HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRR21285 Rourke Batch 1From:jverhulst@charter.net
To:Bell, Kyle
Subject:14Apr21 hearing Notice
Date:Monday, April 5, 2021 10:54:44 AM
Attachments:SLO Hearing Notice_04-02-2021.png
163 Serrano Heights Drive.png
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Good Morning Kyle,
I received this notice in the mail on Saturday and noticed that there is a small, but potentially
confusing, issue in the Project Site Map. What is listed as Serrano Heights Drive is actually my
driveway. And to be more precise, Serrano Heights Drive actually ends just beyond where the cars
are parked in the Google Earth screenshot. A narrow private drive, that connects to my driveway,
continues south from there to the Madonna pasture gate.
Also, it’s not clear as to which parcel of the double lot at 163 shown on the Notice is intended to be
subdivided.
Thanks,
James and Catharina Verhulst
From:Cody Lorance
To:Van Leeuwen, Kyle
Cc:John Rourke
Subject:163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
Date:Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:30:11 AM
Attachments:image001.png
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Hey Kyle,
In response to our discussion yesterday regarding the Director’s Action review for an ADU height
exception at 163 Serrano Heights Drive-
We understand the potential concern about the location of the proposed ADU and the possible
impacts to the neighboring property. We believe that the existing conditions on the site will help to
mitigate this. The neighboring property to the south (167 Serrano Heights Drive) is situated at a
higher elevation than 163 and is visually blocked by a row of trees separating the properties. This
will help to ensure a visual barrier from the proposed ADU to minimize impact to privacy. The fact
that 167 Serrano Heights is located to the south of the proposed second floor ADU will also prevent
shading from southern sun exposure onto the neighboring property.
Please let us know if you any additional information.
Thanks,
Cody Lorance
Project Manager
From:Sheats, Steven
To:Mezzapesa, John
Subject:163 Serrano Heights
Date:Wednesday, August 18, 2021 11:59:18 AM
Seems they may not have been exaggerating about the 30’ building. They’re putting new
windows in the barn and he said the arborist has gotten involved with the trees situation.
Photos here.
From:Bell, Kyle
To:John Rourke
Subject:163 Serrano Heights
Date:Wednesday, August 25, 2021 5:06:00 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=146255&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk
Kyle Bell
pronouns he/him/his
CDD Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Bell, Kyle
To:John Rourke
Subject:163 Serrano Mitigation Agreement
Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 4:30:38 PM
Attachments:Intro Letter for Mitigation Agreement.pdf
Mitigation Agreement.pdf
163 Serrano Heights - Final Initial Study.pdf
image001.png
Good afternoon,
I have attached the Mitigation Agreement Materials, letter of introduction, agreement, and
the Initial Study.
Please review the agreement and let us know if you have any questions regarding the
mitigation measures. It would be ideal to receive your signature by Friday or first thing
Monday morning next week.
Once we receive your signature on the agreement we will also sign each form and prepare
for public noticing to begin next Thursday for a period of 30 days. I will also need to
coordinate with you next week to pay the Fish and Wildlife fee as outlined in the intro letter.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From:Bell, Kyle
To:John Rourke
Subject:163 Serrano Site Plans
Date:Wednesday, December 9, 2020 12:11:00 PM
Attachments:18133-163Serrano-TPM-2020-02-10.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Can you confirm whether any of the tree species were miss labeled, and could you also
identify which trees were removed back in August/September with Ron?
Kyle Bell
pronouns he/him/his
CDD Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Bell, Kyle
To:John Rourke
Subject:Conditions of minor subdivision
Date:Tuesday, August 17, 2021 1:07:00 PM
Attachments:SBDV-2029-2018 PC Resolution.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Kyle Bell
pronouns he/him/his
CDD Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Kala, Nanika
To:Cano, Esteban
Subject:FW: Avila Ranch - CFD review
Date:Monday, November 9, 2020 8:51:47 AM
Attachments:Avila Ranch CFD_TAC.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
Hi Esteban,
Here is the City signed PSA for Avila Ranch CFD. Please reach out to AR and have them
sign it and send payment to CDD, then set up the PO. I’ll keep the signed PSA in our
records and send you a virtual copy.
-Nanika
From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 9:02 AM
To: Kala, Nanika <nkala@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Avila Ranch - CFD review
Here you go. Thanks
From: Kala, Nanika <nkala@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 10:35 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Avila Ranch - CFD review
Hi Tyler,
Please sign the attached PSA for avila ranch and return via email
Thanks,
Nanika
From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 7:20 AM
To: Kala, Nanika <nkala@slocity.org>
Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Avila Ranch - CFD review
Scope looks good. Please prepare the PSA for my signature. Thanks!
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 4:15 PM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Kala, Nanika <nkala@slocity.org>
From:Whipple, Anthony
To:Cruce, Greg
Subject:FW: Canopy restoration
Date:Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:59:00 AM
Attachments:Rorke 163 Serrano Hts Canopy Restoration.pdf
We got the report and the independent Arborist agrees with City staff on the damage and
potential mitigation measures.
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:42 PM
To: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Subject: Fwd: Canopy restoration
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chris Stier <chris@greenvaletree.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2021, 4:24 PM
Subject: Canopy restoration
To: <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Hello
Please see the attached report.
You will need to send this to Anthony and all those who need this report.
Could you please let me know that you received this and could open the document.
Thank You
Chris Stier
--
Thank you for choosing Greenvale Tree.
Most Sincerely,
Chris Stier
805.235-1668
From:Whipple, Anthony
To:Bell, Kyle
Subject:FW: Canopy restoration
Date:Wednesday, September 29, 2021 7:15:00 AM
Attachments:Rorke 163 Serrano Hts Canopy Restoration.pdf
Kyle, I have been waiting for the report to come in. please review and retain for record.
I plan on attending DRT meeting to update myself on future items
Thank you
From: Whipple, Anthony
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:59 AM
To: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Canopy restoration
We got the report and the independent Arborist agrees with City staff on the damage and
potential mitigation measures.
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:42 PM
To: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Subject: Fwd: Canopy restoration
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chris Stier <chris@greenvaletree.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2021, 4:24 PM
Subject: Canopy restoration
To: <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Hello
Please see the attached report.
You will need to send this to Anthony and all those who need this report.
Could you please let me know that you received this and could open the document.
Thank You
Chris Stier
--
Thank you for choosing Greenvale Tree.
Most Sincerely,
Chris Stier
805.235-1668
From:Scott, Shawna
To:Bell, Kyle
Cc:Corey, Tyler
Subject:FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:30:00 AM
Attachments:Rourke Property 163 Serrano Heights Dr. Erosion Concerns.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Hi Kyle,
When you’re free after 10am today, please give me a ring to discuss.
Thank you,
Shawna
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Bell, Kyle
To:Mezzapesa, John; Sheats, Steven; Whipple, Anthony
Cc:Cocina, Cassia; Sabatini, Hayley
Subject:FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 10:27:34 AM
Attachments:Rourke Property 163 Serrano Heights Dr. Erosion Concerns.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good morning,
We have just been informed of a potential tree removal violation at 163 Serrano Heights.
Can we have someone drive out there and identify the work that is being done? The project
had been approved for tree removals back in December of last year by Ron Combs which
were removed in February, I verified those removals myself on site. To my knowledge the
applicant did not receive any additional approval for tree removals since that time.
Obviously, tree removes on other persons property is a civil issue, but tree removals
without a permit are still a violation. I provided the email of concern below for quick
reference. I have reviewed the permit history of the property and do not see any approvals
that would have included tree removals or any grading at this time.
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot and
the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and neither gave
permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch pile
within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this body has
to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching what Mr Rourke is
doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Scott, Shawna
To:Corey, Tyler
Subject:FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 9:02:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
PC Zoom Instructions.jpg
Hi Tyler, I spoke with Kyle this morning and can give you an update during PDMG (or
before).
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 8:58 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna
<sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning Jill,
Thank you for reaching out. The cover of the agenda contains the meeting’s Zoom details.
As your topic is not listed on the agenda, you are welcome to make your comments during
Item 2, Public Comment for non-agenda items. When the Chair calls for public comment,
please raise your virtual hand (as shown in the attached image) to indicate that you would
like to speak. The Deputy City Clerk, Kevin Christian, will call on you, promote you to a
Panelist, and then you can unmute your microphone and turn on your webcam; you’ll have
three minutes to address the Planning Commission.
If you would like to practice using the Zoom platform, I would be happy to open the webinar
early to facilitate a practice run. I’m available today until noon or tomorrow until noon.
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 7:22 PM
To: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna
<sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Megan-
I would like to find time on the Planning Commission meeting on 8/25 to speak regarding the Rourke
Development and the damage to our property. I was told that you can help me do that.
Thank you -
Jill Stelfox
On Aug 16, 2021, at 11:25 AM, Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org> wrote:
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below,
the Planning Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April
14, 2021, as reflected in the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural
Review Commission is meeting virtually via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and
you are welcome to join the webinar to provide public comment on non-agenda
items- instructions can be found on the cover of the agenda. However, since
the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural Review
Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next
Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021
at 6:00 p.m. via teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be
published this Wednesday, August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to
relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning
Commission and the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this
response are staff that can provide further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff
Liaison to the Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural
Review Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights
project when it was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click
links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would
like to request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project
that this body approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed
nearly a dozen trees from our lot and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors
(parcel 36). Neither of us were home and neither gave permission. In
addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch
pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be
some over site this body has to ensure that these type of issues
have consequences. Is no one watching what Mr Rourke is doing? We
need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox
< wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope
next door neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being
his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill
from 163 Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the
proposed exception and the lot splits. Our side yard &
backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and 3. These
are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard.
The slope is significant between our properties. The rear
section of proposed lot 3 - as you head away from the
existing barn towards and into my backyard through
proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an
issue over the past 10 plus years, which has caused
substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to
the seasonal stream in my backyard is significant. The 18%
grade for lot 3 is suspect, with the adjacent drop off in our
yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a known underground
stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the seasonal
stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted
on the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild
berry vines tracing the stream and running down the
hill across proposed lots 2 and 3 then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope
of the hillside for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant
erosion due to drainage and runoff issues from the above
Rourke parcel, and the path of the underground stream. We
have concerns that development of these lots could have
compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the
underground stream could alter its course towards the path
of least resistance - our house. It is our belief that these have
not been properly vetted and should not be developed. We
request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues
are adequately investigated, and we have security and
surety that run off and erosion due to splitting the
development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in
its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval
and the requirements under the California Water Board
Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or
related, there is a requirement to develop a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the underground stream
on this parcel of land feed into an underground basin that
has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the
Groundwater Basin 3-009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fres
ources%2fjs%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=
0.7745551714322108, which requires additional review of
the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction
equipment access to the site. Not noted on the report is that
Serrano Heights Drive provides access to the Madonna trail
head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive narrows to single lane
and becomes very congested with vehicles parking on both
sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city
is aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides
a pick sized truck for trash and recycling services. Larger
trucks and construction equipment will be limited and likely
unable to proceed past our house, due to congestion and
the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past my
driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a
turnaround and staging area. Consideration needs to be
given to the amount of traffic parked along either side of the
road and the limited access for construction equipment to
maneuver on the street without accessing using my
driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Mezzapesa, John
To:Cocina, Cassia
Subject:Fwd: 163 Serrano Heights
Date:Wednesday, August 18, 2021 12:00:11 PM
John Mezzapesa
Code Enforcement Officer
City of San Luis Obispo
Community Development
Building and Safety
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668
E jmezzapesa@slocity.org
T 805.781.7179
slocity.org
From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 11:59:15 AM
To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>
Subject: 163 Serrano Heights
Seems they may not have been exaggerating about the 30’ building. They’re putting new
windows in the barn and he said the arborist has gotten involved with the trees situation.
Photos here.
From:John Rourke
To:Whipple, Anthony
Subject:Fwd: Canopy restoration
Date:Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:42:49 PM
Attachments:Rorke 163 Serrano Hts Canopy Restoration.pdf
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chris Stier <chris@greenvaletree.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2021, 4:24 PM
Subject: Canopy restoration
To: <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Hello
Please see the attached report.
You will need to send this to Anthony and all those who need this report.
Could you please let me know that you received this and could open the document.
Thank You
Chris Stier
--
Thank you for choosing Greenvale Tree.
Most Sincerely,
Chris Stier
805.235-1668
From:Bell, Kyle
To:jverhulst@charter.net
Subject:RE: 14Apr21 hearing Notice
Date:Monday, April 5, 2021 12:14:00 PM
Good afternoon,
The addressing on the notice is correct, the property at 163 Serrano Heights shares
primary access from Serrano Heights for both properties shown on the postcard map. Both
parcels are affected from the proposed project. Only one new driveway would connect to
Serrano Heights which is a shared private drive aisle that provides access for the
residences in the vicinity from where Serrano Drive ends.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: jverhulst@charter.net <jverhulst@charter.net>
Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 10:53 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: 14Apr21 hearing Notice
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good Morning Kyle,
I received this notice in the mail on Saturday and noticed that there is a small, but potentially
confusing, issue in the Project Site Map. What is listed as Serrano Heights Drive is actually my
driveway. And to be more precise, Serrano Heights Drive actually ends just beyond where the cars
are parked in the Google Earth screenshot. A narrow private drive, that connects to my driveway,
continues south from there to the Madonna pasture gate.
Also, it’s not clear as to which parcel of the double lot at 163 shown on the Notice is intended to be
subdivided.
Thanks,
James and Catharina Verhulst
From:Van Leeuwen, Kyle
To:Cody Lorance
Cc:John Rourke
Subject:RE: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
Date:Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:35:00 AM
Attachments:image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
Hello Cody,
Thank you for sending this over. I will proceed with the review, including this note as the
reasoning for why the provided setback is adequate to protect solar exposure and privacy
to adjacent property. Action date for this item is tentatively set for August 9.
Thank you,
Kyle Van Leeuwen
Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KVanLeeuwen@slocity.org
T 805.781.7091
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Cody Lorance <cody@studioprimeinc.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:26 AM
To: Van Leeuwen, Kyle <KVanLeeu@slocity.org>
Cc: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hey Kyle,
In response to our discussion yesterday regarding the Director’s Action review for an ADU height
exception at 163 Serrano Heights Drive-
We understand the potential concern about the location of the proposed ADU and the possible
impacts to the neighboring property. We believe that the existing conditions on the site will help to
mitigate this. The neighboring property to the south (167 Serrano Heights Drive) is situated at a
higher elevation than 163 and is visually blocked by a row of trees separating the properties. This
will help to ensure a visual barrier from the proposed ADU to minimize impact to privacy. The fact
that 167 Serrano Heights is located to the south of the proposed second floor ADU will also prevent
shading from southern sun exposure onto the neighboring property.
Please let us know if you any additional information.
Thanks,
Cody Lorance
Project Manager
From:Cody Lorance
To:Van Leeuwen, Kyle
Cc:John Rourke
Subject:RE: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
Date:Wednesday, August 18, 2021 2:33:36 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Hi Kyle,
Just want to follow up on this. We will be ready to submit for building permit application shortly so
want to make sure everything is finalized for the Director’s Action. Do you have a condition list you
can send us to review and include on the plans?
Thanks,
Cody Lorance
Project Manager
From: Van Leeuwen, Kyle <KVanLeeu@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:36 AM
To: Cody Lorance <cody@studioprimeinc.com>
Cc: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
Hello Cody,
Thank you for sending this over. I will proceed with the review, including this note as the
reasoning for why the provided setback is adequate to protect solar exposure and privacy
to adjacent property. Action date for this item is tentatively set for August 9.
Thank you,
Kyle Van Leeuwen
Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KVanLeeuwen@slocity.org
T 805.781.7091
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Cody Lorance <cody@studioprimeinc.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:26 AM
To: Van Leeuwen, Kyle <KVanLeeu@slocity.org>
Cc: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hey Kyle,
In response to our discussion yesterday regarding the Director’s Action review for an ADU height
exception at 163 Serrano Heights Drive-
We understand the potential concern about the location of the proposed ADU and the possible
impacts to the neighboring property. We believe that the existing conditions on the site will help to
mitigate this. The neighboring property to the south (167 Serrano Heights Drive) is situated at a
higher elevation than 163 and is visually blocked by a row of trees separating the properties. This
will help to ensure a visual barrier from the proposed ADU to minimize impact to privacy. The fact
that 167 Serrano Heights is located to the south of the proposed second floor ADU will also prevent
shading from southern sun exposure onto the neighboring property.
Please let us know if you any additional information.
Thanks,
Cody Lorance
Project Manager
From:Cody Lorance
To:Van Leeuwen, Kyle
Cc:John Rourke
Subject:RE: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
Date:Wednesday, August 18, 2021 2:33:36 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Hi Kyle,
Just want to follow up on this. We will be ready to submit for building permit application shortly so
want to make sure everything is finalized for the Director’s Action. Do you have a condition list you
can send us to review and include on the plans?
Thanks,
Cody Lorance
Project Manager
From: Van Leeuwen, Kyle <KVanLeeu@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:36 AM
To: Cody Lorance <cody@studioprimeinc.com>
Cc: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
Hello Cody,
Thank you for sending this over. I will proceed with the review, including this note as the
reasoning for why the provided setback is adequate to protect solar exposure and privacy
to adjacent property. Action date for this item is tentatively set for August 9.
Thank you,
Kyle Van Leeuwen
Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KVanLeeuwen@slocity.org
T 805.781.7091
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Cody Lorance <cody@studioprimeinc.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 8:26 AM
To: Van Leeuwen, Kyle <KVanLeeu@slocity.org>
Cc: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: 163 Serrano Heights Additional Info
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hey Kyle,
In response to our discussion yesterday regarding the Director’s Action review for an ADU height
exception at 163 Serrano Heights Drive-
We understand the potential concern about the location of the proposed ADU and the possible
impacts to the neighboring property. We believe that the existing conditions on the site will help to
mitigate this. The neighboring property to the south (167 Serrano Heights Drive) is situated at a
higher elevation than 163 and is visually blocked by a row of trees separating the properties. This
will help to ensure a visual barrier from the proposed ADU to minimize impact to privacy. The fact
that 167 Serrano Heights is located to the south of the proposed second floor ADU will also prevent
shading from southern sun exposure onto the neighboring property.
Please let us know if you any additional information.
Thanks,
Cody Lorance
Project Manager
From:Bell, Kyle
To:John Rourke; John Rourke
Subject:RE: 163 Serrano Heights Presentation
Date:Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:56:32 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Need help testing a Zoom call?
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Bell, Kyle
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 11:25 AM
To: John Rourke <john@rourkefamily.com>; John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: 163 Serrano Heights Presentation
I thought I might share a suggested outline for your presentation tonight.
Staff’s Presentation
Summary of project site location
Location within the City, zoning, proximity to residential and other uses in the
vicinity.
Project features
Requested exceptions
Overview of compliance with code requirements and required findings
Environmental Review Determination
Applicant Team’s Presentation
Introduction of yourself and background on the intent of the application (provide
justification on how this project is the best use of the site)
Inspiration of orientation of lot lines
How you arrived at choosing the layout and three lots instead of more or less.
Expectation of future development
Examples in the vicinity for project materials, building orientation, mass and
scale, offsets and articulation, compliance with hillside development standards
and design considerations that respond to the neighborhood context
(specifically adjacency to low intensity uses).
Expected timeline of when properties may be developed
Try to keep it between 3 – 10 minutes.
Staff’s presentation will be focused reminding the Commission of the process and the next
steps and introduce the platform for them to provide direction for comments or conditions.
Kyle Bell
pronouns he/him/his
CDD Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:john@rourkefamily.com
To:Bell, Kyle
Subject:RE: 163 Serrano Heights Presentation
Date:Wednesday, April 14, 2021 5:08:44 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Trying to figure out now
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: 163 Serrano Heights Presentation
From: "Bell, Kyle" <KBell@slocity.org>
Date: Wed, April 14, 2021 3:56 pm
To: John Rourke <john@rourkefamily.com>, John Rourke
<rourkefam@gmail.com>
Need help testing a Zoom call?
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Bell, Kyle
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 11:25 AM
To: John Rourke <john@rourkefamily.com>; John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: 163 Serrano Heights Presentation
I thought I might share a suggested outline for your presentation tonight.
Staff’s Presentation
Summary of project site location
Location within the City, zoning, proximity to residential and other uses
in the vicinity.
Project features
Requested exceptions
Overview of compliance with code requirements and required findings
Environmental Review Determination
Applicant Team’s Presentation
Introduction of yourself and background on the intent of the application
(provide justification on how this project is the best use of the site)
Inspiration of orientation of lot lines
How you arrived at choosing the layout and three lots instead of more
or less.
Expectation of future development
Examples in the vicinity for project materials, building orientation,
mass and scale, offsets and articulation, compliance with hillside
development standards and design considerations that respond to the
neighborhood context (specifically adjacency to low intensity uses).
Expected timeline of when properties may be developed
Try to keep it between 3 – 10 minutes.
Staff’s presentation will be focused reminding the Commission of the process
and the next steps and introduce the platform for them to provide direction for
comments or conditions.
Kyle Bell
pronouns he/him/his
CDD Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID,
visit slocity.org/covid19
From:Sabatini, Hayley
To:Hernandez, Marjorie
Subject:RE: Invoice Request for Illegal Pruning
Date:Thursday, October 21, 2021 11:13:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
163 Serrano.docx
From: Sabatini, Hayley
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 11:13 AM
To: Hernandez, Marjorie <mhernand@slocity.org>
Subject: Invoice Request for Illegal Pruning
Hayley Sabatini
pronouns she/her/hers
Administrative Assistant II
Public Work
25 Prado, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E hsabatin@slocity.org
T 805.781.7002
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Corey, Tyler
To:Scott, Shawna; Bell, Kyle
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:31:14 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Hi all – I am free at 10am and can join a teams call. I will be remote. Thanks
From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:30 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Hi Kyle,
When you’re free after 10am today, please give me a ring to discuss.
Thank you,
Shawna
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Wilbanks, Megan
To:Jill Stelfox
Cc:Steven Stelfox; Corey, Tyler; Scott, Shawna; Bell, Kyle; Christian, Kevin
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 8:57:55 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
PC Zoom Instructions.jpg
Good Morning Jill,
Thank you for reaching out. The cover of the agenda contains the meeting’s Zoom details.
As your topic is not listed on the agenda, you are welcome to make your comments during
Item 2, Public Comment for non-agenda items. When the Chair calls for public comment,
please raise your virtual hand (as shown in the attached image) to indicate that you would
like to speak. The Deputy City Clerk, Kevin Christian, will call on you, promote you to a
Panelist, and then you can unmute your microphone and turn on your webcam; you’ll have
three minutes to address the Planning Commission.
If you would like to practice using the Zoom platform, I would be happy to open the webinar
early to facilitate a practice run. I’m available today until noon or tomorrow until noon.
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 7:22 PM
To: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna
<sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Megan-
I would like to find time on the Planning Commission meeting on 8/25 to speak regarding the Rourke
Development and the damage to our property. I was told that you can help me do that.
Thank you -
Jill Stelfox
On Aug 16, 2021, at 11:25 AM, Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org> wrote:
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below,
the Planning Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April
14, 2021, as reflected in the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural
Review Commission is meeting virtually via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and
you are welcome to join the webinar to provide public comment on non-agenda
items- instructions can be found on the cover of the agenda. However, since
the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural Review
Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next
Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021
at 6:00 p.m. via teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be
published this Wednesday, August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to
relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning
Commission and the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this
response are staff that can provide further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff
Liaison to the Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural
Review Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights
project when it was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click
links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would
like to request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project
that this body approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed
nearly a dozen trees from our lot and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors
(parcel 36). Neither of us were home and neither gave permission. In
addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch
pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be
some over site this body has to ensure that these type of issues
have consequences. Is no one watching what Mr Rourke is doing? We
need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox
< wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope
next door neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being
his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill
from 163 Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the
proposed exception and the lot splits. Our side yard &
backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and 3. These
are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard.
The slope is significant between our properties. The rear
section of proposed lot 3 - as you head away from the
existing barn towards and into my backyard through
proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an
issue over the past 10 plus years, which has caused
substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to
the seasonal stream in my backyard is significant. The 18%
grade for lot 3 is suspect, with the adjacent drop off in our
yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a known underground
stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the seasonal
stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted
on the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild
berry vines tracing the stream and running down the
hill across proposed lots 2 and 3 then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope
of the hillside for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant
erosion due to drainage and runoff issues from the above
Rourke parcel, and the path of the underground stream. We
have concerns that development of these lots could have
compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the
underground stream could alter its course towards the path
of least resistance - our house. It is our belief that these have
not been properly vetted and should not be developed. We
request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues
are adequately investigated, and we have security and
surety that run off and erosion due to splitting the
development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in
its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval
and the requirements under the California Water Board
Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or
related, there is a requirement to develop a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the underground stream
on this parcel of land feed into an underground basin that
has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the
Groundwater Basin 3-009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fres
ources%2fjs%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=
0.7745551714322108, which requires additional review of
the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction
equipment access to the site. Not noted on the report is that
Serrano Heights Drive provides access to the Madonna trail
head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive narrows to single lane
and becomes very congested with vehicles parking on both
sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city
is aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides
a pick sized truck for trash and recycling services. Larger
trucks and construction equipment will be limited and likely
unable to proceed past our house, due to congestion and
the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past my
driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a
turnaround and staging area. Consideration needs to be
given to the amount of traffic parked along either side of the
road and the limited access for construction equipment to
maneuver on the street without accessing using my
driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Bell, Kyle
To:Corey, Tyler; Scott, Shawna
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:35:46 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Yes I will be available at 10, I will review the info right now.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:31 AM
To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Hi all – I am free at 10am and can join a teams call. I will be remote. Thanks
From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:30 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Hi Kyle,
When you’re free after 10am today, please give me a ring to discuss.
Thank you,
Shawna
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Wilbanks, Megan
To:Jill Stelfox
Cc:Steven Stelfox; Corey, Tyler; Scott, Shawna; Bell, Kyle
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25:12 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Wilbanks, Megan
To:Corey, Tyler; Scott, Shawna; Bell, Kyle
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27:10 AM
Attachments:Rourke Property 163 Serrano Heights Dr. Erosion Concerns.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Whipple, Anthony
To:Mezzapesa, John
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 11:41:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
John,
Thank you
Anthony Whipple
Acting City Arborist
Public Works
Urban Forest Services
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E awhipple@slocity.org
T 805.781.7021
C 805.431.0398
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 11:27 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org>; Whipple, Anthony
<awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Cocina, Cassia <ccocina@slocity.org>; Sabatini, Hayley <hsabatin@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
I can swing by and see if there is any grading that has occurred without the necessary
permits.
The tree removal is a violation of the city’s tree regulations and should be handled by Urban
Forestry.
John Mezzapesa
Code Enforcement Officer
Community Development
Building and Safety
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668
E jmezzapesa@slocity.org
T 805.781.7179
slocity.org
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 10:28 AM
To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org>; Whipple,
Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Cocina, Cassia <ccocina@slocity.org>; Sabatini, Hayley <hsabatin@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good morning,
We have just been informed of a potential tree removal violation at 163 Serrano Heights.
Can we have someone drive out there and identify the work that is being done? The project
had been approved for tree removals back in December of last year by Ron Combs which
were removed in February, I verified those removals myself on site. To my knowledge the
applicant did not receive any additional approval for tree removals since that time.
Obviously, tree removes on other persons property is a civil issue, but tree removals
without a permit are still a violation. I provided the email of concern below for quick
reference. I have reviewed the permit history of the property and do not see any approvals
that would have included tree removals or any grading at this time.
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot and
the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and neither gave
permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch pile
within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this body has
to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching what Mr Rourke is
doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Mezzapesa, John
To:Bell, Kyle; Sheats, Steven; Whipple, Anthony
Cc:Cocina, Cassia; Sabatini, Hayley
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 11:26:59 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
I can swing by and see if there is any grading that has occurred without the necessary
permits.
The tree removal is a violation of the city’s tree regulations and should be handled by Urban
Forestry.
John Mezzapesa
Code Enforcement Officer
Community Development
Building and Safety
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668
E jmezzapesa@slocity.org
T 805.781.7179
slocity.org
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 10:28 AM
To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org>; Whipple,
Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Cocina, Cassia <ccocina@slocity.org>; Sabatini, Hayley <hsabatin@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good morning,
We have just been informed of a potential tree removal violation at 163 Serrano Heights.
Can we have someone drive out there and identify the work that is being done? The project
had been approved for tree removals back in December of last year by Ron Combs which
were removed in February, I verified those removals myself on site. To my knowledge the
applicant did not receive any additional approval for tree removals since that time.
Obviously, tree removes on other persons property is a civil issue, but tree removals
without a permit are still a violation. I provided the email of concern below for quick
reference. I have reviewed the permit history of the property and do not see any approvals
that would have included tree removals or any grading at this time.
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot and
the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and neither gave
permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch pile
within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this body has
to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching what Mr Rourke is
doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Corey, Tyler
To:Scott, Shawna; Bell, Kyle
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:31:14 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Hi all – I am free at 10am and can join a teams call. I will be remote. Thanks
From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:30 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Hi Kyle,
When you’re free after 10am today, please give me a ring to discuss.
Thank you,
Shawna
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Scott, Shawna
To:Bell, Kyle; Corey, Tyler
Subject:RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:36:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Thanks, Kyle, see you two at 10 via Teams. I’ll send out an invite.
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:36 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Yes I will be available at 10, I will review the info right now.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:31 AM
To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Hi all – I am free at 10am and can join a teams call. I will be remote. Thanks
From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:30 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Hi Kyle,
When you’re free after 10am today, please give me a ring to discuss.
Thank you,
Shawna
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:27 AM
To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Sorry, I forgot to provide the attachment Ms. Stelfox included in her initial email.
From: Wilbanks, Megan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Cc: Steven Stelfox < ; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Shawna Scott
(sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below, the Planning
Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April 14, 2021, as reflected in
the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural Review Commission is meeting virtually
via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and you are welcome to join the webinar to provide
public comment on non-agenda items- instructions can be found on the cover of the
agenda. However, since the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural
Review Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next Planning
Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via
teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be published this Wednesday,
August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning Commission and
the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this response are staff that can provide
further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff Liaison to the
Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural Review
Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights project when it
was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot
and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and
neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide
and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this
body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching
what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot
splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and
3. These are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard. The
slope is significant between our properties. The rear section of proposed
lot 3 - as you head away from the existing barn towards and into my
backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the
past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal
stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect,
with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a
known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the
seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted on
the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild berry vines
tracing the stream and running down the hill across proposed lots 2 and 3
then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside
for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and
runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the
underground stream. We have concerns that development of these lots
could have compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the underground
stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance - our
house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should
not be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due
to splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be
our liability or cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-
009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs
%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108,
which requires additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment
access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive
provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive
narrows to single lane and becomes very congested with vehicles parking
on both sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city is
aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides a pick sized
truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and construction
equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our house,
due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past
my driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and
staging area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic
parked along either side of the road and the limited access for
construction equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing
using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Bell, Kyle
To:Linda Harvey
Subject:RE: SBDV 163 Serrano
Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 11:59:02 AM
Good morning,
Thank you for your email, I have provided responses to each of your questions below,
please let me know if you have any additional questions.
