in FY2022-23 due to continued impacts of the pandemic, needed capital investment to modernize the Parking Services program, and cost preparing for the construction of the City’s fourth parking structure. The Parking Fund is positioned to sustain this short-term structural deficit by using working capital. However, measures must be taken to mitigate this structural deficit; if it continues past FY2022-23, it will jeopardize the City’s ability to secure financing for the construction of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure (formerly referred to by its cross streets of Palm/Nipomo). Shown in table P7 is the required debt ratios for lenders. For future debt obligations a ratio of 130% or greater is required. Expenditures Continue to Exceed Revenues as Pandemic Impacts Linger This Parking Fund summary provides projected revenues and expenditures for FY2021-22, the supplemental budget for FY2022-23, and revised financial forecasting through FY2026-27 based on the assumed implementation of future rate and fee changes. As Council has been informed throughout the pandemic, the Parking Fund has operated at a deficit, expenditures continue to exceed revenues and are projected to do so until FY2023-24 as shown in Table P11. The primary reason for this arises from the diminished demand for paid parking in Downtown and the pandemic’s ongoing impacts on social, office, and retail activities. A secondary reason for this is that the continued modernization of the Parking Services program has required significant investment in equipment and facilities which has resulted in increased capital and operating expenditures. At the time of the writing of this report, revenues are trending upward but have not yet reached pre-pandemic levels. The timeline for a full recovery of downtown parking revenues, while unknown, is expected to parallel the recovery from the pandemic and the changes in consumer and workforce behavior. The uncertainty of the rate at which Parking revenues are expected to recover has been considered in concert with the debt obligations needed to finance the Cultural Arts District Parking. Due to projected revenue shortfalls and anticipated increased construction costs for the new parking structure, staff has forecasted three rate increases occurring on January 2, 2023 and July 1st in 2023 and 2025 necessary to maintain a balanced Parking Fund. These rate increases will be needed to secure the financing for the construction of the parking structure (including all phases of design, site preparation, and vertical construction) which is now estimated at $53 million. Cultural Arts District Parking Structure and Debt Service Ratio Requirements for the Fund As previously mentioned, the Parking Fund’s expenditures have exceeded its revenues throughout the pandemic. To assist the local economy and businesses, the fund temporarily suspended collection of revenues and created new loading zones and parklets and offered free parking during the holiday shopping season. Over the past two years, the fund lost approximately $750,000 in revenues through these supportive efforts. Due to a then existing working capital (much of which was being built up to help fund the construction of the City’s fourth parking structure, the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure), the Parking Fund was able to maintain service levels, its capital improvement schedule, and its 20% operating reserve despite operating at a deficit for three consecutive fiscal years. The prolonged impacts Budget Document Pg. 50 Page 510 of 652 Parking Fund of the deficit has resulted in the fund falling short of its debt service ratio coverage 2. The Fund’s debt service ratio is a critical component for future debt funding and could jeopardize the fund’s ability to secure a loan from the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (I-Bank) or on the open market (e.g. bond sales) if not addressed by increasing fund revenues. Phase 1A and Phase 1B, “site preparation” of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure are scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2022-23. This effort, which entails grading and site demolition, will be paid for from existing working capital. Phase 2, “vertical construction” is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2023-24 and will be debt funded. The debt proceeds and capital outlay necessary for the structure are included in the updated fund analysis show in Table P11. The cost of construction is anticipated to see further increases during Phase 1 and Phase 2 that are not currently shown; thus, it is important that the City plan for and be prepared for bonding in excess of the current estimated cost of construction. An updated construction estimate was prepared by a consultant in March 2022 showing a projected increase of over 11% of the construction cost for the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Costs are subject to further change as the design is finalized, and staff begins the process of bond issuance to finance construction. The process of providing debt proceeds from the issuance of bonds takes approximately six months. To begin construction in the Fall of 2023 staff plans to initiate this process in December 2022. Due to current economic uncertainty caused by the pandemic and global instability, staff is anticipating interest rates to range from 3% to 5% at time of bond issuance which is significantly higher than initially forecast. Operating Program Expenses As shown in Table P2, a summary of the revised 2021-23 Financial Plan operating budget projections for the Parking Fund. Expenses are increased due to the recently completed class and compensation study and the need for increased security services to maintain a safe environment in the parking structures downtown. Previous years’ actuals for staffing have been significantly lower than the budgeted amount as the Parking Services Program has struggled to fill and keep key positions. Parking has been undergoing a transition to credit card pay stations in the parking structures and paid parking in lots and streets which in turn has resulted in an increase in merchant fees paid due to the higher volume of credit card payments. The Parking Services Program is requesting approval for a full-time supervisor position that will oversee the maintenance and operations of the structures, surface lots, and on-street parking spaces. The position being requested would supervise the Parking Meter Repair Worker, new Facilities Maintenance Workers, Lead Attendants, and the Parking Ambassador positions; all of which currently report directly to the Parking Services Supervisor. Centralizing all maintenance and operations of these key parking assets would allow the Parking Services Supervisor to focus on contract management, budgeting, and the implementation of CIP Projects. The Parking Services Program is also requesting the reclassification of the Parking Services Supervisor to an Assistant Parking Manager; this position would oversee the Parking Maintenance Supervisor and Supervising Parking Enforcement Officer, as shown in Figure 1 below. This position change is important because the Parking Maintenance Supervisor and Supervising Parking Enforcement Officer would both be reporting to the Assistant Parking Manager. In addition to these supervisory responsibilities the Assistant 2 Debt financing requires the City’s net income and depreciation be 130% of its annual debt obligation Parking Manager would continue assisting with administrative duties such as budgeting, contract management and CIP delivery. Budget Document Pg. 51 Page 511 of 652 Parking Fund Figure 2 – Proposed Organizational Chart for the Parking Services Program Table P2: Parking Fund Operating Expenditures by Type Significant Operating Budget Changes Drinking Fountain: $16,800 is needed to replace a dilapidated water fountain located at the Marsh Street parking structure on Pacific Street with a new water hydration station that will service the needs of the downtown community. Row Labels FY 2021 Actuals FY 22 Budget 2023 Adopted 2023 Revised Budget Change % Change 1 Staffing 1,126,434 2,022,327 1,802,766 1,917,920 115,155$ 6% 2 Contract Services 682,982 751,806 449,265 584,065 134,800$ 30% 3 Other Operating Costs 323,855 577,218 580,133 623,458 43,325$ 7% 4 Transfers 990,911 1,105,120 1,122,518 1,263,622 141,104$ 13% 5 Grand Total 3,124,182$ 4,456,471$ 3,954,682$ 4,389,066$ 434,384$ 11% 2021-23 Financial Plan Budget Document Pg. 52 Page 512 of 652 Parking Fund Parking Structure Equipment Extended Warranty: $28,000 would cover an extended warranty for newly installed equipment in City parking structures. The cost of equipment maintenance and replacement is anticipated to be greater than the cost of the extended warranty. Having the extended warranty in place would enable the Parking Services Program to keep equipment in good working order for the community and would minimize payment collection issues. Marketing and Communication: $30,000 is needed to provide the proper resources for the Parking Services Program to effectively inform the community of operational initiatives and gain valuable input from stakeholders. These resources should improve transparency of the goals of the Program while improving community engagement. Reclassification of Parking Coordinator Position to Parking Maintenance Supervisor: $6,500 is for the reclassification of an existing parking coordinator position that would oversee the maintenance and operations of the structures, surface lots, and on-street parking spaces. The position being requested would supervise the Parking Meter Repair Worker, new Facilities Maintenance Workers, the Lead Attendants, and the Parking Ambassador positions. Reclassification of Parking Services Supervisor Position to Assistant Parking Manager: $20,000 would reclassify the existing Parking Services Supervisor position to an Assistant Parking Manager position. The Supervising Parking Enforcement Officer and proposed Parking Maintenance Supervisor positions would report to the Assistant Parking Manager. Additional responsibilities include contract management, budgeting, and the implementation of CIP projects. Overtime: The Parking Program requires an additional $12,000 for overtime as the need has exceeded the budgeted amount for the last three years. This need is tied to staff shortages, an expansion of enforcement hours and increased service levels at the parking structures. Credit Card Merchant Fees: An additional $13,325 is needed due to Parking’s transition to credit card pay stations in the parking structures and for lots and streets. This has resulted in an increase in merchant fees paid due to the higher volume of credit card payments. Table P3: Parking Fund Operating Budget Changes One-time Ongoing 1 Drinking Fountain $ 16,800 2 Parking Garage Equipment Extended Warranty $ 28,000 3 Overtime $ 12,000 4 Credit Card Merchant Fees $ 13,325 5 Marketing and Outreach $ 30,000 6 Fund New Parking Maintenance Coordinator $ 20,000 7 Fund Reclass of Parking Services Supervisor $ 6,500 8 Total $ 44,800 $ 81,825 Proposed Changes to the Capital Improvement Plan Pay Station Installations - Upper Monterey St.: This request for $122,000 would cover the installation of new pay stations and associated signage on upper Monterey St. This effort would implement an approved revenue enhancement strategy included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan. Budget Document Pg. 53 Page 513 of 652 Parking Fund Pay Station Installations - Railroad Square Parking Lot: This request for $66,200 would cover the installation of new pay stations and associated signage in the Railroad Square parking lots. This effort would implement an approved revenue enhancement strategy included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan. Pay Station Installations - Downtown: This request for $800,000 would continue the build out of multi- space pay stations that will replace more single space meters. This funding will replace about one third of the remaining single space meters. The multi-space pay stations have been adopted by the customers and continuing this effort will provide a more consistent customer experience as well as providing what patrons expect in today’s wireless, App-dominated world. Though staff had not planned on building out the system until the 2023-25 Financial Plan, wireless providers have informed staff that existing single space meters will no longer be supported by their 3-G infrastructure. Staff concluded that a continuation of the work to switch to multi-space station would be the most cost-effective and customer-oriented approach. This request would essentially advance the funding and therefore free up future funding for other needs. With multi-space meter installations, single space meter poles will be removed concurrently and existing single space meter poles without meters will be prioritized for removal. Table P4: Parking Fund CIP Changes 1 Upper Monterey Paid Parking $ 122,000 2 R/R Square Paid Parking $ 66,200 3 Pay Station Installation $ 800,000 4 Total 988,200 Revenues As an enterprise fund, the Parking Services Program finances its operations through rates and fees charged for parking services, property lease income and one-time incomes such as Parking In-Lieu fee payments. According to City fiscal policies, rates must be sufficient to cover operations, capital asset improvements and maintenance, debt obligations and maintain appropriate reserve levels to keep the fund healthy and prepared for unforeseen and long-term funding needs. The fund is not able to meet these requirements at current rates given the additional debt service and operating costs associated with the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Revenues from service charges are still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is still unknown when parking demand will return to normal levels. For FY2022-23, revenues are projected to be below what was initially forecasted in the 2021-23 Financial Plan for FY2021-22. Parking meter and structure revenues are heavily reliant on downtown activity and thus are subject to variances tied to public health and economic factors. Due to large increases in the estimated construction cost for the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure brought on by labor and materials shortages as well as high inflation, recovering revenues and rate increases are critically needed so the fund can meet its debt obligation requirements despite lower-than-normal demand. Staff is proposing three rate increases occurring on January 2, 2023 and July 1st in 2023 and 2025 at the proposed rate schedule as shown in Table P6. Budget Document Pg. 54 Page 514 of 652 Parking Fund It should be noted that there is some loss in revenue associated with customers leaving parking structures after hours, or when not staffed. There is a technologic solution to this issue and the Parking Services Program is working to implement a gateless solution to address these issues for all parking structures. While this work is important, this project delivery is limited based up CIP delivery staffing discussed in other sections of this document. Key Assumptions 1.Parking utilization is expected to reach pre-pandemic levels in FY2023/24 2.Cultural Arts District Parking Structure are anticipated to exceed $53M 3.No changes to parking enforcement hours 4.Full implementation of adopted revenue enhancement strategies approved in the 2021-23 Financial Plan 5.Adoption of rate increases as shown below in Table P6 and included in the parking fund’s long- term forecast Proposed Parking Rate Increases Due to the drastic escalation in the projected cost of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure and reduced parking demand, staff incorporated rate increases needed to meet the required debt service obligation and maintain a balanced budget. These rate increases were calculated by forecasting the Parking Program’s operating expenditures, debt service, and parking demand over the next five fiscal years. Based on the forecasted demand these increases are necessary to meet the 130% revenue to expenditure debt service ratio as required by I-Bank or possible other lender on the open market for current debt and debt issuance to fund the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure construction costs. Without these rate increases the Parking Fund will not be able to sustain the additional debt obligation for the escalated costs of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Parking rates are charged based on location for meters and all structures are at the same rate. Approved operational hours are as follows: Mondays – Saturdays: 9:00 am – 9:00 pm; Sundays: 1:00 pm – 9:00 pm. Any reductions to operational hours would require additional hourly rate increases beyond what is proposed to offset that change. Table P5: Parking Revenues ACTUAL Budget BUDGET PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 REVENUES Service Charges 1 Parking Meter Revenues 1,265,085 1,940,900 2,268,500 4,876,000 4,876,000 5,688,700 2 Parking Structure Collections 347,873 835,300 2,030,950 4,647,100 4,793,400 5,060,700 3 Long-Term Parking Revenues 483,346 547,800 844,900 695,300 766,000 768,700 4 Lease Revenues 497,879 459,200 487,800 456,300 456,300 456,300 5 Parking In-Lieu Fees 10,691 20,600 20,600 20,600 20,600 20,600 6 Total Services Charges 2,604,874 3,803,800 5,652,800 10,695,300 10,912,300 11,995,000 7 Fines & Forfeitures 718,173 717,800 793,500 852,100 852,100 852,100 8 Interest on Investment 3,559 75,600 62,000 34,000 41,500 44,700 9 Other Revenues 22,000 14,100 25,000 17,100 15,500 19,200 10 TOTAL REVENUES 3,348,606 4,611,300 6,533,300 11,598,500 11,821,400 12,911,000 11 Proceeds from Debt Financing 46,315,169 12 TOTAL REVNEUES INCL. DEBT FINANCING 3,348,606 4,611,300 6,533,300 57,913,669 11,821,400 12,911,000 Budget Document Pg. 55 Page 515 of 652 Parking Fund Table P6: Parking Hourly Rate Changes Current Parking Rate Effective January 2, 2023 Effective July 1, 2023 Effective July 1, 2025 1 Parking Meters Hourly Rate 2 Tier 1 (Super Core) $2.00 $2.00 $4.00 $5.00 3 Tier 2 (Core) $1.75 $2.00 $4.00 $5.00 4 Tier 3 (Outlying Areas) $1.25 $1.50 $3.00 $3.00 5 Parking Structures Hourly Rate 6 Hourly $1.50 $1.50 $3.00 $3.00 Figure 1 – Map showing locations of Tiered Parking Rates Shown in table P7 below is the required debt ratios for lenders. For future debt obligations a ratio of 130% or greater is required. As shown below future ratios all meet this requirement with the proposed rate increases. It is imported to display this information for lenders as it shows the funds ability to pay back future debt at the same time as taking care of existing assets. The increase in ratio from 2021-22 and 2022-23 is due to the parking fund debt restructuring. The General Fund assumed parking fund debt for the 919 Palm Parking Structure and the Parking Fund is servicing the debt obligation to the General Fund each year by transferring out funds. This transfer out is not included in the ratio calculation. This debt structure allows for a positive revenue to expenditures ratio which is required to fund the future Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Budget Document Pg. 56 Page 516 of 652 Parking Fund P7: Debt Ratio Met With Proposed Rate Increases Capital Improvement Projects The Capital Improvement Projects identified for FY2022-23 include annual asset maintenance projects for the City’s existing three parking structures. This investment is intended to extend the useful life of these assets as conveyed in the Condition Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP). In FY 2021-22 the Parking Program completed scheduled maintenance at the Marsh parking structure. Last fiscal year, in addition to its investment in asset maintenance, the Parking Program pursued capital projects focused on improving user experience. Single space meters were removed in the downtown as part of the roll-out of multi-space pay stations which helped to modernize the program and expand utilization of the sidewalks. The program will look to complete the transition to multi-space pay stations during the next few years once debt service obligations are fully addressed. Pay stations provide an improved customer experience by offering contactless payment option and by allowing parking sessions to be extended from any pay station within the same rate zone (e.g. Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3 as shown in Figure 2). While the Parking Services Program is well positioned to complete already programmed capital projects, concerns related to meeting debt coverage requirements has required the delay of additional projects such as replacement of all single space parking meters with multi-space parking meters. Continued progress has been made on the delivery of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure CIP and the design is currently 95% complete. Once complete, the new structure will require an increased investment in asset maintenance. Staff is monitoring inflation and will continue to make the necessary adjustments to ensure the program can continue providing core services, maintain its infrastructure, and deliver the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Capital Improvement Program Budget Summary ACTUAL PROJECTED EOY BUDGET PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 1 Total Revenue 3,348,606$ 5,229,400$ 6,533,300$ 11,598,500$ 11,821,400$ 12,911,000$ 2 Operating Expenditures (3,084,271)$ (3,719,000)$ (4,389,065)$ (4,701,700)$ (4,755,900)$ (4,800,700)$ 3 Net-Income 264,334$ 1,510,400$ 2,144,235$ 6,896,800$ 7,065,500$ 8,110,300$ 4 Depreciation 663,100$ 649,200$ 648,900$ 653,733$ 653,733$ 653,733$ 5 Debt Service 855,471$ 415,085$ 414,100$ 4,193,200$ 4,063,500$ 3,935,300$ 6 Ratio -47% 207% 361% 149% 158% 189% Table P7: Net-Income to Debt Ratio Table P8: Parking CIP Summary (in thousands) 2021-22 Budget Carryover FY 2021-22 Total Budget* 2021-22 Actuals 2022-23 Budget 2023-24 Forecast ** 2024-25 Forecast ** 2025-26 Forecast 2026-27 Forecast 1 842 Palm Parking Structure Maintenance 400 800 1,200 55 400 400 400 400 400$ 2 871 Marsh Street Structure Maintenance 400 693 1,093 30 400 400 400 400 400$ 3 919 Palm Street Structure Maintenance 100 200 300 - 100 150 100 50 50$ 4 Fleet Replacement: Public Works - - - - 130 37 - - -$ 5 IT Replacement 4 21 25 - 4 15 76 18 -$ 6 Major Facility Maintenance 5 - 5 - 25 - - - -$ 7 Cultural Arts District Parking Structure***850 1,907 2,757 20 5,582 46,315 - - -$ 8 Gateless Parking Equipment Install 40 - 40 - 90 - - - -$ 9 Multi-Space Pay Stations (New)- 87 87 137 800 - 1,200 - -$ 10 Upper Monterey Paid Parking (New)- - - - 122 - - - -$ 11 Paid Parking at Railroad Square (New)- - - - 66 - - - -$ 12 Total 1,799 3,708 5,507 241 7,719 47,317 2,176 868 850$ * Includes Carryover ** FY 22-23 will be financed through built-up working capital and FY 23-24 through debt financing ***Forecasted cost for phase I work in FY 22-23 is $6,969,000. This is subject to further change so additional budget is not being requested at this time. Budget Document Pg. 57 Page 517 of 652 Parking Fund Cultural Arts District Parking Structure Table P9 Cultural Arts District Parking Structure (formerly the Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure) Status Project is currently under design review. Design review will be completed prior to building permit applications. This project is broken down into the following phases: •Phase 1A PG&E Relocation – Project Design is 90% complete. Phase 1A expected to advertise for construction in Summer 2022, with construction work on this phase beginning Fall 2022. •Phase 1B Site Clearing and Demolition – Project is at the 95% design completion level. Staff will be applying for reviews for building permits for Phase 1B in the Spring of 2022. Construction is scheduled to begin Spring 2023. •Phase 2 Parking Structure Construction – Structure design is at 95% design completion level. Staff will be applying for reviews for building permits in the Summer of 2022. Construction scheduled to begin Fall 2023 immediately following completion of Phase 1B Site Clearing and Demolition. Budget Current Project Budget Project Budget Expended Total Project Budget Estimate Budget Notes $ 2,808,989 3 $ 1,315,529 $ 53,300,000 The total cost of construction of all phases of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure has increased by 11.83%, or $4.7 Million, due to abnormal inflation/rising costs. This percent increase is tracked by Engineering News Record’s Construction Cost Index. This budget estimate includes construction costs, soft costs including construction management services, and a 12% construction cost contingency to address unforeseen changes during the work. The current projected cost to deliver the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure is $53 million. Phase 1 which entails utilities and demolition work is estimated to cost $7 million and will be covered by working capital. The cost of construction which is estimated to be $46.3 million will be paid for by debt proceeds. Phase 1: Site Prep using Working Capital $7,000,000 Phase 2: Construction and Debt Financed $46,300,000 Debt Service Debt service payments for the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure are scheduled to begin in FY2023- 24, the year the City will receive debt proceeds. Payments for the Parking Structure are estimated to be $3.7M annually but will depend on final debt financing terms. The next debt service to be retired is for the Marsh St. Parking Structure expansion which will occur in August 2031. The 919 Palm St. Parking Structure debt obligation will be retired in June 2036. As previously mentioned the General Fund assumed this debt obligation and the Parking Fund is servicing the debt via a transfer out from the Parking Fund to the General Fund. 3 Current project budget reflects ongoing design phase work, as well as Phase 1A PG&E Relocation construction costs. Budget Document Pg. 58 Page 518 of 652 Parking Fund Parking Fund Financial Forecast Unreserved Working Capital City policy requires that the Parking Fund maintain a fund reserve that is 20 percent of operating expenditures. The balance beyond this required reserve is the unreserved working capital. The unreserved working capital has intentionally been built up in anticipation of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure. Phase 1A and 1B of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure construction which entail utility work, grading and site demolition will be entirely covered by the current unreserved working capital. Upon construction completion of the parking structure, Parking’s operating costs will increase as will the minimum level of investment in asset maintenance. Staff will continue to closely monitor its unreserved working capital to ensure resources are being appropriately used to support the programs resiliency and sustainability while at the same time providing the optimal customer experience. Long-Term Strategy The Parking Program will continue to closely monitor trends that impact revenues. Staff is focused on maintaining the fund’s health while continuing to provide core services, improve customer experiences and sustain the financing of a generational capital project. The fund is continuing to weather the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and unprecedented inflation. Careful planning and strategic decision making have enabled the fund to bear these challenges thus far, however it cannot sustain the additional costs of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure without adjustment. Throughout the pandemic, the Parking Services Program has worked to provide an unparalleled level of outreach and communication to the community through local, social, and print media in addition to direct infield customer engagement. Through these efforts staff have identified the increased need for communication and are requesting a $30,000 (see Table P3) increase to the communications budget of $5,200 that are used to inform the community about rate, operational, enforcement and special offerings. With the assistance of the Public Communications Manager, the Program has developed a Communication Plan that is aimed at maximizing trust and confidence while increasing awareness of the Parking Services Program’s much overdue modernization efforts and how parking benefits the community. The Program has contracted with a communications consultant to assist with creation and distribution of communication materials throughout the remainder of the calendar year. Communication needs, and emphasis will continue to be a priority for the Parking Services Program in the long-term as technology evolves and the City’s fourth parking structure, the Cultural Arts District Parking Structures, is constructed and begins operations. Communications cost directly related to the construction of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure will be included in the project budget. Table P10: Debt Service 2020-21 (Actuals) 2021-22 (Budgeted) 2022-23 Supplement 2023-24 Projected 2024-25 Projected 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 Projected 1 Marsh Expansion 416,071$ 415,085$ 414,068$ 413,021$ 411,941$ 410,829$ 409,682$ 2 919 Palm 439,400$ 440,193$ 437,509$ 439,095$ 438,668$ 437,982$ 335,959$ 3 Cultural Arts District Parking Structure 3,782,400$ 3,653,800$ 3,526,800$ 2,362,200$ 4 Total 855,471$ 855,278$ 851,577$ 4,634,516$ 4,504,409$ 4,375,610$ 3,107,841$ Budget Document Pg. 59 Page 519 of 652 Parking Fund Table P11: Parking Fund Five Year Forecast ACTUAL Budget BUDGET PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 REVENUES Service Charges 1 Parking Meter Revenues 1,265,085 1,940,900 2,268,500 4,876,000 4,876,000 5,688,700 2 Parking Structure Collections 347,873 835,300 2,030,950 4,647,100 4,793,400 5,060,700 3 Long-Term Parking Revenues 483,346 547,800 844,900 695,300 766,000 768,700 4 Lease Revenues 497,879 459,200 487,800 456,300 456,300 456,300 5 Parking In-Lieu Fees 10,691 20,600 20,600 20,600 20,600 20,600 6 Total Services Charges 2,604,874 3,803,800 5,652,800 10,695,300 10,912,300 11,995,000 7 Fines & Forfeitures 718,173 717,800 793,500 852,100 852,100 852,100 8 Interest on Investment 3,559 75,600 62,000 34,000 41,500 44,700 9 Other Revenues 22,000 14,100 25,000 17,100 15,500 19,200 10 TOTAL REVENUES 3,348,606 4,611,300 6,533,300 11,598,500 11,821,400 12,911,000 11 Proceeds from Debt Financing 46,315,169 12 TOTAL REVNEUES INCL. DEBT FINANCING 3,348,606 4,611,300 6,533,300 57,913,669 11,821,400 12,911,000 14 EXPENDITURES 15 Staffing 1,141,869 1,711,200 1,917,920 1,952,400 1,982,000 2,001,800 24 Contract Services 682,982 831,100 584,065 675,500 690,400 705,800 25 Other Operating Expenditures 268,520 498,000 623,458 526,500 536,600 546,900 26 General Government (CAP)710,200 710,200 872,976 873,000 873,000 873,000 27 Operating Transfers Out 280,700 675,400 390,646 674,300 673,900 673,200 28 919 Palm Debt Service - - - - - 29 Total Operating Expenditures 3,084,271 4,425,900 4,389,065 4,701,700 4,755,900 4,800,700 30 Capital Improvement Plan Projects*896,769 1,844,200 9,106,900 47,363,900 2,259,200 1,018,200 31 Debt Service 855,471 855,278 850,800 852,116 850,609 848,810 32 Cultural Arts District PS Debt Service - - - 3,782,400 3,653,800 3,526,800 33 Total Debt Service 855,471 855,278 850,800 4,634,516 4,504,409 4,375,610 34 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,836,510 7,125,378 14,346,765 55,848,000 10,668,900 9,345,700 55 CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION 56 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 14,892,628 13,185,700 10,671,600 3,941,735 5,860,504 6,891,704 57 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses (1,487,905) (2,514,078) (6,686,865) 1,961,769 1,074,200 3,483,500 59 ENDING FUND BALANCE W/O CALPERS 13,404,723 10,671,622 3,984,735 5,903,504 6,934,704 10,375,204 60 Cal PERS Downpayment 219,055 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 61 ENDING FUND BALANCE 13,185,668 10,671,622 3,941,735 5,860,504 6,891,704 10,332,204 62 Policy Reserve Level - 20%731,800 921,200 969,800 975,900 986,500 995,300 63 CalPERS Trust Fund - - 43,000 64,400 107,400 107,400 64 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 12,453,868 9,750,422 2,928,935 4,820,204 5,797,804 9,229,504 *Fiscal Year 2022-23 is the forecasted cost of construction, not the budgeted amount. 2021-23 Financial Plan PARKING FUND LONG-TERM FORECAST Budget Document Pg. 60 Page 520 of 652 Transit Fund Section 4: Transit Fund Overview As an enterprise fund, the Transit Program funds its operations entirely with state and federal subsidies and fare revenues. This consists of federal and state funding as well as local fare revenue generated through the sale of bus passes and a discounted fare agreement with Cal Poly. As projected in the 2021- 23 Financial Plan, revenues kept pace with escalating costs in Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 and are projected to continue to do so in FY2022-23. The noted caveat being that inflationary and wage pressures will require the City to closely monitor costs and revenues so that they remain balanced and any expansion of services (i.e. routes, reduced headways, duration of service) will require new revenues. This report presents a review of the Transit Enterprise Fund for FY2021-22, and a forecast for FY2022-23 through FY2026-27. The forecast covers key issues and trends which could impact the overall health of the fund. Due to the receipt of federal funds in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Transit Fund remains in excellent health. Staff was able to secure $12.3 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for Transit operations. Additionally, the City will be receiving $4.7 million in funding from the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority for bus replacements. These funds have positioned the Transit Program to maintain and significantly accelerate its schedule of capital outlay; notably the scheduled replacement of its fleet with zero emissions buses to comply with state requirements. Staff is focused on securing additional funds to ensure the appropriate infrastructure is in place to support the electrification of Transit’s fleet. While these one-time grant funding opportunities are certainly helpful to address upcoming mandating fleet requirements and capital outlay, they are not sufficient to otherwise address the ongoing service needs and demands for shorter headways and prolonged service delivery during each day. Constraints Labor shortages have caused the Transit Program to shift to an alternative and a reduced schedule of routes. Staff plans on addressing this issue by leveraging federal dollars to boost wages and attract interest in driver vacancies with its contracted service provider. This will enable the Transit Program to offer a schedule of routes that reflects the returning ridership demand. While demand is trending upward, lower than anticipated demand in FY2021-22 resulted in lower costs from First Transit, LLC, (First Transit), the City’s transit operator. Staff is working on executing an amendment to its operations and maintenance agreement with First Transit to extend the agreement for an additional two-year term. This two-year term agreement is expected to adjust contractor wages to attract and retain drivers in a tight and competitive job market. The Transit Program continues to dedicate a significant portion of its resources to servicing Cal Poly at a discounted rate. Staff is seeking to execute a new long-term agreement with Cal Poly that would result in quarterly payments based on level of ridership and proportionate contribution toward capital asset maintenance and replacement 1. This is a crucial work effort as Transit relies heavily on Cal Poly to hit its state required 20 percent fare-box ratio. Furthermore, as the Transit Program endeavors to achieve 1 While federal grants will help maintain and accelerate capital replacements; in the long term, capital costs need to be factored into operating revenues so that deferred replacement costs do not accumulate over time. Budget Document Pg. 61 Page 521 of 652 Transit Fund compliance with the California Air Resource Board’s Zero Emission Goal for heavy duty vehicles, it is appropriate that Cal Poly contribute toward capital asset maintenance and replacement 2. The influx of federal funds to support transit systems during the COVID-19 pandemic have given the Transit Program the ability to make significant strides in its transition toward an electric fleet. This funding will also be relied on to incentivize drivers to fill vacancies, enabling Transit to return to its standard level of service. Absent this funding, Transit would not have been able to replace buses in accordance with its bus replacement schedule nor would it be able to respond with contract change to address the current labor shortage. Staff is currently working with a consultant to analyze and review Transit’s operations and infrastructure to ensure the optimal program structure for providing quality services to the community. This study will serve as a guiding document for how to navigate similar constraints in the future. Discretionary Revenues for Electric Bus Purchases The Transit Program successfully secured funding beyond its originally anticipated Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Transportation Development Act (TDA) formula-based grant funding. $12.3 million in ARPA funding from the FTA was secured to support operations for the next three fiscal years. This will free up FTA funds that were originally going to be used on operations and maintenance to be spent on electric bus purchases. The San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority secured funding from the FTA, $4.7 million of which will be allocated to the City for the replacement of fleet with electric buses. Transit secured $285,000 in Low Carbon Transportation Operations Program grant funding that will be used for infrastructure costs related to the purchase and installation of electric bus charging units. Key Assumptions Transit’s forecast is based on previous year trends and upcoming operational changes. Staff continues to navigate constraints and opportunities arising from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ridership levels and additional funding opportunities will be monitored closely. Assumptions made in the Transit Fund forecast are shown below. 1.Ridership will continue to trend upwards and reach pre-pandemic levels in FY2022-23. 2.A new long-term agreement with Cal Poly will be executed that more accurately reflects the cost of providing services and includes contributions toward capital asset maintenance and replacement 3.The Transit Fund will continue to receive formula based federal and state grants on an annual basis. 4.An amendment with First Transit, LLC will be executed that will reflect an increase in wages for drivers and operations staff. Operating Expenses Contract Services In June 2016 the City Council approved the award of the Transit Operations and Maintenance contract to First Transit. The contract called for a base four-year term with the potential for additional extensions. The City Council in May 2022 authorized the final amendment with First Transit, a two-year extension. The terms of the agreement include a significant increase in costs tied to driver and operational staff 2 Cal Poly Transit Agreement negotiations are ongoing and staff hopes to return for Council action prior to the end of the fiscal year. Budget Document Pg. 62 Page 522 of 652 Transit Fund wages. These increased costs will enable the Transit Program to increase service levels to match increasing ridership demand. The increased cost will be covered by discretionary ARPA funds. Current pricing for SLO Transit Services is in line with industry standards, however, it outperforms other transit providers in the region based on key performance indicators. Transit will be conducting a review of past performance and start planning future operational needs to craft the scope of work for a new operations and maintenance contract following the lapse of this last amendment. Fuel Fuel costs have steadily risen in FY 2021-22 and staff anticipates this trend to continue into the new fiscal year. This could serve as an additional impediment to providing adequate service levels. Should fuel prices increase significantly beyond staff projections, the program will either maintain alternative service levels, use undesignated working capital to cover the increased costs, or reduce capital expenditures. As Transit shifts to an electric fleet the impacts of volatile fuel prices will become less impactful. With only two electric buses being added to the fleet this year, the benefits in the short-term will be minimal 3. General Government City Staff is currently working on a cost allocation plan for Fiscal Year 2021-22, a minimal increase is anticipated from the previous fiscal year. The purpose of the cost allocation plan is to quantify the level of support operating departments, such as transit, receive from internal services departments funded through the General Fund.-. The Transit Fund is responsible for reimbursing the general fund for those services. The Cost Allocation Plan does impact the performance of the farebox ratio, as it is considered an operating expense. Revenues In accordance with the City’s fiscal policies transit rates are set based on targets tied to the Transportation Development Act, the City will strive to cover at least twenty percent of transit operating costs with fare revenues. While ridership was low, this did not inhibit the Transit Fund from meeting this twenty percent state requirement as the service level tied to the City’s operating and maintenance contract with First Transit is based on ridership demand. The Transit Fund is projected to finish FY 2021-22 with a balanced budget given decreased operating costs, and the receipt of both anticipated annual grants along with unanticipated state and federal discretionary grants. As noted above, staff is currently negotiating with 3 Currently SLO Transit operates 17 buses of which two are pending replacement by electric buses. Due to fuel pricing volatility, 50% of the diesel bus fleet or more will need to be replaced by electric transit vehicles to realize savings. The current electric vehicle replacement schedule is planned to replace two to three buses per year based upon available funding. The Current FTA lifecycle of a bus is 12 years, which means the more buses SLO Transit buys at one time would require that same expenditure in future years. Table T1: Transit Operating Budget 20-21 Actuals 21-22 Budget 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change % Change 1 Staffing 313,020$ 422,212$ 372,314$ 306,115$ (66,198)$ -18% 2 Contract Services 2,414,328$ 904,871$ 2,895,950$ 2,895,950$ -$ 0% 3 Other Operating Costs 407,776$ 3,407,654$ 684,100$ 684,513$ 413$ 0% 4 Transfers 321,727$ 226,183$ 230,707$ 365,544$ 134,837$ 58% 5 Grand Total 3,456,850$ 4,960,920$ 4,183,071$ 4,252,122$ 69,051$ 2% 2021-23 Financial Plan Budget Document Pg. 63 Page 523 of 652 Transit Fund Cal Poly to execute a new long-term agreement that more adequately reflects the cost to the Transit Fund to provide this service. Federal Transit Administration Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding is based upon population and service level categories. SLO Transit is part of the Federally recognized SLO Central Urbanized Area that receives additional FTA funding for performing above industry standards, known as State Transportation Innovation Funding (STIC) funding. FTA funds are typically used for operating and preventative maintenance costs, however the influx of additional federal funds tied to COVID relief has freed these funds to be used for the purchase of electric buses. Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act funding covered Transit’s operating costs in FY2021-22 and ARPA funding will cover operating and preventative maintenance costs over the next three fiscal years. The ARPA grant funding allows the use of Federal 5307 funds that would typically be used for operating costs to be used for capital expenditures, specifically for the replacement of existing transit vehicles with new zero emission buses. This Federal 5307 funding coupled with additional grant funds secured by the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority in the amount of $4.7 million specifically for the City’s Transit Program will fund the replacement of eight existing buses with new electric buses over the next several years. Given the required timeframe for both programming this funding and lead time for new buses, the City should start to see new buses from these grant funds in two years. Transportation Development Act The California Transportation Development Act (TDA) is comprised of two sources of funding for transportation programs. Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transportation Assistance (STA). LTF is derived from a retail sales tax and STA is derived from a statewide excise tax on fuel. Both funds are distributed to the regions by the State. San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) then allocates this amount regionwide to each of the cities in the County, the County, and the Consolidated Transportation Services Agency for the San Luis Obispo region. TDA funding was in line with staff projections in the 2021-23 Financial Plan and are projected to remain consistent. State revenue in FY2021- 22 is higher than usual due to grants from PG&E and the Air Pollution Control District. The APCD and Air Pollution Control District funds will reimburse the Transit Fund for part of the cost to install electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Fare Revenue Local revenue is generated from cash fares, pass sales, and an agreement with Cal Poly. The terms of the agreement entail payment from Cal Poly on a quarterly basis that is calculated by applying a discounted fare per Cal Poly rider. In Fiscal Year 2021-22 both general and Cal Poly ridership increased from the previous Fiscal Year. As ridership demand is increasing, staff is working to address labor shortages to ensure service levels reflect this increased demand. There is a requirement tied to the receipt of state funding that local revenue account for 20% of the transit operating budget. Cal Poly plays a considerable role in the generation of local farebox revenues and the overall health of the Transit Fund. The current agreement with Cal Poly is scheduled to lapse on June 30, 2022. Staff is working with Cal Poly to reach an agreement based on levels of ridership and proportional contributions toward capital asset maintenance and replacement. Reaching agreement with Cal Poly will be critically important Budget Document Pg. 64 Page 524 of 652 Transit Fund and an equitable share of costs 4to ensure robust services to meet their Master Plan mode shifts, labor agreements and equity with other users. Revenues Summary Capital Projects With the influx of federal funds staff will maintain its schedule of bus replacements with zero emission alternatives. Two electric buses were purchased in FY2021-22 and will be delivered in Fall 2022. Additionally, work is underway to revise Transit’s capital outlay schedule to purchase and install the infrastructure necessary to support an entirely electric fleet. Chargers and zero emission buses will require a 1 to 1 ratio given most of the operational buses will need to charge every night so that they can be used during the day. This work is being funded by the Transit Fund’s unreserved working capital, state discretionary grant funding and federal ARPA funding. Part of the cost will be reimbursed by PG&E and the Air Pollution Control District. Transit will replace eight buses with zero emissions buses over the next several fiscal years. New CIP for Office Space Improvements To leverage operational synergies and common goals to serve resident and visitors’ transportation needs, and to free up space in the offices at 919 Palm Street for added CIP engineering staff, Transit staff will be relocating to the Parking Services Office Space. This will require tenant improvements at 1260 Chorro Street. A new CIP has been proposed for the Transit Fund in the amount of $250,000 to cover tenant improvements at 1260 Chorro Street. This would result in a consolidation of Transportation services, a 4 Using 2018 data as non-COVID ridership information for Cal Poly, Cal Poly paid $0.77 per ride while a general non- Cal Poly rider fee is $1.50. Table T2: Number of riders year over year General Ridership Cal Poly Total Ridership 1 Fiscal Year 2018-19 342,000 609,000 951,000 2 Fiscal Year 2019-20 278,000 427,000 705,000 3 Fiscal Year 2020-21 142,000 37,000 179,000 4 Fiscal Year 2021-22 259,000 269,000 528,000 Table T3: Revenues Sum of FY 2021 Actuals Sum of FY 22 Budget Sum of 2023 Adopted Sum of 2023 Revised Budget Sum of Change Sum of % Change 1 TDA Revenue 1,379,861$ 2,101,064$ 1,729,374$ 1,729,374$ -$ - 2 STA Revenue 208,814$ -$ 246,430$ 311,567$ 65,137$ 26% 3 Other State Grants 265,199$ 550,000$ -$ 50,000$ -$ - 4 Low Carbon Operation Revenue -$ -$ -$ 291,000$ 291,000$ - 5 FTA 5307 (Capital)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - 6 FTA 5307 (Preventative Maintenance)-$ 248,349$ -$ 202,581$ 202,581$ - 7 FTA 5307 (Operating)-$ 2,557,332$ 1,462,600$ 2,945,716$ 1,483,116$ 101% 8 Other Federal Grants -$ -$ -$ 4,100,000$ 4,100,000$ - 9 Federal Stimulus Grants 4,189,680$ 898,093$ -$ -$ -$ - 10 Other Grants/Subventions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - 11 Bus Fare 478,000$ 687,500$ 800,000$ 850,000$ 50,000$ 6% 12 Cal Poly Transit Agreement Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - 13 Interest on Investment 30,826$ 30,826$ 6,500$ 14 6,552,380$ 7,073,164$ 4,238,404$ 10,486,738$ 6,191,834$ 246% Budget Document Pg. 65 Page 525 of 652 Transit Fund shared public counter, and an enhanced customer experience. Staff does not anticipate this relocation will have a significant impact on the Transit Programs operating budget. The Transit Fund will fund the necessary tenant improvements for the office space pay market rate rent to the Parking Fund for use of the space. This market rate rent cost will be included as a Transit Fund expense in the 2023-25 Financial Plan once costs and timeframe are better known. Summary of Capital Improvement Plan Changes in Financial Position City policy requires that the Transit Fund maintain a minimum working capital balance that is 20 percent of operating expenditures. The working capital beyond this amount is considered unassigned. It is best practice for Transit operations to maintain a total working capital balance that could cover six months of operations. The unassigned working capital balance currently reflects the $12.3 million in ARPA discretionary funds that will be received over three years. Staff is working on updating the bus replacement schedule which would result in increased capital expenditures through Fiscal Year 2025-26 and will result in a lower unassigned working capital balance than is shown below. Long-Term Strategy Federal funding has mitigated previously held concerns about a shortfall of funding needed to deliver necessary capital projects. The Transit Fund is well-positioned to meet state requirements and City goals of attaining a zero-emission fleet and the infrastructure necessary to support it. Furthermore, the Transit Fund has sufficient funding to maintain its schedule of bus shelter replacements 5 and will be exploring updating the same as well as other rider services to the shelters adjacent to City Hall. This funding will also be used to address the labor shortage by offering higher wages to drivers through its operations and maintenance contract with First Transit, LLC. The federal funding that made this possible is an anomaly, and previously held concerns on reliance on outside funding should be maintained. Staff will review recommendations provided in the Transit Program Analysis and Assessment to determine what adjustments need to be made to achieve greater long-term fiscal sustainability. To maintain fund health the Transit Program continues to pursue discretionary grants and seeks to reach more equitable terms in its service agreement with Cal Poly. 5 Staff will propose replacing shelters at City Hall in the 2023-25 Financial Plan as well as self-cleaning restrooms for transit users. Table T4: CIP Summary 2021-22 Budget Carryover Total Budget Actuals 2022-23 Budget 2023-24 Budget 2024-25 Budget 1 40 Prado Rd. Bus Shelter Relocation 35,000$ -$ 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2 Bus Replacements 1,935,916$ 366,596$ 2,302,512$ -$ 1,910,000$ 2,085,000$ 2,085,000$ 3 Bus Shelter Replacement (91253)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000$ 90,000$ 4 IT Replacements 1,201$ 3,063$ 4,264$ -$ 3,157$ -$ -$ 5 Transit Auto Location System (91606)-$ 82,343$ 82,343$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6 Transit Facility EV Charging Infrastructure 651,824$ -$ 651,824$ 29,878$ -$ -$ -$ 7 Bus Yard Parking Lot Maintenance -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 8 Bus Wash Replacement -$ -$ -$ -$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 9 Transit Supervisor ADA EV Van 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10 Vault Room Addition Study -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ -$ -$ 11 Transit Yard Solar -$ 22,077$ 22,077$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12 1260 Chorro Tenant Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 13 2,693,941$ 474,080$ 3,168,020$ 29,878$ 3,128,157$ 2,175,000$ 2,175,000$ Budget Document Pg. 66 Page 526 of 652 Transit Fund Table T5: Long-Term Forecast Actual 2020-21 Budget FY2021-22 Revised Budget FY2022-23 Projected FY2023-24 Projected FY2024-25 Projected FY2025-26 Fund and/or Revenues 1 Federal - 5307 Operating -$ 2,557,332$ 2,945,716$ 3,004,630$ 3,064,723$ 3,126,017$ 2 Federal -5307 Preventative Maintenance -$ 248,349$ 202,581$ 206,633$ 210,765$ 214,981$ 3 Federal - 5307 Capital 1,384,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4 Federal - Cares Act 2,805,680$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5 Federal - ARP (American Rescue Plan) Formula -$ 898,093$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6 State TDA (Transportation Development Act) STA 208,814$ 305,458$ 311,567$ 317,799$ 324,154$ 330,638$ 7 State TDA LTF 1,379,861$ 1,787,606$ 1,729,374$ 1,763,961$ 1,799,241$ 1,835,226$ 8 State TDA Allocated to RTA, SLOCOG and Other Off-the-Top Obligations*690,993$ 633,596$ 646,268$ 659,193$ 672,377$ 685,825$ 9 State - APCD (Air Pollution Control District)-$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10 PG&E Grant -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 11 Farebox Revenue 328,000$ 150,000$ 200,000$ 240,000$ 250,000$ 260,000$ 12 Cal Poly Agreement 150,000$ 537,500$ 650,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 13 State - SB1 8,468$ 8,000$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 14 State - LCTOP (Low Carbon Transit Operations Program)256,731$ -$ 291,000$ 75,000$ 75,750$ 77,265$ 15 ARPA Discretionary -$ -$ 4,100,000$ 4,100,000$ 4,100,000$ -$ 16 Interest on Investment 30,826$ 30,826$ 6,500$ 6,630$ 6,763$ 6,898$ 17 TOTAL REVENUES $ 7,243,373 $ 7,706,760 $ 11,133,006 $ 11,373,846 $ 11,503,773 $ 7,536,848 18 19 Expenditures & Obligations 20 Staffing 313,020$ 358,181$ 306,115$ 315,299$ 324,758$ 334,500$ 21 Contract Services 2,414,328$ 3,470,217$ 2,895,950$ 2,982,829$ 3,072,313$ 3,164,483$ 22 Fuel 204,966$ 435,034$ 320,000$ 326,400$ 332,928$ 339,587$ 23 Maintenance 133,171$ 269,453$ 240,000$ 244,800$ 249,696$ 254,690$ 24 Other Operating Expenditures 69,639$ 137,442$ 124,513$ 127,003$ 129,543$ 132,134$ 25 Cost Allocation 230,707$ 235,321$ 365,544$ 372,855$ 380,312$ 387,918$ 26 RTA, SLOCOG and Other Off-The-Top Contributions from TDA 690,993$ 633,596$ 646,268$ 659,193$ 672,377$ 685,825$ 27 Transfers Out -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28 Capital 1,800,000$ 2,753,518$ 3,128,157$ 2,055,000$ 2,115,000$ 2,175,000$ 60 TOTAL Expenditures & Obligations: $ 5,856,823 $ 8,292,762 $ 8,026,547 $ 7,083,378 $ 7,276,927 $ 7,474,136 61 62 CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION 63 Beginning Fund Balance** $ 2,697,491 $ 2,715,598 $ 2,129,596 $ 5,223,501 $ 9,501,414 $ 13,715,705 65 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses 1,386,550$ (586,002)$ 3,106,459$ 4,290,468$ 4,226,846$ 62,712$ 67 Ending Fund Balance before CalPERS $ 4,084,041 $ 2,129,596 $ 5,236,056 $ 9,513,969 $ 13,728,260 $ 13,778,417 68 CalPERS Downpayment -$ -$ 12,555$ 12,555$ 12,555$ 12,555$ 69 Ending Fund Balance $ 4,084,041 $ 2,129,596 $ 5,223,501 $ 9,501,414 $ 13,715,705 $ 13,765,862 70 Policy Reserve Level - 20%673,166$ 981,130$ 850,424$ 873,837$ 897,910$ 922,662$ 71 Undesignated Fund Balance $ 3,410,875 $ 1,148,467 $ 4,373,076 $ 8,627,577 $ 12,817,795 $ 12,843,200 2021-23 Financial Plan **FY 2022-23 Beginning Fund Balance is based on projected FY 2021-22 year end balance which is higher than what is shown in the FY 2021-22 Budget column because of some additional unanticipated revenue and expenditure savings. *State TDA Allocation is shown to illustrate SLO Transit's state funding contribution toward regional planning as dictated by RTA. Budget Document Pg. 67 Page 527 of 652 Local Revenue Measure Section 5: Local Revenue Measure The Local Revenue Measure is a 1.5 percent local sales tax approved by City voters in November 2020 that went into effect on April 1, 2021. It replaced the previous .5 percent local sales tax approved by City voters in November 2006. The tax is instrumental in protecting and maintaining operating services and public infrastructure identified by the community as high priorities such as community safety, creek protection, addressing homelessness, keeping public areas safe and clean, retaining local businesses, investments in youth/senior services, streets, open space/natural areas and other vital services and facilities. The largest use of Local Revenue Measure funding for operating costs is for fire, police, rangers and other public safety services. Other examples include staffing for programs such as neighborhood street paving, flood control, and code enforcement. FY 2021-22 In Review and Emergent Trends At the end of March 2022, 70% of the City’s forecasted sales tax revenue for this fiscal year had been collected due to the timing of disbursements from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) which lags behind. This accounts for revenue earned July 2021 through February 2022. Like the rest of the nation, the City experienced a surge of consumption that corresponded with the lifting of lockdowns and stimulative fiscal and monetary policy. While the U.S economy has largely recovered from the pandemic-driven downturn, new challenges arose. Higher labor and raw material costs due to supply chain issues, along with inflationary pressures drive taxable good prices upward and increase the City’s sales tax revenue. However, higher prices reduce consumer demand and increase the City’s own expenditure costs. It is still unclear how these factors will play into the local economic forecast, but staff expect a weakening of sales tax receipts beginning in 2023. While the City has made significant progress on delivering capital projects, it is currently constrained by unprecedented labor and supply chain shortages that are affecting the entire world. Locally, these include labor market shortages, significant construction activity in our area that are increasing local competition for design, inspection, and construction services. Table L1: Local Revenue Measure Forecast 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Revenue Forecast 25,810,000$ 27,048,880$ 27,725,102$ 28,279,604$ 28,845,196$ Growth from prior year 5%3%2%2% Budget Document Pg. 68 Page 528 of 652 Local Revenue Measure Table L2: Changes from the Adopted Financial Plan (or Mid-year Review) Project Project Name 22-23 Original Budget 22-23 Revised Budget Change 1000500 CIP Project Delivery Augmentation $1,000,000 $142,710 $(857,290) Change reflects reallocation of capital budget to Public Works' operating budget to cover cost of 4.00 FTE new positions added at FY 2021-22 Mid-Year. In addition, the change reflects the recommended addition of 1.00 FTE Maintenance Supervisor to create additional capacity within Public Works to deliver capital and maintenance projects. 1000027 Urban Forest Maintenance $175,000 $375,000 $200,000 Change is due to a correction of an approved FY 2021-22 Mid-Year request to add $200,000 to the operating budget for annual pruning and watering costs. This expenditure should have been classified as a capital expenditure and is being moved to an existing capital project for FY 2022-23 via adoption of the Budget Supplement. 90346 Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing $4,266,258 $3,266,258 $(1,000,000) Project budget is being decreased for two purposes: 1. To transfer $900,000 to the Capital Reserve to partially reimburse use of $1,000,000 used in FY 2021-22 to advance construction of the Area 6 & 7 Curb Ramps ahead of the Summer 2022 Slurry Seal project; and 2.to balance the budget appropriated for FY 2022-23. Table L3: FY 2022-23 Projects Recommended for Deferral (See Budget Section 7 for more detail) ID# Spec# Project FY 2022-23 Budget to be Deferred 1 91503 California & Taft Roundabout $2,720,000 2 1000031 Parking Lot Maintenance – Meadow Park and Minor Repair of City Parking Lots $155,000 3 90742 Storm Drain System Replacement – Woodbridge Runoff $175,000 4 1000052 Buchon-Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements $250,000 5 1000029 Bridge Maintenance $100,000 6 1000032 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway Maintenance - Railroad Safety Trail from Cal Poly to Taft Street $50,000 7 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance - Ludwick Community Center Roof and Solar $40,000 8 91385 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs - Santa Rosa Barbeque Replacements $7,500 9 Total $3,497,500 Table L4: Recommended Use of Deferred Project Funding (See Budget Section 7 for more detail) ID# Spec# Project/Reserve FY 2022-23 Budget to be Reallocated 1 90346 Roadway Sealing 2022 +$1,585,000 2 1000055 City Hall Meeting Room TI +$115,000 3 Capital Reserve +$1,797,500 4 Total $3,497,500 Budget Document Pg. 69 Page 529 of 652 Local Revenue Measure Investment into Capital The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has grown significantly due to an increase in available funding to maintain, enhance, and expand City infrastructure from Measure G-20. It quickly became evident that the growth of the CIP exceeded the City’s existing organizational capacity to effectively deliver capital projects. In March of 2021, the City executed an agreement with Management Partners to perform an assessment of the City’s CIP. The assessment resulted in 53 recommendations covering all aspects of the City’s CIP to improve project delivery, including staffing and organizational structure, policy, work processes and responsibilities, finance and budget, staff training and onboarding, and communication and reporting. Since the CIP Process Improvement Manager was hired last year, many of these recommendations have been implemented. With the mid-year budget update, the City added 4.00 FTE new positions and an additional position is being recommended with the Supplemental Budget. While the construction phase of projects is often the community’s first encounter with the improvements that are being made, it is also the result of months and sometimes years of planning, outreach and design work that must be completed prior to making visible progress on a project and proceed to vertical construction. Considering this, the City must ensure that operating resources are right sized to deliver projects. Overall operating costs are forecasted to grow by about 12-15% in the next fiscal year due to equity adjustments and inflationary pressures. Based on existing staff positions, the table below shows the percentage split between operating and capital expenditures for LRM: Table L4: Operating/Capital Split 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 Operating1 32% 26% 26% 26% Capital 68% 74% 74% 74% 2022-23 Appropriations The Local Revenue Measure funds 44.6 positions and over 85 CIP projects. The graph below shows the total LRM investment by priority. The full list of LRM appropriations for FY 2022-23 is included on the next page. 1 Many operating costs have a direct nexus to Capital. The split is approximately 80/20 (80% Capital, 20% operating) when CIP-related staff are categorized under “Capital”. Budget Document Pg. 70 Page 530 of 652 Local Revenue Measure 3% 14% 6% 3% 6% 9% 1% 13% 36% 9% GRAPH L5: LRM EXPENDITURES BY PRIORITY Address Homelessness Community Safety and Emergency Preparedness Creek and Flood Protection Economic Development and Business Retention Open Space/Natural Areas Preservation and Maintenance Other Services and Projects Protect Financial Stability Safe and Clean Public Areas Street Maintenance and Transportation (includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements) Youth/Senior Services and Recreation Facilities Budget Document Pg. 71 Page 531 of 652 Operating CapitalAddress Homelessness 764,069$            1Housing/Homelessness Contract Position97,055$              2Mobile Crisis Unit ( Social Worker ‐ contract through TMH)207,810$            3Mobile Crisis Unit (Paramedic) 1FTE92,190$              4CAT Team Social Worker ‐ Contract through TMH116,188$            5Expansion of 40 Prado Homeless Services Center Bed Capacity 63,826$              6Housing and Homelessness Contract Services Support117,000$            7Parks and Open Space Environmental Clean‐Up Resources70,000$              Community Safety and Emergency Preparedness1,992,685$         1,520,700$            8Emergency Manager (1 FTE)161,130$            9Public Safety Customer Engagement12,000$              10Supplemental Overtime for Farmer's Market Support15,000$              11Community Safety and Emergency Preparedness (Firefighters, 2; Downtown Police Patrol Officers, 3, Downtown Sergeant, 1): FTE 61,180,646$         12Emergency Response Live ‐ Fire Training Improvements17,570$              13Facility Roll Up Door Replacements ‐ Various Locations15,000$  14Fire ‐ Fleet Replacement (1/2 ton truck, 1; Heavy Duty Truck, 1; Heavy Duty Truck w/ Utility Bed, 1; Compact Truck, 1; Open Space Rescue Truck, 1)465,000$               15Fire Emergency Operations Center Training (Emergency Management Services)30,000$              16Fire Equipment Replacement (PPE, AED, etc.)177,499$            17Fire Hydrant Replacement40,000$  18Fire Inspection Management Software (Mobile Eyes)12,200$              19Fire Intern Program23,257$              ‐$20Fire Station #3 & #4 Remodel Space Study and Design75,000$  21Fire Station #4 Exterior Paint27,500$  22Fire Technical Rescue Team Expansion9,150$                23Fire Training/Safety Captain (1 FTE)263,352$            24Initial Design Study ‐ Police Station Replacement300,000$               25Open Space and Creeks Hazardous Tree Removals20,000$              26Police ‐  Information Technology316,000$               27Police ‐ Fleet Replacement (Patrol Hybrid SUV, 2/YR; Motorcycles; SNAP SUV, 1; Investigations SUV, 1)235,000$               28Police ‐ Public Safety Equipment Replacement and Supplies70,881$              29Police Evidence Storage Bldg. and Police Range ‐ Roof Replacement47,200$  Creek and Flood Protection 742,816$            550,000$               30Creek and Flood Protection ( Wastewater Collection Operators and Supervisor, Environmental Compliance Inspectors,  Stormwater Management, Environmental Programs Manager): FTE 6 742,816$            31Creek Trash Capture 50,000$  32Storm Drainage Infrastructure Replacement (multiple locations)325,000$               33Woodbridge Groundwater Runoff Diversion175,000$               FY 2022 ‐ 232022‐23 Local Revenue Measure Expenditure Budget by PriorityLocal Revenue Measure Budget Document Pg. 72Page 532 of 652 Operating CapitalFY 2022 ‐ 232022‐23 Local Revenue Measure Expenditure Budget by PriorityEconomic Development and Business Retention 757,375$             117,500$               34Additional Banner Arms, Bench Arm Rests, Signs25,000$  35Annual Public Art Maintenance and Projects (Utility Box Beautification, Small Public Art Projects, Maintenance)92,500$  36Arts, Culture and Community Partner Support25,000$              37Economic Development Data Tracking and Reporting30,000$              38Economic Development Program Support25,000$              39Holiday Activation Support in Downtown for Lighting and Other Features150,000$            40New Economic Development Strategic Plan100,000$            41Open SLO ‐ Downtown Dining Temporary Staffing27,375$              ‐$42Support for Underserved/Underrepresented Community Businesses150,000$            43TBD Business Retention/Recovery Programs250,000$            Open Space/Natural Areas Preservation and Maintenance709,019$            730,000$               44Additional Pruning/Watering200,000$               45Parks Additional Contract Funding40,000$              46Parks Maintenance Beautification Gardner (1 FTE)106,643$            47ECOSLO partnership ‐ SLO Stewards, Tree Planting & Maint., Green Business, Creek Clean Up20,000$              48Fuel Reduction Crew (4000 Supplemental Staff Hours)61,589$              49New Ranger Maintenance Worker (1 FTE)85,276$              50Open Space Acquisition250,000$               51Open Space Fencing25,000$  52Open Space Maintenance80,000$  53Open Space Vegetation Management and Fuel Reduction20,000$              54Open Space/Natural Areas Preservation and Maintenance (2 FTE Ranger Maintenance Workers ) 190,892$            55Ranger Services Staffing Resources70,071$              56Sustainability & Natural Resources Analyst98,819$              ‐$57Sustainability & Natural Resources Intern/ Urban Forest Master Plan Intern15,729$              ‐$58Urban Forest Maintenance175,000$               Other Services and Projects1,165,820$        1,230,817$            59Centralized Resident Inquiry Platform40,000$              60Capital Projects Engineering Staff (6 FTE)883,460$            116,540$               61CIP Interns5,900$                62City Fleet Vehicle Repairs20,000$              63City Storage Area Network (SAN)178,136$               64Citywide Wireless System Replacement70,641$  65Contract Heavy Equipment Mechanic113,539$            66Council Hearing Room Modification and Functionality Improvements245,000$               67Electric Vehicle Charing Stations (Various City Facilities, Including Parks and Rec and Corp Yard)100,000$               68Energy Management Controls Upgrade50,000$  69Facilities Maintenance 3/4 ton Pickup with Utility Bed60,000$  70Fleet Intern22,921$              Local Revenue Measure Budget Document Pg. 73Page 533 of 652 Operating CapitalFY 2022 ‐ 232022‐23 Local Revenue Measure Expenditure Budget by Priority71Funding for Increased Cost of Facilities Maintenance Materials and Supplies30,000$              72Increased Contract Funds for Specialized Mechanic Services50,000$              73Major Facility Maintenance ‐ ADA Transition Plan Implementation10,500$  74Roundabout Public Art Installations400,000$               Protect Financial Stability404,558$            75Accounting Assistant (1 FTE)60,041$              76Application Systems Specialist (1 FTE)135,485$            77Financial Specialist ‐ Accounting (1 FTE)102,881$            78Fire Injury Reduction Program18,000$              79Fire Policy Research Software (Lexipol)9,369$                80Half‐Time Technology Project Manager (.5 FTE)78,782$              Safe and Clean Public Areas586,454$            2,710,000$            81Additional Pressure Washing25,000$              82Additional Streets Maintenance Staff (2 FTE)216,512$            83Additional Supplies for Downtown Maintenance Program*25,000$              84Facilities Additional Contract Funding25,000$              85Increase in Mission Plaza Maintenance27,000$              86Additional Landscape Maintenance Contract Services65,000$              87Bob Jones Trail and Railroad Safety Trail Solar Lighting1,350,000$            88Curb Ramps and Sidewalks Replacement (various locations)150,000$               89Increased Trash and Recycling Services in Public Spaces125,000$            90Mission Plaza Concept Plan Implementation (Phase 1 ‐ Restroom Replacement and Kiosk Café)1,035,000$            91Safe and Clean Public Areas (Parks Maint. Specialist): FTE 177,942$              92Sidewalk Replacement and Installation (includes street trees)100,000$               93Street and Pathway Lighting (various locations)75,000$  Street Maintenance and Transportation (includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements) 1,084,129$        6,721,573$            94Additional Street Operator for Maintenance of Streets and Right of Way (1FTE)101,242$            9521‐22 Sealing Project Complete Street Components200,000$               96Accessibility and Process Improvement Support Services12,000$              97Active Transportation Plan Implementation305,000$               98Bridge Maintenance ‐$99Buchon‐Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements‐$100California & Taft Roundabout Construction‐$101Concrete Street ‐ Monterey ‐ CA to Santa Rosa800,000$               102Increased Asphalt and Concrete Budget60,000$              103Increased Budget for Signals and Street Light Equipment and Electricity25,000$              104Madonna Inn Frontage Bike Pathway (Madonna to Fernandez)150,000$               105Neighborhood Traffic Improvements75,000$  106Pavement Management (Downtown areas)3,010,000$            107Prado Road Bridge & Road Widening 146,573$               Local Revenue Measure Budget Document Pg. 74Page 534 of 652 Operating CapitalFY 2022 ‐ 232022‐23 Local Revenue Measure Expenditure Budget by Priority108Prado Road Interchange (YR 1 PA/ED Phase &  YR 2 Design Phase)1,910,000$            109Railroad Safety Trail from Cal Poly to Taft Street‐$110Street Maintenance and Transportation (Engineering, Streets Maintenance, Active Transportation) FTE 4.60599,957$            111Supplemental Street and Parklet Sweeping 250,000$            112Traffic Signs & Striping Maintenance25,000$  113Transportation Interns35,930$              114Transportation Monitoring & Modeling Update70,000$  115Transportation Safety & Operations 30,000$  Youth/Senior Services and Recreation Facilities 395,492$            1,701,500$            116Contract Volunteer Coordinator (1 FTE)106,626$            117Concrete Bench & Table Replacement Various Locations15,000$  118Hydration Stations Various Parks and Facilities15,000$  119Irrigation Mainline Leak Repair15,000$  120Jack House Arbor refurbishment7,500$  121Laguna Lake Golf Course Maintenance20,000$  122Ludwick and Senior Center  ‐ Exterior Paint and Shell Rehabilitation30,000$  123Ludwick Community Center ‐ Roof and Solar Replacement‐$124Meadow Park Exercise/Par Course Equipment Replacement20,000$  125Mission Plaza Arbor Refurbishment70,000$  126Mitchell Park Playground Equipment Replacement100,000$               127Orcutt Area ‐ Linear Park Planning and Construction815,000$               128Park Maintenance ‐ Fleet Replacement: (Mower, 1; Tractor, 1; Trailers, 4;) 108,000$               129Parking Lot Maintenance 50,000$  130Parks and Recreation ‐ Fleet Replacement103,000$               131Parks and Recreation Master Plan Implementation200,000$               132Parks Major Maintenance ‐ ADA Transition Plan Implementation 20,000$  133Parks Play Area Surfacing30,000$  134Santa Rosa Park Barbecue Replacements‐$135SLO Swim Center Minor Capital Maintenance and Operating Costs (Electricity conversation for solar)55,000$              136Swim Center ‐ Pool Automatic Vacuum18,000$  137Swim Center Furnaces Replacement40,000$  Local Revenue Measure Budget Document Pg. 75Page 535 of 652 Operating CapitalFY 2022 ‐ 232022‐23 Local Revenue Measure Expenditure Budget by Priority138Swim Center Supplies (pool chemicals, etc.)25,000$              139Water Stations and Supply Lines25,000$  140Youth Services Staffing Resources (Equivalent to 1.5 FTEs)116,925$            ‐$141Youth/Senior Services and Recreation Facilities (Parks Maint. Specialist): FTE 191,941$              Total LRM Budget8,602,418$         15,282,090$          Transfer to Capital Reserve2,697,500$           8,602,418$        17,979,590$          *Budget items highlighted in orange were approved at the 2021‐22 Mid‐year Review*Budget items highlighted in green reflect projects with recommended changes in the 2022‐23 Supplemental Budget. See Budget Section 7 for detail26,582,007$ Grand TotalLocal Revenue Measure Budget Document Pg. 76Page 536 of 652 Debt Section 6: Debt Service Debt Issue Principle Interest Total Payment Debt Service Fund 2012 Revenue Bond 2012 Refunding Revenue Bonds 285,000 102,300 387,300 2014 Revenue Bond Los Osos Valley Overpass 185,000 238,031 423,031 2018 Revenue Bond Refunding 2005, 2006, 2009 Bonds 569,850 369,719 939,569 2018 Lease Fire Truck 142,144 3,986 146,131 2014 State Loan Energy Sources Conservation 93,074 1,168 94,242 Lease Golf Cart Leases 1,860 1,860 2020 Financing Motorola Radios 217,671 217,671 Total Debt Service Fund 1,494,600 715,205 2,209,804 Water Fund 2012 Revenue Bond Refunding Bond 550,000 22,000 572,000 2018 Revenue Bond Refunding 2005, 2006, 2009 Bonds 16,530 10,725 27,255 2018 Revenue Bond Refunding 2006 Water Revenue 470,000 416,500 886,500 2020 State Loan CIEDB - Water Treatment 588,144 368,659 956,803 Total Water Fund 1,624,674 817,884 2,442,558 Parking Fund 2018 Revenue Bond Refunding 2005, 2006, 2009 Bonds 265,350 172,159 437,509 2001 State Loan CIEDB- Marsh St. Parking 301,748 112,320 414,068 Total Parking Fund 567,098 284,479 851,577 Sewer Fund 2018 Revenue Bond Refunding 2005, 2006, 2009 Bonds 18,270 11,854 30,124 2009 State Loan CIEDB-Tank Farm Lift Station 322,310 230,000 552,310 2008 Bank Loan Installment Sale Agree.-SunTrust 170,000 11,130 181,130 2014 Bank Loan Installment Sale Agree.-US Bank 511,479 105,896 617,375 Total Sewer Fund 1,022,058 358,880 1,380,939 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 4,708,430 2,176,448 6,884,878 FY 22-23 Budget Document Pg. 77 Page 537 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects Section 7: Capital Improvement Projects Overview All City construction projects and equipment purchases costing $25,000 or more are included in the City Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP is adopted as part of the budget in every Financial Plan and accomplishes several goals. Maintains and replaces existing City infrastructure in accordance with the City’s asset management plans, infrastructure replacement schedules, and other documents Meets community needs and desires as established in the Community Budget Forum, Major City Goals and Council priorities. Plans, schedules, and finances projects to ensure cost-effectiveness and conformance with established policies. Comprehensive policies relative to the development of the City’s CIP are specified in the Budget Policies section of the 2021-23 Financial Plan including detailed information relative to both the two-year Financial Plan and the Five-Year CIP forecast1. The Supplemental Budget is the second-year budget of a two-year Financial Plan. Before the beginning of the second year of the two-year cycle, the City Council reviews the progress during the first year, adjusts as necessary, and approves appropriations for the second fiscal year. As reported in the Mid-Year Budget Review, the revised revenue forecast for the General Fund is significantly increased compared to the forecast presented with the adopted Financial Plan, due largely to the continued re-opening and recovery of the economy. Due to revenue trends at the time, the FY 2020-21 Supplemental Budget included a full overhaul of the CIP budget initially presented in the 2019-21 Financial Plan. Fortunately, current financial conditions do not require similar recommendations for FY 2022-23. That said, some projects are experiencing delays or cost increases due to a variety of factors, discussed extensively below. The FY 2022- 23 CIP section below includes recommended changes to certain project budgets to reflect changes at the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Budget review or address urgent needs. It is likely that additional funding may need to be requested for additional projects throughout the coming year associated with anticipated ongoing supply chain and/or costs of goods issues. The current project to augment CIP delivery (discussed in more detail below) informs the format and content of the FY 2022-23 CIP Supplemental Budget and continues progress towards providing more comprehensive and contextual reporting on the CIP. The CIP Supplemental Budget is intended to provide readers with a clear picture of the context in which the CIP is operating, as well as insight into the progress to date implementing the Management Partners 2022 CIP Process Improvement recommendations in the current year, and further changes and enhancements to come in FY 2022-23. 1 2021-23 Financial Plan, Pages 537-569. https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/finance/city- budget Budget Document Pg. 78 Page 538 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects The 2021-23 Financial Plan includes funding for 115 construction projects (inclusive of new assets, asset replacements and asset maintenance) that are managed by CIP Engineering, Transportation, or Utilities project managers. In FY 2021-22 to date, 22 projects have been completed (this includes both projects funded in FY 2021-22, as well as projects funded and initiated prior to the 2021-23 Financial Plan). 81 projects are in progress, with 50 projects scheduled to begin construction prior to the end of FY 2022-23, assuming Council’s adoption of staff’s recommendations for the 2022-23 CIP. City construction projects are completed in seven distinct phases, shown below. While the construction phase is the most visible to the community, it is also the culmination of months to sometimes years’ worth of planning, design, engineering and permitting which all work to minimize issues and delays during the construction phase. Project Identification & Budgeting •City Council & community input •Project planning & development •Funding identified & approved by Council Project Design •Preliminary work •Project layout and mapping •Retain consultant design services Plans & Specifications •Development of detailed information •Coordination with third party utilities •50% design review •90% plan review/design review •Project communications •Environmental review Project Ready to Construct •Design completion •Advertisement of project for public bid •Award of construction contract Permits •City building permit •Outside agency permits Construction Project Completion •Ribbon cutting •Notice of completion project closeout Budget Document Pg. 79 Page 539 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects The chart to the right shows the status of the 115 construction projects funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan. It is expected that roughly two-thirds of the projects currently in design will begin construction prior to the end of 2021-23. Most of the construction projects that have not yet started will not be funded until the start of FY 2022-23, assuming adoption of staff’s recommendations. Measure G20 and Expansion of CIP The 2021-23 Financial Plan represents significant growth to the City’s CIP, due to the passage of the Local Revenue Measure (Measure G-20) which increased the local sales tax rate from 0.5 percent to 1.5 percent which is projected to generate approximately $25 million annually. For the General Fund alone, capital expenditures in the current year have increased by $18.5 million or 70% compared to FY 2020-21 when including American Rescue Plan (ARPA) funding. Absent the one-time ARPA funding, General Fund capital expenditures in the current year have increased by $14 million or 65% compared to the prior year. CIP Process Improvements in Progress The growth of the CIP has exceeded the City’s existing organizational capacity to effectively deliver capital projects. To address this, the 2021-23 Financial Plan included budget augmentations of $500,0000 in FY 2021-22 and $1 million in FY 2022-23 and beyond to “right-size” the organization to address the increased project workload. In 2021, the City contracted with Management Partners, a local government consulting firm, to perform an assessment of the delivery of the CIP and provide both structural and process improvements to deliver projects. The Management Partners assessment resulted in 53 recommendations covering all aspects of the City’s CIP to improve project delivery. The recommendations FY 2021-22 CIP Process Improvements A CIP Process Improvement Manager was hired in November 2021 to lead the implementation of the recommendations, as well as other identified areas for improvement. Many of the recommended improvements relate to the policies that govern the CIP and the processes that are Design 61% Construction 3% Study 1% Complete 8% Not Started (not funded until FY 22-23) 22% Not Started 5% Status of Construction Projects Funded in 2021-23 Financial Plan Budget Document Pg. 80 Page 540 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects followed to deliver projects. The work being done in the current year lays the foundation for a multi-year process to refine CIP policies and processes to best deliver on the expanded CIP. It is expected that the work being done today will be reflected during the 2023-25 Financial Plan, when projects will be delivered as intended. The $500,000 budgeted for the CIP Project Delivery Augmentation project in FY 2021-22 funds these efforts, as well as contracted services to support delivery of various parks projects as well as implementation of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan and Public Safety Center. The table below summarizes planned expenditures from the project budget in the current year: Because the growth of the CIP has outpaced the City’s capacity to deliver projects, the first priority has been to add new staff positions, as recommended by Management Partners. As part of the Mid-Year Budget update, the Council approved the addition of 4.00 FTE new positions to build capacity to address the unprecedented CIP growth and support implementation of other recommendations over the coming year. These positions are funded with the additional budget allocated in the 2021-23 Financial Plan and include: 1.1.00 FTE Engineering Inspector to provide construction management for capital projects; 2.1.00 FTE Capital Projects Manager (a new classification) to provide project management for capital projects that do not require a high degree of engineering expertise and to partner with Engineers to manage larger and more complex capital projects; 3.1.00 FTE Supervising Civil Engineer to manage more complex and higher profile projects and also provide direct oversight of Engineers and Capital Projects Coordinators who are actively managing projects; and 4.1.00 FTE CIP Manager (a new classification) to manage to non-technical aspects of the City’s CIP. In addition, 1.00 FTE vacant Engineer has been reclassified to the new Capital Projects Coordinator position. As of the writing of this report, staff has developed the new classifications and has completed the required meet and confer process with SLOCEA for the addition of the Engineering Inspector, establishment of the new Capital Projects Manager classification and reclassification of the Engineer position. Recruitments for these new positions are either in progress or will begin very soon. The expectation is that the increased staff capacity (both in number and broadened skillset) will enable the CIP Engineering program to more effectively deliver on the planned capital projects which have increased in complexity, scale and number. Table C1: FY 2021-22 Planned CIP Project Delivery Augmentation Project Expenditures ID# FY 2021-22 Budget $ 500,000 1 MP CIP Project Management -Phase I (55,000) 2 RRM PM Support for Mission Plaza and Public Safety Center (136,720) 3 MP Parks Project Management - Phase 2 (100,000) 4 CIP Process Improvement Manager (Contract) (117,600) 5 Office Supplies for CIP Process Improvement Manager (3,608) 6 Remaining Balance 87,072* * Remaining budget available to fund the cost of the new staff positions, for the remainder of FY 2021-22. Budget Document Pg. 81 Page 541 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects 2022-23 CIP Process Improvements As part of the Supplemental Budget, staff is recommending the addition of 1.00 FTE Capital Maintenance Supervisor (a new classification) to oversee critical Public Works programs including streetlights and signals, urban forestry, and maintenance contracts. The intent is that this new position will increase the capacity of existing staff to supplement the efforts of the CIP Engineering group to oversee the many projects included in the City’s CIP. Because of the direct alignment of this new position to the effort to augment CIP delivery, it is recommended that this position be funded from the designated $1,000,000 for the CIP augmentation project in FY 2022-23. The table below summarizes planned expenditures from the project budget in FY 2022-23: In addition to building staff capacity (necessarily prioritized in 2022), the CIP Process Improvement Manager is also exploring opportunities to update policies and work processes, streamline project delivery, more clearly define roles and responsibilities throughout the organization, improve communication and reporting internally and externally, and improve staff onboarding and training in line with the Management Partners recommendations. Project Delivery Project Delivery is constrained by several unprecedented conditions. These include limited staffing (a phenomena not unique to the City but impacting all businesses), significant construction activity in our area, due to Federal stimulus monies (increasing local competition for design, inspection, and construction services), supply chain issues, and inflation. Staffing Constraints As of the writing of this report, there are 8.00 FTE vacant positions in the CIP Engineering Program in addition to 1.00 FTE vacant CIP Manager. This is due in part, to the addition of the 4.00 FTE new positions noted above, but also reflects the transition of several employees (Engineers and an Engineering Inspector) who have left for career advancement and/or higher compensation in the private sector or other public sector agencies. Currently, each CIP Engineer has a project workload of approximately 15 ongoing active projects in different phases of delivery. In addition, the City Engineer is managing three of the four legacy projects (discussed in more detail below) and the Supervising Civil Engineer is also providing direct management of certain projects, which impacts Table C2: FY 2022-23 Planned CIP Project Delivery Augmentation Project Expenditures ID# FY 2022-23 Budget $ 1,000,000 Notes 1 CIP Process Improvement Manager (Contract) (89,301) Remainder of contract initiated in November 2021 2 CIP Manager (185,182) New positions approved by Council via adoption of FY 2021-22 Mid-Year recommendations 3 Supervising Civil Engineer (189,475) 4 Engineering Inspector I/II/III/IV (138,470) 5 Capital Projects Manager I/II/III (134,432) 6 Capital Maintenance Supervisor (146,599) New position recommended for approval in FY 2022-23 Supplemental Budget 7 Remaining Balance 116,540* *Remaining budget available to fund continuation of existing contracted services, or new contract services to support project delivery. Budget Document Pg. 82 Page 542 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects their ability to provide overall management of the CIP. Due to the scale and complexity of some projects, the current project workload is neither ideal nor sustainable. The use of consultant resources has previously been a good option to build capacity when there are staff vacancies. However, due to staffing shortages in all industries and the number of construction projects currently underway in the region, there is a shortage of consultant availability to move projects forward without delay. Supply Chain Issues and Construction Cost Escalation The FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Budget Review noted that global supply chain issues resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have influenced the availability and cost of goods. These issues have continued and have been exacerbated by the current conflict in Ukraine. The supply chain issues and cost escalation have impacted various City operations, from water treatment at the WRRF to fleet replacements, and have also extended to construction projects. Today, the construction industry is still facing uncertainty in costs, and labor supply. Multiple City projects have come in well above engineers’ estimates and have had to be rebid and/or returned to the City Council for further funding allocations. The costs of materials are escalating far more rapidly than indexes can predict and the construction industry is facing a labor shortage. At present, it is predicted that costs will escalate approximately 22% year over year. In addition to projects coming in over bid, several capital projects received no bids, which is an unusual occurrence. As noted in the Utilities Fund Review, inflation and supply chain issues have particularly impacted Utilities’ projects and operations. Chemical price increases have increased the Water Treatment Plant and Wastewater Recovery Facility’s chemical budgets by approximately 50% and 29% respectively. Electrical costs for Utilities’ non-Community Choice Energy operations are projected to increase as much as 20% over initial projections. These material cost increases, in addition to the need to respond to current drought conditions, result in significant operating budget changes in FY 2022-23 for both the Water and Sewer funds. Fortunately, recent government intervention may help to ease up some of the supply chain issues. Governor Newsom and State Department of General Services have recently identified sites to store shipping containers to alleviate delays to goods getting into California’s ports. At this time, it is too soon to tell whether or not these storage sites will increase the availability of goods. Efforts to Address Constraints to Project Delivery Recognizing that the City is not able to significantly influence many of the constraints noted above, staff has been working to adjust processes and expectations in order to effectively deliver capital projects. Below is a summary of a number of efforts currently underway to adapt to the current realities of the CIP: Compensation In order to assure that the City provides competitive compensation and to address recruitment and retention issues throughout the organization, the City initiated a compensation study in August 2021. The study included a survey of other employers to evaluate the City’s base salaries and determined that overall, the City’s base salaries are 8.55% below the median of comparator agencies. In February 2022, the survey results were presented to the City Council, and shortly after, the City initiated the negotiation process with SLOCEA in order to increase wages for SLOCEA- represented staff (this includes many of the classifications within the CIP Engineering group that Budget Document Pg. 83 Page 543 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects design and deliver the City’s capital projects). As of the writing of this report, negotiations with SLOCEA are still underway, but the hope is that increased compensation will improve the City’s ability to recruit and retain employees that are critical to delivery of the CIP. Project Prioritization It is expected that staffing constraints will continue well into 2023. With limited opportunity to address the factors contributing to staffing shortages, CIP staff led an effort to realistically assess capacity to deliver on the construction projects funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan, and prioritize those projects not yet started. The prioritized has been vetted by the CIP Review Committee to assure broad input and support. The intent of this effort is to: 1.Set realistic expectations related to project delivery; 2.Prioritize the project management tasks that will be assigned to new staff as they are onboarded; and 3.Identify which projects not yet in progress may be able to reallocate funding to projects in- progress that may need additional funding due to cost escalation. The identified priority levels include: The priority levels for each construction project can be found in Tables C7 through C14 which provide status update on all projects funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan. The next section summarizes staff’s recommendations around projects that can be deferred to the 2023-25 Financial Plan, in order to fund projects that are in need of additional funding. Recommended Changes to General Fund Projects to Address Impacts of Supply Chain and Construction Cost Issues As a part of the Supplement, staff is recommending several changes to General Fund projects for FY 2022- 23, reflective of the cost increases and staffing constraints noted above. The project prioritization exercise described above was used to guide analysis of projects to identify those that could be deferred to 2023-25. The projects recommended for deferral are those that are: 1.Not construction ready, or 2.Grant funding is being sought for, or Budget Document Pg. 84 Page 544 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects 3.Can be paused until staff resources are online. The projects listed below are recommended for deferral (they are not being cancelled) and will be included in staff’s recommendations for funding in the 2023-25 Financial Plan. The funding from the deferred projects is recommended to be used for cost increases for the Summer 2022 Roadway Sealing project which came in significantly over bid, the City Hall Meeting Room Tenant Improvements project, and to fund the Capital Reserve at the policy-required funding level. Staff anticipates that reserve funding will be needed in order to address the increased cost of goods and services due to continued global economic conditions into FY 2022-23. The following projects are recommended to be deferred to 2023-25. All projects are funded through the Local Revenue Measure or General Capital Outlay. Table C3: FY 2022-23 Projects Recommended for Deferral ID# Spec# Project FY 2022-23 Budget to be Deferred Funding Source Priority 1 91503 California & Taft Roundabout $2,720,000 LRM 2 2 1000031 Parking Lot Maintenance – Meadow Park and Minor Repair of City Parking Lots $155,000 LRM 5 3 90742 Storm Drain System Replacement – Woodbridge Runoff $175,000 LRM 5 4 1000052 Buchon-Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements $250,000 LRM 5 5 1000029 Bridge Maintenance $100,000 LRM 6 6 1000032 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway Maintenance - Railroad Safety Trail from Cal Poly to Taft Street $50,000 LRM 6 7 1000508 City Hall Lighting $15,000 General Fund 6 8 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance - Ludwick Community Center Roof and Solar $40,000 LRM 6 9 91385 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs - Santa Rosa Barbeque Replacements $7,500 LRM 6 10 Total $3,512,500 The deferred funding is recommended to be allocated as follows: Table C4: Recommended Use of Deferred Project Funding ID# Spec# Project/Reserve FY 2022-23 Budget to be Reallocated 1 90346 Roadway Sealing 2022 $1,585,000 2 1000055 City Hall Meeting Room TI $130,000 3 Capital Reserve $1,797,500 4 Total $3,512,500 Additional information about each of these projects is included below in the ‘Recommended Changes to Existing Projects’ section. Viewing the Capital Improvement Plan Through the Lens of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) The City Council set a vision of a community with core values of diversity and inclusivity with the adoption of its 2019-21 Major City Goals. In developing the 2021-23 Financial Plan, DEI was identified as one of four Major City Goals. Staff is in the process of developing a deeper understanding about the interplay between capital projects and DEI and how the built environment can help to advance the City’s DEI goals. Budget Document Pg. 85 Page 545 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects In the near term, there are a number of capital projects funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan that provide an opportunity to support diversity, equity and inclusion within the community. These include: 1.Curb ramp construction projects to provide an accessible route for pedestrians at intersections; 2.Implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plans for major facility maintenance and parks maintenance and repair projects; 3.Performing a planning study for gender-inclusive restroom and sleeping facilities for Fire Stations three and four; and 4.Reviewing the new Police Station building program and budget for opportunities to reduce costs to preserve resources for community service investments. 