Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21CV-0734 - Case Management StatementForm Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 www.courts.ca.gov CM-110 FOR COURT USE ONLY CASE NUMBER: ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): TELEPHONE NO.:FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS: ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Check one):UNLIMITED CASE Amount demanded exceeds $25,000) LIMITED CASE Amount demanded is $25,000 or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date:Time:Dept.:Div.:Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1.Party or parties (answer one): a.This statement is submitted by party (name): b.This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2.Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b.The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3.Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a.All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b.The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint 1)have not been served (specify names and explain why not): 2)have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): 3)have had a default entered against them (specify names): c.The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4.Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Page 1 of 5 21CV-0734 John Armstrong,Bar No.183912 Armstrong Law Group 23232 Peralta Drive, Suite 102 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-942-6069 john@armstronglaw.group NHC SLO,LLC SAN LUIS OBISPO 1050 Monterey Street 1035 Palm Street SAN LUIS OBISPO Civil &Family Law Branch NHC SLO,LLC City of San Luis Obispo et al. 2-14-2022 9:00am D2 John R. Armstrong NHC SLO, LLC 12-23-2021 Petition for writ of mandate;declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of a revocation of a permit without a hearing when SLO Municipal Code does not authorizes revocation of permittees without a hearing but only authorizes such revocation as to cannabis business applicants as different rules apply to persons who acquire cannabis business permits. ELECTRONICALLY FILED 2/17/2022 9:26 AM 05/16/2022 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: CASE NUMBER: 4.b.Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5.Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request a jury triaI a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): 6.Trial date a.The trial has been set for (date): b.No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): c.Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): 7.Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a.days (specify number): b.hours (short causes)(specify): 8.Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following: a.Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d.Telephone number: e.E-mail address: f.Fax number: g.Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9.Preference This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10.Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a.ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. 1)For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. 2) For self-represented parties: Party has has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b.Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). 1)This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. 2)Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. 3)This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): Page 2 of 5 NHC SLO, LLC City of San Luis Obispo et al.21CV-0734 Presently,this action is just for the wrongful revocation of the permit and so seeks equitable relief only. 1-2 CCP §1094 since matter is based on admin.record CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: CASE NUMBER: 10.c.Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing this form are willing to participate in the following ADR processes (check all that apply): If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR stipulation): 1) Mediation Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete mediation by(date): Mediation completed on (date): 2) Settlement conference Settlement conference not yet scheduled Settlement conference scheduled for(date): Agreed to complete settlement conference by(date): Settlement conference completed on(date): 3) Neutral evaluation Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): 4) Nonbinding judicial arbitration Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): 5) Binding private arbitration Private arbitration not yet scheduled Private arbitration scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): 6) Other (specify): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): Page 3 of 5 NHC SLO, LLC City of San Luis Obispo et al.21CV-0734 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: CASE NUMBER: 11.Insurance a.Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b.Reservation of rights:Yes No c.Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12.Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 13.Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a.There are companion, underlying, or related cases. 1) Name of case: 2) Name of court: 3) Case number: 4) Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b.A motion to consolidate coordinate wiII be filed by (name party): 14.Bifurcation The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15.Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): 16.Discovery a.The party or parties have completed all discovery. b.The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Description Date c.The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): Page 4 of 5 Party NHC SLO, LLC City of San Luis Obispo et al.21CV-0734 Once the administrative record is complete,Petitioner will move for judgment. Petitioner Administrative Record for Respondent March 31, 2022 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021]CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: CASE NUMBER: 17.Economic litigation a.This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b.This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18.Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): 19.Meet and confer a.The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b.After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following specify): 20.Total number of pages attached (if any): I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: TYPE OR PRINT NAME)(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) TYPE OR PRINT NAME)(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. NHC SLO, LLC City of San Luis Obispo et al.21CV-0734 Hearing date on motion for judgment under CCP,§1094 combined with motion for preliminary injunction 5 2-13 2-11-2022 John Armstrong