1. Further subdivision of the property with the existing residence is highly unlikely due to
the size and shape of the property, any resulting parcels would not comply with the
City’s minimum standards and would likely be rejected (however, this would not
preclude the ability to apply for an application just the same as any other property
with the City of SLO).
2. Setbacks for these properties are the same as all properties within the R-1 Zone
(Low-Density Residential), 5-feet for a structure up to 12-feet in height with an
increasing setback of up to 11-feet for a structure that is 25-feet in height. The
property with the existing residence and Parcel 1 will also require a 10-foot setback
from Serrano Heights. Please note that per the conditions of the subdivision any
future development of the site requires discretionary review through an architectural
review permit which will provide public noticing to all neighbors within 300 feet of
each of the new parcels.
3. A slope analysis of the property was provided prior to the lot line adjustment which
resulted a 16.45% average cross slope.
4. Yes a slope analysis of the property was provided for the resulting parcel from the lot
line adjustment with an average cross slope of 17.8%
5. I am unaware of any grading on the site since 1969, and in 1969 a grading permit
was not required as the grading was accessory to the single family residence. The
proposed subdivision was evaluated based on existing conditions of the site.
6. All trees that have been removed have been approved by the City’s Arborist.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Linda Harvey <lindaharvey569@rocketmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 10:52 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: SBDV 163 Serrano
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Dear Mr. Bell,
We have reviewed the proposed subdivision at 163 Serrano Heights Dr. and have a few questions about
the proposed plan.
1-If the subdivision is approved is there anything preventing an owner from further subdividing the parcel
with the existing residence on it in the future?
2-What are the orientation and setbacks of the proposed lots?
3-Was a slope calculation done on the unimproved lot prior to approval of the lot line adjustment?
4-Has a slope calculation been done on the unimproved lot that was created by the lot line adjustment?
5-Did the current owner obtain a grading permit on the grading that he has already done on the
unimproved lot?
If so, was there a slope calculation done on that lot?
6-Did the current owner obtain a permit for the tree removal that has already been done?
Looking forward to your prompt response.
Kent and Linda Harvey
150 Serrano Heights Drive
lindaharvey569@rocketmail.com
From:Kala, Nanika
To:Bell, Kyle
Subject:RE: SWCA Invoice Submittal for Project 163 Serrano Heights Subdivision
Date:Tuesday, November 3, 2020 7:23:56 AM
Payment sent to AP. FYI there’s about $8 remaining in the PO.
-Nanika
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 3:20 PM
To: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>
Cc: Kala, Nanika <nkala@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: SWCA Invoice Submittal for Project 163 Serrano Heights Subdivision
I have another Invoice from SWCA, this one included a PSA so I am not sure which of you
are addressing this project (sorry).
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Beth Yohannes <Beth.Yohannes@swca.com>
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 3:17 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Payment <Payment@swca.com>; Brandi Cummings <brandi.cummings@swca.com>
Subject: SWCA Invoice Submittal for Project 163 Serrano Heights Subdivision
Good Afternoon,
Attached is SWCA's invoice #000118047 dated 11/02/2020 for 027640.24 - 163 Serrano Heights
Subdivision. Please reference the invoice number on your remittance.
Our preferred method of payment is ACH/Wire as indicated on the invoice. If you prefer, you may
mail payment to our lockbox at PO Box 7217, Carol Stream, IL 60197-7217.
Please let me know if anything more is needed to process this invoice.
Thank You,
Beth Yohannes
Project Accounting Specialist
SWCA Environmental Consultants
20 E Thomas Rd, Ste 1700
Phoenix, AZ 85012
P 602.274.3831
www.swca.com
From:Kala, Nanika
To:Bell, Kyle; Cox, Rebecca
Subject:RE: SWCA Invoice Submittal for Project 163 Serrano Heights Subdivision
Date:Monday, November 2, 2020 5:17:33 PM
Thanks Kyle, this one is me! -Nanika
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 3:20 PM
To: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>
Cc: Kala, Nanika <nkala@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: SWCA Invoice Submittal for Project 163 Serrano Heights Subdivision
I have another Invoice from SWCA, this one included a PSA so I am not sure which of you
are addressing this project (sorry).
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Beth Yohannes <Beth.Yohannes@swca.com>
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 3:17 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Payment <Payment@swca.com>; Brandi Cummings <brandi.cummings@swca.com>
Subject: SWCA Invoice Submittal for Project 163 Serrano Heights Subdivision
Good Afternoon,
Attached is SWCA's invoice #000118047 dated 11/02/2020 for 027640.24 - 163 Serrano Heights
Subdivision. Please reference the invoice number on your remittance.
Our preferred method of payment is ACH/Wire as indicated on the invoice. If you prefer, you may
mail payment to our lockbox at PO Box 7217, Carol Stream, IL 60197-7217.
Please let me know if anything more is needed to process this invoice.
Thank You,
Beth Yohannes
Project Accounting Specialist
SWCA Environmental Consultants
20 E Thomas Rd, Ste 1700
Phoenix, AZ 85012
P 602.274.3831
www.swca.com
From:Bell, Kyle
To:John Rourke
Subject:RE: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
Date:Thursday, May 27, 2021 9:11:25 AM
Attachments:163 Serrano Heights - Initial Study EID-0100-2020.pdf
Notice of Determination - 163 Serrano Heights.pdf
Intro Letter for Mitigation Agreement.pdf
We will be recording the Initial Study and Notice of Determination with the County Clerks, I
also included in this email the Intro to the Mitigation Agreement which mentioned this fee
we have to pay.
Let me know if you have any questions, otherwise see you at 4:30 pm.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 6:40 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
Hi Kyle, Just saw this, can you do today? What time? Call me or text me if you can. I dont check my
email often.
Thanks
John
On Wed, May 26, 2021, 11:22 AM Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Would you be able to meet at the County Clerk’s Office at 1pm or 4:30 pm?
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 11:14 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
Sure thursday is fine
On Mon, May 24, 2021, 10:33 AM Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Looks like I was missing one last step in the process for the letter to be finalized.
I will need to record the Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk’s Office,
which will also require a Fish and Wildlife fee of $2,320.75 (includes a $50 County filing
fee). This was described in the Intro Letter of the Mitigation Agreement we had sent
you on February 22, 2021.
Can we set up a time on Thursday or Friday to meet at the Clerks Office to record the
document and pay the fee?
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 6:54 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Scott Stokes <scott@abovegradeengineering.com>
Subject: Re: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
Hi Kyle, its been over a month since tentative map approval, whats happening?
Thanks
John
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 12:25 PM Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
They are still in the queue for processing, I am waiting for the final signed copy. As
soon as I have it I will send it over, I will check on the progress of the queue right
now.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Scott Stokes <scott@abovegradeengineering.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 12:24 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: (805) 440-4973 <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Kyle
I did not get a response on this email. Is this something you can email me?
Thanks
To comply with San Luis Obispo's COVID-19 Shelter at Home ordinance
our office at 245 Higuera Street will be temporarily closed to the public
until further notice. During this time our team continues to be available
via phone and email to discuss your projects. We apologize for any
delays you may experience during this time. Your patience is greatly
appreciated.
Scott Stokes, PE
President
Main: (805) 540-5115 X 302 | Direct: (805) 548-1172
245 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 3:29 PM Scott Stokes <scott@abovegradeengineering.com> wrote:
Kyle,
Can you send me the conditions of approval for this project so we can get going on the
final map?
Thanks
To comply with San Luis Obispo's COVID-19 Shelter at Home ordinance
our office at 245 Higuera Street will be temporarily closed to the public
until further notice. During this time our team continues to be available
via phone and email to discuss your projects. We apologize for any
delays you may experience during this time. Your patience is greatly
appreciated.
Scott Stokes, PE
President
Main: (805) 540-5115 X 302 | Direct: (805) 548-1172
245 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
From:Bell, Kyle
To:John Rourke
Cc:Scott Stokes
Subject:RE: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
Date:Wednesday, June 2, 2021 3:35:55 PM
Attachments:SBDV-2029-2018 PC Resolution.pdf
PC Approval Follow-Up Letter.pdf
Good afternoon,
The signed resolution was just sent out in the mail today, I have attached them to this email
as well. Let me know if you have any questions.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 6:54 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Scott Stokes <scott@abovegradeengineering.com>
Subject: Re: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
Hi Kyle, its been over a month since tentative map approval, whats happening?
Thanks
John
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 12:25 PM Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
They are still in the queue for processing, I am waiting for the final signed copy. As soon
as I have it I will send it over, I will check on the progress of the queue right now.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Scott Stokes <scott@abovegradeengineering.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 12:24 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: (805) 440-4973 <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Serrano Subdivision for Rourke
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Kyle
I did not get a response on this email. Is this something you can email me?
Thanks
To comply with San Luis Obispo's COVID-19 Shelter at Home ordinance our
office at 245 Higuera Street will be temporarily closed to the public until
further notice. During this time our team continues to be available via phone
and email to discuss your projects. We apologize for any delays you may
experience during this time. Your patience is greatly appreciated.
Scott Stokes, PE
President
Main: (805) 540-5115 X 302 | Direct: (805) 548-1172
245 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 3:29 PM Scott Stokes <scott@abovegradeengineering.com> wrote:
Kyle,
Can you send me the conditions of approval for this project so we can get going on the final
map?
Thanks
To comply with San Luis Obispo's COVID-19 Shelter at Home ordinance our
office at 245 Higuera Street will be temporarily closed to the public until
further notice. During this time our team continues to be available via
phone and email to discuss your projects. We apologize for any delays you
may experience during this time. Your patience is greatly appreciated.
Scott Stokes, PE
President
Main: (805) 540-5115 X 302 | Direct: (805) 548-1172
245 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
From:Bell, Kyle
To:Whipple, Anthony
Cc:Cruce, Greg
Subject:RE: Serrano
Date:Wednesday, September 1, 2021 4:21:31 PM
Attachments:Rourke, 163 Serrano Heights.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
I also found this old Arborist Report associated with the project from 2019, but it didn’t really
have anything to do with our review. Just thought you might want it for your records.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Bell, Kyle
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 3:45 PM
To: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Serrano
Also, do you have any notes about which of the 10 trees you identified in your email below
were located on the neighbor’s property?
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Bell, Kyle
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 3:40 PM
To: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Serrano
Any updates from your meeting last Monday?
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 11:09 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Serrano
Kyle,
I will be meeting with John on Monday the 30th to review his trees and complete my
inspection report. I would like to get a vision of what Mr. Rourke is trying to accomplish.
From my field inspection notes I have 7 trees total removed and 3 disfigured starting at
Steven Stelfox property West roaming Eastbound toward Serrano Hight’s.
Tree #1. Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak 6 inches at base under native DBH.
Tree #2. Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak 8 inches at base under DBH.
Tree #3. Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak 8 inches at base under DBH.
Tree #4 Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 6 inches at base under DBH.
Tree #5 Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak 8 inches at base under DBH.
Tree #6 Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak 15 inches at base without measuring prior to
removal will be problematic to enforce disputed DBH.
Tree #7 Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak 15 inches at base without measuring prior to
removal will be problematic to enforce disputed DBH.
We discovered the three Coast live oaks # 8,9,and10 Topped and disfigured. However, I
will need to remeasure with the Property owner present, to help him comprehend ISA
standards/ our City Tree Regulations.
Tree #8 Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak DBH? Topped and disfigured.
Tree #9 Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak DBH? Topped and disfigured.
Tree #10 Quercus agrifolia Coastal Live Oak DBH? Topped and disfigured.
I sent John an email notifying him of our tree regulations. Urban Forest Services will
continue monitoring this property for any disputed tree violations.
Let me know if you have any questions
Thank you,
Anthony Whipple
Acting City Arborist
Public Works
Urban Forest Services
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E awhipple@slocity.org
T 805.781.7021
C 805.431.0398
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 5:39 PM
To: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Serrano
Hey Anthony,
Does this write up include any evaluation of the trees that were removed on the neighbors
property? They were saying that there were trees removed over 10-inches on their
property. Did you note that on our site visit?
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 10:20 AM
To: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Serrano
Hi John,
The city values trees as an important part of the natural, urban and economic
environment and efforts shall be made to protect, preserve, and create the conditions that
will promote the preservation of trees.
The chief complaint was about the 2 trees on the fence line at a low stump measured 15
inch in diameter which may or may not be a violation of the over 10 inch native regulation.
Moreover, the pruning photos attached are of concern.
This is a friendly reminder to review our City Tree Regulations with respect to sections
12.24.150 and 12.24.170
Before
After
Tree topping of Coast live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) this practice reduces its food-making
capacity, and creates large wounds that are susceptible to insect invaders and severe
fungal decay. Proper care is based on a thorough understanding of tree physiology and
tree biomechanics. Trees need foliage to manufacture food. Removing all or most of the
foliage puts the tree on a starvation diet. To grow new foliage the tree depends on sugars
stored in the roots and stem. In order to continue manufacturing food for itself the tree will
activate growth from epicormic buds which we observe as “water sprouts”. These epicormic
branches, or water sprouts, must grow vigorously and quickly to replace lost foliage if the
tree is not to starve. As they grow they are significantly more prone to breakage and failure
than normal branches. Also, large wounds can compromises the tree’s chemical defense
system. Attacks from insects, disease, and fungal pathogens can follow. With mature trees
that have too little space to thrive. One option of reasonably reducing a tree’s overall height
and width is crown reduction. Crown reduction is a typical pruning technique, but one that
should be employed judiciously.
12.24.150
Protection of trees.
A. No person shall:
1. Trim, prune or cut any tree unless such work conforms to this chapter and is performed
in accordance with all International Society of Arboriculture standards. In no case shall
more than one-third of the tree canopy be removed.
3. Willfully injure, disfigure or intentionally destroy by any means any tree, except with
permits described elsewhere in this chapter.
12.24.170
Enforcement.
The public works department shall be responsible for enforcement of this chapter.
A. Any person deemed responsible for damaging a tree, failing to plant trees required as a
condition of a tree removal or other permit, or removing a tree without a permit as described
in this chapter shall be liable for civil penalties to the city.
2. The property owner shall also be held responsible for damaging or removing a tree on
the owner’s property without a permit as described in this chapter and be liable for
additional civil penalties to the city as described in subsection (A)(1) of this section.
Let me know if you have any questions
Thank you,
Anthony Whipple
Acting City Arborist
Public Works
Urban Forest Services
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E awhipple@slocity.org
T 805.781.7021
C 805.431.0398
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 8:23 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Trees <trees@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serrano
I will probably do trimming this weekend sp please get me any advice before then. I Met with Ron
Combs on site before he retired and feel like I know what I can and cant do. Please let me know
where I am mistaken. As far as conditions of Subdivision it call for protection of any oak 4" or greater
in the building envelope, there were no oaks in the proposed building envelopes only in the side
yards and setbacks. The pile of wood chips is not construction or dirt work and therfore doesnt meet
the requirements for stockpiles either. Mike Ive begun including you on these emails because the
only neighbor who spoke out against my Subdivision is now using city resourses to harass me. At this
point Id appreciate all contact and communication to be through email (no more surprise visits).
Thank you for all of your time, sorry to always be the squeaky wheel.
John
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, 7:57 AM Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Hey John,
Can you hold off on any more trimming, we are working on a write up for you about best
practices that need to be addressed, and it would seem that at least two of the trees you
cut down were Oaks over 10-inches in diameter.
It would be wise to hold off on any other improvements at this time, until we address the
complaints we have received.
However, it would be helpful if you could do something about the wood chip pile.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: John Rourke <rourkefam@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 7:31 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Trees <trees@slocity.org>
Subject: Serrano
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Hi guys we will be doing more trimming and clearing, never heard back about the last round. Did I
miss anything.
From:Cruce, Greg
To:Horn, Matt
Subject:RE: Tree Damage Fines
Date:Monday, November 22, 2021 6:52:00 PM
Attachments:Rorke 163 Serrano Hts Canopy Restoration.pdf
We’ll discuss this more in the morning, but I wanted you to see the existing restoration plan
and make sure I’m on the same page as you.
1. Compute new fines appropriately (likely reduces by half because of no development)
2. Draft a staff report outlining the situation for the TC
a. With recommendation of fine or reduced fine for additional plantings
3. Require annual evaluation by Greenvale every March to report on trees.
4. If we get concurrence at TC meeting, we add an item the next available CC consent.
Lastly, TC Agenda for 12/6 meeting was due today but Megan can wait til Wednesday if
needed. I know not ideal, but do you see any harm in this going on January TC meeting?
Greg Cruce
Deputy Director of Maintenance Operations
Public Works Department
805.781.7264
gcruce@slocity.org
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2021 9:52 PM
To: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: Tree Damage Fines
Greg,
I didn’t spend a lot of time on this because I think 12.24.170 is pretty clear. I think that we proceed
like this:
1. Compute the civil penalty at the value of the tree times two, plus all staff costs related to the illegal
tree removal or tree damage.
2. Develop a replanting plan and restoration plan for the existing tree that will plant at a minimum of
three trees that are forty-eight-inch box tree.
3. Work the fine amount and the replanting plan through the tree committee with a goal of obtaining
concurrence from TC and property owner.
a. I support the idea if we can augment the replanting plan with timeframes for compliance,
regular notification from a third-party arborist on tree status, regular watering, and
increasing the number of plantings to reduce the civil penalty amount.
b. Hopefully, the TC and PO and come to concurrence on a good plan that is uncontested.
4. If we have concurrence, we can put this on the City Council as a consent item with a resolution
memorializing the revised civil penalty and replanting plan. Otherwise, it would be a business item
to hear the appeal.
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
From:Hannula, Hal
To:Bell, Kyle; Avila, Richard
Subject:Re: Agenda Correspondence for 04/14/2021 PC Meeting
Date:Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:05:35 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Hi Kyle,
Feel free to call my city cell number. Our conditions and code requirements for the
subdivision and future development will cover the drainage. Although the map shows a
private drainage easement, that would not allow future development to significantly modify or
increase the drainage beyond our code and existing California statutes. Downstream
properties are expected to accepted historical upstream drainage. We would appreciate an
invite for a site inspection of the neighbors existing drainage situation. We could add a
condition about future development requiring a construction management plan prior to
grading or building permits to be approved by the Community Development Department or
Director if you or others think that might be necessary. If we do this, we will most likely need
to add a holds/alert in energov or we may not capture in the future. I don't expect that there
will need to be a follow-up on the spring or perched water situation.
Hal Hannula
Supervising Civil Engineer
City of San Luis Obispo
Community Development
Engineering Development Review
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E hhannula@slocity.org
T 805.781.7201
C 805.431.0083
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 2:38 PM
To: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Avila, Richard <RAvila@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Agenda Correspondence for 04/14/2021 PC Meeting
Hey Hal, can you provide some insight on the Agenda Correspondence letter we received
for the PC hearing this evening for 163 Serrano Heights. Please let me know if there are
any concerns related to the information presented in the letter.
Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Stelfox
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
T 805.781.7524
From: Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 11:46 AM
To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>
Cc: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Agenda Correspondence for 04/14/2021 PC Meeting
Hello,
Linked below is Agenda Correspondence for the Planning Commission meeting on April 14,
2021.
Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Stelfox
Bcc: Planning Commission Group
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Jill Stelfox
To:Advisory Bodies; Corey, Tyler
Cc:Steven Stelfox
Subject:Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55:48 PM
Attachments:Rourke Property 163 Serrano Heights Dr. Erosion Concerns.pdf
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would like to
request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this
body approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees
from our lot and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us
were home and neither gave permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave
the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch pile within 15 feet of our roof line above
us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site
this body has to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one
watching what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox <
wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door
neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163
Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and
the lot splits. Our side yard & backyard run along the rear of
proposed lots 2 and 3. These are above us on the hill and run
downward into our yard. The slope is significant between our
properties. The rear section of proposed lot 3 - as you head away
from the existing barn towards and into my backyard through
proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then drops off in
my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue over the past 10
plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the
seasonal stream in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot
3 is suspect, with the adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%.
In addition, a known underground stream runs across proposed lot 3
toward the seasonal stream below. This underground stream, which
is not noted on the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of
wild berry vines tracing the stream and running down the hill across
proposed lots 2 and 3 then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the
hillside for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to
drainage and runoff issues from the above Rourke parcel, and the
path of the underground stream. We have concerns that development
of these lots could have compounding and adverse effects on
drainage. We have particular concerns that any development on top
of the underground stream could alter its course towards the path of
least resistance - our house. It is our belief that these have not been
properly vetted and should not be developed. We request that the lot
split not be granted until natural underground stream, drainage and
erosion issues are adequately investigated, and we have security and
surety that run off and erosion due to splitting the development of this
single lot into three will not be our liability or cause further harm to
the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the
requirements under the California Water Board Construction General
Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or related, there is a requirement to
develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the
underground stream on this parcel of land feed into an underground
basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin
3-009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources
%2fjs%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.774555171
4322108, which requires additional review of the subterranean
stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction
equipment access to the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano
Heights Drive provides access to the Madonna trail head. Further,
Serrano Heights Drive narrows to single lane and becomes very
congested with vehicles parking on both sides of the street to access
the Madonna trail head. The city is aware of this narrowing and
congested path and provides a pick sized truck for trash and recycling
services. Larger trucks and construction equipment will be limited
and likely unable to proceed past our house, due to congestion and
the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past my driveway. This
results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and staging area.
Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic parked along
either side of the road and the limited access for construction
equipment to maneuver on the street without accessing using my
driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Jill Stelfox
To:Advisory Bodies; Corey, Tyler
Cc:Steven Stelfox
Subject:Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:49:41 PM
Attachments:Rourke Property 163 Serrano Heights Dr. Erosion Concerns.pdf
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project that this body
approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed nearly a dozen trees from our lot and
the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors (parcel 36). Neither of us were home and neither gave
permission. In addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch pile
within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some over site this body has
to ensure that these type of issues have consequences. Is no one watching what Mr Rourke is
doing? We need to find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox < wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope next door neighbor of
John Rourke and have enjoyed being his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill from 163 Serrano
Heights Drive: the property of the proposed exception and the lot splits. Our side
yard & backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and 3. These are above us
on the hill and run downward into our yard. The slope is significant between our
properties. The rear section of proposed lot 3 - as you head away from the existing
barn towards and into my backyard through proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly
steeper and then drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an issue
over the past 10 plus years, which has caused substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to the seasonal stream
in my backyard is significant. The 18% grade for lot 3 is suspect, with the
adjacent drop off in our yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a known underground
stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the seasonal stream below. This
underground stream, which is not noted on the plats or report submitted, is
evidenced by run of wild berry vines tracing the stream and running down the
hill across proposed lots 2 and 3 then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope of the hillside for
proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant erosion due to drainage and runoff issues
from the above Rourke parcel, and the path of the underground stream. We have
concerns that development of these lots could have compounding and adverse
effects on drainage. We have particular concerns that any development on top of
the underground stream could alter its course towards the path of least resistance -
our house. It is our belief that these have not been properly vetted and should not
be developed. We request that the lot split not be granted until
natural underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are adequately
investigated, and we have security and surety that run off and erosion due to
splitting the development of this single lot into three will not be our liability or
cause further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval and the requirements
under the California Water Board Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-
DWQ or related, there is a requirement to develop a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan. Further, the underground stream on this parcel of land feed into
an underground basin that has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the Groundwater Basin 3-009 in
San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fresources%2fjs%2fma
pconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=0.7745551714322108, which requires
additional review of the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction equipment access to
the site. Not noted on the report is that Serrano Heights Drive provides access to
the Madonna trail head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive narrows to single lane and
becomes very congested with vehicles parking on both sides of the street to access
the Madonna trail head. The city is aware of this narrowing and congested path
and provides a pick sized truck for trash and recycling services. Larger trucks and
construction equipment will be limited and likely unable to proceed past our
house, due to congestion and the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past my
driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a turnaround and staging
area. Consideration needs to be given to the amount of traffic parked along either
side of the road and the limited access for construction equipment to maneuver on
the street without accessing using my driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Jill Stelfox
To:Wilbanks, Megan
Cc:Steven Stelfox; Corey, Tyler; Scott, Shawna; Bell, Kyle
Subject:Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
Date:Monday, August 23, 2021 7:22:37 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Megan-
I would like to find time on the Planning Commission meeting on 8/25 to speak regarding the
Rourke Development and the damage to our property. I was told that you can help me do that.
Thank you -
Jill Stelfox
On Aug 16, 2021, at 11:25 AM, Wilbanks, Megan <mwilbanks@slocity.org>
wrote:
Good Morning,
Thank you for taking the time to relay your concerns. As you indicated below,
the Planning Commission approved the 163 Serrano Heights project on April
14, 2021, as reflected in the Minutes from that meeting. The Architectural
Review Commission is meeting virtually via Zoom this evening at 5:00 p.m. and
you are welcome to join the webinar to provide public comment on non-agenda
items- instructions can be found on the cover of the agenda. However, since
the date of Planning Commission’s approval, the Architectural Review
Commission has not reviewed the 163 Serrano Heights project. The next
Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021
at 6:00 p.m. via teleconference. The agenda, and Zoom instructions, will be
published this Wednesday, August 18th; you are welcome to join the webinar to
relay your concerns.
Your correspondence will be archived and distributed to both the Planning
Commission and the Architectural Review Commission. Copied on this
response are staff that can provide further information about the project:
Tyler Corey – Deputy Community Development Director and Staff
Liaison to the Planning Commission
Shawna Scott – Senior Planner and Staff Liaison to the Architectural
Review Commission
Kyle Bell – Associate Planner assigned to the 163 Serrano Heights
project when it was reviewed by Planning Commission
Sincerely,
Megan Wilbanks
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mwilbank@slocity.org
T 805.781.7103
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 7:55 PM
To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>
Cc: Steven Stelfox <
Subject: Re: Item 2 - SBDV-2029-2018 (163 Serrano Heights)
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click
links, or respond.
I now also understand that there is a committee meeting tomorrow August 16. I would
like to request a speaking slot at that meeting.
On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jill Stelfox <jstelfox@mac.com> wrote:
Hello -
We are seeking urgent help with what is happening on the below project
that this body approved in April 2021. Mr Rourke has now removed
nearly a dozen trees from our lot and the lot (parcel 37) of our neighbors
(parcel 36). Neither of us were home and neither gave permission. In
addition Mr. Rourke chose to leave the nearly 15ft wide and 7ft tall mulch
pile within 15 feet of our roof line above us.
We have filed an incident report with SLOPD, but there must be some
over site this body has to ensure that these type of issues have
consequences. Is no one watching what Mr Rourke is doing? We need to
find a way to stop the damage.
I await your response.
Jill Stelfox
On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Steven Stelfox
< wrote:
Greetings -
I live at 131 Serrano Heights Drive. I’m the downhill slope
next door neighbor of John Rourke and have enjoyed being
his neighbor.
Our property is immediately adjacent to and runs downhill
from 163 Serrano Heights Drive: the property of the
proposed exception and the lot splits. Our side yard &
backyard run along the rear of proposed lots 2 and 3. These
are above us on the hill and run downward into our yard.
The slope is significant between our properties. The rear
section of proposed lot 3 - as you head away from the
existing barn towards and into my backyard through
proposed lot 2 - becomes increasingly steeper and then
drops off in my yard. Drainage and runoff have been an
issue over the past 10 plus years, which has caused
substantial erosion to our yard.
The downhill slope from the barn on the Rourke property to
the seasonal stream in my backyard is significant. The 18%
grade for lot 3 is suspect, with the adjacent drop off in our
yard and exceeds 20%. In addition, a known underground
stream runs across proposed lot 3 toward the seasonal
stream below. This underground stream, which is not noted
on the plats or report submitted, is evidenced by run of wild
berry vines tracing the stream and running down the hill
across proposed lots 2 and 3 then into our parcel.
Attached is a PDF that contain pictures that show the slope
of the hillside for proposed lot 3 and lot 2, the significant
erosion due to drainage and runoff issues from the above
Rourke parcel, and the path of the underground stream. We
have concerns that development of these lots could have
compounding and adverse effects on drainage. We have
particular concerns that any development on top of the
underground stream could alter its course towards the path
of least resistance - our house. It is our belief that these have
not been properly vetted and should not be developed. We
request that the lot split not be granted until natural
underground stream, drainage and erosion issues are
adequately investigated, and we have security and surety
that run off and erosion due to splitting the development of
this single lot into three will not be our liability or cause
further harm to the hillside in its entirety.
We believe that based on the report submitted for approval
and the requirements under the California Water Board
Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ or
related, there is a requirement to develop a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan. Further, the underground stream
on this parcel of land feed into an underground basin that
has been recognized by the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA) as a known part of the
Groundwater Basin 3-009 in San Luis Obispo Valley per
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?
jsonfile=https%3a%2f%2fsgma.water.ca.gov%2fportal%2fres
ources%2fjs%2fmapconfigs%2fGspSubmittalsConfig.js&_dc=
0.7745551714322108, which requires additional review of
the subterranean stream.
In addition, we have concerns about traffic and construction
equipment access to the site. Not noted on the report is that
Serrano Heights Drive provides access to the Madonna trail
head. Further, Serrano Heights Drive narrows to single lane
and becomes very congested with vehicles parking on both
sides of the street to access the Madonna trail head. The city
is aware of this narrowing and congested path and provides
a pick sized truck for trash and recycling services. Larger
trucks and construction equipment will be limited and likely
unable to proceed past our house, due to congestion and
the streets narrowing to single lane 50 feet past my
driveway. This results in my driveway being used for a
turnaround and staging area. Consideration needs to be
given to the amount of traffic parked along either side of the
road and the limited access for construction equipment to
maneuver on the street without accessing using my
driveway as the turnaround.
Steven Stelfox
M:
From:Linda Harvey
To:Bell, Kyle
Subject:SBDV 163 Serrano
Date:Sunday, April 11, 2021 10:52:09 AM
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Dear Mr. Bell,
We have reviewed the proposed subdivision at 163 Serrano Heights Dr. and have a few questions about
the proposed plan.
1-If the subdivision is approved is there anything preventing an owner from further subdividing the parcel
with the existing residence on it in the future?
2-What are the orientation and setbacks of the proposed lots?
3-Was a slope calculation done on the unimproved lot prior to approval of the lot line adjustment?
4-Has a slope calculation been done on the unimproved lot that was created by the lot line adjustment?
5-Did the current owner obtain a grading permit on the grading that he has already done on the
unimproved lot?
If so, was there a slope calculation done on that lot?
6-Did the current owner obtain a permit for the tree removal that has already been done?
Looking forward to your prompt response.
Kent and Linda Harvey
150 Serrano Heights Drive
lindaharvey569@rocketmail.com
From:Bell, Kyle
To:Van Leeuwen, Kyle
Subject:Serrano Example
Date:Wednesday, May 12, 2021 9:15:53 AM
Attachments:SBDV-2029-2018 PC Report.docx
SBDV-2029-2018 PC Resolution.docx
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Serrano Example
Kyle Bell
pronouns he/him/his
CDD Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Kala, Nanika
To:Accounts Payable
Subject:Vendor: SWCA, Receipt 37394, PO 607552, Invoice: 118047, amount $1,587.83
Date:Tuesday, November 3, 2020 7:22:51 AM
Attachments:image001.png
163 Serrano Heights Subdivision Invoice 000118047.pdf
163 Serrano Heights Subdivision payment to SWCA
Thank you
Nanika Kala
Administrative Analyst
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E nkala@slocity.org
T 805.783.7850
slocity.org
From:Aggson, Keith
To:Department Heads
Subject:Adverse Weather this Week.
Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 1:49:09 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
Annex H Adverse Weather FINAL.doc
All,
Just finished with NWS briefing related to the upcoming storm late Tuesday through Friday
AM. Expected rain in SLO to be 4-6” with steady winds at 35mph and gust to nearly
50mph. SLOFD is assessing the need for upstaffing and encourage all Departments
prepare for potential extended power outages, flooding and hazard trees. As more
information becomes available we will share out. The Public Works Director is the IC for
Adverse Weather events:
https://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?
CityName=San+Luis+Obispo&state=CA&site=LOX&textField1=35.2828&textField2=-120.6
59&e=0#.YA86x2hKg2w
Additional information:
Folder: Emergency Plan and Operations Center
Document: Comprehensive Disaster Leadership Plan 2020.pdf
Thank you,
Keith Aggson
pronouns he/him/his
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Aggson, Keith
To:Department Heads
Subject:FW: Operational Period Emphasis 9/20 - 9/26
Date:Monday, September 20, 2021 9:07:00 AM
Attachments:09.20.2021 to 09.26.2021 Operational Period Emphasis.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
SHARING
Keith Aggson
Fire Chief
2021 SLO County Fire Chiefs President
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Denise Y. Yi <dyi@co.slo.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 8:52 AM
To: Elizabeth Merson <emerson@co.slo.ca.us>; Vince Pierucci <vpierucci@co.slo.ca.us>; Tara
Kennon <TKennon@co.slo.ca.us>; Shantessy Kaye <skaye@co.slo.ca.us>; Heather L Hildenbrand
<hhildenbrand@co.slo.ca.us>; Phil D'Acri <pdacri@co.slo.ca.us>; Nicholas Drews
<ndrews@co.slo.ca.us>; Bonnie Monzel <bmonzel@co.slo.ca.us>; Leigh Ann K Alcorn
<lalcorn@co.slo.ca.us>; Kelly Van Buren <kvanburen@co.slo.ca.us>; Anita Konopa
<akonopa@co.slo.ca.us>; Frederick S Rosen <frosen@co.slo.ca.us>; Jennifer A. Miller
<JeAMiller@co.slo.ca.us>; Christine Gaiger <cgaiger@co.slo.ca.us>; Jessica E Harris
<jeharris@co.slo.ca.us>; Maya R Craig-Lauer <mcraiglauer@co.slo.ca.us>; James L. Beebe
<jbeebe@co.slo.ca.us>; Liz Pozzebon <lpozzebon@co.slo.ca.us>; Aaron Labarre
<alabarre@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael L. Groves <MGroves@co.slo.ca.us>; Jennifer Shay
<jshay@co.slo.ca.us>; Penny E. Borenstein <pborenstein@co.slo.ca.us>; Laurie Salo
<lsalo@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Abby H Lassen <alassen@co.slo.ca.us>; Cynthia A McCown <cmccown@co.slo.ca.us>; Neda G
Alzraiee <nalzraiee@co.slo.ca.us>; Sara L Nygaard <snygaard@co.slo.ca.us>; Eric M Boyd
<eboyd@co.slo.ca.us>; Sean T Silbert <ssilbert@co.slo.ca.us>; Alexander R Guill
<aguill@co.slo.ca.us>; Danielle Perez Madrid <dperezmadrid@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Shoresman
<mshoresman@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Coughlin <mcoughlin@co.slo.ca.us>; Rita L. Neal
<rneal@co.slo.ca.us>; Morgan Torell <mtorell@co.slo.ca.us>; Kenny W Herrscher
<kherrscher@co.slo.ca.us>; Robin Hendry <rhendry@co.slo.ca.us>; Landon J King
<lking@co.slo.ca.us>; Tamara Kaizuka <tkaizuka@co.slo.ca.us>; Shane A Yu <sayu@co.slo.ca.us>;
SLOJimBeebe (slojimbeebe@gmail.com) <slojimbeebe@gmail.com>; Stacy Evans
<sevans@co.slo.ca.us>; Glen M Miller <gmmiller@co.slo.ca.us>; Karen Jones
<karenjones@ombudsmanslo.org>; Tami D. Douglas-Schatz <tdouglas-schatz@co.slo.ca.us>; Anne
Robin <arobin@co.slo.ca.us>; Phyllis M Guaspari <pguaspari@co.slo.ca.us>; Christy Mulkerin
<cmulkerin@co.slo.ca.us>; Mark Zeltmann <mzeltmann@co.slo.ca.us>; cbryson@atascadero.org;
Eddy Moore <Eddy.Moore@fire.ca.gov>; William Hollingsworth <whollingsworth@cambriacsd.org>;
john.j.nielsen13.nfg@mail.mil; mjp9_pge.com <mjp9@pge.com>; slieberman_fivecitiesfire.org
<slieberman@fivecitiesfire.org>; James.Grennan_parks.ca.gov <James.Grennan@parks.ca.gov>;
Steve Knuckles <sknuckles@morrobayca.gov>; jstornetta_prcity.com <jstornetta@prcity.com>;
rob.roberson_sanmiguelcsd.org <rob.roberson@sanmiguelcsd.org>; Aggson, Keith
<kaggson@slocity.org>; Chief_templetoncsd.org <Chief@templetoncsd.org>;
dmccrain@morrobayca.gov; smv7800@gmail.com; rrickard@atascadero.org; Scott Collins
<scollins@morrobayca.gov>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; James Lewis
<jlewis@pismobeach.org>; mbronson@groverbeach.org; wmcdonald@arroyogrande.org;
gcarpenter@prcity.com; Stephanie Landgraf <slandgraf@co.slo.ca.us>; Robert M. Crout
<rcrout@co.slo.ca.us>; Jeremiah Mayes <jmayes@co.slo.ca.us>; Herzig, Rebecca(ASH)@DSH
<Rebecca.Herzig@dsh.ca.gov>; Ivet Silva <isilva@co.slo.ca.us>; Benjamin D Blair
<bblair@co.slo.ca.us>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Sophie M Glazebrook
<sglazebrook@co.slo.ca.us>; Jon Ansolabehere <jansolabehere@co.slo.ca.us>; Nina Negranti
<nnegranti@co.slo.ca.us>; Amber N Carbo <acarbo@co.slo.ca.us>; Cecilia Azziz Baumgartner-ED
Director FHMC <cecilia.azzizbaumgartner@dignityhealth.org>; Lauriston, Emma
<Emma.Lauriston@tenethealth.com>; carrie.vucasovich@tenethealth.com; Shauna St. Vincent-
Emergency Department Manager- AGCH <shauna.st.vincent@dignityhealth.org>; Teresa McCarthy
White <tmccarthywhite@co.slo.ca.us>; phillip.koziel@dsh.ca.gov; Read, Chris <cread@slocity.org>
Subject: Operational Period Emphasis 9/20 - 9/26
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good morning,
Please see the attached Op Period Emphasis for the current operational period.
Thanks,
Denise
Denise Yi
COVID-19 Plans Section Chief
County Health Agency Department Operations Center (CHADOC)
O: 805-788-2067 | M: 805-266-0987
dyi@co.slo.ca.us | ReadySLO.org
From: Denise Y. Yi
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 3:45 PM
To: Elizabeth Merson <emerson@co.slo.ca.us>; Vince Pierucci <vpierucci@co.slo.ca.us>; Denise Y. Yi
<dyi@co.slo.ca.us>; Tara Kennon <TKennon@co.slo.ca.us>; Shantessy Kaye <skaye@co.slo.ca.us>;
Heather L Hildenbrand <hhildenbrand@co.slo.ca.us>; Phil D'Acri <pdacri@co.slo.ca.us>; Nicholas
Drews <ndrews@co.slo.ca.us>; Bonnie Monzel <bmonzel@co.slo.ca.us>; Leigh Ann K Alcorn
<lalcorn@co.slo.ca.us>; Kelly Van Buren <kvanburen@co.slo.ca.us>; Anita Konopa
<akonopa@co.slo.ca.us>; Frederick S Rosen <frosen@co.slo.ca.us>; Jennifer A. Miller
<JeAMiller@co.slo.ca.us>; Christine Gaiger <cgaiger@co.slo.ca.us>; Jessica E Harris
<jeharris@co.slo.ca.us>; Maya R Craig-Lauer <mcraiglauer@co.slo.ca.us>; James L. Beebe
<jbeebe@co.slo.ca.us>; Liz Pozzebon <lpozzebon@co.slo.ca.us>; Aaron Labarre
<alabarre@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael L. Groves <MGroves@co.slo.ca.us>; Jennifer Shay
<jshay@co.slo.ca.us>; Penny E. Borenstein <pborenstein@co.slo.ca.us>; Laurie Salo
<lsalo@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Abby H Lassen <alassen@co.slo.ca.us>; Cynthia A McCown <cmccown@co.slo.ca.us>; Neda G
Alzraiee <nalzraiee@co.slo.ca.us>; Sara L Nygaard <snygaard@co.slo.ca.us>; Eric M Boyd
<eboyd@co.slo.ca.us>; Sean T Silbert <ssilbert@co.slo.ca.us>; Alexander R Guill
<aguill@co.slo.ca.us>; Danielle Perez Madrid <dperezmadrid@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Shoresman
<mshoresman@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Coughlin <mcoughlin@co.slo.ca.us>; Rita L. Neal
<rneal@co.slo.ca.us>; Morgan Torell <mtorell@co.slo.ca.us>; Kenneth W Herrscher
<kherrscher@co.slo.ca.us>; Robin Hendry <rhendry@co.slo.ca.us>; Landon J King
<lking@co.slo.ca.us>; Tamara Kaizuka <tkaizuka@co.slo.ca.us>; Shane A Yu <sayu@co.slo.ca.us>;
SLOJimBeebe (slojimbeebe@gmail.com) <slojimbeebe@gmail.com>; Stacy Evans
<sevans@co.slo.ca.us>; Glen M Miller <gmmiller@co.slo.ca.us>; Karen Jones
<karenjones@ombudsmanslo.org>; Tami D. Douglas-Schatz <tdouglas-schatz@co.slo.ca.us>; Anne
Robin <arobin@co.slo.ca.us>; Phyllis M Guaspari <pguaspari@co.slo.ca.us>; Christy Mulkerin
<cmulkerin@co.slo.ca.us>; Mark Zeltmann <mzeltmann@co.slo.ca.us>; cbryson@atascadero.org
<cbryson@atascadero.org>; Eddy Moore <Eddy.Moore@fire.ca.gov>;
whollingsworth@cambriacsd.org <whollingsworth@cambriacsd.org>; john.j.nielsen13.nfg@mail.mil
<john.j.nielsen13.nfg@mail.mil>; mjp9_pge.com <mjp9@pge.com>; slieberman_fivecitiesfire.org
<slieberman@fivecitiesfire.org>; James.Grennan_parks.ca.gov <James.Grennan@parks.ca.gov>;
sknuckles_morrobayca.gov <sknuckles@morrobayca.gov>; jstornetta_prcity.com
<jstornetta@prcity.com>; rob.roberson_sanmiguelcsd.org <rob.roberson@sanmiguelcsd.org>;
kaggson@slocity.org <kaggson@slocity.org>; Chief_templetoncsd.org <Chief@templetoncsd.org>;
dmccrain@morrobayca.gov <dmccrain@morrobayca.gov>; smv7800@gmail.com
<smv7800@gmail.com>; rrickard@atascadero.org <rrickard@atascadero.org>;
scollins@morrobayca.gov <scollins@morrobayca.gov>; djohnson@slocity.org
<djohnson@slocity.org>; jlewis@pismobeach.org <jlewis@pismobeach.org>;
mbronson@groverbeach.org <mbronson@groverbeach.org>; wmcdonald@arroyogrande.org
<wmcdonald@arroyogrande.org>; gcarpenter@prcity.com <gcarpenter@prcity.com>; Stephanie
Landgraf <slandgraf@co.slo.ca.us>; Robert M. Crout <rcrout@co.slo.ca.us>; Jeremiah Mayes
<jmayes@co.slo.ca.us>; Herzig, Rebecca(ASH)@DSH <Rebecca.Herzig@dsh.ca.gov>; Ivet Silva
<isilva@co.slo.ca.us>; Benjamin D Blair <bblair@co.slo.ca.us>; rhill@slocity.org <rhill@slocity.org>;
Sophie M Glazebrook <sglazebrook@co.slo.ca.us>; Jon Ansolabehere <jansolabehere@co.slo.ca.us>;
Nina Negranti <nnegranti@co.slo.ca.us>; Amber N Carbo <acarbo@co.slo.ca.us>; Cecilia Azziz
Baumgartner-ED Director FHMC <cecilia.azzizbaumgartner@dignityhealth.org>; Lauriston, Emma
<Emma.Lauriston@tenethealth.com>; carrie.vucasovich@tenethealth.com
<carrie.vucasovich@tenethealth.com>; Shauna St. Vincent-Emergency Department Manager- AGCH
<shauna.st.vincent@dignityhealth.org>; Teresa McCarthy White <tmccarthywhite@co.slo.ca.us>;
phillip.koziel@dsh.ca.gov <phillip.koziel@dsh.ca.gov>; Read, Chris <cread@slocity.org>
Subject: COVID-19 Briefing
When: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:00 AM-9:30 AM.
Where: HA.SLO.3450Broad.AcaciaCreek.LargeConfRm
Microsoft Teams meeting
Join on your computer or mobile appClick here to join the meeting
Learn More | Meeting options
________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-
transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information
by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
From:Aggson, Keith
To:Jorgensen, Markie
Cc:Dietrick, Christine
Subject:FW: Supporting Documents
Date:Monday, October 25, 2021 5:46:00 PM
Attachments:10-25 Table Top Safety Message.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Annex H Adverse Weather FINAL.pdf
Comprehensive Disaster Leadership Plan 2020 (Emergency Plan).pdf
image006.png
Team,
Attached are several portions of the Emergency Plan and Supporting Documents. We plan
to update and print the entire emergency plan by late December for each DH and Deputy.
Here a link to the plan; Comprehensive Disaster Leadership Plan 2020.pdf
See you in the AM,
Keith Aggson
Fire Chief
2021 SLO County Fire Chiefs President
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Aggson, Keith
To:Department Heads
Cc:FD_AllChiefs
Bcc:Council_All
Subject:July 21, 2021 - Mutual Aid Update - Red Flag Warning
Date:Wednesday, July 21, 2021 2:24:00 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
SLOFD Ready-Set-Go.pdf
CC: DH/All Chiefs
BCC: CC
All,
In the last 24 hours, SLOFD Engine 6, assigned to Strike Team 1473C at the Dixie Fire,
was assigned to Division Papa the last operational period. During their operational period,
crews continued to build containment lines, mop up and assist with a 100-acre slop over
(fire over the containment line) on the Papa/Quebec division break. They are off the line
restoring equipment for the next operational period.
In addition, SLOFD Fire Captain Matt Lipson is leading a strike team of combined engine
resources from both SLO and SB County, also assigned to the Dixie Fire.
Attached you will find our version of the Ready-Set-Go program I mentioned last night in
regard to preparedness and defensible space in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) areas
in our community. Community preparedness presentations are scheduled for September
2021, March, and May of 2022.
The department is at drawdown however, all stations remain fully staffed.
California Incident Summary
"Intel – for internal use only. Numbers subject to change."
State
Quail , Vegetation Fire, Riverside County, Update
Gilman Springs Rd x Eden Hot Springs Rd, East of Moreno Valley
State DPA, SRA, Riverside Unit
• 45 acres grass and brush, 90% contained
• Ground resources continue to mop-up and strengthen control line
Dixie, Vegetation Fire, Plumas County, Update
Above the Cresta Dam, 9 miles northeast of Magalia
State/Federal DPA, SRA/FRA, Butte Unit, Lassen National Forest
• 85479 acres brush and timber, 15% contained
• Fire is burning in Plumas and Butte counties
• State Route 70 is closed
• Union Pacific Railroad is closed
• Continued threat to multiple communities, power infrastructure (hydroelectric
facilities and major transmission lines), communication sites, state microwave
communications site at Red Hill, Union Pacific Railroad, Sierra Pacific and W.M.
Beatty timberlands, Feather River Canyon Watershed, Pacific Crest Trail, cultural
and historic sites and endangered wildlife species
• Road, trail, and area closures in effect
• Fire remained active overnight with torching and long-range spotting
• Access and terrain continue to hamper control efforts
• Evacuation orders and warnings for multiple communities
• FMAG application approved
• CAL FIRE ECC Support Team 5 (Jarvis) assigned
• Unified Command CAL FIRE IMT 1 (Truax) and Lassen National Forest
Unified
Frenchtown, Vegetation Fire, Yuba County, Update
Frenchtown Dobbins Rd x Seward Ln, 2 miles west of Dobbins
State DPA, SRA, Nevada-Yuba-Placer Unit
• 90 acres brush, 60% contained
• Main fire is 70 acres with 20 acres of spot fires
• Continued threat to structures
• Fire behavior moderated overnight
• Evacuation orders remain in place
• Unified Command CAL FIRE and Yuba County Sheriffs Office
Local
Peak, Vegetation Fire, Kern County, Update
Walker Basin Rd x Piute Mountain Rd, 13 miles south of Lake Isabella
Local/Federal DPA, SRA/FRA, Contract County/Central California District
• 1600 acres grass and brush, 5% contained
• Structures threatened
• Threat to the community of Claraville
• Evacuation orders and warnings remain in place
• Unified Command Kern County Fire and BLM
• Significant augmentation of air resources
• CAL FIRE Agency Rep assigned
• Road closures in the area
• CAL FIRE Air Resources Assigned
• CAL FIRE Ground Resources Assigned
Keith Aggson
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 2:13 PM
To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org>
Cc: Alforque, Michael <malforqu@slocity.org>; Fox, Sammy <sfox@slocity.org>; Hais, Ray
<rhais@slocity.org>; Blattler, James <jblattle@slocity.org>; Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Subject: July 18, 2021 - Mutual Aid Update - Red Flag Warning
CC: DH/All Chiefs
BCC: CC
All,
The National Weather Service has upgraded the fire watches for San Luis Obispo, Santa
Barbara and Ventura Counties to Red Flag Warning, starting today at 6:00 AM PDT, lasting
through Monday 10:00 AM PDT. There will be threats of thunderstorms with potential for
dry lightning, and gusty and erratic winds up to 40 mph gusts due to atmospheric instability
shifting from southwest California. There may be fires starts given very dry fuels, which
may spread unpredictably with gusty and erratic winds. Red Flag Warnings may also
trigger a Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS), however PG&E has no advisements for SLO
County, which may result is local power outages.
CAL FIRE San Luis Unit (SLU) has activated the SLU County Lightning Plan that will be in
place in the event we start to receive lightning fires. Attached is a map showing critical
areas in the County. CAL FIRE SLU resources are under a staffing pattern; however, our
federal partners are short on resources. Fires with the potential for extended attack will rely
heavily on local government resources.
SLOFD Engine 6, part of S/T1473C was reassigned Friday night to the Dixie Fire just North
of Paradise CA. They will be rotating out tomorrow (Monday) with a new crew (Vasquez,
Flatos, and Larsen) who will join up with Firefighters Woods who is staying on the engine.
Patrol 1 has been moved to station 4 as a possible lightning strike response vehicle to keep
the Truck in service in the city.
Please let me know if you have any questions,
Keith Aggson
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Aggson, Keith
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 8:13 PM
To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org>
Cc: Alforque, Michael <malforqu@slocity.org>
Subject: July 12, 2021 - Mutual Aid Update
CC: DH
BCC: CC
All,
Just wanted to provide a quick update. This afternoon SLO City Engine 9166 was dispatch
as part of a SLO County Local Government Type 3 Strike Team (ST1473C) to the rapidly
expanding Madera-Mariposa River Fire located North/West of the Bass Lake area. Fire
Captain John MacDonald is leading the crew of Mike King, Mitch Wood and Luke Doolin.
The strike team went right on the line this afternoon and is engaged in point protection of
structures and protecting evacuation routes.
Deputy Fire Chief Alforque is committed to the Beckwourth complex which unfortunately
experienced structure loss last night and has increased to 91k acres. Chief Alforque
anticipates rotation of a new Type 1 Incident Management Team this coming weekend and
will be returning to the City.
All stations remain staffed and CAL FIRE SLU instituted a staffing pattern this evening to
hold over all on-duty staffing. We will provide expanded initial attack resources within the
county as needed.
California Incident Summary
"Intel – for internal use only. Numbers subject to change."
California PM Incident Summary
State
River, Vegetation Fire, Madera County, Update
Oak Grove Rd and Oak Grove School Rd. , Bootjack
State DPA, SRA, Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit
• 9000 acres grass, brush and oak woodland, 10% contained
• Evacuations orders remain in place
• Threat to the communities of Bailey Flats, Raymond, Nipinnawasee, and
Ahwahnee
• Threat to the Grub Gulch area
• Threat to Historical Landmarks
• Structures threatened
• Damage inspection ongoing
• Access and terrain continue to hamper control efforts
• Short range spotting observed
• Active fire runs with extreme fire behavior
• FMAG Submitted
• CAL FIRE IMT 6 (Veik) on order
• CAL FIRE ECC Support Team 10 (Davis) assigned
Federal
Dexter, Vegetation Fire, Mono County, Update
Wickie Up Rd x Pilot Springs Rd, 11 miles northeast of Mammoth Lakes
Federal DPA, FRA, Inyo National Forest
• 1000 acres grass and timber, 0% contained
• Structures threatened
• Evacuation orders in place
• CAL FIRE Air Resources Assigned
• CAL FIRE Ground Resources Assigned
Bradley, Vegetation Fire, Siskiyou County, Final
Highway 89 x Harris Spring Rd, 7 miles east of McCloud
Federal DPA, FRA, Shasta Trinity National Forest
• 357 acres, 90% contained
• All CAL FIRE Resources Released
Beckwourth Complex, Vegetation Fire, Plumas County, Update
Beckwourth Ranger District, 2 miles northeast of Beckwourth
Federal DPA, FRA/SRA, Plumas National Forest
• 91200 acres brush and timber, 26% contained
• Dotta and Sugar Incidents have been combined into the Beckwourth Complex
• Dotta 594 acres, 99% contained
• Sugar 90,606 acres, 23% contained
• Decrease in acreage on the Dotta due to more accurate mapping
• Continued threat to structures, power infrastructure, recreation sites, historical
and cultural resources
• Road, area, and trail closures in effect
• Union Pacific Railroad has been shut down
• Highway 395 is open to controlled traffic
• Major fiber optic lines have been damaged affecting local cell and internet
• Active fire behavior with wind driven runs and group torching
• Evacuation orders and warnings remain in place
• CA IMT1, Team 4 (Opliger) in command
• FMAG application has been submitted
• Continued commitment of CAL FIRE ground resources
https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Keith Aggson
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Aggson, Keith
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2021 8:50 AM
To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org>
Subject: July 11, 2021 - Mutual Aid Update
CC: DH
BCC: CC
Deputy Fire Chief Alforque is committed to the Beckwourth complex as part of USFS
Incident Management Team 1 in Plumas National Forest. The fire is >83,000 acres with
8% containment. The fire has moved rapidly East over I395 into Nevada with structures
lost and nearly 100 firefighters having to shelter in Temporary Refuge Areas (TRA’s) due to
erratic fire behavior. The weather forecast in the region remains hot, dry, and windy.
Currently CAL FIRE SLU has two strike teams of type 3 engines and two type 1 hand-
crews assigned out of county. No local government resources have been committed yet.
We continue monitor available resources within the county and are prepared to upstaff
accordingly due to weather and utility outages. No planned power outages have affected
SLO yet. All stations remain fully staffed and we can send engine resources as needed.
California Incident Summary
"Intel – for internal use only. Numbers subject to change."
California AM Incident Summary
Federal
Road , Vegetation Fire, San Diego County, Final
Japatul Valley Rd x I-8, Descanso
Federal DPA, FRA, Cleveland National Forest
• 100 acres, 27% contained
• All threats mitigated
• All CAL FIRE Resources Released
Beckwourth Complex, Vegetation Fire, Plumas County, Update
Beckwourth Ranger District, 2 Miles NE of Beckwourth
Federal DPA, FRA/SRA, Plumas National Forest
• 83926 acres brush and timber, 8% contained
• Dotta and Sugar Incidents have been combined into the Beckwourth
Complex
• Dotta 670 acres, 99% contained
• Sugar 83256 acres, 8% contained
• Continued threat to structures, power infrastructure, recreation sites,
historical and cultural resources
• Road, area, and trail closures in effect
• Union Pacific Railroad has been shut down
• Highway 395 is closed
• Moderate overnight fire behavior
• fire moderated at approximately 2200 hours
• Continued construction and improving control lines
• Evacuation orders and warnings remain in place
• Mandatory evacuations are currently underway
• CA IMT1, Team 4 (Opliger) in command
• FMAG application has been submitted
• Continued commitment of CAL FIRE ground resources
Tennant, Vegetation Fire, Siskiyou County, Update
Tennant Rd x Pengrass Rd, 11 miles S of MacDoel
Federal DPA, FRA/SRA, Klamath National Forest
• 10580 acres brush and timber, 95% contained
• Incident is burning on State DPA
• Continued threat to multiple cultural sites and critical wildlife habitat
• Minimal fire behavior with with smoldering observed
• CAL FIRE Ground Resources Assigned
https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/
Keith Aggson
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Aggson, Keith
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 2:41 PM
To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org>
Cc: Blattler, James <jblattle@slocity.org>; Sammy Fox (sfox@slocity.org) <sfox@slocity.org>; Roger
Madgio (rmaggio@slocity.org) <rmaggio@slocity.org>; Hais, Ray <rhais@slocity.org>
Subject: June 7, 2021 - Mutual Aid Update
CC: DH
BCC: CC
Deputy Fire Chief Alforque has been dispatched up to Northern California to the Sugar fire
part of USFS Incident Management Team 4 in Plumas National Forest. Their Incident
Management Team (IMT) received an in-brief from the local Type 3 IMT and assumed the
fires late last night. The fire is <5,000 acres with 5% containment. The fire is skunking
around in steep rugged inaccessible terrain. Crews and equipment are being helicoptered
in and smokejumpers are being used from the Redding base. With the weather forecasted
over the next several days it’s going to be a challenging for them.
Currently CAL FIRE SLO has resources assigned to mutual fires and no local government
resources have been committed yet. We are monitoring available resources within the
county and are prepared to upstaff accordingly due to the projected weather system over
the next 3-5 days. All stations remain fully staffed and we are still capable of sending
additional resources as needed.
Current California Incident Summary
"Intel – for internal use only. Numbers subject to change."
California AM Incident Summary
Federal
Juniper, Vegetation Fire, Modoc County, Update
South Mountain Reservoir x South Mountain Spur, 8 miles west of Goose Lake
Federal DPA, FRA, Modoc National Forest
• 964 acres grass and brush, 5% contained
• Threat to historical and cultural resources
• Fire is in remote location with difficult access
• Continued threat to structures
• Red Flag Warning issued 1500-2100 hours today for gusty winds and low RH
• CAL FIRE Ground Resources Assigned
Beckwourth Complex, Vegetation Fire, Plumas County, Update
3 miles northeast of Beckwourth
Federal DPA, FRA/SRA, Plumas National Forest
• 3035 acres brush and timber, 34% contained
• Dotta and Sugar Incidents have been combined into the Beckwourth Complex
• Dotta 670 acres, 40% contained
• Sugar 2365 acres, 28% contained
• Continued threat to structures in the community of Maddalena
• Evacuation orders in place
• CA IMT1, Team 4 (Opliger) in command
• CAL FIRE air and ground resources assigned
Salt, Vegetation Fire, Shasta County, Update
Gilman Rd x Coal Creek Rd, 11 miles north of Shasta Lake City
Federal DPA, FRA/SRA, Shasta-Trinity National Forest
• 12546 acres brush and timber, 25% contained
• Continued threat to structures
• Continued threat to major power transmission lines, communication, water
supply infrastructure and commercial timberland
• Continued threat to cultural and historic sites, campgrounds, and RV parks
• Limited access and steep terrain
• Evacuation orders and warnings remain in place
• Repopulation continuing where safely possible
• Road, area and trail closures in effect
• 27 Single Residences destroyed
• 14 Minor Structures destroyed, 4 damaged
• Damage inspection is ongoing
• CA IMT1, Team 2 (Minton) in command
• CAL FIRE ground resources assigned
• CAL FIRE Agency Rep assigned
Tennant, Vegetation Fire, Siskiyou County, Update
Tennant Rd x Pengrass Rd, 3 miles south of Mount Hebron
Federal DPA, FRA/SRA, Klamath National Forest
• 10614 acres brush and timber, 71% contained
• Incident is burning on State DPA
• Continued threat to multiple communities, structures, cultural sites, critical
wildlife habitat, private timberland and the Union Pacific Railroad
• Road, area and trail closures in effect
• 2 Single Residences destroyed
• 1 Nonresidential Commercial Property destroyed
• 5 Minor Structures destroyed
• Evacuation warnings remain in place
• CA IMT2, Team 15 (Harris) in command
• CAL FIRE Ground Resources Assigned
Lava, Vegetation Fire, Siskiyou County, Update
Hotlum Rd x Lumm Rd, 4 miles northeast of Weed
Federal DPA, FRA/SRA, Siskiyou Unit, Shasta Trinity National Forest
• 25002 acres brush and timber, 72% contained
• Incident is burning on state State DPA
• Evacuation warnings remain in place
• Continued threat to private timberlands and major power transmission lines
• Union Pacific Railroad sustained damage, repairs are underway
• Road and area closures in effect
• Continued threat to cultural and historic sites
• 12 single residences destroyed, 1 damaged
• 5 minor structures destroyed, 1 damaged
• Damage inspection is ongoing
• Suppression repair is under way
• Excess resources being demobilized
• Incident has transitioned out of unified command
• CAL FIRE ground resources assigned
• CA IMT1, Team 1 (McGowan) in command
Local
Tumbleweed, Vegetation Fire, Los Angeles County, Update
SB I-5, 1 mile south of Gorman, Gorman
Local DPA, SRA, Contract County
• 868 acres grass and brush, 95% contained
• Ground resources continue to mop-up and strengthen control line
• CAL FIRE Agency Rep assigned
• CAL FIRE Ground Resources Assigned
https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/
Please be extra fire safe this weekend, stay hydrated and out of the sun!
Respectfully,
Keith Aggson
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Aggson, Keith
To:Codron, Michael; Maggio, Rodger
Cc:Sadowski, Mark; Bailey, Georgina
Subject:RE: Invite
Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 1:23:38 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Rodger,
Please let me know if we will be bringing in someone from SLO County Environmental
Health on contract to assist with the tank removal process.
Thank you,
Keith Aggson
pronouns he/him/his
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:19 PM
To: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Cc: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey,
Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Invite
Hi Rodger, please keep me up to date on status as more information is learned about this
second tank. We will likely have an issue with their required opening date, Georgina, but
seems like under the circumstances we will need to figure out how to accommodate.
Thanks, -Michael
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:15 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Codron,
Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
I have copied Mark Sadowski and Chief Aggson who can advise on the new tank that was
discovered on your project. Otherwise, look forward to touring the facility in June/July and
the new facility in SLO.
