Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 5g. Resolution in Support of Reproductive Freedom Item 5g Department: Administration Cost Center: 1001 For Agenda of: 7/5/2022 Placement: Consent Estimated Time: N/A FROM: Derek Johnson, City Manager Prepared By: Hans Poschman, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM RECOMMENDATION Consider adoption of Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, affirming support of reproductive freedom.” POLICY CONTEXT The resolution is consistent with the City’s Major City Goal of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion as laws limiting reproductive freedom disproportionately impact low-income women, survivors of sexual assault the trans and nonbinary community, Black, Latinx, Indigenous and other people of color. A majority of Council Members requested to staff that this item be placed on the agenda. DISCUSSION Background On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 959), a constitutional challenge to a Texas statute that criminalized the termination of a pregnancy unless a woman’s life was at stake. The case had been filed by “Jane Roe,” an unmarried woman who wanted to end her pregnancy safely and legally. Finding that Ms. Jane Roe’s constitutional rights had been violated, the court struck down the Texas law. In that landmark decision, the court recognized the constitutional right to privacy “…is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (Roe v. Wade (1973) 410 U.S. 113, 153.) Roe v. Wade has come to be known as the case that affirmed the constitutional right across the nation for a woman to choose an abortion and have control over her own body. At the time the decision was handed down, many states outlawed abortion. Roe v. Wade rendered these laws unconstitutional, making reproductive health services safer and more accessible to women and persons who could become pregnant throughout the country. Page 93 of 197 Item 5g On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overruled Roe in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on the grounds that “the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision.” It is expected that more than half the states in the United States could pass laws that would preclude a woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion or not. Under California law, the rights of women and/or a pregnant person to make their own reproductive choices are protected in the California Constitution’s based on the right to privacy. On June 27, 2022, the California Legislature passed Senate Constitutional Amendment 10 (SCA 10) that will place on the ballot a proposition to add specific language to the California Constitution ensuring reproductive freedom. Public Engagement This item is scheduled for the July 5, 2022 City Council meeting and will follow all required postings and notifications. The public may provide comment on this item at or before the meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The California Environmental Quality Act d oes not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2021-22 Funding Identified: No Fiscal Analysis: Funding Sources Total Budget Available Current Funding Request Remaining Balance Annual Ongoing Cost General Fund N/A $ $ $ State Federal Fees Other: Total $ $ $ $ Because no additional staff work is anticipated as a result of this resolution, no new fiscal impact will be incurred. Page 94 of 197 Item 5g ALTERNATIVES The Council choose to not adopt a resolution regarding reproductive rights. ATTACHMENTS A - Draft Resolution in Support of Reproductive Freedom Page 95 of 197 Page 96 of 197 R ______ RESOLUTION NO. _______ (2022 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AFFIRMING SUPPORT OF REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM WHEREAS, in 1973, the United States Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade ruled that the United States Constitution protects a pregnant person's reproductive choices and liberties, namely the right to an abortion; and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Clinic overturned Roe v. Wade, holding there is no federal Constitutional right for a pregnant person to have an abortion; and WHEREAS, Dobbs expressly calls into question other substantive due process rights protecting the right to privacy and bodily autonomy; and WHEREAS, overturning Roe will greatly impact marginalized groups who already face barriers accessing reproductive healthcare services, particularly low-income women and women of color, causing further inequity; and; and WHEREAS, in a recent survey of abortion patients, 49% are living below the federal poverty line, 59% already have children, and 55% are experiencing a disruptive life event; and WHEREAS, women with access to reproductive health services are more likely to finish college, pursue higher education, participate for a longer period in the labor force, achieve higher-paying occupations, and are much less likely to fall into poverty and receiving public assistance later in life; and WHEREAS, a woman’s and/or any pregnant person’s ability to freely access reproductive health care is essential to ensuring the lives, rights, health and equality of all people and society are protected; and WHEREAS, in the past 54 years since the state of California protected a pregnant person’s right to choose under law, the people of San Luis Obispo and the State of California have been able to freely and without fear of legal recourse exercise their reproductive freedoms; and WHEREAS, as a result of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, effectively ending federal constitutional protection of a woman’s and/or pregnant person’s right to choose their path towards reproductive health, as many as 26 states may move to ban reproductive choice in its entirety; and Page 97 of 197 Resolution No. _______ (2022 Series) Page 2 R _____ WHEREAS, prohibitions on the right to exercise reproductive freedoms are harmful to the public health and safety of all people, and are contrary to the values of equity and justice that the people of the City of San Luis Obispo and the Constitution of the State of California seek to uphold; and WHEREAS, passage of these laws disproportionately impact low-income women, survivors of sexual assault, the trans and nonbinary community, Black, Latinx, Indigenous and other people of color; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo will continue to uphold everyone’s right to equality and liberty by protecting their reproductive freedoms, and their access to health services, welcoming anyone to San Luis Obispo to fully exercise their full reproductive rights; and Page 98 of 197 Resolution No. _______ (2022 Series) Page 2 R _____ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City affirms its commitment to the human rights afforded to all women and persons who can become pregnant , regardless of socioeconomic, ethnic, racial, cultural or religious background, age or sexual orientation and to opposing any laws or regulations that pose a threat to reproductive freedom, reproductive rights and equitable access to reproductive health services, sexual freedom and/or self -determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City supports efforts to add a person’s right to choose in the California and United States Constitutions. Upon motion of __________________, seconded by ___________________, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of ____________________ 2022. __________________________ Mayor Erica A. Stewart ATTEST: ___________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. __________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk Page 99 of 197 Page 100 of 197