5.Council’s provision of policy direction for the framework of Community Work Force Agreements (CWAs) for named projects to encourage local worker participation on legacy capital projects so that local workers can benefit from these projects. Legacy Project Updates Among the projects funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan are four major or “legacy” projects which will be highly visible to the public and support growth into the future. Below is a status update on the legacy projects funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan: Table C5: Legacy Project Updates 90435 - Cultural Arts District Parking Structure (formerly the Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure) Status Project is currently under design review. Design review will be completed prior to building permit applications. This project is broken down into the following phases: •Phase 1A PG&E Relocation – Project Design is 90% complete. Phase 1A expected to advertise for construction in Summer 2022, with construction work on this phase beginning Fall 2022. •Phase 1B Site Clearing and Demolition – Project is at the 95% design completion level. Staff will be applying for reviews for building permits for Phase 1B in the Spring of 2022. Construction is scheduled to begin Spring 2023. •Phase 2 Parking Structure Construction – Structure design is at 95% design completion level. Staff will be applying for reviews for building permits in the Summer of 2022. Construction scheduled to begin Fall 2023 immediately following completion of Phase 1B Site Clearing and Demolition. Budget Current Project Budget Project Budget Expended Total Project Budget Estimate Budget Notes $2,808,989 $1,315,529 $53,300,000 The total cost of construction of all phases of the Cultural Arts District Parking Structure has increased by 11.83%, or $4.7 Million, due to abnormal inflation/rising costs. This percent increase is tracked by Engineering News Record’s Construction Cost Index. This budget estimate includes construction costs, soft costs including construction management services, and a 12% construction cost contingency to address unforeseen changes during the work. The Current Project Budget reflects ongoing design phase work, as well as Phase 1A PG&E Relocation construction costs. Working Capital $7,000,000 Debt Financed $46,300,000 91365 - Public Safety Center Status The project is currently in the Planning and Entitlements phase. Staff received Council feedback to continue to move forward with project development in November 2021. The next phase includes public outreach and the planning and entitlements phase, including adoption of a CEQA Budget Document Pg. 86 Page 546 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects environmental document. Staff will be reaching out to a public relations consultant experienced in large municipal project communications to assist with outreach. Construction is anticipated to begin in Summer 2025. Budget Current Project Budget Project Budget Expended Total Project Budget Estimate Budget Notes $190,685 $110,558 $53,200,000 The Total Project Budget Estimate includes ongoing design and CEQA environmental review costs, construction costs including market escalation of 3.5% per year to the construction year, as well as soft costs during construction such as construction management. As this project moves through the project delivery process, construction estimates will be updated based upon more refined project details and current known construction costs. Working Capital $1,200,000 Debt Financed $52,000,000 91613 - Prado Interchange Status The Project is currently in the Project Approval/Environmental Document phase (PA/ED). 1.The PA/ED phase is anticipated to be complete by January 2024. i.Elks Lane re-alignment and impacts to City Corporation Yard (30% plans) 8/2022 ii.Prado Road widening 10/2022 iii.CEQA Documents under consultant review after Caltrans comments 5/2022 iv.Caltrans to begin NEPA document development 6/2022 v.30% Plans and const estimate for all alternatives considered 7/2023 vi.Meetings with Caltrans to choose preferred alternative 9/2023 2.Final design which is the Plan Specification and Estimates (PSE) delivery phase, is anticipated to commence in January 2024 and be complete by June 2025. i.Only for preferred alternative 3.Construction is anticipated to begin in December 2025. i.Anticipate 36-48 month construction window Budget Current Project Budget Project Budget Expended Total Project Budget Estimate Budget Notes $1,656,120 $947,657 $72,300,000 The Current Project Budget reflects design costs only. The Total Project Budget Estimate includes construction cost and is planned to be funded using contributions from San Luis Ranch, SLOCOG, Traffic Impact Fees, County of San Luis Obispo, City Capital Outlay funds and debt financing. Staff are activity seeking grant funding to support project construction. * The amount of working capital and debt financing to support this project is dependent upon the ability to acquire grant funding for this project. Working Capital ~$42,300,000* Debt Financed ~$30,000,000* 91439 - Mission Plaza Concept Plan Implementation Status The Project is currently in the design phase and is at a design completion level of approximately 30% complete. The planning application has been submitted and has been reviewed by the Community Development Department’s Planning staff. Planning and advisory body review and approval was completed on April 25, 2022 with project review and approval by the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC). The design consultant will be preparing a revised construction cost estimate pending design review by the CHC. Building permit issuance is expected in early spring 2023, with construction beginning in late spring or early summer 2023. Budget Current Project Budget Project Budget Expended Total Project Budget Estimate Budget Notes $449,825 $119,891 $1,484,825 The Total Project Budget Estimate includes ongoing consultant services for project entitlements, environmental review, and design work. The total estimate also includes current figures for project construction including soft costs. As the project completes entitlements and enters detailed design, the Working Capital $1,484,825 Debt Financed $0 budget will be updated based upon more refined project details and current known construction costs. Budget Document Pg. 87 Page 547 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects Projects Completed to Date in FY 2021-22 As of the development of the Supplemental Budget, 24 projects have substantially completed construction. This number includes projects approved in the 2021-23 Financial Plan and prior. The summary below reflects projects funded from the City’s various funds and shows the comprehensive enhancements that the CIP Engineering Program provides to provide a safe, welcome, clean and beautiful community. The projects below support reliable delivery of water throughout the city, improve and maintain park facilities, prevent flooding in local creeks, improve the safety of City transportation infrastructure, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, among other things. Table C6: Projects Substantially Completed Construction in FY 2021-22 to Date (through 5/20/22) ID# Project# Fund Project 1 91425 Water Terrace Hill Pipeline and Pressure Reducing Valve Rehabilitation 2 91647 General Fire Station 1 HVAC Replacement 3 1000066 Water Bee Bee/Cuesta/Loomis Waterline Replacement 4 1000198 General Silt Removal 2021 5 91385-12 General Sinsheimer Irrigation and Stadium Drainage 6 91609 General Broad Street/Woodbridge Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon 7 1000196 General Mission Plaza Railing Upgrades 8 1000021 General Meadow Park Pathway Maintenance 9 91392 General Laguna Lake 2021 Maintenance Dredging Project 10 90742 General Meinecke Storm Drain Repair 11 1000111 General Swim Center Therapy Pool Boiler Replacement 12 1000163A Parking Downtown Parking Meter Pole Removal 13 1000167 General 2021 Downtown Pavement Improvement 14 1000090 Water/Sewer Jeffrey Sewer and Water Replacement 15 1000060 General Energy Efficient Lighting Retrofits - City Hall and Fire Station 1 16 1000190 General Emerson Fitness Park Equipment Replacement 17 1000180 Parking Downtown Crack Sealing 18 1000184 Parking Monterey and Broad Improvement 19* 1000180 Parking Sinsheimer Court Entrance Hardscape 20* 1000034 Water Reservoir 1 Cover 21* 91375 General Railroad Safety Trail Taft to Pepper 22* 1000031-13 General French Park Parking Lot 23* 91385 General Poinsettia Creek Walk 24* 91385 General Sinsheimer Hardscape Replacement *Project is not fully complete (“Notice of Completion” a legal notification process not filed), but construction work is substantially done In addition to the projects included in the list above, there are additional projects (including the Water Treatment Plant Energy Efficiency project that are anticipated to complete construction by the end of FY 2021-22. Status of Projects Funded in 2021-23 Financial Plan FY 2021-22 saw the start of the construction phase for many projects, which will carry into FY 2022-23. In addition, many other projects will begin construction in the coming year. The table below provides a status update on those projects that are funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan. While the construction phase of Budget Document Pg. 88 Page 548 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects projects is often the community’s first view of the improvements that are being made, it is also the result of months to years of planning, outreach and design work that must be completed prior to making visible progress on a project. The tables below list all projects funded in the 2021-23 Financial Plan and include the amount of funding approved in FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23, as well as a brief status update on each, and indication about whether or not the project will begin construction in 2021-23 (for projects with a construction element). The identified priority for all construction projects based on the project prioritization exercise described above is also included. To convey workload, the projects are sorted by the workgroup that is leading the projects. Projects that aren’t funded until the start of FY 2022-23 generally show a status of ‘N/A’, unless work is already underway by staff to ready the project for construction FY 2022-23. Table C7: Projects Led By CIP Engineering (bold are project categories) ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 1 1000049 842 Palm Parking Structure Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 Design Yes 2 2 1000050 871 Marsh Street Structure Maintenance $400,000 $400,000 Design Yes 2 3 1000051 919 Palm Street Structure Maintenance $100,000 $100,000 Design Yes 2 4 1000029 Bridge Maintenance $0 $100,000 N/A No 6 5 1000052 Buchon-Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements $0 $400,000 Design Yes 5 6 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance $520,000 $437,500 7 Fire Station #1 Administration Bldg. Roof $270,000 $0 Design Yes 2 8 Jack House Roof and Widows Walk Railing $100,000 $0 Design No 4 9 Swim Center Therapy Pool Boiler $85,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 10 City Hall Landing Repair $60,000 $0 Design Yes 2 11 HVAC Air Handler at Parking Services $5,000 $25,000 Design No 5 12 Corp Yard Fuel Island Siding / Recoating of Fuel Island and Dispensers $0 $300,000 Design Yes 2 13 Fire Station #4 - Exterior Paint $0 $27,500 Design Yes 6 14 879 Morro - Roof $0 $15,000 N/A No 6 15 Ludwick and Senior Center - Exterior Paint and Shell Rehab $0 $30,000 N/A No 6 16 Ludwick Community Center - Roof and Solar Replacement $0 $40,000 N/A No 6 17 1000021 Meadow Park Pathways $350,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 18 91385 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs $1,730,000 $55,000 19 Sinsheimer Stadium Irrigation and Drainage Replacement $650,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 20 Railroad Bike path fencing $350,000 $0 Design Yes 5 21 Cheng Park Revitalization $300,000 $0 Design Yes 2 22 Poinsettia Creek Walk $215,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 23 Sinsheimer Hardscape Replacement $135,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 24 Mission Plaza Railing Upgrade $80,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 25 Santa Rosa Barbecue Replacements $0 $7,500 N/A No 6 26 Jack House Arbor $0 $7,500 N/A No 6 27 Meadow Park Exercise/Par Course Equipment Replacement $0 $40,000 N/A No 6 Budget Document Pg. 89 Page 549 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 28 1000031 Parking Lot Maintenance $175,000 $255,000 29 French Park $70,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 30 Minor Repair of City Parking Lots $50,000 $25,000 Not started No 5 31 Fire Station 2 $45,000 $0 Design Yes 5 32 Meadow Park $10,000 $130,000 Design Yes 5 33 Ludwick Community Center $0 $10,000 N/A No 6 34 Santa Rosa Park $0 $20,000 N/A No 6 35 Islay Park $0 $35,000 Design Yes 2 36 Laguna Lake $0 $35,000 N/A No 6 37 1000102 Parking Lot Maintenance - Bus Yard $5,000 $500,000 Design Yes 4 38 1000032 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway Maintenance $20,000 $200,000 39 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway Inventory and PCI Study $20,000 $0 Study N/A 4 40 Railroad Safety Trail from Cal Poly to Taft Street $0 $50,000 N/A No 6 41 Madonna Inn Frontage Bike Pathway (Madonna to Fernandez) $0 $150,000 Design Yes 1 42 1000035 Pismo/Johnson/SL Creek Bank Stabilization $92,272 $0 Design No 3 43 1000033 Playground Equipment Replacement $110,000 $100,000 44 DeVaul Ranch Playground $60,000 $0 Design No 5 45 Vista Lago Mini Park Playground $50,000 $0 Design No 5 46 Mitchell Park Playground $0 $100,000 N/A No 6 47 1000084 Sewer Maintenance Hole Cover Adjustments $85,000 $25,000 Ongoing Yes 5 48 90849 Sidewalk Replacement and Installation $235,461 $250,000 49 Curb Ramps and Sidewalks $135,461 $150,000 Ongoing Yes 4 50 Street Tree Sidewalks $100,000 $100,000 Ongoing Yes 4 51 1000046 Silt Removal $210,000 $100,000 Design Yes 5 52 90742 Storm Drain System Replacement $910,000 $725,000 53 Drainage Infrastructure Replacement $860,000 $675,000 Design Yes 4 54 Trash Capture $50,000 $50,000 Design Yes 4 55 90346 Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing $3,592,702 $4,266,258 56 Pavement Management $3,592,702 $3,366,258 Design Yes 1 57 Concrete Street - Monterey - CA to Santa Rosa $0 $900,000 Design Yes 3 58 91740 Trench Repairs- Sewer $25,000 $25,000 Ongoing Yes 5 59 91147 Trench Repairs- Water $200,000 $200,000 Ongoing Yes 5 60 1000034 Water Storage Tank Maintenance $50,000 $1,355,000 61 Wash water tank #1 $40,000 $325,000 Design Yes 5 62 Reservoir 2 Cover Replacement $10,000 $950,000 Design No 5 63 Edna Tank Recoating $0 $80,000 N/A No 6 64 91149 Water Valve Cover Adjustments $50,000 $30,000 Ongoing Yes 5 65 1000506 Bus Shelter Replacements $105,000 $0 Design Yes 4 66 1000053 Bus Wash Replacement $75,000 $450,000 Not started No 5 67 1000055 City Hall Meeting Room TI $0 $130,000 Design Yes 2 68 1000516 Fire Station 3&4 Remodel Space Study and Design $25,000 $75,000 Design No 4 69 1000060 Lighting Energy Efficiency Retrofits $15,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete 70 1000522 Major Facility Replacements $200,000 $300,000 71 Police Station Replacement $100,000 $300,000 Design No 2 Budget Document Pg. 90 Page 550 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 72 Parks and Recreation Interior Office Rehabilitation $100,000 $0 Const. Yes 1 73 90649 Mid-Higuera Bypass $100,000 $100,000 Design Yes 2 74 91439 Mission Plaza Concept Plan Implementation $0 $1,035,000 75 Phase 1 - Restroom Replacement and Kiosk Café $0 $1,035,000 Design Yes 2 76 91252 Prado Road Bridge & Road Widening $7,070,100 $14,972,220 Design No 2 77 1000535 Transit Facility EV Charging Infrastructure $715,000 $0 78 EV Infrastructure Upgrades Behind the Meter $615,000 $0 Design Yes 2 79 EV Charger Installations $100,000 $0 Design Yes 2 80 1000538 Vault Room Addition Design Study $0 $15,000 N/A No 6 81 1000091 Verde, Luneta, Ramona Pipe Replacement $1,276,000 $0 Design Yes 1 82 1000539 Wastewater Collections System Improvements $160,000 $3,860,000 83 Morro, Mill, Santa Rosa $135,000 $1,485,000 Design No 5 84 Islay, Henry, Sierra Way $25,000 $1,825,000 Design No 5 85 San Jose, Ramona, Monte Vista, California $0 $25,000 N/A No 6 86 Taft, Hathaway, Phillips, Buena Vista, Loomis $0 $25,000 N/A No 6 87 Murray, Chorro, Meineke $0 $500,000 Design Yes 2 88 1000545 Waterline Replacement: California Ave - Stafford to Mill $140,000 $1,650,000 Design No 3 89 1000550 WRRF And Wastewater Collection Shop $150,000 $350,000 Design No 3 90 1000502 Active Transportation Plan Implementation $200,000 $200,000 91 Area Sealing Projects Complete Street Components $200,000 $200,000 Design/ Ongoing Yes 2 92 1000501 Bob Jones Trail and RRST Solar Lighting $100,000 $1,350,000 Design No 3 93 1000508 City Hall Lighting $0 $15,000 N/A No 6 94 1000057 Development Related Park Improvements $1,520,000 $4,210,026 95 Orcutt Area - Neighborhood Park $1,200,000 $0 Design No 3 96 Orcutt Area - Linear Park $200,000 $825,000 Design Yes 3 97 Orcutt Area - Pocket Park $80,000 $350,000 Design No 3 98 Orcutt Area - Trail Junction $40,000 $160,000 Design No 3 99 Laguna Lake Improvements $0 $2,875,026 Design No 6 100 1000512 Downtown Zig-Zag Lighting $250,000 $0 Design No 4 101 1000513 Electric Vehicle Charging Station at Various Facilities $175,000 $100,000 102 Utilities - 879 Morro $75,000 $0 Design Yes 3 103 Corporation Yard $50,000 $0 Design Yes 3 104 Parks and Recreation $50,000 $0 Design Yes 3 105 Various City Facilities $0 $100,000 N/A No 3 106 1000514 Emerson Park Amenity Upgrades and Beautification $2,810,000 $0 Design No 3 107 99110 Laguna Lake Dredging and Sediment Management Project Implementation $840,000 $0 108 Dredging and Shoreline Restoration $840,000 $0 Complete Complete Complete Budget Document Pg. 91 Page 551 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 109 91683 North Broad Street Neighborhood Park $175,000 $0 Design Yes 2 110 90435 Cultural Arts District Parking Structure (formerly the Palm - Nipomo Parking Structure) $850,000 $5,582,000 111 PG&E Relocation $700,000 $0 Design Yes 2 112 Adobe Removal $150,000 $0 Design Yes 2 113 Site Clearing and Preparation $0 $5,432,000 Design Yes 2 114 CM Services $0 $150,000 Design Yes 2 115 91613 Prado Road Interchange $500,000 $5,849,571 116 PA/ED Phase $500,000 $0 Study No 2 117 Design Phase $0 $4,004,660 Study No 2 118 Construction Phase $0 $1,844,911 Study No 2 119 1000528 Recycled Water Broad Street - Tank Farm to Aerovista $45,000 $1,040,000 Design No 5 120 1000037 South Street Median Landscaping $240,000 $0 Design Yes 5 121 1000500 CIP Project Delivery Augmentation $500,000 $1,000,000 In progress N/A 2 122 Total $27,496,535 $52,207,575 Table C8: Projects Led by Fleet Maintenance and Fire CIP Engineering The fleet replacements led by Fleet Maintenance and Fire do not have a construction component. This table does not include information about estimated construction start timeframes and the projects below were not prioritized. ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status 2021-22 2022-23 1 Fleet Maintenance 2 1000518 Fleet Replacement: CDD $0 $74,000 3 Building & Safety SUV (#0129, <> Chevy Bolt EV) $0 $37,000 N/A 4 Building & Safety SUV (NEW <> Chevy Bolt EV) $0 $37,000 N/A 5 1000519 Fleet Replacement: Parks and Recreation $139,000 $103,000 6 Golf Course Mower (1201) $65,000 $0 Ordered 7 Masticator attached to Skid-Steer $35,000 $0 Not ordered yet 8 Parks and Recreation Event Trailer $20,000 $0 Not ordered yet 9 Golf Course Trailer (0506) $10,000 $0 Not ordered yet 10 Dump Trailer $9,000 $0 Not ordered yet 11 Parks and Recreation Minivan (0802) $0 $48,000 N/A 12 Parks and Rec Ranger Truck, F350 HD Towing $0 $55,000 N/A 13 1000553 Fleet Replacement: Police $220,000 $235,000 14 Police Patrol Hybrid SUV (2 Vehicles per Year) $130,000 $130,000 Ordered 15 Police SNAP SUV Hybrid (0818) $50,000 $0 Received, currently being built 16 Police Motorcycles $40,000 $40,000 2 Received, currently being built 17 Police Investigations SUV $0 $65,000 N/A 18 1000520 Fleet Replacement: Public Works $631,000 $298,000 19 Streets Maintenance F550 Truck with Hooklift Bed(0843) $150,000 $0 Not ordered yet 20 Streets Maintenance F550 Truck with Utility Bed and Crane(0842) $135,000 $0 Not ordered yet 21 Fleet Maintenance (Corp Yard) Stationary Generator (200kw) $100,000 $0 Not ordered yet 22 Park Maintenance Mower (1007,1504) $75,000 $0 Not ordered yet 23 Streets Maint Asphalt Zipper Safety Improvements (1802) $75,000 $0 Cost increase, not pursuing 24 Streets Maint 2 Axle Kneeling trailer (0420) $30,000 $0 Not ordered yet 25 Facilities Maintenance 3/4 ton Pickup with Utility Bed (0612) $0 $60,000 N/A 26 Parks Maintenance Trailer (9915) $0 $8,000 N/A Budget Document Pg. 92 Page 552 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status 2021-22 2022-23 27 Park Maintenance Tractor (0218) $0 $75,000 N/A 28 Parking 1/2 ton Pickup (0813) $0 $55,000 N/A 29 Parking Scooters (1403,1404 Go-4's) replc with 1 LPR equipped vehicles $0 $75,000 N/A 30 Parks Maintenance Trailers (0007, 9405) $0 $10,000 N/A 31 Parks Maintenance Trailer (0320) $0 $15,000 N/A 32 Engineering Pickup (2), 3 Yr Temp $66,000 $0 Ordered 33 1000521 Fleet Replacement: Utilities $170,000 $535,000 34 WRRF F550 Flatbed with crane (0611-F550 Diesel) $80,000 $0 Not ordered yet 35 WRRF Forklift (0622) $40,000 $0 Not ordered yet 36 Water Resources - Chevy Bolt $35,000 $0 Ordered 37 Water Distribution Signboard (0613) $15,000 $0 Not ordered yet 38 Sewer WWCL Tilt-Trailer (0616) $0 $30,000 N/A 39 Whale Rock Trailer (0417) $0 $15,000 N/A 40 Sewer Hydrocleaner (0718) $0 $475,000 N/A 41 Water Distribution Trailer (0235) $0 $15,000 N/A 42 Fire 43 1000554 Fleet Replacement: Fire $275,000 $465,000 44 Fire Medium Duty Truck with Utility Bed $125,000 $0 Ordered 45 Fire 1/2 ton Truck $75,000 $0 Received, currently being built 46 Fire Heavy Duty Truck (Type 3 Wildland) $0 $415,000 N/A 47 Fire Compact Truck $0 $50,000 N/A 48 Open Space Rescue 4x4 1/2 Ton Truck $75,000 $0 Received, currently being built 49 Total $1,435,000 $1,710,000 Table C9: Projects Led by Information Technology The IT replacements led by Information Technology do not have a construction component. This table does not include information about estimated construction start timeframes and the projects below were not prioritized. ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status 2021-22 2022-23 1 1000074 IT Replacement $1,112,558 $606,445 2 911 Phone System $250,000 $0 Study 3 Police CAD Hardware (Servers and Storage) $233,000 $117,000 Study 4 Audio Recording System Replacement $150,000 $0 Design 5 VMware Infrastructure Upgrade $131,250 $0 Complete 6 Radio Handhelds & Mobiles $116,758 $0 Not started 7 IT Pipes Inspection Software and Licenses $82,250 $0 Complete 8 Public Safety Specialized Surveillance cameras (PODs) Replacement (9K ea, 14 total) $63,000 $54,000 Design 9 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS’s Servers and Storage) $51,000 $0 Complete 10 Asset Management (Cityworks - Utilities Integration) $35,300 $0 Implementation 11 City SAN $0 $198,500 N/A 12 PD SAN $0 $145,000 N/A 13 Wireless System Citywide $0 $91,945 N/A 14 Total $1,112,558 $606,445 Table C10: Projects Led by Parks and Recreation Many of the projects led by Parks and Recreation do not have a construction component. This table does not include information about estimated construction start timeframes for all projects and not all projects below were prioritized. ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 1 1000503 Annual Public Art Maintenance and Projects $142,500 $142,500 2 Small Public Art Projects $102,500 $102,500 Ongoing Yes N/A Budget Document Pg. 93 Page 553 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 3 Utility Box Beautify $20,000 $20,000 Not Started N/A 4 4 Public Art Annual Asset Maintenance $20,000 $20,000 Ongoing Yes 3 5 1000510 Downtown Public Art Installations $200,000 $0 Ongoing Yes N/A 6 1000030 Laguna Lake Golf Course Maintenance $20,000 $20,000 Ongoing Yes N/A 7 91397 Open Space Maintenance $85,000 $105,000 8 General Open Space Maintenance $60,000 $80,000 Ongoing Yes N/A 9 Open Space Fencing $25,000 $25,000 Complete Complete N/A 10 1000532 Roundabout Public Art Installations $300,000 $300,000 Design Yes N/A 11 1000526 Parks and Rec General Plan Implementation $200,000 $200,000 Study N/A N/A 12 Total $947,500 $767,500 Table C11: Projects Led by Public Works Maintenance The projects led by Public Works Maintenance were not prioritized. ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 2021-22 2022-23 1 Facilities Maintenance 2 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance $252,500 $195,700 3 Energy Management Controls Upgrade $75,000 $75,000 Const. Yes 4 Fire Station 1 Campus Roof Access Ladders $50,000 $0 Not started Yes 5 Swim Center Pool Water Chemical Regulator $50,000 $0 Design Yes 6 IT Room Heat Pump Replacements $20,000 $0 Const. Yes 7 Facility Roll Up Door Replacements - Various Locations $17,000 $15,000 Ongoing Ongoing 8 Hydration Stations $15,000 $15,000 Design Yes 9 ADA Transition Plan Implementation $10,500 $10,500 Design Yes 10 Swim Center Olympic Pool Thermal Blankets $5,000 $0 Not started Yes 11 Swim Center Bath House Ceiling $5,000 $0 Not proceeding N/A 12 Police Evidence Storage Bldg. Roof $5,000 $22,200 Not started Yes 13 Swim Center Furnaces (2 Furnaces) $0 $40,000 N/A N/A 14 Swim Center Auto Vacuum $0 $18,000 N/A Yes 15 91385 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs $20,000 $20,000 16 ADA Transition Plan Implementation $20,000 $20,000 Ongoing N/A 17 1000157 Banner Arms, Bench Arm Rests, Signs $100,000 $25,000 In Progress Yes 18 Parks Maintenance 19 91385 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs $85,000 $85,000 20 Parks Play Surfacing $30,000 $30,000 Complete Complete 21 Water Stations and Supply Lines $25,000 $25,000 Design complete Yes 22 Concrete Bench & Table Replacement Various Locations $15,000 $15,000 Started Yes 23 Irrigation Mainline Leak Repair $15,000 $15,000 Started Yes 24 Streets Maintenance 25 1000511 Downtown Safety Enhancements $400,000 $0 Started Yes 26 Urban Forest 27 1000027 Urban Forest Maintenance $175,000 $175,000 28 Urban Forest Maintenance $175,000 $175,000 Ongoing Yes 29 Total $1,032,500 $500,700 Table C12: Projects Led by Traffic ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority* 2021-22 2022-23 1 91612 Neighborhood Traffic Improvements $75,000 $75,000 Design Yes 3 2 91616 Streetlights - Annual Asset Maintenance $75,000 $75,000 3 Pathway Lighting Various Locations $75,000 $75,000 Study No 4 4 90943 Traffic Signs & Striping Maintenance $25,000 $25,000 Design Yes 4 Budget Document Pg. 94 Page 554 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority* 2021-22 2022-23 5 1000073 Transportation Safety & Operations $50,000 $50,000 Design Yes 4 6 91503 California & Taft Roundabout $300,000 $2,798,000 Design No 2 7 91610 Higuera St. Widening - Bridge to Elks $510,000 $0 Design Yes 3 8 1000502 Active Transportation Plan Implementation $350,000 $350,000 9 Pedestrian Facility Improvements $100,000 $100,000 Design/ Ongoing Yes 2 10 RRST (Tiburon to Orcutt) Preliminary Engineering & ROW $100,000 $0 Design Yes 3 11 Bicycle Facility Improvements $100,000 $100,000 Design/ Ongoing Yes 4 12 Active Transpiration Plan Tier 1 Network Implementation $50,000 $150,000 Design/ Const. Yes 3 13 1000036 Cerro San Luis Neighborhood Greenway Plan Implementation $2,450,000 $0 14 Phase II $2,450,000 $0 Design Yes 2 15 1000056 Development Agreement - City Share $0 $715,000 16 600 Tank Farm $0 $715,000 N/A N/A N/A 17 1000155 Open SLO $200,000 $0 18 Downtown Renewal - Supplemental funding for Curbside Parklets $200,000 $0 Const. Yes 3 19 1000537 Transportation Monitoring & Modeling Update $40,000 $115,000 Const. Yes 5/6 20 Total $4,075,000 $4,203,000 *Only construction projects are prioritized. Table C13: Projects Led by Utilities ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 1 1000063 Fire Hydrants $40,000 $40,000 Const. Yes 5 2 91739 Inflow/Infiltration Reduction $200,000 $250,000 Const. Yes 5 3 91736 Infrastructure Renewal Strategy Report Update $0 $250,000 4 Flow Study $0 $250,000 N/A No 6 5 1000150 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act GSP $150,000 $150,000 Study No 4 6 1000540 Water Distribution System Hydraulic Model Update $100,000 $0 Study No 5 7 1000062 Water Meters and Boxes $286,000 $330,000 Const. Yes 5 8 99653 Treatment Major Facilities Maintenance $274,000 $109,000 9 Ozone System Maintenance $125,000 $40,000 Const. Yes 5 10 WTP Roof Repair $80,000 $0 Not started No 5 11 Air Compressor and Dryer Maintenance $36,000 $36,000 Const. Yes 5 12 Chemical System Maintenance $33,000 $33,000 Const. Yes 5 13 1000527 Wastewater Collections System - Point Repairs $50,000 $50,000 Ongoing Yes 5 14 1000542 Water Treatment Plant Major Facility Maintenance $275,000 $180,000 15 Cityworks Integration (water) $50,000 $90,000 Not started No 5 16 Lab TOC Analyzer Replacement $0 $30,000 N/A No 6 17 Actiflo Train #2 Mixer Bearing/Gear $0 $35,000 N/A Yes 6 18 Facility Master Plan $150,000 $0 Study No 5 19 Aluminum Bulk Tank #1 Replacement $50,000 $0 Const. Yes 5 20 Transfer Pump CLA-VAL Re-build $25,000 $0 Const. Yes 5 21 Package Thickener $0 $25,000 N/A No 6 Budget Document Pg. 95 Page 555 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority 2021-22 2022-23 22 1000065 Waterline Replacements - Point Repair $590,000 $0 Const. Yes 5 23 91335 Whale Rock Reservoir - Major Facility Maintenance $815,000 $145,000 24 Spillway Drain Repairs $765,000 $0 Design Yes 5 25 Stilling Basin $30,000 $90,000 Design Yes 5 26 Reservoir Fencing $20,000 $20,000 Const. Yes 5 27 Whale Rock Reroof of Shop and Residence $0 $35,000 N/A Yes 6 28 91617 Whale Rock Transmission Pipeline $60,000 $510,000 29 Transmission Pipeline Repairs $60,000 $510,000 Not started Yes 5 30 1000077 WRRF Major Maintenance $340,000 $520,000 31 Cityworks Integration $50,000 $100,000 Not started No 5 32 Digester Portable Heaters $50,000 $0 Const. Yes 5 33 Coating Maintenance $15,000 $0 Not started No 5 34 Headworks Grit Piping and Blowers $0 $95,000 N/A No 6 35 Headworks Grit Pump $0 $175,000 N/A No 6 36 Lab Improvements $0 $150,000 N/A No 6 37 Chain Link Fence Extension $175,000 $0 Not started Yes 5 38 Security Lighting $50,000 $0 Not started No 5 39 1000530 Recycled Water Tank $237,500 $50,000 40 Tank Site Fencing $87,500 $0 Not started No 5 41 SH Line and Pump & Bioassay Test $150,000 $50,000 Const. Yes 5 42 91369 Wastewater Lift Station Rehabilitation: Airport Lift Station $2,020,000 $0 Design No 5 43 1000082 Wastewater Lift Station Rehabilitation: Silver City Lift Station $0 $70,000 Not started No 6 44 1000551 WRRF - Digester Flare Upgrade $0 $100,000 N/A No 6 45 91219 WRRF Upgrade $15,920,563 $426,625 46 Construction $11,069,088 $22,335 Const. Yes 1 47 Construction Management $3,088,281 $257,357 Const. Yes 1 48 Office Engineering $1,235,313 $102,943 Const. Yes 1 49 Program Management $527,881 $43,990 Const. Yes 1 50 1000083 Wastewater Lift Station Rehabilitation: New Buckley Lift Station $396,000 $0 Const. Yes 5 51 1000541 Water Treatment Plant - Power Storage Units Tesla Battery Grant $30,000 $0 Const. Yes 3 52 1000126 Water Treatment Plant Emergency Power – PSPS $465,000 $0 Design Yes 3 53 Total $22,249,063 $3,180,625 Table C14: Projects Led by Other Groups Many of the projects led by other groups do not have a construction component. This table does not include information about estimated construction start timeframes for all projects and not all projects below were prioritized. ID# Project# Project Name Funding Allocated in 2021-23 Financial Plan Status Const. Start in 2021-23 Priority* 2021-22 2022-23 1 Administration 2 1000507 City Facility Energy Infrastructure Plan $100,000 $0 Started N/A 4 3 Community Services Group 4 1000027 Urban Forest Maintenance $140,000 $0 5 Urban Forest Master Plan $140,000 $0 Started Yes N/A 6 Developer 7 1000056 Development Agreement - City Share $120,000 $0 Budget Document Pg. 96 Page 556 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects 8 Avila Ranch - Buckley Extension Class I $120,000 $0 Const. Yes N/A 9 Natural Resources 10 99837 Open Space Acquisition $250,000 $250,000 In progress N/A N/A 11 Parking 12 1000525 Parking Enforcement Equipment at Gate Entry $40,000 $90,000 Design Yes 4 13 Transit 14 1000505 Bus Replacements with EV $1,854,000 $1,910,000 Ordered N/A N/A 15 1000536 Transit Supervisor ADA EV Van $70,000 $0 Not ordered yet N/A N/A 16 Total $2,574,000 $2,250,000 *Only City construction projects are prioritized. FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan As noted, the FY 2022-23 Supplemental Budget does not recommend an overhaul of the CIP. However, staff is recommending the creation of new projects to address emergent needs, as well as budget changes to several existing projects. These changes are summarized in the tables below. New Projects Recommended for FY 2022-23 The tables below provide a summary of the new projects recommended for funding in FY 2022-23, sorted by fund. Many of these new requests reflect emergent or urgent needs. The projects for Parking, Transit and Fire are recommended to be funded either with fund balances or reserves specific to those funds. Utilities has identified projects that can be delayed to free up the budget needed to support the new projects (the delayed projects are noted below in the ‘Recommended Changes to Existing Projects’ table following this section. Table C15: New Projects in Parking Fund Project No.: 1000163 Project Name: Installation of pay stations on Upper Monterey Street Proponent Department: Public Works Project Summary: Council approved the expansion of paid parking in the upper Monterey area with the 2021-23 Financial Plan as part of the long-term approach to address the Parking Fund's health and ensure it was able to meet debt service. This project is for the infrastructure needed to complete the implementation of paid parking. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Parking $122,000 Parking fund undesignated capital N/A Project No.: 1000163 Project Name: Installation of pay stations in the Railroad Square parking lots Proponent Department: Public Works Project Summary: Council approved the expansion of paid parking in the Railroad Square parking lots with the 2021-23 Financial Plan as part of the long-term approach to address the Parking Fund's health and ensure it was able to meet debt service. This project is for the infrastructure needed to complete the implementation of paid parking. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Parking $66,200 Parking fund undesignated capital N/A Table C16: New Projects in Public Safety Equipment Fund Project No.: NEW Project Name: Fire Department Extractors Proponent Department: Fire Project Summary: Project to install washing machine extractors at Stations 2, 3 and 4. Washing Machine Extractors are used to extract carcinogenic material from personal protective equipment after structure fires or hazardous materials exposures. Currently the department only has one extractor located at Station 1, which cannot keep up with demand after a large incident. Project was paused in FY 2020 due to COVID-19 and is being funded through the Public Safety Equipment Fund. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Public Safety Equipment $135,000 Public Safety Equipment Fund Budget was set at $120,000 in January 2020. Increase to $135,000 to accommodate inflation. Budget Document Pg. 97 Page 557 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects Table C17: New Projects in Sewer Fund Project No.: NEW Project Name: Chorro - Palm to Monterey Pipeline Replacement Proponent Department: Utilities Project Summary: The City’s wastewater collection system includes approximately 140 miles of sewer pipelines with some portions of the system being older than 100-years. The older areas of the wastewater collection system are near the end of their useful life and have been prioritized based on need as recorded by field inspections. The objective of this project is to replace sewer pipeline along Chorro from Palm to Monterey Street. The existing ductile iron pipe crossing the creek experienced a corrosion problem and is need of replacement as a high priority project since the sewer system serves key components of the downtown area. The new pipeline will meet City Engineering Standards and will provide resiliency in the wastewater collection system against corrosion problems normally encountered near the creek. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Sewer $60,000 Project is recommended to be funded through the reallocation of funding approved for other FY 2022- 23 projects included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan which are recommended to be deferred to a future fiscal year. FY 2022-23 recommended project budget funds design for the project. An additional $253,000 will be recommended in FY 2023- 24 for project construction. Table C18: New Projects in Transit Fund Project No.: NEW Project Name: Tenant Improvements at 1260 Chorro Proponent Department: Public Works Project Summary: This project will redesign the 1260 Chorro Street office to accommodate all of the mobility services that the City offers. Transit Services staff will be relocating and share the office currently occupied by Parking Services. This project will provide one counter where the community can reach both services. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Transit $250,000 Undesignated Capital Transit Fund N/A Table C19: New Projects in Water Fund Project No.: NEW Project Name: Johnson - Iris to Bishop Pipeline Replacement Proponent Department: Utilities Project Summary: The objective of the project is to replace a critical water transmission pipeline along Johnson Avenue from Iris to Bishop Street. The existing cast iron pipe has been deteriorating faster than anticipated and is need of replacement as a high priority project given this pipeline serves a major hospital and other essential facilities along Johnson Avenue. The new pipeline will meet standards by the American Water Works Association (AWWA) that will provide resiliency in the distribution network against variations in pressure and flows for current and future developments. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Water $180,000 Project is recommended to be funded through the reallocation of funding approved for other FY 2022- 23 projects included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan which are recommended to be deferred to a future fiscal year. FY 2022-23 recommended project budget funds design for the project. An additional $1,890,000 will be recommended in FY 2023- 24 for project construction. Project No.: NEW Project Name: Recycled Water System Retrofits Proponent Department: Utilities Project Summary: The City operates and maintains the recycled water system comprised of one distribution zone, one booster-pump station, and a concrete tank located at the Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF). With the on-going efforts for water conservation, this project will convert existing irrigation systems from potable water use to recycled water systems. In 2017, a series of parcels were identified as priority projects that could provide water conservation measures of the City’s potable water portfolio by changing into recycled water systems; “purple pipe". The objective of this project is to follow the recommendations from the 2017 study and expand the use of recycled water systems within the City’s service areas approved by the Regional Board. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Water $200,000 Project is recommended to be funded through the reallocation of funding approved for other FY 2022- 23 projects included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan FY 2022-23 recommended project budget funds design for the project. An additional which are recommended to be deferred to a future fiscal year. $200,000 will be recommended in FY 2024- 25 further efforts. Budget Document Pg. 98 Page 558 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects Project No.: 1000542-05 Project Name: Water Treatment Plant Major Facility Maintenance Proponent Department: Utilities Project Summary: Annual Asset Replacement - The City’s Water Treatment Plant was originally constructed in 1961. In 1995, a significant upgrade to the plant was completed to meet changing water quality requirements. In April of 2008, another major upgrade project was completed that replaced older equipment, added additional storage capacity for treated water, and enhanced treatment processes. The ongoing maintenance of the facilities and equipment at the Water Treatment Plant is necessary to prolong the useful life of the facilities and ensure staff’s ability to operate the plant and treat water to State and Federal standards. The proposed maintenance projects include asset replacement of the polymer mixing unit’s gears, bearings, and appurtenances related to the coagulation system needed for water treatment and disinfection. Budget Information Fund 2022-23 Rec Budget Funding Source Notes Water $210,000 Project is recommended to be funded through the reallocation of funding approved for other FY 2022- 23 projects included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan which are recommended to be deferred to a future fiscal year. FY 2022-23 recommended project budget funds for replacement of the unit. An additional $75,000 will be recommended in FY 2024-25 for further retrofits related to the polymer mixing system. Recommended Changes to Existing Projects The table below summarizes recommended changes to existing project budgets for FY 2022-23. Recommended changes to project budgets are based on the following: 1.Deferral of projects to future years in order to free up funding to address the new projects noted above that are needed to address urgent needs. 