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:50 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Yes I was on a Zoom call with three members of your staff a few weeks ago. Unfortunately we’ve
discovered a second underground tank that needs to be removed…along with approximately 30 tons
of soil from the site. Unfortunately this second tank appears to be more problematic than the first
tank. Any direction you can provide Derek, or perhaps a site visit with some of your key staff at the
property to discuss the issue? I know you’re busy so I appreciate your time on this…and I want you
to know our commitment as a company is to open our SLO store as soon as possible. That remains
our top priority.
Thanks,
Joe
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:40 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Subject: RE: Invite
Joe,
I believe your team has been in touch with our CDD team about inspections and we look
forward to getting project done.
Thanks
Derek
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:22 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Our team is available anytime, and to be honest we would love to host members of your team in MB
ASAP. The store is amazing.
On another note, we’ve become snagged in another construction issue at our Broad Street site. We
are in serious need of help from you and your administration to help us get back on track. Can we
discuss in the next day or so?
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:17 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Cc: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org>; Scott Collins <scollins@morrobayca.gov>
Subject: RE: Invite
Thank you Joe and I had a chance to tour the NHC in Grover years ago and my calendar is
full through the end of June and please share some dates that might work for your team.
Derek
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:19 AM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: Invite
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good morning Derek, I'm hoping I can interest you in a visit to our brand new store in Morro Bay for
a special tour. Can you look at your calendar and let me know when that would be a possibility?
Best,
Joe Armendariz
805.990.2494
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
From:Aggson, Keith
To:Maggio, Rodger; Codron, Michael
Cc:Sadowski, Mark; Bailey, Georgina; Brown, Molly
Subject:RE: Invite
Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 3:06:00 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Understood, thank you!
Keith Aggson
pronouns he/him/his
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:40 PM
To: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>; Brown, Molly
<mbrown@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Molly Brown has the lead and is working under advisement of County Environmental
Health. As of this morning we were not aware of the second tank. We will proceed as we
did with the first, removal by Pacific Petroleum followed up with soil sampling.
Rodger
From: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:24 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Rodger,
Please let me know if we will be bringing in someone from SLO County Environmental
Health on contract to assist with the tank removal process.
Thank you,
Keith Aggson
pronouns he/him/his
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:19 PM
To: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Cc: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey,
Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Invite
Hi Rodger, please keep me up to date on status as more information is learned about this
second tank. We will likely have an issue with their required opening date, Georgina, but
seems like under the circumstances we will need to figure out how to accommodate.
Thanks, -Michael
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:15 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Codron,
Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
I have copied Mark Sadowski and Chief Aggson who can advise on the new tank that was
discovered on your project. Otherwise, look forward to touring the facility in June/July and
the new facility in SLO.
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:50 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Yes I was on a Zoom call with three members of your staff a few weeks ago. Unfortunately we’ve
discovered a second underground tank that needs to be removed…along with approximately 30 tons
of soil from the site. Unfortunately this second tank appears to be more problematic than the first
tank. Any direction you can provide Derek, or perhaps a site visit with some of your key staff at the
property to discuss the issue? I know you’re busy so I appreciate your time on this…and I want you
to know our commitment as a company is to open our SLO store as soon as possible. That remains
our top priority.
Thanks,
Joe
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:40 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Subject: RE: Invite
Joe,
I believe your team has been in touch with our CDD team about inspections and we look
forward to getting project done.
Thanks
Derek
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:22 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Our team is available anytime, and to be honest we would love to host members of your team in MB
ASAP. The store is amazing.
On another note, we’ve become snagged in another construction issue at our Broad Street site. We
are in serious need of help from you and your administration to help us get back on track. Can we
discuss in the next day or so?
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:17 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Cc: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org>; Scott Collins <scollins@morrobayca.gov>
Subject: RE: Invite
Thank you Joe and I had a chance to tour the NHC in Grover years ago and my calendar is
full through the end of June and please share some dates that might work for your team.
Derek
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:19 AM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: Invite
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good morning Derek, I'm hoping I can interest you in a visit to our brand new store in Morro Bay for
a special tour. Can you look at your calendar and let me know when that would be a possibility?
Best,
Joe Armendariz
805.990.2494
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
From:Aggson, Keith
To:Brown, Molly; Maggio, Rodger; Codron, Michael
Cc:Sadowski, Mark; Bailey, Georgina
Subject:RE: Update on tank found at 2600 Broad Street, Natural Healing Center Construction Site
Date:Tuesday, April 13, 2021 11:22:05 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Thank you Molly for the detailed update and information, it is appreciated.
Keith Aggson
pronouns he/him/his
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Brown, Molly <mbrown@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 4:51 PM
To: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: Update on tank found at 2600 Broad Street, Natural Healing Center Construction Site
Hello All,
I want to clarify the status of a second underground tank that Mr. Armendariz, representing
the Natural Healing Center, said was recently found on this site. I believe he is referring to
an old concrete sump structure, which was discovered on the site shortly after the actual
tank was discovered. For this concrete sump, we are waiting for analytical results of a 2nd
round of soil sampling that we did, after the 1st round found lead contamination in the soil
within the concrete sump. The sump had been full of old brick fragments, soil, and other
debris.
I have been working closely with Pacific Petroleum, the hazardous materials remediation
contractor, on the clean-up for this site and for the 790 Foothill construction site, to expedite
remove of any old tanks and associated contaminated soil. I have asked the job
superintendent at 2600 Broad to ensure that Mr. Armendariz is aware of the current status
of soil remediation work being done for this old sump. Please call me if you have any
questions.
Thanks.
Molly
Molly Brown
Fire Inspector III
Fire Department
Fire Prevention
2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240
E mbrown@slocity.org
T 805.781.7560
C 805.431.0302
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 3:06 PM
To: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>; Brown, Molly
<mbrown@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Understood, thank you!
Keith Aggson
pronouns he/him/his
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:40 PM
To: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>; Brown, Molly
<mbrown@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Molly Brown has the lead and is working under advisement of County Environmental
Health. As of this morning we were not aware of the second tank. We will proceed as we
did with the first, removal by Pacific Petroleum followed up with soil sampling.
Rodger
From: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:24 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Rodger,
Please let me know if we will be bringing in someone from SLO County Environmental
Health on contract to assist with the tank removal process.
Thank you,
Keith Aggson
pronouns he/him/his
Fire Chief
Fire Department
Administration
E kaggson@slocity.org
T 805.781.7377
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:19 PM
To: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org>
Cc: Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Bailey,
Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Invite
Hi Rodger, please keep me up to date on status as more information is learned about this
second tank. We will likely have an issue with their required opening date, Georgina, but
seems like under the circumstances we will need to figure out how to accommodate.
Thanks, -Michael
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:15 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Codron,
Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
I have copied Mark Sadowski and Chief Aggson who can advise on the new tank that was
discovered on your project. Otherwise, look forward to touring the facility in June/July and
the new facility in SLO.
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:50 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Yes I was on a Zoom call with three members of your staff a few weeks ago. Unfortunately we’ve
discovered a second underground tank that needs to be removed…along with approximately 30 tons
of soil from the site. Unfortunately this second tank appears to be more problematic than the first
tank. Any direction you can provide Derek, or perhaps a site visit with some of your key staff at the
property to discuss the issue? I know you’re busy so I appreciate your time on this…and I want you
to know our commitment as a company is to open our SLO store as soon as possible. That remains
our top priority.
Thanks,
Joe
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:40 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Subject: RE: Invite
Joe,
I believe your team has been in touch with our CDD team about inspections and we look
forward to getting project done.
Thanks
Derek
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:22 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Invite
Our team is available anytime, and to be honest we would love to host members of your team in MB
ASAP. The store is amazing.
On another note, we’ve become snagged in another construction issue at our Broad Street site. We
are in serious need of help from you and your administration to help us get back on track. Can we
discuss in the next day or so?
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 12:17 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Cc: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org>; Scott Collins <scollins@morrobayca.gov>
Subject: RE: Invite
Thank you Joe and I had a chance to tour the NHC in Grover years ago and my calendar is
full through the end of June and please share some dates that might work for your team.
Derek
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:19 AM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: Invite
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good morning Derek, I'm hoping I can interest you in a visit to our brand new store in Morro Bay for
a special tour. Can you look at your calendar and let me know when that would be a possibility?
Best,
Joe Armendariz
805.990.2494
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
From:Joe Armendariz
To:Johnson, Derek
Cc:Sadowski, Mark; Aggson, Keith; Codron, Michael; Bailey, Georgina
Subject:Broad street construction
Date:Monday, April 26, 2021 9:03:29 AM
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Good morning Derek,
I know you’re buried in things, but is there any chance we can get you to do a quick visit at our Broad
street construction site ASAP? We’re having an issue possibly related to jurisdiction with respect to
some of the mitigation measures occurring on the property. We’re hoping you and your team can
add some clarity so our contractors understand what is going on and we can move forward and get
our doors open.
Thanks,
Joe Armendariz
805.990.2494
From:Joe Armendariz
To:Johnson, Derek; Codron, Michael
Cc:Sadowski, Mark; Aggson, Keith; Bailey, Georgina
Subject:Re: Broad street construction
Date:Monday, April 26, 2021 10:14:04 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Think you Michael,
I recall when I served on the community toxic advisory committee which dealt with the
CUPA program in Santa Barbara County and how it can be a challenge to navigate. So we
really appreciate the City's guidance, and help.
Joe
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:48:51 AM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Bailey,
Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Broad street construction
Thanks for the phone call, Joe. As discussed, we will follow up with our team members who
are on-site multiple times per day. Best, -Michael
From: Codron, Michael
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:12 AM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Bailey,
Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Broad street construction
Good morning, Joe. I will give you a call shortly after 9:30 to get more information.
Thank you,
Michael Codron
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Community Development
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mcodron@slocity.org
T 805.781.7187
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:03 AM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Sadowski, Mark <msadowsk@slocity.org>; Aggson, Keith <kaggson@slocity.org>; Codron,
Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: Broad street construction
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good morning Derek,
I know you’re buried in things, but is there any chance we can get you to do a quick visit at our Broad
street construction site ASAP? We’re having an issue possibly related to jurisdiction with respect to
some of the mitigation measures occurring on the property. We’re hoping you and your team can
add some clarity so our contractors understand what is going on and we can move forward and get
our doors open.
Thanks,
Joe Armendariz
805.990.2494
From:Joe Armendariz
To:Johnson, Derek
Cc:Codron, Michael; Jim Clancy; Valnette Garcia; Bailey, Georgina; Joe Armendariz
Subject:RE: request to meet
Date:Monday, September 27, 2021 3:35:55 PM
Thank you for your response, Derek.
Natural Healing Center is working diligently to complete construction at the site including
working Saturdays. And your team’s cooperation in this process continues to be invaluable.
Let’s keep our foot on the gas until we’re at the finish line.
Look despite the challenges, and there have been several, NHC is proud of the fact that the
dispensary on Broad Street is a “Net Zero” Project. As you know very well, that means it costs
significantly more to build and also takes longer than other projects of similar scope and scale.
But the company is proud that by doing the project this way we’ve forged a meaningful
partnership with the City Council by helping the City meet the goal of creating an
environmentally friendly and sustainable community. The City of SLO will be a cleaner and
greener city thanks in part to NHC’s Net Zero project.
We have also undergone major soil remediation of the property and at a significant financial
expense to us. This will of course accrue to the health benefit of the community, and also the
local environment. However, this caused NHC significant delays that were completely out of
our control. We appreciate the City’s objective here, which is to make sure applicants do not
sit on their licenses and instead work diligently through the planning process to open their
doors to the public. We believe the record shows unequivocally that we have done exactly
that, and that we have consistently reached out to the City for assistance wherever and
whenever it was needed in order to help us stay on track and open on time.
Now, with respect to PG&E, and without assigning blame or motives, suffice it to say their
lack of responsiveness up to now (although I’m feeling more optimistic about things today)
has created additional challenges in what has already been an extremely challenging situation.
But as we approach the last mile of this lengthy construction process, please indulge me as I
reiterate some fundamental points that I believe must be communicated and hopefully
understood by the City.
NHC has invested over $7 million dollars into this project. We invested $4.2 million in
purchasing the land, and now over $3 million in our build-out. This investment, while
substantial by any measure, is consistent with NHCs corporate vision, which is to strive to be
the highest volume retail cannabis sales operator in every market we operate in. We are 3/5ths
of the cannabis market in Grover Beach and with 2 Multi-State operators as competitors, and
still, we outsell them. We are already the #1 dispensary in Morro Bay, less than a year after
opening, and we are #1 in Lemoore by a country mile.
As you will see when we open our doors next month in SLO, our build-outs are state-of-the-
art and set the standard for other retail operators in this space. NHC management team knows
the market, and they know how to carve out more sales based on their knowledge, experience,
and due diligence. Plus they just outwork the competition. NHCs corporate work ethic will
benefit the City of SLO just as it has helped Grover Beach, Lemoore, and Morro Bay. NHCs
store on Broad Street will add several dozen living wage jobs, will result in nearly $50,000 in
direct annual community benefits to local causes, and community programs, not to mention
millions of dollars in the direct, and indirect multipliers from the taxes paid, goods purchased,
and the weekly, monthly, and annual incomes distributed.
Finally, adding a third high-end store to NHCs inventory of SLO County dispensaries will
increase the company’s buying power allowing it to demand products at more competitive
prices which then allows us to pass on these savings to customers while driving a higher
percentage of local foot traffic to the surrounding area. And this has a positive stimulus effect
on its commercial retail neighbors. NHC is also vertically integrated with over 135 acres of
entitled cultivation making the company a genuine farm-to-table operation. And this goes a
very long way to helping NHC keep its commitments to its employees, and also to the city and
the communities we operate in.
The bottom line is this, the City of SLO will be NHCs next beneficiary and we are looking
forward to seeing that happen. I want to thank you in advance for your commitment to helping
NHC bring this exciting project to fruition. And I look forward to seeing you at the grand
opening.
Best,
Joe
Joe Armendariz
Government Affairs Manager
Natural Healing Center, LLC
998 Huston St, Grover Beach, CA 93433
Mobile: 805-990-2494
Email: joe@nhcdispensaries.com
Web: www.nhcdispensaries.com
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 1:38 PM
To: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Jim Clancy <jim@nhcdispensaries.com>; Valnette
Garcia <val@nhcdispensaries.com>; Bailey, Georgina <gbailey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: request to meet
Good afternoon Joe,
It is my understanding that Michael and Georgina were present at the site visit last week,
were made aware of the challenges NHC’s site is facing with PG&E and informed you to
continue working with PG&E. Please continue to work with Michael and Georgina as you
work towards your activation date.
Likewise, on the topic of occupancy, I have attached the letter that was sent to Craig Smith
September 13, 2021, in case you had not received it prior.
Please direct any follow up questions you have to Michael and Georgina who are available
to assist.
Regards,
Derek Johnson
From: Joe Armendariz <joe@nhcdispensaries.com>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 11:31 AM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Jim Clancy <jim@nhcdispensaries.com>; Valnette Garcia <val@nhcdispensaries.com>
Subject: request to meet
Importance: High
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Friday, September 24, 2021
Good morning Derek,
Hope you’re well. As you might be aware, members of NHC’s executive team and others met
with members of your staff yesterday to discuss some of the logistical challenges (primarily
related to PG&E) facing us as we approach the last mile of our long construction process. To
be honest we left the meeting yesterday feeling a little concerned that their wasn’t more of a
sense of urgency shared by some of those present. The reality is there is an important
logistical matter related to PG&E that needs resolving as soon as possible for us to adhere to
our upcoming deadline. And the city’s help could really make a big difference.
I know you’re a really busy guy, however, I’m requesting a meeting between you, our CFO, and
our CEO. I would also be in the meeting. Are you available next week?? I would expect it to
only last about 30-minutes. We can meet at the Broadt Street site. In fact that would be best
so we can show you exactly what is at issue.
Thank you Derek, I look forward to hearing back from you soon, and I really appreciate your
help with this.
Have a great weekend!
Best,
Joe
Joe Armendariz
Government Affairs Manager
Natural Healing Center, LLC
998 Huston St, Grover Beach, CA 93433
Mobile: 805-990-2494
Email: joe@nhcdispensaries.com
Web: www.nhcdispensaries.com
From:Katrina Ackerman
To:Otte, Freddy; Whipple, Anthony
Subject:El Capitan Tree Removal
Date:Thursday, August 19, 2021 10:12:01 AM
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Hi Freddy and Anthony,
My daughter Kaysha let me know you stopped by yesterday to inquire about our property
behind the creek at 919 El Capitan Way. I would love to set up a meeting with the two of you
to discuss the future of that space. She said there was a question about planting trees and yes
we definitely want to have lots of beautiful trees. I just want to make that clear now before we
meet.
What's a good meeting time and date for the two of you?
Warm Regards,
Katrina Ackerman
(
From:Katrina Ackerman
To:Otte, Freddy
Cc:Whipple, Anthony
Subject:Re: El Capitan Tree Removal
Date:Thursday, August 19, 2021 12:54:11 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image003.png
As of now I'm wide open. I have to transport children to and from school so 8-9am and 2:30-
3:30 are not good times. Let me know what works best.
Regards,
Katrina
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, 10:21 AM Otte, Freddy <fotte@slocity.org> wrote:
Good morning Katrina and thank you for the email. I will check Anthony’s schedule
and see when we have some time to meet with you next week. Are there better
times you might be available to meet next week?
Thanks again and take care,
Freddy
Freddy Otte
pronouns he/him/his
Biologist
City Administration
Natural Resources
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E fotte@slocity.org
T 805.781.7511
C 805.431.0111
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Katrina Ackerman <kat.ackerman3@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 10:11 AM
To: Otte, Freddy <fotte@slocity.org>; Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Subject: El Capitan Tree Removal
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or
respond.
Hi Freddy and Anthony,
My daughter Kaysha let me know you stopped by yesterday to inquire about our property
behind the creek at 919 El Capitan Way. I would love to set up a meeting with the two of
you to discuss the future of that space. She said there was a question about planting trees and
yes we definitely want to have lots of beautiful trees. I just want to make that clear now
before we meet.
What's a good meeting time and date for the two of you?
Warm Regards,
Katrina Ackerman
(
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Cohen, Rachel
Cc:Hill, Robert; Cruce, Greg; Basden, Adam; Van Beveren, Daniel
Subject:600-650 Tank Farm & DG Complex
Date:Wednesday, April 21, 2021 9:54:07 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Team:
From what I was hearing this morning, the main point of the access is to connect to Industrial and Broad St, not necessarily the fields. What
is preventing the design from boarding the wetlands and having a ped/bike path connecting 600 to 650 to Industrial and avoiding direct
access to the complex? See diagram below.
From my understanding, a ped/bike bridge is also being planned to connect Industrial to the Righetti Ranch neighborhood over the railroad
tracks. If so, the proposal from RRM would significantly impact the DG Sports Complex
I am aware that I am coming in late to the party, so feel free to let me know if this has already been proposed and/or due to EIR has been
disqualified as an option.
Looking forward to the next convo to help plan this out. .
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Hill, Robert; Cruce, Greg; Basden, Adam
Subject:ECOSLO Tree proposal
Attachments:Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park.msg
Discuss background and approach for ECOSLO’s proposal for tree donation and planting.
Who’s point person, identify roles, other staff to involve, set expectations, etc.
________________________________________________________________________________
Microsoft Teams meeting
Join on your computer or mobile app
Click here to join the meeting <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-
join/19%3ameeting_NTg1MjYwNjUtY2Y0Zi00NzVhLWIxZGYtMjMzNjdjN2RhZmQ1%40thread.v2/0?
context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22a78b182d-94e4-4507-a9a9-330dcb148164%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22033f0e20-8dc2-45f8-aca8-
d937189176aa%22%7d>
Or call in (audio only)
+1 209-645-4165,,767942188# <tel:+12096454165,,767942188#> United States, Stockton
Phone Conference ID: 767 942 188#
Find a local number <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f72d38db-88d0-4b7b-be19-71a20f3a0897?id=767942188> | Reset PIN
<https://mysettings.lync.com/pstnconferencing>
Learn More <https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting> | Meeting options <https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=033f0e20-8dc2-45f8-aca8-d937189176aa&tenantId=a78b182d-94e4-4507-a9a9-
330dcb148164&threadId=19_meeting_NTg1MjYwNjUtY2Y0Zi00NzVhLWIxZGYtMjMzNjdjN2RhZmQ1@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en-
US>
________________________________________________________________________________
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Whipple, Anthony
Cc:Horn, Matt; Cruce, Greg
Subject:ETO Park tree trim & removal
Date:Monday, November 8, 2021 10:24:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good morning, Anthony-
I hope you’re well and congrats on the Arbor Day recognition last week!
I am following up from our earlier conversations and site visit to ETO Park from a few
months ago. The SLO Rotary is continuing to move forward with their project to revitalize
and upgrade the park for the 20th Anniversary (May 2022). When you and I met, we
identified some opportunities to cut back and thin out some of the larger trees, as well as
remove the dead/diseased trees from the park area.
The original Rotary member(s), along with Pat Connelly (local landscape architect who
helped with original project) have identified the trees that can be removed (painted an X on
the trucks). Also, the larger trees that you and I observed will need significant trimming
and branch removal.
I am requesting that we schedule this work to be completed by fist week of January
(if possible) to have the park area cleared for the Rotary to begin their work. The Rotary
plans to schedule time in late January/February for volunteer workdays to add more DG,
add rocks, replace statues, replant shrubs, and replace identified trees, as well as clean-up
and repaint the fencing. FYI, as of last month, the irrigation was working but needed new
batteries for the automatic controllers.
To prepare the park for the volunteer work in Jan/Feb/March, I am happy to meet you at the
site to do another walk through to gage the scope and identify the appropriate trees. My
calendar is up to date, so please feel free to contact me to schedule another site visit.
Thank you!
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Whipple, Anthony
Subject:Eto Park trees
Anthony-
I scheduled it for 50 minutes to allow for ‘travel time’.
Hoping to get your insights on the current trees and flora that is located at the park.
What is healthy?
What/which can be trimmed?
What can be removed?
Ideas or short list for anything that can replaced?
See you on July 9.
Thanks,
Greg
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Whipple, Anthony
Cc:Horn, Matt; Basden, Adam; Cruce, Greg
Subject:ETO Park trees?
Date:Tuesday, June 22, 2021 10:09:38 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good morning Anthony:
I will be working with the local Rotary Club to revitalize Eto Park (176 Brooks Lane) over the
next 6-12 months.
I did a site visit to initiate the discussion and some questions came up regarding the tree
pruning and what may be native and/or can be removed. Hoping to set up time to meet at
the park location in the next few weeks to get your insights and opinions, as well as what
the City scope would be or if we would utilize a contractor (Bunyan Bros, Greenvale, etc.?).
Adam: Once I have more information on what Rotary has for potential ideas and funding, I
will loop you in for the next meeting to ensure you and your staff can weigh in and provide
appropriate support information and any guidelines.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Basden, Adam; Whipple, Anthony
Subject:Eto Park upgrades - SLO Rotary
Date:Thursday, September 30, 2021 4:19:29 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good afternoon Adam and Anthony:
The SLO Rotary is organizing their group and members to invest in upgrading Eto Park for
its 20th Anniversary (May 2022). I have been meeting with their organizational leaders
over the past few months as they make their plans. Additionally, Anthony and I were able
to meet at the park a couple months ago to outline some potential for tree trimming and
removal of dead or diseased trees.
A couple lead members of Rotary are planning to meet with me on October 8 (Friday) and I
am hoping that you both can attend to help identify the scope related to the renovations. I
am expecting confirmation of the meeting time in the next day or two from Rotary and will
then put a hold on your calendars. Expecting a quick 30-minute meeting at Eto Park on
October 8.
Items to consider:
What and how to repair the irrigation
Fencing repair and painting
Identifying which trees and plants can be removed and which need to stay
Discuss the project overview for Rotary contributions such as: new DG, replacement
of rocks and sculpture/statues, benches, new planting, educational signage, etc.
Potential for adding lighting (landscape and safety). Possibility for solar to be
installed on poles to support the lighting
Overview of other general clean-up and upgrades
Thanks in advance for the assistance and I’ll be in contact as soon as I hear from Rotary on
the time for the on-site meeting.
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Ettestad, Sahvanna
Cc:Hyfield, Devin; Basden, Adam; Cruce, Greg
Subject:FW: French Park Pickleball
Date:Thursday, February 4, 2021 8:03:57 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
FYI. Can you do a brief social media notification.
Devin, might be good to notify Brian O’Kelly as a courtesy as well.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 7:48 AM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Harvey, Billy <BHarvey@slocity.org>; Whipple, Anthony
<awhipple@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Klein, Jeff <jklein@slocity.org>
Subject: French Park Pickleball
Hi Devin,
The pickleball courts at French park will be closed on Tuesday, February 9th from 7 am to
12 pm to allow our contractor to trim the pine trees that are overhanging the courts. We will
be posting signs letting the public know of this closure. The tennis courts will remain open.
Thanks,
Adam Basden
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Public Works
Parks Maintenance
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E abasden@slocity.org
T 805.781.7025
C 805.431.0666
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Stanwyck, Shelly
Cc:Scott, Shawna
Subject:FW: Letter To The San Luis Obispo City Council
Date:Tuesday, July 6, 2021 7:49:01 AM
Attachments:807_05_21...lettertothecouncil.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Shelly:
Received this correspondence to Council from Allan Cooper. Some factual errors within
the letter as the City doesn’t approve or endorse any triathlons, trail running, or Mt. Bike
races within the OS, as well as not sure what document he is referencing as the Blueprint
doesn’t have a page 355 (only 144 pages).
Finally, I am not educated on the financial breakdowns referenced at the end of the letter.
We will be prepared to address any questions from Council if they direct them to staff.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Allan Cooper <allancoope@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 5, 2021 6:41 PM
To: emailcitycouncil@slocity.org; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna
<sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: Letter To The San Luis Obispo City Council
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Dear Greg and Shawna -
Would you kindly forward the letter attached
below to the City Council? This letter pertains to
their July 6, 2021 approval of the "Parks and
Recreation Blueprint for the Future". Thanks!
- Allan
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Hill, Robert; Stanwyck, Shelly; Codron, Michael
Subject:FW: Parks and Rec Land
Date:Monday, February 1, 2021 5:08:27 PM
Attachments:Octagon Way 0 citrus ground 2-21.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Just received this interesting email from past PRC Chair. Not sure of the viability of this but
wanted to get your early opinion. Feel free to share with others that may have input.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Steve Davis <davis@mccartydavis.com>
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 3:14 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Jeff Whitener <
Subject: Parks and Rec Land
Greg - Hope all is well and the New Year is off to a good start.
This property came up on the market and I have thought for some time it could be an ideal
parks and rec facility.. As I have mentioned a few times, I think it is key for the City to acquire
parks land they can grow into now, as opposed to wait, since there will be little land available
in the future.
The cost of this is a little over $2/sf. Undeveloped, unentitled land in the City is selling for $8/sf
and there are literally only about three of those parcels left. Entitled lots are $25/sf and up.
It is big enough to house a major sports complex
It is next to the Octagon Barn which is supposed to become a recreation/bike trail hub
There are very few owners that lights would impact
It is far enough from the airport where I do not believe lights would impact airplanes and flight
paths.
It has recently been planted in lemon trees, which is a bummer for them to potentially get
removed, but there is income (lemons) on the property while it is being held until it is
developed.
Outside of the City Limits, but very close to the existing City boundary.
Outside of the box I know, but these opportunities do not come along very often. I truly think
this is worth at least kicking around to see if it could be of value. Happy to discuss more if you
are interested.
Steve
Steve Davis
McCarty Davis Commercial Real Estate
641 Higuera St., Suite 201,
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
805-543-1801 (voice)
805-543-1857 (fax)
805-704-5727 (cell)
www.mccartydavis.com
davis@mccartydavis.com
DRE#: 01843738
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR
THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT NAMED ABOVE.
The information contained in this message may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from
disclosure by law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this communication in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, copying of the
message or the taking of any action on reliance on this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by responsive e-mail or by telephone at the number
shown above.
And my cause: https://www.slofoodbank.org/
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Codron, Michael
Subject:FW: Public Art Mural on Broad St.
Date:Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:56:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good morning Michael-
Hoping you may be able to do some recon on this project and provide me any information
to assist the artists.
This project was not communicated to Meghan Burger or I as part of the City’s Public Art
program, nor was it being managed under our partnership with SLOMA.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and let me know what we can do on our end.
-GA
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Amy McKay <amymckay.art@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 2:39 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Katy McGrath <katy@badgerbranding.com>; Burger, Meghan <mburger@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Public Art Mural on Broad St.
Thanks for the introduction, Katy!
Greg, I spoke with NHC’s CFO this morning and he doesn’t believe the application was ever
submitted so he did so today. Meghan, let me know if you see it and if there’s any other info you
need.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 20, 2021, at 1:43 PM, Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org> wrote:
Good afternoon, Katy and Amy-
Thanks for the email and the background on this project. Yes, very unfortunate
circumstances for you as the artists, as well as for the employees for the
business at this time. Plus, it’s a complicated matter.
I will reach out to our Community Development Department to see if I can help
track down the status of the permit and if even one was submitted.
Also, I’ve copied Meghan Burger who is the new Recreation Manager (the new
Lindsey ). She has only been in this role for about 60 days, so we are both tag
teaming Public Art right now.
One of us will reach out to you both as soon as we have any information.
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
<image001.png>
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
<image002.png>
<image003.png>
<image004.png>
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Katy McGrath <katy@badgerbranding.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 10:16 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; amymckay.art@gmail.com
Subject: Public Art Mural on Broad St.
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click
links, or respond.
Hi Greg-
I spoke this morning with Amy McKay (cc'd here) this morning regarding the mural she
and her team of artists have been working on for the past couple of weeks. She
mentioned that the construction manager asked about her permit for the mural. She
was originally told by her contact with the building owner that a permit was not
required, but later was told it would be required. She passed all the requested
information on to her contact in order for him to execute the permit, but he left the
company without providing a new point of contact and the process stalled, from what
Amy can tell, in February.
I am trying to help her figure out where/if the permit is in process and we are not sure
who the correct person at the city is to contact. We're worried that this beautiful mural
is in danger of being removed because of a technicality and are hoping it can be
approved/permitted as it stands.
Please advise on our next steps or another point of contact to help shed some light for
us.
Thanks in advance!
-Katy
--
Katy McGrath
Owner / Badger
Pronouns: she / her
Badger Branding | 805 550 0900
1880 Santa Barbara Ave, Suite 160 | SLO, CA 93401
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Department Heads
Cc:Hyfield, Devin; Hussey, Gaven; Crisp, Matthew; Villanti, John; Booth, Jeff; Johnson, Lee; Cano, Molly; Bettina
Swigger
Bcc:Council_All
Subject:Hyundai 2021 Filming - Tuesday 6.22.21
Date:Friday, June 18, 2021 11:29:31 AM
Attachments:SLO - Contrast Eye - HYUNDAI - 6-22-2021.pdf
MAP - DT-SLO - GRID2 - Notification .pdf
image003.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
BCC: Council
Good afternoon Department Heads and Council:
Below is information provided by Recreation Manager, Devin Hyfield, in conjunction with
Parking Services, Streets, and Police Department who have been involved for review and
endorsement.
A film company will be conducting filming for a new Hyundai automobile commercial on
Tuesday, June 22 within the Downtown area, French Park, and additional side streets.
