Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-15-2014 C9 2014 CDBG Funding Modifications FROM: Derek Johnson, Community Development Director Prepared By: Tyler Corey, Housing Programs Manager SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF 2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING ALLOCATIONS. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution modifying funding allocations for the 2014 Program Year based on final funding allocation from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. DISCUSSION Situation On February 4, 2014, the City Council approved funding allocations of $460,000 for the 2014 CDBG Program Year (Attachment 1, Exhibit A). The preliminary funding estimate was provided by the County based on available information from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). On April 4, 2014, HUD released its final funding allocation for the County, which resulted in an 8.4% or $38,446 increase to the City’s 2014 Program Year allocation. 2014 CDBG Recommended Modifications The table below reflects projects approved for funding by Council on February 4th in the amount of $460,000, and staff’s proposed funding increases based on HUD’s final allocation of $498,446. The bolded and italicized figures represent an increase in funding from Council’s approved allocation. Applicant Project February 4 Allocation Revised Allocation CAPSLO Maxine Lewis Homeless Shelter $69,000 $74,767 Alano Club Transitional Housing Rehabilitation $139,898 $139,898 Women’s Shelter of SLO County Plumbing Rehabilitation $31,200 $31,200 City of SLO ADA Curb Ramps $127,902 $152,892 City of SLO Housing Element Implementation $55,200 $59,813 City of SLO CDBG Administration $36,800 $39,876 Total $460,000 $498,446 Meeting Date Item Number 4-15-14 C9 - 1 Modification of 2014 CDBG Funding Allocations Page 2 Staff’s recommendation reflects the grant restrictions of 15% for public services (Maxine Lewis Homeless Shelter) and 20% for CDBG program administration and Housing Element implementation. Based on HUD’s final allocation, funding for these programs are proposed to be increased by $5,767 and $7,689, respectively. When subtracting the public services and program administration increases from the CDBG allocation, a balance of $24,990 remains. Per Council Resolution No. 10494 (Attachment 1), any increase in funding shall be allocated to the City’s ADA Curb Ramp project. Consistent with Council action, staff has allocated the remaining funds to this project. Next Steps The 2014 CDBG funding modifications adopted by the City Council will be forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors for inclusion in the 2014 Urban County Action Plan, which includes funding allocations for all of the participating jurisdictions. This meeting is scheduled to occur on June 3, 2014. Although the CDBG fiscal year begins on July 1, 2014, funds for projects are not expected to be available until October. FISCAL IMPACT Decisions made regarding CDBG funding determine how the limited pool of funds the City receives through the Urban County allocation process are spent. To the extent that projects are funded through CDBG, the burden on the City’s General Fund to pay for those projects is reduced. As a result, projects that receive CDBG funding have a positive fiscal impact on the City if they otherwise would have been paid for out of the General Fund. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Council may modify the proposed funding. 2. The Council may continue consideration of funding for the 2014 CDBG Program Year. Direction should be given to staff regarding additional information needed to make a decision on funding amounts. This alternative is not recommended as the County Board of Supervisors will adopt the updated Action Plan at their June 3, 2014, meeting to submit to HUD. ATTACHMENTS 1. Council Resolution No. 10494 (2014 Series) 2. Draft resolution approving the staff recommendation T:\Council Agenda Reports\2014\2014-04-15\2014 CDBG Funding Modifications\CDBG 2014 Funding Modifications CAR.docx C9 - 2 Attachment 1 C9 - 3 Attachment 1 C9 - 4 Attachment 1 C9 - 5 RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING MODIFICATIONS OF 2014 CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATIONS WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a participating jurisdiction in the San Luis Obispo Urban County, along with the cities of Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, Morro Bay, and Paso Robles and the County of San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, said cities and County cooperatively administer several federal grant programs under the provisions of the Cooperative Agreement executed between the City and County June 21, 2011, and under applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) rules; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said