2.Reclassification of expenditures as capital or operating as appropriate. 3.Receipt of additional funding from outside agencies. 4.Deferral of projects in order to fund others that are exceeding budget based on initial estimates or the Capital Reserve. 5.Increase to those projects that are expected to exceed budget. Table C20: Changes to Existing Projects ID# Project# Project Name Proponent Dept Fund 22-23 Budget in 2021-23 Financial Plan 22-23 Revised Budget Change 1 1000500 CIP Project Delivery Augmentation Public Works Capital Outlay $1,000,000 $116,540 $(883,460) Notes: Change reflects reallocation of capital budget to Public Works' operating budget to cover cost of 4.00 FTE new positions added at FY 2021-22 Mid-Year. In addition, the change reflects the recommended addition of 1.00 FTE Maintenance Supervisor to create additional capacity within Public Works to deliver capital and maintenance projects. 2 1000027 Urban Forest Maintenance Public Works Capital Outlay $175,000 $375,000 $200,000 Notes: Change is due to a correction of an approved FY 2021-22 Mid-Year request to add $200,000 to the operating budget for annual pruning and watering costs. This expenditure should have been classified as a capital expenditure and is being moved to an existing capital project for FY 2022-23 via adoption of the Budget Supplement. 3 90649 Mid-Higuera Bypass Public Works Capital Outlay $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 Notes: Funding is allocated from the County yearly through approval by the Zone 9 Advisory Committee. For FY 2022-23, additional funding of $50,000 has been approved in support of ongoing design and environmental permit application work for the Mid-Higuera Bypass Project. The funding source for this work is County Zone 9, with funding expended through Capital Outlay. 4 1000046 Silt Removal Public Works Capital Outlay $100,000 $130,000 $30,000 Notes: Funding is allocated from the County yearly through approval by the Zone 9 Advisory Committee. For FY 2022-23, additional funding of $30,000 has been approved in support of ongoing Silt Removal Projects, for a total FY 2022-23 budget appropriation of $130,000. The funding source for this work is County Zone 9, with funding expended through Capital Outlay. 5 1000055 City Hall Meeting Room TI Admin Capital Outlay $130,000 $260,000 $130,000 Budget Document Pg. 99 Page 559 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Proponent Dept Fund 22-23 Budget in 2021-23 Financial Plan 22-23 Revised Budget Change Notes: Project is currently in the final design phase and is anticipated to be constructed in FY 2022-23. Current project estimates indicate that the $130,000 initially appropriated is insufficient to construct the project, and an additional budget allocation of $130,000 is necessary. 6 1000031 Parking Lot Maintenance – Meadow Park and Minor Repair of City Parking Lots Public Works Capital Outlay $255,000 $100,000 $(155,000) Notes: The parking lot maintenance activities funded in this projects are in various phases. Staff is recommending deferral of Meadow Park parking lot maintenance ($130,000) to the 2023-25 Financial Plan, as well as reallocation of $25,000 planned for minor repairs of City parking lots in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. The remaining funding in this project will fund other parking lot maintenance projects in FY 2022-23. 7 90742 Storm Drain System Replacement – Woodbridge Runoff Public Works Capital Outlay $725,000 $550,000 $(175,000) Notes: Staff is recommending deferral of this project in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. This project is recommended for deferral as the project is not expected to need construction funding until the 2023- 25 Financial Plan. The remaining funding in this project will fund other storm drain system replacements in FY 2022-23. 8 1000052 Buchon-Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements Public Works Capital Outlay $400,000 $150,000 $(250,000) Notes: Staff is recommending deferral of this project in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. Due to staffing constraints, final project design is not expected to be complete until FY 2023-24 and therefore construction funding may be deferred until the next Financial Plan period. 9 1000029 Bridge Maintenance Public Works Capital Outlay $100,000 $0 $(100,000) Notes: Staff is recommending reallocation of funding for bridge maintenance projects in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. Due to staffing constraints, final project design for the next phase of bridge is not complete and therefore construction funding may be deferred until the next financial plan period 10 1000032 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway Maintenance - Railroad Safety Trail from Cal Poly to Taft Street Public Works Capital Outlay $200,000 $150,000 $(50,000) Notes: Staff is recommending deferral of this project in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. Due to staffing constraints, final project design for the next phase of pathway maintenance is not complete and therefore construction funding may be deferred until the next financial plan period. The remaining funding in this project will fund other pedestrian and bicycle pathway maintenance projects in FY 2022-23. 11 1000508 City Hall Lighting Public Works Capital Outlay $15,000 $0 $(15,000) Notes: Staff is recommending deferral of this project in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. This budget for design project will be incorporated into a future planned CIP for improvements to the bus stops adjacent to City Hall, utilizing transit funding 12 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance - Ludwick Community Center Roof and Solar Public Works Capital Outlay, Parking, Sewer, Water $633,200 $593,200 $(40,000) Notes: Staff is recommending deferral of this project in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. Due to staffing constraints, this project is not expected to enter design until sufficient staffing resources are available. The remaining funding in this project will fund other major facility maintenance projects in FY 2022-23. 13 91385 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs - Santa Rosa Barbeque Replacements Public Works Capital Outlay $160,000 $152,500 $(7,500) Notes: Staff is recommending deferral of this project in order to fund projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. Due to staffing constraints, project design is not expected to begin until FY23/24 and therefore design funding may be deferred until the next Financial Plan period. The remaining funding in this project will fund other park maintenance and repair projects in FY 2022-23. 14 91503 California & Taft Roundabout Public Works Capital Outlay & Developer Cont. $2,798,000 $78,000 $(2,720,000) Notes: Project is in progress, but construction is not anticipated to begin until FY 2023-24 due to delays with right-of-way acquisition. In addition, staff is pursuing grant funding for this project which may decrease City costs. The funding that is being deferred to the Budget Document Pg. 100 Page 560 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects ID# Project# Project Name Proponent Dept Fund 22-23 Budget in 2021-23 Financial Plan 22-23 Revised Budget Change 2023-25 Financial Plan is recommended to be allocated to projects in need of additional funding in FY 2022-23 and the Capital Reserve. 15 90346 Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing - Pavement Management Public Works Capital Outlay & SB1 $4,266,258 $4,851,258 $585,000 Notes: Project budget is being modified for several purposes: 1. To transfer $900,000 to the Capital Reserve to partially reimburse use of $1,000,000 used in FY 2021-22 to advance construction of the Area 6 & 7 Curb Ramps ahead of the Summer 2022 Slurry Seal project; and 2. To adjust for a forecasted LRM fund imbalance in FY 2022-23; and 3. In mid-May, the City received two bids for this project which were both significantly over the engineer’s estimate. On June 21, 2022, staff will recommend that Council award a contract to the lowest responsive bidder. The recommendation to proceed with this project is due to the fact that deferral of road maintenance activities results in more expensive rehabilitation treatments being required in the future. In addition to the $1,585,000 recommended to be funded by the deferral of projects initially planned for FY 2022-23, staff also seek approval of budget amendment requests in the current year to reallocate funding from the Jack House Roof and Windows Walk Railing maintenance project ($100,000) and South Street Median Landscaping project ($240,000) in order to fully fund the additional $1,925,000 for this project. 16 1000163 Multi-space pay station installation in the downtown Public Works Parking $0 $800,000 $800,000 Notes: This project is the continuation for replacement of single space meters with multi-space pay stations. This request replaces half of the remaining single space coin meters with credit card capable pay stations. This project will be funded through working capital. 17 1000542-07 Water Treatment Plant Major Facility Maintenance – Cityworks Integration Plan Implementation Utilities Water $90,000 $0 $(90,000) Notes: Project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2024-25 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. The Cityworks Software Implementation task has been reprioritized. 18 1000542-01 Water Treatment Plant Major Facility Maintenance – Package Thickener Utilities Water $25,000 $0 ($25,000) Notes: The Package Thickener project has been reprioritized and the project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2023-24 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. 19 1000034-02 Water Storage Tank Maintenance – Edna Tank Recoating Utilities Water $80,000 $0 $(80,000) Notes: The Edna Tank Internal Coatings Replacement project has been reprioritized and the project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2023-24 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. 20 1000034-03 Water Storage Tank Maintenance – Wash Water Tank #1 Replacement Utilities Water $325,000 $0 $(325,000) Notes: The Wash Water Tank #1 Replacement project has been reprioritized and the project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2023-24 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. 21 91147 Water Utility Trench Repairs Utilities Water $200,000 $0 $(200,000) Notes: Project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2023-24 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. 22 1000082 Sewer Lift Station Replacement - Silver City Utilities Sewer $70,000 $0 $(70,000) Notes: Project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2023-24 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. 23 1000077 WRRF Major Facility Maintenance – Lab Improvements Utilities Sewer $520,000 $370,000 $(150,000) Notes: The Lab Improvements project has been reprioritized and the project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2023-24 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. The remaining funding in this project will fund other WRRF maintenance and projects in FY 2022-23. 24 91739 Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Utilities Sewer $250,000 $0 $(250,000) Notes: Project start is recommended to be deferred to FY 2023-24 to fund new projects recommended as a result of urgent needs. 25 1000521-03 Fleet Replacement: Utilities – Sewer Hydrocleaner Utilities Sewer $475,000 $0 $(475,000) Notes: At FY 2021-22 Mid-Year, the City Council approved Resolution 11289 which made Sewer funds available to purchase this vehicle in FY 2021-22 rather than in FY 2022-23. This change in the FY 2022-23 Supplement is reflective of prior Council action which impacts the FY 2022-23 budget. Budget Document Pg. 101 Page 561 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects Capital Reserve Update The City’s comprehensive Fund Balance and Reserve Policy was adopted in June 2021 and includes guidelines related to the Capital Projects Reserve Fund, as follows: In the current year, the reserve has been used as intended to offset unanticipated cost increases and help advance unanticipated projects that were necessary for infrastructure maintenance and enhancement. The use of the reserve to date in 2021-22 is as follows: Table C20: FY 2021-22 Use of Capital Reserve ID# 2021-22 Beginning Capital Reserve Fund Balance $3,426,208 1 Use of Funds 2 Fire Station #1 Roof Replacement $(200,000) Approved by Council on 7/6/21 to address unanticipated structural repair work associated with this project. 3 Parks and Recreation Office Interior $(150,000) Approved by Council on 12/7/21 to cover additional costs that came in over the engineer’s estimate due to the rise in construction labor and material costs. 4 Mid-Year Requests $(1,872,000) Approved by Council via adoption of the Mid-Year recommendations on 2/15/22 to augment various project budgets, address emergent safety issues and fund increased fleet replacement costs. The single largest expense was $1M to fund the City’s responsibility for a project to improve Santa Rosa at Monterey intersection safety improvements. 5 Area 6 & 7 Curb Ramps $(1,000,000) Approved by Council on 2/15/22 to fund curb ramp construction work ahead of the Summer 2022 Slurry Seal project to minimize construction delays and public impacts. Capital Reserve funding was used to advance the project’s construction one fiscal year and will be returned to the Capital Reserve at the commencement of the 2022-23 fiscal year when the project was originally funded. 6 Current Balance $204,208 The use of the reserve has resulted in a balance that is substantially under the 20% of budget policy requirement. However, these funds have been used strategically to advance projects to mitigate delays which often result in cost increases and prolonged impacts to the public. It is expected that the reserve will continue to be a useful tool as the City works to ‘right-size’ the CIP to meet the demand to deliver on a significant increase in capital projects by providing additional funding to keep projects moving forward. In order to meet the policy-driven fund balance requirement for this reserve, staff recommends the following: 1.Allocation of the forecasted $907,000 in LRM fund balance at the end of FY 2021-22 due to revenues exceeding expenditures (the exact amount will not be known until FY 2021-22 is closed out) to the reserve; and The City will maintain a committed reserve of 20% of capital improvement plan budget from the Local Revenue Measure for the purposes of offsetting unanticipated cost increases, unforeseen conditions, and urgent unanticipated projects to provide continued investment in infrastructure maintenance and enhancement. Use and allocations of funds from the Capital Projects Reserve Fund will be made to Capital Projects including Major Facility Replacement upon Council approval as necessary during any fiscal year. Budget Document Pg. 102 Page 562 of 652 Capital Improvement Projects 2.Allocation of $900,000 from the $4,266,258 initially planned for appropriation to Pavement Management within Street Reconstruction and Resurfacing (90346) to the reserve to partially ‘reimburse’ the $1M used in 2021-22 for Area 6 & 7 Curb Ramps. 3.Allocation of $1,797,500 from projects that were initially planned for FY 2022-23, but are now recommended to be deferred to the 2023-25 Financial Plan, due to the staffing constraints discussed above. In addition, staff is currently working to identify an ongoing practice to assure that the reserve meets the 20% policy requirement year over year. The following two tables provide detailed lists of Existing Projects and Remaining Balances (C21) and 2022-23 Recommended Project Budgets by Funding Source (C22). Budget Document Pg. 103 Page 563 of 652 Table C21: Projects and Remaining Balances Project Current Budget Actual Available 1 1000015‐2018 Transportation Monitoring (91420) 70,878$                     60,045$                   10,833$                 2 1000027‐Urban Forest ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account Cap‐X 965,797$                  616,989$                117,810$              3 1000029‐Bridge Maintenance ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 13,432$                     ‐$                          13,432$                 4 1000030‐Laguna Lake Golf Course ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 50,000$                    30,000$                  15,926$                 5 1000031‐Parking Lot Maintenance ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 312,621$                  113,031$                180,579$              6 1000032‐Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 20,000$                    14,225$                  5,775$                   7 1000033‐Playground Equipment Replacement ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 157,145$                   ‐$                         157,145$              8 1000034‐Reservoir Maintenance 1,664,743$               768,616$                797,420$              9 1000035‐Pismo/Johnson/SL Creek Bank Stabilization 277,272$                   66,052$                   42,023$                 10 1000036‐Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Plan ‐ Phase 2 3,085,455$               301,321$                 2,662,330$           11 1000037‐South Street Median Landscaping 255,000$                   15,904$                  214,525$              12 1000044‐Water TTHM Byproduct Reduction Project 3,142,174$                2,821,448$             251,455$              13 1000046‐Silt Removal ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account ‐ Zone 9 355,774$                   17,896$                  310,532$              14 1000047‐Fleet Replacements ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance 605,593$                  127,358$                139,101$              15 1000049‐842 Palm Parking Structure 1,200,000$               116,189$                 1,072,380$           16 1000050‐871 Marsh Street Parking Structure Maintenance 1,125,906$               104,042$                 1,011,865$           17 1000051‐919 Palm Street Parking Structure Maintenance 300,000$                  18,698$                  281,302$              18 1000057‐Development Related Parks Improvements 1,820,000$               ‐$                          1,820,000$           19 1000058‐Bus Replacements 2,192,771$               ‐$                         448,512$              20 1000060‐Lighting Energy Efficiency Retrofits 15,000$                    ‐$                         15,000$                 21 1000061‐LOVR Spur of the Bob Jones Bike Path 150,000$                  ‐$                         150,000$              22 1000062‐Water Distribution Meters and Boxes 741,384$                  620,787$                110,489$              23 1000063‐Water Distribution Fire Hydrants 62,276$                    62,251$                  24$                        24 1000065‐Water Distribution Point Repairs 1,066,240$               264,447$                727,767$              25 1000069‐Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 320,000$                  41,501$                  256,202$              26 1000073‐Transportation Safety and Operations 175,000$                  29,459$                  139,719$              27 1000074‐IT Replacements ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 3,001,910$                1,479,040$              1,283,356$           28 1000075‐Major Facilities Maintenance ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 1,204,211$               168,823$                936,143$              29 1000077‐WRRF Major Equipment Maintenance 840,000$                  85,907$                  754,093$              30 1000083‐Sewer Lift Station ‐ New Buckley Station 576,000$                  155,699$                397,678$              31 1000084‐Sewer Manhole Cover Adjustments 1,301$                       ‐$                         1,301$                   32 1000087‐Sewer Lift Station – Calle Joaquin 700,000$                  8,794$                     691,206$              33 1000091‐Verde, Luneta, Ramona Pipe Bursting 1,392,000$               19,566$                  1,372,218$           34 1000096‐Mission Plaza Enhancements 47,906$                    46,057$                  1,849$                   35 1000126‐PSPS Emergency Power 4,224,960$               1,104,081$             2,919,524$           36 1000130‐Police Patrol SUV ‐ 1511 65,000$                    20,567$                  44,433$                 37 1000131‐Police Patrol Replacement ‐ 1536 75,000$                    18,412$                  56,588$                 38 1000132‐Police Patrol SUV ‐ 1507 65,000$                    20,567$                  44,433$                 39 1000139‐City Facilities HVAC Replacements 151,588$                  150,690$                897$                      40 1000144‐Transit Yard Solar 74,467$                    73,650$                  817$                      41 1000150‐Groundwater Basin Management Revised 574,581$                  381,024$                177,434$              42 1000152‐City Security Project 380,000$                  89,136$                  290,864$              43 1000154‐Public Safety Equipment Replacement 1,145,884$               235,436$                910,448$              44 1000155‐Open SLO 1,000,203$               831,827$                148,683$              45 1000157‐Banner Arm ‐ Bench Rests ‐ Signs 196,000$                  86,459$                  87,731$                 46 1000159‐City Hall Breaker Replacement 30,000$                    ‐$                         30,000$                 47 1000160‐Pedestrian Safety Improvements on Monterey at Buena Vista 30,000$                     10,766$                   19,234$                 48 1000161‐Pedestrian Crosswalk Beacon on Ramona 50,000$                     ‐$                          35,000$                 49 1000163‐Multi‐space On‐Street Pay Stations 602,850$                  582,084$                 20,753$                 50 1000164‐Orcutt/Tank Roundabout Construction 5,132,007$                2,198,163$             707,140$              51 1000166‐Bullock Lane CMP Replacement 352,146$                  342,856$                 3,931$                   52 1000167‐2021 Downtown Pavement Improvements Project 4,004,889$                3,813,281$              23,531$                 53 1000170‐City Hall EV Charging Station 110,820$                   81,883$                   28,937$                 54 1000171‐Higuera Street Paving 181,216$                  174,330$                 6,886$                   55 1000174‐Higuera Parking Structure 151,828$                   ‐$                         151,828$              56 1000176‐Whale Rock Intake Valve Replacement 200,000$                   ‐$                         200,000$              57 1000181‐Fleet Services Vehicle Lift 100,000$                  69,145$                  9,283$                   58 1000186‐2020 Neighborhood Greenways Public Art 32,900$                    13,369$                  19,531$                 59 1000188‐Mitchell Park Picketball Courts 210,000$                  8,328$                     201,600$              Budget Document Pg. 104 Page 564 of 652 Table C21: Projects and Remaining Balances Project Current Budget Actual Available 60 1000190‐Emerson Park Fitness Court 310,400$300,548$7,862$   61 1000501‐Bob Jones Trail and RRST Solar Lighting 100,000$‐$ 100,000$              62 1000502‐Active Transportation Plan Implementation 600,000$50,520$316,632$              63 1000503‐Annual Public Art Maintenance and Projects 142,500$62,800$74,888$                 64 1000505‐Bus Replacements with EV 1,854,000$               ‐$ 1,854,000$           65 1000507‐City Facility Energy Infrastructure Plan 100,000$‐$ 100,000$              66 1000510‐Downtown Public Art Installations 200,000$139,948$60,052$                 67 1000511‐Downtown Safety Enhancements 775,000$208,581$566,198$              68 1000512‐Downtown Zig‐Zag Lighting 250,000$‐$ 250,000$              69 1000513‐Electric Vehicle Charging Station at Various Facilities 175,000$‐$ 144,947$              70 1000514‐Emerson Park Amenity Upgrades and Beautification 2,810,000$               ‐$  2,810,000$           71 1000516‐Fire Station 3&4 Remodel Space Study and Design 25,000$‐$ 25,000$                 72 1000519‐Fleet Replacement: Parks and Recreation 139,000$‐$ 73,189$                 73 1000520‐Fleet Replacement: Public Works 631,000$9,289$  562,091$              74 1000521‐Fleet Replacement: Utilities 705,000$‐$ 602,121$              75 1000522‐Major Facility Replacements 270,000$12,278$196,448$              76 1000525‐Parking Enforcement Equipment at Gate Entry 85,000$‐$ 85,000$                 77 1000526‐Parks and Rec General Plan Implementation 200,000$‐$ 200,000$              78 1000527‐Wastewater Collections System ‐ Point Repairs 67,249$‐$ 23,994$                 79 1000528‐Recycled Water Broad Street ‐ Tank Farm to Aerovista 45,000$‐$ 45,000$                 80 1000530‐Recycled Water Tank 237,500$‐$ 202,749$              81 1000532‐Roundabout Public Art Installations 300,000$‐$ 100,000$              82 1000535‐Transit Facility EV Charging Infrastructure 715,000$34,691$647,458$              83 1000536‐Transit Supervisor ADA EV Van 70,000$‐$ 70,000$                 84 1000539‐Islay, Henry, Sierra Way Wastewater Collections System Improvements 25,000$‐$ 25,000$                 85 1000541‐Water Treatment Plant ‐ Power Storage Units Tesla Battery Grant 30,000$8,567$  21,433$                 86 1000542‐Water Treatment Plant Major Facility Maintenance 275,000$24,139$221,696$              87 1000545‐Waterline Replacements : California Ave ‐ Stafford to Mill 140,000$‐$ 140,000$              88 1000550‐WRRF And Wastewater Collection Shop 150,000$‐$ 150,000$              89 1000553‐Fleet Replacement: Police 380,000$103,069$127,742$              90 1000554‐Fleet Replacement: Fire 295,000$125,608$105,648$              91 1000558‐Area 6 & 7 Curb Ramps 1,000,000$               ‐$ 183,010$              92 1000561‐Morro, Mill, Santa Rosa Wastewater Collections Systems Improvements 135,000$‐$ 135,000$              93 1000562‐Mission Plaza Landscape and Lighting Improvements Construction 275,000$35,170$229,605$              94 1000563‐Additional WRRF Safety Perimeter Fencing 260,000$‐$ 260,000$              95 1000564‐Vehicles for New Maintenance Positions 210,000$‐$ 12,349$                 96 1000566‐40 Prado Rd. Bus Shelter Relocation 35,000$‐$ 35,000$                 97 1000568‐Golf Course Pro Shop Flood Damage Repairs 120,000$23,823$93,177$                 98 90346‐Street Reconstruction and Resurfacing ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 817,942$616,074$200,483$              99 90435‐Palm‐Nipomo Parking Structure 2,808,989$               1,478,924$             833,113$              100 90480‐Marsh at Santa Rosa Replacement 2016 (90480)6,669,047$               5,664,947$             980,248$              101 90525‐Public Art Annual Asset Maintenance Account 75,142$13,802$56,336$                 102 90572‐Bicycle Facility Improvements ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 158,618$51,570$86,185$                 103 90649‐Mid‐Higuera Bypass 722,301$475,767$91,149$                 104 90741‐RRST Hwy 101 BR (90741)13,429$‐$ 13,429$                 105 90742‐Storm Drains Annual Asset Maintenance Account 1,125,472$               262,678$300,225$              106 90849‐Sidewalk Annual Asset Maintenance Account 841,342$370,470$465,043$              107 90884‐Traffic Ops Improvements (90884)48,902$47,809$1,093$   108 90943‐Traffic Signs and Striping Maintenance 95,758$43,372$38,326$                 109 90949‐Traffic Model Update (90949)139,515$78,894$53,451$                 110 91020‐Utility Box Beautify (91020)25,926$7,745$  18,181$                 111 91118‐Sewer Lift Station and Siphon Replacement ‐ Calle Joaquin (91118)8,534,359$               1,079,267$             1,998,207$           112 91147‐Water Utility Trench Repair (91147)746,984$510,911$165,681$              113 91152‐Edna Tank Maintenance (91152)40,005$‐$ 40,005$                 114 91156‐Broad and Leff Culvert Repair (91156)10,000$9,921$  1$  115 91219‐WRRF Facility Upgrade (91219)142,950,129$           81,312,590$           22,042,853$         116 91224‐Foothill Sewer Lift Station 2,498,476$               113,145$2,340,238$           117 91250‐Facility Maintenace ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 97,902$80,422$17,480$                 118 91252‐Prado Road Bridge Widening 11,849,343$             712,462$9,688,922$           Budget Document Pg. 105 Page 565 of 652 Table C21: Projects and Remaining Balances Project Current Budget Actual Available 119 91293‐Railroad Crossing Upgrade ‐ California & Foothill (91293)292,731$5,406$  287,325$              120 91294‐Higuera at 50 Higuera Widening (91294)417,078$58,096$341,673$              121 91295‐Traffic Safety Implementation 164,467$15,810$134,217$              122 91320‐Downtown Renewal 361,096$286,921$73,919$                 123 91335‐Whale Rock Major Maintenance (91335)1,396,716$               193,573$1,053,505$           124 91365‐Police Station Replacement 190,685$110,558$3,475$   125 91368‐Reservoir No 2 Replacement 171,570$59,578$111,991$              126 91369‐Sewer Lift Station Replacement ‐ Airport 2,170,000$               113,641$2,008,524$           127 91375‐Railroad Safety Trail Taft to Pepper ‐ 2018 (91375)7,144,559$               5,845,347$             588,246$              128 91376‐Safe Route to School (91376)318,147$316,258$1,889$   129 91385‐Parks Major Maintenance ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 2,047,424$               970,961$780,289$              130 91392‐Laguna Lake Dredging and Sediment Management Project Implementation 44,204$41,106$3,097$   131 91397‐Open Space ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 273,254$168,695$91,593$                 132 91435‐LOVR Interchange Landscape (91435)454,970$357,795$97,176$                 133 91439‐Mission Plaza Restroom Replacements and Enhancements 449,825$132,601$92,099$                 134 91503‐California Taft Roundabout 1,412,538$               121,642$1,203,517$           135 91506‐Groundwater Well Development Program (91506)4,641,041$               1,499,340$             2,543,647$           136 91532‐City Hall Landing Repair (91532)21,580$‐$ 21,580$                 137 91534‐ERP Acquisition (91534)2,335,264$               2,107,633$             30,511$                 138 91560‐Annual Public Art Funding (91560)36,467$31,266$4,807$   139 91561‐Public Art Master Plan  (91561)40,000$37,103$2,798$   140 91562‐Parks and Recreation Interior Office Rehabilitation 605,000$410,923$14,471$                 141 91566‐Water Treatment Plant Energy Efficiency 15,211,994$             14,255,289$           525$   142 91572‐Parks & Recreation HVAC 2017 (91572)17,806$15,278$2,529$   143 91574‐Multisite Energy Management (91574)232,600$150,940$71,870$                 144 91578‐Pest Control (91578)17,500$7,120$  10,380$                 145 91581‐Fire Station Rollup Door (91581)14,790$3,610$  11,180$                 146 91583‐Radio Handhelds (91583)102,291$‐$ 102,291$              147 91584‐Community Safety Emergency Response Communication Equipment 1,336,682$               901,270$411,540$              148 91590‐Police Interceptor SUV (91590)57,300$57,010$(106)$   149 91607‐2015 Traffic Safety Report Improvements (91607)205,000$22,487$157,783$              150 91608‐Active Transportation Plan 140,000$139,893$107$   151 91609‐Broad Street Corridor Access Improvements 452,778$451,850$893$   152 91610‐Higuera Street Widening Bridge to Elks (91610)365,500$39,235$322,953$              153 91611‐Orcutt Tank Farm Roundabout Design (91611)280,479$276,883$3,596$   154 91612‐Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 293,702$85,205$193,535$              155 91613‐Prado Road Interchange 1,656,120$               976,886$517,353$              156 91615‐Railroad District Boardwalk Replacement 300,976$295,155$5,820$   157 91616‐Street Lights ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance Account 217,500$84,836$115,176$              158 91617‐Whale Rock Pipe Assessment (91617)586,638$479,441$20,750$                 159 91619‐Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Plan ‐ Phase 1 780,559$425,504$354,956$              160 91628‐Sewer Lift Station Repairs (91628)245,608$103,062$137,049$              161 91632‐Corp Yard Fuel Island Siding (91632)14,750$14,549$201$   162 91639‐Chorro/Murray Sewer Replacement (91639)444,000$90,561$352,970$              163 91643‐Corporation Yard Tenant Improvement (91643)31,797$23,022$8,775$   164 91647‐Fire Station 1 HVAC (91647)196,300$168,070$28,230$                 165 91653‐Swim Center Co‐generation Plant (91653)85,000$1,501$  83,500$                 166 91681‐Parks Hydrate Station  (91681)15,000$‐$ 15,000$                 167 91682‐Electric Plan Submittal (91682)59,477$46,977$3,488$   168 91683‐North Broad Street Neighborhood Park 958,000$99,198$817,095$              169 91687‐Fire Station 3 Sewer Lateral Replacement (91687)18,000$‐$ 18,000$                 170 91717‐LAN Tablet System  (91717)34,100$25,230$8,870$   171 91718‐Whale Rock Auto Control Valves (91718)76,000$49,232$26,768$                 172 91726‐WRRF Telemetry and Server Upgrade (91726)108,000$18,799$89,201$                 173 91731‐WTP Chemical System Maintenance (91731)29,000$19,448$9,552$   174 91735‐Meinecke Murray Easement (91735)17,860$‐$ 17,860$                 175 91739‐Sewer Inflow and Infiltration Reduction 1,026,866$               516,530$510,335$              176 91740‐Sewer Utility Trench Repair (91740)98,982$69,274$23,544$                 177 91742‐Hydraulic Model Update (91742)20,000$8,123$  11,878$                 Budget Document Pg. 106 Page 566 of 652 Table C21: Projects and Remaining Balances Project Current Budget Actual Available 178 99110‐Laguna Lake Dredging (99110) 703,721$622,408$59,577$                 179 99653‐WTP Major Equipment Maintenance 840,872$428,106$229,452$              180 99821‐LOVR at 101 and SLO Crk Bridge Widening 2016 (99821)934,753$8,895$  925,858$              181 99837‐Open Space Acquisition 4,187,845$               1,422,980$             2,734,319$           182 298,860,119$          147,838,109$        90,722,434$         Budget Document Pg. 107 Page 567 of 652 Funding Source/Project 2022‐23 Budget  Amount 2022‐23 Revised  Amount Change 1 AASP Impact Fee Fund $130,000.00  $130,000.00 $0.00  2 91613 Prado Road Interchange $130,000.00  $130,000.00 $0.00  3 Developer Contribution $78,000.00  $78,000.00 $0.00  4 91503 California & Taft Roundabout $78,000.00  $78,000.00 $0.00  5 Federal HBP Grant $6,000,000.00  $6,000,000.00 $0.00  6 91252 Prado Road Bridge & Road Widening $6,000,000.00  $6,000,000.00 $0.00  7 General Capital Outlay $1,564,647.00  $1,564,647.00 $0.00  8 1000055 City Hall Meeting Room TI $0.00  $15,000.00  $15,000.00  9 1000056 Development Agreement ‐ City Share ‐$715,000.00  $715,000.00 $0.00  10 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance $300,000.00  $300,000.00 $0.00  11 1000503 Annual Public Art Maintenance and Projects $50,000.00  $50,000.00 $0.00  12 1000508 City Hall Lighting $15,000.00 $0.00  ($15,000.00) 13 1000518 Fleet Replacement: CDD $74,000.00  $74,000.00 $0.00  14 91252 Prado Road Bridge & Road Widening $410,647.00  $410,647.00 $0.00  15 Public Safety Equipment Fund $0.00  $135,000.00  $135,000.00  16 NEW Fire Department Extractors $0.00  $135,000.00  $135,000.00  17 Local Revenue Measure $18,763,050.00  $15,282,090.00  ($3,480,960.00) 18 1000027 Urban Forest Maintenance $175,000.00  $375,000.00  $200,000.00  19 1000029 Bridge Maintenance $100,000.00 $0.00  ($100,000.00) 20 1000030 Laguna Lake Golf Course Maintenance $20,000.00  $20,000.00  $0.00  21 1000031 Parking Lot Maintenance $255,000.00  $100,000.00  ($155,000.00) 22 1000032 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway Maintenance $200,000.00  $150,000.00  ($50,000.00) 23 1000033 Playground Equipment Replacement $100,000.00  $100,000.00 $0.00  24 1000052 Buchon‐Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements $250,000.00 $0.00  ($250,000.00) 25 1000055 City Hall Meeting Room TI $130,000.00  $245,000.00  $115,000.00  26 1000057 Development Related Park Improvements $815,000.00  $815,000.00 $0.00  27 1000063 Fire Hydrants $40,000.00  $40,000.00 $0.00  28 1000073 Transportation Safety & Operations $30,000.00  $30,000.00 $0.00  29 1000074 IT Replacement $564,777.00  $564,777.00 $0.00  30 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance $293,200.00  $253,200.00  ($40,000.00) 31 1000157 Banner Arms, Bench Arm Rests, Signs $25,000.00  $25,000.00  $0.00  32 1000500 CIP Project Delivery Augmentation $1,000,000.00  $116,540.00  ($883,460.00) 33 1000501 Bob Jones Trail and RRST Solar Lighting $1,350,000.00  $1,350,000.00 $0.00  34 1000502 Active Transportation Plan Implementation $505,000.00  $505,000.00 $0.00  35 1000503 Annual Public Art Maintenance and Projects $92,500.00  $92,500.00 $0.00  36 1000513 Electric Vehicle Charging Station at Various Facilities $100,000.00  $100,000.00  $0.00  37 1000516 Fire Station 3&4 Remodel Space Study and Design $75,000.00  $75,000.00 $0.00  38 1000519 Fleet Replacement: Parks and Recreation $103,000.00  $103,000.00 $0.00  39 1000520 Fleet Replacement: Public Works $168,000.00  $168,000.00 $0.00  40 1000522 Major Facility Replacements $300,000.00  $300,000.00 $0.00  41 1000526 Parks and Rec General Plan Implementation $200,000.00  $200,000.00 $0.00  42 1000532 Roundabout Public Art Installations $300,000.00  $300,000.00 $0.00  43 1000537 Transportation Monitoring & Modeling Update $70,000.00  $70,000.00 $0.00  44 1000553 Fleet Replacement: Police $235,000.00  $235,000.00 $0.00  45 1000554 Fleet Replacement: Fire $465,000.00  $465,000.00 $0.00  46 90346 Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing $3,325,000.00  $3,910,000.00  $585,000.00  47 90742 Storm Drain System Replacement $725,000.00  $550,000.00  ($175,000.00) 48 90849 Sidewalk Replacement and Installation $250,000.00  $250,000.00 $0.00  49 90943 Traffic Signs & Striping Maintenance $25,000.00  $25,000.00 $0.00  50 91252 Prado Road Bridge & Road Widening $146,573.00  $146,573.00 $0.00  51 91385 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs $160,000.00  $152,500.00  ($7,500.00) 52 91397 Open Space Maintenance $105,000.00  $105,000.00 $0.00  53 91439 Mission Plaza Concept Plan Implementation $1,035,000.00  $1,035,000.00 $0.00  Table C22: Projects by Funding Source Budget Document Pg. 108 Page 568 of 652 Funding Source/Project 2022‐23 Budget  Amount 2022‐23 Revised  Amount Change Table C22: Projects by Funding Source 54 91503 California & Taft Roundabout $2,720,000.00 $0.00  ($2,720,000.00) 55 91612 Neighborhood Traffic Improvements $75,000.00  $75,000.00 $0.00  56 91613 Prado Road Interchange $1,910,000.00  $1,910,000.00 $0.00  57 91616 Street Lights ‐ Annual Asset Maintenance $75,000.00  $75,000.00 $0.00  58 99837 Open Space Acquisition $250,000.00  $250,000.00 $0.00  59 MASP Transportation Impact Fee Fund $529,400.00  $529,400.00 $0.00  60 91613 Prado Road Interchange $529,400.00  $529,400.00 $0.00  61 Parking Fund $6,731,279.00  $7,719,479.00  $988,200.00  62 1000049 842 Palm Parking Structure Maintenance $400,000.00  $400,000.00 $0.00  63 1000050 871 Marsh Street Structure Maintenance $400,000.00  $400,000.00 $0.00  64 1000051 919 Palm Street Structure Maintenance $100,000.00  $100,000.00  $0.00  65 1000074 IT Replacement $4,279.00  $4,279.00 $0.00  66 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance $25,000.00  $25,000.00 $0.00  67 1000520 Fleet Replacement: Public Works $130,000.00  $130,000.00 $0.00  68 1000525 Parking Enforcement Equipment at Gate Entry $90,000.00  $90,000.00  $0.00  69 90435 Palm ‐ Nipomo Parking Structure $5,582,000.00  $5,582,000.00 $0.00  70 1000163 Parking Pay Station Installation $0.00  $988,200.00  $988,200.00  71 Parkland Development Impact Fees $3,395,026.40  $3,395,026.40 $0.00  72 1000057 Development Related Park Improvements $3,395,026.40  $3,395,026.40  $0.00  73 San Luis Obispo County $1,435,260.00  $1,435,260.00 $0.00  74 91613 Prado Road Interchange $1,435,260.00  $1,435,260.00 $0.00  75 SB1 $941,258.00  $941,258.00  $0.00  76 90346 Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing $941,258.00  $941,258.00 $0.00  77 Sewer Fund $6,623,483.00  $5,738,483.00  ($885,000.00) 78 1000062 Water Meters and Boxes $165,000.00  $165,000.00 $0.00  79 1000074 IT Replacement $19,358.00  $19,358.00 $0.00  80 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance $7,500.00  $7,500.00 $0.00  81 1000077 WRRF Major Maintenance $520,000.00  $370,000.00  ($150,000.00) 82 1000082 Wastewater Lift Station Rehabilitation: Silver City Lift Station $70,000.00  $0.00  ($70,000.00) 83 1000084 Sewer Maintenance Hole Cover Adjustments $25,000.00  $25,000.00 $0.00  84 1000521 Fleet Replacement: Utilities $505,000.00  $30,000.00  ($475,000.00) 85 1000527 Wastewater Collections System ‐ Point Repairs $50,000.00  $50,000.00  $0.00  86 1000539 Wastewater Collections System Improvements $3,860,000.00  $3,860,000.00 $0.00  87 1000550 WRRF And Wastewater Collection Shop $350,000.00  $350,000.00 $0.00  88 1000551 WRRF ‐ Digester Flare Upgrade $100,000.00  $100,000.00 $0.00  89 91219 WRRF Upgrade $426,625.00  $426,625.00 $0.00  90 91736 Infrastructure Renewal Strategy Report Update $250,000.00 $250,000.00  $0.00  91 91739 Inflow/Infiltration Reduction $250,000.00 $0.00  ($250,000.00) 92 91740 Trench Repairs‐ Sewer $25,000.00  $25,000.00 $0.00  93 NEW Chorro ‐Palm to Monterey Pipeline Replacement $0.00  $60,000.00 $60,000.00  94 State or Federal Grant $2,875,000.00  $2,875,000.00 $0.00  95 1000053 Bus Wash Replacement $450,000.00  $450,000.00 $0.00  96 1000102 Parking Lot Maintenance ‐ Bus Yard $500,000.00  $500,000.00  $0.00  97 1000505 Bus Replacements with EV $1,910,000.00  $1,910,000.00 $0.00  98 1000538 Vault Room Addition Design Study $15,000.00  $15,000.00 $0.00  99 Transit Fund $3,157.00  $253,157.00  $250,000.00  100 1000074 IT Replacement $3,157.00  $3,157.00 $0.00  101 NEW Tenant Improvements ‐1260 Chorro $0.00  $250,000.00  $250,000.00  102 Transportation Development Act TDA $45,000.00  $45,000.00 $0.00  103 1000502 Active Transportation Plan Implementation $45,000.00  $45,000.00 $0.00  104 Transportation Development Impact Fee $3,940,000.00  $3,940,000.00 $0.00  105 1000073 Transportation Safety & Operations $20,000.00  $20,000.00 $0.00  106 1000537 Transportation Monitoring & Modeling Update $45,000.00  $45,000.00 $0.00  Budget Document Pg. 109 Page 569 of 652 Funding Source/Project 2022‐23 Budget  Amount 2022‐23 Revised  Amount Change Table C22: Projects by Funding Source 107 91252 Prado Road Bridge & Road Widening $3,875,000.00  $3,875,000.00 $0.00  108 Water Fund $5,215,253.00  $5,085,253.00  ($130,000.00) 109 1000034 Water Storage Tank Maintenance $1,355,000.00  $950,000.00  ($405,000.00) 110 1000052 Buchon‐Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $0.00  111 1000062 Water Meters and Boxes $165,000.00  $165,000.00 $0.00  112 1000074 IT Replacement $13,753.00  $13,753.00 $0.00  113 1000075 Major Facility Maintenance $7,500.00  $7,500.00 $0.00  114 1000150 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act GSP $150,000.00  $150,000.00  $0.00  115 1000521 Fleet Replacement: Utilities $15,000.00  $15,000.00 $0.00  116 1000528 Recycled Water Broad Street ‐ Tank Farm to Aerovista $1,040,000.00  $1,040,000.00 $0.00  117 1000530 Recycled Water Tank $50,000.00  $50,000.00 $0.00  118 1000542 Water Treatment Plant Major Facility Maintenance $180,000.00  $275,000.00  $95,000.00  119 1000545 Waterline Replacements: California Ave ‐ Stafford to Mill $1,650,000.00  $1,650,000.00 $0.00  120 90649 Mid‐Higuera Bypass $100,000.00  $100,000.00 $0.00  121 91147 Trench Repairs‐ Water $200,000.00 $0.00  ($200,000.00) 122 91149 Water Valve Cover Adjustments $30,000.00  $30,000.00 $0.00  123 99653 Treatment Major Facilities Maintenance $109,000.00  $109,000.00  $0.00  124 NEW Johnson ‐Iris to Bishop Pipeline Replacement $0.00  $180,000.00 $180,000.00  125 NEW Recycled Water System Retrofits $0.00  $200,000.00  $200,000.00  126 Whale Rock Fund $671,121.00  $671,121.00 $0.00  127 1000074 IT Replacement $1,121.00  $1,121.00 $0.00  128 1000521 Fleet Replacement: Utilities $15,000.00  $15,000.00 $0.00  129 91335 Whale Rock Reservoir ‐ Major Facility Maintenance $145,000.00  $145,000.00  $0.00  130 91617 Whale Rock Transmission Pipeline $510,000.00  $510,000.00 $0.00  131 Zone 9 $100,000.00  $180,000.00  $80,000.00  132 1000046 Silt Removal $100,000.00  $130,000.00  $30,000.00  133 90649 Mid‐Higuera Bypass $0.00  $50,000.00  $50,000.00  134 Grand Total $59,040,934.40  $55,998,174.40  ($3,042,760.00) Budget Document Pg. 110 Page 570 of 652 Major City Goals – Economic Recovery Section 8: Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability In collaboration with local partners, continue to support economic recovery for all from the COVID pandemic and support a thriving local economy by supporting local businesses, arts and culture, downtown vitality, practicing fiscal responsibility, paying down unfunded pension liabilities, and investing in critical infrastructure. Strategy Updates: Strategy 1.1: For all members of the Community The groundwork for the majority of the actions in support of the DEI Major City Goal has been completed. The Economic Development team is working closely with the DEI manager to establish next steps and priorities. The completion date of the tasks has been pushed back and will continue to be adjusted as the prioritization and execution are aligned in conjunction with the DEI manager. Initially it was planned to update the Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) in the early part of FY 2022-23. Due to several factors, including the unexpected, delayed return to normalcy after the COVID 19 pandemic and the REACH team securing funding to do a region-wide Comprehensive Economic Strategy (CEDS) during the same period, staff recognized that it would be more effective to postpone the update by six months to ensure the best possible outcome. Strategy 1.2: Business Support The City continues to support the economic recovery of the community through various initiatives including, but not limited to: -Allocation of the $500,000 in action 1.2.a-1 in support of local businesses through marketing and promotional efforts like the activations in Mission Plaza, Buy Local Bonus, Mid-Weekend promotion, Childcare grants as well as the new Chamber of Commerce program to assist the relocation efforts for the spouses/significant others of new hires relocating to the area. -The Support Local advertising program continued to provide benefit to the community through on-going advertising through local and regional sources. -Promotional work for the City to visitors and residents remains strong resulting in increased visitation. -The TIPP-FAST program, which fast tracks tenant improvement permits to support business