Attached are maps of the impacted areas. Please inform any potential staff or divisions
that may need to be aware. I’ve also copied Lee Johnson, Molly Cano, and Bettina
Swigger (DSLO) as an FYI
Over the past month, City staff have been meeting with the permittee regarding a car
film shoot for the new electric Hyundai to take place in Downtown SLO as well as
other locations within the City and in SLO County.
Filming and street closures will take place on Tuesday 6.22.2021 from 7am-2pm
Some locations of City streets will be closed during filming locations with the SLO
CHP office assisting the City with the temporary closures for the specific streets.
Shots will take 3 – 5 minutes and roads will reopen after each on a rolling basis.
There maybe multiple shots per each location, but vehicles and cameras will need to
stage and reset.
No parking signages will be posted along the street areas for the hours of 7:00 am –
2:00 pm, but signage will removed and areas reopened for public access as the
shoots are completed per location.
Filming is expected to be done by noon within the downtown area.
There may be an additional filming at 1800-1845 Santa Barbara St.
Please be aware that some filming locations are within proximity of Fire Station 1 and
production will allow for emergency access.
Deliveries within closure areas will still be allowed and permittee will need to work
around planned deliveries.
Permittee will be notifying all businesses and residents within affected areas this
Saturday and Sunday.
Impacted streets:
Santa Rosa – between Marsh and Peach
Monterey – between Santa Rosa and Morro
Morro – between Monterey and Marsh (advised they need to be out of this area by
11:00 am)
Marsh – between Higuera (101 intersection) and Santa Rosa (advised they need to
be out of the 700 block by 11:00 am)
Higuera – from Nipomo to the Higuera/Marsh intersection
Nipomo – between Higuera and Marsh
Pismo – between Garden and Broad (only need 4 spaces on each side at the
Garden/Pismo intersection)
EA French Park – Parking lot and surrounding streets (Morning Glory, Fuller,
Poinsettia)
For any specific questions, please contact Devin Hyfield at dhyfield@slocity.org or at ex
7295.
Thank you!
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Nelson, Brian; Kloepper, Shelsie
Cc:Horn, Matt; Hyfield, Devin
Subject:Park & Rec projects - updates?
Date:Wednesday, September 1, 2021 1:35:00 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good afternoon Brian and Shelsie-
I am hoping to get more communication on the status of pending and approved projects
related to Parks & Rec. I understand that we are short staffed, many projects occurring at
same time, and new expectations for projects that may not have been on the list, plus I
know having more meetings is not always the solution.
For short term, I am requesting the following status reports (even if they are just ‘on hold’ or
‘status quo’):
1. Cheng Park
2. N. Broad Street
3. P&R Department Office
FYI: I am already up to date on Emerson Park fitness and Mitchell Park revitalization.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Horn, Matt; Hill, Robert
Subject:RE: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:49:06 AM
Attachments:image003.png
image004.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
image010.png
image011.png
image012.png
Interesting.. I’d like to discuss with Bob and the Rangers about this.
You don’t think adding any additional signs (no parking, no trespassing, etc) in this area would suffice?
Over a year ago, there was some talk about moving some large boulders as deterrents as well.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit slocity.org/covid19
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:43 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
See below. What do you think about installing a berm?
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: John Waddell <jwaddell@co.slo.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:48 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Matt, I saw the clean up crews working this morning at the City property on South Higuera. With the new posted no parking signs, it should help reduce camping. However,
there is one area where the vegetation has been removed enough to make it easy to park well of the road and in the trees above the creek. In the picture below, it is most of
this shoulder area up to the on-ramp/bridge area. This is where your contractor had parked their vehicles to load trash. Most of this area is far enough off the road or out of
right of way to avoid CHP enforcement. In these situations, we sometimes build a 2'-3' dirt berm a few feet off the EP If you want to build a berm, we would support it and
issue the City an encroachment permit for the work.
John Waddell
Deputy Director
Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 788-2713 | Cell: (805) 459-5034
An APWA Accredited Agency
Website | Twitter | Map
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 4:07 PM
To: Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; John Waddell <jwaddell@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Joshua R. Roberts <jrroberts@co.slo.ca.us>; Jan Devera <JDevera@co.slo.ca.us>
Subject: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
ATTENTION: This email originated from outside the County's network. Use caution when opening attachments or links.
That you all for making this happen. I really appreciate it!
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 2:32 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; John Waddell <jwaddell@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Joshua R. Roberts <jrroberts@co.slo.ca.us>; Jan Devera <JDevera@co.slo.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Higuera project
Mat and John,
I just realized that my reply to the crews did not include the pictures – so likely no context for either of you. Sorry about that.
See the attached photos – No Parking signs on South Higuera are up.
Mike
Michael Britton
Transportation Planning & Operations Supervisor
Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 788-2318 | An APWA Accredited Agency
Website | Twitter | Map
From: Kevin Tardiff <ktardiff@co.slo.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 1:08 PM
To: Jan Devera <JDevera@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Joshua R. Roberts <jrroberts@co.slo.ca.us>; Tim Cate <tcate@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Mark D. Tabares <mdtabares@co.slo.ca.us>
Subject: Higuera project
Good Afternoon,
all just wanted to let you know Higuera is done.
Stay safe.
Kevin Tardiff
Leadworker Major Maintenance
Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-5115 | An APWA Accredited Agency
Website | Twitter | Map
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Horn, Matt; Hill, Robert
Subject:RE: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:56:15 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
And that is why you are the Director of PW and I’m just the Park & Rec guy!
Good input!
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit slocity.org/covid19
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:54 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
Personally, I like the berm and no trespassing sign route. The boulders make me a little nervous about liability. They would be considered a fixed object and if a vehicle
struck them that would cause us liability. So we would have to move the boulders away from the road and what is considered the clear space recovery zone and that
might defeat the purpose.
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:49 AM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
Interesting.. I’d like to discuss with Bob and the Rangers about this.
You don’t think adding any additional signs (no parking, no trespassing, etc) in this area would suffice?
Over a year ago, there was some talk about moving some large boulders as deterrents as well.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit slocity.org/covid19
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:43 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
See below. What do you think about installing a berm?
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: John Waddell <jwaddell@co.slo.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:48 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Matt, I saw the clean up crews working this morning at the City property on South Higuera. With the new posted no parking signs, it should help reduce camping. However,
there is one area where the vegetation has been removed enough to make it easy to park well of the road and in the trees above the creek. In the picture below, it is most of
this shoulder area up to the on-ramp/bridge area. This is where your contractor had parked their vehicles to load trash. Most of this area is far enough off the road or out of
right of way to avoid CHP enforcement. In these situations, we sometimes build a 2'-3' dirt berm a few feet off the EP If you want to build a berm, we would support it and
issue the City an encroachment permit for the work.
John Waddell
Deputy Director
Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 788-2713 | Cell: (805) 459-5034
An APWA Accredited Agency
Website | Twitter | Map
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 4:07 PM
To: Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; John Waddell <jwaddell@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Joshua R. Roberts <jrroberts@co.slo.ca.us>; Jan Devera <JDevera@co.slo.ca.us>
Subject: [EXT]RE: Higuera project
ATTENTION: This email originated from outside the County's network. Use caution when opening attachments or links.
That you all for making this happen. I really appreciate it!
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 2:32 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; John Waddell <jwaddell@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Joshua R. Roberts <jrroberts@co.slo.ca.us>; Jan Devera <JDevera@co.slo.ca.us>
Subject: FW: Higuera project
Mat and John,
I just realized that my reply to the crews did not include the pictures – so likely no context for either of you. Sorry about that.
See the attached photos – No Parking signs on South Higuera are up.
Mike
Michael Britton
Transportation Planning & Operations Supervisor
Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 788-2318 | An APWA Accredited Agency
Website | Twitter | Map
From: Kevin Tardiff <ktardiff@co.slo.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 1:08 PM
To: Jan Devera <JDevera@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Joshua R. Roberts <jrroberts@co.slo.ca.us>; Tim Cate <tcate@co.slo.ca.us>
Cc: Mark D. Tabares <mdtabares@co.slo.ca.us>
Subject: Higuera project
Good Afternoon,
all just wanted to let you know Higuera is done.
Stay safe.
Kevin Tardiff
Leadworker Major Maintenance
Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-5115 | An APWA Accredited Agency
Website | Twitter | Map
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Johnson, Derek
Cc:Stanwyck, Shelly; Horn, Matt; Kloepper, Shelsie
Subject:RE: Broad St. Park
Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:43:59 AM
Yes. I have a message out to our P&R staff to confirm some of the dates/timelines for when the neighborhood
community outreach sessions occurred, along with the PRC meeting approvals (Multiple) and Planning Commission
date.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:36 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie
<SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Broad St. Park
Hi Greg,
Do you want to respond for us?
Thanks
Derek
-----Original Message-----
From: Wren Mead <kwrenmead@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:46 PM
To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>
Subject: Broad St. Park
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
________________________________
Dear Council Members,
I wrote the email below on January 5, 2021 in response to the planned park. I was trying to be polite with my words
but I won’t mince them any longer. This is a totally stupid, dangerous place to put a park. Can you imagine parking?
Look at how impacted the neighborhood gets at lunch time from the Lincoln Deli. Can you imaging a parent taking
a toddler by the hand onto an on-ramp to the freeway to go to a playground? Yes, it’s land owned by the city and the
money allocated must be used by some date but let the money go back into the general fund! We have the Anholm
Park and small as it is, I’ve never seen it crowded. From my observation of walking the neighborhood almost
everyday, there are not that many children who actually live in the vicinity. We DO NOT NEED another park.
Please use the money set aside for a better use. There are plenty of wonderful parks and places where people can go
for space close to this area.
Karen Wren Mead
742 Center St. SLO
>
> I live on Center Street in the proximity of the proposed park. I have scanned the documents but nowhere can I find
the answer to whether or not the Broad St. on-ramp to the south, will be closed. Could you please supply that
answer?
>
> Another thought regarding this development is re-installing speed bumps. There are bumps in place on upper
Broad, Foothill to Mission St. and then they have been taken out. At one time, they did exist further down the street
(to my knowledge) and that is really the area where it gets even more necessary to slow traffic. At my corner of
Center and Broad, people blow through the stop sign regularly.
>
> I personally think the location of a new park is a poor choice but I understand it since the city already owns the
land.
>
> Thank you for the information regarding the park and your response, if you will.
>
> Karen Wren Mead
>
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Kloepper, Shelsie
Cc:Stanwyck, Shelly; Horn, Matt; Johnson, Derek
Subject:RE: Broad St. Park
Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:50:59 AM
Thank you Shelsie! This is very helpful. I'll reference Luke's email and my focus will be on the definition of a
Neighborhood Park which supports the surrounding homes, etc: walkable, bikeable, strollers, etc.
As well as the community outreach that occurred over the past 2+ years to get to this point of the design and project.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Kloepper, Shelsie <SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:45 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Johnson, Derek
<djohnson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Broad St. Park
Hello Greg,
I just wanted to attach the original email with responses for the group to see. This questions went to Kyle Bell who
promptly answered the email and directed to Luke Schwartz to provide more details concerning the traffic elements.
Luke did an excellent job answering all the concerns raised in the original email.
Please let me know if you have any questions I can help with. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Shelsie Kloepper
Engineer III
Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E SKloepper@slocity.org T 805.783.7735 slocity.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:36 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie
<SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Broad St. Park
Hi Greg,
Do you want to respond for us?
Thanks
Derek
-----Original Message-----
From: Wren Mead <kwrenmead@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:46 PM
To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>
Subject: Broad St. Park
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
________________________________
Dear Council Members,
I wrote the email below on January 5, 2021 in response to the planned park. I was trying to be polite with my words
but I won’t mince them any longer. This is a totally stupid, dangerous place to put a park. Can you imagine parking?
Look at how impacted the neighborhood gets at lunch time from the Lincoln Deli. Can you imaging a parent taking
a toddler by the hand onto an on-ramp to the freeway to go to a playground? Yes, it’s land owned by the city and the
money allocated must be used by some date but let the money go back into the general fund! We have the Anholm
Park and small as it is, I’ve never seen it crowded. From my observation of walking the neighborhood almost
everyday, there are not that many children who actually live in the vicinity. We DO NOT NEED another park.
Please use the money set aside for a better use. There are plenty of wonderful parks and places where people can go
for space close to this area.
Karen Wren Mead
742 Center St. SLO
>
> I live on Center Street in the proximity of the proposed park. I have scanned the documents but nowhere can I find
the answer to whether or not the Broad St. on-ramp to the south, will be closed. Could you please supply that
answer?
>
> Another thought regarding this development is re-installing speed bumps. There are bumps in place on upper
Broad, Foothill to Mission St. and then they have been taken out. At one time, they did exist further down the street
(to my knowledge) and that is really the area where it gets even more necessary to slow traffic. At my corner of
Center and Broad, people blow through the stop sign regularly.
>
> I personally think the location of a new park is a poor choice but I understand it since the city already owns the
land.
>
> Thank you for the information regarding the park and your response, if you will.
>
> Karen Wren Mead
>
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Cruce, Greg; Johnson, Derek
Cc:Horn, Matt; Hyfield, Devin; Lindsey, Brian; Hernandez, Alejandro
Subject:Re: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
Date:Friday, August 13, 2021 1:17:45 PM
Attachments:image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Greg Avakian
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of San Luis Obispo
Parks and Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E: gavakian@slocity.org
T: 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Avakian, Greg
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 4:02:41 PM
To: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Lindsey, Brian <blindsey@slocity.org>; Hernandez, Alejandro <ahernand@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
Good afternoon Derek and Greg C:
I was out of the office last week and catching up on emails. I have had experience with draining large pool facilities (3-4x in my career) and the amount of effort to
neutralize the pool water in order to make it safe for irrigation is extremely challenging and not always successful.
I have had one successful idea work a few years ago by offering construction companies that required water trucks for dust control come in and pump water out
of the pool to fill water trucks. This was a good optic and helped a bit, but the logistics to arrange this is an impact to staff. Also, the amount of gallons needed to
empty the Olympic size pool was only a ¼ to a 1/3 used by the trucks of the actual volume needed to empty to pool.
Just an idea that could be explored prior to the project starting in mid- August.
-GA
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:34 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Lindsey, Brian <blindsey@slocity.org>; Hernandez, Alejandro
<ahernand@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
Unfortunately, the water is too high in solids to use for most landscape irrigation. When we replastered in 2015, we were in a severe drought at that time too. We
had conversations then about hosting bring your water container to fill or a doggy swim day. At the time we decided not to pursue any of these options. In the
end, we were very surprised that we received very little complaints, and most folks were happy to see the facility they love getting replastered.
Matt and I will discuss this later this week and bring in Greg A. and Devin if the decision is made to pursue something.
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 8:53 PM
To: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Lindsey, Brian <blindsey@slocity.org>; Hernandez, Alejandro
<ahernand@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
Thank you and completely agree and is it possible to treat the water and use it for irrigation? Watering trees, crazy ideas I know and just mindful of the drought
backlash that will inevitably come.
From: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 20:51
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Lindsey, Brian <blindsey@slocity.org>; Hernandez, Alejandro
<ahernand@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
Derek,
The material used to seal the expansion joint on the main pool is severely compromised and has come out in quite a few spots. This material is the protective
layer to the concrete shell, which is now exposed to the corrosive pool water. As you know, over time the structural steel will rust and lead to larger problems if not
resealed.
While this is certainly not a good time to drain the pool because of the drought, I do recommend proceeding with the project. As Devin mentioned, this project was
postponed last year and the sooner we can address the better. We also have the opportunity to align this project with another CIP project at the facility which will
be closing the therapy pool.
Another perspective to consider is the water saved by having the facility closed for this length of time, means we will not have patrons taking showers or replacing
evaporated pool water. This coupled with starting a pool off with fresh water (which eliminates the need to dilute for solids) will likely be an overall water savings.
Sorry to go pool nerd on you!
Let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further.
Thanks,
Greg Cruce
City of S.L.O.
Public Works
805.781.7264
gcruce@slocity.org
From: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 5:11 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
Hi Derek –
The pool is being drained due to the replacement of an expansion joint which has become an issue since the replastering of the Olympic pool occurred four years
ago. This was scheduled for replacement last year but it was decided to postpone as the SLO Swim Center was one of the only available recreational opportunities
at the time (the Swim Center did not close for maintenance last year).
In addition to the expansion joint replacement, the therapy pool heater will be replaced which is large project taking place in August.
Greg Cruce can provide some additional details regarding the projects, timelines and possible alternatives.
Devin Hyfield
Recreation Manager
T 805.781.7295
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 5:03 PM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
Should or can we postpone as draining the pool during the drought seems odd?
From: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 16:47
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: cc Mobley (Pool accessibility)
BCC: Council Members
Good Afternoon Ms. Mobley,
Thank you very much for your email regarding the pool schedule at the SLO Swim Center. Historically the SLO Swim Center has closed mid-August into early
September for our maintenance projects. During this time period, the maintenance staff completes a variety of specialized projects that keep the pool running
throughout the year. This year required a longer closure due to some larger projects which require a full drainage and refill of the pool – a three-week process.
Unfortunately, this is a planned CIP project with the project dates contracted so they cannot be modified.
With the recent completion of the SLO High School pool and the relocation of the SLO High Water Polo and Swim Team practices and matches to the facility, City
Staff will be meeting to discuss the shifting of the facility maintenance window to the Fall for minor maintenance projects at the SLO Swim Center for the upcoming
years.
We apologize for any inconveniences this may have caused. We have a wonderful community full of very passionate members that utilize the pool in a variety of
different ways, which is a very fortunate thing. Please be in touch if you have additional questions and we look forward to seeing you at the pool for the remainder
of the summer!
Regards,
Devin Hyfield
Recreation Manager
T 805.781.7295
From: Amanda Mobley <amobley18@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 5:08 PM
To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>
Subject: Pool accessibility
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
________________________________
Hi,
I’d like to know who thought nearly a months worth of annual cleaning and maintenance should be scheduled during the hot summer months?
Any way this be pushed back to sometime during off season?
Sent from my iPhone
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Whipple, Anthony
Cc:Horn, Matt; Cruce, Greg
Subject:RE: ETO Park tree trim & removal
Date:Monday, November 22, 2021 8:57:00 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good morning, Anthony:
Great to see you at the Mid-Managers event at the Jack House the other week. Thanks for
confirming that the tree trimming and removal at Eto Park can occur.
I wanted to do a friendly reminder of the following:
Timeline: Preferably by early to mid-January or sooner
Tree Removal: A pink “X” has been painted on several trees that can be removed. These
were reviewed when Adam Basden and I met the Rotary Leaders and Pat Connelly (who
was part of the original install as landscape architect). Pat marked the trees that could be
removed and not impact the integrity of the park since Rotary will be replacing them with
like style trees.
Trimming/Thinning:
a. The large trees bordering the eastern side of the fence and along the street
(powerlines) can be significantly cut back and major limbs removed.
b. Trimming back the trees on the west-side of property bordering the historic church (I
also believe a tree is marked with an X for removal at that spot)
Thanks in advance and happy to meet at Eto for a walk thru when needed.
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Avakian, Greg
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 10:24 AM
To: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: ETO Park tree trim & removal
Good morning, Anthony-
I hope you’re well and congrats on the Arbor Day recognition last week!
I am following up from our earlier conversations and site visit to ETO Park from a few
months ago. The SLO Rotary is continuing to move forward with their project to revitalize
and upgrade the park for the 20th Anniversary (May 2022). When you and I met, we
identified some opportunities to cut back and thin out some of the larger trees, as well as
remove the dead/diseased trees from the park area.
The original Rotary member(s), along with Pat Connelly (local landscape architect who
helped with original project) have identified the trees that can be removed (painted an X on
the trucks). Also, the larger trees that you and I observed will need significant trimming
and branch removal.
I am requesting that we schedule this work to be completed by fist week of January
(if possible) to have the park area cleared for the Rotary to begin their work. The Rotary
plans to schedule time in late January/February for volunteer workdays to add more DG,
add rocks, replace statues, replant shrubs, and replace identified trees, as well as clean-up
and repaint the fencing. FYI, as of last month, the irrigation was working but needed new
batteries for the automatic controllers.
To prepare the park for the volunteer work in Jan/Feb/March, I am happy to meet you at the
site to do another walk through to gage the scope and identify the appropriate trees. My
calendar is up to date, so please feel free to contact me to schedule another site visit.
Thank you!
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Whipple, Anthony
Subject:RE: ETO Park trees?
Date:Wednesday, June 30, 2021 11:36:58 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Thanks Anthony! Not sure if you are available this Friday (7/2) or next Friday (7/9) for short
site visit at Eto with me let me know.
Thinking a 20-30 minute max.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 11:51 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: ETO Park trees?
Greg,
Please feel free to contact me for any support I can provide.
Thank you,
Anthony Whipple
Acting City Arborist
Public Works
Urban Forest Services
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E awhipple@slocity.org
T 805.781.7021
C 805.431.0398
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 10:10 AM
To: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg
<gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: ETO Park trees?
Good morning Anthony:
I will be working with the local Rotary Club to revitalize Eto Park (176 Brooks Lane) over the
next 6-12 months.
I did a site visit to initiate the discussion and some questions came up regarding the tree
pruning and what may be native and/or can be removed. Hoping to set up time to meet at
the park location in the next few weeks to get your insights and opinions, as well as what
the City scope would be or if we would utilize a contractor (Bunyan Bros, Greenvale, etc.?).
Adam: Once I have more information on what Rotary has for potential ideas and funding, I
will loop you in for the next meeting to ensure you and your staff can weigh in and provide
appropriate support information and any guidelines.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Christian, Kevin; Basden, Adam; Cruce, Greg
Cc:Nocket, Kelsey; Scott, Rick; Codron, Michael
Subject:RE: Feedback for City of San Luis Obispo, CA
Date:Monday, October 11, 2021 12:17:17 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Thanks Kevin-
As this is a combination of park space and community gardens, I’ve copied Adam Basden
and Greg Cruce on my reply.
Ranger Supervisor, Doug Carscaden, is out this week, but I will have the Rangers take a
look at the location as well. They have assisted in the past with retrieval of items down
near the creek area at this location.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 3:32 PM
To: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Nocket, Kelsey <knocket@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Feedback for City of San Luis Obispo, CA
All,
The Clerk’s office receives emails directed through the website that are not assigned to
specific offices and forwards them to the appropriate staff. Since this involves a community
garden and the streets and homeless I have put you all in the loop.
Please see the below message and take whatever responsive action you feel is
appropriate.
Kevin Christian
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
City Clerk's Office
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E kchristi@slocity.org
T 805.781.7104
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: webmaster@slocity.org <webmaster@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 3:26 PM
To: Feedback <feedback@slocity.org>
Subject: Feedback for City of San Luis Obispo, CA
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
You have received this feedback from Jill Talley < jilltalley01@gmail.com > for the following page:
https://www.slocity.org/living/neighborhood/homelessness-solutions
There are a group of homeless people that sleep in the creek near the community garden at 533
Broad Street. One of the men sleeps on a mattress that he moves around. The mattress is at times a
traffic hazard on Broad Street getting on the freeway. Another is a woman, who leaves her large
shopping cart off to the side of the road at that same place, also posing a traffic hazard at times
when trying to get on the 101 South. I would like to ask for removal of the mattress at 533 Broad
and also for increased patrol of this community garden, which is soon to be made into a park. Under
the SLO city ordinance city parks may not be used for camping, overnight occupation or housing. The
traffic hazards posed by the individuals continually sleeping in this community garden are constant.
Thank you.
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Christian, Kevin; Basden, Adam; Cruce, Greg
Cc:Nocket, Kelsey; Scott, Rick; Codron, Michael
Subject:RE: Feedback for City of San Luis Obispo, CA
Date:Monday, October 11, 2021 2:00:36 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Follow up:
Rangers stopped by the N. Broad St. community gardens this afternoon. They picked up a
mattress and a couple other small abandoned items.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Avakian, Greg
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 12:17 PM
To: Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>; Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg
<gcruce@slocity.org>
Cc: Nocket, Kelsey <knocket@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Feedback for City of San Luis Obispo, CA
Thanks Kevin-
As this is a combination of park space and community gardens, I’ve copied Adam Basden
and Greg Cruce on my reply.
Ranger Supervisor, Doug Carscaden, is out this week, but I will have the Rangers take a
look at the location as well. They have assisted in the past with retrieval of items down
near the creek area at this location.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 3:32 PM
To: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Nocket, Kelsey <knocket@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Feedback for City of San Luis Obispo, CA
All,
The Clerk’s office receives emails directed through the website that are not assigned to
specific offices and forwards them to the appropriate staff. Since this involves a community
garden and the streets and homeless I have put you all in the loop.
Please see the below message and take whatever responsive action you feel is
appropriate.
Kevin Christian
Deputy City Clerk
City Administration
City Clerk's Office
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E kchristi@slocity.org
T 805.781.7104
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: webmaster@slocity.org <webmaster@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 3:26 PM
To: Feedback <feedback@slocity.org>
Subject: Feedback for City of San Luis Obispo, CA
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
You have received this feedback from Jill Talley < jilltalley01@gmail.com > for the following page:
https://www.slocity.org/living/neighborhood/homelessness-solutions
There are a group of homeless people that sleep in the creek near the community garden at 533
Broad Street. One of the men sleeps on a mattress that he moves around. The mattress is at times a
traffic hazard on Broad Street getting on the freeway. Another is a woman, who leaves her large
shopping cart off to the side of the road at that same place, also posing a traffic hazard at times
when trying to get on the 101 South. I would like to ask for removal of the mattress at 533 Broad
and also for increased patrol of this community garden, which is soon to be made into a park. Under
the SLO city ordinance city parks may not be used for camping, overnight occupation or housing. The
traffic hazards posed by the individuals continually sleeping in this community garden are constant.
Thank you.
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Hyfield, Devin; Ettestad, Sahvanna
Cc:Basden, Adam; Cruce, Greg
Subject:RE: French Park Pickleball
Date:Thursday, February 4, 2021 8:07:23 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
I think Adam was posting notification signs at the courts
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 8:06 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Ettestad, Sahvanna <settesta@slocity.org>
Cc: Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: French Park Pickleball
Sounds good will also get some flyers posted today
- Devin Hyfield
City of San Luis Obispo Parks and Recreation
Sent from Mobile device - please excuse any typing errors
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 8:03:55 AM
To: Ettestad, Sahvanna <settesta@slocity.org>
Cc: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg
<gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: French Park Pickleball
FYI. Can you do a brief social media notification.
Devin, might be good to notify Brian O’Kelly as a courtesy as well.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 7:48 AM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Harvey, Billy <BHarvey@slocity.org>; Whipple, Anthony
<awhipple@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Klein, Jeff <jklein@slocity.org>
Subject: French Park Pickleball
Hi Devin,
The pickleball courts at French park will be closed on Tuesday, February 9th from 7 am to
12 pm to allow our contractor to trim the pine trees that are overhanging the courts. We will
be posting signs letting the public know of this closure. The tennis courts will remain open.
Thanks,
Adam Basden
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Public Works
Parks Maintenance
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E abasden@slocity.org
T 805.781.7025
C 805.431.0666
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Johnson, Derek
Cc:Christian, Kevin; Scott, Shawna; Codron, Michael
Subject:RE: Missing playground
Date:Monday, April 19, 2021 1:34:55 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
Thanks Derek-
I also received this communication and plan to respond later this afternoon to Mr.
Chapman.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 1:29 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Missing playground
Hello Greg,
Please see below and sure would love if the last MASP phase would happen to build the
park? We just need the property owner to move froward with the housing project!
Thanks
Derek
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 2:15 PM
To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>
Subject: Missing playground
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hello,
I read recently that a new park and playground is planned for 533 broad st. This is good news, but as
you can see in the images below, I think there are other neighborhoods that are further away from
existing playgrounds.
The area around violet st seems especially far from any playground compared to most other areas in
the city. It is not a practical walking distance for toddlers and seems to be a neglected side of town.
A playground will be more beneficial for the community and needed, especially as new houses and
apartment buildings are complete in the area.
Is there any plan to resolve this issue in the near future?
Is there anything the residents of this area can do to encourage a playground in the area?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Aug 9, 2018, at 12:56 PM, Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Shawna and Kyle,
Have all of the plans for the Toscano lot been completed? Did they meet the park
requirement for new developments? If not, this seems like a good opportunity to make
up for the mistakes of the previous developments not having any park areas nearby.
Could the plan be updated to include a park, or anything similar?
What about the new units on Prado Rd?
Does the affordable housing lot coming to the the top of Violet have any park?
How do these developments keep getting approved while not meeting the park
requirements?
Are there any other developments on the horizon in the nearby area?
This is an unrelated question, but has there ever been talk about a separated bike path
on Tank Farm, or anywhere else in town? Who owns the land undeveloped land on
Tank farm between Broad and Higuera? Bike lanes on a road are nicer than nothing,
but they don't offer much protection from motorists speeding by. It seems like
installing bike paths could reduce traffic that is getting worse, save lives, and would be
much easier to do before more developments in this and other areas. For a "bicycle
friendly community" we have a very small number of connected separated bike paths
leading to places where people actually commute.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Cameron,
The parkland/greenway requirements for the subdivisions identified below
have already been determined and approved; however, as we look forward,
this is really good feedback for us as we are starting the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update.
Thank you for sharing your concerns regarding use of parkland (Quimby)
fees, what constitutes a park within new subdivisions, and ideas for potential
new park locations.
Thank you,
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 7:26 PM
To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Developments not meeting park requirements
Hi Shawna,
While the greenway under the power lines is nice, it is hardly the same as an actual
park, where the community and families can gather. Does this meet the requirement
for parkland in developments? It doesn't seem fair that fees that made our houses
more expensive go to supporting other neighborhoods and parks that are farther
away, where most neighborhoods in SLO have parks within walking distance. Is there
any way to establish a park in this area, perhaps in the empty lots on Prado, or the
one at the top of violet st?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Cameron,
I have some additional information for you.
In association with approved Vesting Tentative Map (VTM) #2353 and
VTM #2342 (Rescal/Mangano), three lots were dedicated for “greenway”
park use and common ownership. No park land was dedicated for the
Toscano development.
The initial study prepared for the revised VTM for Serra Meadows states
the following:
The project is consistent with the [Margarita Area Specific Plan] MASP and
will contribute to the construction of public park facilities through the
payment of City, as well as, MASP-adopted Park Improvement Fees to
offset costs associated with increases in demand and services as it relates
to maintaining City-wide public park areas. The two additional residential
lots would increase park demand, but would increase these fees
proportionately. The fees would be used to fund parks planned within the
MASP, the environmental effects of which were described in the MASP
EIR. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact on parks
or other recreational facilities.
Thank you,
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 9:06 AM
To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Developments not meeting park requirements
Thanks shawna, I will keep an eye out for those. Do you know how the developers
of Serra meadows and toscano escaped the park requirement?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Apr 10, 2018, at 8:03 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Cameron,
We are just at the beginning of the process for the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update.
One of our first steps is the presentation of the Community
Engagement Plan and Initial Planning Framework at the Parks
and Recreation Commission meeting April 11, to be held at the
SLO Swim Center, 5:30 pm. For additional information, please
see here: https://www.slocity.org/Home/ShowDocument?
id=5681
One component of the Community Engagement Plan will be
an upcoming online survey, which will be a good opportunity
for you to provide additional comments regarding the update.
There will be many additional opportunities for public
comment, including events, workshops, and public meetings,
throughout the update process.
Thank you for your initial questions and comments!
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 2:42 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna
<sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: Developments not meeting park requirements
Hi Shawna and Kyle,
Did the update to the City’s General Plan Parks and Recreation
Element ever happen? If so, what were the results?