agreement, the Urban County Public Participation Plan and HUD rules, the City Council held a public hearing on February 4, 2014, to consider funding recommendations by the Human Relations Commission (HRC), to review applications for federal grant funding, and to consider public comments on community needs and the use of such funds; and WHEREAS, On April 4, 2014, HUD released its final funding allocation for the County, which resulted in an 8.4% ($38,446) increase to the City’s 2014 Program year allocation; and WHEREAS, The City Council has considered HUD’s new estimated funding allocation and determined that modifications are necessary to balance the 2014 CDBG Program Year budget. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: Section 1. Environmental Determination. The project is exempt from environmental review per CEQA Guidelines under the General Rule (Section 15061(b)(3)). It can be seen with certainty that CDBG funding allocations could not have a significant effect on the environment. Section 2. 2014 Community Development Block Grant Program Amendments. The City’s 2014 Community Development Block Grant Program is hereby approved, as shown in Exhibit A. The City Manager is authorized to approve final dollar amounts if there are changes to HUD’s allocation with the direction to make up differences in the two amounts. Any additional increase in funding shall be allocated to the City’s ADA Curb Ramp project once increases for public services (15% of allocation) and program administration (20% of allocation) have been adjusted. Section 3. Board of Supervisors Consideration. The Council hereby forwards the above actions to the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors for consideration prior to the Board’s final action on the Urban County’s 2014 Consolidated Plan. Attachment 2 C9 - 6 Resolution No. (2014 Series) Page 2 Section 4. City Manager Authority. The City Manager is authorized to act on behalf of the City in executing grant agreements and other actions necessary to implement the approved Consolidated Plan and CDBG Program, including revisions to funding amounts for the 2014 CDBG Program if the City’s actual CDBG allocation is different than expected. Upon motion of , seconded by , and on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of April, 2014. ____________________________________ Mayor Jan Marx ATTEST: ____________________________________ Anthony J. Mejia City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________________ Christine Dietrick City Attorney Attachment 2 C9 - 7 20 1 4 C D B G General FundOther Sources No . A p p l i c a n t A c t i v i t y (N o t e 1 ) ( N o t e 2 ) ( N o t e 3 ) Total Pu b l i c S e r v i c e s $7 4 , 7 6 7 A v a i l a b l e ( 1 5 % o f $ 4 9 8 , 4 4 6 ) 1 Ma x i n e L e w i s H o m e l e s s S h e l t e r 1 8 0 , 0 0 0 7 4 , 7 6 7 4 6 , 0 0 0 1 2 0 , 7 6 7 2 Pr a d o D a y C e n t e r f o r t h e H o m e l e s s 5 9 , 9 0 7 5 3 , 7 0 0 5 3 , 7 0 0 SU B T O T A L , P u b l i c S e r v i c e s - 1 5 % M a x 2 3 9 , 9 0 7 7 4 , 7 6 7 9 9 , 7 0 0 - 174,467 3 Al a n o C l u b Tr a n s i t i o n a l H o u s i n g R e h a b i l i t a t i o n 13 9 , 9 8 9 1 3 9 , 8 9 8 1 3 9 , 8 9 8 Pu b l i c F a c i l i t i e s - 4 Wo m e n s ' s S h e l t e r o f S L O C o u n t y Pl u m b i n g R e h a b i l i t a t i o n 31 , 2 0 0 31 , 2 0 0 31,200 5 AD A S t r e e t I m p s - C u r b R a m p s 20 0 , 0 0 0 15 2 , 8 9 2 152,892 SU B T O T A L , H o u s i n g / P u b l i c F a c i l i t i e s $4$3 2 3 , 9 9 0 A v a i l a b l e 37 1 , 1 8 9 3 2 3 , 9 9 0 - - 3 2 3 , 9 9 0 Pr o g r a m A d m i n i s t r a t i o n $9 9 , 6 8 9 A v a i l a b l e ( 2 0 % o f $ 4 9 8 , 4 4 6 ) - 6a Ho u s i n g E l e m e n t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n 59 , 8 1 4 5 9 , 8 1 3 9 , 7 1 1 1 7 , 0 0 0 86,524 6b CD B G A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 39 , 8 7 6 3 9 , 8 7 6 3 9 , 8 7 6 SU B T O T A L , P r o g r a m A d m i n / P l a n n i n g - 2 0 % M a x 9 9 , 6 8 9 9 9 , 6 8 9 9 , 7 1 1 1 7 , 0 0 0 126,400 TO T A L 71 0 , 7 8 5 4 9 8 , 4 4 6 1 0 9 , 4 1 1 1 7 , 0 0 0 6 2 4 , 8 5 7 1. E s t i m a t e d F u n d i n g f o r C D B G P r o g r a m Y e a r 2 0 1 4 : $ 4 9 8 , 4 4 6 2. T e n t a t i v e G e n e r a l F u n d a l l o c a t i o n s p e r c u r r e n t p o l i c y ; a n d c u r r e n t b u d g e t a l l o c a t i o n s f o r h o m e l e s s s h e l t e r a n d P r a d o D a y C e n t e r . 3. C D B G R e a l l o c a t i o n s , C i t y A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g F u n d s 2 0 1 4 C D B G F u n d i n g R e c o m m e n d a t i o n Amount Recommended Ho u s i n g Ci t y o f S L O CA P S L O C A P S L O Re v i s e d Am o u n t Re q u e s t e d Ci t y o f S L O Ci t y o f S L O CA P S L O Attachment 2 C9 - 8