recovery, will continue. Forty-three (43) permits have been issued through the program within one week of a complete application. In addition to expediting these projects, all tenant improvement building applications have been supported through the City’s Tenant For complete detail on goal strategies, stakeholders, task detail and expectations, please reference the Adopted 2021-23 Financial Plan. Budget Document Pg. 111 Page 571 of 652 Major City Goals – Economic Recovery Improvement Fee Rebate Program. To date, rebates totaling $201,025 have helped reduce total permit fees owed at permit issuance for applicants of commercial tenant improvement projects. The Open SLO program Fitness in the Parks was concluded when businesses were allowed to fully reopen back at end of summer with the lifting of the COVID-19 restrictions. The Parks & Recreation Department provided additional support by expanding offerings to serve all previous five school sites (C.L. Smith, Hawthorne, Pacheco, Sinsheimer, and Bishop’s Peak). Additional programming has included expansion in support of the teacher workdays, minimum days, and academic breaks. The division is growing its scholarship program to better serve disadvantaged families, thanks in part to a stipend from the California Department of Social Services. Strategy 1.3: Support Arts and Culture Support of Arts and Culture in the City continues to move forward with the ongoing Public Art and PCC programs as well as the new $75,000 grant program that was announced in Q4 of FY 2021-22. The City partnership with SLO Museum of Art has resulted in one mural by an international artist and one "visiting” sculpture art piece. Additional art pieces are slated for installation through the end of the fiscal year, including the upcoming Tank Farm/Orcutt roundabout sculpture. Development of an map App will result in opportunities for updated Downtown art walks. Strategy 1.4: Downtown Vitality The vitality of Downtown has been a major focus of the City team over the last 12 months and will continue to receive additional support. Some of the key initiatives include the use of some of the $500,000 funding in action 1.2.a-1 to activate Mission Plaza with new programs every month of the year, using $150,000 in City funding to “Light up Downtown” for the Holidays as well as investing significant resources in the various Clean and Safe initiatives. The City has also invested infrastructure improvements in Mission Plaza and in Downtown in general. The Parks and Recreation Department continues to collaborate with Downtown SLO to streamline activities and events at Mission Plaza for holidays, artwork, and activities (e.g., Santa’s Village, Skate Mission Plaza). The long term Open SLO program is being finalized and is expected to come to Council in July of 2022. To increase housing and vibrancy downtown, on November 11, 2021 the City Council approved amendments to the Zoning Regulations to implement several Housing Element policies. The updates to the Zoning Regulations went into effect on February 28, 2022. After many years of working toward having the ability to track downtown vacancies, the City was able to develop a database for tracking that Downtown SLO has agreed to update. During the height of the pandemic the vacancy rate was above 12%. As of April, the rate was at 7%. Strategy 1.5: Practicing Fiscal Sustainability During FY 2021-22, staff have worked to maximize the use of the City’s Enterprise Resource Planning System and Human Resources Information System to help maintain the City’s accounting and financial information. Configuration changes resulted in fewer manual entries for employees’ pay, and self-service open enrollment went live in FY 2021-22 which reduces use of paper forms. A Benchmark Compensation Study was completed in February 2022 for unrepresented management and confidential employees as Budget Document Pg. 112 Page 572 of 652 Major City Goals – Economic Recovery well as employees in the San Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association (SLOCEA). The results of the study have been incorporated into a three-year successor resolution for unrepresented staff, which was adopted on April 19, 2022, and the City is currently in negotiations with SLOCEA for a successor agreement, whose contract expires on June 30, 2022. Successor resolutions and agreements will align with the City’s five-year forecast to ensure fiscal sustainability. To ensure the City is protected against losses, staff have updated the language in many of its standard contracts and coverage requirements; new software is being introduced to monitor compliance and ensure continuous protection. Additionally, the City is offering preventative services for public safety personnel to reduce workers’ compensation claims, including a functional mobility program for Fire employees and preventative mental health services. Strategy 1.6: Paying down unfunded pension liabilities After postponing scheduled additional payments to CalPERs due to the uncertainties during the COVID- 19 pandemic, the City found itself in a solid financial condition at the beginning of 2022. At the FY 2021- 22 mid-year review, the Council therefore approved a lump-sum payment of $12.4 million dollars which caught up three years of postponed payments. The long-term forecast considers continued annual payments in addition to the required unfunded liability amount with a goal to pay-off the required payments ahead of the 30-year schedule. The City’s funded rate stands at nearly 75% which is the highest in the last 20 years. Strategy 1.7: Investing in critical infrastructure The City invests in critical infrastructure based on the approved 2021-23 Financial Plan that facilitate economic recovery from the pandemic, enhance safety, address past commitments, partner with private development projects that deliver housing, address core infrastructure maintenance needs and/or provide positive impact towards the City’s Major City Goals. Included in the 2021-23 Financial Plan is a robust Capital Improvement Plan that is currently being delivered and at the same time the City is augmenting the CIP Engineering Program that delivers the majority of the Capital Improvement Plan. Ensuring that critical infrastructure funding is used in the most efficient manner possible includes determining whether partnering with agencies that provide similar services is of benefit to the community. The Regional Transit Authority has just constructed a new transit facility adjacent to the City’s transit facility. As the City’s transit facilities is aged and nearing the end of its lifespan, the City is currently evaluating SLO Transit’s operations and infrastructure to determine if there may be benefit to sharing infrastructure, equipment or centralizing services to provide increased community services or lower costs. This evaluation is currently underway. Budget Document Pg. 113 Page 573 of 652 Major City Goals – Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Section 8: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion In response to our commitment to making San Luis Obispo a more welcoming and inclusive city for all, continue to develop programs and policies to support diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and advance the recommendations of the DEI Task Force. Strategy Updates: Strategy 2.1 – Establish Office of DEI Most of the efforts required to establish the office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) have been completed. The DEI Manager was hired on February 17, 2022, who has been doing much of the groundwork to establish and identify ongoing programming and engagement opportunities for the community. Staff have been evaluating the needs of the office and identifying the best staffing structure for optimal operational support, which includes interns and administrative support. Strategy 2.2 – Develop & Implement DEI Strategic Plan Given the robust workplan and the recent onboarding of the DEI Manager, strategic planning efforts have been recast to begin in Q3 of FY 2022-23. This will also allow time to intentionally align strategic planning with efforts related to Multicultural Center feasibility study. The DEI Manager has laid the groundwork for submitting the City of San Luis Obispo to the Human Relations Commission municipality index for LGBTQ+ inclusion. This will provide staff with additional data and benchmarking that can contribute to the strategic planning process in the next fiscal year. Strategy 2.3 – Workforce Recruitment & Retention A significant amount of work has been completed in partnership with the Human Resources Department to advance DEI within workforce recruitment and retention. Job descriptions have been revised to incorporate more inclusive language, as well as the addition of the following supplemental question to all City job postings: The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to cultivating diverse and inclusive environments in our workforce and our community. It is the expectation that all staff will contribute to and be committed to this effort. Do you agree with these conditions of employment? A DEI resource page has been added to the new employee onboarding platform and a DEI-specific section has been implemented into the Day of Welcome, an employee onboarding event. In reviewing opportunities for further enhancements, three DEI-specific questions were also added to all employee pre-evaluation forms. Human Resources will continue to provide employees with information on resources and support for childcare, primary caretakers, and scheduling options. It will also review For complete detail on goal strategies, stakeholders, task detail and expectations, please reference the Adopted 2021-23 Financial Plan. Budget Document Pg. 114 Page 574 of 652 Major City Goals – Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion policies and guidelines on an ongoing basis to ensure they reflect the City’s commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and DEI best practices. Strategy 2.4 – Inclusive & Equitable Workplace Staff have laid the groundwork for enhancing the DEI internal committee charter and developing a clear scope of their efforts and impact across the organization. Key efforts from the committee have included quarterly DEI newsletters and learning burst opportunities for all staff to discuss topics related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. The DEI manager is working in partnership with Human Resources and the Centre for Organizational Effectiveness to develop an introductory training for all staff that will be embedded into the Foundations of Excellence training module. Additionally, the DEI Manager is set to deliver an Inclusive Leadership training for the leadership team and is working to build out the DEI section of Supervisor Toolkit with essential resources. Strategy 2.5 – Community-based Policing and Restorative Practices The Police Department (SLOPD) has continued to prioritize community-based policing practices through a variety of new and continued efforts. State and federal mandates regarding protest response protocols have been implemented, along with after action report recommendations. The Fire Department has also launched a new Mobile Crisis Unit (MCU) that will send mental health professionals out with paramedics to non-violent mental health distress calls without a police officer. The Community Action Team continues to grow and be a successful model for addressing homelessness through a service response approach. Additionally, the Police and Community Together (PACT) group has been reinstated and a five-year strategic plan for SLOPD is set to launch in FY 2022-23 with a strong emphasis on DEI. Strategy 2.6 – Cal Poly & Cuesta College Partnerships A Memorandum of Understanding between Cal Poly’s Office of University Diversity and Inclusion and the City, that outlines efforts to strategically align and collaborate on our DEI efforts, has been entered into. Key aspects include a liaison intern, intentionally hosting DEI educational programs off campus and in the City, and the leveraging of City space. Quarterly leadership roundtables are set to commence and include Cuesta leadership. The DEI Manager continues to meet with key staff at both Cal Poly and Cuesta to strengthen collaborations and increase access to City DEI initiatives. Strategy 2.7 – Access, Inclusion, Support for Underrepresented Communities Many efforts are either underway or have been initiated to increase access, inclusion, and support for underrepresented communities. Some efforts include but are not limited to: •DEI high impact grants expected to be disbursed in FY 2022-23 with an extended grant amount of $300k to account for a missed cycle in FY 2021-22 due to the delayed onboarding of the DEI Manager and the HRC transition to City Administration and IT. Intentional communication and outreach efforts will be implemented to ensure maximum engagement by community organizations. •Grants-in-Aid (GIA) grants for FY2021-22 received an additional $100k from the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund through the American Rescue Plan Act and are expected to go to Council for adoption in May 2022. The additional funding more than doubled the number of organizations Budget Document Pg. 115 Page 575 of 652 Major City Goals – Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion to receive full funding and expanded support to organizations addressing multiple priority areas within the GIA funding requirements. • The City’s Community Academy has been launched for the first time since the pandemic and robust outreach efforts were initiated to increase diversity of participants. A section specific to DEI was also added to the curriculum. • In partnership with City Administration communications staff the groundwork has been laid to update City’s Public Engagement Manual (PEN) manual with a specific focus on inclusive outreach strategies and best practices for reaching diverse constituents in the community. • The DEI Manager has worked collaboratively with a Cal Poly student design team for a City Multicultural Center to ensure findings from the student group contribute and support the launch of an official feasibility study in FY 2022-23. Strategy 2.8 – Community Education & Programming The City’s Office for DEI launched a diversity speaker series that is free and open to the public. This series is a quarterly opportunity for the community to engage with diverse speakers on topics related to equity, justice, and inclusion. This series will inspire community connection, dialogue, and educational learning rooted in cultural richness, innovative equity, and expansive inclusion. The first event in the series was held in April 2022 and was a collaboration between Cal Poly, the Office of Sustainability, and the Diversity Coalition. Strategy 2.9 – Support & Attract Minority-Owned Businesses In partnership with the City Administration staff in Economic Development and Tourism the groundwork was laid for key efforts. Work has been initiated to develop a process for collecting data related to identifying business owners via the business license & tax certificate application and renewal process. This data will then provide the City with necessary information to begin engaging diverse business owners through collaborative programs with the Chamber of Commerce and other key stakeholders. The completion date of specific programs has been pushed back and will continue to be adjusted as the prioritization and execution are aligned in conjunction with the DEI Manager. Budget Document Pg. 116 Page 576 of 652 Major City Goals – Housing and Homelessness Section 8: Housing and Homelessness In order to expand housing options for all, continue to facilitate the production of housing, including the necessary supporting infrastructure, with an emphasis on affordable and workforce housing. Collaborate with local non-profit partners and the county, the state, and federal governments to discover and implement comprehensive and effective strategies to reduce chronic homelessness. Strategy Updates: Housing Strategy 3.1 - Implement the Housing Element On November 2, 2021, the City Council adopted the Objective Design Standards (Housing Element Program 6.22) for eligible housing project that qualify for ministerial review. The standards became effective on January 7, 2022. On November 11, 2021, the City Council adopted amendments to the Zoning Regulations. This update included amendments to implement several Housing Element Programs (2.17, 5.5, 6.23, 8.18, and 8.23) that streamline the development review processes for various housing projects. The updated regulations became effective on February 28, 2022. Staff is actively working on updating the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Housing Element programs 2.13 & 4.6). A preliminary recommendation, based on a nexus study and feasibility analysis, was presented to the City Council on March 1, 2022. The Council provided feedback on the preliminary recommendation and staff is currently working on a draft Inclusionary Housing Ordinance update. Staff is updating Subdivision Regulations to implement Housing Element Program 6.20. The update will include provisions for innovative and flexible subdivision options, including small lot and common interest options in the R-1 zone and updates to existing flexible subdivision options in commercial and multi-family zoning districts. This work will also address any identified concerns associated with SB-9 subdivisions. The update is anticipated to be completed in the Fall of 2022. Strategy 3.2 - Implement Inclusionary Housing Ordinance This strategy is an ongoing effort. Development applications are regularly reviewed for compliance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Staff engages with new applicants and developers with entitlements to ensure affordable housing agreements and resulting project plans reflect requirements of the ordinance. Recommendations and a public hearing on Inclusionary Housing Ordinance amendments will be considered by the City Council in July 2022. Strategy 3.3 - Below Market Rate Portfolio Management For complete detail on goal strategies, stakeholders, task detail and expectations, please reference the Adopted 2021-23 Financial Plan. Budget Document Pg. 117 Page 577 of 652 Major City Goals – Housing and Homelessness Staff provided an update to the City Council on March 1, 2022 regarding the onboarding process for the City’s contracted Below Market Rate Housing Administer, Housekeys Inc. Housekeys, contracted in August 2021, constructed a web platform specific to the City, including accessibility for Spanish speaking community members, and has scheduled in-person trainings in April and May 2022. As of March, 2022 Housekeys is fully launched, has started certifying and processing affordable units, and is working with larger developers to facilitate administration of affordable units in the pipeline with various affordable housing agreements. Annual reporting and monitoring of below market rate housing units was accomplished by staff for submittal to the State Department of Housing and Community Development on April 1, 2022. Strategy 3.4 - Financial Management Staff conducted the annual Community Needs Workshop to re-establish funding priorities for the City’s Grants-in-Aid Program and Community Development Block Grants. The City has made $250,000 available to the Grants-in-Aid Program to provide financial support to local non-profit organizations that provide critical services to community members who are currently homeless or at-risk of becoming homeless. These services are not limited to homeless prevention, but services that support that effort are prioritized. CDD staff worked closely in collaboration with the Finance Department to track existing loans that the City has provided to past affordable housing projects and loan commitments to future projects. This collaboration allowed both departments to determine the funding availability within the Affordable Housing Fund. Other information that was tracked included in-lieu fees, payoffs from the sale of equity- share homes and BEGIN (first time homebuyer) loans. This information is now also reported on with the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. Strategy 3.5 - Advisory Body & Council meetings & support On December 8, 2021, the Community Development presented to the Planning Commission on significant new state legislation regarding the Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency (HOME) Act that went into effect on January 1, 2022 (Senate Bill 9, Atkins), that gives homeowners the opportunity to add additional units to their R-1 zoned property. Staff provided housing information on social media regarding new affordable housing units available for low-income residents at Courtyard at the Meadows in San Luis Obispo as well as information related to temporary state rental protections and is scheduling monthly housing information blasts. Homelessness Strategy 3.6 - City Homelessness Team Coordination (Homelessness Response Manager) An Interdepartmental Service Level Agreement has been drafted and is currently being reviewed by Technical Specialist Group and Steering Committee. Strategic Plan areas of focus were presented to Council on November 16, 2021 for review and approval. The City Council approved further development under the five proposed areas of focus: 1) Data, 2) Communications,3) Regional Cooperation, 4) Pilot Programs, and 5) Funding Opportunities. The Homelessness Response Manager in Community Development Strategic Plan accomplishments include the following: Budget Document Pg. 118 Page 578 of 652 Major City Goals – Housing and Homelessness 1. Data: worked with IT to develop data platforms on GIS. 2. Communications: formalized communications structure with all impacted departments comprehensive update to the Service Level Agreement and timely and responsive communications to community concerns. 3. Regional Cooperation: established a strong presence with the County and non-profit partners including the 5-Year Plan Steering Committee and 40 Prado coordination. Activated the County of San Luis Obispo to take a more intentional and direct role in leading a comprehensive and coordinated regional strategy. 4. Worked with CAT/PD and the County to overhaul the Safe Parking at Railroad Square and converting to a permitted use; and procure contract amendments for the CAT and MCU. 5. Worked with Community Development staff to evaluate potential sites for Homekey funding and a pallet structure pilot project with the county. The City’s Homelessness Prevention and Assistance webpage has been updated to provide timely information and resources to key groups: at-risk community members, unhoused/unsheltered people, property owners, and helpers. Additionally, the webpage links relevant and localized news articles to increase public awareness of City, County, and State initiatives. The “For At-Risk Community Members” tab of the City’s Homelessness Prevention and Assistance webpage lists resources and information related to rental assistance and eviction protection as related to COVID-19. The City has recruited a Code Enforcement Safe Housing Technician who will focus on providing low-income renters with information and resources on tenant rights and housing standards. The City’s Homelessness Response Manager is currently serving on the Steering Committee for the County’s 5-Year Strategic Plan for Homelessness and is advocating for clear regional goals and benchmark expectations for each City within the County. At Mid-Year, the City Council approved hiring an additional staff member on a contract basis dedicated specifically to supporting the City’s Homelessness Response efforts. This position will assist the Homelessness Response Manager in responding to public inquiries and supporting field operations staff. Strategy 3.7 - Environmental Protection and Water Quality Ranger Service has facilitated 186 environmental cleanups over the course of FY 21-22. Many of the clean- ups occurred in flood zones and riparian areas along San Luis Creek (Bob Jones Bike Trail), Bianchi and Matthews Open Spaces, and boundaries around Cerro San Luis Open Space. The Public Works Department is responsible for encampment management in Parks, along the Railroad Right-of-way, and under bridges. During the 2021-22 FY, staff has cleaned up 42 encampments with approximately 75% of the cleanups being under bridges or adjacent to riparian areas. The Office of Sustainability has been working with the California Conservation Corps (CCC) as part of the Green House Gas Reduction Fund to remove dead material from the creek systems around the City. Through the removal of dead material, non-native vines and weeds are also controlled to improve line of site in the creek corridor and opening up new area restoration by native species and reducing the impact from encampments from being established in these enhanced areas. Tree contractors are also part of the creek clean-up during the winter to implement the City’s flood control program with selective removals Budget Document Pg. 119 Page 579 of 652 Major City Goals – Housing and Homelessness of dead and down material in the creek channel for capacity. These efforts support the Climate Action Major City Goal, Pillar 6 where staff are planning and planting 10,000 trees by 2035. Strategy 3.8 - Regional Engagement and Grant Management The City’s Homelessness Response Manager is currently serving on the Steering Committee for the County’s 5-Year Strategic Plan for Homelessness and is advocating for clear regional goals and benchmark expectations for each city within the County to contribute to. The City’s Homelessness Response Manager currently attends HSOC General Meetings as well as finance and housing subcommittee meetings. The Homelessness Response Manager and DEI Manager held an introductory meeting on March 18, 2022, to discuss key cross-over areas, shared resources, and areas of strategic collaboration. They have identified public and internal communications as a key strategy area that will require close coordination and have set up regular check-in meetings to ensure ongoing streamlined efforts. Strategy 3.9 - Community Action Team (CAT) and Downtown Bike Team Resources The City has finalized a contract with Transitions Mental Health Association for a second CAT Behavioral Health Specialist. Due to funding constraints and an exceptionally difficult recruitment environment, the entry requirements for this position have been reduced from licensed mental health clinician to case worker. Strategy 3.10 Mobile Crisis Unit (MCU) Pilot Program Implementation The City is in the process of finalizing a contract with Transitions Mental Health Association for an additional MCU Behavioral Health Specialist. Due to funding constraints and an exceptionally difficult recruitment environment due to labor shortages and the demanding social work related to street outreach which required the team to rethink and adjust the entry requirements for this position from a licensed mental health clinician to case worker. San Luis Obispo Fire Department has hired an Emergency Medical Technician to serve on the MCU. They onboarded on March 31, 2022 and are engaging in training as we prepare to recruit the Behavioral Health Specialist counterpart. Strategy 3.11 – Non-Profit Partner Funding Support On March 1, 2022, the City Council received an update regarding State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) through the American Rescue Plan Act for up to $3.5 million for eligible projects. On April 19, 2022, the Council approved using $2 million in SLFRF for the Anderson hotel in the amount of $1.7 million and $300,000 to support a Transitions Mental Health Association project to provide eight homes for homeless individuals with a mental illness via the No Place Like Home Grant. The funding will be provided under subrecipient agreements to report on the use of funding to the U.S. Treasury. A 25% expansion of the number of beds at the 40 Prado Homeless Services Center was accomplished. Safe Parking opportunities were expanded at Kansas Avenue for the County and a use permit was processed for the Safe Parking at Railroad Square. At the April 19, 2022 City Council meeting, the Council will consider a $300,000 Affordable Housing Fund award to leverage No Place Like Home funding for the Budget Document Pg. 120 Page 580 of 652 Major City Goals – Housing and Homelessness eight-unit Transitions Mental Health Palm Street Studios project that provides supportive housing for formally homeless residents. Ongoing General Fund support has been allocated to CAPSLO for 40 Prado (includes safe parking, warming center, operations support, and bus tokens). Additionally, on March 1, 2022, the City Council, upon a recommendation from the HRC awarded $74,132 for 40 Prado through CDBG allocations. Budget Document Pg. 121 Page 581 of 652 Major City Goals – Climate Action Section 8: Climate Action, Open Space, and Sustainable Transportation To proactively address the climate crisis, continue to update and implement the Climate Action Plan for carbon neutrality, including preservation and enhancement of open space and the urban forest, alternative and sustainable transportation, and planning and implementation for resilience. Strategy Updates: Strategy 4.1 – Provide capacity to achieve Council's adopted goals Strategy 4.1 includes actions to add staff, increase collaboration among staff, and provide outside resources to allow staff to have the capacity to complete complicated climate action, open space, and sustainable transportation tasks. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22, the City has either completed or is on track with all tasks in this strategy. These resources have been integral to the successes outlined below, with notable contributions coming from the new Sustainability and Natural Resources Analyst, Ranger Services staffing, and grant writing consultant support. An organizational assessment of the Urban Forest program has been completed that provides recommendations for the appropriate levels of staff and support services needed to maintain the existing urban forest, while also advancing sustainability objectives. These recommendations are currently being reviewed and will be brought forward to Council for future consideration. To ensure consistent maintenance and adequate oversight of City Open Space lands, Ranger Service added one net new Ranger Maintenance Worker in July 2022 to maintain level of service standards, and in August, converted four Ranger Specialist supplemental positions to full-time regular permanent positions. Strategy 4.2 - Continue to update and implement the Climate Action Plan for carbon neutrality. The City continues its climate action approach to “implement while planning.” The update of the Climate Action Plan, which will establish the 2023-25 climate work plan, is ahead of schedule, with adoption planned for early 2023. Implementation is generally on track, with numerous municipal operations projects, including lighting retrofits, electric charging infrastructure for the transit yard, and electric fleet vehicle transitions. Notable challenges include a nine-month delay in delivering fleet electric vehicle charging at the Parks and Recreation and Utilities offices due to staffing and supply chain shortages, and an ongoing delay of the solar projects due to their implementation being subject to completing the bus yard vehicle charging project. Community projects are on track with continued support of Central Coast Community Energy, an on- schedule update to the Clean Energy Choice Program for New Buildings, and a new building retrofit pilot For complete detail on goal strategies, stakeholders, task detail and expectations, please reference the Adopted 2021-23 Financial Plan. Budget Document Pg. 122 Page 582 of 652 Major City Goals – Climate Action program all ongoing. One notable change is with the Community Electric Mobility Plan (4.2g). Due to lack of sufficient capacity, a community-based organization was not able to lead this effort. In its place, the City will directly initiate efforts to deploy electric vehicle chargers for public use. Strategy 4.3 - Preserve and enhance open space and the urban forest. Staff remain active with land conservation work in a variety of settings including a voluntary conservation easement project at the Miossi Brothers La Cuesta Ranch, open space easements that are required for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, and also with the conservation easement associated with the remediation and restoration of the Tank Farm Wetlands. The latter project was not originally envisioned to take place during the 2021-23 Financial Plan period, and as a result the conservation plan update identified in the work plan for the South Hills Natural Reserve is proposed to be delayed to the 2023-25 time period. The City entered into a trail agreement with Cal Poly in November 2021 that allows for a connection between the City’s Miossi Open Space property and Poly Canyon; Ranger Service began work on this new trail segment in early 2022 following the rainy season and will continue through late spring / early summer. Trail planning and environmental compliance measures were also completed in early 2022 to allow for the installation of a trail network at Righetti Hill Open Space as part of the Orcutt Area Specific Plan – this effort will create an entirely new open space within the City. Extensive fuel reduction efforts and fence replacement have taken place in the Cerro San Luis Natural Reserve, as well as cattle grazing, consistent with the updated Conservation Plan. Ranger Service continues to conduct Open Space maintenance activities on an ongoing basis as outlined in the Open Space Maintenance Plan and ensure compliance and stewardship through regular patrol. Ranger Service also created a series of public information educational videos and will be welcoming kids back to Junior Ranger Camp this coming summer. Strategy 4.3 continues the theme of “implementing while planning.” The planning effort in partnership with the Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District to support soil health and capture carbon at Johnson Ranch Open Space and City Farm is complete, with pilot implementation actions scheduled for FY 2022-23. The Urban Forest Master Plan, tentatively titled the Community Forest Plan, is also underway, with the expected completion moving back one year to the second quarter of FY 2023-24. In addition, the City’s Tourism and Business Improvement District allocated 1% of its annual budget to dedicate to tree planting efforts under its “Keys for Trees” initiative. Trees are a major focus area at present, with the City recently completing an internal review and organizational assessment with the assistance of Davey Resources Group on how to best manage and maintain the urban forest, while also advancing measures in support of the 10,000 trees by 2035 goal. The City’s partnerships with ECOSLO, as well as with other community groups and volunteers, such as Rotary de Tolosa, has resulted in numerous new tree planting occasions, as well as reaching the three- year success milestone for the oak trees that were planted at Johnson Ranch Open Space. While these planning efforts are underway, the City is remaining focused on maintaining the urban forest and has executed a multi-year agreement with West Coast Arborist for tree maintenance services. Strategy 4.4 – Alternative and sustainable transportation Budget Document Pg. 123 Page 583 of 652 Major City Goals – Climate Action Implementation of the Active Transportation Plan is underway with several capital projects in the Tier 1 (highest priority) bicycle/pedestrian network recently reaching completion, including the following major milestones: •Broad/Woodbridge Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon – Completed Fall 2021 •Marsh/Higuera Protected Bike Lanes – Completed east and west of the downtown core in 2021, with improvements within the downtown core to be completed summer 2022. •Railroad Safety Trail (Taft to Pepper) Project – Completed early 2022. Both the 2022 Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project and Cerro San Luis Neighborhood Greenway Project (previously referred to as “Anholm Greenway”) are in the final design phase, with construction expected to begin in the summer and fall of 2022, respectively. Planning and preliminary design efforts are progressing on several additional major Active Transportation Plan Tier 1 projects, including: •Higuera Street Complete Street Project – Includes addition of protected bicycle lanes and enhanced pedestrian crossings on Higuera Street between Los Osos Valley Road and Marsh Street. Project may include extension of protected bike lanes on Madonna Road between Higuera and the Madonna Inn, pending approval from Caltrans. Staff pursuing Caltrans Grant in spring of 2022 to pursue additional funding. •Foothill Boulevard Complete Street Project – Includes potential for protected bicycle lanes, enhanced pedestrian crossings, and other corridor safety and speed reduction enhancements on Foothill Boulevard from Patricia east to California Boulevard. •Railroad Safety Trail (Tiburon to Orcutt Road) – Gap closure of the Railroad Safety Trail between Orcutt/Laurel/Bullock intersection south to Tiburon Road. To be constructed by Bullock Ranch development project, pending right-of-way agreement with Union Pacific Railroad. Transit continues to be a key part of achieving the City’s Climate Action Plan and Genera Plan goals. Key updates include: •Transit electrification is underway, with the City’s first two all-electric buses to be delivered in 2022. The first bus is anticipated to arrive in late June 2022, and the second is scheduled for delivery in Fall 2022. Concurrently, the City initiated a Capital project to install high power vehicle chargers at the Bus Yard. Depending on construction and “on-boarding” (i.e., registration, training, inspection,) the first bus could be in service as early as summer 2022. Transit electrification is moving forward on an ad hoc basis. •The City is also currently conducting a Transit Innovation Study to explore innovative options including: on-demand deviated routes, micro-transit, bus rapid transit, a “free to the user” ridership program, and other ideas. •Given substantial COVID-19 impacts to ridership and labor shortages, the City has been unable to make progress on shortening transit headways. The City is continuing to implement the Short- Range Transit Plan, which is planned to be updated in FY 2022-23. Budget Document Pg. 124 Page 584 of 652 Major City Goals – Climate Action The “Resilient SLO” effort made substantial progress and the Climate Adaptation and Safety Element of the General Plan, which will expand the traditional public safety document to include issues related to local climate change impacts, is expected to be brought to Council in the first half of FY 2022-23. Implementation efforts continue, as well, with substantial progress made in fuel management to prevent wildfires, creek and tree management to prevent flooding, and microgrid and battery storage planning and projects to support energy resilience. Social infrastructure is also a focus, with the Micro Communities Collaborative successfully launching their community sustainability website platform as a major project of the SLO Climate Coalition. To provide increased flood protection and reduce the likelihood of property loss, the City has continued efforts to maintain, replace and improve the City’s storm drainage infrastructure and creek system. The storm drain culvert at Broad and Leff streets is scheduled to begin construction in May 2022. Additionally, the replacement of the storm drain system at Funston at Lawton intersection is currently in design phase. San Luis Obispo Creek at Pismo and Johnson streets is in the design phase for a bank stabilization project where construction is scheduled for summer of 2023. Finally, the Mid-Higuera Bypass project is nearing the completion of the design phase. The next step for this project entails property appraisals and negotiations to secure the necessary easements for construction. Ranger Service worked with Public Works to replace fencing at the Cerro San Luis Natural Reserve, repair fencing at Irish Hills Natural Reserve and add new fencing to the Bob Jones Trail. Ranger Service recruited and hired four supplemental Open Space Techs to support the City’s Fuel Reduction program, reducing and removing fuels from the wildland urban interface (WUI) at locations such as Cerro San Luis, Bishop Peak and Irish Hills. The City continues to install hydration stations as a part of capital parks maintenance projects. Hydration stations were installed at Sinsheimer Park, and installation is scheduled at the North Broad St. Neighborhood Park in Fall 2022. Strategy 4.5 – Planning and implementation for resilience Budget Document Pg. 125 Page 585 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 1 1.1 For all members of the Community 2 ERR a. Establish a process for the City to recognize and promote Minority-owned businesses.Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q2 3 ERR b. Implement protocols within the City’s Office of Economic Development to reach out to existing and new Minority-owned/operated businesses to learn of their experiences operating in SLO, and to identify ways the City can be of support. Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q2 4 ERR c. Evaluate and potentially establish a City Leadership/Chamber of Commerce / Minority Business Owners’ roundtable. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q4 5 ERR d. Research, explore and potentially utilize innovative practices such as micro-loans, targeted-sector recruiting and promotion, City facilitated lending, grants, private support and crowdfunding to support businesses owned by or serving underserved/underrepresented communities. The City will also leverage its partner network, including the Chamber, Downtown SLO, REACH and others to support the DEI initiatives as they relate to economic development including creation, retention and attraction efforts. FY23 Q4 6 ERR e. Update and maintain a listing of resources for BIPOC, LGBTQ+ and other underserved communities on the City's Doing Business section of the website.Ongoing 7 ERR f. Hire a consultant, support legal review, and establish an internal working group and hire a consultant to research methods to support local contractors, local vendors, and labor through workforce agreements, local purchasing requirements, alternative project delivery methods and other options to support local businesses and employees. The Community Services Group will be leading this effort. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q1 8 ERR g. Develop and implement a scorecard to track visitation to key areas of the City, employment, DEI economic efforts and other relevant economic indicators. Original: FY22 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q3 9 ERR h. Update the City's Economic Development Strategic plan Original: FY23 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q4 10 ERR i. Review the Economic Development program structure based on the outcome of the EDSP update. FY23 Q4 11 ERR j. Ensure adequate temporary and flex resources available to develop and execute required initiatives. Ongoing 12 1.2 Business Support 13 ERR a-1. Set aside funding for activations, promotions and programs like "Light Up Downtown", "Buy Local Bonus", Shop local to aid in the recovery from the impacts of COVID-19 through out the City and including downtown. Ongoing 14 ERR a-2. Elevate the promotion and branding of the Economic Development activities of the City highlighting the efforts around Sustainability and DE&I through the website, videos and other collateral. ($60k communications support for Administration) Ongoing 15 ERR a-3. Continue to work with our partners at the Chamber, REACH, Cal Poly, Downtown SLO, SCORE and others to support the business community through retention, creation, attraction, education and communication efforts. Ongoing 16 ERR a-4. Work with REACH and other partners to offset the loss of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power plant through business attraction, H-o- H job creation and other relevant efforts. Ongoing 17 ERR a-5. Evaluate the continuation and/or modification of the Open SLO program Fitness in the Parks.Complete 18 ERR a-6. Review transitioning the Business Ambassador program from a COVID response action to an ongoing program with an available hotline as well as an online form option.Complete Major City Goal (MCG) Update The following table provides an update on all ongoing Major City Goal tasks and all tasks that were scheduled for completion in FY 2021- 22. The completion date is the originally scheduled completion date unless otherwise noted. The status of each task (far right column) is based on the following scale: Budget Document Pg. 126 Page 586 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 19 ERR a-7. Continue to promote the City to tourists, visitors and locals through the efforts of the TBID and the PCC. Ongoing 20 ERR a-8. Provide childcare programming to the community to enable residents to work and fuel the local economy.Ongoing 21 ERR b-1. Continue to implement the TIPP-FAST program to fast track tenant improvement permits and support business recovery. Incorporate subsidies into program when funding is available.Ongoing 22 ERR b-3. Develop a streamlined and easy to understand process for businesses to allow activities encouraged by Open SLO, and other programs implemented in response to Covid-19, to continue - especially in relation to outdoor dining. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q1 23 ERR b-4. Improve efficiency and transparency in the permitting process through implementation of paperless permitting, performance management reporting, and enhanced customer transparency tools. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q2 24 ERR b-5. Review and establish policies as required to support broadband to the home to take advantage of the opportunities to work from home to support the Climate Action Plan and Quality of life. Ongoing 25 ERR b-6. Staff Resources to improve permitting efficiency and support development services program capacity Ongoing 26 ERR c-1. Ensure the business community is updated and aware of major City projects (CIP and others) that will impact their operations. Coordinate with business adjusting working hours and construction impacts to reduce impacts. Ongoing 27 ERR c-2. Set aside funding for the potential to expand the various Open Slo programs (Parklets, Street closures) to other areas of the City to support busines recovery. Ongoing 28 1.3 Arts and Culture Support 29 ERR a. Support the recovery of Arts and Cultural activities throughout the City.Ongoing 30 ERR b. Support the recovery of Arts , Culture and Community programs through a PCC program similar to GIA. Ongoing 31 ERR c. Continue to support local community non-profit organzations through the Cultural GIA program facilitated by the PCC. Ongoing 32 ERR d. Roundabout Public Art Installations Ongoing 33 1.4 Downtown Vitality 34 ERR a-1. Continue to partner with Downtown SLO to ensure the recovery and growth, and vitality of the Downtown. Ongoing 35 ERR a-2. Support Downtown SLO in expanding the Holiday "Light up Downtown" program and incentivize private participation through a matching program.