Is it possible that this or a similar update could address the lack of a
park and failure of the developers to meet requirements in our area?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Dec 27, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
If you or your neighborhood do ever want to take it
on, let us know and we will let you know all the
steps to take. I have also been informed of another
process that could be an option for you. The City
Council recently directed an update to the City’s
General Plan Parks and Recreation Element. I am
not sure of what the scope of this update is but if
you would like more information I have provided
the contact information of the Planner tasked with
the update.
Shawna Scott
sscott@slocity.org
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 1:29 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra Meadows Affordable Housing
Questions
Thanks for the description and candor. That does sound
like quite the process.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Good evening,
After looking into the scenario you
described, I believe the community
could petition the City Council to
address a need for a park in the area.
But this would not be a simple
endeavor, there is a lot to consider
with an alternative location of a park
and potentially substantial public
funds. The process would require an
amendment to the City’s General Plan
so it would be quite the cumbersome
process to take on even if initiated by
the City Council.
I apologize if I am being blunt, I
wanted to provide you with my honest
feedback.
Let me know if you have more
questions about this process.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 8:42
PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra Meadows Affordable
Housing Questions
Thanks Kyle. Based on that uncertainty,it
seems like the development and park
could never be built,if the farmer doesn't
ever want to sell, which would mean the
park requirement of the Serra Meadows
development would never be met. Could
that be correct? If it was the case, would
another nearby site be selected to meet
the park requirement?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Bell,
Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Good evening,
In regards to the anticipated
timeframe for the Prado Road
connection, it is uncertain of when
the property owners will initiate a
project for development on their
property. To my knowledge, I am
unaware of any established or
agreed upon timeframe for buildout.
Let me know if you have any
additional questions.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 5:01
PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra Meadows Affordable
Housing Questions
Kyle,
Thanks for the response and update. I
was at the arc, and felt they didn’t
consider enough the valid concerns of
existing residents such as neighborhood
traffic, and how much this massive 3
story building will stick out on it’s
already raised ground. I understand the
biggest mistake was the zoning location
in 2006, and that is hard to change
now.
Is there any anticipated timeframe for
the Prado Road connection to broad st
and additional development like the
park in the margarita plan? The rancher
doesn’t look like he is moving or selling
any land soon.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Dec 11, 2017, at 4:42 PM, Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Good afternoon,
The project you are
referring to at 3175
Violet Street is still
active, the project
received entitlements in
September 2016. The
Housing Authority is
currently working with
the State for funding on
the project, once
funding has been
secured, the project will
be reviewed for building
permits. The
entitlements for the
project are set to expire
in September 2019,
however, once building
permits are submitted
the expiration will
change annually until
construction has begun.
The project site has
been dedicated to
provide the affordable
housing that is required
as part of the Serra
Meadows development,
this land was dedicated
for affordable housing
back in 2006. I
understand the
concerns regarding the
multi-family housing
adjacent to the single-
family residences,
however, I expressly
addressed this at the
ARC hearing back in
September. If you were
unable to attend that
hearing and would like
to discuss this in more
detail perhaps we could
schedule a meeting.
In regards to the park,
you are correct that the
City does require parks
or contributions to parks
for new development,
the Margarita Area
Specific Plan identifies
the locations of parks
that Serra Meadows
and Toscano contribute
to. The parks are
located on the
undeveloped property
adjacent to Serra
Meadows and will be
included with the build-
out along the extension
of Prado Road. All this
information is available
on the City website, I
provided a link below:
http://www.slocity.org/go
vernment/department-
directory/community-
development/planning-
zoning/specific-area-
plans/margarita-area
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community
Development
919 Palm Street, San
Luis Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@g
mail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December
07, 2017 12:50 PM
To: Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra
Meadows Affordable
Housing Questions
Hi Kyle,
I haven’t seen much action
at this site recently. What
is it’s status? Hopefully
this large complex could
be moved to a site closer
to public transport, not
diverting large amounts of
traffic through
neighborhood streets, and
where a large building like
this better matches the
neighborhood building
style, rather than sticking
out on top of a hill in the
midst of single and two
story homes.
The empty lots off of
prado road would be a
good site for this, as would
others.
I have a somewhat related
question. Don’t all new
building developments
require some sort of park
by town regulation? How
did the Serra meadows
and toscano neighborhood
developers get away with
bypassing this
requirement? A park in
this location would be
excellent for families,
community building and
more. There is currently
nothing like that in
walkable distance, and the
closest one is about a 5
minute drive.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Apr 25, 2016, at 10:32
AM, Bell, Kyle
<kbell@slocity.org> wrote:
Hello
Cameron,
Below is a
link to the
conceptual
review
application
regarding
the
affordable
housing
project.
http://openg
ov.slocity.or
g/WebLink8
/DocView.a
spx?
id=54448&d
bid=1\
The ARC
reviewed
the
conceptual
design of
the
application
and
provided
feedback to
more
carefully
consider the
context of
the
neighborho
od. At this
time no
application
has been
submitted
for the
actual
project.
Once an
application
is submitted
there will be
a public
hearing by
the ARC to
review the
design of
the project,
if there are
any
requests for
exceptions
from any
developmen
t standards,
they will be
reviewed by
the City
Council
through the
affordable
housing
incentive
program.
Without an
actual
project
submittal
there is no
avenue to
follow the
process for
this
potential
application.
Any
concerns
should be
forwarded
to the Serra
Meadows
manageme
nt company.
If you have
any
concerns
how
affordable
housing
operates in
the City of
San Luis
Obispo
please
review one
of the
several
affordable
housing
projects in
operation
throughout
the City
managed by
HASLO.
Kyle Bell
CDD
Assistant
Planner
<image001.
png>
Community
Developme
nt
919 Palm
Street, San
Luis
Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E
kbell@slocit
y.org
T
805.781.75
24
slocity.org
From:
Cameron
Chapman
[mailto:camdc
hapman@gma
il.com]
Sent:
Sunday, April
24, 2016 2:58
PM
To: Bell, Kyle;
Cohen, Rachel
Subject:
Fwd: Serra
Meadows
Affordable
Housing
Questions
Hello,
My fiance
and I are
future
residents of
the new
Serra
Meadows
development
on Violet
street. We
were recently
made aware
of the
concerns
about the
affordable
housing
project
adjacent to
the current
development
. We support
the benefits
of and the
need for
affordable
housing, but
want to make
sure it is
implemented
in a safe and
appealing
way that
benefits all
members of
the
community.
Is there
anywhere I
can view the
proposed
project plans,
and the
status of
their
approval?
Has it been
verified that
the planned
development
meets all
code
requirements
? The height
of the
structure on
already
raised
ground and
availability of
parking seem
to be the
biggest
concerns.
What steps
can the
members of
the
community
take to voice
concerns or
opposition to
the style and
plans of the
development
?
We and
many of the
other
community
members are
concerned
about the
safety of
increased
traffic
through
neighborhoo
d streets,
lack of
parking
available in
the complex
(which would
lead to
residents
parking on
the already
densely built
adjacent
streets), and
the height of
the
development
on the raised
ground
disturbing
the views of
the open
space.
http://www.i
petitions.com
/petition/serr
a-meadows-
affordable-
housing-
amendments
Please let us
know what
steps we can
take to be
involved in
the decision
process and
voice our
concerns.
Thank you,
Cameron
Chapman
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Scott, Shawna
Subject:RE: Missing playground
Date:Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:54:13 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
OK. The webpage is not up to date then either. .
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:52 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Missing playground
Hi Greg,
One correction to the timeline:
May 12, 2021: Special Parks and Recreation Commission meeting: Recommendation
to Planning Commission
May 26, 2021: Planning Commission: Recommendation to City Council
July 6, 2021: City Council: Consideration of adoption of final plan
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:42 PM
To: camdchapman@gmail.com
Cc: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Missing playground
Thank you for your inquiry Cameron Chapman regarding parks and playground amenities
for the Margarita Area community. Staff appreciates your concerns and overview of the
proximity of park locations within our City.
As I also live in the Margarita area, I can empathize with you and your family and neighbors
on the lack of park and playground amenities in this subarea of San Luis Obispo. Along
with the correspondence of Mr. Bell and Ms. Scott over the past few years, the current
identified property for the final phase of the Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP) includes
land designated for parks to support the Margarita/Prado area communities. Unfortunately,
the land owner has not moved forward with the sale of the property to the developer. When
the property comes available, the City will move forward with park design and construction.
The park in-lieu funds collected from the current developers which are designated for this
area are being held by the City specifically to support the Margarita Area and have not
been assigned to any other project or renovations.
The Parks and Recreation staff have been working diligently to outline park amenities to be
within an equitable distance and location within housing and community developments
throughout the City as staff have moved forward with a new and updated parks and
recreation master plan. Over the past three years, the Parks and Recreation Department is
finalizing the update to the Parks and Recreation Blueprint for the Future. The linked
webpage will provide you with the draft version of the documentation and extended
appendices, as well as additional support documents.
City staff are continuing to receive community feedback for the documentation via email,
Open Town Hall correspondence and at our monthly Parks and Recreation Commission
meetings.
Here are the timelines for upcoming opportunities to provide public comment:
Community Feedback and Workshop Timelines:
· May 4, 2021: Staff presentation of Draft Plan to City Council
· May 12, 2021: Staff Presentation of Draft Plan to City Planning Commission
· July 6, 2021: Final Presentation and Endorsement to City Council
Please let me know if you have any additional questions, comments or clarifications.
Be well,
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 2:14:53 PM
To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>
Subject: Missing playground
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hello,
I read recently that a new park and playground is planned for 533 broad st. This is good news, but as
you can see in the images below, I think there are other neighborhoods that are further away from
existing playgrounds.
The area around violet st seems especially far from any playground compared to most other areas in
the city. It is not a practical walking distance for toddlers and seems to be a neglected side of town.
A playground will be more beneficial for the community and needed, especially as new houses and
apartment buildings are complete in the area.
Is there any plan to resolve this issue in the near future?
Is there anything the residents of this area can do to encourage a playground in the area?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Aug 9, 2018, at 12:56 PM, Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Shawna and Kyle,
Have all of the plans for the Toscano lot been completed? Did they meet the park
requirement for new developments? If not, this seems like a good opportunity to make
up for the mistakes of the previous developments not having any park areas nearby.
Could the plan be updated to include a park, or anything similar?
What about the new units on Prado Rd?
Does the affordable housing lot coming to the the top of Violet have any park?
How do these developments keep getting approved while not meeting the park
requirements?
Are there any other developments on the horizon in the nearby area?
This is an unrelated question, but has there ever been talk about a separated bike path
on Tank Farm, or anywhere else in town? Who owns the land undeveloped land on
Tank farm between Broad and Higuera? Bike lanes on a road are nicer than nothing,
but they don't offer much protection from motorists speeding by. It seems like
installing bike paths could reduce traffic that is getting worse, save lives, and would be
much easier to do before more developments in this and other areas. For a "bicycle
friendly community" we have a very small number of connected separated bike paths
leading to places where people actually commute.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Cameron,
The parkland/greenway requirements for the subdivisions identified below
have already been determined and approved; however, as we look forward,
this is really good feedback for us as we are starting the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update.
Thank you for sharing your concerns regarding use of parkland (Quimby)
fees, what constitutes a park within new subdivisions, and ideas for potential
new park locations.
Thank you,
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 7:26 PM
To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Developments not meeting park requirements
Hi Shawna,
While the greenway under the power lines is nice, it is hardly the same as an actual
park, where the community and families can gather. Does this meet the requirement
for parkland in developments? It doesn't seem fair that fees that made our houses
more expensive go to supporting other neighborhoods and parks that are farther
away, where most neighborhoods in SLO have parks within walking distance. Is there
any way to establish a park in this area, perhaps in the empty lots on Prado, or the
one at the top of violet st?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Cameron,
I have some additional information for you.
In association with approved Vesting Tentative Map (VTM) #2353 and
VTM #2342 (Rescal/Mangano), three lots were dedicated for “greenway”
park use and common ownership. No park land was dedicated for the
Toscano development.
The initial study prepared for the revised VTM for Serra Meadows states
the following:
The project is consistent with the [Margarita Area Specific Plan] MASP and
will contribute to the construction of public park facilities through the
payment of City, as well as, MASP-adopted Park Improvement Fees to
offset costs associated with increases in demand and services as it relates
to maintaining City-wide public park areas. The two additional residential
lots would increase park demand, but would increase these fees
proportionately. The fees would be used to fund parks planned within the
MASP, the environmental effects of which were described in the MASP
EIR. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact on parks
or other recreational facilities.
Thank you,
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 9:06 AM
To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Developments not meeting park requirements
Thanks shawna, I will keep an eye out for those. Do you know how the developers
of Serra meadows and toscano escaped the park requirement?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Apr 10, 2018, at 8:03 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Cameron,
We are just at the beginning of the process for the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update.
One of our first steps is the presentation of the Community
Engagement Plan and Initial Planning Framework at the Parks
and Recreation Commission meeting April 11, to be held at the
SLO Swim Center, 5:30 pm. For additional information, please
see here: https://www.slocity.org/Home/ShowDocument?
id=5681
One component of the Community Engagement Plan will be
an upcoming online survey, which will be a good opportunity
for you to provide additional comments regarding the update.
There will be many additional opportunities for public
comment, including events, workshops, and public meetings,
throughout the update process.
Thank you for your initial questions and comments!
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman <camdchapman@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 2:42 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna
<sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: Developments not meeting park requirements
Hi Shawna and Kyle,
Did the update to the City’s General Plan Parks and Recreation
Element ever happen? If so, what were the results?
Is it possible that this or a similar update could address the lack of a
park and failure of the developers to meet requirements in our area?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Dec 27, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
If you or your neighborhood do ever want to take it
on, let us know and we will let you know all the
steps to take. I have also been informed of another
process that could be an option for you. The City
Council recently directed an update to the City’s
General Plan Parks and Recreation Element. I am
not sure of what the scope of this update is but if
you would like more information I have provided
the contact information of the Planner tasked with
the update.
Shawna Scott
sscott@slocity.org
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 1:29 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra Meadows Affordable Housing
Questions
Thanks for the description and candor. That does sound
like quite the process.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Good evening,
After looking into the scenario you
described, I believe the community
could petition the City Council to
address a need for a park in the area.
But this would not be a simple
endeavor, there is a lot to consider
with an alternative location of a park
and potentially substantial public
funds. The process would require an
amendment to the City’s General Plan
so it would be quite the cumbersome
process to take on even if initiated by
the City Council.
I apologize if I am being blunt, I
wanted to provide you with my honest
feedback.
Let me know if you have more
questions about this process.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 8:42
PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra Meadows Affordable
Housing Questions
Thanks Kyle. Based on that uncertainty,it
seems like the development and park
could never be built,if the farmer doesn't
ever want to sell, which would mean the
park requirement of the Serra Meadows
development would never be met. Could
that be correct? If it was the case, would
another nearby site be selected to meet
the park requirement?
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Bell,
Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Good evening,
In regards to the anticipated
timeframe for the Prado Road
connection, it is uncertain of when
the property owners will initiate a
project for development on their
property. To my knowledge, I am
unaware of any established or
agreed upon timeframe for buildout.
Let me know if you have any
additional questions.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
CA 93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 5:01
PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra Meadows Affordable
Housing Questions
Kyle,
Thanks for the response and update. I
was at the arc, and felt they didn’t
consider enough the valid concerns of
existing residents such as neighborhood
traffic, and how much this massive 3
story building will stick out on it’s
already raised ground. I understand the
biggest mistake was the zoning location
in 2006, and that is hard to change
now.
Is there any anticipated timeframe for
the Prado Road connection to broad st
and additional development like the
park in the margarita plan? The rancher
doesn’t look like he is moving or selling
any land soon.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Dec 11, 2017, at 4:42 PM, Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org> wrote:
Good afternoon,
The project you are
referring to at 3175
Violet Street is still
active, the project
received entitlements in
September 2016. The
Housing Authority is
currently working with
the State for funding on
the project, once
funding has been
secured, the project will
be reviewed for building
permits. The
entitlements for the
project are set to expire
in September 2019,
however, once building
permits are submitted
the expiration will
change annually until
construction has begun.
The project site has
been dedicated to
provide the affordable
housing that is required
as part of the Serra
Meadows development,
this land was dedicated
for affordable housing
back in 2006. I
understand the
concerns regarding the
multi-family housing
adjacent to the single-
family residences,
however, I expressly
addressed this at the
ARC hearing back in
September. If you were
unable to attend that
hearing and would like
to discuss this in more
detail perhaps we could
schedule a meeting.
In regards to the park,
you are correct that the
City does require parks
or contributions to parks
for new development,
the Margarita Area
Specific Plan identifies
the locations of parks
that Serra Meadows
and Toscano contribute
to. The parks are
located on the
undeveloped property
adjacent to Serra
Meadows and will be
included with the build-
out along the extension
of Prado Road. All this
information is available
on the City website, I
provided a link below:
http://www.slocity.org/go
vernment/department-
directory/community-
development/planning-
zoning/specific-area-
plans/margarita-area
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
<image001.png>
Community
Development
919 Palm Street, San
Luis Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
slocity.org
From: Cameron Chapman
[mailto:camdchapman@g
mail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December
07, 2017 12:50 PM
To: Bell, Kyle
<KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Serra
Meadows Affordable
Housing Questions
Hi Kyle,
I haven’t seen much action
at this site recently. What
is it’s status? Hopefully
this large complex could
be moved to a site closer
to public transport, not
diverting large amounts of
traffic through
neighborhood streets, and
where a large building like
this better matches the
neighborhood building
style, rather than sticking
out on top of a hill in the
midst of single and two
story homes.
The empty lots off of
prado road would be a
good site for this, as would
others.
I have a somewhat related
question. Don’t all new
building developments
require some sort of park
by town regulation? How
did the Serra meadows
and toscano neighborhood
developers get away with
bypassing this
requirement? A park in
this location would be
excellent for families,
community building and
more. There is currently
nothing like that in
walkable distance, and the
closest one is about a 5
minute drive.
Thank you,
Cameron Chapman
Sent from my phone
On Apr 25, 2016, at 10:32
AM, Bell, Kyle
<kbell@slocity.org> wrote:
Hello
Cameron,
Below is a
link to the
conceptual
review
application
regarding
the
affordable
housing
project.
http://openg
ov.slocity.or
g/WebLink8
/DocView.a
spx?
id=54448&d
bid=1\
The ARC
reviewed
the
conceptual
design of
the
application
and
provided
feedback to
more
carefully
consider the
context of
the
neighborho
od. At this
time no
application
has been
submitted
for the
actual
project.
Once an
application
is submitted
there will be
a public
hearing by
the ARC to
review the
design of
the project,
if there are
any
requests for
exceptions
from any
developmen
t standards,
they will be
reviewed by
the City
Council
through the
affordable
housing
incentive
program.
Without an
actual
project
submittal
there is no
avenue to
follow the
process for
this
potential
application.
Any
concerns
should be
forwarded
to the Serra
Meadows
manageme
nt company.
If you have
any
concerns
how
affordable
housing
operates in
the City of
San Luis
Obispo
please
review one
of the
several
affordable
housing
projects in
operation
throughout
the City
managed by
HASLO.
Kyle Bell
CDD
Assistant
Planner
<image001.
png>
Community
Developme
nt
919 Palm
Street, San
Luis
Obispo, CA
93401-3218
E
kbell@slocit
y.org
T
805.781.75
24
slocity.org
From:
Cameron
Chapman
[mailto:camdc
hapman@gma
il.com]
Sent:
Sunday, April
24, 2016 2:58
PM
To: Bell, Kyle;
Cohen, Rachel
Subject:
Fwd: Serra
Meadows
Affordable
Housing
Questions
Hello,
My fiance
and I are
future
residents of
the new
Serra
Meadows
development
on Violet
street. We
were recently
made aware
of the
concerns
about the
affordable
housing
project
adjacent to
the current
development
. We support
the benefits
of and the
need for
affordable
housing, but
want to make
sure it is
implemented
in a safe and
appealing
way that
benefits all
members of
the
community.
Is there
anywhere I
can view the
proposed
project plans,
and the
status of
their
approval?
Has it been
verified that
the planned
development
meets all
code
requirements
? The height
of the
structure on
already
raised
ground and
availability of
parking seem
to be the
biggest
concerns.
What steps
can the
members of
the
community
take to voice
concerns or
opposition to
the style and
plans of the
development
?
We and
many of the
other
community
members are
concerned
about the
safety of
increased
traffic
through
neighborhoo
d streets,
lack of
parking
available in
the complex
(which would
lead to
residents
parking on
the already
densely built
adjacent
streets), and
the height of
the
development
on the raised
ground
disturbing
the views of
the open
space.
http://www.i
petitions.com
/petition/serr
a-meadows-
affordable-
housing-
amendments
Please let us
know what
steps we can
take to be
involved in
the decision
process and
voice our
concerns.
Thank you,
Cameron
Chapman
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Cruce, Greg; Johnson, Derek; Stanwyck, Shelly; Horn, Matt; Codron, Michael
Cc:Burde, Richard; Nelson, Brian; Kloepper, Shelsie
Subject:Re: Mission Plaza - design sketches
Date:Wednesday, June 16, 2021 8:09:31 AM
Attachments:image001.png
I think we are all in agreement. I like the pitched copper roof line. Agree with GC about flat
roof collection of debris from the trees, as well as things being thrown up onto roofs. Not sure
about how to bird proof the roof but something to inquire with the final design as well.
Looking forward to this project moving forward!
-GA
Greg Avakian
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of San Luis Obispo
Parks and Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E: gavakian@slocity.org
T: 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 7:13:36 AM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt
<mhorn@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg
<gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie
<SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Mission Plaza - design sketches
It sounds like there is consensus for the pitched copper roof and I agree. Flat roofs typically
become maintenance intensive later on, especially when under a tree canopy like Mission
Plaza.
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8:35 PM
To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Cc: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie
<SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Mission Plaza - design sketches
Me three and trust that our CDD staff can flag any issues that might emerge so we don’t
end up in a design loop.
From: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8:33 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Cc: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie
<SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Mission Plaza - design sketches
I like the copper too.
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8:26 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Codron,
Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg
<gcruce@slocity.org>
Cc: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie
<SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Mission Plaza - design sketches
I like the copper roof option shown in the attached. I think I saw flags flying from these structures
but I’m thinking that may just be an oversight. I’m looping in Greg Cruce to see if there are any
maintenance concerns with a flat roof versus a pitched roof.
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
From: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:49 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt
<mhorn@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg
<gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Mission Plaza - design sketches
For reference, below is the original image that was used as a background for the sketches.
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:44 PM
To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael
<mcodron@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Mission Plaza - design sketches
Feedback please. Two options to choose from.
From: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:09 PM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Rudd, Debbie L. <DLRudd@rrmdesign.com>
Subject: FW: Mission Plaza - design sketches
Hi Derek,
Please see the attached for the revised sketches. I told RRM to hold off on doing the extra
work required to produce more presentable renderings since this is extra work and I’m
trying to be mindful of our budget and scope creep.
Let me know what you think
Thanks
From: Rudd, Debbie L. <DLRudd@rrmdesign.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:00 PM
To: Burde, Richard <rburde@slocity.org>
Subject: Mission Plaza - design sketches
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hi Richard, here are the three options that you and I narrowed it down to. As you know, we had a
design charrette with our team and they came up with a couple of more contemporary options, and
a few other versions, and these are our preferred options.
1. Flat roof option –
a. Kiosk - bring metal panels to base of building and wrap entire building instead of one
side.
b. RR – put a flat roof on the building, wrap building with same metal panels and brick.
Remove arches.
2. Copper Roof option A – preferred roof option
a. Kiosk – add pitched copper roof (see steeper pitch and on black and white sketch, use
metal finial or no finial at roof peak instead of flag); bring metal panels to base of
building and wrap entire building instead of one side.
b. RR – primarily metal option - use hipped copper roof (see steeper pitch and on black
and white sketch, use metal finial or no finial at roof peak instead of flag); bring metal
panels to base of building and wrap entire building instead of one side.
3. Copper Roof option B – preferred roof option
a. Kiosk – same as #2
b. RR – combo of metal and brick option – same copper roof as option #2. Façade would
integrate both the metal panels and the light toned brick. By keeping some of the
brick, we keep the building from being too dark and soften the RR a bit.
We would like to get direction from you and Derek, before we work out the sides and back of RR
building so we don’t go down the wrong path.
The other items to confirm with Derek and team:
1. Do we want to pursue Solar on the roof? The southwest side of the building is the back of the
building. In the CC hearing, Andy suggested that we keep it. I would be interested in her
opinion if this is still worth it to the city, since it will be in shade. I am not sure that was made
clear in the CC meeting. We should check the City Council meeting notes to see if solar was a
suggestion or directive.
2. We are being required in most cities to provide a family/gender neutral RR option. It was
mentioned by Shelly in the CC hearing that we could handle that by signage. If we want the
men’s RR to be the gender neutral/family facility, we will want to instruct the architects to
remove the urinals and just have stalls.
Call if you have any questions,
DEBBIE LAGOMARCINO RUDD
Principal
3765 S. Higuera St., Suite 102
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 543-1794
Mobile: (805) 801-4554
rrmdesign.com
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Scott, Shawna
Subject:RE: P&R Master Plan Update - consolidated comments
Date:Monday, January 4, 2021 8:33:48 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Thank you Shawna! I love the ‘…Blueprint for the future…” or something like that. I believe
the PRC may be able to assist with naming of the final document. We could remove the
word Master and just list as: “
Parks and Recreation Plan 2021 – 2041, Blueprint for the Future”.
That is the same list I had from our talk with Shelly. So I am good with routing.
Thanks again and let me know if I can assist tomorrow or we can catch up during the
Master Plan meeting on Wednesday morning.
-GA
Greg Avakian
pronouns He/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 5:06 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: P&R Master Plan Update - consolidated comments
Thank you, Greg, I’ll get this out tomorrow. I don’t think I need any talking points.
My list from our discussion with Shelly includes:
Public Works: Matt Horn, Adam Basden, Greg Cruce, Brian Nelson (note maintenance, trees) –
focus on Implementation Chapter, recommended tree list
CDD: Michael Codron, Teresa McClish – focus on Goals and Policies, Implementation Chapters
Transportation: Luke Schwartz, Adam Fukushima, Jennifer Rice – focus on Goals and Policies,
Implementation Chapters
NR: Bob Hill, Chris Read – focus on Goals and Policies Chapter, Chris to focus on Sustainability
Goals and Policies
Atty: Markie Jorgenson – focus on Goals and Policies, Implementation Chapters
Admin: maybe Victoria (DEI lens) – overall readthrough with DEI lens
Shelly Stanwyck – focus on Goals and Policies, Implementation Chapters
Also, the term “Master” is limited to CEQA, which describes a Master environmental
document and certain requirements for content. I’m not seeing the term in any other
Government Code so we can develop a more interesting name than “Parks and Recreation
Master Plan”. “Blueprint for the Future” is the first thing that popped into my head, or simply
“Parks and Recreation Plan 2021-2041” but I think there are more creative people than
me!
Thank you,
Shawna
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 4:48 PM
To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: P&R Master Plan Update - consolidated comments
If you feel we are ready then let’s get some more eyes on this! I let Shelly and Matt Horn
that it would be coming out early this week.
Do you need me to prepare any talking points for the email notification?
Do you have the list of City staff to route the document to? I think I have my notes available
with them if you need a refresher.
Let me know.
Greg Avakian
pronouns He/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 2:40 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: P&R Master Plan Update - consolidated comments
Hi Greg,
I think this is ready to be sent out for internal review – let me know if you want to chat first,
otherwise I’ll send out.
Thank you,
Shawna
From: Scott, Shawna
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:16 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Bergam, Aleah <abergam@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin
<DHyfield@slocity.org>; Stephenson, Lindsey <lstephen@slocity.org>
Subject: P&R Master Plan Update - consolidated comments
Hi Greg,
I’ve consolidated all our comments and questions here: 2020-12-
21_SLO_PRMP_SPS_GDA-comments.pdf
Looking forward to continuing our work on this in 2021!
If anything comes up, feel free to text or call:
Happy New Year,
Shawna
Shawna Scott
Senior Planner
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Kloepper, Shelsie
Cc:Horn, Matt; Hyfield, Devin; Nelson, Brian
Subject:RE: Park & Rec projects - updates?
Date:Tuesday, September 7, 2021 3:53:00 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Thank you Shelsie. Really appreciate the update on these pending projects.
For Matt and Brian:
I am open to discuss the future of the Parks & Rec Department Office renovations. I’d like
to talk about the potential of shelving the project or reappropriating the funds based on
impacts to the P&R operations.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Kloepper, Shelsie <SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:57 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian
<BNelson@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Park & Rec projects - updates?
Hello Greg,
I can provide a quick update on the status of the projects below and I can also provide
more details in person tomorrow at the park site visits.
1. Cheng Park – Project is proceeding per normal process. There were delays in project
scoping and recently some consultant delays in delivery of design. RRM is currently
working on preparing the 50% submittal which is expected to be produced in the next
week. Aaron Glauch is the City PM and will work on scheduling a meeting once the
50% submittal is received.
2. North Broad Street Neighborhood Park – Project has been on hold due to staffing
constraints. Strategy to move it forward is to work with the new engineer starting next
week to compile all department comments for review. City staff will need to meet to
discuss the 90% comments prior to having Cannon complete the design. The City will
need to amend Cannon’s contract to fund the additional conditions of the project
established during the zone change process (i.e pathway lighting and additional
street striping and signage).
3. Parks and Recreation Office Rehabilitation – This project is behind schedule due to
the issues identified during the first bidding period. Strategy to move forward is to
work with the new engineer to coordinate a meeting with Parks and Rec staff, RRM,
and CORE to identify specification language that needs to be added to the project
prior to re-advertising. Timing of construction will also be discussed in the meeting to
establish a set start date within the specifications. PW staff will then need to re-
advertise and move forward with the award process.
Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Shelsie Kloepper
Acting Supervising Civil Engineer
Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E SKloepper@slocity.org
T 805.783.7735
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 1:57 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie <SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Park & Rec projects - updates?
Hi Greg,
Shelsie is working on an update for you on the below projects.
Thanks,
Brian Nelson, PE
Acting City Engineer
City of San Luis Obispo
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 1:36 PM
To: Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org>; Kloepper, Shelsie <SKloeppe@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Subject: Park & Rec projects - updates?
Good afternoon Brian and Shelsie-
I am hoping to get more communication on the status of pending and approved projects
related to Parks & Rec. I understand that we are short staffed, many projects occurring at
same time, and new expectations for projects that may not have been on the list, plus I
know having more meetings is not always the solution.
For short term, I am requesting the following status reports (even if they are just ‘on hold’ or
‘status quo’):
1. Cheng Park
2. N. Broad Street
3. P&R Department Office
FYI: I am already up to date on Emerson Park fitness and Mitchell Park revitalization.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Helen Nolan
Cc:Johnson, Derek; Stanwyck, Shelly; Horn, Matt
Subject:RE: Parking at Mitchell Park
Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 11:16:39 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
BCC: Council
Good day Ms. Nolan:
Thank you for reaching out to the City with your comments and concerns regarding the
potential pickleball court project at Mitchell Park. I am hoping to address your comments
and provide you additional avenues to have input for the next phase of the community
workshops regarding the design in the coming months.
The City was fortunate to be awarded a grant from the State of California Parks Department
for over 85% of the project cost to construct two pickleball courts at Mitchell Park. Staff
conducted a city-wide parks and amenities Community Needs Assessment in fall 2018 as
part of the Parks and Recreation Plan for the Future and one of the results listed Mitchell
Park as being graded a C (based on traditional A-F grading) with the emphasis of providing
more multi-generational activation while maintaining the historical feel for the park.
Pickleball is a very popular activity that can be played by all ages and abilities. Children of
all ages are playing it as part of recess and PE classes in school (Pre Covid), families play
together, and the Parks and Recreation Department has been offering pickleball clinics to
ages 6-12 years old since fall with waiting lists. Over the past couple of years during the
community outreach workshops, as well as routinely at the Parks and Recreation
Commission meetings, community members have asked for more courts and court
availability. The only permanent courts are the three at French Park that recently opened in
September 2019. The other courts are on multi-use courts that are shared by basketball at
Meadow Park, and at the multi-use court at French Park shared with tennis.
Staff have identified the proposed selected area for the two pickleball courts to maintain the
integrity of the parks gazebo and signature ‘X’ pathways, as well as still being able to host
music, book readings, poetry, and other events at the park. The identified location allows
for the majority of the lawn area to remain available to be utilized for picnics, lounging,
games, and support larger gatherings such as events based around the gazebo. Staff have
taken into consideration these important factors and are planning the location of the courts
to be on the northeast section of the park adjacent to the restrooms (Pismo Street side).
The anticipated footprint for the courts is approximately half the size of a tennis court.
Please note that initial site visits have identified two juvenile trees that would be relocated
or replanted within the park. This area provides access to the playground, Senior Center,
and restrooms near the courts.
With the proximity to the local neighborhood and downtown corridor, along with the Senior
Center, parking is a valid concern. With the size and location of the two courts, staff
anticipate the use to be traditionally recreational. The courts would accommodate 4 to 8
players at a time total. This is much different than the French Park courts which can
accommodate between 14 to 28 players at a time. Also, with the new housing
developments being constructed in town, additional multi-court complexes are planned for
those area.
City staff will be initiating additional community input from those in the Mitchell Park
neighborhoods for the project in April. These will most likely occur in a virtual format and
staff hope to also include an on-site meeting at the park. Staff also plan to temporarily
mark out the dimensions of the proposed court footprint to also provide the community a
better perspective. Staff will provide mailers to the neighborhood, as well as promote on the
City’s social media to announce when the workshop(s) will occur and we hope you are able
to attend.
Your ideas regarding parking along the perimeter streets of Mitchell Park are well received
and we will forward them to our City streets and parking divisions as they continue to
progress with their project plans within the City.
Thank you again and wishing a wonderful weekend.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 8:03 AM
To: Helen Nolan <helen.nolan1970@gmail.com>
Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly
<sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Parking at Mitchell Park
Ms. Nolan,
Thank you for your email. I am including Greg Avakian, Director of Parks and Recreation
on this email. I believe that Greg, or one of his staff, are the most knowledgeable staff
members about this project and can address your concerns.
Thanks,
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: Helen Nolan <helen.nolan1970@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 4:06 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn
<cchristi@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>
Subject: Parking at Mitchell Park
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good afternoon,
My name is Helen Nolan. I live directly across the street from Mitchell Park, and I was surprised to
find out that pickleball courts are planned for this location. There are several reasons I was
surprised: one, there does not seem to be enough room to install these courts without removing
trees, the gazebo, or the playground equipment, and the loss of any of those would be tragic. Two,
where are these pickleball players going to park? Mitchell Park only has a very small parking lot, and
it is for the Senior Center. When that lot fills up (and it will), where will the seniors park (assuming
the Center will eventually open again post-COVID)? Three, I am a full-time resident who certainly
was not asked for my opinion on pickleball courts. I am sure there must have been some public
notice of meetings where this was discussed (right?) and I was just not aware of them. If this sport
truly is the fastest growing sport in America, I anticipate there will be a LOT of players wanting to
learn the game.
All this being said, my email is to respectfully request that the City take a good look at the street
parking on all four sides of Mitchell Park: Santa Rosa, Buchon, Osos, and Pismo. Some of the parking
is two-hour, but some is not. My main concern is with the increased number of cars expected
because of the pickleball courts, perhaps the city would consider drawing parking Ts to indicate
where parking spots begin and end on the four streets that border the park. This includes both sides
of the aforementioned streets, as park-goers do not restrict their parking to only the park-side of the
street. The reason for my request is that people don't always pay attention to driveways, red zones,
etc, and tend not to park in a considerate manner for other cars to either fit in front of or behind
their car, thus taking up too much space and decreasing the number of available parking spaces. This
creates compaction and makes it even more difficult for full-time residents, such as myself, to be
able to park near my own home. I am already frustrated with the current parking situation, and can
only imagine how much worse it's going to get once the courts go in. Addressing the lack of parking
sooner, rather than later, would be very much appreciated by this SLO resident.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
Respectfully,
Helen Nolan
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Horn, Matt
Subject:RE: Parking at Mitchell Park
Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 2:40:31 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Ha ha! Now you have the template for any other emails… just kidding.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:34 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Parking at Mitchell Park
Thank you!
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 11:17 AM
To: Helen Nolan <helen.nolan1970@gmail.com>
Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt
<mhorn@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Parking at Mitchell Park
BCC: Council
Good day Ms. Nolan:
Thank you for reaching out to the City with your comments and concerns regarding the
potential pickleball court project at Mitchell Park. I am hoping to address your comments
and provide you additional avenues to have input for the next phase of the community
workshops regarding the design in the coming months.
The City was fortunate to be awarded a grant from the State of California Parks Department
for over 85% of the project cost to construct two pickleball courts at Mitchell Park. Staff
conducted a city-wide parks and amenities Community Needs Assessment in fall 2018 as
part of the Parks and Recreation Plan for the Future and one of the results listed Mitchell
Park as being graded a C (based on traditional A-F grading) with the emphasis of providing
more multi-generational activation while maintaining the historical feel for the park.
Pickleball is a very popular activity that can be played by all ages and abilities. Children of
all ages are playing it as part of recess and PE classes in school (Pre Covid), families play
together, and the Parks and Recreation Department has been offering pickleball clinics to
ages 6-12 years old since fall with waiting lists. Over the past couple of years during the
community outreach workshops, as well as routinely at the Parks and Recreation
Commission meetings, community members have asked for more courts and court
availability. The only permanent courts are the three at French Park that recently opened in
September 2019. The other courts are on multi-use courts that are shared by basketball at
Meadow Park, and at the multi-use court at French Park shared with tennis.
Staff have identified the proposed selected area for the two pickleball courts to maintain the
integrity of the parks gazebo and signature ‘X’ pathways, as well as still being able to host
music, book readings, poetry, and other events at the park. The identified location allows
for the majority of the lawn area to remain available to be utilized for picnics, lounging,
games, and support larger gatherings such as events based around the gazebo. Staff have
taken into consideration these important factors and are planning the location of the courts
to be on the northeast section of the park adjacent to the restrooms (Pismo Street side).
The anticipated footprint for the courts is approximately half the size of a tennis court.
Please note that initial site visits have identified two juvenile trees that would be relocated
or replanted within the park. This area provides access to the playground, Senior Center,
and restrooms near the courts.
With the proximity to the local neighborhood and downtown corridor, along with the Senior
Center, parking is a valid concern. With the size and location of the two courts, staff
anticipate the use to be traditionally recreational. The courts would accommodate 4 to 8
players at a time total. This is much different than the French Park courts which can
accommodate between 14 to 28 players at a time. Also, with the new housing
developments being constructed in town, additional multi-court complexes are planned for
those area.
City staff will be initiating additional community input from those in the Mitchell Park
neighborhoods for the project in April. These will most likely occur in a virtual format and
staff hope to also include an on-site meeting at the park. Staff also plan to temporarily
mark out the dimensions of the proposed court footprint to also provide the community a
better perspective. Staff will provide mailers to the neighborhood, as well as promote on the
City’s social media to announce when the workshop(s) will occur and we hope you are able
to attend.
Your ideas regarding parking along the perimeter streets of Mitchell Park are well received
and we will forward them to our City streets and parking divisions as they continue to
progress with their project plans within the City.
Thank you again and wishing a wonderful weekend.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 8:03 AM
To: Helen Nolan <helen.nolan1970@gmail.com>
Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly
<sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Parking at Mitchell Park
Ms. Nolan,
Thank you for your email. I am including Greg Avakian, Director of Parks and Recreation
on this email. I believe that Greg, or one of his staff, are the most knowledgeable staff
members about this project and can address your concerns.
Thanks,
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: Helen Nolan <helen.nolan1970@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 4:06 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn
<cchristi@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>
Subject: Parking at Mitchell Park
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Good afternoon,
My name is Helen Nolan. I live directly across the street from Mitchell Park, and I was surprised to
find out that pickleball courts are planned for this location. There are several reasons I was
surprised: one, there does not seem to be enough room to install these courts without removing
trees, the gazebo, or the playground equipment, and the loss of any of those would be tragic. Two,
where are these pickleball players going to park? Mitchell Park only has a very small parking lot, and
it is for the Senior Center. When that lot fills up (and it will), where will the seniors park (assuming
the Center will eventually open again post-COVID)? Three, I am a full-time resident who certainly
was not asked for my opinion on pickleball courts. I am sure there must have been some public
notice of meetings where this was discussed (right?) and I was just not aware of them. If this sport
truly is the fastest growing sport in America, I anticipate there will be a LOT of players wanting to
learn the game.
All this being said, my email is to respectfully request that the City take a good look at the street
parking on all four sides of Mitchell Park: Santa Rosa, Buchon, Osos, and Pismo. Some of the parking
is two-hour, but some is not. My main concern is with the increased number of cars expected
because of the pickleball courts, perhaps the city would consider drawing parking Ts to indicate
where parking spots begin and end on the four streets that border the park. This includes both sides
of the aforementioned streets, as park-goers do not restrict their parking to only the park-side of the
street. The reason for my request is that people don't always pay attention to driveways, red zones,
etc, and tend not to park in a considerate manner for other cars to either fit in front of or behind
their car, thus taking up too much space and decreasing the number of available parking spaces. This
creates compaction and makes it even more difficult for full-time residents, such as myself, to be
able to park near my own home. I am already frustrated with the current parking situation, and can
only imagine how much worse it's going to get once the courts go in. Addressing the lack of parking
sooner, rather than later, would be very much appreciated by this SLO resident.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
Respectfully,
Helen Nolan
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Johnson, Derek
Cc:Horn, Matt; Stanwyck, Shelly
Subject:RE: Questions weren"t answered.
Date:Wednesday, October 27, 2021 11:42:00 AM
Attachments:image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
image010.png
Thanks Derek!
I am also preparing a brief, but detailed email response to help Ms. Pinard with some of her
questions related to Mitchell Park and the Per Capita Grant.
Truly appreciate your summary response below and will copy you all and BCC Council on
my response later tonight.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 9:20 AM
To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly
<sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Questions weren't answered.
Mayor and Council,
Please see response to Ms. Pinard’s questions.
All the best,
Derek
BCC: CC
From: Johnson, Derek
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 8:15 AM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Peg Pinard
<pinardmat@gmail.com>
Cc: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Questions weren't answered.
Good Morning Everyone!
City trucks watered hundreds of trees this summer during another unprecedented period of
drought. The real challenge is that many of the trees that were planted years ago no longer
can survive in the prolonged heat and drought. Climate change is having an impact locally
and COVID-19 reprioritized resources during the last two years.
Planting sycamores and alders in dry sidewalk areas won’t make it unless there is an spring
or nearby water source. No matter how much water we drive around and place on trees,
some are just the wrong trees that were planted and may need to be replaced. New growth
from new trees have a great potential to take up CO2 and our goal is to plant 10,000 trees
in the next ten years.
The City Urban Forestry Program is undergoing a review right now, the model of employing
people to do heavy duty labor for 30 years in terms of trimming, etc., just won’t work
anymore. The costs are too high, outcomes are not there and we need more strategy,
monitoring and enforcement when we have illegal tree removals. Doing the same thing we
have done for the last 30 years just won’t work. Palo Alto and the Roseville redid their
Urban Forestry models and are hitting better outcomes.
With respect to Mitchell Park, the facts are that the City received a grant and we went to the
Council and suggested some ideas such as Pickleball as there is a very vocal group of
residents who continually ask for additional Pickleball Courts. They drove the request and
Staff indicated that before we did anything else, we needed to meet with neighbors near
Mitchell Park and work with the PRC. The process worked and ultimately it was
determined that Mitchell Park was not a location for more Pickleball courts (BTW, many
seniors love it for physical activity and socialization) and more passive recreation ideas
were appropriate to augment activities at the Senior Center.
Thanks for the feedback please stay on the lookout for a report to the City Council after
January 1st to shift and reorganize our Urban Forestry Program to get us to the place that
we need to be at in terms of maintenance, planting, strategy, and carbon sequestration.
All the best,
Derek
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 7:11 AM
To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Questions weren't answered.
Hi Peg (and thanks for forwarding the email Jan),
I will have our maintenance operations manager respond concerning the tree watering and
specifically address the trees in the photos. Can you tell me the approximate location of the tree
below? I am having trouble visualizing its location. Fortunately, we did receive some rain this week,
but I would like to ensure that the identified trees are on the City’s water schedule.
Thanks,
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
From: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 6:56 AM
To: Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Questions weren't answered.
I agree with your concerns, Peg. I am including our Public Works Director in this response,
since his Department has responsibility for tree and park maintenance.
Best wishes,
Jan
From: Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 4:58 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>;
Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Wilson, Nick <nwilson@thetribunenews.com>; Dave
Congalton < ; Peter Johnson <pjohnson@newtimesslo.com>; Santa
Lucia Sierra Club <sierraclub8@gmail.com>; Sandy Rowley <
Subject: Questions weren't answered.
Dear Mr. Avakian,
While I appreciated your reply, the questions I asked were left unanswered.
1) Where did the plan for pickleball courts in MItchell Park come from when it was something
the neighborhood overwhelmingly didn’t want? There seemed to be a lot of staff time spent for that
proposal, so it is important to understand how something got so far down the bureaucratic line
before the neighbors were made aware of it.
2) There seems to be a lack of recognition in the plans you referenced that some areas of the
city do not meet minimum standards for acceptable access to green space for residents. These
areas need to be clearly delineated if the city is to rectify these inadequacies. There is much
discussion about fairness and diversity throughout the city documents but the words appear to be
lacking any importance or meaning when it comes to the more impacted neighborhoods. The most
densely populated areas are also the ones with the most diverse number of minorities, ages,
abilities, etc. If I am missing this consideration in the “Plans” you referenced, perhaps you would be
so kind as to cite the exact reference, (including page and paragraph).
3) Mitchell Park’s small green space is the only place where the surrounding neighborhood
residents (and, as was previously noted, also many downtown employees) can sit and relax. There is
no other area within walking distance that is not already designated for some form of active
recreation. There is a reason our department is designated “Parks and Recreation” and not just
‘recreation’. Before any decisions are made with regard to what else our green space needs, I would
request that you involve the residents and neighborhood organizations like the (Old Town
Neighborhood Association and Residents for Quality Neighborhoods) in the decision-making. This is
required in our city’s constitution, its General Plan, but somehow keeps getting forgotten or ignored.
Given increased global warming, shade structures would ordinarily be welcome, but they need to be
very carefully designed. Similar structures were actually removed a few years ago due to the fact
that they became hang outs for drug dealers and an incredible amount of drug parapheralia
(including needles) were stored in the overheard trellises. The veteran’s monument was re-designed
using some of the bricks that were taken down from the support trellis. It is also noteworthy to
mention that if you watered the trees, they could remain as ‘shade’ providers…as well as major
carbon sequesters, etc.
4) I specifically asked the question about why isn't your department watering its parks (and
street trees) like they did in years past? When the city really cared about its trees, recycled water
was routinely used to keep the trees healthy during summer months and especially in times of
drought. Right now we are seeing trees dead/dying all over the city. Residents specifically paid for
the ability to have this additional water for its parks and trees. To say the least, it is most unusual
that the city isn’t using our recycled water for the benefit of its own city residents.
I am submitting these questions again and hope to hear back from you soon.
Peg PInard
P.S.: Just a sampling of Trees in Local Parks as well as our nearby street trees. I have hundreds of
these pictures now…it’s really distressing. You should take a good, close look at the sad state of our
city’s trees. It is additionally distressing to see that tens of hundreds of our otherwise mature,
healthy trees (our best carbon sequesters) are being unnecessarily cut down.
The resulting huge amount of carbon pollution that is being put into the atmosphere, right here by
this city is an IMPACT that is never mentioned in all your reports!
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Avakian, Greg" <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: What exactly was approved?
Date: October 21, 2021 at 12:16:04 PM PDT
To: Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Cc: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>, "Hyfield, Devin"
<DHyfield@slocity.org>, "Stanwyck, Shelly" <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
BCC: Council
Good afternoon former Mayor, Peg Pinard:
Thank you for your questions and advocacy for Mitchell Park. The information
outlined for the revitalization of Mitchell Park is designed to maintain the
history, purpose, and integrity of Mitchell Park. The area outlined in the Staff
Report is to update the location closest to the Senior Center and parking lot
area.
In addition to the links and response from Recreation Manager, Devin Hyfield, I
would also encourage you to look into the recently adopted new master plan
and general update now titled “Parks + Recreation Blueprint for the Future:
2021-2041” located on the City’s web page:
https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/parks-and-
recreation/parks-and-recreation-plan-and-element-update
Many of your concerns and questions are addressed within the document, as
well as reference the current housing developments that are supporting new
parks for our community. Each upcoming revitalization and new parks projects
are on a planned timeline to address our communities needs using a short-
term, mid-term, long-term philosophy.
In addition, the Parks and Recreation Department web page has a Current
Projects page that will provide the most current projects and information.
As a reminder, the Parks and Recreation Commission meets on the first
Wednesday of each month and is open to the public to attend (currently in a
virtual format) and the agenda and minutes of each meeting can be reviewed
by the community via the website. These meetings and the information that is
uploaded to the website are great ways to stay connected on the current
projects and activities related to Parks and Recreation.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 11:53 AM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: What exactly was approved?
Devin, (and Greg)
Thank you for the clarification. The motion made it sound like the passive amenities
were in addition to the pickleball courts. My understanding from you now is that
pickleball courts will not be included at Mitchell Park. Residents were very clear that
they didn’t want them and that they wanted this area to be kept for a more passive
enjoyment - especially since it’s the only green space in the area!
In order to understand your department’s thinking for even suggesting that location,
why didn’t you suggest utilizing a more accessible location like Laguna Lake Park?
(where there is a lot more land and parking) Even though it is primarily for passive
recreation, there are areas off the main entrance, right near Madonna Road, backing
up to restaurants, that are easily accessible and don’t fit the definition for the more
passive recreation that exists further into the park. And, even more to the
point, where are the new public parks that were supposed to be included with all
the new development that the city has been approving? Where have the needs for
active recreational facilities been included with the new developments that will be
easily accessible for the thousands of people who will need them?
At some point, the city has to recognize that Mitchell Park is more than ‘FULL’. This is a
little park where people can get a respite from the density and busy-ness of everything
around them. As was determined years ago, and according to all the guidelines for park
accessibility, the MItchell Park neighborhood is already way under the recommended
amount of acreage for green spaces in relation to the numbers of residents in the area.
Mitchell Park is the only green space in this whole area. People use it all the time as a
quiet place to eat lunch (even downtown employees go there for a break and to eat
their lunch since it’s in easy walkable distance). It’s the only place parents (and
grandparents) can bring their little ones. As the new rules for building an almost
limitless, number of additional units are felt even more in the area, that very limited
green space is going to be even more important!
So, to pursue this a bit further…your report indicated that ‘signage’ was to be included.
What has been requested by users of the park? I can’t even think of an example that
wouldn’t just become a visual blight. Why isn’t it ok to just leave something green
without having man-made obstructions that really serve no purpose? We certainly
don’t need another one of those “directional signs” (like what is in front of the rec.
offices- which, in my opinion, looks really tacky) If someone is sitting on a park bench,
they certainly aren’t asking where the airport or wineries are!
I would also like to ask why the city’s parks department isn't utilizing the city's water
trucks again to bring our recycled water for the trees? The trees have been terribly
neglected. Some are even dying. This sad commentary is true for all the city’s parks!
That’s the kind of oversight I would expect from the Parks Dept. to be vigilant about. I
would like an answer to that question.
Please be very carefulul in what you do to this park. We’ve worked very hard to make it
a safe place. Please don’t ‘junk it up’.
Thank you for clarifying the motion.
Sincerely,
Peg Pinard
Former Mayor, City of San Luis Obispo and Chairperson,
San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors
On Oct 21, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
wrote:
Hi Peg -
Thank you for the email. The resolution the was approved by Council
provided the update to the amenities at Mitchell Park which included
more passive amenities as discussed at the public workshop held in
September and through an online poll conducted during that same time.
Amenities agreed upon will potentially include, chess/checker tables,
bocce ball courts, shade structures and a new stage at the social gathering
area, more benches, interactive and educational signage, and pathway
safety lighting. Please see the following link for additional information.
Pickleball courts will not be included in the amenities at Mitchell Park.
Staff will be working on the design features at Mitchell Park and will be
providing updates at upcoming PRC meetings in Spring 2022. If you would
like to sign up for notifications regarding the meeting, please sign
up here.
Devin Hyfield
Recreation Manager
T 805.781.7295
-----Original Message-----
From: Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:09 AM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Subject: what was approved?
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to
open attachments, click links, or respond.
________________________________
Couldyou please clarify council’s action? the consent agenda item
regarding Mitchell Park…does it still include the pickleball courts that
residents didn’t want?
Thank you,
Peg Pinard
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Bultema, Graham
Cc:Scott, Shawna; Hyfield, Devin; Hill, Robert
Subject:RE: SLO Public Art Jury Question
Date:Tuesday, July 13, 2021 3:41:31 PM
Attachments:Jury Selection Criteria & Rating Form.pdf
Jury Guidelines for Public Art.pdf
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
image010.png
image011.png
Good afternoon Graham:
It is my understanding from recently retired staff member, Lindsey Stephenson, that this
does qualify for an art jury. She communicated with SLOMA reps, Emma, about this about
a week or two ago. I’ve attached the criteria and rating forms that Lindsey used for
previous art jury’s. Once the SLOMA and City updated agreement is approved after the
July 20 City Council meeting then they can move forward with the process.
I’ve copied Bob Hill on this response as he has been working on the updated agreement
and has recently (6-8 months ago?) been involved in the art jury process with SLOMA.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Bultema, Graham <gbultema@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 3:27 PM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: SLO Public Art Jury Question
Hello Devin,
I have a question for Parks & Rec regarding the public art jury. The SLO Museum of Art
(1010 Broad Street) has recently submitted a building permit application to install a
temporary sculpture adjacent to the museum on the lawn across the street from the history
center. I was wondering if you or someone in Parks & Rec could provide guidance on the
criteria for if and/or when public art should be reviewed and approved by the public art jury.
Normally, the Community Development Department refers to Zoning Regulations Section
17.70.140 for public art regulations, but that section is for public art that is required through
the development process. Would this proposed sculpture adjacent to SLOMA need to be
reviewed by the public art jury?
Thank you, I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Graham Bultema
Assistant Planner
Community Development
919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E gbultema@slocity.org
T 805.781.7111
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Bultema, Graham; Hill, Robert
Cc:Scott, Shawna; Hyfield, Devin
Subject:RE: SLO Public Art Jury Question
Date:Tuesday, July 13, 2021 5:15:55 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
Graham:
SLOMA can’t officially conduct an Art Jury until the updated facility and collaborative
agreement is approved by City Council on July 20. It’s my understanding that the
SLOMA staff have lined up the art jury process and may even have notified some
community members to be on the jury so they can move forward ASAP.
Let me know if you need to have contact information for the SLOMA staff and we can
forward that to you or if you are inquiring just about the timeline. FYI, I am still learning
everyone’s role and timelines based on public art and art jury’s.
-GA
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Bultema, Graham <gbultema@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 4:41 PM
To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: SLO Public Art Jury Question
Thank you Bob and Greg for providing this helpful information. I just want to clarify; have
they already been scheduled to be reviewed by the public art jury yet? Will that be part of
the City Council item on July 20th, or will the proposal be reviewed shortly after July 20th?
Graham Bultema
Assistant Planner
Community Development
919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E gbultema@slocity.org
T 805.781.7111
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 4:36 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Bultema, Graham <gbultema@slocity.org>
Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: SLO Public Art Jury Question
Hi Graham and Greg,
I agree and I can recall Lindsey mentioning to them that this exhibit would need to go
through the process. The jury process I participated on was for the outdoor murals on the
museum itself, it was a fairly informal and quick process.
Following prospective Council action on 7/20, they’ll be pushing to go quickly so glad to
hear you’re reviewing already.
Bob
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 3:42 PM
To: Bultema, Graham <gbultema@slocity.org>
Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert
<rhill@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: SLO Public Art Jury Question
Good afternoon Graham:
It is my understanding from recently retired staff member, Lindsey Stephenson, that this
does qualify for an art jury. She communicated with SLOMA reps, Emma, about this about
a week or two ago. I’ve attached the criteria and rating forms that Lindsey used for
previous art jury’s. Once the SLOMA and City updated agreement is approved after the
July 20 City Council meeting then they can move forward with the process.
I’ve copied Bob Hill on this response as he has been working on the updated agreement
and has recently (6-8 months ago?) been involved in the art jury process with SLOMA.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Bultema, Graham <gbultema@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 3:27 PM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>
Subject: SLO Public Art Jury Question
Hello Devin,
I have a question for Parks & Rec regarding the public art jury. The SLO Museum of Art
(1010 Broad Street) has recently submitted a building permit application to install a
temporary sculpture adjacent to the museum on the lawn across the street from the history
center. I was wondering if you or someone in Parks & Rec could provide guidance on the
criteria for if and/or when public art should be reviewed and approved by the public art jury.
Normally, the Community Development Department refers to Zoning Regulations Section
17.70.140 for public art regulations, but that section is for public art that is required through
the development process. Would this proposed sculpture adjacent to SLOMA need to be
reviewed by the public art jury?
Thank you, I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Graham Bultema
Assistant Planner
Community Development
919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E gbultema@slocity.org
T 805.781.7111
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Cruce, Greg; Hill, Robert
Cc:Whipple, Anthony; Fields, Paul
Subject:RE: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
Date:Thursday, September 9, 2021 7:52:00 AM
Attachments:image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Good morning GC:
I am working remotely the first part of the day and am unable to open the link you provided.
It looks to be a Google doc that isn’t allowing me access.
Also, I am not available to attend the 10a meeting due to the weekly COVID meeting.
Hoping that Bob can assist with the questions you and the committee may have.
Sorry,
-GA
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 7:45 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Cc: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Fields, Paul <pfields@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
Good morning Greg and Bob,
DRG sent out the link to the Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators for us to fill out and rate.
Anthony and I have gone through and answered most questions, but there are some
questions specific to Natural Resources and Open Space. I have highlighted the sections
in groovy neon green, but feel free to review the entire document. Please let me know if
you have any questions or if you cannot access the document.
Thanks!
Greg Cruce
City of S.L.O.
Public Works
805.781.7264
gcruce@slocity.org
From: Sitz, Rachael <rachael.sitz@davey.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 4:04 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Fields, Paul <pfields@slocity.org>; Bernstorff, Rebecca
<rbernstorff@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Boyle, Ellen <eboyle@slocity.org>;
Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Allison Steere <allison.steere@davey.com>; McKeand, Tina <tina.mckeand@davey.com>
Subject: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hello Everyone,
We mentioned the Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators on our call today and here is a link to that
document. There are four tabs. One is a tally of the scores that you total from the sheets entitled
"The Trees", "The Players", and "The Management Approach". Read the descriptions and if any do
not apply to your program, feel free to skip them. After you self-assess we will review it and let you
know if we have any questions about your responses.
Also, I will move forward with the community survey and stakeholder questionnaire and send them
to you for review early next week.
Thanks and have a great rest of the day!
Rachael
Rachael Sitz, PhD
Urban Forestry Specialist, Entomology
Davey Resource Group
(208) 997-8154
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Cruce, Greg
Subject:RE: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
Date:Wednesday, September 15, 2021 10:15:00 AM
Attachments:image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
image010.png
image011.png
image012.png
Hey GC:
Sorry, the link doesn’t work for me. Had the same issue last week. Can you send me a
fresh link?
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 7:39 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
Good morning Gentlemen,
DRG has grant you both access to the shared drive. When you get a chance, could you
please review the Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators for the org. assessment? Let me
know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Greg Cruce
City of S.L.O.
Public Works
805.781.7264
gcruce@slocity.org
From: Cruce, Greg
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 8:08 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Cc: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Fields, Paul <pfields@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
I have requested DRG to give you and Bob access, I’ll let you know when that occurs. No
worries today’s call, we’ll let you know if we have any follow-up.
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 7:52 AM
To: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Cc: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Fields, Paul <pfields@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
Good morning GC:
I am working remotely the first part of the day and am unable to open the link you provided.
It looks to be a Google doc that isn’t allowing me access.
Also, I am not available to attend the 10a meeting due to the weekly COVID meeting.
Hoping that Bob can assist with the questions you and the committee may have.
Sorry,
-GA
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 7:45 AM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>
Cc: Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Fields, Paul <pfields@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
Good morning Greg and Bob,
DRG sent out the link to the Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators for us to fill out and rate.
Anthony and I have gone through and answered most questions, but there are some
questions specific to Natural Resources and Open Space. I have highlighted the sections
in groovy neon green, but feel free to review the entire document. Please let me know if
you have any questions or if you cannot access the document.
Thanks!
Greg Cruce
City of S.L.O.
Public Works
805.781.7264
gcruce@slocity.org
From: Sitz, Rachael <rachael.sitz@davey.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 4:04 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Fields, Paul <pfields@slocity.org>; Bernstorff, Rebecca
<rbernstorff@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Boyle, Ellen <eboyle@slocity.org>;
Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>
Cc: Allison Steere <allison.steere@davey.com>; McKeand, Tina <tina.mckeand@davey.com>
Subject: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond.
Hello Everyone,
We mentioned the Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators on our call today and here is a link to that
document. There are four tabs. One is a tally of the scores that you total from the sheets entitled
"The Trees", "The Players", and "The Management Approach". Read the descriptions and if any do
not apply to your program, feel free to skip them. After you self-assess we will review it and let you
know if we have any questions about your responses.
Also, I will move forward with the community survey and stakeholder questionnaire and send them
to you for review early next week.
Thanks and have a great rest of the day!
Rachael
Rachael Sitz, PhD
Urban Forestry Specialist, Entomology
Davey Resource Group
(208) 997-8154
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Cruce, Greg; Horn, Matt
Subject:RE: thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net
Date:Thursday, February 4, 2021 5:18:42 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Thanks GC!!
It’s a no win situation with some and Mr. Weinschenk can be challenging (we have
experience with him with trees).
Thanks for looping us in on the convo and Adam’s reply.
-GA
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 4:47 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net
Fyi, keeping you in the loop.
Greg Cruce
City of S.L.O.