(For example $100K base with $ for $ match on $50K)Ongoing 36 ERR a-3. Continue the work of the Vacancy and Vibrancy Task force in cooperation with Downtown SLO with a focus on a activating and re-leasing vacant store fronts. Ongoing 37 ERR a-4. Review, evaluate and execute on the outcomes from the Downtown Future Forum ensuring the required public participation and Council approval as needed. Complete 38 ERR a-5. Continue to enhance and modify the Open SLO program "Downtown Dining" within Mission Plaza as needed to contribute to downtown vitality. Ongoing 39 ERR a-6. Support the restart of the various Downtown SLO activations like Farmers, Concerts in the Plaza and the Holiday Parade. Ongoing 40 ERR a-7. Continue to promote the Downtown to tourists, visitors and locals through the efforts of the TBID and the PCC. Ongoing 41 ERR b-1. Update the Zoning Regulations to allow for more flexible administration of allowed uses, especially downtown, to support desired pop-up, shared-resource and new business model approaches to facilitate business opportunities in the community. Original: FY23 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q4 42 ERR b-2. Look at flexible uses in private commercial parking lots to support desired pop-up, shared-resource and new business model approaches to facilitate business opportunities in the community. Complete 43 ERR c-1. Support Arts and Culture in the downtown while ensuring appropriate efforts are made to support DEI through available programs.Ongoing 44 ERR c-2. Support the recovery of Arts and Cultural activities by working with new and existing community partners.Ongoing Budget Document Pg. 127 Page 587 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 45 ERR c-3. Activation of public spaces in downtown through events and programming such as pop up activities and temporary public art that celebrates the proliferation of public art.Ongoing 46 ERR c-4. Explore options of creative placemaking and temporary public art in the downtown i.e. adjacent to Bubblegum Alley and Rose Alley.Ongoing 47 ERR c-5. Support creation and partnership of a Downtown Mural Program with Downtown SLO and SLOMA.Ongoing 48 ERR d-1. Develop and present a long-term plan for the initiatives started under the Open SLO like parklets and street closures in the downtown. Ongoing 49 ERR d-10. Expansion of enforcement to ensure on-street, off-street, and residential compliance and safety and to improve overnight safety in the parking structures Ongoing 50 ERR d-11. Expansion of maintenance to ensure parking structures and adjoining areas remain safe, clean and orderly (see above for fiscal impact)Ongoing 51 ERR d-12. Parking structure maintenance at 842 Palm, 871 Palm, and 919 Palm.Ongoing 52 ERR d-13. City Hall lighting: Project has design funding allocated year two of the 2021-23 Financial Plan with construction funding the preceeding year. Original: FY23/24 Updated: FY23/25 53 ERR d-2. Replace the existing Mission Plaza Restrooms in compliance with Mission Plaza Concept Plan and Council Direction.FY23 Q4 54 ERR d-3. Construct the new Palm/Nipomo structure in coordination with SLO REP theatre.FY24 Q1 55 ERR d-4. Continue with the City banner program.Ongoing 56 ERR d-5. Establish and implement a plan to make the Zig Zag lights permanent in the current locations as well as other locations in the downtown.Ongoing 57 ERR d-6. Ensure the downtown business community is updated and aware of major City projects (CIP and others) that will impact their operations and set aside funding to minimize the impacts where possible. Ongoing 58 ERR d-7. Investigate opportunities to develop a Downtown Wi-Fi Mesh.Ongoing 59 ERR d-8. Expansion to gateless parking structure to improve the customer access and experience when visiting downtown. Original: FY22/23 Updated: FY23 Q4 60 ERR d-9. Assist with the continuation of Open SLO parklets and courtesy curbside pick up locations Ongoing 61 ERR e-1. Continue to support the Downtown SLO programs like Clean & Safe, the Ambassadors and homelessness support. Ongoing 62 ERR e-2. Continue to enhance downtown cleanliness through daily sidewalk scrubbing, street sweeping and trash clean up and the improvement of the existing creek walk.Ongoing 63 ERR e-3. Continue to provide public safety presence in the downtown. Includes costs of Downtown Bike Patrol, Sergeant, and Officers)Ongoing 64 ERR e-4. The Police department will develop an educational program, which will include in-person presentations for business owners (including visitor serving) to know how to deal with situations requiring public safety support. Costs are associated with materials. Ongoing 65 ERR e-5. Develop a CAT staffing plan with a second social worker, to ensure public safety and social service resources in both the downtown and creek area. FUNDING LISTED IN HOMELESSNESS MCG Ongoing 66 ERR e-6. Evaluate a plan to reestablish a downtown sub station for public safety. (Potential of adding to Mission Plaza Project)Ongoing 67 ERR e-7. Track hours worked (regular and overtime hours) by the downtown sergeant and downtown officers and tracking crime statistics.Ongoing 68 ERR e-8. Downtown safety enhancements - Anti-Vehicle Bollards have been purchased, branded, and implemented on the north and south Higuera Street entrance to Farmer's Market. Public Works staff recently met with the manufacture to discuss some of the limitations, and will be meeting with public safety in early April for concurrence of the full closure. Staff expects to have the remainder of the Farmer's Market entrances implemented by the end of FY22 Q4. FY22 Q4 69 ERR e-9. Mission Plaza Railing Replacement FY22 Q2 70 1.5 Practicing fiscal responsibility Budget Document Pg. 128 Page 588 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 71 ERR a. Practicing fiscal responsibility: The City will continue to focus fiscal sustainability through all work efforts, programs, and the required budget appropriations. It will review its revenue sources ongoingly and maximize collection and return on its investments. Ongoing 72 ERR b. Staff Resources: Continued enhancements to the Oracle Cloud system through the MOTION program to increase efficiencies and overall effectiveness of the system. Additionally help maintain the City's accounting and financial information. Ongoing 73 ERR c. Negotiate successor agreements with employee groups in alignment with Council adopted Labor Relations Objectives.Ongoing 74 ERR d. Complete benchmark compensation survey for SLOCEA, Management, and Confidential groups.Complete 75 ERR e. Continue to monitor and reduce liability and workers’ compensation claims through actions aimed at reducing liability and workers’ compensation costs. Ongoing 76 ERR f. Injury Reduction Programs, Compliance Software, Onboarding Software, and transitioning to electronic files Ongoing 77 1.6 Paying down unfunded pension liabilities 78 ERR a. Paying down unfunded pension liabilities (includes all funds): The City will work to pay down the unfunded liabilities and allocate additional annual payment in pursuit of a 20-year paydown. Ongoing 79 1.7 Investing in critical infrastructure 80 ERR a. Investing in critical infrastructure: The City will invest in critical infrastructure based on the approved 2021- 23 CIP or as otherwise directed by the City Council. Projects that 1) facilitate economic recovery, 2) enhance safety, resilience, fire prevention, 3) address past commitments (previously budget, approved planning documents), 4) are partnership projects with a significant portion of the cost covered by private development, 5) address existing core infrastructure maintenance needs and 6) provide positive impact towards climate change goals and/or Diversity Equity and Inclusions needs will be prioritized for inclusion and Council’s consideration in the 2021-23 CIP. Specific CIP projects/Investments are included in the relevant task and the overall CIP plan. Ongoing 81 ERR b. Regional Transit Authority Analysis: The RTA is currently building a Regional Transit HUB 800 feet from the City’s SLO Transit Bus Yard. Much of the infrastructure that supports SLO Transit is aged and nearing the end of its lifespan. All transit providers are required to shift the fleet of transit vehicles to zero emission vehicles. This funding would support the analysis and review of SLO Transit’s operations and infrastructure to determine if there may be benefit to sharing infrastructure, equipment or centralizing services to provide increased community services at the same or reduced purchasing requirements, alternative project delivery methods and other options to support local businesses and employees. The Community Services Group will be leading this effort. FY22 Q4 82 ERR c. Administrative Costs to Support Investment in CIP (Office modifications, Interns)Ongoing 83 2.1 Establish Office of DEI 84 DEI a. Design DEI Administration, Function, and Operations of the Office Complete 85 DEI b. Develop DEI Base Operating Budget Complete 86 DEI c. Identify and secure office space (2000/mo @ 7 mos Y1, 12 mos Y2)Complete 87 DEI d. Develop positions; Hire Staff Complete 88 DEI e. Hire Diversity position - 1.0 FTE FY22 Q2 89 DEI f. Hire -DEI Administrative Support - .5 FTE Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q1 90 DEI g. Hire CivicSparks Fellow - Y2 - .75 FTE Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q2 91 DEI h. Hire Interns - Cal Poly, Cuesta, community candidates - .25 FTE - 2 positions Y1 @ midyear / 2 - Y2, full year FY22 Q3 92 DEI i. Consultant - DEI SME - 360 total hours Ongoing Budget Document Pg. 129 Page 589 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 93 DEI j.Create and establish formal and informal activities, outreach, programs, policies, structures to advance equity and inclusion, cultural and systemic anti-racism, and cultural competence in the organization and community, and support underrepresented communities Ongoing 94 DEI k.Implementation of prioritized activities – internal and community-based Ongoing 95 DEI l. Support DEI efforts throughout each department Ongoing 96 DEI m. Coordinate activities of the DEI Employee Committee Ongoing 97 DEI n. Community-based outreach, education, programming Ongoing 98 DEI o. DEI High Impact and GIA grant administration and management Ongoing 99 DEI p. Cal Poly & Cuesta collaborations Ongoing 100 DEI q. Support the HRC Ongoing 101 2.2 Develop & Implement DEI Strategic Plan 102 DEI a. Conduct needs, priority, and resource assessments. Create comprehensive DEI initiatives and programming for the organization and community. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q4 103 DEI b. Utilize DEI Task Force Recommendations, Internal D&E Audit as foundation; Cal Poly Experience report and other documents as reference and for benchmarking Complete 104 DEI c. Present comprehensive plan to City Council for Adoption Original: FY22 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q4 105 DEI d. Create project designs and implementation plans. Identify applicable qualitative and quantitative metrics to measure impact of DEI projects and overall DEI program Original: FY22 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q3 106 DEI e. Begin implementation of prioritized programs and projects; scoped as resources allow. To be determined through Strategic Planning process.Ongoing 107 2.3 Workforce Recruitment & Retention 108 DEI a.Improve DEI-Focused Recruitment, Screening, Hiring Practices Ongoing 109 DEI b. Improve DEI-focused language in job descriptions, announcements and other recruitment materials. Identify gaps and opportunities to increase inclusivity in materials. - supported by consultant, 2.1.4.g Ongoing 110 DEI c. Provide DEI-focused screening and interviewing training to personnel and panels - supported by consultant, 2.1.4.g Ongoing 111 DEI d. Implement applicable recommendations from Internal Audit, as well as other industry best practices. Continue to ensure final selection guidelines are consistent with DEI best practices Ongoing 112 DEI e. Conduct Pay Equity Audit Ongoing 113 DEI f. Examine Policies and Programs to Support for Primary Caretakers Ongoing 114 DEI g. Review, evaluate and implement findings of SLO County Child Care Study (First 5’s analysis) of childcare for working families, as applicable; 22-23 Supplemental Plan as resources permit.FY22 Q4 115 DEI h. Continue communicating childcare options and resources for City employees; additional to First 5 findings. Explore flex schedules, job share, remote options, etc.Ongoing 116 DEI i. Expanded Recruitment Services Expenses to Augment HR Complete 117 DEI j. Fire: Recruit Academy Support and Intern Program - enhance DEI recruitment efforts Ongoing 118 2.4 Inclusive & Equitable Workplace 119 DEI a. Develop and Adopt Diversity Statement for the Organization Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q1. 120 DEI b. Assist Departments in infusing DEI into their programs, policies, and practices in relevant and practical ways Ongoing 121 DEI c. . Further develop purpose, role, activities and enhance impact of DEI Employee Committee – (e.g. ERGs, cultural celebrations, activity budget, speakers, self-study materials, public web pages)Ongoing 122 DEI d. Grant equal standing and priority to the tasks and responsibilities periodically assigned to DEI committee members as is given to their other duties Ongoing 123 DEI e. DEI-related Staff Development / Training Ongoing 124 DEI f. Implement a DEI module in new hire onboarding FY23 Q2 Budget Document Pg. 130 Page 590 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 125 DEI g. Provide training and other learning opportunities for all levels. E.g. inclusive leadership, cultural competency, assessments, speakers, self-study, etc. Ongoing 126 DEI h. Continue Clarity Collective training as foundation training - ASSIGNED / RESOURCED TO HR Ongoing 127 DEI i. Training for Council, Commission, Advisory Board – tailored for roles, Brown Act, etc.Ongoing 128 DEI j. Complete a planning study for gender-inclusive restroom and sleeping facilities for Fire Stations 3 and 4. Proceed with design work pending results of study.Original: FY23 Q4 Updated: FY24 Q2 129 2.5 Community-based Policing and Restorative Practices 130 DEI a. Implement After Action Report recommendations Complete 131 DEI b. Review and implement Governor’s recommendations regarding protests when issued Complete 132 DEI c. Implement federal government changes in law enforcement. Implement RIPA Spillman Module: the Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) was formed as part of AB953. California law enforcement agencies will be required to collect data for stops made by law enforcement personnel. Annual reporting to DOJ is a requirement. Ongoing 133 DEI d. Review new Police Station building program and budget for opportunities to reduce costs to preserve resources for community service investments Original: FY22 Q2 Updated: FY22 Q3 134 2.6 Cal Poly & Cuesta Partnerships 135 DEI a. Solidify relationships and collaborations Ongoing 136 DEI b. CP Office of University Diversity and Inclusion (OUDI) and City DEI Office/City Manager Leadership quarterly planning meetings Ongoing 137 DEI c. Host City / Cal Poly Office of Student Diversity & Belonging quarterly roundtable (City & CP leadership, DEI committee, HRC, Cal Poly students, DEI leaders, etc.) - re community / student experience, relationship- building Ongoing 138 DEI d. Utilize Faculty Fellow assigned to Office of DEI in partnership with CP OUDI to research best practices, grants for internships, programs, outreach, innovative practices, etc. – seeking sponsorship from Cal Poly Ongoing 139 DEI e. Explore opportunities and build collaborations with Cuesta College Ongoing 140 DEI f. Provide City facilities as available to campus DEI programs delivered to and in the community Ongoing 141 DEI g.Utilize interns from Cal Poly and Cuesta within the Office of DEI Ongoing 142 2.7 Access, Inclusion, Support for Underrepresented Communities 143 DEI a.High Impact DEI Grants Ongoing 144 DEI b. GIA Grants Ongoing 145 DEI c. HRC Operating Budget for enhanced presence, advocacy, community building, etc. (such as awareness campaigns, access/fairness efforts, citizen award, etc.). Activities TBD Ongoing 146 DEI e. Support feasibility study for Multicultural Center; provide City liaison/staff support FY23 Q4 147 DEI f. Contribute to planning / feasibility study FY23 Q4 148 DEI g. Update City's formal Public Engagement & Noticing (PEN) procedures as well as other public outreach, input efforts to increase diverse participation. Develop tactics and cost to implement Original: FY23 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q1 149 DEI h. City 101 / Community Academy to increase understanding / access / participation in City government Ongoing 150 DEI i. City 101 – first stage, short program, easy access/commitment. Overview of City, how to access, ways to be involved. Extensive outreach to Underrepresented minorities, community-based sessions. Design, pilot Y1 FY22 Q4 151 DEI j. Community Academy – second stage, longer program. Partner with Chamber, others. Test demand, develop. Pilot Y2 FY23 Q4 152 DEI k. Develop “Undocu-Friendly” logo for City documents, as allowable by law (cost of internal resources)Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q1 153 DEI l. BIPOC youth artists' public art project. Feature work that provides a fuller representation of all communities. Artists are stipended. Pilot in Y2 - ASSIGNED & RESOURCED TO P&R FY23 Q4 154 DEI m. Park major maintenance and repairs specific to Cheng Park improvements and Mission Plaza railing improvements. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q4 Budget Document Pg. 131 Page 591 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 155 DEI n. Parks Major Maintenance - ADA Transition Plan Implementation Ongoing 156 2.8 Community Education & Programming 157 DEI a. Trainings, workshops, speakers, forums, townhalls, listening sessions, outreach, etc. for youth, marginalized communities and community-at-large [in addition to CP's programming]Ongoing 158 DEI b. Utilize proven providers rather than City develop program. City serves as coordinator, sponsor, convener, etc. Ongoing 159 DEI c. Determined by interest, guidance by BIPOC, other URMs, DEI committee, HRC + public input, etc. Ongoing 160 2.9 Support & Attract Minority-Owned Businesses 161 DEI a.Establish a process for the City to recognize and promote Minority-owned businesses Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q2 162 DEI b.Implement protocols within the City’s Office of Economic Development to reach out to all existing and new Minority-owned/operated businesses to learn of their experiences operating in SLO, and to identify ways the City can be of support. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q2 163 DEI c.Establish a City Leadership/Chamber of Commerce / Minority Business Owners’ roundtable.Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q4 164 DEI d. Research, explore and potentially utilize innovative practices such as micro-loans, targeted-sector recruiting and promotion, City-facilitated lending, grants, private support and crowdfunding to support underserved/underrepresented communities. Leverage City's partner network, including the Chamber, Downtown SLO, REACH and others to support the DEI initiatives as they relate to economic development including creation, retention and attraction efforts. FY23 Q4 165 DEI e. Update and maintain a listing of resources for BIPOC, LGBTQ+ and other underserved communities on the City's Doing Business section of the website.Ongoing 166 DEI f. Establish a process for the City to recognize and promote Minority-owned businesses Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q2 167 3.1 Implement Housing Element 168 HH a. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (HE programs 2.13 & 4.6)Original: FY23 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q1 169 HH b. Flexible Density Program (HE Program 2.15)FY23 Q3 170 HH c. Develop Objective Design Standards & Update Development Review Process (HE 6.22 & 6.23)Complete 171 HH d. Zoning Regulations Update - Housing (HE 5.5, 8.18, 8.23, 2.17 and AB 2345)Complete 172 HH e. Subdivision Regulations Update (HE 6.20)FY23 Q1 173 HH f. Missing Middle Housing (SB9 - HE 5.4)Original: FY23 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q1 174 HH f-2. Missing Middle Housing (SB10 - HE 5.4)Original: FY23 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q4 175 HH g-1. Additional Housing Element Program Implementation (HE 2.16)FY23 Q2 176 HH g-2. Additional Housing Element Program Implementation (HE 2.18)Complete 177 HH g-3. Additional Housing Element Program Implementation (HE 3.10, 4.7 & 4.8)Ongoing 178 HH h. Regional Coordination (HE Chapter 4)ongoing 179 HH i. Housing Element Program Implementation (Chapter 3)ongoing 180 HH j. Construct Prado Road Creek Bridge Replacement & S. Higuera/Prado Road intersection reconstruction, adding protected bicycle lanes, sidewalks and a bicycle protected intersection, as recommended in the Active Transportation Plan. Original: FY24 Q1 Updated: FY24 Q2 181 HH k. Complete construction of the Prado Road Interchange project, providing more efficient connectivity for motor vehicles and transit service (reducing VMT), and providing physically-separated facilities for bicycles and pedestrians, as recommended in the Active Transportation Plan. Original: FY25 Q1 Updated: FY25 Q2 Budget Document Pg. 132 Page 592 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 182 HH l. Development related park improvements specific to Laguna Lake and Orcutt Area. FY23 Q4 183 HH m. CDD Fleet Replacement Ongoing 184 3.2 185 HH a. Development review project referrals ongoing 186 3.3 187 HH a. Inventory Management; Monitoring; Escrow services; Homebuyer & rental services; BEGIN/FTHB ongoing 188 3.4 Financial Management 189 HH a. CDBG Program Administration ongoing 190 HH b. GIA Progarm Administration ongoing 191 HH c. Affordable Housing Fund Administration ongoing 192 HH d. Grant research; applications; coordination ongoing 193 3.5 Advisory Body & Council meetings & support 194 HH a. Reports, Community meetings, presentations (does not include time associated with tasks identified herein)ongoing 195 HH b. HRC liasion ongoing 196 3.6 Homelessness Team Coordination 197 HH a. Coordination of staff from various City departments (Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Police, Fire, Administration) focused on addressing issues associated with homelessness.ongoing 198 HH b. Develop a Strategic Plan to guide a sustained effort of engagement by regional partners, non-profit partners, and community members to identify and implement coordinated solutions to chronic homelessness. Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q1 199 HH c. Maintain and update informational resources, such as the City's Homelessness Solutions web page, about City actions to help the unhoused population, and the scope of services provided to address the challenges of homelessness by the County, State, City, and regional partners. ongoing 200 HH d. Work to prevent homelessness through a Safe Housing Outreach and Education Program that will provide, among other duties, information about rental assistance programs, eviction protection programs, and new housing opportunities. ongoing 201 HH e. Pursue a coordinated lobbying strategy to motivate action at the State and regional level, and research and secure additional sources of funding to address local challenges.ongoing 202 HH f. Housing and Homelessness City Staff ongoing 203 3.7 Environmental Protection and Water Quality 204 HH a. Environmental clean-ups in creek and open space areas associated with abandoned personal property and trash (Parks & Rec)Ongoing 205 HH b. Environmental clean-ups in creek and open space areas associated with abandoned personal property and trash (Parks & Rec)Ongoing 206 HH c. Environmental clean-ups in City Parks and public spaces associated with abandoned personal property and trash (Public Works)Ongoing 207 HH d. Environmental clean-ups in City Parks and public spaces associated with abandoned personal property and trash (Public Works)Ongoing 208 3.8 Regional Engagement and Grant Management 209 HH a. Active participation and respresentation of the City in the County's regional strategic planning efforts to develop regional solutions to chronic homelessness. ongoing 210 HH b. Attend HSOC & PACT meetings, support City seat on the Commission, and report status of agenda items back to staff ongoing 211 HH c. Support the Housing Policy and Program section and the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion on homelessness related funding opportunities, such as CDBG, GIA, DEI, and other sources.ongoing 212 3.9 Community Action Team Resources 213 HH a. Expand the current Community Action Team by adding an additional social worker position.ongoing 214 HH b. Continue to provide public safety services by utilizing the Community Action Team; includes two officers and a social worker. (Costs include existing social worker position, but funding for the position is provided by the County). ongoing 215 HH c. Continue to provide public safety services by utilizing the downtown bike team.ongoing 216 3.10 Mobile Crisis Unit Pilot Program Budget Document Pg. 133 Page 593 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 217 CA a. Pair a crisis worker with an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) to provide non-emergency response and care to unhoused community members. Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY22 Q4 218 CA b. Implement the program with the goals of reducing emergency dispatch of paramedics and law enforcement to community members who need non-emergency support. ongoing 219 CA c. Engage with the County of San Luis Obispo in the implementation of the pilot program so that if it is successful it can be scaled up and replicated across the region.ongoing 220 3.11 Non-Profit Partner Support 221 HH a. Support non-profit partners in pursuing funding resources, such as CARES Act and Project Homekey grants.ongoing 222 HH b. Support a 25% expansion of the number of beds at the 40 Prado Homeless Services Center.Complete 223 HH c. Continue to expand Safe Parking opportunities and support coordinated regional efforts for Safe Parking, transitional housing, and other shelter resources.ongoing 224 HH d. Ongoing General Fund support to CAPSLO for 40 Prado (includes safe parking, warming center, operational support)ongoing 225 HH e. Bus Token in-kind program to CAPSLO ongoing 226 HH f. General Fund low income utility subsidies Ongoing 227 HH g. Federal CDBG Grant for social services (Provided to CAPSLO to help fund Homeless Services Center operations)ongoing 228 4.1 Provide Sustainability Resources to achieve Council's Adopted Goals 229 CA a. To ensure consistent maintenance and adequate oversight of City Open Space lands, add one net new Ranger Maintenance Worker to maintain level of service standards following recent Open Space acquisitions. The City's level of service standard for Open Space is 1 Ranger per 1,000 acres. Complete 230 CA b. To address Ranger Services staffing, recruitment, and retention, convert 5 Ranger Specialist positions (currently limited benefit temporary) to full-time regular permanent positions. Complete 231 CA c. Create a limited term Sustainability & Natural Resources Analyst position to support open space conservation planning, implement Climate Action Plan actions that were established for 2021-23 on time, and support the completion of the Resilient SLO climate adaptation work effort. Ongoing 232 CA d. Restore the Sustainability & Natural Resources Intern position to support open space administration and planning efforts and climate action plan implementation efforts, including completion of the Community Forest Master Plan. Costs include $10,000 in Year 1 for minor office retrofits to support the office of sustainability Ongoing 233 CA e. Hire a CivicSpark Fellow for one year to initiate, complete, and begin implementing a municipal solid waste reduction initiative.Complete 234 CA f. Continue grant writing consulting support to ensure focused and competitive proposals for state, federal, and private grants. Ongoing 235 CA h. Orient the Green Team to support "Lead by Example" implementation, "Resilient SLO" implementation, and all-staff educational efforts.Ongoing 236 CA i. Continue SLO Climate Coalition support to provide a resource for community members to participate in climate action initiatives and build overall community capacity. Ongoing 237 CA j. Convene an inter-departmental staff team to assess and provide recommendations for the Urban Forest Program's future role in advancing sustainability goals and objectives.Ongoing 238 CA k. Continue to monitor the status of the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) Polystyrene Ordinance and respond as needed and appropriate.Complete 239 4.2 Continue to update and implement the Climate Action Plan ("CAP") for carbon neutrality 240 CA a. Complete the Biennial Climate Action Plan Update, as called for by CAP Administrative Action 3. Original: FY23 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q3 Budget Document Pg. 134 Page 594 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 241 CA b. Implement the Lead by Example Municipal Operations Carbon Neutrality Plan, as called for by CAP Lead by Example task 1.1. Specific projects include: - i. Install electric vehicle chargers to support the transition to all-electric fleet vehicles. - ii. Initiate and complete Building and Facility Energy and Decarbonization Study in order to identify and prioritize projects for City facilities. - iii. Complete installation of lighting retrofits at City Hall and Fire Station 1 using available on-bill financing. - iv. Complete installation of solar panels at the City's Bus Yard, Fire Station 1, and Sinsheimer Pool. - v. Install Transit Facility EV Charging Infrastructure - vi. Review options to further integrate climate action into the 2023-25 Financial Plan. Ongoing 242 CA c. Provide for ongoing support for Central Coast Community Energy Policy and Operations Board Members, and engage in staff level policy and program development, as called for by CAP Clean Energy task 1.1.Ongoing 243 CA d. Update the Clean Energy Choice Program for New Buildings for consistency with the 2022 California Building Code update, as called for by CAP Green Buildings task 1.1.FY23 Q2 244 CA f. Initiate a new grant program to catalyze energy efficiency and decarbonization retrofit projects in existing buildings that will also serve as demonstration and showcase projects, in support of CAP Green Buildings task 2.1. FY23 Q4 245 CA g. Implement organic waste reduction measures required by California Senate Bill 1383, which are also called for by CAP Circular Economy tasks 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 2.1.FY24 Q3 246 CA g. Provide support for community electric mobility work being led by the SLO Climate Coalition, in support of CAP Connected Communities task 3.1.FY22 Q2 247 4.3 Continue preservation, maintenance, and enhancement of the City's open space and urban forest 248 CA a. Working with the Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District, complete existing planning efforts and pilot program implementation at Johnson Ranch Open Space and City Farm intended to improve soil health and remove and store carbon, as called for at CAP Natural Solutions task 1.1.FY22 Q4 249 CA b. Complete an Urban Forest Master Plan including a comprehensive update of tree inventory update, assessment of tree canopy coverage, and implementation of an ongoing tracking system, as called for by CAP Natural Solutions task 2.1. Original: FY22 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q2 250 CA c. Establish a contract service for enhanced tree pruning and maintenance to ensure the long-term health and vigor of the City's Urban Forest, as well as public safety and identify a strategy for a prioritized replacement schedule for downtown focus trees, and begin implementation in order to ensure the long-term preservation of the Downtown street tree canopy. Ongoing 251 CA d. Partner with ECOSLO to support the 10,000 Trees by 2035 goal through a tree planting and maintenance program, as well as continue with the SLO Stewards Docent Program, annual creek clean up efforts, and administration of the SLO Green Business Program. Ongoing 252 CA e. Actively pursue opportunities to purchase open space lands and permanent land conservation agreements in furtherance of the City's Greenbelt Protection Program.Ongoing 253 CA f. Update the existing Cerro San Luis Natural Reserve Conservation Plan (2005), including a contemporary natural resources inventory, mapping, policy review, and identification of land stewardship needs and priorities. Removed 254 CA g. Implement priority projects and actions at Cerro San Luis Natural Reserve consistent with the updated Conservation Plan.ongoing 255 CA h. Update the existing South Hills Natural Reserve Conservation Plan (2007), including a contemporary natural resources inventory, mapping, policy review, and identification of land stewardship needs and priorities. 2023-25 256 CA i. Implement priority projects at South Hills Natural Reserve consistent with the updated Conservation Plan.2023-25 257 CA j. Create the Righetti Hill Open Space Conservation Plan in order to guide the long-term protection and appropriate public use of this new City Open Space property.FY23 Q4 Budget Document Pg. 135 Page 595 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 258 CA k. Implement priority projects at Righetti Hill Open Space consistent with the Conservation Plan. Original: FY23 Q4 Updated: FY23/25 259 CA l. Complete installation of adopted trail systems and establish regular Ranger Service patrol at Miossi Open Space. Original: FY23 Q4 Updated: FY22 Q4 260 CA m. Complete installation of adopted trail systems at the Waddell Ranch addition to the Irish Hills Natural Reserve. FY23 Q4 261 CA n. Continue Open Space education activities including the "hikes with experts" series, Junior Ranger Camp, supporting the SLO Stewards Docents, and ongoing public information and programming. Ongoing 262 CA o. Continued implementation by Ranger Service staff of all Open Space maintenance activities including establishing a replacement schedule for Open Space trailhead improvements, as well as replacement or repair of Open Space fencing currently in disrepair, all as set forth in the adopted Open Space Maintenance Plan Ongoing 263 CA p. Continued, ongoing Ranger Service patrol of Open Space areas ensuring compliance with the City Open Space regulations, the safety of users, and protection of natural resources values and functions.Ongoing 264 CA q. Implement Laguna Lake Dredging and Sediment Management and Shoreline Stabilizations Projects in order to begin restoration of the lake for recreation and habitat improvement purposes Complete 265 4.4 Alternative and sustainable transportation 266 CA a. Establish consistent mode split tracking and reporting method, consistent with performance monitoring recommendations as called for in the Active Transportation Plan and CAP Connected Communities task 1.1.Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q2 267 CA b. Prepare a Mobility as a Service Study to guide potential implementation of programs and software tools to create an integrated platform linking access to transit, future bikeshare and ridesharing services, as called for in CAP Connected Communities task 1.2. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q2 268 CA c. Prepare a Transit Innovation Study to provide a blueprint to guide the transition to increased service frequency, electrification and feasibility of no-fare service for students, seniors, and others as called for in CAP Connected Communities tasks 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4. Original: FY23 Q1 Updated: FY23 Q2 269 CA d. Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Implementation: Implement infrastructure improvements and programs specifically identified in the City's Active Transportation Plan to improve access, mobility and safety for walking and bicycling citywide. Actions support the CAP Connected Communities task 2.1, ATP. Specific projects and programs within the current work program include: - i. Plan, Design and Construct the ATP Tier 1 Network - ii. Construct Minor Bicycle and Pedestrian Access & Safety Improvements - iii. Complete preliminary design and right-of-way acquisition for the Railroad Safety Trail (Tiburon to Orcutt Road) - iv. Implement complete street improvements as part of 2021 and 2022 Roadway Sealing Projects - v. Continue to monitor trends in the Micromobility industry and feasibility of future SLO Bikeshare Program. - vi. Complete construction of the Broad/Woodbridge Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon crossing Ongoing 270 CA e. Perform additional sweeping to remove debris and obstructions along sidewalks, shared-use paths, and bike lanes, including use of narrow street sweeping machinery and manual sweeping to clear protected bike lanes, parklets and painted bulb outs. FUNDING IN ECONOMIC RECOVERY 1.4 e-2.Ongoing 271 CA f. Construct sidewalk repairs and new ADA curb ramps to improve access and safety for pedestrians, particularly those with mobility challenges.Ongoing 272 CA g. Achieve meaningful progress towards the "Vision Zero" goal by implementing recommendations from the City's Annual Traffic Safety & Operations Program, with particular focus on eliminating injury collisions involving vulnerable road users such as bicyclists, pedestrians, seniors and children.Ongoing Budget Document Pg. 136 Page 596 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 273 CA h. Construct the Cerro San Luis Neighborhood Greenway Phases 1B and 2, completing the priority bicycle and pedestrian route between Foothill Boulevard and Downtown SLO, including safety lighting and public artwork at the US 101/Chorro Undercrossing Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q1 274 CA i. Complete construction of the Orcutt Road/Tank Farm Road Roundabout, reducing congestion and auto emissions and improving access and safety for bicycles, pedestrians and drivers.Original: FY22 Q3 Updated: FY23 Q1 275 CA j. Complete construction of the California/Taft Roundabout, reducing congestion and auto emissions and improving access and safety for bicycles, pedestrians and drivers.FY23 Q4 276 CA k. Install new streetlights throughout the city Ongoing 277 CA l. Install new solar path lights along the Bob Jones and Railroad Safety Trails, utilizing solar options where feasible, to improve safety for active transportation users. Ongoing 278 CA m. Widen Higuera Street from Bridge to Elks to address collision trends by providing a center left-turn lane and improve bicycle facilities. Original: FY23 Q2 Updated: FY23 Q3 279 CA n. Continue Active Transportation Education and Outreach to encourage safe behaviors for all road users and to encourage interest and use of active transportation modes.Ongoing 280 CA o. Prepare Feasibility Study for Potential City VMT Mitigation Program, providing a programmatic mechanism to reduce VMT and GHG production of new development projects within the city.FY22 Q3 281 CA p. Continue advancing the electrification of the SLO Transit vehicle fleet, including electrification of buses and bus charging infrastructure. Ongoing 282 CA q. Replace SLO Transit bus shelters to maintain a quality environment for new and future transit users.Original: FY23 Updated: FY22 Q4 283 CA r. Fund two Transportation Interns to assistance with implementation of sustainable transportation projects and programs.Ongoing 284 CA s. Implement Neighborhood Traffic Management Program to address traffic speeding concerns through local residential streets and collector/arterial streets with fronting residential uses.Ongoing 285 CA t. Preserve and repair pavement surface within SLO Transit Bus Yard FY22 Q4 286 CA u. Pedestrian & Bicycle Pathway Maintenance: Preserve and repair pavement service along off-street pedestrian/bicycle pathways (RRST from Cal Poly to Taft; Madonna Inn Path; Meadow Park Paths)Ongoing 287 CA v. Street Reconstruction and Resurfacing: Implement the City's Pavement Management Program, repairing pavement surfaces along roadways throughout the city while leveraging opportunities for safety and multimodal street improvements. Ongoing 288 CA w. Traffic Sign & Striping: Repair and replace traffic signs and roadway pavement markings to maintain traffic control measures for all road users in a state of good repair.Ongoing 289 CA x. Development Agreements: Fund the City's share of costs associated with public infrastructure to be constructed by private development projects per reimbursement agreements for the following projects: - Avila Ranch -- City share of Buckley Road Extension Class I Path - 600 Tank Farm -- City share of Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout, Santa Fe Road Extension, and Design & Right-of-Way for Tank Farm Class I Path FY23 Q4 290 4.5 Planning and implementation for resilience 291 CA a. Complete the "Resilient SLO" planning project (Safety Element Update and associated CEQA) to assess community vulnerability to the impacts of climate change and adopt a resilience policy framework in the City's General Plan, as required by California Senate Bill 379. Original: FY22 Q4 Updated: FY23 Q1 292 CA b. Following successful piloting at Terrace Hill Open Space, implement and expand vegetation management for fire fuel reduction, as well as to promote soil health and recruitment of native perennial bunchgrasses, using goats and sheep with a professional contractor in order to ensure a safe and effective operation.Ongoing 293 CA c. Proactively conduct pre-season inspections of the creek system and implement the removal of woody debris, hazardous trees, and other obstacles that could lead to an increased potential for local flooding in accordance with the City's Routine Maintenance Agreement permit issued by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Ongoing Budget Document Pg. 137 Page 597 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 294 CA d. Replace or repair Open Space fencing that is currently in disrepair at Cerro San Luis Natural Reserve, Irish Hills Natural Reserve, Bowden Ranch Open Space, and the Bob Jones Trail. (Includes existing Creek and Flood Protection Staffing resources) FY23 Q4 295 CA e. Respond quickly to instances when hazardous trees are identified on City Open Space lands or creek areas where the City has a property interested.Ongoing 296 CA f. Conduct a microgrid feasibility assessment to identify City properties that could add solar, battery storage, and controls to allow operation during times of electrical grid outages as an uninterruptable power supply. FY23 Q4 297 CA g. Support development of the "Micro Community Collaborative" (MCC) initiative with SLO Climate Coalition, which includes a 1) web platform for community members to learn how they can complete their own sustainability initiatives, and 2) coordinating support to advertise the web platform and support communities of practice throughout the city. FY23 Q4 298 CA h. Establish an Open Space Fire Fuel Reduction Crew (part-time staff, 4,000 hours), including procurement of necessary machinery and equipment, in order to ensure that the City's has a reliable means of conducting fuel reduction activities. Ongoing 299 CA i. Expand Technical Rescue Team roster from 3 to 6 firefighters to improve the City's open space rescue capabilities and improve self-sufficiency following the first 72 hours of a regional disaster such as earthquake or flood where resources are often limited. Complete 300 CA j. Project: Storm Drainage Infrastructure Replacement - capital maintenance and replacement of pipe, culvert and constructed drainage channels to provide increased flood protection and reduced likelihood of loss of property Ongoing 301 CA k. Project: Inlet Trash Capture Devices (Water and Wastewater Management Element: The City will manage the collection system to ensure that the proper level of maintenance is provided and that the flow in sanitary sewers does not exceed design capacity.) This annual asset maintenance project addresses capital maintenance and replacement of pipe, culvert and constructed drainage channels to provide increased flood protection and reduced likelihood of loss of property. Ongoing 302 CA l. Project: Pismo/Johnson/San Luis Creek Bank Stabilization - San Luis Creek passes under Johnson Avenue near Pismo Street. The creek bank is starting to erode and this project will stabilize the creek bank and protect Pismo Street. Ongoing 303 CA m. Project: Hydration Stations at Various Parks - funding annually for parks surfacing maintenance and water supply infrastructure including the installation of hydration stations.Ongoing 304 CA n. Project: Laguna Lake Dredging - rerouting of Prefumo Creek has increased sediment deposits into the lake. This is a pilot project to ascertain if dredging is a viable solution for Laguna Lake and could become a routine maintenance activity. Original: FY22 Q2 Updated: FY22 Q3 305 CA o. Project: Ludwick Community Center - Roof and Solar Replacement (This funding provides for capital maintenance of faculties that will reduce unplanned repair costs and optimize energy use by providing planned equipment replacements and building shell sealing. Benefits of proper infrastructure maintenance reduces the cost of major repairs, increases energy efficiency, and ensures the facilities remain in functional condition.) Original: FY24 Q2 Updated: FY24 Q3 306 CA p. Water Treatment Plant Emergency Power - PSPS - additional temporary or permanent emergency generators, requiring engineering design and inspection services, and construction at the Water Treatment Plant, Whale Rock Reservoir, and other water pump stations. Complete 307 CA q. Water Treatment Plant - Power Storage Units Tesla Battery Grant - when emergency power is not required for plant operations, the power storage units will allow plant staff to shift power needs during electrical time of use periods having lower electrical rates, and lower carbon emissions associated with the transmission of electrical power. The control module operating the power storage units will also monitor and track energy efficiencies of existing pumps and the plant’s treatment units. Complete 308 CA r. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) - collaborate with Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) stakeholders to effectively manage the groundwater basin in the City, which may include preparation of research studies, field investigations, legal documents, grant applications, and regional participation in the development of a GSP. Ongoing Budget Document Pg. 138 Page 598 of 652 MCG Key: ERR= Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability; DEI= Diversity, Equity & Inclusion; HH=Housing and Homelessness; CA= Climate Action, Open Space & Sustainable Transportation MCG Task Completion Date 309 CA s. Mid-Higuera Bypass - this funding provides final engineering design work for this long-planned flood control project between Marsh Street and Madonna Road along San Luis Obispo Creek. Ongoing Budget Document Pg. 139 Page 599 of 652 Section 9: Department Updates The next section provides an update on each of the City’s ten operating Departments, including Departmental Goals and Performance Measures. Budget Document Pg. 140 Page 600 of 652 Department Updates Administration and IT Administration and Information Technology Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The Administration and Information Technology Department is responsible for providing information and recommendations to the City Council, implementing Council policies and programs and managing the day to day operations of the City. It is also the lead department charged with overseeing the implementation of several of Council’s Major City Goals. The department is organized by the Office of the City Manager, Office of the City Clerk, Office of Economic Development and Tourism, Office of Sustainability and Natural Resources, Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, and the Office of Information Technology. In February, Administration and IT welcomed the City’s first Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Manager who will continue to advance DEI priority initiatives in the City organization and community. Several projects have already been completed including a Memorandum of Understanding between Cal Poly’s Office of Diversity and Inclusion and the City that outlines efforts to strategically align and collaborate on DEI efforts. A new DEI section was added to the City’s Legislative Platform and a community speaker series was launched. Looking ahead to the 2022-23 fiscal year, DEI high impact grants will have an extended grant amount of $300,000 to account for the missed cycle due to the delayed onboarding of the DEI Manager. The City’s Economic Development Program continued to focus on the recovery from the impacts of the pandemic. Initially it was planned to update the Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) in the early part of the 2022-23 fiscal year. Due to several factors, including the unexpected, delayed return to normalcy after the COVID-19 pandemic and the REACH team securing funding to do a region-wide Comprehensive Economic Strategy (CEDS) during the same period, staff determined that it would be more effective to postpone the update six months to ensure the best outcome possible. The City’s Tourism Program through the Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID) continues to be successful in the development and management of the City’s tourism brand through advertising, public relations, community partnerships, and creative content. The City’s Community Promotion program through the Promotional Coordinating Committee (PCC) accomplished the implementation of the modified Grants in Aid (GIA) program including the addition of community workshops focused on advancing sustainability and inclusivity in events. Additionally, the PCC developed a public art promotional plan to support the implementation of the Public Art Master Plan. The City’s Communications Program has been more active than ever, utilizing more graphics and videos to communicate information as well as new features including staff highlights and City meeting summaries. The number of news releases distributed will likely not reach the 2021-22 target, but the City’s overall reach has expanded due to the increased use of additional channels such as social media and direct emails which do not always have a corresponding news release. As part of the 2022-23 fiscal year, the Communications Program will develop a crisis communications plan for the City, update the Public Engagement and Noticing (PEN) Manual, and develop a communications plan to be implemented in the 2023-25 Financial Plan. The Office of Sustainability and Natural Resources has been active with preparation of the Climate Action Plan 2022 Update including a public engagement process, participating on the Resilient SLO climate Budget Document Pg. 141 Page 601 of 652 Department Updates Administration and IT adaptation planning process together with the Community Development Department, the Clean Energy Program for New Buildings update and the Better Buildings SLO retrofit program, as well as activating the Green Team for implementation of the Municipal Climate Action Plan. Staff are also continuing work on a suite of conservation easement projects that are anticipated to permanently protect valuable open space and natural resource values in areas throughout the City’s Greenbelt. Other key work items have included completion of the carbon sequestration study for Johnson Ranch Open Space and City Farm in partnership with the Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District and progress towards the Urban Forest Master Plan. The City Clerk’s Office completed an annual training for Advisory Body Members, ensured compliance with several City-wide regulatory mandates and is prepared to implement hybrid meetings for City Council, and Planning Commission in fiscal year 2022-23. The Clerk’s Office is also prepared and ready to conduct the November 8, 2022, Municipal Election for Mayor and two Council Member seats. Rounding out the department is Information Technology which provides the network and information technology infrastructure, support, training, policy and technology strategic planning. The Information Services (IS) Team is working on three Cityworks-related projects: Whale Rock addition to Cityworks, Velosimo Springbrook-Cityworks integration, and IT Pipes upgrade. The IS Team is also revamping the “Web GIS” to improve sharing of information and enhance collaboration among several different departments and other agencies. The Network Services (NS) Team added additional redundancy to backups to protect from ransomware and other threats, which accounts for the increase in data backed up. The department is not proposing any work program changes from the Financial Plan and will continue its contribution to the City’s strategic goals and departmental objectives. Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Provides City-wide communications to the community. Strategic Goal: Citywide Communications Open City Hall Participant Satisfaction Rating 90% 94% 90% # of City News Releases 1 150 115 175 1 Actuals for FY21 includes COVID-19 County Press Releases sent by the City. From FY15 through FY20, the City averaged 143 City News Items per year and the program is now investing more in additional communication channels such as social media and direct emails which do not always have a corresponding news release. Budget Document Pg. 142 Page 602 of 652 Department Updates Administration and IT Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Provides reliable IT resources to the organization and community. Strategic Goal: Information Technology Maintain City Network Reliability Uptime Status 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% Data backed-up in Gigabytes 173,000 335,000 173,000 Number of GIS layers maintained 905 920 905 Economic Stability Strategic Goal: Economic Recovery and Stability Contacts with businesses regarding starting, expanding, and/or staying in the City 75 822 75 One-time funds used for direct aid to local businesses and non-profits $500,000 $500,000 3 $250,000 Supports our commitment to sustainability and provides open space resources to the community. Strategic Goal: Climate Action, Open Space, and Sustainable Transportation # of Green Team 4 Meetings 10 10 10 # of Open Space Conservation Plans that will guide the long-term protection and stewardship of natural resource values while guiding appropriate public use 1 - 1 Strengthens the City’s commitment to advancing Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Strategic Goal: DEI # of City-wide DEI Trainings Offered 5 10 22 12 Funds for High-Impact DEI Grants Awarded 6 $150,000 $0 $300,000 2 At the time of writing there were approximately 66 contacts and based on the average number of contacts per month we will end slight ahead of the target. 3 Due to the delayed conclusion of the pandemic and timing issues approximately $50,000-$75,000 of the funds may be carried over to FY 2022-23 to complete projects developed in 2021-22. 4 The Green Team is a cross-departmental collaborative body that helps guide the approach of the CAP Pillar ‘Lead By Example: Carbon Neutral City Operations’. As noted in the Major City Goal Work Program, in 2021-23, the Green Team will focus on implementing the carbon neutral municipal operations plan, completing the Resilient SLO project, and facilitating all-staff sustainability training. 5 Includes DEI intro/info sessions held in July and Augut 2021 with almost all functional teams. “City-wide” trainings will increase once the DEI program is fully established. 6 FY 2022-23 DEI high impact grants will have an extended grant amount of $300,000 to account for the missed grant cycle in FY 2021-22. Budget Document Pg. 143 Page 603 of 652 Department Updates City Attorney City Attorney Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The attorneys and administrative staff of the City Attorney Department continue to provide sound, thorough legal advice and services to the City Council, advisory bodies and City staff to support legal compliance and reduce exposure to liability; to advance most, if not all, Major City Goals and other important City objectives; and to maintain the core department objectives of completing efficient and reliable document review; providing and/or managing qualified counsel; and coordinating the administrative citation appeals hearing, claims review, and public record request legal review processes. The 2021-23 Financial Plan was adopted with the short-term goal of keeping the department staffed in a manner sufficient to maintain the necessary level of service delivery while launching, participating in, and concluding a department organizational assessment. The temporary and contract supplemental staff of the department have done an excellent job of quickly getting up to speed, asking good questions, and supporting the department’s functions throughout an assessment process which has, unfortunately, dragged on months past its estimated completion. At mid-year, Council approved the addition of three regular staff positions based on the draft recommendation of the assessment and doubling the number of full-time, regular staff assigned to the department. Recruitment for the first of those three positions has begun and everyone is excited to begin onboarding and mentoring long-term, regular staff. While the Financial Plan had been constructed intending to transition new staff in January 2022, and a delayed organizational assessment was not foreseen, the department intends to meet the challenge of this delay and begin onboarding new staff in June 2022. Various temporary support functions have been implemented to make the onboarding/transition process manageable - for the time being, code enforcement will be handled by outside counsel, who provides similar services for other local cities, which will allow the department attorneys to focus on larger, more complex issues and avoid time wasted waiting in court for hearings to be called; the part-time temporary Assistant City Attorney, who has been with the City for several years, will continue in a part-time role, but hopefully work on assignments that utilize his experience and strengths; and new matters and work efforts will continue to be analyzed for efficient completion by outside counsel and funded, when applicable, by developer or applicant funds. Litigation and claims have intensified during the year, including challenges to housing development approvals, cannabis regulatory actions, and police civil rights actions. Despite overwhelming success in defending the City against a variety of meritless cases, the management and support for the City’s defense has demanded an unfortunately disproportionate level of staff and attorney time, and public financial resources. Regardless of the time and attention such matters have required, staff have continued to provide legal advice and support to Council and staff throughout the organization to help advance, or bring to completion, dozens of important projects, including: •The implementation of SB 1383’s solid waste mandates and reorganization of the Integrated Waste Management Authority, which required the drafting and review of the joint powers agreements, ordinances, franchise agreement amendments, and rate setting documents. •Negotiation with the County regarding satisfaction of RTA’s conditions of approval related to future construction of the Elks Lane realignment. •Reached a significant milestone in the Citywide Contract Templates project by drafting and updating seven new contract templates to be used Citywide, developing staff training materials, Budget Document Pg. 144 Page 604 of 652 Department Updates City Attorney and creating a Contracts SharePoint site where all City staff can access approved templates and training materials. • Drafted and negotiated the agreement for the City’s nearly $4 million grant to the SLO Reparatory Theatre to assist in the construction of SLO Rep’s new facility. • Assisted Planning staff with completing the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element. • Amendments to the City’s cannabis regulations Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Strategic Goals Measure 2021-22 Target/ Expected Volume 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target/ Expected Volume Timely and Responsive legal advice and support Strategic Goal: Department Objectives Administrative Citation Appeals Received by the City 150 117 120 1 Appeals closed without need of a hearing 2 25 35 25 City assisted corrections to defective appeals to allow access to hearing 15 19 15 City facilitated hearings on the record without need for personal appearance by Appellant 50 29 40 3 # of hearing days scheduled 7 11 7 Legal Training & Compliance Strategic Goal: Department Objectives # of Council, Staff, and Advisory Body legal trainings, legal updates, and compliance advisory sessions 12 6 4 12 Municipal Litigation & Prosecution Management Strategic Goal: Department Objectives Percentage of Claims Resulting in Litigation <5% 9%5 <5% Liability Claims Against the City Reviewed/Managed 70 67 70 1 The exponential increase in appeals that occurred related to the enforcement of COVID-19 health orders (April 2020 to Summer 2021) appears to have subsided so, target being lowered closer to previous year amounts 2 Closed in some way that did not include a decision being issued (e.g. withdrawn by appellant, untimely filed, voided by the issuing department) 3 The reduced volume of appeals received will translate into fewer that can be decided without a hearing so, reduction made to this target as well 4 The ongoing time and attention demanded by the organizational assessment and the delay in bringing that effort to a close (so its staffing and other recommendations could be implemented) has reduced the amount of time available for planning and presenting these legal training sessions. 5 This high percentage is from six cases. Five of those are: a person injured during after-hours, reckless use of a City park; an unfair labor practices charge; a writ petition to force the City to permit a disqualified cannabis business applicant; damage done to a gas main during a contractor’s work for the City; and a writ to force the issuance of a permit for a yard structure built in violation of the building code. The sixth lawsuit was known to not involve the City but was filed to include it anyway out of the plaintiff’s abundance of caution. The City was recently dismissed from the case following production of discovery responses that supported its non-involvement. Budget Document Pg. 145 Page 605 of 652 Department Updates Community Development Community Development Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The Community Development Department includes the Administration, Housing Policy and Programs, Planning, Engineering, and Building & Safety divisions which develop, implement, and track guiding policies in the City's General Plan. Plans for new construction are reviewed through planning applications to ensure compliance with City standards and policy objectives. Construction is supported through implementation of zoning, building, and engineering codes and through coordination with a wide variety of City departments. The Community Development Department provides service to the community directly at its public counter and services offered on‐line on the City’s website. The department helps maintain the health and safety of the community directly through code enforcement activities, and indirectly by guiding the City's urban form from concept to construction. All divisions within the department have done an exceptional job of handling high workload with a few experiencing numerous employee vacancies. Some of these areas of consistent or increasing workload include reviewing planning applications, public improvement projects, code enforcement violations, building inspections, and building permits. Additionally, the department processed numerous agreements for the City’s affordable housing portfolio, created Objective Design Standards, updated the Zoning Regulations, and made significant progress on updating the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and developing the Homelessness Strategic Plan. Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Affordable housing production Strategic Goal: Housing Number of affordable housing units secured through entitlements or construction 50 112 1 50 Provide Excellent Customer Service Strategic Goal: Other Department Objectives Customer survey response positivity rate 95% 91% 80%2 1 The number of affordable housing units that have been secured is higher than anticipated due to the sporadic timing in the entitlement process that is hard to project. 94 of these units are from a single development project that received a land dedication to produce 100% affordable housing units and a density bonus. 2 Reducing due to a discrepancy with the initial target and changing to the Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT) standard. Budget Document Pg. 146 Page 606 of 652 Department Updates Community Development Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Ensure a Safe Community Strategic Goal: Housing Percent of Code Enforcement cases investigated on‐time: First Tier ‐ 24 Hours, Second Tier ‐ 2 Days, and Third Tier ‐ 3‐5 Days 85% 85% 85% Development Review activities Strategic Goal: Other Department Objectives The target goal of meeting cycle times 75% of the time reflects an increase in more complex and resource intensive development review activities. 75% 78% 75% Building Inspections Strategic Goal: Economic Stability Percent of inspections performed the next working day 85% 96% 90 3% 3 Increasing target based on success of next‐day inspections. Budget Document Pg. 147 Page 607 of 652 Department Updates Finance Finance Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The Finance department is tasked with safeguarding the City’s resources and fiscal health by implementing financial policies, procedures, and reporting systems to serve the citizens and enable operating departmens to achieve their objectives. Finance plays a key role in the City’s Economic Stability and Recovery Major City Goal by developing strategies to reduce pension unfunded liabilities and enhancing the City’s financial system to support accurate and timely accounting processes. With the passage of Measure G-20, the City’s budget increased by about $15 million annually, requiring two full- time staffing positions to be added with the Financial Plan to help right-size the department resources with the growth and service demands of the City organization. For the first time in over two years, the department is fully staffed and looks forward to redistributing workload which will help staff deliver on core services and objectives more efficiently. The department continues to make progress on its strategic goals such as improving the Oracle ERP and HCM systems in coorindation with IT. The City was also able to make it’s planned $12.4 million additional downpayment to CalPERs which will help achieve the City Council directed goal to reduce the pension unfunded liabilities. On May 17th, the Council adopted a resolution updating the City’s Purchasing Policy including considerations for a Local Preference and Sustainability in procurement. The department is not proposing any changes from the Financial Plan and will continue its contribution to the City’s strategic goals and departmental objectives. Performance Measures Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Enables & enhances transparency, accountability & integrity. Strategic Goal: Fiscal Policies # of calendar days following year-end until CAFR is issued 170 180 170 # of audits/reviews conducted/ # of additional agreed upon procedure audits performed 2/2 2/2 2/2 Protects & prudently manages its financial resources. Strategic Goal: Fiscal Policies # of funds within fund balance requirements/ total funds with fund balance requirements 8/8 8/8 8/8 Net direct debt per capita (General Fund) $44 $42.4 $42.3 Twelve-month total rate of return/City portfolio 3% -0.76%1 3% 1 Based on the February 2022 Investment Report. While ultimately the City aims for a long-term rate of return of 3%, market volatility can cause swings from year to year. This was especially true during the pandemic years due to the Fed’s monetary policy to assist economic activity and recovery. The 3-year average is currently 2.7%. As a government entity, the City’s primary investment objective is to achieve a reasonable rate of return on public funds rather than the maximum generation of income, which could expose the City to unacceptable levels of risk. Budget Document Pg. 148 Page 608 of 652 Department Updates Fire Fire Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan In addition to providing exceptional and compassionate emergency response, the Fire Department embraces inclusive fire prevention and education strategies that include fire and life safety inspections, plan review services, fire/arson investigation, fire safety and public safety education, and disaster preparedness classes. The Department’s vision is to be a progressive organization that leads the community in public safety and preparedness demonstrated through an unwavering commitment to the protection of lives, property, and the environment. The service provided will be of the highest quality recognized against local, state, and federal standards. The fire department has six major programs to ensure the community continues to receive exceptional service: Fire Administration, Emergency Response, Fire Prevention, Fire Training, Fire Apparatus Fleet Service and Emergency Management. At mid-year of fiscal year 2022, the City Council funded two new positions to support the Emergency Management and Fire Prevention programs; one full-time emergency manager and one half-time fire inspector, and also authorized the use of the public safety equipment fund to purchase needed rescue equipment for Emergency Response. The Emergency Manager position was funded through the Local Revenue Measure as disaster preparedness was identified as a community priority and the half-time Fire Inspector cost was offset through over-realized fire and life safety inspection program revenue. The department is not proposing any additional changes from the adopted 2022-23 budget that was adopted with the 2021-23 Financial Plan and will continue its contribution to the City’s strategic goals and departmental objectives. Continued on next page Budget Document Pg. 149 Page 609 of 652 Department Updates Fire Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Deliver Timely Emergency Response to ensure rapid care and hazard mitigation.1 Strategic Goal: Other Department Objectives Meet the Response Time objective as defined by General Plan Safety Element of 4 minutes to 95% of all lights-and-siren emergencies in the City. 4:00 5:59 4:00 Meet the Total Response Time (TRT) goal of 7 minutes or less to 90% of all lights- and-siren emergencies in the City as defined by the Department’s Master Plan. TRT Includes Call Processing Time, Turnout Time, and Travel Time. 7:00 8:31 7:00 Meet the Call Processing Time goal of 1 minute or less to 90% of all lights- and-siren emergencies in the City as part of TRT. 1:00 1:38 1:00 Meet the Turnout Time goal of 2 minutes or less to 90% of all lights- and-siren emergencies in the City as part of TRT. 2:00 3:11 2:00 Meet the Travel Time goal of 4 minutes or less to 90% of all lights- and-siren emergencies in the City as part of TRT. 4:00 5:20 4:00 Provide timely service to the development community. Strategic Goal: Housing % of Fire Department Development Review activities completed within published cycle times. 80% 69%2 80% 1 While the Fire Department did not meet the response time performance targets in 2021-22, the target remains unchanged in 2022-23 due to National Fire Protection Association recommended standards. The fire department is working to implement process improvements based on data analysis to help improve turnout times. Additionally, COVID-19 call screening and additional PPE requirmenets have impacted the speed of both call processing times and turnout times. Fire department staff will continue to work with Police Department staff to help improve call processing time. Travel time is the most difficult time to improve in the short term as they are impacted by road construction, traffic, roadway design changes, and expanded response zones due to annexations in the southern end of the City. 2 The Fire Department expects the development review perfmornace measure to increase substantially with the addition of a ½ time fire inspector that should be filled before August 2022. Budget Document Pg. 150 Page 610 of 652 Department Updates Human Resources Human Resources Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The mission of the Human Resources (HR) Department is to help employees realize their full potential so they can effectively serve the community. HR provides support throughout the organization on benefits administration and compensation, recruitment, labor relations, performance management, training and development, and legal compliance. HR also is responsible for promoting wellness, safety, and risk management to support a healthy and safe workplace and reduce costs related to injuries and illness. As approved in the 2021-23 Financial Plan, four FTEs have been added to the HR department to address the complexities of a growing organization. The additional positions will enable HR to continue to meet the City’s recruitment and retention goals and anticipated timelines. Fortunately, staff, who have been hired to date, have helped to provide the capacity to oversee compliance with COVID-19 responsibilities during a surge in cases at the beginning of 2022, and to respond to the largest volume of turnover the City has experienced in over 20 years. In a six-month period, 25% of the organization shifted for reasons evenly divided among resignations/retirements, promotions/transfers, and to fill new positions. Since the beginning of the fiscal year, over 3,000 applications were received, more than 100 recruitments took place, and nearly 120 employees were onboarded. During this time, staff expanded the onboarding process by offering a variety of trainings for employees in the City’s Leadership and Learning Academy, created a Supervisor Toolkit to set up new leaders for success and hosted Quarterly Management Meetings. The City recently went live with employee self-service for Open Enrollment to reduce the use of paper forms and further improve the process and maximize the use of technology. Staff completed a Benchmark Compensation Study for the City’s unrepresented Management and Confidential groups and the San Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association (SLOCEA). The results of the study have been incorporated into a three-year successor resolution for unrepresented staff and are incorporated into negotiations discussions with SLOCEA as the existing Memorandum of Agreement expires on June 30, 2022. The Department also concluded its search for the City’s first Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Manager. Staff, in partnership with the DEI Manager, have made progress on many strategics included in the DEI major city goal. Due to the increased demands for recruitment and onboarding new staff members across the organization, the percentage of on-time employee evaluations did not achieve the target for FY 2021-22; however, is still at 80% of on-time evaluations. Higher value workers’ compensation and liability claims required a transfer from the Insurance Fund to cover related expenses; however, the Insurance Fund was structured to manage such fluctuations and remains robust. Staff will continue to seek ways to reduce workers’ compensation claims costs and recently initiated a Company Nurse program so when staff are injured, they can seek immediate assistance from a health care professional. In addition, the functional mobility program for firefighters has continued throughout the pandemic with specialized training to minimize work-related injuries. Since the program began in fiscal year 2018-19, the department has seen a 40% decrease in days lost from work. Specifically, days lost from work has declined from 769 days from fiscal year 2018-19, to an average of 315 days in the subsequent three fiscal years. Overall, the Department focused on and achieved its highest priority goals and will operate within the parameters of the approved Financial Plan for the remainder of the 2021-2023 budget cycle. Budget Document Pg. 151 Page 611 of 652 Department Updates Human Resources Performance Measures Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actuals 2022-23 Target Integrated HR Services (Strategic Goal) Average days between injury and workers’ compensation claim filed. 4 4 3 Achieved lower severity of workers’ compensation claims than the risk pool Yes Yes Yes Liability claims payments under the Self- Insured Retention amount. Yes Yes Yes Employee Development & Growth (Strategic Goal) Percentage of on-time employee performance evaluations 95% 80% 95% Percentage of internal promotions 40% 42% 40% Training sessions coordinated 35 35 35 Engaged and Aware Culture (Strategic Goal) Number of policies communicated 5 60 1 5 Informational sessions coordinated 80 300 90 1 Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and due to the influx of hiring, Human Resources staff have communicated significantly more policies than targeted. The communicated policies included the ever-changing rules for employees related to COVID-19 compliance and onboarding supervisors and employees to the organization. Budget Document Pg. 152 Page 612 of 652 Department Updates Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The Parks and Recreation Department is committed to providing quality parks and facilities (such as the SLO Swim Center, Damon‐Garcia Sports Complex, and Laguna Lake Golf Course) where recreation programs, special events, activities for youth and seniors, cultural and educational opportunities occur in an effort to encourage wellness and develop community through leisure, cultural, and social pursuits. The Department also protects and preserves the City’s natural resources and open spaces. The Community Services Division has returned to hosting in‐person community events. Given the resource‐intensive nature of the SLO Triathlon, as well as a reduction in participant registrations, the City will discontinue hosting the event. This will allow Community Services staff to reallocate staff resources previously dedicated to the SLO Triathlon toward weekly community building and more cost‐effective neighborhood pop‐up events at local parks and neighborhoods. The Community Services Division will also be adding a series of five‐week summer sports camps during the summer months (mid‐June thru mid‐August)and expand to year‐round Youth Sports clinics, add a “Concerts at the Jack House” series, and the return of the Monster Skate series at Santa Rosa Park. As approved at Mid‐Year, this spring, Parks and Recreation will be hiring a full‐time Community Services Coordinator to support enhanced senior programming, oversee the Community Gardens program, manage the expanding Contract Class program, and support the Community Services division. The Department will also be hiring a Volunteer Services Coordinator position (full‐time, contract position) in FY2022‐23 to manage a citywide volunteer program to ensure consistent marketing, recruitment, tracking of hours, risk management, recognition events, and centralized program area support, as well as providing coordination with local service groups, academic and other community partners. Changing needs at San Luis Coastal Unified School District have impacted Youth Services programming in FY2021‐22. Staff has gradually expanded offerings to serve all previous five school sites (C.L. Smith, Hawthorn, Pacheco, Sinsheimer, and Bishop’s Peak). Additional programming has included expansion in support of the teacher workdays, minimum days, and academic breaks. The division is growing its scholarship program to better serve disadvantaged families, thanks in part to a stipend from the California Department of Social Services. The Laguna Lake Golf Course will increase service by adding course marshal shifts to better provide customer support and security. Additionally, due to an aging facility, supplemental maintenance worker shifts are added to support the overall maintenance of the course (the Golf Budget Document Pg. 153 Page 613 of 652 Department Updates Parks and Recreation Maintenance Crew Coordinator has had to fill in for supplemental shifts in FY 2021‐22). Rainstorms in the winter damaged the Golf Pro Shop, rendering it unoccupiable as of December 2021. An abatement, remediation and repair project is scheduled to conclude by October or November 2022. The course welcomed a new concessionaire, Zen Dogs, which will provide a new revenue stream, as they initially operate out of their food truck and eventually serve customers out of the Golf Pro Shop upon its reopening. Aquatics programming continues to return to normal operations with the lifting of pandemic guidelines, as well as increased staff recruitment efforts scheduled in FY2022‐23. The division will expand programming with recruitment of a new Special Swim Instructor for warm water exercises. Ranger Service has expanded its educational programming in FY2021‐22 with more environmental education videos, Ranger‐led interpretive hikes, and expanding to add a third session of the Junior Ranger camp, all of which the division expects to sustain in FY2022‐23. Additionally, in FY2022‐23, Ranger Service will be opening the new Righetti Open Space to the public and unveiling new trails in Irish Hills Open Space and Miossi Open Space (including a connection to the Poly Canyon trail). The division has experienced challenges in hiring and training part‐time open space techs to support the fuel management and wilderness urban interface (WUI), which may continue in FY2022‐23. The Public Art Program has had much success through the Department’s partnership agreement with San Luis Obispo Museum of Art (SLOMA) with the addition of the two murals, temporary sculptures, and the upcoming Tank Farm/Orcutt roundabout sculpture. Major sculpture maintenance projects are also in the works (Flames of Knowledge and Oh Great Spirit). The next phase of the Utility Art Box projects is scheduled to begin in late spring/early summer 2022. Budget Document Pg. 154 Page 614 of 652 Department Updates Parks and Recreation Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Provide inclusive, accessible programming that serves the whole community. Strategic Goal: Programming is Directed to Diverse Users (P&R Strategic Plan Goal), DEI and Economic Vitality MCGs # of Department Community Events 20* 16 20 # of non‐profit permitted Facility Uses 120 60 120 # of program registrations 3,200 2500 3,500 # of program offerings 300 325 320 # of childcare spots filled/offered 1085 /1085 1150 1100 /1100 # of children receiving subsidy 51 CAPSLO 27 City scholarship 44 CAPSLO 27 City scholarship 51 CAPSLO 27 City scholarship In Coordination with Public Works, engage the public to prioritize new and revitalized Recreational Amenities Strategic Goal: Expand Parks & Facilities (P&R Strategic Plan Goal), MCG Economic Stability # of public outreach meetings 6 8 6 # of updated or new parks and amenities in process 4 4 5 Creates and fosters a sense of community through citizen involvement Strategic Goal: Maximize Community Resources & Collaborations (P&R Strategic Plan Goal) # of volunteers/hours 100/400hrs 50/300 hours 400/1200hrs # of temporary Public Art or Cultural Art Events 5 5 5 Leverage technology to engage the community and promote program offerings Strategic Goal: Programming is Directed to Diverse Users (P&R Strategic Plan Goal) # of Instagram followers 6,700 6,260 6,900 # of Facebook followers 4,890 3,890 4,300 # of Virtual Program Offerings 15 1 15 Open Space Preservation and Enhancement Strategic Goal: Nurture Open Space (P&R Strategic Plan Goal), Climate Action MCG # of miles of Open Space trails maintained 61 62 63.5 # of staff hours dedicated to fuel reduction 2,500 1665 2,500 # of encampment site clean‐ups removed from Open Spaces 60 268 60 *The Department held fewer Community Events due to COVID restrictions. Budget Document Pg. 155 Page 615 of 652 Department Updates Police Police Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The Police department is responsible for maintaining a safe city by working in partnership with the community. Goals of the department are to protect life and property, prevent and reduce crime, and improve the quality of life for residents and visitors alike. The department has two bureaus; Administrative Services and Operations. Administrative Services includes the following work divisions: Administration, Investigations, Communications, and Records. The Operations bureau includes Patrol, Traffic Safety, and Neighborhood Outreach. The department plays a supporting role in the following Major City Goals for the 2021-23 Financial Plan: Economic Recovery, Resiliency & Fiscal Sustainability, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, Housing and Homelessness, and Climate Action, Open Space and Sustainable Transportation. A significant achievement in FY 2021-22 has been hiring new employees to fill several department vacancies primarily in dispatch and patrol. Since September 2021, the department has hired fifteen employees in total. The department is not proposing any changes from the Financial Plan and will continue its contribution to the City’s strategic goals and departmental objectives. Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Reduce Crime Strategic Goal: Economic Recovery, Department Mission # of total Part I Crime by year.1 1,825 2,069 (actual for 2021 calendar year) 2,050 Provide safe roadways for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicyclists. # of total traffic collisions.2 Vehicle: 500 Vehicle: 399 Vehicle: 450 Pedestrian: 30 Pedestrian: 32 Pedestrian: 25 Bicycle: 42 Bicycle: 36 Bicycle: 35 1 Part 1 Crimes include: homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, and motor vehicle theft. Figures shown represent calendar year. The increase in Part 1 crime is directly attributed to low crime data in 2020 due to COVID-19, and changes in jail booking and bail policies that reduced the ability of Law Enforcement to book criminals in County Jail. 2 Traffic Collision data is shown by calendar year. 3 Grant funding was capped to only allow 8 traffic enforcement operations in 2021-2022. The initial estimate of 15 operations was based on the funding received in the prior grant year. Budget Document Pg. 156 Page 616 of 652 Department Updates Police Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Strategic Goal: Patrol Objectives, Department Mission # of targeted enforcement operations conducted under the Office of Traffic Safety Grant per year DUI Checkpoints: 2 DUI Checkpoints: 2 DUI Checkpoints: 2 DUI Saturation Patrols: 30 DUI Saturation Patrols: 28 DUI Saturation Patrols: 24 Traffic Enforcement Operations: 15 Traffic Enforcement Operations: 3 8 Traffic Enforcement Operations: 12 Motorcycle Safety Enforcement: 2 Distracted Driving Enforcement: 7 Distracted Driving Enforcement: 10 Bicycle & Pedestrian Enforcement: 6 Bicycle & Pedestrian Enforcement: 5 Bicycle & Pedestrian Enforcement: 6 Reduce Homeless related Calls for Service through proactive engagement. Strategic Goal: Economic Recovery, Department Mission, Patrol Objective # calls related to homelessness 3 7200 7441 7000 # of unique individuals contacted by CAT 600 541 600 # of Family & Agency Reunification 60 27 35 # of Local Permanent Housing 28 18 31 # of major camp cleanups 10 34 4 12 # of Mental Health/Substance Abuse Treatment Referrals 160 124 130 3 All stats related to homelessness are based on calendar year. 4 Total for major clean ups represents data from City Parks and Public Works; all clean ups involved the City contractor 2M. Budget Document Pg. 157 Page 617 of 652 Department Updates Public Works Public Works Department Department Summary and Changes from Financial Plan The mission of the Public Works Department is to preserve and enhance City infrastructure for an accessible, safe, and inclusive community experience. This is accomplished through two focuses: providing safe mobility options and the continued enhancement and maintenance of the City’s infrastructure. The mission of the department is rooted in ensuring a high quality of life, community safety, health, and wellness. Progress toward this goal is illustrated in the department’s performance measures. Staff exceeded most of the FY2021-22 goals despite constraints brought about by the COVID-19 Pandemic and organizational transitions. The CIP Project Engineering program successfully managed the 2021 Downtown Paving project and continued to deliver priority capital projects despite being short-staffed and the recent expansion of the capital budget due to the passage of Measure G20. To expand the capacity of the CIP Project Engineering team, four new positions were approved with the FY2021-22 Mid-Year report. In addition to these positions staff is requesting one more position intended to expand the capacity of the Department’s Transportation Planning and Engineering program to deliver capital projects. This position will take over the supervisory duties related to Signal Maintenance thereby increasing the available time for Transportation Planning and Engineering program to assist with the planning, design and construction of capital projects. Since the onset of the pandemic, staff has continued delivering capital projects, managed the OpenSLO program, and worked on the development of a new permanent program for parklets. Additional staff support is needed to continue these previously mentioned work efforts and adding a maintenance supervisor to assist with Signal Maintenance duties will reduce demands on the Transportation Planning and Engineering Program and provide support for the Signal Maintenance Program. The additional maintenance supervisor is included as an SOBC for Council’s consideration and shown on page 21. Similarly, the Department’s maintenance divisions have continued to perform their primary functions in addition to increased maintenance in the downtown associated with higher use due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the City’s focus on “clean, safe, and beautiful”. To support these efforts, additional positions were approved in the FY2021-22 Mid-Year report to expand the capacity of the Streets and Sidewalk Maintenance division to ensure downtown cleanliness and safety. The maintenance divisions have also been working through supply chain and inflationary issues that have resulted in higher costs and longer lead times than originally anticipated. The Department has sought to offset unforeseen constraints and seize opportunities to ensure the continued pursuit of its mission throughout the first year of the 2021-23 Financial Plan, however, a similar set of circumstances is anticipated in FY2022-23. Performance Measures on next page Budget Document Pg. 158 Page 618 of 652 Department Updates Public Works Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actual 2022-23 Target Proactively enhances traffic safety by providing a system of safe, reliable, and well-maintained roadways, sidewalks, traffic signals and streetlights. MCG: Climate Action Strategic Goal: Enhance Safe & Efficient Transportation (PW Strategic Plan) Pavement Condition Index 74 71(1) 74 Bicycle network in total miles (Class I/II/III/IV)12.4/28.9/24.6/2.1 12.1/29.3/25.0/1.2 14.7/31/24.8/4 Street miles maintained 135 135 137 Enhance the City’s Urban Forest and maintains visually appealing public spaces. MCG: Climate Action Strategic Goal: Proactively Manage Assets (PW Strategic Plan) # of trees maintained 20,250 14,000(2) i 20,500 Total acreage of park inventory 583 585 585 Provide high quality services to the community through efficient and effective delivery of capital improvement projects and management of the City’s infrastructure. MCG: Economic Recovery Strategic Goal: Connect with our Community (PW Strategic Plan) Total value of CIP Managed $59M $66M $64M 1 After pavement maintenance work is completed, the roadway’s PCI increases to approximately 100. The City’s PCI average will increase after completion of this summer’s pavement maintenance project which will be completed in pavement area 5 and 6 which is approximately 20% of the City’s roadways. 2 The Urban Forest Services Program recently complete an audit of the Urban Forest in the Streets and Parks setting. The urban forest number of managed trees has been aligned with maintenance program scope of service. Many trees in the City’s open space have been removed from the Urban Forest Services maintenance metrics as these trees are maintained by the Parks and Recreation Departments Ranger Services Program. Budget Document Pg. 159 Page 619 of 652 Department Updates Utilities Department Utilities Department Performance Measures Performance measures are designed to determine accountability, improve service quality, allocate resources, and evaluate departmental performance in meeting San Luis Obispo’s goals and objectives. Objective Measure 2021-22 Target 2021-22 Projected Actuals 2022-23 Target Manage Assets Responsibly & Transparently Strategic Goal: Public Stewardship Grant and partnership dollars to be obtained to offset rates 1 $4,454,168 $3,304,040 $1,395,000 Minimize number of Customers Shut-Off for Nonpayment 2 500 150 450 Average Infrastructure Asset Age (years)3 20.42 20.1 19.92 Connecting the Community to High Quality & Reliable Service Strategic Goal: Public Service # Unplanned Service Interruptions 4 0 42 5 0 # of Sewer Lateral Replacements including Offsets 100 105 100 Recycled Water Delivered (AF) 300 285 325 Foster Leadership, productivity, and opportunity for personal and professional growth. Strategic Goal: Workforce % of New Hire Safety Trainings Conducted 100%6 100% 100% Provide Coworkers and the Community with Information & Opportunities to Participate in Decisions that Impact them Strategic Goal: Communication Public Outreach : # of Communications with the Community 7 170 251 200 1 Based on reimbursement and disbursement of actual project costs as of April 2022. $1,395,000 was initially expected in FY 2021-22 but due to project timing is expected to be captured in FY 2022-23. 2 Both 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 are artificially low due to the Covid-19 shut-off moratorium. In 2018-2020 (a typical year), there were 533 shut-offs for non-payment. 3 Average asset age from City fixed assets data. This should decrease each year as assets are replaced. 4 Includes water main and service line outages; and sanitary sewer overflows. 5 Average of 53 service interruptions annualy across the past three years. 6 Goal is to have all safety trainings conducted for all new employees within their first three months of employment. 7 Includes Facebook posts, blog posts, email bulletins, groundbreaking event, quarterly project reports, the Resource, website news articles, and bill inserts. Budget Document Pg. 160 Page 620 of 652 Section 10 Appropriation Limit Section 10: Appropriation Limit The City’s appropriation limit is based on the Gann Spending Limit Initiative, a State constitutional amendment adopted by the voters on June 6, 1979 and amended in 1990 with Proposition 111. It is anchored in the State Constitution under Article XIIIB. The limit restricts appropriations from tax revenues by State and local governments. Under its provisions, no local agency can appropriate proceeds of taxes in excess of its “appropriation limit”. Excess funds may be carried over into the next year. However, any excess funds remaining after the second year must be returned to taxpayers by reducing tax rates or fees; a majority of the voters may approve an override to increase the limit. The City’s appropriation limit is calculated by considering population growth and cost of living as allowed under Proposition 111. Appropriation Limit 2022-23 - Calculation Factors Ratio Formula A)Prior Year Appropriation Limit $79,470,558 B) Adjustment Factors 1.Population Change1 0.28% 0.0028 2.Cost of Living Increase 2 7.50% 1.0750 3.Combined Factor 7.79% 1.0779 B1*B2 Adjusted Limit $85,666,375 A*B3 The following summarizes changes in the City’s appropriation limit and appropriations subject to the limit for the past ten years as well as the appropriation limit for 2022-23. A positive variance indicates that the City’s appropriations are lower than the allowable limit. Fiscal Year Limit Base Cost of Living Factor Population Factor Appropriation Limit Appropriations Subject to Limit Variance 2013-14 51,423,500 5.12% 0.52% 54,337,500 40,104,100 14,233,400 2014-15 54,337,500 8.69% 0.09% 59,112,600 36,642,900 22,469,700 2015-16 59,112,600 4.97% 0.78% 62,534,500 46,067,700 16,466,800 2016-17 62,534,500 5.63% 0.60% 66,451,500 49,397,200 17,054,300 2017-18 66,451,500 1.20% 0.92% 67,867,633 50,036,391 17,831,242 2018-19 67,867,633 1.88% 0.35% 69,383,546 51,142,315 18,241,231 2019-20 69,383,546 6.37% 0.24% 73,981,290 50,127,692 23,853,598 2020-21 73,981,290 1.92% -0.04%75,373,410 48,342,410 27,031,416 2021-22 75,373,410 5.11% 0.31% 79,470,558 52,362,031 27,108,458 2022-23 79,470,558 7.50% 0.28% 85,666,375 65,610,162 20,056,213 1 State of California Department of Finance https://dof.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/Forecasting/Demographics/Documents/PriceandPopulation2022.pdf 2 State of California Department of Industrial Relations, Consumer Price Index, January 2021 – January 2022 https://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/CPI/CPICalculator/CpiCalculator.aspx Budget Document Pg. 161 Page 621 of 652 Page 622 of 652 R _____ RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2022 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET WHEREAS, in accordance with San Luis Obispo Charter Section 802, the City Manager has submitted the 2021-23 Financial Plan to the Council for review and consideration consistent with established budget and fiscal policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the 2021-23 Financial Plan on June 1, 2021 and appropriated the budget for 2021 -22; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 804 of the City Charter, the City Council must adopt the 2022-23 Budget by June 30, 2022 in order for the appropriations to be in place when the 2022-23 fiscal year begins on July 1, 2022. WHEREAS, an updated fiscal forecast was presented to Council with the 2021-22 Mid-Year Review and due to significant increases in revenue forecasts, Council took action on February 15, 2022 to appropriate additional funding into the 2021-22 Budget and approved changes to the 2022-23 budget; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved wage and benefit changes for unrepresented and confidential employees on April 19, 2022 to provide competitive compensation in line with the City’s compensation philosophy and has set parameters for the San Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association; and WHEREAS, the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget includes the parameters and compensation changes approved by the Council; and WHEREAS, the City has an Insurance Fund policy that states that within the Insurance Fund, a self-insured retention (SIR) will be set aside to cover expenses associated with claims from the Excess Liability Insurance program and the SIR will be funded based on a 75% confidence level of the previous five -year average claims experience; and WHEREAS, the City has received notification that its required contribution for 2022-23 will be higher than the amount adopted with the 2021-23 Financial Plan; and WHEREAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative on November 6, 1979 and Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990, which establish and define annual appropriation limits on state and local governmen t agencies; and WHEREAS, regulations require that the governing body of each local agency establish its appropriations limit and annual factors by resolution. Page 623 of 652 Resolution No. ____ (2022 Series) Page 2 R _____ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The 2022-23 Financial Plan Supplement and budget is hereby approved and that the operating, debt service, and capital improvement plan budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023 is hereby appropriated as presented in the 2021-23 Financial Plan Supplement – 2022-23 Budget. SECTION 2. The additional required contribution for 2022-23 above what was adopted in the Financial Plan will be covered by the Insurance Fund Balance. Page 624 of 652 Resolution No. ____ (2022 Series) Page 3 R _____ SECTION 3. The City’s appropriation limit and annual adjustment factors for fiscal year 2022-23 are adopted as follows: On motion of ___________________, seconded by _______________________, and on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted on ___________, 2022. ______________________________ Mayor Erica A. Stewart ATTEST: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk APPROVED: J. Christine Dietrick, City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ________________________________ Teresa Purrington, City Clerk Appropriations Limit 2021-22 $79,470,558 Consumer Price Index 7.50% Population Factor: County Population Growth 0.28% Compounded Percentage Factor (multiplicative not additive) 1.025% Appropriations Limit 2022-23 $85,666,375 Page 625 of 652 Page 626 of 652 ARPA Funds – Ad Hoc Subcommittee Wednesday, March 21, 2022 Council Hearing Room 4:30 to 5:30 pm Subcommittee: Mayor Stewart, Councilmember Shoresman Staff: Derek Johnson, Brigitte Elke, Michael Codron Agenda Items 1.American Rescue Plan Act – A brief review and Council action to-date 15 min 2.Funding options and uses under Final Rule 30 min 3.Review of timeline for adoption with the 2022-23 Financial Plan Supplement 5 min 4.Next steps 10 min Attachment C Page 627 of 652 ARPA Funds – Ad Hoc Subcommittee Wednesday, April 20, 2022 Council Hearing Room 5:15 to 6:15 pm Subcommittee: Mayor Stewart, Councilmember Shoresman Staff: Derek Johnson, Brigitte Elke, Miguel Guardado Agenda Items On March 21, 2022, the subcommittee met to review the opportunities afforded under the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) to consider allocation of $1.5 million in available funds. The subcommittee members wanted to receive additional information on two topics: 1. Broadband coverage and possible investments 30 min This agenda contains the information provided via an email on March 23, 2022. Staff will present additional information including maps, coverage, and economic information during the meeting. 2. Premium Pay 30 min Attached is a summary of the responses received from the California Cities list serve for fiscal officers. Staff will be available to address any questions. Page 628 of 652 ARPA Funds – Ad Hoc Subcommittee Broadband Infrastructure & High-Speed Conduit Short-term – Start the conversation and assess the need •We take as a base layer our existing map of city-owned and Digital West communication and fiber conduits (map that Derek shared). •We contact Charter and AT&T and ask if they can share their high-speed internet coverage maps within the City of SLO and add them as layers on top of our map. •The city GIS team will create a layer utilizing American Community Survey data. Long-term – Solidify processes and policies to achieve success •Conduct a Broadband and Policy Study to develop a plan. Once we have the above short-term information, IT will be able to identify areas where we might have pockets of unserved families based on economic indicators. Additionally, based on the analysis of the data collected, staff will locate proximity level of effort to extend our existing infrastructure into those areas. If we cannot attain the coverage information from Spectrum and AT&T, one can speculate that Spectrum has our City well covered with high-speed internet connectivity. From what we can tell, AT&T’s fiber roll-out is limited and they primarily still offer DSL services. Why this approach? A study would identify which areas of the City of San Luis Obispo qualify as unserved and underserved Internet Communities. We know there is a lack of competition for actual high- speed internet. Those not able to pay the higher prices of good reliable internet service may qualify as unserved or underserved in our community. As defined by the FCC, high-speed internet is anything over 25 megabytes per second (MBps) download and 3 MBps upload. Conversations are happening at the federal level to revisit what is actual high-speed internet. Many families struggled with this level of bandwidth during the pandemic and the FCC is considering modifying the definition to be 100 MBps download and 20 MBps upload. Why use American Community Survey data? The most recent decennial census consisted of a short form, which included basic questions about age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship, and owner/renter status. After the 2000 Census, the long-form became the ACS, and this survey continues to collect long-form- type information each year. The ACS data includes the basic short-form questions and detailed questions about population and housing characteristics. The 2020 ACS data was originally planned for a December 2021 release, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the data was just released on March 17th, 2022. Information gathered is: •Potential ACS Variables useful for San Luis Obispo •Computer & Internet Usage •Food Stamp/Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program •Poverty Status of Households Page 629 of 652 •Rent asked •Educational Attainment •Income in past 12 months •Occupation status (employed or not) Our ability to plot this information on a map would provide information on where to concentrate our effort of conduit and fiber optic cable build-out. This is important as we currently have only focused on a partnership with Digital West. Our existing partnership could be leveraged to help us reach and provide affordable internet to unserved and underserved residents. Digital West is now part of Wave Communications, and they offer an affordable internet package. Expanded City conduit and fiber infrastructure might also entice other players to partner with the City, increasing resident choice, particularly for unserved and underserved residents. I would recommend setting aside $500,000 of ARPA funds to begin the implementation of conduit and fiber once unserved and underserved neighborhoods are identified by either our internal analysis or that of the overall broadband study. In parallel we can cross reference existing city projects with areas identified as unserved and underserved. Where there is a nexus, we can utilize ARPA funding to install conduit. Installing conduit alongside planned projects greatly reduces the cost of installation. Why conduct a City broadband study? Conducting a broadband and policy study will create a broadband master plan which will guide the City over the next ten years with a defined process and set of policies for installing conduit and fiber across the City for future services. We do not have the expertise or resources in-house to conduct this ourselves. The current market model is not working as telecoms and internet service providers are unwilling to commit the capital resources to expand their existing networks. Cities have been able to fill this gap by expanding conduit and fiber infrastructure throughout their communities, which they can then lease back to private companies to run the networks. A broadband study would take seven to nine months to complete and has an estimated cost of $100,000. Page 630 of 652 ARPA Funds – Ad Hoc Subcommittee State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Premium Pay American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Local Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used to provide premium pay to eligible workers performing essential work during the COVID -19 public health emergency or to provide grants to third-party employers with eligible workers performing essential work. These are workers who have been and continue to be relied on to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infrastructure sectors, including those who are critical to protecting the health and wellbeing of their communities. Workers who are covered by premium pay include: •Staff at nursing homes, hospitals, and home care settings; •Workers at farms, food production facilities, grocery stores, and restaurants; •Janitors and sanitation workers; •Truck drivers, transit staff, and warehouse workers; •Public health and safety staff; •Childcare workers, educators, and other school staff; and •Social service and human services staff. The Final Rule defines essential work as work involving regular in-person interactions or regular physical handling of items that were also handled by others. A worker would not be engaged in essential work and, accordingly, may not receive premium pay, for telework performed from a residence. The table on the second page reflects the data received from the Cal Cities list serve for fiscal officers. Further information on the administration of pay provided to grocers and pharmacy are provided following the table. The list serve request garnered interest and several entities requested to receive the information including Cal Cities itself as many jurisdictions are still reviewing their options. We also wanted to provide the subcommittee with information regarding the City’s appreciation pay given to each employee and the average corresponding dollar amount it represents: Supplemental $ 522.31 Police $ 1,422.41 Management $ 1,530.00 Fire $ 1,326.84 SLOCEA $ 914.17 Confidential $ 739.82 Page 631 of 652 City PP Y/N Approach Victorville N used for city buildings Fremont N all revenue loss Mill Valley N no additional information given Hawaiian Gardens N no additional information given Arroyo Grande N no additional information given Brawley Y Lump sum for all employees / $2,500 and $1,000 respectively Ridgecrest Y $1,000 FTE / $500 part-time (no salary increases since 2008) La Mesa Y first round: $2,500 per FTE / $1,000 for part-time second round: $500 stipend / additional $500 if proof of full vaccination status is provided per CDC guidelines. Alhambra Y 7% of base salary Santa Maria Y $10,000 / all employees / all employees were back after an initial 2 weeks. Oxnard Y Grocery/Pharmacy - $1,000 if worked at least 3 months during the first 12 months of the pandemic – see detail below. Port Hueneme Y Grocery/Pharmacy - $1,000 if worked at least 3 months during the first 12 months of the pandemic Suisun City Y $6/hr to Police & Fire / $4/hr to safety dispatchers / $2/hr to other non-safety employees Chico Y $4,000 non-safety / $6,000 safety - overall $1.8 million Town of Fort Jones Y $2,000 per full time employee in each 2021 and 2022 (total $4,000) Exeter Y $10,000 each employee from Revenue Loss / received $2.5 million overall Waterford Y $15,000 for each of their 20 employees. All were at work from day one. Hollister considering lump sum Hawthorne considering $1,000 to $2,000 per employee San Marino considering as part of negotiations Oxnard Program Administration They defined eligible employees as anybody who worked a minimum of three consecutive months during the time from March 2020 to March 2021 to receive $1,000. It did not matter whether the person worked three or twelve months as they did not prorate the amount. They used their business license database to determine the stores and 70 were deemed eligible for the program. They first intended to establish a portal for employees to sign up. Ultimately, they were Page 632 of 652 able to work with the grocers and pharmacies to facilitate the program. Large grocers and drug stores (Vons, Ralphs, Costco, CVS etc.) – 20 in total They entered into sub-recipient agreements and sent one check to each business for dissemination to their employees. They will have to report to the city in accordance with U.S. Treasury requirements, so Oxnard can in turn report out to Treasury. Small independent shops – 50 in total The owners of the stores provided the list of eligible employees and communicated with their staff as to the program and required steps to receive the pay. Employees had to sign in via a city-established portal and confirm eligibility and provide contact information. Each employee then received the payment directly via check. They do not yet have a final tally since the program is ongoing. They did not work through the unions as they did not want them to have an opportunity to “market” membership. Page 633 of 652 Pharmacy Address Type C V S/Pharmacy #17619 11990 LOS OSOS VALLEY RD Chain Costco Wholesale #741 1540 FROOM RANCH WAY Chain CVS Pharmacy #9662 3960 BROAD ST Chain CVS/Pharmacy #9345 717 MARSH ST Chain CVS/Pharmacy #9873 1300 MADONNA RD Chain Von's #2306 3900 BROAD ST Chain Pharmerica Drug Systems, LLC 873 RICARDO CT Chain Rite Aid #05820 1251 JOHNSON AVE Chain Rite Aid #5822 765 E FOOTHILL BLVD Chain Img Rx Slo, Inc. 77 CASA ST STE 205 Local Integrated Health Concepts, Inc. 720 AEROVISTA PL STE B & D Local Grocery Address Type California Fresh Brands Slo, LLC 771 E FOOTHILL BLVD Chain Grocery Outlet Of San Luis Obispo 1314 MADONNA RD Chain Lassens Natural Food & Vitamins LLC 896 E FOOTHILL BLVD Chain Sprouts Farmers Market 313 MADONNA RD STE A Chain Trader Joes Company #41 3977 S HIGUERA ST Chain Whole Foods Market 1531 FROOM RANCH WAY Chain Smart & Final #913 1321 JOHNSON AVE Chain PAQ, Inc. (Food 4 Less) 3985 S HIGUERA ST Chain Ralphs #656 201 MADONNA RD Chain San Luis Oriental Market 1255 MONTEREY ST STE C Local Natural Foods Co-op Of Slo 2494 VICTORIA AVE Local SLO Veg 225 TANK FARM RD STE A4 Local Market Address Type Cost Plus World Market 325 MADONNA RD #47 Chain Target Store T-2759 11990 LOS OSOS VALLEY RD Chain Gus's Grocery 1638 OSOS ST Local Lincoln Market And Deli 496 BROAD ST Local Sidewalk Market & Deli 1401 OSOS ST STE A Local Liquor Store Address Type 7-ELEVEN #2133-27835D 692 MARSH ST Chain 7-Eleven #25115B 552 CALIFORNIA BLVD STE A Chain Beverages & More, Inc. 1502 FROOM RANCH WAY Chain Cork 'n Bottle Liquor 774 E FOOTHILL BLVD Chain SLO Beverage N More, Inc. 158 HIGUERA ST STE E Local Campus Bottle Shop 290 CALIFORNIA BLVD Local Laurel Lane Market and Liquor 1291 LAUREL LN Local Sandy's Deli & Liquor, Inc. 586 HIGUERA ST Local Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting - April 27, 2022 Page 634 of 652 Oxnard Program: Total program funding available: $2.5 million Do you have a cut-off date for people to request the pay? Yes. For both categories, it was 30 days once they had the basics ironed out and needed either the return of the subrecipient agreement or employees self-attesting through the portal. The portal was shut down after 30 days. Was there a requirement that employees live in Oxnard or do most of them live in your jurisdiction anyway? No, since all of them served Oxnard residents regardless of where they themselves lived. Did you apply any administrative cost as allowable under final rule? No, they don’t ever recover admin cost; not even for other grants. How many employees will receive the pay and how many do you expect to pay directly? They estimate about 450 direct checks will be issued. They do not know the final tally yet for the direct payments. However, they have 20 chain stores. Do you have any idea about the time investment from the city organization? The largest investment is in getting the program up and running, contacting the organizations, and receiving the employee information. Also, the development of the subrecipient agreements and the execution thereof was time consuming. What was the cost for the development of the portal? They used a Google form therefore it was important to only have mailing information to confirm since this is not a secure environment. Hence the collaboration of the stores and store owners is essential to receive the base data and contact information. Page 635 of 652 Page 636 of 652 R _____ RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2022 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF $13,564,467 IN STATE & LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE U.S. TREASURY FINAL RULE WHEREAS, in March 2021, the U.S. Congress approved the American Rescue Plan act with $1.9 trillion in funding; and WHEREAS, the State & Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, dedicated to aiding state, county, and local governments in counteracting the effects of COVID-19, received $350 million in funding; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo was appropriated $13,564,467 of which it has received $6,782,234 in July 2021 and will receive the remaining $6,782,234 in July 2022; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo experienced tremendous revenue loss in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, the City invested heavily to support the community and businesses through the pandemic and recover from the effects of the lock-down; and WHEREAS, the City desires to support the population most affected by the pandemic with housing; and WHEREAS, the pandemic has shown that the City does not have even access to broadband and high-speed internet throughout the community, putting certain areas at a disadvantage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The City will claim the, under Final Rule allowable, $10 million in revenue loss and dedicate the funding as follows: 1. $9.9 million toward the City’s infrastructure investment fund to backfill high-priority infrastructure and to counteract adverse trends and unforeseen circumstances brought on by the pandemic. 2. $100,000 for grants to health & human services programs/projects via the HRC grants-in-aid program. SECTION 2. The City will invest the remaining $3,564,467 in accordance with the U.S. Treasury Final Rule as follows: Page 637 of 652 Resolution No. ____ (2022 Series) Page 2 R _____ 1. $600,000 to study and improve the broadband coverage in San Luis Obispo. 2. $2,964,467 toward affordable housing for at-risk population or very low to extremely low-income classes most impacted by Covid-19. On motion of ___________________, seconded by _______________________, and on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted on ___________, 202 2. ______________________________ Mayor Erica A. Stewart ATTEST: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk APPROVED: J. Christine Dietrick, City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ________________________________ Teresa Purrington, City Clerk Page 638 of 652 O ______ ORDINANCE NO. ____ (2022 SERIES) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 52 (PARKING METERS), OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, California State law provides, in Vehicle Code Section 22508, that cities must establish parking meter and parking payment center rates by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the parking program needs to continue to be self-sufficient for its financial commitments; and WHEREAS, to address the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic to the downtown business community, the parking program suspended collection of revenues, deferred parking rate increases, and used reserve funding to maintain parking operations during the pandemic; and WHEREAS, the parking program is pursuing a loan for the construction of a fourth public parking structure; and WHEREAS, the fourth public parking structure represents a significant financ ial investment that requires an increase to established hourly rates before construction of the new structure commences; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the parking revenue enhancement strategies presented as part of the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget staff report and held a public meeting which included review and discussion of the proposed changes to the paid parking rates; and WHEREAS, the adoption and implementation of these paid parking rates are necessary to offset the construction costs of the new public parking structure and to maintain the fiscal solvency of the Parking Enterprise Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Section 10.52.010 (Paid Parking zone - Rates) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: 10.52.010 Paid Parking zone—Rates. A. Within the area enclosed by a solid line on the parking rate zone map (Exhibit A) the parking of vehicles on streets or in municipal parking lots may be control led and regulated with the aid of parking meters as defined in section 10.04.110 and/or parking payment centers as defined in section 10.04.120. Page 639 of 652 Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 2 O ______ B. Within the dotted area designated on the parking rate zones map (Exhibit A) the base rate for parking on streets or in municipal parking lots in the lower rate zone shall be one dollar and twenty-five cents per hour effective July 1, 2021. B. C. Within the cross-hatched area designated on the parking rate zones map (Exhibit A) the base rate for parking meters on streets or in municipal parking lots shall be one dollar and fifty cents per hour effective January 2, 2023. The rate in this area shall increase to three dollars per hour effective July 1, 2023. C. D. Within the grey-shaded area designated on the parking rate zones map (Exhibit A), the base rate for parking meters on streets or in municipal lots shall be two dollars effective January 2, 2023. The rate in this area shall increase to four dollars per hour effective July 1, 2023. The rate in this area shall increase to five dollars per hour effective July 1, 2025. D. E. The tier-based parking rates, which allow a customer to extend their parking session beyond the posted number of hours, are as follows: 1. Tier 1: The base hourly rate per rate zone 2. Tier 2: The Tier 2 rate is effective for one additional hour beyond the Tier 1 time and is 50% above the Tier 1 rate rounded up or down to the nearest twenty- five cent increment whichever is closer. 3. Tier 3: The Tier 3 rate is effective after expiration of the Tier 2 hour(s) and is 50% above the Tier 2 rate rounded up or down to the nearest twenty -five cent increment whichever is closer. E. F. Signage for the tier-based parking rates reflects the number of hours a vehicle may park at the base hourly parking rate (Tier 1) before subsequent tiered rates take effect. 1. 1+ parking rate: Parking up to one hour at the base hourly parking rate before Tier 2 is in effect. 2. 2+ parking rate: Parking up to two hours at the base hourly parking rate before Tier 2 is in effect. 3. 3+ parking rate: Parking up to three hours at the base hourly parking rate before Tier 2 is in effect. 4. 4+ parking rate: Parking up to four hours at the base hourly parking rate before Tier 2 is in effect. F. G. The Public Works Director may periodically adjust the hourly parking rates on any block or set of blocks within the areas designated on the parking rate zones map (Exhibit A) during the time of operation as detailed in section 10.52.020 up to and including 120% of the effective hourly rate based on the observed occupancy. Hourly parking rates shall be adjusted not more than every 30 days. Page 640 of 652 Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 3 O ______ (Ord. 1683 § 1 (Exhs. A, B), 2020: Ord. 1635 § 1 (Exh s. A, B), 2017: Ord. 1620 § 1 (Exh. A), 2015; Ord. 1568 § 1, 2011: Ord. 1552 § 2, 2010; Ord. 1532 § 2, 2009; Ord. 1492 § 1, 2006: Ord. 1233 § 1, 1993: Ord. 1194 § 1, 1991: Ord. 1099 § 1, 1987: prior code § 3213) SECTION 2. Severability. If any subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforcement of the remaining portions of this ordinance, or any other provisions of the city' s rules and regulations. It is the city' s express intent that each remaining portion would have been adopted irrespective of the fact that any one or more subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unenforceable. SECTION 3. Environmental Determination. These amendments to Title 10 Chapter 52 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code do not constitute a “Project” under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sec. 15378. Page 641 of 652 Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 4 O ______ SECTION 4. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in The New Times, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the ____ day of ______, 2022, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the ____ day of ____, 2022, on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ________________________________ Mayor Erica A. Stewart ATTEST: ______________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk Page 642 of 652 Ordinance No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 5 O ______ Exhibit A Page 643 of 652 Page 644 of 652 R ______ RESOLUTION NO. ______ (2022 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING RATES FOR THE CITY’S PARKING STRUCTURES WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo wishes to maintain effective usage of its public parking structures; and WHEREAS, the parking fund needs to continue to be self-sufficient for its financial commitments; and WHEREAS, to address the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic to the downtown business community, the parking program suspended collection of revenues, deferred parking rate increases, and used reserve funding to maintain parking operations during the pandemic; and WHEREAS, the parking program is pursuing a loan for the construction of a fourth public parking structure; and WHEREAS, the fourth public parking structure represents a significant financial investment that requires an increase to established rates before constru ction of the new structure commences; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the parking revenue enhancement strategies presented as part of the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget staff report and held a public meeting which included review and discussion of the proposed changes to the parking structures rates; and WHEREAS, the adoption and implementation of these paid parking rates are necessary to offset the construction costs of the new parking structures and to maintain fiscal solvency of the Parking Enterprise Fund; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Fee Schedule will be updated to reflect all new and updated fees becoming effective July 1, 2023. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. As approved by City Council in Resolution No. 11252 (Series 2021), effective July 1, 2022, the first sixty minutes of parking in the City’s parking structures free of charge shall be eliminated. A fifteen minute grace period shall be provided upon entry into all parking structures before the hourly parking structure rates apply. SECTION 2. Effective July 1, 2023, all hourly parking structure rates shall increase to $3.00 an hour, including Sundays. Page 645 of 652 Resolution No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 2 R ______ SECTION 3. Effective July 1, 2023, the maximum daily parking structure rate shall be to $12.00 per day. Daily parking is considered any entry after 12:00 AM and corresponding exit by the same vehicle before 12:00 AM within the same day. SECTION 4. Effective July 1, 2023, the rate for lost tickets in the parking structures shall be $12.00 per ticket, including Sundays. SECTION 5. Effective July 1, 2023, the overnight parking structure rate shall be $15.00 per day. Overnight parking is considered any entry before 12:00 AM by a vehicle on a given day and corresponding exit after 12:00 AM by the same vehicle on a different given day. SECTION 6. Effective July 1, 2023, the hourly validation program parking structure rate shall be $2.00 per hour. Page 646 of 652 Resolution No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 3 R ______ SECTION 7. Environmental Determination. The establishment of parking structures rates and fees do not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. Upon motion of ___________________, seconded by_____________________, and on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this ____ day of ___________, 2022. ___________________________ Mayor Erica A. Stewart ATTEST: _____________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ________________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk Page 647 of 652 Page 648 of 652 R _____ RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2022 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE PARKING CITATION PENALTY SCHEDULE WHEREAS, State law provides, in Vehicle Code Section 40203.5, that cities shall establish the amount of parking penalties, fees, and surcharges; and WHEREAS, State law authorizes the City to recover administrative fees, parking penalties, fees and collection costs related to civil debt collection, late payment penalties, and other related charges; and WHEREAS, the parking program establishes parking penalties that are, to the extent possible, similar to parking penalties adopted by other issuing agencies within the county; and WHEREAS, Government Finance Officers Association best management practice for fines and penalties recommend that fines and penalties be regularly reviewed and updated and at a minimum every five years; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide safe, secure, and convenient parking for all users of the City’s parking facilities; and WHEREAS, the parking program establishes parking penalties that are proportional to the violation in an effort to deter certain parking behaviors; and WHEREAS, parking citation fine amounts listed in Section 1 below are out of date and no longer are effective at deterring certain behaviors; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the parking revenue enhancement strategies presented as part of the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget staff report and held a public meeting which included review and discussion of the proposed changes to the parking citation penalty schedule. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Effective July 1, 2022, the City’s parking citation penalty schedule shall be modified as set forth below and as reflected in Exhibit A: 1. Increase unlawful to park after session is expired violation (SLOMC 10.52.050) from $40 to $45; and 2. Increase no standing, stopping, or parking within intersection violation (CVC 22500(a)) from $40 to $60; and 3. Increase no standing, stopping, or parking on the roadside of a vehicle stopped, parked, or standing at the curb violation (CVC 22500(h)) from $33 to $60. Page 649 of 652 Resolution No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 2 R ______ SECTION 2. Environmental Determination. The establishment of parking structures rates and fees do not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. Upon motion of ___________________, seconded by_____________________ and on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this ____ day of ___________, 2022. __________________________ Mayor Erica A. Stewart ATTEST: _____________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk Page 650 of 652 Resolution No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 3 R ______ EXHIBIT A CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2022 CODE & SECTION DESCRIPTION CURRENT PENALTY PROPOSED PENALTY PROPOSED PENALTY & LATE FEE SLMC 10.12.050 INTERFERENCE WITH POLICE/AUTHORIZED OFFICER 93 93 123 SLMC 10.14.030 OBEDIENCE TO TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 58 58 88 SLMC 10.14.090 UNAUTHORIZED PAINTING ON CURBS 58 58 88 SLMC 10.34.020 OVERNIGHT CAMPING (10pm - 6 am)100 100 130 SLMC 10.36.020 STOPPING OR STANDING IN PARKWAYS PROHIBITED 40 40 70 SLMC 10.36.030 STOP/STAND/PARK IN VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 33 33 63 SLMC 10.36.040 NO PARKING ZONE - PROHIBITED PARKING - Also Taxi Zone (d)60 60 90 SLMC 10.36.050 USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES PROHIBITED 75 75 105 SLMC 10.36.070 REPAIRING OR GREASING VEHICLE ON PUBLIC STREET 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.080 WASHING OR POLISHING VEHICLES 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.090 PARKING ADJACENT TO SCHOOLS 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.100 PARKING PROHIBITED ON NARROW STREETS 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.110 PARKING ON GRADES 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.120 UNLAWFUL PARKING - PEDDLERS, VENDORS 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.130 EMERGENCY PARKING SIGNS 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.140 LARGE/COMMERCIAL VEHICLE PARKING NEAR INTERSECTION 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.150 NIGHT TIME PARKING OF LARGE VEHICLES 33 33 63 SLMC 10.36.160 NIGHT TIME PARKING OF VEH/OPERATING AIR/REFRGERATION 23 23 53 SLMC 10.36.200 PARKING IN A RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA 40 40 70 SLMC 10.36.230 PERMITS - DISPLAY OF PERMITS 28 28 58 SLMC 10.36.235 NO PERMIT LOT 45 45 75 SLMC 10.40.010 TIMED PARKING 10 MINUTES TO 10 HOURS (Overtime Parking)50 50 80 SLMC 10.40.020 BACKING INTO PARKING SPACE PROHIBITED 40 40 70 SLMC 10.40.040 PARKING PARALLEL ON ONE-WAY STREETS 21 21 51 SLMC 10.40.050 DIAGONAL PARKING 21 21 51 SLMC 10.40.060 PARKING SPACE MARKINGS 45 45 75 SLMC 10.40.070 NO STOPPING ZONE 21 21 51 SLMC 10.40.080 ALL NIGHT PARKING PROHIBITED (3-5am)38 38 68 SLMC 10.44.020 CURB MARKINGS TO INDICATE NO STOPPING 23 23 53 SLMC 10.44.030 EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOAD/UNLOAD IN YELLOW ZONE 53 53 83 SLMC 10.44.040 EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOAD/UNLOAD IN WHITE ZONE 40 40 70 SLMC 10.44.050 STANDING IN ANY ALLEY 33 33 63 SLMC 10.44.070 DISABLED PARKING 338 338 368 SLMC 10.48.010 CERTAIN VEHICLES PROHIBITED IN CENTRAL DISTRICT 58 58 88 SLMC 10.48.020 ADVERTISING VEHICLES 33 33 63 SLMC 10.48.030 ANIMAL DRAWN VEHICLES 33 33 63 SLMC 10.48.040 TRUCK ROUTES 88 88 118 SLMC 10.48.050 COMM VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING CERTAIN STREETS 88 88 118 SLMC 10.48.060 MAX.GROSS WT LIMITS OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN STREETS 88 88 118 SLMC 10.52.040 PARKING METER-OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES 23 23 53 SLMC 10.52.050 UNLAWFUL TO PARK AFTER METER TIME HAS EXPIRED 40 45 75 SLMC 10.52.070 IMPROPER USE OF METER 15 15 45 SLMC 10.52.080 PARKING METERS/STANDARDS PROPER USE 15 15 45 SLMC 10.52.110 MOTORCYCLE SPACES 15 15 45 Page 651 of 652 Resolution No. _____ (2022 Series) Page 4 R ______ CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2022 CODE & SECTION DESCRIPTION CURRENT PENALTY PROPOSED PENALTY PROPOSED PENALTY & LATE FEE CVC 21113(a)VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS-MOVING 116 116 146 CVC 21113(b)VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS-PARKING 33 33 63 CVC 21113(c)DRIVEWAYS, PATHS, PARKING FACILITIES ON GROUNDS 33 33 63 CVC 21211(a)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING CLASS I BIKE PATH 60 60 90 CVC 21211(b)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING CLASS II BIKE PATH 60 60 90 CVC 22500(a)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: WITHIN INTERSECTION 40 60 90 CVC 22500(b)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ON A CROSSWALK 60 60 90 CVC 22500(c)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: BETWEEN SAFETY ZONE 60 60 90 CVC 22500(d)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: W/IN 15' FIREHOUSE ENTRANCE 60 60 90 CVC 22500(e)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: PUBLIC/PRIVATE DRIVEWAY 40 40 70 CVC 22500(f)STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ON SIDEWALK 40 40 70 CVC 22500(g)STOPPING/STANDIN/PARKING: ALONG OPPOSITE OBSTRUCT 33 33 63 CVC 22500(h)STOPPING/STANDIN/PARKING: ON ROADWAY SIDE OF VEHICLE 33 60 90 CVC 22500(i)IMPROPER PARKING IN BUS ZONE 288 288 318 CVC 22500(j)STOPPING/STANDIN/PARKING: IN TUBE OR TUNNEL 33 33 63 CVC 22500(k)STOPPING/STANDIN/PARKING: UPON BRIDGE EXCEPT AUTH 33 33 63 CVC 22500(l)IMPROPER PARKING IN WHEELCHAIR ACCESS 288 288 318 CVC 22500.1 STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: FIRE LANE 120 120 150 CVC 22502(a)CURB PARKING -RIGHT WHEELS MORE THAN 18 INCHES FROM CURB 40 40 70 CVC 22502(b)(2)PARKING OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 40 40 70 CVC 22502(e)CURB PARKING -LEFT WHEELS MORE THAN 18 INCHES FROM CURB 40 40 70 CVC 22504(a)UNINCORPORATED AREA PARKING 33 33 63 CVC 22505(a)PARKING ON HIGHWAY WHERE SIGN POSTED 33 33 63 CVC 22505(b)POSTED NO PARKING - STATE HIGHWAY 33 33 63 CVC 22507 UNLAWFUL PARKING 33 33 63 CVC 22507.8 (a)PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED 338 338 368 CVC 22507.8 (b)PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED - OBSTRUCT/BLOCK 338 338 368 CVC 22507.8 (c)(1)PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED - ON LINES MARKED 338 338 368 CVC 22507.8 (c)(2)PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED - CROSSHATCHED LINES 338 338 368 CVC 22511.1 (a)UNLAWFULL TO PARK UNLESS EV CHARGING 45 45 75 CVC 22511.7 DISABLED ZONE 338 338 368 CVC 22512 VEHICLED UNATTENDED 116 116 146 CVC 22513 TOW CARS-PARKING FREEWAY 33 33 63 CVC 22514 FIRE HYDRANTS 70 70 100 CVC 22515(a)UNATTENDED VEHICLES-SET BRAKE 33 33 63 CVC 22515(b)UNATTENDED VEHICLES-SET BRAKE MOVING 33 33 63 CVC 22516 LOCKED VEHICLE 116 116 146 CVC 22517 OPENING AND CLOSING DOORS 116 116 146 CVC 22520.5 VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT OF WAY 116 116 146 CVC 22520.5(a)VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT OF WAY 116 116 146 CVC 22521 ILLEGAL TO PARK ON RR TRACKS 33 33 63 CVC 22522 PARKING NEAR SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMPS 288 288 318 CVC 22523(a)VEHICLE ABANDONMENT- On Highway 283 283 313 CVC 22523(b)VEHICLE ABANDONMENT 283 283 313 CVC 22650 UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF UNATTENDED VEHICLE 116 116 146 CVC 40225*PROCESSING OTHER VEHICLES *10 CVC 40226*FAILURE TO DISPLAY DISABLED PLACARD ADMIN FEE *25 CVC 5204(a)*CURRENT TAB IMPROPERLY ATTACHED *25 LATE PAYMENT PENALTY 30 *Fine or fee amounts are set by the Uniform Bail & Penalty Schedule or by specific CVC section All other fine amounts set by City Council pursuant to CVC 40203.5 Page 652 of 652 1010 Marsh St., San Luis Obi: (805) 546-8208 . FAX (W PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P,) S'TATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Luis Obispo, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the New Times, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published weekly in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, and which has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, under the date of February 5, 1993, Case number CV72789: that notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: in the year 2022 I certify (or declare) under the the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at San Luis Obispo, California, this day 2 Cz of —ZI-1�2022. Patricia Horton, N•tu Times Legals 'e-A eo RECEIVED MAY 3I 2022 S;* 0 CITY CLERKJ A,6in :l p... o .W.M1 1 MG A,(.,m/*rf MC Olfic011USNlESS/11ublic :Joriusinrnor of put• Proof o —T;. SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCII NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The San Luis Obispo City Council invites all intereste parsons la attend a public hearing on Tuesday, June 7 2022 all 6:00 P.M. held in flte Council Chambers at Cil Hall, 900 Palm Street, San Luis Ohispo. Please note Iha loom participation will not he supported, as this will 61 an in•Persan meeting. Meetings can be viewed ramotell on Govornmenl Access Chanool 20 or streamed live iron the City's You7ube channel at I i . Public comment prior to the start of the meeting, may be subminar in writing via U.S. Mall delivered to the City Clerk's office n1 9W Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 9340€ or by email to email uni�1 cIIY49. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: The City Council will consider adopting the 2022-23 Supplemental Budget. Per the City Charter, Articiti XIII, Section 602, the City Council must appropriate a budget for the upcoming fiscal year by July 1 st. The City's budget policy allows for ;I two-year budget to be adopted. However, the appropriation of funding is only given for one fiscal year, necessitating an annual budget hearing for subsequent appropriation. Consistent with the City's two-year budgetary process, the 2022-23 Budget presented for adoption was prepared using the adopted 2021-23 Financial Plan as its foundation. However, unlike n typical budget cycle, the City's fiscal forecast changed so drastically after initial adoption In June 2021 that Council adopted changes to the 2021-22 as well as the 2022-23 budget with the Mid -year Review on February 15, 2022. Forrnore faiforrnatiar+ contact Natalia Harnafr, Pni10051 Sudgirt Anal€ f; far the City's Finance OepantnBntar (805J 781-7128 or by email, rflrafnelwociryorg, A public hearing to introduce an Ordinance amending Title 10, Chapter 52 (Parking Meters), of the Municipal Code to modify the on -street and surface parking hourly rates and establish paid parking in the upper Monterey Street area. This item also includes two proposed Resolutions to: I1 establish parking rates for the City's Parking Structures, which will go into effect on July 1, 2023, and 2) approve modifications to the Parking Citation Penalty Schedule to increase fine amounts for three different parking violations (expired parking session, parking within an intersection, and parking .i roadside of vehicle). For RIM iftfamtabon, conracr Alpxander Fuclls Perking SaNisas supemsai, for file Clty's parking Aivision attW)l781.75M a byemag afuchsawocrfyurp. H1e City Council may also discuss aliter hearings or )usiness hems before or after the Items listed above. If you :holie nge the proposed project in court, you may ba Nnitmr ❑ raising only those issues You or someone also raised at he public hearing described in this notico, or in written wraspondencc daliveredto the City Ccunc11 at. or prinrto, ha public hooring. :ouncil Agenda Reports for ?Iris meeting will be available ar raview ono weak in advance of the meating date on to City's website, under the Public Meeting Agendas web age: t13IpS16nn7S48ilty,D1g[ Please cell the City lerkrs Office sl {gflyj 781 7100 for more information. The ity Council maeting will be televised live on Chahar Cabo ha Final20 and five sltesming an the City's YouTube channel W4tUWk 21e,ci r. lay 26, 2022