Public Works
805.781.7264
gcruce@slocity.org
From: Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 2:04 PM
To: Thomas Weinschenk <thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Harvey, Billy <BHarvey@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net
Hi Mr. Weinschenk,
Sorry for my delayed response as we have been real busy dealing with last weeks storms
and the current Covid-19 pandemic. I appreciate your response and again sorry for any
inconvenience this has caused. After consulting City Administration about this issue, I have
some clarification on the City Municipal code and what section we fall into. For SLMC
9.12.50 we fall into 9.12.50.B6.a :
a. Operating or causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair,
alteration or demolition work between weekday hours of seven p.m. and seven a.m., or any time on
Sundays or holidays, such that the sound therefrom creates a noise disturbance across a residential or
commercial real property line, except for emergency work of public service utilities or by exception issued
by the community development department. (This section shall not apply to the use of domestic power
tools as specified in subsection B 10 of this section.
We do not operate domestic power equipment and we are providing work as a public service, so we are
exempt from the two codes that you stated below. We have developed a good relationship over the years
with the tennis groups and they are adamant about having the courts blown off every weekday to make
sure that they are safe to play on. Having the players do their own maintenance on the courts before they
can play is not an option and would damage the relationships that we tried so hard to build. We will try our
best to start blowing closer to 8 am, but if the courts are really messy, we might have to start a little bit
earlier. Again, we are just trying to find that happy medium where all of the public is happy with the
service that we provide.
Regards,
Adam Basden
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Public Works
Parks Maintenance
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E abasden@slocity.org
T 805.781.7025
C 805.431.0666
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Thomas Weinschenk <thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 1:41 PM
To: Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Harvey, Billy
<BHarvey@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net
Hello Mr. Basden,
I disagree with your assumption that using a leaf blower as on the Sinsheimer Tennis courts is permitted
by city code. Please read the following two code items from the City of San Luis Obispo:
1. This is from "Noise Standards in San Luis Obispo":
"The noise ordinance for the City of San Luis Obispo is a 24/7 regulation. It is a violation to make or allow
noise between 7:00 am and 10:00 pm that can be heard 50 feet from your property line; between 10:00
pm and 7:00 am, it is a violation to make or allow noise that can be heard across your property line. Noise
is not limited to music; it could be a TV turned up loud, voices, power tools, and so forth. SLMC 9.12.050"
(https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument?id=15164)
2. This is from a list of prohibited acts from San Luis Obispo's Municipal Code:
"b. Operating a power blower in a residential zone or within two hundred feet of a residential zone
between six p.m. and eight a.m., seven days a week."
(https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/9.12.050)
Both of these codes make it clear that running the blowers at 7:30 in the morning is in violation with city
ordinances. Furthermore, I have played tennis on the Sinsheimer courts for over 25 years, and
traditionally members of the tennis community would bring brooms on windy days to sweep away leaves
and debris. This worked just fine, and there is no reason why tennis players cannot take care of the
debris on the particular court they play on with a broom or a hand when they get there. If it is not a
requirement for every sidewalk to be blown free of debris for joggers and pedestrians each and every
day, what city code requires you to blow the courts with gas-powered leaf-blowers?
Your blowers are very loud and a cause of irritation and discomfort for my family. In our neighborhood
there are many elderly residents and small children as well as students and adults forced to work from
home due to Covid. Please be aware that even though you may run your very loud blower in the
morning, the courts on a windy day can easily be filled with debris by the afternoon. The most effective
and neighborhood friendly way to maintain the courts would be to provide wide brooms for each court
which could be used by players as needed.
Sincerely,
Tom Weinschenk
On Friday, January 22, 2021, 11:35:04 AM PST, Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Mr. Weinschenk,
Thanks so much for contacting the City regarding this issue. The Sinsheimer tennis courts and
playground are highly used assets for the community. We have the obligation to provide a clean and safe
facility. We routinely need to blow off these areas to make them safe for the public to use as rocks,
leaves, woodchips and other debris can create a hazardous situation. The tennis groups show up around
8am to use the courts, so we need to make sure that we complete this task before 8am. The City of San
Luis Obispo code for blower use during the week is after 7 am. We don’t like to start that early because
we know that there are residences close to the park, so we start around 7:30 to 7:45. This makes the task
difficult to complete before 8am. I am truly sorry about the disruption this has caused. Electric blowers
work great for the homeowner that is blowing off their deck or driveway, but it is inefficient when we have
to blow off six tennis courts, the entire playground and the walkways. I wish I had a better answer for you
as it is challenging to find a happy medium between the user groups and residents.
Regards,
Adam Basden
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Public Works
Parks Maintenance
25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7314
E abasden@slocity.org
T 805.781.7025
C 805.431.0666
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit slocity.org/covid19
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:51 PM
To: Thomas Weinschenk <thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Basden, Adam <abasden@slocity.org>; Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net
Good afternoon Mr. Weinschenk:
Thank you for reporting your concern regarding noise issues at Sinsheimer Park and specifically near the
tennis courts. I’ve copied our Parks Maintenance Supervisor as he may have more input and the ability to
determine the issue if it is a staff member, contractor, or a fellow community member.
Thank you for expressing your concern and we hope that you and your family members are well,
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit slocity.org/covid19
From: webmaster@slocity.org <webmaster@slocity.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:23 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net
Message submitted from the <City of San Luis Obispo, CA> website.
Site Visitor Name: Thomas Weinschenk
Site Visitor Email: thomasweinschenk@sbcglobal.net
Dear Parks and Rec Director,
Someone is using a very loud leaf-blower about 3 or 4 times a week at the Sinsheimer tennis courts. The
leaf-blowing usually starts around 7:45 a.m. and goes on for 20 minutes or more. It's been a real
disruption to our home, where my wife is working and my son studying, due to Covid. Sleeping-in is
impossible. I encourage you to visit the courts just to hear how loud the leaf-blower is. We live on Santa
Clara Street, but there are many families who live much closer to the courts that we do. It might be
worthwhile asking the owners of the leaf-blower whether they could use an electric blower, which is much
quieter. Thanks for any help you can give us.
Sincerely,
Tom Weinschenk,
San Luis Obispo
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Codron, Michael; Horn, Matt; Stanwyck, Shelly
Subject:RE: Tonight"s presentation
Date:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 2:11:15 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
I agree Michael. I reviewed what the Planning Commission recommendations were, as well
as the traffic control/mitigation that Luke outlined for the Broad St/Lincoln intersection. My
understanding is that Shelsie is also very well informed on these additions, as well as the
increased sidewalk buffer and fencing between the park space and the on/off ramp
roadways.
As this is a rezone study session, how much are we planning on entertaining on park
design vs. the rezone topic from Open Space to Park Space? Just being cautious we don’t
go down a rabbit hole revisiting what PRC, PC, and community workshops have already
done.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:36 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg
<gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Tonight's presentation
Hi All, for tonight’s item on the park, Kyle did not schedule Luke to participate. I just want to
give everyone the heads-up that there was quite a bit of discussion about traffic safety at
the Planning Commission and there is agenda correspondence specifically on this point. I’ll
double-check the presentation to make sure we affirmatively state the steps that we went
through to ensure safety, but there may be additional questions and just wanted to make
sure you were aware of that. I think between Shelsie, Kyle and the consultant we will be
fine. Thanks, -Michael
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:43 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
No I do not, should we have him attend the meeting? Shelsie could provide an update
regarding the on-ramp and intersection improvements.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:32 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
Do you have Luke scheduled to address questions with the on-ramp, intersection, etc.?
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:20 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
I just sent a meeting invite for 4 pm today, let me know if there is a better time to meet.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:18 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: Tonight's presentation
Hi Kyle,
At agenda review and we discussed incorporating a few slides at the beginning of the
presentation to allow Greg to provide some background and context for how this park site
came to be and provide some of his perspective and background.
Would you mind sharing a link to the presentation so that we can see the format and pop in
the additional slides?
Thanks, and if anyone thinks we should huddle ahead of the meeting to coordinate let me
know and I can set up a meeting. -Michael
Michael Codron
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Community Development
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mcodron@slocity.org
T 805.781.7187
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Horn, Matt; Codron, Michael; Stanwyck, Shelly
Subject:RE: Tonight"s presentation
Date:Tuesday, March 2, 2021 4:47:57 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Great! I am on a call with Shelsie and team now. I just informed them. Shelsie will take the
lead, but if needed she will have Luke weigh in.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 4:44 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Stanwyck,
Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
Luke is going to attend the meeting and address any traffic questions.
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
C 805.431.5474
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 2:22 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly
<sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
I definitely don’t want to go down any rabbit holes, and if we are responsive to the public
testimony with clear, affirmative statements then we’ll be able to keep things higher level.
Will the City Council see the final design at some point (e.g. when the RFP is approved
or?).
From: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 2:11 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly
<sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
I agree Michael. I reviewed what the Planning Commission recommendations were, as well
as the traffic control/mitigation that Luke outlined for the Broad St/Lincoln intersection. My
understanding is that Shelsie is also very well informed on these additions, as well as the
increased sidewalk buffer and fencing between the park space and the on/off ramp
roadways.
As this is a rezone study session, how much are we planning on entertaining on park
design vs. the rezone topic from Open Space to Park Space? Just being cautious we don’t
go down a rabbit hole revisiting what PRC, PC, and community workshops have already
done.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:36 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg
<gavakian@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Tonight's presentation
Hi All, for tonight’s item on the park, Kyle did not schedule Luke to participate. I just want to
give everyone the heads-up that there was quite a bit of discussion about traffic safety at
the Planning Commission and there is agenda correspondence specifically on this point. I’ll
double-check the presentation to make sure we affirmatively state the steps that we went
through to ensure safety, but there may be additional questions and just wanted to make
sure you were aware of that. I think between Shelsie, Kyle and the consultant we will be
fine. Thanks, -Michael
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:43 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
No I do not, should we have him attend the meeting? Shelsie could provide an update
regarding the on-ramp and intersection improvements.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:32 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
Do you have Luke scheduled to address questions with the on-ramp, intersection, etc.?
From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 12:20 PM
To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: RE: Tonight's presentation
I just sent a meeting invite for 4 pm today, let me know if there is a better time to meet.
Kyle Bell
CDD Associate Planner
E KBell@slocity.org
T 805.781.7524
From: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:18 AM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>
Cc: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Subject: Tonight's presentation
Hi Kyle,
At agenda review and we discussed incorporating a few slides at the beginning of the
presentation to allow Greg to provide some background and context for how this park site
came to be and provide some of his perspective and background.
Would you mind sharing a link to the presentation so that we can see the format and pop in
the additional slides?
Thanks, and if anyone thinks we should huddle ahead of the meeting to coordinate let me
know and I can set up a meeting. -Michael
Michael Codron
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Community Development
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
E mcodron@slocity.org
T 805.781.7187
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Stanwyck, Shelly; Horn, Matt
Cc:Cruce, Greg
Subject:Re: Tree trimming award
Date:Wednesday, August 25, 2021 8:13:00 PM
Well… he may have officially taken the new “Mobley Award” from me on best way to
respond. Looks like I need to refocus and train on my patience and soft writing skills to battle
back for my chance at the title.
Nice work GC!
Greg Avakian
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of San Luis Obispo
Parks and Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E: gavakian@slocity.org
T: 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 7:38:39 PM
To: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Tree trimming award
You have trained him so well. He’s a natural!
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 6:36:52 PM
To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Subject: FW: Tree trimming award
Check out Cruce's handywork.
Matt Horn
Director of Public Works
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E mhorn@slocity.org
T 805.781.7191
-----Original Message-----
From: Amanda Mobley <amobley18@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 6:35 PM
To: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: Tree trimming award
Thanks for sharing.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 4:56 PM, Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org> wrote:
>
> Ms. Mobley,
>
> Attached are the price sheets for the three pruning contractors. The contract terms would have
been the same for all vendor, except for pricing. The bulk of the contract is anticipated to be items
1-8 and 18 on the price sheet. As you can see, WCA was a good value for the City.
>
> I also wanted to bring your attention to a City Council study session occurring on 9/7/21. At this
meeting, the Council will be discussing different methods to support the local economy. As you're
aware, you can join the meeting and express your thoughts during the public comment period.
Written correspondences ahead of the meeting are also allowed.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you,
> Greg Cruce
> City of S.L.O.
> Public Works
> 805.781.7264
> gcruce@slocity.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amanda Mobley <amobley18@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 2:37 PM
> To: Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org>
> Cc: Horn, Matt <mhorn@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>
> Subject: Re: Tree trimming award
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> What did each company bid? Did the other 2 companies offer on call contracts?
>
> The city seems to constantly push the “shop local” concept but seems completely content with
outsourcing city business (from outside the county and sometimes outside the state), which I find
ironic.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 25, 2021, at 2:26 PM, Cruce, Greg <gcruce@slocity.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Ms. Mobley,
>>
>> You are correct, West Coast Arborist was selected as the contractor for on-call tree pruning. The
City received three proposals from Bunyon Bros, Greenvale, and WCA. After review and scoring of
the proposals, WCA was selected because they proposed the lowest cost and received the highest
overall ranking. Since the contract is on-call, there was not a specific amount awarded. Staff
expects the annual cost to under $150,000.
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Greg Cruce
>> City of S.L.O.
>> Public Works
>> 805.781.7264
>> gcruce@slocity.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Amanda Mobley <amobley18@yahoo.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 1:37 PM
>> To: Christian, Kevin <kchristi@slocity.org>
>> Subject: Tree trimming award
>>
>>
>>
>> This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click
links, or respond.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> It looks like WCA out of Ventura got the contract to trim city trees; did any other local
businesses bid for the job and how much was awarded?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>
> <Bunyon Bros_UFP.pdf>
> <WCA_ UFP.pdf>
> <Greenvale_UFP.pdf>
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Stanwyck, Shelly; mary@ecoslo.org
Cc:Hill, Robert; Jenn Yost; Matt Ritter; Whipple, Anthony; Basden, Adam; Grant Helete; Hannah Romano
Subject:RE: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 8:23:54 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Good evening Mary and thank you for reaching out with this amazing opportunity. As
Shelly stated below, City staff are wrapped up in a few items over the next couple of weeks,
however I would be happy to contact you next week and get some additional background
on the project(s) and process.
Thank you again and I look forward to talking with you.
Be well,
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 5:33 PM
To: mary@ecoslo.org; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Jenn Yost <jyost@calpoly.edu>; Matt Ritter
<mritter@calpoly.edu>; Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Basden, Adam
<abasden@slocity.org>; Grant Helete <grant@ecoslo.org>; Hannah Romano <hannah@ecoslo.org>
Subject: RE: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Mary this is a great opportunity for us to continue to partner with ECOSLO and add trees
and all of their benefits to our community.
Greg Avakian will coordinate the City’s response and follow up activities in the near term. If
you would be so kind as to be patient with that response; staff is presently responding to
potential storm emergencies this week (all hands on deck for that) alongside of our COVID
emergency response, Budget, and Core Services and are presently a bit overwhelmed with
activities.
I would anticipate that we will get back to you in early February after we’ve had a chance to
review the locations and assess any impacts to park use and maintenance activities
(sometimes there are one or both) as well as the agreement we have with the school
district with whom we have a joint use agreement for this particular park.
Again, looking forward to the partnership and thanks for the patience.
Shelly
Shelly Stanwyck
pronouns she/her/hers
Assistant City Manager Community Services
City Administration
919 palm street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E sstanwyck@slocity.org
T 805.781.7294
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Mary Ciesinski <executive-director@ecoslo.org>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 3:10 PM
To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Jenn Yost <jyost@calpoly.edu>; Matt Ritter
<mritter@calpoly.edu>; Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Basden, Adam
<abasden@slocity.org>; Grant Helete <grant@ecoslo.org>; Hannah Romano <hannah@ecoslo.org>
Subject: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Hello & happy Monday Shelly and Greg,
I hope this email finds you well! I am reaching out on behalf of the Environmental
Center of San Luis Obispo (ECOSLO) and our Urban Trees program.
ECOSLO has just finished a very successful year working in collaboration with the
City of SLO to plant 120 trees on City streets. We have been working with Ron
Combs, the entire City tree crew, Bob Hill, and Cal Poly faculty Matt Ritter and Jenn
Yost.
ECOSLO has recently received another grant to work with the City to plant 240
additional trees over the next three years. We would like to do some of these
plantings in City Parks. We hope this can strengthen the relationship between
ECOSLO and our City partners for years to come.
In the past year since starting our Urban Trees Program, we have received many
requests for trees in Throop Park. Below is a map of the suggested locations for 10
new trees in Throop Park and we would like your feedback on this potential planting
plan.
ECOSLO is able to provide the trees for free and do the planting. We just ask that
you would coordinate with your staff to mow around them and keep an eye on them.
I have attached a letter describing the program in more depth as well as specifics on
the tree planting. I have also included a map as a visual.
I am happy to answer any questions you may have and am really looking forward to
the possibility of being able to share more with you.
Many thanks,
Mary
Mary A. Ciesinski, Executive Director
ECOSLO - Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo
www.ECOSLO.org | Office: (805) 544-1777 | Cell: (805) 710-8021 | mary@ecoslo.org
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Hannah Romano; Mary Ciesinski; Grant Helete
Cc:Hill, Robert; Cruce, Greg; Basden, Adam; Stanwyck, Shelly
Subject:RE: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Date:Tuesday, February 2, 2021 3:43:40 PM
Attachments:image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
image010.png
image011.png
image012.png
Good afternoon Hannah, Grant, and Mary:
The City staff were able to discuss this amazing opportunity this afternoon and are excited
to continue the partnership with ECOSLO. I’ve included the three key staff that will be
taking the leads on the next steps for the tree planting at Throop Park, as well as any
additional collaborations that may occur in the near future.
Bob Hill, Natural Resource Manager
Greg Cruce, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor
Adam Basden, Parks Maintenance Supervisor
Again, thank you very much for your continued stewardship to our community and the
valued partnership with the City. Please don’t hesitate to reach out with any additional
questions or needs.
Looking forward to this project.
Be well,
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Avakian, Greg
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 5:22 PM
To: Hannah Romano <hannah@ecoslo.org>
Cc: Mary Ciesinski <executive-director@ecoslo.org>; Grant Helete <grant@ecoslo.org>
Subject: RE: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Good evening Hannah:
Thank you for reaching out and also for providing this fantastic opportunity to partner with
ECOSLO. City staff are meeting on Tuesday to discuss this and after that we will reach out
to coordinate a time to set up a virtual meeting.
Please keep in mind that many of the City of San Luis Obispo staff are filling multiple roles
supporting COVID-19 related tasks, including coordination of vaccines and working as
liaisons to the County Health Dept., along with their normal expected positions. There may
be a delay in our response based on these priorities, however staff are very honored and
excited for this opportunity.
Looking forward to setting up a meeting soon.
Be well,
-Greg
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Hannah Romano <hannah@ecoslo.org>
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 4:05 PM
To: Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Mary Ciesinski <executive-director@ecoslo.org>; Grant Helete <grant@ecoslo.org>
Subject: Re: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Hello Greg,
Thank you so much for your enthusiasm and for getting back to us. My name is Hannah and I am the
community forester AmeriCorps member of ECOSLO that will be working on planning and facilitating
the plantings. We completely understand the chaos of this week and life in general during these
times. If availability does come up in your schedule this coming week, it would be great to further
discuss the project and process! We will keep an eye out for your email and are available to meet via
phone or video call depending on your preference. It looks like as of now our team is available
Tuesday the 2nd from 2-5pm. We can always adjust to a time that best works for you as well!
I hope you stayed safe in the storm!
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Hannah
Hannah Romano, AmeriCorps Volunteer Services - Community Forestry
ECOSLO - Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo
www.ECOSLO.org | (805) 710 - 8017 | hannah@ecoslo.org
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:23 PM Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org> wrote:
Good evening Mary and thank you for reaching out with this amazing opportunity. As
Shelly stated below, City staff are wrapped up in a few items over the next couple of
weeks, however I would be happy to contact you next week and get some additional
background on the project(s) and process.
Thank you again and I look forward to talking with you.
Be well,
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 5:33 PM
To: mary@ecoslo.org; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Jenn Yost <jyost@calpoly.edu>; Matt Ritter
<mritter@calpoly.edu>; Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Basden, Adam
<abasden@slocity.org>; Grant Helete <grant@ecoslo.org>; Hannah Romano
<hannah@ecoslo.org>
Subject: RE: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Mary this is a great opportunity for us to continue to partner with ECOSLO and add trees
and all of their benefits to our community.
Greg Avakian will coordinate the City’s response and follow up activities in the near
term. If you would be so kind as to be patient with that response; staff is presently
responding to potential storm emergencies this week (all hands on deck for that)
alongside of our COVID emergency response, Budget, and Core Services and are
presently a bit overwhelmed with activities.
I would anticipate that we will get back to you in early February after we’ve had a chance
to review the locations and assess any impacts to park use and maintenance activities
(sometimes there are one or both) as well as the agreement we have with the school
district with whom we have a joint use agreement for this particular park.
Again, looking forward to the partnership and thanks for the patience.
Shelly
Shelly Stanwyck
pronouns she/her/hers
Assistant City Manager Community Services
City Administration
919 palm street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E sstanwyck@slocity.org
T 805.781.7294
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
For updates on COVID-19 and how to access City services during COVID, visit
slocity.org/covid19
From: Mary Ciesinski <executive-director@ecoslo.org>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 3:10 PM
To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Jenn Yost <jyost@calpoly.edu>; Matt Ritter
<mritter@calpoly.edu>; Whipple, Anthony <awhipple@slocity.org>; Basden, Adam
<abasden@slocity.org>; Grant Helete <grant@ecoslo.org>; Hannah Romano
<hannah@ecoslo.org>
Subject: Urban tree planting outreach for Throop Park
Hello & happy Monday Shelly and Greg,
I hope this email finds you well! I am reaching out on behalf of the Environmental
Center of San Luis Obispo (ECOSLO) and our Urban Trees program.
ECOSLO has just finished a very successful year working in collaboration with the
City of SLO to plant 120 trees on City streets. We have been working with Ron
Combs, the entire City tree crew, Bob Hill, and Cal Poly faculty Matt Ritter and Jenn
Yost.
ECOSLO has recently received another grant to work with the City to plant 240
additional trees over the next three years. We would like to do some of these
plantings in City Parks. We hope this can strengthen the relationship between
ECOSLO and our City partners for years to come.
In the past year since starting our Urban Trees Program, we have received many
requests for trees in Throop Park. Below is a map of the suggested locations for 10
new trees in Throop Park and we would like your feedback on this potential planting
plan.
ECOSLO is able to provide the trees for free and do the planting. We just ask that
you would coordinate with your staff to mow around them and keep an eye on
them.
I have attached a letter describing the program in more depth as well as specifics
on the tree planting. I have also included a map as a visual.
I am happy to answer any questions you may have and am really looking forward to
the possibility of being able to share more with you.
Many thanks,
Mary
Mary A. Ciesinski, Executive Director
ECOSLO - Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo
www.ECOSLO.org | Office: (805) 544-1777 | Cell: (805) 710-8021 | mary@ecoslo.org
From:Avakian, Greg
To:Peg Pinard
Cc:E-mail Council Website; Hyfield, Devin; Stanwyck, Shelly
Subject:RE: What exactly was approved?
Date:Thursday, October 21, 2021 12:16:00 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
BCC: Council
Good afternoon former Mayor, Peg Pinard:
Thank you for your questions and advocacy for Mitchell Park. The information outlined for
the revitalization of Mitchell Park is designed to maintain the history, purpose, and integrity
of Mitchell Park. The area outlined in the Staff Report is to update the location closest to
the Senior Center and parking lot area.
In addition to the links and response from Recreation Manager, Devin Hyfield, I would also
encourage you to look into the recently adopted new master plan and general update now
titled “Parks + Recreation Blueprint for the Future: 2021-2041” located on the City’s web
page:
https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/parks-and-recreation/parks-and-
recreation-plan-and-element-update
Many of your concerns and questions are addressed within the document, as well as
reference the current housing developments that are supporting new parks for our
community. Each upcoming revitalization and new parks projects are on a planned timeline
to address our communities needs using a short-term, mid-term, long-term philosophy.
In addition, the Parks and Recreation Department web page has a Current Projects page
that will provide the most current projects and information.
As a reminder, the Parks and Recreation Commission meets on the first Wednesday of
each month and is open to the public to attend (currently in a virtual format) and the agenda
and minutes of each meeting can be reviewed by the community via the website. These
meetings and the information that is uploaded to the website are great ways to stay
connected on the current projects and activities related to Parks and Recreation.
Greg Avakian
pronouns he/him/his
Director of Parks and Recreation
Parks & Recreation
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934
E gavakian@slocity.org
T 805.781.7120
slocity.org
Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications
From: Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 11:53 AM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>; Avakian, Greg <gavakian@slocity.org>
Cc: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>
Subject: Re: What exactly was approved?
Devin, (and Gavin)
Thank you for the clarification. The motion made it sound like the passive amenities were in addition
to the pickleball courts. My understanding from you now is that pickleball courts will not be included
at Mitchell Park. Residents were very clear that they didn’t want them and that they wanted this
area to be kept for a more passive enjoyment - especially since it’s the only green space in the area!
In order to understand your department’s thinking for even suggesting that location, why didn’t you
suggest utilizing a more accessible location like Laguna Lake Park? (where there is a lot more land
and parking) Even though it is primarily for passive recreation, there are areas off the main
entrance, right near Madonna Road, backing up to restaurants, that are easily accessible and don’t
fit the definition for the more passive recreation that exists further into the park. And, even more to
the point, where are the new public parks that were supposed to be included with all the new
development that the city has been approving? Where have the needs for active recreational
facilities been included with the new developments that will be easily accessible for the thousands of
people who will need them?
At some point, the city has to recognize that Mitchell Park is more than ‘FULL’. This is a little park
where people can get a respite from the density and busy-ness of everything around them. As was
determined years ago, and according to all the guidelines for park accessibility, the MItchell Park
neighborhood is already way under the recommended amount of acreage for green spaces in
relation to the numbers of residents in the area.
Mitchell Park is the only green space in this whole area. People use it all the time as a quiet place to
eat lunch (even downtown employees go there for a break and to eat their lunch since it’s in easy
walkable distance). It’s the only place parents (and grandparents) can bring their little ones. As the
new rules for building an almost limitless, number of additional units are felt even more in the area,
that very limited green space is going to be even more important!
So, to pursue this a bit further…your report indicated that ‘signage’ was to be included. What has
been requested by users of the park? I can’t even think of an example that wouldn’t just become a
visual blight. Why isn’t it ok to just leave something green without having man-made obstructions
that really serve no purpose? We certainly don’t need another one of those “directional signs” (like
what is in front of the rec. offices- which, in my opinion, looks really tacky) If someone is sitting on a
park bench, they certainly aren’t asking where the airport or wineries are!
I would also like to ask why the city’s parks department isn't utilizing the city's water trucks again to
bring our recycled water for the trees? The trees have been terribly neglected. Some are even dying.
This sad commentary is true for all the city’s parks! That’s the kind of oversight I would expect from
the Parks Dept. to be vigilant about. I would like an answer to that question.
Please be very carefulul in what you do to this park. We’ve worked very hard to make it a safe place.
Please don’t ‘junk it up’.
Thank you for clarifying the motion.
Sincerely,
Peg Pinard
Former Mayor, City of San Luis Obispo and Chairperson,
San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors
On Oct 21, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org> wrote:
Hi Peg -
Thank you for the email. The resolution the was approved by Council provided the
update to the amenities at Mitchell Park which included more passive amenities as
discussed at the public workshop held in September and through an online poll
conducted during that same time. Amenities agreed upon will potentially include,
chess/checker tables, bocce ball courts, shade structures and a new stage at the social
gathering area, more benches, interactive and educational signage, and pathway safety
lighting. Please see the following link for additional information. Pickleball courts will
not be included in the amenities at Mitchell Park.
Staff will be working on the design features at Mitchell Park and will be providing
updates at upcoming PRC meetings in Spring 2022. If you would like to sign up for
notifications regarding the meeting, please sign up here.
Devin Hyfield
Recreation Manager
T 805.781.7295
-----Original Message-----
From: Peg Pinard <pinardmat@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:09 AM
To: Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org>
Subject: what was approved?
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open
attachments, click links, or respond.
________________________________
Couldyou please clarify council’s action? the consent agenda item regarding Mitchell
Park…does it still include the pickleball courts that residents didn’t want?
Thank you,
Peg Pinard
From:john@rourkefamily.com
To:Jorgensen, Markie
Subject:RE: 281 Broad Street URL Update
Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 8:39:26 AM
Please send to me
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: 281 Broad Street URL Update
From: "Jorgensen, Markie" <mjorgensen@slocity.org>
Date: Fri, February 05, 2021 4:45 pm
To: "john@rourkefamily.com" <john@rourkefamily.com>, Marshall
<mochylski@slolegal.com>
John,
Can you please confirm whether Mr. Ochylski is representing you in matters related to 281 Broad? I have a letter ready to send
to you, but I want to make sure I address it to, and communicate with the correct person.
Thank you,
Markie Jorgensen
From: john@rourkefamily.com <john@rourkefamily.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 1:24 PM
To: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Jorgensen, Markie <mjorgensen@slocity.org>
Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Marshall <mochylski@slolegal.com>; Scott Stokes
<scott@abovegradeengineering.com>
Subject: RE: 281 Broad Street URL Update
Hi All,
At this point id prefer something in writing from the city citing what is happening now since it sounds like you are deciding not to do what
you said you would do. I Have acted in good faith and met several times on this subdivision and have gotten different answers depending
on who ive talked too. At this point I think we will proceed with a subdivision using the density bonus law to overcome the obstacles that
were not obstacles when we started the process over a year ago.
Thanks
John
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 281 Broad Street URL Update
From: "Bell, Kyle" <KBell@slocity.org>
Date: Wed, January 20, 2021 1:55 pm
To: "Corey, Tyler" <tcorey@slocity.org>, "Jorgensen, Markie"
<mjorgensen@slocity.org>, John Rourke <john@rourkefamily.com>
Cc: "Scott, Shawna" <sscott@slocity.org>
Meeting Request
[Accept] [Decline]
If you accept, this meeting will be added to your Calendar automatically.
Meeting Name:281 Broad Street URL Update
Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting
Start Time:Fri, Jan 22 2021 1:00 pm
End Time:Fri, Jan 22 2021 1:50 pm
Conflicts in the Next Year:None
Description:
________________________________________________________________________________
Microsoft Teams meeting
Join on your computer or mobile app
Click here to join the meeting<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-
join/19%3ameeting_MjE3MDIxZWYtZDUxZC00YjEwLWIyODgtNzIxYTFhMzM5ZGFh%40thread.v2/0?
context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22a78b182d-94e4-4507-a9a9-330dcb148164%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22c4eba68e-1da0-
42fa-950d-6f2753c936c7%22%7d>;
Or call in (audio only)
+1 209-645-4165,,792780327#<tel:+12096454165,,792780327#> United States, Stockton
Phone Conference ID: 792 780 327#
Find a local number<https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f72d38db-88d0-4b7b-be19-71a20f3a0897?id=792780327>; | Reset
PIN<https://mysettings.lync.com/pstnconferencing>;
Learn More<https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting>; | Meeting options<https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?
organizerId=c4eba68e-1da0-42fa-950d-6f2753c936c7&tenantId=a78b182d-94e4-4507-a9a9-
330dcb148164&threadId=19_meeting_MjE3MDIxZWYtZDUxZC00YjEwLWIyODgtNzIxYTFhMzM5ZGFh@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en-
US>;
________________________________________________________________________________
Comments: