HomeMy WebLinkAboutBates 16436-16938 Appendix F - Historic and Cultural Resources Studies APPENDIX F
Historic and Cultural Resources Studies
F. 1 — Froom Ranch/El Villaggio Speci�c Plan Section 106
Prehistoric Report (CONFIDENTIAL)
F.2 — Analysis of Historic Structures at Froom Ranch
F.3 — Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review
F.4 — Froom Ranch Specific Plan Historic Resource Assessment
F.5 — Froom Ranch Specific Plan Cultural Resources
Assessment (CONFIDENTIAL)
F.6 — Froom Ranch Retention Basin and Land Exchange Areas
Supplemental Phase I Cultural Resources Report
(CONFIDENTIAL)
F.7 — Froom Ranch Limited Phase II Cultural Resources
Assessment (CONFIDENTIAL)
F.8 — Linear Rock Features Historical Resource Evaluation
F.9 — Assembly Bill 52 Native American Consultation Letters
F.10 — Senate Bill 18 Native American Consultation Letters
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project
Final EIR 16436
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16437
APPENDIX F. 1
Froom Ranch/El Villaggio Specific Plan Section 106 Prehistoric
Report
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This technical report contains sensitive information
regarding archaeological resources and is maintained on file at the office of the
City of San Luis Obispo.
16438
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16439
CONFIDENTIAL
This Technical Report contains sensitive information and is deemed confidential. The contents of this
report have been excluded from public review of this EIR. Physical copies of this report are available and
can be reviewed at the City.
16440
APPENDIX F.2
Analysis of Historic Structures at Froom Ranch
16441
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16442
�tork, �'L'olfe,�� 1'�ssa�iates
►�tru�tural Ln�ineers
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES
AT
FROOM RANCH
12165 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
- "pR0ttS51pNR� .
�a Y y
��� ���
� o �,.
='1� �1�',
'�; �� ��,r�`,``.
"- N �981 �'
F)' .
�
-,� � ,
C i---v:
•.. OF CA1-�F��
STORK, WOLFE & ASSOCIATES
599 HIGUERA STREET, SUITE H
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
(805) 548-8600
June 30, 2017
16443
INDEX
Introduction & Methodology 1 — 2
Main Residence 2 — 4
Dairy Barn 5 — 7
Old Barn 8 — 10
Creamery House 10
List of Figures
Figure 1 — Main House 13
Figure 2 — Main House roof joists w/ mid-span bracing 13
Figure 3 — Unbraced wood cripple wall with redwood sill 14
Figure 4 — Dairy (Round-Nosed) Barn 14
Figure 5 — Dairy Barn roof framing 15
Figure 6 — Dairy Barn exterior wall framing 15
Figure 7 — Western entrance to the Dairy Barn 16
Figure 8 — Bracing at interior line of wood posts 17
Figure 9 — Interior Dairy Barn posts bearing on soil 18
Figure 10 — Old Barn 19
Figure 11 — Old Barn roof framing 19
Figure 12 — Old Barn exterior wall framing 20
Figure 13 — Full-height plywood shear walls 20
Figure 14 — Creamery House 21
Figure 15 — Deterioration of Creamery House 21
16444
Figure 16 — Deterioration of Creamery House 22
Figure 17 — Creamery House foundation 22
Figure 18 — Deterioration of Creamery House 23
Dairy (Round-Nosed Barn) Schematic Structural Drawings
S2.1 — Foundation Plan
S2.2 — Roof Framing Plan
S3.1 — Structural Elevation `A'
S3.2 — Structural Elevation `B'
S3.3 — Structural Elevation `C'
S3.4 — Structural Section `D'
S3.5 — Structural Section `E'
Structural Calculations A1 — C9
16445
INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY
John and Susan Madonna wish to study the feasibility of preserving and/or
renovating several existing structures of historic significance at the Froom Ranch
property in San Luis Obispo.
The structures included in this analysis are the Main Residence, the Dairy Barn,
the Old Barn, and the Creamery House. All structures consist of wood-framed
walls and roofs, wood siding, and either a wood or concrete foundation.
Construction of these buildings took place between the late 1800's and early
1900's.
As part of the preservation, it is necessary to assess both the gravity and lateral
load resisting systems of the buildings in order to ensure life-safety of the
occupants. For existing structures of historic significance, the structural analysis
is to be per the 2016 California Historic Building Code (CHBC). In order to
balance structural safety with historic preservation, this code allows for a 25%
reduction in current building code design wind & seismic load levels. In addition,
it also provides strength capacities for structural systems that would typically not
be allowed for new structures. Where design gravity loads are not being
increased, the CHBC also allows that the vertical load resisting system may be
assumed adequate by having withstood the test of time, where no distress is
evident, and a complete load path is present.
Guidelines for determining the feasibility of historic preservation is given in the
City of San Luis Obispo Historic Preservation Ordinance, December 7, 2010.
Feasibility is defined by this document as the ability of a building or other
structure to "be repaired or rehabilitated so as to be safe and usable without
significant loss of historic fabric," and that the structure has the "physical
capacity...to withstand the repair and/or rehabilitation process without the danger
of further damage."
Both the structural integrity and the feasibility of rehabilitation have been
addressed in this report for the structures noted above. The study considers
multiple building-use scenarios, including continued commercial use as well as
the conversion to public space. For continued commercial use, the building code
does not require any structural upgrades to be done. However, we have
included in our recommendation the items that pose a significant risk to the
structure, or to the life-safety of the occupants. Where the conversion to public
space is considered, we have included all structural deficiencies, as well as
potential increases to design live loads, and long-term perFormance
improvements.
Our scope of work for this project involved the following tasks:
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 1 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16446
1. Review of the Froom Ranch/EI Villagio Specific Plan Section 106
Prehistoric Report dated February 20, 2015.
2. Review of the Seismic Analysis Map provided by Geosolutions. The map
shows the local fault zone, in which it is recommended that no structure
with an occupancy of 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year may be within
this zone.
3. Visually survey each building to verify the original construction, past
alteration, and the current conditions.
4. PerForm a structural analysis of each building for CHBC-level gravity,
seismic and wind loads.
5. Prepare a report that includes an outline of the major structural
deficiencies, as well as a general description of the proposed structural
retrofit work.
MAIN RESIDENCE
The Main Residence [Figure 1] was constructed in 1915, and has been occupied
continuously for use as both a residence and an office building. The
approximately 1,600 SF one-story wood-framed structure appears to be in good
condition, and has undergone several renovations and repairs throughout its
history. The majority of the structural framing is original, however concrete
foundations have been added at certain locations around the perimeter where
excessive settlement has occurred. The lateral load-resisting system consists of
wood siding over straight-sheathed exterior wood stud shear walls.
Roof Framing
The roof framing consists of consists of composite shingles over the original
wood shakes over 1x6 skip sheathing supported by 2x4 roof joists at 30" spacing.
The roof joists are braced mid-span with kickers down to interior stud walls below
[Figure 2]. Although the existing roof framing appears to be in good condition,
there is no recognized diaphragm system needed to resist lateral loads.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the roof framing system. It is recommended, however that the next time the roof
is replaced, the original wood shakes be removed, and a layer of plywood added
over the existing 1x skip sheathing. The layer of plywood, if detailed and nailed
properly, will act as a structural diaphragm. Additional wood blocking and metal
framing clips will also be required to tie the roof diaphragm to the exterior walls
below. It should a/so be noted that if a new roofing material is selected that is
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 2 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16447
heavier than the existing roofing material, strengthen of the roof rafters will be
required.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, the
existing roofing shall be removed and the plywood, blocking and framing clips
added as described above.
Exterior Walls
The exterior walls are constructed of horizontal 2"x4" wood studs at 24" spacing.
The exterior is sheathed with 1x shiplap siding over 1x straight sheathing, which
provides lateral stiffness for the structure in resisting wind and seismic loads.
The wall framing and siding appear to be in good condition.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing exterior walls. Although the walls are overstressed for CHBC-level
design loads, one-story wood framed structures typically perform well in
earthquakes, and no strengthening is recommended.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, it is
recommended that plywood shear walls be added. Plywood, when detailed and
nailed properly provides significantly greater lateral strength and stiffness for
wood shear walls than the existing 1x straight sheathing. For existing structures,
the interior drywall in specific locations can be removed, plywood installed
directly over the existing studs, and then the drywall reinstalled. Holdowns
anchoring the shear wall boundaries to the foundation are a/so typically required.
First Floor
The first floor is constructed of wood flooring over 1 x6 diagonal sheathing over
2"x5-1/2" wood floor joists spaced at 24". The wood floor joists span across
unbraced wood cripple walls below spaced at approximately 7'-6" [Figure 3]. The
2x redwood sill of the cripple wall bears directly on grade. Releveling of the first
floor has been perFormed several times throughout the life of the structure.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing floor structure. The existing floor joists are adequate to resist code-
level office live /oads. It should be noted, however, that if future unevenness in
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 3 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16448
the floor surface is encountered, it could be an indication of excessive settlement
in the foundation. See the foundation section below for potential strengthening
recommendation.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy,
strengthening of the floor joists may be required. The existing floor joists do not
have the capacity to resist code-level design live loads when considering areas
of assemblies. If space is to be made within the structure for meeting or
conference areas, the floor joists below that area are required to be doubled up.
Foundation
The foundation consists of interior and exterior 2x wood stud cripple walls
bearing on an existing wood sill placed directly on grade [Figure 3]. Where past
excessive settlement has occurred, an undocumented concrete foundation was
poured below the sill to provide a greater bearing surFace and better long-term
durability. The exterior cripple walls are lightly braced with occasional 1x
diagonal boards, while the interior cripple walls are completely unbraced.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, as a minimum both the exterior and interior cripple
wall systems should be strengthened. This can be done with either a system of
properly detailed diagonal boards or a pattern of plywood sheathing. Where
concrete foundations have been added in previous repairs, it should be verified
that the wood sills are properly anchored to the concrete. Because the existing
structure bears directly on top of the soil and proper concrete foundation
embedded into the soil are not present, sliding of the structure during a large
earthquake could occur. Although life-safety does not appear to be a significant
risk assuming the cripple wall bracing is installed, non-structural damage to
interior furnishings and equipment is likely. In addition, attention should be given
if future unevenness in the floor surface is encountered. This could be an
indication of excessive settlement in the foundation. For better long-term
structural performance, see "For Use as Public Space"below.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, a
proper concrete foundation should be installed. To install the concrete
foundation, the structure is jacked up, continuous trenches are dug below the
exterior and interior cripple walls, and concrete footings are poured. The
structure is then lowered and bolted to the concrete. In addition to the footings,
all cripple walls require bracing as described above.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 4 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16449
DAIRY BARN
The Dairy Barn [Figure 4] is an approximately 4,200 SF wood-framed farming
facility built in 1913 to house livestock and hay. Weather and neglect has
severely deteriorated many of the barn's key structural elements over the course
of its history. In addition, a significant portion of the barn is located within the
rupture zone setback of a potentially active trace fault. These items are
discussed below and shall be addressed in the renovation along with the
strengthening of the lateral load-resisting system.
Local Seismic Hazard Mitigation
Because the Dairy Barn is situated within the rupture zone setback of a
potentially active trace fault, there is a high risk of significant damage to the
structure due to ground rupture. If the barn is to be used in any way other than
being fenced off and left in a state of arrested decay, significant alterations to the
building footprint are required.
Required Remediation:
If left in its current location, it is recommended that the round-nosed portion of the
barn be removed, in addition to the next three adjacent bays of framing,
essentially cutting the structure in half. Also requiring demolition due to its
proximity to the fault line is the northern masonry addition to the barn. Because
the round-nosed portion of the building is unique and has historical significance,
a portion of the demolished materials may be salvaged to rebuild the round-
nosed portion at the eastern end of the structure. It is estimated that
approximately 75% of the roof framing and 50% of the floor framing will be good
for re-use. Nearly all the exterior siding is in such a state of decay that it will
have no structural value. This remediation is required to ensure the safety of the
occupants during a large seismic event. The rebuilt round-nosed portion will
require a modern concrete foundation system to prevent they type of settling and
deterioration that is currently present.
Relocation Option:
Another option for the Dairy Barn is to demolish and rebuild the structure at
another location. In order to preserve the historic aspect of the barn, the framing
system should remain the same as the existing framing system, but with
consideration of the strengthening requirements outlined in the sections below. It
is also possible to re-use a portion of the lumber as noted above. Please refer to
the schematic structural drawings provided for reference at the end of this
document.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 5 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16450
Roof Framing
The existing roof framing [Figure 5] consists of wood shingles over 1x6 skip
sheathing supported by 2"x6" roof joists at 30" spacing. A collar tie system
consisting of tension rods at 10'-0" spacing thru the double top plate at the two
interior post lines is present to resist the horizontal thrust. The majority of the
roof framing has the capacity to resist code-level dead and live loads. The
existing skip sheathing provides minimal lateral stiffness lateral stiffness, and will
not act as a proper roof diaphragm.
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy less than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— Because the existing wood shingles are in a serious state of deterioration,
much of the roof framing is exposed to weather. It is recommended that the
existing roofing be removed and all framing be inspected for damage. It is
estimated that approximately 10% of the roof framing will need replacing. It is
possible that lumber sa/vaged from the seismic remediation described above
may be reused for this purpose. Additionally, a layer of plywood will be required
over the skip sheathing in order to create a roof diaphragm. The entire roof shall
be re-roofed with a light weight standing seam or corrugated metal roof with
better long-term performance.
Occupancy greater than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (public use,
meeting space, etc.) — Same as above.
Exterior Walls
The exterior walls [Figure 6] are typically constructed with 1x12 vertical siding
spanning from the double top plate to the wood sill, with an intermediate
horizontal 2"x4" girt mid span. The double top plate and girt span horizontally to
4"x4" wood posts at 10'-0" spacing around the perimeter.
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy /ess than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— The exterior vertical siding is required to be in good condition to allow for
adequate nailing. Proper nailing is essential for shear wall performance.
Because of years of neglect, it is estimated that up to 75% of the wood siding will
need to be removed and replaced for the wood shear wall system. It is a/so
estimated that approximately 10% of the wall framing will require replacement
due to weather intrusion at the damaged siding. The entire exterior will require
re-painting to help preserve the condition of the wood.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 6 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16451
Occupancy greater than 2,000 man hours per year (public use, meeting space,
etc.) — Same as above.
Wall Bracing
At the main western entrance to the Dairy Barn, not enough wall length existing
to provide adequate lateral stiffness [Figure 7]. At this location, as well as at the
two interior lines of posts [Figure 8], diagonal wood wall bracing will be required.
All connections will be designed to be bolted and hidden. The bottom ends of the
bracing will be required to be anchored to the existing foundation
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy /ess than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— Install new 4x4 wall braces at the western wall and at the two interior lines of
posts. Strengthen all brace connections and splices with steel plates and bolts.
Anchor braced connections to new concrete pad foundation.
Occupancy greater than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (public use,
meeting space, etc.) — Same as above.
Foundations
The majority of the perimeter foundation consists of a 24" high concrete stem or
retaining wall [Figure 6] with an undetermined footing depth. The concrete
foundation appears to be in good condition for the age of the structure. The
majority of the foundation damage has occurred at the eastern downhill portion of
the structure at the round-nosed area of the barn. The foundation system at the
interior post line appears to be a redwood sill bearing directly on the soil, or else
the wood posts are embedded directly into the soil [Figure 9]. The posts appear
to have settled over time approximately 2".
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy less than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— Provide a modern concrete foundation system to support the re-built round-
nosed portion of the structure. This is included in the Seismic Remediation
section above. Additionally, concrete pad footings will be required below the
posts. These pad footings have been included in the Wall Bracing section
above.
Occupancy greater than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (public use,
meeting space, etc.) — Same as above.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 7 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16452
OLD BARN
The old barn [Figure 10] is an approximately 1,300 SF wood structure with a
corrugated metal roof, vertical wood siding, and a concrete slab-on-grade
foundation. It is estimated that the barn is 125 year old, and has been moved
from its original site. The barn appears to be in very good shape for its age due
to the fact that it remains in use. However, its constant use has led to a number
of undocumented alterations that have inadvertently compromised the historic
fabric of the Old Barn significantly.
Roof Framing
The existing roof framing [Figure 11] consists of corrugated metal roofing over
existing wood shingles, over 1x6 skip sheathing, supported by 2"x4" roof joists at
32" spacing. A collar tie system consisting of 2x4 struts near the ridge is present
to resist the horizontal thrust. This appears to have been added at a later date,
most likely to combat a sagging ridge. The majority of the roof framing has the
capacity to resist code-level dead and live loads. The existing skip sheathing
provides minimal lateral stiffness lateral stiffness, and will not act as a proper roof
diaphragm.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the roof framing system. It is recommended, however that the next time the roof
is replaced, the original wood shakes be removed, and a layer of plywood added
over the existing 1x skip sheathing. The layer of plywood, if detailed and nailed
properly, will act as a structural diaphragm. Additional wood blocking and metal
framing clips will also be required to tie the roof diaphragm to the exterior walls
below. It should also be noted that if a new roofing material is selected that is
heavier than the existing roofing material, strengthen of the roof rafters may be
required.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, the
existing roofing shall be removed and the plywood, blocking and framing clips
added as described above.
Exterior Walls
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 8 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16453
At some point in the history of the barn, the exterior walls were reframed with a
more modern system of 2x4 vertical studs spaced at 16" o.c. [Figure 12]. This
system likely replaced a post-and-beam system with horizontal wall girts, similar
to the Dairy Barn described above. Blocking between the vertical studs is used
to support the 1x12 vertical siding.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing exterior walls. However, because of the three large door openings at
the north elevation of the structure, a wood bracing system is recommended
along this line.
For Use as Public Space — Same as above. Additionally, the exterior vertical
siding is required to be in good condition to allow for adequate nailing. Proper
nailing is essential for shear wall performance. It is estimated that up to 50% of
the wood siding will need to be removed and replaced for the wood shear wall
system. It is also estimated that approximately 5% of the wall framing will require
replacement due to weather intrusion at the damaged siding. The entire exterior
will require re-painting to help preserve the condition of the wood
Wall Bracing
At each of the two interior lines of posts, a shear wall has been added [Figure
13]. It is unclear as to when and why the shear walls were added, however they
do provide a significant amount of stiffness to the structure.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing exterior walls. However, if a plywood roof diaphragm is added at a
later date, proper blocking and shear transfer detailing will be required.
For Use as Public Space — Same as above.
Foundations
The Old Barn bears on an undocumented concrete slab-on-grade foundation.
The slab-on-grade appears to be in good shape, and no differential building
settlement is noticeable.
Required Strengthening:
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 9 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16454
Continued Private Commercial Use — In order to resist the design lateral loads at
the new bracing elements required at the north elevation, it is likely that several
pad footings underpinning the existing slab-on-grade will be required.
For Use as Public Space — Same as above.
CREAMERY HOUSE
The Creamery House [Figure 14] is an existing wood-framed structure in a state
of disrepair. Years of abandonment have made it unfeasible for renovation
[Figures 15 through 18]. Among the issues are the following:
• All exterior siding requires replacement
• There are no wood studs in the majority of the walls. The siding, which
has no bearing capacity, is currently supporting the majority of the roof
loads.
• The roof framing is undersized and severely damaged.
• The floor framing is undersized and severely damaged.
• The wood post-and-beam foundation system is supported on rocks or soil
and has failed.
Required Strengthening:
The Creamery House is an unsafe building in a state of disrepair, and the
materials are unsalvageable for structure purposes. It is recommended that the
structure be properly documented and demolished.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 10 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16455
This page intentionally left blank.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 11 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16456
This page intentionally left blank.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 12 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16457
� �
_ � -
_ _ _ _ �`�'-
� '��.. � -. - _- �.,�
--- _=�-__ - -__. -. -- - �
�� - —� _ -��— - �` _ :��. '=
�'°e -_ � . —� i � � ,��� .:� .
� li�, _ _ .— � � - ..,.�
- �� �■� � �
,_� � 1. � �� .�1 I� ��I .
� �_ - � � --. __� - _� � �
�_ _
_ _ _ �_ . .��
:�� _� -_ , _ -, r_ � � _..�._
:�
,�� _ �����. �,.
r��F _ ..� ,: . •:���,z. ,M._ . 7„�s�;�..=� .` ;
,. .. ,,.�+ � �,..-�3�-�-^�.. �:��"'- - y
,�r-.: - .��`�-���.+r M=
.��_ . ��--,�IV,�,,,t�ia,. :i��.._�.y:-..A�.:.�o .-�.�'. �s�
-� � _ T- , � -w�^:,y��"!�`�iPK�`....-�`. . '.- _
-. .. •• -... .: ��. , � .
_ . �. '- - -��. _ �..__���� . .. .. - -
��;�.
.. �. . . . ... .. - - _
....-- .. _ ... _
. ... . - - � . . .:�
:_ . ... -. .... . -:�. _...,:. . -
_ ..- _- , _. - _. --- �_ �:-=�� _"^ ��•�
�:�_�. - -
:_�._.a
- _ .._ .... �� �� .�� _
Figure 1 — Main House
�k
.x••
' _ V
I �•t.
` �i
•.-
�
�
� -
a
;� � + � - -'� �
� ��y -�
� �.; _.
Figure 2 — Main House roof joists w/ mid-span bracing
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 13 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16458
� '� - �� � �
��.��- � �
._ �.�,r��• _ - J '�°�t`
, �� ��.� •r� �
� '*�..._ . . ' � �
� . �. � �
;
.-�_ • �
w a�:xy.ot
1. �� .. _.�
� r ...
� :!'r` � • ,� �. r�..-•—' --+.� �
:r��4 , ^ .Af- T •�. ' ,_ _ - �n" - . ^ .�` Ft:•�'��_"r: �
�. - _ — -r— • �
��"�l- ,N""�r`:,f"`;-7.¢..,` r-*r:�:►�.�'•_ ,.t��„" • " • •~ Fr s�
: —�� r y,; . � -- ..i,'`'�-�_�'.�'r:,4�
fv- ' ^ ' � ' - . ' ' iirn ' �`�
- " � - . �.�'�+� .f- • _ � . - �
. - � �'�.f'`� . � __- �x _...r' '.*^'
�'� � ' ' ' .r �. � -' � -�.
Figure 3 — Unbraced wood cripple wall with redwood sill
�;-.
-� ,=
- -�y' .�.Y- - '�
- -__' ----- -_- - - - `'��"�!= =-'�-l -_ `
` _ -' - _- - -_ _ - -_= 3 J`r;_�-.`- - - ___- _-_ .. . �
� - - - � .. . . . . -'�:.:•. . . . . - _. . -
- /� - _ - � i ; i -
�„� i' � r. ��.,,,. � � . r ; _
� �l:i�i; i� � '�i
- � - ''-��11 '� �►�� �� .,k ;,� � i' „ �_, , � �
_ I �� J� '�' �. i aS � � ;�
��. � .;,. � t. ,, �,:,4�. `,
� ��: s,� � '�t' �
�>�;
�,, , �.-. ;sr t:��r�� ,.��';' r .. . - .�':�,,,¢',.x�.�y ,
_ • - �� �r•J�; : � S•f • � �- ����-... � . -
" r t^��.,,
.. . _ .,. , � .. � � p . _��.,'r�1�.:s;.,�T.1�1 {7 ,�.yl� rr ' . . . _
�: Y� " � ,v-�' i� i.. � -{. . .
�, �� �r• ;,`.r _ . -F'�,�k�^ � • � J , r-�F .i. . ,.: : + .
.�,; �z � �. :y
,-,_a'-�•;�,ti=_ ,_ . . � ��'S.�'.?�� �� ',��.�,�i:'A.a�{r• �� :�i '�: . .
- _ - _ �;�, #,. -i: ,. ,�':;,.:�•:4;;����;�:�; 4'.; -
_ ,�_.i-- - -• �.r' ...�:.�i�::I"�:'�� :,�;`� �`:a: r...r��;�tf;:.i.i 3. ;i,'�„�: ,i.�
. - - . :�=-�° N liiY: ry�i... ��p:��:- :r�'..�.��r• !.� +�i:.
_ _ ��r,. ,�;�r,,,;;�'��>=: ,d ` . ,« .� �;
;� - . . . • .r-.�: .' ��i r�4..��`:,y:. .. •;�''. '•� ,I��. , .
. :'�`'` ,.',�y,'e':7',.i i't. J,L- I �; �, 'u`,'• :.
. . :=r�.'�� . . _ ..�,' �. ` �£:.'.:r�E'•.: i A.- '��•���.�}.
_-:�',: -• .. . .._. ..- .'�^-::�3F.�:.�.�;•a.,>.':3F.,�a���.;:c:,�� s' ..� .�...1.�:;'', � �.,, "�`�'. . .r ,
Figure 4 — Dairy (Round-Nosed) Barn
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 14 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16459
�►�__ �� � � 1� r , �-
�� �� � �� �� a � .
� `r � f'' � I ;:�
} �� ��' � �
� � E � �
� '°" �` ;"`� � , ' � �
� �� � h � � � � ' -
,�,� � � . � ,,, '�; .� ��
� � � ��� � .� , � - � �
� � � , .�►� ;
��� ���T ��f`�� � d. •- � � , �
. �� � � �. � `'�:� -,� '
` � � ' - �
� .
�.,����,'���_ - ���. _� �.
. � �`+ ��`'' ,�*�`� �: :� � { � � r f
'` - �� ��`'�` _�. `'�� ,� t ,. - �
_,,� ,..-
�, '►
�� - ; �°���_� :�.� �► �
� ' � � .. . � . - r.r,. .., ., . �. .�r r� .., � �` �' +
� � `�`�� �`� �, `
,w.. , �.�.... . _ ::.,� .. ,. K�. �, r
� � .�.� V�� � .. �,r� - F.a�.,.�n.� � _ • �
"1� / •w� �,�� �* .•+r �+ •w�r+r��.�� �
�� � ! �. '�^��. �. �� ��l��
�� � t �� �.�►��+ �14/n`�U���'. �v.�.. +�r�wr�� .. �'. �
x�
� 'l���r �r� :�� ��� � +� �l.�i � � � « -
�� � �", �.�:y.�..�,� � .� t " ' �
�
Figure 5 — Dairy Barn roof framing
� - f�� � �
-- - — - -----� ' -- . - * �" ��i
_ __� 1 - . . . - �. �-�.
- _ : �r _ _ ---- r =_ _� �
�; �!� �? -�----�-,�~+` _ --- �— ��'�
� + �, , _
+! i ° �. Mr�fi • ,.�.i J. t- � _ I' .a
� , , 4 � _ �'• � � : �;
�' : r � � ! '� � � � ��� � ,
;� �-�- t
,�! � . i .� ;� 'i�+ ; `�
,. _ �;. ; , � -
�~ ' ��:�,:
� ,'I: �A �a� �_�� r '
:_� � ��— µ.� r'.f i .
� :. 1 �' � �_ _�' ; � �.. '�, .
F,,, '
�G� �
�R _ ■ �� ' ����� _ —
~� k $ � �
�'s ,� e��
� .! � �� _��K� � - �'7�.
. .i -` �, - -�. �
.. ti � 'J!
� `� � � i � - ..pq�.;:..-:��. _ �
1
S �
� ��. ��. ]� _ _
Figure 6 — Dairy Barn exterior wall framing
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 15 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16460
: � � ` _� � ��!
�m
.
: � � y4
♦ \'
� ,\� �� �
� e � �
' �
' `' , ` . �
� r. y
1 �
i �
, ��
� � � '�►"'�
,I �� � ' �
�`� j �J�
i .:� � �- •
: �� � w
.. y .� �
,, �
_ r.
� . ;4 �
t: - � � �
,
T �r���� ��
..s �:� -- �t' _ _
�
T. '
Figure 7 — Lack of wood bracing at main western entrance to the Dairy Barn
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 16 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16461
� � � ��- �- _ �� y -
, � � !� �►��
� �s -�� �``:
� . . � � ._
�� � � �► �`' � � �` 4 -�
�' � � ` �
�� � � - �� � ��,;,�
� �� . _ �.
�. ,�,�� � ,,�,�.� �r-- ,� `.
� ,�� , �,,��-� � �� �� � „ ���^
r ~ Y ,� �� � ��; a-
� � �I ���'� ����- ::��� �. .
� � I �� ,,��,� ��•��t� ����. �
~ -� . � �'ir.�r �� r�,��i' '` `�
• � ,�.c` w-� �:•�� '
iw.�.+^ _ �� - �` . ���_
� ��� �� �� � �. ,� � r n+ .. . � S• .'; -
�""�- --�� 1: -�_ . f� i 1 � � i:l�� �y � :* "'�
:k i � �� ' •iL�� ..� � .
,� k- � ' 'i[f4Lilli4'iSif +�'i .y.. �
� �' " t yy ��Kr�° + }
'� A��^- ` ���:'��7.J�'. �.F��i�r �� :: .� IHdW
�-!F�" . �'F� [
. 'i. I+ I.I � � _��_ , ,�°1�,� F������ ,� `�
�� ' S �1 '�� N r•¢i._ i
�. �, ��t�� - �� , , , . , �
� ► .._� � �`1� �. - ��� ��r�� . ��
Figure 8 — Bracing at interior line of wood posts
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 17 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16462
� � ���
,T r �
� �r - �: `�� .►. �';:
�' ,:
�� �
� ,y� . �
�<
� '
� � � r•�
� ' M1� •
� �
�,� . _.� � � . -�- ��
t � � --
�.. �� r ., �
_ _ � � � �
_ , �;
�.. �4� �
=�1. � �,��
��� -� �
�._� -� `�� � � � � � �
`�� -�.� � �..�� ��,�� .....�
" :�- - . ....,,,,,,
-� ,
.� ��\\ • � � �
-'�,`� .. �' �, . .
�— � �.P ti .. � r
�-- ,�,�_ � � �.a
.-_t, .� `'wf �i�:� t t�_ ��' \+�' � �7--`
� r ;� � f� � '�
�:� � ° � `� ' �`' �
�� �� r_` : .� �
'- f ' �� llir � �'.�r
:'-�./, .� _ ' ��, '� 4��
� .�,- ' ��
x� � • .
=x";s� -. „ • , �
���� r p �w. � l~
� ' - " ' y�� �r�'. ..����i►�y'�ti
_ ... . ,:��'. . � � � - �as��
L - • .1��'
,�:,�: . ��. . :7��„•` •; �i�,,
�.+� _ � ti.+�-:��ka,
. •x
'r-� .'�',;.s:'�^►���
� w � 'S+�.iy-i e '•
'� ,_ ,��' -a.+.]R
Figure 9 — Interior Dairy Barn posts bearing on soil
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 18 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16463
- . - - -- - . �6:
r4 �`'�,+—��-- -__
, .� ------�- - - - -
� ..� i� :tbn.�:.... �;-- �.,.
I ' ''i `�.;.. ,"'^'��."-^^.�_� ' - —_ _
i'.f.� ,�.�! f Ii , 41 =.... _... -
,:{; , �, .
� { ,,I, r. � I ' -
:(E '.;� •� i,��. �: m.
' h� •k I.�' � ' ` I , . `
- �•�' •rir .�{. �l . ._I. _ . ' .
'�" r� '�; ; �, _-- ; -- � �' ` ,����i� - � ���
----- r�� �� ��l;��E�� z� �'��` -r-=�.
- r �� ,�... i� . � r i .r�:�•.•.
���..r," �
!�� + ��. �.:
� , �;' � ,,,�,
-;•: . _- - .=r. -•:;:.�_;,;;:s_�-�;..'_ :,:_ .-. _ - — - _.. , _ -= ',_;:
�.�: .;�'..��=_ _ --�-_ _ ",. .�,•:::- _ .. . . -- - -- -� ::;
�"�� �,... - -�-.r:.r .�,+.��3;: - - - :'-�'�'--:'.�
�•A__ - _<�="' - a;:��.�' -^�Y`�,' ' -- -`� - - - -
�s'Y.:... -• " - .�,; > : . , �,:_� - T = '.���"�;._
��,� ' �-�.���-"="=- w _ .. - - .. .. _ - `
..r-�;a�.r ..��4";�- , . . . '.'_,-�i=-�:`..r-�"-�i:;���`"' . . ... .�-�i.s°��rt��-'�-=.,:.���-
Figure 10 — Old Barn
r - �
,,. .
.� _.. .
_ y' n, _ ��� �s.� -
�
� :. �a,�
a.
� r'�� � ,r
- :��� � l ' �. --.
� � �
J ~ �.� j�" -'�'�
�, • i
' •
� � ` �` :�
^,'�
.,, _
_ _ y-." °•�y_ i�� a
� f
�% -�i y1�
rt '1�� � ,�•'
f� } _ ' �.
4
������5 1�. . .. •�1• �� !� �� r �
Figure 11 — Old Barn roof framing
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 19 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16464
-.
..■�.
�
. �
� �
� `J� ' ���. .
.� � . �
ti_ . .
�' - ��� -�►�
� ,� ���� N1 :� � ,,�
. �. . ��., r .�.��: �
� �� � �-.r� .
, � ,�•,,� :°�''����, •
, r���. a;; - i
:" 1�'�-�" � � `
'� _� w�
,
� ._ � � � �� , __�_ �
Figure 12 — Old Barn exterior wall framing
�. - � .�►�.-�
_ .�� �
i . _ �.L�-�-"- � _."�
sr,
�� � . i ~i �, -
�� � ��1�•. .
r " .
� � ��
, �'ti� ' � ...r�r �.�� - --
r �� , - :� , r��` ����. •- -��_ _ .
wN .�• �� "y �*'1 L-_ � r „�
, ���:,►` , _ _ _�- _
. ���, -.�: .� � � �
� --- : � - .___..
� ��:
...� . �:�. :����:.� .� r�=
. �.�
Figure 13 — Full-height plywood shear wall (left & right of photo)
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 20 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16465
i �
�'� �a
s
� � - ; y ��. .f., ,: p.F: fW.?. r r. •ax
. � � ... � .. .c -�d: •. .• � ,.A�.: .�`,Y �;..�U��
_ ". C. . . , . . -.` . 3�����. �: :y�'�.i����`� �I
• - ;'f.'• " }' _" � '.�
.. . . '', :, ,' .��Y. �:, nr.'�i��^e.. ��3�.. 'e,g. ' [
.. -�� .t_- _ :��.�(..�iL�M1 � � y'r ,��.� � t`•��
.�i�.� • � -1�1�. . , rT-:•=�•�q,��,� � �n
�:� ;r:. .,F;=���1":7l!'`��.. �:yfa•.;rl'�.::�.�• cY, .r]�:;..-��..�.�- � ��.[4k.T..��..'l�P- 1 u:
- � ii�C. ' � y ,,. � •y�?•:X�_, f�'.k��:����ri�`�.kv
;y; �: x. t... �p�
::,�L_;,,: -.a: �:��A' ;;� a:n" ;,..a;r..•: �.... :.r ,�,: r.;�'�:i
` yT?`�. .Pr: :���.� r,y:;, . "�.�•�- ��Y:i��. t7.
''���:• ��il'� `i'' '�:y j. •';�:�� �•r>: . .�s4���'��',�'•-'� .�.�-n�..`:•� � ::t ;.�t::•..:..i.�,�;
.�r, ra ;�`.,," "� ';�' ��, ,�r• .e�... ,�, a
�':r�''< <�b .r .,'a lr'Xy� ����: ���;-�..' ',�,; r'�,. :d. ' � 'P�': .. +�::;�
:'��; ��',� ��; ��`
:i:h��i 7 ,y.� �,.. :'a .+4� � ��:S:�a` �,:`.'.L�„ v r�:.;,f�i s�� r
- ',;�v"�`.�-� .�..�, ',}•.� 'r. '��'• •-.i���- r" .4�.
.. '.::�^�iF�`:��..�':a�A;�;'��•+�... k`7���.r�.� `.'.�
'i�: '_y':: '.41c .�. f +"1"''!7�•F�'• ':�''13.'��^��'; .'y .:�..;.
- .� .[A:1:L�. �:�n'::h'�. '�j .�'.... .; :�' S 1.L ,{'.. � _ 1'':�1.•'y'.�h
� ;�'� :.7'�: ��.�� �..F� 'R. ••. �'.�'�,.3'.?y..:.�� ;� .qt;�f�.'�I.�'::.;' ��}�� 7. �3fi� .74
,{y��Y���,���� r.ir•�i'b�'. � '1 �{.' `.F N��:.;/.��.: �����lr�.:.�9 ��+4�' ,.�1.� G:�, ia�r.•�
�y.w'.' g.�V �,� I L �'.�' ']�'�:•' ��'\��'J'� ry'�.� �Y+'�i'�'�/� �
•Si.�� .' ., � `r'Y::�i . " J,1.:� � i�{s. h': �: �
���• ' 'Ir�, y(e '�,+��y�''�f5' '��a
,���' �� .�. �. � � � .;.E';,�4:� y��Yi•"'`::�y�.!,' ...?�' � �fy��'�`�'J�"�ri:��. `�� y�ti:.
"�- `� �7�`;` . i�: • ;1 P �,� •, •:'..}I'•T��' :. � �. ry��` �L :�tl
,y�, ,�i3,•,•.�;}. .�.� 1^7R,(;�'C'�.i_Ai.�� :�, r.�i•�.i.'��j.f-.�.�.'..��.
�.�.•� �,'.. �y�-,� �•. ,v..., �:iJ�;� J'� r;� .�,F; . f.
.
. .
' ....
� .,.. . r � , : 1�,
�,�'; �•" � �
�7_?y „:. �' �; y
........ .. . .. .. . � . , � .. � .. ..id��r'.i:���•:lll:yr•,� . . ._"i.�.:�..'rA�.��! �Ph.��T�f`�+iA�!`.:c.�i=wi."`;��ih
Figure 14 — Creamery House
`�~��;����� �. . ..
�� ,. � �__,
� ��� -
_T�- r-l-_`:" '
~___ YY.'ttt" ti•..- t�`!=� -�.�.lr_��
,. -:'��'\- `r_�ti�"c;�:�:.-- _"
•• -���. �`t�""�'F��t `-�—'�'� - �=�_=�.
��:� :.;��� '� �.. _
�_�..`���._ ,�v���
. .�` �-=:�;` � ��_.,.����.�—.��
�r'Ct:�� C��`1 �_ �T�'.�-�_�'�._��_
_��� �,�.-_��:- r� �r.'_�r-�y=�`�
��t��-�`��`-
'_�1— `-�'-_`��Z.:�=��`
__ _���:'-��... -•-• _ ` •-�`�y_�'`��-:'�-- -
`-�_— .,�• �-. .,.��= -
_�L�;�4':�_-_- - �...0����'�"`��.��-� �
�`���=.����-_���=��-.- `T�.�_
�y:�y� _ _ __:�'�_—Y—l'~�----="�?i�a --=-....�.
��� - �� - ��� -�.����.��
� �_' �.
.•�'a .- . .��. _ _
�7N'�•�-�1�T�in'i 'T . � .�7.-.._�� �� � I+ _
_.. � ��• f � , ��' ' ' �
�- � �:.. �.L �
�-- 1 � .f �
. :ti
� ���` - I '
. JI '' � j � �r{� � �
' _ .� _ f.: � ` ��i�l�r�;.��� � �.
- t i, �. �� � �
_��' . ' �� r '', � '- _ _' 'z�
. . . � 14 � ;� ,:yYr - �,. =�"sF��
,,f' ��� x� l-•'f"�::.. -,
>.,,,�:,-: .. - ._; :� � '••':.;'` .
.�Lr�- ���a::,,> � J'F'� :.•: `
, . . • � �f . 1•'��:i��'''�IL�•...�p•'i . . :�'",':��tJf�;.. .. .
. .i: ':�" a. �!�'[:':�i'. i�. . �."•�I! - �"�•!:.:�',,
f�.� . r . . ' ' . �r• .:��1�.'�. 'j�"
' . • � ' •• I .. i .. . . .�.y .. ��,I..���'.......... ... � . .• •. . ' . . .'Y�� .. ... ... ' � .
Figure 15 — Deterioration of Creamery House
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 21 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16466
` -- - ' �'�'%` �-
. � �
r� • ,`� T _ . y�� .� Y� i .
� . ��:
.. �.. � ' ..`-c � _ _ [ • ��..-
___� _ - -- —� . �a J�µ�-.
� - _`�- • S �
_ �..r-.v r` _ .- � � =�- ,:� .
- . �a+—•��„ - i: . .
_ � - �� � � . . � ,.
-- _ . - .�' '1 � �,.
- , , , .
"�`�_`_;- -�� � - - � '} ¢.
�.� _ . � _ ` " �y;. _i . : l t
.- � �, ` �aw � t: . i �:� 7 + �
$ �� �� ;;.. �.�; ... ��
' ; . - - _ . ��.; . � � � � �`";
�. . :�..
. y � - � � . ;' �e � . �� f'.r �.�-
r '� � � • i•�� �. I � i` �� ��
. � ;' •
Figure 16 - Deterioration of Creamery House
�
�- _ �� - ._
_ =.�
. � - - - - - -_
_ �_:.o- � �` ---�-�---�....,
.� -�- � _s
- _ �=�
�
�,,� _ �`�._ _ _- �:.'"'��
, .��r- � , � -
�' ,�-'�1 -y �r �.�. '"� � -r
� • :���� -� - � � _ ' _ -
�f�.
� ►� .'�% _ :. . - „r �#,�. �- . .
-�� ;�' � : : ; .}%�` :� , .
r�tr� .3�"Y����: �1•. .i ' • 5 'l�- `�� F
` _�s �- �� . � � '�' � :
-��;, ,=•'`^�� � '�
, � ^� �� �
�:�;_ - � . . �... k , �
Figure 17 - Creamery House foundation
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 22 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16467
. -.._ _. �
�. r!-.'� _
� _ �
4 � ��- � .. .z
� � ��
� — � ��
��'-. �S. � � — .
� _ " �'A
�. �� _._ _ — _'' ' �i._— r
r �� �, ^��,.
��� � J �:'' f�--� e -:�'.
�� I � ��. � ,{�'F '
M
-.�..M1.i:� ^_if'`.'ti ' '
' � ':,'-'�r�.
I+ ^ ..-.
�� . Y .�
� �, I .a�.
�i
r. I _ � .�
r '�
I�� .
�>r�
7� � � �I�,1+r
i '�� �
r
' - <
A.
+��
..y
r4a, ,x�., , � .
� . .�
Figure 18 — Deterioration of Creamery House
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 23 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16468
APPENDIX F.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review
16469
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16470
FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
CONFORMANCE REVIEW
.� � � .
�
- ,
. n . . - , f� �� ;
��:; ., ,- ' � - }',
' ' 4��[ j�6. ���.�'! � � �� � `4, � �� �.s
� '++w�..� � ' _' f �`;µ� � �� � �
� �r��� �^ 1 _ �_ _ 1 �k/ ' ��a���i� 3 . ' - . . _ ._.
- �A :� e�e 17 . r, . �$ ,
�- - - -
Prepared for:
John Madonna
P.O. Box 5310
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
Prepared by:
Chattel, Inc. � Historic Preservation Consultants
13417 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks, CA 91423
FINAL DRAFT: December 14, 2017
16471
Page intentionally left blank
2
16472
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................. 5
II. QUALIFICATIONS..................................................................................................... 7
III. METHODOLOGY AND EVALUATION............................................................................ 9
IV. $ETTING............................................................................................................... ��
HistoricBackground ..........................................................................................................11
Periodof Significance........................................................................................................13
RegulatorySetting.............................................................................................................13
Historic Resource Assessment and Physical Descriptions ..............................................19
V. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................. 39
VI. PROJECT DESCRIPTION, IMPACTS ANALYSIS, AND PROPOSED
MITIGATION MEASURES ......................................................................................... 43
ProjectDescription ............................................................................................................43
ImpactsAnalysis ...............................................................................................................46
MitigationMeasures..........................................................................................................53
VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................................... 57
VIII. ATTACHMENTS ..................................................................................................... 59
Attachment A: Historic Images
Attachment B: Contemporary Images
Attachment C: Inspiration Images
Attachment D: Froom Ranch — Historical Buildings Cultural Heritage Committee Hearing
Drawing Package, November 14, 2017
Attachment E: Froom Ranch — Historical Buildings Cultural Heritage Committee Hearing
PowerPoint, August 28, 2017
Attachment F: Froom Ranch — County Assessor Records and Historical Buildings
Dimensions
Attachment G: "Analysis of Historic Structures at Froom Ranch," Stork, Wolfe &Associates,
June 30, 2017
Attachment H: "Moving Historic Buildings," National Park Service, John Obed Curtis, 1979
Attachment I: "Historical Evaluation for the Froom Ranch Building Complex," Bertrando and
Bertrando Research Consultants, March 14, 1998
3
16473
Page intenfionally left blank
4
16474
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed project is the Froom Ranch Specific Plan area consisting of an approximately 109.7-
acre development with a mix of land uses including residential, commercial and open space
(proposed project). The proposed project also includes dedication of approximately 3.6 acres of the
subject property to the City of San Luis Obispo (City) as the Froom Ranch Trailhead Public Park
(Park). The Park would consist of approximately 2.9 acres of space for park facilities reusing
identified historic resources, and approximately 0.7 acres of open space including a drainage
channel.
The Froom Ranch complex (subject property)was found eligible for listing as a potential National
Register of Historic Places (National Register), California Register of Historical Resources (California
Register) and City Master List historic district consisting of seven contributors, Main Residence,
Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn. These contributors were all
constructed during the period of significance when the property was in use as a dairy farm and when
Bill Froom did his important work, which corresponds to the subject property period of significance
from 1900 to 1950s.
There are three non-historic, non-contributors for a total of 10 buildings and structures at the subject
property. Primary, individually eligible, historic resources existing on the subject property would be
retained and adaptively reused: Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary. The Main
Residence would be relocated and rehabilitated, and the Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary would
be disassembled, relocated, and reconstructed. Secondary historic resources existing on the subject
property would be demolished: Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn. Non-historic resources on the
subject property, with the exception of the Cell Tower, would also be demolished: Storage Building,
and Outhouse. Refer to Attachment A for historic images and Attachment B for contemporary
images of the 10 buildings and structures.
Due to the presence of a trace of the Los Osos fault which runs beneath the Dairy Barn, the
proposed work would reconstruct and relocate the Dairy Barn at a new location slightly downhill and
to the east, which is outside the required setback from the fault. The Main Residence and Creamery
would also be relocated, both further to the east, to maintain their same horizontal spacing in relation
to Dairy Barn. The Main Residence would be rehabilitated, and the Creamery would be
reconstructed. To maintain the visual hierarchy of these three buildings, grade changes would be
created between them to mimic their existing vertical relationship. The Granary would be
reconstructed and relocated proximate to the Dairy Barn to reflect the functional relationship
between these two structures. Refer to Attachment C for Creamery reconstruction inspiration
images, and Attachments D and E for proposed project images. Refer to Attachment F for County
Assessor Records and building dimensions, Attachment G for structural engineer report"Analysis of
Historic Structures at Froom Ranch," Stork, Wolfe &Associates (June 30, 2017), and Attachment H,
"Moving Historic Buildings," John Obed Curtis (1979)for Main Residence relocation approach.
This conformance review (report) uses primary sources including Assessor's records and historic
photographs, secondary sources including the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Historic Resource
Assessment prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions (HRA), and site visits and consultation with the
design and Applicant team. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties (Secretary's Standards) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidance on
impacts to historical resources were used to evaluate the proposed project and prepare
recommended mitigation measures to reduce historical resources impacts to a level of less than
significant. Refer to Attachment I, "Historical Evaluation for the Froom Ranch Building Complex,"
Bertrando and Bertrando Research Consultants for a historic assessment of the Froom Ranch
complex (March 14, 1998).
5
16475
Under CEQA, a project that results in physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of an
historical resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource
would be "materially impaired"would have a significant impact. Materially impaired is defined as
demolishing or materially altering in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an
historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for listing. This
report evaluates whether the proposed project would result in material impairment, and thus have an
impact, to individually eligible resources or the potential historic district.
With implementation of recommended mitigation measures, the proposed work on the Froom Ranch
complex, including rehabilitation, reconstruction, and relocation of four individually eligible
contributors to the identified potential historic district, was found to conform with the Secretary's
Standards. The loss of secondary contributors was found not to cause material impairment of the
district because the secondary contributors are not necessary to convey the historic district's
potential historical significance. With mitigation, impacts to individually eligible resources and the
potential district would be less than significant.
6
16476
II. QUALIFICATIONS
Chattel is a full service historic preservation consulting firm with practice throughout the western
United States. The firm represents governmental agencies and private ventures, successfully
balancing project goals with a myriad of historic preservation regulations without sacrificing
principles on either side. Comprised of professionals meeting the Secretary of the Interior's
Professional Qualifications Standards in history, architecture, architectural history, and historic
architecture, the firm offers professional services including historical resources evaluation and
project impacts analysis, in addition to consultation on federal, state, and local historic preservation
statutes and regulations.
Staff engage in a collaborative process and work together as a team on individual projects. This
evaluation was prepared by President Robert Chattel, historic architect, Associate II Caroline
Raftery, architectural historian, and Principal Associate Christine di lorio, AICP, professionals
meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for historic architecture,
architecture and architectural history. Additional input was provided by Consulting Principal
Associate Susan O'Carroll, Ph.D., a CEQA specialist.
Since its founding in 1994, Chattel has successfully completed a number of historic resources
projects in the City, including the Bowden Ranch and Railroad Square developments, as well as
projects planned for Long Bonetti Ranch and in construction for Garden Street Terraces (Hotel
Serra).
7
16477
Page intentionally left blank
8
16478
III. METHODOLOGY AND EVALUATION
To complete this conformance review, Chattel:
• Reviewed and evaluated FirstCarbon Solution's 2015 Froom Ranch Specific Plan Historic
Resource Assessment (HRA), and provided minor edits included in the revised 2017 version
of the HRA.
• Reviewed and evaluated the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Draft (July 2017).
• Reviewed County of San Luis Obispo Assessor's (Assessor's) records and Joan Sulllivan
archives.
• Conducted additional research including with National Register staff Paul Lusignan on
similar dairy properties, and the San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau on Bill Froom as co-
founder.
• Researched dairy farm layout history and planning.
• Conducted site visits and completed photographic documentation on May 1, 2017, August
1, 2017, and October 1, 2017.
• Met with City of San Luis Obispo staff on May 22, 2017 and August 1, 2017.
• Provided on-going design consultation with the design and applicant team.
• Applied CEQA guidance to the proposed project including conformance with the Secretary's
Standards and material impairment provisions, and recommended mitigation measures to
reduce historical resources impacts to a level of less than significant.
9
16479
Page intenfionally left blank
10
16480
IV. SETTING
The following provides a summary history of the Froom Ranch complex, describes the regulatory
setting for determining whether a property qualifies as historic, and uses this guidance to evaluate
whether the subject property contains historic resources. This evaluation identifies the period of
significance and describes each building and structure in terms of history, physical description,
character-defining features, and integrity.' The historic background summaries and physical
descriptions are paraphrased from the FirstCarbon Solutions HRA. Refer to Attachment A and B for
images referenced.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan area is approximately 109.7 acres, includes two parcels (Assessors'
Parcel Numbers, APNs 067-241-030 and 067-241-031), and is located at 12165 Los Osos Valley
Road in County of San Luis Obispo (County). The subject property occupies approximately 2.9 acres
in the northern portion of the larger Specific Plan Area and includes 10 buildings and structures. Of
the 10 buildings and structures, seven are associated with the dairy industry and Froom family: Main
Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, Shed, Bunkhouse, Old Barn, and Granary.2 The Outhouse,
Storage Building, and Cell Tower are more recent additions and are not associated with the dairy
use of the subject property or Froom family.
HISTORIC BACKGROUND
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan area was originally part of the Rancho Canada de Los Osos and La
Laguna subdivisions surveyed and mapped by James Stanton in 1869. This land consists of Lots 60,
67, 68, and 69 and totaled approximately 868 acres at one time. The subject property is contained
within Lot 68 of the original subdivision.
History of Dairy Farminq in California and the Central Coast
When California became a state in 1850, the Central Coast was already an important agricultural
area for the region. Many of the ranchos developed during the Spanish and Mexican periods were
subdivided under new American land and title laws once the area came under American control. In
the mid-19th century, the primary agricultural products from the Central Coast area were cash crops,
including potatoes and wheat.3 Following a drought between 1862 and 1864, the agricultural
economy of the region moved away from these crops, which relied on a consistent supply of water,
to cattle production. By 1866, dairy was the second largest agricultural product in the County,
outranked only by wheat. The Steele brothers from Delhi, New York, were said to have brought the
dairy industry to the County, and early on were the largest owners of milk cows in California after
Shafter& Howard in Marin County.4 E.W. Steele first came to the City in 1864, and after declaring it
"cow heaven," purchased 45,000 acres of land to farm.s
' For the purposes of this section, integrity is defined as the ability of a building's or structure's physical
features to relate and convey historical significance.
2 Based on the FirstCarbon Solutions findings, the Froom Ranch complex potential historic district would be
assigned a California Historical Resource Status Code of 3S.The four contributors would be assigned status codes
of 3B, if significant both as an individual resource and as a district contributor or 3D, if significant solely as a district
contributor.
3 Cuesa Cultivating A Healthy Food System. October 28, 2005. https://cuesa.org/article/california-farming-
reg ions-central-coast-and-southern-cal iforn ia.
4 History of San Luis Obispo, California;with illustrations and biographical sketches of its prominent men
and pioneers, (Oakland:Thompson&West, 1883),226.
5 Ibid., 63.
11
16481
In 1868, the City became the County seat. The dairy industry experienced a large expansion during
the mid-19t" century and continued into the 20t" century, supported by improved transportation
connections with the arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s. Union Oil of California
focused its operations in the County, which further supported growth of the dairy industry.
In 1901, California Polytechnic Institute, a vocational and agricultural institution, established a
campus in San Luis Obispo (now California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, Cal Poly).
Establishment of Cal Poly both reflected the growing dairy industry, as well as helped to support it.
Cal Poly, along with San Simeon Ranch, established by newspaper publisher William Randolph
Hearst, influenced agricultural development of the area around the turn of the 20t" century.
History of the Froom Family
In 1886, John R. Froom came to work on the land that would become Froom Ranch. By 1890 he had
leased 500 acres and had begun dairying with 50 cows. By 1904 John Froom married Harriet Perry,
and in 1915, as the family expanded to include seven children, the Froom family moved from the
Creamery into the Main Residence. John Froom died in 1929, and his son Bill Froom would run the
farm until 1977. Bill Froom co-founded the San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau (Farm Bureau) and
served as a director for the Cattlemen's Association.6
Dairv Farm Layout and Planninq
The buildings and structures that comprise a dairy farm historically needed to be arranged in such a
way as to make operations on the farm efficient. The first determination made was the location of a
dairy farm, which needed to be a flat area close to a water source and a grazing area.' Froom Ranch
sits on a relatively flat grade, with hills to the west, and Froom Creek running west to south of the
farm buildings. The first structures typically constructed on a dairy farm were "a house or two, a barn
for hay and horses, fences and corrals, and the creamery."$These would be typically followed by
larger barns and houses, if necessary. At Froom Ranch, the first buildings constructed were the
Dairy Barn, Horse Barn (not extant), Creamery, Granary, and Main Residence, which were followed
by accessory structures and additions.
While it was important to build on a relatively flat grade, natural drainage necessary for dairy farming
operations was also a consideration.9 It was also important for dairy farms to have the barn and
corral located close to each other to make it easier to rotate pastures.10 In addition, it was desirable
to have the farm buildings face north-south to allow for the best light and ventilation.�� The Dairy
Barn nearly follows this arrangement, with the entrances to the barn facing northwest.
The main factor in determining the layout of a dairy farm was efficiency of labor. The farther away
buildings were for each other, the longer it took the farmer to travel between buildings, and
subsequently complete daily tasks.12 It was advised that the farm house be between 100-150 feet
from any barns, and that the other outbuildings be at least 50 feet away from each other for fire
6 While FirstCarbon Solutions noted that Bill Froom was founder of the Farm Bureau, according to
correrspondence with James Green, Government Affairs Specialist I, he was a co-founder. Green stated their
archive facility burned down a few years ago, and thus no primary records were available for review.
'D.S. Livingston.A Good Life:dairy farming in the Olema Valley:a history of the dairy and beef ranches of
the Olema and Lagunitas Canyon Golden Gate National Recreation Area and Point Reyes National Seashore,40.
$ Ibid.
9 H.R. Sinnard, H.P Ewalt, M.G. Huber, "Dairy Buildings," Extension Bulletin 711, Federal Cooperative
Extension Service, Oregon State College, November 1950,4.
�o A.L. Pulliam, "Farm Layout and Farmstead Planning,"Extension Bulletin 685, Federal Cooperative
Extension Service, Oregon State College, January 1948, 16.
" Ibid.
1z Ibid., 17.
12
16482
protection.13 At Froom Ranch, the Creamery is located approximately 125 feet from the Main
Residence, and the Dairy Barn is almost 300 feet from the Main Residence. The granary needed to
be closer to the barn because it would take less time to deliver the feed.14 Froom Ranch follows this
model as the Granary is located northwest of the Dairy Barn by approximately 25 feet, making it
easier to deliver grain.
Period of Siqnificance
Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s, when the
local dairy economy began to fade due to the high cost of dairy farming. The Froom family operated
the dairy farm from 1890 to the 1950s, and Bill Froom's involvement in the Farm Bureau was prior to
the 1950s. The extant buildings and structures identified as significant were constructed from
approximately 1900 to 1915. As a result, the period of significance of the subject property is 1900 to
1950s.
REGULATORY SETTING
National Reqister of Historic Places
The National Register of Historic Places (National Register) is the nation's official list of historic and
cultural resources worthy of preservation. Authorized under the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966, as amended, the National Register is part of a federal program to coordinate and support
public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect the country's historic and archaeological
resources. Properties listed in the National Register include districts, sites, buildings, structures, and
objects that are significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture.
A district"possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures,
or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development."'s
The National Register is administered by the National Park Service (NPS), which is part of the
United States Department of the Interior. Resources are eligible for National Register listing if they:
A) are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of our history; or
B) are associated with the lives of significant persons in our past; or
C) embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or
that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that
represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack
individual distinction; or
D) have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory.16
Once a resource has been determined to satisfy one of the above-referenced criteria, then it must be
assessed for integrity. Integrity refers to the ability of a property to convey its significance, and the
degree to which the property retains the identity, including physical and visual attributes, for which it
is significant under the four basic criteria listed above. The National Register recognizes seven
aspects or qualities of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association. To retain its historic integrity, a property must possess several, and usually most, of
these aspects.
13 Ibid., 18.
14 Ibid.
�s National Register. IV. How to Define Categories of Historic Properties. "District."
https://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/nrb15 4.htm#district
16 National Register Bulletin#15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National Park
Service, 1990, revised 2002).
13
16483
The National Register includes only those properties that retain sufficient integrity to accurately
convey their physical and visual appearance from their identified period of significance. Period of
significance describes the period in time during which a property's importance is established. It can
refer simply to the date of construction, or it can span multiple years, depending on the reason the
property is important. The period of significance is established based on the property's relevant
historic context and as supported by facts contained in the historic context statement.
Evaluation of integrity is founded on "an understanding of a property's physical features and how
they relate to its significance.""A property significant under criterion A or B for its association with a
pattern or history of significant persons may still retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance
even if it retains a low degree of integrity of design, materials or workmanship. Conversely, a
property that derives its significance exclusively for its architecture under criterion C must retain a
high degree of integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. For some properties, comparison
with similar properties is considered during the evaluation of integrity, especially when a property
type is particularly rare.
While integrity is important in evaluating and determining significance, a property's physical
condition, whether it is in a deteriorated or pristine state, has relatively little influence on its
significance. A property that is in good condition may lack the requisite level of integrity to convey its
significance due to alterations or other factors. Likewise, a property in extremely poor condition may
still retain substantial integrity from its period of significance and clearly convey its significance.
National Register Bulletin 15 includes the following information regarding historic districts:
A district possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of site, buildings,
structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development.
A district derives its importance from being a unified entity, even though it is often composed
of a wide variety of resources. The identity of a district results from the interrelationship of its
resources, which can convey a visual sense of the overall historic environment or be an
arrangement of historically or functionally related properties. For example, a district can
reflect one principal activity, such as a mill or a ranch, or it can encompass several
interrelated activities, such as an area that includes industrial, residential or commercial
buildings, sites, structures, or objects.A district can also be a grouping of archaeological
sites related primarily by their common components; these types of districts often will not
visually present a specific historic environment.
A district must be significant, as well as being an identifiable entity. It must be important for
historical, architectural, archaeological, engineering, or cultural values. Therefore, districts
that are significant will usually meet the last portion of Criterion C plus Criterion A, Criterion
B, other portions of Criterion C, or Criterion D.
A district can encompass both features that lack individual distinction and individually
distinctive features that serve as focal points. It may even be considered eligible if all of the
components lack individual distinction, provided that the grouping achieves significance as a
whole within the historic context. In either case, the majority of the components that add to
the district's historic character, even if they are individually undistinguished, must possess
integrity, as must the district as a whole.
A district can contain buildings, structures, sites, objects, or open spaces that do not
contribute to the significance of the district. The number of non-contributing properties a
" Ibid.
14
16484
district can contain yet still convey the sense of time and place and historical development
depends on how these properties affect the district's integrity.
Relationship to Project-Summary
The Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary are individually eligible for National
Register listing, given their association with the dairy industry (Criterion A) and the Froom family
(Criterion B). The Main Residence does not appear individually eligible for National Register listing
as an example of modest Late Queen Anne Cottage architecture (Criterion C), but the Creamery,
Dairy Barn and Granary were identified as individually eligible as vernacular examples of agrarian
buildings (Criterion C).
Additionally, as a National Register historic district"possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or
continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or
physical development", the Froom Ranch complex'$was identified as eligible for listing as a potential
National Register historic district consisting of seven contributors, Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy
Barn, Granary Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, eligible for listing in the National Register at the
local level of significance (Criteria A, B). These contributors were all constructed during the period of
significance. There are three non-contributors, for a total of 10 buildings and structures.
California Reqister of Historical Resources
The California Register of Historical Resources (California Register)was established to serve as an
authoritative guide to the state's significant historical and archaeological resources (Public
Resources Code (PCR) §5024.1). State law provides that in order for a property to be considered
eligible for listing in the California Register, it must be found by the State Historical Resources
Commission to be significant under any of the following four criteria, if the resource is:
1) Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; or
2) Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history; or
3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of
construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or
4) Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or
history of the local area, California or the nation.
The primary difference between eligibility for listing in the National and California Registers is
integrity. Properties eligible for listing in the National Register generally have a higher degree of
integrity than those only eligible for listing in the California Register. There is, however, no difference
with regard to significance. A property that meets the significance criteria for California Register
eligibility would also be eligible for listing in the National Register unless there are issues of integrity
that decrease the ability of the property to convey its significance.
The California Register also includes properties which: have been formally determined eligible for
listing in, or are listed in the National Register; are registered State Historical Landmark Number
770, and all consecutively numbered landmarks above Number 770; points of historical interest,
which have been reviewed and recommended to the State Historical Resources Commission for
listing; and city and county-designated landmarks or districts (if criteria for designation are
determined by State of California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP)to be consistent with
California Register criteria). PRC §5024.1(g) also states:
'$ Based on correspondence with Paul R. Lusignan, Historian, National Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service, "there really is no material difference in the NR documentation for a complex or a district, except for the
block selected for`Category of Property."'August 29, 2017.
15
16485
A resource identified as significant in an historical resource survey may be listed in the
California Register if the survey meets all of the following criteria:
1) The survey has been or will be included in the State Historical Resources Inventory.
2) The survey and the survey documentation were prepared in accordance with
[OHP]... procedures and requirements.
3) The resource is evaluated and determined by the office to have a significance rating
of category 1-5 on DPR [Department of Parks and Recreation] form 523.
4) If the survey is five or more years old at the time of its nomination for inclusion in the
California Register, the survey is updated to identify historical resources which have
become eligible or ineligible due to changed circumstances or further documentation
and those which have been demolished or altered in a manner that substantially
diminishes the significance of the resource.
Resources are eligible as a California Register historic districts if they meet National Register historic
district criteria.
Relationship to Project—Summary
The Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary are individually eligible for California
Register listing, given their association with the dairy industry (Criterion 1) and the Froom family
(Criterion 2). The Main Residence does not appear individually eligible for California Register listing
as an example of modest Late Queen Anne Cottage architecture (Criterion 3), but the Creamery,
Dairy Barn, and Granary were identified as individually eligible as vernacular examples of agrarian
buildings (Criterion 3).
Additionally, the Froom Ranch complex was identified as eligible for listing as a potential California
Register historic district consisting of seven contributors, the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn,
Granary, Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn (Criterion 1, 2). These contributors were all constructed
during the period of significance. There are three non-contributors, for a total of 10 buildings and
structures.
California Environmental Qualitv Act(CEQA)
According to CEQA,
an historical resource is a resource listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California
Register of Historical Resources. Historical resources included in a local register of historical
resources..., or deemed significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (g) of Section
5024.1, are presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of this section,
unless the preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that the resource is not historically
or culturally significant (PRC §21084.1).
If the proposed Project were expected to cause substantial adverse change in an historical resource,
environmental clearance for the project would require mitigation measures to reduce impacts.
"Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means the physical
demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such
that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired" (CEQA Guidelines
§15064.5 (b)(1)). The CEQA Guidelines (§15064.5 (b)(2)) describe material impairment taking place
when a project:
16
16486
A) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics
of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its
inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register... or
B) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics
that account for its inclusion in a local register... or its identification in an historical
resources survey... unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project
establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or
culturally significant; or
C) Demolishes or materially alters those physical characteristics of an historical
resource that convey its historical significance and thatjustify its inclusion in, or
eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register... as determined by a lead agency for
the purposes of CEQA.
According to the CEQA Guidelines (§15064.5 (b)(3)), "Generally, a project that follows the Secretary
of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving,
Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and
Grimmer, shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the historical
resource." The Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with
Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings
(Secretary's Standards) is published by the National Park Service (NPS), and was recently updated
and reissued in July 2017.19
Relationship to Project—Summary
The Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary, were identified as individually eligible
given their association with the dairy industry and the Froom family (Criteria 1 and 2), and the
Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary were identified as individually eligible as vernacular examples of
agrarian buildings under architecture (Criterion 3).
Additionally, the Froom Ranch complex has been identified as a potential National Register and
California Register historic district consisting of seven contributors, the Main Residence, Creamery,
Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, eligible for listing in the California Register for
significance at the local level (Criterion 1, 2). These contributors were all constructed during the
period of significance. Therefore, the potential historic district with seven contributing structures are
historical resources under CEQA. There are three non-contributors, for a total of 10 buildings and
structures.
Citv of San Luis Obispo Master List
In 2010, the City adopted a Historic Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 14.01)that
formally codified City Historic Preservation definitions,evaluation criteria, and review procedures.
This ordinance references the "Inventory of Historic Resources" which is the City's listing of two
categories of historic resources and properties. Master List Resources are the "most unique and
important resources and properties in terms of age, architectural or historical significance, rarity, or
association with important persons or events in the City's past." Contributing List Resources are:
"Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and
architectural character, and contribute, either by themselves or in conjunction with other structures,
to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole. They need
not be located in a historic district.
19 Anne E. Grimmer. "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with
Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring&Reconstruction Historic Buildings." Rev. National Park Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior, 2017.
17
16487
The ordinance outlines the process and criteria for the inclusion of historic properties on the City
Master List or Contributing List of Historic Resources. In order to be eligible for designation, the
resource must exhibit a high level of historic integrity, be at least 50 years old, and satisfy at least
one of the following criteria:
A. Architectural criteria: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or
method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possess high artistic values.
1. Style: Describes the form of a building, architectural details within the form (e.g.,
arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.). Building style will be evaluated
as a measure of:
a. The relative purity of a traditional style;
b. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the
structure reflects a once popular style;
c. Traditional, vernacular, and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social
milieu and period of the community; and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and
how these styles are put together.
2. Design: Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic merit
and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or
combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements.
Also suggests degree to which the designer(e.g., carpenter-builder) accurately
interpreted and conveyed the style. Building design will be evaluated as a measure of:
a. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its artistic merit, details,
and craftsmanship (even if not necessarily unique);
b. An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders,
although the craftsmanship and quality may not be superior.
3. Architect: Describe the professional (individual or firm) responsible for the building design
and plans for the structure. The architect will be evaluated as a reference to:
a. A notable architect (e.g., Wright, Morgan) including architects who made significant
contributions to the state or region, or an architect whose work influenced the
development of the city, state, or nation;
b. An architect, who in terms of craftsmanship made significant contributions to San
Luis Obispo (e.g.,Abraham who according to local sources designed the house at
810 Osos—Frank Avila's father's home—built between 1927 and 1930).
B. Historic Criteria
1. History– Persons associated with the lives of persons important to local, state, or
national history. Person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person
or group was:
a. Significant to the community as a public leader(e.g., mayor, congress leader, etc.)
and for his or her fame and outstanding recognition—locally, regionally or
nationally;
b. Significant to the community as a public servant or as a person who made early,
unique, or outstanding contributions to the community, local affairs or institutions
(e.g., Council member, education, medical professional, clergymen, public officials)
2. History– Event Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the
United States. Historic events will be evaluated as a measure of:
18
16488
a. A landmark, famous, or first of its kind event for the city—regardless of whether
the impact of the event spread beyond the city;
b. A relatively unique, important or interesting contribution to the city (e.g., The Ah
Louis Store as the center for Chinese-American activities in early San Luis
Obispo history).
3. History–Context.Associated with and also a prime illustration of prominent patterns of
political, social, economic, cultural, medical educational, governmental, military,
industrial, or religious history. Historic context will be evaluated as to the measure of the
degree to which it reflects:
a. Early, first or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historic
effects go beyond the city level that are immediately connected with the building
(e.g., County Museum).
b. Secondary patterns of local history, but closely associated with the building (e.g.,
Park Hotel).
C. Integrity–Authenticity of an historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival
of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Integrity will be
evaluated by a measure of:
1. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether the original
foundation has been changed, if known;
2. The degree to which the structure has maintained enough of its historic character or
appearance to be recognizable as an historic resource and to convey the reasons for its
historic significance;
3. The degree to which the resource has retained its design, setting, materials, workman-
ship, feeling and association.
The City defines historic districts as "areas or neighborhoods with a collection or concentration of
listed or potentially contributing historic properties or archaeologically significant sites, where historic
properties help define the area or neighborhood's unique architectural, cultural, and historic
character or sense of place." Historic districts are delineated on the official zoning map as Historic
(H) overlay zone under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.54."20
Relationship to Project–Summary
The Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary are individually eligible for City Master List
listing, given their association with the Froom Family (Criterion B1 b) and dairy industry (Criterion
B2b, B3a). The Main Residence appears individually eligible for City Master List listing as example
of modest Late Queen Anne Cottage architecture (Criterion A2a), and the Creamery, Dairy Barn,
and Granary were identified as individually eligible as vernacular examples of agrarian buildings
(Criterion A1c). The Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary have retained integrity
(Criterion C1, C2, C3).
Additionally, the Froom Ranch complex was identified as eligible for listing as a potential City Master
List historic district consisting of seven contributors, the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn,
Granary, Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn.21 These contributors were all constructed during the
period of significance. There are three non-contributors, for a total of 10 buildings and structures.
20 Section 14.01.090 E of the ordinance.
21 The eligible historic district is not currentlty delineated on the official City zoning map as Historic(H)
overlay zone under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.54.
19
16489
HISTORIC RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTIONS
A Historic Resource Assessment (HRA) prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions included a historical and
architectural significance evaluation of the subject property and survey of buildings and structures on
the subject property was recently completed. The HRA documented 10 buildings and structures:
Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed, Bunkhouse, Old Barn, Outhouse, Storage
Building, and Cell Tower.22 This section describes each building or structure, and identifies:
character-defining features, alterations, integrity, and eligibility for listing as historic resources at the
national, state and local levels.
Individual Resources
Main Residence (Attachment B; Images 18-26)
�
.:'� �
__ � � om �+_ _,���
5
� � , - �
, ":� r�.
� ���� �
Description and Character-Defininq Features—The County Assessor's building record indicates
the Main Residence was constructed in 1915 and measures approximately 30 feet by 54 feet. It was
occupied by members of the Froom family until 1998. Because there does not appear to be any
other building that might have served as a business office for dairy operations, it is likely the Main
Residence functioned in this capacity as well.
The Main Residence is a modest example of Late Queen Anne Cottage, which is common Iocally.23
The single-story wood-frame Main Residence is L-shaped in plan and contains approximately 1,600
square feet. It is oriented with its principal elevation or fa�ade facing east toward the street. The
building has a hipped roof with boxed eaves, a wood stoop, and a slightly inset front porch under a
front-facing gable roof. The gable end contains a fish scale pattern of wood shingles. The porch roof
is supported on three simple Tuscan columns set on a solid low wall. The Main Residence has a
raised foundation covered in wood vertical boards, with horizontal wood (shiplap) siding above
extending to a flat wood frieze. Windows vary in size and shape, and include a number of paired,
wood double-hung windows. The north elevation features a rectangular, cantilevered bay window
with a hipped roof dormer above. The south and west elevations consist of an infilled porch, aligned
with the west elevation, and projecting on the south elevation to form the L-shape in plan.A Phoenix
canariensis (palm tree) is located southeast of the porch.
zz FirstCarbon Solutions. "Froom Ranch Specific Plan Historic Resource Assessment."July 21, 2017.
z3 While the FirstCarbon Solutions HRA identifies the Main Residence to be Craftsman, Chattel disagrees as
the Main Residence has the character-defining features of Queen Anne.The character-defining features of Queen
Anne are detailed in Virginia Savage McAlester's A Field Guide to American Houses and Janet Foster's The Queen
Anne House America's Victorian Vernacular.
20
16490
Alterations-A rectangular-shaped, front-facing gable roofed non-significant addition is located at
the northwest corner of the building. Its attachment to the Main Residence is limited to the outside
corner northwest corner of the Main Residence, and thus no internal connection or entry door exists.
This addition has been used as a cleaning and storage space, and is clad in both horizontal (shiplap)
wood siding and unlike the residence is clad in vertical (board and batten)wood siding. The pattern
of windows and entry doors appears to have been unaltered, however the rear porch appears to
have been infilled with windows on the south elevation and screens on the west elevation.Although
no longer extant, historically the roof ridge has cresting (Attachment A, Image 3). It is possible that
some or all of the wood vertical board skirt on the raised foundation has been replaced.
Condition -The Main Residence appears to be structurally sound, and the siding and wall framing
are in good condition. However, the building lacks a structural system necessaryto fully resist lateral
loads. Therefore, the building is in good condition.
Inteqritv Analysis -The Main Residence retains integrity as described below:
Location -The Main Residence has not been relocated, and thus retains integrity of
location.
Design -The Main Residence retains its late Queen Anne era Cottage design, particularly
as expressed in the hip and gable roof forms, as well as fish scale shingles in the gable end.
The pattern of windows and entry doors appears to have been unaltered, however the rear
porch appears to have been infilled with windows on the south elevation and screens on the
west elevation. The northwest addition has not taken on significance over time because it is
secondary to the Main Residence, is not connected to it internally, nor is it functionally
related. Despite minor alterations, particularly the infilled porch and northwest addition, the
Main Residence retains character-defining features of the Queen Anne era style and thus
integrity of design.
Setting -The Main Residence maintains its orientation to the street and relationship to other
key buildings and structures in the Froom Ranch complex. The northwest addition does not
detract from the setting. The Main Residence thus retains integrity of setting.
Materials-The Main Residence retains the majority of its wood horizontal siding, boxed
eaves, and pattern of windows and entry doors. It is possible that some or all of the wood
vertical board skirt on the raised foundation has been replaced. The northwest addition,
given how it minimally connects only at the corner, does not appear to have compromised
materials. Therefore, the Main Residence retains integrity of materials.
Workmanship- Because the Main Residence retains the majority of its design and
materials, it retains integrity of workmanship from its original construction.
Feeling -Given the relationship of the Main Residence to other key buildings and structures
in the Froom Ranch complex, particularly the Creamery and Dairy Barn, and its relationship
to the street, it retains integrity of feeling.
Association -As the Main Residence served the Froom family, and likely served both
residential and office dairy farm uses, it retains integrity of association with dairy operations
and Froom family.
Eliqibilitv- Because the Main Residence dates from the period of significance, is demonstrably
associated with dairy farm operations and was integral to the functionality of the Froom Ranch, and
retains integrity, it is individually eligible under National Register Criterion A(association with an
21
16491
event or pattern of events—dairy industry).As the Main Residence is individually National Register
eligible under Criterion A, it would be eligible under California Register Criterion 1. It would also be
eligible for the City Master List, under Criterion B3a for an association with prominent patterns of
economic and industrial development of the regional dairy industry.
The Main Residence is individually eligible under National Register Criterion B (association with
important persons—Froom family), and California Register Criterion 2, because Bill Froom was co-
founder of the Farm Bureau. Under City criterion B1 b and B2b for persons important to local history,
particularly Bill Froom's contributions to the Farm Bureau and regional dairy industry, the Main
Residence is eligible for individual inclusion on the City Master List (Criterion B1 b, B3a).
The Main Residence does not appear individually eligible under National Register or California
Register Criterion C/1 (architecture—Queen Anne) because it is a modest example of the late
Queen Anne style and does not"embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method
of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that
represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction."
Under City criterion A2a for design "evaluated as a measure of: notable attractiveness with aesthetic
appeal because of its artistic merit, details, and craftsmanship (even if not necessarily unique),"the
Main Residence is eligible for individual inclusion on the City Master List.
Main Residence eligibility description in relation to Froom Ranch complex potential historic district is
described following the individual descriptions.
Creamery (Attachment B; Images 27-34)
� :��. , + 4
4�
� �rt��� 1
�, 4
I+ �, _ � � �
'I �-�.- f-
, ��,
- . '-�y�,. - .:.;a'�j��':.
� . , � -:�f�'_:y�. .
y_ -- iv
Description and Character-Defininq Features–The County Assessor's building record does not
appear to describe the Creamery. The Creamery is composed of two buildings separated by
approximately one foot: a west portion and an east portion. The west portion was built at an
unknown date during the period of significance, and was used as a creamery that housed a horse
powered churn and a butter brake table. The east portion was built later and was occupied by
members of the Froom family until 1915.
The Creamery is an example of vernacular architecture associated with the dairy industry. The
single-story wood-frame Creamery is rectangular in plan, irregular in shape and asymmetrical in
massing. The visual profile of the Creamery, composed of the irregularly shaped and asymmetrical
massing, when viewed from a lower elevation is the most significant character-defining feature. The
Creamery is a combination of horizontal and vertical (board and batten)wood siding and contains
approximately 1,950 square feet. It is oriented with its entrance elevation facing north. The west
portion of the Creamery is at a slightly higher elevation and has a higher ceiling and larger volume
than the east portion, with a combination of shed, north-south facing gable, and east-west facing
22
16492
gable roofs. The shed portion at the west elevation faces the Dairy Barn. The east portion of the
Creamery has an east-west facing gable roof. The gable end at the east elevation faces the Main
Residence. The Creamery has a stone foundation. The pattern of window and entry door openings
vary in size and shape.
Alterations-A rectangular-shaped, shed-roofed, minimally supported lean-to, non-significant
addition is located near the northeast corner of the east portion of the building.At one time, an
addition was present at the south wall of the west portion, however as it was in extremely poor
condition was removed.
Condition -The Creamery is structurally unsound, and paint has almost entirely weathered away.
Therefore, the building is in poor condition.
Inteqritv Analysis-The Creamery retains integrity as described below:
Location -The Creamery has not been relocated, and thus retains integrity of location.
Design -The Creamery retains the character-defining features that reflect vernacular
architecture, particularly expressed in the shed and gable roof forms and combination of
horizontal and vertical (board and batten)wood siding. The pattern of window and entry door
openings appears to have been unaltered. The northeast addition has not taken on
significance over time because it is secondary to the Creamery and is not structurally
attached. Despite minor alterations, particularly the non-significant addition, the Creamery
retains character-defining features of vernacular architecture and thus integrity of design.
Setting-The Creamery maintains its relationship to other key buildings and structures in
the Froom Ranch complex. The non-significant addition does not detract from the setting.
The Creamery thus retains integrity of setting.
Materials-The Creamery retains the majority of its horizontal and vertical (board and
batten)wood siding and pattern of window and entry door openings. However, most of the
materials are rotted and likely not salvageable.
The construction of the non-significant addition did not compromise historic materials.
Therefore, the Creamery retains integrity of materials.
Workmanship- Because the Creamery retains the majority of its design and materials, it
retains integrity of workmanship from its original construction.
Feeling -Given the relationship of the Creamery to other key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex, particularly the Main Residence and Dairy Barn, it retains integrity of
feeling.
Association -As the Creamery served the Froom family, and served both dairy farm and
residential uses, it retains integrity of association with dairy operations and the Froom family.
Eliqibilitv-As the Creamery dates from the period of significance, is demonstrably associated with
dairy farm operations and was integral to the functionality of the Froom Ranch, and retains integrity,
it is individually eligible under National Register Criteria A(association with an event or pattern of
events—dairy industry).As the Creamery is individually National Register eligible under Criterion A,
it would be eligible under California Register Criterion 1. Under City Criterion B3a for an association
with prominent patterns of economic and industrial development of the regional dairy industry, the
Creamery would be eligible for the City Master List.
23
16493
The Creamery is individually eligible under National Register Criterion B (association with important
persons—Froom family), and California Register Criterion 2, because Bill Froom was co-founder of
the Farm Bureau. Under City criterion B1 b for persons important to local history, particularly Bill
Froom's contributions to the Farm Bureau and regional dairy industry, the Creamery is eligible for
individual inclusion on the Master List (Criterion B1 b, B3a).
The Creamery appears individually eligible under National Register or California Register Criterion
C/1 (architecture—vernacular) as a vernacular example of an agrarian building. The Creamery aslo
appears eligible under City Criterion A1 c, "traditional, vernacular, and/or eclectic influences that
represent a particular social milieu and period of the community..." as a vernacular example of an
agrarian building.
Creamery eligibility description in relation to Froom Ranch complex potential historic district is
described following the individual descriptions.
Dairy Barn (Attachment B; Images 35-51)
- � .-
�
-- �_:�'�__.'�:::_•.,�l�i.���r I
•,�'�e.f.. �.
`� .
Description and Character-Defininq Features–The County Assessor's building record indicates
the Milk Barn (Dairy Barn)was constructed in 1913, and measures approximately 76 feet by 56 feet.
It was constructed to hold 10 cows at the north and south ends, and 10 cows at the west and east
sides. The Dairy Barn is an example of vernacular architecture associated with the dairy industry,
and is the only extant barn in the County exhibiting this design.
The wood-frame Dairy Barn is rectangular in plan, irregular in shape and asymmetrical in massing.
The Dairy Barn has a north-facing gable roof, high volume ceilings and is clad in vertical wood
siding, and contains approximately 4,200 square feet. It is oriented with its entrance elevation facing
north. The north elevation contains two sliding entry doors, one at the east and one at the west. The
west elevation contains an opening at the south. The south elevation is curved at the west and east
ends, has no foundation, and cantilevers above the natural slope. The curved ("rounded")south
elevation was strategically constructed above the natural slope to facilitate movement of cow
manure and is the most significant character-defining feature. The Dairy Barn has a wood pier and
concrete block foundation. Windows openings of generally the same size are located at the east,
west and south elevations. The east elevation contains an entry door at the south end that opens to
a sloped concrete ramp. This ramp was designed to remove mud from cows' hooves.
Alterations–A rectangular-shaped, shed-roofed minimally supported lean-to non-significant
addition is located on the east elevation of the Dairy Barn. This addition contains partition walls.An
original east elevation window was enlarged at the addition interior. New structural members have
also been installed for stabilization.
24
16494
Condition –The Dairy Barn, given some recent stabilization measures, is relatively structurally
sound, and the building has experienced some loss of original material. Therefore, the buildling is in
fair condition.
Inteqritv Analysis–The Dairy Barn retains integrity as described below:
Location –The Dairy Barn has not been relocated, and thus retains integrity of location.
Design –The Dairy Barn retains the character-defining features that reflect vernacular
architecture, particularly expressed in the curved south elevation that was strategically
constructed above the natural slope to facilitate movement of cow manure. Despite minor
alterations, particularly the non-significant addition, the Dairy Barn, retains character-defining
features of its vernacular architecture and thus integrity of design.
Setting–The Dairy Barn maintains its relationship to other key buildings and structures in
the Froom Ranch complex. The non-significant addition does not detract from the setting.
The Dairy Barn thus retains integrity of setting.
Materials–The Dairy Barn retains the majority of its vertical wood siding and pattern of
window and entry door openings. The non-significant addition, given how it minimally
connects to the Dairy Barn, does not appear to have compromised materials. Therefore, the
Dairy Barn retains integrity of materials.
Workmanship– Because the Dairy Barn retains the majority of its design and materials, it
retains integrity of workmanship from its original construction.
Feeling –Given the relationship of the Dairy Barn to other key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex, particularly the Main Residence and Creamery, it retains integrity of
feeling.
Association –As the Dairy Barn served dairy farm uses for the Froom family, it retains
integrity of association with dairy operations and the Froom family.
Eliqibilitv–As the Dairy Barn dates from the period of significance, is demonstrably associated with
dairy farm operations and was integral to the functionality of the Froom Ranch, and retains integrity,
it is individually eligible under National Register Criteria A(association with an event or pattern of
events—dairy industry).As the Dairy Barn is individually National Register eligible under Criterion A,
it would be eligible under California Register Criterion 1. Under City Criterion B3 for an association
with prominent patterns of economic and industrial development of the regional dairy industry, it
would eligible for the City's Master List.
The Dairy Barn is individually eligible under National Register Criterion B (association with important
persons—Froom family), and California Register Criterion 2, because Bill Froom was co-founder of
the Farm Bureau. Under City Master List Criterion B1 b for persons important to local history,
particularly Bill Froom's contributions to the Farm Bureau and regional dairy industry, the Dairy Barn
is eligible for individual inclusion on the City Master List.
The Dairy Barn appears individually eligible under National Register or California Register Criterion
C/1 (architecture—vernacular) as a vernacular example of an agrarian building. The Dairy Barn aslo
appears eligible under City Criterion A1 c, "traditional, vernacular, and/or eclectic influences that
represent a particular social milieu and period of the community..." as a vernacular example of an
agrarian building.
25
16495
Dairy Barn eligibility description in relation to Froom Ranch complex potential historic district is
described following the individual descriptions.
Granary (Attachment B; Images 52-57)
1 �
I���` � � ~`�-j_ _ _
_ , ��� � ��;� � -- _
, �,���� -�:=
�'4 ;�.rti��. , .. . � .
�:�
_ , � �`�'s•.�,^_�';•.,,'�
., .. . . -r:.��
Description and Character-Defininq Features—The County Assessor's building record indicates
Grain Storage (Granary)was constructed in 1913, and measures approximately 12 feet by 16 feet.
The single-story wood-frame one-story building has vertical (board and batten) exterior wood siding,
a gabled moderately pitched roof and a wood pier foundation. It has one window on the south
elevation, and a single entry door on the east elevation. The roof is clad in wood shingles. The
interior walls are clad in horizontal (tongue and groove) interior wood siding designed specifically to
prevent rats from eating the grain inside, and was the only such granary in the County.
Alterations —There have not been any significant alterations to the building.
Condition —The Granary appears to be structurally sound, but features evidence of termite
damage, and paint and shingle loss due to weathering. Therefore, the building is in poor condition.
Inteqritv Analysis—The Granary retains integrity as described below:
Location —The Granary has not been relocated, and thus retains integrity of location.
Design —A simple building in design and plan, the most important character-defining
features of the building are its wood-frame construction with vertical (board and batten)
exterior wood siding, horizontal (tongue and groove) interior wood siding, and gabled roof,
thus the building retains integrity of design.
Setting—The Granary maintains its relationship to the Dairy Barn, and thus retains integrity
of setting.
Materials —The Granary retains its integrity of materials, all of which appear to be original.
Workmanship— Because the Granary retains its original design and materials, it retains
integrity of workmanship from its original construction.
Feeling —Given the relationship of the Granary to the Dairy Barn, it retains integrity of
feeling.
Association —The Granary is located in its historic location and retains integrity of
association with the functions of the operation of the Froom Ranch.
26
16496
Eliqibilitv– Because the Granary dates from the period of significance, is demonstrably associated
with dairy farm operations and was integral to the functionality of the Froom Ranch, and retains
integrity, it is individually eligible under National Register Criterion A(association with an event or
pattern of events—dairy industry).As the Granary is individually National Register eligible under
Criterion A, it would be eligible under California Register Criterion 1. It would also be eligible for the
City's Master List, under City Criterion B3 for an association with prominent patterns of economic
and industrial development of the regional dairy industry.
The Granary is individually eligible under National Register Criterion B (association with important
persons—Froom family), and California Register Criterion 2, because Bill Froom was co-founder of
the Farm Bureau. Under City Criterion B1 b for persons important to local history, particularly Bill
Froom's contributions to the Farm Bureau and regional dairy industry, the Granary is eligible for
individual inclusion on the Master List.
The Granary appears individually eligible under National Register or California Register Criterion C/1
(architecture—vernacular) as a vernacular example of an agrarian building. The Granary aslo
appears eligible under City Criterion A1 c, "traditional, vernacular, and/or eclectic influences that
represent a particular social milieu and period of the community..." as a vernacular example of an
agrarian building.
Granary eligibility description in relation to Froom Ranch complex potential historic district is
described following the individual descriptions.
Shed (Attachment B; Image 58)
��
`___ �i���. •; i' ' ���, .
�� �� i "
_ J I 'I 3� ��_'�
F�.�. 1
:n!�.�:+L�.l��' , � �f '�
� ..� , e��.:,; � . �:r��.��i.•�'r..'y,.;i
: i 4�,�er.' °.S
�'`F ��. 1 ,�, :��
��� �^��` • `
'Jl? .
Description and Character-Defininq Features–The CountyAssessor's building record indicates
the Wood Shed (Shed)was constructed in 1915. The building measures approximately 12 feet by 15
feet. The building currently contains a seeder machine that is helping the structure remain vertical.
The Shed is a one-story structure irregularly shaped and asymmetrical in plan. The building lacks a
foundation, features vertical wood siding walls and has a steeply slanted shed roof. The entrance to
the shed is at the north elevation. The Shed features a small addition that has a flat roof and an entry
door. The vertical wood siding and steeply slanted roof distinguish the structure as a shed.
Alterations–Aside from the small addition there have not been any significant alterations to the
structure.
Condition –The Shed appears to be structurally unsound, the vertical wood siding has deteriorated,
and the paint has almost entirely chipped away. Therefore, the structure is in poor condition.
27
16497
Inteqritv Analvsis—The Shed retains integrity as described below:
Location —The Shed has not been relocated, and thus retains integrity of location.
Design —A simple building in design and plan, its character-defining features are its
asymmetrical plan, vertical wood siding, and steep shed roof. Despite the small addition, the
building has remained relatively unchanged since its time of construction, and thus retains
integrity of design.
Setting—The Shed maintains its relationship to the key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex. The non-significant addition does not detract from the setting. The
Shed Building thus retains integrity of setting.
Materials—The Shed retains the majority of its vertical wood siding as well as its entry door
pattern. The addition, completed in the same materials, has not compromised the materials
of the original structure. Therefore, the Shed Building retains integrity of materials.
Workmanship— Because the Shed retains the majority of its design and materials, it retains
integrity of workmanship.
Feeling —Given the relationship of the Shed to other key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex, it retains integrity of feeling.
Association —The Shed was used by the Froom family, and thus has integrity of
association.
Eliqibilitv—While the Shed dates from the period of significance and retains integrity, and was
associated with dairy farm operations, it was not integral to dairy farm functionality and is not a dairy
farm-specific building type but rather is a building type used in many agricultural and industrial
operations, and therefore does not appear individually eligible for the National Register and
California Register.
In addition, the Shed would not be eligible for the City Master List under Criterion B3 because dairy
use is not"closely associated with the building" given a shed is a building type used in many
agricultural and industrial operations.
Shed eligibility description in relation to Froom Ranch complex potential historic district is described
following the individual descriptions.
28
16498
Bunkhouse (Attachment B; Images 59-60)
.
.
' - - -
� _
_ :,_.
�=:rs=.� _�`_�_ f::-_ : ^ -
�.�� _ _ :, � ___ .�--� :
� ' - . � _ ,
__ � -_� . _
t~r �
.�`i - �' .."� �-
:�`. - ��� �
��= y
Description and Character-Defininq Features—The CountyAssessor's building record indicates
the Bunkhouse was constructed in 1900. The Bunkhouse measures approximately 12 feet by 12
feet. The building is a single-room, one-story building rectangular in shape and symmetrical in plan.
The building has a concrete foundation, horizontal (shiplap)wood siding, and a gabled roof clad in
asphalt shingles. The building has an entry door on the east elevation accessed by a concrete stoop.
The south and west elevations both feature a wood-frame double-hung sash windows, and the east
elevation has a wood sash window.
Alterations—Over the course of its history the building has been painted, received a new roof, and
a new floor. There does not appear to be any other alterations to the building.
Condition —The Bunkhouse appears to be structurally sound, but most of the exterior paint has
weathered away. Therefore, the building is in fair condition.
Inteqrity Analysis—The Bunkhouse retains integrity as described below:
Location —The Bunkhouse has not been relocated, and thus retains integrity of location.
Design —A simple building in design and plan, its character-defining features include its
symmetrical plan, wood shiplap siding, gabled roof, and original wood windows. The building
retains integrity of design.
Setting—The Bunkhouse maintains its relationship to the key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex, and thus retains integrity of setting.
Materials—The Bunkhouse retains the majority of its horizontal (shiplap)wood siding.
Therefore, the Bunkhouse retains integrity of materials.
Workmanship— Because the Bunkhouse retains the majority of its design and materials, it
retains integrity of workmanship from its original construction.
Feeling —Given the relationship of the Bunkhouse to key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex, it retains integrity of feeling.
Association —The Bunkhouse was constructed to house additional members of the Froom
family, and its primary occupant was Bill Froom's brother. Thus, the Bunkhouse retains
integrity of association.
29
16499
Eliqibilitv-While the Bunkhouse dates from the period of significance and retains integrity, and was
associated with the Froom family, this small building could have been used for a variety of purposes.
There is nothing in the design of the building that would indicate to the observer that the building
functioned as bunkhouse. Therefore, it does not appear to have been integral to dairy farm
functionality and is not a dairy farm specific building, but rather is a building that could have been
used in many agricultural and industrial operations, and thus does not appear individually eligible for
the National Register and California Register.
In addition, the Bunkhouse would not be eligible for the City Master List under Criterion B3 because
dairy use is not"closely associated with the building" given there is nothing in the design of the
Bunkhouse that indicates its dairy farm specific use.
Bunkhouse eligibility description in relation to Froom Ranch complex potential historic district is
described following the individual descriptions.
Old Barn (Attachment B; Images 61-68)
� _
_ . � `�"�
- •�'
__ S �; �;I��
t , � � ��� �
! � �.. {� ,..
.f'S i� � i. � � ,�. I 1'
.. �� F , , ,�p�> �-
� I • � i l �
�, .YJS.i.�f�'�,.:' �^_�,� • '!�
.��C � � :���,` .� �r�.
,.♦ _ Y'��':�°�1,'�'/ .. . . �.�.
.gw.. -
Description and Character-Defininq Features-The CountyAssessor's building record indicates
the Barn (Old Barn)was constructed in 1900, and measures approximately 40 feet by 32 feet. The
building has a concrete floor, vertical wood siding, and a gabled roof clad in corrugated metal. It was
reportedly moved to the present location prior to 1949. On the east elevation, the building has a set
of wood sliding doors at the ground level, with a door to the hayloft located directly above it.
Alterations-The Old Barn has been altered numerous times, particularly at the interior. One visible
alteration is replaced vertical wood siding on the west elevation. The roof has likely been replaced.
Condition -The Old Barn appears to be structurally sound, but most of the exterior paint has
weathered away. Therefore, the building is in fair condition.
Inteqritv Analvsis-The Old Barn retains integrity as described below:
Location -Though the Old Barn was not originally constructed where it is today, it was
relocated during the period of significance, giving this building sufficient integrity of location.
Design -A simple building in design and plan, its character-defining features are its
vertical wood siding, and gabled roof clad in corrugated metal.As the building retains these
features it retains integrity of design.
Setting-The Old Barn maintains its relationship to the key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex, and thus retains integrity of setting.
30
16500
Materials-The materials of the Old Barn have been replaced throughout its history. The Old
Barn does not retain integrity of materials.
Workmanship-Since the Old Barn was moved to the present site, and its materials have
been replaced, the barn does not retain integrity of workmanship.
Feeling -Given the relationship of the Old Barn to other key buildings and structures in the
Froom Ranch complex, it retains integrity of feeling.
Association -The Old Barn retains its association with daily operations of the dairy farm,
and thus retains integrity of association.
Eliqibilitv-While the Old Barn dates from the period of significance and retains integrity, and was
associated with dairy farm operations, unlike the Dairy Barn which was designed specifically to
accommodate dairy use, this specific barn is utilitarian in nature and could function as a barn or
storage building for any agricultural or industrial use, as evidenced by the fact that it was moved
from another site. There is nothing in the design of this barn that is integral to dairy farm functionality.
Therefore, it does not appear to have been integral to dairy farm functionality and is not a dairy farm
specific building, but rather is a building that could have been used in many agricultural and
industrial operations, and thus does not appear individually eligible for the National Register and
California Register.
In addition, the Old Barn would not be eligible for the City Master List under Criterion B3 because
dairy use is not"closely associated with the building" given there is nothing in the design of the Old
Barn that indicates its dairy farm specific use.
Old Barn eligibility description in relation to Froom Ranch complex potential historic district is
described following the individual descriptions.
Outhouse (Attachment B; Image 69)
��. - _ _ _ I �_.�=.
� Fr-,-t ---- `•�.
� '
� � ,
� F � , y - - ; _,
� � _�.- -_ f
�_� � -
�E . _._ �-
� -- -__�`-��, �
_ �-. _ � ���.
- ����-.
- .� i���'����� �"F - ',�V
Description and Character-Defininq Features-The Outhouse is located west of the Old Barn and
has an unknown date of construction. It is a one-story rectangular building asymmetrical in plan. The
building has horizontal (tongue and groove)wood siding, and a gabled roof with a shed roof
extension on the east. The roof is clad in wood shingles. The restroom has a wood entry door with a
half moon cutout. East of the restroom is a small wood porch. The building was originally designed
as a parking kiosk, and was located in downtown San Luis Obispo. John Madonna had the building
moved to its current location and altered to becomea restroom. The building was placed where it is
because of its proximity to an existing septic tank. The outhouse is less than 50 years old.
31
16501
Alterations-When it was moved to Froom Ranch, the former parking kiosk was converted to an
outhouse. There have not been any significant alterations since.
Condition -The building is in fair condition.
Inteqritv Analysis -No integrity analysis is required because the Outhouse was constructed after
the period of significance.
Eliqibility-The Outhouse was constructed after the period of significance, and was moved to its
current location from an offsite location. Upon relocation the structure was converted into a restroom,
therefore, the building does not appear eligible for the National Register, California Register, or City's
Master List.
Storage Building (Attachment B; Image 70)
��, �
..;r-�_�����-�'.
- - ' ��-
�`-����-�� �� � �`
-.. .� �. � ; � �
�: -
_ _ , � - ��
� --� �� �
Description and Character-Defininq Features-The Storage Building is located north of the Old
Barn and has an unknown date of construction. It is a one-story rectangular building asymmetrical in
plan. The building lacks a foundation, and has vertical (T1-11) plywood siding, and a gabled roof clad
in wood shingles. The building has an entry door centered on the south elevation, and aluminum
windows on the east and west elevations. John Madonna acquired the building from a friend and
moved it to its current location. The County Assessor building records do not document this building;
therefore, it appears to be less than 50 years old.
Alterations-There do not appear to have been any significant alterations to the Storage Building.
Condition -The building is in good condition.
Inteqritv Analysis - No integrity analysis is required because the Storage Building was constructed
after the period of significance.
Eliqibilitv-The Storage Building was constructed after the period of significance, therefore, the
building does not appear eligible for the National Register, California Register, or City's Master List.
32
16502
Cell Tower (Attachment B; Image 71)
�
�
�
.�, '`'`*- :, r
'�-� ,, . r
r,, ^a�;;
t� � —�� �
�- ���`
, . i'i�� , ��#tAF�,}t
r _.
. � �r
Description and Character-Defininq Features-The Cell Tower is located north of the Granary
and was constructed within the last five years by Verizon Wireless.At first glance the Cell Tower
appears to be a water tower, an intentional design choice to make the Cell Tower blend in with the
surrounding architecture. The base of the tower is composed of inetal posts. On top of the beams is
a metal base that supports a circular, metal barrel with a dome-shaped roof. The metal barrel is
finished to give the appearance of wood with metal rings. The Cell Tower is surrounded by a fence
comprised of vertical wood boards.
Alterations-There have not been any alterations to the Cell Tower.
Condition -The structure is in good condition.
Inteqritv Analysis-No integrity analysis is required because the Cell Tower was constructed after
the period of significance.
Eliqibilitv-The Cell Tower was constructed after the period of significance, therefore, the building
does not appear eligible for the National Register, California Register, or City Master List.
33
16503
Eligibility Summary
The following table summarizes the findings regarding the 10 buildings/structures present on the
site:
SUMMARY OF ELIGIBILITY
BUILDING/ NATIONAL CALIFORNIA LOCAL
STRUCTURE REGISTER REGISTER
(Individually Eligible (Individually Eligible (Individually Eligible
or as Contributor to or as Contributor to or as Contributor to
Historic District Historic District Historic District
Main Residence Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible:
Criteria A& B Criteria 1 & 2 Criteria B1 b, B3a,
A2a)
Primary Contributor* Primary Contributor to
to Historic District Historic District Primary Contributor to
Historic District
Creamery Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible:
Criteria A& B & C Criteria 1 & 2 & 3 Criteria B1 b, B3a,
A1c)
Primary Contributor* Primary Contributor to
to Historic District Historic District Primary Contributor to
Historic District
Dairy Barn Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible:
Criteria A& B & C Criteria 1 & 2 & 3 Criteria B1 b, B3a,
A1c)
Primary Contributor* Primary Contributor to
to Historic District Historic District Primary Contributor to
Historic District
Granary Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible: Individually Eligible:
Criteria A& B & C Criteria 1 & 2 & 3 Criteria B1 b, B3a,
A1 c)
Primary Contributor* Primary Contributor to
to Historic District Historic District Primary Contributor to
Historic District
Shed Not individually Not individually eligible Not individually
eligible eligible
Secondary Secondary Secondary
Contributor*to Historic Contributor* to Historic Contributor* to Historic
District District District
Bunkhouse Not individually Not individually eligible Not individually
eligible eligible
Secondary Secondary Secondary
Contributor*to Historic Contributor* to Historic Contributor* to Historic
District District District
34
16504
SUMMARY OF ELIGIBILITY
BUILDING/ NATIONAL CALIFORNIA LOCAL
STRUCTURE REGISTER REGISTER
(Individually Eligible (Individually Eligible (Individually Eligible
or as Contributor to or as Contributor to or as Contributor to
Historic District Historic District Historic District
Old Barn Not individually Not individually eligible Not individually
eligible eligible
Secondary Secondary Secondary
Contributor*to Historic Contributor* to Historic Contributor* to Historic
District District District
Outhouse Not Individually Not individually eligible Not individually
Eligible eligible
Not Contributor to
Not Contributor to District Not Contributor to
District District
Storage Building Not Individually Not Individually Not individually
Eligible Eligible eligible
Not A Contributor to Not Contributor to Not Contributor to
District District District
Cell Tower Not Individually Not Individually Not individually
Eligible Eligible eligible
Not Contributor to Not Contributor to Not Contributor to
District District District
Historic District District Eligible: District Eligible: District Eligible
Criteria A, B & C Criteria 1, 2 & 3
'Primary Contributor is defined as an individually eligible historic resource.
'*Secondary Contributors are not individually eligible historic resources and are not integral to dairy farm
functionalit , but date to the period of si nificance and contribute to the settin .
Froom Ranch Complex
Description and Character-Defininq Features-The Froom Ranch complex occupies
approximately 2.9 acres in the northern portion of the approximately 109.7-acre subject property and
includes 10 buildings and structures: Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed,
Bunkhouse, Old Barn, Outhouse, Storage Building, and Cell Tower. Of these 10 structures, seven
were constructed during the period of significance: the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn,
Granary, Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn. Four buildings which are individually eligible as historic
resources are considered primary contributors, as they are individually eligible historic resources:
Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary. Three buildings are considered secondary
contributors, as they are not individually eligible historic resources and are not integral to dairy farm
functionality, but date to the period of significance and contribute to the setting: Shed, Bunkhouse,
and Old Barn. The character-defining features of these seven contributors are described in the
individual building descriptions. The Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, while they provide a context
for the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary, are not necessary to convey the
significance of the overall complex.
35
16505
The Froom Ranch complex's topography is moderately sloping and contains mostly non-native
grasses and weedy species. As such, the type of landscape and open space contributes to the
visual relationship between the buildings and is thus a character-defining feature.
The relationship of the four individually eligible buildings, the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy
Barn, and Granary within the Froom Ranch complex facilitated the dairy use. The Dairy Barn is at
the highest elevation and the Main Residence is at the lowest elevation. The Dairy Barn's curved
south elevation is located above the natural slope to facilitate movement of cow manure, and
conveys its relationship to the dairy industry. The Creamery's location east and slightly downhill from
the Dairy Barn also facilitated the milking of cows and other creamery tasks. The Main Residence's
location east of the Creamery, and downhill from the Dairy Barn, was strategic for work purposes,
but also maintained a level of distance for domestic comfort. The relationship of the Main Residence,
Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary, in terms of form and use is critical in conveying the significance
of the Froom Ranch complex.
Thus, the existence, orientation, horizontal and vertical relationship of the Main Residence,
Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary and the relative open space and minimally landscaped setting
are character-defining features of the Froom Ranch complex.
Alterations— Refer to the individual building descriptions for alterations.
Inteqritv Analysis—The Froom Ranch complex retains integrity as described below:
Location —The spatial relationship of the four primary contributors is a critical character-
defining feature of the Froom Ranch complex, and has not changed over time. They thus
retain integrity of location. The spatial relationship between the three secondary contributors
and the four primary contributors is not character-defining, since these buildings could have
been located elsewhere within the complex without altering the functionality of the dairy farm.
Although the relationship between the secondary and primary contributors is not character-
defining, the location of the secondary contributors has not changed over time. The Froom
Ranch complex therefore retains integrity of location.
Design —The Froom Ranch complex retains its character-defining features and key
geographic and structural relationships, and thus integrity of design.
Setting—The Froom Ranch complex maintains the orientation of its buildings and
structures, particularly the relationship between the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn,
and Granary. The Froom Ranch complex thus retains integrity of setting.
Materials—While overall condition ranges from good to poor, the Main Residence,
Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed, and Bunkhouse all retain the majority of their historic
material. The Old Barn retains the majority of its siding but the interior has been heavily
altered. Thus, while the Froom Ranch complex has lost some historic material, it retains the
majority of its historic material and thus integrity of material.
Workmanship—While the Froom Ranch complex has lost historic material, the majority of
its design and materials, particularly exhibited in the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn,
and Granary retain integrity of workmanship from the time of original construction. Therefore,
the Froom Ranch complex retains integrity of workmanship.
Feeling —Given the retained relationships, particularly exhibited by the primary contributors,
the Froom Ranch complex retains integrity of feeling.
36
16506
Association -As the four primary contributors, Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and
Granary and three secondary contributors, Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, within the
Froom Ranch complex, are associated with the Froom family and the dairy industry, the
complex retains integrity of association with dairy operations and Froom family.
Eliqibility-The Froom Ranch complex "possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity
of site, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical
developmenY' in terms of its association with dairy farm operations. The Froom Ranch complex also
retains integrity and each contributor(Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed,
Bunkhouse, and Old Barn) dates from the period of significance. The Main Residence (individually
eligible for National Register(Criteria A& B) and California Register(Criteria 1 & 2), Creamery
(individually eligible for National Register(Criteria A, B & C) and California Register(Criteria 1, 2, &
3), Dairy Barn (individually eligible for National Register (Criteria A, B & C) and California Register
(Criteria 1, 2, & 3), and Granary(individually eligible for National Register(Criteria A, B & C) and
California Register(Criteria 1, 2, & 3), are primary contributors to the Froom Ranch complex. The
Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn because they are not individually eligible historic resources and are
not integral to dairy farm functionality, but date to the period of significance and contribute to the
setting, are secondary contributors. Therefore, the Froom Ranch complex is eligible as a National
Register and California Register historic district.
The Main Residence (individually eligible for City Master List under Criteria B1 b, B3a &A2a),
Creamery(individually eligible for City Master List under Criteria B1 b, B3a &A1 c), Dairy Barn
(individually eligible for City Master List under Criteria B1 b, B3a &A1c), and Granary (individually
eligible for City Master List under Criteria B1 b, B3a &A1c), are primary contributors to the Froom
Ranch complex. The Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, as they are not individually eligible historic
resources and are not integral to dairy farm functionality, but date to the period of significance and
contribute to the setting, are secondary contributors. Therefore, the Froom Ranch complex is eligible
as a City Master List historic district.
37
16507
Page intentionally left blank
38
16508
V. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
According to the CEQA Guidelines (§15064.5 (b)(3)), "Generally, a project that follows the Secretary
of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving,
Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and
Grimmer, shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the historical
resource."
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Secretary's
Standards) contains four treatments for historic properties. The Secretary's Standards are
promulgated pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq. and provide
general guidance on treatments for historical resources and their immediate surroundings or setting.
State environmental law utilizes the Secretary's Standards as a means of evaluating proposed
projects and potential impacts on historical resources. A project that conforms with the Secretary's
Standards has a less than significant impact under CEQA.
The Secretary's Standards are not prescriptive or technical, but"are intended to promote
responsible preservation practices" and "provide a consistent philosophical approach" to treatments
for historical resources.24 NPS identifies four treatment approaches, which include preservation,
rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. These treatments, in hierarchical order, are defined as
fol lows:
The first treatment, Preservation, is defined as,
the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, integrity, and
materials of an historic property. Work, including preliminary measures to protect and
stabilize the property, generally focuses upon the ongoing maintenance and repair of historic
materials and features rather than extensive replacement and new construction. New
exterior additions are not within the scope of this treatment; however, the limited and
sensitive upgrading of inechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and other code-required
work to make properties functional is appropriate within a preservation project.z5
The second treatment, Rehabilitation, is defined as,
the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair,
alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its
historical, cultural, or architectural values.z6
The third treatment, Restoration, is defined as,
the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it
appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other
periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. The
limited and sensitive upgrading of inechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and other
code required work to make properties functional is appropriate within a restoration project.27
24 Grimmer, 3.
25 Ibid., 27.
26 Ibid., 75
27 Ibid., 163
39
16509
The fourth treatment, Reconstruction, is defined as,
the act or process of depicting, by means of new construction, the form, features, and
detailing of a non-surviving site, landscape, building, structure, or object for the purpose of
replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location.28
As the Secretary's Standards are not intended to be prescriptive, they are intended to be flexible and
adaptable to specific project conditions to balance continuity and change while retaining historic
building fabric to the maximum extent feasible. Their interpretation requires exercise of professional
judgment and balance of the various opportunities and constraints of any given project based on
use, materials retention and treatment, and compatibility of new construction. Not every standard
necessarily applies to every aspect of a project, nor is it necessary to comply with every standard to
achieve conformance.
The proposed work involves rehabilitation and reconstruction.
The Rehabilitation Standards are as follows:
1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal
change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.
2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive
materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a
property will be avoided.
3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes
that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or
elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken.
4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be
retained and preserved.
5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old
in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features
will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means
possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.
8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be
disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic
materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work
will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features,
size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its
environment.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner
that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
environment will be unimpaired.
The Reconstruction Standards are:
1. Reconstruction will be used to depict vanished or non-surviving portions of a property when
documentary and physical evidence is available to permit accurate reconstruction with
28 Ibid., 225.
40
16510
minimal conjecture, and such reconstruction is essential to the public understanding of the
property.
2. Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure, or object in its historic location will be
preceded by a thorough archeological investigation to identify and evaluate those features
and artifacts which are essential to an accurate reconstruction. If such resources must be
disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
3. Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any remaining historic materials, features,
and spatial relationships.
4. Reconstruction will be based on the accurate duplication of historic features and elements
substantiated by documentary or physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the
availability of different features from other historic properties. A reconstructed property will
re-create the appearance of the non-surviving historic property in materials, design, color,
and texture.
5. A reconstruction will be clearly identified as a contemporary re-creation.
6. Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed.
Compliance with the Secretary's Standards indicates that a project may have a less than significant
impact on an historical resource. The converse of this does not hold; that is, failure to comply with
the Secretary's Standards is not, by definition, a significant impact under CEQA.
According to CEQA Guidelines, a project would result in a significant impact to historical resources if
it would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource as defined
in §15064.5(b). "Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means the
physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate
surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired"
(CEQA Guidelines §15064.5 (b)(1)). The CEQA Guidelines (§15064.5 (b)(2))describe material
impairment taking place when a project:
A) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics
of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its
inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register... or
B) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics
that account for its inclusion in a local register... or its identification in an historical
resources survey... unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project
establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or
culturally significant; or
C) Demolishes or materially alters those physical characteristics of an historical
resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or
eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register... as determined by a lead agency for
the purposes of CEQA.
41
16511
Page intentionally left blank
42
16512
VI. PROJECT DESCRIPTION, IMPACTS ANALYSIS, AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is the Froom Ranch Specific Plan which includes a development proposal for
the approximately 109.7-acre site with a mix of land uses including residential, commercial, park and
open space. The proposed project also includes the dedication of approximately 3.6 acres of the
subject property to the City as the Froom Ranch Trailhead Public Park (Park). The Park would
consist of approximately 2.9 acres of space for park facilities, and approximately 0.7 acres of open
space including a drainage channel. Within the Park, the primary historic resources existing on the
subject property would be retained and adaptively reused: Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn,
and Granary. The Main Residence would be relocated and rehabilitated, and the Creamery, Dairy
Barn, and Granary would be disassembled, relocated, and reconstructed. Secondary historic
resources existing on the subject property would be demolished: Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn,
Non-historic resources on the subject property with the exception of the Cell Tower would also be
demolished: Storage Building, and Outhouse.
Due to the presence of a trace of the Los Osos fault which runs beneath the Dairy Barn, the
proposed project would reconstruct and relocate the Dairy Barn at a new location slightly downhill
and to the east, which is outside of the required setback from the fault. The Main Residence and
Creamery would also be relocated, both further to the east to maintain their same relative horizontal
spacing in relation to the Dairy Barn. To maintain the visual hierarchy of these three buildings, grade
changes would be created between them to mimic their existing vertical relationship. The Granary
would be relocated proximate to the Dairy Barn to maintain a functional relationship.
The following includes a summary of proposed work to the Froom Ranch complex potential historic
district, Main Residence rehabilitation, and Dairy Barn, Creamery, and Granary reconstruction.
Review of the proposed project is based on the FirstCarbon Solutions HRA, "Analysis of Historic
Structures at Froom Ranch" report (Stork, Wolfe, &Associates, 2017), and as-builts, existing,
proposed and composite site plans and sections, and renderings from RRM Design Group.
Proposed Froom Ranch Trailhead Public Park
The "Tea Stain Map" contained in Attachment F shows the Froom Ranch complex located along the
northern boundary on a relatively small portion of the overall Froom Ranch Specific Plan area. The
proposed siting of the four primary historic resources would retain on-site and off-site views of these
structures with a similar horizontal and vertical relationship to one another that now exists.
Interpretive and directional signs are proposed throughout the Park to educate and direct visitors. A
commercial building would be located north of the Main Residence, and a surface parking lot would
be located to the north and west of the Dairy Barn. These features would be designed to
complement historic resources and not detract from the natural and cultural setting as visitors
approach the Park.
Main Residence, Creamerv, Dairv Barn, and Granarv
Because a portion of the Dairy Barn is currently located above a trace of the Los Osos fault, the four
primary contributing structures, the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary would be
relocated down slope to the east. The existing relative horizontal configuration between each of
them would be retained. As such, the Main Residence would move approximately 224 feet, the
Creamery approximately 215 feet, and the Dairy Barn approximately 222 feet to the east. The
Granary would be located proximate to the Dairy Barn. The compass orientation of each building
remains relatively the same, as each building would be shifted in the same direction.
43
16513
The grade would change between the four structures to mimic the vertical proportions of their
existing relationships and improve accessibility. The Main Residence is currently at an elevation of
approximately 127 feet and would be at an elevation of approximately 130 feet, the Creamery is
currently at an elevation of approximately 136 feet and would be at an elevation of approximately
137 feet, and the Dairy Barn is currently at an elevation of approximately 142.5 feet and would be at
an elevation of approximately 142 feet. The Granary would be located at an elevation proximate to
the Dairy Barn. While the overall vertical relationship would slightly change, the relationship of the
Main Residence at the lowest elevation, the Dairy Barn and Granary at the highest elevation, and
the Creamery in between would be retained.
Landscaping would consist of low-growing and drought tolerant native grasses in keeping with the
historic setting and to avoid detracting from its historic interpretation. The relocated or a new palm
tree would be planted proximate the east elevation of the Main Residence.
Main Residence
The Main Residence would be relocated and rehabilitated. The proposed use is currently unknown,
and final details would be developed in consultation with the City Parks and Recreation Department.
The proposed work would maintain all character-defining features, including the single-story,
asymmetrical massing, horizontal (shiplap)wood siding, slightly inset front porch, and hipped roof
with a front-facing gable with wood shingles, and modest eave overhang. The existing front wood
stoop would be reconstructed, and a sloped walk, ramp or lift would provide accessibility, preferably
on a secondary elevation. The palm tree would be relocated, or a new palm tree would be planted
proximate to the east elevation. The non-significant addition at the northwest corner would be
removed, and replaced with a plaza. This plaza would contain an interpretive sign that provides
information on building history and function, and could also incorporate decorative paving, public art,
bike racks, and benches and/or a seat wall.
The Main Residence scope of work includes:
• New foundation would be installed.
• Plywood over existing 1x skip sheathing at the roof and new wood shingle roof cladding
would be added.
• Floor joists would be doubled up (sistered).
• Interior plywood shear walls would be added.
• New mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems would be installed.
Creamery
The Creamery would be reconstructed and relocated. The proposed use would be restrooms in the
west portion and a picnic shelter in the east portion.
The proposed work would reconstruct all character-defining features, including asymmetrical form,
combination of horizontal and vertical (board and batten)wood siding, and wood shingled roofs. The
non-significant addition at the northeast corner would be removed. A plaza is proposed at the
northwest corner and would contain an interpretive sign that provides information on building history
and function, and could also incorporate decorative paving, public art, bike racks, and benches
and/or a seat wall.
The Creamery scope of work includes:
• New wood foundation would be installed.
44
16514
• New concrete floor would be installed.
• New wood stud walls, plywood and exterior siding would be replaced.
• New wood roof framing and wood shingle roof cladding would be installed.
• New mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems would be installed.
The proposed work would reconstruct the Creamery using new in-kind materials in the same exterior
form and dimension as the existing historic building. The west portion would be fully finished on the
interior. The east portion includes interpretive "ghost" elements29, where walls, fenestration, and roof
are framed but not cladded.
Dairy Barn
The Dairy Barn would be reconstructed and relocated. The proposed use would be a multi-purpose
space. The proposed work would include a plaza at the north elevation of the building. This plaza
would contain an interpretive sign that provides information on building history and function, and
could also incorporate decorative paving, public art, bike racks, and benches and/or a seat wall.
The proposed work would reconstruct all character-defining features, including the rounded south
elevation atop a slope, vertical wood siding, and wood shingled roof. The structure would not be fully
finished and would have open beams without insulation or interior wall finishes such as drywall.
The Dairy Barn scope of work includes:
• New foundation would be installed.
• New concrete floor would be installed.
• New wood stud walls, plywood and exterior siding would be replaced.
• New wood roof framing and wood shingle roof cladding would be installed.
• New mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems would be installed.
• Additional wood diagonal bracing would be installed.
Granary
The Granary would be reconstructed and relocated. The proposed use would be storage space.
The proposed work would reconstruct all character-defining features, including the wood pier
foundation, doubled walled with vertical tongue-and-groove wood siding, and front-gabled
moderately pitched roof.
The Granary scope of work includes:
• New foundation would be installed.
• New concrete floor would be installed.
• New stud walls, plywood, interior and exterior siding would be replaced.
• New roof framing and roof cladding would be installed.
• New mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems would be installed.
29"Ghost"elements or"ghost structures,"such as the Benjamin Franklin Museum and Franklin Court in
Philadeliphia, where"ghosY'reconstructions of the form of the house and print shop interpret these lost buildings. The
reconstructions often take the form of steel beams that mimick the structural dimensions of the lost buildings.
45
16515
Storaqe Buildinq and Outhouse
Two non-contributors, Storage Building and Outhouse, would be demolished; one non-contributor,
the Cell Tower, would be retained.
Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn
The three secondary contributors, Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, would be demolished.
IMPACTS ANALYSIS
The following is an evaluation of the proposed project for conformance with the Rehabilitation
Standards for the Main Residence, and the Reconstruction Standards for the Creamery, Dairy Barn,
and Granary. The relocation of the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary would
utilize methodology contained in "Moving Historic Buildings," (1979), John Obed Curtis is published
by NPS (Attachment H).
Individual Resource Impacts - Primary Contributors: Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn,
and Granary
The proposed work involves relocating the four primary contributing historic buildings, the Main
Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary, within the Park. Each of the four buildings have
unique characteristics, and different structural and condition issues. As the Main Residence is in
good condition, the appropriate treatment is rehabilitation, defined as the "process of returning a
property to a state of utility...while preserving those portions and features of the property which are
significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values."30 As the Creamery, Dairy Barn, and
Granary are in poor condition, the appropriate treatment is reconstruction, defined as the "process of
depicting, by means of new construction, the form, features, and detailing of a non-surviving site,
landscape, building, structure, or object for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific
period of time and its historic location.'°31
Main Residence
As further explained below, the proposed work is found to conform with the Secretary's Standards
with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1, 2, and 5:
Secreta 's Standards for Rehabilitation Conformance
Standard 1
A property will be used as it was historically or be given In conformance with Standard 1,the proposed work
a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive requires minimal change to the distinctive materials and
materials,features, spaces, and spatial relationships. features of the historic building, including horizontal
massing, a hipped roof,wood horizontal siding,
projecting partial width front porch with a front-facing
gable roof, and wood double-hung windows.As the use
is currently unknown, no change to the interior spaces
is proposed.The spatial relationships between the Main
Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary will be
retained.
The proposed work to the Main Residence would be in
conformance with Standard 1 with implementation of
Mitigation Measure 2 which is designed to document
existing appearance.
3o Grimmer, 75
31 Ibid., 225.
46
16516
Secreta 's Standards for Rehabilitation Conformance
Standard 2
The historic character of a property will be retained and In conformance with Standard 2,the proposed work
preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or retains historic character by preserving historic
alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships materials that characterize the subject property.The
that characterize a property will be avoided. proposed work includes removal of the non-significant
addition at the northwest corner, retention of late Queen
Anne Cottage characteristics, and reconstruct the
existing wood vertical board skirt and front concrete
stoop in-kind.
Standard 3
Each property will be recognized as a physical record of In conformance with Standard 3,the proposed work
its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false would not create a false sense of historical
sense of historical development, such as adding development, as the proposed work would not
conjectural features or elements from other historic introduce new materials, and the original design would
properties,will not be undertaken. be retained.While there would be a new foundation, it
was not identified as character-defining.
Standard 4
Changes to a property that have acquired historic With the exception of the porch infill at the south
significance in their own right will be retained and elevation which appears to be an alteration that has
preserved. taken on significance, no other changes and alterations
have acquired significance,thus the proposed work
would be in conformance with Standard 4.
Standard 5
Distinctive materials,features,finishes, and In conformance with Standard 5,the proposed work
construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship would not alter distinctive materials,features,finishes,
that characterize a property will be preserved. or construction techniques that characterize the
property. The construction of a new foundation is
necessary to ensure the structural soundness of the
building.With the exception of the reconstructed wood
vertical board skirt and concrete front stoop, historic
materials would be retained.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 5 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1
which is designed to ensure compliance with the
Secretary's Standards from design through
construction.
Standard 6
Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather In conformance with Standard 6, deteriorated historic
than replaced.Where the severity of deterioration features would be repaired.Where features are
requires replacement of a distinctive feature,the new deteriorated beyond repaired,they would be replaced
feature will match the old in design, color,texture, and, in-kind to match the existing.
where possible, materials. Replacement of missing
features will be substantiated by documentary and
physical evidence.
Standard 7
Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be In conformance with Standard 7, physical treatments
undertaken using the gentlest means possible. would use the gentlest means possible and would not
Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will damage historic materials.
not be used.
Standard 8
Archeological resources will be protected and FirstCarbon Solutions completed a thorough
preserved in place. If such resources must be archeological investigation of the subject property in
disturbed, miti ation measures will be undertaken. 2015,which was later updated in 2017, and concluded
47
16517
Secreta 's Standards for Rehabilitation Conformance
the proposed work does not disturb archeological
resources.
Standard 9
New additions, exterior alterations, or related new In conformance with Standard 9, proposed work does
construction will not destroy historic materials,features, not include new additions, exterior alterations, or
and spatial relationships that characterize the property. related new construction. New construction is proposed
The new work will be differentiated from the old and will proximate to the north elevation of the Main Residence.
be compatible with the historic materials,features, size,
scale and proportion, and massing to protect the The proposed new construction would be in
integrity of the property and its environment. conformance with Standard 9 with implementation of
Mitigation Measure 5 which is designed to ensure
compliance with the Secretary's Standards from design
through construction.
Standard 10
New additions and adjacent or related new construction In conformance with Standard 10, proposed work would
will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in not include new additions.
the future,the essential form and integrity of the historic
property and its environment will be unimpaired.
The proposed work on the Main Residence is in conformance with the Secretary's Standards as
noted above. Mitigation Measures 1 and 5 are required to ensure impacts are mitigated to a level of
less than a significant impact on the historical resource.
Creamery
As further explained below, the proposed work is found to conform with the Secretary's Standards
with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1, 2, 3, and 4:
Secreta 's Standards for Reconstruction Conformance
Standard 1
Reconstruction will be used to depict vanished or non- In conformance with Standard 1, as reconstruction
surviving portions of a property when documentary and would be based on as-builts, physical evidence from
physical evidence is available to permit accurate on-site surveying,and historic and contemporary
reconstruction with minimal conjecture, and such photographs, minimal conjecture would occur. The non-
reconstruction is essential to the public understanding significant addition at the northeast corner of the east
of the property. portion would not be reconstructed. The west portion
would be reconstructed, and the east portion would
have ghost elements to match historic form and
dimension,with the intent of providing interpretation
while serving a contemporary use.
The proposed work to the Creamery would be in
conformance with Standard 1 with implementation of
Mitigation Measure 1 which is designed to ensure
compliance with the Secretary's Standards from design
through construction.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 1 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2
which is designed to document existing appearance.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 1 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3
which is designed to provide interpretation.
48
16518
Secreta 's Standards for Reconstruction Conformance
Standard 2
Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure,or In conformance with Standard 2, FirstCarbon Solutions
object in its historic location will be preceded by a completed a thorough archeological investigation of the
thorough archeological investigation to identify and subject property in 2015,which was later updated in
evaluate those features and artifacts which are 2017, and concluded the proposed work does not
essential to an accurate reconstruction. If such disturb archeological resources.
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will
be undertaken.
Standard 3
Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any As reconstruction would be based on as-builts, physical
remaining historic materials,features, and spatial evidence from on-site surveying, and historic and
relationships. contemporary photographs, minimal conjecture would
occur, and reconstruction would include measures to
preserve any remaining historic materials,features, and
spatial relationships. Therefore, proposed work would
be in conformance with Standard 3.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 3 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4
which is designed to reuse historic materials to the
greatest extent feasible.
Standard 4
Reconstruction will be based on the accurate In conformance with Standard 4, reconstruction would
duplication of historic features and elements be based on the accurate duplication of historic
substantiated by documentary or physical evidence features and elements substantiated by documentary or
rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or
different features from other historic properties.A the availability of different features from other historic
reconstructed property will re-create the appearance of properties.A reconstructed property would re-create
the non-surviving historic property in materials, design, the appearance of the non-surviving historic property in
color, and texture. materials, design, color, and texture. The west portion
would be reconstructed, and the east portion would
have ghost elements to match historic form and
dimension,with the intent of providing interpretation.
Standard 5
A reconstruction will be clearly identified as a In conformance with Standard 5, reconstruction would
contemporary re-creation. be identified as contemporary reconstruction due to a
combination of both traditional construction and ghost
elements. The ghost elements would assist in
identifying the Creamery as a reconstruction,while also
accentuating the most significant character-defining
feature of the building:the visual profile, composed of
irregularly shaped and asymmetrical massing.
Interpretative signage would provide information
regarding the history of the buildings while also
describing the reconstruction.
Standard 6
Designs that were never executed historically will not In conformance with Standard 6, designs that were
be constructed. never executed historically would not be constructed.
The proposed work on the Creamery is in conformance with the Secretary's Standards as noted
above. Mitigation Measures 1, 2, 3, and 4 are required to ensure impacts are mitigated to a level of
less than a significant impact on the historical resource.
49
16519
Dairy Barn
As further explained below, the proposed work is found to conform with the Secretary's Standards
with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1, 2, 3, and 4:
Secreta 's Standards for Reconstruction Conformance
Standard 1
Reconstruction will be used to depict vanished or non- In conformance with Standard 1, as reconstruction
surviving portions of a property when documentary and would be based on as-builts, physical evidence from
physical evidence is available to permit accurate on-site surveying,and historic and contemporary
reconstruction with minimal conjecture, and such photographs minimal conjecture would occur.
reconstruction is essential to the public understanding
of the property. The proposed work to the Dairy Barn would be in
conformance with Standard 1 with implementation of
Mitigation Measure 1 which is designed to ensure
compliance with the Secretary's Standards from design
through construction.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 1 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2
which is designed to document existing appearance.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 1 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3
which is designed to provide interpretation.
Standard 2
Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure,or In conformance with Standard 2, FirstCarbon Solutions
object in its historic location will be preceded by a completed a thorough archeological investigation of the
thorough archeological investigation to identify and subject property in 2015,which was later updated in
evaluate those features and artifacts which are 2017, and concluded the proposed work does not
essential to an accurate reconstruction. If such disturb archeological resources.
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will
be undertaken.
Standard 3
Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any As reconstruction would be based on as-builts, physical
remaining historic materials,features, and spatial evidence from on-site surveying, and historic and
relationships. contemporary photographs minimal conjecture would
occur, and reconstruction would include measures to
preserve any remaining historic materials,features, and
spatial relationships.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 3 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4
which is designed to reuse historic materials to the
greatest extent feasible.
Standard 4
Reconstruction will be based on the accurate In conformance with Standard 4, reconstruction would
duplication of historic features and elements be based on the accurate replication of historic features
substantiated by documentary or physical evidence and elements substantiated by documentary or physical
rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the
different features from other historic properties.A availability of different features from other historic
reconstructed property will re-create the appearance of properties. The reconstructed property would re-create
the non-surviving historic property in materials, design, the appearance of the non-surviving historic property in
color, and texture. materials, design, color, and texture.
Standard 5
A reconstruction will be clearly identified as a In conformance with Standard 5, reconstruction would
contem orar re-creation. be clearl identified as a contem orar re-creation.
50
16520
Secreta 's Standards for Reconstruction Conformance
Interpretative signage would also provide information
regarding the history of the buildings and their
reconstruction.
Standard 6
Designs that were never executed historically will not In conformance with Standard 6, designs that were
be constructed. never executed historically would not be constructed.
The proposed work on the Dairy Barn is in conformance with the Secretary's Standards as noted
above. Recommended Mitigation Measures 1, 2, 3, and 4 are required to ensure impacts are
mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the historical resource.
Granary
As further explained below, the proposed work is found to conform with the Secretary's Standards
with implementation of Recommended Mitigation Measures 1, 2, 3, and 4:
Secreta 's Standards for Reconstruction Conformance
Standard 1
Reconstruction will be used to depict vanished or non- In conformance with Standard 1, as reconstruction
surviving portions of a property when documentary and would be based on physical evidence from on-site
physical evidence is available to permit accurate surveying,and historic and contemporary photographs
reconstruction with minimal conjecture, and such minimal conjecture would occur.
reconstruction is essential to the public understanding
of the property. The proposed treatment to the Granary would be in
conformance with Standard 1 with implementation of
Mitigation Measure 1 which is designed to ensure
compliance with the Secretary's Standards from design
through construction.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 1 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2
which is designed to document existing appearance.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 1 with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3
which is designed to provide interpretation.
Standard 2
Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure,or In conformance with Standard 2, FirstCarbon Solutions
object in its historic location will be preceded by a completed a thorough archeological investigation of the
thorough archeological investigation to identify and subject property in 2015,which was later updated in
evaluate those features and artifacts which are 2017, and concluded the proposed work does not
essential to an accurate reconstruction. If such disturb archeological resources.
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will
be undertaken.
Standard 3
Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any As reconstruction would be based on physical evidence
remaining historic materials,features, and spatial from on-site surveying, and historic and contemporary
relationships. photographs minimal conjecture would occur, and
reconstruction would include measures to preserve any
remaining historic materials,features, and spatial
relationships.
The proposed work would be in conformance with
Standard 3 with im lementation of Miti ation Measure 4
51
16521
Secreta 's Standards for Reconstruction Conformance
which is designed to reuse historic materials to the
greatest extent feasible.
Standard 4
Reconstruction will be based on the accurate In conformance with Standard 4, reconstruction would
duplication of historic features and elements be based on the accurate duplication of historic
substantiated by documentary or physical evidence features and elements substantiated by documentary or
rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or
different features from other historic properties.A the availability of different features from other historic
reconstructed property will re-create the appearance of properties. The reconstructed property would re-create
the non-surviving historic property in materials, design, the appearance of the non-surviving historic property in
color, and texture. materials, desi n, color, and texture.
Standard 5
A reconstruction will be clearly identified as a In conformance with Standard 5, reconstruction would
contemporary re-creation. be accurate. Interpretative signage would provide
information regarding the history of the buildings and
their reconstruction.
Standard 6
Designs that were never executed historically will not In conformance with Standard 6, designs that were
be constructed. never executed historically would not be constructed.
The proposed work on the Granary is in conformance with the Secretary's Standards as noted
above. Mitigation Measures 1, 2, 3, and 4 are required to ensure impacts are mitigated to a level of
less than a significant impact on the historical resource.
Individual Resource Impacts - Secondary Contributors: Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn
The Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn where not found to be individually eligible historic resources.
Demolition of these structures would therefore not result in a significant historical resource impact.
Individual Resource Impacts - Non-Contributors: Storaqe Buildinq, Outhouse, and Cell Tower
As the Storage Building and Outhouse are non-contributors built outside the period of significance,
and thus do not have historic significance, their demolition will not result in a significant historical
resource impact. The Cell Tower would be retained.
Impacts - Potential Historic District- Froom Ranch Complex
The proposed work would retain the four individually eligible and thus primary contributing buildings
to the potential historic district (Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary) and their
contextual relationship through rehabilitation and reconstruction. However, the secondary
contributors would be demolished. The Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, while contributors to the
potential historic district, are not individually eligible and do not convey the same level of significance
as the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary. As such, they have been identified as
secondary contributors to the potential historic district. The Froom Ranch complex was identified as
eligible for listing as a potential National Register, California Register, and City Master List historic
district consisting of seven contributors, the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed,
Bunkhouse, and Old Barn. These contributors were all constructed during the period of significance
when it was in use as a dairy and when Bill Froom did his important work.
The proposed work would result in the loss of secondary contributors to the potential historic district,
the Shed, Bunkhouse, and Old Barn, and thus requires analysis of whether the proposed work would
52
16522
result in material impairment of the potential historic district and have an impact under CEQA. Under
CEQA, material impairment occurs when a project demolishes or materially alters in an adverse
manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance
and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the National Register, California Register,
or City Master List.
As detailed in the description of the Froom Ranch complex, the potential historic district's character-
defining features, which convey its historical significance are:
1. The existence, orientation, horizontal and vertical relationship of the Main Residence,
Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary.
2. The relative open space and minimally landscaped setting.
3. Although the secondary contributors were associated with dairy farm operations, they are not
individually eligible, were not integral to dairy farm functionality and are not dairy farm-
specific building types.
While the Froom Ranch complex would be regraded, the proposed work would maintain the
character-defining features, including the existence, orientation, relative horizontal and vertical
relationship of the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary, and the relative open space
and minimally landscaped setting. The viewshed from the Main Residence to the Creamery, Dairy
Barn, and Granary would also be retained, as it would remain at the lowest elevation, the Creamery
at the middle elevation, and the Dairy Barn and Granary at the highest elevation. The Main
Residence would be rehabilitated consistent with the Rehabilitation Standards of the Secretary's
Standards and the Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary would be reconstructed consistent with the
Reconstruction Standards of the Secretary's Standards. Demolition of the secondary contributors
would not affect the ability of the Froom Ranch complex to convey its significance of association with
the dairy industry and Bill Froom, or impact the architectural significance of the Main Residence
(local for Queen Anne style)or Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary (National, California Register
and locally eligible for vernacular architecture).
As the character-defining features of the potential historic district would not be impacted, and
therefore "those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical
significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for" listing would be retained, material
impairment would not occur and impacts to the potential historic district would be less than
significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
The proposed work to the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, and Granary has been found by a
qualified professional historic architect to be in conformance with the Secretary's Standards based
on the available plans, and as currently proposed the project would not result in a significant impact
to the potential historic district. In order to ensure conformance with the Secretary's Standards
through final design and construction, a measure for ongoing design review and construction
monitoring by a qualified professional historic architect is required, as set forth below. In addition, a
measure requiring Historic American Building Survey (HABS) documentation with respect to all
contributing buildings will provide contemporary photographs to document existing appearance. It is
industry practice when a portion of a potential historical resource is removed to prepare HABS
documentation to provide a high-quality record of the subject property before proposed work. There
are some historic photographs that document historic conditions, and HABS photographs would
supplement them. Additional measures are provided for interpretative signage and reuse or sale of
salvaged materials. These measures would ensure the proposed project has less-than-significant
53
16523
impact on the Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, and Froom Ranch complex and, if
agreeable, would be considered Applicant Proposed Measures.
1. Measure for Continued Design Collaboration and Construction Monitorinq
The Applicant shall continue to retain a qualified professional historic architect meeting the
Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (36 Code of Federal
Regulations Part 61)to review and comment on design and construction drawings and
monitor construction to ensure conformance with the Secretary's Standards. The role of the
historic architect shall include collaboration on a range of items relating to materials
selection, construction methods, design of exterior and interior alterations, and monitoring of
construction activities. The historic architect shall submit a report documenting continued
conformance with the Secretary's Standards to the City for review and approval prior to
issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. The historic architect shall
participate in a pre-construction meeting with the general contractor and subcontractors and
periodically monitor construction to completion of construction. The historic architect shall
notify the Applicant if any unforeseen circumstance arises during construction that could
potentially result in nonconformance with the Secretary's Standards. The historic architect
and Applicant shall resolve any unforeseen circumstance in a manner that conforms with the
Secretary's Standards.
The qualified professional historic architect shall work with Applicant team to ensure:
• Deteriorated historic features would be repaired to the greatest extent feasible. Where
features are deteriorated beyond repair, they would be replaced to exactly match the old.
• All character-defining features are retained.
• Physical treatments to historic material would use the gentlest means possible and would
not damage material.
• Reconstruction would be clearly identified as a contemporary re-creation.
• Interpretative signage would clearly provide information regarding the history of the
buildings and their reconstruction.
2. Measure for Historic American Buildinq Survey (HABS) Documentation
The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional photographer to prepare HABS Level II
documentation. This documentation shall record the existing appearance of all seven
contributing buildings in large and medium format HABS photographs. All documentation
components shall be completed in accordance with the Guidelines for Architectural and
Engineering Documentation (HABS standards). The photographs shall consist primarily of
large format, 4-inch by 5-inch, black and white negatives (one set), contact prints (one set)
and 8-inch by 10-inch prints (two sets), archivally processed and printed on fiber-based
paper. The set of original negatives shall be made at the time the photographs are taken.
The original, archivally-sound negatives and prints shall be and distributed as follows: (1) the
Library of Congress in Washington, DC through the National Park Service (one set of
negatives and contact prints). A digital copy of the HABS documentation shall be submitted
to the City. The draft documentation shall be assembled and submitted to the qualified
professional historic architect and the Applicant for review and approval prior to submittal to
the repository. The HABS documentation shall be completed prior to the start of proposed
work.
54
16524
3. Measure For Interpretation Of Froom Ranch Complex, includinq Primary and Secondary
Contributors
The Applicant shall work with the City to develop an interpretive project that documents the
potential historic district and its cultural and architectural heritage by means of a pamphlet.
This pamphlet will highlight the Froom Ranch complex, both primary and secondary
contributors, in a social (Froom family) and industrial (dairy industry) context, with an
emphasis on how these buildings were used on the dairy farm, and how this property relates
to the larger dairy farm context in both San Luis Obispo, Central Coast, and California. Five
hundred copies of the pamphlet shall be published. These professionally researched, written
and printed materials will be offered at no cost through the local museums and heritage
organizations, and at the Park. After the initial distribution of printed brochures, digital copies
shall be available. Throughout the Park interpretive signs that provide information on building
history and function (extant and demolished) shall also be incorporated.
4. Measure for Reuse or Sale of Historic Building Material
The Applicant shall reuse original material to the greatest extent feasible in the proposed
work on the primary contributors. The Applicant and historic architect shall work with the City
to prepare a marketing plan to offer to the public any salvaged historic materials not used
during rehabilitation and reconstruction of the primary contributors, and demolition of the
secondary contributors. As appropriate, unused or unretained historic materials will be
offered to local historical societies and museums, then offered to architectural recycling
before being disposed.
5. Measure for Desiqn Guidelines and Review of New Construction
The Applicant and historic architect shall prepare design guildlines and a review process for
new construction proximate to the Main Residence. New construction shall be undertaken in
such a manner that the essential form and integrity of the Main Residence and its setting
would be unimpaired. The design guidelines and review by City Community Development
Director shall ensure new construction is compatible with Main Residence in material,
features, size, scale and proportion, and massing.
With implementation of recommended mitigation measures, the proposed work on the Froom Ranch
complex, including rehabilitation, reconstruction, and relocation of four contributors to the identified
potential historic district, was found to conform with the Secretary's Standards. The effect of the loss
of secondary contributors was considered on eligibility of the potential historic district and was found
to not cause material impairment.
55
16525
Page intentionally left blank
56
16526
VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY
"California Farming Regions: The Central Coast and Southern California." Cuesa: Cultivating A
Healthy Food System. October 28, 2005. https://cuesa.org/article/california-farming-regions-
central-coast-and-southern-california.
County of San Luis Obispo Assessor. Miscellaneous Building Record. 1949, 1954, 1960, 1965.
County of San Luis Obispo Assessor. Residential Building Record. 1949, 1954, 1960, 1965, 1968,
1970.
Curtis, John Obed. "Moving Historic Buildings." National Park Service, 1979.
Dandekar, Hemalata C., Adrianna Jordan. "The Railroads and San Luis Obispo's Urban Form,"
Focus 8, no. 1, (2010): 46-55.
FirstCarbon Solutions. "Froom Ranch Specific Plan Historic Resource Assessment." July 21, 2017.
Grimmer, Anne E. "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties
with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstruction Historic
Buildings." Rev. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, 2017.
History of San Luis Obispo, California; with illustrations and biographical sketches of its prominent
men and pioneers. Oakland: Thompson &West, 1883.
H.R. Sinnard, H.P Ewalt, M.G. Huber, "Dairy Buildings," Extension Bulletin 711, Federal Cooperative
Extension Service, Oregon State College, November 1950, 4.
Lakovitch, Anna, and Richard Brandi and Richard Sucre, "Hagemann Ranch Historic District."
National Register designation form. November 30, 2007.
Livingston, D.S. A Good Life: dairy farming in the Olema Valley:a history of the dairy and beef
ranches of the Olema and Lagunitas Canyon. San Francisco: National Park Service,
Department of the Interior, 1995.
Raup, H.P. "The Italian-Swiss Dairymen of San Luis Obispo County, Ca."
Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 1 (1935): 3-8.
Steele, Catherine Baumgarten. "The Steele Brothers: Pioneer's in California's Great Dairy Industry."
California Historical Society Quarterly 20, no. 3 (1941) : 259-273.
Pulliam, A.L. "Farm Layout and Farmstead Planning." Federal Cooperative Extension Service,
Oregon State Col/ege, Extension Bulletin, 685, (1948) : 5-32.
National Register Bulletin #15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National
Park Service, 1990, revised 2002).
National Register. IV. How to Define Categories of Historic Properties. "District."
https://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb 15/nrb 15_4.htm#district.
57
16527
Page intenfionally left blank
58
16528
VIII. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Historic Images
Attachment B: Contemporary Images
Attachment C: Inspiration Images
Attachment D: Froom Ranch — Historical Buildings Cultural Heritage Committee Hearing
Drawing Package, November 14, 2017
Attachment E: Froom Ranch — Historical Buildings Cultural Heritage Committee Hearing
PowerPoint, August 28, 2017
Attachment F: Froom Ranch —County Assessor Records and Historical Buildings
Dimensions
Attachment G: "Analysis of Historic Structures at Froom Ranch," Stork, Wolfe &Associates,
June 30, 2017
Attachment H: "Moving Historic Buildings," National Park Service, John Obed Curtis, 1979
Attachment I: "Historical Evaluation for the Froom Ranch Building Complex," Bertrando and
Bertrando Research Consultants, March 14, 1998
59
16529
ATTACHMENT A:
HISTORIC IMAGES
16530
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTACHMErvT A: HISTORIC IMAGES
_, �' t � �
_.'�.
. .
, . ,
___ _-- �� �, � �-
- '' y.�''''"�' r
�- - � --�� �'� � _
_.�' � � �
4 �r . ..
- f r , - +d`�- ��;
r���'�rR t.� � . � � {
�' ��-
_. _ ��� _'F.i�o �
r � �� ,
• ' � '�`{G'ifF F :'II �� �� ��c.
� CENTERr.[hEE QF INGR�55 AN� �GRES`
4 :F�;:�tir r:-n l7[7C. N0. 201 p-C+5�;=
. �, ,�,-
'�•�+ F # ' . _.s
- �' .ti .. . � . .
� a
r�' �..- . . �
. f-1r �
�..:- ' 1�
-'� � �:�; �
Image 1: Aerial view of Froom Ranch complex (John Madonna archives)
. , r,.r��Y Y„ � ' _
'. ...+�:�.. r.�'�`t^:��+.r�..i .�3�- —
,� �. • . ^ ' r .. Y + �
�:. ' ' •
P�. _ { '�,,� f
;�. . ."� �'��" .��`���,�:��;;`y��,�'�-� �:F� ,�� [ 4
_ �.1,.�. -_ _���;.: _,; , , r,
.`;,F::
�� ,r�vy
-=,w=� =;::i'���� ;� � ... .: , -...
� y_ � h' . � r9. . ��
' ����������
� - ' '
� � u .. _ �
,� r;���',s�'� `+e ►.� ' � � .�ih aF N'!'r�,y�i►l�i�r i •�rr� µ � , • .. ,.
,� yi, • - I k r . ,
;�;: ,� n r��.. � � n �
�' _ � �'Ir'�', ��+:.� a�'�"�i -'�P-�� : '1,• '•�' �x ,�yLy,�-
�. 2 � � R � �,p� � �, !�
Image 2: Froom Ranch complex, view northwest (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16531
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTacHMENT A: HISTORIC IMAGES
`�_. ■� i,
s
.�� . ` s � � , y
��
r � ' - ���� � . ��t� .
_ � � - �
Image 3: Froom Ranch complex, view west (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
rr���
• �,
rw. �`�� Yw�� �-
M1�„��' '-.. ' � � :.,`�;«
. _ _ ,. ��. -
�' :�
� ,- ���+t..+, • ,� '
f� ���
"'TIti�,�� , � � �. ..
� R �
. ' ��' iA a �1 3 �.
1�'�� �� i� • � ��f � r .�.��a �
y,+����5. � `.`�� ,�r � ' . Slh I)
1'
���r ` ti s.
' � 7' �
..ia< ' • .sr , . . . .
Image 4: Froom Ranch complex, view west (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16532
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTacHMENT A: HISTORIC IMAGES
��
-�'�_ �
��� ' �
. .. ...�.- -_':��'�t --
�
, . _� ���
I .� } , ,�, � ; -.
�. 1[� . '� j , �c ...'•, . .,.'.�, -
�';�e'�t �1.� {•,. • .,j: ;�S �`� • i�[,;;��T
� � • ��� �..• ��'�:.� '
.;. � ,,.�� - ��;�.�:
. , � ��� . �..�
'� . ; '��y-��``,�, ;a�.'�'�.r:
�;•. , �.. �.
�;�:� �-����;. w. -,,;�.
s= �- �k�, -%�!-{_;a'- ,fi-
. y1� �-" P .•+� I i
y 4•
� '�. '� f� � _ �r
. ,�, -•���:
..�:,� p�
Image 5: Froom Ranch complex, view northwest (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
. � .
� .
l� ` 4�
\
,� y � � �
r.� � -~ y � .p: .� � ! -
i
�. - � � '�� ;� ��, �
�� ' c, .�sw-� s
� t � � _.y�'� �
� � a �, � � �, _,..ti. i.- �----_=-T. -' _'�-�'*_"'""_�`-�;� -
� - ,-� '� � �
��:. ;� , ..�.�.;,� _- . . . _
__-1-_.. - �=�, _ -
� - �: t � , _ _-:.
� �' � � , � �, , �����. r�,
:��`.
��.�''�t.�� -�.:•..
� r ir �r t -���. 'R,��:� .. � ' 'Ai - ,
���` � = � r� , .. - =�' '_
� - - -
- - - �� � _. -
Image 6: Shed, Creamery, and Dairy Barn, view northwest(Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16533
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTacHMENT A: HISTORIC IMAGES
`.'� •
� �., �
- - . � � ;
+ L ii� ; •���s. `-
,i -� * � -�--�"'' } 1 ' �i. ~ y _ ��� '� "� -
' t�� _
�:, ; ►! � + � �`•`' _� --�r• —�• -—•r r
�„�,�•• '`-t�_� ._ . _ _. � , ,.
.._�-,�:` I
��� . L " �' �`� �`� �.r,, � �
T- '.�.+� .: ` �:•Jj:,: "�� :r�,'. ::f ri::r:::
F i �.r�;•;'.�:. _-
' _.. y • �� •;�:�?'
, .• -
_ .:�� ,. � � _ -
` 'y } '�s� ' ':'f`'': ' �
.. � - �: � ... �';
� � � ����' - 1 tr
_ rr��- ---
.`
__
�
Image 7: Shed, Creamery, and Dairy Barn, view northwest (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
� ��!'� �, '�"�`��
Yy..7.•� � r � :-:�'"� ! .��—�
_.� .� ��x , _ _ T _ _.____� -
.. �. �. - � r� ■
;
� ���Y1s = �„� � �
�
3 +rM1�'.+4� ,�r�i�. ��� �= Y''" ��r ~� ��,� � �y,��¢�'
i r - . � ^ ' � +•r+' _ " '
� � _`��.: � . • ra.
.-. ` �' r , �. � � ti: ��: ;� • •
� � • _ �'r+y,. • . -. ^�'r". � � . ._.. '
� " .. �+... �.�~ � '-.. . 'e�'T'r^'�- �!'.�. .
� - ... . � � _ .. ..,� • _ - � J�Y�•°�'.. .
.Y.`• ' � . • ' '
, ., • .yt ...
�� Y . . i ' .
..�x . �. �_a .
� �t�
Image 8: Creamery and Main Residence, view southeast(Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16534
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTacHMENT A: HISTORIC IMAGES
# ; `� -, �. #��` . i,��'
�
r ' ti, • ,.,
-- � ' �, ;:� �, ��: ' _
',�,. ,���� ..��,:, "r
_ ��'" ' .,.r i'.i.��! •- f- •-r�_�A— -. -
_ ._ • f� ,.�^�'=•►L�r -
•7P�
--_ ':� - - �.�-::_. : ��- - _-�.s.�[ I � .
.. f�. 1 f
�.;�y. - ;� �. .
� j
_ _=... +�_ —. �,�_.�,� , :—: - .
- � .�. �::.v. �:� � �
�Y -- — �,x��-��,.��.�—. �:...,.�,;.,_
_ ��;��:�- _�. � _. ; � .
_��,.�^_,s-_.. -,r�r+.:r-x���,"'"'�-$- . --
� �.��/�A��Iq4' �31 _ ��•.�' — �.• _ ' � .. .. =1�r - . •
�_�h����.�. ' _ " " ; w"' . '�� +•�•�=� .
.^� M.A ��.' � �J L
�='e� � �' ...-:. ;: -.-. •.. . ��..,�rEr"'r.,- _- , t�= .
..-.L�Y .✓`'�'" - ' :. . � ^^-.�+b'.. M1��f'1;_ �..
.: _ 4 ���� �. ,g� . �r.. " ' _�� .. - . r
F J-~�+r�,:�"�• .!Y. �...Z''��' . Y . .i . ' _. 'tr-ti�..r
...5= .
. � ' �-• ' • � ` - + n1'� .
Image 9: Dairy Barn, view north (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
/ r
/ . ' -
I ' �
� `�
��� �,� - _ �Y -6. � . .... - 'a
. ,-� - � :••3: :�i: . - .-- - s E
~;��. - sr;�r- � '�-^�, .. "" ' . w '?� ,r . . � �..
.v�i�- . .r r-' •�• ... ` y � �- Sr '.-r _ -
�A - � ��� � � ~� -��x�7=�' � •-����+ ~ '�
'.a
fi ;�T . • -
.a��.-�� - ' �� ^� ^y ...
�:.;;,t.. � �,
�_�_ . , t - . '�`� . ' . �`� — . _ _
Y' i�'t::y 'te .i } . ' � .` .. � . "
Image 10: Creamery, view west (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16535
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTacHMENT A: HISTORIC IMAGES
�_�
�
�-
—
--_ - ��
+ ��
_ f
. - � �
r ^ _. -� .�
� + � ' ��Y �+m. `
��I _�-��� � � � �' , 4 � �4 i
� - l i
� � ., k `� y .
�� _ _ ',' � � _ F FI = � �
-� - -�. _ . . � , } ,
-_ �,; ,
4M � � � ��� '� � ! t
. � � e� 4 �
� �. _ � ' �� r�i 'i - : � '�y '�
•4 �� � ' l��
'+'k*er'' 1 _ ,. �'.� ���,�`� ..
� ' ; '�',
� 1e� ,:�� �•
; � . '��.`- ` __ � �
'� � •`�-'��� - .
. �� ;�',�'�ti ' �j'►, � ,'--- !
r. . �:.• s_
;.��. �,..
Image 11: Creamery, view southeast(Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
�� - -.-� �+ - �, --�. ;
� _..-J-I a ��, --
�,� ;� i F . --� .
�r I
� � : I � '
,'�� ��
:,�� � .��, �
r: .
� y �
, � ; �� � � �
:��,�w �r -��Y 1��� �rt:�� �� _
� � �"-'°'�: �s
.�
, ' �
.�'+V � �4 �-��� ...�1�'�� 1'. .L • ' '
1'
��' .Y •' � �� ' . . . !. ' . r ,�:�,•� .
'��` • .. , . � I-S,♦ S.,•
. • i. 7!� �"7 �''�:..
• _ 3'4�", ;�'',.Y'�
��..=•
. �
Image 12: Creamery, view south (Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16536
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTacHMENT A: HISTORIC IMAGES
, . ;r ,�',.
'i � w • ��y..,�, _ .� _
, yf yK�s� - ."+�,.��--
V . �{7 �,�' ' r riA
��.Irrl'i"�� ' '�V., �� .
•c
� �y'� �y,+ �'t
�
. r�I' .. . . � ..
f
���: �
. �
��
. E
=t,.. , � �.�.
y
Image 13: Main Residence, interior(Joan Sullivan archives, c1970s)
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16537
ATTACHMENT B:
CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
16538
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
�
'��� ��. � .
���,,�., .
-� ��'
., ,
�_ -
1:
,.
�; �;
��
�� �
__ �
� ��� :-,�" -�.° �-'��"��_ ""���
sI '��"' �: . .
g.
- ,. L a ..`'�.�: � _ ���."_ '
_� ' - - ` _ � ��II�'r`-
. � �" ' u��� —� � ��.��i� -� �` � �'�,'-� � �
w � �
.. �
, . , ' _
,
; .� ., s _
_ , ,
�. �, - � e ���i��; �—��0�, ,� =�, •�
� �- a I �. _
W�
Image 14: Froom Ranch complex, view northwest (Chattel, 2017)
�
�
{ �► , �� �: , _�
�i�`� ���i�; •-�y�." ''.:;. .�- f� �`�--:�.
� � ��"�ii .v___- A�` , �
'� �ii
�f f ��r
�:T y�' ..1�[' �'^ Y• •• _� ' .. �"
-1 � � i �.��`S: . `�r"�+�- v � ._ -
.�. • . � . -_ �. __ "
_N _ . •`�
-- ' _ -_'t �:`�6t. .
Image 15: Froom Ranch complex, view northwest (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16539
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—OveRa��
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
F
i. � i
� +
� f �
�
J?. '�
i.1 I .
- �.
- f ��r,, +` . .. �.
- ---- _ _ _�"�.��� �_� J� �
�r.� - -' - �.�+�'-?�: "* '.;, �� ��-' �� ti .; �ti
1 - - .r� � � '� � '� e� '
•.�;; . . 1 �_ .a;�.:a�-+�i.�.�wY,�„'i�:,�i�' r - -
. � . �� ..' � r� � s
.�n �:�3 r�. . <
. . #p:� .. < �... .7�:11��:'.� � �
. ' . . .�i: ' t• ..��r.. � ' , . ;
y(�� i ��....�:..� y'.
y:�i'.�-�,{''��' ���.'��_ a�;,.�: '�y'��.�a�
" . " . !F`! Y .�i'1n�.•�y'�'F.�� ..N' T .
� ' . . ' :'t'•".S':�•_•r� � • !:*� � 1�..
t:}, i
' .. ... _ ��.4�� � . �� �'� �I
..� , � y ` r £.
��As ;•S.i ' �..� �. � �� '�'{.
=� .F..• � " .i'
1 ,. i' i7 ',t. ,1,ti,}�, � �� ::L, ; _,!7
�:� .�p .1. i'1:;k`:::5 ••M'-':!p��>.'i..},l '��i��:'�..� ' .. :i
�:�. s1�b. • , . {...:.�,.;TvY }'' ��ti'�� _ . !s� �
�"� . 'i' :'.}�:�,,§';j�;r�.. ;��. t:=::';�' I :3� . .�:�."
T 3•� •-�'�:'.�.•���� �,p:
. .�� . ,i�.• •.i}t::'•�. '.l�.: � •�'
�'�',-'' ,i, a'i�li�l���'A'f`.};'�: ,p>. ••'�'�•..
'� � - ;�[ ' � '3' �``.1, . . :h�:�`
. . ... { 'i1- d"='rt°.i•,$:'d.s�,: .,.,�; ,.�-�. '':ti i`�::h�::5�.,.ti_ ..
' `�' .-. . � �,�' h'.'.v �r.:�•_ `'iVr'.�•'
:i. �.1, ."_.'� ���.: ,:�r '�` �,t.. :w. =- +
� .r_': .. 4•� .��':..�i. v�,. �•�'".� j
�.:. �. J q3�• � �
i �
.'.� a l
. . '.:y ��.•�.
�
� y,�
'� ���. � rS.".�.•...}i. t i r � � p� .
"�:�� .��z ��V'.��,f:}t�y.�'• �'I� . � �;�;�'._� � .t lY+�Y k• �_ .. .
.-��.:�.;..:�.;��� - :�Pi � '�k � `�y f � �w ��.,
�-�F:.�': �";t:�'• . .,R.., ��V1�'f ' �� ,i� •���� ws'- .�:F, „�fi�'f.�-
...;,. z" '��T�����r �L,.
Image 16: Froom Ranch complex, view east(Chattel, 2017)
� �R ,:'"�''i� � , , r ��-. -
i• .!�'': "... „'�'.—�'�„,�� -
'�� - - - _ �,, �.;,
.r -�'-� � - _ --
.�:- .:. . ,r-'�F • _
a� Y' l�
:�3.�'S:`.,ti.er"'�Ap:."a.�^ ,!r ' ` ;'.. ' .S��t!� - .. . .
.. f . -`��' ���?' •. �5+,� tt " � _ . .�`�� .� �.
- �•�. •�� _ ,� �• , .�.-
a; ,
. :� �:.$..� ' '�. �'� .
_., :d` `� b '�'
;: ,= � . .•�..� :
_; :': .. _�. -f�� ,.....:%�;: ..�;�:�^. '
/ �.,;-•
/�..�T_> '.• � �� ,
77T:. ��!-:i'Ly..�.��.?'� -- , �
: � � � •��� . � � ''�R�c'7i'.:_-.;�`..����, . . .. .. .
I:�df[y .Y. .7:-i., ... . � . .. . . .� " . ,'�Y.'�. ..
:fri', `. .'_'�'E;�.. 1,�.. - _
:r: : -. _ ,��.;;�'::�;u:�; :°.r�� :[:�;;��
L;�i�'�'' �7'!��' J.. _ " �.f y �e.Y.� L 4�`.
� "�~'• : Y ' .�"''�'�.• ` � ..,.�.� �,,� }N•. �:�,•,.; •'':
7' Fn �rv � •_,i �3ir_•� . .��,-• �. . �A,��'t .y` t" • '�lr� i t�,� y+s � -�•
.� � a �.��'.�r.�'`�.r•^ •��'�., r.�t0� ; .� r f:. ,�^�c��"4 '= Fi�^�`- �� .
� •�z, ,� -� t�r�.� 2•N�' � 7� • �� -
'� ;.�.�V •.a, . ,.�� -
Image 17: Froom Ranch complex, view northeast(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16540
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—MaiN ResioeNee
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
: ��
�r r
��' �
�
_�� . ��
�i
�' - ' -. �• - � •
- - •� �.. r
" �s ..,''� A '' �•
* �r
1 -__ _" - � ' � �a�-. ^ �
_ �y� � }' �'� ��� ����I� �' � i --- l�n�_ .. a� . .
� ---- _� �� ��. �� ■ �
�� __ - �'a�.'�. �'Q�: _;�����:�„ !�
,��-" - � � - .�-.� _
_ ;���,�-��� -
Image 18: Main Residence, southeast corner, view northwest (Chattel, 2017)
�
-- • �" ` � -
.i�� : ~ ~ � - �._ � �
'. � ., -
�—.-- _ - � � . �. �
���_�� � ��..K� �� 'i�= � �� � rl N ll , � Y � , .
�'� l� . _ ��i�y�� , � — - •i , ����
!1�'i'r'"`�' . ... ��- -�-
. . .:r�?i�iC���'•:r. �-i _ _. ._ ...- . -- �� �`-��� -.:•_._�--_,.:_
,.`Y. .r,- �e�x'=�:'_:r_�•a.�.. .
..p ' - . . ._ . -•�::.::�"�=•- �°.i":�'-'
- "� r w - �'- - _ :�.�. �"-Y`.y�-..
• .:r � . . - -�::�z.:1:--„�`' �s_=�
r. +%... _ . - ��n..'. . � .. ._ . .;�� ..�.�
• �t.''. . . l�'� � - . _ _ ,_:'�?#t"
. _ - ,,h.�r�
. -'!''" - . ••i��t•'..."•.:: ' - - ..
. . � �,y ,.,.. ... . .... i��;� ::.�;n.:'-. ' _ _ - . :
s� '"[.�. .sz� h:;i '� .'ti. . .�c�e�.:
- . i�['ry,y " ,ir ''�'§- � '�:-��r�,-^�• `"`�`.!. - �:��'�~i:..
Image 19: Main Residence, northeast corner, view southwest (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16541
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—MaiN ResioeNee
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
�
� �
- _ ; n.- . � i _ � u�-:_
.- . __ _ � — • ' _ �� -'�� -�• �
_ _ � " ■ I .�-�-
_ .. �;�■ � �`�t����. `�
- �-� � ■ , ■ �
��.`� _ �� ��
��+�./ �.• � � .�1 a
� ����;�::�s��=:}:: ,�,� �' -_-� ��`�i _� � � �
� .. :�.�:�-_::::�-. __ ,� �
. •.i:�.�-'-_
�sr�395 ; _ . ,
�q�.--- —---�_ _
� ��
Image 20: Main Residence, east elevation, view west (Chattel, 2017)
�'
�_
- ---- --- - -.::��,�
-- - _ -- ---- ------- ,'�
s : ;
� �'t� �
- I: �
_ _ -. ,
� �- - -- - - _ _ .
_ , _ �w t,�= � Y � _ '�. �- =��a��� -
��� '�:�:� w�'=��`- -
'� C� � � ��� y��
�.� �� ,�'1��. f _ �; . , -
��;�:n�_ _ :��r . — — � ����
Image 21: Main Residence, west elevation, view north (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16542
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—MaiN ResioeNee
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
�
-- - �
� •:� _ _ . - -- �'. ,_ -
I . .`` •`�- :.�� _�„�,__�.,� '��,
x� ,� � � .- . - - � -- -- ��
'rr`" i .1'E� ! � I � f � . .
� � ; -i'� • _-�a=-
�I �i, ; + � i ..�_ ��^y�'� -
- I 'I I� f ' I �`
,� i � �� , ��� .,
� � + �' j�� 1�.�.
3 � Y J���
. ; � �� .. ' r •:;:�; - .�.�.
,� m �-Y �:����
' b
� _ ' '��y�,Y•_
� �•��-. ..- in. .a�����'4.t �7v��•WiR'•�
Image 22: Main Residence, addition, view northeast (Chattel, 2017)
�
�':ti:
_ � .,��p- ,;� �
- . . �.� —
• , �. -
. �
` , - --
1 �'�� ;.. ,,._, � �. t � ,�
'1. i �
- �Y�: f I �
�`v:- . � � �!r ... y �='� �,i'I� i � ---- - - - -
� ..f.•; , i _
. I � � '�1 , ,
_- �, j ' :� ' ;i
' �i� I . , i � �, I. • �
�;- ` , , `� ' � i '+i�y ,,: r �
;ti;,.; a,��;- -_ . � ;;��
,_ �_: - � ; � �, ; 4�, �,� �
� ' � Y
I �'
ll I . , r, � .��. .
.�`�+ . ,_ .µ�. .
� -
,�.�;���,a�.... . .' �"�}� . - ' � -
.�:- .J . ��-•.
��F.'-��,' ' . - e ! �'�-0.-::k'=' .,
� �AA.
_ .. .... �. ' " ii`...�i.(���� . " n ` .
_ ��w; - - - .'�;�,�� � .s�;'�_: ,
v.;.��'' =�'+
Image 23: Main Residence, addition, view southeast (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16543
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—MaiN ResioeNee
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
r
.F
�� '
u
� _ ���l �
� ,� __..
� ,
M1 l,�
Image 24: Main Residence, interior, view east (Chattel, 2017)
�
. �,,
:� ��.
,_ _�^'
�.; :
�i n'1�! . ..-_,.. J x�
�� r�
� ' 9
� ,,. ,� f �i
R i,
� '
,� .
- - r
� -
�
!
a/ 4
�
Image 25: Main Residence, interior, view west(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16544
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—MaiN ResioeNee
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
��, V
� ` ��.:
f��'S;�� .+�
���k.._� � ��rp��-
f '►�.
m� � "
�� f--•�� �,
��I•� ��F, f.lk,�, .�� -
� _�.�p� "$�," .
_ �
��r � ��
� _�, �
��.
Image 26: Main Residence, interior, view east (Chattel, 2017)
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16545
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—CReanneRv
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
� •
- � ��
.•c� �
_ _ -. _ _ <<x � l
_ _ � - � �. � ; '�t ,
� -. � �` ,�.
� �
�, {��' �_� , l � y 'i
� - <<
�'�o � :�� :..#' � � ��''� • '
;� �� �s: -.e� . , . .:•,y�►
's �- �;' ;'�':
`��:,�i� �, . . =v` , '
r,�. •� . � ���' _ '�' � ,
� � �� ,,::�
' . '�a'��. . . . � .1 � ��t'� � -e�'
�. �" �' .:'��'� �
� . � •. .. � � :t:-:%le,, � . ���,.�
. . • .'i: ., . . - • .
� -
. -"'�,'�- . :�'ti'., .. „ •� • � . ' . . 1
�• . .�, ... � �.�.
. . � � :ri,.�}::t` . :t.�r�� � . r,�' . .
.. �°.ci' .�ik;���"si;�•^ .. '� ' C��f�':�f.f%�,�,v!f,..•R. .
. . .. �-;��: . .�. "�� .. . .'�'�... .�± . . � . ' ..' . '
,�: . � � _� .,. ..��;, . . • . .
.ti y:�_y�� •-. � � � .
'�����V ..
Image 27: Creamery, south elevation (left) and east elevation and addition (center), view
northwest. Refer to Image 10 for 1970s condition. (Chattel, 2017)
� . --- - -. __ - --.-. - -
- -- - -=.��-
_� �� � . � - ` -� - = i - .-- -- . _.. ---_-_
� � � � ---=�=_�;,�
:�;. � ;� .� _ ,� --
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—CReanneRv
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
��.�.--_ -_-_`�=��-'=�-�=�.;�.=�
- - = _--�..=�
_ �:�.�,:.�_��=`�=-- _- ==�.
��`- _ �,-r"4=-.:���" =�-�:�-- -�.:�-
_ �_v_ -=�:�;---'_`�=--R--.— - <�
_�.�. � -- �=��_�- �.----_=..- _
_�::�_ �=- -__�__ _�=r
-- .�-�=��=-�„1;.—-- ��
-- - �_.����J��`-�h=_- -___�-�_: �:., �„,,,
_ --�_--__- _s�`--�'..��:;:�wT _ .A
� - - - , r�
_ - '', �
�i- � �i , '. -':�r: ��' - _
q�; 1 i,jy . . •:.a�r u�
;`�� � f _ . . : . � . � ` . � .'.r . � . �.
5�� �����w . � .
�.� . � . `• ' .
'"i'r 'r?`� � •7':: L��.-
t_ �...(� .
. , . ,..4a'i:,:_
�'��[Oi�-7•.
.. s:F:1.
. - :�ti
�. .Y"' }' ~ , ' -� .'
��'�,:^ ,. �, _
. ... - . � ���:F{, ...r rx;i� �. . ;� ' °- ''�^�'�• - �` f�'�,iN P-. � .
�� ��"p te.�riy�y`s �•��si�,'.` r''T''r,�"-.�.
. . � � iF. �•f�"�y' � x�i�'•�1`•-•�x-•�^ R " . -
�.(�""+.6'Y'{.. ��[� ��' "�j1'.V%,�JY.•R. .. .�.�11L - i.�i• '4� �.::'-'.���." _
��' .?r��i .
Image 29: Creamery, west elevation, view southeast (Chattel, 2017)
_��
_ �--._ �
�Lti��1�� ��-=
—'�� ���..�.��-�..�,,�--�.��_��
`���'�`�-�`-a`� �`-����`���
^�e�-��''�� ���.���������.-
ti r��r.r,_ �� `=
\ �.�`��' ��~��
"�-�__. ��_ _��r._�����
=. .. _ � -�' � - ^-`ti��"-�
'��_ - �`�=4- '��� --- _
_ �a-- `�-�
_ _�--��=
�.��y-_ ___� _ .... �..
��� _-_ -z.�_ �.�-`
�L + + , �-.r."`�^��____-.-
I� i 1'
]
I• I � 1 1'�'t�}
{ � �
' k:�,,,, ri' :�i.
- i � ��� ����: :
I� ' _'� l��qi�.'� � �•'�' ' ' '1
.. � `�.��! �
I , , g,,'�r,�¢�✓� I � �
���, ��. . y'
�A �.,
.i�- � y � ' :.
'��� t PS; ,'�
yr�F'� �.r,+�,L�. .�1 � , .:Ea:
�R�:� . �
•.� ,r� _ �-• .
'` y, ��,;�F;�..... f � .�:. N-
• S. }� �. �1',
+ 1. w f�'.':d g �' , �x ;,.�:�� 1�"Y. ..
s, ;� :a. .r�•l.�.h
Image 30: Creamery, northwest corner, view southeast (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16547
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—CReanneRv
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
� ���
r.:. �� ,. �
`�,�# . �
�+ �- �
:�..�-- ; �a ,��� �
' `�`r--=�, �: -�r� ;
� ' ., .-. . _ �.--
:: . ':�� .,. ''"'� ° '�°' �'. - ���
:' r.�.�K::� s. ;.. ;; &, �. �^'s�°:,."x�-
t�!.a.�.' _;�'v_.����;• . :�-°.k;.,�,vi� .: � a-:-:='�±�� -
tvf-.�. . -nr� . t�: - 'i,�� .. �- a.= � � - `�3� _
� ..: �r�''•'~���}���`A
����',!�re' i�: yk.: .� �1�.. '�� ��� .
� ���.'c�'�"��...'.-+'-�����y:..�:.•��i'i,
� . .,."�;..a:} ]C.� .�,�i,' . . . .
,��2;..._ . :,..�•..r. .: . • �..• 'K��.`{�ys.., _ � . � �•..:.-.
Y��'�.'�:4: �, 'ar�' * . . x _ '�r�ti�.F,-f;_:
,��"::.x': �'"'L. ;�:��Y�.'R , +� t ��..
. -� ��� �-" ., .�-� . ,�-;(•.. = �..` 7 :._ j�: .�`a
. ..�r'.�i�. . ...�i_�'�:. � : � � ��. +� �-r.: .. , .
- :,jt:r�a,� •i� .�'T.'-�,.:i, ' � i:fti . -� .
� '�' ..�-�r3.i��:�a;�. ' �„..,•
. _ . '•��=..TI•. .�'l�►+�;,'.<. ..; �.��.F�..i.:'" •�� �.3'_s:.•�'
C` =u�.;:., ..:...e:•..:•s;. • •�;r sf^._ �:�� �: �
'`-. �.- !•A�.z6�7 ¢: '''S-,�: .;,�:',� - .. �.�. �y+.;�°i':..
" .: '�w�� � ..r::S�r.:'; � •.�.; ` . - .. �"?�': .::y� �l►�'':..`��yf;;-
.� .V-, ' ."E'.- � ].:.,.i'..�. y.
M'l� " l+f;i� :.�.1-�s.._iy' � ..��. :'u+ -�v�"h���by�lT�n's,'.
'''�R._ - - - . �1,3'x"�.�.. - .. ��r''"�i'":.: ..� .`iiSi'C
- . �y:. .�.:�• .%�,.:�..::.�. ..7!•�',L. �3
_ f'��".' .�. '.�;. i..�•
- •':�'..��` . .�.. ��'. �, �•.
- "�,' �,'t. -2.ff��^ `:s,�� ' r,.i• .
�� s•�:r�•.
'�r� . . -��:a-�•��,:•
'�����f. •�_ `''4i!'��°'= �lJ-�fl:::•.
,•f''i:-''•.`-��,.• .�.�: ..... 1.: ^.1 '- � ; .e-r
��E'a:•�- � •'V.'
i,:f:y_" 'y=!:r-'" '_7"• . .. _ . ,S` .�':':i`7i'` .�%.•;
_ �,.L. -�.--�i
'�y�..c'.: �.y..•::
r��.�+ . .'�:• Y,1..� _� "�y�..� 1..�.. '_ • �•�,Y
?�'.- J :.1.�'.:'f':�. "ti _\ `�I'�. 'i.�.'
�,�:�= - ��'�• f� .r•� _�'..�- i�'•e�-. -
_ _ i''ir• �'i'.� .��� . ��P..��' -A�- . .'!`:�.`,e�,` ti
�,..?,'l`.� .+- ,�-:cc''. ��ri F�.�' '�`Rri: ��ap. .
,k .F.hy � ..1Z..ti. �t,.� ' `�i���.�'• .. �ly ' �' 1.:�`'_ �`..'.: :�..,�,�
.'..a"•'C.� r• ..:. �Kx'.'...t' �..,.,, .. - • .. . �{_ �x .
.�e_...� �.:,.
_ X:;.• �i_^���� ._�;. ^3; �-�. �; . .. . ii'.�- _ � ` . . �.��le.:�: �����f.�i�._y.
..;��� ,�,ir�:,..-_:� � �"Y��. �~:i�.N,i�,'a�:;�.;7w:,:�, �;:�`4-�=•r;i�..�:��°�?.�� .- �A'' ���f-!;:RR:,.�. :'�4Fi'?. � .
�;§:{.',3?r;.�i.-.. - .v+l.::r�d�.i�., � . . .�A. �'�''`.`i�s g
�� '� Q.��i:�� •_ .�.. �1 ��.#, �::, .1
'.ti•��� �=�;Y'�_ry'�x- �."r:--��'�.�-..•;::;. .:�.. :.1ti'.;•{�.a^'„W'. 'r�::wS
� .�` ,.,. �r:
�� �'r; ;.f��r9`:= P.;+.+?•�..1'�y�,��r� •= s;�`G:...;O.�w��`i-r .��..,- �?t.::._: . _ •:r QY'�}.:�. . ,�_
`��ij�'. _ ,`� i. r,�r �t . ..;�;;r:': ,,t'•:..,� -_'
�? � �f�: x-�� �•�� r:rY9:.�_. .;�,�-'.'.;:i� . � . �• .5��.. ;.5�'�9r .
� .3� tl�• �•(.r� C.^� � ", ..:` �, ��•��tii � .
y$�,' ���}y .� � �3.
`-.r�Y.. �:•'�;�. '•:J�'�"':r�!YMb�"X ��, .A��' .t<A'��,� '.���..1�.•.1i�' �.�'.��.Y�'�4 •_}t'
' *�,•.�" ��`'d �' .h; rx,.t9 rx'Y-f� . ��•S, , .�
C s�Jr �"�. • �" �};� ` ��i�,'�-..�:�y'.-'; ,�-'.
�i ���,�3���}'�� _S. i����r.�.��.S:y;���;, �
���;r ti: `� �t°•"�y�...-,ia'."i,� r� .. �, .
•��r�M`• � �^� .1•' ���� ..;�� �t !"'? 51
Image 31: Creamery, east elevation, view west. Refer to Image 10 for 1970s condition. (Chattel,
2017)
� 4�
\ `1•
_ _ 1,1' � ,
�.+ ti ,
; ;���
.•� ,; , ; ��
.���
� ��+',� 1� '
���' �� �
q 'I
'ip�i' � ���Y+: �Y� � �1_
. , '' ` . ; ..{
-. � ' r i• �'
_ �� 15 i f
- + �� � 'i
Image 32: Creamery, interior, view south (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16548
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—CReanneRv
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
' ��' #�vY��j � �
+�i � �'
�' . ;�;�f - �- ,�
I , � �� �F��� " � '•.re�
� . ! � ,�. .�f,, �
r � 3 ��r ` . 'r � � �
+ ���v,h � �.�'`� \
' e�f,�..F#• ' .��;� ��"� 1 � �
. , ,T=ti ,f' �� � ■ ��_
�`�I�K: � _ � ..�'�'
1
- �� 1� -
. . ��' � r .�' � _ �
. . �r+ �� - - -
.� . � �
�.�f --- ���
� •��. �� :
i � � .
' �{ . . � - ��� ' _ R' ~•�}
� �' � �+ � .. .
• -"•"�y ��r
, �` � ` 1,�.
� - ��..:: .
�
�. � �
. �, _�
Image 33: Creamery, interior, view east (Chattel, 2017)
f ' -
�f.'��riRJ'- , ....r - -
- 1 y�_ - y 1-�'""�.�� . .. ...
-s•,crr.�'^ �-+r-- ....- �,i�_ ' _ - - - � , "'�-.
. - ---- �t. - -��-
. — J -- ----�f '�:�`�'�k • .�i _--• � _.
i - �..�:st�;r :�,.. r�+�"�-�_ �r��
�, � ___ - �5�; " . - __ ,�*�Y- x
- � ��.�-'`
.r_ 'k: �� , '
;� s r ��.� �
���w �n ...��. .- ��y ,
:.�- . r
t A�,�� , ��.�:�= _ -:a.
, i:
;�R �•_. '"�•::"•'.�-'G►T.."�' '- �`;': .
�T � p
�_ .�•^ � . . `
- •;,* � - . :w , '
_p,: . . _� . r .��r.
• .Y� �' ��.�;' '.. !- .� '
='-.�'.' . � . '1.._
.kp, j�:_ . . j _ ..
� `�, ' . . • � " , ' �` • +'�r?'
- .. 1 � . . ".� �. ��
� � ..,i ..���Y�}•
i
� .�i�'ra:. . .�5:.�
- f- ..;:� '��- .
_ i+�,�:. . . _ i�r�'"�'',: .
f r=.�'� . ;�
Image 34: Creamery, foundation, view south (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16549
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
��" _=�'il�li�i, �.
_ ��- - _��:,.
�
�. _ - -_ __ -
�.. - -
-..' ��� ' -•a' ra i. I ��',,�:.� � ��� i' i
■ � ..r.- . � `' . ��•i '� .�� �,�.',�'• ��.�r.�: r � � � �. •�'
� ��. ?
' '` z er
� =�. - -- � ;�! � .
' :
. , a!";�•�. .,�:-. � •^..:.::
_ - ��:.. _�•�a.��.. :'�.:
�•:;g: ,
,:
"' �,u�'r. ..
. .;. -- - •-_i[.i.� i;� ���:�'P���! .� �x� r�� ' � �� 'N .��'�`�.' ��,, �-
. '� �-i'.:�. .; ��1�� Y 1iFi"��•:]i�:' 1�.-FI ':��' �7T.�✓'�'.?:,�
- - - . - ��';'tG'••• ' .i':7�'„ �.Y:�."•..
. . . .._-.e�J�'Y � .. y{V_� '� �.�.;��,.�.:`•;i �.�.}y'+:��`..�.':�:',����Y�-�`11:f�y: -.: .
. . . - .. • � 'r�.':� �1[�,�y.. �'-.l�� � � . � ''i7F
,._~r,=, ,�' `�a�,i%� •�r �`�,�p
_ . { 1•,.,.t.".:::.,�� ,r� x
" - . . . r . '�r . ..:R�. ,2�Y's ��'�!'�; . : ,
,�,� . . -. ��� .: kY`"c7yr.R , � �. .
.;��. '�• �=-- ''��..�'.��..:;�.:
��::•.
_ . �, .:.. � � ..�iK' ..>�y�. � .-•: �,'��5./{
- "- �°'`�:�::_ y�,'.6•;S�.
- .. " "��.�.'=µx�:'-`�+'��.F��:^,�.�.`7. .� . . � . M .
� � y�� �'?�...�,�..� �'x'ir��e4�. ." . .. . =,�.
- ' . . ' _ ' , •.'f:��t':txc'-`,t5�.�_�:L%'��""�lC z; " � . �
. '��� �,lr.�Y��� - .t' ��y.::R.. -
Image 35: Dairy Barn, west elevation (left) and right elevation (right), view northeast
(Chattel, 2017)
.,,
r . - � _ - -
�
�
;r�1,.� 1 ■ �!:
_{ .iR�t�4l�� ;� + Z.i} � ��t�'�.r'„ 1 � A .
� •� r _ , '.:f•.i;.�,�F.� .•��'?'1..� � . 1 ..
" . ,1 . �• :� � .
,• ���•.�. ���r .
�:Y. - :x;�`'�';�..- :, - . I� �' � � "��
. .. . �;� �
�::' ;�' � . ,=;- ,., . , ; -� .•
����<�� � ��'� �,F- =;- �
�.-�...�.. �F -t;� . .�
�j .�. . ��.rf.'y.:,�';.;#���','...�, r• . , .��. ... .�r y �..ri��4�:.0 • X�
� ',}L' . ,.`�n�' L ��..,�.•.��''"•� ���?''T''`.^� �f��.• _:b ��r` � •�i} �I, �'
:� . , ' �.. �. "'� I '� ` ,�;...
r�r`-���� , �� #- � ,Q.. . _'�.e:. ;i�-��Fe= � . � . . . ,d,�: . -
���-�i r F:.y. ... � � . ?�b"� �a�l� ., � V_: � �i-i-•:��.'. - . ..
• .� . � .� • . . '�;P ��;�.''!f .. .:1:�. .�,;� - � � �
" r' + Y: ,,��.�`.`- . :� r��: ;::. ►
�:�'sa - r•;�:� : ' . a••. � �.�: i :�i�., y
-:��' •'�.:.�•� °3M.�. ,� ;-'�.�i���_�.,:�.y 'r .{:.i.y�P r
'Y�. • '�s. • • r.��''�'. _.:,[•`�•g„•�' � '�itti;�:���•�a � . ,
+ ;nn_ '�h•- •,: � � ,`� �,��.a �.�,�.. . �".'',...�.,,,•.��?':ii•.'�1� }j:,�..� �":,. .
p . e.. �. ,;�.�.� � '
'_��,, . ' ,�.� . . :.'... , �r>j�K,;: �'d'='��}'�',ti;�,°;�,
x�;•:� y 's' r ,�; �;�,.;:.�+:' ��;�'*,
Y.j. :.+�,i`. �z� '� �R �t�. . v+.� -: .
�Y� :.f. =., i1'y7��:::, ,f. �i, ��;;..�.•.`�t::• .� .
��s ti��,.,:.���."- r-.ry:...., �-r; ��4�.
.: ;�' ['`, ` !�^ _ � ' y
�T :,#� i :� ,.� �s,.:. y�<�.S�xP�� i r. �4•��' • . =�?-
r���:. ,�..�'�' , -� �. �L'; ���'��' '.�.. `��,��
. A' ..r'� � . �v�t�.:'i�af�+. , , `v :�< a,,+
_,3 "-.��` y�' _ �t�' .y ���>>%�..���.�.+,-�:�•�� .�:�� �.� vsi', �T..
Image 36: Dairy Barn, south elevation, view northwest (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16550
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
�'�'� ,�.
�
� �
-.';�. d.!� r � � � � � �a , �,� i:'•,I �
_ ' . . . � t� i ���.�•.a �e- 1
�` ;'�' � 1 .�"'r"� ... , . � ,
.l:l`���� I ' ' . .. ' . •� . - �-C _
4� �`i a.` '�. � �'. �t-,�-- � . ' ' w~� � ,
x�r � '�. �
�;'"�'�-_ �y�""�- ,•:� .�—'. �,���: _
-.- �• ;,.:r .
� � _ � ....
. . : . ;. � i�.•� . .
,�:i�,,�. � •J " � . !. �� �.
... _. � �'.t�. � � � a'',.��
'r�e.__ . �. �
_�'� � i�
. -. .. . - • .. ���.
Image 37: Dairy Barn, south elevation, view northwest (Chattel, 2017)
�
�
� 'i
: y '� �
i
�_ , �
, ;
+ � �
�-� „ . :•
�v
� �Y . - S .�i1
L
��i 1 �
r' '11,,
'�,1��'.�� r:�
� �,�.y��?r
. ,�q,,-w
..;. . `
, :i,-
y � `k,:�:
�� ����� I. A�, �'���
� , '—"�„.:.
- ��,
,:: �� r ': .��,:
` �.� '. •. j'�:��,�'a�.�
::�-� .��: r�y. .` ...},x�� �_ ��-
� F:: '',�j'r a►i��. �`: �;
:;. .� • ;,liy�: L� �:•,L:`-�' �r--
' ,t., .. M4 � .�,' �.i.�....,;
..� ��. •�,Gy..il��'•.�..�t�„%� �� $. �
� ��. � �+. �-.
.�'; a, ,.�,,s
Image 38: Dairy Barn, south elevation detail showing material loss, view northeast
(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16551
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
.i- . s . ..p•.
'�'�• � �, �:��,. ,!,
� � . ��
�� { , ,
t i, r'.A
. �� . � '.�� �� �ly�.M���.e•',,�.,��41,."'��.
' �' s. r:
P' �:� ;s ',F..�. y
�� . . �,'_,��:�Z �Y.
��,
_ � :�. :. �~�;�:� �'�••
- ; � ` =�•���, -���?� �,a..
���'- • r3'.��� �:�`�`�.M���"$,i�Yt�hr 4•�y����,r:� .
q , � .��.�.�i�-.�.;rb:.:� :a�.y�+-� ! s,
--- _ ._:t .���.�';: � . ^.�. �..��;.
� i� ` � c.;�.i�:,�.M i',.'��j ��.; �
. .�,�' . ���� � 7
�� ..a , tl .`�$ � t ���{�.� � .� S �. .
!�SL.�tii �+ a 1��..�"jl.�••Si''s,' ;+J ��
_ _ l � 'S_".N: ,. ..s'�� 7�' r �G ��.� ,'���
.f. ��'G � �";
�'�. �...•�r.s .. , '�' �•.. � '�
a�+i-`�.r"�; "�3,�A� �.�i
� ,:��r f�, r1�s. .��
—�:' � ,�,�: ��t _�- ��-�'���.
y� KyY:}��.� �. -. A v
-�z• ;+��� .r �o-:;_,,;r;' �, k;-c�::r; ��;.+�'.x. ,�;.
r ^.�:• `� r�_'... �
,. ti�... �i..•. ' ` ''' €,. �r, ,
y•.� ,K;: s. :y�.��tr°'� ��y, `6�.�. �
��;4. � `�I ::P' • � � �. '�r"�iV �Y�'; '� . ��1:�'�""�.;�.� Y ��.�
'r :. :z .��: � �° ���=;�Y
;�:. �'•, I,,+c.� +,�j' �� .•a-�;� 1 ��q 3r.
�, M" , �[-.�...
. r�:� if r ?� ► :��w��::� ;.a t �„
�_ +� � ;. '���
. .._ +���i:�.� �iy��k�.: :�+ ��i.1. � � +4s. I�� ��_
�a'i~ � , �' ++'� ,��"$�� ��r.�i .f� 'F.��.�- �� 'T,+.+J�
� �'`•�� .�` 9[.1y:.:��s9 . '�� -
. •w J:.!� F.:e, _ y. �... "•' • .�f '/
�h ... ' ' x'..�I'� 1� ....��Y�:::��-�..� x�". .. . �- .
y� ,�y. ,it .. ..�.+s.:. � -.. ; . '�� 'Y�Y 'I
fr� , � �i�T,.rJ`� _, � tG�,:�.�`�.��`�'.:-.f;�tj�(�;,�,_, ,.�iY��:•��_ .;i�� •s: '�'f.
.�' �f� ��'• .e���. � r• �;�,�r.��� :* �•'°. ' ��;'��s;'K¢.�"J T.• ~;:
� - .�`',7y: .
�� � . � � r�:�s`y }"rA�• � �e�.:�.a'sr�,�:r�:kl�'�;,`.•�.����; �� , a
.� r � ''�ia�;` •..-� , - "�`�y��y;k°!�',.`.�a�►�,� � ~
.`f^ii!►, • ' . .' 4;`'. .. ' �•: :�•� ��; . ��': :,'�,�, R"
n r�� .��'-� ' .. . .:�i'�:*.'� y '�a�a�� .�•':.._'�:��� •� � .
Tr
�, 3 �, �'tii�.=` �
y �^ Y�71 �� 7•i,,� i� tii..��' An. :.. :p V �* �:
x..� ':�j' '' �, �� +j�i�. t �+ �1.�y�
�_ =r. •f'r� ��r ::'�9�,'� i..� �. i }� �.� 4�.. ��� �� � .
- "� .l :'J.,' �,. ��:+., °�,.;.`9�.4 �, . 1:'i'`.�.��y c;i�•' ��. ��
"����.. � ,1A� � �L 3' ,Y �+ . P','�:..
� .eF�I�.L_ _�'.' .'[�-1Y;1. ' �=�ijl.��� -�r .. -�. ,5�{ � - '� � '� �
��.�� �..• � ;+l� �,:. �r'•....�.'::•
� � i. � �.:; ..� ..�:•S., ..�:.1'�a' ..�?ti..� • �! ri
./' �: �•�i6��.�s��:.., E'�1 i d��^ '7 .it�...4 � �y �a't �. '�.�.�
- �'r«' e'i,:,�$, �"l. �•�.1:�
.�. ���3:.r:_" �
7 '.c. '^ '- e. ;�..
Image 39: Dairy Barn, south elevation detail showing material loss, view northeast(Chattel, 2017)
,. ;,..-
-;-�-��
'� � � �_�-.
�� ���;.:.-- --:;�:.
�,. � --�_,: ��- _-
j. --'�`��E=- _
:'�- �-;��4�.''.��_._._
-�:._R��='��' -- - - --
:���- _ ---���
�ti � `�..� _ ---
� j�r ~�- �-'=-�=�=�:;.-�
+� ' Y � � - _=--=__ -
�i' ��,�_'��'z=��'�.�.�.` -- - 'i�-
. _,� . . . . ,�•�l�f• + i., . r.���'.'��--r--x^ _
� i` � . p� `�-.-.�.:--- �__'e`'-= #
� r ! :�.:.'� '�i I '� . I,``���� �--�.---..�:
i.�f��� R r ;;I�� 3
'YY��� �� ` .
Y J .e
_ �:.� .. ' I f�:.
��-.'� `i� 'I�
_ . . � � .�� y�fkY�4 . ,,
• -. . ..-�l.��� �, _ . ... . ��•' .
.� . .:.� �.�� ;, '�,;•�, - ' .. " ' -f.:,�_ �.
" x�. , ,- .*'�•".` •ti;.: �� . �;� .. �
. �AW.
� . . ,4-��,p: . +;7�! '?^: y�. � + •-�
-� , . �a.� � -�y � . .�.., �`_. .. � ...
W ..�s rr-...';�,H�?.�:r'•� ,. - �� -. '�'~ _
�, s. ' i'.'• . . .. ..S•�:' �:.`s:�'
- ,v..-�K��� �.Y'� ":TT!'.':j•°:?':�'•. ±�.�r.�-���'rs <3-•� .. . .. .
^ r.�: ;iLti.'�-..����.'. :ti�` � ' � -
►...r:����.� wSi��.s� .� - �. . _ _ . �~�' _ � .?a�C.:`"Ly._'r._:`,
'�H��. _ f.f.. �.���. :��i '�.:'Y -
. �l' .�'.a � .�.. ." .:'r :J..'J��.. ... - - -
?r,� .S�.'' .i.�.
Image 40: Dairy Barn, north elevation, view southeast (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16552
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
� .���, �
� i. ,
'� �•, ;
.'}' �� 7 . r
�t�•, •1 .,�
,,: .�.
Y�� �_,�:.�.
, � �_� �._
rr. ';��[�It �Ir ' F! ; ��I4 -
��... F$"�. -- - � ;�� A�;4 �,} ,� � r
� �F� T '4 � � � � '
�"�` ��� , _ . ,�' j ' .
s� � i� • ,i i i �I
- .. ,.'K :�:'.1� }�� � t :,I: � � e
ar;;W�_ ,. �q-�-�� ,, ;r.. ' . _ I •r�. . { � ,
�.y. � l.'�� �t.��� �" '�M1i� ,i�i�. .j .». .. ��f C' �i.' � i• � i'���'�:J�
�� ` . ' �. ; '�
. �' _.._ +r ^,';{�,ti."_ _ _ i
��j.'• ; •. ��. ' Y- . .. .;.,� . i �a rf:
f� _ . ��.. . ��F+ W [ ����," � ���
r� [ -5��J �,'� !Y
.�..` ' .:�3�.t.��,��,'°F:.����Y� 'ci. �} �
;: ��.€-"': .. �,�• . . f:,�:. �.
:. L?�,� . ..".��'`. , s:�:::`,:`_�e: � '�T,; .�..
,� � � "� .9�i
,,�` �_t�..`.+,_ � . - � . :,".Y�:. �,v: ti.
3 � - � � 'y �L 3� �. ' _ n .y'r
� �5 - �1�. . � i�ir5;'�.����, ��'r' . �� -
Y" � Y i '�i�'IY�!.k'r:T�.1 ''�'� �' •" ::.?� �'.^u{�' � ..*,�' �.y �..�:
�'' }•, s:i. ! � �, ���';"� s�"�r� '
-a*��`�'.c�.," '�}: �':�:�: ��-3...:��+.�' f�r�:ry�,y��;�'..i'!�.;y_�:.J s.o.
..�,ivti�_S:�•�a �•.: �'t'.e;'��:.� . �..,�i, .:'�'�;�.�,�.::�.:+�[�i���.:�•:"` ,i��.:. :
.�•'ir:• i` .?I• •:� ''ry':,��i' �L �pq `; _
9 �'ySi�.��.) " 'S.-�� '�Tl.. ��I'.. .s1��LF
.l '��' �t`-t5{y n ��'s�i�[�..�Y1�:�:: i��� '*':�... ' "'..."��Y�.�.• .. �� '.�.�• � :T;
. �'} �y �r' .p��^. F,i �.W-'S li•�.� �.,y.. . i 3�. �. �.i
' ..r;� � �r''�:. ,:�� x �.a..�. ' .
V4.2r "�ti�.ti • .ry�'�r, ./...' ��J:• . �� �'.
_;,�. ,Fi; .�`�'^'� '.�'.t':. ��'...5 t'� ���!''%'i��� kr.'. lj5�•:. ' '�4 .�.'�._.
.�.:'f:• ' f�_...��•�.:t `: - . ` ,' ����• �•..�.
���i:'. - ��:,Yr�:'� j�z� a.�;F_��f;,.�.�.'-4.�;�':'��� .. ��il:�'�; • .:�.,, $
��'r ''�r:�7Ts,.•. ^..o. �s.',, .s.:`� + {d ;� : S�.. ;;aY�:•' - �
:"'� -��...';..`-- y :r's , '; • �.'. 'i _ ,.
�:����i.., ra�. ��f.. ��i.�����i. ����k2 f: �� :�. �.Y''.�t��.f � .- -
y ,;ji... �r •[+ �,.•q�'1yr Tr � .
- 1.� . ,!+1 ' Y��:.1ti" ���,�.�qi- '- • �� .. _ ,iiF:
• a��y:�. .��y.. _`r"7. ^}�� .'�'
� ' .iid'.r �3`': r�.-:' . ... ' �
:.C�y �.�;�
Image 41: Dairy Barn, north elevation with addition, view southeast (Chattel, 2017)
�
_ _.._
�'����L��.n� M_:~_=.•^ . .
_�`�`-:���'-_ _ _ ___= _-� _ _ � .
:�.�--�.'`:-�_
�;�!'_�.��._ -__�_ - = c_ _- _ . .. � - . ��
� �� -.�= __ -�F_-_ _ __ ___- _ -
� �; "`' - _ ------ -. •�ra�
_ ',�i�5 y k ' ,,''.n� '� �!
V r :t/ '9:
� � � ����r,
;� . ;�� .��,i �?�:;��;., -i . .
�. -•�"i '� ii• 4� .1�,{i�� �� . . 4��
��`�J,.r ! ��' -,`, �I!!���h��. _��.a . ,�
�=�,� ��•.. � �::".- :c :`��.. .. x-
;,� !:��' . __y •. �T �`''"'~ '. a
y;�Y�:�. . , -"'�-��• r -
—���_`_ _�:�:� .:a�k��: __. .
..,�� , .. 1 -__ .._•;��..��r �_ Y
�c � 1?: R
��n! �, .
'.�-Z'�h�,�R. _.�� .i:4� ' . 'F . '� "_�-.
' �__'"
. -' �r.��`Y� . . "—y .��
. . . ':CF�p.y� � � i�� .,�
' _.. Y'�
' . . - '. . .:� ' .�
� ;�=� "r�` '
.�,.'�r .,. :,. �--:
• , ����, - ��;-. �`-`�
�x.
. . _ �?!.>>
:h: _
Image 42: Dairy Barn, east elevation with addition, view northwest(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16553
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
--_ '__- - -=_=--- _.���
-- - -_=-- _____ _-_-___ __ ___ _ _ -- _. _ _- - `�.
;�T�� _=_____ - --_-_- --___ _- -=_'_ _--__- . - .._
- _ - --_ -_ __- _ � - _ - - -_- -
_- --_ ',-- I `�".=y- +� - -
�-__ _-___-_ - I
i �. . �' ��- ��
� , � ;� • i� ;� „��= '•
�{�a� µ� �. i ���_..�,
I� � ' ` ��
I �{i � �'� � • � ���
� � �: i — � li.
'.����� ..i .� -���� ■y . - —..�._r��..�� - — � � .
�ey� �:rir.:•� .: ' ■ ' .
"'3i�� . . ... 1' � .
. • - ,����+�r ti
f�4,,,,� - '� '�� �
��. .
. �:':. +'� .
_ - _ �� , 'i
s� �::�
' .� a. .__ '_" ...`,
- � —. � - . `�` . .'A���-�:�p,�w _ :,`� :�..
,`t �� `..,-`;_"` • +�'� , ���
- . - r _,y. - .��f,�3�'� . '� ��` - `� '�'"fy�-�'"•- .. r�.�
'."^M:: . ' .... ry�� Y<'';:.
� �' �.`�':�,; 11..'.
� ` - �:�.�,-'�k= ;r: •
i ;� . �,•,�� '� �� � �;��r.
__- '' ,�,'1;'�, y '�:.�:��': � ,
�_�.���
� ����
Image 43: Dairy Barn, east elevation addition, view northwest(Chattel, 2017)
a ��,' '.y ` i:°� `+ '�r: �. _ . . .�
� f ; �i• �,:�:.;.
, y ' t � '.},� - '��'�.,� r
���� ': I'13 1 � . . .�'}y `�'. �/
�� , ����:,� ��'� '.
� , . � ,
. � . ;�� �.':,.
, � � ��� ,�� �� �.
,; �. +' �;� y�
,,•p ; �:��. :+�� ;:
'�;f ' .l?n:�'. �o .�`�� '' 3 11.I �?�:4 iI r.
��`5,,� •�` .
vti ,yr y '�' � � ' , �� I . , � �
`'�;►F� :��v �: � , -
:, .:� - �; �,, �
,t� '.�,;.. � 'r � f ��a ��I '�° �•
1 t t. ' � ��, �'��g.::�ii': '' , f � �'
e,y i,�' �+ :�� ��E�?.� � +,� I . 1 �, I' 1 .
�� , l� S'� - ��r�. � �
� � ��� � { ��!'� . ,r�.� .��� � _ � �
,:�1`,.�� . .. . ,�'q'���''�'f 2�� . � i:r ���:�. � 1
{Y' 'S 1 :l �, '.��•.:.�� , . a t , •� ' ► i! � r �
�� �.� �s";�""'� �.. . '���.y , .. �. ��'. ,�j ��� ::� � _ �
'} ��.'� i .;�':,` :� �i 'v ,J� � r:s. r..�'�� .e Sr '7�
f •iF a�r� �J ���, �.�� +- � ,..''S•�� .a� ►
y,� �;�'. . ti �`if�,N;';�.p .i'i� � "e,���' :� .�,.'.'.I;� ...� ''' •.�
l'.:vl: � � � t • V•�.�
� .�� �Gi�i' ..�� I �``�...�(., .s:�.�?�
�. �•�. ` ;: �,�:�;;.��y:-;
i: � ..��:: ti;..�,. �r�:. .. .1�+:. � ;.:. •.,�..r ' .�--
����: f:��:
�� � �; �� ;� �� ��;; •�::� -� _ ; ;,� r: :�;�..
�} .�, i• `� .�: •��".' .•ti� l; .f• . . `�,�..: n .
��;� � :'!'''� :�r.i�Y:��'�� 5�'
�' a, i ,��'F ^ti. l v� � . . . f���`� .
.� :�, � �:•, ��',::�;;,: .. _ - . : _ � `
i� i', �r' .�.. K�,�_ ` :�_: s,.;; ''•.
� . ,'k . ' Y y.y. �_'..�A�
1 ,_,��'�9��. ., �- • - .1' - - • �` C! E', : =._
1 i�� �G _•� .. F�ty .%•i,�-��_ �,�.. - "R: e.. � , 1-
_ 'T. _ �'���.r_ ,.^
� , ti A a.t. r.•���y�� . '..�. �i� r; .E";. - ;y� r.: yr�.:;_.:_-s
..�..��-�i2x `s.�.., S:�.
� 1• � - .i��''�`-.j::i�; •����'��#w�::r: �'-�v'� � - '�����. �.f- ... �,��"�!,� :4. j�5�;1 Iy t'a .
.a ,. a�' y ' ' ,r.:..: '_� �'� :- �c:�r� -.
s� �� �.r� ��t ' . :�.r.. . . � .. F:^..:'�:.��';. .i CF ��•�.��•-�,.
- �.. ..�:_ �,yr:•. �.4��" r.i:—' 1` w�4. ?�
::y� . �.- , _i:- . .i�!n� �.:�...�
..+ , ; � . ��.7�������`:�'P�-J-:�.:y-�� �� �.,r:-,:•.. i.� �•i t:er7d�4 i��'•'����
� '� � R:i�s�"y°.d:z ' i.' . .. .ti'.:f.� 'I'�.' .{ .�P.�};'. ..
�'.. ,r : •,�" ' %;:' . �,.:;_ �. :• -
- , '.� r,....,. ��`. .Y..;�'A: :.� ��
• ..�2i�::o-'- �g..t• ,{•2'f�.r1.�lP'' .•n ;�� " �•F';�ir_%:'L`�.;�,��� pf��'e1'iR�.•,�='..�.�.;c,..��-:'
,j � � �i�'..� y.�. _ :-5,.•, - :�p �
f��. ~.;�-.��'�, y, � r • i`: *�'' r$
.�.,. �.�, j"A,'� -';�:'�, y f,;'o�/
�. �r r�� - ��'�.' .;3-+�
";%"��';-. :t r �,;,'''
Image 44: Dairy Barn, southeast corner showing structure's relationship to topography, view
southwest (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16554
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
- �.,�� ' .: t�: � i �,�r'!�.$ �►�. ,� '�j ' ..�4� � ,
� �� �� � � � �
� c�'� � � ' . �F* :����.��' .� - ��.�.
.� °s's " f - •- ..
+�.. � �",ia ,.��.� �- - ��l•:"
� �; � t+���� <��!�.��.
��` � � ..,
�� � � � .�- �; �
� ,/) �.:����„'' �+P' - � �. '��� �
�, �Y .. � �''� T���'�, � � �'�"�
�' � � �� � �
��_ ��� � � � ,,� _:.���`� , _.
- �—� E c � �--
� - i' :,�-�,_��� �
� -� + ■�' � � .�s� _ . ��� . �
� �:� '�`/�',1 �,�, __.. ,�,.�� ��
� p,�_ •�.. �'} �.: -�:- - =: - ==; �'' � �:����� �
� `�����: -.. ��+ ��.��-, — _- -"=-'� '�.�� '•'a.��� ��� �
".,, ���.., r-,- : s. �.= _.�� �-��,� , �
�� . _ "=' :-�.W�'=. _ � `�. �.�
� ���p _ - r'%. ' y�-�--=�= -:��?''C�c �\������ws� �.•'-�--'
��;:� ��_ `�..: --��=_= - - ---- -_ - �.?' F . �� '� _-a��
�Y(- _ � __�7__ _.�.�' ti:���.__.._ -. .---...- --- -...v.=. _ �,^,���v��•� _. _-
r 1 � � �� _ _ *; i• �
=�� ` �':� ' - - R _ i
il. � k.'A '��
,a1 -�r�=� � R'Tw� ��`
� � .�� � ��� � �
, °���� :;:, - � _ �, ��� ,��;� �� _ . �,:; �,.
�' �il�� ,,'; �� �, _ �,1 ;r; ;�-`� '' ►` i1 �7;��
f1� 1 '!! . ..�r. .,�'� ` L„� � �;��,y��r
� �a i��-.�s� `I �. 4 s�.�.
_1 � �.� r, ti- `
'i _y:, 1 r.. � ''••r � .�i�;Y� '�-��.� �ki
� -�= -� ` tl� �������.:, _ . ��- : -�
�� � �,°;== ,.,
�� � . r .;: .. :�r� -L;� ;
-� :.��, ,� �;, ,
"� -. r . � �y ���ei: �r .ti, i . . . �s
a
Image 45: Dairy Barn, interior, view southeast(Chattel, 2017)
� - f��� � ,� 1 r._ Yl� �
� Tr� � '�
� �'� ��� '� _ '� - �
� r
���Y � .� _
�`�-�� � - `�� � _- --
��l - � - �-�� �� � � �
� -� � � - ., � � -- ,- -
�� � �► _ � . � �
+ � � � � �� �
� �.� �
� }, ��. � ,�
�, :.������� �. � _ ��►
� _� � � ,�� ,��, .�,���� _ _
����� �.�R � � , _ _ �_T
- �. ':_—� - � , •�� r� � -
� �'� —`' ���,Ms-i,;� �. _ . � � �� - � 1
� � ��_�� . �E .. - � - •= r `- - ;��- - - ��
� � �_,.,� t 'I _�'� 'j ,. .�`
�i ;� ��. kh � A F; `. - �,.
•.} � 'll ���. � `� ��� !
- '� .�..I i� � � .� . , 1
. ��� � � � . �. ' rL ,t �i�.
� � •� . , � �,�:- _ ���ti_� ��.� �
. r � �.. � ' ,;.a� �j � - __ _�
� - � !r � �.�. �5���-,�. �4 � � IY� • ..
r.�J- rr�.. i � - 3
-�v.. `! �'' ?l'aC:�1- 7::� :'`� i -s
� � - '-�- _ r_- ..r'_' - ~�L -
n�. C�:��
��.R�1 _ �'� � . vsr.�:t:.� `- iz=�'h'"- � :�.�`�= - -
� _" � ��f.'t": . -- `�l! ■y 'yi� �, •S��
� F' � � _ _ l�i��`�'���±•,'R1'�^i:. ,t'�..5;�
� . �'r� � .:��::�l� - �:[iii`SSi�x�•.a�ie�T�ai'�� .
.av.-� 'f^ 1 � �d�-'' 5... tr��! ":>f[.- ��•��"��~
!i,
!7::' :F�'.�.�i:•�+: ._y����-.
Image 46: Dairy Barn, interior, view southwest (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16555
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
,��'.� 1 ��y+k �'�� -- �, ;� �� �� � .! ��
� '� � �''�1�-. . �� �
���a a������� �L� 1� 1�� �'� 4 �� 'r"'� � �
�
Y�_ +� '�'�� Y�le�esarrr uarsrer rrs �� ',�"���'.�� r�` ^� � �
�� „ ,�.�,�.�,s..�w+��� ��=.���e� » '� � '�r�
-� _.y.
r-+-.i �i.. e'.'.�r--- �r-.. ►3WY��� er. .. r� .__T_����^�,..ti�`r���[� ' E'/• � ��,i .�
�� 1 ����1+ww�r �r .s �tiL ����"�' ti�y� ..C�c� y F' Y.�J� '� ' aayy'�-
�► �1Ma Y��y����^7—.. J arr�y. r i T ��� �y ����� _���+
a�� r��w....- L�F.vr'�aY�51�'s +�+r�M` r�.��` �� �.k� �"'! -0.. �"
��—. �..��— �—�. �i�+� rY� .�� .I �� ��� �I
_ ' ' � _ . '_ - _e � "�I .�J ., y'+ �, _
'_r-'„� ��� il .. r . 'I'i �� � -
- .;,� _ ! � � ..-
�� i ;;� _
� � {1��F _.
,. -W� , ,�-.�r•=
I � 4 iii � -
�� '�� i r �
c *
' �`f Y.
�,
1i.
�
� .
Image 47: Dairy Barn, interior, view east (Chattel, 2017)
I / . r:
.. �� !•
��
1' � J _
� � •
_--;�. -
� 5 _ _
` _
•,•S. u� ��I �FI _
. �
. �� �� T ,
f � �� 1 �
�f ' I�� �� i
i ,.a �
I i� �'�'• �
I '� � i
- � F �, r
N � ��, �, ty
�r"�
-7
Image 48: Dairy Barn, interior, view southwest (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16556
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
i � � �� "
ri �
` _ � ' ,:�� ._ �JJ "�:. ` • .d�r--�� .
r
� � � � � � .� : ` ��� , � _�, � _ -,�
� _ � � � . � k�.���— _� ��,�T ����—
� - - - - . '_ � -�
� � F,.� �._. .�_ ..
.,�_J` .�'.-.. .�� I ^ '_ �� ,. � ��,;.�-�i
�ar,':�� �y
� � �� _ � �" �
,� z. * ���
f� �j `�� ��. �s �., ��` �. �
�� . �� - � '- '� �'�� . ~� �--- �� _1�R'I �� � _
.`t e!� � ^+�.�•^i.�� -- �ti J"�.:. g��,1v„: .+Tr' � l_� � R- . • . �"
- •`'�r.= -• =�•..;� : r;� • _ _ .��.. :� -- _��'�, �����"� .
. �.�����r..�., .` ._ _ -r'�� __ � .` -F �-� �
•} �e: s � r� �����. �
�f•t _ �,� • •�J .�-- - -�-?1. �_� ,i-� � ...��., .
a���^ ' -2 , .�"��i:' i- -'-l�-`ri ` (
� �i� } ..n i-. ..��1'.!ll�y; "'�@; �[/� �r , �`aY�' ��'-� � p _
"i" [ 1..V I�:�rrllaLi.i.� ���3 8 . �.r� _„ •�
_—_ �� ;��;��� �,s���;�If�� ,;i � � . — - _ .-
�� � �� r •� ,� - f'��
� '
�y ,F�::. ��^ � .
;, '" " � � � : r
r�•� i�,,��� , i ��� � � � �I
_ �- � l , �.
..�, ��'' � �' ' �-
�- ,�:., �� �
�,�'�..::.�; � � : - ..
� ' �,_ '� :
,��Ar _ �� �� , ` �
�'�-��_� _ � ;- ,
..w■� f�.'�•"'•
I�r�� 4r
_ ,�"`� � -
Image 49: Dairy Barn, interior, view south (Chattel, 2017)
� 4
•
� � �
1 �
+ � 4 , . _ .
� . . � •
. ` y� - �r � � . : L. - ",.�..���---=,"'�!�'� . . r� a�P -
I i �� `
� . �• '� --+f-: '� ; �` .
, �. � �� � _. --
� �' '�'' f � _ _ –'�,�- ' _ -
� � � '�� � ,
� ��,� ..�-
' �--.
� ,� ___.. � _ —
.
Image 50: Dairy Barn, interior WF (William Froom)wood engraved detail, view east
(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16557
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—DaiRv BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
, , � •� � .. -
1 � . � S
�,-- �
- - � �--
, �. , .
_ ;.
�
- �
A} � � �y,.r�"�'�
-.� � i �S .
_ �- �_ ... .���`'r� •
�v ' .
� �y
�[i[.~ . . • '
_'�['r.
'� .
� • � *..
}._,
Y�`� � I � -
x
' ' � Jy.
Image 51: Dairy Barn, addition interior, view northwest (Chattel, 2017)
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16558
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—GRaNaRv
ATTacHMErvT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
. r�.
�'"'V�� I �
� � i � �
���": '��-%' I� I I � �'1 �` '�;
.��-. ��•' �'' ` I "
, ���_,.= �+� . � e . � �rt:
� ! ' I ' I � 1 . ' -.
'C� j I . I i �' ' ��.
�� � ' I f t'' � ��4' � i ,I �;j�� �`���'�� :�Fv
; I � r i � ti�
. . = r� . ��� � !. !'y � . y4� �.: . ;,
i � � � j �� ;�,i�, ,a:..:
� : �
I 9'j, I . +� • 5 �1
.- 'fii i ' I II :E . _ E ` I r � i i �I� � r -- .
� �_ l j I� s �y�� I j � �. °'� i � � k i':� l�
�. .�= ;: s ! � � l ;� Fi � ''�f� � i � ). ed �s i
;„: ... . �:'�.; °•� �� �. :4:� �� � �.,
��.�� �. ,� , i ;.; ; � ,
;: � °�;� � I` � �f ,:�� � � ',ti '
�^�,n'_ ,t ; ';.�r J' ,�. ; �
:�: Y , �::_ _ +. ', � �f� .'`
j.s'..�. ' f'�:.�.'�.i ,' .. I ,+I _�i
��E�:� -s;�''; T+-�".�;,�. r,{•:.�J,r� - -
��. . y..-'�t. .�, .> -�!t.. --•� .��. . � .=.
��'� '�s,�.�..;�� :'��".';y�, t� . . �r : • •�:•-
"•,�5�.i:._ '. '�'r:- � . �f 4..��� � � �.��� :.�.. .5' � ��.v. .
'. .�- '1�I'.i.����" i,. '.y�r _ j `'� }W . �,
:!_ _ , -i-:�;:`•.1f;�'�' . ' ���:� , �,�� +� t.�,('�f"J�;;�,e . e���.:
=�'.`. � ..r.:�.� ,'�,. '•ti {:;,; ..`
r.y R��Y`..��y':>•. .� . . � '��:m .... . :::. .
...�.;:.,
3; .��; ,�;•. ... . . ... •
Image 52: Granary, view northwest(Chattel, 2017)
�
• .�� r� __
.� r►- `.'��.��:.
� ,�'�� �� . ..
�� =- � �: .
.,� -� `'-�- �.�.�
�.�i``. '�-.
i. f } ' '� �► i � I i , ,.
I ;r�, �'� �
. 'i � f • i , ` '
� ' !��,� '� � + ' i� � ��`iY+��.
� �.. , .I ���i
� F a ,; i
+ �l ;: � ; ':�� + i --
� �� " :I' f
� _ : �II I�; ; � �; ,; � �
� �. '� �,.,, ,�' 7�r�r;;��:.� ��g!i� y:' y' ,
�T� • . � ° ,}4'i # �✓ 6... r�' a� `� 1v I i ' � �
y. .. 1 �f�-•' f�.1 A• ,�• f. �!. �rY•�Y5
-.�C . ']•1 - •� .�� ��' ��3.����� i. .I + '.
;,; i .''z ,,r�•..,����'.�' J +� � , � I�' ' ��r:
�l�::h_ r �' �SI. • ;.�; � ' � �� .�5:14�.
,:� �'����<irti., -- � - _ ,`•7_'.j�..., ��,_::,.._�• �. `f,,l Y � �..i.
• y =��� ,?.�. 1 C -41� F � -.t �'. ��r ��Fi
',�,.y.-i"-''�... «;�N� . ' _ .� !'His"'ij,�f!- i. i�;-J l.I,i ' __ls;�a�.
.�i� -'Y ji� "4Y:M1 .yYy�"r•`�� _ �.N . � ^ �r. .
. [r. �:'� ��
�.�`y<:{;4�' - ��'� ;:z��::' ��.'�;;``tiL�,,, ,�[;���.
''4- '.F.• t F'.t [;. . . �1
ti�.t. �����N.� f�,'�:.- rP,��:.`.',..v�' a%f;o-' ��/;�y� �.���-� rf4•,,-.Y�F� A��'�`+
� , , '''�''; . :,x �.�:�.�.y�: � .;•$�' :a. -y� ':
, k `�"'�
� � rr'�`1'.Z .�� �.y� a:+.r�r�r.. ::�• {J..
Image 53: Granary, view northeast (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16559
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—GRaNaRv
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
, � � � �k�
..� �, �.� � �,�.
b -
♦ � �
i ,��,f-
9 •k' 1_
3 _ "'
��' -
�`
�
� •
. .. ' -.'c� .
- _r �+.�
y �_,�,;;� . �.:.�_ -
�- �- � 'x�;:`:
�..` - � , �_ •
� -,::: • -
'�' _ �_
��
/
;.i� � .�y+., , .
Image 54: Granary, interior, wall and roof structure (Chattel, 2017)
� , s ; .�u
�` �
�>
, ! �' _ ;;�
I., '��� �� ��. ^,' li�`:`.
ll � �� • ���;','''.
,, , ;�:::;
i L° ��'`1
��� -
`� ��;� � �� �
,� �l�!: i '4 ���
� �!I���i �� �
— ;m; ,,s
,: ,� �.�,� ,,� i .
—§w .� :t';'. � � 1 �.
- " � �`]�� � �ti, ;:
l�•L. �1� •S��k ��,.'�_-:i:
k f�j,. _:-:,� ..
i f;��. )h � ;iifi_
� •1.'� y .'i'i' �� .� '":
�3 ifl,lr'• � }, �_ - !!s:;�';';
�:
�'�«:�:i; � l�; ;�
�� ,. : it , ' �
�fll��;;.:. �I�ri j
�1 ' ` �� �
i���: ,t ,
k.' � t
�S�
I�I.: .', . .�� � -�1
�� ���� :�
.f . '' ► ;� �''.,t�I'�t „•r.;.:
'�• ;'i i':; Y�� � `. ;i i;;+
� ; • �, ��'� ' �`• ` `1 ` `� ,
.�t ;w. •t � �, :� r
Image 55: Granary, showing wood frame with tongue and groove interior finish detail
(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16560
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—GRaNaRv
ATTacHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
�
' ` __ � e. ;::�'Y �
� � ,�� -;p ..�
. . _ . (�'�YI' ,er -' rr'I r _ f'
_ t��
,'�'._" � - -r�,$� . r�;. � . .
. .- . �� Y�4�.
'r
r � -
rY�..
_ � •y ��..
__.�• `•- _ `�
s2'
< �.
�_✓ �: , �
• • `�4� '�•
_�:
��
� ��' " � � R
d� � � �{ ' �'' ��.
�� - . ,r' � 1 lj
.� i >� ii � :� �
� �� �
,R� x;: .� ''�a
�
• , '�� 4 j�� ;` . -
i ,� i
,�•�:; I �.
Image 56: Granary, interior, roof structure (Chattel, 2017)
_ � � ;-
!�
-i::
�
��A ��
y' �
�:
'- ' c:y
r: �'.
Image 57: Granary, interior, view east(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16561
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—SHeo
ATTacHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
�.� .�
� �
�-- ,.�
. '.��-
_ .� � ,�, :.
a �. �' � ' , �f ~�
�� � � :; � � �+' � f.
a.�. 3i � r � ,
'/� .�,. .�� " ' �� ,.-� t ,.��-•.
'�., � � f`; . '
�.-��� i �-� � �I 4
�'r F i, {
I i
�
' ��
fF �
�'re�
`ar =
+ ,. . , .4 k S',' � +.. � -t'
���';y�"" ;,'• x • .. . .. .t:.k�.. ,�' '�r� A� .'i�-� �".,.:
./y.�,Y ��'� rl��' ��+ .,L` � �
. •:�"7TG �4.{r . • .. � :G�����t.:�� � •:�a.
-`-�`f`?�'�' • ;� .�.r,
. . .'�_ ��'.J A ,.. . " �.. . . .
... • . • .:�.
_ :ti.
Image 57: Shed, view southeast (Chattel, 2017)
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16562
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—BuNKHouse
ATTacHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
.
•
,.
,�� „���' ' � ""`:'�
.��- '-�� -- -
_ '�� _ ,__� �~ _
��� +
r--y;' F � ' � �._:_:.. �k
*'`� �f - _ � �����`�
..x ' . ' _' - - _ ��
-;` � / �; -L^7'. - ti�-- f� - � � � • --`_"� � --
--�..�. � -
� -- , � ; -
� �, _...� ' - � ' ' �
���'• -.w•2 r-a.+�.:�;.�"�'.J� 4 � M ' � �-. .
---�'�- _ , _ � . !�.��r .,�.�
� - .. - - �''.,,�''. �� �r .
'�: �
- '�: �
Image 58: Bunkhouse, northeast corner, view southwest (Chattel, 2017)
�..
-,..`.
�
'f�: _ - -- --
�F � , - . : - _ _ _ �
� � ��------ - -
,. -- --
�- - _-_ : ` - _���
.�., _ _ _. � �
_ . �
- ��__, - — _ — , .�...� —.:= r ��-:��.=�
.�; - -- _ ..�-=-,�_=._-- �s.'1►
' - - --�- ; - � :� -'-
_ �_� {, __ - - _,���r �Y �
�r.� ��� "_ "� �f -
4 _ ,� � ---.�, , _
- _ '.i �....
_-. . � • � . � �r►;+;-x' r. �ti.. _ •-... -
-_ - -�- :. --..= �-� -��. _ -�� . -- _. _
; d�
_ _ -:�-=K - . �;�:.:;� .
� � � �;�-::.. r¢,� , - _
_ -r.- _ .� °�= . _
+.: ��:.
Image 59: Bunkhouse, southwest corner, view northeast(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16563
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—O�o BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
� ! ` .� . '
7 t
5 ' --
�i �r , - -� �,
;���. � .� ,, '' ` . '� � `-. '�M. ;'F� i�
_ , ,�; � ,. , � -'i�: ',
- i• ,#`',, ' � ;'� ; ` �
.�,
� ,1 �. '`' '���� �� L i� ��—'.ws ��:,
� �: � z �`�,�.`��'� � `�` s. , . . -
�
. �k� ,� � �?l
� �; F;' i. � . i i'R; '' }' i '�, I, �
i 4 Lr y �.Y! �.�3' �. r . ti ' ' � ���', � � •
.[�p � •�r � I� . .
� � I�I, n' -
�._� , �. � i;�,a �
-- � , ,!" _ 'I. �'' 6�'iy ` r+� � �, , �`'' -
� ,;. _.;�� -�•
—� 1 � "' �� � � _ �_ —
'f`=� � .., �. `�-+-
�=�
�, ' ����_'��� -
, .. � � _ .:+y� .
... -�'' .�R �.L~ -
.� " �r�f", ::
Image 60: Old Barn, southeast corner, view northwest (Chattel, 2017)
�•. ~ --
---- ----- --. _ _ ::-�
°��
�.t .'� � � -._._ �--- ��'._-�r- _^c'�-
� � . � .. .. _ .
I � L � ' - .�i--3'r''" •-- " ►
. .��� I•I ................... ' � '' _ . - ��� _
Y� ��:� �!�� E l �, .
.���_ � '��1
h ��
;I ti.
���:',� �r.rFII- ' •:l F� � �
����' ,�j '� ' i I. y , f ` �� �• �S
.� '� . ..k! �'� i, ��� �� �
...._ � . �a � ; I, r e',I � p , � ,� i' -�W� � �:�ii'
� � �I '� i� �.i , i i,��'�N�: ! �.; �" .�
_� 1 �� I� �f t„+ �i.' �� ��i I' �;I �� �i,. �� �4� '' � }
"s _� , f, .f _
�� ��` . '�$ ��; it.,
- - �{ �'
� � - -
�_�..r-�+�+r:.
. �::�r-'� ..: - "� . .
Image 61: Old Barn, southwest corner, view southwest (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16564
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—O�o BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
� —
� � -_
—
�
__------- -- ��.�~ ��;�� - �`=� --
- - ---------- �- i , i
—� �.
s . --
.� � - -
.. . . � _—
- �' ; " � �+��,1:'3' �s.l` . � 'i,
i�' ��.;�.; ��
� r e:
, '�,>, ���',��' �. :� �'., � �
N, � , �
� ���. � t � - ,•' -
�
W .._ ��
' _ �—�--�:_=.�,'..� _ - -
-_ •�.�-.y.. . ,..;,,: , �, -.- _...
• =-�.. .. .... . , -
- ' `_ - . -_�t.::.__. ...r. ��•, ._:�.>• ��..�_..' .' --
._-y _,,,.r,-:-�= .
~ •. : -_ _ �. �- "�`--,:.,. _, •.. . ,....4,�-^'- ,_, �;�:.�;• - . . , ".
'S�_'" '.�.. '.. .," ' ' _ . �s . ' '.S. .. �_. y
_ " •]r'Jt- ..%F%:+�y•�' ' �"tii-W.Y�' �°1t�Y .- '���
N',��.r:;_- - ':�;;= -- " " � _•r- . .'ti.ti�,
Image 62: Old Barn, northeast corner, view southwest (Chattel, 2017)
�---���
— - '�r.
- --- --- 1;'�'
-� ■fi} i �
�.� �# --
� „ + - _ . _. P
� �� � �1
� . . � t� �
��I '� � � h '
r �� - _ `�`
' � '1
� ;
,
� ,
.� �� � �
_ ► t.
—� =� ,: .
� �,�
�� �
r, ---
Image 63: Old Barn, interior(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16565
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—O�o BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
r ,
� � •'— • _
� \ ,����;: y .. `� 'S
��. � �� }� .. : - - � �
� - ,�_ - --—�• r
� - ��, - ���„•, I .
. ,�' � �1 ,
� � � + ��
�1�
_ � '�r� � '°�� +,,. �
• ���i�, � hSw �, .. . .�r�`P`' ' Jk Iy �
' 11
� i " , � � ����`� � #. �� t 1
. � ,;;;�.�-�;� f '�,
/ ��' �T�-� - � �` '4 �
'f• ,:_� � }
{ 3_r"_ � - �, �=- + y� ; � .
, �� � t
;i. , ���� ,� { .,,,�„� � ��
L: .. a�"X � ._
� .�� : ti � ��
t + { �
,
, - �
t� ���' �
��r,� �
Image 64: Old Barn, interior(Chattel, 2017)
� �,.
�
� - �� 4 ,,� �
_.�., �
� �� �
- �
�
►���
,...�. ���
- �,,� �
�. N �
I 'S� L'
M��
r� 1
��� F�� ,�
�, 1 4 , •xd.
_ �
/ I
_�
�
_ ..� � $ � ' liryi
w:�ai. �.
- � -
Image 65: Old Barn, interior(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16566
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—O�o BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
;,--a��,�
' �
-� � — �.,
��, f f�.
��
t:'.-,:=•
�r. � �.
� �p _
tc -.--
�� --
��!
I
i
i.+i�
l�'�y I
'''� '`'�"�� ' �'. '
g:�r ►� i� .� -
�� ,� _ "'�
� .: �� _�� -
, _.
,� , ti
�1 ;�: � _.
��� � -
5`��t �- �`_
�
�� _-
Image 66: Old Barn, interior(Chattel, 2017)
� '�; '7:'[; .
�- .
�
'� .. — _
� �,`- " ,
� � �
�.. �.'� -
ti
�., � --
_ � �
!-_ � a��'= _�` -
, -- ---
- ,,
; ,
��
_.-,
'_ 1�J �� N
3 ��� � �
�� � ��
1 —�r��
��r ti;� _ - . ,.r � - --
Y^ ��;;�j_ �
�Yr �.
� � ' * �.. - .
_5 - J _
� 3 � ��
f_ �r `'-
' �c,I..�� �. ,1 . .
Image 67: Old Barn, interior(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16567
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—STORAGE BUILDLING AND OUTHOUSE
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
�•`;�14 :� � . _ -"�
�„�. - . �.�_-- - `•.�
�'- -�-�- _ '''�
�'� �. _ �T +��. �
������-� �~ YI ��.
- �' ` rL'i - � A� �, .
,� l. � � _ '�
�� � �-J . . _ - �-
:���,� � � � _ _ . __..-
�`�; �. �� � -� _��.- � � � . ..�
�� __ , �,
, _ .
, :� " �. �' , �,, �,.�:- �
-� ,� ��A , f r —
i !� y�
=n :�,�. �:
.�" �l _ ' � ,�' _
� •� � ;a:: ' n i ,.J �.,w'J ���o ,.���
. .1 . _. — . _ . . .,�.e�'.
' , ".:_ �'� ' .. - .� ., I' FFsa`'F''I
._ . . . -��-a' _�� � � �� f :.a�: . :. '•-= �� =�� -
�� � . . .. . �.�...�
.'�^r.- ..- �;rJ�u-��� -_ ����Y�.;z1'-,r� �s++�`-.._�• �-:`
.�I. . ���� .�.� �`.�d'� a'�i�'
�. '��'2'"- -. ' '^ .: _ __" - ��„ _ . . .�:'r� },'il �! -
" _ ' ,y ' '. �' -:
- - ' � . . -=1.��.:Z�- ' . �::. . �• w�.��3 _.�..
. . _ ifc. r�Yr�+- •'•.,F� '• �� � 1' �•
. �I''w[ . . �ti �!�. •'� �T'
_ '" �.
_. . . . :..1y.�(y�a¢� ". .. �.�6:'.in�.•�: _,..,iF,'!4��i
. "�'�:`A.�.�'S�YLy��=��,��. "--" '!J'�•�� .S',��t�y \• i��l �� A •-"
Q T�
° .'��$�'I��• s;�i:]:F� a�► Y,_,�
`� ��" 's
Image 68: Outhouse (Chattel, 2017)
--- - — � --� ��
'_; _�-,--:-
--��,�.:__-::�`s- �.�
��- —
� ��.
��- �
`_� __�----�"'f� " ."
-��_�--- _ -- -
wx' �=�_ �_ " :t��:
.,���� ' .�;'` f # - - -,�,�" .:���`
� y ,.. j ' , � � , � � `� ~-
��. — � ,1j , �'i �". . . ;�: -�.a - �`�-.
^� ��'�' ' � � �. '� � ��.�•.�
1 �: � , �'I�'' � }, ' ' ,sy� x
� � " _ � � �! - +
��. !� .1.;, ,- ��� i� �c�:�;:,;,�;,
,,, ..�-_._ f��. _ _ '��
.. . .�.F - .. �
.. . �,���. ��7[�� _�'� '.
- i 'y ��
-.. � � N�'
' "" . . .. . . .. ��•^ti�., -
_ _- - _ :Ff ..J'.'� -•. _ -:.ti�.'..'4�:+;.��Y,r�i-• �' .
,- ' "• _i'� i .
�?A.-�.=.-.,'.�.. �-�. ..
'-���r'--' .��.�5.-q•� _ _ _
Image 69: Storage Building (Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16568
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—Ce��ToweR
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
� �
L..�-
, ,
� ��� � �� ; "�; � ,
'^ *�r'r. _-� �_ ;7 . �.� �v�
i i �. 4�i
. .... �L �j6 � i �. -:� - -
-� ~��« � ���
� i► � ._
�'
`� r 1' ''�� F �ta i
� ��j • '� � �i
a�,1+Y �. - ����'� I�5{I'V�l�.tl� � I� i'„�'+ i I ,
� k� � , •• �r'�A V��:A,s�,
4. � ' � 'eY
��. � 4 + ' ��' �- ... . _.
Image 70: Cell Tower(Chattel, 2017)
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16569
ATTACHMENT C:
INSPIRATION IMAGES
16570
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16571
- •. • • �
, � .�- . . .
�►'�� . . :� • -
�f � , _
�� �
t.� . :�..
' ...�:,v� " �h
'f '���'�; �,,
Y�i'� - `�
, ..��.� f .'yy.t�
.F�����-�'�w .,.'�r�.'v.•^` ::j1'.�.
-,[e".� _ i ��y��{•�a�t+�.
. .a�:.. . • � .. �r -
. , y���yti.�.' r,�T.
�c'.: �u�� ��a IiS1� :: 1.{.
I '�;"��.
��sh� , �� �;; �-��. :
�f�� �=�� ���
.��� _ �.
.��:^X� � �:i� �i "� . `�' ::'�„
- - -�; t,.y � �
�
��:- - F<,.�-�:►.z:;�,�� .
?�._..,..-.� ' ' �_�- -
�, -.� . . .- • F;, .
,t" ''Y.;' _�. �: �.,r `;.�
: - . - _ � _ � - ��
.: - �
. '� y,�'. - _���
. . - . . ..- . . . . . . . ...
,~+.�4� '��� r '�
1 � � �
� ' "ti!
~ �' ,f�, '�'.
1:��ti�•�6 �� !��
�,r� �� ' �•�s�°�. � �.7`�.
� ^� � : .�
,.��i. � .
.E L� ��� �r �•
` • �• . �'�� , • � 4'• ��
3tii° i� ;,,�• ;
' �,{' ' '; " •• + . _ � �
- � . _'` '�,¢,:� T
y �',. k'w ������r'.`� Z.'-..3' 1^.. �l�s
� '� ' � �� '��+ � i J �.�t' . : Td•�t
, `�' �, t •' _ . .A . ;��!'� _.�.�.'y .1 _ _ �w
'�.# �' "�.. � r �,}. �' 7'�' -
� s�' ,.;{7k'r�"�`' � '�—'r !`� � � f "� i
a, � ;�I� � ��:����+ .. `S�� . �' • .� ' y.
r.�r,.�• ry .Yr ' i i S. ♦'� � ��-� �
yti� t! l
., �.7.. � t �fi �� e. �� �'+' '!I' i��J .� ` -
��r.ryd--- �~ - '.�, � 4.�,.y i3 1- �� ���e%���i ��,. _� ��
r•} • .-�/" "� - ,�' �
'T'7� '_
.-r-_.t� I e7�e ��'��3
'.' ' :�� * _� "`•��= ,`� -
�
�,.�r�'•w,.�►.
. . • • . • .�- • • • • • • - ' • •�•
•- • •
FROOM RANCH COMPLEX—O�o BaRN
ATTACHMENT B: CONTEMPORARY IMAGES
;; � ,
�
. •
♦ � ti �.�
' �y �
-, � �� ,�
.� �': a� � �—� _ �
� � �
. -�• . � � _ '` � - �
•���.�. ��. � . � - - � �\
,:r.; _. � � 1 �
�.�-~�;:�s; ���'� – _ . - - - - � � I l`(
'.- '. :.�jw} �` �fi �"�� � _.�i � � � �
y~�:�.'' ''_ �� . }�y�,� �. ' � � I � _
'+��, - �
, :��;,•'� �"�.�s-�.`�-.
• '�"."r' �r.
- %'.� �t-,i.��,'��-,_' �. 1�
Fi.'�•.:- „• f.., ..-. �
-,� -`� _��•;.. : .�'�ii:� - . - ' "� I
� �+?--�'�-_:�;' :'�`�-�+�=z��ti��"�t ' �-��:-. ..'-,-. - � � r � r— _
~r." �.y.�' a' ' , r�~•F'.�' �R:.��� tF/ �rt.:.' �r� _�
+w�5�� z-� 1�'w•'Sa-r � :R� y ��� . .. � ����
s� �kr.. �
r_�j} � ;r�4, � '`}+yr� �!�Y. - _ - -, z ' .. 4, ��5 ��� -_
�L • �k. � ; ���v�r,��.� i'� � I� •y. �4.; ' � ,f� _- j i ^_
_ .� �,�. ~ ,S#� � 4,: ��- .'L.- �.{_: ��_` _, ... �
. - `V.7� �'` ���' � . . .l _..fr�,n,... L',+,�_y�. � i.:�. - - Lyi` ',,.
��•� 'S � _ ,� °T �� ��}•�s�►t,��.�� _ �
- .I�4� • �'°�;' �e�c�`'G�-�.�i '��c•��.
_ ' , � �� �
. ' _ ���' - _ •.4�-.— _
� � � +��'.._ _
�• �' ..y�__ -
Image 74: Inspiration image of ghost structure, Benjamin Franklin House, Philadelphia
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CHATTEL, INC. � HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANTS 16573
ATTACHMENT D:
FROOM RANCH - HISTORICAL BUILDINGS,
RRM DES�GN GRouP, NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16574
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16575
�
• • •
u ura er � a e omm � ee ear � n
N ove m ber 14 , 2017
, _
.: _ ..r � ' z
.y T . , \ _
Y � . _ ,�� t�*
� C �� �.�
q _
� � _ s�
� .
�1 ,j �, �.�� — � �;�'
�r�" - '�
Pv '
�o �, I
� , � .;. . 1� `
� Y� fi F � +� 1 k''}.,y' : � 7 �,.
%i -� s'�/� ��'� H ��, y _ �..
.
p� in,� 12 .d. ��'�'k'�� .
�� � �^k � % Y
+-+. S �r „�T'l`�� � a� i�. `� �, � �,' ✓.�- ,vb,
.� . ;� y"'S�"I� �'u- �M'p A .1 bS �� x
� � �!. � -.� �> � A ,�"` v
. � � % �'" � ��, �� = � ��� ��- w+ -
/ " �'d ��,:r_ �` � � '�
� ' �
1� W �.
_ �� ;� � � ���� �� � � �� ��� �
e � � „�� t :� � "`; a 1
ij a4' K
�. � �� .�I�4�� Iw �' ��.Y�'� ''
�� � �, . � 4: ��,�,�, � /
�� �
�'1 a, _
,
� - - '
.
* " ��,� `,��•*'�y�� ' �� •;, " �� �� � ! 1 .
� ,�� �`� � . _ __ . � ;;a r` �` �
'�� , � t � '„ � ' � n
.� m �� � ., , . � �, ��, � ��'� ��;• _ _ j��• _ 1�� z. �. �- .� � ; ` ;��� ., - ..w���3
, _y�,
�
__ � j .
. .
� ' ' -
.
�'^� . , . ,.. , � -r •� ��. ,r � s.[ `� ��`,y}�' >��, =1-`l�" ` -
� � .��I� � S 9�i ,` ��'�;.�iK� by�
�� . 1. ��� ���. ` . �" . . .� _'KZ �" - � + ' - F, ��� �!'_a � " �V a _ - . � _ t�� { .
. . � `� ., r �.' . .- .- . . ��, .r� ����5 �.'� af'I� ,-. I _ �/.-' - ' -__ �''s.a- .: �
` � �,�
"'� . . . .. �'� � ;� �� ,���` � �.�� � °� �, aa ��y `- �,y � �� 4 _ --- -
�`, a►�" �i _. � -.�� • �' . ��^��: �' �� �� n�r � � " `, �'��,��� � _ � ��.
. . �. . . .. ' - . , y_ . . .,. '. -,'�* .' 1 �"' 's!F"�.' . - . - . �
", '�' . �� ..�'� �� .� � -,..,-" ' .., � � � � �i'. �-. 3�S..w "�1� � �,�R*:'��. ��_t��I ��_'n` � _ - _ _ - - -
, . ,.
. . ,: . � -. �t .. , - - a ,� .. . _ . ..... -�� 2 - , 1{"�;_� �:W ',7l - � � - -�. �� _
, _; .. i � p�� - '
` _ * C
. �� . � � " �� -
�. r f .���. � . _ ' „ �� 9��j � � .� _ . ' � _
���, ,t
� � ', � • � � ,. ��� :� _
. . ,. *- . . � �- � �� — —
,
. � , � . • � � -
. . ��; j�f�� r s� �� � �
: _
_ . � - --
.. z- — _ � �� �.,e.. - �`� _ _
r �.
� �.
.�-
,�-. - - -- - - - f` _s ,�
,_ - '. ... ' � � .,. :� � �._ �_Y - -�. �a� +d�+��3 a� -. � ._ -- _�,-�� y � -�� _.. _.�.�i"`l'�� ._�.� ..�...o.._..-i_ _
�� _
e _
. . - .� �_.' _ ,_ I +�W .. _ __ ..�._ .._.�...v—..��i—__� -
:� } .
. '. ' _ . _ : _' . _-.. i1.0 �:.. :_T.� ... � . -
- _ _..:. ... _--. � ,�� .�f^' ' i '
J ��'• • . •y�i�}��.����� _ _ � � �6�� � �1. �I �Y• � ��������_ ��� - � � I �� '�y,{��.'1� . . ' ' - . _
. , ' ` 11'�►V' . }.� ��' L� �I�T I�, � '� ,i �� l`��~}~ . - . � .. . . i - ��
� "�:'..y�tan��.�y��l� ���� .r. �± - � . A1 � 3^���� � .� _�� �5
v.w� as J
,
1
� _
...- "• - . �.r -
�
, i � _
..�.:� , � . r"-- . _ _- - .__ -.
a �i..:. � � .,� -_ .S�=.��. � e .. . ._ ..`¢����,_
, - ..-.: .�-„� �=T �* ._ .,:�. .. - • _ . � �9 �' _ � f'1
... R� , � � � � �
� -' �1 � � � --j� i• �� � ",; q -
— . _ - - . _-- � � a , p ��
s�
- ��-�.�_�_ _ � � ,����^ `ti� 3�� ,� � � •� ��� � �
'„
, � � � �� .,` �\ -��ti��;�:'- . - - �, .J-.
J - ,� ' `-
�r� <
� � ri �1 ... _.��... �_��.._ I � �i,, ' � -;��� - _ . . . - -
�rvr � d a�`s,�. . -
-.:' . fxw !�; � -� ;,;�� . - . . . . _
� - 4i�"`� ,���-. .,�.�'- - ��, . i;), , , . ... 1 ,N; �. 5��r 'i���ti � �'F4,5;` :. , , . _ ' T -
�c_.� ' :N } ''- � r .l�. � t
- .- . ' ''� ..,'°�4j! .r{�@j "t��� Yf�� �n ,;.� I.' .I
..
s� '
�.
.- �,: , s:� . . _
. ,.,�.... c a
. . _ , �...�.�a�wr'_.e�'��aia
. '�. .�:.� _ _
n
a ,
: .. .r r ,s . .,. � . _:. . . � � - , . } ,� - .� _..._. _ �
i.
�� t�.i
5a`"r
_�
.
; -
..
�' / �. ..-;:c„
�
s � �...,�..._''�� _ ' '-�. . _�' F '�'d
.� .. "W , ;,,
+ 'r ;�. : ,r .., _ _ - - _- _ . . - _.. _. . - -�
.
� ..
..._.._., ....
ssaa
-� .:� "��."�Isal54'7t�ai.:. -�'_ . `�mueri�. .. ..-,w_.saoe'� _ _ -� - � - -
�;'.:.. )'� . " _ __ __ _
�' _ � � �'_� � -- � ._ - -
� k'i 3� dE�� �� . �"� � ��� �
, ' e �y w
d _ � � �.a � ��� �,� a ���" �; � � y�4� ? � '� � �rq�t,� +°' �
. 1 1' ��i kV�rZ. ) �Y. V �� �s'N 41 C �'Ai f} �F4� .
- � �� Y�i i � 8 � 7V ] p� .
� � � ��� � �: , > �� ..
_ _ W�` "" . ,` '"e � �
,�i� ' H � t ,,� . � �? F Y� ' _� . �� . -
� � ,5x! 4' .; � ;1 � y �� � �' , � ' � :� .. _. � J --
i 7�ysr:.i,.'�, .,a� r;�'�' <iil'��.;b".�,°Y . f ,�,r� , rt 7 i�` _ �.de��s�Y��� - _ �a .
�� .
n � #
F t
' : MMi�y ° i�• t'���.a ° C ' '��1�°rrdP`� � - � -_
�� �q. . $� i w�- p ' ; �,'�' r _ '��-=�-S�"-
'�'�, �` � { 4 � �V� � � �� _
� 1' � � vl � � .' �� e� � � � .
� w a t'�9, J w � i' - ,� � �
�" �h'�� ' i�i-�� �"S 3,Jw`�- i y'y��+�p - _ _ _ - - .
P, �`�atl�, �� n �i_ '-'° - ' - _. _ .� ,.-�`-s � J _.
1 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION 9 . CREAMERY - FLOOR PLAN 18 . DAIRY BARN - STRUCTURAL ELEVATION
2 . EXISTING STRUCTURES 10 . CREAMERY - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 19 . DAIRY BARN - STRUCTURAL ELEVATION
3 . TEA STAIN MAP 1 1 . CREAMERY - PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 20 . DAIRY BARN - STRUCTURAL ELEVATION
4. COMPOSITE SITE PLAN 12 . CREAMERY - PROPOSED PERSPECTIVE 21 . DAIRY BARN - STRUCTURAL SECTION
5 . PROPOSED SITE PLAN 13 . DAIRY BARN - FLOOR PLAN 22 . DAIRY BARN - STRUCTURAL SECTION
6 . E/W SITE SECTIONS 14 . DAIRY BARN - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 23 . EXISTING VIEW
7 . N /S SITE SECTIONS 15 . DAIRY BARN - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 24 . PROPOSED VIEW
8 . MAIN RESIDENCE - PHOTOS 16 . DAIRY BARN - FOUNDATION PLAN 25 . TRAILHEAD PARK PLAN
17 . DAIRY BARN - ROOF FRAMING PLAN
16576
BAC KG RO U N D / P RO P OSA L O BJ ECTI V ES
The proposed project includes the dedication of 3.6 acres to the City of San Luis Obispo as the P R ES E RV E TH E H ISTO R I C E N V I RO N M E NT
Froom Ranch Trailhead Public Park. The main portion of the Park consisting of 2.9 acres would 1 . Historic Preservation - Retain the three most si nificant historic structures,
. . . . . . J
incorporate the most significant historic structures on the property. The rema�nder of the Park area which are the Main Residence, Creamery/House, and Round-Nose
(0.7 acres) is an open space and drainage channel that will act as a physical and visual buffer Dairy Barn, into the City Trailhead Park for adaptive reuse .
between the main park area and the shopping center to the north .
2. Comply with SOI Standards - Follow SOI Standards for Reconstruction for the Creamery/
A Historic Resource Assessment documented seven existing structures as historically significant for House, and Round-Nose Dairy Barn, and Rehabilitation for the Main Residence .
their association with the dairy industry and Froom family and as contributors to a potential historic . . . . . . . .
. . , . . 3. Reta�n Phys�cal Relat�onsh�p Between Bu�ld�ngs - Ma�nta �n the same
d�str�ct referred to as the Froom Ranch Complex. Ma �n Res�dence, Creamery/House, Round-Nose . . . . . . .
. horizontal spacing between buildings with their relocation .
Dairy Barn, Shed, Bunkhouse, Old Barn, and Granary.
4. Preserve Character- Defining Features of Buildings - Reconstruct all character-defining features
Of these seven existing structures, four buildings, the Main Residence, Creamery/House, Round-Nose using historically accurate materials, including salvaged and reused materials where feasible.
Dairy Barn, and Granary were deemed to be primary contributors to the potential historic district
as they exhibited more unique architectural features and greater historic significance from their MAI NTAI N EXI TI N H I T RI VI EW H ED
. . . . . . . . S G S O C S
association with the Froom family and dairy industry of San Luis Obispo County. R r t th V rti I R I ti n hi tw n B il in - Whil th Fr m R n h m I x
5. ec ea e e e ca e a o s p be ee u d gs e e oo a c co p e
. . . will be re-graded , the existing vertical relationship between the three primary contributing
The Shed, Bunkhouse, Old Barn, and non-significant additions were identified as secondary il in will mimi k with th M in R i n t th I w t I v ti n th r m r
. . . . . . . . . . , bu d gs be c ed e a es de ce a e o es e e a o , e C ea e y/
contributors in terms of their architectural integrity and ability to convey association with the dairy H t th mi I I v ti n n th R n -N D ir B rn t th hi h t I v ti n
. . . . . . ousea e ddeeeao , ad e oud ose ay a a e geseeao .
industry and Froom family. These non-significant structures and additions would be
thoroughly documented consistent with the Secretary of the Interior' s Standards for the Treatment 6. Provide Accessibility - Grading will maintain the general slope up from
of Historic Properties (SOI Standards) prior to demolition . east to west across the park site, mimicking existing grades, but also
allowing for complying accessibility to and between buildings.
Due to the presence of a trace of the Los Osos earthquake fault which runs beneath the Dairy Barn, , , , , , , , ,
the ro osed ro'ect ro oses to reconstruct the architecturall si nificant Dair Barn at a new 7. Reta�n the Off-S�te V�ew Corr�dors - Open v�ews w�ll be ma�nta�ned from the
p p p J p p Y J Y . . . . .
location sli htl downhill and to the east, which is outside of the re uired setback from the fault. roun da bou t �n to t he par k area o f t he t hree h�s tor�c bu�l d�ngs beyon d .
J Y a
In addition, the two other architecturally significant buildings, the Main Residence and Creamery, g, Preserve the O en Atmos here - The landsca in for the ark will rimaril
. . . . . . p p p J p p Y
w o u l d a l s o b e r e l o c a t e d f u r t h e r t o t h e e a s t t o m a�n t a�n t h e�r s a m e r e l a t�v e h o r�z o n t a l s p a c�n g . T o consist of low- rowin and drou ht-tolerant native rasses to mimic the
. . . . . . J J J J
ma�n ta�n t he v�sua l h�erarc hy o f t hese t hree bu �l d�ngs, gra de c hanges wou l d be crea te d be tween historic settin of the ranch . Drou ht-tolerant trees and shrubs will be
. . . . . . . . J J
the structures to mimic their existing vertical relationship . strate icall laced in informal rou in s behind the historic structures.
J Yp J p J
���' \� `�� .. � "' " 9. Incorporate the Palm Tree - The Main Residence will include one prominently
w �;:y� ,
���` ' ������ ����� � � �'' EXISTING STRUCTURES • • • • •
� - , _ , located palm tree near the front of the house to m� m�c the h�stor�c sett�ng .
. ,
. � -
Significant Structures 10. Select Historicall A ro riate Site Details - Li htin and fencin
� � ;� �� "� -- 1 Main Residence Y pp p J J J
,
, � \\ 5
- ,
� �" � 2 Creamery should be historically accurate to the Froom Ranch setting .
_ � . -, � _ � -
.
� � ;
,
.
, . _ _ � .
� � _ - -- _ ._ 3 Dairy Barn
\ . r j •�, , . ,
. � .
,
� � - • �� � � � - 4 Grana
� _ s � � - ry
, � _ - _
, �
,, ,, ,. \ � — - � , ,, ,
�,
� EDUCATE PARK VISITORS
���,. ' � � �--_ _ —� �} � \ ''
- � � _ � - Non-Significant Structures . . . . .
- /( ;
� - �� . 11 r t PI z t m I m nt Hi t ri B iI in - A m II ri f I z
\ � � /
- 5 Shed . C ea e a as o Co p e e s o c u d gs s a se es o p a as
� ���� �� , -
- :
�� � � '� �'� �� � ---= 6 Bunknouse are ro osed on the back sides of the buildin s to create a sense of entr
� � --
� -
��� � � V - p p J Y
' ������ � i 6 �
�, 4 - - 2 .
, .
,
� � �� �-� % � . �� , 7 o�d Barn and atherin s aces but not detract from the natural settin .
�� g g p - g
. , , � , / .� ,
.;� ` �, \, . �. - i � �,•� ;�;� _
.
�
..
� .
�
,,� \ , . ,� �,� `, � � � Non-Significant Additions . . • • • •
��� � � � � � 12. Educate Park V�s�tors - Inter ret�ve and d �rect�onal s� ns are ro osed
. -�! 3
,
� � 7 � � p g p p
' � � - ~ � ' `� r � �� R throu hout the Trailhead Park to educate and direct ark visitors. Si na e
^� '� � � , � ,r� � _
� .��, ; �;. :� �'� .,, � , J p J J
. � � �
� � � -�� " �� .. � ��� ;O �i
�, � �� � � a ���� . . . . . . .
i �� � � :-,:= ; , , , ,, , , near plazas would conta�n �nformat�on on bu�ld�ng h�story and funct�on .
.� , , , _
�
� .. _ _ .� .� �
.
� . .
. . - � - - - -
, _.
. �
;� . ,. . , _ �._.. ,
,,;:;;� --
� , � „ �
4 � � � � . �� �. � � � ���'
i
i
_ �ti�
_
� �� � � �
� _
� i \ ��� � 1
_ � �` // I
. / (
;' .. -..,. 1
��\ � �
� U I �,� n
t.... •r �--� .....�y � �A. . ' ii
�
..._.... .._-------------------------- _�`. :.'',�,
Ji w
� '
- _`
_ -�- '•� _ / � ` ...
� � �
� �
� � � � 1f _ f_ 11 1f f1 1f_ 1_ 1f 11 1f
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16577
� � � - .
� °� f �!— 1 x�� -��.
[ � R ��, • ' �2 �.7 � - -
� � - i' ,�� , + , , . � �� -�: ��
I ti� � _ - - ..• �'r � �i�;`;,i 1,; ' i, _ _�- � �
� ' _-- ��� ' f"�r• i:k';.^�i:�` ; ,� � ,} _ • `� - _
� '� - � 1 �'��,,: '; '•��r .�l' �!�� ` - _ - - - .� ` ` --- -- — -
i, � :rqr-- # �{�� � .� � ` ;i� �,iyf Z 4 �..� �
I � i _—
I i f�, '� i � r�,: � �t, ' '1 - �S `4� 1'y�:� �- — x - -
`I� � y�r:� '�_ ��� I F . . �'�. •i y �v __�1� � � . :��_ _ ., - - -
i� '{.. ','�� j � { f �— �
' � � ���' .:�. r j.'��1: . � � . _,�. ti t•.` ' —� � . '�
.�. � �5�. _ � - 1-�,�� S I r, ..y..t ,;��{1 �* - ���
� � , ` ' � 1 '� � �
;�' ... •���y ��� ��.1` z�_�' =:,�.'i� ` :�i Zi'�.' � � � f:• —. _ -'�� _ ■ �� � k I ��-i�"a7'�
�.,'. Y � •s
..��' ' '��::��/�,:i r.�'ty' .I..�'I � '�'4�.1 +�� - � ' _ - ..F� �, �� � ■ . �
.��.� :'�+�. � ".4. ,.,' •'�9 t � �i� � " • ' � . _��
:� -K:� �::_ � •. ;�-. ... ^,.: j.,'�; '� ��� ,,v' , 3 � I � , �
K!y:�N-'' �.-k . . .`'��'.;�:�� ��� ' . : '^ _ . ' _ L• � -r'..r'� � ���—
� :..... . .>x.• .��'1�:.:: •h . _ .` ,�I. I ��I:'�` '�
.' . �RKf;.�•�r .nR ' 'p''� ' 'r� :°�`�..�..' -:. . '�'. � � , .... �. ... �.
:�:���:. �., �'� ,'%�`.,� . .�. �`; � �
;�. '♦i•���d- .,r� � . •"('r •r�1�,�,� � � -w . . i i . ��� -
',�.N,��'�y� � f� � 1` ,til��,�:t::',�•. - lr' 1� ♦
;� . R � r�.
.j;��:�� .r.r�` .,.....�:. ..�;. �.���.;a�,�. _ - - . . i � .�
,��. :F.�. ;,.. ;�. _ y`. 3 , � '- . .. -_.. � J �
�'y'a,,y��'sy��. }•,�p�!<.' �}�I�c.p�� . '-1 r y .•" . { � .�' �'.
� yf/¢�,��s �f7 � r:
. 5\S�Bl�i�'. •71•�:- ., :v� i'�E .Ti�'.�I:. i�:: . �` .r. � ,r:.� l�.M �R'` i.. � I ,I 7 � . lL '��I�_ .
__._ � � - _� � ! LATER ADDITION SHED BUILDING LATER ADDITION MAIN RESIDENCE
- -- � _�—w ' �'. �:, -
, � 1 :�_
'� � I ` I .'+ �r i5
— �� � ! � � �
,, ar � � � — _ �
�+i�'i �� � ' ,,�� , � - �
�. ��•� i I�� �� -_%'!"��_ J" �
� - 1� � .�A.°�-.�N' .� \\\\\\� �
_ ,1' '�l �/ ,�. .
�'' p,� I � ,
� + , Y �Pf��4i��.. ���_i '...�� -• . ' � S
I " - ' �;;, '+" �a:��v � -y.�
� `i.�``��,•� �. ..,r....' .,r '��., � ��is- .::�:x�::� `O
L .,. ". ������(.rt {r� y�� �,�,,,,_, .,�r.r�,�Y ��r' / ?. �.
/ �tr'� �F�+'
�ry'f�` .:•'���.r .':;v�'1'': •L�'r-��r , � :r;.. �
`•�4'-W�f •Rf'��,i ' ���.�. .. � . � - . - " ' ..�.t�� : �. � � .
��:�;�` � ■ ,�Qj��♦
■ • ` o,�.��
CREAMERY/ HOUSE � •• '' � • Q�� _ _
♦ _ _ — ,_ 's ,
. �
. �
.,` � �-:�- _ _ --_ — ___- .._ _ —
.
, .� -�.
•♦ � � - . � ,�. .
� ��
�� � - �
`, ,� � -
\ �� � � � __ . , � •
_ . i.
;-� - - '
, \_ ;.;k- ' :;f f._;�'.�-�-�- _��:�
� ,. -- -- -- _ -
I
�� — - _ .. .
, � BUNKHOUSE
,
; �
��~ _ _ ,JI1 1
"� �� . , 1 I .
� �`y �'�, „ ' �Y.w'=y�' . . '>��. 1 'y�r'�' :..�4-ti�.- -- �
'�' �L ��•- 'r I ��il�nl�.{• -
. .. . ,. . � e .�' ~ ^� ,�{I�I!��t
' � - - �� i . ,-t 1•. N �'.i ';�,,� ti.
f � ���`_-�t� i'�; , �. ` ' '1 I i
CELL TOWER �� r :,�. �j�tI�� ;, _ :� �� �
7i�.i �!
'I, I�� � � I � �4I
.'�
� :i; ,� 't' , ;�
� "� ' � ; , �i ,
:�9�� � �J�� ��
, . r } ;�r + �� ,r�� '; � �,;
r ,'�,,� � _
�� � ��� ��� �'- ' _ -
�',�� -. ; - - ---�
�
= —�- "OLD" BARN
--. -- _��
,� �-�-
�.���
,�. �'� _
���, � � a ��
� � �; { ,�
� ,
� � � � 4' I�,� �r�
k;� ' ; ':,� ,� ,,' ':, ay'5'; 4 . -� ::�
� �,� , + I �`- y ,Y�'
� � �� ��� `
.�y. �_I i� �-�
` ��, �I �I �•.�+��.•' I�JI I�'' +I ti.
'i' - �
-�� �;. o
' F� Zt'�'' Costco Target
G RANARY D �,
.
H' e '•
� Dee t � �
0
a a
0
, �
0 10 20 30 60 90 ��4 d.9� ,
L___J M�
�
- r. _- _- - - - _ '� � �� �
... � -F l��.�� - ��. -- �� '
_ x. ,� Lx. -- �- ! �_��-^-�" .�y/��-s� 1- �"-�. �
' Frr-1[u r 'x��- � . . � �f .��v����1� �r�,`�� ���'���� � ��-��� �- -i � I I, s/
� � h _.r� i� - r ��.� _�����.fjiri'` . _ .-y �-r'-�----'�'�=--_�.: �
i . 'l �+��".� . - .
s,�
� '
. l
I, t# �r�l .�`� .�, , ,- _ ,. `"'—�='` - - ;,� �
.F �����,��.., m�T _ � .n" - _ - � �__ �
_� _, _ . . - -
- •. `�-�.___
� y - - - 5
:.�� = - - � � � � ��
_ � �. . _ _ - I '' 1 :��,.-Tr � � �` � PROJECT �a'�
�►`�r":�"�:'►� ' � �•. �f i. � ►` :� a. j� S I T E �
:-1 .
� � � � � '1��� • ` ' . - s.^ ' � �
4.rr�i�r�i+'� � � i I ;� 'Yy"��� , � � '�� �� � �� ,;ri>, �
r �' �� . , � I � � . � - :J. . �i� �1�� N , � _ II' � :4,� • / '�
�J. :� � . �� FJ .. � ;.u,rii" ' t � ,-.�;�j. � !�, ; . �P�.�:+.�, � I I + +s� �,� �
! � �����,��.� �.x � ~ Y;s �.�.� �9, � .'i' ��j.i ,I �'� �,� , a ,r .
_ . �� �+R''"� ��`� �a�- �t j�'
_ � �� �' , .. � ��. , r
_ . � 1 -- ' � , .'�r " �i �: I � ' - �*.
i ���-__ � �..• _�`� ��'
,- L .!► _- .!'�% '-�f'� ':s.._ .�"�•. .�h'� _. � . � Y�..
� - , '.' � {{ - ' �S'`� ,i.�� I - , --- —_ ��-� _ - r,.,,�" - —- _.�
ti" . � _ - �.���. �: ��P}_r,� . v : . .���'*�. ��� ,.. �,�.,.� �. :
' �::�t��
DAIRY BARN LATER ADDITION STORAGE BUILDING OUTHOUSE
�
�
� � � i �
� � � , �� — �_ �� �� �� ��— �_ �� �� ��
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16578
KEY MAP EXISTI NG STRUCTU RES �* . �� � ��� �� ��'� - � ��� -� �� � �' � '�
l, �� Y � . � ..
S�}.�� . � . � �iR a '� + ' � +
� . f � �•��+. ` ` , .. ����t� , ��, ~ ��
r i _ I � r
� � � � �
���� . i. � . . /
; � , � ,., Significant Structures � � ,.' � ,� �� ��
.
��" � � � � � � � M i n R i n ' •� � '
� � a es de ce � -
. � .
. ` �
1 � ' ���� � �� . , r y � I ,E r
' ' Creamery �' . . _ _ � ` � �
�
� g . .r 2 _
� ,' ., i � r :z
t,rs��'t!�', �,' • � a " y ' .�'1 . �
���w , - rr 3 Dairy Barn '� � ��►, �� '
��' � . . ,
k� . '`. � .��•,_ � ' � '_ � '�.
�� � � ,_ 4 G ra n a ry .,� - � � � � i
, . . , .
p '�; � 1 }� � - � � r
�r � �
. • r � _
� ;�'.:�� PROJECT � . . . �� + � ���� ',
. SITE , . ,, ��, �. Non-Significant Structures � � _ � , � .
� � ,+. � •_ a �'•. �� �, ,
= �, -�� -t ~ . � 5 S h ed • . � - . • � � .�
. ; ��� - � ,
s .
rS� � � "� "`� � � � 6 Bunkhouse � � �
. � �: ' :�:''--.,.. _ �
, . `�. ,r1.- ' �
� � I.', l� r �� .. • '
�`� '�� � � �. �. � 7 Old Barn - � �
��� .�
� ��. :� �� �,, ,y � .� - t
-�� �`�� � �`�� �.�;� �, �
1�;�?*"- ' • . . � �`. ; _
.t. . � � � ti" ��
�-� '" �
�. 4.��.1� � � � Non-Significant Additions --
•M�_ � �. _���•�!u+�� t� �
� t � �
\
� � ��
. �� � �
�
�
r
_�1��� ��� �
a�}�'' .
.,..•�_�����} � � � -
\ k *�
� � + �` Y�
- � i � �
� � � � "� , '�� -
� * 5
_ _ ; �, �
- . �
� ` `y� __ �� l
, �� � _ ��� � *� �
— � � � #y.
a / �
�� _ '
� �r� ,' � _ _ -"1 . / —\ - /� i� � �� �
. ` � � � � � r
. �r, / r s f
� / / � � � ' �� =
�� - / i � .
� , , / / , 1
� � \ � / ' �
�
. / " ' i � r +� r
�
�► \ _ - .. — � � `
� , . 6 - � � � .�� -
, 4 2 - �- ,� � � � _{
, , / � . _ �. � .
\�/ / � / ` ' . - "``, .
� �
t - ,, • �i � ` *
� � . ~
� j� , , � .
`� � / � � , I .
4�, ,� �'
,
„' , f � ~---�. .
� �.�. �
_ � � . �
* �.
F ''�! �� � �
3 � , � � .. ,. � �
� � � � � � � i �
, , j. � � \ � . r
� y � 1 � � � i}
� � * �� � /� �
. � � �,
�� � � � � ,.t � � � ,i+: +
� # ' , +►� ,.� ,
� .�• � � � � .
I �r�, , r .
I _ # _ .� ' � , � ' .
t ,..{„.� � . ►
\ � # s
� �"' � � ' t� / ��l %�
� - �r . � � #
� �,� *- � � � � ►`
' � � � 4 � r I � � , i �' � -.
' / � �' /
� ' '- - � . \ • �
�' • �
� , \ � -. �
'-` r / �— r �D
� 4 ' ��i � ` � � 0 1�20 30 60 90
.� r .� ) �
�� � _ .� / '� � � s�_-��� � . �
� � �
� �
� � � � 1f _ f_ 11 1f f1 1f_ 1_ 1f 11 1f
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16579
EXISTING STRUCTURES
- Significant Structures
� Main Residence
2 Creamery
3 Dairy Barn
4 Granary
Q Relocated Significant Structures
0 Main Residence
Q Creamery
Q Dairy Barn �
0� Granary �
•
.
.
� �
.
.
.
.
_ .
.
� � �,
�
�� :
�, .
�,
��� � `������
� � ``������� .
,
: ��������� :
: ��������� ;
: ��������� %
-
: ����`� —
♦ _
—
.:,, 1 % ������� _
�� �� '�����, : ������� �
� • ��������� :
�� �-6'' �►����� :
♦�� \ �� �- �
O �
��i�j , 132�_6�� ```��
I�j ������
�I����' � Q ���
4 ` 2 �����
,
`����
� ,o'' ���
� \ 9� `���t►�
� �� Q `����
. ,O O ``������
` � 0�1 ````����
��������```
� 3 � , �N��������
' ����►��������►������
� �
� ���►►�►►►�►►��►�►��►���
�►����►���►�►►��►��►►►
� ►►►���► ►���►��►►����► �
�
�i �� ����► �� ►� ��►►��►►��►���►►�
�� 111111 ti/y� rr� 11111111
� 1 1 1 11 111111111111111111111111�111111
I
a �
�
� P
i
! ' in It Li e� Tra
g _
� and Setback Park Area
�
�
0
0 10 20 30 60 90
a
� � � i �
� � � , �� - �_ �� �� �� ��- �_ �� �� ��
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16580
EXISTING STRUCTURES
Relocated Significant Structures
0 Main Residence
0 Creamery
Q Dairy Barn
Q Granary
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
� �
:
. . .
��--=^- i �
' __ - J i � ��[.�� �_ �� � �• � �� i
����'' , � � �
����'' �' � _ �.� i ```����
����' � ! ' ```�����` I
'��� � , � � ��```` �
����' ' �..' i `````���� '
� � � �
����'' y � i ````����` . . �
����' � � ```�����` � i �
�� �
����'' . � ```����` � �E =
''�� � .. . � ���``,`v �
��� � . . ; .%f� � �, ,�--�. , - ; �``� �� � ����````` '=`s �
��`` . �,�i � '`� ����` �
� S� �� ��, � .;� �I u •i � -��� � `
�``` ' � Jr _�_ `` ! � ' ' - � _ 1=--�_ ' ` ` .�(• - ` O �
� , � . � ' �J � �� f� . .- .�_��-- � . . ��
���I � - _ ; • ` , f ...� � �� ,.--�...._ ., `��
I � - . . '
�I��� . � � � � � /�' . . � � `���
�� , � ,, � ♦
rr I�I� ` ,� �-,�,. ,,, s; . ���
� I���� .:�� - 1 Q `���
'� ��I� - �.-�"� . �� :�; ``����
�� � � ,�'� _ � ����`
, ` ;.� _ _ � ``����
, � , ; ` _ Q `�����
�� � � � � O ��````�
� . � _ �.� ���
' ,y� ` , - _ '�` - ,.:�. '*��� h.:,.. ````````�`
R
� ` � , �.- � ,`������
� � •�: � �r�- �
w. � �. � � ` �,� � 4 ����N�������
�` � * � � � '` ;- -� �� � f i� � 1111111111111111�11
� $ � � - �� �� �: ' ��f T �' = � �� 1111111111111111111111111�
� �� f � 11111111111111111111111111
� � -
� � 1111111111111111111111111
���/ �- ���_ ��A '� 111111111111111111111111111
.+
���II1111111111111 � - ,
1 111111111111111111111111111
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111�1111 � ,
� �
� ��
�
}
�
� �
Proposed +� . ` ' � ��_, -
Trailhead � . �, '� � �
.� � , � �� i - �
; !.. � Park �
� r
�� ''-�-�
� � _ _ � . � - ��--��.
� •� . , �.
� � � , � �.
� . .
—_ __. a . � � �
�
_ _ _ � _ _ �� - � � �
- _ � ' � 0 10 20 30 60 90
.,' , � �
-, - —M1 _ - . � � � _ _ -_---- ` .
� �
� � �
� � � � „ — ,_ „ „ „ „— ,_ ,� „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 — 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 —1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16581
�
DAI RY BARN
�
CREAMERY �
�
�
MAIN RESIDENCE
�
1 EXISTING SITE SECTION A
A1-1 1"=20'-0"
�
o I
GRANARY DAIRY BARN "' _ ROUND-ABOUT
0
CREAMERY �
MAIN RESIDENCE
�
_ 2 PROPOSED SITE SECTION B
A1-1 1"=20'-0"
A
B
EXISTING
DAIRY BARN
EXISTING
CREAMERY PROPOSED
DAIRY BARN PROPOSED
PROPOSED MAIN RESIDENCE
EXISTING MAIN RESIDENCE
3 COMPOSITE OF SITE SECTION A & 6
A1-1 1"=20'-0"
Existing Section Proposed Section Composite Section
� ,- � ,�
� �� - ���' '� ,i' - �
�� � , —
� � � --
, ,. � _
� �='
--- � _ � � ,
_ , _
� � - „ � —
, ,.
,
. �� � � � � �
_ � _
� ,
. . -
, �
, , � � s
� �., � � e
- - � �
� /� � ' q
�
� � �_�
,
_ ,�+��.-� — — � ,��? �'� .
��� �
� ��aa� � ��,�zs���� , �� —-
�� , l�� r�NTlO\QMt��
�-,� B ��y
�� � . B
�� � .
� � :���� ��
, � �, _ L�
� �� mmmmmmne��eueueeneeebbene��'
.,�,; ���ry1M�
n .�r,��.�� � � �II1A01 INIAl1At1N1MIMIMIMIMAAlMlIAlEAIAAIEAlttlE111AIINEN1A11A1111MIMMMMM�M
� \ '.,141VYt9994 X ��,�1\Y�I �� � ����n�M�n�tlM1111pM11lIIIINIIIIIIEAIMIAIRIRIAIXItl��M�n� ��
� � � .r,.V dBIBA11111M�1�
. �.1t49fE11EEI1SE119EPRS9M1�P9wP 4 9 9AYPi Vi�PPi9VR4'1!(rll�r�lr��
_ C
� � -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 — 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 —1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16582
CREAMERY
�
1 EXISTING SITE SECTION C
A1-2 1"=20'-0"
STREET
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
CREAMERY
1
D
2 PROPOSED SITE SECTION D
A1-2 1"=20'-0"
�
STREET
D '
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
� EXISTING
CREAMERY
PROPOSED �
CREAMERY
3 COMPOSITE OF SITE SECTION C & D
A1-2 1"=20'-0"
cxisring �ecrion r � c�posea �ecrion �omposiTe �ecTion
.,� � � �
� � �
, , �
, ., � .
� � i
� ,: _ � � .� ���-� ,� �� � �
-
,, � - �
C ' � -- �� --�'.�
o ,� ., C .
Q �,.• ��.,.- '� _
'�+ � '� e���� 1,/,f � '�� %.� ���
� `� �... -�' �� �-.. � �._ �
�� : � � _ � �� -
�,� T��,,6�1� < /� �
� � =� �
� ��e�r
� � �
o ��� �
� �
� ' �'
�.�� �������� .���,��� �
�,�,���a��,�,��.�oo��oa,�
� �
� �
.
� — � � -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16583
� `
� ��• _�
y� �
�.�- �� - - - _ -
r ���� � - �_ �' .
� . � .
�.°` .k . . . � Y � �• . • _ � I
_ �* 4�
� + -, � ' • �_�
� + f � _ . �- '
! -
_ . ,� -- •
t .- ' � • � �_ �
� . - � F+F
- � C � "
. �
• � `� '� + -.-
� � ..�� �'S� __ , .�' _ n,-
� '-` �-��� -- — ' ' - -- � f ; � .h
�� �
} ��
_ �r �� F �
1 _ �_ :- � ,_.i�• �
�-. �� �
__._ � �
� ' � � � -
k �- ; � , � . . ��
� � � � , .
Y. , � � . ��
� + � . _
�
��. � ..
� ��„ � 4 : E �
_ � � � � ' , �' • .
! � ��' �� 4 �'
�� --
� � _ T� �*4 ��,
� � � , �
� � ■ �- ' �.
� �.
� ' ����
, .,-�� , � --�q�� r
-"�� . . M ,� � r I � � ' . � • ' + + r� �
! • \� J
f€ ��i ' '
� ti � �
, • . � � y ,� #� .a � ��
f ' .,, �� � ,
.
`M� . ���' . �•'�►,�� r • �= '�� .._--_ _`--
. _ i �
View of the East Facade View of the North Facade
� � ���,,�,
. �
5 z � _
J - - �
� ' �� � ' �' '
C ' � '� •
1 ■ � ' • - , .
J� . �
■T� � � +'
,� I �,,� J�� �,� , � r . � _ �' �� .
. t ��-- i�s
�- � � �i�� � • � '
: 1 _ � . . •-
` , � -�
!G• _ ���•�_■ - ' �•���` ■ - • � • � • ~��L
� `• �
� . .
� � . . � • .� • � � • - _ - . � • � • ■ ��
� A
� - ��•� • a � - ��r � .� i �1
: T ' � 'r " • - " ' • ' ' i
� � • � , � � . : ' �.. . _,l ' � . _ '. _ ' . -- ' ' __� __ ' .Z.. _ _ __
� � #r� � ;� �a 1 1 ti tr � ��
r • � ' � '
� �
• • ��� �� k � - 1 � `-' � _ � , � . � � . � . _ . . .
; - � �i , � . - �� ■
' i r
• .. �
~ � ��' - � - • �� 1 I'•
, �- .� _ � � � �
�...�� • � � _ _ �
:.,--4 1 :
�_ _ ����- . � .
ti� _ �� � � � •, . • --- . �
_ �� I - _ .ti �� _ . _ � - • � �
� �
� � � . 1 � � . � _ � �*'.� __ _ ���
�, , � �
� 1 f � , � �� - - ' � I
� �• •
�,, =�_�—� � �,_ - �
- '' � , '� � ..
- , � � � � � , - . _.y
• � � � - � -
z �
y� � � � � 1 • �. � � - � � _ .
y ,� . �.— --_ � . .
. �
, � ��
. � '� _ _ • ��
_ 1 �. �� ' _ - • r-. � , i � - r ���i�� •�
-- r � � � . . • . � - -
� � . - -� � � . . �
� '�' .�-
� � • - ' � � ;` 5
� . _ � .
•r��' � �r�
�-�
` i , �
A
I�` ' - � '
r -
� � � . __ �
� ���'� � . F . .. . - _ . -�-
View of the West Facade View of the South Facade
a
� � � i � �
� � � , �� - �_ �� �� �� ��- �_ �� �� ��
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16584
�
�
�
�
�
�
Z �
0
N
�
�� �
- � �
w
,��,�`'� _ � m
_ - � �
:.�� _ •� W
,i,5�.��` j��Yy,,i • '�–�–� �
••��� � ���YF�' --�— O
h� ,.��� Z
�.s. Y �, '.`Y, '.rf' —
f �`{l�••F`Ry�f +�— , �
:�,.y�,�� , _ _ - N
�` � ��r:�°``���`f' ' —�� � o
� � �
r� �?� `,:. :i i
,� l� '�' y�+ �� �
, �� �� �� _ �
�1 �r�, ;., �
;�� ' ;�;; �
'�;i, :�;::.;;� < _� ---- �
y ,�'y� i�:�. ��%� ��ti �
� t�,,����'r�i� ` ` � � — -- —
.�...'`:' \� '�. . �
�•�`.;� �� ' fr` . \
��.,:;; �� ,�. W --
��� � �
��r� � - w
,r:, ,.
�,��;:� ;�., ; - _
.,;r;, , ;.� . -
�
. , ;::::� �
;�;� / �� —.
,�� �������• X
I . , _ -, N
,,:; � ,,` W
., � f � _ �C
.. . - o
.. . y •�.'`� , _'
.. ' , . i= �! II
. , :`,' ./ �
r
..'�.,yZ. �,�;. �./�����' � ..
S.; � II� I��'`.` �
� i-' I��• /��%I�: ..
\
,••.;.� .� '`,, , ':'�/�����I�,l',:� — - - �
�� .'�.. �.% �� �� ��f�
; „
� .,'��.�� ���f�l,� = '' _--_
~�' :' - •r.�/� ��� ��� �� ' - - �
��l ���� ��.'I I ,,I ..I�'�.l \ .•�� I• 1':.�� .
F . .�..C.'' I.I I/ ��t ...�'. � � — ' � _ `} �
' :� i�. ..I�. �`,���J, /-� 'I � . ..�' ��...�,:��. . _ .'-'J �•_ / W
. /� .' ., : i �
``•• ���/�� ,.�� pt: ��T.;� �!.� ��..._ Z
� //� ''. -�—' w (�
�� � •. � 00
" � Q X
� ''�J I�ji �
„- , N
_ - ;�,,�T fC ��• � W
•;' ,/ // ,/' , , a � �
ti. �' � f� ,, �� �. , U �
% / / ! '� O
� _ �:;�:; �.%�����j/�l��� ' — V
i
� ',.. _
�"�; / / / �'�' � .
z �
,,� ���������; �.� ,`.
, ''� ,'•, •:�- �����/��/� /'� ' � I I
' ' � l/ /� J�lj' -:' �
� ����jl�jl�j�lj _ - ' � 00
�`a, w
�`,�: r��f��/��%'�'� ' �' — �
� /��/� %l ' : :<" � X �
� � 1.�. �l ',� ' —
; ,I��I�.l ',' � W
.; ���1 Y , �
.1�' � -- U w
�:, f� _ --- -- - :�%',I J
,, � — — Q
��� � �
�;� � cn
�< W
.N - I L
�� O/�
( J e//
� Q
�� . N
�
.],.'
1�. �
�
�
�
�
�
��6-�9 ,�8-�Z ��Z/� 9-�Zl ��£-�Z ��Z/l �-�� ��L-�9 ��£-�Z ��£-�L ,�5-�� ,�L-�9 ��8-�Z �� ��6-�5l �
�
�
�
�
M
v �
��b-�Z 6 �
�
- (V �
i
<O �
1
Lf) ' �
� O N \
� � �
N N �
V
Z '
o O
� � �
�
CV
� � �
O � �
M O
O
� '
� � �
N
�
� �
�
�
,�L-�Z� �,£-�9� ��Z/l 9-,9 ��9-�Z ��Z/l 6-�9 ��E-�� ��0-�£ �,Z-�8� � a
��0 4 -,8Z ��O l -�5� ,�5-�� ,�5-�5Z � � •�
�
�
� �
� �
18' 9" HIGH RIDGE LINE
LOW RIDGE LINE
11'-0" HIGH T.O.P
v 8'-0" LOW FLOOR T.O.P
� 7'-0" LOW SHED T.O.P � %, 7'-0" LOW SHED T.O.P
�l �
� HIGH FLOOR _ _ _ _
t�
� _ _GROUND FLOOR � �� GROUND FLOOR
� �I \�
�
- ---�
-
-
__--------- --------- --
- - -�
1 EXISTING NE ELEVATION 4 EXISTING SW ELEVATION
A2 1/4"= 1'-0" A2 1/4"= 1'-0"
� 18' 9" HIGH RIDGE LINE
v
_ _ LOW RIDGE LINE �
�I
,�� 7'-0" HIGH SHED T.O.P 8'-0" LOW FLOOR T.O.P
v �
_ ��
3 EXISTING SE ELEVATION
A2 1/4"= 1'-0"
18' 9" HIGH RIDGE LINE �
�I
� LOW RIDGE LINE
v
11'-0" HIGH T.O.P
, , , , , , 7'-0" HIGH SHED T.O.P �
� 8'-0" LOW FLOOR T.O.P : �I
\.� ,� �
,
,
,
,
�� ' HIGH FLOOR �
�
V
�
�
2 EXISTING NW ELEVATION
A2 1/4"= 1'-0"
� � �
� �
� � � , �� - �_ �� �� �� ��- �_ �� �� ��
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16586
24'-2"
❑
COl/�l�dGORCN
� �
00
�
� O C�
WOMEN'S � M�N 5
_�
�
� �
� �
0
�
�
� CI.05�Y WGJ�
Fp.AMWG
OpEN WA�I.
F�AMWG��
i�
C�05�17 WA��
F AMWG
ic>
ic>
N
OpEN WGJ.,F�PMING
�
� � � � �
� � � , �� — �_ �� �� �� ��— �_ �� �� ��
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16587
� '� � �V�'�.5�,�. r' -: �}�c��.•�' � � �
�f . S ;_���� . , t. _�'�a�,t .;. -. .. ; .;e# .
�.. �. - �'.:.;: r �'° ,.p, ..� c�
__�_-__-'_____--_ �� '�v'"'�"ys��,..�;�.�'•.4�Y�A ���'
�__ --- - ___�-- - ,;�,�',� - ;�7P� .+���,''4 @' � � �
n
�ly� _ - �.� . � . ���." � ' ��
� � �' � �
___'__��� __� �..,��'�. . ,�•t i�'� - � _ — _' �,__
4� �_ � yn'• _..�, .c,.�-._'.� � . _' .a .�
���... ' $�'. -.�„ •.{i ap. .,�4,��--. ��_,x - .. � -
�" �..�.d: .� � �
� �,�...:' � ��:: _ � �N � ,.�:.:�- w.. : _
'0� ,:� : .-�• ;�•.�,:, s'"` � �_�.-- �
�r '��:��, �X:� � , z �.. �; ..���.r
- - - � � -_— -- �� '�. `'� �,+► � ._ .-. ---- --
� f �.;�, !L .�Y ' '.'.' '_ . �
- � �,Y ' ' ` _ _ ''�`Et- q .. �',� � ;� .
- - - ��.•• �� ��~���y ~'!g; ' _ sS=��.• �,�i > .�`�.
,�t• � � ,f ��.e. �
'y. .� �r '� . `�_�.',�'r:��i,
_ V� '�- , '�LSr'' „�;�� A�i�S",tiR f, a" '::+
- �� tik4,��+� � ' �.'-•�.;�. �� �4, •- �
� �:�� � A':� �:
� �'`� � ; "�.e �. � � �, ,` _ .�� '�: ` -
� � - � „ �a ;.� �� � '� ..� ,.,.�,:. ,.,,':`' T �. _ �
� - , ti x ,R,� •''4�,..:f. :.`�. �' .
�� ���* `�.",�' �. -� ��+ �* ,
���A ti. .� '�.. F�' r� �
',A ' Ti �� M��7. . . ..�: �. '� �
_�� � � .� �,�..L ' A k� ' f�*����p .�4 �. � ."��,'a. 4� ��p �. '� �
�,r � � ` ~ '.. . � ��S �4��Y_`9���R���� '7"}^��'i°'A� . .��'�,� �'�...�]'+ '��R�
I � � . �. - � :��''; � ����_iy ���� { r� �� ,�
_� `�, _ �r .� �� � W`�+� :►+ti �
� I, � �� ��-: �1� �` 's.:s ��. .r' - ¢•, - +
� � - �y
- - I I - � � � i' � r� .r 1�' .?�'l'�y2� 'i�: `.�$ �� _.��-�
}__ u .} �i' ° w�' �'.. ��_
a,.-���.�.:—-- _ 1. '.4� '� � �� -. �f �.{� ,�''�.,�1t � --,�,� ��
.��
�� ---�~ i � � 1` -. ��. _ , � �-� '.__���
�-•°�.. ,�,��:,�.� ���--- � .,� 'i \ � �� �. � �- -�.. - . � - . -_-- - -� �-
��. �T"�=� ;:z: - y - , � �� �� ,
;�;'::R=..- .. -. � � �� �� �� �� _ _ .. -� - --.--�.
��-Q ``- ;:' s:`"'l• ,-;'i - _-� � �� � + _ �. _ _ - - --�
��. ..�r� � . -.. • •.. . V + , _ �. -- ----
,_, '+�. : - .. .� �r - . �� i -.
'� �` r ' Sk-" .. '�, .. _�.a a... . . '�i, I - �` �q �� 4
4�h'���h-S'�.���.:•��:_g�l�•�i�? � :'.7.�{ � � 6 �LL �� � � ?� ` ' �I . � � � '- 4���'�k
�'t ��.-!'`:'. .:s.. �.� 7. �._�x?: .fL.. I ���'� �.' � � I I � ' I . �
�,-`..: .;,� �,,f� a,�'';,�,.ri':; �,. , h �i � i , ''�• � -
t. � f-ia .��:�.`�.;_�.{ .�:4 - ti h ' _ � � �
�'}.4'.�` " �l' �.r�'^ - :k.'L''� :.''' � � 4 i � ` ���� , ,_�
=�t•, r A:�s:��. ' ry'- ig�: '.`4` '., ', i i '1 �i i i I� .,} � � � -,-
� 1 n �.,� :e�. . q.rA ' ` .�:�•. .
_' . �a:�:�+�e i'`L.�'��� yjx``'` �T�a,•,� � ..,�}�;-.�� '� •y � 'I 1 1 I y II i I �� r. - - �. - -
ti -�v����w,;,�'.a'.h. -� 4 Y�� . , � ' :4 � ly �4, ' �i . \ � �
� � �. ���' ` } t ''•` � �� � ��.
�+r ti �
� � '�b.`�' " S1 �R...#}�'.��.�.n �I V4 �I �I � t 4� 4 .I` � �I�Lti �\\ � '� , - _# _ ..•
. . g. s ' ��.�.'�a. - � �I l �I � i I' � \ � -� � � - .
� ' � ��r��1c'4r -'4Y`:,. i x, � IS� � l 4 � � —��.
�+ �' �f �,y, I
���4+�r�,,. ' ,� � ' i � �y i, 'i I i .�� -- � l
lf F�, ��4 � .�I ` I� '1 '� � �I t .� �� � � �'� � ��
f� � 1 ��y � .r
I �,,� k �i I � I �I 9 �1 �� - �i�. f - -
� I 4 i y' II I I � � � ii .� � t� � � l�f,-�� `x - r�'.
��': i4fi ' f ��.� '. i �i �i 4 il �i �i } ', y �i + 1 �� ' ` _ r f k r -
�', � � y x5 f �,� 1 �
'� i �
, � � � �� ,, �� �� i � . k � . ��� f �_ � ,
,I�I� II� �4 , 4 � �,y I� � ..i�j� �I� � ' � '� .� ��_ _�' � f f� � j fr .
� I � j � !
I ' + � �I I� 'I�I � 4 , I� I� R�.� .II 4`I �I � y �� � � /�!f` f' �/ �� )��
i . �i , il { �' �� il � � I ".� I I I i 'Y�� � _ / � /�f I.` J ,, ��� ' � .
�
' �', h�'', l I I, , . ' ', � 4�; Iti I� � ', I . - /�J � � .f � � ''`� � '� � ' ,
_ ' ''� + ' � ' I I l��_.`I . ' !J r J r.�; � l, � . _ _ _ 4\
' w , i r `�� � .�. / � 1,�,� �� �'�, s'�; f'� -
4 `' � '/� .�'' S y K
� a � ` i I . � �._I I �� F �f J JI� I �� �f ' �;� l � . �.',.
�', � � . � 7s 4 , �: , li � , ' i�' �� ' �. f� / lf'� �� /fI{ ��`�`'J `� � ff ��r �� L r �?�� i..
! f f �
� ��� I, I��', i ' �� ' � � I � � � f %� �I f,•� f f- � ._.���`f r . ..� . .«
r � i f 1 ��! � �;r �f r � '�� �. � ,i i > f'
, � ' �� � � ' � I I I ' I{ f � � f/ �I� / � ,�' ' r 'Yr�i� /,�� .�f `• - -� ��,i a�`•��s --
�r , � �/ � � � �� f f ��I � •/ - �,'iL � � � -
,I • � �' ✓r� / ,. ,/'�.��� ��� ' 1 s- �f r'�,� � �� �f.� � �! k��? �.s t�' :-
� ��� � � I � r` Jf %f � � f f �f '� t� � � f f �`� � ''� . '
�� � �. 4 , � I �;�1J '' ,� r���if = � _ ••' � ,, � r - � =-,� �' iY I1 !�`�l Y -T _
�i, ,� , � � I rtf r .f`J r� : �j f � � �f �f r is�� !f fy ■ . . . �. 'r;F,1:�•� �j�...t-� . ' _ ' _
i i /� 1 ! f 1� �r/ '� � � ;�J� ;� 1� � � ` , � _ _ -
1 � ui � � � J'{ �� ' fj // � �'!f�'I � � � f' �`�// f I y'�' - :s�` f,r�
� � ` r'� 1 i� J ff ff� '{ T f� ��� 1 f r . ' ^ `7fs��
/ � . I f ��.
��• } { �`J �� � I ��`rr �r Y �f, / � � ' � J f� � /�' f' fff r� � Y 1�_ •J, - }• '� . y t �~' �
h r� / �'` r f� Y
I - I !: //{ J L--
� _` � [' i`� .`f ��lt �� � f . � �r �i I r'fr •�f �I - � ; ��:io •. 4 )�t�ai,�•yr r y�.*
! f ' `f'�;'
`� !!�' ' � 1 .f" ,�l '� � f '� f i� r f�� � `••? ;�� �-Sr.' �;';jR.��,..
l � r�� �r.� r f` , r (/� , �� �1' ` �.;��.:�•y:,,,�,,�, ��.
'�f :r � � ',•� f ��yJ - � � ` ,I 1 r � !_ � �.'r-�... F-1��,. �
� � � i i � � � ��� f � � �'• {� r '�"` ti '�'�
�� ;� f �; ; � �. _
� .� �� � �� ,_ � _ ��- � �. _ �.����-�:�.�
� f � � �k.�, f �� �� 7. ti .i ;�. y,
r 1 � l I '�;� .j''��' ' _ -- f � I �! � -. '' � ''.�5 �.,� "r`�'�r�"��'R_L�
. � ...4 �8i�9E� ' � e1.�.
•�._ . '�. ' _ � • �� _ _ f: . .. . -
' ' . � � �Jf J�� f/ If���yr�� � �! Y� � r� tlti '
. � r F :'
.,� '� � � - J ,� � { - �.-.� •
�. �f r� I� J�;{ f .� � . �.�t .
J / �
—" , . r�' ' ;�•�f ��/' fr�� � !�� � I � �r ., .._
. ,t 41 .:.�t� J� ffy� , �f fr• , . � '�� r . }�
- � i �.�f, J` ! ���'� �1 f � f�I _�
_ �� '� r:�J,r� � ''�.f! .f '� ti • � .
�, '• . . � 1 {�; �!''rf � . .�� ..�. �. 4 . . -' .
_ _ � . � � 7". �� !f � - I `� .
�� �f ,�' �.� . ,: � �' �
- �� r� � � ` , , �
f�� d r- ��� f` �--- � '�
J �� _,.
r , � � �
� z� f � y ��
� � J1;' }/ '• I 'c; _
ti~ - f'� ���/ �. � r I . �� _ �+ �
�� r /s J � . '�:. .ti': � �
��� �' � � V - _, -:'u:i�'�' �C��^' ' . .' _ _ _ � - . . '__--
'_vr.4;.,. ,��'r��t{,s�
. �.y `'_ _ �;:�"�'`�-,,��- .�, ..
� + i :'_;,'�1��.�*�
•z� + �. .i ;.t���`-�_°�.4;'`• �* �-
'� '•w:.x. .,r-- ��;. K4,.�
� 1 �J�� � .y?-" .a:.•7'c��'.��.. 4r., �„`
- � ? / �'#�,.'i •� T 4h.45_e'. M���.�..
.,� t, ; :r. � _ ,r��,:_,r .���
... � i � r � ,. -,'����:
...�,.�� + r,- �' ��rt_ . ,
- ' � 9' 'sr�.
. � i
•. ' ' 'r�e`r��:�
� �` �f
...� f
�` - - _ _ _ 'i1 __ �
\ �.
�,�
A
IC � 1 —
z .� ;
�.�... /
� / r
t�� i
��'z
�.�� r T
���- .
t. / _ _
r
�� _..-,_-: --_ : _ -- _ � . _ _ -. _.
�. i
�� �•
.�.� � -
..•.., i . ti '
� ..
�
.,.c_..=--_. -- � —c-•. .
- N 7� .
�L~�� ��� ' _
�f
�
i � � �
� �
� � � � 1f _ f_ f1 1f 11 1f_ 1_ 1f 11 1f
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16588
Q �
�.`'�.
��6�u'. �� � �` _�,�
Q� - . - ��
�:•:-•:•�.
�: '�;:�:�'=',;:.":
J" _ _
�'.
�.�
�.._'.�..���..��...`'."�.�'...":�.�•���•.''-:.������� ������'�'��.�:"�,.�.-.�:���,..�''_."�.''�..���.•��.'.� .'�.�•'�.��..'.��:�'�..
' -�e. _ -
..'� ...:.•....�.
.�-' . .� �•....'.:..
. .,• .
.
�' � ...
y'' _ - _ _
. •—�,�:-.":.� - _ �
. .. _ _ _ _ _ .:y..•1.
_ -
�.
.:��'
�-... _ ;�.�,.::'`-•.�..-�,:�:�.>�:�.:..,..`... . .
�.
._ .
: .•�.�.. ...
- •'r:� -
...��'� - ;�>r.�.,;�.
- - - -
i.
. ..
. ... _
: . .. .
. . . � . -...�:� _
...:
. . ..:. .. . .. .:.:�.
, .
-• ,.•
� �� • ... . .. --.� .. .:. . _ .
...•� . .� . . ., .. . . . � . _ .
.:
.
� ,. : .- ..•_. _.. _ �...; .,- 'i:t`
f/ - f�':.• - - �`1
J . "�
� - - -
.�' - 'i
- - - _ - :7
!"
� - -
.�.r"r:�..
}.� ..
-- I
�`,. - - - _ -
`r:.• _
I =.
I :�;.�.
I -
�� I �+ _ _ _
.':F:�J�
h
I g _
_ _ - I
I _ _ - - -
I
�• -.
� - - - J-::
- I
�
�=- _ �'"
::.��`
- - �
..... ..
: .
:..,.�:.:
� -
- -:�-
;�._
i
- �
f � � - _ _ _
-,.
M �
.;�.:::=�::''�::;_':�:
-
�
� - I - - -
I
...�:
.J�
_ �:. ..���� i
�.� - _ -
i r - _
_1 _ -
--L
_1
;:�;�
�
--� -- -��:=
_J - -
, - - I
�
__ �:�,
� � - _- ;�;'.
i
� - -
� -
�
i
i -
- _ ��_'
1
:--
�
_ '•r�''-:�".=..:.; ���I
=,•
- - - l
,. ..,
: . :.
,
.. . .. ..
r .-... .....:: ::.
� �
: ::�..
- _- i I
� _
I
� I
;=: �
�
�.
:�:
�
_ :::- ::f �
�
� � �
M � i - I . �.�,.`�. _':. T� � � ' � , ...
a :- � ___ , , 1 �� :� � �
_ _ � � � � . .�_
_-�_----- �-�-' --------�-- I i � i . ._-
���----------- ---------� -- i ! �
Q N -- -- _---- ---___--� - -�__L_!--'�_ I
2 ISOMETRIC - EXISTING DAIRY BARN
A1
56'-9"
¢ �
�
1 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN - DAIRY BARN
A2 A1 1/8"= 1'-0"
� - � iRVUM RANCrIi - IiISTURICrAL BUILDINC�S -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16589
TOP OF RIDGE �
V
�
�
�
N
_ _ _ FIRST LEVEL. T.O.P �
�I
�
,
�
GROUND FLOOR �
�I
1 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION
A1 A2 1/4" = 1'-0"
� TOP OF RIDGE _
\�
;7 FIRST LEVEL. T.O.P
\�
� GROUND FLOOR
\� _
%� �
4 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION
A1 A2 1/4" = 1'-0"
� � � �
� �
� � � , �� - �_ �� �� �� ��- �_ �� �� ��
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16590
� TOP OF RIDGE
\.�
��.
� FIRST LEVEL. T.O.P
\�
� GROUND FLOOR
v
1 EXSTING EAST ELEVATION
A1 A3 1/4" = 1'-0"
_ _ TOP OF RIDGE �
�I
�� .
�
FIRST LEVEL. T.O.P �
�I
GROUND FLOOR �
V
2 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION
A1 A3 1/4" = 1'-0"
� - � i ' - " ' " " DAI RY BARN - EXTERI R ELEVATI N
RVUM RANCrIi IiISTURICrAL BUILDINC�S
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16591
6 D
S3.4
� �
i �
/ \
/ 7 �
� 2 �
� �
� � FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES :
/ \
/
/ \
/ ,,� \
/ �6��� l�l \
% P
/ 5 ��F., � `
I � � 3 3 � I
I I � � I I
� � � �
I � � 5 � I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I � � � � I
I � I I � I I
� � � � I
�
-�
I ; = I FOUNDATION PLAN KEYED NOTES :
� � ~ �
I O1 4" CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE
o �
�
I � I O2 15" W/DE x 18" DEEP CONCRETE GRADE BEAM AROUND PER/METER OF BARN
6 I �� O3 4x6 POST ON 2'-0" SQ. x 18" DEEP CONC. FTG.
� � � � � I O4 4x6 POST ON 3'-0" SQ. x 18" DEEP CONC. FTG.
� I I � I W
�" O5 6x6 POST ON 4'-0" SQ. x 18" DEEP CONC. FTG.
I � � � � I � _
1'-3" � Q O 1 x 12 VERT. WOOD SIDING OVER 2x4 HOR/Z. WALL GIRTS � 2'-3" o.c. MAX.
I � �
TYP. � O7 4x4 WOOD POSTS � 5'-0" o.c. MAX
I I �
A 8
I S3.1 S3.1 � I
I I
I � � � � I
I I 4 TYP. OF I � I I
(10)
I � � � � I
E I I E
S3.5 I I S3.5
I I
I I
I � � � � I
I I � I I � I 7 I
I � � � � I
6
I I
I I
I I
I I
I � � � � I
I � I I � I
I � � � � I
I I
C
S3.3
I I
I 2 I
� J
16'-8"
6 V.l.F., MATCH (E)
� 13'-8" 21'-8„
S3.4 V.1.F., MATCH (E) I V.l.F., MATCH (E)
�
� - � iRVUM RANCrIi - IiISTURICrAL BUILDINC�S -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16592
D
S3.4
i � � �
/ � � \
/ �
3
� �
�� �� ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES :
// \�
// � �\
// \�
// \\
Ii il
I � � I
2
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O5/8" PLYWOOD SHEATH/NG OVER 2x6 ROOF RAFTERS � 30" o.c.
O2 POST/BEAM LINE BELOW
O3 BEARING WALL BELOW
U ' 3
�
1 ' �J W 1
c�
�
E E
S3.5 S3.5
3
�� - - - -� - � �- - � - - - - - - �J
D
S3.4
�
� I .
� � � �
� - � - I STU R I CrA L B U I L D I N C�S -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16593
1
5
+7'-6"
TOP PL. (MATCH EXIST.)
i �
CONTINUE FRAM/NG AROUND
3 nP 2 �,P 4 NP � ROUND—NOSED PORTION OF BARN
� �
� 7
+0'-0"
�
<����������y������ �%
������'' . . .
��
'�;��
�
8 8
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAM/NG PLAN 18
O2 1 x 12 VERT. S/D/NG
NOTE WALL OPEN/NGS NOT SHOWN.
F/NAL LOCATION OF ALL OPEN/NGS O3 2x4 HORIZ. WALL G/RTS � 2'-3"f o.c.
SHALL MATCH (E). O4 4x4 POSTS � 5'-0" o.c. MAX
O5 4x4 TOP PL.
O 2x4 P.T.D.F. S/LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN
O
10
� � 11
ELEVATION A 12
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
14
15
16
17
� - � iRVUM RANCrIi - IiISTURICrAL BUILDINGS -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16594
1
9
+17'-1"f
TOP PL. (MATCH EX/ST.)
a
10
TYP.
1
13 TYP.
15 � 15
10 TYP. W
OF (5) �2
13 TYP.
+7'-6"
TOP PL.
MATCH EX/ST.)
14 7YP.
6 6
7
+0'-0"
�
� � � � ` `i�i�TOP OF S.0.G.
. � ��%.��i���\��r
. . � ����%��������.%��%��..�<..
�% ���.r
8 8 TYP.
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAMING PLAN 18
O
O
O
O
O2x4 P.T.D.F. SI LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FDUNDAT/ON PLAN
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDAT/ON PLAN
O9 6x6 TOP PL.
10 4x6 POST PER FOUNDAT/ON PLAN
� � 11
E L EVAT I O N B 12 2x6 HOR/Z. STRUT � EA. POST
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13 4x6 HOR/Z. STRUT
14 2x6 VERT. STUD
15 6x6 WDOD POST
16
17
� - � i ' - " ' " " VAI KY 13AKN - J I KUC,: I V KAL tLtVA l IVNJ
RVUM RANCrIi IiISTURICrAL BUILDINC�S
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16595
/
//
9
�
� 12
� 7f V.l.F.
/� 17 �\
/ I \
� � 2 � �
� \\
�
15
10 10
/ 5 7YP. \ \
+7'-6"
TOP PL. (MATCH EXIST.)
� i � �
16 TYP.
� � � � � � � 3 TYP. i �
6 6 I I I � I
7
+0'-0"
2�!i�r�������������%���'�� ��'���'��������������/��� TOP OF S.0.G.
� �i �� �� � � i
���� �fi�.r
� ��
8 8
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JOISTS PER ROOF FRAMING PLAN 18
O2 1 x 12 VERT. S/D/NG
NOTE: W,4LL OPENINGS NOT SHOWN.
FINAL LOCATION OF ALL OPEN/NGS O3 2x4 HORIZ. W,4LL GIRTS � 2'-3"f o.c.
SHALL MATCH (E). O
4
O5 4x4 TOP PL.
O2x4 P.T.D.F. SILL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN
OS CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN
O9 6x6 TOP PL.
10 4x6 POST PER FOUNDATION PLAN
� � 11 4x6 DIAG. BRAC/NG
E L EVATI O N C ,2
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
14
15 6x6 WDOD POST
16 4x6 POSTS � 5'-0" o.c. MAX
17 6x12 HEADER
� - � iRVUM RANCrIi - IiISTURICrAL BUILDINC�S -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16596
1
�
�
�
9
+17'-1"f
TOP PL. (MATCH EXIST.)
1
15
12
+7'-6"
TOP PL.
MATCH EX/ST.)
7 6
+0'-0"
�
:��TOP OF S.O.G.
���������%�����������;.��.��<..
��%i:���;��i���i�.r
>`
8 8 TYP.
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAM/NG PLAN 18
O2 1 x 12 VERT. S/D/NG
O
O
O
O2x4 P.T.D.F. S/LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN
O9 6x6 TOP PL.
10
� � 11
S E CT I O N D 12 2x6 HORIZ STRUT � EA. POST
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
14
15 6x6 WOOD POST
16
17
� - � iRVUM RANCrIi - IiISTURICrAL BUILDINGS -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16597
9
� 12
� 7f V.l.F.
18
10
12
+7'-6"
TOP PL. (MATCH EX/ST.)
4
6 �
+0'-0"
���'� ; ;�� � �� ��% TOP OF S.0.G.
. � �� � ���
� �/T��
.
�,/� �j�.
8 8
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JOISTS PER ROOF FRAMING PLAN 18 1"0 STL. TIE ROD, TYP. � EA. POST BAY
O
O
O4 4x4 POSTS � 5'-0" o.c. MAX
O
O2x4 P.T.D.F. SILL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN
O9 6x6 TOP PL.
10 4x6 POST PER FOUNDATION PLAN
� � 11
S E CT I O N E 12 2x6 HORIZ. STRUT � EA. POST
Scale : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
14
15
16
17
� - � iRVUM RANCrIi - IiISTURICrAL BUILDINGS -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16598
l'y �
h
I
S
I
1 �
�
1 �
1
' ��
1 � ��
� �-�
4 /f
�
!
_ ��
_-- �
rt"r+
. -- -' i
�' .
I
.�
�
� �
� i' Fl
�
_ ��
��r
t _.
i �� �-.- -
tr � - __
I
�
_ �'. ��-+��'_ � f y. - .- �
� 4 � K
- � - , . i�'�*f` '� . - `'�*+' ,' � . :�* �,
_ . , ,- _ _ ti.. �' R ,� .� . i
� 4 � • }} .�� �i ' �� ' ' ' �-. 4 _ }'• r,a+ • �� . ` ~ # k•`+ � ' [y _' ' ' ' � �_ z��r . ���+�r' ' - _i �_l `„
� �` �+� ' - -• � _ . . # . Yti � ` - r--i - _ _ ;� • � ' �:- .�; . - ` �' ,�+ • �r �"' �� � t� �' - � ' _ �� �=-�; '�-� j '- ,
_ ��-� �� - . � � _ � ``� ��~�� r '��� � Y`�� � � 'S ► 4�W'-�� �� � �y�}� � ��~ �a . • � . • . . ' , � . . � }� . - . � - _ _ �
� ��M ` � } - . ' � Y f . r � _ M1 _T Til� { ' " � _ ;'r�' �• �
-{'�� . s' _ ' � y '�' i '�• '; '1 _� � `•'' ' �:�a_ }+-'� '����4'. a i_ - . r, #�'.',r � '.�.�� N � i f �
- - - • w . . , 1• +. � ' . • , - "i � � " `� ' *� ' -� , . s � - � . �.�. ,
,,,.���ti��'►-�_ s ; - ; , . . - ��i w �f . �- . `�:�,M . ��.w i • J.r. ` '�,,••rl' . ' � - � _ � - � -
.� t:i _ �' _ �i " � .; .�Y � _ . , .�� � • • " � i:ti' �r�l�.,�`_ . . .
w� � ' 4 � �� • -- r , � ~ • � • •�~ �~- _ •y ���r ��.
f r :T-� •� _ y . � __ a � ' a ��� w�,��#��, _ { • . _ �� � � , � � " ' � .
- '�� ,L� r� � �` l:• .. ,.,y�ti +y'�*4�'.' h� ��'�.����+�*- _�i* '►." :��#i. ��� -, . ,� e � , 4 v { _ . } - .. .� �
� +t � �+. � 4 . , � , ,
. _i.�� t � � ' � .y �: `� ` �� ;..�� K: ,� k� - � ' . -- -. _ �� - - — - - - — �~�� '� ,
� � t +� + ,* �=•''�^� •rt :F��:_4 � � - �� r. � -
• • _ - _ ' �' .t � � R -�� -��� _ ;� �•�E�1i� ,x � - �; � � �`,, # - � _�
- r � . /��' *�- � ��1w - - r.
. _ . �*r- � ,� . , � ~� �' *.� .��..,~l--.#' -�'��Z`'�^ - � � „� - � r_ �� � + . � - x . . ,_ i
� i � t,�3 , ! �.� �� ��- t _ �d �• yi�` — y ! � � .�,, . r� ' _ 'f�+s�
� y � Y� ' � �+ �� �! � f� .
f+ ` � ` ',. .�-
� ` ���� � � __�► �#,�+r � • � - - � -- � __- � -
;� � - . . — ��T _ , ,����'� �,4 `��� � ����.�r - 'f ���.+ - . �. '` �. � " - . ��! : - - _ -
i� � + } � / � ��� I +eiy_-�_ - � � 1 ' _ � - �_ �� . __ _ . - -_
� t � � � �1 � . _- '� ��_ � � _
� � • � � ��.•� - - � f F'` ���.'� �I ; �+���` � _ ��- y�`_ . � _ �=
-k . , ; --rr���r� _ - �..� _ � , .. � �,� ...}, : _ � _�_� .* --_ - -
{ � � ` .._ �` � • ' + '� �``� �� �. , 'r . ` . �' . , t �Rw�*���rt��-�-� -�a - r�f ``� �� - . "a�� . .�` _
- � y � N - � e �ti1 + �. �
' �� �����_ ` •� � � � h „! � s - ``� f • � -- _ • � � I _ �-... . , • " � � " `� " ~ - —• �- �
�.. . � ` � J. � _ t . ,. `- � �' �M�- ,+� -
��� , ,.� . �� ; - � .� _ _ . -�-- �.-- . =� ��:.� � . �. �- �u.� r � l� _r�r . _ _ _ . � _ _ �
. � �.� , � � ' ` ~ r ' ' ' � � � '� � ,.� � ._ - :� �r- � ' �-..' �.� ��- I - � ' i . . — - � -
f �i - � ' , � :� � •' � � _, ' x � � - z � * - � , r � ' ` — _ ��`' �.�� , �►j��.
� � �r: ' '+ � �.� r * � � . r � i � 'i
I a� �ry � r !.J'�� �: '� � .- �. ` ' - � � � - - J "f� - �� - + ~ - •'
r �q � � �
��,�,� �'_ _ * ��� � �` � ,' - � �. �- • � � _�� � �� - :��. — � �!� - � � — � ` �
� � r
• '. +. ' ►� _ � _� _ � - • _.*k�-''�'�',+�w�-� � ' � . , �t - � . � -—_ =-- — _ _ � � _ . . �" �
_�� ` � � �� � � � .i.. _i.n . " LL _ -_'_ ' ' � '' - ' � � - " _ _ •
.l� � - _ �_ • ! ' _ ��_ " _ _ - __� - �
N'�� � �r
` _��' �. �� �� _ if � I�� .. - --� - _ - - - -- � - -Y _�....� �� ��� '�r �- '�;��
d4 1 :e }� l � � ��� - _. - - `�
� � q " -.` �� !�r . ' _ ' _�_ _ —�_-� L _ _ - � � \w' `��_���� �
�~r �� � . � -..�- �.� � 5 � . l��l�-�-._ - F
�• 1. . 5 �' r- . - _ _ ���� i,
�.• . -- F-� -,�. .� {�._� . .�..� i � - - � - 1 �'� , ,
�y.' - ._. � _ `��:� . s . F - { - _ � z' � ��
:- �,`��• "'':"'f. - -� + -
_. ` --a#ti ` ' ���� �.�� � � �f � � ._." • �
�` •� �y r .1►. .. �.��. � �. ���e
. � Ja --�+�rr ' - . ,' �4 � - i. � -' �'��.-'� -'�`
-� ' '�• _.#� . . .�� r� � .. ��{�� ���+��~ ��
. � .ar �}�Ikiw"Y' �.5.' .
' _ .,+r' .'' -y
.�;'y � .
� R � �
. • J r -
- ,r -
t i�f,., _ 'Y- . - ..-_
..r _ '�_�-s;- - . r=r�--� a �- �_' _ ;t -' ' . ` ' '`_,r;
�, r„ -• � . . ._ •- .�i�.-�;w:a�.g�• ��r.,,i,F`~' rt • �_.- . ►�: � � ' +.. .
- _ � - 5 �+�� �+-�#��L��e��.�-�.���`r� � ���
. h� J . � � ��+ _ + �i - ' _ �. . l _�.� � _ ` • ' , � . � •.�#r�
_ • - - � �����
Y _ � '_ ; + - � _ "
. - . ' ' � � � . . � . � - �
- • . �� -
' • + � _ • � . . ' ' f � • . � ' ' • �'x `• �;��.
� �
� �
� � � , �� � �- �� �� �� ��� �- �� �� ��
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 - 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 -1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16599
2 �ry - �
• r w'r �r„'�1 ' ' - �,�j'� .Y � � • „ ' � �� . ��.
' � ,�� ���:. ',�� • r 6► ;� :� + i -' i i lS.�• • • -5 f� ��i� F � . �'��i:� .- �` �i -
� `� �,.,,�-.. .�''. ' * _ �f.e` + 5 �.,, , . �' � ,� s�. „ ,�•. � ' :�.F�;•��' ;,r��:j��Z•�',�, •�;^r, -. �{ �. :° ..• .��•'��+�-f,' �~
'.; .� ` L '�rr!'•''•' •� ' �, ' ��
'� -� ti ■• i+��l� �°3 ��Y � ifi<. � }. -4"':. � �r • 1 g e• • �,
�"f�.J.� *y 4 _ .�. '�ti r, ; �• 'r� -- � �" Y' s:. y�,���,�t����� o-r`� �,� . ��� d l�k��a•• ,�,� �y�.�`.' ���z.���Fl, f��'y • •{•'
i �. i� � � � � ���� Y M1 •} � '�� �
_ j�,. r .. � aa �� .a. 'x" � .�' `+��y 4 3 '�' ' �
. � � 'w • �,�Y t.e �r� � ..�� �' , •��; *• .��:� �! .��' �� ��! � � ���x�•. ,� ' • � Y " . .�
,A, ^ - .�'� �.,• l
� •� '�• ti •►. �r■ i �.'. ��� 7•�� f ��• �� .Y,�•�- -.�°�. ��[�,�
� �; t �� � f �"i 11 A :Y '�'� , .� f, . �� '� •'�'�C. � '�'���� �.;�'���,..r, ���„it_r`t'�•.�. '� .�' .. '�`t L
��� •�Y� � . °" w � � � �1� ' :~�L �, .� ' '�SJ �,+,�.,' ';qy'.� �.`�t ,4 ' � . � ~ ' . `�.
�• , '�1.� �r i�� �. r a: �� .�f"��?;r +�:� «�i � � ..:�f. .'�• v .}'..al �
.�. r n. • ` � " ' ��. '�� i• ' r `L y. '.• �l «�, .Y. i, ��\'+��. . W �. .a �r 4` �'�, €�. r �.
� • r s`" \ •� ' . . e ti`� ��� '.�$'� �� �� _ y ��/� a , r
f• . r�, �, �� -P� ��4 , _� .r. ��" 4��-i. � - . .1 .r� a i' :i�'• � '+'r� '� .•�' '� +�t=�.r� ���• r ��._ r ..�
�t � r ' • . - � �-� S, � .� �l.�r".�f�r• i'.y 4 a� � '•.�s• •�, •.~ �.. i � . ��.� �� 1.-.'. �'.���....
. - . ��� , '4:�~. ` � r• '� t• ���' �•`��, i, _ y�, =�' .
- ,� � ..�s. `�,. _ . �� . i:• •.4 , - � �.i� � �;� •� 1. .Z r ^Y6'. i :r . ' L`,: r,'-� k� t
_ .* �!. �� � ' '� � ,��? + �� � . �rd � ! .�', ��a��i'• r•" �,f. .#' �i.-�.4ti � �;'�-':' �.. -s` ��'�� �
1.. ;..4- I�
�i.'?. � . � ��� ' =a�r.!' �.• �. -^ �, p.. ' ' . ��, , ��' , .; , s - - -s �^� �w.
� -� ' _ • '�+��. . � , ` ` , � ti .f ' ',ri! �'+"' r� : � � -_. ' ti. �
� + ri � �''�"' :� f.},x'- .. " � ■ R'�~ � . 3";"' � •i ..i1��, ` �E�. �• �� �'• •ti �:. . M�' �
�+� - . _'�. 1 � � . �. •�Y}�' +�' �i .�r� ' '-. .. s� .~ �.�.,., . . � . �� �n ... �� �` �
R �� �� ��� ' 1�.� 1� `R��iM .����f� ����,{�Y• !.. �'��.. v� +re. 4..•:t �+�. '�, � t .�� �► t
'�� • . •.�;,,,,^�� - ;:�" . �� .1, � ��,., �_ ➢ �+' - �� . .� �;t.. +���.- -,�' �--Y::,�''a .� � � �,y�`y�
�' - - t :='�.�' -��"''j?h� .-i. �.;�1�`r-I��11''�•� R�t'� . �] � F � �' '���4'y � �� �k = :�`rt-� •.� • � `..r�+fi �:o f�'�77�^�` �•�T� '`� �µ ��"�
+" �b„4 � �r � �s'-� r�,� `� .�.:. �._�.*v.�.•'1sl i ti'+'a' ���:,�;r'" r�'4•."��; :� .� f1 v.1�'1 1 ¢,�&_�;;i.�w�' :1�;. �?�y;: t s-. Rti,..� �ti�.��
�'���. � +'�� ���; �� -� �� � .:K f - �'S`¢.' �E.4�, '� .y .�r � 'f' � 1 ,k.y..� . �r,� . l ��� .. t� r ,,.� ,�r,� �.��s�;+a.s �r"� :.;�..;�W��� t
- ;� ��^ f"1 � �,. °�y T ..., �� �.6. ��-w � t _ `�,�yy !. •��,..N�. '.r�. ���� 4' *. . �, " .�ii.�.� T�� '`�'a::,',^t.� ��. 7 y�� �.�':! _ :h•�` ✓.►Y�
'� a �V� • .wC &� �� � " �r .. . . • , . � " *� � � , •. .�• W.. . � �s��� ..� �.t _ P+..r
;�� "`r _ ' r� . t� �� y �� q •.;*� ,� ' � •��� ►'�'��..�t+ �� �•�� �y f'�`l��� •' , ,�� .�• lY�. :,�cnr . . .'�'..�,�.�'D�,�x����'it�f �,,,��_,.Sf�;� w -.;� r :
� f . +� ' ,91 '� � � �� 'I I� � �
� `r r i s �' -t K. 's� : �� `. . .i 1 .* .3�.� ti � +^v �'� �!' . , �ti.m �" � u .
:w _ • � . �.;w :d�' .. r -• . '! _ ;� �••'�. ' 'y► '�� •..' .�',� � _ �,�,i �' 'f J�a` �, '�.'''^����,���,�;+Y` . =.__•��+ � -
•-ir '�■��! y• ..�.° . - '� . ,t'� ��' � 4. �, ,r '� . . ^, f� ' � .; ' ' -
,' ��? N r:�� +r. �, � . 1s�,�'.� yj i * Y ��--,, y ;r 3y1.."�..r�� �,� _•� � ��.,,
A �� y +�� . ,� ~ � . i ��: '•,�i ���� ��,���� + 1 `�:Z �w� • ��� '� ��� • ~�n• ,�, � � �� ���.� .4�_ �•• ,��I` •���,�
•� � � ���� '�. �''_� � � .: • ��� r- . � '• ����'�• • i t• j�� �'� ?r+�' �' � •� / �!�
■' _ . , X.U+e" _ p• '!+� �,: � . . ��' ,. !ti:� . �4., �..:'.:y .�r" /s
•� ��f �.�..� �� �' '� i r r.� 'a yA�, � '�, .� ,� � `".�p. .s",.t;�y '•a�'• �r 1� � � ,;fj '+�'r�F
.��r ��� � ��` a� �' . . a. Y' '� 'f°' % _ .! h.• �.f
K ' " , .�'� �'•�{" �
.-y6 •� � + ` '�� ' i. ��' �.} - 7;i a ,y � 1� '� � -�i., �•� �!� ���'`=��.:- ' .y��.•�•� a ^ "' I�`1 ` �i..��•' �
�S. .-a.�,* �, �-s � �� i 'v � ' "' �1�� �` ;'x''`�' �Y _' �y. . .s �,.R . yy�'�.$,'' � �.�. z�Ft!�+ y,,� �e'�
�::. ..,►i. . � a. �r � r� ��� � �� �r-« S�r� ��i �..* rc�:' :.�a . ►.� � �. � � �,�,rx", �i�9!ri.�f•��A4 �9fy•.:"�yR�� .��n. y,� ��. .
-�_,. - .. �• .� . �" -�-,�• i +.::° � � • �=.�� . . `� ���' �`"• - �.:• �.�l��r .�: "�4 J "V'• ��:' ■<
::� M'S- ��.I���,�r'i� ���' �'.. , r� •�NC.� '�:�x • , .► �:��'"':�� ' .
�`�` � °A�� � ��,i�� Z .�P � �i� �' r�� � � h'.w Y�:.�;,�� r: '� �I t, y . ' r .� r.�
.. �9��,; ��.. ,� ' ' '}�►"�..ty`T -• �'��'r �•i i� .� ��. � '.:s�, ��-`#!i�, 1�.f . "' '� ,� �� S _1.. `,�• r� 'r L. �,�"r�';�''�. :���Y j �+��_ 'f ��'
M1 ��. ii #:• �M d
. -� . ,�, yis' "f ►�. i�tR ' \. - .�n, '��y y�� •,.v� 1a ! �.`•:.i •'N • . -;,'�:' r. � �• f7
•�.�. .+� ,•.� 1 f%���, � - �1.. ^.0 �J � '�" :�� ���• �� ; • 1 �+`•��k�� * .+ ��r ` v�� +• 't i ' .� �,r i r` F � f
� `�� r �� ` L ' �i1/ � � �� S �}n
�� � ,� � �:.. •��. � , : f
�: .
� ... -.f ��' .�� .� _� T.•, �r� "dp'r.ti�' �JL��.tr��^ . ; y? 2.�� �e aF 1 5�'� � � � ,�}'r� �' • s:[, � ,` �
.. . E S. � _ �f�' }►� � �� � i � 1'1��• •r���:, .� .!�'�Tr ,r .•� � (
. - - �!. . l• .'�� ti . •.�: '� •� -�y . �l �J' • '���:, J
j �` _ '`� ' �� � �� f • � . . � � ^ � 1 f � 1� �A ' y�y "� V .rr . I " � . �t. ���8� • �` ��
�� ► , � . r�� . ."� '}�� a {_ " � ��V� �,.r,�. �� /.��•: ��'' ! 1�: -� � !� ,�
.1 • '" "� � �:"�, � ,1M :� t �. _ ' :,e� ' ."�., �."�,.. x '�� ��'�r.'�s�� � �'• �' �.p-.. 1 - ," • .� _ •t .���/.�*i'�,�1 , �� �' ..�'
. `� '°�� � s A 'L,r '�,t;„ �, �i. p�,�-R� �,,. :.'! � �h .�:� �7�f �f
�C'c r'- �� �+4s �-� . �� +�• ' .'i�� ..:�� � .�.-. T: �'.
'+�� �.-�y�• e(" ' �_� �► ' r' ; t k<G] �..r . ° �.-•" y. -T-s w .. .�..��. _ ��' •� -�,: �� y�} X.ti.r' _}, � ��i. �E� �r • / « • � �,
�'•� � ��+��y � - T :�� �:;� � ... . .s� ..�xr i4" � ti���.. H :,!'-s'��y(��':e�'�� a'+ � `�r��� �';G''a �~�' 'L• � ' r�'��.��. :�r �,. :�
�'
r � , :� r. �' f �•
"- �/` • t .,��'� • _ . �-�. �'r. ., . ..� �:. ,. +�;��„ ..,� _ - �ar r y i.:� � -
• . r ' t � •T' : �'Ra�:*>'�. �a �.�, r p ��r'�� � -�y� - . f .,'y, . � 1e- � �•y .-K r'7�;',�
S� �ti y '■ __ �-• `.lGi.`� ��' ,f•'+ � T' � ��' -r' s f
.. _
' ,� ' . � . . :•.. , w
� '
/ . � .. "1 ?' '' 'Tx'1 • i �� �1 .r �.1 yy �� � 5.�� �.r' _ ��M �'�[. �•� �f' .� �
�� .�• � Y�. .�tl � +l w•'� L -\• � • ,•:� - . :- '�• f� � �'� .
- ^ _ ' .
. - �
. . •I' '� . � • ' '" �' - q , �u' • ��•? •�t ' . • " - � ' � �} �r�
. 3 i . � • . .. �': . .. . .0 Y� • ' 1 . ��� ' �"�1 �� �l • � 'l' - i 5 •"f.:�.
W.' 4^[
+ �� f � �' /� , w3:.
T � � �;, .�9 '' ', . ��+�... � . i ` � , I� �� -
�,� � * 4 _Z. �i�'ti. •. ..� �. t�...ha'_�4� ,- :��� "y,"d ,".1��.. ,t;�,.A. �j � .�.� �.�'N�� r,'*1�.
��� - _ - - - - - �l r�!{' .`��..�.� 4 - L� .�, i �'. .4 :1 r '+ :�►f k �. r= s ��,`i'• �
r :..� ]�.��^' .'.�t.� �� ^�x �� � '.� � f F.� r� �r '� F`.r :�` � �r .y ' • . y� . •- `�ti �� . ' \�� ���., '!;��;c •.�i��
�.� s'` ,�• � �
�,� �� -��' � �. 4: ••�. P •i'�",��i�. S'+ r R. . '�� A _ �i } P� • Y�7 � �j
���j "a� .��k. I} i �• . ��. ;�a i�i * 1�,�,�� � �'_ �'• � ��� ,.�.h= � ,�.,� ,.� - ;y+ � �ryy_�. .1 _t#_. ._ � � . . .�i�.�.•:
,��J .y f� • � .'R, M� f . 1 r G . .. .R�fd � _ .� ��.=c��' A
`t .�. � - �'1 +� '�,�i s � '� �� -.��' 9iE� i{ ��ra , :�. ,+r��i .� `� �,� ,; . ��� ,� :�` „�a\E
1r �; _ .�1� .�� • ..;�1 �r �1.� /.' � �� 4 l• 1�� ��� _ j.� �� �,�.� -� 4 • ' �.�•
_.- '� .y,� �13„' rt, �f y �'+l�* 1"r � ■' ` �:�: .��. ,R�'. �� � ....•.• � • � �, ! �
'•:yr -�.~� - - • �. '�" ,e,�:.<S':�E=�_� •'�j;• :{��: ..� �'r `i ��•�����ti'�. . -a a 3' •S � •� '� j +��� -.:�' �
•- e ' . � +�' ` �� �I#. ��5� 'E..4 '�� C '��' �` ; �• � . �.' � +� �
���6. r1:�� _ - F�'�.,�r! ..i� ��- �f `.. ,,,, :.�., . �•�, ry .'�' � :�7. y��'�= • �•`e` �.�� �.�� � � _ �r�
f � .4 � , 7 F � - _ � �� 1 � e�- � -YT �S . _
'� r. -I �. 'r.' ,Fi'�y._��;w:,'�� t � ]�' �. �r� 7.J1.. a {�.,. - 'y��1 �,�I f �1 __
�.,+ � �� �. �`,�i�a'� �`�7■ ... � ti•'/� � .
� r , y �, r ,'R�e � �� '�+ _ ' �. �ai�`r .. r _ . ��
• , - ,i9c�` �1.�� '���: � .:� ,.y�° �4. �-r: .�' "�"Y�`�f: �tl:.• r�• � _ _ =� - -- _ �-�}
_ . �� t -"� ��: ,� 'a ': � r1.", � ��. •!3.' rt � •�' � � �s �� Y =-
- y.� •+� _ :'� ,� n '� - .L�i� � '�1� l�'� r .$�� _�
A � ��
.� � ;;, 'ti�" -;,� r. + '+� �; 4
.�:- '�. v ,�., "�°� #: ..:,`.. �L y .�,� � �.
_... �,, u•� -:e. 1��; a � � _ _,� �:
.� _ - ��� 4. • � c. ':�� �1 , � iw:: �' ! _ _
.:�� �A• Y"�y�'•' -� J '}�' _ �.7-�', ,r: e � . '�cy' . �yi i� -'��_ • -�= ' ' _
t -•y� =�-_ �sj•'•" •c:^�, p��_ _- '�- •� :�n,� ,' _ - - � �' ,; '� t �
�� _ _ �� - - � - _ _ '; � _
� - �rY 4 � .�.�y .�� a`�
'-�'��__ {. � ��. ' . e� � .�(iF,��+��� •
- '�.�;� " - - -- _ _ --"-�� ~�� � �-�l�?., �yr�-_ - - _ _ gg.,- - _ - ���� ��a
'r� �y +-/.. � f '�}� - _ _ �4�.�
t�b�' •�' �. . -- ' _ ^�-�' �4- _.�_w.'ray���F�'�J'- _ �.:�. �:,,�,_.: '��,.�'"'� * ��"'��?�' .4- •
� �
.t
_�. . .
. -��
� �
:
F
„. .. .. r.• .� ' - - - - - �� - - - � i:�
_ _ ..
� -�4,d� • . - - . r� �� - � " - _ � �i •
". s ' ' ,,►: ��� . . � - - - •� � ��� if_ 1.+�.��� - - � - - _ - '
. .:.:
-
�.
. _
•y- ��.
- - r '" �; ar - • - _ �c�� - .�
. ��
'
�
.
. .
• �- .:, p • -
�
.p ., �ti� .. �. 1 1.�.,+1��� i-
___
�
_
� . -I �t _- r ' ..' . �L� � r�_ �-� �E= l� ,�� -_
} � �� h- - 'q , 'F y r I' ��l� d I�� �;., _. ;4`'�.
� � 1l �; ,: �� � y. �� s � ��
- � I < <
- I I�� '�M1 I. i .
k
� - ��I ` _ - '�
I � � �.; _ �.- i ... • � �� .. - , ..^ 3 t � � � _ �f ���� y'43j1� 1 1•'�■" � '� `� -
- I i•i r I 'r- r� t.[ ��.�, 'i• y` , '+ `�' � • .- � � �'•
.. ` �. i _ � R {�.,�.� �y�, _�. •� �'r
y�' � + � .. .' , ^y.�.r 1,. ���
. �� . .�4 ' i�f'.� �:
• •� .� i:� \ .��
V•� � •I, - , � �� ci41�. � I:L' - 'Q}' �+�
_ - �i�--;:-.. 3:; �•f, �.
_ , ' K��.-: , �
..�
.:Ar �_s i ��-�=' _„� -. t •r s' i
.i� • _i:,�' r .:y '*f y ti�� J
i ,�
1��, . .. � S '■ w� I.
� ����.. y.' �. . i, �
+ K. �,� s -
- ' _ �l�� ���:��.a �'�.
. . , .kr , • ,'� ��' - _. .�
�� " - . ..� _ �.:".`'= 1R � •
!w ti. k�. • � � r.� ({�
>r - i � .� • r � � � �., . _ � _ - .. . .
. . _ , .'@�p.�: � ~. � 'R + �
- ,s3�� + , `��►► '�: „ •
. �,• � . !� � � -�_
• ��:'��- •� _r�.�� " ',SW �' '`�, - r' , - _ - - - - - -
• 3' x .�. �7" 7 -
- ����, :•` '.77�-. ': .' '_. : �._'+��' . � �t. rc. r' .� 4
p� ". '��
_ �` "" r�� - k� � ,�t.^' ,
�- :,• ,.
` `.�i _�, , ,�'; � _
_ �.''�*r'� • �+� Q } �" C•`, � .�`t� x i .4 ',�
3�� �, �'� ��' � , � 5.�� �' .. ��
.'7� � ° "7"�� �^��' .- _ ..� �lti� `s � - - _ r. i
I�"�r� -�-1._ ,•r'.�- ���' - � . - 1 � .i _ (�_�M�
,� ' ; n� `� •k ::! ,�.� _ .�} IG' _ . "
_ �,�R _ ■ _ -- -_ _ ; 4l - a _
_ ' " ". " _ tiy ...�,
.., __
. . '-. � - _ - . _ . - _ :i.. _ � -
, -�{. , , Y�'�" - ..-r_� . . ._..,,. _ - -� - . -- _ - -
1: .4: _
_ _ . - � - . r . ... - - - - .s . . . . _ _ zr. - ��'�' .'!E= _ •__�.x:ii+1r�-} - -
_ .. _ . . . . - - i�
. _ .; . . _ ... _ � . . - . - _
. •�_ .. . _ , _ _..
� � - . . . _ � - .
� .
{
1
,, -.�-�� _ - -_ ` `_ - _� - _ - ._= � --_- -
- .� ,�"� �. - . - - - _ A - - :� _'.�r�___,,,�' ___� �-�� __ - -- �-
's,. -- ~ -- -- ��_ _� _
� -...+� - •_�. .,� - - - _ _ _ �! _ . ' :_ -_- � -- � _ _ �� �' .�._ _ _ 'ti �� �.
- � N.,ti � � � �_ � - - -_� � ' - .
.n p .. , ,s. ry• • _ _ . _. . ` . . . _ .i�`I�i..#'� �� � _ _ _r- - - _-_ y _ -- ``� � - - -�� _ _
:� - � . . _ �_ � -- - - _ - - --
J ` .� _ -~ R _ _
�� ���I � • • • • • • • • . , • • • • • ,
�
� �� � ,
� . � � . • � , � , / , � , � � ,
• � • / / • � /
LEGEND PLAYGROUND ELEMENTS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER
.� . . - -
..=��*--�� -. �'}' � ,#"- i ;� - ����� �' ;:1�� !� _ - - -
.
� . F ., .� .. I , ' 4.
:.�_ . . ' . . e.
..�.,+Y 't _-`:�.��.L,-l�•�.. ��� "� ...1. � _:��� �' ���� �� �� ^� #r �� � \ ���
` � �
_
• • • � . ._��(�v�F. '..,..� �� • ' .. . _._ — .a _ _ _ ::{� M.uJ:.'. �', f I+ _ _
� x .
.y,.' y.,-.�j' ! . 1.�[' s,... • I __ l'��. 'y �<,-..�v . �.
�. � ~
'.^ 4' ` .c_� �1"I.� i�' `- ,� ���'� �' ' ''�, �-u� '� �� � k '�.�-``� u
�, � , �
Main Residence w�th Plaza - ���. �_ - ::��� :� a _ � � -- - -- � � .rty _ _ �,4 . _�- f; - `��� a.�'
O ��" _ .y .$�� �. .+�' � '� � � ��. . � i . " � . ��l
N � r
._ ._ . ,,, . p _
s
� {1� �
C` ,
t
q- �y _ ,y�
� ....Y` .�R _. �., . i'_ � w t.. �'' �r,I.�� � �� . . . __ . , _ ' .�/i. _
� .�': . • . ...
�
1
. . �: . �. �` f ��i�' ..
�`,�' " '� ,�.��-.w� ' �9-� ,� ' ' - �n-�`"�.�.r t.�� . A _ I/ �.y�j �[.��
�,�+.._—� -- _ �_ _ :i.� _ a -t •.:�, i. . � �„ £ . . _ 'f� �'`- �. C��AA.. \
.
—� ,- .
� --•- =-!�- O� � �•--•
—..�cv ,-, � r,
� �_ - ±., �� � 1�.�' _,rs�: �," � -�� :� _+�`+r+� .n� ��'`r~ g A+l9' ��
�:�►Y _ �,_ ,:x �`'' � '� '!
_T � _ _ -: , ;.'
. , �- . . .
Creame with Restrooms � ��; �,�- . L. � , , � _ �-� � s , _ �� :,.�*•. r,� =;�' �����,�� ,, ,.
� rY �" � _
� �
� ;
. : . _ . , �
_ , w � ;. ,
�` ' ..o. ...,�, �,. 'ni3� .."�` �r . ' r�),;��. .:� - i�.A k ,it�M� 4� _�� �d
_ �^c�'�'� ��
„� '+� -� .� I ; ._ . . , r; � - ,�',> a:�� �r• r +� �'�..
. .... . ...�� � . �. � .. �;�
.. ; . �, . - . :; :.�. . . ,-. . e , . . - ,;• ��'�'" ,..�,, 'i�� �. «.
'��� �ul y i��
, � ._, � .. , . .. ) _ .
\'f a . . .:. .,� - . . ..- -�,: ..nel� "".y� •y�k-j'�b,�'�.: _ . *��` �,�4_ . _ ,15� t� .j,: .'M �?\���
& Picnic Shelter . .�. :, ;i� �.-- �� ; . . . : ,� -�a � .� .: ��� :�
,�
,, . :.
��
, t ,.,. -
_i ,�� � `
. _.,>,,Y,� , ,,>�; ;;�r ;,���r'.- ; ,, :,... .. � . �• ,� ��" s� �: - " ,F • ,� �'� ��sa� '��`:�r
- - � - �l ��
. ; � � ..: ,, .,�.:. . �� � 4 , , ,'ti ��� ���
, , . ..
�=_ >,. ..; - , .
- a �- _ � "+.: �..:ne s '� � F �� '1 .� '�'�Ry'J
. �^'. , .s-. , �' .•.�•. '. �
� ., . -. � ,,.
- • ' - c:r;t: �:- - __ __..-_ , 1 ,� • �
,.
� , �`. ��,
., I
._J�:_ .e' '•.,,�, • ��'' ,.,c�' ^ ' FY. s .l 5 .Y y � '� �.�i,y'`Sa V��+�.
. - . .. : .. '.
. . . �. . . .._ ...
, ' . . . . n .- ..s V
,:jn,�i,t iS'� a+��. " yt�rtir"w . • •�; • i 8 � �F� µ b J
�N.Y'y
� ,��
r -�n .3 �, �:: � .,,� � 4�
. .r, .
, . . .. �
. �, ,-;-. M ,: _ , > �' _�_ �c _� - ��
,
Roundnose Dair Barn : � _ . � ,.. , �..� - �. . .:�,�r,:,w: .� __ .:. . f _ _ �t� :..F ,;� ��� � _ �. , .�
Y _ �. : ... ._.� .�:,,� . v. . ��i� f���• 4� ti I
�
„ _
,
� � ,
� -- �:: rw . ,,.n�� "�S. . ... „_��.�rh. "..3� ,:u, . .,. ` \ _ T �5. i_`} +'r,'.�( �'��� ?m.. �
. . . ` � �' ` , � �I..S+4Sy Iu �` H.r...
. , ��a I . �,. , � �..:r.:. � .. ?' mk.�.. ... � `1�1 ����� �5, .�I��� _���i� ' w
with Granar & Ent Plaza , :� �,.. `. ' �" r .- � .. � ... ° .. � �.��� ��� . �k _ _���������;, � .�,� _ ¢:
C _ .�.�;. . � �' ��� � �;
y �v � � t
INTERPRETIVE ELEMENTS AND PLAZA CONCEPTS `,�� -
. F �i� ., d rF :, � ,^ . �f.,#i . � �� . ��,.•;. .� , ' _ I .
Q Playground Area _-I .- x� � � � L a� � y � ��� �,� �:� ��� _ ��J� _ _ - � �,� �-�� _
s� .•� � "' 1 � �` �
.. ; �A� _ b��:� �'-0 `�s- ... . - � _" • � �''n �v '�lLi
�1'k�;�c, ��: �"- �l�� _ �t �i . � � _ ,�,
��� �, � � �,�i �Y - `,.r --_ _ �� Y . /� . _ �y � ,. � ��� . �
� . . . . . . . � _ - - , - -
Trailhead Plaza with Bike ��ti .,3 �� � � �� �.� V.. " - <; �- _ " � � ; g F��� s� .
� ,
�. �-. , _ � � _
. . . ue - — � '�'a
i ; �;_ . �: � '� �. 'f 3"` �i
Parkin & Trail Connections _ � � y -� , „ : � - �} :,, '� � `�� _ � „ ����e
9 , , _ � � � �`;';. �`� � ' `
�;� ,,. ,: �9a. , _' :., � ,. � _ - - s� ��e�2 am W'iL'
- _:�... t:� .:' � s '<-.'-�.� '• �.� .:.. ::+.� .�t�` _ '.:_ � �w� �r� � � ,J'^-� . `-� � - _- .,"� _- - } . i��s `vi� .`��.�
� - , ..,...,, . � � _ -�
. . . �._ �t.-r �-- -::,�,:�-- � i r _ � i� ,�.. - _ . . ... :: . � �. ��m�ea .. �. ... ..
� Y
__ '� ` ••1 < y � — t�{� . . �
4 !u-_ - � V���4,� - •,,�:�1 �' - _ .— . — _ .� ��.. 5 �.� �,� .
Picnic Area ` _ a{ j -- � �� �-°� � - - � '� � a :�� �
O k� r - ,a.,. - ;I _ _. _ , - .e-` .. � �Y - �'-. 77 i`s'�, .-:,a_ ,�1 �g �.�fa��S t�Ta;�d � ..
a } `� ��
�2, �3µ+ c '�r} �� ffi - *,�. �•�� t.:� � :. .�. �"'� ��a� lti ..-"�-. _- $ �a .��.{�, �� - ,,Y�,, ��- _
�� '� y 4 r-�� . - �' . Ct�� �.'" ':��;�:� �__ _� . _ �' '�% - .t. -_b
' � �
�'��U'� ��' G F. 9 1 . . �"�,� -' __ L"~�- _ _._. � __ ___ . ' '.P� �� .}3 h �_- .
3�.�.: 1Y .� ., . ���'` '!�.�"�:i - � ..� . =� _/_" __ . _.. -- _-� .«q r 8' :;,;�,�'+. ��sf.,�,,,f ::� _
QOff-Street Parking u:.:�:� ,:�.��;_ _�. __ _ :_. -�: . * � .�. �.ti �- __ - - _ _ ��,.�. ��� , �; ���.�� .. s. - .
(30 spaces) � �
� �► �
: Turnaround & Drop Off � �� -� � � �+ �
.�
� \�' Emer enc
� Existing Cell Tower \ TRAILHEAD PARK g y
�
3.6 acres to be -- `�� - Access Road � �
NOTE: dedicated to the City
Refer to Description of Proposed of San Luis Obispo) C�
Trailhead Park for additional information. �-�
Open Space t-� �
� / .
Buffer / % y �
r � '-
� � � �,�
Maintenance f� • ` �
��►,► w 1° Access � --- � � � � ;
YII� � . . ��.�
, � — �,,- i' ,' � �� ,
� R G � �
�n' .
, /` f �, � � � �..-�r '`'�` ' ��,,,s,��� ' ' ,,.f_ ' i
� 1 ,: �, ��� � =�` � � ````������
, .w� ���; ♦
�' . �r_ `� .` ' �' � ".�'. ````���0����`- i
���I��� •�.' �� 1�.� , �'.� ` . � � � �������```,�� �+' i
��ji� __ _ ,, , � j �-,—�, .�.� . r , . � `,������ .� . �
O� � -� � .�� - . ,.� , �O� � ' —
���I� ' ' . i r�':� ' ������`` _ , � ���`�� � �
� I� . _. � ������'� . � ,<r. � a r
'� � . r
. ♦
• � ♦ �
♦
♦ �
� ,--..-.. . i °'�-
,
♦ _ .
�
�/'��� ♦
� � - • . -- � `� � ��� , J � ���.3
���� • ,• • �, - . _ . ' � :��''` �_ ��� , �..�----.,n� G ������� ��'� � � �
O � �`� -f � �r , � � � � �� � �
`�� ...�'.b_� � ,,, , , ' ' �.`� � ► � � �"
�� � � � .ti ti., �/ � } �� �, ____-... �: .��" �
� � ti, � "� . � �.�, �,,,���•.. f. r ' r�� f� �- ' ,-.'. ♦
;.� �f ���� -^��.._----� , : r , `,-_ -.,...._.- �
�� � _ i � `� � 1 � � + .� ���` '�
� ,, i
''����I �� . � � � -l" A� �` �^ � - ,n ,... - � ��'� ' � ��`
��/� •1 �� �� � . �� � -� � t.�c ��
�I"' � -.�.• ,` ~:--r"'� �;�. �.� _ ' 4•. r :•y,{' _ '"`'.' y'�. � ``, -
����'_ ,'� . , � `� � � `��� `i
I��� 2 _. f ' ```���
!=' • � � - �
Z �1 � - ' � r` . ���` `
�,�� � '� � � .���'�� �� � � '� ����������
� � ````� �` ►,., .,I'�_
� � � `, _ ' � . ,: ., �` �`_ _ �. ' `````�
'r� � ? )� �� � ��' ����'��` - -
� , O ;"�,'"'�` 'h�,---- �����
.. �, ,�' _�-,� `-_. , � +,J. ,� , . `Q````,``�����
� � � � r�� '�_ � � !� `' � � '!� ." fi � 1� . IU1111�1����
, � , � � r � �-� y � Ullll
�� 'r ' � ' ` �'` � C> � � 11111/1111111 .
�� � �, � -- � ��
` 1111�111111111111111111111111111111111111
�, a�tt� ��- � -_ '� � 1
� �I � � � . ` , . 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 `� , r
�tiv �� � ' ; . '�r " uuuuuu�u '
i�r � ,�� uu '4"�.
��- �
m�i��mrn�m��� �����n ��i��i�������n������ ��������i��mu���uuuuuuuuunnnnu
„�„ .� �
����� � � �
�� - .,�,�, „�'
� _ - - — �.
, - �� � - '�� �-- .
-' �, _ � , � ,,-.,�.r . - ; _�:. . ..
�.d,,._ �������������� � � — �
k '^�... , . k++. � '� � ; ��
w�
� . . �..,�' 'R t . �� � .
. � 1
r ' l
'ti�� � � 'l h `�I �-
j � � � � �ll
� t
� 4 '
, � , ` � � •� � ' '7
� _ -.'4.-.. , _ � �j� 'i �
�� � � � � �� .� � a�-'--^w—"_ �
' � . y � _ .� --T�-� �
� 1 L �
- � � � ' _ __ "' _.
�' ? � �- F `.� _. ` ,"��- � � �
_ -� � � � �
.� . � - -
� � r� � i�� �
-�— — _ �` _ _ � � �
� � � �`
--- � �� ---- .
0 10 20 30 60 90 -
Links to Irish Hills - -- Links to Froom Froom Creek � _���n�
' r k Tr il �
Natural Reserve Trails C ee a �
�
_ C
� � -
� � � , „ _ ,_ „ „ „ „_ ,_ „ „ „
� A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA SCALES: 1 /8 — 1 0 (12 X18 SHEEf) 1 /4 —1 0 (24 X36 SHEEf) 1 Ol 4012 NOVEMBER 14, 2017
16601
ATTACHMENT E:
FROOM RANCH - CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE
HEARING POWERPOINT,
RRM DESIGN GROUP
AuGusT 28, 2017
16602
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16603
Froom Ra nch Specific Pla n
Cultural Heritage Committee
I August 28, 2017
' }
�Y� , �}
' h1 ��� �]~~ ' I _ �
� �� s
� �1�. ' � ' . ;. - .-
♦ w �
x;" - � ' ` •►•.�r+. .�^ •i
- Ky i'.. ' � , � ••l. .• � � s�
�. �.
His�oric a�oio c�5�os(doz�s�ii�ao arcnivss>
�� LJLILJ .. i I I -,� a�i��' R�r.���a' r r�
=�''�',� .-_
i� 'i,`• \ � �
, �� Costco� � :\ Targe.t?
Site Information G��, � , ,. ,
-- ,
��� _ -, � �,�. � ��:yf:
•Approximately 111 acres, , � � Hoi„e z, �., ��;�_
and primarily in the County ���� ''`�,�epot ,�. � a° .
i _ ' �`' �
I •Located on Los Osos �
'� Valley Road,just south of / 3.,..�••--�� ���
the Irish Hills Plaza ;;�� � '-
`� '.
•Majority of the project site ,i aa�
a
'�i is undeveloped �;.-� �c,�;��
o` =.
i ,•' ��.,
� •Froom Ranch Complex is � � �+
located near Home Depot � �r.Hampton
" � r-e .111 n
�• ��'.- . ..
' � �� ����i .
� � /%' ClT Y��MITg ��'� s�
'� .�. i , ti �r
�� � Mountainbrook ;,j;:,�, ':-�
�� � Church "-ji�S� ,�;'�
.
;`' � - ��I�:�
16604
1
Froom Ranch Com lex
�sre�.fi��i sq���, ` � '�y " .
; re�mdne�e ��>�� •" �. 5
- 3 Ua�ry B � e�'
1 •
_Na��Sq�?cmt5lNc��iez y , - �
� -r
e��nwx
6 OW Bam
Gnn�ry ,
C'� . .- -a ., . L �\ -
�''/, �° � 4 ,. -
� �� .
� � � � ^ � : ' ..
/` � ,.`i`` -
� � ;�1 '
� ��
_ _ , ♦
r.
;,Y� l + �, �
• - -I`
/
'N
Y�i�1!l
� Froom Ranch Complex
�i _ � ,. ,, . ,� .
,_ .., :,,.. ,
, � .
. ��+on50^��t5tncwne f'����:
.� a snen ' 1� :4 '��
5 9�nN�e�ee , ��
6 OiEBern I!- _�
i Granary
��l�,ii�r.p,i..i,�i.�:.li�.i,�i.�. ` .
. �^.M _ �
�v —
J
. Cw.�^ {�'.
� `
� � .,1 �
. �F^ �� � . /'
. . n^'-�'^� .
- .�'
. `1
VL� �
�'.' LJ�LJ . .�. .
��S
16605
2
Hlc��*���- V��w
�` ; �
. �
'��� �
�
_ -- ��
_ �
� .
.
� �; �
:�� � y J
� « . , . � . �
- ��, __.�.r-.r- # �r"✓
f
���
Historic Photo,c 19]Os
,��-,r.-*�v-- r��
�p+_-i�V'1!l
� Historic View
_-:.
�, -��� �- � . .� -� �
��� �I___� . I j � �� , . � ' J = _
�i ,�,. , - -r- —►--• —�
k e=�-�`"'G�' � _
-- �� � :� �
,� . :..
r•!- ��� ° �� , . , � i
� �
` Jt � �, �,: :;''�i'.S`k'�
��" .`}-� --
� �l
��s�o��Pno:o,�,s�os
��•� ��� . . � : ��
.:+s —
16606
3
Contemporary V�ew
�
�
-- _ � :.
- .�:�.:���_.-�<.�, - - . -.��.f.. ;
.� �.
_:.�
f , � y`` �.� .q
!` =:i:- �'�y -"`� Y•""L.,_�x �
`����
.►�. _ :, .�.Y4 .`Mr.
�.;�'.� - _.�.
��-� :a �� ��i:� -�-_ - -
k � - {��-.-
;:'��' 4- - %r ,�'-=����'. ; �
-4 _.'� �_-`L.� - -_���
� '��,>�" _�� :�•�'.._��- !
�F� - . �- -� ., � _ �
ZY- �..." k" - 1i
_ �' y,�K���.'-.��v',,.. -"+.-�' - _
�.r"�r:_3..-•,`��_�`�-�'.''S�e�'..e��~"'� ' .
!:n ���I . . . .
,'_'i'Yxf'f'
III Y i
� Significant Structures
,:� _�% ., ,�
�.� , �
r' G t 11� - ��+ �� � � :�
_ ����� l�: � , ,�z� .
..��- .• - -- y � _
1. Main Residence 2.Creamery
:� ':��
, ;: �� .�-- �
"� ` ,
3. Dairy Barn
�ii...iL.i
•c+s
16607
4
I Non-Significant Structures
4....'
, • '� �'��.�
�
� °\
yl� �� �� � .�..: 1 � � � ��� �
�I�l �'� ��.fi� � _ �
� ��� r -�-
i ,z= _ `����`�
4.Shed 5. Bunkhouse
I -�' "' �
i" . 4 � � }'�I, � �;`- _
�� �.�� '� +' �
d�y .�_`- j,
��� :w.�� ., : ��
� �;_ �-J..
' 6.Old Barn 7. Granary
��� L�LI� .. i I I �
,�_'�
Composite Site Plan
�,v
�rea - �
, t ,.� ,,
,—..:.:;
, __� � -
ry.
� ��� �
..,a��a_,. .L— o
uuLl _
..,� -
16608
5
Composite Site Plan
.E��-f--aUSs ii S�thvci�ies
axe s
e
q uae.;2,;.
li ����' .
�
��
O
�I � ..i.. ': .
I � 9x#
9
I \
�I ��.i._,�nx � �^� � �
':n j ..
'-',:s-. _ '
y��y_
Composite Site Plan - Relocation
�_;.�s,s:�_
- �r
o�e ��,�.�
o edn�
��ry� � �
� �
� � ,
Q e
�
�
`__._- ' .� �
•' �ii..��
--�
16609
6
Proposed Park Pl�n
�R��ryrteam � ��,es
lil��li,, � .
r'
_��
��-- _ �1
`• a � , � o
�" \ � �,
�
. .ti�}.'�'�'' s�',/r",f..•.
� . ,� � � :
��_ �
w':;:
!;n I.
ir.s - -
i'Y.`kf',i_
� Proposed Park Pl�n
, �,� , . .
� � . ,,
I, �
�,_.,�..
�,
��, ���� � _ _ ��,���
� � �-� �- ; � �
'� � , - � °
: ;
� . ... :
,. .,,,,..,,,,.. _„���
�, ��. s , ��
_P�oo,.d
I p�ineaa t
� L
J�� �
�'�• ��IJ_ _ . .
�-`,1S _ __ - _
16610
7
Proposed Park Pl�n
� _ � �
� �. � ��",_�,� �„� ,��h ,..�,.�� �
... , .. ��;�
p m„�. �� BP�SI. - .i�.. �.� 1 . .
. ioi
s � �,... �� I �
�
�
ti
+;,: . , Q � �,� `"d e.�,. ��_.���+"'�e���i
fl '�Q,' •o ' .�� ' " '_ ',� O,,
.I- ' ^t` i�.i N�r _• ��� �
.a� 0 �'i�� '
�������„ '..�-
�����. ,
� 1
��� L�L�u .. i i I �
,�_'�
East and West Sec�tio�ns
- 9.�,.
1 � 15 �
Dalry Bam Creamery ,� _ _
Main Residence
Exisling Site Seclion A
5'2 �.
tRoundzbo
u�
Dairy Bam Creamery � Main
Residence
Proposed Sile Section B
;Y
.4
,� A
e
-B
A
Ezisling Section Proposed Section
�iuLi
-+s
16611
g
Composite East and West Sections
P�oPosad �
_ Dairl'Bam -
� , ProPosed
Creamery
Existing . ___ -�
I Dairy Bam Exis�ing __ �
Creamery Existing Main Residence Proposetl Main Residence
Gomposi�s ol5ita Section A antl B .
/"-'✓
I - -\ j•
��./ A
�i B
B
A
�I Composile Section
I��� L�LILJ .. i I I �
,�_'�
�� Individually Signific�n# Structures
;�
''� 1. Main Residence �, —�� jj'°'?��� Rehabilitation
� �
Er_.--r�
L�
2.Creamery Reconstruction
3. Dairy Barn � Reconstruction
I I � I l::l i:-;,���� .
�,-�-����
+,s �-,: '�"
16612
9
Main Residen�+e
� � �
;, � = �
�� �� 11 ',�1 �
��-����
�
�r_ E� 1�
� `�\� ,
His[oric Photo,c 1970s ����� I� ��� � . -
,��.�r.�-_.��-� :
Contemporary Photos,2017 1�%
;�
':n .
�y��y_
, Main Residenc+e - Rehabilitatio�n
���� ;
I, ��� _ i
�;�,�"` �. �11; ia-� � � 11 ��
_.� � _ _4Y�_�• �\ --`- _ -
" � ' '��?i�J.'��. �' _ .- _ I _ :'^'�v
\
\. � �.
1■y�r � -*- � � I I�� 1
��p � a`���j��11�91C1��p , .,!i�
) �� �
Contemporary Photos,2017 Historic Photo,c 1970s
II,
I . .i I ,. - .
��
16613
10
Inspiratio�n
� ��� � . r ,�
�2..
�� i�+T_
��� � • I
•�-- s �� �G �� I
�,.�',...�.._�. -,� ���' � I
- � — i
'�:. �.
I
' � ,�,!� ..a_ � � –
��{� `�'�: _
.�
�
�-.-,,. � _ ;:�:�
.'ay:.
, _ "'A
I ---�
�, �,...t^�r'� � � �a" �_ , �,.�`.` �
i � - "� ' - �� .
�I =_���ti� ,+�+H - �s�� _
� �'�,
i � � ' �'
'��� - . +
�:.. ♦ S�Y'�treY
--�....z� "-�`^-:. " . �1' ��v
I,� Ahn House,USC(2004)
Y"n LJ��I
,'_'y'�x/' _ _
, Creamery►
�-� - �� �
� � � , �
,�., � c� � ––� �—=.,._� �
_`£'_ .�-�'�. I:� .�� F ,F. i� i
� � �� ;�t
'�'� �"_�" ` a �� �«_ � ; �;�� " ;;��
. i l���r : �
� �� � ������
� ,
� �. � '� =�. ���:�C��� �
, _�J _� �,�������.
,i . . � �_'_"� .. .i. . _ j 6.i '� �. y�l.
Historic Photos,c 1970s .
Contemporary Photos,2017 Lk
.- LII...I�.I
+r�S — �•`
16614
11
Creameryr - Reconstruction
__ _ ,�� �
���� _ �
� 'i}�; �_ -
, �_ j��i � , ,:� �
� �
� � ,�, E���
_ �� '�µ�K ����
� �
Proposed Rendering
�., ..,...,..
i-�
- � '��' .: . _ , .
. ... . � ..;, � � -_
I
I -JJ� - • _
I � I
.._ i
� � �
� o a v �
,� r I —
9 .. . '
- �_
' �1 �° I � r _° ..._ . I �
As-Built Elevations Proposed Floor Plan-
W�� �
';n I e
ir.s - - �
i'Y.`kf',i_
�� Inspiratio�n
:,� ;._r;.:
ia �
u"i
- Y -„i, Y:e�^ �:�u�.:.�.
' �.
.k�`- ''�f� .
i I
�"4 s. i
�� �= �
� - ' � �' _ I
,'r i
r�'' i
_ ...��sy-�'�.. ��i � .
,:�P�.
" � L.
- -;� i
�
'�:— " s'�: � . � �i �"�� �
- � � i�i,
� �
�. r._ ' �
t . - 1 1�I���' '..
�•���,, �. ���i
�-. .,�;�,
�u
� Highland Camrose Park,Hollywood Benjamin Franklin House,Phlladelphla
��S
16615
12
Dairy Bar�n
� -
_ O.
�� � _ _
__. . .�_, ���'_
I .., . -� - . . -_�71�1`�3...11Erl��`„1:� b .
`�M �
� -' —
�k }j �!, ■ ��p �
` � ■ �
�; �
'a. � ��.', -�
y�os � -
_ _ �
_-�r�: ,��.
_ �_��;,
ILII I , . . Contemporary Photos,2017 �
';^n L1 U :
,�� � ',..�
"r'4x r'rt"
I Dai Bar�n - Reconstruction
�
�: �
- - , _ , � �
_ _ _ �.. ,�,�� . �
- -� � �
Proposed Section
��\
i�
�
!� ��
.
-.-. ' - -:._i
° _ _-___:...:_... . ,
.s �f /�:
.... ....r'_---.. . . ..._ .
a»`'•---..�
. _�n— � • ���.�L_._�-
. ..--'__--� __—_--"' _,.-�,_
,
. , _. . .___ . .,
. r
Pmposed Section Proposed Elevations
�iuLi
•c+s
16616
13
Inspiratit��n ���-�rr'� �
�
_.''� �-.. � �,�7d
_ `+����y" - f• � ;
, .. � �y�.��,;.,'� i k p�� ,��,: i
• ' 1, 5��.�i � ! M..r
'��5v.��''� � W" •'�wS�p'� _ Y ��. r.6�.
� ■
;E'�r. �'. �i`4 0 - �,��,°'
�� � .� :F.�.; —__ � . -
1�� ti � �
��,s �
1�� ������,.� � _ -ig ..
y�` '_ �` y „ y�
4' �"` � _
sy�� . �� � F,b ,.
_ .�� .�� �;:��,�;
' '' :�': � .�,..— r—— - �� i
�
f '��, s,.;;`_
,„ '
'�";�� - i:.;P,,�:•::_;�:``�i;:.':e�� ,�''r:;i;,
Y�i�xf'i- �_ _ , . .,.
�II ��.�. ��:, ..�
Perspect�
�, ,
, ,, ,
� �
_ � . �-,. .ur� 1 .��� .
i". _� .�y'=
1
� �� °:��'# � �'
. 1 �
�
-'�
, -+�:�,... _ �i . ��1 ��.
�'
I f ..
Proposed Rendering
_, u�iLi
,.,s - -
16617
14
ATTACHMENT F:
FROOM RANCH - COUNTY ASSESSOR RECORDS AND
HISTORICAL BUILDINGS DIMENSIONS
16618
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16619
„� ,.,,, ,� ,�� . .. , ..,s., .. , „ „ -.w-:,� �, ��,:,:�y, �� e..h�, r:r � ;;;s �, .��; ,�. .�., .�ca�, .� a 'v-,��,��'J�r,"��t� "e+¢�"7w�^ii�(P$p����.��K , �
�.�r a r e'�t�r
�f�1'x ' {'p . ` tgw� . 4 k�3& 2` °�'�y*A��1� 1 4�S�Y�, �.
d 3*
�
�
� � .� �y . c �„ ��'� Y i�*��`� ��t ��"�. �' ��,r� r�
u"
' �,�
k �
�
J
5
� �
D' � . "� a`'S � Y
�#�r ',�, F fi�'� �� �n�� �'�£'�a� �'-���� � �. � . �+�^ �+€ r.. �.�'w� .� , `%�__r� s_ „:�t�.� #'�k�� ;..� �,�;=... �..e.
q ` y '
,.... . .. � �
.. _ , . �. a:t � �. ;. '� .�:: �s � �: . -� s#x. § �' . '�.. � ,_...
' w., ^ ., m .,.x s. x , ,�.e�r t . „��; ,-�.
r �
. _ ... �. .. ... ��. . .». �w4a'� a. .u. a x:: ... �, ".°„.`�x :i�'';i .t ga`:�' � .�'�°�wr;i i ;�3. ;.�; ,�,�
t
�, . ,r. , .;..... x..;, t. �.,. ... � ns-,�. �,,.,., .. '. :, ,..t „�.
: .
. �. ;•..• ,,,TM';..x :.� .:. ..�-.,r. :. . .xw... s ..-�-z . .. ....��-.�, .,. .,fn . ..�........ . .....s�.;r.�.,,K.z�F...:�,,. ..�.; .a, �t..,,. �. t
. , r.;^'t� a.,#'. 1, '�' +,��:,-.., t�. � .s.-x >T.,. .k; �f,
, .�� . . �� �. �'",.,r ... �.,, ..:s, �3 .�"w' � ��..4., k'� .".#. .�'£ �` t..-r. a i�c:� * .::..• � :=t .� t .,s..,. ., �.m . . � ',e�:.� s*� ,;.. t *`�=:Y.� ,.�ci ,fi-"-=.�.�"rF�� i��; a �':..
�.� :. � :� # %^� ?...,,��,��5�„ '�;..;._ �a, �,....y.r � . ! � �,.;. �xr.. ..._,_. .�,.+.. � „ .,y,= ";��.. � a. *.,��,.r. `*�.: �' z..�..�'s <� .�,+�^''� r _
.,;,..,.. .. �:.v.*4 �i ;;: .� �a;,�..�s «�;,;�t� as�. y"M.., o-:. s�-,:`:"`�'z , �,.�s:; ..,e.c;: ��k:,:, ;�.. '* ...:. r= � . , :, `,:,� �. ,�'G;... _ ,.�:.: .� .Y,�.,a ,�..f �-...
_.^,,.,.. .. ,�, ;�� a .c.3.��a�<: -"� �,.v.... z^�.,K?- .,w'�.. ..o- . , ,... .���'ii�� � .,,�s . � �
.,,:S�. ,.,.��'�fi'h�,»�.�.*�.,v,.,. 5�;,�k�r.a'�rm „�.e.n�ff.,��-�. � �:` ,,�,...�i,�'*�'#��.n....r.,-_�sx,n�. ..r�,.4 n w.,a„w„r_.»-r.,.�,fir „��^��e r.��-����'�.,��,�...a....,t.� -'.x ��.�„s c r;�?�'�-'ti��' ,�U �:rk �. t,.�;�m �-�" a.a
*s x'x
-,.., ..y.:. .,..r.„. ,., � ...�� :m.• . ..�. . .
�. �5.a..... . . .�. ,.-.'%t� �':' ,x.. ��. ., .., ,. .�.:;,'� � �. .,:. ,..x ,a�s.•.:x ..� „, ..:� , z�.�:.k. .:„ ;t.,�..,^. . „5.. °x k^ ,.
. ,,... x �,.a�:..- �.: &x .,., # a,,-. .E. ,. .,..:. �.z;t..;o-,.., ., _.. '5:.,.......,.... Jt u.,:,i.�. ..� �...�,�.. :..�.r...,. r.. .�.�. ��';�..s.c .s..,-R ���#�. ;� r,Y
, .�f � �� aJ'� +�r, c� , s ,.�= x ..... �..�, .* y �. r..t� �.€"%� � �x � `_ J . �. z.�,
e. 1�*�a .;�.s�: 5.+, s�.. � •.�v7:� •:zi�`-�n ...< ..c:.s tY �s: ,..��,'�� --:� �+ . . y�`� -x ,h
.....a..,�. 5 .a.... , .t.. >.�'.� .,:� .'f,'�'�"',. E .,4..: :., n......1: ,.�. , .,..�. ...,,.,..... ,.,. .<T .:r.. .,+ti t� �'k 4 ,y sA
..� ... 3... . v ....:, ... ...� v.f ,..,s..� ,�.. ..,..... .J.-... .x,.... , x. . w... . ... ��, ,v. ,,v„ �7fi .�:, ' :�.,;�- ,::..
..i'.w..„..t2.+'r" ..-v...,£ . �#r+-S3'.:�. 3 .�..:<.��.., ,o-�. � '�m�.t.:e. .>�. .r.,, r � , .,.�.�e. .r..... , :x. �; awk2. �.n�. c::e^. �� � t. �; '}4.�y. 4�} K.:�. .t�
'x. y.... ,f°`+`' .x, y +..: '`$...:�� , . ...,... ;.( . .„.. S ..r�e ir.. .:zi,. � � �.�a
�. k« v,. . F. a r x v.,� :s �,�.:z. ..... ... .:.. ,..:� �:9 ..... , x€ 'y'% V�.4� �^_,. �+
1c... .:�.��..,, ,. .„�,,, �s �,,x.s, ..,.;:+,�.t. « �.� .. .�.�,�� ;.,a ;,. .:., _,.�. ,...�� > .a€*�.� �,..�., �;�..:. . r „i4.. '�p.s,
, ".. F,,?,,. .. �. lr,. ���. . ., , . ..��. �.. , .: , �� .., ..... ; < , # ,:,.,... ... ...3x. .....: S 1,....3 � .,. � „� �'.::� �� .gS
, �� ... , ._ ?� _ ,t�T,, �. �,�2'19' �.n t.,�,r a . , .,_ � O``�/:�" ,�� . ,. � ,. ,.., .z.. . t0� � .;� �d! t1 n �!�� �
� � � � ti,."� � , >. �. ,. ti,,... �., .. � � s .., .,,�, �. .�� $ �'r � �
, ...�,,.�'� k ..„ 7 nc� >,.,�. . .�. �.,..,,,a s,�r€.. ..�. F.. .,�.. ._.. < ,.,� .:.� ,.,��� �.,+;�,. ....�� ,�.:- .s t� � _">::
,;.,'n�:� ��s ., � ,.....�,. ,� � s +,..r:.., ... w � h .h .�.1 � ..h�. . ,_...,,� 'z P s :-: x�d �.,... ��y,� r�'
k.�1' ".' �:' .. �- ,�'s.:, ' t x,_ �r',: s . .::w, .� -. �,. .. , K�. ,....,,. .., `,.� �� � .,a ����z.`.
w .�d.��;.,. y.,.;;��;�.�'s a.,v.,..,t..�,� ..,.�v�:�.§.�b��',,.,a.iF W� �6iz.t�u-:� .r�.>t.�.�.�, ,�, �i,.,.,t l _ ,��� .��i <z � �e�- i f,. ���.
-<a,a '-`. ��. .�,:., "�; � 'b,.�.� •�;�.
��: ,.� �
t :d�". 4 �la&n a.�:.r, t, '�" ah +�ro �s s,��,:.�rc., r a4X b ? W..
��,�` �'�•`�``� ,tu� � i�,r }..:�'i a ,f..��:'7"` � `;aY� �� t� w `'� x f�` � Sq ', w
� ��' �„ `r�' r�' x .sk:, ��'� �„ s. �. � � :.��v�,' ast�
'� '�:'�,v,+?';i^4 ,.`�.'„+"'. � �K�sYM, M , +��' Y3 ;f '� �tr,:`=, f, �,�.. .x ;.sv'�';r,�1a
,.�„ W.���F ,Pfr a .� t ,�y{� ., f Z 4 f; ( �.� 'a , t T�:vW,
4o- ..�rv��° 'A 'v.�4" ��Y €� W,, y .3 rv.7� �Y: Y� fi,
�"� p "t. x;y�,+«� at�y,� ,.^,r �e ; �� "'�}�t z y� ,r-� F' .rk �t ro��+:,;.a
���� b°� x,`� � ..'�r'�et� r d � � ��`":�� ^ � ��� ���"',
a, xyfx. �° zyih .� r:. qf '^x :t-� r� v a ..r.
t�`�:, aa �.,. =a, � �x£a'� � ,�,.�, .7 �s :. , . r.:' �rn 1 �_ �r a �v-.�,',��
�' ,�r�,� �r �. a;y � + t k
'�� t�:F .s,. z�., ..t�€s :�'� �� ��.�
� ,g 4x �,5 ,i,��- ,#'y �`+ �"�.�'�+"t ;� 5�:.�k, -.f av*' ,c k�..,i :,k ,,..s „�� �r .: ,f�'.'rF s '�t.�
� w:, ..,. . � �; �. .
h . ,-
�h & .:s ,� s;� . . y��„ �. ..,�,e � � s�' ,} 1 . �;'�. ��. yt f r s r ��..
g
v _
�s4` 'r . , .. . . 5 �'.�.+F , ��' z-.-.: �.... ,.> ..,'. r-..,' , . �..v �... �'� - 5'$ " �S .Ia. s�y �f,
�y'�`t' ' s .��„ A''., f ,5 C M� � �' � P �., J: k 'q�F y_ '3 .y i��,,.�..
��� �� �.:} '.�" k.,•- �;�' '�� ,�;;� 4 r �.�. a,` k� �i�t �kc',k''�.E�'��*, r,.:rt..�.�:
~ .k.%r"' d '; 7 v:.�fi { `� Y ".,.�" : ,.�t.,::v5�r,.)
� N .� .r` �.� �x.�:.��: �' t*, ��' # 1 : xt: J��, �}tiu
'` ,� e� s � �b � "'�� ,�`*,�. ��;3 '�`�` x s�;�'C''� L -'� .� a�� f�4��.��s:
�e . � t Y F] 4 # .4' ]. .�.( � � ,'� tY: �
��, lx �,%�F�.-'�' 1 �',v _ S w' } ''� x" +^�tx$ d.�,. .,"��`#",'
�.�} ,y`� x �t .s$ as
k,,.., � i" i%'��v �Fi�� ��} kT., '`'�xX
Y r '3n+ ,$�YhrS '"�'. s�'�. . `� �''�~ ' ���. : �. �
Y @„" a � �� x �z � x; � �- ..-.,f� ��3 � � a.'Iy
a= �i' i,+J�, �.'�
..:� � ��"�, `" .� .��.v 4 a s ? x .�,�., ��.,a y� w:� }:�x ' ,a,'�" ,� � .�e�t 3' :�r�-'r
z� ,
,�� a. �, . : ; : y�' ,t Tt �y } Y,a �1 , ^r,.
�u��
;.
� t
� � s�,��;, t��„ v Aa� .�� ,f.� � .,,s:,. 4!�,t�„i���I�F�r 1�,���;;, ' � ��K r�.�°du�. �,.x: # ��� r<
�:+ ; y,��+;�u� �o-�w.�.,H s� v�.. a � y�y f' r �,� ,�.�-+ *� *c ,�,i,�,ns;��� �,,. w �,
k �„tr"c„ �`}.:.�..°t '�^-��' ,r'�+7� f� r�� �?.�,,.��:� ,��:�r �ij,.ry�t�, ,;���,, � ��'��,s
+�M*t�?a .."q„,.�,.�r�'„r �,, x ,,�s. �n^ .�;� ��''1✓�. ''.� ./,G±, .,.�u. .� ;�A::. <,sa, ,w m� + �:��� ,a�'�max"�:,
„�
. . _, .,. . ...
'� .3'.� � a.,,� .. ,: ,,,�,. : ♦� ,�,: , i
�.� 5�.......�..� �.„.r d' ..h a� „r.<��'y � ;u, +'x, �".�.�`i r..�. �....;�" . =x..;,3 � .qal, , ',�A'. ,�a.�u. � , .,.:z,, .r ��` s �oA` i �s..°:�, r • � aa�. �""'� dg � ,,,,.,,�i�.
n .�� .✓..<,. �'rr. „s� , .. „� � .,,,,.V a;.'r 3 „}„f � r �. ��y'�". �� �' ^�" "�� �;�zn t��.r a i,.,,�� �, <..,�.
�:. ^,-. :� ��i'/�-r,7� �.�.,,t. .:{�y"����:�.:. ; � : . �rl.. ;� r . ..��. i7'a ��'� �, ? 0$��' � k:-,. � s +:.(7'�t ra�.
.a'i.� '�^�:��.���r*=�.�,�' .�,s :u.�'. < �:�.. ...,,, ,.y; Y„�e� �� �k �,� r,���G'�r. �n '��,. �h� �5�r.y, :a;� .t �+�".� `.� +'k �' �;�'?�,�,��
a
'�'S,. 4'� .�G'S x+„.'z? fi�7'�i .. �$ie' �r��,.:�"..,: 4§ 41r ii u� ='k:�;� . 4.. ..r,::. .��, 4.:,x......... .. ' a`•� �`, ,. � .�'.� �: j7^�'� .,t',,., J S' h4�^.i::gR� ` ..�tY. 1.. `3:d'�yS��i
�` ..�����.yt� � ..:,�. '�,.,.': ..., .-.;,,�� .�..�<, :..r; s�' �:�� '� ».�.z� , . .�'..;,. t. ,.,,. :r �. .F. ,� a �'.y ��) a�. -��� h ,, k. a"�". Yw��'.u,,., �
� � ,.�'}3. ?.,' �. t;2.�t�': �. ._ '- y ..:.ro. � � :' na ..:� ::' .s. Y. fY 4 b�c ��..h'a �xre.. �y�_� ,„P ,�'�l
��... ..�� .i .s x�k:. 5*., �- . tcY.-.k?,S ., .;2.£... �... ., rv,.,�.� f,.�., u'i;�. �.{ t='��,� 's 4���. .� .`R3,. Y.3 -�??.r...ro�4'.E., �..�44b�.
A � K
. . v
• "., . .. ' .«�
" x �
���... ,+, d. . . :� � c�:. .. , a.
r '.i,. �SS�.!",a ,. .,�:x �} •�,.,... ��..-z.-. r�: n ..y.,tn. .,... ., �. '.;�;,'.._ ,.� ...o.,�z,: ':fi�:� .' �'.u:��., _ .:;�� �:"ti d ' z� d ":";.4, m
.,t.: �a . �.. ., 3 � r�� r�� .�,:. � ,....�:n;.� w .� �. ..,; �,��,.. � ..��,-.,..,,,4.��#,.,:.�'. �a #.a...; �.:�.�,�t .�"` �i� +fi... � ;�.�,...x k , s'�� ",'a�i �r � r..,.�:�.� �
.� � . "ro 3 �;; 4``�"i• .�. �;+.'�,�. �'' .+ x 4.. `
. .��,..�..n't s...,.=�.:x ., u�„�:,e.r �.. �"x�,. '.�4 ;«, iFb�' . .^e4`��.G...'^x �� ' s�. ..a. �t.�yr � �,.�� �`�q..r S ��', ��+�ur��,+�r�, :,,r�,7�°..; F .,5k,..'<4� .z.<&�.�� ��` ..iti�����.
�; �•� �. 4'' . "-
�:=`?,.+��s� � `-i�" 1'x �.�.: 4. � -s;?:-r' �.;�:• w .�:. �:, s �rzs,;: tf�.;.",: S' z,,.,,ry t ,t- r+' r . "4� # ?, ,�: .�
a,�'� , r. � �,�C <, r r � �." �' 7 t .a� .�i.. �ry �,xa,����
,. , , � ..y.� j
; �` #:5.�.: .`�. ,.,.�5 .;.' r. .; .�. ,�,.z�. fl�. .�� >.. ,,�. 1 fiJ_.. ��'�.,. $,(`� s r.x �"�'k4 ,�.��r; �. ''A k�y���¢,i, � {.,_.*"� � „�4ve}'�'�u F' .�h .
�w a � �*'� �
, " .'.. €"�;;€3r xm ":." �.4,-� z '.� S. ,�:� '`�s ...�+,'�; k':;. `; a��3r xr F'�:�,� , a'�,� :ir :� '.,s- .�:?: r y t ' #- r t ,�1n;, '�y ..,.�,r.� ;,**_�,.'.,�,�^
"� F � ;Ez�2..�� "��'. ��'� ���a :,r 4.n;� } �"j �;'.3 ;y'r�^ �'�''�'�:�.:. ,?,��s^'s:i-,n`�F�.� x�.
�.. '-s � v ,� `� � � 'L ':� r±� � �f�:, � .r�F� ��� a� ^�.:�a � �", ���� ,v�..'��#�' �.
� ,�„��•� �" #,'��x �, t � „a� � %k,° 4 � o-�:�:�,x k g' .:v�.,.:�r� �.�rr''�?�:�;#r'n Y � ns t�^*. <.�; x
F �'r
��n�� .',�'''z � '„,�j4� q i § `4° <�;^'� {)��y �r_ ,..��[}'���, �}^.+� 4 {qI �.:s w�w X fl:,.�. ir�.� $���'' �+
] 'k`v ��?"� �.: �� ?.� ,`R'Sif. .}'�T a^�. �,J'1 >.. =5' '���, .r�^'�,°,*�-.�.i . „y�'= ti:°,� � "�` s,.� .. �
e �
<:.
k+ �x Y
� �_.
,,.i � �,� ..,. , �:
k` S itl i� .Yl `k�
U,.w2j�ei. '�� i�.r'i� , .. �_ ` ;y+,r�Y
,'"*r'f '�.rr,�K a ,° .�c,4• 3,e,A,E....' wl +r.,. x tz� ,'.�:,.t . . ,:. ..� 'x,' �"W* ti'�.: } .Y � .:R �''> ,is Y" i:f- ,.�y;�,.
4� �.r:.r� r� :.�.Yr t 4. �'r. �-� �: v . �.1'.� .1'+,�s.„.. . �' kf.t�.. .'.�'- : : ` • ...., f�fn .p} �>`+Y ,�l',. $ ,`'"4'� �e.*,�.., '�*"�.
� � ..,,. ". '�.i�.
.. , &'4 Y.�.::r`.:m ...,-��s'"'a. F n ...,� ...�,54•,-. Y. ... �.a.�. �, k:. . ., .... .
G'*. '+.� ,k 5' '1, f e ',:�i S! i e Fa }yp4' x,'�s..�,Y.s �3� :;� "�t � 'S?�t:� ofi.-,skp�,...
,.�,� `tv ,�..�.x ���!,�,. �^ �,,,,:�.,� .: r.,X�:�..., � �s.hstw, a�;.��,>,:�n-� .`a�3 `, . „d;(��. .��. '�s ��� 3��;. �. ,��.�r �.� �, _.�.,
• �'�,�c" � � ���'" ��.,� s�. .,. ... .�.,.� �,.� , ,, „��
� ` ��� _>�,�
s �_,.,, � ��� � � ��� ,
, . ,s.:., .:, , w� .. .. .:,, , ,�, �� � � .�� ,. ,� �
.,..,�. ,-�.,� ..� o- .;,. . . . �.,� .. .. y... ,��.<, ..:. x u� �, ,4.,.�.
..�. , "y�,. �.;-ur� �8`�1•. l� .rz ,.x.�. ,a+;.:x ... :,-�,. �.�.,, .. SNm, ., .;..� , - . �;. ..�,� .,.: „..� a �t �,t ;:e�' .,�.�.+
� �,.`. .,�`S. ., �+ �' '�_,�.. f. r ., .., �' ..,�. ,,., , .t�;...., .. . . .,..,� . : ''� ,.:,.:" : ::zS +Sv�`' `� �4 .f v�ad.'' ,s,:
.,.;::.. , �.....i. .,„,<... .,,.,.., c �.,�n. va : .�..a � ,_�. ..; ,,.�,. ,. .,.,. ,a.. . ,. ,e. .,. t ,,. ^, z. ,"�^..' �' ':'r;, ��.�
,;, ,.3 � .. .r .. .;,. .�,, ,±r ....., ..��. ,�� :r..: ,. „ ..F :.:.'E .�.,� .:�> ..... ... ,;, ,�{ „, , , t i .� 1, ��x�:��/5 h�, tet a�5. 1
i. r �... y.,::, .,i...,i�.:! ,, i,,, ., x� ..,.:,, .Y. � .{ �: �... .'.,; � -0 y+k
. �.4. � �u4,�'� �.0 ... ,.� ..� _ �.�F,r:aY.?�.� , ,' s. ; ,.�,,,�+;...�°. 'r x..,,ry :. ,�.;,- :,..,{y �.;�, ;y�„ .;��,'< ���i��, °�..�:;�..�"„r����; ti�!d� xr s �+�iI,F . '�u;N� ,,+_.�'�.,r, ��'�,"�`��. ' ,.'�r .��s.�':,
,
y xr i
$tx {^-..xE+, pfiA °�" �#�.Y:�.. ..��.�,+^".' S� 1. ' �4,it �` "'d:"'"
� �� -� .nx.s.�y1 � .e l .,, , � ,. , , .
„,. .,�� .� �. +�r= '• �i �..'��.� .. v zs , ..,�r,�.. , .,.,: �.„,;;. :,: w.�x .�.�_, ,t .;,,, ,�� r., r'� :t�''yr ,� u .�.�n z��. Y-
'�.� • . "p, ., ..:��.:� �. $r:^'�pr� r�, .,, ,v."�^' . :,,= I�jt.:} �y p ,�* Ht;�m�u� k'��, �'
�+ F '
"^, �:, �.. " ;"�'i ���<, „ ��k`?-.^; 'r ��r��. -'w'?� .��, i fa, ' �. ,'.
t�, � :-a?, t >� t'.17�i4 "�� `� O'��:�' �„�h,� iK YI'1'�yv �r y+fi�3 .�e ��»,,.; r
, ..
�
;,. �:�, a , x..:x �. ..�;,� :'.< �rs�, '�d r��- x ... ,<< :��,,` ,.. ,.: �v $ (,�y �:v k ;��.x � d^�.
., g
, ... z^� a_ < ,. 4 ,s .. .�„ ;: ,. �: � :� .n ;.r:, ., i,., '�: .�.,.. � � ;:, �..,. :r, .. '� , � ry
i.. :,� r ,r .� � ��.,,.r:, y •. s �s t y;
n, : , „...� �. ...e.e , ...z,..Y ,. �s �'.r�:,���.' '�,�` �.s"..N. i�.: .. y. .�:, ,"9 y"..Y' Y✓-C�.� .,w*i+�H 'ww ih}'�i �,�y {� ry�g"�"
. r....� w .,.,.:E- xx= i..'.:: . �. .�-.:2` '" ,..4`s . ',., ,'•." '�. . :.,.,+,4 1"i C'- .� #;.� Y f" A �gft{F ,y�b'.. �,i, S, �;3
�� .Ft ,rd°?F �,�. l=-, x C� '�r,r.�.�� .n+f .�r,� � �,. ��'�% � ,i�,�.�.�ca�. �,.°a" " 2 a. .s'�;"�",�ti.
"�".� � x*�`; r^ . t �����` �;� r� '`� ,. i e a; ._r C .°�,.���� �ro�fr�W+' j-, �. # � ,����,�y �..
���,:„;�i ��4 �+ r. e�`�-+'� ��^ ;'�. �j .� ��.;..x�;: .Y�«,�r� d�h a��3�r`:.a �„!4,.:::Lr r=`2�"�-x��
."'cri` x"�..'� r � a ��f ( �',�:� ,,{�s�w �+ '��"� �.....� ��, i ,; �`�#^x.�i"•'.s�
�3 t �x' �.�+r. Y /� �'�4a/i���[ t��'k.'.. Y 4 �. �+ �`' i',fi�. �.C�?
.. .�.� �. .. .
k ��f
{
*.�' >l-�'. � `�" �tu,.� �"''�.-�:��h...4.. .�S� & :.�:{�: [k�. �..�' �� � ���!� ,r'�v�' tv.-�.� ,�';.�,�"� s r�,� '�e�ss�'�+��.� h+
„++ ..; �;. - , �� _. .
,..,; f ;::� .-.�< : ��.�'+
,,. . , .., ., , ,. �,' . �r'+-
� . � ..:, , . ...... _ . ,.. . _ . , . _ . � . , . ... . .��. ,. .. .. . . ,.. l�.���v�.�;�.. . . .
'+.� :x.�r 'az '�;?+ 'sn"Si: ��7 .� a� , s�" g:x. .�,��.:. -a S�_�°`-'-'r ,,;;++.f �;,r°, a�. °.'�.�'r `�.• "%„�. -�' , �, ,�,.
t .,�� .,� .�.x . y .
S:: s �x � t`^"-;fi/ �`':: �'. .k ��:�...���'t :��'s`� t � .,,�'
�
„,� ,�� � :. < <, " ° � ,s. . . �C �; D`�I`�'< F � ;� ��:. ��`��"�: �^
_
���� �E:.r����"O� � �Y . ; ������!��i� : � � � .;+�; �+, ��, g=�„ ; _ y;K � " !I'��
,
� �;� "�, �.� ;� � �F , M ,� .
. -
.<� _.,.. � �K ��R.�i,.� �s: ,.:<P. . . . �,. ,.r� as r�. ,�,-,r� s� Y '� ."�',�"��
� �
�,^�,,,,. n*z .,'€s xr,, � -a;,* : g��s^��a'Sro �r '�°=5*'� 3:< r,� z.,w^c� '� ,. 4�� ,. ,.,. r�.�,.� z;. , `^w .-s,- �,�- �x;�.wv. �";:r �'�'a�;�*3�*5 , +'�, u.a,
.?z kfi`t�,- ,�, ,r,, r i a �„rxv. '�• rj r �' , �i'� ,'�.:^' # �� ,,;,E ��-':}� s'M,'�.� °�; ,:N �.,
y '�+'��;i�` t�' a .t �� 't� .� r L..,� '� � „? �.f�k e t � ;a,�.,i-��. a y�.
��az r�- ,Y ,,,� u"� �r P 1,+n .x" t - =.x, .�'�, r�t{,i�.._ >"�'a�. t ,r�+n �.,c+ :�.+
,
�, .i .�r ..,.< ..
, a .# : •t«. � . r ; . . , � �°�. ,. 4 a, :' 4! � ;; < ,,. :t �x 'i s ,�k:
-,v. t,�s.,a�: ..::, .,�; ..< ,�. ,�W,.., � .:: .wa„�,.,+� .��.,.;:.., , , �;..: «., . : ..,,. �'-.,.. .` ,.r' � � w�^�.ti u'#. ��,�..�Fa��,.t y;r�;..
4 ' ` �i:`-.M�i �l2 M ,3e a,.�, ...'.$,_ d Y. �' � B:- hr4. t` a.r-#..�L
i M�,� e,, . x�. .`... >o,., Ax t �;�,r . �`;.: ',, :� 44;�� ,a,. ,.. '� y � :s �.'1a ;�k,*h.,'r^c'� +�� g.�;:txm ��,�
" k"AC "1 d�:; :C Pex`�:; 1Nk t x«z{� :E; .5..! .aaz#>' F F'..=' "x'r'a s y..
} s`� w K .,,;k�' G 8G 3 f t�: � '; A ;.�. .A'��" �nc:`
'� :�. ..n .. ,� . �,o- ,a. :: �.
-t !;n .t y �, s �:� � .�. �� .�..'�;�
.x .� �,. ;�. , .,. .
".� ,.. ,�. , " .,.4 r , .,.�. .,,,,.,:,.` r . .,� ., w.�
�
�n:*�"�� a� .e,,;� .ri;e ,.: . .."r; rc�.e,-�' 3 �,,,,,a,r<: ;.. Cl. . t:. . .,.r....:.� 3 t.,,, .,.,,.�.Ps � +� �, Se r.z `�s ;� *� 'rra:.�, �.
,"�t :,�� ,..�a.,,,,,,,w ,.,.�� ..,. .. x��*,�'i , . �:..,�-*�'].,r,.��,�`v�.�a, •, �t r��.� v �r: . .�,, ti 4, a._�..,..,<.,,,� .f�r^a;'�:, , ',.�....�..
z s
. . ,.., .:. . .. . , . t. ,..
u ..� ,..�;.: .,.,: . �, ,, :� ..5 ��m ,,� . ; , ..
,..�, ;�.. ,R ;x_..s: �,�,� ..�.�,� �s . ..�..<,, . . .:.*�:.W . ,. �.n
::'wv,.- „u',..,. d. .K�. +^: � _:. #,.. ,t d^W^-.:. i.�.. i,i7� � n i t l .,:.�Y.r . ..F Ji�:„i ,,.'^.. A, 4Y ,.�v 1 M �:.Y „)
,x,�. Y�.K ,,., . ...nc$ ,..,.,.. ..: `'Y� a , .., . ..,.....,. u v"�,>r, .... ,..,,r, . „ ._.,�, m 5 ;m �.',Y
x�... . ,�5 4: s .,.,,. , ,.. .. ,, :.,,. „ , . �, ..'�. .._. ¢ , �.....�. � . .� , ..._ . ........ .. .. .:.. sr�' t -�." .7, �.
s� . . .�... v .. ... ..,_. ,, ..�x �c',. a ,.. , :. .
:,_ �`
.,. ,r.. «� .., . � . .. ::i.s. e� :::. ,,,: , ,'y
._ .t.. . ,:a.,o- , ,.., . , .,. . . ......;�r.o�,+] .�..,.. ...:�c , ,w. .. .a. ,..,.�. ��'. � .�E� , �. �.:�, m ,� .. q S' �fi
,,. ... ,�.. .�..., r , ., ..«. ., eC .,, ... .F"� :,-.., ,,. -.�a. a.-.� �.. 3,. �,z 4+., .. t .,.,�.s:�, a. �<�=s .i' `r'�.
.. . ,: �.....„ a. . K ..... # .,,. ..,... ,_ ..:. .. .?,� u .e� �r . �,. ... ,. .: ., ...,„.. . . > �. .... :��., .��'„ r'. . �, �.t
. . ,u r... a.�.. ., , .-... .x�4,w , .... .,,.. ,�� h ... . ,x... .,.... ,� ..., -r .. �.....,.�.,. �*,, .�., .,.a. ._:t ,. ^Y ,-� ,� r..�+
. �� �`,,. ...... ,,.,:...>,. .,.._. . . ,.,..r. x .... ,. r �.J. .,. .�.,. ., ..,,. � .ax, �,. s. . ,... u... , ..,:,h ..i�.,. .�. :� e. .._.�. i " �
. .. .�.,.,, , .�,.. u. ...L.. .. ,,.s ..4. ..:...... ,:., .� :.;'�.. �..t,.. a ...: �. �«sa� ���:- r.o . ,i.:n,., � . . �,. ..,.�. ..x��b r �.,R �.
� ,r . _.,,., , ... r�:5v �. .-. �..,.r.� .R . �:..d .� .x'..c ,N...¢! .,, �.Mn r, "d: ..,. ... .r. � .,... k�s.. .^ .., �:fr.,,� � 4x,��. .,vr�a ,`t'�.:., ..
��.;.,... } ..e�+..;>5 ,. ,. ,y,.,.� � .,„ `7 .m, '�,rt ..�,� ,,,.,:;� ,,.„�:, a r�:� .�n��f-, .N., .a. s rW. �., � �' a;�.�ss� �r, .,ra 8r�. ,x'.,a ;w {tC.t� �,:�'.,. R.,•
�,. ,�,,, :_ . , ._ - �.��..�.. �,.:,., .,{ �;��- .,,.. .,.,. , _..x. "�"! �.:�,,.. ..P..,� .. _ ,�c�;. ,.t,1a�.., �a� �� �e ��, .-�, �,
.r�e.,. .�.�. s. ...' ,,..�.o,. Mtw'um.�.v� " m si'.. ,.-- . .. y.
,.,x, ... �2. ..,. a ... . '.a. .w .,...�w. ..y,.,,�r' ..,w�.;ss�, ��..w .;:,.,. ..��v�., ".ro' ,rr'.. # ..�,...+i .., ;'-F &4 u� k,..w='... S:` y�,N
... .r..'�+ o..i. -.�4.. t.. i ... .� . ,.. d �d+ � a,
,,.,�, £!w � .r ..+... ..., .'i.....�, ttP .,d .ox,ea �, i ..., .xd''�„v� "Yf"i'
.,.. t ...,:�.. x ... ..a. . ,..., .,, F ...�u ,. 'a,. .. , :r+'. .., a ... .. ,. ..5:..4... . ,...,, t... .... > ..a.. ,... ._. :�. �y4 �,; i �....�*�
.n ,a r . >., ..s,,. . ���.u.. .,. . + .,. ,...�`3,.'��.,. , x...�.x. ,«e. �., , ... ., ... .. .:. . .;�. .,., , ,. a,.. ..�.. .,. ...� '1 .,7. .�i�, �t.
.6, ,.. ...... ...e.,.. .� ;::-,..,.. , ,,.f�,....,,F-, * . r.. ,. ,.�. ..,t4 .,,.,.r. u,:, ;�s
,, �� .� ...:�.. ....,. �r.. .... ..� v �... .z :,.., t .,..... .r. .r ,. , s,,:,; ,..�. ,,,� „_ � ,...�+ „t ,�., .,,..,e E a ,...... )h.. .,,,-.. .� ,.�,., �.a.'3"S t. ;^�". �.D
,. .., .,.. ..,,.. .�. ,� ,..,.,. ....,. ��y,- x>< .,.^�.,,., ..,.., ,..,.. ,,. . t . . .... ..... ..�Y.. , ,........ .,., . .,... '� ....�.., �. t., '"�., �d R 3
,,,.._,. ...�,-. ..,. ..._.... ....... . , " . ��� , � . . ..�. ..r. .. ..�. .. .n �,.. . . � .,... ..�. a ...., ,.<,,. .,,., *'�
1.t... 3� 3,. rc,: �.... ..,., � . �.��5.: ... .:� ., m . . W .....�a v..�.,.:.�; .;..: . �f,o.. . ..,,, .,�.. „ C _,..�, .1�.-... r ...... 5 � � .. �'.;
x, s. .......f f �,6,. .:,.. .., .0. E..�x x > .:,� .v. .u..c e� e. -'N .. .,�t�.x r .>,-.a.v+,� ....,....�.... .....,w, w.4` �y, ..... .f r-e.,..-ti ,:V ��i .�. a�R.
�a :Y�', t ,�. ,2 .MY.. x /t'k.,.. � ,, .. , .�^, 3°.. . v, . �....,:. , ....a...�,.� ., f€ i. ,c,. •.:: ..,�.i... :�>,c .� "4'1..2�,. Cr a7'� P
a.. ... .. .:'+,:n x ., �...... ts..L„x .2*.,.,- �m�„r '�:- ..�d`.:J,.. ..� � a.. .,� .�... ..,..i... .,., .,...d.. .f7 . .t. ..,. " . . :, ',..q. .i� 5 r-cP.,r �)'.
.,.. .:....� �... __... .t_.-s ,...,.x ..,..�._ . ., .. _ .'�. .. ..€.4.. . :i..a ,....,.. � ,.,.,, .....», � ..,. :�.�_ . , »>-, r �a. 4 k s v � ��� .ar.�
... =�r.���., u*`+. , ,�.x in,.i.,.xr�`"� .s,�x.� ...rr:._.,��.,,y��a- �r„3�m.��. a q•, ...x�y��,.;.c �,�'�* .,s'`, . -
_. .....,. . ..�� ."�,. -. .�-, ,i� 2 .'` �A.R,.u��'�✓ ar"'rv� t": arf .t,��� '-E"e} 2,+ �{fC.- F '�`«,�7`�rcE�9 �.����' .N�.i+raS�
, ,... , .a. � �"�rv, „�.�..�.r �n r. .. .,eL- . , w, .'#`� ..�u,,�:q
.-,:,.,., .��:, ..�,��: ._.. ,�,,,. .,,, ..N., ,,,,., :. ..;., ,.. r
::,.e�Y�.. u. ,,,x . -,;s,a.. .�w;u�.�. ...,u•-; . .N , 5=�. ., tz, .«. �,. _..�.,t , , ..... �_, .... 7 ., ..J H.... �w. �. „...:, # �s` �. ^
,. -�,._, , .��. , ...... u,. , .,...,.. . , .. .s.. :� :n k .. .H.. �'� ...��., . ..a,�„m t+ a ,x s„o.. , ....:. ,.. �,y��f-: � st.,, v
t.... . . ..:, .. ,. .... a.,, ..,�€ .., .r.-�t a... S......_ 5�. ,.,. , . .,.._v< . ,:,.... > ...., .�..,.a,., ,�. ,, �. ...,w ... � rY , .x"?'...,�.i?"` �..,�
.,";r..r . �_ ., ...�-,,.'; . .. ,r ,.1+:.,.. . . ..., t. £ 4 ....,:�:�`'.,: ..5"#'. ... �. .... .t... .�, i.,,.«�', ,....�. ., k :"�r .is..9.
.v .x'.. t3 ,.. _ "S.�i'`. �.� . . . .,,.c,a . _, .A _ .,...... .,. � .....� ,., . I ... __. , �:-. d•�'" �, �^ ,7;e�� , ...d �
,.,.,u... . . .....�: N.�... .'t. .>� �, � ...i � � ..,y... �. ......... . ..r t .�.�.,.�.. ,t . . ;. N.�. ..:�.., ., : .., ....:�.. . m �9� ,�J�
...Y. �. .. ,a .. ,a'.+. a. xqm .§:. . .. ... 3`n' ue� ..a �a ... ..., .,. � ,.^.,.r.Y ..c,•R +4 ..4..,. � .:.....i ,.4 4 .,.,,. � r �..r�#.:.� X .x..,<. �]+'h:d ��': C �x
,.t,.�_...., r'i.�.�s...a...�..ax.:3i.. ✓.u........ ...u . .-, . . ...± .....s"vx . �:... . . ......� : .: h_n .� h..
, �:.._.... .m..x .. ..,.. �.. ....„ ...... ��._ r�: .s�,.. �...���'...s . «.. . . .4. �... ..v. .,, . ,.. . ....� .�� ..., ,E r....... ... .:... ...�ro�.v .�. a .,�n:�. d.
� . ..... 'iz .,�,... G. `.. Y.�. ..i, . . x� �„ uii. � '
. ....._. ... ... . .�.v ..0. s,.W r. e. ..-,�'#. , �.. _. r. .. . :.,. „ . �.-::. �.:...� 8 ":: . +;w .r.:G . ,.1. S 'c.M.., t. ,.'��'""�.F ..
t, �4:�� . ........ .a Y,�s,e.,. a . �..., ., ,a�K-�•� �� � �.t ..t� wr "'�w,vea. P .,..^�' .� xa ES,F p �'�.y
, ,o,, � �. � ,. ;� >. �,�s , E?4���:±+_. n.��..a,� ,�..._�! .. ��,...�� r,1� z .a� �n�, �a.. _,�. �c�:c,� 9� �x.
_r�
�4s c h.'.'. 'i�:. R �v'+ro-^-"} -.:T :�A r r��: �"'�'s ! �,+
" :' w qk;{..'.# ���s.".'. � ., . ; _.„ Ars �� ,', ...k.#.�n`, , §� '�'` ..,�..... .......a� .." ,.:e ,.. x3.�t, '� �!..t..f .;y�, 3 r„�a. "tk� .f�'
.i �,.:s... .e-,>_ i � '7 a z�; t' �s. ,.� y .$ - "��!,�'.J,d' ,�
."�-, .., . . :� � _ .0 , . ,..• ;- s . Y`...�.• _ ��. ,.: , :,� ,,r- � 3,� r
..t�n, .:,. . �«.'�a. , �- �� :.r�`..� vrtka ;s"'F ....^+.^�:3 ,...:s ;. ,r'.:-:A 2 r,"z�,�. r,.'��;. �r ;c,„' r,� te."�^''�: �;*�Y'�,...t "�" ',`.+�:` ^'�,, s .^�- p':'�.
t` � �. . x.�i ��.._. �, .� � �'t'.t'4�- �......3� , k ,�.. '+6'tfi"',,..,�a� .'^"`F� � ..#_ �� , � �'". ��� .;'.n
... -�.. .�.; :t.�:,,.. � .,;@>x,.�. ,.-'.�.x_����,��;z�.t .'�.��.�.. ,. F.�,�,,.;�r ,a,� i.A ,- �. 4 s,°�"�.,k�z„ f y'z�`�,` .x..�� �^��� ��3:..: ''tr .�,�'f,""� "�,'"`�rdw'^�: a�";��'._.�;� ;�.t�, rY k 3ias,s=���' ¢ .ts:� S
� � -.. 'un:.yt ., "x 3"�. �,. . - .x r.'�,�,e 4F :_'1 'G=c;:7 Tey .':.., ':�x .a ., z,�,�., Y ..:xl i '.:r :. �.k t,4,N ^.,na+wi f"} `✓� Yk�..
._...... . .„�..:�'�k , . F��.G. ri�,"x . ,"���.. i�. . „..�. K.".:....;. .., �`k..�fr �.�..,:�,.. "�`� a „ ...„., � +,s -...:.t., .3:.. r.�-:�:,� ��'.�'' , .<` "�,' ,�, t� ? g.,
..w�. �:. �. . ,�,..i .4 �i!.,.,...� ��L,v. �. • .N, .�:+r ..� .�.L.;,,: N ti.�. t fi.,,.t � .�' '�z v a...n::., .��.i�'2 £, .`�..v �?r 2..
.. �i .:�. . . .. `��.e ,. � ° .;�.v,w.� ���. . 7�..wa`"� . .....�� ��'* , ..., � y:--�a.������ �s `Y:'s' .���: .< ,... n ��s „� �;+�t�„w..���. -�:�.�. ..
„ �. , , , ..� `.,'�"�.'�� , �.. �`��'�' �:���,� �4�� o r.t:..,�:r.� �j�`� .,,�...k�' ��� ;��..:�.�� ��.:: .,y, �.:'t �'*;:�' �:t r� �`M�k�:+�`,� `�:,*,��3` '`"�s�>..a�" �.f�. ;'�,._._
� �� ., ..:.=. . �
�a t � t.C: .,��'�g��.'
,. . . . . .. 5< .h. . . :
�'. ' ,'�. �' ;�,M �...s , ,. � �r ., �`•'� ,;".�"" & �;:5�, "���'..'�.�. ±3f'"'x;F '�- e?.^'�3x ��g�,- a� " -.;'£,`��s..
� `�"� ���s' � �'"�. � .�r� " t �r��'��`�`"�> , s
�
� ,
������� �� ������ �+
" ;,, . ' ..,,. ._....a., ,,r.,�_, .:v " - _';_. -ti. a��.,.;,. „§, _.
.,.. : . a�.. ..� .��. .,. � �.,s. >�.. ;, �. ..� - . . . . _
. _ . +�.�..as� ...n. .. . . _...:, �.�._�..e.¢a�
.
��.��i�`�,r�'.,�1?1 .�a��'���..�,,�°'��t��,��.�t�` ..� t:�� � �.
;� f rr tn���Ac. r�urr.vw� t�EC�RD ���o- � � ��.�-�`�-� �' �.
��.�«�'r?,r�v't ;�r�''�I��*�"7"��'�"�+P� '., _ �, `' � ��A�}�l1i'ESS° `�' ` SNEE7 , OF___: � `'
� ,� � z . .
' " , �;. / ShlE�TS
.�,.. . � _,, ,_ � OESCRtPT/0!Y OF Bl�lLD/NG
, - . F . - . . . .
ce:ass,�rs�+at*�. �ca�t�r�evcr�►onr srrrvc�U�r��,_, Exr�rrrv� ; RaoF c�c�xrrnta � coNorr�oN �too�r �►�rQ. Ft�rrs� pFr�►.�c ;
_ tlght frame.�. stUcco=on � f�or! Pr'tob ., Wlri/1l,� . Hsoti tbu�i. RQOMS FLOORS l�'LQOR F/NlSH IRihi tA1TER10R filYtSH;
"� `� a.�; Sub-Slandard _ _ �r 6obtt � K.T. Conduit � Forctd �eo�1i �. 1 Y Mot'e/ipt Grode iVo/!s Ceilin a
ARCHtTEGTGRE-T � Stontrard � ��:shaothi - .� . -svdtn .: .��.-. ; p;,v _/q r' a x. oble , �_ ravit � Numid.�Att �
� � J°- , �,� �
Alwre-Standard Gorrcre�ieBlack Shed � F`lXfUf@S hYoitUnit
S/or(es Specfal dd.8. ; 7.d Gc - Cui Uy Fe,v Cheop Eht.Ho/I
ilSE.TYPE �_' Brick;`. ` Shin ie3 lJormehs. Av : , ium F�awuni! Liv�n ,2; _
�3'i 1e... � FQflNDA7/.ON Adob�e' _ aStmkes.. < ,Nony Spts+`ot 2'oneUnit Dinin '
ODu.bfe Concreta ' FIOcr:�afsir Lt88. " T.$G Gnt�ers Centrol�•
� ��plex � Reinfor��d,� , ; /o�. "'x " � PL(/M81N6 - Eed � � � � �
_ Aprtr�ment Brick .� ' ?"1t` 'x '- " Brick Sbi It r, Goad 6ed
F/ot ,.Wood. Svb Floar ,J'/pne . _. Shoke Oi/Burner
Cou�f Pi�s 1Y/MDOWS T!!e f'fixrures
k 0•ft• Cosam�at Ti1a Trim K'oterXeater ,fd.-B.T.U.
' Ins�tvlyd�erli `s .SJ'Ce/Sash C6mposi#icn Y ;4vlomatr'c f'iieploce Kitrhtr� } • � �. '
Units -> ti bt. .:}levv - lrrautaftd Nolls ,y�' ,Fcreens. Compo,Shin le Gas , E/ect.. ' DroinBd. /l9oie�io% 1 lhr' f� 'Spfosh: `"
CONSTRLtC7/QN R�CORt? -NORMAL_� GOQD RATIN:G (E,G,A,FP} e,eTN +REr�f�.
EFPEG. APPR °
Permit YE,4R YEAR �ma�n o ArGh: func. Cbrr-, o s ce Worx- FI: No. �JN1SH F/XTUR S SNt7W i7' '
A/a. For �mounf Oafe, �AqP Lift � Tob/t � ��d qftr.. Plan fvrm. pbd foset nship f7oo�s iYo/ls G to, u T e �rrode t. . .Q�fs�f'sk..
��, ,� 1 p.. � 1 :,
� �.� �. r .5� �.,2 b ,��to .3s
J.7" t`� � �.3 : ; _ �f�
�9+5 F�s�" , . _ ..:''D-. „ c:��' .
_ , �'�� : �'� . �`� ��- �3- .. ,� sn�cra;t �F,ar���s
� . . . � � �QO.f'f.OJtS- BUF/1�^/'+7't�'d�S �Yd78t%OJI-E►/%!70'S. .
� - � .$A!l�fBfJ. �
{,j �iQ�/��Ti����N .,;:
. �
� f
' ApaRCO"1SeT �����0�#P. � �_��1f� i=��-.�" `� ti`G. o E.� 5-3-�.5' =`�'�", " 'L ����� �L S� 775 �
� �.,. nif,� ��� �.� nrt: „ �-Ur�Jt � � n�l �'�t nit � ai/ ni# � �'
.. Clriit "_ , Aretr Cost , Cost t Casf Gost Cost Cos� Cost Co�!
�' . ��, � �� .r' 3 .5S
; .. ��,�� . ,�� �. _ �-:�u '�'-,'p��= a a '�� t�_e� c� c'� ° '
�-
,
� �} , f°`�! �;�' ., �- .� �02:S�a d �.,�`a 9f� . ,�'�,-" /Q"cP�L3 ���s' /��/ .� 4 tJ ,
�
. ... .._ . . . .. ......... . .'1 . . . �, .. . , . �
� . � ,. . ' � ...
.. . . .. . , . .t .. .B.. . :.... . ... .. .. . ... .
... . . ... . .., .. , _ _ �,..:.. . � . . . .. . .
t �
,. ... .;. . . . .. . �_... :,... . ... ,. . � �. . . � . . . ' .
.
. . . ... .. .,,.. . �� �.. .., . .. . .,k . . . _ � . . � . .
.,.� ... . . �.� .. � � . .
...,-.... . . . . . . .�� ..:. � . '� , _ . ' . .
_ . . , .�'. ,. , . '
. :. .. . . . .. . . '.. , .. �.. . _, ..... .. �.... ,-. .�.._.,. . , .-. . . . � .. . . . '
,7QTAL . _. ,.. ,�„�w �a _ � . G,D,3 , � . ��� ���. 662T
_ NOR�AL °.6 GODA ._ � 1�3:. 'ie.^�-. D -� :y-,
.R�L.N.D. ' . ` � ,
._ , . _,�l� _ �,�� . �,��.� , ,� G �r' �3 '? t, �c��`9`
' k -_ . r:�., . ... ..,._: � . _ ,,,
t�._ .._
,.:._ � , . . .. A Y��R'.71:A A�� /!1`...�rtT` �^n o. � .
i .
�. � � M/SGt L�ANt utl� S�rtUtr i unc�r
., : .
�� �� �m
, +-� } � � ! � � + �� � �-� � �T-� ( � ��T �T l 1`" � f �. S � �_.. � � F � �..' s
-r � -r.�f ._� j �. J a� � _.�.-� i i � F � � 1 '''� i , r , �- �..�h
�` � ��._ ,.._ � ,� , . ,, rt.. ¢ r � $ , �. � � �_�._�. L � _ .�
Sfructure nd Coris. Fxi. Raaf Ftoar ltrf.' Size eiC. .
_ ,
g ��p_�� ,.. _� �. r � =_,4 i i _ � �'
�',-f i 7, f � `' � 3 -r p � F � � _� r f._ �� }-q�"� .
t-}. 3 �..�._a_.�.-t--^-+ " � �--�--�_" ' � _+ , �'t '� � � "�"� I'��-�-- '�-` T . .
-°-a-{�'.�.., -i-.-}�' ''w`�' , '-�-+--z �, i-^�-'�^�-`-'�'-� � -r-^ r-' '� .( }-.� .._� ..; .
9 � ♦ 3 '..
_L,-,."�`` � .,���'}-�L. . �t�.. ._� } � _ .._k i �
}.,t < _' � :�'"� ; i r t - 'T S� i - � � ' �..-� ��._._ • .
__h"�_,_.�.. �, .'� � k �.i � � c� ���� � i�' -- __t . _ k t �� r � l. i !�_j �� -
'-.—L.
s. c-. _., .�_r. �_ ;.. �.�._Y.J�. _.�`,�,�. � _ + �- � �,�
_ � i 1
'. '� 3 : ,.¢�}I�.�`" , ; �1_yi . . . ... ..
, i...�.. � ......�..... .y.._.�. .«. .�._�.__. � h ...:.. f .��- 1-- .�_L.. _ _ . _ ..�. ., r.� � . __ _...{_�� 7� .
.
.. 1 1 { ' r...... � '�
..r__'.. I 1_ '_ � . . '� . � . � ' __"..—_..
� f �"-� t f.. . ( �_... F _� _..�.. _—_.. 1 -_Y•;L� .F .
�.h,. „ �
_;_. -{ __ � � _ f � � d _rE t , 1� � � ' j� �-� � � z-�t� � � �
-i � _ � � .� � _i.._}__�j__,.� ,--4 �-_;_ j..1_ ._.,_�. r �_ir�.'�Y._.� -
�: i .. �_ , _ .�_, �j � : ' ....� �H_ :_� �., i_ '-_�I �.�� � _�... ._ � � ,.•. _ . �
� b + x a
„- }._._.�. �.. � ._ �� �
� � ; t � � � , i i 3 r
_T_� ._ _..-_-.1 � � � x �. � �. i - a' 'r f � � �j7. �
iT.� .._ ......-� .._�. _t ..�.. .r. �.�.y �.'��_} _ � �. . _{ .1_....r. � . .
..�._ ,�,_'.._.....+._ i._.M.+.! " " . , � ' t _ ...�.._ � ...� _'�. ''A ' .� i� _" F „y. � ..�._��.—� �.._�.,. .1..< ��I�Y�� .
� � � ; � � � �...��.,_.� � ��� y . t t :� � , a ; , , OMPl1
�.,_.. ..� , ....., , �
,
-� � _ ._ .-�-.,-�,....,. �.�;�..�_ y,. ,� �
; i � 3 s : i f � 'i � . i . ; ` i { ....� I f � - � ' . .
' ; + _ .._ ..1 ..,.Y_.., p. �,_ .. 7--r—$.,�_1.l�.1..., y i !.. r F -I— {-�-V � -� • .
.. . t � � . � . . { �p
_.1... �i1_T_.�.JI {--{..� .�_.� ..r.. ...1.,.� �I .. .{' p ,":_. ..._ ..�.� F... . ...... ,- _. �..k. � 4 — ' �_ "
.�. � G
�, � � _�_ � , , , � f � ,� , � �_.
.. _
� � , '1" i. � . � 4 � � , � �. ; ... Ss � . . .
- ^T.. '�-- �-•-_ -�.-y- + ...� '}_.... r_ .t, ...t y .a ,4... � ._ �_� -- -�
; � � � f - � i � �
J� ��,_ ..��..��-�-�.. , ;� - `�--�s__F_�-k_f_-� _��_ `�~�-m ' ��a .X �..��.3 0 _ �
�t F S •
"j"' -�-�---�s � --� �r_
-�-� r.� t t �� r.�� � i � � -� � F '�z j� � f j -;--� 4- � 4 q +� �7
'' I ' �� t i i.�r'- ..-, .....�._ ..� ..i._r J-1-��+ �-.-.E:_' ..-j J' .�1 �/ = a< /' C; � .
..w- . ._ ......- i
-��_ i � � ; i , i.-� i � i � i � � , .� i , � i ¢ , .t � �_t i � �! � �l
__.�._:�_ ._.<......� .... j .t .__�, } ., f _...1. _._ .r A { { �- � �F r �-� � �j` !--}--•- .a . . .. . . . ,
} . � 1 � ' E �� ''�� � �.,.�c `p�L'F
�
[ '...�.�.e. u.._..... ..�. � .
_ s �- �
",�""�" ; -
K d � L � {i" ti.....,.,�. � ....� � i v 1 �
._ �� . � a_. � �.� __ .i r5 .��..���f .f � -� �_ ' , � �` ,. }. _ (-�' • .
� I , -}9
�� : "_E ...� r L... � ..... , .. � Z r.... �. 1..y 1 i..1 I }- 1 y '}�1 _l }. r j..� F �-./ � . .
� -�---- ..��. �. a � i_ ...�.._ j-i � ' - {' f q. � .. � I_�y- I 7 .x..�_ L E. {_,. ��j!7 . .
_,,.��.� ... � } -t�j� � - � r ,..� _,...; � _�....�.. �_# _ _ .1 + _� � _. :r.-;--�-
..a 9 x � � :
; �- � E t , �� x!� �t �-�
--� � �. � �, �_+� , :�� �..� �- �- -�
.-�� .'... ',--i-�-. ...: _... r --f.._ t _�_� :-_f ` ,-�.y..� { ��2...r .� �'..x �..,�_ � i i -7� �/
f E�-t � - �-- + , r � i ' }�- a- f F -f ,. -t�� f , �- 1 7� � � �__ i J C l�S h/'
�-- :
, �_.�_, .[:._y._..; t_...., .. ..,.. T_ ,... a ' } . 4 -�. x,.. .�....�..�p_.. . . .
.�
, ' z
�.. ...._..._ .t._.,.., ' .y. '�F... � 1 ._r ! _ � } _ .b ...t '•..1 :} -�--r.._ .J
� .. � '� : �: �; � � : � .
, ...i. . �.. .,. t : : .� i ! � � . i , r "`i '""`{ k `_4"-.{..""8""°�'�"'� 'i
L � { j y �f
_..1-. . __"'Y -�,....__u., �_1_t, .. ..:_.. �-_'_-. f-r.._5_,._(_ --- - -- {- -. �i -.'_'_",'-"`" � E .--.
��� � �_ �. 17:x � /� 9
� 1 � �
�-+-,-t k + . r -_ __ r. � a 4 , fo 7`
, `- � � � r � i � � �
. '-»-i+i- ..1..... j_4_. __� . . . 1 _. i._�.. . }_. . .....1 r_LA—•-�- --�' ' i __�..I 3 .� �.�-. .�- f l .�..� - � .
. - � , � � � � �r -� 7� } `" i j �� L -. 'Y'
.-q.,-_L � _,.. .._ �� .., t_ ' �r_..t... � ��._� ;
,. _
i�� � � _.- � ..a_ .r'
� .;-7--.,..�.� E ,�-,-« : T '�-#-,--� F .� �� t_'_( .� ,
� � "'r""'{ ; • " � .."`'" � �
,
�-,-_� r_.�..;._ _.,.�,�_,�.__� _.._{... _^_ f s..>_..� i ,�..+_-fi � _ �l_ -� __ ��- _
_ . , a_. �j 1
/�
_.._ +d. .7,..4..,m
+ �
�____
���I '� T�� _7- r-`{. ,�.;_i-- -t_.p. ._+- 3 n z T ..� �..y_.� � r :.... F -r--+ �-*'--t —}--4 -L..-J---k .
-�' -�---r .t- �._... _.__ �.__�._ _ N..._.;.,.�...-_e-:_._. � �_..��....,_*'_ _-' _- - . . .
�
_,{ .�. ..7 �ri.l
�� �� , �` �' � � . � ' � �T � "� F- i � �� 1 �. � � `�'�� { 1�� �� '- _
_�`_t' -�-
, �" ....... ... . ._.., .. . , .
, � r- - � --3 -i- ' ._ .-k --�-#---�-+`--f-
, 1 ..r..� t , t t � � , �- � � f �' t -t � -�1....�...,r,l , --i- �
t.��--.�: � � .�.�,.#_,,1� � ��, _ f'�t�j
,--�- + -�--,- , ;- � r � ?-- , � T � --�- g -_, � � ; � ���"-� Remarks. r� �
,....�", . .a_-1— . -_ �.. .r� ��- � m i—I-. � �.�i ! y �, � _.} { F.._ `-'^�
...-r.t_y._ t__.,. t ..:. .�r.. t '�-�� � - �.�r�_-t +--�'—' r--r--� ..... ...z_ _.t . .i �. i.� j��- ,�,�p s ,..r
'�t'�7� _ ,-... ._. �...� ._Y� �,...�'..�._.;_..,�. ��� S .� �T. � . ., ��` 1✓� -��.
1 �
� '..�, ��._.,Tm.�.w._ � ;- . .. ,-..l�.� �. ; ,. _... 4 �"� r �- � + � �-. �� , � f/�!',� �Fi''n!3�",�'�`� . ±.. �
i � _.:._...-..__E_`�
i �
� �"1 ;-......�_t,�� r-_ � ��_ : � _.- '. i r t �.F ��_..y.--�
a t_ . , . �'�
< � _
.,,�._y__.�.. --+ -t �- �, -_.�-. }..1__� w.-t ., ��-fr� r,.,,- {- �--� y , '�- �--�-�--�-- .
`._. ._... . ,.,',. ..__ � ._..
..,y.„__ _A ..._ .t ..
� i � � ti
4 ' . ; -t- }� , E - , i � r.. .� .,j_.� ."`r � �---t
t p
� �r.r � _Y_-� � . . r _.'I- i fP-� -, E -� `� t� - � � �v� 1 -� � �r �i� . -*- ' .
. r � � � .� �� � f .,,,�� y�� .
, � ( ; ��';!7 � k �j $
�^'� T"` '-[ `? , .�� .� -i�•- ._-� .y p � �-.fi ._..� } � . �-"t-�Q 7 . -�" � _d' � ,y_...t...,. � � _
_.;._- � ' . . _ 5 � � _ . ��v .
. . � �.__ }. .,. . .4.. t......r,_;_.�_,�,. �� � '� 4 z i -� +
�__4 1 F _ r ,
.,-( r-t � i -{ ..-' , � __R . v i�'� t� i . 4..... f . + ..,� 7
.i...�_. ' .� . r_ . ....-�__ _.. * , � -� _ .' '
-P-' -�- � E ' �_-h _i � .
..' ., � -^{^�w. -�i^-t �i--+--"r-^."a �-�-r----7--G ',; �,. �_, p,<.� �.,.y...,l„,.,,t„. � � ,�„ l �.� _._.4--x. . .,,,...,r � .
i
�»�—;--�- � ��- '�1 t .�.. � J.. a.. ' � { ;- a-� �. .....t i .
:-�_.�.�L..4� S �' � � t � a..�..--r ..�.'.t t I.�. �_.v :� s . F_ + _... r--�'- � -
.�
� � . :".� a --�- t �� �-�P - . � .. _ .....� ;
i ( '
t ;- -t. �'_i - r r � � -�� �"�" i -h i- - -� t � i-� , i i-� -j-�---`-r �� : � � �
� .��L ; ��� � . . ` ,
t
' + -i` , -�_. - , . �..!.a...�_7'-3 -' -� T.� ;... i._Y �-. „-.�_ ; +-t , „<�a.����
� r-T � --� � * � r � t i � r - � � f
- � _ i .
� '� � . i � - ' ; �-
.� k y ��
-f-'?_f_ ;-_"_*_#'-i-=r. , ?- Y ��. �� r -f---�-r . .i..j ..r��_-�_+ x -f -�,._,+ � r__�- + *--i-� -r-i_.4�-r--�- � 3 . . .
. i�.1 y � .� ._� -}- -� i"'E -'� � � . d �..i l ! �. � .L_� g . . .
7
7 ..s ; � 1"� 3 i _ 4 y . t �" f"?�'n
. .„.-�-�-'�.w...t.-� i - --a.,-n- _.F �..-.'�---L ��..F� ' �. 1�'..M-.T.�..��.. .d � .. .
.�...�....p .�_ �._ � _.l a i . i a .r-r '} f i -_.i'��.. t [._ �t -c -_r..-�i-' -� i -r-( -r��-��-'�--f
� � I
i
i�`� � . "`f"'..�.� �"�""+ � "� . "}'�'�i -�--} �rTM- }--f�-"�'_'�.' "h -�--'� -�-�-{-�-- 1'"'.L_ �,�,.� ;., , _ . .
.-y-�-F- _ --�-#., �i -�., 4. -e--i-- �^ �_t_f � r�- ;. .�---�-Y �_S`.r_.# _ ,y � �_,._� ?�. _�� ..�_.;
16622
Y �-_�._-�--� .
, �.,.....--� �-�#_-!_�-+ z :.._.--s--; ..i_;__.;_ -�--�--+ � ' --7--4-#-t._�__�_.�_{�_z._�� '
- -.. a , F-*,�-...,1.�_fi-'v-�� -':--�
������������ �������■■io���w��������r�.��■o�����l���■������■�■■�o���■��a��������■o�������■.������m�
�� ���������ri����� ���.�.ss��■�s■��w�����w�■������s�oo� e�������������■e��R�■��w.��w■■����■�.���■�■��
���. �������� ���■�e���■■�e�■�s�����e�■������■m���.�■������������e��■�s���i�w■s�a������■�■.����
� w� �������� �������a���■a��������.�■�������■�■■e����■�o���■e����■■����■s���■■��■�a�■��...�■a����
������������e■���■����o�����s�■r������������s������■�■����������.���s����e���a��o■4■����s�����
�����������������sr�����■������������������a��s�.■��������������������e���e������■�����s����v������
tlH��������a�������t■�����������s�� ■������■���■����s������l������O���o��H����e������!■��������
■�������������i�i�ii�iiiiiaii�siei�=�iiiii�i��i�■ii���i�i ��������■ ������������a��e��������s�
.■��.��.�■■■ '�C.■■.■■...■_■■....■�■.�■■�■.�...■.,�■��
���na��r��win■a����■�s�����������t1��0����■�■������■�����0�����SliRit�qi��iMv��������lil�lll�������ll�■�11���
��W ��OS 0��N������i������l��•��N�l�l�n��������■��■l����pi���ll������■ie�■�l��d�■s������R31M
■� �i l���■ ■■ �0��■���■ !�■ ��� ■ ������■�i����NN��■������������l�\��A��■������:l�����
�I��■�������l����i�N������/��s����N���N/��iN�'�����/���������0�l��6/!l�/��l��IN1���11�
�� ��°���w�i�i�i ,i ���i�i'��is ir�iiiniai�i i�°�i�i����ii i�ii��iii�E��ii�iiii�i�oii���������
�� °�� � ����� �����r��i����� ��■iu��i����■�� ■ t��■ ���i��ii�����si�i��������i��sw�r�o��w����■
e��e�����.=�r��a��������u��es������i=���������+��s�����ii�■�■ ����■��������r���e��s�� ���0���■����s
���rt�t��e��r�����r��wn���������r�����������s��������■�wo��������� ����■t�■���s���m��■i�+���r����r�r�r��o�s����
�01�� I�iMMI��i���i�:��:s��i�i��Oo���fO���o��i���%�:O:�i���0�■i�����������������i����i�����:���ii�����
i��e���� ��� ��e�������e ii����������■���ii ��uiiiii�mi�e■�oiisiis�a��s�i���i�������
��...���E==C..�...e...= � 'C C C �
' a�� ��■n� n �����o� ■�� ���� �� ��� ■■■�s���� ���■�������s�����■����������s��a�e��e��w�
��i�i.����i��iii�iiiiiiiiiiii�■iii�iie�iiiiiiiiiii:i�ii�i�r�iiiiiiiiiiiii���a0iiiiiiiiii�i�ii�A�iw��i�e
.�y�
� � �����iii�iiiriCis�iiii�iiiiiii�i�ii�iiiiiiiii�iiiii�iiiiiiiiiii�ii�iio��i�iiii�ii�i�ii��iir��ii���i
��■ae�e■.■��r�es���e�■■■�e�a��■���■�����■������■��As�����■��■���■�■�■■�■�� ��■���e■���■o�r�■���a�����
�� ■ .�����■���■���e����■����■■■f/���■■■��■�■�i�■�i�■r�i����i����s���■�A��i�i�■��■�������■I�i■■11��■
� ��ia ���i�w��ai°■�i�isi�i�iiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiii��s�iiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiemiisiim�i�i��m�m�o��������°�
. � �IH���1���0O���S��i�■�����i���■�l�����n�����#�11■■■��r��■i�����������■\i�����■■��������■5������1�4�1�116
. �n��������������ema���e�����■s����t����e■�■■■������■es��e�����■■■���e��■s���e����■ens���������s������aa
��i'��°�°���i�i�i��isiiiiiiiieiioieiiiiiiiiCiiai��i�iiiimiiiiii�iiiiiiaie�ii�aiiii��i:i�a�mi�iiii°��i���'i
��ii������o �■�������■�����■■���■��������■■���e■■■■��■������■����■����■�������������������r��r����
, ���r���e�■��C� ��see�es■�����■�■������■�����w��■�■��■�M■������s��������■e■e���o���■sae���s.�.t�����o�.
����o��a�■�.��o����������■����■■�����������■�����■�a�■■���������������■��o■■����■�.�■�o��■��.■�.������a
� �s����■..�e���s.es��ss■����■�■��■������■��e�eao�.■�■������������e��■�re����■■�■�e��e�e��soee�e��m���a��
s�■���■■v �el�/�!�■■����■��■!■����■■�■�����■���o�■��l����A�������■O�■����i��■��i���■0��1 �a�a����
� �����■ �i�sis�i��ii�e�iiii���iii�ia�iii��oii�aiiii�ivin�iii:��iii���i�iso�°iiii���ii�i�i�i������
s � ���■����■
� � �� i�����i�� ii�iiiisiiiiii��iiiii'��iiiii�iiiiiiiiiii�iiioiiiiiiiiiiisii�ii eo�s°����o�i�i:iii�����
���iii���! �Ci�iiiiiiiiieiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii����i����iiiaiiiiii�iiiiiii■�iiiiiiiiiiie�iiiiii:�i��i�
�� v�
�� � ■ a�■�� ��s.�■e■�w�■�■�■�■���i���������s■������s�■s�■■■o��s������e���e����es���.��eo .���� �r
■�i11�.'�� �vu�Ce��������������■u���������■��■■���■���������■o■����■■�a���n■���o���e�■������i�i°�°'���
�°�i�i�iiiun ii�iCiii�iii�iiiii�iiii�ii�i�u�iiii�r°�iiiiiiiiiiiiiii�ii�iiiiiiiiiiisii�iiiii�i���e°��t�� �
,
��s� ��■�e� ■��irrNr■.�ee����s■ ■■�a■����■�s�� w���ame■a�n��������.e■■■ ��s���aw���ee�am�■�s����m�
;:
�N�����n ��e i�����r���������������i� ■e���������������� ■�����■���+����o��e�e�o���� �
■����■ ■ es��a�t� e��e��a�sea�sr� ���n■�r� ■■ ��i■ ��,�� ■����s� ■■saoa������w�e=�ii�is�iii��ie°°i�e p,�
■m� �� �°e� e�a��� ��■��� �s�■a �i��=iiis���i Ns������ia� ■��u� ■��■ ■ ■���ew� ��� s ee.���
■���i���l�o��BN e�����■�■���■�N����■N����i�B��������/��N�� ■■�������■��l������/���a�@I�� 4,:`s
� �ri��'� �ss ■e����s���s�s�s'�■�a����n�s��sv��■��s����= �■�i�w�uiaio�iiii�i�iiii�i°�iii� � �� �'�'�;�
■ ■ ■ oo�����■ ■ �����uii��i'�iiiisiiii=� n s� ■ ■�� ■ ■■r ����e ■e� �
■■ �■���=1= �:��5 ■■�■....■....■C... =S Z �� ,
..�._ _ � � ..... �::�_:�: .. . .......... .. . ...�.. ... . . . . .� �.�,
��� � ���e■ ■ �ie■ ■■�����es��■ �i�i�n������n�s��i���� ���■��ni���ee��i��i+�ii ��_ ��°���e� ,�<
�s� �i�rG�iis�� ai�sii�isi=i ■ a�i���i�i�i� i s�i ��ii i�=iii�i�ii��■ �i i�=��ii��sii=s�r�� ������i�i��
■ �i° �i��.. ■ a���■������■ ����� ■■ �n����=��������■=�i ■ ■ �� �■���� ��i� �i=���e ��� � .
w � a �� ���r■eee���m■a� ����������o■■■m���s����H■s■�s ��r�sss� ���eo�a� ■ ■■ �� �a� �:�;
■�A1 ���li■��iN1�0/i■�����■■l�������■��■����i���11�■��l�����n��■!�■���■�1�����������������1■���II�� ^ti;;
�i�aii��n� i C:��o�a���� s ii i°=i=��■a�■��usU�'���ieH��� iaii� �ii�e ���� � ����
� � _ � � �i = � ■■■�■�■n at ��i� _. � �� � � � �i
� :�ae�i��s��i���e��°��i=����isi�=ie���siCiiii�i��i���s��ii�iiii��i�e���iii�i�Ce��isii��s��=�i���a� ���
w ��.�e�a���■���s�� ���w�����s��������� ■ es�s��e� ����� �s��� ■ ■ ���a�■�s�i��ae�r���a��w e�� � ,,
� _ ��■��� ��v �� ■�io���.��e��■�■��s ��"�i��i�■����� Z���� �iii � ■��ir�i�����■���������a� ■ ���r �
�� .i �a�ii�is t�i��°s��=�����■���n�����s�= ■��w���■�����������i�i�����■��.��� ��iei�iiii�a������'oi���i'�
���iw�ra��w�■�■���■�i�i���iw:i�����r����i��w�����iaa�i����is���■ii���������:����i������■+e�������e�a�� � � r.
. .�...
;;�.
v:i5':
.•
�� .
• •
•
�. �..�.•' �•
O �♦
� �
�\ ��
O '•
.•
\ � ■.�'` '�.� ,.-
� �■r�''����'�'! ♦�
��` ` ♦
■\ ••` \ �\\\��., �.` .'♦
\ • ,•
O \ •`
♦�
♦• /
�� � � �
� • � _ 4 ���
•,�..�• �
�� 15' 13`___
�
O _,,, _
_ _ 54'
�_. � � ���
1
� �� ��, �,
� ,\ 43'
� 36'
� \
�6,2,, i
; ,�_ --- - -
,
�
z, 5 _
41'3"
12'
24'2"
5
� ��
%� '
� � 3 ' � 6 C
�
� 40'
32' �
�� 76'8" '
� ��� '
� (. �-�
�
/
� � .._ ;���—_
� � F R O O M R A N C H - H I S T O R I C A L B U I L D I N G S DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FROM THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
� � � SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA Project # 1014012 AUGU�S�6��, 2017
ATTACHMENT G:
"ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES AT FROOM RANCH," STORK,
WOLFE 8c ASSOCIATES, JUNE 30, 2017
16625
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16626
�tork, �'L'olfe,�� 1'�ssa�iates
►�tru�tural Ln�ineers
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES
AT
FROOM RANCH
12165 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
- "pR0ttS51pNR� .
�a Y y
��� ���
� o �,.
='1� �1�',
'�; �� ��,r�`,``.
"- N �981 �'
F)' .
�
-,� � ,
C i---v:
•.. OF CA1-�F��
STORK, WOLFE & ASSOCIATES
599 HIGUERA STREET, SUITE H
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
(805) 548-8600
June 30, 2017
16627
INDEX
Introduction & Methodology 1 — 2
Main Residence 2 — 4
Dairy Barn 5 — 7
Old Barn 8 — 10
Creamery House 10
List of Figures
Figure 1 — Main House 13
Figure 2 — Main House roof joists w/ mid-span bracing 13
Figure 3 — Unbraced wood cripple wall with redwood sill 14
Figure 4 — Dairy (Round-Nosed) Barn 14
Figure 5 — Dairy Barn roof framing 15
Figure 6 — Dairy Barn exterior wall framing 15
Figure 7 — Western entrance to the Dairy Barn 16
Figure 8 — Bracing at interior line of wood posts 17
Figure 9 — Interior Dairy Barn posts bearing on soil 18
Figure 10 — Old Barn 19
Figure 11 — Old Barn roof framing 19
Figure 12 — Old Barn exterior wall framing 20
Figure 13 — Full-height plywood shear walls 20
Figure 14 — Creamery House 21
Figure 15 — Deterioration of Creamery House 21
16628
Figure 16 — Deterioration of Creamery House 22
Figure 17 — Creamery House foundation 22
Figure 18 — Deterioration of Creamery House 23
Dairy (Round-Nosed Barn) Schematic Structural Drawings
S2.1 — Foundation Plan
S2.2 — Roof Framing Plan
S3.1 — Structural Elevation `A'
S3.2 — Structural Elevation `B'
S3.3 — Structural Elevation `C'
S3.4 — Structural Section `D'
S3.5 — Structural Section `E'
Structural Calculations A1 — C9
16629
INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY
John and Susan Madonna wish to study the feasibility of preserving and/or
renovating several existing structures of historic significance at the Froom Ranch
property in San Luis Obispo.
The structures included in this analysis are the Main Residence, the Dairy Barn,
the Old Barn, and the Creamery House. All structures consist of wood-framed
walls and roofs, wood siding, and either a wood or concrete foundation.
Construction of these buildings took place between the late 1800's and early
1900's.
As part of the preservation, it is necessary to assess both the gravity and lateral
load resisting systems of the buildings in order to ensure life-safety of the
occupants. For existing structures of historic significance, the structural analysis
is to be per the 2016 California Historic Building Code (CHBC). In order to
balance structural safety with historic preservation, this code allows for a 25%
reduction in current building code design wind & seismic load levels. In addition,
it also provides strength capacities for structural systems that would typically not
be allowed for new structures. Where design gravity loads are not being
increased, the CHBC also allows that the vertical load resisting system may be
assumed adequate by having withstood the test of time, where no distress is
evident, and a complete load path is present.
Guidelines for determining the feasibility of historic preservation is given in the
City of San Luis Obispo Historic Preservation Ordinance, December 7, 2010.
Feasibility is defined by this document as the ability of a building or other
structure to "be repaired or rehabilitated so as to be safe and usable without
significant loss of historic fabric," and that the structure has the "physical
capacity...to withstand the repair and/or rehabilitation process without the danger
of further damage."
Both the structural integrity and the feasibility of rehabilitation have been
addressed in this report for the structures noted above. The study considers
multiple building-use scenarios, including continued commercial use as well as
the conversion to public space. For continued commercial use, the building code
does not require any structural upgrades to be done. However, we have
included in our recommendation the items that pose a significant risk to the
structure, or to the life-safety of the occupants. Where the conversion to public
space is considered, we have included all structural deficiencies, as well as
potential increases to design live loads, and long-term perFormance
improvements.
Our scope of work for this project involved the following tasks:
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 1 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16630
1. Review of the Froom Ranch/EI Villagio Specific Plan Section 106
Prehistoric Report dated February 20, 2015.
2. Review of the Seismic Analysis Map provided by Geosolutions. The map
shows the local fault zone, in which it is recommended that no structure
with an occupancy of 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year may be within
this zone.
3. Visually survey each building to verify the original construction, past
alteration, and the current conditions.
4. PerForm a structural analysis of each building for CHBC-level gravity,
seismic and wind loads.
5. Prepare a report that includes an outline of the major structural
deficiencies, as well as a general description of the proposed structural
retrofit work.
MAIN RESIDENCE
The Main Residence [Figure 1] was constructed in 1915, and has been occupied
continuously for use as both a residence and an office building. The
approximately 1,600 SF one-story wood-framed structure appears to be in good
condition, and has undergone several renovations and repairs throughout its
history. The majority of the structural framing is original, however concrete
foundations have been added at certain locations around the perimeter where
excessive settlement has occurred. The lateral load-resisting system consists of
wood siding over straight-sheathed exterior wood stud shear walls.
Roof Framing
The roof framing consists of consists of composite shingles over the original
wood shakes over 1x6 skip sheathing supported by 2x4 roof joists at 30" spacing.
The roof joists are braced mid-span with kickers down to interior stud walls below
[Figure 2]. Although the existing roof framing appears to be in good condition,
there is no recognized diaphragm system needed to resist lateral loads.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the roof framing system. It is recommended, however that the next time the roof
is replaced, the original wood shakes be removed, and a layer of plywood added
over the existing 1x skip sheathing. The layer of plywood, if detailed and nailed
properly, will act as a structural diaphragm. Additional wood blocking and metal
framing clips will also be required to tie the roof diaphragm to the exterior walls
below. It should a/so be noted that if a new roofing material is selected that is
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 2 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16631
heavier than the existing roofing material, strengthen of the roof rafters will be
required.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, the
existing roofing shall be removed and the plywood, blocking and framing clips
added as described above.
Exterior Walls
The exterior walls are constructed of horizontal 2"x4" wood studs at 24" spacing.
The exterior is sheathed with 1x shiplap siding over 1x straight sheathing, which
provides lateral stiffness for the structure in resisting wind and seismic loads.
The wall framing and siding appear to be in good condition.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing exterior walls. Although the walls are overstressed for CHBC-level
design loads, one-story wood framed structures typically perform well in
earthquakes, and no strengthening is recommended.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, it is
recommended that plywood shear walls be added. Plywood, when detailed and
nailed properly provides significantly greater lateral strength and stiffness for
wood shear walls than the existing 1x straight sheathing. For existing structures,
the interior drywall in specific locations can be removed, plywood installed
directly over the existing studs, and then the drywall reinstalled. Holdowns
anchoring the shear wall boundaries to the foundation are a/so typically required.
First Floor
The first floor is constructed of wood flooring over 1 x6 diagonal sheathing over
2"x5-1/2" wood floor joists spaced at 24". The wood floor joists span across
unbraced wood cripple walls below spaced at approximately 7'-6" [Figure 3]. The
2x redwood sill of the cripple wall bears directly on grade. Releveling of the first
floor has been perFormed several times throughout the life of the structure.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing floor structure. The existing floor joists are adequate to resist code-
level office live /oads. It should be noted, however, that if future unevenness in
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 3 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16632
the floor surface is encountered, it could be an indication of excessive settlement
in the foundation. See the foundation section below for potential strengthening
recommendation.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy,
strengthening of the floor joists may be required. The existing floor joists do not
have the capacity to resist code-level design live loads when considering areas
of assemblies. If space is to be made within the structure for meeting or
conference areas, the floor joists below that area are required to be doubled up.
Foundation
The foundation consists of interior and exterior 2x wood stud cripple walls
bearing on an existing wood sill placed directly on grade [Figure 3]. Where past
excessive settlement has occurred, an undocumented concrete foundation was
poured below the sill to provide a greater bearing surFace and better long-term
durability. The exterior cripple walls are lightly braced with occasional 1x
diagonal boards, while the interior cripple walls are completely unbraced.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, as a minimum both the exterior and interior cripple
wall systems should be strengthened. This can be done with either a system of
properly detailed diagonal boards or a pattern of plywood sheathing. Where
concrete foundations have been added in previous repairs, it should be verified
that the wood sills are properly anchored to the concrete. Because the existing
structure bears directly on top of the soil and proper concrete foundation
embedded into the soil are not present, sliding of the structure during a large
earthquake could occur. Although life-safety does not appear to be a significant
risk assuming the cripple wall bracing is installed, non-structural damage to
interior furnishings and equipment is likely. In addition, attention should be given
if future unevenness in the floor surface is encountered. This could be an
indication of excessive settlement in the foundation. For better long-term
structural performance, see "For Use as Public Space"below.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, a
proper concrete foundation should be installed. To install the concrete
foundation, the structure is jacked up, continuous trenches are dug below the
exterior and interior cripple walls, and concrete footings are poured. The
structure is then lowered and bolted to the concrete. In addition to the footings,
all cripple walls require bracing as described above.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 4 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16633
DAIRY BARN
The Dairy Barn [Figure 4] is an approximately 4,200 SF wood-framed farming
facility built in 1913 to house livestock and hay. Weather and neglect has
severely deteriorated many of the barn's key structural elements over the course
of its history. In addition, a significant portion of the barn is located within the
rupture zone setback of a potentially active trace fault. These items are
discussed below and shall be addressed in the renovation along with the
strengthening of the lateral load-resisting system.
Local Seismic Hazard Mitigation
Because the Dairy Barn is situated within the rupture zone setback of a
potentially active trace fault, there is a high risk of significant damage to the
structure due to ground rupture. If the barn is to be used in any way other than
being fenced off and left in a state of arrested decay, significant alterations to the
building footprint are required.
Required Remediation:
If left in its current location, it is recommended that the round-nosed portion of the
barn be removed, in addition to the next three adjacent bays of framing,
essentially cutting the structure in half. Also requiring demolition due to its
proximity to the fault line is the northern masonry addition to the barn. Because
the round-nosed portion of the building is unique and has historical significance,
a portion of the demolished materials may be salvaged to rebuild the round-
nosed portion at the eastern end of the structure. It is estimated that
approximately 75% of the roof framing and 50% of the floor framing will be good
for re-use. Nearly all the exterior siding is in such a state of decay that it will
have no structural value. This remediation is required to ensure the safety of the
occupants during a large seismic event. The rebuilt round-nosed portion will
require a modern concrete foundation system to prevent they type of settling and
deterioration that is currently present.
Relocation Option:
Another option for the Dairy Barn is to demolish and rebuild the structure at
another location. In order to preserve the historic aspect of the barn, the framing
system should remain the same as the existing framing system, but with
consideration of the strengthening requirements outlined in the sections below. It
is also possible to re-use a portion of the lumber as noted above. Please refer to
the schematic structural drawings provided for reference at the end of this
document.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 5 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16634
Roof Framing
The existing roof framing [Figure 5] consists of wood shingles over 1x6 skip
sheathing supported by 2"x6" roof joists at 30" spacing. A collar tie system
consisting of tension rods at 10'-0" spacing thru the double top plate at the two
interior post lines is present to resist the horizontal thrust. The majority of the
roof framing has the capacity to resist code-level dead and live loads. The
existing skip sheathing provides minimal lateral stiffness lateral stiffness, and will
not act as a proper roof diaphragm.
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy less than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— Because the existing wood shingles are in a serious state of deterioration,
much of the roof framing is exposed to weather. It is recommended that the
existing roofing be removed and all framing be inspected for damage. It is
estimated that approximately 10% of the roof framing will need replacing. It is
possible that lumber sa/vaged from the seismic remediation described above
may be reused for this purpose. Additionally, a layer of plywood will be required
over the skip sheathing in order to create a roof diaphragm. The entire roof shall
be re-roofed with a light weight standing seam or corrugated metal roof with
better long-term performance.
Occupancy greater than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (public use,
meeting space, etc.) — Same as above.
Exterior Walls
The exterior walls [Figure 6] are typically constructed with 1x12 vertical siding
spanning from the double top plate to the wood sill, with an intermediate
horizontal 2"x4" girt mid span. The double top plate and girt span horizontally to
4"x4" wood posts at 10'-0" spacing around the perimeter.
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy /ess than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— The exterior vertical siding is required to be in good condition to allow for
adequate nailing. Proper nailing is essential for shear wall performance.
Because of years of neglect, it is estimated that up to 75% of the wood siding will
need to be removed and replaced for the wood shear wall system. It is a/so
estimated that approximately 10% of the wall framing will require replacement
due to weather intrusion at the damaged siding. The entire exterior will require
re-painting to help preserve the condition of the wood.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 6 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16635
Occupancy greater than 2,000 man hours per year (public use, meeting space,
etc.) — Same as above.
Wall Bracing
At the main western entrance to the Dairy Barn, not enough wall length existing
to provide adequate lateral stiffness [Figure 7]. At this location, as well as at the
two interior lines of posts [Figure 8], diagonal wood wall bracing will be required.
All connections will be designed to be bolted and hidden. The bottom ends of the
bracing will be required to be anchored to the existing foundation
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy /ess than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— Install new 4x4 wall braces at the western wall and at the two interior lines of
posts. Strengthen all brace connections and splices with steel plates and bolts.
Anchor braced connections to new concrete pad foundation.
Occupancy greater than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (public use,
meeting space, etc.) — Same as above.
Foundations
The majority of the perimeter foundation consists of a 24" high concrete stem or
retaining wall [Figure 6] with an undetermined footing depth. The concrete
foundation appears to be in good condition for the age of the structure. The
majority of the foundation damage has occurred at the eastern downhill portion of
the structure at the round-nosed area of the barn. The foundation system at the
interior post line appears to be a redwood sill bearing directly on the soil, or else
the wood posts are embedded directly into the soil [Figure 9]. The posts appear
to have settled over time approximately 2".
Required Strengthening:
Occupancy less than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (tours, exhibits, etc.)
— Provide a modern concrete foundation system to support the re-built round-
nosed portion of the structure. This is included in the Seismic Remediation
section above. Additionally, concrete pad footings will be required below the
posts. These pad footings have been included in the Wall Bracing section
above.
Occupancy greater than 2,000 cumulative man-hours per year (public use,
meeting space, etc.) — Same as above.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 7 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16636
OLD BARN
The old barn [Figure 10] is an approximately 1,300 SF wood structure with a
corrugated metal roof, vertical wood siding, and a concrete slab-on-grade
foundation. It is estimated that the barn is 125 year old, and has been moved
from its original site. The barn appears to be in very good shape for its age due
to the fact that it remains in use. However, its constant use has led to a number
of undocumented alterations that have inadvertently compromised the historic
fabric of the Old Barn significantly.
Roof Framing
The existing roof framing [Figure 11] consists of corrugated metal roofing over
existing wood shingles, over 1x6 skip sheathing, supported by 2"x4" roof joists at
32" spacing. A collar tie system consisting of 2x4 struts near the ridge is present
to resist the horizontal thrust. This appears to have been added at a later date,
most likely to combat a sagging ridge. The majority of the roof framing has the
capacity to resist code-level dead and live loads. The existing skip sheathing
provides minimal lateral stiffness lateral stiffness, and will not act as a proper roof
diaphragm.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the roof framing system. It is recommended, however that the next time the roof
is replaced, the original wood shakes be removed, and a layer of plywood added
over the existing 1x skip sheathing. The layer of plywood, if detailed and nailed
properly, will act as a structural diaphragm. Additional wood blocking and metal
framing clips will also be required to tie the roof diaphragm to the exterior walls
below. It should also be noted that if a new roofing material is selected that is
heavier than the existing roofing material, strengthen of the roof rafters may be
required.
For Use as Public Space — If the structure is to be used for public occupancy, the
existing roofing shall be removed and the plywood, blocking and framing clips
added as described above.
Exterior Walls
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 8 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16637
At some point in the history of the barn, the exterior walls were reframed with a
more modern system of 2x4 vertical studs spaced at 16" o.c. [Figure 12]. This
system likely replaced a post-and-beam system with horizontal wall girts, similar
to the Dairy Barn described above. Blocking between the vertical studs is used
to support the 1x12 vertical siding.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing exterior walls. However, because of the three large door openings at
the north elevation of the structure, a wood bracing system is recommended
along this line.
For Use as Public Space — Same as above. Additionally, the exterior vertical
siding is required to be in good condition to allow for adequate nailing. Proper
nailing is essential for shear wall performance. It is estimated that up to 50% of
the wood siding will need to be removed and replaced for the wood shear wall
system. It is also estimated that approximately 5% of the wall framing will require
replacement due to weather intrusion at the damaged siding. The entire exterior
will require re-painting to help preserve the condition of the wood
Wall Bracing
At each of the two interior lines of posts, a shear wall has been added [Figure
13]. It is unclear as to when and why the shear walls were added, however they
do provide a significant amount of stiffness to the structure.
Required Strengthening:
Continued Private Commercial Use — If the structure will continue to be used for
private commercial purposes, the building code does not require any upgrades to
the existing exterior walls. However, if a plywood roof diaphragm is added at a
later date, proper blocking and shear transfer detailing will be required.
For Use as Public Space — Same as above.
Foundations
The Old Barn bears on an undocumented concrete slab-on-grade foundation.
The slab-on-grade appears to be in good shape, and no differential building
settlement is noticeable.
Required Strengthening:
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 9 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16638
Continued Private Commercial Use — In order to resist the design lateral loads at
the new bracing elements required at the north elevation, it is likely that several
pad footings underpinning the existing slab-on-grade will be required.
For Use as Public Space — Same as above.
CREAMERY HOUSE
The Creamery House [Figure 14] is an existing wood-framed structure in a state
of disrepair. Years of abandonment have made it unfeasible for renovation
[Figures 15 through 18]. Among the issues are the following:
• All exterior siding requires replacement
• There are no wood studs in the majority of the walls. The siding, which
has no bearing capacity, is currently supporting the majority of the roof
loads.
• The roof framing is undersized and severely damaged.
• The floor framing is undersized and severely damaged.
• The wood post-and-beam foundation system is supported on rocks or soil
and has failed.
Required Strengthening:
The Creamery House is an unsafe building in a state of disrepair, and the
materials are unsalvageable for structure purposes. It is recommended that the
structure be properly documented and demolished.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 10 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16639
This page intentionally left blank.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 11 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16640
This page intentionally left blank.
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 12 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16641
� �
_ � -
_ _ _ _ �`�'-
� '��.. � -. - _- �.,�
--- _=�-__ - -__. -. -- - �
�� - —� _ -��— - �` _ :��. '=
�'°e -_ � . —� i � � ,��� .:� .
� li�, _ _ .— � � - ..,.�
- �� �■� � �
,_� � 1. � �� .�1 I� ��I .
� �_ - � � --. __� - _� � �
�_ _
_ _ _ �_ . .��
:�� _� -_ , _ -, r_ � � _..�._
:�
,�� _ �����. �,.
r��F _ ..� ,: . •:���,z. ,M._ . 7„�s�;�..=� .` ;
,. .. ,,.�+ � �,..-�3�-�-^�.. �:��"'- - y
,�r-.: - .��`�-���.+r M=
.��_ . ��--,�IV,�,,,t�ia,. :i��.._�.y:-..A�.:.�o .-�.�'. �s�
-� � _ T- , � -w�^:,y��"!�`�iPK�`....-�`. . '.- _
-. .. •• -... .: ��. , � .
_ . �. '- - -��. _ �..__���� . .. .. - -
��;�.
.. �. . . . ... .. - - _
....-- .. _ ... _
. ... . - - � . . .:�
:_ . ... -. .... . -:�. _...,:. . -
_ ..- _- , _. - _. --- �_ �:-=�� _"^ ��•�
�:�_�. - -
:_�._.a
- _ .._ .... �� �� .�� _
Figure 1 — Main House
�k
.x••
' _ V
I �•t.
` �i
•.-
�
�
� -
a
;� � + � - -'� �
� ��y -�
� �.; _.
Figure 2 — Main House roof joists w/ mid-span bracing
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 13 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16642
� '� - �� � �
��.��- � �
._ �.�,r��• _ - J '�°�t`
, �� ��.� •r� �
� '*�..._ . . ' � �
� . �. � �
;
.-�_ • �
w a�:xy.ot
1. �� .. _.�
� r ...
� :!'r` � • ,� �. r�..-•—' --+.� �
:r��4 , ^ .Af- T •�. ' ,_ _ - �n" - . ^ .�` Ft:•�'��_"r: �
�. - _ — -r— • �
��"�l- ,N""�r`:,f"`;-7.¢..,` r-*r:�:►�.�'•_ ,.t��„" • " • •~ Fr s�
: —�� r y,; . � -- ..i,'`'�-�_�'.�'r:,4�
fv- ' ^ ' � ' - . ' ' iirn ' �`�
- " � - . �.�'�+� .f- • _ � . - �
. - � �'�.f'`� . � __- �x _...r' '.*^'
�'� � ' ' ' .r �. � -' � -�.
Figure 3 — Unbraced wood cripple wall with redwood sill
�;-.
-� ,=
- -�y' .�.Y- - '�
- -__' ----- -_- - - - `'��"�!= =-'�-l -_ `
` _ -' - _- - -_ _ - -_= 3 J`r;_�-.`- - - ___- _-_ .. . �
� - - - � .. . . . . -'�:.:•. . . . . - _. . -
- /� - _ - � i ; i -
�„� i' � r. ��.,,,. � � . r ; _
� �l:i�i; i� � '�i
- � - ''-��11 '� �►�� �� .,k ;,� � i' „ �_, , � �
_ I �� J� '�' �. i aS � � ;�
��. � .;,. � t. ,, �,:,4�. `,
� ��: s,� � '�t' �
�>�;
�,, , �.-. ;sr t:��r�� ,.��';' r .. . - .�':�,,,¢',.x�.�y ,
_ • - �� �r•J�; : � S•f • � �- ����-... � . -
" r t^��.,,
.. . _ .,. , � .. � � p . _��.,'r�1�.:s;.,�T.1�1 {7 ,�.yl� rr ' . . . _
�: Y� " � ,v-�' i� i.. � -{. . .
�, �� �r• ;,`.r _ . -F'�,�k�^ � • � J , r-�F .i. . ,.: : + .
.�,; �z � �. :y
,-,_a'-�•;�,ti=_ ,_ . . � ��'S.�'.?�� �� ',��.�,�i:'A.a�{r• �� :�i '�: . .
- _ - _ �;�, #,. -i: ,. ,�':;,.:�•:4;;����;�:�; 4'.; -
_ ,�_.i-- - -• �.r' ...�:.�i�::I"�:'�� :,�;`� �`:a: r...r��;�tf;:.i.i 3. ;i,'�„�: ,i.�
. - - . :�=-�° N liiY: ry�i... ��p:��:- :r�'..�.��r• !.� +�i:.
_ _ ��r,. ,�;�r,,,;;�'��>=: ,d ` . ,« .� �;
;� - . . . • .r-.�: .' ��i r�4..��`:,y:. .. •;�''. '•� ,I��. , .
. :'�`'` ,.',�y,'e':7',.i i't. J,L- I �; �, 'u`,'• :.
. . :=r�.'�� . . _ ..�,' �. ` �£:.'.:r�E'•.: i A.- '��•���.�}.
_-:�',: -• .. . .._. ..- .'�^-::�3F.�:.�.�;•a.,>.':3F.,�a���.;:c:,�� s' ..� .�...1.�:;'', � �.,, "�`�'. . .r ,
Figure 4 — Dairy (Round-Nosed) Barn
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 14 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16643
�►�__ �� � � 1� r , �-
�� �� � �� �� a � .
� `r � f'' � I ;:�
} �� ��' � �
� � E � �
� '°" �` ;"`� � , ' � �
� �� � h � � � � ' -
,�,� � � . � ,,, '�; .� ��
� � � ��� � .� , � - � �
� � � , .�►� ;
��� ���T ��f`�� � d. •- � � , �
. �� � � �. � `'�:� -,� '
` � � ' - �
� .
�.,����,'���_ - ���. _� �.
. � �`+ ��`'' ,�*�`� �: :� � { � � r f
'` - �� ��`'�` _�. `'�� ,� t ,. - �
_,,� ,..-
�, '►
�� - ; �°���_� :�.� �► �
� ' � � .. . � . - r.r,. .., ., . �. .�r r� .., � �` �' +
� � `�`�� �`� �, `
,w.. , �.�.... . _ ::.,� .. ,. K�. �, r
� � .�.� V�� � .. �,r� - F.a�.,.�n.� � _ • �
"1� / •w� �,�� �* .•+r �+ •w�r+r��.�� �
�� � ! �. '�^��. �. �� ��l��
�� � t �� �.�►��+ �14/n`�U���'. �v.�.. +�r�wr�� .. �'. �
x�
� 'l���r �r� :�� ��� � +� �l.�i � � � « -
�� � �", �.�:y.�..�,� � .� t " ' �
�
Figure 5 — Dairy Barn roof framing
� - f�� � �
-- - — - -----� ' -- . - * �" ��i
_ __� 1 - . . . - �. �-�.
- _ : �r _ _ ---- r =_ _� �
�; �!� �? -�----�-,�~+` _ --- �— ��'�
� + �, , _
+! i ° �. Mr�fi • ,.�.i J. t- � _ I' .a
� , , 4 � _ �'• � � : �;
�' : r � � ! '� � � � ��� � ,
;� �-�- t
,�! � . i .� ;� 'i�+ ; `�
,. _ �;. ; , � -
�~ ' ��:�,:
� ,'I: �A �a� �_�� r '
:_� � ��— µ.� r'.f i .
� :. 1 �' � �_ _�' ; � �.. '�, .
F,,, '
�G� �
�R _ ■ �� ' ����� _ —
~� k $ � �
�'s ,� e��
� .! � �� _��K� � - �'7�.
. .i -` �, - -�. �
.. ti � 'J!
� `� � � i � - ..pq�.;:..-:��. _ �
1
S �
� ��. ��. ]� _ _
Figure 6 — Dairy Barn exterior wall framing
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 15 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16644
: � � ` _� � ��!
�m
.
: � � y4
♦ \'
� ,\� �� �
� e � �
' �
' `' , ` . �
� r. y
1 �
i �
, ��
� � � '�►"'�
,I �� � ' �
�`� j �J�
i .:� � �- •
: �� � w
.. y .� �
,, �
_ r.
� . ;4 �
t: - � � �
,
T �r���� ��
..s �:� -- �t' _ _
�
T. '
Figure 7 — Lack of wood bracing at main western entrance to the Dairy Barn
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 16 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16645
� � � ��- �- _ �� y -
, � � !� �►��
� �s -�� �``:
� . . � � ._
�� � � �► �`' � � �` 4 -�
�' � � ` �
�� � � - �� � ��,;,�
� �� . _ �.
�. ,�,�� � ,,�,�.� �r-- ,� `.
� ,�� , �,,��-� � �� �� � „ ���^
r ~ Y ,� �� � ��; a-
� � �I ���'� ����- ::��� �. .
� � I �� ,,��,� ��•��t� ����. �
~ -� . � �'ir.�r �� r�,��i' '` `�
• � ,�.c` w-� �:•�� '
iw.�.+^ _ �� - �` . ���_
� ��� �� �� � �. ,� � r n+ .. . � S• .'; -
�""�- --�� 1: -�_ . f� i 1 � � i:l�� �y � :* "'�
:k i � �� ' •iL�� ..� � .
,� k- � ' 'i[f4Lilli4'iSif +�'i .y.. �
� �' " t yy ��Kr�° + }
'� A��^- ` ���:'��7.J�'. �.F��i�r �� :: .� IHdW
�-!F�" . �'F� [
. 'i. I+ I.I � � _��_ , ,�°1�,� F������ ,� `�
�� ' S �1 '�� N r•¢i._ i
�. �, ��t�� - �� , , , . , �
� ► .._� � �`1� �. - ��� ��r�� . ��
Figure 8 — Bracing at interior line of wood posts
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 17 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16646
� � ���
,T r �
� �r - �: `�� .►. �';:
�' ,:
�� �
� ,y� . �
�<
� '
� � � r•�
� ' M1� •
� �
�,� . _.� � � . -�- ��
t � � --
�.. �� r ., �
_ _ � � � �
_ , �;
�.. �4� �
=�1. � �,��
��� -� �
�._� -� `�� � � � � � �
`�� -�.� � �..�� ��,�� .....�
" :�- - . ....,,,,,,
-� ,
.� ��\\ • � � �
-'�,`� .. �' �, . .
�— � �.P ti .. � r
�-- ,�,�_ � � �.a
.-_t, .� `'wf �i�:� t t�_ ��' \+�' � �7--`
� r ;� � f� � '�
�:� � ° � `� ' �`' �
�� �� r_` : .� �
'- f ' �� llir � �'.�r
:'-�./, .� _ ' ��, '� 4��
� .�,- ' ��
x� � • .
=x";s� -. „ • , �
���� r p �w. � l~
� ' - " ' y�� �r�'. ..����i►�y'�ti
_ ... . ,:��'. . � � � - �as��
L - • .1��'
,�:,�: . ��. . :7��„•` •; �i�,,
�.+� _ � ti.+�-:��ka,
. •x
'r-� .'�',;.s:'�^►���
� w � 'S+�.iy-i e '•
'� ,_ ,��' -a.+.]R
Figure 9 — Interior Dairy Barn posts bearing on soil
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 18 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16647
- . - - -- - . �6:
r4 �`'�,+—��-- -__
, .� ------�- - - - -
� ..� i� :tbn.�:.... �;-- �.,.
I ' ''i `�.;.. ,"'^'��."-^^.�_� ' - —_ _
i'.f.� ,�.�! f Ii , 41 =.... _... -
,:{; , �, .
� { ,,I, r. � I ' -
:(E '.;� •� i,��. �: m.
' h� •k I.�' � ' ` I , . `
- �•�' •rir .�{. �l . ._I. _ . ' .
'�" r� '�; ; �, _-- ; -- � �' ` ,����i� - � ���
----- r�� �� ��l;��E�� z� �'��` -r-=�.
- r �� ,�... i� . � r i .r�:�•.•.
���..r," �
!�� + ��. �.:
� , �;' � ,,,�,
-;•: . _- - .=r. -•:;:.�_;,;;:s_�-�;..'_ :,:_ .-. _ - — - _.. , _ -= ',_;:
�.�: .;�'..��=_ _ --�-_ _ ",. .�,•:::- _ .. . . -- - -- -� ::;
�"�� �,... - -�-.r:.r .�,+.��3;: - - - :'-�'�'--:'.�
�•A__ - _<�="' - a;:��.�' -^�Y`�,' ' -- -`� - - - -
�s'Y.:... -• " - .�,; > : . , �,:_� - T = '.���"�;._
��,� ' �-�.���-"="=- w _ .. - - .. .. _ - `
..r-�;a�.r ..��4";�- , . . . '.'_,-�i=-�:`..r-�"-�i:;���`"' . . ... .�-�i.s°��rt��-'�-=.,:.���-
Figure 10 — Old Barn
r - �
,,. .
.� _.. .
_ y' n, _ ��� �s.� -
�
� :. �a,�
a.
� r'�� � ,r
- :��� � l ' �. --.
� � �
J ~ �.� j�" -'�'�
�, • i
' •
� � ` �` :�
^,'�
.,, _
_ _ y-." °•�y_ i�� a
� f
�% -�i y1�
rt '1�� � ,�•'
f� } _ ' �.
4
������5 1�. . .. •�1• �� !� �� r �
Figure 11 — Old Barn roof framing
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 19 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16648
-.
..■�.
�
. �
� �
� `J� ' ���. .
.� � . �
ti_ . .
�' - ��� -�►�
� ,� ���� N1 :� � ,,�
. �. . ��., r .�.��: �
� �� � �-.r� .
, � ,�•,,� :°�''����, •
, r���. a;; - i
:" 1�'�-�" � � `
'� _� w�
,
� ._ � � � �� , __�_ �
Figure 12 — Old Barn exterior wall framing
�. - � .�►�.-�
_ .�� �
i . _ �.L�-�-"- � _."�
sr,
�� � . i ~i �, -
�� � ��1�•. .
r " .
� � ��
, �'ti� ' � ...r�r �.�� - --
r �� , - :� , r��` ����. •- -��_ _ .
wN .�• �� "y �*'1 L-_ � r „�
, ���:,►` , _ _ _�- _
. ���, -.�: .� � � �
� --- : � - .___..
� ��:
...� . �:�. :����:.� .� r�=
. �.�
Figure 13 — Full-height plywood shear wall (left & right of photo)
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 20 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16649
i �
�'� �a
s
� � - ; y ��. .f., ,: p.F: fW.?. r r. •ax
. � � ... � .. .c -�d: •. .• � ,.A�.: .�`,Y �;..�U��
_ ". C. . . , . . -.` . 3�����. �: :y�'�.i����`� �I
• - ;'f.'• " }' _" � '.�
.. . . '', :, ,' .��Y. �:, nr.'�i��^e.. ��3�.. 'e,g. ' [
.. -�� .t_- _ :��.�(..�iL�M1 � � y'r ,��.� � t`•��
.�i�.� • � -1�1�. . , rT-:•=�•�q,��,� � �n
�:� ;r:. .,F;=���1":7l!'`��.. �:yfa•.;rl'�.::�.�• cY, .r]�:;..-��..�.�- � ��.[4k.T..��..'l�P- 1 u:
- � ii�C. ' � y ,,. � •y�?•:X�_, f�'.k��:����ri�`�.kv
;y; �: x. t... �p�
::,�L_;,,: -.a: �:��A' ;;� a:n" ;,..a;r..•: �.... :.r ,�,: r.;�'�:i
` yT?`�. .Pr: :���.� r,y:;, . "�.�•�- ��Y:i��. t7.
''���:• ��il'� `i'' '�:y j. •';�:�� �•r>: . .�s4���'��',�'•-'� .�.�-n�..`:•� � ::t ;.�t::•..:..i.�,�;
.�r, ra ;�`.,," "� ';�' ��, ,�r• .e�... ,�, a
�':r�''< <�b .r .,'a lr'Xy� ����: ���;-�..' ',�,; r'�,. :d. ' � 'P�': .. +�::;�
:'��; ��',� ��; ��`
:i:h��i 7 ,y.� �,.. :'a .+4� � ��:S:�a` �,:`.'.L�„ v r�:.;,f�i s�� r
- ',;�v"�`.�-� .�..�, ',}•.� 'r. '��'• •-.i���- r" .4�.
.. '.::�^�iF�`:��..�':a�A;�;'��•+�... k`7���.r�.� `.'.�
'i�: '_y':: '.41c .�. f +"1"''!7�•F�'• ':�''13.'��^��'; .'y .:�..;.
- .� .[A:1:L�. �:�n'::h'�. '�j .�'.... .; :�' S 1.L ,{'.. � _ 1'':�1.•'y'.�h
� ;�'� :.7'�: ��.�� �..F� 'R. ••. �'.�'�,.3'.?y..:.�� ;� .qt;�f�.'�I.�'::.;' ��}�� 7. �3fi� .74
,{y��Y���,���� r.ir•�i'b�'. � '1 �{.' `.F N��:.;/.��.: �����lr�.:.�9 ��+4�' ,.�1.� G:�, ia�r.•�
�y.w'.' g.�V �,� I L �'.�' ']�'�:•' ��'\��'J'� ry'�.� �Y+'�i'�'�/� �
•Si.�� .' ., � `r'Y::�i . " J,1.:� � i�{s. h': �: �
���• ' 'Ir�, y(e '�,+��y�''�f5' '��a
,���' �� .�. �. � � � .;.E';,�4:� y��Yi•"'`::�y�.!,' ...?�' � �fy��'�`�'J�°�ri:��. `�� y�ti:.
"�- `� �7�`;` . i�: • ;1 P �,� •, •:'..}I'•T��' :. � �. ry��` �L :�tl
,y�, ,�i3,•,•.�;}. .�.� 1^7R,(;�'C'�.i_Ai.�� :�, r.�i•�.i.'��j.f-.�.�.'..��.
�.�.•� �,'.. �y�-,� �•. ,v..., �:iJ�;� J'� r;� .�,F; . f.
.
. .
' ....
� .,.. . r � , : 1�,
�,�'; �•" � �
�7_?y „:. �' �; y
........ .. . .. .. . � . , � .. � .. ..id��r'.i:���•:lll:yr•,� . . ._"i.�.:�..'rA�.��! �Ph.��T�f`�+iA�!`.:c.�i=wi."`;��ih
Figure 14 — Creamery House
`�~��;����� �. . ..
�� ,. � �__,
� ��� -
_T�- r-l-_`:" '
~___ YY.'ttt" ti•..- t�`!=� -�.�.lr_��
,. -:'��'\- `r_�ti�"c;�:�:.-- _"
•• -���. �`t�""�'F��t `-�—'�'� - �=�_=�.
��:� :.;��� '� �.. _
�_�..`���._ ,�v���
. .�` �-=:�;` � ��_.,.����.�—.��
�r'Ct:�� C��`1 �_ �T�'.�-�_�'�._��_
_��� �,�.-_��:- r� �r.'_�r-�y=�`�
��t��-�`��`-
'_�1— `-�'-_`��Z.:�=��`
__ _���:'-��... -•-• _ ` •-�`�y_�'`��-:'�-- -
`-�_— .,�• �-. .,.��= -
_�L�;�4':�_-_- - �...0����'�"`��.��-� �
�`���=.����-_���=��-.- `T�.�_
�y:�y� _ _ __:�'�_—Y—l'~�----="�?i�a --=-....�.
��� - �� - ��� -�.����.��
� �_' �.
.•�'a .- . .��. _ _
�7N'�•�-�1�T�in'i 'T . � .�7.-.._�� �� � I+ _
_.. � ��• f � , ��' ' ' �
�- � �:.. �.L �
�-- 1 � .f �
. :ti
� ���` - I '
. JI '' � j � �r{� � �
' _ .� _ f.: � ` ��i�l�r�;.��� � �.
- t i, �. �� � �
_��' . ' �� r '', � '- _ _' 'z�
. . . � 14 � ;� ,:yYr - �,. =�"sF��
,,f' ��� x� l-•'f"�::.. -,
>.,,,�:,-: .. - ._; :� � '••':.;'` .
.�Lr�- ���a::,,> � J'F'� :.•: `
, . . • � �f . 1•'��:i��'''�IL�•...�p•'i . . :�'",':��tJf�;.. .. .
. .i: ':�" a. �!�'[:':�i'. i�. . �."•�I! - �"�•!:.:�',,
f�.� . r . . ' ' . �r• .:��1�.'�. 'j�"
' . • � ' •• I .. i .. . . .�.y .. ��,I..���'.......... ... � . .• •. . ' . . .'Y�� .. ... ... ' � .
Figure 15 — Deterioration of Creamery House
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 21 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16650
` -- - ' �'�'%` �-
. � �
r� • ,`� T _ . y�� .� Y� i .
� . ��:
.. �.. � ' ..`-c � _ _ [ • ��..-
___� _ - -- —� . �a J�µ�-.
� - _`�- • S �
_ �..r-.v r` _ .- � � =�- ,:� .
- . �a+—•��„ - i: . .
_ � - �� � � . . � ,.
-- _ . - .�' '1 � �,.
- , , , .
"�`�_`_;- -�� � - - � '} ¢.
�.� _ . � _ ` " �y;. _i . : l t
.- � �, ` �aw � t: . i �:� 7 + �
$ �� �� ;;.. �.�; ... ��
' ; . - - _ . ��.; . � � � � �`";
�. . :�..
. y � - � � . ;' �e � . �� f'.r �.�-
r '� � � • i•�� �. I � i` �� ��
. � ;' •
Figure 16 - Deterioration of Creamery House
�
�- _ �� - ._
_ =.�
. � - - - - - -_
_ �_:.o- � �` ---�-�---�....,
.� -�- � _s
- _ �=�
�
�,,� _ �`�._ _ _- �:.'"'��
, .��r- � , � -
�' ,�-'�1 -y �r �.�. '"� � -r
� • :���� -� - � � _ ' _ -
�f�.
� ►� .'�% _ :. . - „r �#,�. �- . .
-�� ;�' � : : ; .}%�` :� , .
r�tr� .3�"Y����: �1•. .i ' • 5 'l�- `�� F
` _�s �- �� . � � '�' � :
-��;, ,=•'`^�� � '�
, � ^� �� �
�:�;_ - � . . �... k , �
Figure 17 - Creamery House foundation
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 22 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16651
. -.._ _. �
�. r!-.'� _
� _ �
4 � ��- � .. .z
� � ��
� — � ��
��'-. �S. � � — .
� _ " �'A
�. �� _._ _ — _'' ' �i._— r
r �� �, ^��,.
��� � J �:'' f�--� e -:�'.
�� I � ��. � ,{�'F '
M
-.�..M1.i:� ^_if'`.'ti ' '
' � ':,'-'�r�.
I+ ^ ..-.
�� . Y .�
� �, I .a�.
�i
r. I _ � .�
r '�
I�� .
�>r�
7� � � �I�,1+r
i '�� �
r
' - <
A.
+��
..y
r4a, ,x�., , � .
� . .�
Figure 18 — Deterioration of Creamery House
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES PAGE 23 OF 23
FROOM RANCH, SAN LUIS OBISPO 16652
�3E�VSIO�IS I�Y
6 D
S3.4
� �
i �
/ \
/ 7 �
� 2 �
� �
� � FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES :
/ \
/ L 8 O�
� � �
/ \ �
W c� �
�
/ � ` ��
L � �
� � �
1/
/ �6 ��` l� \ u �
t � �P� "" U� J
� e
/ ., ,� �
F N
5 J\. 'N
�
� � 3 3 � � N �
� �
I I � I � I I I � � �
� � � �
� J � J ' �
I � � 5 � I o �o
� � �
� ��
� �
I I
II QROFESSIpNq�
I I ����� � ��
� � � 2
I I � �
� � No.4981 � �
� J, IXP. 9/30/17 v •
I � � � � I � �
s�.9T� � T ����Q
I � I I � I I F OF CP�-\F�
L J L J I
' �J
I ; _ � FOUNDATION PLAN KEYED NOTES :
� � ~ �
I O1 4" CONC. SLAB–ON–GRADE
o �
�
I � I O2 15" W/DE x 18" DEEP CONCRETE GRADE BEAM AROUND PER/METER OF BARN
6 I O� O3 4x6 POST ON 2'-0" SQ. x 18" DEEP CONC. FTG. W
7 � � � � I
O4 4x6 POST ON 3'-0" SQ. x 18" DEEP CONC. FTG. A
� I I � I � w � �
�" O5 6x6 POST ON 4'-0" SQ. x 18" DEEP CONC. FTG. O O
I L � L � I ; _ � � �
�0 � O6 1 x 12 VERT. WOOD S/D/NG OVER 2x4 HOR/Z. WALL G/RTS � 2'-3" o.c. MAX. �
I 1'-3" �
TYP. � � O7 4x4 WOOD POSTS � 5'-0" o.c. MAX �j w �
� � � �� a �
A B 1 � � �
I S3.1 S3.1 I �
Z � a
I I � o �
I � � � � I � � �
� o0
I I 4 �� � OF I � I I x � �
I L J L J I � �—+ �
E I I E � �
S3.5 I I S3.5 � �
r--1
I I ^
I I O
r � r � �
I � G�
I I � I I � I 7 I �
I L J L J I
6
I I
I I
I I
I I
I � � � � I
I � I I � I
I L J L J I Z
I I J
I � I °"
S3.3 Z
I I O
—
� 2 � Q
� � �
Z
�
6 16'-8" O
V.l.F., MATCH (E) �
� 13'-8" 21'-8" Date 5/17/17
S3.4 V.l.F., MATCH (E) I V.l.F., MATCH (E)
Scale
57'-0"
V.I.F., MATCH (E) Drawn GHS
Job 17007
F� U N DATI O N P LA N Sheet
Sca/e : 1/4��->>-o» S2 . 1
Of Sheet�s6653
�3E�VSIO�IS I�Y
D
S3.4
� — — �
/ � � \
/ �
3
� ��
�� �� ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES :
// \�
// ' \� � � �
// \� � �
�
W� �
�
��
� ��
�� �� 2 �
y� � J
+�+ VL e
r0 �
•V Vf
O
�I I� � �
� ��
o � �
� � � �
� � � �
� ��
2 $ �,=
� � �
QROFESSIpNq�
����� � � ��
W� ��+
r No.4981 �
� J, IXP. 9/30/17 v •
� Q.
��9TF OF CP�-�0��\Q
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 5/8" PLYWOOD SHEATH/NG OVER 2x6 ROOF RAFTERS � 30" o.c.
O2 POST/BEAM LINE BELOW
O3 BEARING WALL BELOW W
A
w � �
O—� 3 � o �
O � o
� w
�� � a �
A � c�
z � o
� � �
O ° c�
� �O w � p� o 0
� x � �
� � �
� �E E �
S3.5 S3.5 � �
r--1
�
O
O
�
�
Z
Q
J
0..
V
Z
-
�
Q
�
�
3
LJ..
�� - - - - - - - - -� - � �- - �- - - - - - - �J �
�
�
� Date 5/17/17
S3.4
IScale
Drawn GHS
Job 17007
R O O F F RA M I N G P LA N Sheet
Sca/e : 1/4"=1'-0"
S2 .2
Of Sheet�s6654
�3E�VSIO�IS I�Y
L 8 O�
� � �
�
W c� �
�
��
L � �
� � �
u �
2 �
y� � J
+�+ VL e
r0 �
•V Vf
N
� �
�
� N O
md �
� � �
0 � A
� � �
7 �^
�O
� � �
id ��
� � �"'
QROFESSIpNq�
����� � � ��
� � � 2
4�i � � r�n
r No.4981 �
� J, IXP. 9/30/17 v •
� Q.
s�.9T� � T ����Q
F OF CP�-\F�
W
A
w � �
� � �
O �, o
� a �
A � c�
1 5 � � a
� O �
+7'-6" O (� �
TOP PL. (MATCH EXIST.) � Q O
I I � I I I I I � I I I I i I i � I I I I I � x � �
� ^ �
CONTINUE FRAM/NG AROUND � �
ROUND–NOSED PORT/ON OF BARN �
2 TYP. '�
3 TYP. 4 7YP. � (/)
r--1
— �
� � O
� 7 — O
+0'-0" �r_
���i��'�i �
TOP OF S.O.G. W
�%,.�,.�!�`� �
!
8 8
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES : Z
O
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAM/NG PLAN 18 —
�'
O2 1 x 12 VERT. S/D/NG �
NOTE WALL OPEN/NGS NOT SHOWN.
F/NAL LOCATION OF ALL OPEN/NGS O3 2x4 HORIZ. WALL G/RTS � 2'-3"f o.c. �.l.J
SHALL MATCH (E). J
O4 4x4 POSTS � 5'-0" o.c. MAX W
O5 4x4 TOP PL. "J
O 2x4 P.T.D.F. S/LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
�
O7 CONC. SLAB–ON–GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN �
�"'
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN V
O �
O10 �"""
�
� � 11
E L EVATI O N A 12 Date 5/17/17
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
Scale
14
Drawn GHS
15
Job 17007
16
Sheet
17
S3 . 1
Of Sheet�s6655
�3E�VSIO�IS I�Y
L 8 O�
� � �
�
W c� �
�
��
L � �
� � �
u �
2 �
y� � J
+�+ VL e
r0 �
•V Vf
N
� �
�
� N O
md �
� � �
0 � A
� � �
7 �^
�O
� � �
id ��
� � �"'
QROFESSIpNq�
����� � � ��
� � � 2
4�i � � r�n
r No.4981 �
� J, IXP. 9/30/17 v •
� Q.
s�.9T� � T ����Q
F OF CP�-\F�
1
9
+17'-1"f
TOP PL. (MATCH EXIST.)
o� �
10 �
TYP. �
, w � p
� � �
O �, o,
13 7YP.
I a �
15 � 15 A � �
10 TYP. W �
OF (5) � � a
12 � � �
13 TYP. O �
+7'-6" O �
TOP PL. � O O
MATCH EX/ST.) � �
M+1 �
� ^ �
l!� �14 TYP. �
� �
r--1
�
O
6 7 6 O
+0'-0" �r_
i�\i� ��i ; i�`�TOP OF S.0.G. W
i��� j I ;y%���j'��j��j���.,..%��<..
��\\,�\,.\�\�, i �����\�/���//�\//,•/
� �����
; \//�
8 8 TYP.
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES : Z
O
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAM/NG PLAN 18 —
�'
O �
O W
�4 W
O -'
O 2x4 P.T.D.F. S/LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
�
O7 CONC. SLAB–ON–GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN �
�"'
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN V
O9 6x6 TOP PL. �
�
10 4x6 POST PER FOUNDAT/ON PLAN �
� � 11
E L EVATI O N B 12 2x6 HORIZ. STRUT � EA. POST Date 5/17/17
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13 4x6 HOR/Z. STRUT Scale
14 2x6 VERT. STUD
Drawn GHS
15 6x6 WDOD POST Job 17007
16
Sheet
17
S3 .2
Of Sheet�s6656
�3E�VSIO�IS I�Y
L 8 O�
� � �
�
W c� �
�
��
L � �
� � �
u �
2 �
y� � J
+�+ VL e
r0 �
•V Vf
N
� �
�
� N O
md �
� � �
0 � A
� � �
7 �^
�O
� � �
id ��
� � �"'
QROFESSIpNq�
����� � � ��
/ � � � 2
c� �
� � No.4981 � �
/ � J, IXP. 9/30/17 v •
� Q.
s�.9T� � T ����Q
F OF CP�-\F�
9
� 12
� 7f V.l.F.
17 . �
A
w � �
� � �
/ 2 O �, o
\ � a �
� 15 ^ � �
M�i
10 10 Z � Q
� a
� O �
�7YP. � \ +7'-6" O �
TOP PL. (MATCH EX/ST.) � Q O
I � I I � I x � �
16 7Yp. T 1 � �
V
i!� ��
1 1 1 1 � � 3 7YP. � (/�
r--1
�
� � � O
6 6 � O
+0'-0" �r_
��\���\/i\ \��i\��%�\�����i������!;�!i:� TOP OF S.O.G. W
y��.����:���% ����i:��\\\�/%/��
� �����`��
/i
8 8
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES : Z
O
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAM/NG PLAN 18 —
�'
O2 1 x 12 VERT. S/D/NG �
NOTE WALL OPEN/NGS NOT SHOWN.
F/NAL LOCATION OF ALL OPEN/NGS O3 2x4 HORIZ. WALL G/RTS � 2'-3"f o.c. �.l.J
SHALL MATCH (E). J
�4 W
O5 4x4 TOP PL. "J
O 2x4 P.T.D.F. S/LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
�
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN �
�"'
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN V
O9 6x6 TOP PL. �
�
10 4x6 POST PER FOUNDAT/ON PLAN �
� � 11 4x6 D/AG. BRAC/NG
E LEVATI O N C ,2 Date 5/17/17
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
Scale
14
Drawn GHS
15 6x6 WDOD POST Job 17007
16 4x6 POSTS Ca? 5'-0" o.c. MAX Sheet
17 6x 12 HEADER (�� .�
J
Of Sheet�s6657
�3E�VSIO�IS I�Y
L 8 O�
� � �
�
W c� �
�
��
L � �
� � �
u �
2 �
y� � J
+�+ VL e
r0 �
•V Vf
N
� �
�
� N O
md �
� � �
0 � A
� � �
7 �^
�O
� � �
id ��
� � �"'
1
QROFESSIpNq�
����� � � ��
� � � 2
4�i � � r�n
r No.4981 �
� � J, IXP. 9/30/17 v •
2
� Q.
�
� ��9TF OF CP�-\F���Q
�
9
+17'-1"f
TOP PL. (MATCH EXIST.)
W
A
w � �
, � � �
15 O �
� w
' '� �
A � �
12 � � O
� � �
+7'-6" O O �
TOP PL. � O O
MATCH EX/ST.) � �
M+1 �
� ^ �
l!� ��
N �
�
�
�
� 6 O
+0'-0" �r_
i�TOP OF S.0.G. W
�\ �\�������.,..%��<..
�/\\j\��i��i,,r
����
8 8 TYP.
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAM/NG PLAN 18 Z
O
O2 1 x 12 VERT. S/D/NG —
3 ~
O �
4 C/)
O
O -'
O 2x4 P.T.D.F. S/LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
�
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN �
�"'
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN V
O9 6x6 TOP PL. �
O10 �"""
�
� � 11
S E CT I O N D 12 2x6 HORIZ. STRUT � EA. POST Date 5/17/17
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
Scale
14
Drawn GHS
15 6x6 WDOD POST Job 17007
16
Sheet
17
S3 .4
Of Sheet�S6658
�3E�VSIO�IS I�Y
L 8 O�
� � �
�
W c� �
�
��
L � �
� � �
u �
2 �
y� � J
+�+ VL e
r0 �
•V Vf
N
� �
�
� N O
md �
� � �
0 � A
� � �
7 �^
�O
� � �
id ��
� � �"'
QROFESSIpNq�
����� � � ��
� � � 2
4�i � � r�n
r No.4981 �
� J, IXP. 9/30/17 v •
� Q.
s�.9T� � T ����Q
F OF CP�-\F�
9
� 12
� 7f V.l.F.
18 M
w
A
w � �
� � �
O �, o
� a �
�o A � �
12
z � o
� � �
+7'-6" O O �
TOP PL. (MATCH EX/ST.) � Q O
x � �
� ^ �
l!� �4 �
� �
r--1
�
O
6 � O
+0'-0" �r_
��\���\/i\ \��i\��%�\�����i������!;�!i:� TOP OF S.O.G. W
y��.����:���% ����i:��\\\�/%/��
� �����`��
/i
8 8
ROOF FRAMING PLAN KEYED NOTES :
O1 PLYWOOD OVER ROOF JO/STS PER ROOF FRAM/NG PLAN 18 1"� STL. TIE ROD, TYP. � EA. POST BAY Z
O
O �--�
O �
W
O4 4x4 POSTS � 5'-0" o.c. MAX Cn
O -'
O 2x4 P.T.D.F. S/LL w/ 5/8" A.B. � 32" o.c. ON 6" CONC. FTG.
�
O7 CONC. SLAB—ON—GRADE PER FOUNDATION PLAN �
�"'
O8 CONC. FTG. PER FOUNDATION PLAN V
O9 6x6 TOP PL. �
�
10 4x6 POST PER FOUNDAT/ON PLAN �
� � 11
S E CT I O N E 12 2x6 HORIZ. STRUT � EA. POST Date 5/17/17
Sca/e : 3/8"=1'-0" 13
Scale
14
Drawn GHS
15
Job 17007
16
Sheet
17
S3 .5
Of Sheet�s6659
ATTACHMENT H:
"MOVING HISTORIC BUILDINGS," NATIONAL PARK SERVICE,
.10HN �BED CURTIS, 1979
16660
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16661
. ,'�. .
, . r
t . ;�_ r
� f � ! �
� ' � 1
�-� . . - � r� .� .
� w� , � � r� � ��� • �
�� �� � �. ��
. ...� S �.1 : �
� - � � �`,� f � �
• �� � .�� I.� , 1 .
; � r , � ` �
• _ . ,. � .
� ;
� . �s. ,,� � . ��� �s., .
l� � � `� � � �
/ '�' . 1 l
.,�;� .. ,�"• i��'
� * / � � t,�--"'� 1 �1 e"- : � ~ .
, � ,� � , 1. � � - "• �
�� h . ` � .' � � ^ �y:
�' / � � r • ti :�
� -. � � r�
:�� ,; �. '�.~�����'. � - � -
, �
._ %��� ,t' '�•``�� 1 , • • • �r `' ' _
/. 1 . R
�� l, � �'�� r' � ~ Y � . •��► � �'�1,�
, { `� ! � 1 � . '��' �'
.�+ � .� ,
� (.�'a.� �-,� � r � ! `
�.. +
�,` �4 � � ��
���� -�'r: '�1J • /
. � � � � . ti`' r ,..
i. , � � , t� . 1, � , ~� �
� � � ' , ' " : !
� `� ti -
�� � i '„��a � ' , -
���-.. �� � �, �,./� � � .t 1 ,' t� �
� / /� '�. ^%j� i .s � ��
� �� � 1 ./ / �� � �t � , .
. .� � � a �.t� 1 � � � �.+ �
" _� ,� , _;_ '� '. .1�� .:,��- �' ` _' ,, ,,,
\ % �r ` I, T • ,� :
I�� /� t ,l�-i�E�i1�l�5r�� �i1, � ,
� �� � T+-� �'�•ti ��. �, �1� �' r
, ;,�i � 1 �. � ,.y!: � ,
,�' �y tf .
' , 'y!� \ e j .
/ � � S r�! . �
•ey. ��� � f ��
.'` ' �T \�i' , %
� ' * j
, ''��. ' , '.�, �� ` �. , ,�
� -�`� "�� 1 '�L�� �:
a�� �lti`�- �.Y.*.�� •��, �
..����� ` �� �� •{ �� t`a
.�, —�i �� . , �� � a � :
r'
Mo�ing Historic Buildings reprinted August, 1991,caurtesy of
Audrey and William Patram, Fairfax,Virginia and ihe
Internationaf Association of Structural Movers, Elbridge, NY.
This publication is dedicated to the thousands of building mo�ers who, over the past twa hundred years,
have mo�ed tens of thousands of struct�[res, accomplishing seemingly irnpossible tasks which, in many
instances, others thought could nat be done. Special recagnition is extended ta those individuals whose
�ision, goals and diligence led to the formation of the International Association of Structural Mavers in
.lanuary, 1983, and to the hundreds of movers who became members and joined in the work that has
made the Association a viable and respected organization representing the moving profession.
Dur special thanks ta Kay D. Weeks of the Technical Preservation Services
Di�ision, U.S. Department of Interivr,for invaluable assistance in this reprint.
For infarmation concerning this publication and the structural moving industry,contact the;
International Association of Structural Ma�ers, Box 1213, Elbridge, New Yoric 13060,or,
Williarn B. Patram, Inc.,3511 Cornell Road, Fairfax,Virginia,22030.
16663
�o�ing
Historic
Buildings
John Obed Curtis
U.S. Department of the lnterior
Heritage Conservation and Recreation Ser�ice
Technical Preservation Services Division
Washington,D.C. ]979
16664
As the hation's principal conservation agency,
the Department of the Interior has basic respon-
sibilities to protect and conserve our fand and wate�,
energy and minerals, Fish and wil�life, parks and
recreation areas, and to insure the wise use oF all
these resources. The Department also has major
responsibifity for American]ndian reservation com-
mursities and for people wha live in Island Terri-
tories under U.S.administration.
The Heritage Conservation and Recreation Serv-
ice, a non-land managing agency within the De-
partment, is responsible for assufing the
�dentification, protection, and beneficial use af our
important cultural, natural, and recreational re-
sources. The Service offers grant assistance, tech-
nical information, and guidan�.e ko those in the
public and pri�ate sectors invol�ed in conservation
or recreation projects.
CI.S. Department of the[nterior
Cecil D.Andrus, Secretary
Robert L. Herbst, Assistant Secretary
Heritage Conservation and Recreation Ser�ice
Chris T.Delaporte, Director
Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service
Publi�ation Number 9
Llbrary of Congress CaWoging In Pubikat�an Data
CuRis,John Obed.
Moving historic buildings.
(HCRS publication;no.9)
Bibiiography: p.
1. Moving of buildings, bridges,ztc 2. Historic
buildings—United States—Conservatipn and restpration.
I. Tikle. II. Series: United States. Heritage Corn
servation and Recreation Senr;ce. HCRS publication;
no. 9.
THi53.C87 69Q'.028 79-14677
16665
�
Contents
�
�'oreword �
[ntroduction 1
Community and Federal In�olvernent �4
Relocating Properties Listed in[he National Register
Ta�c Reforrn Act
Selecting a Morring Contractor ]6
Specifications and Licenses 18
Selecting the Best Pracedure for the Move 19
Mo�ing Intact
Total Disassembly
Partial Disassembly
Planning the Route 24
Documentation 26
Hisiorical Background and Researc�
Field Notes and Physical[nvestigation
Recording the Disassembly and the Move
Restoration Notes and Maintenance i�otes
lnterim Protection Prior to the Mo�e 31
Weatherproafing the Structure
Protection From Vandalism
Selecting and Preparing the New Site 32
Preparing the Structure for the Move 36
Mo�ing Intact
Moving Partiaiiy or Totally Disassembled
Cnnclusion 39
Case Study: Relocat9on of the Gruber Wagon Works,
by Charles A. Parrott, ll1 40
Selected Bibliography 49
iii
16666
� ��
,�>
- = �6'.u�L'�{r����' __ � '
�=��"iy.�` _ --
r � -�_ _- � = �
- __
_ -_ � _—
�- � _; -- _= = -
� ��
� �� _
l %' . �=� - '
_ — : � 'M�� �_� __ ,���lµ.
_ —, _ � , — �a, _ = i� � ,
� _� � - _ --
,�- � .����'�- r;�-�"` �� - �
_ ; - � �, ��„
�.,-�
�- ��
< . ���_� i
�� -� � „�� � � "' �ii'�- ,� �� �;`�ilii I�JIf� i
��' � - ,.i� �� __ � � �a��,I,M�r i ,�j�
% � � �� n
�� � �� - _ T = �s
� Y_ .� �� � _ _-
- H
.-=' �.:�:' � _ -- _ -
_- _ - _ _ _
f� ,�-=..- _ �Y� � - ._ � _ _ _-,
-- _ -- - -- �-
._ _ __ _ � .
__ _ . _ . _ �_
�+'1Q,. �.—C iliftlA.GE FOI3. MOPING HOIIBES. F�g. `�.—HOT78E RAIgLp11 BY 9CREWS.
'_ _ __ �t� _ -
` �� = f � _ � _ - _ = ' - " - -
� i, •. r� .-
— �`e� � `-- - ;� _ - �_ " - - -
�F�3� ;� .*��--rs_ , � s .-�. _ _
- '' � '°.� --'� �-'" � - r� � `�— � �`
£ - '- .' '" • .,�:.-_:.� . '���3 -�
-%- _ .
..� �r�f 1- � t � - I �tr ��1�� ./�. �
� � : � � fs�e ri � �;�� Iji�. ' t,F
�
�� '�y-:�=__.�`'���"`��'. �� �� � _'F'` - �� . _ ,� _
}� �� � �t
--� �� - 4 ,:, =
� �
� �,� �� ,�-- - -��",s`�.yS�� � . �k'�-su..�: , �"-
_ f� � _ "h ��n".a"�- �"� �����"�� 5 .� I ' '�E`��y',��'�
t� .s- � f. �� a�k^+- q i � +'� .
�- � 3 -r-
� j � � '����.-yu- 'i�r �-`y �'
�I ��� '��I.,.��� �5�- ��'�`r� . . Y� '�"�"2� ��,_.
a
� � � `� 1 � � . _
��`-- � ,�:�.����y�l��1� I --a —�1 _ ___� ��l_ I i k I f_4 i f � ` i� i-N -�'�� _ �
— `������jl������ _� ��'�--"�- — - — �- _ " -
� A�i��l � dl� y i�� - ` __
�lr�'����4"'� �'�°'`'xrra�' - — —_ _- - --� � _�.-
"�-�-'� - - �� ��.�- _
"
`.e�.-._=""' .:_' --__
.__ _ �,,,_ :
-'��-'�� --� � -'^..c, ... . _'
.' � � -_ �.3-_ -:...�y _ �- .._ '
-_ _ -�.��..�_-��-^ __�� _ __ �,L __ —_ :
.� -�''4 tt-���'�� p'� ��____ ��'- -- ._
x �5..��"F� 4 �6�. ���_�� � �' - � . `_ _
�'�C'v � v--+'�..���_..-���� '_ ' _ _-� '
� - ��v __
��1�'• �.—T�{E IIOUSE ON ITS TRAVEI.S.
—American Agriculturalist,�olume 32,IYovember 1873.
�
16667
M
Foreword
Ma�ing a historic buifding is sometimes the only ices Division, and is based on his paper presented
way to save it frorn demolition, but such an action at the 1977 Annual Con€erence of the Society for
should be undertaken only as a last resort when all Industrial Archeoiogy.
other preservalion options have been exhausted. Several staff inernbers made substantial contri-
When a hiskoric building has been moved, it loses butions toward the publication of this report: Laurie
its integrity of setting and its "sense af place and Robin Hammel, Architectural Historian, who de-
time"—important aspects of the histaric �haracter �eloped the initial subject outline, wor€ced with the
of a building and its environment. All too often, author to develop the manuscript and edited the
however, histaric and architecturalfy significant first draft; Marsha Glenn, Summer Intem, who lo-
structures are subjected Yo intense economic or cated much of the documentary materia! on the
planning pressures from which there are no rea- history of house movi�g; and Anne E. Grimmer,
sonable alternatives except selocation. lt is a pro- Architectural Nistorian,who edited the revised man-
cedure which requires considerable skill and uscript,the�ase study,and the illustrative materials
experience. Despite the effort and risk invofved, into the present publishec! Form.The Final draft was
Americans have been moving buildings success- edited by Deborah Cooney,Writer/Editor,Technical
fully since the early 18th century. Preservation Services Division.
This publication was developed by the Technica] Other individuals that made helpf�l contributions
Preservation Services Division,Office of Archeoiogy to this�ublicakion include:John ingle,formerly with
and Historic Preser�atiors, Heritage Conservation the Corps of �ngineers, Phiiadelphia; Tir� Turner,
and Recreation Service, as part of a Preservation SouthwestlPlains Offi�e, I`3ational Trust for Historic
Handbook series for use by architects, adrrEinistra- Preservation; John Miiner. .lohn Milner Associates;
tors, and govemment officials at all levels con- Peter M. Coope, Mystic Seaport, Enc.; and James
cerned with the preservation and maintenaRce oF H. Mundy, formerly Maine 5tate Historic Preserva-
cultural resources.John Obed Curtis,Director,Cur- t�on OFficer.
akorial Department, Old Sturbridge Village, wrote
the first section of this report under contract with Comments and suggestions regarding th[s publi-
this office. The supplementary ease study or� the cation are enr.ouraged,and shauld be sent to Te�h-
relacatian of the Gruber Wagon Works was written nical Preservation Services Division, Heritage
by Charles A. Parrott, III, formerly of John Milner Conservation and Recreation Service, U.S. Depart-
Associates, now with Technica[ Preservation Se�v- rr�ent of khe Interior,Washington,D.C.20243.
Lee H. Nelson,AlA
Preservation Hand�ook Editor,
an�
Acting Chief,Technical
Preser+ration Services Division
v
16668
16669
�
Introduction
Moving a historic building is a delicate operation; The subject of building relocation, or "�ouse
it should not �e undertaken until all ather possible moving" as it is more popuiarly termed, is a rnatter
ways to sa�e a structure from demo4ition t�ave been often �iewed as a remarkable feat, possible only
investigated.This report has been prepared to serve through the skfflful application of the most modern
as a guide for just such a situation. Its aim is to technology available. In actuality, the relo�ation oF
explain the precautians to take,and to suggest pro- �uildings has been a fairiy common occurrence in
cedures to Fo�low during the relocation process that the United States since the late 18th century (figure
will cause the least damage to the character and 1). The fact that it was Frequently easier to move
historic fabric of the buifding. a building than to construct a new one doubtless
^` '��k� - :�;`
.�����p .� „z,4� �- � '`� <�
� , f`,�.� �� ,
z � s ;r
.. .. - '�� �. �
5
�
� � � � � .���w �.::.
� �, - �
� l� � �
.
�- � ��. �.
�' . � . ,^^w.�A+.�n� ',J:Y'
r ��� �� � �� � �.� � � � ,� � ��. FP
_ � � � � � � � � � -_.= Y��-
-"'a�--�� _ - ���K, � � � . . _ � ...
�, "� _i - y 2 v�_4 ". -.d�i '» _ ....��,iews.. , '��...`� �� .�.i
� �� E _ � �i�.- ... � x�`� . . . , ."` rc
'�. � " � ,_ .�..
y� �. .
)9 K �]Y S' "r t
'� - T � .� — .s \ �� �'�.�,
a' *
�•
� a� �.3 " . r' � s� � �,: 4 �3 A_:
'"�� �<� '6 'S�6 .� . �+f .
— ��` ... � � �.
�- ' - _ .. . � �, _� _ �a ,..�y .�;� ,,,,
� �'�� � �r . � '�"°-.�to..� �-.�.
�`":.."1�-.m�, i� ._ :�'cYi,..�.e^`-.� , ,< _ .
Figure l. MoviRg a building in Philadelphia in 1799
One of the earliest illustrations to be found of house moving in America is ihis l799 engraving by William Birch and Son. which
illustra[es a small Frame building being mo�ed by teams o(horses,
Note the use a(eross bracing to provide added support for the structure during its mo�e on wooden wheels- In the background is
the Walnut Sveet jaiE.designed by master builder'architect Robert Smith fn 1 773-74.and sited directly opposite the State House Yard.
This view is one of twenty-eight engravings included in "The City of PhYladelphia in the State o� Pennsylvania. �lorth America as it
Appeared in the Year 1800" published by Wfllfam Birch on December 31. 1800, �Photograph: Collection of the Library of Congress�
�
16670
�
has played an important part in the tradition of �a�e the same aest�etic relationship to its new site.
house moving everywhere. National or comrnunity Thus the selection of a new site,appropriate for the
pride has also played a role in decisians to mo�e building, plays an important role in the success of
important buildings and even whoie kowns. the reloration project.
In recent years, ane of khe most common rea- When the decision is made to move a histqric
sons for moving a building has been the construc- structure, careful consideration musE be given to
tion or widening of a street or highway (figures 2 determining what aspect of the structure contrib-
and 3).In the past,other circumstances which have utes most toward qualifying it as worthy af pres-
necessitated a building rekocation include: mo�ing ervation. Factars to be evaluated m9ght include:the
a counry seat, retreatiRg Frorn a rising tideline, the uniqueness of the building type, its craftsmansh3p,
installation or widening of tracks,and the discovery some outstanding decorative interior painking, an
of a valuable vein of iron ore ar cnak beneath an unusual structural system, ihe nature of the build-
exising town.A majority of the more recent buiiding ing fabric itself,or even the relationship of the build-
relocation projects in the United States have been ing to its setting. The method se�ected far the
undertaken as alternati�e to demolition.A second- building relocation process shoufd reflect the im-
ary factor has been economEc--it may have been portance of saving just such a significant feature.
cheaper to move an existing sEructure than to con- If it is essential ta preserve a unique or obsolete
struct a r�ew one. Although most of the buifdings method of [imber framing, for exampie, it is irn-
which have been relocated in t�e last two centuries portant not to sever the structure in a way that will
probably were not tho�ght historically significant be conspicuous after it has been reassembled.
in their own time, now the preservation of the ar- Even though such a method is ohen tedious, time
chitectural and historical qualities oF old buildings consurning, and may require careful dismantling
is khe primary reasan for moving them. Relocation oF the indtviduaf Framing members, the result wil!
may be the only way to sa�e these now histor�c be worth the effort.This procedure was used in the
structures. disassembly of the Gruber Wagon Works (see the
Moving a historic structure, whether intact or in case study,this report},necessitated by the exposed
a totakly or partially dismantfed state, unavoidably interior Framing oF that structure.
desEroys some of the historic fabric and lessens the Althaug� the art of house moving is neither a
historic iniegrity of the building. Some building new nor technically complex inventian of the 20th
rypes lend thernselves to moving better khan others. century,engineering a building mo�e must be done
A smaq frame structure,whic�can be mo�ed intact, with care to ensure the safe and successful relo-
is unquestionably easier to relocate, with less �is- cation of a historic structure. It cannot be over-
turbance to its integrity, than a large multi-storied, emphasized that such buildings should be moved
masonry building. Often richly ornamented with oniy as a last resort, and if they are moved, pre-
plaster comices, moldings, and elabarately carved cautions rt�ust be taken so that the 1�istoric signif-
woodwork, this type of building may require disas- icance of the building is not destroyed ir� the
sembly in order to be moved. process. If those who are about to err�bark upon
such a protect follow the advice given in the text
Often the ariginal site and its relationship to the that foilows, their relocation project should be
historic structure is as important as the building greatly facilitated, with the result that the structure
itself. A re{ocated building, even if placed on a ter- retains its architectural integriry, and is harmo�i-
rain similar to where it stood pre�iously,will seldom ously integrated with its new site.
2
16671
�
_ �. i
- ==� �� -=
-=_ __�,
- �, �
_ �
- �
-_ - -- �_��
__-_=-_ -- =-- r � _
�' _-�� _—_ -� f � - - � � b
h - a C i ea � e C
- a
Figures 2-3: Moving a brick house In fYew York�n the 1830s
When David Stevenson, a civil engineer from 5cotland, published his "5ketch of the Civil Engineering of EYorth America�� in 1838
{an account oF his three month-long travels through the United States and Canada), his fascfnation with the phenomenon of house
moving led him to include an entire chapter on this subject in�is book.
[n consequence of the great vafue of iabour,the Americans adopt,wfth a view to economy,many mechanical expedients,which,
in the eyes of$ritish engineers, seem very extraordinary, Perhaps the most curious of these,is the operation of moving houses,
which is oken practised in fVew York.
With the afd of ihe skeici�es induded here.Mr.Stevenson proceeded to explain to h�s readers the manner in which a four story brick
raw house, 5� feet long by 25 feet wide.at 130 Chatham 5treet in lYew York Ciry was moved back 14 Feet 6 inChes from the newly
widened street. The house, supported by logs on beams labeled (b), (F) and (g�, was moved by working screw-jacks (h) attached
horizontally to beams labeled (e).pushing fvnvard the upper beams(d)which slide on the}ower beams{e)which serve as a sort vF
track on which the house moves. These beams (d and e) are weil greased. and a groove on the upper beams and corresponding
"feather (projectian or tongue)on the surFace aF the lower beam keeps the building moving in the right direction. Because the lower
beams (e) form the "path." they musi be extended resling on a firm foundation accardingly until the siructure reaches its new
foundation. if the building is to be moved farther than che length oF the horizontal screw-jacks (about 2 (eet). the screw-j�7cks must
be unFastened,then reaFfixed to the beam{e},and the same process repeated.
Mr. Stevenson was particularly impressed by the Fact that the building s accupants had not bothered to move their Furniture befare
the rnove,and"was astonished to Find"they had left piCtures and mirrors hanging on the walls.Although the adual time spent moving
the house l9 feet 6 inches was only 7 hours,the campiet'son d the project took a total of about 5 weeks.�Illustrated in David Stevenson,
��Sketch of the Gvfl Engfneering of IYorth America;� London,John Weale,Architectural Library, 1838]
3
16672
Figure 4: Hote3 Pelham.Boston �
Probably the earliest instance of the relocation of a large ma- �
sonry structure took place in Boston in 1869.when ihe seven- �
story Hotel Pelham was moved 6ack to permit the widening of .y .a"r'r-,
.r� ���.�. ..
Boyleston Street.Constructed oF freestone and 6rick,the build-
ing covered 5.800 square feet and its weight was estimated at � �� � �� , �
���� ' �� �� ,
5,000 tons.According to a coniemporary report in ihe Journal . � "�
oF the Franklin fnstitute, there was some question about the . r �" � '�' k .� *� �y
feasibilfty o(such a rnove, but experts were consulted who de- , ,�'� �� ��. � � � �'" a
dared it possible, as well as less expensive ihan the alternatfve ��`� �
oF cuttin off a ortion of the front to allow for the wfdened �' � �� �' "
sireet. The buildPg was moved a tatal of 13 Feet 10 inches at •`�,����� �-� � � � E� � �.�; � � ��� ��
a rate oF about I inch every 5 minutes. 7hrough an elaborate ,� � ��. �"�''�"""� �"
� � f i
system. incorporating a combination of 904 rollers and 72 �; #��� �� � � �r �,` ��� ��>d�3�i
screws,the structure was pushed along iron rails.The complete �� � � ►. �� � �' ` f ��t,Ja� '`
€ - ��tl•+ �
removal process took approxfmately 3 months. during which F� �. 3-'�' r;- j
time the First Aoor businesses, and several of the apartment �'�E�� �� �� [' � �! s—'- ^M ; � �
tenants remaine�in residence.with plumbsng and gas services ,��,��p�� �� �/ � � � � t -�;��,
kept in continuous operation through t4�e use af fiexible tubes. � . ��� �� ;� �� - -
� �
�Photograph: Courtesy of the $ostpn Public Library Print De- � � � p �� � . --�° 4
partment� 4 �• � �� �.
� ._��; � � ��
� �. •,� � ���;
,�, ��,�-_.-. ; �,� ``:
�~`� � , ..
._`'� � _. � ��
, �-
a� `Y��'�•r
,.��x.:°�
� { �� �r��
�� d¢ 5 � Y
w�� ,� ,��� � . i� .�^r.
}}} �.� � . /��"'�[� � _� '` .
�[ � .�.� � � ..�; � ���i����.L'= � s���' �9 ����
S
� ' i "�� �" .. . _-m i�'i'
�-'^". 4� � ;.I �'' '^,.�,. � „r. �� �� ..;. �f
. � �y , 'Y'�""'"� r ��+�
� r,�. � .. ��o' '�.5�-. ' '.1 .\'� �i(� y� ��.�Il,k
{i'� �'` !��e}. "0 � ; Y � �S1. p. � t '��' 4\ r�.�6.y'Ca.. ��eo��
�;.. j: `��` � 1 '
� 6�{'sa�i F T �F � L .i:�� � ,� �� '��, '�� �� ��� � �
�� ��� �-� ,�: � - �.
� �. �}�� � ,•.^�� r--"� ..h,.
� : �.....r ��'-� � � F -�, � �. � �
m..
, ; ., � . �
,__
� .. ._ : . . ._
--�
� ' _ .
� : � ,, - , �: r � ------ p
��,. � }
��""-" �.� ,�i w",� �"�� �� � � �f� 1
� , ���. _ I��� {.i_�
.�—r•�'� �'��a �� �� � � ��� '' . �_
�
� '
, �, � ..P ���
i� � �� . .,�.��-- �;�
�F- F ,� � � � �=w � ::� ._�.
, .
, _: . .,
, , �-,.,,, ° .:
�r-y - �..�,.,� ' ..., . _
... � ���
...... .
� �,�.,�,� .. '�`"'�,: "'� � �
. ---.__ � �!s `
_ �r� . . „ •:
.,.--.�.-w.... . ., <
._ _m.a�`�";
�:� ' -- , ^ .
. 1:� ..s.,�- �.�m*,e,�B'w�$}���;,:os. I,.. ,.-.. . .. �� �, ,.
� .����� � '� \� '' -'....s+�,��"yw.� `$�,..." . . "�^ - ,-e-
..,
��10
.
. ... .. . . .. ��' .. .:�. �.
�
4
16673
-�t y' �,����.
.. ��=.,k� ' .
�- �,�' `�' `•:--�.
�;=�F,jt, ;-r �
.;, <
-��.�::;...
,�'._:':`-. •-�.�:,
r.
r�".e.;
�..
��
�
�� �.
_ �� .:� � �i..f.r�- �` 4_ $ f,.
� � t _ '`� � ,,.���� �'�, r, �-+-� � . �
���. .s. .��} tl- ! A MP . . �
:5. .< �+.- .
.�'� �W: ,v�� � fd� 'jJ
. . . .C�� �y� F � �.� y�q•�yyy ,b'�:
' ` �..iY�S.. 9::� � �i�.,-�; _ . ..
i 1 �.
'�ti,� y,:,� �=Y' - �..
���` � �.as„� Y'r � .:�' '.
�`,_' �:. i�'�= ;� _
�;� ��-� � �. �.�� �:
>
�,,• ,� � �, , --
�.V�.'iW.y: � �� : N^r�^,t� *r� .
-1.. � � b:.� x�4'.,°�� .- �d' , ..
C'�'i7�''e 2 . '^n ='� . . ' s� �
2 . ' � ��tir- . , ��°m
�. 5 �'�-4 ' -.. -� .� --- r , . .,. - e� �.;
�L �: � s �+ , a�"`� �wMr �.`
p�p�' �'��i� �ir-c�l'� � �u. .,�� h y� i ^'�sA ' -,r•.. 'V: . �� � ��:,,��r ..
�=.`�y .�,_�w'S.r��� �� .:..+ k'��tt` t�,y� '. �'��+ '� i �� ;t � » ` - -ro-;::� � ��,��`�"��'.✓`.
;,'�a,k14s��w�,._. .! w....�§J._�...,."� e u��" �. '•- r . "5�'..� .
.-. '� .��'.1-, �...
Figure 5: Caurthouse.Box Butte County,IYebraska
In 1889,when the Burlinglon Railroad was cut through Box Butte County,it bypassed the county seat of fVonpariel, passing instead
through two neighboring towns,Alliance and HemingFord.Clearly,the counry seat would have to be changed to one of the towns on
the railroad line. An election was held to deEermine whether Alliance or Herningford would have the honor of becoming the new
county seat.Through some questionable voting, Hemtrtgford was selected and a new courthouse was erected there.Ten years later
in 1899,the matter was still unresolved for many residents nf Nliance.and the question was put to the voEe agafn.Th#s time Alliance
won,and the county commissioners were Faced with the quandry oF what should 6e done about a courthouse for Alliance.
Rather than building a new courthouse. the county commissioners decided to purchase tMe 10-year old cvurtt�ouse fn Hemingford
and move it to Alliance, all for t�e amount of $1504.lronically,the caurthause was moved to its new location by the same railroad
thal eaused the relocation of the county seat in the first place.The structure,whlch measured approximately 45 feet by 54 feet by 40
feet high.weighing 95 tons,was mounted on nine pairs of railroad car"trucks' and piaced between four iarge,loaded caal cars w�ich
5erved as anchors. The courthouse was pulled by a locomotive to its new home 9 miles away.Accompanied by a train crew of 75,
which fecilitated the train�s progress by widening cuts where necessary,the train proceeded at ID miles per hour. The move eliclted
considerable attention. and the event was publicized with commemorative plates and silver spoons with the piciure and the date of
the move,Jufy 3, 1899.[Photograph:Courtesy of ihe Alliance 3(night Museum�
5
16674
� 3 �
� _.
f �
'�,`��� P �.
� �...� E �. ���.
��.�.,� '� �; � p�
s"t�°"' i ,y� 1�+� r
^�, yx`,���� �''� ' ��: .
�„`'�� ��� � " ' � " �;,;a
�� °�r;.•�, „"'� '�
��.����e��� �..� �
M_A
�'�j� ���~ .
� �A'r � wy�,�n •�'
d �� �
..�.�/�� !✓.p'"i',y �� �M.y�? ��(�g
. � J" Jl��. � �Y
, -n" r�.,✓A��F �e �t� " a
_ `ti . +r ", �. t: � �a.�� .
"t y.�.s�� �'fti f. ��' ��7.r� � � .� � ,
�_�� 'r q < .
w ;��.��� � � � r�.a� �� ,
i�' P.' °s"" "+� �.,�" x k"`� r„, •T � .
' '� �
� � r� �, � ! " �.s+. �.r .�a
�" '.. .M �. � .
.� ��ii �o"°� .�SjC,��:..
V�'��,,��,�r+�p �.�"'.d.-",�.""� `"���;`� � x
� ���� . �� z� �
� ♦ �� � , r� 1 �� E.✓� i ��- ,iR� .t
; � �� � . `' � f � ,y,�. .� . .
`�. �t.p ��a�.,. � 'a`�"'a, ^�y_�'
� ��f� �
� 6 . � ,���_ . t M yy�� , = . .
B 6 � � p� ' i
' . T'f f �� ^�y 4J b . .
' �� - �"� •, '�. "� � 4 ��y �_.���y„�a• �kf� ,�;�1"J
� s � �
� � '�' ] • {�� '"��A�1� � . ��'�r �}1� 1
°� , � #e�.� µ l.� 1
;�;'.:r?� _ �, �=�'S�, �� s°�iClx3�,;..�.�-�"_�,'L M„ .' +
�4� ....,�� a b, c•
tir
� .�, ���"��'� �"� :". ' "��'.�-�t,-a�* � ��i
+� S ""+
. � , '�k � � ��lh. ��' M ;,,���a���
�� ����,,,,. ��. — - �
� « , ti _ ��.t ifif""'� �,a, .•���
,y z� - ".,y� ' ��' �:.�'�'� ��-mw
" . �'w j � �•� �,- �� '§°�i 'L'�
f +;,: . . "_ ``�''i��-5 ,t�'e
�. �;� - . a
��.��w°.s aK�� w . �' , � a � � . . " � �.. , � ���. n ---
Flgure 6: CapWin Samuel Brown's Mansion.Brown's StaEion.�ennsyhrania
Buildings can be moved vertically,up or dowre a steep hillside, benches abauE 30 feet apart on which the house could "resi'
as wel3 as horizontally,a fact well illustrated by this photograph during its journey up the hifl.
oF the relocation of the Captain Samuel Brown mansion at
Brawn's 5tativn, now part of PitLsburgh.Originally construded 1 he building was lhen raised a small amount at a time using
in 1868 on the edge of the Monongahela River,the house had hand jacks,so that eight walls of timber cribwork could be built
to be moved in 19Q3 because of!he conscruction oF the 8alti- up beneath it This cribwork was strengthened by 8-inch by 8-
more and Ohio railroad tracks. By this time the house was in incM waling pieces, and it was sway-6raced by �/z inch chains
the possession of James Ward, Jr., a relative oF the ortginal wit#� turnbuckles. When the buifding had been raised 30 feet,
owner. Since he owned a large secUon of orchard land at the it was puiled onta the first bench using two winches located at
top oF the bluff ]60 feet above the house,Mr.Ward decided to the top of the cliFf.Each winch was driven by two horses,using
lift the building to the higher area. 2-inch Eine with four-paR blocks. This operation was repeated
The feat of moving the house, 85 feet by 40 feet and weighing �our more times until the house had been placed on its new site,
about 800 tons,was planned and executed by Lfiie John Eichleay, Z0� feet back from its former site and 1 b0 feet above it The
Jr. Company,an engineering firm in Pittsburgh.The firm sup- move required over 20,000 wooden beams and timbers,which
plied information for an artide about the move to the Scientific had to he Vanspor#ed to the site in twenry railroad cars. Because
American.In order to carry out this move.it was first necessary the 540,000 cost o(moving the Brown mansion considerably
to insert B large timbers, 12 inches by 16 inches by 85 feet in ex�eeded that of its originai consiruction,it is believed that Ihe
length,beneath the building,and then to lay approximately 200 move was underta�Cen primarily out of a desire to preserve a
steel roeedie beams 7 inches in diameter between the timbers Family inheritance.A(cer such great eFfort,it is sad ta relate that
and the building structure.While this work was being performed, �e sVucture was totaEly desVoyed by fire 10 years]ater,in 19]3.
the side of the cliff was"stepped out'into Four verticalty placed [Photograph:Courtesy o[the Camegie Library o(Pittsburgh�
6
16675
-��
�:'�-'t
F�. �§
�� ` .�
��� s ��
f ,w
�`��� � �
�'^ �,
��. a� � .
� =�:
�� �
��
�' ��
�
:�.::� ' � �
? �� ..� � _ � � �� 3F. �
� - � � .
_ �j� : �� �
�Ye xet p� �'�� p f � ..,�,7���e t'
T �-� J � �
a � �' � � ii
-��.�b� � � •t �� �� -�s3 .@.±�y� � ,� �
�� � �' � �2
_ - �s ��� °�' P y� � - { �_ , � �. +y,� �e`�a �
-.eK 9�'Ys-� t � ��
��,qL �'� � _
� � ��: ��;`�'",:�. � „ � � ����-��. '
���� „�� 7�� .._� i _-�d�; �'`.,�: ��
� _ �' �-r � _�""`� y
.�`-._ — �,- ;� r "' ��; �
�:�. '�y ,� `��;,;� �,������'�� . .. ���.
� � f 1 s � '' f'.�. 9'�k - w
�
� ,��� � � �.,
� l...
�`�° � �=�
_::�-..
,
t"`�4 -.,.�..� �, � ��
°."�;� ��» �v.'".`."-"�':.' � � _ � -- _-.._ __ _..
� � ' . "-_
_._ ,,�r... � ` -
�F�-�_..,_ . . �_.. -_ __ ___ ____ '
,...�., =.ry:.:e�^�-:o:�..:_.�,.,
Fgures 7-$: Hibhing,Minnesota
Discovery of a large veir�of iron ore beneath approximately one-third oF the town oF Hibbing in l9]9.led to possibly the most extensive
building relocation project undertaken in the United 5tates at that time.The structures within the sixteen-block area covering this vein
of iron ore were gradually moved over a period of about three years to a new area on the outskirts o[town. The immense scale af
the prpjeci involved a great deal of manual labor and required considerable skill, as well as the use of numerous types of maving
equiprnent:primarily steam locomotive trectors with traction belts and jacks,horse teams and wagons,and heavy trucks and logs.
These two photographs suggest the variety of buildings moved during this relocation praject—including houses, a hotel, a church,
the ciry market, clubs and many other commercial and private structures. Some buildings were constructed of brick and others of
wood.The size of this project prefgured a similar ptoject undertaken halF a century later in Most, Czechoslovakia, in order to reacF�
a rich vein of coal lying below the sur7ace oF the village.(See figures 12-17 for an il�ustrated description of that relocation project.)
�Photographs:Courtesy of the Minnesota Historicai Society�
�� .. �
."- , j`'�:_
��� '°,t- ` �..
�''�° � •,, -- �•
�,� � : ;�_ �,
�. � e.. �, �,
:�
� � ; � �
��. s� �� ;�� .
d;
. =r r. �. r # � �; _r � _
� �. L, � ��_ -- �� �: e, �_
.. . . . .W Ts._ ..- . �� ��. --�-�� .o �.
'��
t ..-� � _ �� �_ � ' �,g�� q
�. . F- ��- -� �r.._�i�•'�: � �`�t'I. '. .. �- �
. �iN1r �3.. — .
� .
�Y" ..a -. . �-er^,^ ,_..� _ �.+a,.�
,� ��;� � � ��.���t��� �� � �F..
a � �
r,� �� _ � �.
� 4 r . _ :y� #� �. � �—
,� � �1`� w 'p �• � 'jy, .,�• {•�.
'�'c _ ��s � N y'�:
' ..� _ , � _ ��' � �'3 �.
� � � ,. . � '� � �� `� 16676
- __ -- ` ,�- � � _� � ;"�
;,��.. � _ "
�,m.�"'� - � �,..
'r�Ap.
r�i f`. '
f � `�
._�k � ' ; _ ����
#���� ' ' ��`_
.' `�..;� ,,, r�
st' `s�� � . �. � ..
. . -����% it i�Fi �
. .. „�" ,- � "�" ' �
� � �� �� �i�
, ,.. � � � v
i `� . ��
r�- w 1 , .
��°��� ► --•���`
� �� � .a _, . �� i
� e� .:�:
'�,c ��;, �.�_d
� � � . -r`�-� .
�""'"� �� ' ���
� ,�: � +� �".�• ��,��: �+� �,
�� ,,,�:';$� „ �� r-' "ti'�'=',;,��, "�-`a"^ `� .�� �`�=�'•�'`� + _
�-� �"i �-iF/'q�i�:��"�`� :. �`��`• _,'k�.►� �:.�Y...:�+�',;.
�'�� -� ��`�"� � _ ` .�
y _ ,:�v � � � ^ ��'�� ...� �
� 1 '�.r�`d¢"":,� -„�-�. -_
S� ''�i..,�,. w,�:e-94'!��_Ilrt»��..wr m,.
:.;' � . .- . .
� �,
�m, �_. ...'�� . ,:,�.��,����y�.� .!q►
�y —�r �
a� '
" �,V'''.,�` 1 P�" ._�4"""+� KP�� �� `
.-. -'°iP'u''$"w-.^�a �a'�'� _-;d_ . �--.�� e. _,='°}°-`� �"� .c�� . .
'�r�'9 w a,�a�i� �'•<' ' ... .: . .
� ri�
» .„ .. � '::� ;. R �.�+} •.�. .�� '� ..
�..�,.. . � � . . .'� .. ._ .
�- r. .
.�� + T „'��1 . _ _ � ._
. ..�_�''� . .
Figure 9: Perry Mansion,Bay Ridge,fYew York
In 1923 when the Perry Estate,the last remaining large tract in the Bay Ridge se�tion of Brookiyn overlpoicing f`iew Yqrk Bay,was to
be broken up into smallet parcels of land,the 60-year old Perry Mansion was moved from its original and somewhat elevated location
to another slightly lower site on the opposite side of a busy street.To further complicate the move,the roadway had to be kept open
for traffic The house was firstjacke i up and placed on cribbing,which was then extended to the edge oF the roadway,and the house
was moved on rollers to the end of the cribbing 28 feet above the street.Because the opposite bank was lower,envugh of the cribbing
under the house was removed to bring the house down to a height equal to that of the other bank. Cribbing was then built out[rom
the otl�er side,lea�ing a space large enough to allow the passage oF cars.7his opening was bndged with long heavy timbers,and the
house was pulled across,where it was resituated 200 feet from its original lo�ation.
This view shows the Perry Mansion on its cribbing at the edge of tF,e hill, prior to erection of the bridging across the street. This
photograph was featured in the March 1, 1923 "Braaklyn baily Eagle '�Photograph:Courtesy o€the Brooklyn Public Library, Broolclyn
Callection]
8
16677
1
�
�,��:
.,� �
�.
�°' ' ��''� ,, ,w�
_ � Pr �- � � ,.,•
_ • � "�, - �...
„� , �; �' � "�a .�� , ���,��"� •����
� �.
�4 ���r � `
- ..m 1Ja� �:��� � '� ^"�y�.wy�- � �,� '' '!
;'.� . .� � �` � . } .
,TY "� ("<<1Rs`�' ' "/
1
6 �; - 3� "�jr.. . ,d R, �
�7 �
('FIQ., . r' 1� �.� �.} •y- �� r�p� , --
$�^`d'� :.��W ,. � rr�,��`.• ��a ✓
;�y} . .. a� „�f _.w: � ` �+}-
iy������ �5 �.�� , '4 ' . rV S.
' `..`NX� �N... . x �ry .� _ v . �
:��' ���j iY�WI1LL- ,._ _'^a�y�;"
� t� �
^ t AR,.v F�� • �f�" �
�€i' !M _� I �� �+., �� � ��'s ' � �f� :_nJ
���� � � y �11�I�r� 1� �Z ��,� '`��• ��. �.� �'�P
�
Y.. �� � �.-.��r ,.✓� � �
� � r . .. i " _ � .
Figures 1�1 1: "i.ucy,"The Margate Elephant
"Lucy,' the Margate Elephant is probably one oF the most un- ,
R
usual structures known[o have been moveG in the Llnited States.
Built in 188] at Margate Ciry, 1`lew Jersey,as a real-estate pro-
motion gimmick (her design was patented in 1882}. "Lucy'
epitornizes the type of "architectural fally" popular in the late
19th century. The siructure stands 58 feet high, 72 Feet long
and 26 feet wide.Lucy's shape was achieved by appiying curved.
multifaceted waod ribs over the box frame. These ribs were ;
sheathed with thousands oF yellow pfne 6oards. many cut in
unusual and irregular shapes,and finally the entire structure was `
covered with smal! sheets (approximately 2 feet 6y 2 feet) of
heavy terne plate,tatalling I 2,000 square feet. %
Over the years the interfor o(the structure, reached by spiral :�, _
stafrs located m the rear legs, served as a summer cottage, a
tavern. anc€ a tourist attraction. 'Lucy�� was listed on the new
Jersey Reg�ster of Historic�andmarks in 1966.althouyh unused
and in a poor state of preservation. Eventually "Lucy's�' plight i
was brouyht to the attention of local citizens who formed a"Save �� ;
Lucy Committee.' "Lucy"was donated to the Commfttee.whfCh ,�� 1 �
was able to raise enough money ia move her to a city-owned �^ '-' � �
site only two blocks from the oriyinal during the summer of ; -- �, �
� „,
1970. � �4,t�' � - ,
In order to carry out the move, "Lury was raised from her _ ..�
;.�:,�.
location by hydrauli�jacks and wooden crib6iny;she was placed
on a heary steel frarnework carriage and supported 6y three Following the move. "Lucy was Ilsted in the National Regisier
sepatate sets vf wheels. Restiny on this carciage, "Lucy was oF Historic Places.and thus was able to receive financial assist-
towed to her new site and lowered onto her new foundation. ance from the Department of Housing and fJrban Development
The foundation consisted ot five concrete pads for the lour legs and a grani from the t`lational Park Servl�e ior restoration. The
and trunk,each i 0 (eet square by 3 feet deep, which were set restored structure is now used as the Museum of fVew Jersey
on 26 foot long wooden pilings driven into ihe sand. Shore Hfstory. �Photographs: Courtesy of John Milner Assoc.]
9
16678
�
Figures 12-17: Church of The Vrgin Mary.A1ost,Czechoslovakia
The discovery of an 87-million ton deposit oF high quality coal beneath a ciry led to one of the most impressi�e and technically complex
relocaGon projects ever undertaken. This four year relocatian during the mid-1970s in�ol�ed moving the historic section of Most,
Czechosiovakia, ta a new site,one-half mile away.The relocation of the 14lh-century Church oF the Virgin Mary provided the most
dramauc sight. In order to ensure the safety of this architecturally signiCicant church,Czechoslovakian engineers at Inova, a research
and development organization in Prague,developed an intricate moniroring and control system with the assistance of Hewlett-Packard
elecVonic calculators.It is interesting to note that the Czechoslv�akian government spent approximately $20 million on this relocatfon
project.
�����, �"i'y`, ,... '� �
�� � � " „�``'� �� � � � , �
�� � :`;�_. � .. ""�+ ���"''-
�.�a� -�, �`'` -�r` - ��' �,
�r�.� � �� � i�
n. �
r ,
� � �
��"� ���K � �. ,,,,t,. `�
�` � �
«: � � ' �` "'�
? ,
.$ _ ;
tA �� � � � � � �
Y ��`. '� � . t` �y �- ��.
��1�
. ��F � . . . . .a��n- e�� �� �
� �ti. �v -� - �, � �t j '�<� �� ��� �
� } .
�� , '�� �
, �� .
r
,s.,r" , ' _' �w� �,�"r ��3 "`g��_� e�
.. .
u " s�'�� ' ��,����,(�' ���� ,
� ..�'.+a:��' >.��`�- ..,.. �,.c.., �_ . .-..e...� ,� :�' .. . .__ � �
Figure 12:The first step in the moving process was ro remove lhe later additfon nf a tower�not seen herel. Then a steel girdle was
consVucted,approximately 197 feet long by 97 feet wide by 103 feet high,to encirde the struc[ure.[Phocograph from a slide by Jack
�.Boucher, 1975� �
1�
16679
i
�--� � :� � ��; � ��
.s ,��.
' F� �.._-----�-,, `, � -
� �? *�, ��9�` .' I s � � < �_� . .
� �; `�.� �:� �.r.. ���.' - i�6�:
�, �" �� -���. ,��_ � ������� .�
� � � � . �� - ��r�,}
"� ��f[fn
� ; �.� _�-..'..�".....
- � �
�
'` �'� �
z. ;;
� -�: t
r,'��?,�,a`'�,' f ,e ' � k� ° _
� � ; o ,�N,��
'�� .��.��, � ,�� �' �=� , _'�
�
'p`� T" iF 3{_ . .�� :r= ��y�. �� �� �E . R -��
��'�:t����s(�'}�M� , rr `f�'p �, c �� 1
� r
� • i� �.
� ..j r
x�_
,5 `�w d' ,� �.` r�-4
� tr- � �v'
>s3� .,.'' " � .,.. ..,
��' , a�
� M �'- ���� �� � �xr `'`�i.
.����� � �� .��� fy'' � " �. r. ' ,y �.
�� �5'f• ����; -�a�a%r � ��-`^"'.���" _. . , r' '. _ . . 1
�gures 13-14;The weight of the church and its steek suppor[ive superstructure,together totaling 10.560 tons, was raised to a11ow
the emplacement o€more than 50 trolleys(figure 13)which carried the church over four sets of train tracks to its new site(figure ]4).
�Figure 13 frorn a slide by Jacic E.Boucher, 1975.Figure 14 photograph by W.Preiss,Dresden. ]975,courtesy of Jack E. Boucher�
' �
- - - - � � �
~ �� 'i�i. ---
, � � � r�' �� + i '� r,�'�rR�
' e�." '�I ,y��' � '� �� ti � �- '
-�. ?�t � . +.r'T• �I �( � ��
�+ � _brs�. �• '���� .� �-� 4'��� '�,,;:. .-�..f.' r a
�i. '
.�X.". . � �p .. � ` '�•
..� .. � C �' "'.Y_ ,R�� �4� ' .age"ym
e4� ' --�.. r' ���,�td �'r:�� , d. .t x . .,�>
�AM�« � ..T� �_. �7 ��.r .�, ..� . `�_ -4,*� 3 h�
�. .`.rt--. '3` �'♦ . �.f�, q�- _ � v � a`�� �
�� � ' {
�,% � � �;r .�yy . � .. .x� "� Y� V�
� - d.?n. .oy�.. „F . `
��i -�'f t�� �$. . . . � � `. '�+ '.�. i�^'.�.`F .
� ��� �' � �
t .' ' � . ���•��� � ��,
� F ��.� . ,y.,.N. .: �' eC' t�
.�� - " ,[ .. � .. �'��' rt� _� t';.
�„ ..� r .' „_�_� � ..� ��e:
�,�_ � � �� ��� ",� � �w�
'�� "` : � s., `f
«� �_ 'a8' �" '' �Y ;a ��' +� ��„�'�1
`v.� .���.��,',. „ ;b „ 's.r� � ry
' �-:t .��y.%m .�_. .. �`�`'"y '.�` .a - ..__ ,_ -""_�...k. �
��
16680
.�'�,i� ... � ..rY' �� � w
� `d� 'r
. � -
Figure 15:This diagram illustrates the detailed system of exterior
� _ and interior bracing used to support the church,and the route
� � '• it was to Follow during the move. �Photograph: by W. Preiss,
. � ; Dresden, 1975,Courtesy ofJack�.Boucher�
+ .
�
1 !
►
�
� -, "
t .
�
§
Fgure lfi:Each of the sixteen interior masonry piers se�arating
• • the na++e (rom the aisles was girdled with a steel support ex-
+ 3 � �� tending from the Floor to the springing of the vaults.
� � ' The steel supports encasing the pier5 were then connected lon-
Y � gitudinally by steel beams which were in tum supported by the
� additian oF�ertical steel beams between every two piers. Th[s
i � same bracing system was further reinfosced by a similar ar-
e, - rangement of tie beams extending across the width o( the
e_ '
� � church.Such thorough supportive measures were necessary ta
F . ensure that the interior angles of the church remained constant
� � during the move. Even though the church was moved very
* slowly(approximately 1 inch per minute?. a specially designed
C '
� i, hydroelectric stabilization system was developed using two Hew-
� . _ ' lett-Packard 9821 calculators which continuously monftored any
`-. _�_� � possible shiFting in the church structure.This system was linked
• to sensors attached to the trolleys.and any change m the a�ign-
' �L�� � ment of the structure,as minute as'%zs of an inch,was equalized
�!� with the assistance of the computers. (Photograph: W. Preiss.
��T Dresden, l973,caurtesy ofJack�.Boucher�
� � � �^ `� � �
� �
�-. 9d:
,/. 4. ., � s '
� » .
� .�� - �G l, � , �
j �r --.�.. k �
Z.,Iff' .s..iw �. � - � .
� ' � '1'h Yr�� y
-�,�,: .i. y ,�
� F � �
k
e y �
9 7'. ,�f�a .�
4T�'3p � q '�, � � ,
q- ��fi . .� �� .
- � ..�7._ �l � �
t € � �"1" �, ':� �
� ' �� � � .� � ��°° ''�<<�� a�; s — � .
— _L�i�� � �,�,� ,�.
- � d :��. �, � .� � � � �1- � ��'
g � � �
_ ,� _ :� �-� r€� ���� � �- �� Y �:
v��� � a$ _�� �� ,�.� ��
��, �i - �:� � �4
.s z,
,:.. .
I. 4.�.
�-!� �� `_'� -..._.�'" � 3 .'9 �
9�/
r � � �
1 �
1
12
16681
�
�� g ,. _
�r�r �," ��..'�.
��.
� .. R �"�� � ,.. .�....._.y.,.' `,�� -
�� ��: e ..�f ,l�y .. -
�
!' , �_ - .::.. .. �-
�� y,�� _
:�� . � � y S�y•e^"� �
r_ �� �e-:� �� _ �� �-
� �"Y�x�
, - F'- _ � ..s. 3 ' � �
.�
,� �,A '� � �;� k �
,� � �_�; � � � ��
� - � . � � �
� �. �� ! � �,�'` � �_ �
_ �'`Y — �' . ,�" =4_��
+ � . } a. ,' .*14
`� '� ' `��
� .
R �° r -` , ,�
�,� .�. �, ��' � ; ��,�,._ � ���
�" � � � �� �.. � ��
..�, � ' tl . ��q. � �e t k .
4
� •.� t� .� .• . �f�"�
� �� :w�r .� �..
Fgure 17: This photograph further iHustrates the efabarate measures taken to stabilize the structure. The groins of the intricately
detailed lierne vaulting were braced to cushion them from possible shocks during mo�ing.and to make certain that this area of the
church was tied into the monitoring system.[Photograph frorn a slide byJack�.Boucher, 1975)
13
16682
�
Community and �ederal In�olvement
Prior ta beginning a buifding move, and indeed, (2) If it is proposed that a structure listed.in the
e�en beFore acquisition,be certain that the structure National Register be moved and the State or Fed-
is free from legal encumbrances, and that its re- erai agency wishes the property to rernain in the
moval from a community will not generate iil will National Register during and after the move, the
taward the agency or individual initiating the move. State or Fede�al agency must submit documen-
Wrikten authority shouEd be obtained, if necessary, tation prior Eo the rr�o�e which should discuss:
from the local historical commission; in some {i)The reasons for the move;
areas, the consent of the cornparabie state levef (ii)The effect an the properry's historical integrity;
officials may also be requiEed. !f th� structure in and
question holds a prominent position in the midcffe (iii)The new setting and generaE en�ironmenk of
af a historic district or a street that presents a unified the proposed site, including e�idence that the pro-
appearance, its remo�al might leave an awkward posed site does not possess historical significance
gap or destroy the rhythmic harmony of the street that would be adversely affected by the intrusion
ar neighborhood. In this kind oF situation, a design of the structure. In addition, photographs showing
salution agreeaE�le to both sides wifl have to be the proposed location must be sent along with the
worked out between the owner of the property and docurr�entation. ARy such proposal submitted by
the loca! residents or historica3 cammission. How- a State must be appro�ed by the State re�iew baard
ever, in mast cases, khis is not a problem: if re�o- and wil! continue to follow normal review proce-
cation is the a�Ey way to sa�e the building, the site dures.
of the building is ob�iously required for some other
purpose. In this instance, it is unlikely the local res- (3) if the Hatiana! fZegister approves the pro-
idents or historical commission will ob�ect ta re- posal,the property wilk remain on the National Reg-
moval of the threatened structUre. ister dt�ring and after the rriove unless the integrity
Except for concern over the actual removaf oF pf the property is, in some unforeseen manner,
the building itself, the greatest degree of commu- destrayed.If khe National Register does not approve
nity interest may be with site clearance and recla- the proposal,the properry will be automatically de-
mation subsequent to the remaval of the structure. leted from the Nattonal Register when moved.If the
Occasionally, fees for the use of town equipment State ar Federal agency has proof that previously
and personnel are involved at this phase of the unrecognized significance exists, or has accrued,
project if such assistance is utiEized in deanup and the State or Federal agency may resubmit a nom-
site stabilization. ination For the property as outlined below.
Relocating Pro�erties Listed in the (4) E� tt�e e�ent that a structure is moved, dele-
National Regis#er tion from the National Regisker will be autornatic
�nless the abo�e procedures are followed prior to
Properties listed in the Natianal Register of Mis- the move. !f the properry has already been r�-ioved,
toric Places must be rr�oved in accordance u+ith the it is the 5tate or Federal agency's responsibility to
foUowing regulation�Part 60, Chapter 1, Title 35 notify the Nationa] Register. Assuming that the
of the Code oF Federal Regulstions—if the property
5tate or FederaF agency wishes to have the struc- �
is to remain listed.
{]) Properties listed in the f�ational Register ture feentered in the h{ational Register, it must be
sho+�Ed be moved only when there is no feasible norninated again on new forms which should dis-
alternative for preservation. When a property is cuss:
moved, e�ery effart should be made to reestablish {i)�he reasons for the rnove;
its historic orientation, immediate setking,and gen- (ii)The effect an the pra�erty's historical integriry,
eral environment. and
14
16683
�
(iii) The new setting and general environrrEent, Tax Re(orm Act
inciuding evidence that the new site does not pos- property owners also should be aware that under
sess historicaE significance that would be ad�ersely section 2]24 of the Tax ReForm Act of 1976, a
affected by the intrusion of the site. historic structure which has been moved, as well
En addition,new photographs showing the structure as the land on which the histaric structure was
at its new location must be sent along with the previously situated, may nat be eligible to receive
re�ised nomination. Any such nomination submit- cer[ain tax benefits, and indeed may be subject [o
ted by a State must be approved by the State review ta�c pro�isions. Since this decision will be made on
board. a� individuat or case-by-case basis, it is im�ortant
(5) Properties moved [as a result of a Federal, that owners of historically significant structures
federally assisted, or federally licensed project� in (listed in or eligible for listing in the fVational Reg-
a manner consistent with t�e comments of the ister), consult with the Office of Archeology and
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation,in accord Historic Preservation, Heritage Conservatian and
with its procedures(36 CFR Part 800), are granted Rec�eation Service, befare they embark upon a re-
an exception to � 60.16(b). Mo�ing of �roperties location project which might render the properry
in acrord with the Advisory Council's procedures ineligible to rereive tax benef�ts for rehabilitation.
should be dealt with individually in each memo-
randum of agreement.
15
16684
�
Selecting a Mo�ng Contractor
Earfy in the project, it will be necessary to locate
a professional building mover to relocate the struc-
ture. The choices rrtay be limited, depending on
the location and camplexiry of the project. No in- � °
dividuals and few institutions ha�e either the nec-
essary equipment or sufficiently Erained personnel � �
to undertake the moving of a building. This gen- �
erally holds true even if the awner ar agency's staff �
.
artisans do much of the preliminary preparation For - `
an "intact" move or completely disassemble the �rj � -� '
structure. Heither party is likely to have vans or fow- - ""J'
bed trailers available to transport the buiEding com-
ponents. '�
IF possible, employ a Firm with experience in
rnaving historic structures. If none is available, try
to locate a firm which shaws an interest in and `
some sensitivity to F�istoric materials and under-
stands t�e appropriate techniques. It wauld be ad- "" _ ` �' - �-' � ��
visable to work closel with the movers, no matter �`�'�`�' '
Y -�:�a��-
what their level of expertise.
In some unusual ir�stances it may be necessary i
to contract with two building moving firms if one
does not have sufficienk equipment for the job. -•-� _ � ,..
Sometimes it is possible far a contraFtor to rent •~������''' � _ ���
additional equipment. Screw a�d hydraulic jacks, F
cribbing and bridging timbers, wheeled doilies,
cranes, tractors, and traifers are the primary tools ''"�"'�'"�`--��=;�:.;:,"" _
oF the building moving contractor. Dur9r�g recent _Ya�r;- � �A - " '
i
years even helicopters (figure l8), ships, and � �� -- £� �- '
barges (figure ]9) have been utilized in building �ur� l8: 1�+foving by hellcopter
relocation,while steam engines,train cars (see fig-
Illustrated here is a kess traditional method of moving a small
ures 5, 7, 8) and teams of oxen were commonly building. When Mystic Seaport deeided to acquire this linle
employed for such projects in earlier times. "Ha3fway House" in 1968, it was apparent that iu location on
Adeq�take insurance coverage must be pro�ided sand dunes, halfway becween two kife-saving stations on Cape
fOl all PhBseS Of the Opefdtio�, and It IS the re- Cod, made it quite inaccessible and almost impossibke to re-
sponsibifity oF the contractor to provide the buifding move using conventional land or sea veh+cles.With the help o€
the CI.S. Marine Corps, the Halfway House was a�rlifted onto a
owner with certificaEes of proof that he is covered �at-bed trailer which had been placed in a nearby visitor parking
against both public liability and workmen'S COm- lot. The process was cnmplicated by the blowing sand raised
pensation. Public �18�IIIly COVECd92 f11dY Vdf}�, bUt by the rotating helicopter blades,and by the unexpected weight
$100,000 to $300,�00 FOr indi�idual injury, and of the Halfway House which caused a loss of engine power,
from $3�d,Qfl� t0 $�aa,000 for a grou� injury are endangering the helicopter and pperator.Oniy after the extess
fuel was drained from the helicopter could the building be lifted
I'ee5orieble IIm1t5.The cOtltfaCtDf ShOuld dlso mdlR- Safely and removed to the trailer, on which it was transported
tain at least $50,000 praperty damage protection to its new location at Mys4ic Seaport. �Photograph: Courtesy of
as well as the amount of warkmen's compensation Mystic Seaport,Inc.�
16
16685
�
specified by the state or states within which the firm contractor, against the possibiliry of a joint suit re-
is operating. Workmen's compnsation is regufated su�ting from a serious accident.Cfnless the building
by state statute and, if a contractor does not carry is owned by a Federak or state agency, the owner
it, the owner may be held respo�sible for injuries should have replacement value insurance or� the
to the contractor's employees. Additionally, it is building. [t is also the nongovernmental owner's
advisable for the nongovernmental owner to carry responsibility to provide the contractor with a cer-
comparable coverage, to back up that held by the tificate dernonstrating all risk coverage.
}
, .._ _..�.
r �
�� ��, �^� G
�.�� �. . .d�k . `��-_�' "t-'- . �� �I��11
� �
..-� i, �'i ��
� 't. ` . ... , I'1 'i'�. � �jj� ri� eYi�- 'Ai '. I
. .
. j •
� . _ �^°...,u_ t� ��, �mxo �� �
E . � - �.
,-�'r' �--+:„ -
�~ y -�.
'
� � � --� �� m �� J Y -x�
� ,�'?�....�. �- ,t, ��,�y� - ". r _
P��4-. „ .r ,,,, .` - �` ,�•�ia._ . .. ..�.=..t ��'^. . _ ...
C - . � .,., . "s-� ---
w �
. _ _
fy.�.� ".�.�—".�`�� J�r's.�' -wT__. a,.. +�'.� �-�,_..��� r`--�w,�r�-:
,.a����., . :.ar'T-"L:��.-. .�-w:-'x-+'r`�+ �. �.►:�-�.7.7�.`-�-�.hsrr.�,.,,..�..�...- � . �w.. -$, ` 'W��.'�� .
�, __
�
__�f.� '�.-:"'+r-�-i�-.._� '��a" �- ^r--,.�'� � ��•-- .
�-u,. . J. ,�. "' ' _ �.,. _. �� . - .....� _ .
��_ �... . _._ . - '� - -x..��R - ` _.._"�w . .-._ .
�.�.... -� . ..�'°'""-. �-
�
-�� �
. �„a
, .._ �� ,-'� �xPGair�w•�.��-
,:...
... �—y, ._ . .. ' _."...��.�'�-�'
� � .. � � ,,;,,,,.,� _ -�--"t" V.
._,�.._.�.-�.ey....rr--^� .Ti . .�� �r ' . .. ... �'"`-.'+�"'"�-�"r _. .
. .... _ .� _� '� .,re.r ' _" _, �4-..
. -� � ���-'x� .:�s+.�. . �.� .,...-� -- �-'". �.�- _i' .:
—..rr
+ ..w ,�..ti � �.. -++'Aw�
�wr�.:A�e,*,.-�`�..�.rrM,-'.'�^:�. . . _.-' ' -.���--Y-�.�" .�w�i_ ..q_a..�- +,. '�
Figure 19: Moving by barge
Another means of transporting buildings to a new site is by barge. Not a new technique, this method is particularly e(fedive lor
relocating structures on or nearby a navigable waterway, and has ihe added benefit oF not tieing up ground traffic, When the pre-
Revolutionary Buckingham House in Oid Saybrook,Connecticut.was threatened with demolition by the construction of a new highway
bridge across the Connecticut River in 1959,the structure was offered to Mystic Seaport.
In order to move the house,the main section.buili in the second quarter of the i Bth century.was separated From ihe kitchen addfifon
in the rear. (lnterestingly enough. the kitchen section was built in the 1690s and had been moved and attached to the main house
in the 18th century.}The roofs of both sections were removed.and their openings co�ered as proiection against the elements. Both
were placed on a barge and shipped to Mystic Seaporl.where the sections were reassembled and set on a new foundation and the
house restored ta its P Sth-century appearance.�Photoyraph:Courtesy of Mystic Seapori,Inc,�
�7
16686
�
Specifcations and Licenses
Specifications for moving a buildfng natutally will vide certificates of insurance coverage, prove the
vary #rom projert to project. �fowever, certain as- abiliry to comply fully with all local and state safery
pects of the work rnust be agreed upon, and both regulations, and also provide all necessary equip-
the owner s and the contractar's irsterests are best ment and vehicies un�ess otherwise agreed. Fu-
served if details are in writing. Responsibility for migatior�(if necessary)af disassembled components,
preliminary work, research, documentation, field since they will be transported in the contractor's
studies and new site selection best lies with the �ans, should also be par# of the contractor's re
owner, since the building moving contractors are sponsibilities. It i� the obligation oF the contractor
unlikeiy to have staff skilled in these specialities. to be aware of, and comply with, all state and loca!
Similarly,the owner shouid arrange for and oversee safery regukations covering wide-load transport in-
archeological site work. 5ee the chapter on doc- cluding such things as flares,flags,signs,and warn-
umentation for a fuller discussion. ing vehicles.
Certain permits and fees are necessary, and it is The contra�tor sf�ould outline the period of time
usually the responsibility of the moving contracior expected to complete the given project.Tl�e owner
to obtain the proper documents and pay the fees. shoufd be able,however,to exercise the prerogative
The contractor must have permits from the state oF interrupting work at critical intervals to record
for conveyance or tra�el af heavy equipment o�er architectura� evidence vital to the accuracy of the
the roa�s; these may include explicit stipulations planned restoration.
about traffic tie-ups and road blockage. Permits If the contractor is providing a "package" which
may e�ers designate the tirne of day and the months includes a new foundation,t�en the contract should
of the year during which the move can be made. clearky define the architectural character of the new
in some states, the Department of Public Works is foundation, the finish grade at the new site and, iF
the licensing authority, although responsibility may included in the tota! "package,"provisions For grad-
vary from state to state.Certain states and counties 'tng or backfilling the original siYe after akE data, ar-
require proof oF prior notifi�ation to utiliry com- cheological or otherwise, has been recovered from
panies whose crews will be .required to assist in it. If the moving contractor does not have the per-
raising or temporarily removing overhead wires. sonnel or capabiliry to undertake the new faun-
Depending upon differing state or utility company dation work, then the owner or agency should
policies, there may be fees for the temporary re- assume that responsibility. If the contractor is to be
location of wires, and provision for such costs responsible for post-move work, the contract should
should be written into the project specifications and also s�ecifjr the nature of any and all replacement
budget. In instances where a structure wilk be or restoration materiaEs to be used in either re-
moved through a grade �rossing or railroad right- pairing or reassembling the moved structure.
of-way,it will also be necessary to obtain permission The basis for bidding the job shoulc! be the con-
and clearance from the raiiroad authorities. Each tractural co�siderations previously discussed. It
governmental entiry through which the bui�ding may well become quite evident, however, that due
moves can, concei�ably, charge Fnr permits, police to the relative scarcity of building-moving firms in
assistance,and tree work. some locales, the bid process becomes merely an
The contractor should arrange for all requisite ideal and the owner is fortunate, indeed, to fnd a
perrnits. licenses, and utility companies' services, single firm within reasonable distance equipped
plan the travel route together with the owner, pro- and competently staffed to handle the job.
]8
16687
�
Selecting the Best Procedure for the Mo�e
Buildings can be moved in basica]]y three con- original chinking will be destroyed and must be
ditions:intact,partially disassembled,o�completely replaced with new material, meaning that perhaps
disassembled. The procedure adopted for the re- only 50% of the reconstructed building will be orig-
moval of a structure from its existing site is de- inal Fabric. The extent of ]oss of wooden elements
pendent upon several factors. One of the primary varies,depending upon the condition and character
considerations is the physica[ condition of the of the various cornpanents. ]t may not be possible
building. Advanced structural decay of sills and si- to spread frame members sufficiently apart to dis-
dewall frame elements rr�ay preclude rnoving a engage mortise-tenon joints and the expedient of
frame building intact. The construction material of sawing tenons and drilling out treenails (wooder�
the building is also a determining factor. Large pins which secure major Frame joints) may be a
masonry buildings, for example, are difficult to last recourse. Clapboards and exterior sheathing
move intact over ]ong �istances. The size limita- beco�me brittle with age and often cannot be re-
tions posed by the selecEed travel route, such as moved intact. Finish work may be marred by in-
narrow and winding roads, or height restrictions of experienced carpenters during dismantling and the
highway bridges or underpasses are also essential risk of breakage, even with skilled and sympathetic
considerations. Regulations for loads traveled over personnel,is always present.
roads in some parts of the country limit overall Breakage and consequent]oss of masonry units
he�ght to a maximum of 18 feet. It is therefore varies,depending upon the}�otential friabiliry of the
essential to ascertain height, weight, seasonal reg- masonry uniks themselves and the nature of the
uiations and restrictions€rom authorities in the par- mor#ar(Figure 22).Most mortars used after the third
ticular locale weil in advance of the actual move. quarter of the �9th century contain some portion
Proximity of adjacent structures and the nature oi of �ortland cement. These mortars, because of
the immediate topography are also deciding factors their strength and bonding ca�abilities, are very
in sekecking a moving technique. Other problems difficult to remove from most stones,such as sand-
may come up also. Tractors may be unable to stone, marble, and from brick. E�en with minimal
maneu�er in a congested and narrow space or a attrition, the texture and coloration of the original
structure built into a hillside may defy e�forts of masanry wall is extremely difficult to reproduce
cribbing and jacking. faithfully. Aside From the actual physical ]oss of
Moving Intact original fabric,whicn cannot be avoided during the
The relocation of a building as a single and intact complete dismanding of a structure, there is the
unit is generally khe mast desirable method (figure very unfortunate loss of the originaliry that is part
of an undisturbed building.
20). Not only are the labor costs of dismantling and �f there is a positive factor in khe total dismantling
reassembEing avoided, but more importantly, the
origir�al fabric is preserved (figure 2l). No matter of a structure, it is that the technalogy and the
how skilled the artisans who disassemble the build- 9rowth pattern of the building may be studied and
ing, the loss factor increases with the scope of the recorded in detaiE. Frequently, it is only through
complete disassembly of a structure that hidden
dismantling process. Features of construction or clues to structural ev-
Total Disassembly olution come to light. In khis fashion, a growing
When a braced frame house is corripletely di- body of architectural and technological knowledge
sassernbled, all the plaster and all the original clay is gradually developed, providing of course, that
or lime mortar From the chimney stacks and foun- such informatian is carefully recorded. But total
dations will be lost. Even the original lath may be dismantling shou�d stilE be laoked upon as the last
unsalvagable. In dismantling a log structure, all resort.
19
16688
;'.;¢ �� �II�,
� �� �
_: - __ ,�� _
,
.� �._� _.
, __ .�-�----,..,,,_ i :_. -� � ..- �
_. __
. � �_ o.
� � ' ° � ,
�. " � �� � � �
� � � �'�
� � � ,, �
— _ '_ . � , a.� f
� 1.�rr�+w° �Y�. �ry YNII �r- .,Y(�,'�`vi..<� _$"'tlr+��' �
{�+�ww� .. . �:-' �� �� �JaLT^_. �� .
I �� � p� ��"' �`.Y+
, �i
..� � 1-�'.i�6 5t0i5t,
' �� �� A �'' � l_
� � � � ' ���� � �� ��
i � �� � � � �`�� '�.� ���� �� '
�. ; �� � � ~� �
�`.�" .. _. �'° ,�� ��,.. �� � !� � . '
...:: ,.
��- , � d.,e � r''.
. � F� �'� , � ' • � �.t�
, � �} �:,:Ra+.-ao'' : . ,.� pm.,�..� ^�Y — �
�. :i,
_ r� �� � �-�`„y.� ����
. E � ' �.�•�� . , �...' '_ . ,. . ..T �,�' .c
� `�..�
,,y L - ' _.�` x�
� 7�' .. �' ��� .r '�
.
1' __ - b� ' - s��,
�� � ��
� � - �
�
�:
_ ::s,, ,
Figure 20: House moving in San Francisco
On three successive weekends in November 1974,twelve[ate l9tfi-century frame houses in 5an Francisco,such as the ones pictured
here,were moved intact from their original locations within a"fire zone"to the Western Addition.a section of the city in which wood
frame structures are permitted. These structures had been put up for pu6Eic sale fn ]972 by the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
(SFRA)as part of an ongoing effort to decrease the threal of fire by removing all frame buiidir�gs from this area of the city,The houses
were purchased by the Foundation for San Francisco's Architectural Heritage,which in tum found buyers for the buildings.The new
owners were required to demonstrate the ability to pay for the costs of purchasing the relocation srte.installing a new foundatipn and
utility hookups,and restoring the houses,but the move was carried out by the SFRA. Because all of the houses had 6een designated
city landmarlcs aqd/or were listed in the IVational Register(through the efforts of the SFRA staff�, the SFRA was eligi6�e to receive
Federal Funds to help defray the costs of the move. �Photographs: Jeremiah O. Bragstad for the San Francisco Redevelopment
Agency�
Figure 21: Alexander Clark House,Muscetine,lowa
!n planning the reiocation of a structure that has been enlarged severa! times over the years, it is oken assumed that the additions
(especially if they are of masonry),will have to be remo�ed from the main section of the building and mo�ed separately.One can see
from lhis photograph of tl�e Alexander Clark Nouse that it was successfully moved with its several "appendages" still attached, thus
avoiding the probiem of rejoining tMem to the mairt building after the relocation.(Photograph:Courtesy of Elizabeth Leach�
� � � , �
r�.�-�.-„�-.�... ..�e. � �
�. _ ,� .. m.e_� .�_,.�a�....._,..,�._......,.���, _. ._ � Y..n.._....��...,�.
r•,� ,��t �
� F-
�� � �
d�
�� � h
� � � � �. .
� � � � �
R -
,; 16689
� � / �� f�`. ^��F�:'0."�'= \'+�e
/ � :?��'`'� % ,:'�, P � �
� �� ��^�?��.��T � �
� 5u � � �
��� �
� ��, �9�� �:�}�R-�� s�•
� � f ��"� �` �� �� ��� ��
.� .,�,ffi. a �x,-� -r
� ��-
�: ,�," ?��', ' � � °-�: �k,.��' � '�°-
-•,{.� � � � �-�� �, 4:e � b" „
� "t, `'�S'� '�� f.. -f
� ^' �: ���' �`�� si -.g
€ ��i � .;FK �r.7.:� ,,\���` _`�
�g , � -
7�.a: .��� M� �C� �
i €, R�� �� � "",'�+�w �� r �.
� �°�'r �
` ��,�.��. � �y .�^"' a` . ,
� " � � � ., ������� ° � '�- . '.
. "'{� �e`' ` , �,. ,... k+�., r_ .. ��'�
��, . � � � 4i r
�� �"MY�w1i5 � �. '.� � ar:,. . � *7
!� s 1 �� �� � g5 �
,:�>� ` v
° • w � -�i�
1j .E/ i � ..,. ,� �
� b �
,�. "'�r ....�
� � `
�# i �": ��_. r� . !
5 }
��4� �� ..-H'J_ "*� �.
a � r �
# �, � �,. -
':�', t _ ,� ,
� _ _ - �
-�� � , w.., � : - ��v� � � �.
�,�` s y�� ,�.a ��-.��_ ' -.�.' �....
, . ":";�_,� --�^ _ _ �:^';� �.=,
� ' .. _ �i
-"a �.�
- - ...-.. . . .
�:" � �`$• �y ��`�-
. . .,'�� �L�y��w.:e=.a7��
� .. ... . _. .. ..r-"'-S�'..,_. .-.c,.
Fgure 22: �isassembly nf a stone rrfasonry nuilding in Mystic,Connecticut
The I 833 Mystic Bank,a srylistic mixture of Federal and Greek Revival,was acquired by Mystic 5eaport,Inc.in 1947,fotlowing almost
70 years of disuse. In order to move the structure, each of the building stones was carefully marked according to orientatinn and
numerical arrangement. Then the building was disassernbled stone by srone, and reassembled on the grounds o(Mystic Seaport
where it remains the second oldest bank building in Connecticut.�Photograph:Courtesy of Mystic Seaport,Inc.�
21
16690
�
Partlal dlsassembly oF a Frame structure
�
I l
i _ R
� �I LU y`-J
i
l
� � 1�� ����u � . � �
Flgure 23:A schematic drawing of � ,� + � ;Jl�'' � � , ,�
the circa 1830 Napgood Carding ��� �- �' ! 1:` �� �T���'�'��
Mifl in Soush WaterFord,Maine, de- x� �� , ` ��^�I��- �
tails a meihod of paRial disassem- _ �� �C;�,'Ti tilK� • , �r y,
61y, RooF components must be � �, ,�,� i1�� • :;�r�
marked and disassembied in their i I L_� y ' �fr
entirety prior tp separating the re- ` I ��� �
mainder oF the structure into six � r� � I `.+�
major elements. �Sketch by Jphn � ;`�:';�
O.Curtis,Old Sturbridge Village� �'
��� , - . . _ .:.v� /
� `"' �?`�. �, � ��'�'
,����.: ��� —�}� �� � , � ���, ~�s,�,.�'�..,,.� ��
� �
�� �� � � . _ aR� - . 'X
�'ia'.tr'��'�� � � �..
. /
x..�i;, ' ' � �"�'"•� , � ',? � ,i'�
�•� ���'�' ��`� ��� .���-i j�"'`.r�»'cb�
�. _ - ;�� . . .�. �� . ,
�
'` � �, J;,,,;
-� +� �---�,� ,'�
~ � 1�..� y �� '�„�,�P .
1 ti,��.. . f , N"��
s 4 1��-�°''' a.. � -'�,�.YI'��� .
�.,
_ ;"^9�.� - �` ' �,_. .. • �+
:. ���` ��.' .
�'
-��� }X, ��`. -
_�^y�6�. .. a��,.
y tl s..
.. � ,�. �. �"";�..�...,,,L�4I�-_._. .
.-- .:. � ..� � -
._.� _ . =z'^ 5.�- .. p _. .. ;,...� ,� � �.�.:
- �.~��� ���� �. �_-_... �.
_�.,�-
�^ �.
�i.� �, ""�— , �"��-�-
. . � :a.t,_�
� -
at�+.-.-�._.
'�{ �„"� w
ti�
,x - ' �..�a�+-�-. -
rt a ��' ,�,
-�<.-.
- �,...-+��_"- _
. ... w� .'� . �•�, � ..
. _. . , ...... . P2�a ,.. -t
Flgure 24:The ent�re gable end of the Hapgood Carding Mill is handked as a unit in a partial disassembly. [Photograph:.fohn U
Curtis,Old Sturbridge Village�
22
16691
Partial Disassembly sections, buc the procedure requires extensive sub-
Partia[ disassembly, with emphasis upon han- sidiary bracing, sirtce major elemer�ts common to
dling the structure in the largest warkable pieces, fi"'Q Wal[s cannot support both walls as they are
is ar� alternative that combines favorable aspects separated for the mo�e. Temporary splir�ts may be
of both previausfy discussed extremes.A story and required to brace wall units pierced by doors or
a half braced frame building, for exarnpEe, may be �'�ndows(see figures l, 5, 38, and 4l).A crane will
separated into six major components:the front and �e needed to move a structure which has been
rear walls, the two end walls, and the two gables separated into sectians(fig�re 25). Renting a crane
(figure 23). Disassembly of the roof and f�oors is expensive, but it may actualiy save in the long
must, of course. be compieted first, and interior run by eliminating the labor costs involved in dis-
non�oad-bearing wails may, with supportive brac- mantling a building. However, preparations for this
ing, be haRdled as whole units. Two majar advan- sort of move must be planned well in ad�ance.
tages of par�ial disassembly are that tirrEe and labor ��equently, masonry builclir�gs are partially disas-
costs are reduced and the potential loss of fabric sembled for a move so that the main block of the
is minimized(figure 24), structure can be transported as one unit, while the
roof and oti�er frame appurtenances are detached
Larger frame bui�dings may also be moved in and disassembled.
"` �� � �� _ �� :' - � \ ��-
` rt � � � �.
�.��A� � f ���� ,� �' yM � �� ' � .
i� ,�9'� �. .�'...� �`?'���'� �„�, � ='�a� .-_ �1 E�'
,-. . ,ti*� `� � ��._,�....i3�..
�� c �`�4���• � �,r,� � � $f 4 �� �`
1 , � � _� � � :.
�� ��� y��� ��:�� �� �� �� � ' ,P� '._
+.: � d -
i:.
'� ' 1 ^
� ��-+.. �y"' .
.' . .. . . . : ._. .....` ...a:_.:._.._....� . .fi .V �.
.y �. � �,!�_ "'.1'� p� ��._{ ��,��� �, ����
� ^� � ��"..�. �
� �� _ .__
��q'. -
� �� " �
E�)� :-� �� `�' j . � ��
yy S �
�� _ F� � ' �"Y� � �-t. �.
A
�: ..
�� ��� .� .. ��'
_ ;;�.�
��� -� ���� ��
���� � � w��
� �� T��
�.
��—�F
, _ ��
� ;.. .�.
. . _ : __ _. �
�: � r. , >
�. � � .
Figure 25; Using a crane to reassemble a wakl unit
Using a crane, the entire end wall of the Hapgood Carding Mill is hoisted fnto positian atop a reconstructed foundation fai left) and
timber cribbing iat right).Partfal dfsassembly of a frame building expedites reconstruction and conserves original fabric. [Photograph:
James C.Ward,Old 5turbridge Village�
23
16692
1
Planning The Route
Selection af the route to be taken during the traffic-control duty during the actual move. ff the
reEocation of an intact structure must be made well duration of the move is likely to take severai days,
in advance of the actua! date of the move. Moving traveling at an average speed of 3 to 4 miles per
an entire building usually requires wide roads and hour,then provision must be made for surveillance
a travel route planned to circumnavigate low un- or police protection while the structure is parket!
derpasses or narrow bridges wich insufficient load- during the intervening nights. In planning the travel
bearing capabilities.Althaugh extremely steep gra- route for a move of several days duration. parking
dients should be a�oided for ob�ious reasons, mod- sites should be carefuily selected and permissian
erate inclines may be tra�ersed by using three truck For their use secured in advan�e. In some areas,
tractors in appraprizte combinatians: two pulling especially in cities, building moving rr�ust be done
uphill or,alternatively,two acting as anchors behind at night rather than during daylight hours; thus,
the load to brake the descent (see figure 39). Re- provision rnust be made for daytirne parking ac-
member, maneu�ering tractors and a building re- commodations(see€igure 26).
quires space (figure 26). Availabiliry of overhead Some tree Eimbs may ha�e to be removed along
space must be considered,too, and arrangements the route; permits from the municipality as well as
must be made by the contractor with telephone the services of t�e local tree warden may be
and electric companies to raise or ternporarily re- needed. lf trees are privately owned, permission for
move overhead wires.This will necessitate a careful cutting will be rzecessary and some remunerative
survey of the utility poles along the entire route ta costs may well be enkailed.
be traveled, coordination of utiliry cornpany wark Similar precautions must be taken when rela-
crews with the moving schedule and, usualiy, an cating pariially or completely disassernbled build-
hourly fee for their services. ings to those followed when moving an intact
Moving and road use permits will probably be structure. Careful and detailed route planning
required�y the severaf communities through which should be completed well before any actual rr�oving
the building will pass. These generally can be ob- begins. The route and mode of transport selected
tained through either the state or local highway wiil depend upon the size, weight, and conditions
departments. The proposed tra�el raute should be af the dismar�tled building sections. Storage facil-
planned in cooperatian with, and cleared by, the ities, secure against the weather and vandalism,.
appropriate state an� loca] police depart�nents. should be provided at the new site For the more
Their services should be schedule� for escort and perishable components prior to reassembly.
,
24
16693
. � ���._�'� J
� . � Y
� �`k'.
r,� ...��_ ; ;
;;� ' .�°��_ �F
�-�`''�r,,;�..��- - �� �.�
� � � - � -:�' , �� �� ,
��,.;� (' � s
,�:_ — � �, .,�, ��
.� �; � � �� i�'� --
ti , � ��,
"a «ww�.�_ .
� ' ��. ` e�
d � � � �y �. � � �
�t=�. � �` � �`� a,�:.: �����"-�.-�.,.._ �
. _ , ��� ti '� a s:
�" , ,� �
, y a �-„� �
� ...... �_.��4 i i a� „ , �� .
3-.tie;�.YL, s r e � ��..�
Pk�"L�r i. 'i .���.
., �:�' � r�`.'� . -.��
�.. ti�
L_:�:.. ' ""d
�
�� �
"r _
Figure 26: Housemoving in tight spaces
This view of another o(the twelve Vidprian houses relo[ated by the San Francisco Redevelopment AgencV Isee fiyure 201 elearly
illustrates two dffffculties atiendant on moving buildings in bufl[ up urban areas. Space kn which to maneuver heavv equipment and
the buflding ftseEf may be severely limited.making the move more ditlicult.but no less attainable, Secondly.the move itse�f may have
tp take place at night m order io avoid massive traffic tse-ups and rush-hour deEays. [Yhotograph:Jeremlah O k3ragstad (or Ihe San
Francis�o Redevelopment Agency]
Z5
16694
�
Documentation
Et is important that thorough documentation and the same parcel of land. In Fact, the b�ilding might
recording of the mo�e and/or restoration of the be one that had been moved kF�ere years before.
property be carried out in every phase of the work, A portion of a building might have been moved
particukarly if a structure is to be dismantled. There onto the �roperry, or attached ko an existing struc-
are essentialiy Four different aspects of this re- ture already an the property—a practice common
search,which may be divided as follows. in f`lew England during the 18th and 19th �enturies.
Historical Background and Research Once a chronoiogy of owners is estabGshed, the
Field I�otes and Physica!Investigation researcher can turn to other documentary sources
Archeoiogical Research For additiona! cfues to structural changes or the
Architectural Resear�h physical evolution of the building (figure 27). If ex-
Recording the Disassembly and the Move tant,tax records,assessors' records, and insurance
Restoration Notes and Maintenance Records records may be�aluable in that they usually contain
somewhat more detailed descriptions of the struc-
Historical Background and Research ture. References to square footage of ground plan,
Documentary sources serve a dual purpose; they number of stories, type of construction, number of
both suggest what may be found in either the ar- winclows, number of chimneys or fireplaces, and
chitectural or archealogical surveys and substan- outbuildings are ofken contained in these records.
tiate what is found during physical explorakion of Ef authentic furnishing of the building is contem-
pkated,then a search of probate inventories should
the fabric. Occasionatly, docurnentation such as be conducted in the county probate records office
old phocographs or archeological data may provide
the only clues to missing features of a structure or to see if the pertinent estates were inventoried at
the time of death of the owner(s). Such roam by
site. Historical research includes a land title search room inventories are not only of great assistance
to eskablish a chronological sequence of nwner-
ship, usually working back from the most recent in de�eloping fur�ishings schedules, but also they
may provide clues to former decorative treatment
to the earliest deed.While particularly difficult titles of particular spaces through brief descriptions. ln
may require the assistance of a lawyer, one can the case af those former owners who did not die
generally research the title unaided, relyir�g upon intestate, registered wills may provide the same
either the assistance of records office staff, or an �,�es oF information.
indexing system based u�on the grantor's (or
seller's) name and the grantee's(or buyer's) name. The pracedures outlined abo�e may be dealt with
Land transfers are generalfy recorded in the county in a reasonably systematic manner in county or
seat, although in some states they are maintained municipal records offices or insurance company
by the town clerk. records. Other avenues of research should not be
A title search rnay provicle an initial canstruction overlooked. Diaries, ledgers, daybooks, and ac-
date for the building, because deeds usually define count books related to a former occupant oF the
the land boundaries and list "buildings or appurte- building may be of value. �hese may turn up in
nances thereon standing." Thus, a title searched area libraries, historical societies or museums, or
back to a point when structures are no longer men- in private hands. An ef(ort to contact descendents �
tioned rrtay provide a time frame during which con- may generate Family papers, old photographs, or
struction may ha�e occurred. However, there is a prints that will pro�ide restoration clues. Lastly, the
fa[Eacy inherent in depending solely upan such doc- conscientious researcher should not rule aut oral
umentary data, for tf�e building presently standing history as a primary source of information about
upon a site rr�ay be the second or third built upon the building's recent past.
26
16695
�
�qq�jj �� �� � �,s�. �� —� �
��� �y���°_ �..' ��-ai� �"��� ��I
_� �
X"�P+` '+�^" � �
^��
�:'� � � �' � € '��
.. p
1�� � x � ����� � Y xr�� l� ,e��. .�.x. �
�� � M ���.:� �
�� � � � �_ �.:z� � �� � t
� � ae ,x.�� � .�
f� °�" �° _ �.�-� j;,.. - � �
' F� �. „ � `�'_'
!; ?". �"'
. r�'. . a ' ,,,xAq� '� �
. . . _`'"'.r .�~ � .:�`� .e- .....�i„�- � ''
a,� _
.��v�"� I ° ��� �.
t^ "w�'-+,,i+"^91Y,w.
. , 1__�''��
:�
,;... '��, �I'tl�nr
.a � " „�y �W�
r
'�'�"��;.•� ' �r..� � ,�- �a;, _ �
�. �
, � ��i �".�� �� �
�,.m
� �.. s ���. .
_ '.«.�..m ,�'. � �' y
v
.�. � �, us _" � `�� . �a
� �� x�� � ' .�I
��. , ..
�,�,rt�. ���,�'3� �
�-y''�Sm� �_i��'' `.�" . �'�'.h� � � F�� '�r
� "':r. i�w.��,,�,.�.. �.�^�"° ; L�.� � �
��..� �' ; r y�,��`#�,�. i ^'�� ' ,�p, 1� '� �`��
'�4'�� '�„""'� ,.9 .� '��l;�� f- _ a. - ��.`� ���'�.�
t�Y. . ry
� �
4� � � ,- r� �"�` � � ` - � "
� � i p � . j�,:�,�, 4 ��, . .. °tF""?
�Y �� '�r"► , � .a '�. �`..:���� '�d'� M .. ' � .�a���"'��
� . �:�����n� a, ._�"k ��:� ..�� .� _�''�91Hl�I��:,._. .� 1� eR b '^�+�,
Figure 27: Fxcavation of a historic site
Site archeology may bring to light sigRificant and vitaf information about a structure s previous conFiguration,as in this instance where
the earliest part of the buildi�g survived only into the opening years oF the present century.7hrough excavation. the dimensions of
the grounC plan were accurately ascertained and subsequently provided the 6asis, along with old photographs, for an accurate
reconstruction of ihe missing elements.�Phorograph:John O.Curtis.Old Sturbridge Village�
Field Notes and P�ysical [n�estigation
urnent past uses of the structure and the site and
Archeological Research the known history of the area.This phase is followed
Plans by a Federal agency or a recipient of Fed- by field reconnaissance of the area,often including
eral assistance to move a structure listed on or some subsurface testing. A survey should reveal
determined e�igible for listi�g in the I`lational Reg- the presenre ar absence of transportation neE-
ister of Historic Places from its original iocation works, foundations of associated structures, refuse
usually require that archeologicai investigatians be areas,wells, gardens and agricultural areas, indus-
conducted at the original location as well as at the trial sites and other features, as well as changes in
site chosen for relocation. The purpose of these topography.
investigations is to identify, evaluate, and reco�er Ef historically significant features are discovered,
cultural and historical data thay may be lost or dam- the State Historic Preservakion QfFicer and the Ad-
aged as a result of relocation. The cultural and visory Council on Historic Preservation must be
historical data obtained at the site of original lo- consulted in order to determine ways in which these
cation may also be used to aid in an accurate res- features may be preserved.At one end of the spec-
�oration of the structure following its relacation. trum of altemati�es available, project plans may be
The first phase of archeological investigation in- rtrtodified so as to avoid destrucEion of significant
volves an in-depth search o( the literature to doc- archeoiogica] materials. At the other end of the
27
16696
�
spectrum, if project plans cannot be modified, a cording meEhod and an invaluable aid in architec-
data recovery program may be initiated. 5ince ar- tural research. A thoroughly documented project
cheological exca�ation is by its very nature a de- will generate large quanticies af prints and slides,
structive process—a site cannot be "reexcavated" which must be identified by accurake descriptive
when new archeologi�al methods and techniques labels. Photographs should accompany the textual
are developed—it is obviousky more desirable to records af the field and restoration notes, and usu-
preserve a site intact rather than to excavate it.The ally should be organized in a chronological se-
eFfects of the proposed actions on archeological quence. A thorough photographic survey of the
and historic sites should be considered ear[y in the entire structure should be made prior to com-
planning process. The alternatives which ha�e the mer�cement of any physical work,either exploratory
least impact upon cultural resources should be Fully or in preparation for the move.Included in the com-
investigated. If there is na feasibke altemative to prehensive series should be site and location views
moving the structure from its ariginal location, ar- from all quarters, exterior eievations on all sides,
cheologists should be able to recover,through sal- interior eEevations of every wall of each room and
vage excavations, data about past living patterns. elevations af each basement and attic wall. Special
and building sequer��es that migh� nat otherwise detailed photographs shoul� be made of notewor-
have been preserved. The materials reco�ered thy decorati�e architectural embellishments, such
might be retained for exhibition within t�e structure as pediments, chimney breasts, cupboards, stair-
itself, if the building is to be restored and opened ways, door hardware and exposed structural fea-
to the public as a period museum, or they might Eures.
be donated or loar�ed to a local historical society It is best to use a view camera having tilts anc!
or museum. swings For architectural work, and a 4 by 5 inch
Archeological resources are nonrersewable and sheek film format should be adopted. particularly
becorr�e valueless out of context. All archeological for the black and white work. Negatives and prints
investigations must be performed by qualified should be processed to archival standards to en-
professio�als,using appropriate methods and tech- sure maximum stabiliry and permanence. Co�or
niques. Minimum standards of qualification For work transparencies may be 35mm, although 2'/a
professianal archeologists may be found in Part 3 �y��/4 inch roll filrn can be used ir� an appropriate
of 36 CFR 61 (Criteria for Comprehensive State- roll Film back on a view camera. [f possib.le, take
wide Historic Surveys and Plans) or by contacting both black and white and color photas, as most
the Sociery of Professional Archeoingists. Because color will fade. Both slides and prints shou�d be
the preservation and proper curatorial care of ar- prompily dated and labeled to prevent future con-
cheoiogical resources require the expertise of spe- fusion. In special.instances. X-ray photography or
cialists trained in restoration and preservation radiography r�ay c�arify uncertain details of con-
techniques, Federal agencies invalved in mo�ing S�ruction technique and eliminate the need for
a structure should contact the State Historic Pres- damaging and time-consuming exploratory prob-
ervation Offieer or Interagency Archeological Setv- �ng of the physical fabric. (For a more thorough
ices (Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service, discussion of this subject, see David M. Hart's Draft
U.S. Department of the [nterior, Washington, D.C. Report,X-Ray Examination of Historic Structures.)
20243}#or technical advice. Other s�ecialized photographic tools applied in
General guidelines for survey, data recovery, architectural recardings are stereo photogram-
analysis and curatorial care of artifacts, and for rnetry and rectified photography. One of the ad-
compilatior� of reports may be found in The Ar- vantages of stereo p�otogrammetry is that through
cf�eological Survey: Methods and Qses (HCRS, its application, many structures which couid not be
1978), and in other guidelines and procedures is- recorded by hand-done measured drawings be-
sued from time to time by the Department of the cause of an inaccessible location, unstable and
Interior. dangerous structura]condition,or which are threat-
Arc�itectural Research ened by imminent dernolition, can be captured
Photography is a very useful architectural re- photographically. Stereo photogrammetry utilizes
28
16697
�
stereopairs (two separate photographs) taken at a of a buil�ing is relati�ely uncomplicated but re-
precise distance apart. quires speciaE attention in marking all parts of the
Thraugh the application of highly sophis[icated build�ng as they are separated from the whole. Of
instruments, the perspective views o� the building course, there s�tould be regular and frequent pho-
recorded on the stereopair can be interpreted in a tographic coverage. As with t�e ather phases of
two-dimensional orthophoto.showing the plan and documentation, a[I photagraphs and slides taken
elevation. (See Perry E. Borct�ers, Photogramme- of the d3smantling process should be labeled with
tr€c Recording of Cultural Resaurces.} Rect9fied a description of the building element shown and
photography is a less complicated application of its locatior� within the structure. [t is equally im-
architectural photogrammetry, and is most Fre- portant to note the building's orientation and siting
quently used for taking perspective-free photo- on the praperty; this is particularly necessary if the
graphs, such as that oF a building faGade. intent is to recreate the building's former setting
Photographs taken in this manner can be printed during the reassembly of the structure at its new
and enlarged to an appropriate architectural scale location.
as a basis for wor�cing drawings, surveys, and fea- Restolration rlptes and
sibility studies. (See J. Henry Chambers, AIA, Rec-
afied Photography and Photo Drawings for Histaric Maintenance I`�ates
Preservation.) The research data, which includes the architec-
When X-ray photography, stereo photogram- tural field notes and drawings, the archeologi�al
metry, and rectified phokography are beyond the findings, ancf the documentary information is nec-
capabilities and budgetary parameters of many essary in guiding and directing the reerection proc-
agencies or individuals, measured drawings may ess; but if the structure is to be res[ored, the
be prepared inexpensively by a qualified draftsman. resioration notes and the maintenance records are
A Full set oF measured drawings should include in- imperative ta support and explain the finished proj-
terior ar�� exterior elevations of all walls, plans oF ect. A building restoration may be compared to a
each ]evel, sections through both axes of the build- theorem in geometry in that it musk be proven and
ing, and a complete framing scheme, and deco- each aspect of the work and each decision go�-
raUve trim details and moulding �rofiles. "Exploded" eming it rnust be carefully, substantiaied and sup-
isametric views will clarify Frame joint details, and ported by physical evidence and other facts. If the
if the building �s to be moved in sections, can also specifics pertinent to the particular building are not
graphically specify and record the techniques. A available, then the restoration should be based ors
site plan of the original location show+ng related clear and plausible citations of similar buildings
Features such as walks,gardens,outbuildings,walls, contemporary in sryle and period. The overriding
and yard furniture such as well heads, hitching consideration in any restoration should be that the
posts, ums and fountains, is an integral part of this bu�ld3ng is being moved and restored for the future
series of drawings. A topographical plot recording �s well as the present. Futu�e i�istorians and build-
gradient changes and other physical features should ing kechnicians should be able to see the decision-
also be made either as part of the measured draw- �aking processes o# our era, and be spared the
ing series or as a phase of the archeological site confusion and inconsistencies of an undocu-
survey. In the interests of consiskency, the Histnric mented project.
American Suildings 5ur�ey format discussed in For this reaso�, a careful record and schedule
Recording Historic Buildings by Har9ey J. McKee, of the maintenance procedures followed in the re-
should be adopted for al!drawings. s�ored structure should be kept and made acces-
sible to future researchers. A major aim of any
Recording the Disassembly preservation and maintenance program is to avaid
and the Move causing any irreversi�le changes to the restored
If a structure is to be either partially or totally building through the day-to-day housekeeping.
disassembled for the move, great care must be Cyclical Maintenance for Historic Buildings, by J.
taken during this process to ensure accurate reas- Henry Chambers,AIA,is a useful guide to preparing
sembly aEter the relncation.Sequential disassembly a maintenance plan.
29
16698
i
Interim Protection Prior To The Move
Before proceding further in the relocation proc- be augmented by a full-time intrusion and fire-cfe-
ess,a thorough survey should be made of the struc- kection system. Tirr�e need not be wasted on in-
ture to assess the physical condition of the building's stallation of a sophisticated and unobtrusive syste�n
frame and "skin," not necessarily as a restoration in an unrestored structure because protection is
planning tool, but rather to disco�er and treat the primary consideration.However,this installation
chronic situations that could deveiop into serious shauld not damage the historic building fabric un-
restoration problems if left unchecked. lncluded in necessarily. Circuit-breaking magnetic catches at
this initial conservation examination should be a door and window openings are of relatively little
determination of the extent of active insect infes- �alue, as it is possible to cut away a section of a
tation, or materials deterioration due to dry rot or door or sash large enough to permit entry without
water damage. diskurbing the catch. Where feasible, such protec-
Weatherproofing the Str�cture tion systems should be connected by an automatic
telephone signaling de�ice to police and fire sta-
Watertight integriry is as important to the survi�al tions.Where this cannot be done, some lesser de-
of a structure as it is to tl�e survival af a ship. Main- gree of protection may be provided by visua! as
tenance of a sound roof and prevention of the in- v,rell as audible alarrn devices on the exteriar of the
trusion of potentially harrnFul ground water or ea�es bui[ding. -
runoff should be initial "first aid" considerakions if �OVering the door and window apertures wiEl pre-
the structure is not to be mo�ed or dismantled right vent glass loss and provide some minimal deter-
away. If the conditions warrant, temporary roof re- ence to intruders.A composition board,sealed with
pairs should be made to protect interior plaster, paint against the weather,or plywood may be used.
floors and frame. Modern gutters and leaders can �t is recommended that the pratective paneks be
also be installed,temporarily to conduct water away applied using nails rather than wood screws; this
from the building. Collapsing foundation walls action wi�l minimize possible damage to trim or
shou�d be braced with timber shoring to equalize exterior finish work should the panels be wrenched
the pressure on both sides of the masonry wall and off by a determined intruder. As dampness can
to prevent subsidence until permanent measures cause interna! damage in a c{osed structure, pro-
can be taken. vision should be made For air circuEation through
If the structure has been heated in the past, a �enting. If adequate ventilation is not supplied by
minimal temperature of 50°F should be main- roof vents or chimney flues,holes should be drilled
tained if possible during cold weather.This wilE pre- in the compositian board or plywood.
vent dampness from damaging plaster and the A mowed lawn and generaiiy well-kept grounds
acceleration of dry-rot activity which thrives in moist ��n provide some protection against both fiEe and
conditions. For the same reason dehumidifiers vandalism,but in the final analysis there is no guar-
should be installed in customarily damp areas dur- anteed insurance against the intruder. Bearing this
ing the summer months beFore the move. in mind, some thought might be given to the re-
moval f�om the strurture of its rnost attractive and
Protection from Vandalism vutnerable components such as hardware, doors, .
Vandals or sca�engers present a constant threat maniels, paneling, and sash. If such components
to any unoccupied structure, whether in a rura! or are removed,their original iocation should be care-
urban context.if the physical conditian of the buil�- fulky documented and the artifacts themselves
ing permits occupancy, there is no substitute for �hould be carefully labeled and stored. Weigh the
a resident caretaker. Alternatively, -�,•rnpathetic risk oF potential kass through �andalism against
neighbors may be enlisted to maintain a measure storage problems,labor costs,disruptian(and pos-
of surveillance, but their part-6me protection should sible loss)of original fabric,which could occur dur-
30
16699
�
ing the process of"preventive remo�ai,"and decic#e
accordingiy. [f the building is warth khe efFort of
mo�ing and restoring, it is worth the efFort of pres-
ervation prior to the mo�e.
31
16700
�
Selecting and Preparing the New Site
Seiection oF a new site for the relocated structure �he building to be relocated, tf�e persons respon-
requires careful planning well in advance of the sible should recognize the important influence that
actual move.[t is desirable to find a setting as much solar orientation can have on the building's artist�c
like the original as possibie (figures 28 and 29). and aesthetic qualiYy. IF the building to be mo�ed
Some earlier architects gave careful consideration is listed in the National Register, it is doubly im-
to the reEationship of the building ta iEs setting. The portant that a compatible site be selected For its
sensiti�e preservationist should not compromise a new location if the building is to retain this status
structure's design integrity with a setking that is during and after the move.
unsympathetic or incompatible with the original. ]n situating a single structure, it is also important
Buildings of a classical design generally ha�e a to ronsider the adjacent structures and the site.
principal fa�ade that requires a particular ori�nta- Shape, mass, and sca�e are critical; the relocated
tion to do justice to the entire structure. (Imagine structure must adapt harmoniously to its new to
a prostyle Greek Revivai mansion sideways on its location if it is not to appear awkward or out oF
lot!) Architects often used mouldings to decorate pla�e. Care must also be taken that relocating a
a buil�ing; it is the play of light and sha�ow that building on a �articular site does not inad�er�ently
gives these architectural rnouldings their distinctive destroy or adversely affect the historical, cultural,
and decorative character.When choosing a site for or arc�eological significance oF that site.
..:�, � ��
q � ,-„ig;y�
' � �� !� �� ..,-0.e�� ���� �.�����'_�*4 S. .
���� �
x���` ;�.: t� ? �,Y„`..�� '�..������ �� �,�� . .. ' -'��, . � -
",�. -. - . s -r+i � .. . �Y:..
�' � ��S��.+ � �, *&- + ¢��� :+�� ��'4y.,�-�� �� �ti � V"}
b � � __t�' � �'�r� �
z� ' � �� { � � '`� ,�,�.' �� �i �, ` ., �i
.�_�. � � :�y, "yl,.r�� � .� �!�`� J �.:� -� ��_ ��.� . . a s�' - _ � ��� .'�
i ,.,i.fa'. F t ' �c ���� ���� �a �� .. �,�,� . � � � � �� . , .�
. �� ��� _� i �. � � �j�J t x _- �: °'"`,�..::� . . �*.'�
� . .r- ` ,,s „j. .V����� dP�». . r . ���`,_ .
ti. Y
@��, �� Y �..tr a+��Y '�' !� *"`� �?�=Y�a� �
F`;� F�,,2'-�,� ,}w �' ,: �e, �r �, �� , ,r �-. g � S��KK � � �
�_-� �
-.� �a�t-� ,r„'" i �i ..r� .�
� �.� � k[T:_� . . *�F '°� �� �°�`'"�.F•�� ,� : 'Y� �•a'
� ro �ti '� .�.f . � .�.. 6 .;��� �. �.
�/� �� F,a t .� - .c } ti"'r .. .� } -�-� ! �� tir �.� .
�"�. 7 � _ _ �`� � .� ,;"�y� � �.r � -�1�� � .! ���� :�,.i�
X i.�` •�R�` " �?��"�^- ,•E ' ...��. - ._ �'�,���f= e t, �_�J;:N�
.
. --�
,, y,.E,.:-�. , � r.�- ' �,,. `�,-�,.����r.r� ,,,t�- - . 1 � -`��
.... . ,.. �d..,
. - ...m.._';� .. ...�.5,�„�: s.,-'� .
�. .. . . . _ �_,,. ._:.... r ` '� � ..r
� _ . ,..,. '—'Y, e. 'Te'�'�.+..�., ' �'�!s
`'1$ _— �„�.,_.'�}�����;
•*, - ,��'��, i���
����.�s�.. .s , . _� ,� e ii� ' si '`s
;.'1v''r y`�a „ �� t �� k �-a'�o�:
�p .qr. "+ ."4{'-.s � c-�,, S �i''ya*. � 3 �����
�t'� ! �G .�..
.� �' �"`�,�--:� °
- � �. f ...�
_i -.�a �
�
_ . ' . .. � . .. _ . - . , �� r�
. r _.. ; .,. r� � _ . , .
� x� �' C �'.���JY �9'� � N- 1 � iR � . y� . {,
. i ,y�� ���� � €�a�� . .��, f� .. � ..,E .. �t � 4,p s . . _
� , k {.-�.�� _ Y `!�. .y ti�+'y'
. , ���-:: ��+h.+x�.'�f` `b7E3w�t'�.,ro^ � ,)�'.. ...=�+r.»'�'� . ?`�,Air- ��. . A, $*�,. ...e�
�2
16701
1
As a part oF the field survey work at the original eellar under any structure. If basement spaces are
site, the dimensions of the structure's foundation not potentiai exhibit areas,foundation walls may be
will have been ta�Cen. Notes will have recorded khe �oured concrete or concrete block, well sealed on
co�dition of the foundation as wei] as the physical the exterior with pargeting.A poured concrete flaor
state of the building as it relates to its foundacion. atop a C-�mil polyethylene vapor barrier should
This wil! bear stror�gly upon the choice of the kind complete an adequate foundation for the structure,
of faundation to be provided at the new site. providing no water Eable or groundwater seepage
Generally speaking, the cause of long-term prvblem exists. Should water be present around
building conser�ation is best senred by a fuli dry the perimeter,the floor must pitch to a sump, rather
Figures 2�29: A 5uitable site for relocation of the Pope-Leighey House
7he importance of relocating a building on a site slmilar to ihat on which it was previously located cannot be overemphasized.These
twp photagraphs show the Pope-Leighey House.a '�Usonfan House' designed by Frank Lloyd Wright and built in 1940�31 in Falls
Church,Virginia.a suburb of Washington, D.C. In the early i96�s,the owners of the house were notified that the house was located
directly in the path oF a planned four-lane highway. Interstate 66. and thus would have to be relocated,Aker seeking the assistance
pF the National Trust for Historic Preservation.the Nationa] Park Service, and other national and local organizations concemec3 with
the pro6lem,the owner eventually decided to donate the house to the Hational Trust
This decision was based partly on the fact that the National Trust was able to oFFer a well-oriented site,from the siandpoint oF natural
topography,landscraping,and seclusion from public roadways.In addition,the 1`lational Trust agreed to provide the awner with lifetime
tenancy and maintenance of the house at its new site on the grounds of Woodlawn Plantation,a property owned by the fYational Trust
and located in Mpunt Vernon, Virginia. Howard C. Rickert, tt�e master carpenter who had built the house originatly, was hired to
supervise the move and reassembly process.
5electing the proper relocation site is always a sfgnificant aspect of building mo�ing,but it is even mare important when a Frank Lloyd
Wright designed house is involved because o(the close relationship betweer�his houses and their natural surroundings.
Comparing the terrain of the onginal site {figure 28) with the new site (figure 29), one can see that the Pope-Leighey House has
indeed been successFully integrated into its new site.�Photographs:Courtesy v{the IYational Trust For Historic Preservation]
� � �y �+ ��,,
�
.e+0^ "'�� - i
fr:�
��, :r
',�_: ��.`.. ���^ �.� .
4�
..�, 4q�'d., c� A.
�t3m�� ' � �- � �: �'� .
..;,�.� � . ��F' �.'
'V� �'y4 ,�.�� -� µ���� .�:. � �
�
n
��C .... . . . ,..- .a�
e
<,
� .. '� �.. ,. ,�,
_ ` ',� '. _ ."��a� _ � ,. '� ' ... . �� _._
y
w�_ �� � `�._..r"�" �-.� �uftF
���� ' ffi
" T ----- l '�`�J�
.:�.
_::�,;�a
� `� � , �----��-----
' ;:�� � s � � . 3 �
� „a � �*:� x.- �� ___ .- - �
.� �.`" � , � � ����
, .,. _� � : .
� �
:_ �t <� �" - �
..��. :�;
�� �; � .. ��;� :
� ,�,� ,� ;
�,-�s�. 8� _� _ �;
`' ' ' �
�, '-f., y.3'Q f '.,A,_ ..tik r�.. . .�, _.r5'�^ rL� y'"f . . � - _ � ..
�r ',:s." .�f�. '� �xa'a�� ,'^� . . . -� 4.
� " a .. ` � : �s..--�
. �`tI . . ..� t '�. `- .
3'i`+ ,�*-�. 'd��• � ,t ' . . -��°" . .
Y�.-�� e�'�
� 'f b. �;`4. ,��c,� � A��fx '�. -w ,o,�'��':y'�S'�.�,ro x,� is.
. .� ,v� ' . �'�'�`�'� {�`�'1 � f F� l.C;- •
'�-i ' � l _ F �'- . _,
� ��� ��� �.X:aK'�h_U':u ...�:.�� �.., .. .._ �r�'�,mn"�kRL..m¢. ~.. . ._.:.,.r . . . ,..
33
16702
�
than to a drain. Trenches or buried pipe may help Because conservation of the histaric structure must
in control of seepage. In situations where rising always take first prioriry, "dry-laid" rubble walts
damp preserns a chronic danger to the sidewalls should be pargeted or grouted and sealed on the
of the structure,additional"darr�p proofing"should outside of the foundation befow grade to ach�eve
be introduced between the new cancrete founda- watertight integriry.
tion and ihe original brick or stone courses. �f a building is totally dismantled for the move,
Regardless of khe kind of modern materials em- the method used to provide its new or recon-
ployed in pro�iding a rnoisture-resistant Foundation, structed foundation is not critical; a plumb, square
the walls should be designed to accommodate fac- and level foundation is usually acceptable as good
ing with the original brick, fieldstone, or dressed building practice, as long as the structure was not
stone for that section oF the foundakion which will b���t out of square originally. Shouid the ]atter be
show above the finish grade.To do this accurately, the case, the new foundation wifk have to be laid
masanry units must have been marked and the to conform to the irregularities of the building it is
thickness of mortar courses measured and re- �o support. When a structure is mo�ed as a unit,
corded prior to dismantling. If, however, it is de- �oWever,thought should be given to the potentially
cided that the basement space is critical to the harmful effects of lowering it onto a perfectly level
interpretation of the restored structure,then, if pos- footing. While a frame structure will rack ta a de-
sible, basement walls must be disassembled and g�ee, accommodating itself to the supporting sub-
moved too. structure,the immediate effect of lowering a masonry
When dealing with masonry units of sufficient building onto a prepared foundation can be the
size to make their handling as individual compo- de�elopment of disastrous cracks. To avoid prob-
nenfs economically feasible, mark each with a lems,the building should be supported on cribbing
number code assigning it a position "left to right" at the requisite height above the footings and the
within a gi�en course of a particular wall. When foundatian walEs built up to meet and conForm to
practicable, numbering should be done in a per- the irreg�larities of the existing sidewalls.This pro-
manent medium such as red lead on top surfaces ���ure is imperative for masonry structures. It may
which will be co�e�ed and hidden by successive also be deemed necessary in those instances where
courses. (figure 30. See alsa figure 22.) EndivicSual it is �esirable to preserve those physical manifes-
stones should be padded with burlap or scrap wood tations of great age which are evident in a frame
in order to pre�ent abrasion by chains or cables �uilding that has settled.
during remo�al and subseguently during travel.
Obviously, a brick or rubble foundatian does not
Eend its�lf to transfer by this technique,and the best
that can be done is careful dismantling and salvage
of materials. The foundations would then be relaid
in mortar mixed to match the original with care
taken to replicate the original bond in both com-
positian and color as well as textural character.
There is another technique for preparation of the
new moiscure-resistant Foundation. ]f the original
masonry units are small enough, it is possible to
utilize them as an interior or exterior facing for a
poured concrete or concrete binck foundation. [n
this fashion,the appearar�ce oF the old is cambined
with the skabiliry and watertight integrity o(the new.
An obvious disad�antage of this procedure, how-
ever, is that the irregu�ar configuration of fieldstc,ne
or some rubble masonry units may preclude their
even alignment against the new foundation wall,
34
16703
Figure 30: Identification systems for reassembly of stone walls
The unique character and disposition oE rubble or Fieldstone masonry requires a careFul marking syste�n to assure proper realfgnment
dunng the reassem6ty process. In this instance. an imprompiu chalk marking system was utilized to expedite the removal
process.Stones were subsequently assigned identification numbers which were painted an the top surfacea
For cut-stone masonry,a simple system of numbers and letters (to indicate orientationl may suffice. but st is fmportant ihat the
numbered wa11 be photographed prior to disassembly io facilitate reerection. �Photograph:John O. Curtis.0ldSturbridgeVillage�
�,����„'.,�,'�"tt�.- �_. ._ ... , ...... . ._._.�. �ra�._..,...,�,.,.. ... � , " �- �.^brr.[F^.r.
�°�°+�fa f�"..-` '� ���� '•
�� � �' �' � � � ' '
, �,.,� � -
, �, -
d �: � . .. <. _ .
h-� .. �,�. r�,.
,r ^„y,: pr� i �� �.y� �
_ � �i�a�'� �d . � • � �
'.-t",7' ... ,�., _ �yi: .i'���'.� _ " r ' ,
� �<, � ��� � � � _ �
� ;: - � � -;,ck ..
` � .. � - .
_ ���. . � . �"; ,,r.�_
�. � .
•`�' " r' f�-� ,� �, ..��- , �
._ =- �- � ~'""°- . � �^���a
��
� R .'� °�{�..r4...V � `..� .. +,.- . , .. .. . ' _ ��`�
.
_ _ � �' .l,;!_ � _. - • � � '�z.
, . �- .. ' ,�4 ,� . -'.. . .T�}iv iS,., .
F�" . . �J � F . /6r�� f.i:.},J � , R:Y,Y
�""'�--�,.�..�.,�. ' V�� �:.T..�R- � •r ���'�, ,�y,� '�.s �r -
.. ' � . .. . � - 'r
._ . � '� � . . � � - �Y � �,
a , s�
. . , " . . <�-. ��.��. ���' �'":
�� . �-� ,�� � : �i � �� �
� � _ �. -��,, .. �. .. s�f ""�''?%S� �. .��s .� � .
� Y��. . . . , m -�.: :7- � r�' .-.
r.,c �.. y �'r-�J �'A S�
"�i �)' - � �,� .. .-+f_t.
-<� v.�^ '._' -� - ��, _
�-"
* wx.. s. '^.����`� _ A �.y. I� �i
�
�-.
�
- �.}wi'.Y����i�.' � F,L.Y1j`� �.� �
4�'� '\1
35
16704
Preparing The Structure For The Move
I
Moving [ntact
If a building is to be moved intact an� handled this is not possible, it may be desirab�e to resill or
by a contractor in the conventionai manner, work- make major structural repairs at the original site in
men wil! prepare the building for jacking, loading order to assure a safe and stable move. [f there is
and transporting. In frame buildings, structural re- �otential hazard of abrasion tn original exterior Fab-
pairs ar temporary remedial measures must be ric af the building, protect the side waE� and roof
ta€cen to replace or splint detEriorated sills and side surfaces by nailing on sheets of homasote board
wall framing.Where possible,supporting planks or ar plywood (figures 3l and 32).The same material
timbers may be attached ta frame members to add may be used to cover windows and doors if those
strength in bri�ging deteriorated sections. Where elements are to remain in situ during the move.
R'�"�
� .�,
�� � .,:�,
,.-�. .� `- ���"'�';��.�—���.,,,�-�„
o � .., `�—r.Y,
,, �`�—=�.
' •� �__�-: ._;-----�'"`•'�� € e � �
�---� _ °` , ,�� .� :�
;., j �
-a
�,� 1 . ; . �.,� ; ,s k �•.,� ..� : a ��.
. ,. ' , �:y,; � ;, r Y' v`�'-- �a'# '� �
.�i . �.� ;�.� �E � :� ��.�� .� .
�,m�"�, � �5�h.F �.. �
� �. ..'�'�..�-'�"'""L ,� E � r, . '..\ � Y L..a � �� .
'"" .i � � �r�.. � � �� . `.:,
.�
,i
I
.
-rce��`y¢�. �'�n� ... 4 � . y -
n
�f� A
._- -G�`� .� Q F. .�
� ..,�a�.aa.+.x.j�: � ��
M1�4�
:i�' $e+F3 , .. .�j � .
ap",�a �� a n'�i,y:. �„g, ..� .- 'rr f� �E-" e t"��in
. ;,4=�m 5�'I�� _ � ��� - eac
, � � ���`��� �-+*d�-ts.�s-� �'�� 1��•- � - .��$
�.� - % � _ �..ew--,w..t�'_ ��'. .'�, .�. `�, '
, . .; - ' �..>�„Y y..
- � r > x"' � �� � ,��, ��.�'
6",.J .-. '����,.mF,'..,�. ��a��.'�,.,;`�^wq,`
Figure 31: A protective craie for moving the Thompson Bank to Old Sturbridge�Ilage
This smalf 6rick masonry bank building has been prepared for removal as a virtually incact uniL The columned portico has been
disassembled aher careful recording and marking. A!I roof components down to the pEate level are marked and dismantled. When
all preparatory work is completed,the foundation is pierced and the jacking process commenced in order to position multi-wheeled
moving dollies be�eath supporting steel beams.
The sandwich"crate"used for this particular building consists oF plywood and cieats(inside and outsidef which are held together with
bolts ihrough the brick masonry.Voids between the masonry surfaces and the plywoad sandwich were filled with insulating material
blown in under high pressure to assure firm support behveen the sandwich and the brick walfs. �Photographs:John Q.Curtis, Old
5turbridge Village(left}James C.Ward,Old Sturbridge Vitlage frightl�
36
16705
�
�� - --„'a�
- r , � � 1
:� .. .,�„r.- ., � �
��. . , .•�
`''� t '`� � •..:.-��"'"""' �
�._� _
,�; �„�..---�~-
��' e
� �� �i� � . �
; ?��x: ���'','„� !f1 �� � � "
��b v�b ' ■ �
`� „ �i '�! =�` ■ �{. F�� ,
`i
-r�,°" ._. -a ' m, (
a 1i �.
. t Y � V
� ,2�..�., �• �M�M
, ' �� -
, � {��1f� � — �� !� 8
�� � �� �� � � . ""'
,� ,
i '�. � - , �����:.a. , �-.,i..._...! ... � �.
r�_ i #�
��� � „![ g..-3. -"i �Oi� :.Y-
.P�,f .�n�� ' i.. , .
�� �
Figure 32: Lentha�l Houses.Washington,b.C. Moved By William B.Patrarrl,InC.,Fall'fax,VA.
A much simpler bracing system provided adequate support tor these attached brick houses when they were moved to make room
(or constru�tion vf a large oFFice buiiding in ]978.The structure has been"crated"with steel cables,The tensile stress of the cables
is transferred to the masonry shell ihrough the�ertical wooden braces. Cable ties attached to exterior horizontal wooden members
are stretched From front to rear through the windows For additional support.�Photograph:John Myers�
Mo�ing Partially Or Totally will pre�ent shiKing or ckeformatian of t�e structure
Disassembled (see figures 1, 5, and 37). Internally, timbers se-
curely boltecf to create "Xs," situated diagonally
Where building height or width preclude a fully from flaor to ceiling,will ha�e the same effeet.
intact move, it will be necessary Eo dismantEe ele- In order to prevent any measure of confusion in
ments such as chimneys,roofing,and roof frarrEing. marking terminology, compass points oF the struc-
Detailed ar�d comprehensive photography +s im- ture's original orientation should be established at
perative and all features being disassembled must the outset so that a]] personnel in�olved in the dis-
be cafefully marked to guide reassembly. mantling and reassembly processes are in accord
ln a situation where a structure cannot be re- as to which side is indeed north. Conirasting colors
maved from its site as a whole unit,the disassembly of either acrylic or latex paint or carpenter wax cra-
process and the actua� move occur in successive yons should be selected, using a different color for
stages. If necessary, remova]of all pote�tially prob- each sic4e. Chalk is not advisable because it rubs
lem-causing st�uctural projections such as porches, off and washes off easily. A marking code may be
� porticos, or bay windows should be done prior to developed to suit the situation, but it should be
the mave. To safeguard original sash or exterior simple and standardized throughout the project.
doors in transii, it may be necessary to remove Foremost should be the consideration that all
them prior to the move. Lastly, the whole building rnarking must be removable or must be done on
may, if deemed necessary, receive additionai brac- surfaces tf�at will be hidden during reassembly.
ing to pre�ent racking during the raising and mo�- Thus, roofing boards marked "R—E-1,'� "R—E-2'�
ing process. Planks or timbers nailed or lag-screwed would be those at the ridge and the next course
diaganally to the exterior create rigid triangles that immediately �elow on the east slope of the roof.
37
16706
With a single co�ar used consistently on a given decorative ar structural cornponents which they ii-
area, spot identification of all related components [ustrate.
is assured.To facilitate accuracy in positioning dur- Aher all interior finish work, plaster and]ath, ar�d
ing reassembly, a bald diagonal line s�ouid be finis� floors are marked, removed, denailed, tied
drawn prior to dismantling across any sheathed in buRdles (where Feasible), and loaded in closed
surface,such as the roaf or side wa[!s. vans Far transportation, dismantling of the build-
Large masonry units may be markec! as to their ing's protecti�e skin and str�cture can cornmence.
location within a wall or course. Ideally, such mark- RooFing boards should be marked on their top sur-
ing should be in a permanent mediur�-i,such as red faces after rerr�oval of shingles or ather sheathing.
�ead,and done on top surfaces which will be hidden Ra�ters are then numbered after remova]of roofing
by successive reassembly of the wall. This method boar�s. Plates and ties are nvmbere� on their top
cen be used for walls, foundations, ar chimneys. surfaces after attic floorboards are numbered and
As stated earlier, thorough overall photography is removed.Clapboards,if sound and sal�agable,may
vital, as are measured drawings in which each ma- be numbered. A large percentage of clapboards
sonry unit is detailed and labeled witE� an appro- and split lath may be salvage�d and reused if re-
priate identifying number. Small masonry units, moved with care. A broad-bladed pry bar may be
especiaily bricks, tend to defy systematic and se- used for this purpose, but a more specialized in-
q�entia� dismantling and reassembly, sim�ly be- strument may be needed for stubbom nails.
cause of the sheer volume in�ol�ed anc! the The uncovered structure may be protected from
consequent prohibitive labor costs.Bric�C wark may the elements by tarpaulins or polyethylene once the
be taken down,salvaging as much as possible;jnint roof is removed {see figures 19, 35 and 38). This
and mo�tar course widths and thicicnesses can be degree of protection may nok be required in every
measured to attempt a reconstruction which ap- case, since all vulnerable interior fabric will have
proximates the original. been pre�ious]y removed. During dismantling, side
Having establis�ed a marking methodology, one wall subsheathing should be retained on a floor-by-
shoulc! retum to the proper sec�uence of buiiding floor basis for the suppart it provides the frame
dismantling. As removal of the roof or protective during disassembly.Additional support may be af-
side waii co�ering will disturb the structure's wa- forded by appropriately spaced diagonal braces
tertight integriry,all interiar finish woodwork should bearing against the wall, securely fastened to "two
be carefully marked and removed beFarehand. by fours" driven into the ground. Frame-joi�t pins
Sash may be marked on their vertical edges (a should be driven out where�er possible; drilling
marked light of glass can be broken out) and the t�em out means loss of original fabric, and cutking
corresponding marking code piaced an the part af tenons is the least desirable expedient. Lengthy
the window re�eal customarily covered by the sash posts ar studs should be lowered to a horizontal
when it is prnperly repiaced. Doors and frames can position with care; ofd and �ry timbers will often
be marked in a similar fashion. The rooms them- shatter or crack if subjected to a sudden impact.
selves must be identified; compass orientation far To simplify the work and minimize darr�age to
designation of each wall af a room is criticaL Thus structura[ components during dismantling, small
"P" may designate parfor, "�C" parlor chamber For farklift trucks, such as those used for handling
the room immediately above stairs,"K"for kitchen, goods in warehouses, can be rented or borrowed.
etc. Alternatively, rooms may either be numbered They are invaluable in Eowering horizontal frame
by Roman numerals or, if there are but a few spe- elements. �hese lifts can move even massive tim-
cial-p�rpose spaces within the structure, by appro- bers w�th considerabie facility. As the dismantling
priate abbreviations such as "SR—W" (salesroom, process moves down frorn floor to floor,the forkli�t
westside), or "CR—E," (counting room, eastside). can be readiiy lowered to the r�ext leve] and posi-
The marking system for each building will naturally tioned in place on sheets of F-inch thick plywood.
vary, as do buildings. A set of plans should always This procedure will adec�uately accommodate and
be at hand during the marking process, and, in distribute the weight of the timber being handled.
every possible instance; drawings should ' e marked In those rare instances where it is desirable to
in a manner w�ich corresponds with the actua� ma�e an entire plaster wall ir�tact because o# dec-
38
16707
orati�e painting ar other decoration, it will be nec- Conclusion
essary to rr�aice some campromise decisians about
preservation of original fabric. [F the wall surface is
af pri�ary irr�portance, then the maintenance of u/hether the structure is of masonry or frame
the originaliry and structura� integrity of its support construction,the pianning,research,and recording
members becomes secondary.The decorated wall P��ses oF the project are essentially sim�lar, to the
should first be protected or faced with paper, cush- relacated and restored structure, they are as sig-
ioning the wall with a resilient paperboard suc� as nificant as the ma�e itselF. However, maintaining
homasote would provide even more protection. In complete records does not end with the corr3pletion
order to remove a wall intact, it is necessary literaiiy of the move. The siting, foundation construction,
to cut it oUt of Ehe fabric of the building.Baseboards b:�ilding reassembly, and restoration phases of the
and other interior trim elements are removed. In �,ork a[so require thorough documentation. Only
the case o€exterior wa[Is, clapboards are removed through such attention and careful recordkeeping
as necessary, to expose sheathing. fn the interest can the Future valiaity and integrity of the move and
of o�erall rigidity of the wall unit, sheathing should restoratidn be assured.
be retained in situ; and it is generally necessary to
pro�ide additional diaganal braces. Note partiru-
larly that all bracing should be fastened to the wall
frame with lo�g wood screws, rather than naiis, ta
avoid plaster damage caused by hammering. With
the wall "unitized" by thorough sheathing and sup-
ported by diagonal braces, it is now possibie to cut
the frame joints. Occasionally, it is possibEe to lift
the waE[ unit with a crane and disengage the joints
of the posts and studs.
The plate, or girt if the wall is from a first floor
loeation, will mo�e with ti�e wall. Obvious�y, sup-
p�ementary temporary Frame etements musi be
pro�ided un#il the siructure is reassembled. 8races
on both sides of the wall may be thro�gh-bolted
using iengths of one-half i�cf� diameter threaded
steel rod. For this reason same areas of clapboard-
ing might be removed from the exterior. The pre-
caution of through-balting of braces provides
additional rigidity for the whole structure and as-
sures even distribution of pressure against the
cushioning mediurn. Reassembly of walls moved
in this manner will require the design af individually
custom-fabricated steel fishpiates and braces which,
when lag-screwed or boEted at the appropriate lo-
cations,will replace those wooden jaints which had
to be cut.
AIE frame building componenks, when packed in
closed vans,shouid be fumigated priar to reassem-
bly. In those particular ir�stances where a part of a
building is simply in a state of deterioration too
advanced to move at all, special care should be
takeR to photograph and record al! dimensions,
surface finish, and types of wood to ensure an ac-
curate reproduction.
39
16708
�
Case Study
Relocation of the Gruber Wagon Works
Charles A. Parrott, 1[I
7he Gruber Wagon Works in Berks County, ment were stiil used occasionaily for repairs until
Pennsyl�ania, buiEt in stages over the years 1882 the early 1970s. Foliowing its closure, the Wagon
to 191 1, is a rare surviving family-operated factory, Warks began to deteriorate more rapidly,and there
complete and unaltered since the early 20th cen- was the added t�reat that the machinery and tools
tury. Virtually alf of its original machinery remains might be sokd and dispersed.The factory buildings
intact (figures 33 anc! 34). !ts operation, the man- were more immediately threatened, as they were
ufacture of wooden farrn wagons, began to decline in the middle of an irnpoundment area scheduled
in the rnid-]920s, with the iast wagons built by the for inundation by the CI.S.Army Corps of Engineers
early 1950s. The buildings and all their tqols, ma- as part of the Blue Marsh Lake Project.
chinery,power generating and transmission equip- However, plans for the implementatian of the
�„�a � �;` �`'};;�`x�_4.'` ,�. `
�' � d� ,. .- � ' - a'
��,. ��
�� �:: ��. �,�'°"�,..
r.
� •�.
_ ..a
� . � "
�� ���; �
�, ,
r,
,. �. . ~�e q;� �,
, :_
�. .
� �� � � :��
.�i �_ � �� ;
�� � .�- - : � � [ ,a
` �w�, � ` � � � r �.�,.�,= .�
�' ����� ,�
",`����,�,,•- _-
.Il..k -� rl
��
� ���t_ : � �. - . . � �) � ,,._ ��
�. ,. ," +R� .... -
� _ Y5,
� � � '`�
;> _
� 1, x � �
- E{ <
j_ 1 . . . � ....... ... — :F�� _ .r�. ^�-0�' w���
i_ . 3 . _ - _ __✓ � ' "_
,. .�.,.aw. . - .,'+.a1k,k:;, _ _ .^ .... . :yx. -...- � 9� �-��. � �
� . - '- '"�:� I�
} '������ 3 , � .+"6tl'�r..�a+ 1
. � �
� � .
IL- - _avlM��-e��'- '.,.+�.-�ra�l4n'��� 3�_'i'°.. . ,., .. "
Figure 33: The Gruber Wagon Works,Berks County,Pettnsylvanfa
An exierior view of the Gruber Wagon Works as the complex appeared in 1976 on its original site,and before [ts paftial disassembly
and relocation. The move was necessitated by the planned impoundment of this area for the Blue Marsh Lake Project by the C[.S.
Army Corps of Engineers.[Phatograph:Courtesy of John Miiner Associates�
40
16709
�
Blue Marsh Lake �roject brought attention to the recovery, protection, and preservation of historical
historical significance of the Gruber Wagon Works and archeological data which might otherwise be
in the late 1960s. Concern for its fukure led to its lost as the result o�any Federal or federally licensed
listing in the National Regisier of Histaric Places in project.
1972, and its documentation and rerording by the P�eservation in this instance meant that the prin-
Historic American Engineering Record (�EAER) cipal structures comprising the Wagon Works
from ]973 to 1975. would ha�e to be moved.Yet a relocation and res-
toration project of tE�is magnitude would require
ln the meantime the Corps of Engineers, aware considerably more funds than the 1% of project
of its responsibilities under Section l Ofi of the Na- costs that the Corps was au[horized to spend by
tional Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (P.L. 89— the Moss-Bennett Act on al] historic and archeo-
fi65), and Executive 4rder i 1593, "Protection and logical resources endangered by the construction
Enhancement of the Cultural Environment," was of a dam.Because of the significance of the Wagon
investigating possible ways to save the Wagon Wo�ks, the matter received 'additional congres-
Works.These efforts were intensified by the imple- sional support,and in October]976,legislatio�was
mentation of the Rrcheological and Historic Pres- passed which authorized the expenditure of sepa
ervation Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-291), commonly rate Funds specifically to relocate and restore the
known as the Moss-Bennett Act. It provides For the Gruber Wagon Works.
�,
�:�:
���
�Y,
6's
.�
3
@
i
S
' I�k s :
_ �.'"'"—�=" F� C h - E �� TF
- "�,�� '�. �-- _�': �L
�--'c =_ _- ..r:'� �' ��?;` � a y .��G: I ;..�a�d
�
.�-
.. .-r I
_ - �._ .. ._ ...-_ ---�-�_ _ ._. .-= _'
a � �
- � +��- r- -i� . . , ��_ -= j��.�
r-: i ' � �
�' I ' - ' � �3
1
� j � ��� �i s ha ' t: ' - �.
i� ..
€� � ��- ��''. � F'�_ � � .Y _ ��
-, "� f �-. , ,, � �r .� ; �. �
- _ -� - -
r.
, .�.t �.1 . ` �{ -3: f 4 : '�r=Ar_ 'f ��.
t �� �.:� .�' - '` � - �v �
. 3 �
.- . !
, ... - ....�P"'.� . - Y¢_
�
... ... ..... .�.....�.� � i�
._ ;y
: yl ' l�
. . � ��. ,������� ..� o�i� .ii� � � '
... ... �i... ..�� .o�� ��ir i�i�.i.� . ,..� . �..�.�. . �..� y.
L 0 4 6 1 I U G I Y A L 5 [ C 1 I 0 N L d 0 F f Y 6 5 � � 1 M
a <I
_ _ ,
..�oW� • j �'.
Figure,i4: Measurect Grawing
This longitudinal section looking south is one of the drawings done as part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER)
project ro record the Gruber Wagon Works. This detailed drawing (one of ten sheets), provides information on the location of che
machinery used to make wooden wagons.[Photograph:Courtesy of the Hfstoric American Engineering Record{HAER).Roland David
5chaaf,Delineator�
41
16710
�
Before any major relocation work could begin, change since before World War E.The disassembly
much preparatory work had to be done. As early methad was left up to the potential bidders, but tE�e
as ]974, the Philadelphia District of the Corps of Corps directed that it be fvlly explained as part oF
Engineers began to study the many factors involved the proposal.
with moving the Wagon Works, such as relocation The prequalifying praposaE also t�ad to contain
sites and some methads and techniques which a pian to relocate the Wagon Works an two possible
cou[d be employed for disassernbiy or mo�ing in- sites: a te�nporary, nonreassembly storage site on
tact. The Corps prepared a case report encam- Corps-owned land, and at the permanent site on
passing detailed ana[yses of five relocation sites Berks Counry park IaacE at Red Bridge,just west of
and five aiternate relocation methods. The case Reading, Pennsylvania. Subsequent to the submis-
repoft was prepared for the review and comment sion oF the proposals but prior to the bidding, the
nf[he Advisory Counci4 on Historic Prese�vation, as Corps and Be�ks County reached an agreement on
required �y its co�npliance procedures (36 CFR the permanent Red Bridge site; thus the bidding
Part 600}, for any property listecf in the [�ational on the storage site was dropped.The caunry agreed
Register affected by a federally assisted project. to provide the land for the relocation of the Wagon
The five relocation methods ranged from retain- Wor�Cs,with the Corps praviding for both the mov-
ing on�y the main Floor interior of t�e buikding and ing and restoration of t�e buildings.The agreement
reconstructing ik within a nonhistoric building shell also stipulated that following restoration, ownership
to retaining all the original building fabric and ma- of the reiocated Wagon Works would be transferred
chinery. The ]aiter alternative was finally chosen. to Berks County which would then maintain the
�ventuaily the choice of sites was narrowed to two, restored complex and operate it as a museum.
one of which was intended as a permanent site. At first it seemed logical to separate the building
The other was a storage site, to be used only if an on�y along the p]anes between the se�eral historical
agreement with the county for the preferred site additions,but this pro�ed to be impractica]because
could not be reached by the scheduled time of the it would have resulted in greaker fabric disturbance.
relocation. Studies were also made to identify the The building was carefu]]y separated into four ma-
o�stacles which would be encountered on each jor sections and Ehe appendages divided into se�-
route to the two sites. era! rninor parts so [hat fabric separation was
In July 1976, the Philadelpi�ia District of the minimized. The usual practice oF indiscriminately
Corps of Engineers awarded a $387,000 low-bid slicir�g a structure apart along a single plane wikh
contract for all services involved in the relocatian a chain saw was not permitted in this case. Instead,
of the Wagan Works from its orig3nal location to the disassembly plans provided for remaving in-
a new site out of the impaundment area of the dividual pieces af original Fabric and speciFic pro-
reservair. The contract was awarded to the design cedures for cutting or disassembling each aFfected
and conscruction team of R.S.Cook and Associates, structural member or joint. (Figure 35 shows the
Inc., general contractors and construction man- projecting beams.}[t would have been easier to butt
agers, Philadelphia; John Milner Associates, pres- cutthejoints,reconnectingthem laterwith exposed
ervation architects and planners, West Chester, pfates and cleats. However, this crUde reassembly
Pennsylvania;Keast and Hood Campany,structural was not acceptable, because it would have been
engineers, Philadelphia: and C. Van Howling and visible on the exposed interior framing, or "open
Sons, building movers, Wallingford, New Jersey. A finish" cornrnon to most early frame industrial
prequalifying �roposal, su�mitted prior to the ac- structures.
tual bidding, required the preparation of a detailed Care was taken so that the joints between all
preliminary analysis and design of the overall proj- disconnected or severed parts came apart horizon-
ect. This proposa] had to meet the technical re- tally to insure that the sections wauld separate and
quirements oF the Corps, w#�ile at the same time rejoin without conflict. Disconnection of joints
preserving the entire building, including the ma- alo�g the sarne separation plane was systematicaEly
chinery and rural industrial am6ience that had been studied ta make certain that any member contin-
maintained at the Wagon Worics virtually without uous becween two adjacentjoints was included with
42
16711
�
separation planes where the strtaetural system was
�` temporarify disconnected.
'� Since the rnain structure had to be separated
' ,. � 3nto pa€rts about 30 feet wide For the 5-mile trip
aiong a two-lane highway and onto the new site
, � one-half mile down a narrow secondary road, it was
� necessary to adopt a dismantling procedure that
� would satisfy cost restrictions and yet minimize re-
E
i mova� and disturbance of the original fabric. Thus
° the plan had to establish separation planes that
� wauld meet the size ]imitations and do the �east
; da�age. The individual tasks required to stabilize,
separate,remove and rejoin or reassemble all build-
� 3ng parts, machinery, and the power transmission
-� - �
, ' system were studied in advance, as was the need
a
to support or strengthen ti�ese eiements during the
" �"� relocation.The resutting relocation design was pre-
%
�� sented in explicit wo�king drawings (see Figures 36
` � and 37)and specifications which had been outiined
�r ' �� ' � in the prequalifying propasal by the architecturaf
� �` � and engineering consultants.Work in this area was
�� � ��-�-� r' i E'�� �, � � facilitated by the existence of the rneasured draw-
�✓; ° � in s and ather documentation done b h H'
, ;� g y t e isEor�c
p ;je"` � ��� American Engineering Record (HAER) in 1973,
1974, and 1975. These HAER documents, which
� � ° ,` � ` � will be retained on file in the Library of Congress,
� '�+`E�� �`- � �p"�r[ include field notes, sheets oF plans, sections and
elevations,and exterior photographs;also included
Figure 35: Separation planes are rnany interior photographs taken in 1973-
A staggered disconnection oF the Flooring was adopted in order l 974,and photocopies of photographs of the build-
to camouflage the ��� sr, the construction aRer the seciions ing, equipment, and workmen taken at variaus
were reassembled.The separation pl�ne for the walls and rooF times during the years of operation of t�e Gruber
fel!along an existing structural division.thus permitting a single
straight separation. �Photograph: Courtesy of John Milner As Wagon Works.
soc�ates] In addition to the building itselt, the machinery
and the power generating and transmission system
had to be relocated. Wherever possible, these me-
the same bliilding section. In addition,on the work- chanical devices and assemblies were 1eft in place,
ing drawings each structural member was noted stabilized as required, and mo�ed along with the
with the number of the building section with which building. However, �t was necessary ko rerr3ove the
the member was to be included as a separation aid entire main drive shaft and se�era�secondary shafts
(figures 36 and 37). Siding and flooring were re- hanging fram the basement ceiling to accomrna-
moved along the separation planes either to exist- date the rigging beams. The Otto gasoline engine
ing joints or rsew staggered joints ta eliminake the and severaf machine tools were also removed sep-
reassembled appearance of a line indiscriminately arately because they were in the �asement or on
cut through the building, (See staggered floor- slabs on grade. In order to control these removais,
boards,figure 35)5tructural reinforcing, consisting a complete inventory had to be made of the me-
primariEy of tirr�ber bracing and tie rods,was added chanica]system;this premove tagging ensured that
throughout the building bath to strengthen existing each pulley and shaft assembly was returned to its
unstable conditions and to provide support along correct location during the reassembly.
43
16712
.
. ��� y:#_4-_
-:a�z s^�ra
!--�:�„a„�°^ - M.,�:�
�-._ ... ~' . - - - --- r
� . e W la.; �.
•:::� u'�,a':��:'4� . - ,.,�...�,::5"�'.:J'-'=�-' �.
�� , /";��;N/v_"°yK_p"\ —
� �0 ...C�j_i� � \ \ ���
/O O +�r� •P�J �Yl O.�� /' /
� % �/ �
.>� i � \� � y��
� �� , O � � � �� �
I ��
— J �..��"` �.,..�
�" ^-„�s'°e:k:.�.,..,..a.,..,YC-.nt D'Fa r1
ec.�.a..e w.=,�....�wne�
I ���.�o,+i
a�.
� � .�
��.y,�..< < �+ � i , " ..
-nr.�w eo�w:..�•`-a: � �"�
� . ��p .,.�.'�°�n"°" �7� , i �j ' �"=f�
<'r / , �i �_i
�. i/ ,
W y � ,�� /' 'a"s'�. ��A���....
�. �� ' ,
�='� `\
r%
n�.=.., .rc- 2] I �
.mva s'm.s I . .��� ��w.e�ea..""`.., _`.2� � ±,��.t�'y�u�N�"$`�
f � a.�'.'' ' � �,d`,�'3:'�1L�
I �'�`�•�.�a.��e �.
�� �� � �
y'�. q�, w.�L�.�a�%�ti� � � /� - �
�� � � 1
m '� � � :'"" � �� �,���'�°
� o� ��,.. �. , �� �
-� � ` ,� ���,.,���.. ,��;;� JOHN M[LNER ASSOCUTEg
�e:.a-.a?�.t`r�w ,� n Y�.iw .�' � .w;« ow:w:.�m�a.. ""
- .T w
' `'`. ' .� ` ����u a�,c � — _ -
��� ` —
.c���Anraa
e"a."'%.';'�,� i ' t' : � acc�r�o�.�""ux�w iw5 veou
� �
Figure 36: Working drawing,"Cutti�g and 5plicing Qetails."
Details Frprr�sheet 18 of ihe working drawings are indicative o#the meticulous study and thought devoted to the early planning siages
o(the Gruber Wagon Works relocation project. This drawiny showiny cukuny and splicing details ot the structural framework fpr
sections I and 2 of the Wagon Works was prepared by John Milner Associates.the architectural tirm whfch supervised[he dYsassembly
and move.I`iote the tarefully worded and ihorough descripiions supplfed on the drawings to ensure that disassem6ly.removal. siorage,
and reassembly o( the siructural members were [arried out in a manner that would cause the least harm to the buildings, thus
preserving their histori�al integrity as much as possible. �Photoyraph, Courtesy af the Philadelphia Dkstrict. U.S, Army Corps ol
Engineers]
44
16713
.�w�.., , � =-� .—..,..o - �
.�i�e',�,_ 'f'�` � ;•g;: :Fw....m��....,,�.. � � •�w..n.
,KT:s� � .....�.�:A:F:,e._ j —
+ _ __ . - I i i f"� .
�i � �
J � . _ . ,
--— _�
.�
; - �,.._..e:.:�,�,`i - ,.
�' _� L .�
� ....... -..��L,r.^:atii �' :.4� 'Iv;f.�...�u'.m"�.°:...�. i �.`��`�W °'��^�.Y /;/ � � •, .,.,
u.�a �
[�fra��Ox co..r�o.+ �.^�-r.".'.. ELE��ria
��
�� I � i
I i _ 1�.�iTf - � _ _ _ . .
I !I Y�
rnvw�r li� a.n_w�s�� � 'ww�.�M \.�i�,�� �ru.^' e I� -�/�. ...• \
I WI_ ' �'•�� y^ ` �•
l
•rrv f I �..�u.n �I � — /' .�.o...�t_�_ � I
S I \�..w. ..J I i.�e,.... '.� •..n!j —= �� � .�
.. " ...:•" �-t - _ ___ —• ;'::kx... '
�� �Y� .� • / �_� � .-, .i.!
.k�...� �
I ;� _ _' —r, �.�,..,�. �y-T - .�le � � .�........e L_ _ ■
'et'r.'�v..
r .
�'
���
�.� �
..�_ o
-�: -� r , ..
!��:,.�.. �— ..�..,��.,.. ; �
u �.r�o� �Ecria� - sEc.o� x-r ]OEiN MILNER ASSOCIAT�IS,
..w.,.,�..................e �� ..e � ,om�.r;r,.�rii:7:.N.�
�s:
� �n.a.,�ff u...a«ro6�awv
eu:M�rm srqr e��tr�
�leu
Figure 37: Working drarving,"Blacksmikh Shop Bracing."
This sheet of the working drawings was prepared by the structural engineering firm of Keast and Hood to illustrate graphically areas
of structural weakness in t�e various bulldings of the Gruber Wagon 1�4'orks complex. and the wav in which these areas should be
supported and braced fn order to withstand the strain of the move. This working drawing {Gke Figure 36Y indicates the lo�ation of
badly rotted and decayed wood members.and dire�ts that many o(these merr}bers be feinforced_replaced,or treated with a preservative
before dfsassembly and the move,[Photogfaph:Courtesy of the Philadelphia District.U.S.Armv Corps of E.ngineers}
45
16714
- � _:� �
:-. > � ..�:`:� �; :�'"�. i, _ �
�k �� 3: � ';� �,
�� �-
�`��� _�
�l' �
�� }�;:�
,�
Figure 38: The Gruber Wagon , . �,,. ,�;a�. =� �,= t�,
Works and obstacles en route `` . "� � �— f
The largest section and[entral por- y; � � � 3 � ;
lipn of the Gruber Waqon Works, ,; � �i � ` ��
26 feet in width by 71 feet in length. + �+' � �� 'W
was moved on December 8 and 9. � "" `� }�'
�� a
1976.This photograph shows some �� �y{ ' �� , J �`;�;r I � `
of the difficulties encountered in " � ' .
• l,� d; � �,� -,
movmg an unwieldy structure of .ye ay = '�"
,}, � ,�
this slze, such as negotiating sharp _ ...
�.u� ^ `� �
comers on narrow country roads.
Note the extension and cross-arms �� ��
atop the utility pole to allow for tem- - `
porary raising of the power iines to " 'x��
r �a� ' ,{.' ��
permit passage o( the structure. ''}F :�� Y'�•
The openings left by ihe remova! ;:�' .�i ��
of rooFs and gabfes have been cov- `'�'�ry'-'� ,
�,�
ered to protect the interior of the ' • ' °
siructure Irorn the harsh winier � �
weather. (Photograph: Courtesy of " �`A � a��
John Milner Associates�. � "� • .
��� �: '
� ;:''�,:� '�,��Y�.�
�.. ,.� ,
��;';� � �,s : �
c. ti . a ' �y../.
�5".�. ,.�.. �F . 1 r �'�. �����4
. 4 . �rS l , .
'LSf+T�' '� 9��- r'}'.
�� • .�.. "i' '�
. . - � ,. _„_ . . .ti.:� --_____ .. .,..
Before moving 4he First of the three largest sec- dling." The cribbing consisted of stringers placed
tions (figure 38), the overhead electricai primaries transversely to the direction of travel and eonverg-
that �rossed the route with less than 4p feet o# ing girders placed longitudinally. under which the
clearance were temporarily raised. The secondary dollies were loeated in triangular support. Smaller
lines were extended with temporary wire coiled to sections of the building were moved on "low-boy'�
their poles. The roof anc! gables of the ele�ator type flat-bed trailers(figure 39).
penthouse of the �entral section were removed to The three largest se�tions were taken to the new
bring its overall height down to that of the other site in two separate operations. The ce�tra3 and
two large sections.Thus, the cost of relocating the largest sertian, 26 feet wide by 71 feet long, was
electric prir�aries was minirtiized. The temporarily moved on December 8 and 9 (see figures 35 and
lengthened electric seconda�ies and telephane ca- 38), and the other two,28 feet wide by 35 feet long
bles were then dropped directly on the road ahead and 24 feet wide by 43 feet long, in ranvoy on
of,and crossed by,the moving rigs.At no time was December 22 and 23 (figure 40).The actual trans-
any ser�ice interrupted.The cost of utility relocation portation over the chosen 5.5 mile route, althoug�
came out oF the original contract sum along with certainly the most dynamic and photogenic portion
all other cosks. of the entire operatian, was probably also the least
The actual pulling apart and re�ocation of the novel part of the job. As exp�ained earlier, this pra-
various sections followed the aforementioned cedure has been repeated many times in much the
structura� stabilization and structural and mechan- same way and has been practired at least since the
icaE disassembly. Each of the three largest sections late 18th century in the United States. A 36mm
o€ the main building was supported on a �ribbing motian picture film, in addition to hundreds of
of steel beams and carried on three 8-or 12-w�eel 35mm color slides and black and white photo-
dollies.The beams were pushed throu-_'i holes cut graphs, doeumente�the sectioning of the building
through the faundation—a process knawn as"nee- and the mo�e.
46
16715
�:�r`� �iI �'� Mjri��"�...,e�..: Y '�e, . .. ..:�.ik�1 -� ... .:r
o- . � �. � ...
- . �^- '`�_ .. �.�� �. . ���� . t
A�C yf .�`� e � _ 1 t
E t � � '-a' ,-�J�',� � �� � �II�
� �� � � �.'r ��
� . _ . ' y. ' ... _ 4 � ��
ai
�
. . =. .. -.. - . �� : . ..
..p *a - 3 � .
� Ya�'��-' ��� � �� j
� . � .. M7� �. - � .
; a�R � � �
���. �� _ ��� ! � ,r � ,.��
_ - � -.�
A � R �� �
��. � x _ �.,
*��„�s� r -
,� _ ' . �
� ._ ��,,:...
�;: ".
,.�,.
-�-, ` ,.i•`
�
. , �"`�
_ .�„
Figure 39:This section pf the Gruber Wagon Works.only somewhat wider than a house trafler, was smail enough to be transported
over ihe narrow country roads on a"low-boy"flat bed trailer.[Photograph:Courtesy of John Milner Associates�
Figure 40: Equalizing the towing forces
�Fo balance a building properly dur}ng a move,fi is often necessary to attach heavy vehicles behind as well as in Front of the structure.
Pictured here is the largest section oF the Gruber Wagon Works on its way to a new site, its weight swtably aligned ihrough careful
positioning of two tru�k tractors in the rear to offset ihe momentum being created by the two [rueks fn front pulling the structure.
�Photograph:Courtesy John Milner Associates�
;:a.
�
a.�:'n'.. � _, _' _ r q � .
r �9�., �� �; .� .
"�^ ' ._ ��+a� .�' ' .
:.. � ��
_ _ - � ���" �
� � —:� — r ��..a
* '.'. _4 FJ F' _ J y .„� - � -� ., � � �tl� .� g '�,�
�; � � `.� .`, .�.. ���.�- .,..�� ' . . .. . ` Y .,
.,� ��'�I- " _ _ . � � . _ - 0.��� �, �, "., _ "`i hy
' - � "E,�- .f- ' �' .
E'x '� ""�� _ � . �°!4't ,r► _. � : . « � � ''�^-���d
�.�_ T�. -� .. � ,� }`.�
�i, -�_x.... �
�i �a � _ .,_ � /�.
rI h
H; Y�}�' . � h����.
� � .. _�' �'.." ,. .. .. _� k
. . : -�_ .�"^_.... . .._ ��� '.
. � . .. . .. ._ . f
,� , " y�
•y f
� S.
~�r�� f.�'.1 �
� T � _
,'�
L � l�
T. � � �.} . �a
' ; -°�,�r= �-� ; 16716
_*�a. Jr.. ;� .`f J •.11 .�A '� '� . - ,
The three large, doliy-transported building sec- in [ocations where it would have 6een extremely
tians were each moved about 800 yards through difficult and costly to replace them after the reas-
a frozen and fortunately le�el com field lust above sembly had been completed.A new foun�ation was
the �ew site (figure 4]). This route was used be- built beneath each section after it was positioned,
cause the trees along the narrow public right-of- levele�, and structuralky reassembled over new
way made it impassable at that point. The largest footings. The concrete block foundation consisted
of the three major sections was moved to the new of a permanent core and temporary exterior veneer,
site first because it was the central piece and it was to be replaced eventually with stone from the orig-
advantageous to reattach the adjacent smalier and inal foundation walls. The roof was temporarify
lighter sections ko it. sheathed in plywood and roofing felt while awaiting
As might be expected,the reassembly proceeded a new slate roof to rep[ace the decayed and dis-
in approximately the reverse order of the disassem- carded ariginal. Afl machinery and shaRing were
bly. The success of the entire scheme, of course, repositioned, but will not be finalfy leveied and
lay in the reassembly, not in the disasse�nbly or khe made operationaf until restoration of the building
transportation. After locating the building sections fabric is cornpleted.
approximately in their final positions by winch and The restoration of the Gruber Wagon Works on
replacing the dollies with timber cribbing,the exact its new site is in progress as of this writing. Only
rejoining and leveling was performed with both with campletion of the restoration, integration of
mechanicalty and manualfy-powered hydraulic jacks other site impro�ements planned by Berks County,
and manually-operated pulling jacks known as and the inauguration vf the Wagon Works as a
"come alongs." museum of rural technology, can the success of
During reassembly, several badly rotted struc- the total project�e measured and the worth of the
tura] members,princi�ally siU plates,were replaced relocation be estabiisheci.
`t r,,_'�'S _ ..a... �r.;-... ..,:�q'~ . 1 s k�3".S.,�sCls`i..���' -� I
��� � �;f
•-a- .-.. , .. ,... , . . . . , : . .�.
� _� .,. _ ..- . �
,�i�.,w . __.�.__�. I
�
• e :.�.. ..
�
� s
. �f � �
a,
�.,.�
i�
Figure 4l: Temporary reinforcement for Cruber Wagon Works move
Dign�fied though ungainly,on its way to a new home,the largest section of the Gruber Wagon Works is pulled slowly by two trucks
followed by cwo rnose trucks at the rear to baiance and stabilize the weight of the building section.This view also shows some of the
temporary internal bracing that was especia4ly designed to stiffen the building where the wings and additions were remo�ed to facilitate
the relocation.[Phokograph:Courtesy ofJohn MilnerAssociates�
4$
16717
I
Selected Bibliography
"At New Orfeans 5000 Ton Reinforced Concrete Mrs. Felton. American Life: A Narratir�e of Two
Hospital Moved 1 12 Feet."Architecture and En- Years'City and Country Residence in the iJnited
gineering, ]25(June ]936),p,2, States. Edited by Bolton Percy. London: Simp-
Bock,A.F."Moving Houses in Germany."Scienti�c �in, Marshaf! and Co., 1843; extracts cited in
American, 7l (May 27, 1911),p.328. Antiques,C113(September 1972}, p,$64.
Borchers, Perry E. Photogrammetric Recording o# Fisher,M. "Mo�ing Hibbing by Tractor and Truck."
Cultural Resources. Washington, D. C.: Tech- American City,25(August 1921},p. ]05.
nical Preservation Services, Office of Archeolagy Gildea, Wiiliarn. "Adventures in the House-Moving
and �fistoric Preserva[ion, Nationa[ Park Service, Trade." The Washington Post (5eptember 3,
1977. 1976),P• S 1.
"Busi�ess as Clsual While Moving." SCientific "Giving tt�e Old 5hambles a Lift." Reprinted from
American, 125(November 1921), p.27. Building(August 6, 1971), n.p.
"A Calculated Move.. . for a 14th Century Church." "Grafting Old Hnuses to New Sites." Cauntry Life,
Tethnology and Conservation, Spring 1976, p. 45(December 1923),pp.69-70.
�� "Great Engineering Feat." Scientific American, 90
Chambers,J. Henry,A.I.A.Cyclical Maintenance for (February ]3, 1904), p. 138.
Historic Buildings. Washington, D. C.: Office of Hart, David M. X-Ray Examination of Historic
Archeology and Historic Preservation, �lational $truckures. Draft Repart. Washington, D. C.:
Paric Service, 1976. Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation,
Chambers, J. Henry, A.I.A. Rectified Photography National Park Service. ]975.
and Photo Drawings for Historic Preservation. ��House Mo�ing." Scientific American, 84 (January
Draft Report. Washington, D. C.: Office of Ar- 26, 1901),p.56.
cheology and Histaric Preservation,f`lational Park
Service, 1973. "House Moving."Scientific American, $9 (Decem-
ber 12. 1903), p.446.
Close, Charles S. "Moving Brick Hauses." Journal
of the Franiclin Institute.70:3(September 1875?, "House Moving in Boston."Journal of the Franklin
pp. 178-180. Institute,59:2(February 1870}, pp.89-92,
"Caurthouse Going to Court." Scientific American, "How to Mave Houses."American Agriculturist, 32
81 (October 7, 1$99),p.232. (fyovember ]873},pp.417�18.
"Curious Feat of House Movin SCientifiC Amer- "If a fyew Highway is Headed Your Way Should You
g� Get into Housemovin � Ho�se and h{ome, 6
ican, 128(�fune i 923).p.378. g'
(October 1954),pp. 154-167.
Curtis, �fohn O. "Moving Historic Buildings.'� AIA Jahn Milner Associates. Historic Structures Fte-
,3ournal,43 (March 1965), pp.41�6.
port: Gruber Wagon Warks, Blue Marsh Lake,
Dtxon, J. W. "Maving a House." Country Life, l9 Berks Country. Pennsylvania. Prepared for U.S.
supplement{March 1, l91 l), p.442. Army Engineer District Philadelphia, Corps of
"A Feat in House Moving."Scientific American, 68 Engineers. U.S. Army, Second and Chestnut
(February 1 1. 1893), p.91. Streets, Philadelphia. PennsyEvania 19106. April
28. 1978.
49
16718
i
�.abine, Claire Wood. "Saving Two Southem Vic- "The Pope-Leighey House." Historic Preservation,
torian Fancies." Old House Journal, 111:12 (De- 21:2-3 (April-June, July-September 1969). en-
cember ]975),p�.3-4. tire issues.
Maruca, Mary. "Saving the Life-Saving 5tatian." Pryke, J.F.S. "Moving Structures." Reprinted from
CRM ECultu�al Resources Management]Bulletin: The Consulting Engineer,(September 1967),n.p.
A nationa! Park Service Technical Bulletin, 1:3 °�T�e Recycled House." S�nset, 149 (5eptember
(Septe�nber 1978),pp.3�1. 1972), pp.72-75.
McKee, Harley J. Recording Historic Buildings. Reirthart, Virginia. "Oid Bui{dings—New Hazarcfs."
Washington, D. C.: National Park Service, 1970. �o}� Safety and Health, 4;7 (.�uiy 1976), pp. l�
"Moving Brick Houses.'� Brickbuilder, 4 (]896), p. 23.
t09. Raberts, R. W. "Moving Old Buildings." Building
"Moving the Montauk Theater." Scientific Ameri- Economist, ]2:4(March 1974), pp.215-220.
can,97(September 7, 1907),p. 171. Schi!]er, Barbara. "A Towering Victorian Status
"The Moving of Buildings." Architect's .3ournal, Symbol." Old House Journal, V:4 (April 1977),
99aoocvi(February 24, ]944).entire issue. pp.40--41.
"Moving a Church: Remo�al of the Church of 5t. Singer,Earie G. "Historic Preservation in the West."
Andrew." R1BA Joumal, 41:53 (October 13, H.Q.�. Challenge, fYovember 1975,pp.4-1].
3934),pp. 1053-1059. Skaele,Joan. "The Moving Story oF a Swiss Chalet
"Moving a Church of 3200 Tons."ScientiFic Amer- in Vermont." Okd House ,�oumaE, 111:6 iJune
ican, 128(March 1923),p. 186. ]975), pp.3-5.
"Moving a ]10� Ton Brick Railway 5tation." Sci- Sluis,William. "1-Block Moving Bill: $30,000." Chi-
entific American, 115 (September 2, 1916), p. cago Tribune,May 16, 1977, Section 6,p. l2.
2a9. "State Highway Bridge Towed Down Stream." Ar-
"Moving House After 350 Years." Reprinted From chitecture and Engineering, 1 13(May 1933),pp.
Contract Journal,(February 3, ]972),n.p. 47�8.
"Moving a House of Glass." Scientific American, Stevenson, David. "House-Moving" In Sketch oF
126(June 1922),p.3$7. the Ci�ii Engineering of North Amerira. London:
"Mo�ing Ho�ses to Clear the Mines." Scientific John Weale,Architectural Library, 1838.
American, l25(August 6, 1921),p.95. "Tale of Church in Two Cities." AlA Journal, 56
"Ma�ing a Large Factory at Jamaica Plain." Sci- (July 1971),p.27.
entifiC American. 73 (October l 9, 1895),p. 246. "Thirteen Story Office Building Cut in HaIF and
"Moving 3500 Tons of Building on Pr9nceton Uni- Moved Eight Feet." Architecture and Engineer-
versity's Campus." Archite�tural Forum, 1 l9 ing, 123{December 1935},pp,5�58.
(July ]963},pp. 10�109. "Vertical House Moving." Scientifc American, 89
"Municipal Control of the Mo�ing of Buildings." {December 12, 1903),p.446.
Bureau of Municipal Research and 5ervice, in "Voyaging Lig�thouse." 5cientific American, 1 i 5
cooperation with the League of Oregan Cities. (July 1, 1916),p. i 7.
lnFormation Bulletin No. 152. Eugene, Oregon: Watson, George H. and Malcolm Watkins. "Res-
(Jniversiry of�regon,January 1967.
taring and Movirtg an Old House to a f`lew 5ite."
�age, Marian. "�.ucy, the Margate Eiephant." In New York History, 28(July 1947), pp. 33�342.
Historic Houses Restored and Preserved. New wayne, H. H. "Half a Church is Moved, Episcopal
York:Whitney Library of Design, 1976,pp. 195- Church oF St.Mathew, San Mateo." Architecture
�g�' and Engineering, 21 1(Octaber i 957},pQ.l4-1 5.
�
sa
16719
ATTACHMENT I:
"HISTORICAL EVALUATION FOR THE FROOM RANCH BUILDING
COMPLEX," BERTRANDO AND BERTRANDO RESEARCH CONSULTANTS,
MARCH 14, 1998
16720
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16721
�3���
� �� ��
�
� �� �t� -pur�:,�..=t{ '
, . ,
Bertrandn and Bertrando
� ���� �e � �° � Research Cvnsu�tants .� y-�� � '" �1 ���� �
y � 2b7 Foothill Baule�ard ! �
� , �
� 5an Luis�bispo, CA 934�5 � �
a �ffice Phon�Numbers
Le A . ���5} 5�44-13�8 n: -`�r��
��- �Aos3 5��-�s3� ` `
�. ��
� � . . ($05} 541-�3�5 (FAX}
� E-mail: betsyb�;hegrid.net
o �
Mar�h 14, �998
� Int�rnational Arch�eological In►+estigabons
� -
.� . . ' - ' - - ----. '- . ' -- - ''� . _ ' �'- ' .. __, � . r.-.-� - ---- � ...
�
- - ''+c����
� - - � ������,:-_-�i�s r�''' I I t `V
.. — — --�=^�� ' ���,., r
.--"��:;��' �"'��'� [� �� s�� 1
- - �'�I i�� --
. - �`s� :�`" + t'S� - _
� � '
;�. � , �� � � ��4�. f - - -
�---� ���,r�r '�`�y �� � 1 :�� �f��' �� �
� � - �=.., -;��'�- ..:_���-..i �
� � =��-�,�
� ,i��- - -`�=-_ -__--- ' -=- _- -=---�"---��'�� :�-:��
��_;;��-- - -
Uld CreamerylHnuse,Frnom Ranch
� HIST[)RICAL EVALUATY4N FUR
THE FRUQM RANCH BilILDING CUMPLEX APN 67-24Z-419
� �AN LUIS �BISPU C�UNTY, CA. �P-4Q-U4-992}
���'' � � �;�� � �'��..`" � �� �
t�. ;- � > > �.�
i �� .�, w' ' � � s_:�� 'i� ��P"4,�.�
� F � � .
t ... •, a
`�.�,. � �`t,��' ;y. w��;r�� ��a���"����.�i�:�
� :
� Prepared at the Request of: Prepared hy:
Dennis Schmidt Setsy Bertrand�
� Centr�l Coast Engineering Historical Researcher
n
�
16722
� �
� "
� ABSTRACT
� Qn February 2, 1998, Betsy Bertrando o#'�3ertrando & Ber#randv Researc�
CQnsultants, at the reqt�est Qf Dennis Schnrsidt Qf Central Coast Engineering, conducted a
signifrcance er�aluation and identi�cation of secandary impacts for the Froom Ranch
� buildings as the result vf#he proposed MadannalEagle Hardware Project. T�e resuits of
t�e e�aluativn found tf�at the Froom Ranch is uot eiigible for the Natianal Register but is of
la�al interest and the resource is eligibie Tor listing as an histaric site. The Froom Ran�h
L was recorded as historical site P-4D-U4�991.
� ZNTRaDUCTI�N
The wark carried out for this study was conducted by �etsy Sertrando. Setsy Bertranda
, � has flver twenty years experience with the histarical resaurces of the Central Coast and has
completed numerous projects within tne City and Cv�nty of San Luis Qbispa. The wark took
place in February and March, 199&. The project locatian is depicted on the I'isrno Beach 7.5"
� USGS quadrangle topagraphic map.
� ` A pre�ious archaealagi�al study, Re�uft�f Pha�e Dn�Arch��9loeical S�rface Sur�ey of�
`, the Frc�9m Ranch��erty, Los C�so�Valley Road �an Lui� [7bist�o Caunty. CA, was prepared
by archaealogist Robert Gibsan(Gihsan 1�93]. He recam.rnended that a specialist in histaricai
� resources e�al�ate the structures if any dise�t impa�ts were ta accur ta the ranch camplex.
� �ACKGRflUND
� The praject area lies within the baundaries of the historic La Laguna or Laguna Rancha.
'� T�e area known as the Froom Ranch originaliy contained Lats 6�, 67, 68, and 59 as partrayed an
the I 869 rnap - u6di�isio�he ranchas Casiada de los �sas and La Laguna, surveyed by
James Strattan. A tatal of$67.87 acres made up the ❑riginal Froom Ranch parcel. Ta�iay, the
� ranch cansists of ap,proximately 500 acres. The ranc�lfarm comp�ex sits on Lat 68 of'the
original subdi�vision bordering the southwest boun�Eary oi�the Laguna Rancha.
� The La�una Rancho was ari�,inally a part of the Mission San Luis �bispo de Tolasa
3ands. In 1$44, after the Mission ranchos had been regranted by the Mexican go�ernment,
� Ga�ernor Micheltorena granted the church"one square league �4157+ acres) in the place callea
Lagurra" �Engelhardt 1953). This was included with two garden plots and the church in San Luis
Ohispa. In I$G5, the new Ga�ernor, Pio Pico, sold off alI the remaining mission Iands and
buildings. Captain �ohn Wilson and two partners, Scott and McKinley, bought the San Luis
.. Qbispv Missivn and the Laguna Rancho far$5�� (Angel l 883}. The pr�perties were later
claimed by t�e church and cflnfir�ned hy the Atr�eriean g��ernment in 1$55 (Kacher I972}. In
1859, Bishap Alemany sald the Laguna praperty to Captain John Wilsan.
�'rooEn Ranc� Histnricat E►+aluatiuri 2
�
16723
�
i �
� W.'L�. St�w, fram San Francisco, e�entually acquired the Wilson estate. Stow was
knQwn locally as a majar benefactar af th� �rst Iil�rary in San Luis ahispo. Contributing boaks
� not money, Stowe felt "there was taa mu�h readin�flf f ction, which might be stvpped if
historical ar�d biagraphical works were pla�ed an t}�e shelf' and war�tec� to nnake the s�lecti�ns
himself(Tagnaz.�ini 199�).
� � In 1875, Stow sald the �raperty tv S.W. (Harry} Fareman, a surveyar. Harry a�d his wife
buili a rather elabarate (far the time}hvuse t�at remains today at the er►d of Madar�a Road and is
` knawn as the De Vaul Ranch laause (Be�tranda 19�7).
� fw.
In 1$84, Ludwig Nelsan purchased Lot 50 flf the La Lagur�a subdi�isian from Forema�.
4 � Ludwig came frorr� Norw�y tv Ca�ifornia in I859 and to the cflunty in 1868. By 1883, he had
a�quired a dairy and 856 acres in the Harmony I]istrict. Nelsan is listed as a farmer in 18$4 and
as a dairyman in the 1892 San Luis �bispv Great Registers. The ranch e�entually grew to
, � cvntain L�ts 67, 68 and 69 as well, for a tota� Qf$67.87 acres. �Vhen Ludwig die�i, tlae property
was z-un hy his wife Annie Nelson. Aru�ie Nelsan awned four ranches; one in Estera, twa in
C�nbrialHarmany and the Froom Ranch on Las �sos Valley Road (Bill Frnom pers. cannzn.},
L
3Q�.n R. Fraom was ��rn in Prescatt, Gran�ille County, Canada in 1864, When he was
� � sixteen years old he left Canada for Iawa. After six months he made his way to California and
did ran�h�vork for a year near Santa Rosa. Then, in 1886, he came ta wvrk far Ludwig Nelsan
in Laguna, living in a little rovm attached to the creamery (Structure E; see Resuits 5ection}. In
� 1890 �e te�.sed fi�e hundred acres and began �airying with fafty cow�.
Hairiet Perry was a nati�e �f Ireland wha first came to Illinois with her brother and later
to San Luis �bispo where she settled. Harriet and Jok�n Froom were married o� December 14,
` � 1944 an�i had se�en children; Harry, Annie, Minnie, Willie, Robert, Bunny and 3ohn (M�rrisan
19]7}. Fram the estate af Annie Nelson, Harriet Perry Froom acquired Lots 60, 57, G8 and b9
�I in 19�4. In 19D5, the H. P. Fra�m Ran�h�onsisted of 412.65 a�res. They li�ed in the srnall
�` additivr�at the east end af t�e �reamery that appears t� }�e, h�t is not,attac�ted to the creamery
{5tru�ture E}. Tn 191 S, they mo�ed into the"new" four}�edraQm house (Structure C}.
� Accarding to Bill Fraom, a dairy has been on the �rope��ty since the 1850s. The
su�di�isian map of 1868 �i�es na information regar�ing land use flr existing structures. The Plat
map of 1858 shows one house near the eastern border af the Laguna Rancho. A "thatched"
� house is shvwn just t❑ the outside of the sauthern point af the rancha.
�
For s��eral years the ranch has been vwn�d by Alex Madonna and used as an equipment
storage yard. Mac�onna z-uns cattle on the ranch as well. He has been respansible for the upkeep
❑f the rancka stru�tures and has painted most af the buildings. Bill Froam, until this fall,
.. continued to resid.e in the house he has spent most of his life in. Health probl�rns ha�e recently
necessita#e� Sili li�ing with his brgther in San Luis �bispo. Currently, no ane resides on the
ranch.
r.
Froom Ranch Historical �►+aluation 3
i�.
16724
�
�
�
�
�
METHflDS
The archi�es of Bertrando & Bertrando Res�arch Consultants were re�iewed for the
� project. 1ncluded in the researched material were inter�iews with Bill Froom �anducted in
Fehruary 1993 and .Tuly 19g7. The original Plat for the Lag�ir�a Rancho in l$58 and the I$68
subdi�isian map, as well as se�eral latez xnaps, were studied for evidence af earty structures.
,r Texts and reparts an file for the area were also re�iewed. A record search was condu�ted at the
Central Coast Information Center�CCIC} at UCSB nn February 18, I g98. Qnly one repvrt frvm
the CCIC, Cuft��l ResoUr�e In�estigation of the P�riera_{sic}-Garcia Pro�v APN 053-1 fi 1-D l 0
�. and 4b7-241- 21 {Farker 14g6}, was found ta contribute to the researcl� project.
� qn February 2?, 1998 an an site re�iew af the existing stru�tures was conducted. VJritten
� descriptions and phatvgraphy vf the camplex were campleted at this time.
Joan Sulli�an, histarian., artist and writer from Los flsos, was generous and forthcoming
"` in a request for informativn regarding the Fraom Ranch. Se�veral �isits to the �anch by Sul[i�an
took place o�er a period of time commencing in 1977. During this period, s�e �ideo tape� Bill
� Fraom at the Ranch, recorded fi�e cassette tape inter�iews with Froom and wrote se�era� articles
Ifor The Sa�lh�w� that resulted in the publication af Tauriti�; t�se Froom Ranch (S�fli�an 1993}.
� Znitially, her�isits were as paz�of a waterco�or class that regularly �isited picturesque sites in the
� caunty to paint. Also part of her collections were sketches vf dairy equipnzent, photographs and
slides of the Froom Ranch. This prQ�ided an in�aluahle contribution to this report as at this time
gill Froom is not li�ing on the Ranch.
�
SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
�
�
The California En�vironmental Quality Act of 197� �CEQA Appen�ix K), and the
�� � National Register of Histori� Places (NRHP Section l06} were used to determine patential
Significance of the Froom Ranch. The National Re�ister criteria for er�aluatian states;
"the quaiity of signi�ca�-�ce in Arz�ericars history, architecture, archaeology,
r' en�ineering, and culture is present in districts, sit�s, ��ildings, structures, and ahjects that
possess integrity af locatian, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and
associatiara and
(a) that are assvciated with events that ha�e made a significant cantrihutian ta the�road
�
patterns of our history; or
� (t�} that are assaciated with the li�es of persons significant in our past; or
�
Froom Ranch Historical E�aluation 4
�
16725
�
I
�
L
(c} that embody the distincti�e characteristics af a type, periad, or method ❑f construction
� that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic �alues, or that represent a
signi�cant a.rid disting�ishahle entity w�ose�amp4nents may la�k incfir�idual distinction;
� vr
(d} that have yietded,or rnay 6e likely to yield, informatian important in �r�htst�ry ar
�, histary."
� � RESULTS
Fiejd In�vestigation
L
Eight structures were reviewed as part of the Ranch complex. They are described brie�ly
�
below, designated as A thrvugh H, and recorded as Prirnary Number P-4�-04-0991.
A. Qa a�
�
This bam near t�e hcruse was moved to its present lvcation and is o�er 1 DO years o�d. T�e
original locativn was oxa the south east side of the ranch until it was mar�ed slowly vn logs o�er
� the creek tv its present site. The barn has a corrugated raof and is farmed from vertical bvar�ds.
There is no foundatian. Double entty doars �ace east at the end af the long dri�eway.
�
�, S.
� A sma�l structure in gc�od condition sits �etw�en the ald barn (A} and the house (C}. lt is
built vf the same shiplap bvards as the house (C}. It has sash windaws and a door opening onta a
concrete stoap on the east side, It was built by Hans Petersen in 1915 at the same time as the
� house (5ulli�an 1993}.
C• 2u�e
�` TI�e four �edroom house was built by Hans Peterson in 1915. Petersan also built a wood
shed, the washing room, store rvom and bunkhause during the same period. The washing room
and store room were added to the rear of the main house in a lon� addition that is parti��ty of
� baard and batten cQnstruction. The main part of the �touse is s�iplap sidin�. The 6uilding sits on
a redwaod sill foundation. The entrance is from a porch supported by tlzr�e columns that faces
` the east. Abo�e the porch are decarative shin�les under the ea�es.
; D. W�9d Shed
�
The shed has a corrugated roof and �erticat board siding. There is a daor on the east ar�d
north sides of ti�e structure. A shed roof that ahuts a flat roof su�gests the flat roof was a later
�'raom Ranch Historicai E�aluafion 5
�..
16726
■d
L
addition. The shed was in the prvicess of being emptied of great piles of tin cans. Dne cleared
� area had exposed a piece of farm equipment in gaod condition, It was a harse drawn seeder
1abe�ed "�aliforrtia Gem Seed Sower". It appeared there maybe other pieces of ec�uipment
� amongst and under the remaining tin cans although it was difficult tv tell.
� E. Old CrearnerylHouse
One of the twv most interesting structures within the ranch, the Qld CreamerylHouse is
' alsa complex, ha�ing been built in at 3east three episodes. The west side of the wood shingled
� crea�nery structure includes a roam that was�iome to Bi14 Fravm's father fQr rnany years. The
board and batten �reamery housed a horse powered churn and a butter break table. Qnly the c�rn
she3ler remains. Most of the equipnnent is gvne. The aut.hor rernembers �isiting this site in the
� 1�7Ds and nvticsng pi�es of old �ottles under the floar boards an the ground. This time it was
clea� and no battles remained.
'� Tlie middle of the structure was built with shiplap and rraay ha�e been an addition ta the
creamery. The west side ap�ears to be attache� to the creannery but is actua]ly sepaxated by a
space about a foot wide. The li�ing space consisted of two roonns that had been muslin o�er
r singfe wall board and batten cvnstru�tian. Currently, the narth facing room is stripped of boards.
A la[er porch additivn is on the south side. The condition af the structure is�ery weathered and
� the flo4ring is unstable.
� F. Dairv Sarn
�
Anvthez-structure of interest is the dairy barn. This structure has an unusual rounded end
� an the south side that hangs along the edge of a slope. The dairy barn, as well as the granary and
the horse harn, were�onstru�ted by Jirr� Aiken ir� 1913 far$18��. The barn raof has wood
shingles and the walls of�ertical planks rest on formed concrete.
�
'� �. Grana.�
I i The small rectangular granary is in fairly good condition and is cornposed of�ertical
�`' ptank wa31s that rest an cQncrete and woad blo�k posts. The granary was constructed by .lim
Aiken in 1913.
'+ H. Qrse B�
�
This barxi is constx-ucted oF�erti�al boards an a cancrete foundatian. The wovd shingle
roof is rnissing approxinnately 12°/o af the shingles. The barn doors apen tv the narth side and
was�sed for wagans, harses and hay starage. The harse barn was constructed by Jim Aiken in
+ 1913. The barn is a style typical for the period.
Froam Ranch His#arical E�aluation 6
� 16727
�
�
Archi�al Research
A re�iew ❑f pre�iaus studies far neighboring histaric properties re�ealed t�e fo�lowir�g
�„ ir�formati�n.
� LongBonet#i Ranch - A historical e�a�uation condu�ted for this ranch in 19g0 in�luded a
�. �ornpaxison of�xisiing histaric ranch properties in the area. The ranch is �acatec� on lower
Higuera Street and is currently undergoing an adapti�� reuse plan for a part of the complex
stxuctures. The rest of the buildings are no langer remaining.
"Irr order to determine ifthe Lang-Bonetti Rarcch is the anl�remainrrzg
ranch bui2ding tivithin!he Ciry[imits or on!he outskirls of the crty, zt rs necessary
, �' to frnd aut hotiv many remain today. �ne excellent example is 1he Frr�om Ranch
i on Los Dsvs I�crlley Road. It is a good comparisan because af 1he selting and a
� large complex offarm buildings, In thrs case !he marn house, bu�[r ca 191�, has
` maintained r1s inlegrity. In addition 1he barn is highly unusual irr style with a
, unique rounded secrion in the rear. There are also some signif canl pre-19U4
�
board and barten strucrurea� on rhe property. This complex would no doubt be
eligible for Che Naliorral Register because rts irztegrity is indact" �Triem I99Q}.
� In doing this study, Triem felt that the Long-Banetti Ranch was importar�t vnly at a Ivcal
le�el as a contributor ta th�de�elopment and growth of agricuiture in Sar► Luis Obispo County.
� � It did not compare to the National Register status of the Froom Ranch.
B - The extremely rare o�tagonal barn is located on the old Highway 141
s�uth of San Luis �k�ispo. It was recarded as an historica� site by Charles Dills in 1989 and the
+�• form is �n file at the Central Coast Informatian Center at L]CSB. Informatian is hy photographs
and caordinates with on�y the fvllowing remark included.
� � "Barn may not be preserved. I! #s in very poor shape. 1�ond rs a2d, bri�tle and warped. "
[Di1ls 1 gSg).
� Fartuiaatel , throu h the efforts of the Land Consetvanc and the communii the outlook
Y g Y Y
for the unusual barn is not so bleak. Restoratian anci plans fQr a new use are pragressing wel1.
� De Vaul R n - This property with its distincti�ve red house is located adjacent to the
Frooan Ranch vn the northwest side at the end of Madonna Road. The red house was determi�ed
� to he signi�cant as a�ery early examp�e af a "country hQuse". The fountain walkway to the
hause entrance is to be in�luded as well. The typica] barn in �ery poar condition and one ather
outbuilding was not included as significant in this report(�ertranda 1 g97}.
�
Daiidi an h - This property on Madonna Road was alsv �is�ussed in the Long-Bonetti
report by .ludy Trienn. The main house is described as a"stylish Califarnia Burzgalow" and that
Frooin Ranch Historicai �valuation 7
�.
16728
�
�
�
� "this ranch complex may alsa be eligible far the National Register based on its setring, desrgn,
arzd high degree of integrity" �Triem l 99b).
� Nat mentione�i by Triem was an interesting building on the property. A part of the vld
grandstan� ihat was part af a ane raaile racetrack is easily seen from Madarula Road. The horse
i racetrack was formerly located vn Los Osos Valley Rvad acrass from the Froom Ranch and was
i. construct�d in the late 18�Os. When the grandstand was rnaved ca tt�e Dalidia property the tra�k
was shartened a half mile (Biil Froam pers. camm.}.
— An archaealogical in�estigation was conducted by John Parker i� 199G af the Pereira-
Garcia proper[y, adjacent ta the Frvom Ranch an the svuth side. As a result of that report,
Cultural Resource In�estigation of the Periera �sic)-Garcia Propertv APN �53-161-014 aild Ob7-
� � 241-q21, historic remains were identified and recarded as site CA-SL�-1784H. The rert�ains
� were fa�nd in the �i�inity near a spring that was described by Bill �'raarn as the ❑riginai location
of the old barn �Stzucture A) and included concrete slab, water tank, trash auid structural remains.
L
Se�eraI of the buildings ha�e been altered, added to and in the case af the ald barn {A}
mo�ed. The ann�x of the rear of the house� has been built of"spare parts" to take �are of
" particular needs, fvr example; stvra�;e, washing r�am and garage. The creamerylresidence {E) is
probably the aldest struct�e remaining on its Qriginal site. The addition af the small residence ta
� the creamery was svan afler 19a�. The ❑riginal home af the Nelsons was not located but may be
under the existing residence [C}. Parts ❑f the original hause were proba�ly reused during the
,r canstructian effort that taak p�ace ir� 1915 and for exannple �sed for the bunkhause {B}.
`
CQNCLL7SIDN AND REC4MMENDATI�IYS
�
The Froom Ranch has been a part of the cultural landscape ❑f San Luis abispa Caunty
� 5E31C� t�k� I SOQS, both as a�airy and iater as a cattle ranch. The Natianal Register of Historic
Places has fvrmed status codes for e�aluatin� resources. The Froom Ranch is not eligible for the
, National Register but fits the National Register category of places of loca! interest and the
� resource is e�igibte therefore, far Iisting as an historic local site.
�
Some elements pf the Frovm Ranch need further attention. The praposed adjacent
de�elvprnent has the opportun�ty to er�hance oUr unc�erstanding Qf times past through the
` following suggested miti�ation due to the results of th� secondary impa�t vn the Froom Ranch.
� 1. It is recammended that the old creamerylresidence and the unusual rounded
dairy bam be further documented with rudimentary flavr plans and style vf�onstruction
� notation �efore they completely disintegrate.
�
2. The �oic�of Bill Froom is recorded on se�eral audio �assettes as well as
appearing an a�idev ta�ae. These antidatal recordings offer a glimpse inta our past.
Froom Rar�ch Historical E�aluation S
�
16729
�
�
� Some of the audiv cassettes ha�e been trans�ribed. As part af the mitigation the rest
shouYc3 }�e cQmpleted as well and made a�ailable tk�xough the San Luis D�ispo
� CitylCounty Lihrary reference, Cal Paly Speciat Collections or another similar agency
with the pe�-mission of Jaan Sullivan af course.
� 3. The old huildings ha�e been enjoyed by some county residents who ha�e been
invited to �isit Bill Froom while he was still in residence. The rest of the community
kr�ows nt�thing of the ranch �uildings as little can$e distinguished from the distan�e of
� Los Dsos Valley Rvad. If the proposed project goes through the planning pro�ess, the
buildings will ha�e an enhanced �iewing area from the southw�st carner of the parking
area. It 'ss recommended that the de�elapment pracess in�lude a type of wayside
� informatian stand fflr the publi� to view and learn about the dairy heritage of our �ounty.
This statian shou[d prfl�ide information on the �arious stnactures and their uses �s well as
a brief histary of the rar�ch. A similar solution was su��essfully implemented at the Dairy
�
Creek Golf Course.
The particular signrficance af the Fraom Ran�h structures is as rernnants of the dairy
� industzy from the �iewpoint of two generatians of an Irish fan�.ily, They are illustrati�e of a life
on the Central Caast that only khe few remaining dairymen truly understand.
� �
ACKMnWLEDGMENTS
� � T wish to especially thank two people that were of assistance in the preAaration af this
repart. �ver the years I ha�e had the o�casivn to inter�view Bill Froom regardin� other praperties
� and the dairy fndustry. He has always flb��ged with a keen wit and enthusiasm. Joan Sulli�an, an
artist as well as a writer ❑f history, has a�er the years de�eloped a special relationship with Bill
Fr�om and the dairy. She �ery generously made a�ailable for this report her taped interviews
' � with Si11, phatographs vf BiII and the dairy, and the �aper t�at she produced that included her
sket�hes of the dairy and its history.
�
�
�
�
i �
;
�
Froam Ranch Histarical E►+aluatian 9
`� 16730
�
L
� REFERENCES CYTED
� Bibliography
Angel, Myron
C 18$3 I Iisio�+ af S�n Luis_{�}is� Count�Cal_�'ornia, with giographi�al Sketches of its
�„ Prominent Men and Pioneers. Facsimile Reprint 1979, Valley i'►�blishers, Fresno,
CA.
� Bertrando, Betsy
1997 Hf,�tory afthe De Vaul Ranch. Report prepared far Ra�ert Gi�san, archaealogist,
Pasv Rohles, CA.
�
Engeihardt O.F.M., Fr. Zephyrin
19b3 Mission �an Luis Qbis�o in the Vall�y af the Bears. W,T. Glenns, Santa Barbai�a.
�
Gi'�san, Rabert�.
1993 Results of Ph�se �ne Archaeological Surface Sur�ey of the FroQm Ranch
� Prq�erty. Los 4sos Vallev �oad, San Luis Obispfl County. CA. Report prepared
for Centraf Caast Engineering, San Luis Qbispa, CA.
�
Kocher, Paul H.
� 1972 Mission San Luis 4hispa de Talosa 1772-1972. Blake Printing and Publishing,
Inc,, San Luis 4hispo, CA.
Morrisan, Annie L. and 3ok�H. Haydan
� 1917 Histarv of San Luis Dbispv �ounty a,nd En�irons. Histaric Record Company, Los
Angeles, CA.
4 1'arker& Associates
1g96 Cult ral In�e ti atia o�the Periera sic -�arcia Prfl ert APN 053-151-01 and
� 067-241-021. Report prepared far Jvhn Franlcs, Mutual Assets, San Luis Dbispa,
CA.
S�lti�an,.Ioan
�' 1993 T urin the Fr m Ranch or the "Wild We t" in La Canada de l s Ds . Sele�ted
articles fr�m the Bay News repuhlished for the La Canada de Las �sas Historical
� �']70L1�3,Y,05 �505, �A.
Tognazzini, Wilmar
,,,,, 1992 l OD Years Aga: 1892. Excerpts from tfne "San Lu'ss Qiaispo Morning Tribune",
campiled �y Wilxnar Tagnazzini.
Froom Ran�h Historieal Evaluatian 10
�
16731
I
�
�
Triem, 7udy
� 1990 Historical E�valuation of the LonglBonetti Ranch. San Buena�er�tura Research
Assv�iaYes, Santa Paula, CA.
�
� Records Re�iewed
�
t 884 Coast ire�torv Lists Lu�wzg Ne�san, farmer.
� 1892 Great Register of 5an Luis 4bispo Coun#X Ludwig Nelson is Iisted as 62 yrs and from
Nvrway.
�' �98� 4-SL�-AS-1�02Hlf'40-DOIQ2 Site farm fvr��tagon Barn on South Hig�era, C.E. Dills.
I ��
Tapes from Joan Sulli�at�
t 977 Audia with Bi�I Fraorn and A. Gamboni at Froom Rarsch - transcribed
1978 Audia with Bill Froom at Froam Ranch (Tape 1 of 2} - tra�scribed
�
l97$ Audia with Bill Fraaxn at Froom R.anch �Tape 2 af 2)
r, 1979 Audia with Bill Froozn
19$7 Audio with Bill Froom - subject Dalidio Race Track
]9�3 Videa tape with Bil] Froorr� and the Las Qsas Historical Group - pi�nic and tour af the
Froom Rartch.
�
� Phone iuterviews Ca�ndu�ted by Betsy Bertrando
1993 as�d 1997 Con�ersations with Sill Froom
�
�
I �
�
Froom Ran�h Histori�al EWaluatinn l I
�
16732
�
..
`r'
�
APPENDIX I
�
Project Laca#ion M.�ps
�
�
i� �
�
�
�r
�
�
i
�
�
�
�
�
9i
i�►
" 16733
�
�
� �ap4 !SW PASb RpBLES]S MI.
12`3Q" �R9 �IO rSanr tu�s pal5ppr �1I sw�v r�irs oe�svv ex�r �.r'.rir
�. : ..�_B� 1L•��.C-'��,'f�i. . . -. �� . ul3 �blS�TC
!_ ��_ , .,' Gr ! ' �
L��@p^{j! � �- ,,:t�� �� ri �ii "Q �L` -' TrEifer
" J�; '� ro '� io-� �
� �� � 1 �11 -{ �'' .�QRt . _ � �� Park
�`"rf " ��� ir`;'.�;���" } u 1 �� 1 ��
� � �'- �;: - --,�.•:�t� � � �. �.
'' � � i"`�} :� - - �; �'�� ��:�A }
��l .- --�t�rri•i� L.. 1 I �
l � � � �.; �� } t x � �
Ci � r
�' �, L�� 'I ;� � -�r � - .
S U'/ -- -�.�� �, �d �'''� � t.__. � �• ..���~�,�F6 ~ — q,
,�/� ,,� - � .� �Y��'_, r,. , _.., _.�� r.�- 1 a
a'�' �3 T�� � ��`L�` • ti� � G� ��-r ,�
_� ��� � ■ gM
� �� ���--" ���;Bo, s � ` /���+ i26 �
� � � � u r�
�•.�� ! �.��� � ) �r' n t � •� I
i. ��.��� �)�/ �f�f s1��� r�-�'• �4 � -_.. �
�� � [ `• �� , Il', ' ��~`, il�'Jp h 5
�`f 1 \ �l ��•_ ��� ,`` � Y��.' ` �I �'�� � • .
. ��� "< ��--ti.� _ � �,.' .�� _ ��
•, ,
- �r ���"��—! �'� �\��, ;.\ -�~ �,� `.�;. •� s�� --
yr 1�� - ��\\ -, 4":.' �
�- , ���._"_ - ,;.� 1`_
' � �f����' j$�;�� __— - ��'`� '�`"� ,� a
`; . -;r � �3;\� ` � �- -� �' ��:.,`;�•- . '
, _ �
� . � • ,�: g . ,
`l '.� ,_ -. ` �'�y� ,�. ;�f�;$.�r`1.., �4:�,•..�_ ,�� � �.
� . , [S' �-:.1.� . {'��L`��. � , `_..
L � _,��' .�` ,�� ���-r. !.Slr` 1� � ,r.' � .� _ •o
/ �. �� � ��_%�` i�i�"'���= : ' y\.- . �. .r � � ..
r�;-.. , . � H�-
���r' - ._� f�5� ��:`��`�� �� �,...,(�,. ' �f�.:- J -��� e��
� �� ��--�,� f'• � 4 � 'fj � , ,
�• - �� ��� ,
� 1
♦� `
� � �•• �� r' - ,
t� �n
� � 's - f .. -"`� . '�,: � � � .
~1���� .,• � •H` I `�
, , „�`,'•� �.6 , ��,e.s . �.� , �
, - • , ati•�. J 7�7 • rO '�tl •r� �.,','...-:
`�\ 9 '�_, � �
- E� '�.
��. . , l
, � ; �
.�` ;
. �
1
n . �,�. �, , . ; ��:_�� . _
� �' � . `- � {'i - .. •y: . .�` �_ • ��
;�r ;�•� ��.;��` �, ('�} �%��
, ..� `, ' '�1 i�5:4_ ' _ ��� �` N . { '!I y� 4`-
�JJ��x' _ � � � � �'•:..
J � `� -�L .a 'ti v .l
� �_. �
` � � _ •� L- � "��' ���a �o = �
f� ' ' ----
�.��: ;`�;i�. ��
'��= . �~�.J .'I a - - • -z°Q'�;��[} `a�bti
,�c - ��. -.r�.��� "'�� --' • ' 1. °� `'.�r r:� ' . -��c
� ��-�'r' __��ti`-�I'r' .�. , -' . . ; •�J '�+,-�; ii �
�7�(� i1� �`-- '�L-}� ���� l a f �[ � '1�5]
, • .l.l .;� ,� - i. �� / a u l: J��;'j •,
'lla� 'ly.�,.\����,�� ��JF:r -i. ''� .��,d��� _.Il i`.r��i.,�i'
�'��a 1 ♦� �� � . - �hG• � �� .. � � �.'.+r ..[� . "
r=.�
!Irfr 4@ti �.�,a����•' .�` ,,'!! - � ..- � ;,,�r �i I. �'����/_
��.� �;: - -° !� i.� � • . -. -- ' .: � �i�I.�.� +
/r\��~��...-�� _ ��., �. �F ` ^�
� ��/.��, �.�5 l'�� `,� - rS�. �/f W-l.�(�/r• - �'y:Jl.' .�/�1 i� "
' - S-F-�:. s .:/J � _
�� �m .?L _ il�.i.. . '. '. .. r�, . ,li "'�` � _ . ' ��/g78i;J?�,r;:� 1
-�1'. . C$ ��y ��Sbi��/j ,; . r � ;; (��._� 667 -- �;:� . .
.—. „ �:�y�;�} ����' , ��� i0�-.� J�% � ' ��'�.r i
rr 1� .. - ,,, •.'' + , .�!�` '�'', . 6 - _
=i, _- �` +�d - � � "i., `b "` �.
2,1 �. -
-. : ,_ +�:��, :-,. .�..W__�,%'....._�:� " - .
1 �1- � Y- .. .-� �f � -: -�t � ;-.r-�,���'� � .-�' n�, �'' �_
� [3SG5 7.5 Pismo Beach, California quadrangle map, 1965, photore�ised 1978.
�
�
'�
16734
�
�
� I f i��r4•.'. ' . ��'�"� y�
3. Y+'1fi.�� ` .. ��rF'�K_
, f_' �,' ' �,� ��.
� - :� �:�� "�� .,. "`
-i'!'�-� + �.��: • -� �).. � +�-w 'r�-�,_�.
� I' �' �• �♦•, "�` i+ �k�s r.w—+M'Y��� 1� �Tf'� `�
��` �� •..M�P ,.:'. ' .F. s�'a'�►,.
�•re..�`�µ k' �. ' ;- . .. ��� . . `�.��+ _ . � .ti`�,�T��
r� . � . :� �• Y`- , � '. •.'.. . : .� +�.1.�.
' ; :;�•.i,. ,:...., � ' +P, .+Kr��•..
� • � r: � _ ..';+'i�.:a�:.`�3�.�":c�:4#:.... _ .. -�' •w�fi��� !��=
� .5 � '. ,�".• -�MyX.r . . , , . .w/.4 - yp,
';',:�� ,I�.'. � ��",� •� „ • ��� L . `z;�:.'. �.,,` .. :�' ;� ;�E��_ .
�' a T �' '+�" {
'� .� .T'`�r��r�.�:�. ., n 1 ,•.�•�•+]r9=. '�` •�.
� s -r '� ; . .: . �'�'*'�' = f �_
'�v'�' ti:� 'M'��K• �;.' .,.�i;•' y L -;r�•
.� .' } y�%r1 r , r�� ' '�
� ; ��.'t �' si' " � ' � " �'
�':a ,� :.i� ��� ;3r.+��.,{�• . � F::: `i
� �] • �7L' ;,�'�. !• .'yiiy'ti:� • ,. , .r�: ' •
] . , .:: �y� �.�. - � - �,�Ft-&• . •r . , .
� � �l ... .fi.. �r•, R.+',ks+., .y J. .,� , . .
' ,��=�: ,• '� �,;.., .
, `�„� �° .4'� ... � " � �.� ;r;+�, �
�.' � . • . •� � � . +S.,:r•r :�r
I.. - . :�r�►,;'" , . w•'! �..,. . ; ';�E •'� '
� .. i.^ �n r •��• -:�I° . •••y �;'-� r'�.. '.�..`.,'
i' �-,�7y .•�'re.. '�N; • �x #d.�.�.. �' y .+4..�;- -•y-•
` I R'-- ' . �'� � • ��'`'s •'�r�'.�� . » . ,i• +,i�� �CMr 5..
i �� ,yi. '.�'�',�.'... ,`' �� •�j ,�; . . , �'Tl•�� •
�•,�_ •�.�,`�... '..".. -r�� d.
jF , ti'�' '�:' . � . , _ F�;. .
� _ '�'' 1•' �.
� i�. �� ` '-�Yy• '• ,' F -5�•�
i � rn '�.y.y •Y�.�� S' '�� ~.. �,i., � , � . � f . . ��. ��f��� t•
� . ._ �.� R C s I ...'•� . • � • , • S� �y
•/� e�: � � � •r� • `� � . • ! - � I/ . ^y�'1� �
i y� �.�•� ��,...
^x \..�LL ����Shi.V,� . i ' I �� ��
� . .�. :.�i�. . �ir�•.i� �'•'' :��� .,. . , _ ��, -� .y � � •
� ��a.[�;�T���, f � ` , �Y: .V •' ` _ 4 4. ., • . . . M1` . �
`x 'f1 S•ti z�y�`r.� ,.F' z ,�:
ti�_~�1 •�' 1�"������-��!"•L�•,.. �' '�Ai• :� 1'i= •.�J
�,�'�' _ .., p - � ^ z .
�r :jM 'v�.�r�. � -)r�.� ,�= �'. ;y .',+.�� ,x, ;y� �..� 'r
,. '��� _U ;,�^.;t .�; .:. -'':�;,��� �� . -�k;.. ::�,,� . a+ � �,,�.�_
,'. . '� �r r �;i : .t,;'�,.�' t� . _ . i . . :.�'�,�+
I � �r- � `�!}. �. , , �; �'" ' i�t' � �'' , „ , � . � ��
� .r.� �•s er:�. n:}� �f,;ryi�+,_'�:',i; ;.f; ,f,;' �; � w
t�':. µ.
' .7 .i 4.•.,. ;: y:�r ,• � ".L i�' .i�.�!�'K�'.�. • ,i.r��;' � ' ^�'�r •
� ti,�, .! � �•,`r�- r� -��,F�r,4,,�-. - • '� -' .
'�' L, 4 • ��;'Ci �. � •. � . , . _. .. - ' � �, i�r n
' ��:.. . ;�'�;• ` �::�_ ��
�, � ;�� � ��-�.; � ..���� :4 :.�_ .. . r , , w�
J' ^� f`r� '� �.� ,. _� _ _ �r.,.'�" � ' , : ' -- � L.�yy' ,
?�,�w� �• - f� � ' R:X� ." , r� . 's:.�'� .�r+✓ Y�,r•` r yt :}• �t r[r�.i
_ r3, .��', .': _
_ � ' '�.,' -�' '�}
� . '' . .,�'-
:,i •�i .'� e" r -•Y +
•� ti: �
. . . . "� i ��
t �y .1• .4.
. ��� • r aa. ' - .
F" ' i. `.� �f•� �•�Y � �• .+ f �q 74'� �� �'�, �y .� .�� ++i
� I ,: `► �► ��. � ��'� ' ' ���.� e'W ;�� . ��; .�.
�• '� ' :. � ...
�'e � �=��. . , � •yl �r i �. . � � .
:.'� . ■ Y•- •;;.; '`} v�'.' . n�'-' ,,�i;;�.'
, .•F�.�' . '�t:��,�.: .1� ;.•ia� . . .
�r ..Q�-. �`.1 ;� '••�`k•,� � ';S+:,t�'.7�'L,;.
.: � .. . -�.+ ,.` rr'�r y � �r
� .�d'��.�-1�.�' + !� �;•�r� '.,w'�.;'�i?S.' Y • Y•�3_'s . . �����. . ���� -�
,.. " �- -.-".'�._.��-•-• y� ' .�7�+..�s:�'r.���'_�=. . �+ ' - . , + � '
` �S� w . �""'_"'�t.••��.� � .�..�� �I
I �'� `ir! A #'�-�!~.:f+ ��5 'i'"'�'' F i
i, .l�� -i���+M��+iw. N�- �:.�':°,�'
� �!: - �. � �•, •..� ' ;�:a' . �_�;:
. � ._.�.___ _.'-�! f
� �_. .
�'rflc�m Ranch Pro�ect Location Map Uetai�
�
�
�
16735
�
�
�
1
� APPENDIX II
Histarical Maps
�
'
I �
�
1
�
�
1
�
�
�
�
�
�
r
� 16736
�
�
�
,�
�'� `� T '"" -
� :� ..�.--_ � � � . .. '.
�-._ � 14
� r 'i�.: ���� -y/S��.f . . , - -
, :. �� � - � �.-
�� � �� . _; . 6z - �
�:. ,5�.� s-� � � � r��� .
e -�s� GI.7d . �f ti `�r-4 . T �� � �f7Jd�
Y �� R, ;�`�—'�1..- ��� �
� ��"—�� �...�f . 1`l
.�,� �� "' `��\ 7 � _�� '"'ar,�t \
� � • � Y a
�. i �/l���,��� i ^��' `� �
� ,� '� � ��r'�`��_- �_�`... ��. _� +�"�
. R�+ � ..r.�s F,;_ � _��.`�-�,,���, �3
� :1'�0 ,q� .a. r r.ns. ��—".. _ : ��76 4:
� � i ` '� l .
° _ L �� • b
F '* ��B �'� �sf�`- .3' �+
�-SM���r� i3557 . r ' f0�� �' �
� _ }'Q� �' . � r Su�. .
�� � Y71 8.�./� �1���
!�jJyr�) X/va �`�,� . I YI N A. ��
�dlSlfSpr NafjY.��Mi � n �Y
" � ' ' . .' ♦ V i
� `Qf�°
• 7 :�s.:�,�}� �..�.ni � _ ��
r/f ti
!.'s�D f�[U Ig!{S� � '�'
� '� . S �..o-..6�i�'.rn . ° �5 � �}
' y`.So� xa�.X+t•E»s�, �n Sie �3�.�C9 w'�
�� r.rr.�l��'^ . �gr oa
�� ��� i 'F ���'F
r'I .'Srv ' ' . � , ,� . "• J#
�, '���' ,�s.ee • ,s.�., �
�' ,�fsrao d .�
• .J.9 � L
' 3rB.C.b • ' -
� :.� � 6d �".:� : S� '
� ' ._�J • . A d�� 9�� 1 �
� _� �. ' � • ..` � �
4s'` ` ,�s•re
. y.S:- �rsi � D4 y'
�5�.,+.�,a, ,� t
���� � �
� �,4 fa,..r.:sArm�a�.
� � .n ..fr.:�R Fff:�,�w' e
�i , � 1
6B ' � ' J�
^�— � /
� ' S334 ' �'F�' \} 1
� � �
� . , ' - 69
18Ct 6¢
...
� 'i.� "i,r� . �r n �
� y „y � . s _ S�e
� �'`_�
�4, v a - - c� � 'y�`f E' D 1
r K " � . � f
r
�►. . � � � r
�, � . .. . z :�
�` ' `� ' ' 70 c `{, �.';.
�. � ���.. 3A.�a ei n��� r�
�
1868 Ma�af the Subdi�isians ❑f th� ran�hos Canada de las �sos and La La�una.
� Su.r�eyed by Jaznes Stratton
�
� �
�
�
, �
� 16737
�
� �•_ � ,��� � - �
� � �►F•91'
����' �bltl•j d":. n� r .L . �
� � � �' � ` �� -- � ' ` ` � �
� � �� _ 1 - �• j ''+ � j �' �
'' f� , •� ��J ' , s .� � ■ �
�� • ,
� � n.•,� ���' � ISq.7�• - ' . .. �
�^ S • J `i _
r .� . � ��
�' 7I� ' •� .. . - � �
�J+'L� t ' ^� FL{ ! .1
` 1,� � '• �l i •� � , .����� ".y
` r t' a
� . . � . � �. :e
, • � �. . .
• � ' " '�`,5an ' �_' . ' - �'
J� �� , ' - . .
� `f '7 �3A�LT�Tj`� � .r• ,,�
�� ^ . q 'ti �' � �i
� n.r. �t4 r
� �• _':., `� Rnn T 1
� �,� .:- - � 1, A __._�._. - -
��'� .
�i' �'� , , - - . S-.�s ' " •,:�
S. t• '1 • • ..
�� ' � , `-� �` 7� . / L • .
�� ' �r
� `_.� . �` T� • . ,� , • - �..
'as�' ]� r �' • • � � �, ill. '� 1
..-� n • • '•' 77 .r.
��� ��. � ��� r�_ .
. , �;; -
� .
, y
! �, , , - �
V �, , -
a 1
. �'�. .
/' 0
� ,
t+ __.t�� _ �'�k _ � fl'�
` �' ��3' f � `� ' , _._ . _ . � 4 _ i_
�{�� { � ji .. '
��[� }}�`
� �•�� `.r ,I i y • ` . . i� '`.. . _ f
i � � Y� f . . . _ .� ,�r U .
. � _�� � � rrr•J'` � e• �.
',� SE]S�1 �� �
�� �'►,� '�f, � R�C � - , 3y S � �
� '� +, ��� r " ' . � • •1vG L
� �� a ,� �•� 7 ,�., �+`� 1
� f , � ��r= ��'-
�: ,� � �• T�`] �� ; � �•
� r ' •• r^r;�� C_ �� ,V �`1 �'� .
� ;,- -�•J � r_� C�.� �ia �
.
Li ' � �,g � r- � •
o ��r.-�0 �, ! ��jj �1}01� b _
�,7 �
� • e � � F � , ',�t � r
� � J � �t �� �
f�.,.
►� • � �,,;�.�? � , ,' �e.
� s r � '� '. . • _ i
� I. . ' T1'p o ' � •��( �1 J' . • � 6
r '
�'4rt _ . - _ 0�.3 �,�� . .
�-, - �,��
� s.,A N Z �1� �.��►�p ,-� . �;-;----r--�_, - ° ►.�-,
19�� USGS- SAN LLIIS QUAD
�
�
�
i
�
16738
�
_ � r . �i
���lx''.G.�' ` , , • .
. � � � • :�5 '; Ni �
' r` �H .. ..� +. ; si f V^r'�s.
t7� ,�g�';��"� . , .•� . �;
t !`�� �i . �. ..� ' � � �� '�4 .
. , r r��.Rl *.��r�7.N.CH.D ��:L4r���,1 �'``'� :t��.�'��� .1�.�f�_
i¢ f� " - 3 ' rY
y� ,� . �
� r=+Y ,rrt' f � �L.?1�JLJti=f'� �• ` '� �
� ' �:.
� ':�v f/ 9�'A� � ZE ` '� -+4�� •t •
�:;, ♦ :J� -� `��i� �• �.� �...c►� .-� '. �. , '
.'�•,ti .�7.^•.4:� � [� p��• '1fil�� �
. �'�i �, ' r N.� ''� � ,
' f � y •.'Z:� -
.{� '�, f
. ,. _� ,., �� �p{!9g ��� :#, ■
:� �. � � - - -�- - - --
'� � .;, "f' ,' - '�$ys'� �.+ �� °�,�':' �, �.S'QnL�ls
;L . . �{b p Gme '
- '° '��"'�. �. P�.�''V +�r.� ,Yrych�U�.Tr�c�
�
.,�•,,C�,rrr�f L,14, ,f �; 1�,r� .
�1�.��:E• � j�; 1•. . _ ; ,
� �L•a' ,�r � •
�f� � � �Y
�;t►�y .P. .A•s.r I�
r�� - 1. :�� _
:Y��Ur17's r7 ' r. i
J'I. �.��`ifKlI1��7� �� �..C'��:.3.Tr �' � � '�.a�•
':�S'A� � j f ' � d'e �//77' + ' .
'�`R1'�'ie� �. �: �� ,•' • "
+ � � � ��.: . _ �r:
� �-r." •. 7Kl►!��r +4�-
� r� 7IiS� I- ���- �a
,�i .w �r+ � � �� � �•r��• a, ti { �� •
,�:,r��� _ � , , � � . ' � . .
y�i� 'r y � ' ��' �+.y •i' � 'n•�;i��'��` � '
. t � til �' ' +� ��7 ��ly�#� �����
i] ;i
F • R�� � .�� . .
`rf *a..r y� � (� � _—^��• �� Yf�.�Gr.
_ �• ��_.� ,.,�tf r4.%. -
�Ir�."�.�1.=a�'�if3�0 r � w: r� .�.�� .Myw:+'����p �r �. .� _ �
y � ��1If11� '""���'• t�.`• .'��� ,.�i. 1
'�,�._� �, tr rs�,; �' �!�sMs: ,,. • .��'�.' 'M.
_ �.,�aF:a ::i! ���.r '���� ' ' � ' �.
�.- �� ::1�- ►7.,N��� r � y} . :�..r� . _� vy]�
AI9 • ��`@If�9�'.�: r ���i�r •��YJ ' , '
�r:, _ jyr. - - �� �' 4��'��. � � ' �.. r�
E .� .�: ' '. �s. A, +rs7er.o� '� �
-- f�+
�1 . � � � � ■- / - � - - � � � • �
�
�
�
� APPEND� �
Froom Ranch PhotagrapF�s
�
�
� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
` �
16740
I �
�
�
, �
� _ �
`i .
� -�'�ri-Z�� .V.. .'v:;' .-�::;-�... •. �. ..�.=..r.�.�" s:i"rY.=... �. - _ _-
I •- �� �•.. Y�:'=
�� .�.'S�'@'"I.�'•;•. ,�' •�.:� .•-
: 'r� :;. 5;:.. ;ur. 1{?t�r;.,r!�:� �k
,��'� .•r�r''-0�y�ti]{ •,,,�;e3��� .`lti�-�f:'y`�'�"'r+` �'5:.�,• . . - _�A
`r.�`'ir �ti .
y. .� S�:- • �. . ,�
�:. ��' � a�'�:'��_
f
� r -. ' .�.
:�'� I -1r" j.�'�,^� .' �
i r�'- - 4
L ��: _y __ ���� �;� - �
� � ' � i �- _ ._
ai1� .F s�• • - � * � View facing west�
i
'� � ; � fi'om the en� of tk�e
� . - - - �i . I ' dri�veway.
ri�- -� -- - � ��x:�i J�
'" ' -� '
� ... ...�_
5tructure A �ld Barri Stru�ture B Sunktiouse
� �
� � �> :�
;ti '� � ' "�
,���•` �;. �,.� u
.;, �= � _
Irl ' i5` ii;� �
'�r � �
. 1
F
�
�� , _ " V. _���� �-y�..
� ?! • ,' J�~n'-•`":�� '•-,� • "• _ -~ '" . ,
.�¢'j��.�'JF.�. ' /� �•. ti'� -�/.�''� • ��^,..�'•
,�rr � �_-.,,.
�r�'�=r��-r'r• � . �'�. '.:. . y;•�, �S 4:.y,
:/ �r `�.S�'��• - :v, '�b:� �.:.
.1- 'y•r '.�- . ,
�. —- - _ - i��J��� r- ' .
L �
�� ' —_ �
� � -; ' !• '^ • . ^��
ry �}�. } z
� '.rr • '-�;, � -..,t*' .
�r• -Y=�-•�r� ' •�(�{ ��-�_a�.I,;-�,���: �5+��
� � '•t _ � • -�. i N . ''�.�1��vip�'1tr-T.��
r r ,:� —� „�•. '{: �
.s •
`"` _• .N.� .' _ �.d��
�. - �ti „,��, r.; �.� x.:
� � ._ �:'�.�,e.:,��� �-.-�,�sn�. �: '� ��_'i�-. �.��.�....____��-���
Str�cture C 19�5 Hnuse View faciug west
�
16741
�
�
�
I �
5
� , _. _ . . _ , _ _ w . ._. .. , _ ,
` '� - - --_.�- :��=::
� r�. � ��- !`��� _ -- � --f.f�~- _- �
t, � � . �.. - ' _
�� i� �€ �
� � ����,� ��� �
:,�s ,� ? ..���•�����
. . • !,,,u,,•�� �'�.r�`.,i� � ..
� ' .'�A � , r . Y
f �''�. �. ' _ .. _ F � . '�I
5tracture E a�d CreamerylHause Laaking north from hattom af icnoll.
a�
�
�
' ;. ..—_ -- «x--r-.
�• _ - - � �, �.�.,��.-,�"�.z,.,��a,
R•r. '�': _ r{. �' ;�I st,t�'��7�i�-�a'.�^r'.�:'•x�
�'�� -� �,�; t� _w' 'I "X�''� +�-'�'- �.�.����
,� i I .� �•'.rT=x.-:�'. r,��:r�;�.
�... . . ii ` ? �c:c.�-�-.=���'•�4_-� -.�.. � -- ��e
•-� :� ,l� t i ,.�-=��� _...;,t::_-_-
=_'===�.-
� �S__�r� - , :} •��til �• 2.'�: =—_, _ -�. . _ -
"" � :1 � ll��i.�T� - --
.. ��� .�����"' :i'� '.
� ' � •���I�I.� ��.
�,� f�•'~� ��'. '�� •� �
�
i
_�`.�`.� �'; , ' ' ,C�
�ti,��e8�.. • _ •. _ `�=��R`. '- �
��Y- - _ ���x. f':. � ' 7 �
r � Y=y�wrti �� � �
r �, �a.^ - � _ �,y� _�� ' ��"A
.r S ��. '` � _ • " ��� x
' ; ;s�. __�. _ -- „p'"'s` __ -_ --�--�`°-Y-
Structure E ❑id Cre�me�-ylHouse Laalung t� t�e east
�
�
16742
�
L
� '. � ,�� �'y+:•.. ~-`:'�:';:?iy
- �ti���'t
� — ..
:r.
y` 's :� `:�'.}ri�:
r,,, ��.
— --- ._ •--- �_� _� — . __ '?. --
. - � • �
�- = - - - - --- = - -- � - - - - Facin�west
ii � � , -
'�"
�� — � � .r—� .— J— � � �y��
'� � � .,:_ _`+�i.Csr
� ��� �Y+ ` ��—r �k—` �`.
�_ - .
�, Structure F Dairv Barn
�
� -. _ � ��.. .
. • r�p.
� . .
. F•
' ' •.e.. -
� �� -:<• .;:'� '`�.�:``:� . .. , - —
� .�: ��--
v+^'���J� t�rrL.' �+ ' �`C�v'
'.��i� ��ta+ _. . 4
_ _ . .~y�_.�y��+F, .
`v:: — �—.�_�. . ' Y�� _ �
� ���� � .� � r �c�'�.��
•-� n�rthwest
:• ,;, ,�_ � + •. ,y_�_, --„�:.
*.,
.� . , �. .
.� - .
� - ._� .._.'1 _ ~ ••'.�'�.y., 3,.� :••y¢•_�,:'s�,i� '� ..______. f...,��
.9���• ��yi � ..• ���5�,f'�
_.. _ rE-�I�..i=-.
Structure F Dairy Sarn
r
�
16743
�
�
..
■
.
� , � - � ' � -_. . _ . _ -
�
�
�;' .�
� � ��� •.�
� -�• � �, !
� �
� 1 1 � � �
� Bill Fravin � `�_
� .. .�, l.�
.i
Photagraphed in the late � � , `����� �
,: .
, �
147Ds hy Joazz Sullivan. � ���:�;�
� �..�_, r:
r'
;w�y .. _
' ��� �
II ,
� �"_ •3f - �. � . -�- -
•3 � .
"
•��!-}
L"
:�.�i
`,. . .
. - f =q.
1� ' �4, y t _ .��� +�`�_
R• . - :�,�� v; --*.' �;
:r r^ -_ -.-� r . _ J-_ �
�e_9 _� --"` � }��sr.�"�`3'ti
ti •
�ti. ' .
ir e ���"- -- . �� I� .
� � •�
.,'� t
i,'
'_�+���� � '� a.�r:�,.,� ��._ �� y _�%., Y. ��..- Facing west
.;�� ,.=i:. .w. � ��; ""� �` - .
r. �-�,. '. ��r ,,�+�-; _ }!'� . �M='f`1;r
� . . +�T�.��ri.. ���` -�a,,,;�y - ��.e,,y;=.�.'�
. �r. � -.. ��a
�}' :Y•�
� - _'_ � ._���__" ' -_' ' � _ �
� Strueture F Corner af Dairy Barn
Stru�ture G Granary
Sfructure H Horse Barn
� �
16744
I �
�
�
�
� � APPEHD�X IV
Site Recard; P-��d-04�991
L
f �
�
�
�
�
�
'
�
�
I'
�
�
�i
16745
�
� S;ate nt Caiifvrnia — The Resauraes Agency Primaiy �! �d �O�0��/
t7£PAR'£MENT DF PAfiKS A11i0 RECREATI�N HRl #
PRIMARY REG�R� Trinom�a�
� NRHP 5tatus Eocfe
C?ther �istings
Re�iew Cods Reviswer. Qate.
�
r
Page�,�, of � "Resaurce NamB ar #: {Assigned py reeorder}
�' P7. dther 4dentifier: Froom Ranch
*PZ. Lacatian: ❑ fVot far Pu�lication ❑ Unrestricted "a. Cnunty San Luis Dhis�a
and fP2c, P2e, and P2h or P2d. Attach a to�atian Map as necessary.]
,r 'h. USGS 7.5' Q,uad Pismo Soh Date 1978 T_; R_, _ 'I. af_ 'I. af Sec�; 6.M.
c. Address 12125 Las O;�as Va11eY�3,oad City _San Luis ObisB9 Zip �3405
d. UTM: [Gi�e more than one for large andlor linear resources� Zane _, rr1E1 rr�N
�
e, nther Locatianal pata: ;e.g., parcel fl, directivns to resource, ele�atifln, etc., as apprvp�iatel
� "P3a. Description: �bescri6e resourc� and its major alements. IncludB design, materials, eondition, alterations, size, setting. and
baundaries� The F'room xanCh�dairy is a complex of buildings �uilt priar t❑ 1924. The
main residen�e was constructed in 1915 by Hans Pe��rson and is shiplap with an annex on
the reaz made frnm vther atru�tures. �'he hause has four bedrtiams and rests on a redwoad
si�l foundation. 'Fhere is a sma�l ship�ap bun3c house nearby was constructed at the same
� time. An oId barn 3�ehind the hause that was moved to its current lo�ation and was probably
constructed before 190a. A horse barn and a small granary are at the rear o� the
property. The two potentially eligible structures are an unusual 1�arn witih a roun�ed end
� and a small ❑riginal creamery/residence. The barn was bui.lt in 1913 along with �:�e
granary and hvrse barn �y �Tim Aiken, The small creamery�residen�e �s the oldest structure
` in �he camplex and is made af three smali different sections, all constructed in a
�, dif£erent manner. Both stru�tures are in poor candition. The residence pvrtion appears
attached to the dairy but is not. It was constructed approximately in 1902.
' •P3h. Resourc� Attributes: t�;st
� � attributes and codesl P
"P4. Resources Present: � Building
� � 5tru�ture 0 Object ❑ Site ❑
{ �; , � ' ` �7istri�t � Element of ❑Istrict ❑ Other
� ' �IsaEates, etc.f
�, �j+ �' 'PSh. Description of Photo: {�Iew.
date, accession N� View lovkina
w�st 313198,
� •Pfi. G a t e
- Cvnstru�tedlAge and 5our�e:� H�szari�
� � � ❑ Prehistoric ❑ 8oth
� ��! _ � �ar__e 1�9Q �o ].�1�. Persvna�.
- - w B' 11 m
� R . • .
•P7. �wner and AdcEress:
Alex Madanna
P B x Z
� 5L0. CA 93406
"P$. Recorded by: I�ame. at[iliatinn,
and address} g $ S n 8 r R r h 2 h�11 B 1 vd.
`" � 16746
DPR 523A (1195} •Required informatinn
�
� 'P9. Date Recorded: 3 L101�8
"P70. 5ur�ay Type: CE]escri6e3 Contract ' st rical eso r� 3��en�c�ry
'P19. Repdrt Citatinn: {Cite su��ay report and other sources,ar enter"none."1 Y' h ,E�ro m
nch - - n r 1
�` S'�4s�_� �[l��.i�ri:L-- — — - - - -- —
•Attachments: ❑NON� ❑Lvcativn Map ❑�ontinuation 5heet ❑Building, Structure, and ❑bject Record
❑Archasolqgical Re�ord �aistrict Record �Linear Feature Record OMiIling Station Re�ord �Rqck Art Record
�` C1Artifaci RBcord ❑Phoio�raph Recqrd ❑ Other tList�:
�
llr
�
�
�i
�
�
�
� �
I �
�
I
�
�
�
I '
i �
�
�
I
�
16747
qPR 523A t1195) •Raquired information
�
L.� State v#Gafifarnis --� The Resaurce's Age�cy Primary �
d�PARTMFHT ❑F FA�K.S A�1U REC�tEAT10N FiRI�
` LQ�;ATI D N MAP Trinomia�
Page ______2 uf _„� 'Resaur�e CVame �r A� 1Assigned by�eaordar}
` "Map Name: Px3m4 B��h �ua .., •scele: i:z4oao *Date of map:1978 L�hota re�]
; . ... .
I �DB 42'30" r09 �l0 15AN tu�s�ae�s�oi 1 PpSOIipBLE532M+, ^
1�' SAN L+175 O&15Pd�XfT!.i M140�
�f�! . . " ' �j '' �' '• ' •' �. .
, ``�. _ �. �_ ecr���L -. "''•,`� � ,;•:. �Gr � ' i� . ' uis Ohispo
;�'� •��^ ' - �'� � � -� • `�•�;:-• _ \ �t u ' '� �at '� a�i
�� �-� ��' 1 Tr er
i'.�� 11�e,` ��� ��� �� '�1 .� ���� ��� .�... .�:- rQ��... . _ � o e � ���1_� Aark �
� ,�1�'.�,•.;�,�' i �'�.L I � �1 ,�'� ;",.:,Q','i:'" _ 1j ��" �] ' v�- «�
�. � . � �U 1 � ,�l � � —
_ y�"/ !'', � ,..i� �_- .�� fj��i������.. •. ._ `..l k���. � �, . � ; �o �� ��
�s�y�,75 � ��rJ C' ������` V_', '�y n.�. � � � � ��:� l
a -4 x��a � -�¢/)(^ —'���`� `��a `�� �� -� • . � �
�,�a � }`� � r� {p���'� cn �. ...... e �� 1
\ � f��� u � / � ` �'l'�' `Q��'�'�` r e � � � , •• ~ � q, ._— �y
� ,.�'�� 1 ♦ � ��� ��u� + �1:�.J� �/'Z:1 � :��y .R.f�- ,ll6 �n —'_ ii
,,`. �, ..•'`��`�l �� 5 � � [} �}l r 1 r QJ � v K
� \.'�1?�,�. 'a�L_�� � g, ___f J�.-r� l��A'=� '� �� � U� %�` }� }
r.. :`; LJ I�,I-'����`'�-- i5 ��� � �1��c80 ti *S'p � i Vl. � �rr 120 1
• - �J�� �-, �_ -�;� � - � ;�-t W ���� r
��J%���;�'_-�--- �� _ __ ��, ;~. { � .) , � - -
�, '� w
+�+ ��,�1���.��:�� �� ��1�, ?!"r',�' �, t� � l' . .
�f � ���- r� � ti � d�
.`\vL `ft ,.-�d,_- - �\�-_ � ` :�'1�, ���� � ��� � q� a t
L � ��� l�~ ',� _... �� l�f ` � r� . - �C5
`,'1 �--�_-- , _._
.�. ' � � � r �� } �r�
�.1 i �'.��'+` ~�c �� � __ ��`�r�.����.� 1�. ,r�� a!� �� — __
` t �� �` � l �� ` i / � �r... � i ,
—�_�—�� � �
� �� .,_ L,` .�. .� �:� - � r_V_��- � • ,:� I . _�
,9� ~R4ji ���\ ` - �L_._\���$���`.t' v--�y �if� �l�`�� _' . �.r` � � � •.1 � �
� �77�7,5� `��� ! �1.��+. , '�,�+'�'�/�� � \•�j�7.�.�.�' � 'i�•! .�� � `�� .
' .�'•�' '�, �� ���.�,;J ~�,����\\. ]j �; � �. :�o'.
�l '
1. � � , �� � � i. - T3L ' � l
� I f • �'.._ �i �.` � '� ` `_ � +�`
- � " I�1''�' ' � '` � '�' ltil' :sp�y s�_ �_�� �
� `�-_ .'J c�o'+���;, `� �"-'n,�L�� ,�i�. . _ _/ ' , .. �' °°
�� u . �b, , -6` � .
�.�-.. . , . -.����� ;.: _ ;��=- R: � l
' i� ,` 1� = .,�'�§s: ��� 16 ���°`, `-�'�' • -:�- J �_-- _-.
,�. -�.
.. , . . - _ . `�� �� z� p o � -�.. :
ti:- ,} $:, `� • �� s� _ `` - �r_ ;.,r,-� [_�
I � ,:` ' �, a . . _ ' ���., �Y� �.$� \` ' z�'� � ,.. f- .
J�!1�1 f" ;•/,� • i��� • �°' _ � • . - � �
�t�, �, � ���_ {�-., '��:-�-
' ,' 'j_ '���� ��t ti � — � � � s , �;,_� .
'�, ' r _�1 ' e� � •N �J � , . •:.� D
i .- ,',. �f����ir:_ _ ` Lf . �a I', � - � r
C;- - � �� �- �� � ^'1 ��' ;a p -' �
��� , 'i�` ^- "E - ;� °
� �;<_:;�; �� . � :�`�__ .���_=��' -`_ �' � � :z�_- � o .,�;
u�..'' . �::�� • _�, r , �'.'N� .
�, , �..�:�`�` , — :���� —_ _ •., �:;��j ti. -
`` � '[ �. / L�- +
`- � , _ � . ,,� ��.,�. •�� . �. �
: .. � �,;, �,'..` �Y� �1 I, ,J�. I, '; '7�6a { .,
` ��
� r�.%�� �� ''i,-- ` /�i` �-.� ,"--�,_ � _''1 `�' n%��� - „ =�l.U� rI � � 'Sp' �
� '�' �+';,�q't `V � �� �� f .. ��9L�:��i, .. �!, __ .- .r r��`ll' l. L
;6f�';; � �o'� .���' �t � � _ :� r�;r � l' ���f :: � .\ .
� ,`il�- � ���� �- ; : �� � i � ,
�% ' : ✓ � �r. • , . , - _- � '�' .
,I' �:'�� l ;a�• • .8�1,. "_ _.f�;" J -_ . '.
'•� ��1' J� '���;�'� ��f . �'�I' - • ..�� '�� � I:I .I �
L _ _ -- �;- , . . _ : , ;.- . ,
i aa.'' a I 8 ' �s�8;,�Il.'.
� �_ .�, . . r AJ ;� �{r.c:j ' � . I C J667 . -�f�� �' i
. ::: ��.�, , . :: f D . _ _ t.�. � ��
` ` �'r; ,�� �. .• g :=:.- �.� _
i =i �. _ _ _, aNd �1 J �� � i i •`
o���', -•� ,
,., ��. I ,.. lJ_� .v '
�; _:�� L-,-� . �._,---��`�� �J
::�.' ^ �� :. � ..:-, ��: � . .�.��;;^n � ��� � J � ..� � �
, �
� i
�
16748
DPR 523J f1195f 'Raquired informatian
APPENDIX F.4
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Historic Resource Assessment
16749
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16750
FI RST��4RB� N :� � �� � � � �v �
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment
San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California
Prepared for:
John Madonna Construction Company
12165 Los Osos Valley Road
San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
Contact:John Madonna, Owner
Prepared by:
FirstCarbon Solutions
1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.357.2562
In association with:
Chattel, Inc.
13417 Ventura Blvd.
Sherman Oaks, CA 91423
818.788.7954
Contact: Mary Bean, Project Director
Carrie D. Wills, MA, RPA, Senior Scientist,Archaeology
Report Date: February 20, 2015
Revised:July 21, 2017
NORTH AMERICA � EUROPE � AFRICA � AUSTRALIA � ASIA
WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM ^ AN ADEC I N N OV�I��I��
r �
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16752
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Section 1: Management Summary, Property History,and Structure Histories and Descriptions...... 1
1.1 - Management Summary..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 - Property History................................................................................................................ 1
1.3 -Structure Histories and Descriptions.................................................................................9
Section 2: Historic Background..................................................................................................... 23
2.1 - History of San Luis Obispo County .................................................................................. 23
2.2 - History of the City of San Luis Obispo............................................................................. 24
2.3 - Methods and Results of Historic Assessment .................................................................30
Section 3: Significance Criteria and Evaluations: Froom Ranch...................................................... 35
3.1 -Application of National Register of Historical Places Criteria..........................................35
3.2 -Application of California Register of Historical Resources Criteria..................................36
3.3 -City of San Luis Obispo Criteria .......................................................................................38
3.4- Integrity...........................................................................................................................40
3.5 - Historic Themes...............................................................................................................42
Section 4: Findings and conclusions ............................................................................................. 45
4.1 - Potential Historic District.................................................................................................45
4.2 - Contributing Structures...................................................................................................46
4.3 - Non-Contributing Structures...........................................................................................47
Section5: References................................................................................................................... 49
Appendix A: Personnel Qualifications
Appendix B: Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Specific Plan Area Map........................................................................................................... 3
Exhibit 2: Regional Location Map........................................................................................................... 5
Exhibit 3: Local Vicinity Map,Topographic Base .................................................................................... 7
FirstCarbon Solutions 16758
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16754
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Management Summary,Property History,and
Historic Resource Assessment Structure Histories and Descriptions
� � � � � � � � ' ' • ' ' �
. . • ' � � � ' ' •
1.1 - Management Summary
At the request of John Madonna Construction Company(Madonna), FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS)
prepared a Historic Resource Assessment for the Froom Ranch/Villaggio Specific Plan (Specific Plan
area) project that included record search reviews and a field survey of the proposed Specific Plan area
located in San Luis Obispo County, California. The subject property(or property) was evaluated for
historical and architectural significance by FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS)Architectural Historian,
Kathleen A. Crawford, MA. Ms. Crawford meets the Secretary of the Interior Standards for
Architectural Historian and is also listed on the City of San Luis Obispo Consultants List(Appendix A).
The Froom Ranch complex portion of the Specific Plan area was identified as a potential historic
district. California Department of Parks and Recreation survey forms document the contributing and
non-contributing structures.
On April 24, 2017,John Madonna hired historic preservation consulting firm Chattel, Inc. (Chattel)to
provide consulting services related to the Specific Plan area. As part of this work, Chattel President
Robert Chattel, AIA, historic architect, and Associate II Caroline Raftery, architectural historian,
reviewed the February 20, 2015 version of this report, and on May 1, 2017 conducted a site visit
with RRM Design Group Principal Victor Montgomery, AIA, and Principal Planner Pam Ricci, AICP, and
CEO John Madonna and CFO Connie Walter. Based on the site visit and subsequent research,
Chattel provided minor edits to Project Director Mary Bean and the edits have been incorporated
into this Historic Resource Assessment.
1.2 - Property History
The property is located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road (Exhibits 1, 2, and 3). The Assessor's Parcel
Numbers for the property are 067-241-030 and 067-241-031. According to Brian Leveille, Senior
Planner for the City of San Luis Obispo, the property is currently located just outside the city limits.
However, for the purposes of the evaluation, Mr. Leveille suggested the property be evaluated under
City of San Luis Obispo criteria, as the property will be eventually annexed by the City.
The property contains a flat level area that extends along Los Osos Valley Road. A long driveway leads
into the property. The front portion of the property is unused and is currently fenced. At the end of
the driveway is a large,flat, open space that contains the Main Residence, "Old" Barn, Bunkhouse,
Dairy Barn,Creamery, Granary, Outhouse,Storage Building, and Shed with slated roof. This group of
buildings and structures(structures) comprises the Froom Ranch complex. The area around these
buildings is currently used for equipment storage for the John Madonna Construction Company.
Alex Madonna purchased the property in a tax lien sale in 1976. According to Mr. Madonna's son,
John (the current owner), Alex Madonna purchased numerous old ranches in the area. The
Madonna family is one of the pioneering families in San Luis Obispo County, and Mr. Madonna was
interested in preserving the heritage of the area. John Madonna stated that his father had a policy
FirstCarbon Solutions 1675�
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Management Summary,Property History,and Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Structure Histories and Descriptions Historic Resource Assessment
of lifetime tenancy for any of the properties he purchased. In accordance with his policy, Mr. Froom
resided on the ranch property until ill health required that he move in to San Luis Obispo to live with
his brother in 1998. The Main Residence is currently used as office space by the John Madonna
Construction Company.
The John Madonna Construction Company was responsible for the construction of many buildings in
the area, and the buildings that were to be demolished still had valuable materials in them. Mr.
Madonna salvaged these materials and stored them on his various properties.
In addition, Alex Madonna was friends with William Randolph Hearst and shared his love of old
buildings and the preservation of the local heritage. Some of the materials came from various
Hearst structures that were also salvaged over the years. John Madonna has continued this family
tradition and used much of this salvaged material to repair the buildings on the Froom Ranch.
The land rises west of the house complex and contains the Dairy Barn,the Creamery/Old House,the
Granary, the Water Tower, and the foundation of the Horse Barn. The remainder of the property is
currently open space with no buildings. Froom Creek runs through the property, and some of the
land is considered possible wetlands. The area contains two recorded prehistoric sites, which are
discussed in the Cultural Resource Assessment.
2 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6756
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
e � � �
� . � - ],. .� ��: �' . � t
. �
Legend . � � � � '' � �`' :� . �` E �
0 - , _���:;:3 �f. .��
, �
� . � � � _ I�:
,�
�� ���� �
�. , � ;� : . � .�
� ..
, r � J� ��. J �.
� � w -� � �i ,f' ��f 'a
- �'� .� Y � r +
, �� �
. � :. � - . ._ y� . _ �;
4
. a�• r�
� � �
� ',1�. �_ ���
�+ � F
� } ` .� �
*.�r
� i �
! � � .
� 'a .
� { gJ a
r •� • � ��T
� . , - y � • .R
,
. � .� . � .
•k, . ,� t ;.
. �,,� � �,� . �
, � �� � � ~` -
s �;� �. r � �� i ,.
� �� ' ��, � � .
- - - �'� � ..�'��' ,w�' i �
�
.�+� �� f �
. �
�' ��gt Ta Q°s� e �
� ' �
�F�
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16758
�
Atascadero
�
� Los
'a� � Padres NF
� � Los Padres NF
e
Santa
Margarita
Morro Bay
� Santa
Margarrta
Lake
Baywood-Los Osos
San Luis Obispo
� �
Pismo Beach
Grover City
Pacific Ocean
.- �.
, , -- .�
� ` ' �_,\ � � --
�; FirstCarb�n` e
� SDLUTIDNS �
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16760
`- ,�.. ~ ' � i 1 Vli''f %r � �.��, �� �. ,
~ r,'r��• k• � J 1 +� ����i;r f ... " ,� , r ' � ' `
�+.il ► . �I�I /..�1'S�� �-' � ""�I~ � .� � � .. `':� � • � �� �l y�,:;c
� � : �-:.� _ -:_■ - �r , . •.�� •+r��...',,VW;�- ' 1'�if���3�'�Y'-�-- � 1 � !' �. {� ': � ...
+���� ��-���il j ';'���2`.�f-�������..��I! G� � L� �, '�I I �`J or_ ' ����� 6 n��.
�� �j�. ! �s�` ,ro�,yr. �' .. �', - �, � �� l , '�1.
�`f:�• � ' _��`I 'S+• � `4 '! '�� %:.. I 1}Y ■ ` _�'� y� �' �■ /
L G r�• ! t�'
� 3--Lt� - - '�:' N.r� I,,� a '
C•:; �' o.: 1 � .a- � ,-- n. �
t •: � ' -� , :•.�' l'f._ �'. 6�/1:,[ � � .r'�� .`��:.�_.,� • � /
,L:. c� �, - t ..:� �:/���1 �• � p � � �'�
�� '�; a6'� ���+� �-•.;� ��.jP .K� .� • t • � $ �• _4���5� . -1 � y��.•.
T�.. �� . � .j� .�V �.�� � y lr7 � � I
. - 1. �� .;� � f .'`\.. r:��. t �'r,� ., _, � . �. . . "
' .� '1 z' r.L
.H. jr��. �' • .;�• • ��, �� r �I �ii� =i �.L�Sr�� ,. . .�... �4: l .. ' �._ ',
•`, _ '�'�_.:ti t.> ' i, '# �•' : ;�� I� ir � � �� �t!� �
;�% �),r� � �F�•, `� � _ ��i:.i^�iy� .�■'" .L `1 `_ �
� � ' � .�' :,f' � �..: •. � i r� 3 :.a `�
� ��' .�il } ,`.. • 8 ,� �id�'•�; �1 ���/���yy . �ti ):�' 4: �7
'� "-.J f r� �* N��r - ..•� "'�-•►��Y' .��, � r . �- _.l
i�,��,i/. -r�, _� i� _ .� ��-.J '-� .. '�°'�I'�. �/ � 'o�. �� � q�� . �
}.J�,1 ' • __ � , y 1 I �r •1 ��'' . - �•�� �'� �,y♦ 7C3 .'�: ! '�`,,�'ti'�'.f.�� � �
I -- _ , -
r.� ■� "�;77
1 / O�r ,' • J w � �-���_.. Y�.��� �_�+� `•� •-.
{ Y+� �� ��t '
_.�/� a � j'r�1�r�rn . .� _�-• --f. it`_ rl �c Y�_�- . � .
� .'1� - � �.- ���� ' �. �,n�,� �.�
. .f� ,� �` ' ;i,''`�j,. t'. �, :��,'�r- •� � - �•:.�r-�..* �' � '�
�' - , ,. F r y Y�.� �,, � � ..�'� ,
� �� �''� �
,-�� J��+' �, ;� `� � ek,� l`•'�3r.,y , "�N',�. � ',��� ,��. - ' � I �I
-���`�" .n- 'J � ��. � ��;°ty�►. ',��,�' �' :�r } ' � � .
�jJ!� !I `k� �'�� � � : _.`�"e r � I � �4;� � '�/ e'e' �
�� �1 �� .
.`..�'�,� � a ' r � a `/: `� �n� r. ��,`''�`} � � f ��.. � �-•, ad�. � '�" I
.I � v � U � '� ( a�j� � � :F ` ti tq z� ..-. �
�i� 4 1 � � . ;; , ,L-�_-_:_ � �� 'T-�-_� - _ --`
i m �� - : ..- ,
,I f �° , � ,�� '� �� ,• -- ' : , � ' ��"�..,
� � � � �-- �f� -_-:= .ti`��� i�� - . ;,
� �. , , � � . % ,� �_�
�j �. �k�' !� . . . i _ '� . -�i � � �' , � :` ��'��n . •
! �, ' .
� ��" �� ` :� 5�f �' 4' f• ��� f � ':�,~ r.��• �,•�; r,•-`-� _ ' - _ ;
�j • � .. • �.. .. • • _
, � �' � _-��� �'�f r�r;',Y �"J? ,-,r.~i,, '. ;r%fJiJ�,�/J�� �� ,' -•~ • p. �
l� r--� �:- � ` " � . \r , �y�. -{�r •
�� . � �' . ,. ,.' . ,�::;- :=;�•�'����. r � C.� �_'.-1 � �f� \r
sr- '� �/'�• �,-: i '�; ,_� ,j; � ',. - , �� �-
�'. 1�' '� ' ��/[ �-��. �,,. A� .•�-- )+ � f � i;� - -� _ --
' `, �� ^ �- � -- l �•:"� ��� 7 y`o_'L-�1 � 'rt� ..1 _�,]
� �'� "..,� y 1 - �)� �r ` ..-, � ,rV .
� .'� '. ,�, . �� .- ' ' � !�1=� �.�� �-._ .� ,., ����� _�
+'I�'i ` ��� j . �, �'. .`���' � � i !jr ��1. � � . `��I �•�"�"� �� ��z' •��,
; '�- � �,�� ti•-
�.'f , f J � �'�.:%- li f1 , ^f` � --- `•`_--ti�1��_�, '�I�` _i ', r;" � '_..�(,��I� -
.�' 'a r �� .,;,� r. r ;,r• f _ - ,- . ~�l- ;�� _ '� f y*=�� !��,.'i - ��.
y ,S�`'• '�`, -� _ � n / ' �1.�. --- � - .o ' [ r,
���` ��f ���V,. .-.- ..r � '\ � I -
,i,•� r . =�'•I:•� �:*� • . _ 4' - �s;} .._ .J;_. �h �, ��i �r�� �r`.-
�� ,,r :�`� '' x i '' " _. ,', f_" :��..� .;�,�.� ,u.�.
�"�-. �:' . , ,� :� �; ,• ; �`. -.� ; . .�
� r,��, :'���=.N:���� �L+'; ��f����jr;��'',,� � .-�. ` --_.;...� , } y ' �`���==7��a � " •-•..-S� r � �� �
'�`� +�:� � �f;� �a� ' f��}? r .] ���' �: � � 4 � �`. �{' ��y +
�� ,;�' ��!��' �i ��x'1 w '�--+ � ` � . --�
, { L� �� � :r, �,�'.,,.° ;x-�;f � iI'�i� ,�`�' 'll�• - �,� � � �.�--�� , •
� � r. ' •�I, �'�'. � , �I� r� _ � �/�,R �,' _ I . �� �1� ` i i - �o N
r_�-',� � �� ' r�r � , �� �I1 � �I � �-F r
.��r,:�`,�}} :F;�; ',N- ;i , _F �`� i��� 'f ,� - ��� �'�`f fC� ;�� � ��
� r r �� i i. ii t� �i' �.:: ti 1� � f,' - . i�
� !fI',. ', �i i �r�1`�•*' �,:,� �,: y`� + '�,`�;�;`�,`��� p�� ��'•.���H,1�1 ,{ ��, � �. � ��• ��
`�.. �'
C - ,.�'C.� r ,�. .1 r:. �� - �i�,,r�- �. `Z`1 �''11} �, �� ` ,r �a���[.,��° �� � a'
x. ypt�,� c•1 � ," -, •- / 41 � a�.- �1 ,q( �,�'%' 914
� - ,�` �. , y i �,.._ ' ( .,� r:. �
� � ,'� � T'� ��� /^ f �, J�r� ���. - _ r� - - - ' r L Q
� �l LL�n
� ,�,r=� - ;,. , � - „ :�r., _ r � L' � ". _ . y4; ;
� '. --�-:'��; ' �; , '�• _ i� '„ �I , r• , 'c�
J � : --�1J �r� � , . _ I ! �I � }�+- \` �h: •Z
�' ' ,a, f>;�-` '��f'�� - �, �?i� ��:� ,;�vr � _l" �., ''`�_'ti__-_.i��a�ud =..��
; ��'� . � �„ .! r ;.' ,, �
1 /'�% �'- �f�._-' !r y.! � �. � _ '���11 r I_ �/r • ��'
� �`i. r� ��� ��`�.r.-��� !� ;`''• ..� i. .� � .�..y:e�
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16762
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
1.3 - Structure Histories and Descriptions
1.3.1 - History of the Main Residence
The Main Residence was built in 1915 by Hans Peterson. The building was constructed as the Froom
family was continuing to grow and needed better living conditions for its young children. The family
had lived in the house attached to the Creamery building on the upper slopes of the property to the
west. The Main Residence was occupied by members of the Froom family until 1998, when Bill
Froom moved in with his brother in San Luis Obispo. When the property was purchased by the Alex
Madonna, arrangements were made to allow Mr. Froom to reside in the home until he chose to
leave.
Description of the Main Residence
�
F l�
. �
_ ���iCr, r. �
- - - � . __ f, � .__
■ �r ���
�� ■ , 1 � ` �I�� i
� � �
� _ , -�_ �
,�. . . �- -
r
'� .~:
��.,� . w-. —ti.,...�..�+�.
The Main Residence is a one-story, asymmetrical, irregularly shaped, Craftsman-style, single-family
residence. The residence was constructed in approximately 1915 by Hans Peterson. The building
has a redwood sill and concrete foundation, wood horizontal shiplap siding, a partial width front
porch, and a hipped roof with shingles and a modest eave overhang. A brick chimney is present on
the roof and extends downward into the residence, terminating about 3 feet from the floor. The
building was heated by a wood stove and there was no ir�terior fireplace.
East Facade
The east facade is the main elevation for the residence and faces Los Osos Valley Road. The facade
contains a partial width front porch, accessed by a short lflight of wood stairs. The front gable roof is
supported by three round columns—two at the entrance area and one on the south end. The main
entrance includes a single wood door with a wood screen door. A pair of wood-framed, double-
hung,focal windows are located south of the off center front door. A front gable roof is present over
the porch and the triangular space created by the roof design is infilled with fish scale shingles.
FirstCarbon Solutions 1676�
V:\Puhlications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310�01\Historic Resource Assessment\503100�1 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
Windows vary in size, shape, and placement around the facades and include wood-framed, double-
hung, sash-style windows.
North Facade
The north facade is the side of the residence that includes multiple wood-framed double-hung sash-
style windows. A bay section projects forward from the main mass of the structure. A dormer
section is present on the side of the roof directly above the bay section.
A rectangular-shaped addition is located on the northwest corner of the building. The addition was
constructed in two parts at two different times. The front portion of the addition has wood shiplap
siding and was built by Bill Froom to store firewood. The rear portion of the addition has vertical
board and batten siding and was built by John Madonna to house electronic equipment. Several
single doors are present around the three facades.
West Facade
The rear of the residence contains a screened porch with a screen door and screened window
openings. The porch wraps around the house, extending onto the south facade. A single wood and
glass door leads into the rear of the house. The back wall of the house contains wood-framed
windows.
South Facade
The south facade is the side of the house facing the open area. Multiple window openings are
present.
The building is in good condition and is currently used as offices for the John Madonna Construction
Company.
Alterations
According to John Madonna,the house has undergone a number of alterations. Both John Madonna
and his father, Alex, have made many changes to restore the building. The original foundation was
redwood sills. Portions of the north and south redwood sill foundations were completely rotted, and
these were removed and replaced with concrete foundations. The house was then leveled, as it had
sunk significantly. At some point,the house flooded and the floors were uneven and buckled. The
floors were leveled, sanded, and repaired. Several interior walls were removed to form larger office
spaces. The kitchen sink and stove were removed and the area was converted to general office use.
The only heat in the house was provided by a wood stove that produced significant amounts of soot.
The walls had been painted over the years and the soot was sealed into the layers of paint. The
walls were scraped,the soot and paint were removed, and they were completely repainted. The
house was rewired for all new electrical service, plumbing repairs were made, an HVAC system was
installed, new ceilings were put in, a new roof was put on, and general tenant improvements were
conducted.
10 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6764
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
The rear addition was altered by adding an extra section at the rear of the addition. This new
section is used by the John Madonna Construction Company to store its electronic equipment.
History of the "Old" Barn
The barn was constructed at an unknown time on another property owned by the Froom family. The
other property was reportedly southeast of the current ranch complex. The building was moved by
placing it on logs and rolling it over the land and the creek(presumably with the aid of a team of
horses) until it was located on its new site. The relocation took place at an unknown time early in
the 20th century, and the barn has been in its present location since that time. The barn is estimated
to be over 125 years old.
Description of the "Old" Barn
,u ����� ..- -7
• ,_w ���
��--.ro�l.4�r�.
- � � , -_ . Y _. {`I hl •�
��� - '� n� 't.i: t. II � -. �i• '�
�I � ,.�Yi.`. �+i ^�i � A� I ` � i �� I ..
� �,
4 +�..
� � � �r .
� � ; �� ,;
� '� �.�,'�: .�1 � a�
� w . r �� �' ;� E � ��..�w�a 6�
,� ; . .�, � _
i �. _i
�+y - y. . " ." _
The "Old" Barn is located west of the main residence. The barn structure is a one-story, rectangular-
shaped,Vernacular-style barn building. The barn has a concrete floor,vertical wood siding, and a
front gable roof with corrugated metal roofing.
East Facade
The main doors are located on the east facade and includle sets of sliding doors. A door for a hayloft
is present on the upper portion of the building. The building does not contain any window openings.
North and South Facades
The north and south facades contain vertical wood siding. No windows are present.
West Facade
The west facade contains vertical wood siding. The rear wall was rotted and the boards were
replaced with historic boards salvaged from nearby barns.
FirstCarbon Solutions 1678�
V:\Puhlications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310�01\Historic Resource Assessment\503100�1 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
The building is in good condition.
Alterations
John Madonna made a wide range of changes to the barn structure. The barn was in poor condition
when it was moved to its current location. The barn was leaning more than 2 feet,the rear wall was
rotted, and the barn was twisted. Mr. Madonna poured a new concrete floor, replacing the original
dirt floor. The building had originally been set down directly on the dirt when it was moved to the
site. Mr. Froom used the barn to store his pickup truck. The rear wall was replaced because of dry
rot and vertical boards from other local farm buildings were used to replace the rotted boards.
Considerable expense was incurred to stabilize the barn and restore it to a stable condition.
History of the Bunkhouse
The building was constructed as a bunkhouse for the workers on the property by Hans Peterson in
1915. However, according to John Madonna, the building is one small room that was used by Bill
Froom's brother,who lived in the small residence for many y�ars.
Description of the Bunkhouse
i i�
r
; _
1
� � ---
-- • �
�� � ` y L ,' �-
Jr' ��
�� �
1 1� � r . s . ' .
� �
� �
a= '� i -•n• �_ ���
�r - . -
The small bunkhouse is a one-story, Craftsman-style building used as a residential structure. The
building has a concrete foundation, wood horizontal shiplap siding and a front gable roof with
shingles. The building was constructed by Hans Peterson in 1915 when he built the main residence.
EastFacade
A set of concrete steps leads to the single wood entrance door on the east elevation. The concrete
steps have the Froom "brand" pressed into the wet concrete. This detail is seen on many of the
other buildings as well. A single wood entrance door provides access to the interior and a small
metal slider-style window is present.
12 FirstCarbon Solutiorr�6766
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\5031�001 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
South Facade
The south facade contains a wood-framed, double-hung, sash-style window.
West Facade
The west facade also contains a wood-framed, double-hung, sash-style window.
North Facade
The north facade is blank with a large metal sign propped up against the wall. The building is in good
condition.
Alterations
According to John Madonna,the building has been altered by general tenant maintenance, including
painting, a new roof, and a new floor. The building was used for paper file storage and rats were a
problem;to solve the problem, a new floor was installed.
History of the Dairy Barn
Jim Aiken lived in a tent by the creek on the property ancN built the dairy barn,the granary, and the
horse barn in 1913 for$1,800.00, which included labor and materials. The dairy barn was designed
to hold 10 cows at either end and 10 at each side. The barn contained a 4-inch carrier track
designed to bring hay into the barn.
Description of the Dairy Barn
,'� . � . . • � ,.:�. ��•-7
���:�
r . r. " ��
�:� �i '�^ , ��r'�. �.�� �.. '
; .
� ;i ,�.., �... `_��'._.:�r:...1..� -
,, �
- {, ..f��- .- •..i � -- ,..��� T � .. -
�
� � r-^.S�-'�n�v�K'�a�.^•A�F`���. � '�:�'��..�, . . K..�lw.,��
. .� , =�2"'�' .�`:
.:% 4� � •:NT^i . .�!':.� . -. . . .. .
•'��,, � . .-"1� �'.�.1:���"..' � �. . ' ��
„.!. ..� ..�� . . ..�. . . .y". 'Y • '
' �V�r �,'`4►�' � 'f ' � "' •I�
#,�'�..:nr" ~}'• . • •}� .. .r . . ,
�
The Dairy Barn is a 60-foot x 80-foot, one-story, asymmetrical, irregularly shaped, Vernacular-style
barn used for milking cows. The barn has a wood pier and concrete block foundation,vertical wood
siding walls, and a gabled roof.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167f�3
V:\Puhlications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310�01\Historic Resource Assessment\503100�1 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
East Facade
The east facade contains a door at the south end of the facade that opens to a slanting concrete
ramp. The ramp area includes a wide concrete apron covering the ground, located between the
Dairy Barn and the Creamery/House structures. The concrete apron had a specific function that
allowed mud to be removed from the cows'feet prior to entering the barn for milking.
The east wall contains a small addition on the north end of the facade that houses a variety of
windows that appear to be remnants from other structures. The windows are of wood frame
construction in various shapes and sizes. Each of the three walls contains a single door opening. A
concrete trough is present on the east wall near the addition.
North Facade
The north facade contains two door openings. The east door opening is a single sliding door. The
other door is the main door into the space and includes a wide opening with a sliding door. The
west end of the facade slopes steeply down to the ground. A large metal hook is present at the peak
of the gable roof.
West Facade
The west facade contains an open entrance on the south end of the facade and a concrete entrance
area that leads into the interior space. The shed roof slopes steeply down to the lower level of the
wall.
South Facade
The south facade contains a unique feature. The facade is curved and a portion of the curved
section has no foundation and hangs out over the slope. The wall has vertical siding and a sloping
curved roof. The wall was specifically constructed in this manner to accommodate the movement of
the cows within the interior space. Because their size and breadth, it was easier to move the cows
through a round space.
The building is in fair condition. Corrals are present on the south side of the slope near the barn.
Alterations
The barn has been altered by both Alex and John Madonna over the years to stabilize the building.
New support beams replaced unstable sections, portions were propped up and repaired, beams
were placed in portions of the roof system to keep the roof in place,vertical wallboards were
replaced, and overall general maintenance has kept the structure standing over the years.
Archival research indicates the barn is the only round barn in San Luis Obispo County. A variety of
early dairy farm equipment is still located within the barn structure. The barn was used to milk the
cows, and start the butter and cheese production, and it was utilized until the dairy operations
ceased in 1977.
14 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6768
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
History of the Creamery/House Building
The east portion of the building was used as the Creamery, an essential part of the dairy operations.
According to Bill Froom, his father lived in the Creamery for a period of time when he first began to
operate the dairy. The residence was constructed at an unknown time, possibly after John Froom's
marriage to Harriet and the need for more space. The young family lived in the house portion of the
building until 1915,when Hans Peterson built the Main Residence. Bill Froom was born in the
house, and presumably, any of the children born before 1915 were also born in the house. After the
family moved into the "new" residence built by Hans Peterson in 1915,the space was possibly used
as additional living space for the workers on the ranch.
Description of the Creamery/House
--- - - , , , �
E �`.
�,� F I�? f' � ��0.
i 1 , � � � . � _
� �
x P � .y.ir �'.� i� �•
"� .i J. .. . ..fi , x
� � �I • �/s + �� . '
y+rr^'
... -�•�.J�jV�i�'�r���r.Ns�,:"��r'::•••'y• . Y'Yy,.�. .�•:.'..'��'_,:-•-{•'' . -•�i
. �,;"r.-.•,�f,��i�''�'f�`�� . ; .. .,"'r9��`:
' ;xr-'•�'r � .. r�.
- _ `"���..^._ ' .,�yx1` ?::f r -�ti.
��+�x:'��e . ' - -. �' _ _ ... .
The Creamery/House is a one-story, irregularly shaped, asymmetrical, Vernacular-style building that
was built in several stages at unknown times. The building is divided into three sections, each with a
gabled roof. The west portion of the building faces the Dairy Barn and was used as the Creamery.
The east portion of the structure was used as a residence. The overall structure comprises two
buildings separating the east wall of the Creamery from the west wall of the House by approximately
one foot.
South Facade
The south facade contains the two buildings—the Creamery and the House. Each section contains a
single door opening, and a window is present in each of the three sections that comprise the two
buildings.
The south facade contains a combination of vertical and Ihorizontal wood siding. The building has a
wood pier foundation with rock footings and infill of the open areas.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167f��
V:\Puhlications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310�01\Historic Resource Assessment\503100�1 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
An addition was constructed on the south wall on the house portion but deteriorated to the point
where it was removed.
West Facade
A single wood entrance opening faces the Dairy Barn on the west wall. The interior contains two
small rooms. A root cellar is present under the building and the adjoining structure. The roof on this
portion of the structure slopes down to a low level and is covered with shingles.
North Facade
The north facade contains vertical and horizontal siding. The entrance to the cellar area is located at
the base of the north wall under the Creamery portion of the building. A secondary entrance is
located further down the wall. A small, narrow door is present in the area where the two buildings
are separated. The door is located on the north wall and there is no corresponding door on the
south wall. An open porch was added to the east end of the north wall of the house structure at an
unknown time.
East Facade
The east facade serves as the end wall of the residential portion of the structure. A rectangular-
shaped window opening is present.
Alterations
The building has been altered by additions to the structure. At one time, an addition was present on
the south wall of the house portion but was in extremely poor condition and was removed by Alex
Madonna. The porch on the north wall of the house was added at an unknown time.
Alex and John Madonna undertook a series of changes to the building because of its instability.
Floors and ceiling areas were replaced with plywood sheeting,vertical siding was replaced, walls and
foundations were stabilized, and general maintenance kept the building standing over the years.
History of the Granary
The Granary was built in 1913 by Jim Aiken in a way that eliminated the rat problem that was
destroying other buildings on the Ranch. The building was secure and many of the local farmers
stored their grain in the building to keep it safe from rats.
16 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6770
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
Description of the Granary
-:�'j`� ��
�.�l. �
- - _s..
.. ,, ,� ��-�,�`��
� � l�i _ _
�_�ti I 1.. r {;i•1+ M
— a �
T' ��� 'a. � • � +i..
� . ..
�- —L''�� :ajj.;a+.r•
.R-.:
The Granary is located on the hill close to the Dairy Barn and the Creamery/House. The Granary is a
small, one-story, double-walled, rectangular-shaped, asymnmetrical,Vernacular-style utilitarian
building. The building has a wood pier foundation, vertical tongue-and-groove wood siding walls,
and a gabled roof. One window is present on the south facade. A single door is present on the east
facade. The interior contains storage areas. Tongue-and-groove siding was used to prevent the grain
from being eaten by animals. No grain was present durirog the site visit, and the floor and walls were
covered with horse harnesses and equipment. The build'ung is in poor condition.
Alterations
None noted.
History of the Outhouse
The Outhouse was originally the parking kiosk at Reilly's Department Store in downtown San Luis
Obispo. Alex Madonna obtained the contract to demolish the building and construct the
replacement building, so he moved the kiosk structure to the Ranch. The ranch workers requested
an outdoor bathroom, so John Madonna converted the building into an outhouse. A septic tank was
located near the barn, and the parking kiosk was repurposed and moved to the location over the
septic tank.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167�9
V:\Puhlications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310�01\Historic Resource Assessment\503100�1 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
Description of the Outhouse
-- � �
�-- -
- �
� -::�1_ _
� � _
.�
�' r
,�
�� ri
.��'� Ny' k •� 't
�,.
�,` vl� �� �'-� .1�..
,• ��,�',c -- ,....w. . — _. __ .. .._ . .� Si,�1,
�`:"'"� �����y ;� , ',
- . . �,: ��_ ,-•
The Outhouse is a small, one-story, asymmetrical,Vernacular-style building. The building has wood
shiplap siding walls and a front gabled roof with a shed roof extension on the east wall. The building
has a single door with a moon cutout in the door. A small toilet room is present. The building
appears to be in good condition. Because the Outhouse is modern (less than 45 years old) and was
moved to its current location, it was not evaluated for historic significance or recorded on a
Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR)form.
Alterations
Conversion of the building from a parking kiosk to a bathroom.
History of the Storage Building
The Storage Building was moved to this location by John Madonna. It was a simple, mobile storage
unit obtained by Mr. Madonna from a local friend and brought to the site.
18 FirstCarbon Solutiorr�6772
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\5031�001 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
Description of the Storage Building
d
^� _' :-...:-_. _. . �-• il
� A-� f~ �
� -- -_-- �._`-�-�=r���"r-"'•r" _
�J . � �-�
� � �".���'�:���.-�'°_"_"_ -�-- i
- Y�:,_,.r��`---�;�::����`r -
�
�� �� ',I
�� �
�, �
� 4 � .:
�. :�,
The Storage Building is a one-story, rectangular-shaped, asymmetrical,Vernacular-style structure
that is located currently to the north of the Old Barn. The building has no true foundation; its walls
are horizontal wood shiplap siding and it has a gable roof with shingles. A single door is present and
small windows are present on the elevations. The building is in good condition. Because the
building is modern (less than 45 years old) and was moved to its current location, it was not
evaluated for historic significance or recorded on a DPR form.
Alterations
None noted.
History of the Shed
The building is located north of the Main house and was built at an unknown time by an unknown
person. John Madonna stated that Bill Froom lived through the Great Depression and cultivated
habits of thrift. At one point,the shed building was full of so many cans of dog food that it took
several trips to remove them all. The building contains a seeder machine that Mr. Madonna has
allowed to remain in the structure, since it holds up the building.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Puhlications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310�01\Historic Resource Assessment\503100�1 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
Description of the Shed Building with Slanted Roof
E`
�
,�
,
I .'.
� ' �, �� � � i .
1 � , .:ti . ��4: 'S, �i}.
� �P� l� i
.,z•- .f ��� �� :r �--,�
4 �t �� 1� ��{, .s j
�� J,w � � i' ,�� ��F
�� + �'. y.
: .. ���, + �� �V �
I' S �.s.6' .
�:r; �..r; !'• o
H ,i!"d f:`�:;i` • ,�` : E. . .
5ry gs ..5;. '.
i I�
The Shed Building is a one-story, irregularly shaped, asymmetrical,Vernacular-style storage building.
The shed roof has a steep slant. The building has no true foundation; it was constructed with vertical
wood siding walls and a steeply slanted shed roof. Entrance doors are on the north wall. An addition has
a flat roof and a single entrance door. The building is in extremely poor condition and is barely standing.
Alterations
No significant changes have been made to the building.
History of the Water Tower
The water tower was constructed by Verizon Wireless for use as a cell tower. The structure has no
historic importance because it was constructed in the last 2 years.
20 FirstCarbon Solutiorr�6774
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\5031�001 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
Description of the Water Tower
1
�
��
_ ,
� �.� - -. � '' ��
�� •,�-�� . _ ..���
. .- ,.
.�. .
.;
The Water Tower appears to be a water tower, but it is actually a stealth cell tower site that was
designed to appear to be a structure compatible with farm landscapes. The circular structure stands
on metal legs, and has metal siding and a dome roof. Because the Water Tower is modern (2 years
old), it was not evaluated for historic significance or recorded on a DPR form.
Alterations
None noted.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167�
V:\Puhlications\Client(PN-1N)\5�31\50310�01\Historic Resource Assessment\503100�1 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.docx
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16776
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
• • ' : � ' • �
2.1 - History of San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo is located along the Central Coast of California, approximately 200 miles north of Los
Angeles and 230 miles south of San Francisco. The area is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west
and the Santa Lucia mountain range to the north, east, and south. The mountains are the source of
San Luis Obispo Creek, which runs through the City of San Luis Obispo and empties into the Pacific
Ocean.
The San Luis Obispo County area was first settled by the Chumash tribes who built a series of villages
along the local creeks. The region was largely unexplored by Europeans until the arrival of the
Spanish in the late 1700s.
The Spanish government had begun exploration of the New World in the late 1400s, and its process
of settlement and development in the Americas continued into the late 1700s. During this period,
the Russian government had created settlements along the coast of Canada and into the Northern
California area. The establishment of a settlement at Fort Ross led the Spanish crown to consider a
more active presence in California to halt the encroachment of Russia into the western portion of
the Spanish empire in the Americas.
In 1769, a joint military and religious expedition led by Gaspar de Portola was sent to the Alta
California area in conjunction with Franciscan missionary Father Junipero Serra to create a chain of
missions and presidios to control Alta California for Spain. The group first journeyed to the San
Diego area, establishing the Mission San Diego de Alcala,the first in a chain of 21 missions extending
northward into Alta California.
In addition to his other duties, Portola was tasked with finding Monterey Bay and establishing a
presidio in Monterey. After accomplishing this process, the expedition proceeded to the San Luis
Obispo area to continue exploring the region. In 1772,the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa was
founded in the Valley de Los Osos (Valley of the Bears) near the banks of San Luis Obispo Creek. The
mission became the fifth mission founded in California by Father Serra.
The Spanish crown granted numerous land grants to the soldiers who accompanied Portola and
Father Serra,thus enabling the overall settlement of the region. Large ranchos were established and
California's cattle-based economy developed over the next decades.
After the independence movement by Mexico,Alta California, and other parts of the Southwest,
became part of the Mexican empire. Transition from Spanish control to Mexican control did not
result in major changes in the early years of the 1820s. However, as time went on,the overall
system of government and settlement changed. American traders, fur trappers, explorers, and
settlers gradually filtered into California. Many of these men married daughters of the old Spanish
families,thus acquiring title to many of the ranchos. As the United States was expanding across the
continent, eyes were turning to California as a necessary access to the China trade.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167�3
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
A variety of governmental and economic changes in California during the first half of the 1800s led to
a decline in the mission system. Secularization was officially declared in 1833: the mission system
was disbanded, lands were sold, the priests left the missions, and the local tribes were left to fend
for themselves. In 1845, Governor Pio Pico decreed that the Mission lands were for sale. All the
land of Mission San Luis Obispo was sold except for the church,which still stands today. The church
fell into ruins during secularization and the priests left the mission grounds.
California became a state in 1850, and, as the County of San Luis Obispo developed,the church
property served as the first courthouse and jail in the county. Some restoration on the building
began in the 1870s but full restoration was not accomplished until 1933. The Mission serves as a
parish church in the Monterey Diocese at the present time.
2.1.1 - Rancho Canada de Los Osos y Pecho y Islay
Rancho Canada de Los Osos y Pecho y Islay was a 32,341-acre Mexican land grant in the Los Osos
Valley in San Luis Obispo County. The grant consisted of Rancho Canada de Los Osos (northern
portion)granted to Victor Linares by Governor Juan B. Alvarado in 1842, and Rancho Pecho y Islay
(southern portion) was granted to Francisco Badillo by Governor Manuel Micheltorena in 1843. The
grants were consolidated by Governor Pio Pico in 1845. The grant extended from the Pacific Coast to
along Los Osos Creek and the Los Osos Valley to the outer boundaries of present-day City of San Luis
Obispo.
The Rancho Canada de Los Osos land was purchased from Linares in 1844 by Scottish Captain John
(Juan) Wilson and his Scottish business partner,James (Diego) Scott. Wilson married into the Carrillo
family, linking him to the prominent Spanish families, including the Vallejos. Wilson, a sea captain
and trader, had come to California in 1837 and with his business partner,James Scott, purchased
other rancho lands in San Luis Obispo County and Sonoma County.
After California's statehood in 1850, one of the major issues was the ownership of Hispanic land
grants. The Land Act of 1851 required owners to file paperwork to prove their claim; Wilson's claim
to the Rancho Canada de Los Osos grant was patented in 1869. After Wilson's death in 1861, the
land passed to his widow, Ramona Carrillo Wilson and their children. Over the next forty years,the
land was gradually sold and a new era began on the former rancho lands.
2.2 - History of the City of San Luis Obispo
The development of the City of San Luis Obispo grew out of the overall settlement of the County. In
1850, California became a state and fell under the control of the United States government. Sorting
out the old Spanish and Mexican land grants, ranchos, and mission lands was an arduous process.
Little formal paperwork existed, land boundaries were vague and unclear, and many of the old
Hispanic families had no way to prove title to the lands that had been in their families for decades.
With the implementation of the California Land Act of 1851, attempts were made to sort out the
ownership and sale of the valuable land. Many of the old ranchos were subdivided into smaller
parcels, and farms and ranches began to develop under the new system. Many families moved into
24 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6778
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
San Luis Obispo and the City began to grow and develop. San Luis Obispo was officially designated
the San Luis Obispo county seat in 1868.
Following a major drought in 1862 to 1864,the local economy shifted from cash crops to cattle
production. A booming dairy industry was established that continued well into the mid-20`h century.
Improvements in the development of the railroad system brought increased expansion to the area.
New lines connected the isolated region to the coast and the area soon became a central hub for
trade moving both north and south to the major centers and to the coast. With the arrival of the
Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s,the town and county areas expanded greatly. Union Oil of
California established centers of operation in the County, and the agricultural and dairy development
within the county thrived.
In 1901, California Polytechnic Institute was established in the City. The Institute created a strong
focus on vocational and agricultural training and over the decades provided an important
fundamental training for local residents. The implementation of the Institute and its influence on
the community greatly influenced the development of San Luis Obispo during the 20t"century.
Another significant influence on the local area was the development of San Simeon Ranch (known as
Hearst Castle) by newspaper publisher William Randolph Hearst. The development of these two
important landmarks, in addition to the Mission San Luis Obispo, served to stimulate the regional
economy and influence the growth in and around San Luis Obispo.
In the 20th century, the development of the automobile made it possible to expand the growth of the
City beyond the downtown core area. City services, roads, and utilities expanded and improved to
meet the needs of the expanded city. Tourism, and particularly automobile tourism, added another
element to the local economy.
The Great Depression of the 1930s slowed the local economy, as it did with the rest of the county.
The establishment of Camp San Luis Obispo, a military training camp, helped to improve the local
economy. Military preparation increased as World War II loomed, and the population of the City
grew significantly, providing an economic boost well into mid-century. During the post-war period of
the 1950s and 1960s,the demand for single-family homes rose dramatically and the City expanded
by annexing areas in the County. Large residential subdivisions were constructed outside of the city
core, and some of the former agricultural land began to transition to residential and commercial use.
The City of San Luis Obispo Historic Context Statement includes the following information regarding
the agricultural development of the area.
The development of ranching and agriculture as the region's main commercial
enterprises influenced the development of San Luis Obispo. In the early 2ptn
century,the primary agricultural crops ranged from flower seeds to winter peas,
bush beans, pole beans, and celery. Japanese farmers were particularly successful
with these crops through the 1930s.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
With the United States entrance into World War I in 1917,there was an enormous
demand for agricultural products, which provided an economic boom to Central
California. During the War, many farmers turned to the production of navy beans,
since these were subsidized by the War Relief Administration. Before reliable
refrigeration, navy beans could be shipped to the troops in Europe without spoiling
and San Luis Obispo's economy boomed.
In the early 20t"century, oil derricks were erected in the area and drilling for oil
began. The first lucrative oil fields were located south of San Luis Obispo and were
controlled by families outside of the region, including the Doheny family from Los
Angeles. The Producers Transportation Company represented the largest oil interest
in San Luis Obispo County, accommodating the transport of oil from the Union Oil
Company and the Independent Production Agency via 500 miles of pipeline to the
Port of San Luis . . . .
2.2.1 - History of Froom Ranch
The history of the Froom Ranch was compiled from a variety of sources. The ranch property lies
within the boundaries of the former La Laguna or Laguna Rancho. The following information was
taken from the 1998 report, Historical Evaluation for the Froom Ranch Complex, San Luis Obispo,
written by San Luis Obispo County historian Betsy Bertrando.
The area known as the Froom Ranch originally contained Lost 60, 67, 68, and 69 as
portrayed on the 1869 map—Subdivisions of the Rancho Canada de Los Osos and La
Laguna, surveyed by James Stanton. A total of 867.87 acres made up the original
Froom Ranch parcel. Today,the Ranch consists of approximately 500 acres. The
ranch/farm complex sits on Lot 68 of the original subdivision bordering the
southwest boundary of the Laguna Rancho.
The Laguna Rancho was originally part of the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa
lands. In 1844, after the Mission rancho lands had been regranted by the Mexican
government, Governor Micheltorena granted the church "one square league (4157
acres) in the place called 'Laguna"' (Engledhardt 1964). This was included with two
garden plots and the church in San Luis Obispo. In 1845,the new governor, Pio Pico,
sold off all the remaining mission lands and buildings. Captain John Wilson, and two
partners, Scott and McKinley, bought the San Luis Obispo Mission and the Laguna
Rancho for$500 (Angel 1883). The properties were later claimed by the church and
confirmed by the American government in 1855 (Koeber 1972). In 1859, Bishop
Alemany sold the Laguna property to Captain John Wilson.
W.W. Stow,from San Francisco, eventually acquired the Wilson estate. Stow was
known locally as a major benefactor of the first library in San Luis Obispo.
Contributing books not money, Stow felt'there was too much reading of fiction,
which might be stopped if history and biographical works were placed on the shelf'
and wanted to make the selections himself(Togazzani 1992).
26 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6780
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
In 1875, Stow sold the property to S.W. (Henry) Foreman, a surveyor. Henry and his
wife built a rather elaborate house (for the time)that remains today at the end of
Madonna Road and is known as the De Vaul Ranch House (Bertrando 1997).
In 1884, Ludwig Nelson purchased Lot 60 of the La Laguna subdivision from
Foreman. Nelson came from Norway to California in 1859 and arrived in the county
in 1868. By 1883,the land acquired a dairy and 856 acres in the Harmony District.
Nelson is listed as a farmer in 1884 and as a dairyman in the 1982 San Luis Obispo
Great Register. The ranch eventually grew to contain Lots 67, 68, and 69 as well,for
a total of 867.87 acres. When Ludwig died,the property was run by his wife Annie
Nelson. Annie Nelson owned four ranches; one in Estero,two in Cambria/Harmony,
and the Froom Ranch on Los Osos Valley Road (Bill Froom pers. comm.).
John R. Froom was born in Prescott, Grantville County, Canada in 1864. When he
was sixteen years old he left Canada for lowa. After six months he made his way to
California and did ranch work for a year near Santa Rosa. Then in 1886, he came to
work for Ludwig Nelson in Laguna, living in a little room attached to the creamery
(Structure E; See Results Section). In 1890, he leased 500 acres and began dairying
with fifty cows.
Harriet Perry was a native of Ireland who first came to Illinois with her brother and
later to San Luis Obispo where she settled. Harriet and John Froom were married on
December 14, 1904 and had seven children: Harry,Annie, Minnie, Willie, Robert,
Bunny and John (Morrison 1917). From the estate of Annie Nelson, Harriet Perry
Froom acquired Lots 60, 67, 68, and 69 in 1904. In 1905, the H.P. Froom Ranch
consisted of 412.65 acres. They lived in the small addition at the east end of the
creamery that appears to be, but is not, attached to the creamery(Structure E). In
1915,they moved into the 'new' four bedroom house (Structure C).
According to Bill Froom, a dairy had been on the property since the 1850s. The
subdivision map of 1868 gives no information regarding land use or existing
structures. The plat map of 1858 shows one house near the eastern border of the
Laguna Rancho. A 'thatched' house is shown just to the outside of the southern
point of the rancho.
For several years the ranch has been owned by Alex Madonna and used as an
equipment storage yard. Madonna ran cattle on the ranch as well. He has been
responsible for the upkeep of the ranch structures and has painted most of the
buildings. Bill Froom, until this fall, continued to reside in the house he has spent
most of his life in. Health problems have recently necessitated Bill living with his
brother in San Luis Obispo. Currently no one resides on the ranch.
A variety of local sources obtained from the files of the Local History Room at the San Luis Obispo
County Library were used to add information to the overall history of the ranch. Local newspapers
interviewed Bill Froom many times and some of his stories about the ranch were recounted in the
articles.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
Local San Luis Obispo historian Joan Sullivan conducted a series of interviews with Bill Froom, which
were published in The Bay News in 1993. An article entitled "The Froom Family Ranch" included the
following information:
Mr. Froom stated that his father had originally leased the ranch for$1500. His lease
included the ranch lands (much larger than today's ranch property),the harnesses
for the horses, wagon and hay. Bill retained the receipt his entire life. His father
worked the ranch for 31 years and lived in the Creamery house for the first ten
years. Froom said his father "bached it" until 1902 when he married his mother,
Harriet Perry, when she was 18.
The Frooms began having seven children and Bill was the middle child born in 1910 in the house
attached to the Creamery building. As the family expanded, a new house was needed. Hans
Peterson built the Craftsman-style residence in 1915 and boarded with the family while it was under
construction. Peterson also built a woodshed,the washing room, the storeroom, and the
bunkhouse.
Bill Froom first attended the Laguna Elementary School when he was six years old. He attended the
school for 8 years and was also hired to care for the grounds for one dollar. Many years later,from
1948 to 1966, he served as a Trustee for the Laguna School District that had been formed in 1877.
The school was constructed in 1870 on land donated by Harry Forma. John Froom worked for Forma
as a hired hand prior to buying the Froom Ranch property. In 1870,John Froom planted cypress
trees around the schoolhouse that Froom had traveled to Monterey to obtain. Some of the trees
were still standing in the 1990s.
When Bill Froom was 8 years old, his father asked him if he could milk a cow and that is when he
began helping with feeding and milking the family herd of Durham cows. Bill Froom continued to
milk cows by hand until 1945,when the milking machine was installed. By age 15, Bill was taking
teams of horses out to track hay and farm.
John Froom died when Bill was 17, during the Great Depression in 1929. Bill took over the farm and
ran it until 1977. Like most ranch families,the family weathered the hard times of the 1930s. Bill
took work outside the farm and worked for local families making 15 cents an hour. He recounted
that the most money he ever made during that period was 50 cents an hour.
The ranch was an ideal location for dairy cows and the Froom family owned Durham cows, which
produced milk with a high butter fat content. The cows were milked twice a day and produced 200
gallons of milk a day. Eventually the family switched to Guernsey cows. The dairy was profitable
until the 1950s, when the local dairy economy began to fade. The high cost of operating the dairy
led the family to slowly reduce the herd. They decided to switch over to raising beef cattle. Bill
commented in the Bay News article that"we could always pay our taxes ($160 per acre) dairying and
I found out the hard way that one good dairy cow was worth much more than any beef cow. One
year cattle brought in $11,000 and cost me$13,000."
28 FirstCarbon Solutiorrtg7g2
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
Bill Froom told Joan Sullivan the story of the barns on the property. Jim Aiken lived in a tent by the
creek on the property and built the dairy barn,the granary, and the horse barn in 1913 for
$1,800.00, which included labor and materials. Every day he came up from his tent by the creek and
worked on the buildings. The dairy barn was 80 feet by 60 feet and was designed to hold 10 cows at
either end and 10 at each side. The barn contained a 4-inch carrier track designed to bring hay into
the barn.
Froom told the story of how difficult it had been to learn to use the milking machine when it was
first installed. It took him 4 hours to do the milking on the first day because the noise of the
machine made the cows nervous. By the second day, the cows were leaking and uncomfortable so
they were much more agreeable to the machine. Froom eventually purchased four milking
machines. Each machine could milk one cow at a time,the most modern method at the time.
Froom stated that "everyone says it would spoil my cows but they liked them better than hand
milking . . . ." Apparently,the cows felt it was more like a calf than a machine. Froom's farm was
considered one of the most modern in the area, and he routinely gave tours to college classes that
learned his techniques and operation. His horse-powered churn fascinated his students.
Froom started the County Farm Bureau and served as a director for the Cattlemen's Association. He
volunteered as a docent at the local history museum. In addition, he traveled around the County
giving demonstrations of how to sharpen tools, explained the production process for butter and
cream, and demonstrated a wide range of farm skills that were being lost.
More information about the buildings was included in the article. The Granary was double walled
and rat free,the only one in the County. A bull pen, built in 1930, had been constructed on the
property after John Froom died, since he had objected to the idea. The horse barn was originally
divided into three sections: wagons were on the left, horse stalls were on the right (two horses to a
stall), and the hay wagon was placed in the middle of the barn.
An article in the San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, dated July 11, 1989, detailed an interview with
Bill Froom. Froom had been hired as a teenager in the mid-1920s by a local banker and worked for
only 3 days. He had to wear a "necktie and nice shoes" and he discovered very quickly he was not
cut out for banking. He listened to his father and returned to the ranching life, which sustained him
for the next 50 years.
Froom took over the farm in 1927 when his father became sick and he was only a junior in high
school. Bill was chosen to take over the farm because the older brother who was first in line to take
the farm was not home, working in the oil fields making$4 a day—big money in those days. Froom
stated that "I had already made my letter in track and so I could skip athletics and come home in the
afternoon to deal with the cows."
During the difficult years of the Great Depression, the farm did not produce enough income. Bill
went to work as a farm hand on the Dalidlio property across the road from the ranch. He made 15
cents an hour working for the neighbors and was glad to have it, as that wage was considered good
money during the hard times.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
During the World War II years of the 1940s, chromium was mined on the ranch property. The
deposit was a large one and has been untouched since the war years. Chromium is mixed with other
ores to make a high-grade steel. The expense of extraction and transportation of the ore proved too
costly for any further production after the war.
Froom told a story about the Creamery building. Apparently, one of the workers on the ranch liked
to drink during the day crawled under the Creamery building to do this. He shifted the rock
foundation stones around so that he could sleep in the shade. When John Froom saw what he had
done, he decided to dig out a cellar under the building.
John Froom's ingenuity led to the design of the Granary building. Rats would chew through the
burlap sacks in which grain was stored, so John Froom built the Granary on stilts with tongue and
groove double walls to prevent rat damage. Farmers from all over the valley brought their grain to
the Froom Ranch for rat-free storage.
An oral interview was conducted with John Madonna, current owner of the property(Madonna
pers. comm.). The Madonna family is one of the oldest pioneer families in the area and owns the
Madonna Inn, a local landmark, and numerous ranches in the San Luis Obispo County area. John
Madonna stated that Bill Froom had been a boxer in the United States Army during World War II. He
said that Froom had never married and had no children. However, Bill Froom had been heavily
involved with the local school system, contributing a great deal of his time to local education. John
Madonna commented that Bill Froom had named all his cows over the years—names such as Rosie
and Betsy. The dairy operation had approximately 50 cows,though possibly not all at the same
time.
Mr. Madonna stated that his father,Alex Madonna, had purchased the property in a tax lien sale in
1976. Dairy operations ceased in 1977 when Bill Froom retired after having run the ranch since
1927. Mr. Madonna raised beef cattle on the property for several years. The property is currently
used as the office and equipment storage area for the John Madonna Construction Company.
2.3 - Methods and Results of Historic Assessment
2.3.1 - Introduction
The subject property was evaluated for historic and architectural significance and its potential to
meet National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, and local City of
San Luis Obispo criteria. This report presents the results of the assessment. The Froom Ranch
complex was assessed for its historic and architectural significance by FCS Architectural Historian,
Kathleen A. Crawford, MA. Ms. Crawford conducted the archival research and on January 6, 2015
visited the property. During the site visit, Ms. Crawford personally inspected and photographed each
structure on the property for this report.
2.3.2 - Archival Research
In order to fully assess the Froom Ranch complex,varieties of archival sources were accessed for
information related to the property and its history. Sources consulted include the San Luis Obispo
30 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6784
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
County Assessor's Office records;the San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office records;the City of
San Luis Obispo Planning Department files, including an interview with Senior Planner Brian Leveille;
the City of San Luis Obispo Building Department building permit files and additional records; the San
Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files;the History Center of San Luis Obispo
files; a variety of internet sources;two films about the Froom Ranch produced by Joan Sullivan, local
San Luis Obispo historian; miscellaneous documents, including Environmental Impact Reports and
previous assessments; and an oral interview conducted on January 27, 2015 with John Madonna,
current owner of the property. One of the most important documents regarding the history of the
Froom Ranch is the report written by local San Luis Obispo historian, Betsy Bertrando, in 1998. Ms.
Bertrando's report was a valuable source of information, as she had personally interviewed Mr. Bill
Froom, owner of the property, and reviewed a wide range of local maps, oral interviews, historic
documents, and other local sources to complete her assessment of the property. She visited the site
at various times over the years and was able to observe the changes to the property. Her
observations were important in the current assessment of the remaining buildings on the Froom
Ranch property.
In addition, invaluable information was obtained from the City of San Luis Obispo Historic Context
Statement, written in 2013. This document provided important historic context information for fully
assessing the Froom Ranch complex.
2.3.3 - Froom Ranch Historic and Architectural Survey Results
The 1998 Bertrando report provided a base of information to compare the current conditions with
the previous developments on the Froom Ranch property. Conditions on the Froom Ranch have
changed since the report was written: buildings have been removed and the remaining structures
are in various states of repair. The property currently contains the buildings/structures described
below.
1. Main Residence (c. 1915)
The building is a one-story, Craftsman-style, single-family residence located on the lower level near
the front of the property.
Bertrando Report:House/Structure C
The four bedroom house was built by Hans Peterson in 1915. Peterson also built a
wood shed,the washing room, store room and bunkhouse during the same period.
The washing room and store room were added to the rear of the house in a long
addition that is partially of board and batten construction. The main part of the
house has shiplap siding. The building sits on a redwood sill foundation. The
entrance is from a porch supported by three columns that face the east. Above the
porch are decorative shingles under the eaves.
2. "Old" Barn (date unknown)
The building was moved to its current location at an unknown time from another location in the Los
Osos Valley. The "Old" Barn is a one-story, wood barn structure. The building is over 100 years old.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
eertrando Report: Old earn/Structure A
The barn near the house was moved to its present location and is over 100 years old.
The original location was on the south east (sic) side of the ranch until it was moved
slowly over logs over the creek to the present site. The barn has a corrugated roof
and is formed from vertical boards. There is no foundation. Double entry doors face
east at the end of the long driveway.
3. Bunkhouse (c. 1915)
The Bunkhouse is a small Craftsman-style, residential building located between the Main Residence
and the "Old" Barn on the lower level.
eertrando Report:eunkhouse/Structure e
A small structure in good condition sits between the old barn (A) and the house (C).
It is built of the same shiplap boards as the house (C). It has sash windows and a
door opening onto a corner stoop on the east side. It was built by Hans Peterson in
1915 at the same time as the house (Sullivan 1993).
4. Shed with slanted roof(date unknown)
The Shed is a small wooden shed with a small addition. The Shed is located to the north of the Main
Residence on the lower level of the property.
eertrando Report: Wood Shed/Structure D
The shed has a corrugated roof and vertical board siding. There is a door on the east
and north sides of the structure. A shed roof that abuts a flat roof suggest the flat
roof was a later addition. The shed was in the process of being emptied of great
piles of tin cans. One cleared area has exposed a piece of farm equipment in good
condition. It was a horse drawn seeder labeled `California Green Seed Sower.' It
appeared there may be other pieces of equipment amongst and under the
remaining cans although it was difficult to tell.
5. Outhouse (date unknown)
The Outhouse is a small, one-story structure located behind the "Old" Barn.
eertrando Report
Not included.
6. Storage Building (date unknown)
The Storage Building is a small, one-story wood structure that is located on the lower level north of
the "Old" Barn. The building was probably moved to this location from an unknown location.
Bertrando Report
Not included.
32 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6786
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Historical 8ackground
7. Creamery/House (date unknown)
The Creamery/House structure is composed of two wood buildings. The west structure is the
Creamery building; the east portion is the house that the family lived in prior the construction of the
Main Residence. The Creamery/House structure is located on the hillside on the upper level.
Bertrando Report: Old Creamery/House/Structure E
One of the most interesting structures within the ranch, the Old Creamery/House is
also complex, having been built in at least three episodes. The west side of the
wood shingled structure includes a room that was home to Bill Froom's father for
many years. The board and batten creamery housed a horse powered churn and a
butter break table. Only the corn sheller remains. Most of the equipment is now
gone.The author remembers visiting this site in the 1970s and noticing piles of old
bottles under the floor boards on the ground floor. This time it was clean and no
bottles remained.
The middle of the structure was built with shiplap and may have been an addition to
the creamery. The west side appears to be attached to the creamery but is actually
separated by a space about a foot wide. The living space consisted of two rooms
that had been muslin over board and batten construction. Currently the north
facing room is stripped of boards. A later porch addition is on the south side. The
condition of the structure is very weathered and the flooring is unstable.
8. Dairy Barn (c. 1913)
The Dairy Barn is a large,wood barn building with a curved front wall. The Dairy Barn is sited on the
hillside above the house complex.
Bertrando Report:Dairy Barn/Structure F
Another structure of interest is the Dairy Barn. This structure has an unusual
rounded end on the south side that hangs along the edge of the slope. The dairy
barn, as well as the granary and the horse barn, were constructed by Jim Aiken in
1913 for$1800. The barn roof has wood shingles and the walls of vertical planks
rest on formed concrete.
9. Granary (c. 1913)
The Granary is a small, wood structure located on the hillside north of the Dairy Barn and west of the
Horse Barn foundation.
Bertrando Report: Granary/Structure G
The small rectangular granary is in fairly good condition and is composed of vertical
plank walls that rest on concrete and block wood posts. The granary was
constructed by Jim Aiken in 1913.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167�3
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historical 8ackground Historic Resource Asessment
10. Horse Barn (date unknown)
The Horse Barn is no longer extant; only the foundation remains. The Horse Barn was located north
of the Dairy Barn and Creamery/House buildings and east of the Granary.
Bertrando Report:Horse Barn/Structure H
The barn is constructed of vertical boards on a concrete foundation. The wood
shingle roof is missing approximately 12%of the shingles. The barn doors open on
the north side and was used for wagons, horses and hay storage. The horse barn
was constructed by Jim Aiken in 1913. The barn is a style typical of the period.
Additional information
John Madonna stated that the Horse Barn had been used for storage of salvaged materials during
the period of ownership by the Madonna family. Alex Madonna collected salvaged materials from
local ranches, businesses, and homes and stored some of these materials in the barn. The barn was
in extremely poor condition and the sides were falling down. John Madonna attempted to stabilize
and prop up the building but eventually the deterioration was too great. The building collapsed and
the materials were hauled away.
11. Water Tower(2013)
The Water Tower structure is located on the hillside above the Granary area. It is a Verizon Wireless
cell tower site and was constructed within the last 2 years. The Bertrando report did not address
this structure, as it had not been built at the time of the 1998 evaluation.
34 FirstCarbon Solutiorrtg7gg
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch
� � . . � � � � � � � � � � �
3.1 - Application of National Register of Historical Places Criteria
Criterion A:Event: Properties can be eligible for the National Register if they are associated with
events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.
Historical evidence was found that would support the determination that the property was
associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. The
subject property,the Froom Ranch, is one of the oldest dairy properties in the history of San Luis
Obispo County. The Froom family was a pioneering ranching family and was part of the overall
development of the important dairy industry in the San Luis Obispo area. The subject property does
merit designation under National Register Criterion A: Event at the local level.
Criterion B: Person: Properties may be eligible for the National Register if they are associated with
the lives of persons significant in our past.
Historical evidence was found that would support the determination that the property was
associated with persons significant in our past. The property is associated with the Froom family and
Bill Froom in particular. The Froom family purchased the ranch in the late 19t" century as one of the
area's pioneering families. Bill Froom, son of John Froom, inherited the property in 1929 and
continued to operate a dairy and ranching operation for the next 50 years. Bill Froom was also an
important local leader and made many contributions to the development of the local school system
and community. The subject property does merit designation under National Register Criterion B:
Person.
Criterion C: Design/Construction: Properties may be eligible for the National Register if they embody
the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the
work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and
distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.
Evidence was found that would support the determination that the property embodied the
distinctive characteristics of a significant style of architecture, which this criterion includes within the
term "type" A property is eligible as a specimen of its type or period of construction under this
criterion if it is an important example of building practices of a particular time in history. The Main
Residence is a typical example of the Craftsman-style of architecture and the interior has been
altered extensively over the years. The building was transitioned to an office use over the last two
decades. However, its exterior appearance has remained essentially the same since it was
constructed by Hans Peterson in 1915. Its appearance includes the following character defining
features as listed in the San Luis Obispo Historic Context Statement:
• Horizontal massing
• Low-pitched gable roof
• Wood exterior wall cladding
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment
• Projecting partial-width front porch
• Wood-frame double-hung sash windows
• Extensive use of natural materials—wood
Therefore,the Main Residence is considered to meet the criteria under style.
The Dairy Barn is a Vernacular-style structure. The barn is unusual, the only one in the County with a
rounded front. The rounded front was designed to facilitate the milking process and move the cows
through the barn efficiently.
The Creamery/House structure is also a local Vernacular-style building with a history indicative of the
local area. The building was constructed as a creamery and a residence. The building displays the
features of local building styles and its utilitarian function.
The Dairy Barn and Creamery/House buildings are examples of the type of local Vernacular
architecture and their period of construction at the turn of the 20th century.
The remaining buildings are not considered to retain, or embody, enough of the distinctive features,
type or method of construction to be considered significant.
A"master" under this criterion is a figure of generally recognized greatness in a field. Hans Peterson
and Jim Aiken were responsible for the construction of the majority of the current buildings on the
site. Neither has been identified as a master builder, architect, or craftsman.
"High artistic values" under this criterion refers to properties that so fully articulate a particular
concept of design that they express an aesthetic ideal, which is not the case here. The terminology
referring to "components of an entity" are intended to address historic districts.
The subject property does merit designation under National Register Criterion C:Architecture at the
local level.
Criterion D:Information Potential: Properties may be eligible for the National Register if they have
yielded or are likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. This criterion is intended
to address archaeological resources. To be designated under this criterion the property must have
information to contribute to our understanding of human history and prehistory and that
information must be important. This criterion is not applicable to this property. The subject
property may merit designation under National Register Criterion D: Information Potential at the
local level, see FirstCarbon Solutions Cultural Resource Assessment.
3.2 - Application of California Register of Historical Resources Criteria
Properties that are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) must be evaluated for
historical significance under the California Register of Historical Resources.
36 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6790
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch
The criteria for evaluating the significance of historical resources require that the resource must be
significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following four criteria:
(1) Association with Events: It is associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of
California or the United States.
Historical evidence was found that would support the determination that the property was
associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional
history,the development of San Luis Obispo County and the dairy industry. The subject property
does merit designation under California Register Criterion (1).
(2) Association with Persons: It is associated with the lives of persons important to local,
California or National History.
Historical evidence was found that would support the determination that the property was
associated with the lives of persons important to local history. The property is associated with the
pioneering Froom family and Bill Froom in particular. The subject property does merit designation
under California Register Criterion (2).
(3) Design/Construction: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or
method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic
values.
Evidence was found that would support the determination that the property embodied the
distinctive characteristics of a significant type, period, region or method of construction. The Main
Residence is a good example of local Craftsman architecture and the Dairy Barn and
Creamery/House buildings exemplify local Vernacular architecture and building techniques. The
buildings were not constructed by master builders or architects, as Hans Peterson and Jim Aiken
have not been identified as masters in these fields. None of the buildings on the property possessed
high artistic values. The subject property does merit designation under California Register Criterion
(3).
(4) Archaeology: It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the
prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation.
To be designated under this criterion, the property must have information to contribute to our
understanding of human history and prehistory and that information must be important. The
subject property may merit designation under California Register Criterion (4), see FirstCarbon
Solutions Cultural Resource Assessment.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment
3.3 - City of San Luis Obispo Criteria
The following criteria and guidelines for evaluation were taken from the City of San Luis Obispo
Historic Context Statement.
Local Designation Guidelines
In 2010,the City of San Luis Obispo adopted a Historic Preservation Ordinance that outlines the
process and criteria for the inclusion of historic resources on the City's Master List or Contributing
List of Historic Resources. In order to be eligible for designation,the resource must exhibit a high
level of historic integrity, be at least fifty(50)years old and satisfy at least one of the following
criteria.
A. Architectural criteria: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or
method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possess high artistic values.
1. Style: Describes the form of a building, architectural details within the form (e.g.,
arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.). Building style will be
evaluated as a measure of:
a. The relative purity of a traditional style;
b. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the
structure reflects a once popular style;
c. Traditional, vernacular, and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social
milieu and period of the community; and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and
how these styles are put together.
2. Design: Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic
merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or
combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements.
Also suggest degree to which the designer(e.g., carpenter-builder) accurately
interpreted and conveyed the style. Building design will be evaluated as a measure of:
a. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its artistic merit, details,
and craftsmanship (even if not necessarily unique);
b. An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders,
although the craftsmanship and quality may not be superior.
3. Architect: Describe the professional (individual or firm) responsible for the building
design and plans for the structure. The architect will be evaluated as a reference to:
a. A notable architect (e.g., Wright Morgan) including architects who made significant
contributions to the state or region, or an architect whose work influenced the
development of the city, state, or nation;
b. An architect, who in terms of craftsmanship made significant contributions to San
Luis Obispo (e.g., Abraham who according to local sources designed the house at
810 Osos—Frank Avila's father's home—built between 1927 and 1930).
38 FirstCarbon Solutiorrtg7g2
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch
B. Historic Criteria
1. History—Persons associated with the lives of persons important to local, state, or
national history. Person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person
or group was:
a. Significant to the community as a public leader(e.g., mayor, congress leader, etc.)
and for his or her fame and outstanding recognition—locally, regionally or
nationally;
b. Significant to the community as a public servant or as a person who made early,
unique, or outstanding contributions to the community, local affairs or institutions
(e.g., Council member, education, medical professional, clergymen, public officials)
2. History—Event Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the
United States. Historic events will be evaluated as a measure of:
i. A landmark,famous, or first of its kind event for the city—regardless of whether the
impact of the event spread beyond the city;
ii. A relatively unique, important or interesting contribution to the city(e.g.,The Ah
Louis Store as the center for Chinese-American activities in early San Luis Obispo
h istory).
3. History—Context. Associated with and also a prime illustration of prominent patterns of
political, social, economic, cultural, medical educational, governmental, military,
industrial, or religious history. Historic context will be evaluated as to the measure of
the degree to which it reflects:
a. Early,first or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historic
effects go beyond the city level that are immediately connected with the building
(e.g., County Museum).
b. Secondary patterns of local history, but closely associated with the building (e.g.,
Park Hotel).
C. Integrity—Authenticity of historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of
characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Integrity will be
evaluated by a measure of:
1. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether the original
foundation has been changed, if known;
2. The degree to which the structure has maintained enough of its historic character or
appearance to be recognizable as an historic resource and to convey the reasons for its
historic significance;
3. The degree to which the resource has retained its design, setting, materials, workman-
ship,feeling and association.
In assessing a property's integrity, the National Park Service recognizes that properties change over
time. National Register Bulletin 15 states:
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment
To retain historic integrity, a property will always possess several, and usually most, of the aspects. It
is not necessary for a property to retain all its historic physical features or characteristics. The
property must retain, however,the essential physical features that allow it to convey its historic
identity.
A property that has lost some of its historic materials or details can be eligible if it
retains the majority of the features that illustrate its style in terms of massing,spatial
relationships, proportion, pattern of windows and doors,texture of materials,and
ornamentation. The property is not eligible if it retains some basic features conveying
massing, but has lost the majority of the features that once characterized its style.
For properties that are considered significant under National Register Criteria A and B, National
Register Bulletin 15 states:
A property is significant for its historic association is eligible if it retains the essential
physical features that make up the character or appearance during the period of its
association with the important event, historical pattern, or person.
A property important for illustrating an architectural style or construction technique must retain
most of the physical features that constitute the style or technique.
A property that has sufficient integrity for listing at the national, state or local level will typically
retain a majority of the character defining features, and will retain sufficient integrity to convey its
significance. The required aspects of integrity are dependent on the reasons for a property's
significance. Increased age and rarity of the property type are also considerations when assessing
integrity thresholds.
For example,for properties that are significant for their architectural merit (Criterion C3, A1-A3) a
higher priority is placed on integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. For properties that are
significant for events or persons, integrity of feeling and/or association may be more important.
The Froom Ranch complex was assessed for all aspects of its historical significance and historic
integrity. The property meets six of the seven criteria for integrity. The following integrity criteria
were applied to the buildings and the complex as a whole.
3.4 - Integrity
In addition to determining the significance of a property under local, state, and federal criteria, it is
necessary to assess whether the property has integrity. Integrity is the ability of a property to
convey and maintain its significance. A property must not only be shown to be significant under the
established criteria, it must also have integrity. In order to retain historic integrity, a property must
possess several, and usually most, of the seven key aspects of integrity, which are location, design,
setting, materials,workmanship,feeling, and association.
40 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6794
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch
Application of the City's Guidelines for Finding Integrity
1. Integrity is the authenticity of a historical resource's physical integrity clearly indicated by
the retention of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance.
2. Integrity relates to the presence or absence of historic materials and character defining
features.
Application of the Seven Aspects of Integrity
Location:The place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic
event occurred. The subject buildings remain at their original location. The "Old" Barn was moved
to the current location but has remained in this location for over 100 years.
Design:The combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a
property. The buildings retain their basic original design and,therefore, have retained this aspect of
integrity.
Setting:The physical environment of a historic property. Review of historic maps, archival materials,
and aerial photographs, as well as physical inspection of the surrounding area, indicates that the
majority of the Froom Ranch has retained its original appearance. However, the surrounding
neighborhood has changed from its original agricultural setting to a mixed-use commercial and
residential setting. The property has not retained its overall setting.
Materials:The physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time
and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.
The buildings have retained their original appearance with no significant changes to their overall
materials component. Alex and John Madonna undertook a series of repairs on the buildings over
the decades. Because they were able to salvage materials from old local barns and other sources,
they were able to use old, appropriate materials to do the repairs and renovations. Therefore, the
overall integrity has been retained.
Workmanship:The physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given
period in history or prehistory. The quality of the original workmanship has basically been
maintained from the original construction.
Feeling:A property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time. The
Froom Ranch farm complex has basically maintained the original feeling of the property.
Association:The direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property.
The property has been determined to be directly linked to an important historic event,the
development of agriculture and the dairy industry in the Los Osos Valley; and a person important in
local San Luis Obispo history, Bill Froom. Therefore, it has an associative element.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment
3.4.1 - Conclusion
Of the seven aspects of integrity,the property retains all but one: Setting. Therefore, it passes the
integrity test.
3.5 - Historic Themes
In addition to the above City of San Luis Obispo standards and guidelines,the City has created
historic context themes that allow further evaluation of the property and is historic significance. The
property was evaluated under the City of San Luis Obispo Theme: Early 20t"Century Agriculture and
Industrial Development.
In general, agriculture and industrial properties are generally not associated with particular
architectural styles. Vernacular industrial buildings of brick and reinforced concrete are the
predominate form, and significance is frequently derived from historic association, rather than
aesthetic qualities. Agricultural and industrial resources from this period may be eligible under
several 20t"-century themes.
3.5.1 - Early 20t" Century Agriculture and Industrial Development
Associated Property Types, Integrity Consideration & Eligibility Standards
Property Types
Examples of industrial properties from this period include railroad-related warehouse, rail yards, rail
lines, and rail spurs. Agricultural property types include: warehouses, farmhouses, and related
outbuildings.
An agricultural or industrial building from this period may be significant:
• As a rare, intact example of a particular type of agricultural or industrial development; or for
its association with the development of an important local industry—Criterion 1A, B2 (Event).
• As a rare example of a specific agricultural or industrial property type—Criterion C3,A1, A2
(Design/Construction).
• As a property type that has a direct association with the railroad—Criterion C3, A1,A2
(Design/Construction).
Integrity Considerations
In order to be eligible for listing at the federal,state, or local levels,a property must retain sufficient
integrity to convey its historic significance under Early 20th Century Agricultural and Industrial themes:
• Agricultural and industrial properties from this period eligible under Criteria A1,B2 (Event)
should retain integrity of location, design, feeling and association.
• Agricultural and industrial properties significant under Criterion C3, A1,A2
(Design/Construction) should retain integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship and
feeling.
42 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6796
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Significance Criteria and Evaluations:Froom Ranch
Eligibility Standards
To be eligible, a property must:
• Date from the period of significance;
• Display most of the character-defining features of the type; and
• Retain the essential aspects of integrity.
FirstCarbon Solutions 167�3
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16798
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Findings and Conclusions
� � � � � • •
4.1 - Potential Historic District
Upon application of National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources,
and local City of San Luis Obispo criteria, standards, and guidelines, the conclusion was reached that
the Froom Ranch complex portion of the subject property is considered eligible as a potential
historic district. The following City of San Luis Obispo criteria apply to the Froom Ranch complex.
These criteria parallel National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical
Resources criteria.
4.1.1 - Architecture: A1, A2
The Froom Ranch complex includes examples of Craftsman architecture:the Main Residence and the
Bunkhouse. The structures are both intact and good examples of the style and contain the main
character defining features of the Craftsman style. In addition,the Froom Ranch complex contains a
unique example of Vernacular architecture: the Dairy Barn with the rounded front,the only such
structure in San Luis Obispo County. Additional Vernacular-style structures include the
Creamery/House building, Granary and Shed. The structures represent the local farming and dairy
industry development and the predominant architectural styles of the early 20t" century.
4.1.2 - Historic Criteria—Person and Event: B1, B2
The Froom Ranch complex is considered to have historic significance for its connection with the
Froom family and Bill Froom and the development of early 20`"century ranching and the dairy
industry. The complex exemplifies the Early 20th Century Agricultural Development theme.
4.1.3 - Integrity: C1, C2, C3
The Froom Ranch complex has retained its overall integrity of design, location,feeling, association,
materials, workmanship, and overall historic integrity. As such, the Froom Ranch complex
exemplifies the early 20th century agricultural development of San Luis Obispo County.
The Froom Ranch complex is also locally significant under Criteria 1, 2, and 3 of the State of
California Historical Register and the National Register of Historic Places Criteria A, B, and C. The
property is significant for its association with the overall development of the San Luis Obispo area
and the dairy industry;for its association with the pioneering Froom family and for Bill Froom and
his local contributions; and for the Craftsman and Vernacular architecture of the buildings located on
the property.
In addition,the Froom Ranch complex is considered to meet the criteria for a historic district, since
the various buildings and structures comprise a significant entity.
National Register Bulletin 15 includes the following information regarding historic districts:
FirstCarbon Solutions 167��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Findings and Conclusions Historic Resource Assessment
A district possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of site,
buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical
development.
A district derives its importance from being a unified entity, even though it is often
composed of a wide variety of resources The identity of a district results from the
interrelationship of its resources, which can convey a visual sense of the overall
historic environment or be an arrangement of historically or functionally related
properties. For example, a district can reflect one principal activity, such as a mill or
a ranch, or it can encompass several interrelated activities, such as an area that
includes industrial, residential or commercial buildings, sites, structures, or objects.
A district can also be a grouping of archaeological sites related primarily by their
common components; these types of districts often will not visually present a
specific historic environment.
A district must be significant, as well as being an identifiable entity. It must be
important for historical, architectural, archaeological, engineering, or cultural values.
Therefore, districts that are significant will usually meet the last portion of Criterion
C plus Criterion A, Criterion B, other portions of Criterion C, or Criterion D.
A district can encompass both features that lack individual distinction and individually
distinctive features that serve as focal points. It may even be considered eligible if all
of the components lack individual distinction, provided that the grouping achieves
significance as a whole within the historic context. In either case,the majority of the
components that add to the district's historic character,even if they are individually
undistinguished, must possess integrity, as must the district as a whole.
A district can contain buildings, structures, sites, objects, or open spaces that do not
contribute to the significance of the district. The number of non-contributing
properties a district can contain yet still convey the sense of time and place and
historical development depends on how these properties affect the district's
integrity . . .
The Froom Ranch complex is considered to meet the necessary criteria as a historic district. The
Froom Ranch complex contains seven contributing structures and three non-contributing structures.
The Froom Ranch complex is considered an excellent example of early 20`"century ranching and
dairy industry development in San Luis Obispo County; its association with the pioneering Froom
family and Bill Froom and his local contributions; and for its examples of Craftsman and Vernacular
architecture.
4.2 - Contributing Structures
4.2.1 - Main Residence
The c. 1915 Craftsman-style residence served as the Froom family home from 1915 to 1998. The
building is a good example of Craftsman architecture in the San Luis Obispo area.
46 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6800
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment Findings and Conclusions
4.2.2 - "Old" Barn
The "Old" Barn was built at an unknown time, possibly c. 1900, and moved to the current location
early 20th century. The barn has been renovated extensively.
4.2.3 - Bunkhouse
The c. 1915 Bunkhouse is a Craftsman-style residential building once occupied by Bill Froom's
brother.
4.2.4 - Dairy Barn
The c. 1913 Dairy Barn is a unique example of local dairy industry Vernacular construction. The barn
is the only barn in San Luis Obispo County with a rounded facade.
4.2.5 - Creamery/House
The Creamery/House building dates to the early period of the Froom Ranch construction. It served
as both the dairy production area and the first residence on the site.
4.2.6 - Granary
The c. 1913 Granary building was used for grain storage. The building has a unique construction to
pre-vent damage from animals.
4.2.7 - Storage Building
The c. 1913 Storage Building was built as part of the early Froom Ranch development and has served
as a storage shed for the property.
4.3 - Non-Contributing Structures
4.3.1 - Outhouse
The Outhouse is a Modern parking kiosk structure repurposed as an outhouse for the John Madonna
Construction Company staff and has no historic significance.
4.3.2 - Storage Building
The Storage Building is a Modern mobile storage unit moved to the site for use by the John Madonna
Construction Company and has no historic significance.
4.3.3 - Water Tower
The Water Tower is a Modern-style Verizon stealth cell tower site and has no historic significance.
FirstCarbon Solutions 168��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16802
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment References
• . .
Angel, Myron. 1979. History of San Luis Obispo County with Illustrations, Oakland, CA:Thompson
and West, 1883. Reprinted from Fresno Valley Publishers, CA.
Bay News,The. 1993. Numerous articles on Froom Ranch.
Bertrando, Betsy. 1998. "Historical Evaluation for the Froom Ranch Building Complex, San Luis
Obispo County," Central Coast Engineering, San Luis Obispo.
Ching, Francis. 2002. A Visual Dictionary of Architecture,John Wiley&Sons, Inc.: New York.
City of San Luis Obispo, Building Department. 2015. Building Permit Records for 12165 Los Osos
Valley Road,January.
County of San Luis Obispo, Assessor's Office. N.D. Property Records for 12165 Los Osos Valley
Road, San Luis Obispo.
Historic Aerials.com. 2015. "12165 Los Osos Valley Road, San Luis Obispo, CA."
Historic Resources Group. 2013. City of San Luis Obispo Citywide Historic Context Statement.
Prepared for City of San Luis Obispo. September 30.
History Center of San Luis Obispo. 2015. Froom Ranch. January.
Leveille, Brian. Senior Planner, City of San Luis Obispo. Personal communication. January 16, 2015.
Madonna,John. Owner,John Madonna Construction Company. Personal communication:
interview. January 27, 2015.
McAlester, Virginia and Lee McAlester. 2003. A Field Guide to American Homes. Alfred A. Knopf:
New York.
Morro Group, Inc. 1998. Madonna/Eagle Hardware & Garden, Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report. Prepared for County of San Luis Obispo. October.
Morro Group, Inc. 2003. Draft Costco/Froom Ranch Environmental Impact Report. Prepared for
City of San Luis Obispo. March.
Nava,Julian and Bob Berger. 1986. California: Five Centuries of Contrast. MacMillan Publishing
Company: New York.
San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room. 2015. Froom Ranch Vertical Files.
Miscellaneous documents.
San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune (now The Tribune). 1989. "Bill Froom:A Man Who Never Left,"
July 15.
FirstCarbon Solutions 168��
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
lohn Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
References Historic Resource Assessment
Sullivan,Joan. 1993. Touring the Froom Ranch or the Wild West in La Canada de Los Osos. On file
at San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room.
Sullivan,Joan. The Froom Ranch. Videos produced in 1994 and 2007. On file at San Luis Obispo
County Public Library, Local History Room.
United States Department of the Interior. 1991. National Register Bulletin 15. How to Apply the
National Register Criteria for Evaluation. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C.
50 FirstCarbon Solutiorrt6804
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resourre Assessmentdocx
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment
� � � - � �
� • � �
FirstCarbon Solutions 16805
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessmentdocx
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16806
� F o S�T`i�o N s Carrie D.Wills,M.A., RPA
�� MICHAELRRANE]MANASSOCIATFS Senior Project Archeologist
Overview
• 23 Years Experience
■ Master's degree,Anthropology - California State University, Hayward
• Bachelor's degree,Anthropology- California State University, Hayward
■ Registered Professional Archaeologist#11138
Carrie Wills, RPA, M.A. has worked in the areas of prehistoric and historic archaeology on tasks that included
pre-field assessments, archival research, pedestrian field surveys,site evaluation and testing, and data
recovery and analysis since 1991. She has extensive experience conducting field research, evaluating sites
and features for historic significance and preparing reports that comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act.
Her experience includes evaluating and assessing historic structures and resources for inclusion on the
National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical Resources. In addition, Ms.Wills has
conducted numerous consultations with Native American tribal representatives and has good working
relationships with numerous governmental agencies. She has provided feasible mitigation that protects
significant resources while staying within budgetary constraints.
Related Experience
Historic American Buildings Survey Documentation - Larkspur 16.8-Acre Project,City of Larkspur, Marin
County. Serving as project archaeologist, conducted a field survey, records and map review, and historic
building evaluation for more than 20 buildings and structures associated with the circa 1920-1980 Niven
Nursery in the City of Larkspur. The existing buildings and greenhouses that retained their historic integrity
were evaluated for historic significance, recorded on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR)
forms, and documented to Historic American Building Survey(HABS)standards. Additionally,two prehistoric
sites were previously recorded and archaeologically tested within the project area, and although neither of the
sites was found during the pedestrian survey,to ensure site protection, construction monitoring was
recommended during all ground-disturbing activities in these areas.
Section 106 Cultural Resources Assessment- DSRSD Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and
Retrofit Project,City of Dublin,Alameda County,California. As project archaeologist/manager, conducted a
cultural resource investigation that included record search reviews, historic map reviews, and a limited field
survey of the proposed Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and Retrofit Project Area of Potential Effect
(APE)that fulfilled the protocols associated with Section 106 of NHPA. The results of the investigation were
submitted to archaeological staff at the Bureau of Reclamation and received concurrence with MBA's findings
of effect.
Lake Solano Regional Park Visitor's Center Project,County of Solano. As project archaeologist, Ms. Wills
conducted a cultural resource investigation that included record search reviews and a pedestrian field survey.
As the project had a federal nexus,the work included a comprehensive report that met the criteria in Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The lead agency was the Bureau of Reclamation which has
specific procedures that must be followed when unanticipated human remains or cultural resources are
discovered. In addition to complying with the Bureau of Reclamation procedures,the results of the research
P��°�
Carrie Wills
and field survey were submitted to the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)for concurrence with the
stated recommendations.
KB Home Monte Vista, Historic American Buildings Survey,City of San Jose. Served as project manager for
the KB Home Monte Vista Project. Conducted Historic American Buildings Survey Level III documentation for a
large multi-structure canning facility, Del Monte Plant#3, in San Jose. Tasks included producing over 200
large-format, black, and white photographs of exterior and interior views of the existing structures. The MBA
historic report augments the photographic documentation by placing the structures within the appropriate
historic context and addressing both the architectural and historical aspects of the site's significance.
Specifically,the historical report focused on the Plant's contribution to the growth of the canning industry in
San Jose. The plant was also assessed for historic significance and found to meet the criteria for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places as a District along with two other local Del Monte canneries. MBA
coordinated with state,federal, and city agencies including, but not limited to, City of San Jose Department of
Planning and the National Park Service HABS/Historic American Engineering Record coordinator.
Section 106 Cultural Resources Assessment/HABS Documentation -St. Regis Napa Valley Project,City of
Napa, Napa County. Served as the lead technical consultant for a historical and architectural analysis of a
historic structure in the County of Napa. Also served as the project archaeologist. Following the evaluation of
the historic significance of the building and recording it to HABS standards,the results were sent to SHPO and
received concurrence with MBA's findings of no effect to historic resources.
Section 106 Evaluation - Dixon Veterans Memorial Hall Project and the Benicia Veterans Memorial Hall
Project,County of Solano. Served as the lead technical consultant for a historical and architectural analysis
of two historic structures in the County of Solano. After evaluating and recording the buildings to Section 106
standards,the results were sent to SHPO and received concurrence with MBA's findings of no effect to historic
resou rces.
Section 106 Evaluation -Solano County Free Library Center Project,County of Solano. Served as the lead
technical consultant for a historical and architectural analysis of an historic structure in the County of Solano.
Also served as the senior project archaeologist. After evaluating and recording the building to Section 106
standards,the results were sent to SHPO and received concurrence with MBA's findings of no effect to historic
resources.
Section 106 Evaluation -Suisun Veterans Memorial Building Project,Suisun City. Served as the lead
technical consultant for a historical and architectural analysis of an older structure in the City of Suisun City.
After evaluating and recording the building to Section 106 standards,the results were sent to SHPO and
received concurrence with MBA's findings of no effect to historic resources.
Cultural Resources Assessment- Zone 3A, Line D Capacity Improvements Project and Zone 5, Line A West
Levee Improvements Projects,County of Alameda. Served as project manager and senior archaeologist,
conducting a cultural resource assessment for the Zone 3A Line D Capacity Improvements Project, Hayward,
and the Zone 5 Line A West Levee Improvements Project, Union City. The assessment consisted of record
searches, review of historic literature, and more than 20 historic aerials to provide an understanding of
development within the project areas and a historical context for the projects.
Off-road Vehicle Park,City of Bakersfield. As senior project archaeologist, conducted an intensive field
survey of 2,500 acres outside the City of Bakersfield. The project area included rolling hills, large flat valleys,
and steep ravines. The survey resulted in discovery of over 150 prehistoric resources including bedrock
mortars, grinding slicks, and rock art. The resources were recorded and evaluated for eligibility for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. Following the
evaluation,a comprehensive report detailing the findings was produced.
Bel Lago Project,City of Moreno Valley. As senior project archaeologist, conducted a site specific field
assessment of the Kerr Ranch and recorded 23 extant buildings and structures on Department of Parks and
P��°�
Carrie Wills
Recreation forms; both Primary and Building,Structure and Object forms. Detailed descriptions and
measurements were taken as part of the assessment process and each building and structure was evaluated
individually for listing to the California Register of Historical Places or local registers or landmarks.
Westlake Shopping Center,City of Daly City. As senior project archaeologist for this major refurbishing effort
for a shopping center located in Daly City, assessed the shopping center for historic significance under CEQA
Section 150.64 by reviewing historic maps, photos, and record and archival search results obtained from the
Northwest Information Center and the Daly City Planning Department. Scope included conducting a visual
appraisal of the existing buildings,structures,and signage.
San Demas Project, City of Sacramento. As senior project archaeologist, conducted a record search and field
investigation for a built environment covering one city block in downtown Sacramento. As this was a built
environment,there was no native ground surface to be surveyed;the investigation consisted of comprehensive
research to determine the possibility of historic structures.
Cabrillo Corners Commercial Project,City of Half Moon Bay. As cultural resources specialist, conducted a
record search at the Northwest Information Center and a pedestrian field survey of the proposed project area
that borders Pilarcitos Creek in Half Moon Bay to determine the presence or absence of cultural resources
prior to project development.
Gustine Municipal Airport Project,County of Merced. As senior project archaeologist, conducted a record
search and pedestrian field survey of a 45-acre parcel located in Merced County to determine the presence or
absence of cultural resources prior to improvements to the Airport.
Scheiber/White Projects,County of EI Dorado. As senior project archaeologist, conducted record searches
and field investigations for a 226-acre parcel and a 286-acre parcel of undeveloped land and completed Phase
I Reports detailing the record search and field survey results.
Protzel Project,County of EI Dorado. As senior project archaeologist, conducted a record search and field
investigation for a 35-acre parcel of land. The field survey resulted in discovery of a site that contained both
prehistoric and historic components located adjacent to one another.
Miller Ranch Property,City of Lincoln. As senior project archaeologist for this 130-acre residential
development, reviewed record search results from the North Central Information Center,Sacramento and
conducted a pedestrian field survey. A negative survey report was prepared detailing the record search and
survey results to meet CEQA requirements.
Fahren's Creek Development Project,County of Merced. As senior project archaeologist, conducted a record
search and field investigation on a parcel of undeveloped land, a portion of which was immediately adjacent to
Fahren's Creek. A negative survey report was prepared detailing the record search and survey results to meet
CEQA requirements.
McBride R.V.and Self Storage Project,City of Chino. As senior project archaeologist, conducted a record
search and pedestrian field survey of a 21.15-acre parcel of land to determine the presence or absence of
cultural resources prior to project development. Prepared a negative survey report detailing the record search
and survey results to meet CEQA requirements.
Brehm Communities,City of Chino. As senior project archaeologist for this 35-acre residential development,
conducted a record search at the San Bernardino Archaeological Information Center and a modified field
survey. Performed a visual assessment from various vantage points rather than a typical pedestrian survey
and prepared a negative survey report detailing the record search and survey results to meet CEQA
requirements.
Albers Barnes&Kohler LLP's Palm Ranch Dairy Project, County of Kern. As senior project archaeologist,
was responsible for CEQA compliance issues related to cultural resources on a 120-acre parcel. Conducted a
P��°�
Carrie Wills
Phase I survey to determine the presence or absence of cultural resources within the project area, resulting in
the discovery of artifactual material on the ground surface. Conducted a Phase II testing program to determine
the presence or absence of subsurface cultural resources, resulting in inconclusive findings. Provided
mitigation measures to protect any previously undiscovered resources during project excavation activities.
Albers Barnes&Kohler LLP's Bonanza Farm Dairy Project, County of Kern. As cultural resources specialist,
conducted a record search and pedestrian field survey of two 200-acre parcels to determine the presence or
absence of cultural resources prior to project development. Prepared a negative survey report detailing the
record search and survey results to meet CEQA requirements.
Montezuma Wetlands Project,County of Solano. Served as project manager for Solano County's Montezuma
Wetlands Project. Provided technical direction of a 4,700-acre archeological survey in Solano County, resulting
in recording and subsurface testing of 12 sites. Co-authored the technical report that included extensive
impacts and mitigation measures.
Arizona Pipeline Reconditioning Project, Phoenix and Tucson,Arizona. Project manager for a 45 mile
pipeline replacement project located along an existing pipeline route in southern Arizona. Project tasks
included archival and record searches, pedestrian field survey, and a comprehensive report detailing the
findings. Various types of historic resources were recorded during the course of the field survey and
recommendations were provided as part of a larger environmental studies report produced for the project.
Costco's Warehouse Project,City of San Francisco. Served as project manager for Costco's Warehouse
Project. Surveyed, excavated, and monitored the proposed site, located in downtown San Francisco,for a new
Costco store. Supervised lab procedures and analysis of over 1,400 artifacts.
Mills Associates'Tassajara Valley Project,County of Solano. As project manager, provided technical
direction of a 2,500-acre archeological survey that resulted in recording and subsurface testing of 14 historic
and one prehistoric archeological site. Analyzed artifacts and prepared technical reports.
Future Urban Areas, Mundie and Associates,County of Contra Costa. As field director, conducted a 4,500-
acre archeological survey that resulted in recording of 11 historic archeological sites, including the previously
unrecorded historic town sites of West Hartley, Empire, and Star Mine associated with the Mount Diablo
coalfield developments of 1850-1885. Recorded features includingfoundations, privies, cisterns, basements,
and dumps. Hundreds of surface artifacts were examined. Also directed artifact analysis and prepared
technical reports.
Military Projects
Cultural Resources Overview Project,Concord Naval Weapons Station. Served as project manager for the
Cultural Resource Overview Project at Concord Naval Weapons Station. Tasks included review of archival
records and record search results for previously recorded sites within the Station. In addition, more than 500
World War II buildings and structures were evaluated for National Register of Historical Places eligibility and
documented on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation forms. An archaeological site prediction
model was developed to determine the likelihood of the presence of cultural resources within specific areas of
the Station. An extensive context document was prepared to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the
Naval Weapons Station in terms of its historic presence within Contra Costa County and the City of Concord.
Following assessment of the Station and its historic components, a Cultural Resource Overview Report for the
13,000-acre facility was developed.
NAVFAC Centerville Beach and Point Sur Projects,Counties of Humboldt and Monterey. Served as project
archaeologist with responsibilities including a review of archival and site records prior to pedestrian field
surveys at each of the locations. Following the surveys, documentation on Department of Parks and
Recreation forms was prepared for each of the World War II buildings/structures located within the Station
boundaries. Subsequent efforts included development and submittal of a historic context report and structural
P
Carrie Wills
assessments of the buildings to determine National Register of Historic Places eligibility status. Prepared a
preliminary Historic and Archeological Resource Protection Plan evaluating known archeological site locations
and preparing maps depicting areas of archaeological sensitivity.
Civil Engineering Laboratory Archaeological and Historic Resources Assessment Project, Port Hueneme.
Served as project archaeologist for the CBC Port Hueneme Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory,Archaeological,
and Historic Resources Assessment Project. The cultural resource evaluation included review of archival
records and historic Port Hueneme documents at the base, review of previously recorded sites records from
the South Central Coastal Information Center, CSU, Fullerton,and research at Ventura Historical Society.
Architectural documentation was prepared for nine World War II buildings on appropriate Department of Parks
and Recreation forms and a single prehistoric site located within the base was assessed. A historic context
report was developed and each of the buildings/structures was individually evaluated for National Register of
Historic Places eligibility. Following assessment and documentation, an EIR/EIS technical report including a
detailed historic setting, an overview of each of the types of buildings within the project area, an impacts
assessment section, and appropriate mitigation for the impacts was prepared.
Navy Construction Battalion Center Historic and Archaeological Resources Protection Plan Project, Port
Hueneme. Served as project manager/archaeologist for the Port Hueneme Navy Construction Battalion Center
Overview; Historic and Archaeological Resources Protection Plan Project. The project tasks included archival
research of Battalion Center documents a record search review at the South Central Coastal Information
Center, CSU, Fullerton, and a pedestrian field survey. Subsequent to the archival research, architectural
documentation of 130 World War II buildings/structures was completed on appropriate Department of Parks
and Recreation (DPR)forms. The forms typically included DPR Primary forms for each building or structure
although in some instances, e.g.,for large non-descript warehouse structures, a representative building was
documented and identical buildings were listed on the form as having identical attributes. In addition to the
Primary forms, a Building,Structure, Object(BSO)form providing additional descriptive and evaluative
information was completed when appropriate. Following the archival research for previously recorded cultural
resource sites and the field survey, an archaeological site prediction model was developed for the Battalion
Center. Following documentation, a historic context for the Battalion Center was prepared. In addition, each
building was assessed for National Register of Historic Places(NRHP)eligibility and a Historic and
Archaeological Resources Protection (HARP) Plan was prepared.
H Street Extension Project, Lockheed Missiles,and Space Company Property. The project consisted of an
extension of H Street within the western portion of the Lockheed Missiles and Space Company facilities.
Archaeological efforts were part of mitigation for construction within a National Register listed prehistoric shell
mound. As project archaeologist,the work included pre-construction site testing using various means including
shovel and backhoe investigations, surface collection for the entire project area, and a Phase III data recovery
program in coordination with the Most Likely Descendant(MLD). Disposition of human remains found within
the site was decided upon an agreement with the MLD. A construction-monitoring program was conducted
during initial grading activities at the site to ensure protection of previously unknown cultural resources and/or
additional human remains.
Naval Fuel Depot Point Molate Historic Resources Assessment Project,City of Rohnert Park. As project
manager, conducted an archival records review at various repositories as well as a record search at the
Northwest Information Center in Rohnert Park for previously recorded cultural resource sites. Conducted a
field survey and general site reconnaissance of the project area. Subsequent to the archival research and
survey, documentation of ten World War II buildings/structures were completed on appropriate Department of
Parks and Recreation forms. The buildings and structures were evaluated for eligibility for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places. In addition, one prehistoric archaeological site was assessed within the
project area. A preliminary Historic and Archeological Resource Protection Plan was prepared evaluating
known archeological site locations with maps depicting areas of archaeological sensitivity. A historic context
P ��5�
Carrie Wills
was prepared for the project area and a technical report detailing all of the research,field survey, building, and
structure evaluations, and the assessment of the prehistoric site was provided to the client.
Energy, Utilities&Pipelines
Santa Cruz Water District's Pipeline Project,County of Santa Cruz. Served as resource team leader for this
project that proposed modifications to the current operation and maintenance of an existing pipeline through
implementation of the Santa Cruz North Coast Pipeline Rehabilitation Project. Reviewed compliance issues
related to cultural resources found along four major waterways in Santa Cruz County and prepared a CEQA
Initial Study to determine environmental impact associated with project implementation. Also provided
necessary details to aid in the decision-making process for the project's next phase.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission(FERC)Relicensing Project,County of Kern. As resource team
leader, reviewed cultural resources to meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act in preparation of a new FERC license application. Directed the Section 106 review and
prepared the preliminary draft of the license application, evaluated project impacts, and authored the Historic
Properties Management Plan and a Programmatic Agreement.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission(FERC)Relicensing Project, Kilarc-Cow Creek. As resource team
leader, provided NHPA Section 106 compliance review in preparation of a new FERC license application.
Following the survey effort, prepared the preliminary draft of the license application, evaluated the project
impacts, prepared a comprehensive report, and finalized the Historic Properties Management Plan and a
Programmatic Agreement.
Calypso Project Environmental Impact Statement, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Served as resource team leader
for Tractebel North America, Inc.'s Calypso Project Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)for a new natural gas
pipeline extending from the Exclusive Economic Zone in the Atlantic Ocean to Port Everglades. Conducted the
NHPA Section 106 review of both offshore and onshore cultural resources and prepared the preliminary drafts
of the third-party EIS for the jurisdictional portion of the pipeline.
Rock Creek Hydroelectric Project,Oregon. Served as project archaeologist for Oregon Trail Electric
Consumer Cooperative's Rock Creek Hydroelectric Project. Conducted a reconnaissance survey and evaluation
of archaeological and historic resources to meet the requirements of NHPA Section 106.
Patriot Natural Gas Pipeline Project,Tennessee,Virginia,and North Carolina. Served as resource team
leader for a project consisting of the Mainline Expansion and Patriot Extension three states. The Mainline
Expansion involved improvement along East Tennessee Natural Gas Company's existing pipeline in Tennessee
and Virginia, including approximately 187 miles of new pipeline, replacement of old pipeline,additional
compression at existing facilities, and five new compressor stations. The Patriot Extension involves
approximately 100 miles of new pipeline in Virginia and North Carolina, including three new meter stations.
Provided third-party review of cultural resources reports and prepared third-party EIS.
Northwest Transmission Line Project,Oregon and Washington. Served as project archaeologist for Wallula
Generation, LLC's Northwest Transmission Line Project. Conducted a 28-mile reconnaissance survey in
Oregon and Washington alongthe Columbia River, evaluated and recorded archaeological sites, and
completed appropriate forms for submittal to Washington
EI Paso Energy's and Broadwing Communications' Fiber Optic Line,Texas and California. Served as
resource team leader for a proposed fiber-optic transmission line reaching from EI Paso,Texas,to Los Angeles,
California. Prepared a Proponent's Environmental Assessment demonstrating CEQA compliance that was
submitted with an application to the California Public Utilities Commission.
Fiber Optic Project,Cities of San Jose,San Francisco,and Los Angeles. Served as project manager for a
Level Three Communications Fiber Optic Project. Conducted cultural resources studies and supervised
construction monitoring to address CPUC mitigation measures during the "city build" portions of the project in
P
Carrie Wills
San Jose,San Francisco, and the Los Angeles Basin. Prepared workbooks for each construction spread in
each city to address potential cultural resources impacts and necessary mitigation required to preclude
significant impacts.
Fiber Network Project, Northern and Southern California. Served as project manager for 360 Networks'
Fiber Network Project. Responsible for all aspects of project management for this linear project spanning the
length of California, including coordination, budget, consultation, and compliance issues.
Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline,State of California. As field supervisor for Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline's Concord-to-
Colton Project, performed records search and intensive archaeological survey of a corridor stretching from
Fresno,through Bakersfield and Mojave,to San Bernardino. Recorded and evaluated for eligibility for listing
on National Register of Historic Places more than 150 historic properties.
CPUC Alturas Transmission Line Project,California and Nevada. As archaeological monitor, documented
compliance with mandated mitigation measures duringthe construction of this high-voltage power line
reaching from Alturas, California,to Reno, Nevada.
Mine Reclamation Plans and Environmental Analysis
Abandoned Mine Inventory Project,Washington Bureau of Land Management. As project manager,
managed a five-person survey crew who conducted an intensive archaeological survey of 1,700 acres of
difficult terrain and conditions in the City of Spokane. Recorded over 100 mining features and archaeological
properties on appropriate State of Washington forms and prepared Determination of Eligibility forms for
submittal to Washington's State Historic Preservation Officer.
Black Diamond Mine Project, Merced County. As project archaeologist, conducted record search and
pedestrian field survey for approximately 29 acres of a 136 acre parcel of land in Merced County. During the
field survey, a cemetery with headstones dating back to the mid-1800s was discovered. Although the
cemetery had a fence completely around it, it is often the case with cemeteries of this age that burials are
located outside the defined cemetery area. Thus, archival research was conducted to determine the actual
age and the size of the cemetery as it grew over the years. Recommendations for procedures to be followed if
the proposed project moved forward were presented to the County of Merced in the form of an Initial Study
re po rt.
KRC Aggregates Quarry Expansion Project,San Joaquin County. As project archaeologist, conducted record
searches and a pedestrian field survey for approximately 340 acres that would be utilized for aggregate
resource extraction. Approved mine land reclamation in accordance with the California Surface Mining and
Reclamation Act would begin immediately following the completion of aggregate extraction. The field survey
resulted in recordation of 4 historic resources and the preparation of a comprehensive report meeting the
requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Valley Rock Quarry Project,San Joaquin County. As project archaeologist, conducted record searches and a
pedestrian field survey of approximately 315 acres in San Joaquin County. Although no resources were
recorded for this project, a small prehistoric site had been previously recorded near the project's southern
border. As the boundaries for this prehistoric site were rather vague,the field survey transects were narrowed
to 3 meters in the southern boundary area to determine the presence or absence of the site within the project
area. No evidence of the prehistoric site was found. The findings of the record searches,the field survey, and
the search for the prehistoric site were detailed in an Initial Study report and presented to San Joaquin County.
Environmental Impact Reports for General Plan Updates
General Plan Update,County of Monterey. As senior project archaeologist, assisted in updating the General
Plan with new policies including archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources. Tasks included a
review of existing policies and suggestions for alternatives and updates relevant to current trends. Worked
P ��
Carrie Wills
closely with Monterey County staff, agency personnel, and sub-consultants to ensure a high quality,timely Plan
Update.
Trails Specific Plan Project,City of Livermore. As senior project archaeologist, conducted archival and record
searches, including review of the 2000 North Livermore Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report and
the 2003 City of Livermore General Plan Update Master Environmental Assessment that specifically focuses on
cultural resources within the proposed project area. Conducted a 235-acre pedestrian survey to determine the
significance of previously recorded cultural resources and the presence or absence of previously unknown
cultural resources, resulting in the recording of five historic resources using California Department of Parks and
Recreation forms with context analysis and detailed maps. Prepared a comprehensive report including a
detailed setting section with impacts and mitigation measures to ensure protection of significant cultural
resources.
Educational Facility Environmental Analysis
Delta View and Kit Carson Schools Project, Kings County Office of Education. As senior project
archaeologist, conducted archaeological and historical resource assessment at two proposed
telecommunication tower sites located at two school sites. Conducted a record search at the Southern San
Joaquin Valley Information Center and pedestrian surveys at both schools to determine the presence or
absence of cultural resources. Determined negative survey results, and prepared a report detailing the record
search and survey results that was presented to the Kings County Office of Education.
High Desert Power Plant Project,County of San Bernardino. As project manager, conducted an
approximately 2,000-acre field inventory of block and linear project areas located near the City of Victorville.
Recorded and evaluated more than 30 historic and prehistoric sites.
Maya Caves Project, Punta Gorda, Belize,Central America. As excavation team member, worked two field
seasons examining prehistoric cave deposits. Conducted surveys and excavations, analyzed and cataloged
artifacts,and prepared technical report sections.
Professional Affiliations
■ Society for Historical Archaeology
■ Society for California Archaeology
• Register of Professional Archaeologists #11138
P
�. Firs#�a r�on`-'
'�"�" c0 � i.1TlC? � S
� • � � �
Overview
Kathleen has over 28 years of experience in the preparation of a wide range of historical and architectural projects. She
meets the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Architectural History and History (36 CFR Part 61). She also meets the
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards as an Architectural Historian. She has extensive experience
with 19th- and 20th-century architecture in California and has prepared over 12,000 historic and architectural
assessments of structures in California for a variety of historical projects conducted for various types of city, state, and
federal agencies. The majority of these projects required compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. Ms. Crawford has extensive experience in the implementation of Section 106 in reference to historic
buildings from all historic periods and architectural styles. The vast majority of these projects required preparation of
California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms for submittal to the State Historic Preservation Office.
She has prepared several Historic American Building Survey (HABS) surveys and documentation over the years and has
worked with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties in the course of the historic
and architectural evaluations. In addition, Ms. Crawford has participated in the production of numerous cultural resources
reports and assessments, environmental impact reports, and historic building surveys of potential historic districts in
California, Arizona, and Kentucky. She has been a Lecturer in the History Department at San Diego State University since
1989, and her extensive teaching experience in U.S. History has aided her understanding of the historical assessment and
evaluation process.
Education
• Master's degree, History - University of San Diego. 1987
• Bachelor's degree, History - University of San Diego. 1984
• Bachelor's degree,Anthropology - University of San Diego. 1984
Project Experience
Oakland International Airport, Oakland,California. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1960s
Airport Structures for National Register of Historic Places eligibility.
Standard Aero Buildings, Los Angeles International Airport(LAX). Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment
of circa 1940s Airport Structures for Cell Tower construction.
California State Capitol Building Complex,Sacramento. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa
1860s-1950s California State Capitol Building for installation of new cell tower service for entire State Capitol complex.
HABS Survey of Niven Nursery, Larkspur. Preparation of Historic American Building Survey(HABS)documentation of circa
1940s Niven Nursery, Larkspur, California.
Independent Order of Odd Fellows Cemetery,Sacramento. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa
1890s National Register-eligible historic Sacramento cemetery.
Leamington Hotel,Oakland. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1920s National Register-
eligible hotel in downtown Oakland.
www.FirstCarbonSolutions.com CORPORA1f�8R�SUME
�. Firs#�a r�on`-'
'�"�" c0 � i.1TlC? � S
� • � � �
East Bay Alliance Chinese Church,Oakland. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1940s church
complex.
Piedmont Apartments,Oakland. Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1930s apartment complex, Oakland.
Oakland Coliseum,Oakland. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1960s sports stadium.
Sheraton Palace Hotel,San Francisco. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1900 National
Register-listed landmark historic hotel for cell tower construction.
University of San Jose Stadium,San Jose. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1950s sports
stadium.
University of Santa Clara,Swig Hall,San Jose. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1960s
residence hall.
Swedish American Hall,San Francisco. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1890s National
Register-eligible buildingfor proposed cell tower placement.
Seton Medical Center,San Francisco. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1950s Seton Medical
Center for cell tower construction.
United Pipe Foundry, Union City. Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1930s historic water tank on historic
foundry property.
Palo Alto Apartment Complex, Palo Alto. Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1950s apartment complex.
Petaluma Hotel, Petaluma. Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1920s hotel in National Register-listed historic
downtown business district.
Paramount Studios, Los Angeles. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of several buildings on
Paramount Studios lot that dated to earliest development of the Paramount Studios Corporation in the 1920s.
St. Mary's Hospital,Tucson,Arizona. Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1930s hospital in Tucson.
Historic Hotel, Elko, Nevada. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of circa 1930s hotel in Elko, Nevada.
Sunwest Building, Roswell, New Mexico. Preparation of Historic and Architectural Assessment of potentially circa 1950s
National Register-eligible building in Roswell, New Mexico.
San Diego Naval Training Center - Preparation of National Register nomination for property including approximately 400
buildings.
Chollas Heights Radio Station - Preparation of Historic American Buildings Survey for radio station for approximately 100
buildings.
www.FirstCarbonSolutions.com CORPORA1f�8R�SUME
�. Firs#�a r�on`-'
'�"�" c0 � i.1TlC? � S
� • � � �
Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station - Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessment of properties including
approximately 300 buildings.
Long Beach Naval Station and Shipyard - Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessment of properties including
approximately 750 buildings.
Marine Corps Air Station,Camp Pendleton - Preparation of History of Air Station.
Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii - Preparation of History of Air Base.
Naval Air Station,Guam - Preparation of Base Closure Documentation for approximately 150 structures.
San Diego Naval Air Station,Coronado - Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessment of selected air base
facilities.
Naval Air Station, EI Centro - Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessment of air base properties, including
approximately 100 buildings.
San Diego Naval Station,32nd Street- Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessment of properties including
approximately 350 buildings.
Caltrans - Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessments for approximately 200 properties in San Diego and
Riverside counties.
Kentucky Department of Transportation(KDOT) - Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessments of
approximately 100 properties in Louisville, Kentucky.
Miramar Naval Air Station - Preparation of Historical and Architectural Assessment of properties including approximately
250 buildings.
Borrego Springs,San Diego County,California. Preparation of Cultural Resources Report for CA-SDI-20016 and Historic
Assessment of former circa 1940s DiGiorgio Fruit Corporation property in Borrego Springs, California for County of San
Diego.
Hell, Riverside County,California. Preparation of Cultural Resources Report and Historic Assessment of Hell, California for
historic documentation of circa 1950s P-33-18794 archaeological site for County of Riverside.
Federal Aviation Administration,Quieter Home Program,San Diego County,California. Historical and Architectural
Assessment of approximately 1,000 circa 1910-1960 historic homes in Point Loma and San Diego for sound retrofitting
program conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration. State of California DPR 523 forms were prepared for each
property for submittal to City of San Diego Planning Department and San Diego Historical Resources Board.
Cesar Chavez Boulevard, EI Centro,San Diego County,- Preparation of Cultural Resources Survey and Historic
Assessment of Cesar Chavez Boulevard, EI Centro, San Diego County,for California Department of Transportation.
World Trade Center,San Diego County-Preparation of National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form for World
Trade Center Building,San Diego,San Diego County, California.
www.FirstCarbonSolutions.com CORPORA1f�8R�SUME
�. Firs#�a r�on`-'
'�"�" c0 � i.1TlC? � S
� • � � �
U.S. Post Office,San Diego Station,San Diego County-Preparation of Technical Report for U.S. Post Office,San Diego,
San Diego County, California and Determination of Eligibility for National Register of Historic Places Nomination.
Coronado Historical Association,Coronado,San Diego County- Historical and Architectural Consultant conducting
research for Historic Home Tour, "Wings of Gold, 100 Years of Naval Aviation" exhibit, and "Coronado We Remember"
exhibit.
Coronado Historical Association,Coronado,San Diego County - Interim Registrar and Archivist.
La Jolla Historical Society, La Jolla,San Diego County-Archivist for historical collection.
Associations
• San Diego Historical Society
• Denver Historical Society
Publications
• Engstrand, Iris H.W. and Kathleen A. Crawford. 1981. Reflections: A History of the San Diego Gas& Electric
Company, 1881-1991. Heritage Press, Los Angeles.
• Davie,Theodore and Kathleen A. Crawford. 1988. A History of San Diego Trust&Savings Bank, 1888-1988.
San Diego Trust and Savings Bank, San Diego.
• Crawford, Kathleen A. 1986. A History of the San Diego Transit Corporation, 1886-1986. San Diego Transit
Corporation, San Diego.
• Crawford, Kathleen A. 1985. A History of Great American First Savings Bank, 1885-1985. Great American
First Savings Bank,San Diego.
• Crawford, Kathleen A. 1985. God's Garden:A History of the Grossmont Art Colony. Journal of San Diego
History,Volume XX,Summer 1985.
• Crawford, Kathleen A. and Bruce Kammerling. 1984. The Serra Museum and its Collections, Some
Reminiscences of Fray Junipero Serra. Santa Barbara Mission Press, Santa Barbara.
• Crawford, Kathleen A. 1984. The General's Lady: Maria Amparo Ruiz Burton. Journal of San Diego History,
Volume XIX, Fall, 1984.
• Crawford, Kathleen A., "Fifty Years of the Journal of San Diego History,"Journal of San Diego History, Fall
2006.
www.FirstCarbonSolutions.com CORPORA1f�8RffSUME
John Madonna Construction Company
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Historic Resource Assessment
� • � ' • i
� ' • . � � • � ' • � � � •
FirstCarbon Solutions 16819
V:\Publications\Client(PN-1N)\5031\50310001\Historic Resource Assessment\50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessmentdocx
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16820
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
DISTRICT RECORD Trinomial
*NRHP Status Code:
Page 1 of 29 '`Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder): Froom Ranch Complex
D1. Historic Name: Froom Ranch D2. Common Name: Froom Ranch
"D3. Detailed Description (Discuss overall coherence of the district,its setting,visual characteristics,and minor features. List all elements of
district.):
The Froom Ranch complex was developed in the late 19�h century by John Froom,a Canadian laborer who purchased the dairy farm in the 1890s.
Froom,his wife,Harriet Perry Froom,with their seven children all lived on the Ranch.The ranch was developed as one of the early dairies in San
Luis Obispo County. The ranch complex currently contains the Main Residence(c.1915);the"Old"Barn(date unknown;moved to the site in the
early 1900s);the Bunkhouse(c.1915);the Diary Barn(c.1913);the Creamery/House(date unknown);the Granary(c.1913);the Shed(c 1913);the
Outhouse(c 2000);the Storage Building(c 2010);and the Water Tower(c.2013). The buildings are clustered in two groupings: the lower level of
the ranch property which contains the Main Residence,Bunkhouse,Shed,"Old"Barn,Outhouse and Storage Building;and the upper level which
includes the Dairy Barn,the Creamery/House building,the Granary and the Water Tower. The main buildings date to the early development of
the diary complex and represent Craftsman and Vernacular styles which have retained their main character defining features. The buildings have
retained their ariginal locations and associations on the site. The buildings have maintained their historic integrity of location, association,
materials,design,workmanship,feeling,and association.
*D4. Boundary Description (Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.):
The boundaries are the current boundaries of the property,Assessor's Parcel Number 67-241-419,Lots 60,67,68,and 69,Township
31 South,Range 12 East,Sections 3 and 10,located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93402.
'`D5. Boundary Justification:
The boundaries are the current boundaries of the historic Froom Ranch complex which has not significantly changed since the
1900s.
*D6. Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1890-1977 Applicable Criteria: A, B, C (Discuss districYs importance in terms of its
historical context as defined by theme, period of significance,and geographic scope. Also address the integrity of the district as a whole.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20�h Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The ranch
was developed by John Froom,a native of Canada,who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in the 1890s
and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in 1902. The
family continued to live in the House portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house. In 1913,Jim Aiken, a
worker on the ranch,constructed the Dairy Barn,added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Barn(no longer in existence)
and the Shed far a total of$1800 for materials and labor. The Dairy Barn is a rare example, and the only one in the County, of a barn with a
rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows.In 1915,Hans Peterson built the Mian Residence on the lower level and the family moved into
the Craftsman style structure.Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a residence.The"Old" Barn was
moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time,early in the ranch's development.Bill Froom,the middle son,took
over the ranching and dairy operations in 1927 when his father became ill and,in 1929,when his father died,Bill Froom inherited the ranch and
continued to operate it as one of the dairies in the San Luis Obispo County area until 1977 when he retired. The property was sold to Alex
Madonna in a tax lien sale in 1976,and his son,John Madonna uses it as an office and storage space for the Madonna Construction Company.The
Outhouse, Starage Building and Water Tower (a Verizon cell tower location) were built by the Madonna Construction Company and have no
historic associations.
*D7. References(Give full citations including the names and addresses of any informants,where possible.):
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office;San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office;City of San Luis Obispo Planning
Department;Brian Leveille,Senior Planner;San Luis Obispo County Public Library,Local History Room files,documents and
films;History Center of San Luis Obispo,Bertrando,Betsy,"Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-
241-019 San Luis Obispo County,CA(P-40-04-991);Oral Interview with John Madonna,January 2015;.
*D8. Evaluator: Kathleen A. Crawford Date: January 30, 2015
Affiliation and Address:
Crawford Historic Services,P.O.Box 634,La Mesa,CA 91944
16821
DPR 523D(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 2 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: None
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec;3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
The Froom Ranch complex is located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,in the County of San Luis Obispo,California. The ranch complex was
developed in the late 19'h century by John Froom,his wife,Harriet Perry Froom,with their seven children. The ranch was developed as one of the
early dairies in San Luis Obispo County. The ranch complex currently contains the Main Residence(c 1915);the"Old"Barn(date unknown;
moved to the site in the early 1900s);the Bunkhouse(c.1915);the Diary Barn(c.1913);the Creamery/House(date unknown);the Granary(c.1913);
the Shed(c.1913);the Outhouse(c.2000);the Storage Building(c.2010);and the Water Tower(c.2013). The buildings are clustered in two
groupings: the lower level of the ranch property which contains the Main Residence,Bunkhouse,Shed,"Old"Barn,Outhouse and Storage
Building;and the upper level which includes the Dairy Barn,the Creamery/House building,the Granary and the Water Tower. The main
buildings date to the early development of the diary complex and represent Craftsman and Vernacular styles and have retained their main
character defining features. The buildings have retained their original locations and associations on the site.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch
"P4. Resources Present: �Building �Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
P5b. Description of Photo: (view,
date,accession#)
West/January 6,2015,#41
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: �Historic
❑Prehistoric ❑Both
c. 1900-1915
*P7. Owner and Address:
John Madonna/Madonna Construction
� •v_ Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
j ,�,, Obispo,CA
� � "" ''u"�'� - *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
'f' - - ��, f and address) Kathleen A. Crawford,
:,,,;,,,, -� - -
, .,�,, " '. � „ ,�� ,__�,:.. MA
� ��
-' �� . �� •:�t . ��;.,�,� � � MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
,.�_,;,�,;�'�- �- � ��� � A - Walnut Creek Ca 94597
_ - _ w ^
� ► _ � s �,;
, ":�:�:" �;: ^� �! �.��, . 4 , . � *P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
��'� .+�. .
��"' M�.. ,�' � *P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
y>.�
..� �, ��.r- „ =
�= .r- ,�:. ="f�,,;�a ��` .� �y,, . Intensive
""'__ - ��. A�".'�'�+��'�'%�+w,y�. -- �3'"k"'..i�',,X�f�k�`� �' "''�"
r+y, ' � i ": `u`t�'�"'��yy"��"�'�+�^° ;A,�,`°"s�'. `'"�''�-' ,��, ,.W *P11. Re ort Citation: Phase I
r '�,� o ,` r +..�.e.Ym'.'yf� +. S �n :,' p
,.� ,,....K. ���,,,..,r�F��. ��� r�' rc d �.� �,,' -
�� c '�=t
���,�p ._ �-�•, *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑
�� """' ` - Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir��formation
. _ � _a .� ..
�` �
�� �� � � ., ti�- � r:� ,
� � � ,� ` !� � �
a� Legend �` �' Q �o� — - pA��-_ ��` s �i ,: ,` ; -_: ---
. =- � �
-� �s �4k.�, � �����.?'`p.4�" ��^�1� F
��--� �.
� Project Boundary � , R „��,� � ; -� � - '�!:,...�:-��'* -
� _� 1/2-mile Buffer ' ,, .�`� � �� � ;: `>> �� t�,,�' ,r' ki '`qn�3<
� f ,�'. ��' � � `L s ��:� � � �.. _- -
�� _ '�� `,^y ���. , J :� � � ,;'�. �. � -�:
� •` � J f�� � i1�% � �i �j �t 1 :+ :4 i
� � ,. ;
i � `��b_ \..��-^. �y�� •st �D�.��yg �� ��' .,\�\. . �,� �
�� '. .r-� - \`'a7 .r r'�S/� � �. / i� �,¢�, � .:-
��-r'Y �` ��.. . ' I .i' s�; \�`��R � �
;��►�� � - \���._��1���A� �� f I/1�:� .{� • �'L .
� ' `�� `1.,.� •. . � �.b�l��¢ ti�,"� � �� ' • \�\:•:� . �fSYe':fF` �
i - �� "'r�_ �C� b � s .�t� . l
..�����.��-� ��� -., =�r= -� � �,F _ �:� _ �` ���.�,:�
�� - - - � -
��� :�b� :.- �►.. `"_,�+j` ` ',:� ,+�; 3 �,•� �.
. ����� _�,,. � ., �� :., .�.,` ►-- ♦ �: .. yy■" �
. = -��--z - -- - � � %��'^ � �� " ^ ♦ Ir r� ..-,�J �L~• �
�'�'A� - - - �t� i. �.:t �'� •`�•'i•_ �� ` V C u r � i
."`r'ti .�J �•��, �-�- '��\ � � '�.� f-��� F
� `. "' . - .�. . �. .. ♦ � r' • • i,�i.:-
���. -�� 1 � `-z � �a�C Seatli. � ���• .. ♦ � 2:%� c•,:1��� .
� -• .:. .r, . v 1 _�� t'149y Sch '� � f 19 � •�ti��� r��:�,:�� , � �j��
:� �� . ..K 64�`�,� � �.'�, '-=� �i�• � *
--j' �r' _:�r �r J , _ � . �i�r s. ....'����`�? Hem�• . Y� .►'� '���
�':\�:1���.~.�"'� _ -7'�r�t ����� - �` '�� 'ii9 �� ri .•� � � � � i ■�
_ �,• _ _ � �. .7�.��1_. ;' :n 101 �' : � v� � 1 W�rf�C
��..����: . p ,M - _ .. ..�� .. __- _-
��� ../ ` ` ��~ r
`�,� �� ��"�' � �'.��y Gr. ;�, , . ./ `H.� i_ f ''——
� �! �! . � : , \ �' : '�r.��,� .- `-�� . - '� �i*� Ial 1 I °��e+�ori�e
`�. ' r � ]l , _ - • - �� ; � �Park �
�` �l ��� ] � '.rti,r.' y � �/�a' � I � � �
_ �•. �. �I ,- ,-,., �-y=* � I �.. f2t �
e '� ���° � , f A ,� ' S�•` 4 1 =-�.p �...�r ... ; � ����i
. ��?SirsP'S� 4_� tl C"' A'�:.......:�. �
�� ��` �:�� �
► • �; �� �� �- � -
� �. �� �•�- � -- , �� � ..� •I - -- -
, . fI . �'�, �� �"�_, 1.' � j ���]ri�r n . �2C i� a/M►��'�6�❑ 'a" le •
,i .�.,� � � �`l I��Q,. � ►■�F�. .
_ -- '---�... �.. � .�t .�� ' -- � �� f� � �; '+1i�r . '�I.'. , I :'y�' �
� ��� .����-;�`--� ��-�- - , _� _v. 4 - J/,� i r� ':4`��rn3F.3[� ■ - -
4 �� ,�� _ • +�w ��: �'
�`�. '�f;,\.``_= .. ,�} � . ':5 . rI��,V J��' �•l'i���.7� - _.
'.'.;__. ^ -` .�-'��. .; � ! �`.� . � , � � �� ,{I -
`. �-W 1' '- -- � .. � ,� .�.r j� ��� �
���1� ",^ ~1 �.� - . ,�, .� .\`_:� . ..�� y4ti ".wI .c . �
'.yc_ ��?Q, '�' __ _ ' ':f. �ti � � '� } �-,.�
+ �' _ . 19 y ,r.`�:-•, .,ti •. •. •` 1�.fi I�.
. . �=� . . • \� ��\L'-�;_ •• � �, � h f. t� !—
�� . � I. �.'• � _ '_ " y��:',p �p 1'c .
� !fy� ` �•• �'w ' � � P _�' . - -
� �•--•._ • -; - - , . .�`,<.: _-_ ': . . q.� 7� � � �r� -
� ���: ` __ _ � :�, --� `��r� •l�,'� ., �`� �- :�• � .
�� � ���..1 f _�_ � ,'_�.��• f�_ .'� r��� ��� ��' a r
,.� , � .y � :o� ..�',�; `� ;L ;r�r�'�-�. .`� s�1 u ■:,�� 'b'' r
. p, �'� ' ;�;�C ' ,; : ;�. � � ��:1• ."�' .� : , 1
_, ,y�� �#, .`i'., _ r�� 5•• 4i �:' .
;�..1 + .�l� � :}`�— �
�l ;. , � ' ,� R. � � _
- -, � � 1� � �J —,� _ . �` �� rr
iWI] � h• ,� "��` :��5�'..•-__ { �� ft�t� � `' r. .i� +°`'`►
._'_� ..�,�JM1 �� } -_ � I ,.- r a ¢�,s
, Y ,� � ,.,_ �� � � 'R � , ,, ;�•
.. , : • ,: •.,�; `
`�� ,, ;�� r� $ :� .�1+ ,_:_. �� _ �. - ,'- �
Q �T 'II I�N ��� J�
1,t- ��f� 4�'..` � V' � !� . J. `
`� � ��i { �i `�:.. ! �.�.-' �- ._.zr •��' �. � :� �•'- •�_-_ .
' �- •' `" . �: -__ ��',�-; -
a.� ��. ` f'. • �Y���1_:- .�� �; . • ~I r��Q�
l J f��-
� /� J 4a�'6!'� ,�. �� - f� . - . -_
C �.'t.� r� `��-- ����. ,r J r'r.
ti�� 1{ �' . �"j.�,- 1 � . _ , -'�1}�"Y• Y t � ' ' '�.r�.p�_
. +1 � . ... ` _ Y'
J7/�' ��� E � � .-f�. �� ` � . � S{ � ��.:� . -- --
" ��.t;,y"�'-����, { -- ��� "__'�, _ . _ ��q�•i�y` � � �� +f�.r�q1 r �_�r �;'-�' �. .
..}+h ' w .�� `� � 'a�a�
_�:sY- -.-.,'��.. * � ��• . �o �a ��' '� �� _ � �� f
. . � L o a a° � �� � - � . ,
.,��•t =��.L i .-�,��11t ' � r �.S= . .. _,__�`�- , .� . f _ �°•
;� .��,. . . �. .�8?x� _'_ - � � ` `'� �'J '.� � `' - � -� 'a.! .n. 1�" -
"`` .4 ' - .� + �::; ;'� �} `� ..'�J.
Z`� o~Q -�� _ , -. l��,o�' � �,'+ '.s: • '�'` �BII� ~ _� •� �� p �;�63! ea .
�'�-= r� � - � �ti�
Source: USGS San Luis Obispo(94) and Pismo Beach(94)7.5'Quadrangles Laguna Land Grant;T31S R12E Secs 3&10
� F�rstCa�Q5� e 2,00�00 0 2,000
�- � Feet Record Sea��� Map
HISTORIC RESOURCEASSESSMENT
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 4 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: Froom Ranch Main Residence
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec;3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
See Building,Structure, and Object Record for Building Description.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch/HP 2: Single-Family Residence
"P4. Resources Present: �Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
P5b. Description of Photo: (View,
date,accession#)
West//January 6,2015/#22
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
,� Sources: �Historic
❑Prehistoric ❑Both
" C 1915
-,Y�a�x-iS .
,�'; �'•, . �_ d•• '
�` � *P7. Owner and Address:
�"�:- John Madonna/Madonna Construction
;� . --�,- Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
• -'�'-- -=_.— Obispo,CA
���� - _:u- � , *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
- • - � �r• ��� and address)Kathleen A. Crawford,
� - � ■ ■ ' � LL I■ ` MA
�� ■ ■ � � ''"�"�"' MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
>> � __ " Walnut Creek Ca 94597
'� �
�' ` � _ _ � ; ��� *P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
.; '." . � J� �- � *P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
�r.•, � �� ��� Intensive
'� �..:
;_..�.. � . . a.r.,�-.,. .a►,�.s - _ ,.._.�``+ -
*P11. Report Citation: Phase I
*Attachments: ❑NONE ❑
Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir�?�4formation
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 5 of 29 *NRHP Status Code
'`Resource Name or#Froom Ranch Main Residence
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Main Residence
B3. Original Use: Main Residence B4. Present Use: Living Space
*B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman
*B6. Construction History: 1915
The Main Residence was built in 1915 by Hans Peterson. The building was constructed as the Froom family was continuing to grow and
needed better living conditions for the young children in the family. The family had lived in the house attached to the Creamery building on
the upper slopes of the property to the west. The Main Residence was lived in by members of the Froom family until 1998 when Bill Froom
moved in with his brother in San Luis Obispo.When the property was purchased by the Madonna Construction Company,arrangements were
made to allow Mr. Froom to reside in the home until he chose to leave.The Main Residence is a one-story,asymmetrical,irregular shaped,
Craftsman style,single-family residence.The building has a redwood sill and concrete foundation,wood horizontal shiplap siding,a partial
width front porch,and a hipped roof with shingles and a modest eave overhang. A brick chimney is present on the roof and extends
downward into the residence,terminating about three feet from the floor. The building was heated by a wood stove and there was no
interior fireplace.
*B7. Moved? �No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
The east fa�ade is the main elevation for the residence and faces Los Osos Valley Road. The fa�ade contains a partial width front porch,
accessed by a short flight of wood stairs.The front gable roof is supported by three round columns–two at the entrance area and one on the
south end. The main entrance includes a single wood door with a wood screen door. A pair of wood framed. Double hung sash,focal
windows are located south of the off center front door. A front gable roof is present over the porch and the triangular space created by the
roof design is infilled with fish scale shingles.Windows vary in size,shape and placement around the facades and include wood framed,
double hung sash style windows.The north fa�ade is the side of the residence and includes multiple wood framed double hung sash style
windows. A bay section projects forward from the main mass of the structure. A dormer section is present on the side of the roof directly
above the bay section.A rectangular shaped addition is located on the northwest corner of the building.The addition was constructed in two
parts at two different times. The front portion of the addition has wood shiplap siding and was built by Bill Froom to store firewood. The rear
portion of the addition has vertical board and batten siding and was built by John Madonna to house electronic equipment. Several single
doors are present around the three facades.The rear of the residence contains a screened porch with a screen door and screed window
openings.The porch wraps around the house,extending on to the south fa4ade. A single wood and glass door leads into the rear of the house
The south fa�ade contains two single wood doors. The back wall of the house contains wood framed windows.The south fa�ade is the side of
the house facing the open area. Multiple window openings are present.The building is in good condition and is currently in use as offices for
the Madonna Construction Company.
Alterations:
According to John Madonna,the house has undergone a number of alterations.Both John Madonna and his father,Alex,have made many
changes to restore the building.The original foundation was redwood sills. Portions of the north and south redwood sill foundations were
completely rotted. The rotted portions were removed and replaced with concrete foundations. The house was then leveled as it had sunk
significantly. At some point,the house had been flooded and the floors were all uneven and buckled. The floors were leveled,sanded and
repaired. Several interior walls were removed to form larger office spaces. The kitchen sink and stove were removed and the area was
converted to general office use.
The only heating in the house was provided by a wood stove and the stove produced significant amounts of soot. The walls had been painted
over the years and the soot was sealed into the layers of paint. The walls were scraped,the soot and paint removed,and completely
repainted. The house was rewired for all new electrical service,plumbing repairs were made,an HVAC system was installed,new ceilings
were put in, a new roof was put on the house,and general tenant improvements were conducted.
The rear addition was altered by adding an extra section at the rear of the addition. This new section is used by the Madonna Company to
store their electronic equipment.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Hans Peterson
*B10.Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1915--1977 Property Type: Dairy Ranch Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme,period,and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20th Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The
ranch was developed by John Froom,a native of Canada,who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in
the 1890s and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in
1902.The family continued to live in the house portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house.In 1913,Jim
Aiken,a worker on the ranch,constructed the Dairy Barn,added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Ba�-6�i5 longer in
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
existence) and the Shed for a total of$1800 for materials and labor.The Dairy Barn is a rare example, and the only one in the County, of a
barn with a rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows. In 1915, Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level and the
family moved into the Craftsman style structure. Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a
residence. The "Old" Barn was moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time, early in the ranch's
development.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
t12. References:
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office;San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office;City of San Luis Obispo Planning Department; Brian Leveille,
Senior Planner; San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files, documents and films; History Center of San Luis Obispo,
Bertrando, Betsy, "Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-241-019 San Luis Obispo County, CA (P-40-04-991); Oral
Interview with John Madonna,January 2015
B13. Remarks:
B14. Evaluator:
Kathleen A.Crawford,M.A.January 6,2015
16826
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
t
►= . - -
�. - -� ��
� -- -
f `
f� _ -
�� ! � �
��� � � � �, �3
- � �
-- � - - - ' ;�TrT '' �' ��' i
� i � . ••�
-ti-+�-—
--- -ov
r
View Southwest: North Side of Main Residence
`�. -��_--:���';,� -
� -�-�- _ � ,�r
r.. �- - - -�
+ 1 - -.
� ,�
� f - - �
� T_�.� - - ! _ _
t --- __ --- —_ _— � - .__~_-� , I ��
- — — - --- , �—i�� .` �-
__'—� _ __._... ' IpG� . . .I �
__ --.�. 1 ' „--"y4�ww
�__— • . �
[�}1 a�J
li '_ . ' _ _ ��r�::
� I
i
View Southwest: Rear Addition to Main Residence
16827
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
__ ��
'�' � ���` �' - .� , _ - _._.x�r�
� � -��`=-
'��;;;;,�,;I�,,;�: _ _ -.._. ��,..
��� '. 'r
i�;_ _ _ _ - . � "'�
r�uIC:�C� �. • ... � �-:_�:z
���'� -�•_ _ * � - � �� � ,_��� ��
--�;��� �.
- !+ � , � ;� r �,.:�.
�I � r J:� � _ �
i �+� �,; � . 4
� I , � ! ' —
r--- - � �` - .
f�-! •
1 _ -- �. � - � - -
- -- . - - - _ � � � -
_ �.�� .
View East:Overview of Main Residence
I
}_ .'
_�'-
��`-
i- - �� � -
�
� ��.
�'`�. . �, `�_ �
r � � : . - - -
� u__ . - -
_ l __ _
View North:South Fa�ade of Main Residence
16828
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 9 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: Bunkhouse
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec;3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
See Building,Structure, and Object Record for Building Description.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch/hHP 2: Single-family Residence
*P4. Resources Present: �Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
�� �� P5b. Description of Photo: (View,
�� date,accession#)
� West/January 6,2015,#47
� � z *P6. Date Constructed/Age and
� " � ~~--� Sources: �Historic
f ~ ❑Prehistoric ❑Both
c. 1915
- *P7. Owner and Address:
-- �` John Madonna/Madonna Construction
- _ ��� ----�._ . Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
"��_4_-�.i: � - Obispo,CA
' � �� =- - •— - + �►:'_� *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
-.�.-- �.
a. _ -- . �_ � and address) Kathleen A. Crawford,
� "'"� —- �' ' • � MA RPA
1 '�� " MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
' � - ''r� ' ` Walnut Creek Ca 94597
� _ • �. � .-
' �-,_s � *P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
W ;f � .. . F *P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
M�.;t„� l � ! __�^' , Intensive
+' 7
ti
*P11. Report Citation: Phase I
M
*Attachments: ❑NONE ❑
Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir�?�9Formation
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 10 of 29 *NRHP Status Code
'`Resource Name or#Bunkhouse
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Bunkhouse
B3. Original Use: Bunkhouse B4. Present Use: Storage
*B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman
*B6. Construction History: �915
The building was constructed as a bunkhouse for the workers on the Froom property by Hans Peterson in 1915. However,according to John
Madonna,the building is one small room which was used by Bill Froom's brother. The brother lived in the small residence for many years.The
small bunkhouse is a one-story,Craftsman style building used as a residential structure. The building has a concrete foundation,wood
horizontal shiplap siding and a front gable roof with shingles.The building was constructed by Hans Peterson in 1915 when he built the main
residence.
*B7. Moved? �No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
A set of concrete steps leads to the single wood entrance door on the east elevation. The concrete steps have the Froom"brand"pressed into
the wet concrete.This detail is seen on many of the other buildings as well. A single wood entrance door provides access to the interior.A
small metal slider style window is present. The south fa4ade contains a wood framed double hung sash style window.The west fa4ade also
contains a wood framed double hung sash style window.The north fa4ade is blank.A large metal sign is propped up against the wall.
The building is in good condition with no major exterior alterations noted. Alterations:
According to John Madonna,the building has been altered by general tenant maintenance,including painting,a new roof,and a new floor.
The building was used for storage of files and rats were a problem;a new floor was installed to solve the problem.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Hans Peterson
*B10.Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1915--1977 Property Type: Dairy Ranch Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme,period,and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20th Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The
ranch was developed by John Froom,a native of Canada,who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in
the 1890s and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in
1902.The family continued to live in the house portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house.In 1913,Jim
Aiken,a worker on the ranch,constructed the Dairy Barn,added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Barn (no longer in
existence) and the Shed for a total of$1800 for materials and labor.The Dairy Barn is a rare example, and the only one in the County, of a
barn with a rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows. In 1915, Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level and the
family moved into the Craftsman style structure. Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a
residence. The "Old" Barn was moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time, early in the ranch's
development.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
t12. References:
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office;San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office;City of San Luis Obispo Planning Department; Brian Leveille,
Senior Planner; San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files, documents and films; History Center of San Luis Obispo,
Bertrando, Betsy, "Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-241-019 San Luis Obispo County, CA (P-40-04-991); Oral
Interview with John Madonna,January 2015
B13. Remarks:
B14. Evaluator:
Kathleen A.Crawford,M.A.January 6,2014
16830
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
_
�
�:-
„`� ---- _ - - --- --
y •�t.. � �� !
- ,.. _.._.._ __ :-_
- •., �� �� - -----..��.�
, � ~ ' �
� .� - . �—�- _ ' • _ �+-,
----- - ,� . -- --- , � - _ ��
� � [�� �. - - -�:�_- = -
'�� -�°�'� �--r-�-$-�-;��. �-=. .-�::�- r�
_ , - _ �=�- �
Y�-_.. .�.� _�_ ..���r:�„�'.
{;,����� ����.___ _,
:�:�� . , .;� � .. � _-
,:�
. � ���=_ _ _.
� -=- �._ . �:��� 1.= � ,
� �v. � ��� ��t�: ,�,.
.t..ns.:,;,�:._�� . ., , , .
View North:West and South Facades of Bunkhouse
� ,�
_ - �
� ��. �
, � i�.{' -
� _ ;.
�- �-� . � — - �: �� �
�r �I ��r
��°-:.. r � . I
„ �;, ,�
.� S� i'�.. „,
_ � M.�. . . . h.
-j I. Yyi '{ l ' .�..
. ' �'+�5�,yr•,�� ,+ '�'' ������T�.
M . ' � �. . f k� �� .
'-. '�,'. . .�.4 ��. �S� '.� .
• ,r .'Y.• :�4:.. ;...�:�" �. . ��' •
.'�- �,:• e�-,,�, y v .
;�'�:•`..+�s��.�� � ay���' . �,-�
.r"����� - ..y� ��F�.�. "`� .:r'-��
.. ' " .:• �.. . ��.Y.Tre.CY?r'T s,4
View South:North Fa�ade of Bunkhouse
16831
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
�i�r�� r ~F�4'�'�� . � . � ,. � � .
�',�`���r� ', 6•�i.-''�..� . . . . . �� _.'�.�, -
'_�� y!r,'i'�► `�'•�`• ... . . . ' - -.
,y �e..�_- ., �.�.
j�-.��X.'�=. ,__; .. . t:
:.�5'���,E� p�Ky
�� y,x `• ~. �A'� + •-•. -
.f ;-a_�.' ,: ..I�y#,'�►� --�
�,. ,.:.Y' ::.���•�.`':.k, ���?�� _
� . �.d; �E
`,:+, •: ,.-.,
:���,= �. �
s r'��•' !� ,� .. -
s57s��;i�� � ��� -
� ,�f��•���,�� • . x
��f."��'�t���_ 9 ^g� 7 ' .
��., a�::= ��
�J �� .��� ���� , i' :
�� � x ..
. ���'.�',l'�i�;���� . ' - • . ;...�.s�•-,:;_'��'
• � ���, �'��' .. f, ; . .; ' . ;;��',:�3.
''F `�r 3��r. ;�,.:, 1.,r a.'>'':[•'�.
y�� _-:i'..� ',Ms";�-:
��:�, "l'
r 1 ,�,. 'ti:
' + c M 1. . ..r:!�`��� . ' � � ; , ::5...'v.:.:r,+:&s.. . , .
;;+ . .1� . �T •, y ' . ... -°�l•� •
•,� .1a �S� ' " ,1 '.!.[:.'�!:',��••� ..rcy �.��•..
..�+' .� ' .��:-;'Yr,.:.^,,f',�,j•.:Y?���, .:f�I�.:��
� _�� h� .1 s� � �l 'T '/5 f Y•.
J�'. • x ' Y'� . r3� ' � ! 1 � .
! . � �' f� .5�...�� e j f,�i l. ,.
i.' '�� �� 't
�i �,� ,.r', ` I'.
,'r. .i.�� ;i�: '`'i"•��,Y' ,a. ,:it7,:�..
.�"=�. �4�.�" 'e?:
�•3. ��.4:; �... :"f;:.',:'.:'�.' rj�
�': 'i ,i
;r, :.�;'
,�:
:�,;'.";,.".•:
,:�. , ��.,..,,.'� '=��:';i:;,',;"''-,� �'.�:,
.,}l
�:�,�;:';; s
] ,- �.`��.
�^t" �.i.�;:w;�=•.. ��;:[-�'•::;::,,..A,,,
r:l . .�'�•'� i f;�:.
Aiq •r'� .�•...
-?i :S�'S:r�y� ;h.'q"� ;5�::'�r�.,..,�.,;r:,:..�,Y, ,'{-. ��r
,l: !f!'r:[.•�,'�Y:. f.-�: .r -�, :[•. '`s:4.:'d.a.�...•�I ;}�. :-;S,F.'�i
;-�rf'r;��.' .� �yy_,L'_r �
:�l' .. r:S�.ti���j�.{;:,'+.S ..;�:i., .;:�.,�l�,...;1'ty�3�ri�ti:-`�<JI;+.'.!�-q•ri::�.,' ":r.i.� r.ti�.-�n
,.�f r!:: �rl^ .�:i�;i�,�r•��J 1�.Y,17::','i",�.'r �.�k::.,;;�.=��v7e,.�.•,.�• :.' rrf,;�''�'�°
'•� *i::�' 'i;r: ,.i;?.�',��.!• n a,i:�t:� •'i.���:�:•t '. J'f;;,.::s'�:.
,Y ar`�t�`f�: ,P?;��;';. ..� -:zr`.:,;'"p :�,5`i.'��
��+. ,ks� ����..r, t.�M1�T.ef .r' �:.i�:.:
�,, �� �..,: i •�" r { ,ti., ''�•..,i,.;:,
s. ,r��r},�.:,a:;�.� ���ir.�3.;,��r%�., �,�ti .�•:�`;°'�r. ��;:.•,•
��,•�Lr� •,�'r. "f:���S��'': �r�..i1• '.L^},'.,;��;.:ti•':� ;�:q...:'}�_F.+'' p:'•'.
.�i �`f",�,�����. S ,���i �sE„+l..yr'�:'�•��� � � i.i�:��� ;y�..r�7','i
� � ,`.r�� ;r, ��•,i�: i r`���::ii.:z.,..;,.
ri f�J''..: �:!��s. " �����5�:•,°:p.:,�,�., ;���
. �.;.� ri` { 'ii:��q�.>,,i i• �� •.��
;,r. •..+�,��r.� ��ta�. .. :"��:;'" •7rf4�4 i:; �
..��"• . '� , . . .s"u'�.. -7';. .� '��...� e t[•1'..i....1'.3.4:'':'�'.�..�!�r';i$.�a., .,'.S':'. . . , ... i�:S�
View of Froom Ranch Brand,Located on steps of Bunkhouse
16832
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 13 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: "Old" Barn
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec;3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
See Building,Structure, and Object Record for Building Description.
'`P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch
"P4. Resources Present: ❑Building �Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (View,
date,accession#)
West/January 6,2015,#15
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: �Historic
❑Prehistoric ❑Both
�, , Unknown
; .,� , .���
/ � ' ��� � 1 �� ` fy 7, *P7. Owner and Address:
� , � � �� '�'����I ' John Madonna/Madonna Construction
l� ' Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
I �' � ' ��
- �' >! i' � �� �'�;���i��, � � li� Obispo,CA
' � 1 �i i•,. ,1 ���
� • '�,j;,' `�� ,�,�� � �� ' � �' �, *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
i , 3 '�ii,y. �-"` �``,;� I{ ' ! and address) Kathleen A. Crawford,
M. 1�"lfi��.'�' �J1r ..� � . I ,.I
� ,., . :�� � MA RPA
� � � � �' � ,�-- � i " j ; � - �� i �� -- MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
' I � �, ; '; � , Y Walnut Creek Ca 94597
' t � � „�� '� ��� h ' ����'� ♦� _
�:
, ,r.� ; M � ,� �1 ��� �" I r ��y '� *P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
� � ' - -
, '' ��fw 7 � �� � � ; *P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
�:!� .�,� .
I � "�� � ` _ �� Intensive
--.�' �_—
.�+ `"�` � *P11. Report Citation: Phase I
*Attachments: ❑NONE ❑
Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir�r�Formation
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 14 of 29 *NRHP Status Code
'`Resource Name or#Froom Ranch"Old"Barn
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: "Old" Barn
B3. Original Use: "Old" Barn B4. Present Use: Storage
*B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular
*B6. Construction History: Over 25 years old
The barn was constructed at an unknown time on another property owned by the Froom family.The property was reportedly southeast of
the current ranch complex.The building was moved by placing it on logs and rolling over the land and the creek(presumably with the aid of a
team of horses)until it was located on its new site. The relocation took place at an unknown time early in the 20th century and the barn has
been in its present location since that time.The barn is estimated to be over 125 years old.The"Old"Barn is located west of the main
residence. The barn structure is a one-story,rectangular shaped,Vernacular style barn building.The barn has a concrete floor,vertical wood
siding and a front gable roof with corrugated metal roofing.
*B7. Moved? ❑No �Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location: Another property owned by the Froom
family,located southeast of the current ranch complex
*B8. Related Features: None
The main doors are located on the east fa4ade and include sets of sliding doors.A door for a hay loft is present on the upper portion of the
building.The building does not contain any window openings.The north and south facades contain vertical wood siding. No windows are
present.The west fa�ade contains vertical wood siding.The rear wall was rotted and the boards were replaced with historic boards salvaged
from nearby barns.The building is in good condition.
Alterations:
John Madonna made a wide range of changes to the barn structure. The barn was in poor condition when he received the property. The barn
was leaning more than two feet to the side,the rear wall was rotted,and the barn was twisted. He poured a new concrete floor,the original
floor had been dirt. The building had originally been set down on the dirt when it was moved to the site. Mr. Froom had used it to store his
pickup truck.The rear wall was replaced due to dry rot and vertical boards from other local farm buildings were used to replace the rotted
boards. Considerable expense was undertaken to stabilize the barn and restore it in stable condition.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Hans Peterson
*B10.Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1915--1977 Property Type: Dairy Ranch Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme,period,and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20th Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The
ranch was developed by John Froom,a native of Canada,who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in
the 1890s and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in
1902.The family continued to live in the house portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house.In 1913,Jim
Aiken,a worker on the ranch,constructed the Dairy Barn,added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Barn (no longer in
existence) and the Shed for a total of$1800 for materials and labor.The Dairy Barn is a rare example, and the only one in the County, of a
barn with a rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows. In 1915, Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level and the
family moved into the Craftsman style structure. Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a
residence. The "Old" Barn was moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time, early in the ranch's
development.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
�12. References:
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office;San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office;City of San Luis Obispo Planning Department; Brian Leveille,
Senior Planner; San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files, documents and films; History Center of San Luis Obispo,
Bertrando, Betsy, "Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-241-019 San Luis Obispo County, CA (P-40-04-991); Oral
Interview with John Madonna,January 2015
B13. Remarks:
B14. Evaluator:
Kathleen A.Crawford,M.A.January 6,2015
16834
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
- ---- - - a
�.a� �
. . . 't „ '
� y �
, a ,� "°: ' ' � �
, i .�5 � .�.. :i�' _
1 l:�, 6 ,� -
� i.�
'4 �
t al � f �� y � ,
' r. �� ���` - ����
�������-- ���� ��
- : .� _ .�'_ i ., '��� ���� -
:�.:=
�x r. F� F _ �'� ` T�_�•.
�r
�:.yrr'.�,,.y.
' ...1�!4.hk.'��'�'.Z�.'��i��� ..i .. ... . .. . •
View North:South Fa4ade of"Old"Barn
`ew
.�i �
,.; J
�
.�! � �' '�' � :�..� v�
. il �� i.� J'� j �� �� �
I•���{ �e e;l�� I ��. �. . - � -
, ,a•�;F �, s � { � ..
' h'��.�I :I.:yk i � � ����N� ��
; � � ��>���.
. :��'. i��r.� ��f.f ��
—..'?Yf:'kE -A�� 'M �,}�I.�, ',I LLi' ' I 4 � �
1 I: � ' �r S�'f ,� �.= ,� i'' .A: �
■ _��_ !�I � �
{' ; ' . � r, r
{ ��, '. R Z� .j i•�' � � ,
�, : ; .:� ,-�: � . f r
iAIR �lf ' ti � "��, �� +�' fY 4�I
a i''..
�" s ' � -- � ` ' !' � i; �
r � rt
.• _ �
� _
� .
.t,..�:�.:.....-._-.=��-
� _ -- - _ . - _ - - �-_:- -.
. . . a:.s??��y. . '
;�':��-.�,i4='�,;i . .�.:. ' ...�:: - �. - ... _-..,
a•r A.• .}
�,�.y��� �• •�_y .� .-_ �,:. ._ , . �.., . . . . -_ ' . - . ' � ..
br J3.`�-7''�-'+"'� ry�r`�_"c� _, ..� .._I• x•-1�..�w ....,r�`'�'.. -' -_ �� ' . ..i �.- _� �- ._
View Southwest: East and North Facades of"Old"Barn
16835
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 16 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: Shed
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec;3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
See Building,Structure, and Object Record for Building Description.
'`P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch
"P4. Resources Present: ❑Building �Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (View,
date,accession#)
SoutheasdJanuary 6,2015,#40
'`P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: �Historic
❑Prehistoric ❑Both
c. 1913
�
x�=
� , •: *P7. Owner and Address:
-- _ �. John Madonna/Madonna Construction
i;,fi � '� 1 �1� � Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
� � �i .. �:.. I� � � �
d6. • !If' . I} I•'•,,;s�'s .i � ��� Obispo,CA
, �Y �E� " � �# ,���� �'��' '''s�', :�� '� '�!� *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
�_ 1 ''� I �,��4,�4 � � ` . and address) Kathleen A. Crawford,
, �5 i.i ..i;} •� ' � ,.. 1 MA
. ��. + i��J�. � j .,
"""',`� - ' 4��� �� � i ;� MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
�+'" . ��;•• fi I � i` ' -.� `� �' � Walnut Creek Ca 94597
;�� � 1� �. F: :
� { f; ,
� I '�'� ' � *P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
�:. .
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive
''' r
� �� �=.� : *P11. Report Citation: Phase I
,,�.. . .. .
�`' ' ' " � "��`''� i� *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑
,:�i�.:,.,.�.'��,=: �`'a�-�i
Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir�r�Formation
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 17 of 29 *NRHP Status Code
'`Resource Name or#Froom Ranch Shed
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Shed
B3. Original Use: Shed B4. Present Use: Storage
*B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular
*B6. Construction History: Unknown date of construction
The building is located north of the house and was built at an unknown time by an unknown person.At the time of the Bertrando
investigation,the shed was full of tin cans. John Madonna stated that Bill Froom had lived through the Great Depression and cultivated habits
of thrift. The building was full of cans of dog food which take several trips to remove them all.The building contains a seeder machine which
Mr.Madonna has allowed to remain in the structure as it holds up the building. The Shed Building is a one-story,irregular shaped,
asymmetrical,Vernacular style,storage building.The shed roof has a steep slant. The building has no true foundation,was constructed with
vertical wood siding walls,and a steeply slanted shed roof. Entrance doors are on the north wall.An addition has a flat roof and a single
entrance door. The building is in extremely poor condition and is barely standing.
*B7. Moved? �No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
Alterations:
No significant changes have been made to the building.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Hans Peterson
*B10.Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1915--1977 Property Type: Dairy Ranch Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme,period,and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20th Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The
ranch was developed by John Froom,a native of Canada,who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in
the 1890s and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in
1902.The family continued to live in the house portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house.In 1913,Jim
Aiken,a worker on the ranch,constructed the Dairy Barn,added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Barn (no longer in
existence) and the Shed for a total of$1800 for materials and labor.The Dairy Barn is a rare example, and the only one in the County, of a
barn with a rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows. In 1915, Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level and the
family moved into the Craftsman style structure. Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a
residence. The "Old" Barn was moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time, early in the ranch's
development.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
t12. References:
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office;San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office;City of San Luis Obispo Planning Department; Brian Leveille,
Senior Planner; San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files, documents and films; History Center of San Luis Obispo,
Bertrando, Betsy, "Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-241-019 San Luis Obispo County, CA (P-40-04-991); Oral
Interview with John Madonna,January 2015
B13. Remarks:
B14. Evaluator:
Kathleen A.Crawford,M.A.January 6,2015
16837
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
�
.�•
::t.
- �=:- r
,;i�; , � � =
,
F � � �� , � �: �
:r� -�' � � .
� .� ��'.� � � , � .
^r�" H � �
�
I. I f
�. e
. � - ... ',N�Y„ �".: 4,. _�i
".xr.:.`� , '`� � • �'. f. .
•'Y..., :�x .: ' �:� .._ ''• s,��;�•.. .,.. , .-"-.s'`. ." :
. �. . .;k• ��. • . . .
_ � .. _�� . r• .- �:��x:.;'.. �i �a •��y��- as
.R� '� T� ��...
z�_' y,R i �k}.:�-�. . ,..,.,�.. , ,
'�... .. . . , �i�z,�: . .• .•�- . .
. - � .5i.�.. : . . . .'-
• . - .�����i :� ��.��. r�.--�..�,^ . -�.•
��y. - -.�� 'nb... . � • . . . .:jS+j..t. . . *'r�'#����.�`�:'r
�"; ,. �, : .�,acv • -t�5
. •• .. .1�t',.: •.w.::: • �c
' . .. _ , ��s�;;�'�����*��L`-''�'yyr''`'4���
. �- .. - . . ., .. .. . . � �r.• , .��-. �'i'.Y•.:•
View North: West and South Facades of Shed
�
�
��' ��;1 �
:.
Il�i�!�;' � �,�+f � -,:
� ,.
,� ,
:'",'.. '�, ; � � �, ,
`F ���. �'+��f .,`;��� F.��
5�:�. .� Mxhh� x, � �
� ' ��.� I'� .;L � ��
:,.�-�- ,� � � � ,� `i , � ._a�.
�� .' .,:; ,����k�''�,�, . �
;� I`�;�'_. ,� � ,. ;; ,�, :� �.
�� �'�' �`� ��;� '�����, � �
��� r,��� ��;���' .
� 7 �.Y� �"_�. � `:� � .. '�
.Y�� ,,,'��n��i
r �� '.a
4'
���r
View West:South and East Facades of Shed
16838
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 19 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: Diary Barn
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec;3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
See Building,Structure, and Object Record for Building Description.
'`P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch
"P4. Resources Present: ❑Building �Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (View,
date,accession#)
West/January 6,2015,#32
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: �Historic
❑Prehistoric ❑Both
c. 1913
*P7. Owner and Address:
- _ • John Madonna/Madonna Construction
` ' ' � -ti ti; r���� Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
a. - ��:.�.--�,.-
� __ _�•.;:�_ . _.
�' ..• Obispo,CA
.e- _ _ .. - _ ,..�i�-� • . -
''--.-,� " *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
'�rt��-- --_ _ - __;__ - � • - and address) Kathleen A. Crawford,
' . , I �i � .. ;. LL... i _ MA
�� � .� � � �'��� `���� ' +� � MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
, ,, �. �
� � ,'���{� �4���-` —�—�""i�...:.�-°�!°�"� . � _ Walnut Creek Ca 94597
: � :��_':._,��.._ ..w..-..-� .__ -• _ ...
r•• =-�--- •_ � � ��- ' *P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
�.•a ' �� ;'P�; �,_. . _ ''� *P10. SurveyType: (Describe)
� • , ,
.. 'r,..r,��..Al;l�;..�.•�: +f�:'� .. . A� 7�i:;�r.,`_ . �*w.� +"-�w�1ns-.�ri J1lteT1S1Ve
�s" '��✓ - . i• :r•...�� '.'SY�y:.... -�.�.r?"' ', • • . .- ^".n'• .. .. .� �, -�ti�':'��,.
°��*�''� ;� `: . r�; �""'., - °. ..; . " �' � •i•.. .�� �'��"�t`,��, *P11. Report Citation: Phase I
,t -. ...r� . � .�:�r- • ��:. y . . �.•�r' .'h. +�. :�*r:.. ..�, ° �°'J+�`��'
1�' .. �� , i���N�.�... � :, ., ux cy] ''
A � y ' � .v�.' .�r1r . . ._ : •�F,���.r-•.�,
�; .� '�,',yr r . ,�.� a�J�yk,:,. r.:- '• '�'�'�. . ',� *101
.,��. 5' :ti;� ;';��' ''.' r• �,=:=�,.�'`�'' s¢,� ttachments: ❑NONE ❑
'C �-ti :�•.fl�". �',i�..,:�4!i,.� :3'�� _��':��:r��''•' '::�,wr:'�...e�•. � .:�sd' .�t�'•.���i'?'�'z-.bi�
Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir�r�9Formation
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 20 of 29 *NRHP Status Code
'`Resource Name or#Froom Ranch Dairy Barn
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Dairy Barn
B3. Original Use: Dairy Barn B4. Present Use: Storage
*B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular
*B6. Construction History: 1913
The dairy barn was built in 1913 by Jim Aiken who lived in a tent by the creek on the property and built the dairy barn,the granary and the
horse barn in 1913 for$1800.00 which included labor and materials. Every day he came up from his tent by the creek and worked on the
buildings. The dairy barn was designed to hold ten cows at either end and ten at each side. The barn contained a four-inch carrier track
designed to bring hay into the barn. Research indicates the barn is the only round barn in San Luis Obispo County.A variety of early dairy
farm equipment is still located within the barn structure. The barn was used to milk the cows,start the butter and cheese production,and
was used until the dairy operations ceased in 1977. The Dairy Barn is a 60'x 80',one-story,asymmetrical,irregular shaped,Vernacular style
barn. The barn has a wood pier and concrete block foundation,vertical wood siding walls,and a gabled roof.
*B7. Moved? �No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
The east fa�ade contains a door at the south end of the fa�ade that opens to a slanting concrete ramp. The ramp area includes a wide
concrete apron located between the Dairy Barn and the Creamery/House structures. The concrete apron had a specific function in that the
hard surface allowed the cows to remove mud from their feet prior to entering the barn for milking.The east wall contains a small addition on
the north end of the fa4ade.The addition contains a variety of windows which appear to be remnants from other structures.The windows are
wood framed in various shapes and sizes. Each of the three walls contains a single door opening. A concrete trough is present on the east
wall near the addition.The north fa�ade contains two door openings. The east door opening is a single sliding door.The other door is the
main door into the space and includes a wide opening with a sliding door. The west end of the fa4ade slopes steeply down to the ground area.
A large metal hook is present at the peak of the gable roof.The west fa4ade contains an open entrance on the south end of the fa4ade. A
concrete entrance area leads into the interior space. The shed roof slopes steeply down to the lower level of the wall. The south fa�ade
contains a unique feature.The fa�ade is curved and a portion of the curved section has no foundation and hangs out over the slope. The wall
has vertical siding and a sloping curved roof.The wall was specifically constructed in this manner to accommodate the movement of the cows
within the interior space. Due to their size and breadth,it was easier to move the cows through the space if it was rounded.The building is in
fair condition.Corrals are present on the south side of the slope near the barn.
Alterations:The barn has been altered by a variety of renovations by both Alex and John Madonna over the years to stabilize the building.
New support beams have replaced unstable sections,portions have been propped up and repaired,beams were placed in portions of the roof
system to keep the roof in place,vertical wall boards have been replaced and overall general maintenance has taken place to keep the
structure standing over the years.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Hans Peterson
*B10.Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1915--1977 Property Type: Dairy Ranch Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme,period,and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20th Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The
ranch was developed by John Froom,a native of Canada,who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in
the 1890s and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in
1902.The family continued to live in the house portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house.In 1913,Jim
Aiken,a worker on the ranch,constructed the Dairy Barn,added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Barn (no longer in
existence) and the Shed for a total of$1800 for materials and labor.The Dairy Barn is a rare example, and the only one in the County, of a
barn with a rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows. In 1915, Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level and the
family moved into the Craftsman style structure. Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a
residence. The "Old" Barn was moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time, early in the ranch's
development.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
612. References:
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office;San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office;City of San Luis Obispo Planning Department; Brian Leveille,
Senior Planner; San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files, documents and films; History Center of San Luis Obispo,
Bertrando, Betsy, "Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-241-019 San Luis Obispo County, CA (P-40-04-991); Oral
Interview with John Madonna,January 2015
B13. Remarks:
B14. Evaluator:
Kathleen A.Crawford,M.A.January 6,2015
16840
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
.; .
, , � ; �� � � �`,
�i�..; �i`�•:�"•'�,�d�
'd'..' _�, .- - ' _
.�;?}:- -_•+4.'4"i-i'�•.• - V�7
JJ�., +��'• " K•.. -. � . .. ' � � - -
� C.
*.,..,��.�- �� � I �
T � I �� � � .
w ��' � — I � � r� r �
it �'+� � �������..�•�
�'n. T '1 -
li
. �
�i � �.
�����C''`-"
.-- � wer�;�. �.;��:�.:�i. .si
View North:South Fa�ade of Dairy Barn
���`-``:t-
;',;• - ��
����.���;"::�;'' ; :�� - --
� -�r-�:�- - - - . _
.�y.���_''';i� ''- ;�-�, -.
- �-�ir:' - ____- �
'�{�_.' _ __''�'� _ - ' .
::�r�'�•:=+~.i'_ �i� �:.�i __ � .
�s..,y_:.r'.
,- ;��i-��r�`_s '
� :�'�
.� s_",„a� ,f �
Y '�
� �� 4 �.. � - ; .�,,�.
. i �� � f �
,�. ��� � ��:
'� ' I '� ���....�...�_. z.-_
L k�K���
�n��.�,�'� t
y�. . _ � � � _ _ r��� � ,i .?3. �± . ...
;�i4.•,..L• - —1'`�'�'-� k��J� �; .r.`'�� .:a� . ..-
a,..•r
. . . �'a 1'" .
� . ��� :�,;;d�"' �r;��,, -
-�, + .,F• :�' . ��" , r '�.
� .. i�.,•.. ,
� . ., �." ���.�
.i... .� .'..j: . ',a:r . . , �.:
. .' �r-�:: ��h��. � . _�•1� �' :�{::.�. :
, ... . v�.� •h; �yg:. .���' •r:;3'.. . _. i
�� af. �'
F- � . = k';:�• .i �
�.iila., .e . . •�,:i��•:. . ,.,.3,. �
View Northwest:East Fa�ade of Dairy Bar
16841
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
- ;�=��_�_"_�__�-r�-^
-_ -��'���F����
- -�;�:. �.-�
- --�_-_� _��������"
- _ __ -_ �=-_�����_=`==:.�=���.
� ._ -- - - ::F=:=�;.- - ��—��
- ,.--=� -_=__ ------_==������'�.
_ ��-�--
f r ���i� __ --
, ��'.
[ � t+ �� 7 � - - { i �
7� - -- �;��� �� n _�. �
��. . . -�-- ;�: -- - .�.� ..
� - 1I I,�'"'_'" _ ��5,� ': 4.
- ;.�"
i�-•�s �,,�,�,�..,,.=.. r - �',
.-4„`.-._+s-:' -i:r i
��A .,n ' . •- • . . � �'r: ����: 'r.
� �-�� '�'�'� '�4T�'�iI K+1�;; �
;:,:.�,.. .s� ,� ��Y;l,�•.'�'�``�'. ��� :" ��' . '
':-� � '�? .6.�r:.�� �qlf. `•.R-� ' .. . ;..r�ti
}, {y � 7- aJ� �`i S�
.�,1'�.s1Y. '•i�'.tiW�'�'4•�i"1�:f . .� 45•�__�. .i.:�'1.�':�Y��.- �.*�•�i. ��'.:
View South:East Fa�ade of Dairy Barn
: - "—?!,�+,�'�r_.s;�
_ = .- .- ir-�T`.,F;_��"�+��_'::�_�•�
- .--- . _ _"_.;�,.= _vs�=�.�..-� ,., .n^:��'�-�f�,
- _ .-.-__'� �� _. '..�r.�.
- - _r=-_�:�:�_� '-:-._=�tt��-:���{ r�,Y�-.
- .�����. -r_ � �
'-�� — __ Y�f+ _ ..""}'��._...��-
Y �- _ - VL'� Y-•�J-
�- - - - -�`�x-� �� �
� ��� r �' �� r _� �Y' .�
�! `'��--��"�_ _ - - - -
�� i
� � � �� , . .
u���� � �J .. x,� '..:;',��� �.'d ;��.. '{ � �
; 'T .[l�'.�.:
-��Yyl+ A ;�� _. .r ....... 'M'�y�('�i�,•LL�7��R ,+�}ri�'!�.
� . .,-. � .t-�., .. 1 � "1
7 � � � �.��- ��:
�
,�R
�� �
.r�. ;�� �'�l•��1. �'•
View West:East Fa�ade of Dairy Barn
16842
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
i�4.
� ' I +ti�
; ��" �
- � � -
- -- � � ���''�,
r=�= � � ��
-__ _ ° � �.� � .� '�
� � � �.�.-.. � �, �
1 ��� �
��� , - , � ; , �
t ' �r
'��.y. I � ` � , 1
_. :��"� i °� in.l Y � �I
� �' '�� �.
n � J 1 � �. �rr� „�e
� ��
View Southwest/East and North Facades of Dairy Barn
.e
e.•
�_.�
�.:.-_ �,'._--.�.`-s��.�f:
���y`�1�� .
--� - . _,�.._:- w
- - - ����1��
_ � ���:��_.-.'f- . _ .
_ ' �-�-.
- _ _ �'_�y—=�`��.�'=�..:'
� - - - - -_'�,_-_,�r���` -;r
- l" = -= -=-- __- ��:-'�ff�
�. �f.:'f_ — � _
� _�-=-- -
. _ 4 j
� ,� - ►i1�1► � r
, � �
�„� �-:- - ���',� , . ,.
. - ���.' �',i; " '�•,�I
_' �'" ti•tify r� �.1' . ' . . �°� �:5 'ti � . � . �
=•�:.` _ ' ��r-� _ �. -�� r� -
_ +.: A�^ . �.. �.:
:-;;,� w�'•`-4'' ,.t':.�;� • t •. n.'; :�•�.•.+'�.;�'.•:.
;u;,,
r:: ��_' �.�.���{` x'.. =�i'�. ;:.�.�ti? .;k"3:.. . . • :�
.!':'. A ��.��:�ti: .� . ��:.�,.. �•� ._*;�:•. `,:��.
s. .�,-. ,_t',k ,... rti.�.c::. ,:�s�� '�:�.:t._''�:
��¢�": � t .,..r`i}�. ,-, :r.e'r`. . :,�--'i;�..j L. ,,:,.:.• -
'. .��'.;..•i ..A;.,.
� .." . ���."j v�:S�• . �r:'T.ai;''v�:Y•. Yii��:�:."i�]i h{'•w'�� ' � -
Ke�^%AM. '1'��.+.�'�.���r ��'�'�'v ��i,.t.. �''--'n � .
�Cf'y2:�� 1� . !�'.F 7:Y.�. .ti: .�� � .� pF
J '�,,`**��'.;',ti�,�
'�RY����•.._' •����.Y a���{�•• • . .�. .•�.� . -�:�• , ' , .
fl�: �Y.x�ti�h:l"":f���" •S���
View North:West Fa�ade of Dairy Barn
16843
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 24 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: Creamery/House
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec; 3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
See Building,Structure, and Object Record for Building Description.
'`P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch/HP 2: Single-Family Residence
*P4. Resources Present: ❑Building �Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (View,
date,accession#)
West/January 6,2015,#58
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: �Historic
❑Prehistoric ❑Both
c. 1900-1915
*P7. Owner and Address:
John Madonna/Madonna Construction
Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
_---- - . yr-L 4 ' � ; ` Obispo,CA
7 4 *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
and address) Kathleen A. Crawford,
k ' 4y MA
` � � i , � f MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
�"z-- 'I'� Walnut Creek Ca 94597
� , � , - { - - . -
� � , � . �
�� ;�� �. ��,� ��� � ���t .�:,���, ��=-�
r r �s �, r. � * _�`"`��� .�`;a�.:;� *P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
� �x
•F � L _.. • ��+�` . ..._ - *P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
��� , . - - ';y�!;'�=>.:. � �.�';:, . . " �•.• ��.� �,y.�e •;r:� Intensive
' .� -i.'r.�.' .»-. '�i:aN..•' .4��'7?:.';�i`��"�
. r . .�•�'��i:.'�;,..��' !.� .- d'��f.Ki Y•• ..���.:� x..•�
.., ..i ,� ' .`'"`':'� $�'"���:.
. y ' � .C�'�'�d'i7��, .?} �
'` YYi%� ` `Y- -3�-•' '�!='•`r'` - • �•�' *P11. Report Citation: Phase I
. : ►.�.f�, • , .�`iiiye:f�"'�r.;�,. . ..: • , � • ' '. � � .. - ' � •�
4.- " '' �._• d"'�.,r _ .. . .... , ; :-it;:.
�.;,��:;;��Ha�� - .. � �..� +�:.- .;:�' • ~� `�w.•�Y ' .�,.. . �=ra
� .f ,�..�'�'��;;".:r : .. ;� '�' �-� _�. * *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑
� •�:rY�i�.. • �..r:t+".=r�b'• ,�.n.:t�k�� .� •.- -
Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir�}4i4formation
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 25 of 29 "NRHP Status Code
*Resource Name or# Froom Ranch Creamery/House
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Creamery/House
B3. Original Use: Milk Processing and Residential B4. Present Use: Not in use
*B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular
*B6. Construction History:
The Creamery/House are two connected structures;the west portion of the building was used as the Creamery and the east portion was the
residence. According to Bill Froom, his father lived in the Creamery for a period of time when he first began to operate the dairy. The
residence was constructed at an unknown time, possibly after John Froom's marriage to Harriet and the need for more space. The young
family lived in the house portion of the building until 1915 when Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level. Bill Froom was
born in the house and presumably any of the children born before 1915 were also born in the house on the upper level. After the family
moved into the"new" residence built by Hans Peterson in 1915,the space was possibly used as additional living space for the workers on the
ranch. The Creamery/House is a one-story, irregular shaped, asymmetrical, Vernacular style building that was built in several stages at
unknown times. The building is divided into three sections,each with gabled roofs.
*B7. Moved? �No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
The south fa�ade contains the two buildings–the Creamery and the House. Each of the sections contains a single door opening and a window
is present in each of the three sections that comprise the two buildings. The south fa�ade contains a combination of vertical and horizontal
wood siding. The building has a wood pier foundation with rock footings and infill of the open areas.
The overall structure is composed of two buildings which are separated by approximately one foot of space separating the east wall of the
Creamery from the west wall of the House.An addition was constructed on the south wall on the house portion but deteriorated to the point
where it was removed.A single wood entrance opening faces the Dairy Barn on the west wall. The interior contains two small rooms. A cellar
area is present under the building and the adjoining structure. The roof on this portion of the structure slopes down to a low level and is
covered with shingles. The north fa4ade contains vertical and horizontal siding. The entrance to the cellar area is located at the base of the
north wall under the Creamery portion of the building. A secondary entrance is located further down the wall. A small,narrow door is present
in the area where the two buildings are separated. The door is located on the north wall and there is no corresponding door on the south wall.
An open porch was added to the east end of the north wall of the house structure at an unknown time.The east fa�ade serves as the end wall
of the residential portion of the structure.A rectangular shaped window opening is present.
Alterations:
The building has been altered by additions to the structure. At one time,an addition was present on the south wall of the house portion but
was in extremely poor condition and was removed by Alex Madonna. The porch on the north wall of the house was added at an unknown
time.Alex and John Madonna undertook a series of changes to the building because of its instability. Floors and ceiling areas were replaced
with plywood sheeting,vertical siding was replaced, walls and foundations were stabilized, and overall general maintenance was undertaken
to keep the building standing over the years.
69a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Hans Peterson
*B10.Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1915--1977 Property Type: Dairy Ranch Applicable Criteria: A and C
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme,period,and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20th Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The ranch
was developed by John Froom, a native of Canada, who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in the
1890s and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in 1902.
The family continued to live in the house portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house. In 1913,Jim Aiken,
a worker on the ranch, constructed the Dairy Barn, added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Barn (no longer in
existence)and the Shed for a total of$1800 for materials and labor.The Dairy Barn is a rare example,and the only one in the County,of a barn
with a rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows. In 1915, Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level and the family
moved into the Craftsman style structure. Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a residence.The
"Old"Barn was moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time,early in the ranch's development.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
*B12. References:
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office; San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office; City of San Luis Obispo Planning Department; Brian
Leveille, Senior Planner; San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files, documents and films; History Center of San Luis
Obispo,Bertrando,Betsy,"Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-241-019 San Luis Obispo County,CA(P-40-04-991);
Oral Interview with lohn Madonna,January 2015
B13. Remarks:
B14. Evaluator:
Kathleen A.Crawford,M.A.January 6,2015
16845
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
- � -
� y._
- � , ,
-- -- r _ f�
� �;.
,�-: �� ,
..�
�� ' � `, i
�il��_ ; t� � i
I �- � , � }; , � ' - . -.�
_�r, . ' � °,� � '�� ����iFr .� .�� .,� � �;., .�'.';�^y�-
���s.: � . .. _+-.� �•��..�i.
f :-:Y; f. - � ,Q,.:� . . . . �- -
�i � _:� i1a+����� " - � . �.r�+-- . . �
��� � ' ��,`?:��' ?.:. .` . . aN..•' �•�.
i •f� 's. :� .i,r.�,. r ..a x.: -.✓+:�? �,r'-•
�.� y ,. �- ,c[�� ,r.�f.Yr��-�� r i.a1'^ *`• i E��`��� .•:1
.,�:•, �r, "'...��,.-3':: � ;rir?�' ' . � . -� .�r. .. -,,.
� '�',".�. '
�• ,y.. • ,�,jive:f�'' ri�!•'� :.'rr.. • : . . . ' . '. w'��
� , '�*'Y : _,w. .,�d"','.�.:r , '. • . ,.w . ..� .. .,. , .-�•'
Y :{IK'.h��' . . �/ :'�...�;.' . , c�.�.
�.rH, ��..,.. ' 'L'. - - - . ..�•'
��:":7� -_ �,��.. '�'r_.;Y ; •... .'�.J .._... • . � L •� ' . •~~,.. - .
�.f;r�1i�,. ''�^ .✓ �..r:�;v il„,. .�f::�•y:� ��
View Northwest:East and South Fa�ade of Creamery/house
16846
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page 27 of 29 '`Resource Name or#: Froom Ranch Complex
P1. Other ldentifier: Granary
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication � Unrestricted '`a. County: San Luis Obispo
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Mt. Diablo Date: 1975 T 31S; R 12E Sec;3, 10 B.M. M.D.
c. Address: 12165 Los Osos Valley Road Zip: 93405
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
• e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate)Elevation:
Assessor's Parcel No. 67-241-019
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and
boundaries)
See Building, Structure,and Object Record for Building Description
'`P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP 33: Farm/Ranch
"P4. Resources Present: ❑Building �Structure ❑Object ❑Site ❑District �Element of District ❑Other(Isolates,etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings,structures,and objects.)
PSb. Description of Photo: (View,
date,accession#)
West/January 6,2015,#46
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: �Historic
❑Prehistoric ❑Both
c. 1913
=�'
��:� • , � *P7. Owner and Address:
'' �' � John Madonna/Madonna Construction
Y `
' ' `--�-..� Co. 12165 Los Osos Valley Road,San Luis
. t��..
� - Obispo,CA
�,, rv. '�`__,�. ,
';:� � ; ' : ��� *P8. Recorded by: (Name,affiliation,
����L r •- •, � , • and address) Kathleen A. Crawford,
` 4i` MA
1 I' ' y `��• .
���``+� � + �'' �" � - - '� MBA/FCS 1350 Treat Blvd. Ste. 380,
+ �
• •�� ��. , ;.� �, 4� ' Walnut Creek Ca 94597
�� 4�.
G ��� �� ,,i,:�r.
*P9. Date Recorded: Jan. 6, 2015
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive
.. �:.. . ,.
. _ `x..•.. .,W
� '� � *P11. Report Citation: Phase I
�_ • .�': __.,.:
��' ':y'�~•`�� �`.� ;�'�,�==' *Attachments: ❑NONE ❑
� � ��1Ir' � �r� Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑
Continuation Sheet �Building, Structure, and Object Record
❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record
DPR 523A(1/95) *Requir�}4r�formation
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 28 of 29 *NRHP Status Code
"Resource Name or#Granary
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Granary
B3. Original Use: Granary B4. Present Use: Storage
*B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular
*B6. Construction History: 1913
The Granary was built in 1913 by Jim Aiken.The Granary was constructed in a way that eliminated the rat problem. The building was secure
and many of the local farmers stored their grain in the building to keep it safe from rats.
*B7. Moved? �No ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
The Granary is located on the hill in close proximity to the Dairy Barn and the Creamery. The Granary is a small,one-story,double walled,
rectangular shaped,asymmetrical,Vernacular style utilitarian building. The building has a wood pier foundation,vertical tongue and groove
wood siding walls and a gabled roof. One window is present on the south fa�ade.A single door is present on the east fa�ade.The interior
contains storage areas.Tongue and groove siding was used as this prevented he grain from being eaten by animals. No grain was present
during the site visit and the floor was covered in horse harnesses and equipment. The building is in poor condition.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Jim Aiken
*B10.Significance: Theme: Early 20 Century Agricultural Development Area: San Luis Obispo County
Period of Significance: 1913--1977 Property Type: Dairy Ranch Applicable Criteria:
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme,period,and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The Froom Ranch complex is a good example of the early 20th Century Agricultural development in the San Luis Obispo County area. The
ranch was developed by John Froom,a native of Canada,who came to the area in the 1870s as a laborer and purchased the existing ranch in
the 1890s and began dairy operations. Froom lived in the Creamery/House structure for many years prior to his marriage to Harriet Perry in
1902.The family continued to live in the house portion for several years and many of their seven children were born in the house.In 1913,Jim
Aiken,a worker on the ranch,constructed the Dairy Barn,added to the Creamery building, built the Granary and the Horse Barn (no longer in
existence) and the Shed for a total of$1800 for materials and labor.The Dairy Barn is a rare example, and the only one in the County, of a
barn with a rounded front wall to accommodate the dairy cows. In 1915, Hans Peterson built the Main Residence on the lower level and the
family moved into the Craftsman style structure. Peterson also built the Bunkhouse at the same time for use by family members as a
residence. The "Old" Barn was moved to the site from a location southeast of the ranch at an unknown time, early in the ranch's
development.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)
t12. References:
San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office;San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Office;City of San Luis Obispo Planning Department; Brian Leveille,
Senior Planner; San Luis Obispo County Public Library, Local History Room files, documents and films; History Center of San Luis Obispo,
Bertrando, Betsy, "Historical Evaluation for Froom Ranch Building Complex APN 67-241-019 San Luis Obispo County, CA (P-40-04-991); Oral
Interview with John Madonna,January 2015
B13. Remarks:
B14. Evaluator:
Kathleen A.Crawford,M.A. January 6,2015
16848
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
�
��,1 `�� �-�-�,``�=�
-� . �•---.-�'=�.
�:.f �
y ,: r� 1
�� fI � �I Fi i g
{ f= F � i I��r I �i F
1 �` �,''
o i � I� F i .� ' .���
�•�'�� - - a �` .j+ �r� IJ11I�� i ,��e
� � •J��i ` 1 !;� � �?-�
� r • ..��"n. .� •I I .1 .. � w
� ys �; � j ��,�' , , ,; _
.� '� „ �'
;�::;.�,>��.��� � -
�;: �`=f��; . - .,.
. . • 'L �
l--,_�+ �•'L�y.Af�L��� •E+�.L
•'m�4�1'�n� ......L'� ' �'1...�kYW. .�.f+eY.. ..
View Northeast:West and South Facades of the Granary
r . _�.�y�_,.� � -- _� � �• ^�.
,..:E� ��
_Y�yy��
w ��L
�
4r � ��..,��� ���� ' i j 1 ,�
I
E.��- ���� ��� � �
�:�:�;-� ; i , � . �
{�.�_ ;--�,�-�,,,� �� j � { ' ,� � i I
- . _ �� � ji � � , ,
_ . . � i, � ' ' � �
*. -_ ,, � � � i �:,�_
� - � � �,� - .-
! k ,~Y#
i 1: ��f I '.4ti^'� .
i I
View Southeast:North and West Facades of the Granary
16849
DPR 523B(1/95) *Required information
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
16850
APPENDIX F.5
Froom Ranch Speci�c Plan Cultural Resources Assessment
(CONFIDENTIAL)
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This technical report contains sensitive information
regarding archaeological resources and is maintained on file at the office of the
City of San Luis Obispo.
16851
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16852
CONFIDENTIAL
This Technical Report contains sensitive information and is deemed confidential. The contents of this
report have been excluded from public review of this EIR. Physical copies of this report are available and
can be reviewed at the City.
16853
APPENDIX F.6
Froom Ranch Retention Basin and Land Exchange Areas
Supplemental Phase I Cultural Resources Report
(CONFIDENTIAL)
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This technical report contains sensitive information
regarding archaeological resources and is maintained on file at the office of the
City of San Luis Obispo.
16854
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16855
CONFIDENTIAL
This Technical Report contains sensitive information and is deemed confidential. The contents of this
report have been excluded from public review of this EIR. Physical copies of this report are available and
can be reviewed at the City.
16856
APPENDIX F.7
Froom Ranch Limited Phase II Cultural Resources Assessment
(CONFIDENTIAL)
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This technical report contains sensitive information
regarding archaeological resources and is maintained on file at the office of the
City of San Luis Obispo.
16857
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16858
CONFIDENTIAL
This Technical Report contains sensitive information and is deemed confidential. The contents of this
report have been excluded from public review of this EIR. Physical copies of this report are available and
can be reviewed at the City.
16859
APPENDIX F.8
Linear Rock Features Historical Resource Evaluation
16860
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16861
� � L� � � � �
Chattel, Inc. � His#oric Preservation Consultants
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 9, 2018
TO: John Madonna
JM Development Group, Inc.
FROM: Robert Chattel, AIA, President
Caroline Raftery, Associate II
Chattel, Inc.
CC: Victor Montgomery, Principal
RRM Design Group
Dana DiPietro, Cultural Resources Division Lead
FirstCarbon Solutions
RE: Froom Ranch, 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, San Luis Obispo, California
Linear rock features historical resource evaluation
This memorandum serves as a historical resource evaluation of six linear rock features (see
Attachment A) located within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan area (SPA), an approximately 109.7- =
.�
acre development site composed of a mix of land uses including residential, commercial, and open �
space located within the County of San Luis Obispo. Revised in 2017, FirstCarbon Solutions, with -
Chattel, Inc. (Chattel), prepared a historic resource assessment (HRA) of the SPA, and this ;7
evaluation serves to supplement the HRA. This evaluation concludes none of the six linear rock 2-
features are eligible as historical resources. A site visit on May 4, 2018 with John Madonna, Dana -
DiPietro, and Robert Chattel informed this conclusion. -�
z
Chattel authored the "Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review" report dated December 14,
2017 (2017 Chattel report). The 2017 Chattel report concluded that approximately 2.9 acres of the _
SPA is eligible for listing as a potential National Register of Historic Places (National Register), ',
California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) and City Master List historic district �'
known as the Froom Ranch complex. The Froom Ranch complex consists of a grouping of seven
former dairy farm buildings: Main Residence, Creamery, Dairy Barn, Granary, Shed, Bunkhouse,
and Old Barn (contributors). __
�s
The Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s, and as 2
detailed in the 2017 Chattel report, extant buildings date to as early as 1900. Therefore, the Froom
Ranch complex period of significance is 1900-1950s. For a potential resource within the SPA to be ;�
considered a historical resource, it would need to have been constructed or used within the 1900 to ;��
1959 timeframe and be clearly associated with dairy farming. To determine whether the linear rock "'
features are historical resources, it is necessary to determine if they date from the period of �'
significance and/or were used in dairy farming.
__-- ---- m
While some rocks may have been intentionally placed, it is unclear for what purpos�'. In co.tr�s�-_,� �
some rocks appear to be natural outcroppings and thus, not intentionally placed. In dditi�to �^
appearing to be either intentionally placed or naturally occurring, two of the linear ro k fe�tures are �
paired (12 and 13, and 70 and 71), each with two parallel or convergent lines. �` , o
. �
�16862 �
Froom Ranch
July 9, 2018
Page 2
None of the linear rock features appear to be have been used as building foundations. There is
evidence, as shown in the images of feature 71, that the rocks were used originally or later to secure
wooden and/or metal channel stakes of a barbed wire fence. While possible, there is no evidence
the rocks or the fence was used to corral dairy cows. The parallel linear rock features may be
collapsed rock walls.
Regardless of whether the rocks were intentionally placed or natural outcroppings, the linear rock
features are at such a great distance from the concentration of contributors in the Froom Ranch
complex to not be associated with dairy farm operations. Therefore, as there is no evidence
associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex, dairy farm operations, or its period
of significance, the linear rock features should not be considered historical resources. In addition, to
be eligible for the National Register(NR), California Register(CR), or local City Master List (ML), a
resource must at least meet one of the criteria below. As the linear rock features do not meet any of
the criterion, they are not eligible for the NR, CR, or ML. See Attachment A for Linear Feature
Record DPR 523E forms for each linear rock feature.
Criterion NR A/CR 1 / MLB2-MLB3
/s associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our
history and cultural heritage.
There is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex, dairy farm
operations, or its period of significance, nor is there evidence the linear rock features are associated
with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and cultural
heritage, therefore they are not eligible under Criterion NR A/CR 1 / MLB2-MLB3.
Criterion NR B/CR2/ MLB1
Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.
There is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex, dairy farm
operations, or its period of significance, nor is there evidence the linear rock features are associated
with the lives of person important in our past, therefore they are not eligible under Criterion NR B /
CR2 / MLB1.
Criterion NR C /CR3/ MLA
Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or
represents the work of an important creative individual orpossesses high artistic values.
There is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex, dairy farm
operations, or its period of significance, nor is there evidence the linear rock features embody the
distinctive characteristics of a type, period, therefore they are not eligible under Criterion NR B /CR2
/ MLB1.
Criterion NR D /CR4
Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
There is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex, dairy farm
operations, or its period of significance, nor is there evidence the linear rock features have yielded,
or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history, therefore they are not eligible
under Criterion NR D /CR4.
Attachment A: Linear Feature Record DPR 523 forms
16863
ATTACHMENT A: LINEAR ROCK RECORD DPR �J23 FORMS
FROOM RANCH
16864
This page intentionally left blank.
16865
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L1. Historic and/or Common Name: Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12
L2a. Portion Described: ❑x Entire Resource ❑ Segment _ Point Observation Designation:6C
b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates,decimal degrees,legal description,and any other useful
locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map.)
UTM:Zone 10;T:31S R:12E Sec;3,10
Assessor's Parcel No.:067-241-031
L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide
plans/sections as appropriate.)
Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12 is composed of above grade and subterranean rocks.The linear placement of the
rocks and parallel relationship to Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13 suggests the rocks may have been intentionally
placed.Rocks that are now subterranean were probably once above grade,but over time have been covered with soil
due to natural erosion of the sloped terrain.See L9 for more description,and L8a Images 1-3.
L4. Dimensions:(In feet for historic features and meters for prehistoric features)
a. Top Width 6-8'
b. Bottom Width 6-8'
c. Height or Depth 1-2'
d. Length of Segment 336'
L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section(include scale) Facing: n/a
As excavation was not completed,an accurate section cannot be developed.
Refer to L8a Images 2 and 3.
L5. Associated Resources:
FirstCarbon Solutions,and Chattel,Inc. Froom Ranch Specific P/an Historic Resource Assessment. February 20,2015,
Revised July 21,2017.
Chattel,Inc.Froom Ranch Specific P/an Conformance Review.December 14,2017.
L6. Setting:(Describe natural features,landscape characteristics,slope,etc.,as appropriate.l:
Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 72 is in an area primarily composed of natural grasses and low vegetation. The
northernmost point of Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 12 is approximately 10 feet north, up-grade at a higher
elevation from the southernmost point.See L8a Image 3 for photograph of setting.
L7. Integrity Considerations:
n/a
16866
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Pa e 2 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8a. Photograph,Map or Drawing
A�,
.;f� r
ii d
R
�
5
�..r r'�'�y, r.
�
�i
� l
1
f
J
..o' ,. 12 �
� • �
f � �
�� .r' � `� .;:.3
� � ,
�, �� r
��
`t
Image 1.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12,denoted in red(RRM Design Group)
� - �,.
,� �:
}
12
_ ,P :� =_ -
,,,�`'�. �
Image 2.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12,view west(John Madonna)
. 12 ,�er.���=
Image 3.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72,setting,view north(FirstCarbon Solutions) 16867
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 3 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8b. Description of Photo,Map,or Drawing(View,scale,etc.)
Image 1 denotes Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12 in red,and location of feature within Froom Ranch Specific Plan area.
Image 2 is an aerial of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12,view west.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13 is visible to the
east(below).
Image 3 shows the setting of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12,view north.
L9. Remarks:
This Linear Rock Feature DPR 523E form (Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12)serves as a continuation of Primary Record
DPR 523A(Resource Name:Froom Ranch Complex).
Six linear rock features(Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 12,13,88,70,71,and 72)exist within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan area(SPA►,an approximately 109.7-acre development site composed of a mix of land uses including residential,
commercial,and open space located within the County of San Luis Obispo.Revised in 2017,FirstCarbon Solutions,with
Chattel,Inc.(Chattel),prepared a historic resource assessment(HRA)of the SPA.As documented in DPR 523E forms for
each linear rock feature,none of the linear rock features,including Froom Ranch—Linear Rock Feature 12,are eligible as
historical resources.A site visit on May 4,2018 with John Madonna,Dana DiPietro,and Robert Chattel informed this
conclusion.
Chattel authored the"Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review"report dated December 14,2017�2017 Chattel
report).The 2017 Chattel report concluded that approximately 2.9 acres of the SPA is eligible for listing as a potential
National Register of Historic Places�National Register�,California Register of Historical Resources(California Register)and
City Master List historic district known as the Froom Ranch complex.The Froom Ranch complex consists of a grouping of
seven former dairy farm buildings:Main Residence,Creamery,Dairy Barn,Granary,Shed,Bunkhouse,and Old Barn
(contributors�.
The Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s,and as detailed in the 2017
Chattel report,extant buildings date to as early as 1900.Therefore,the Froom Ranch complex period of significance is
1900-1950s. For a potential resource within the SPA to be considered a historical resource,it would need to have been
constructed or used within the 1900 to 1959 timeframe and be clearly associated with dairy farming.To determine
whether the linear rock features are historical resources,it is necessary to determine if they date from the period of
significance and/or were used in dairy farming.
While some rocks may have been intentionally placed,it is unclear for what purpose.In contrast,some rocks appear to be
natural outcroppings and thus,not intentionally placed.In addition to appearing to be either intentionally placed or
naturally occurring,two of the linear rock features are paired(12 and 13,and 70 and 71►,each with two parallel or
convergent lines.
None of the linear rock features appear to be have been used as building foundations.There is evidence,that the rocks
were used originally or later to secure wooden and/or metal channel stakes of a barbed wire fence.While possible,there
is no evidence the rocks or the fence was used to corral dairy cows.The parallel linear rock features may be collapsed rock
walls.
Regardless of whether the rocks were intentionally placed or natural outcroppings,the linear rock features are at such a
great distance from the concentration of contributors in the Froom Ranch complex so as to not be associated with dairy
farm operations.Therefore,as there is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex,dairy
farm operations,or its period of significance,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12 should not be considered a historical
resource.As such,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12 is not eligible for the California Register(Status Code:6C).
L10. Form Prepared by:(Name,affiliation,and address)
Caroline Raftery
Chattel,Inc.
13417 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks,CA 91423
L11. Date:July 6,2018
16868
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L1. Historic and/or Common Name: Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13
L2a. Portion Described: ❑x Entire Resource ❑ Segment _ Point Observation Designation:6C
b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates,decimal degrees,legal description,and any other useful
locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map.)
UTM:Zone 10;T:31S R:12E Sec;3,10
Assessor's Parcel No.:067-241-031
L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide
plans/sections as appropriate.)
Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13 is composed of above grade and subterranean rocks.The linear placement of the
rocks and parallel relationship to Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12 suggests the rocks may have been intentionally
placed.Rocks that are now subterranean were probably once above grade,but over time have been covered with soil
due to natural erosion of the sloped terrain.See L9 for more description,and L8a Images 1-3.
L4. Dimensions:(In feet for historic features and meters for prehistoric features)
a. Top Width 6-8'
b. Bottom Width 6-8'
c. Height or Depth 1-2'
d. Length of Segment 278'
L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section(include scale) Facing: n/a
As excavation was not completed,an accurate section cannot be developed.
Refer to L8a Images 2 and 3.
L5. Associated Resources:
FirstCarbon Solutions,and Chattel,Inc. Froom Ranch Specific P/an Historic Resource Assessment. February 20,2015,
Revised July 21,2017.
Chattel,Inc.Froom Ranch Specific P/an Conformance Review.December 14,2017.
L6. Setting:(Describe natural features,landscape characteristics,slope,etc.,as appropriate.l:
Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 73 is in an area primarily composed of natural grasses and low vegetation. The
northernmost point of Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 13 is approximately 10 feet north, up-grade at a higher
elevation from the southernmost point.See L8a Image 3 for photograph of setting.
L7. Integrity Considerations:
n/a
16869
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Pa e 2 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8a. Photograph,Map or Drawing
. y� j .
� . _��'_.' '.
� ,!�_ i
� �
1
� r.
1
{�..���.�..--•.�, . � �
,�13 ' ��
...
..•1��
�''���+ _�?^ ��
� �
��� ��` � •,� -
i ,s :iF
5`� ,��o �
\ � ,}�
� �• �
r' ,
'� � +r 4
—� 1 �
Image 1.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13,denoted in red(RRM Design Group)
�� �.�
h f", .� � . . _
,.�� � ���•- f _
1
9&-��y% � � _ _ _
. . ::..,� : s ��- ��:
-� - .. 13
„ =-r � ; _.� � ,..•„....-. . ..a-_.. _ -
Image 2.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 73,view west(John Madonna)
13
Image 3.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13,setting,view north(FirstCarbon Solutions) 16870
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 3 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8b. Description of Photo,Map,or Drawing(View,scale,etc.)
Image 1 denotes Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13 in red,and location of feature within Froom Ranch Specific Plan area.
Image 2 is an aerial of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13,view west.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 12 is visible to the
west(abovel.
Image 3 shows the setting of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13.
L9. Remarks:
This Linear Rock Feature DPR 523E form (Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13)serves as a continuation of Primary Record
DPR 523A(Resource Name:Froom Ranch Complex).
Six linear rock features(Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 12,13,88,70,71,and 72)exist within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan area(SPA►,an approximately 109.7-acre development site composed of a mix of land uses including residential,
commercial,and open space located within the County of San Luis Obispo.Revised in 2017,FirstCarbon Solutions,with
Chattel,Inc.(Chattel),prepared a historic resource assessment(HRA)of the SPA.As documented in DPR 523E forms for
each linear rock feature,none of the linear rock features,including Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13,are eligible as
historical resources.A site visit on May 4,2018 with John Madonna,Dana DiPietro,and Robert Chattel informed this
conclusion.
Chattel authored the"Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review"report dated December 14,2017�2017 Chattel
report).The 2017 Chattel report concluded that approximately 2.9 acres of the SPA is eligible for listing as a potential
National Register of Historic Places�National Register�,California Register of Historical Resources(California Register)and
City Master List historic district known as the Froom Ranch complex.The Froom Ranch complex consists of a grouping of
seven former dairy farm buildings:Main Residence,Creamery,Dairy Barn,Granary,Shed,Bunkhouse,and Old Barn
(contributors�.
The Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s,and as detailed in the 2017
Chattel report,extant buildings date to as early as 1900.Therefore,the Froom Ranch complex period of significance is
1900-1950s. For a potential resource within the SPA to be considered a historical resource,it would need to have been
constructed or used within the 1900 to 1959 timeframe and be clearly associated with dairy farming.To determine
whether the linear rock features are historical resources,it is necessary to determine if they date from the period of
significance and/or were used in dairy farming.
While some rocks may have been intentionally placed,it is unclear for what purpose.In contrast,some rocks appear to be
natural outcroppings and thus,not intentionally placed.In addition to appearing to be either intentionally placed or
naturally occurring,two of the linear rock features are paired(12 and 13,and 70 and 71►,each with two parallel or
convergent lines.
None of the linear rock features appear to be have been used as building foundations.There is evidence,that the rocks
were used originally or later to secure wooden and/or metal channel stakes of a barbed wire fence.While possible,there
is no evidence the rocks or the fence was used to corral dairy cows.The parallel linear rock features may be collapsed rock
walls.
Regardless of whether the rocks were intentionally placed or natural outcroppings,the linear rock features are at such a
great distance from the concentration of contributors in the Froom Ranch complex so as to not be associated with dairy
farm operations.Therefore,as there is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex,dairy
farm operations,or its period of significance,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13 should not be considered a historical
resource.As such,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 13 is not eligible for the California Register(Status Code:6C).
L10. Form Prepared by:(Name,affiliation,and address)
Caroline Raftery
Chattel,Inc.
13417 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks,CA 91423
L11. Date:July 6,2018
16871
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L1. Historic and/or Common Name: Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70
L2a. Portion Described: ❑x Entire Resource ❑ Segment _ Point Observation Designation:6C
b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates,decimal degrees,legal description,and any other useful
locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map.)
UTM:Zone 10;T:31S R:12E Sec;3,10
Assessor's Parcel No.:067-241-032
L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide
plans/sections as appropriate.)
Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70 is composed of above grade and subterranean rocks.The linear placement of the
rocks and parallel relationship to Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71 suggests the rocks may have been intentionally
placed.Rocks that are now subterranean were probably once above grade,but over time have been covered with soil
due to natural erosion of the sloped terrain.See L9 for more description,and L8a Images 1-3.
L4. Dimensions:(In feet for historic features and meters for prehistoric features)
a. Top Width 6-8'
b. Bottom Width 6-8'
c. Height or Depth 1-2'
d. Length of Segment 158'
L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section(include scale) Facing: n/a
As excavation was not completed,an accurate section cannot be developed.
Refer to L8a Images 2 and 3.
L5. Associated Resources:
FirstCarbon Solutions,and Chattel,Inc. Froom Ranch Specific P/an Historic Resource Assessment. February 20,2015,
Revised July 21,2017.
Chattel,Inc.Froom Ranch Specific P/an Conformance Review.December 74,2017.
L6. Setting:(Describe natural features,landscape characteristics,slope,etc.,as appropriate.l:
Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 70 is in an area primarily composed of natural grasses and low vegetation. The
northernmost point of Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 70 is approximately 14 feet north, up-grade at a higher
elevation from the southernmost point.See L8a,Image 3 for photograph of setting.
L7. Integrity Considerations:
n/a
16872
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Pa e 2 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8a. Photograph,Map or Drawing
� k]. A'+. '�
'- � ;:'-'�:
•9 ';�f-:=•
. �.- �
rJ,.• .
l
� I
1 �O j -
�,.�.��...�..x��
� Y
��
.r
r�'��~
► ��
�'� .r"'r ; .-
� � ..�
� ���fi,r -- ,;r
� �W
Image 1.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70,denoted in red(RRM Design Group)
,_ _ - _ _ � .. `'�,�_�y-,��' �'-
70
Image 2.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70,view north(John Madonna)
_ �
�.-.�_ _ -
- _ �x.�„-
--.�..�;�'2_'..��:.....•.:y�a`:p:�-: _.c:'�.• `-
��ir �-:r."r:=-: ,.:.ar,:,,����.
9Y' ��r:'M"�'•' -�''-� a.. � _
..:.�`.'- •�, 7� ,..�� .�� :�w'�
.. ...' .'�'� o�F' '7��• •. ���� �.ti�_�
.-.ray7M�'" n�".y�'�'"T'r''-li���.i: M+eF�y r ,.���
RS.
�x� ��� �j„y��
..: ::�{.:,��.�.' yY� �".^:..-^',.
�"J�;...• `�_•, �� .��;�.�j_'.
,._�w� ..,�y�'� .. ��y�'�- :
i+�.r;.: y. ��-�? '���`•', � ���^-,"'.. - ,�
� t�� i_ -
� u•_��''.4";��' � � �E' �`►"� '�' ' � -
s-. �r "�`rt•• '�'�•:'�
. . .{': _ i r�`�'i:'
..'' _. ,s: "�•'`iFy�_ :..,� . t
••s; �::�..�':�.; .t�';�.'.r'::.';:�x` .•:�i �,-.:
�t - ��' .�n,..• �� _
y''�`i?� ."'� `� �jp�Cxr.::;�
,_� � ,:,, ��,,•,�_:...•
�_ ���;• '� :..�
x ,�;' �`,�;4�:
. �":;;t ;r,� :� . �,�
. �.�,:
.�Xr •�0�:::,k'p���, �A. ._�.��..�_.....r
„ ::��Y fd *.::; '�,�.��r. �'�� "„' Y3'
�` ��,.
� : ` ' : . �.a�� ..� � t... ."?p�Y`�-'"� �y
��.'��3 ���;.. .:'Jn' .. ' ��r C•'��'`"�tF4•..
� �'"�'�':''.
l�77� .. ._Itiii:��d�'"��il�"'�a�:.F�p L:�•i�5
Image 3.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70,setting,view northwest(FirstCarbon Solutions)
16873
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 3 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8b. Description of Photo,Map,or Drawing(View,scale,etc.)
Image 1 denotes Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70 in red,and location of feature within Froom Ranch Specific Plan area.
Image 2 is an aerial of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70,view north.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 70,77,and 72
visible to the east(right).
Image 3 shows the setting of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70,view northwest.
L9. Remarks:
This Linear Rock Feature DPR 523E form (Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70)serves as a continuation of Primary Record
DPR 523A(Resource Name:Froom Ranch Complex).
Six linear rock features(Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 12,13,88,70,71,and 72)exist within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan area(SPA►,an approximately 109.7-acre development site composed of a mix of land uses including residential,
commercial,and open space located within the County of San Luis Obispo.Revised in 2017,FirstCarbon Solutions,with
Chattel,Inc.(Chattel),prepared a historic resource assessment(HRA)of the SPA.As documented in DPR 523E forms for
each linear rock feature,none of the linear rock features,including Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70,are eligible as
historical resources.A site visit on May 4,2018 with John Madonna,Dana DiPietro,and Robert Chattel informed this
conclusion.
Chattel authored the"Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review"report dated December 14,2017�2017 Chattel
report).The 2017 Chattel report concluded that approximately 2.9 acres of the SPA is eligible for listing as a potential
National Register of Historic Places�National Register�,California Register of Historical Resources(California Register)and
City Master List historic district known as the Froom Ranch complex.The Froom Ranch complex consists of a grouping of
seven former dairy farm buildings:Main Residence,Creamery,Dairy Barn,Granary,Shed,Bunkhouse,and Old Barn
(contributors�.
The Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s,and as detailed in the 2017
Chattel report,extant buildings date to as early as 1900.Therefore,the Froom Ranch complex period of significance is
1900-1950s. For a potential resource within the SPA to be considered a historical resource,it would need to have been
constructed or used within the 1900 to 1959 timeframe and be clearly associated with dairy farming.To determine
whether the linear rock features are historical resources,it is necessary to determine if they date from the period of
significance and/or were used in dairy farming.
While some rocks may have been intentionally placed,it is unclear for what purpose.In contrast,some rocks appear to be
natural outcroppings and thus,not intentionally placed.In addition to appearing to be either intentionally placed or
naturally occurring,two of the linear rock features are paired(12 and 13,and 70 and 71►,each with two parallel or
convergent lines.
None of the linear rock features appear to be have been used as building foundations.There is evidence,that the rocks
were used originally or later to secure wooden and/or metal channel stakes of a barbed wire fence.While possible,there
is no evidence the rocks or the fence was used to corral dairy cows.The parallel linear rock features may be collapsed rock
walls.
Regardless of whether the rocks were intentionally placed or natural outcroppings,the linear rock features are at such a
great distance from the concentration of contributors in the Froom Ranch complex so as to not be associated with dairy
farm operations.Therefore,as there is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex,dairy
farm operations,or its period of significance,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70 should not be considered a historical
resource.As such,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70 is not eligible for the California Register(Status Code:6C).
L10. Form Prepared by:(Name,affiliation,and address)
Caroline Raftery
Chattel,Inc.
13417 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks,CA 91423
L11. Date:July 6,2018
16874
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L1. Historic and/or Common Name: Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71
L2a. Portion Described: ❑x Entire Resource ❑ Segment _ Point Observation Designation:6C
b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates,decimal degrees,legal description,and any other useful
locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map.)
UTM:Zone 10;T:31S R:12E Sec;3,10
Assessor's Parcel No.:067-241-030
L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide
plans/sections as appropriate.)
Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71 is composed of above grade and subterranean rocks.The linear placement of the
rocks and parallel relationship to Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 70 suggests the rocks may have been intentionally
placed.Rocks that are now subterranean were probably once above grade,but over time have been covered with soil
due to natural erosion of the sloped terrain.See L9 for more description,and L8a Images 1-3.
L4. Dimensions:(In feet for historic features and meters for prehistoric features)
a. Top Width 6-8'
b. Bottom Width 6-8'
c. Height or Depth 1-2'
d. Length of Segment 380'
L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section(include scale) Facing: n/a
As excavation was not completed,an accurate section cannot be developed.
Refer to L8a Images 2 and 3.
L5. Associated Resources:
FirstCarbon Solutions,and Chattel,Inc. Froom Ranch Specific P/an Historic Resource Assessment. February 20,2015,
Revised July 21,2017.
Chattel,Inc.Froom Ranch Specific P/an Conformance Review.December 14,2017.
L6. Setting:(Describe natural features,landscape characteristics,slope,etc.,as appropriate.l:
Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 77 is in an area primarily composed of natural grasses and low vegetation. The
northernmost point of Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 71 is approximately 20 feet north, up-grade at a higher
elevation from the southernmost point.See L8a,Image 3 for photograph of setting.
L7. Integrity Considerations:
n/a
16875
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Pa e 2 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8a. Photograph,Map or Drawing
..f� �
,•.�.
'sf::,•�
i �•
i
tl.... .�..�-...••--�•�„� �]
� 71
� -
..�"'`''�.•�
����..�" y�L
� / ��
. / �P `� �.I,�.;'�
►" y� f� i zr'
;� �
�fs�r - .
f i�
I
��� ��
Image 1.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71,denoted in red(RRM Design Group)
'�� � '"��.- ���"�-�
71
�,y�
:.:kI�.4��
Image 2.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 77,view north(John Madonna)
� _ - �, � d� ,
�z+�.:�"r. . _ ��5. a�.� . -�-• '
,"�'�."�"-^'_y,-r''. - • _ r
� ^r��a..'a`��"� ;, _:.'.M: .
rt �� '�„��. � ..
��M 71 p ��
o;:;a ,���5�, -a...;...
,x�.�:e.. ,..�.`-.� .: .,.,� � , _. . r�x �9' ti� �-
!���:+ii��.•-���,■ �%;,.�^ � ,-_- r �
� a ���:��
_ ,�, : � .R. �y �°:� : _
.- .�:,�y�'.• .��'�', a�:'vAr__�'. ��sa���-'#..s,'g`�.i-!.:F`�:� _
,,��r:.'•'/..'7 .'"�M.,., '��� • ':F.:}d�;: ' i". '.� ;` .
.vt'_'°�� d�',"] . �"rI.'
�: . Nr; �. , '�'�j� . �w'+�: ...... -,x,_•, .ry�.
• °.a f ":p°' /���"'p�-s y� .. .:'ht�a.'°.1x;• �`.:
a:;�y J.'af �'. �. ...�J+'�;:..�..
��`.... _ ;��:�x,;�� .
�'?i�.�•�.�.� '. -_ _7:•.,.c `;
�,:: �x�=.
:.,,A.. �'�'�<:
'.�;:" ?., . � `�,r''-` ,; �'
a ; �-: -:�=,,
. : ' � - .��` ��.'.� •.f'�:,�;�
,' .in_tl:#if.¢�.�� r.�.���.".,�:',�.' �`.� '��_ ::":'".'_.
�s .�.k':� ti:G�� �'.S- � ! .� • . . �.Y-
N x ? �, �, r,� _ �� "*.
�.�.' � {'��:a�*.. i. ,��� F b;;,,�>..::.-";.�'`;t`.;._.;.:�
.€ �' ..��� � �3 '� ° ,.
� , ��' � �
:'�.�8-?'�; s����'�;i5��:.:�,::�7-_;���'c�.�'�
Image 3.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71,setting,view northwest(FirstCarbon Solutions)
16876
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 3 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8b. Description of Photo,Map,or Drawing(View,scale,etc.)
Image 1 denotes Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71 in red,and location of feature within Froom Ranch Specific Plan area.
Image 2 is an aerial of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71,view north.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 70,and 72 visible
to the west(Ieft)and east(rightl.
Image 3 shows the setting of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71,view northwest.
L9. Remarks:
This Linear Rock Feature DPR 523E form (Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71)serves as a continuation of Primary Record
DPR 523A(Resource Name:Froom Ranch Complex).
Six linear rock features(Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 12,13,88,70,71,and 72)exist within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan area(SPA►,an approximately 109.7-acre development site composed of a mix of land uses including residential,
commercial,and open space located within the County of San Luis Obispo.Revised in 2017,FirstCarbon Solutions,with
Chattel,Inc.(Chattel),prepared a historic resource assessment(HRA)of the SPA.As documented in DPR 523E forms for
each linear rock feature,none of the linear rock features,including Froom Ranch—Linear Rock Feature 12,are eligible as
historical resources.A site visit on May 4,2018 with John Madonna,Dana DiPietro,and Robert Chattel informed this
conclusion.
Chattel authored the"Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review"report dated December 14,2017�2017 Chattel
report).The 2017 Chattel report concluded that approximately 2.9 acres of the SPA is eligible for listing as a potential
National Register of Historic Places(National Register),California Register of Historical Resources(California Register)and
City Master List historic district known as the Froom Ranch complex.The Froom Ranch complex consists of a grouping of
seven former dairy farm buildings:Main Residence,Creamery,Dairy Barn,Granary,Shed,Bunkhouse,and Old Barn
(contributors�.
The Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s,and as detailed in the 2017
Chattel report,extant buildings date to as early as 1900.Therefore,the Froom Ranch complex period of significance is
1900-1950s. For a potential resource within the SPA to be considered a historical resource,it would need to have been
constructed or used within the 1900 to 1959 timeframe and be clearly associated with dairy farming.To determine
whether the linear rock features are historical resources,it is necessary to determine if they date from the period of
significance and/or were used in dairy farming.
While some rocks may have been intentionally placed,it is unclear for what purpose.In contrast,some rocks appear to be
natural outcroppings and thus,not intentionally placed.In addition to appearing to be either intentionally placed or
naturally occurring,two of the linear rock features are paired(12 and 13,and 70 and 71►,each with two parallel or
convergent lines.
None of the linear rock features appear to be have been used as building foundations.There is evidence,that the rocks
were used originally or later to secure wooden and/or metal channel stakes of a barbed wire fence.While possible,there
is no evidence the rocks or the fence was used to corral dairy cows.The parallel linear rock features may be collapsed rock
walls.
Regardless of whether the rocks were intentionally placed or natural outcroppings,the linear rock features are at such a
great distance from the concentration of contributors in the Froom Ranch complex so as to not be associated with dairy
farm operations.Therefore,as there is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex,dairy
farm operations,or its period of significance,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71 should not be considered a historical
resource.As such,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 71 is not eligible for the California Register(Status Code:6C).
L10. Form Prepared by:(Name,affiliation,and address)
Caroline Raftery
Chattel,Inc.
13417 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks,CA 91423
L11. Date:July 6,2018
16877
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L1. Historic and/or Common Name: Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72
L2a. Portion Described: ❑x Entire Resource ❑ Segment _ Point Observation Designation:6C
b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates,decimal degrees,legal description,and any other useful
locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map.)
UTM:Zone 10;T:31S R:12E Sec;3,10
Assessor's Parcel No.:067-241-030
L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide
plans/sections as appropriate.)
Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72 is composed of above grade and subterranean rocks.See L9 for more description,
and L8a Images 1-3.
L4. DimensiOns:(In feet for historic features and meters for prehistoric features)
a. Top Width 6-8'
b. Bottom Width 6-8'
c. Height or Depth 1-2'
d. Length of Segment 248'
L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section(include scale) Facing: n/a
As excavation was not completed,an accurate section cannot be developed.
Refer to L8a Images 2 and 3.
L5. Associated Resources:
FirstCarbon Solutions,and Chattel, Inc. Froom Ranch Specific P/an Historic Resource Assessment. February 20,2015,
Revised July 21,2017.
Chattel,Inc.Froom Ranch Specific P/an Conformance Review.December 14,2017.
L6. Setting:(Describe natural features,landscape characteristics,slope,etc.,as appropriate.):
Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 72 is in an area primarily composed of natural grasses and low vegetation. The
northernmost point of Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 72 is approximately 20 feet north, up-grade at a higher
elevation from the southernmost point.See L8a,Image 3 for photograph of setting.
L7. Integrity Considerations:
n/a
16878
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 2 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8a. Photograph,Map or Drawing
� •. � �
• ,
� '
`� `.
� i
� 72 .
j,..,��..--�-•�..�. _
�j ' �
�
.�'��
��r
��..
�
��
i� ��
�,.J F• -.r
;, �v
� . . r
� f
z
�'� , -_ a
Image 1.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72,denoted in red(RRM Design Group)
_- -�: : .�. .,� ., _';,�'�;,�:�_ '_
. �
�2 f
.;
�.
- - -0,:,.
..
Image 2.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72,view north(John Madonna)
r.� l.,i��`,.'�=._a._ .... .. ..�'�' . .
��'�'�x�'� , ..'a•yi�a .y,..a . _ .. '•�u� .
'.. „_,_. s�; �y.,.s,
_ � ° tr 72
d µ ` ,��� � ,`
'� �' . .r ' `� ^�-.- ;;�,
_- .,..: .r: �yµ, � ,*h
"',�c— �zh"`- ��.»"`�,.}"' '# ft ..+.. ,�'i:,.
� Rt z t ��' .. �
.a;s�. , ,. f�'
,:{4 .s�".:�'� ,K e� Y����f :!u � .: .��� �
� ,r� Pe.�x, id' ,:..��ttr:�`-'� :,��..'.,�Y.,, ��_Leld���.�1,"�,�
� 4�' � fi � � f� ':'�
:'-.�� ._ ��. �„ : � -�
}�� .:� t ".: �� �'�4 � �� � �
. � -:� � � ._"..
�r�-t"�*'' ,�g �:`;�° . �
��� �E �4 �: � d: �
���' q♦ 9�y �: S ':: � � '- � �°:-.1
-_ i����,e� ,�°��{.y��- 's�, - h � 4 a'r Ji J.rk-.'y,
'?,�iF':...���+��'1YK^'3i�':����..?7L �. .V'���'.'gL•;�k:lke�?�
Image 3.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72,setting,view northwest(FirstCarbon Solutions) 16879
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 3 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8b. Description of Photo,Map,or Drawing(View,scale,etc.)
Image 1 denotes Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72 in red,and location of feature within Froom Ranch Specific Plan area.
Image 2 is an aerial of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72,view north.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 70,and 77 visible
to the west(left)and east(rightl.
Image 3 shows the setting of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72,view northwest.
L9. Remarks:
This Linear Rock Feature DPR 523E form (Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72)serves as a continuation of Primary Record
DPR 523A(Resource Name:Froom Ranch Complex).
Six linear rock features(Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 12,13,88,70,71,and 72)exist within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan area(SPA►,an approximately 109.7-acre development site composed of a mix of land uses including residential,
commercial,and open space located within the County of San Luis Obispo.Revised in 2017,FirstCarbon Solutions,with
Chattel,Inc.(Chattel),prepared a historic resource assessment(HRA)of the SPA.As documented in DPR 523E forms for
each linear rock feature,none of the linear rock features,including Froom Ranch—Linear Rock Feature 12,are eligible as
historical resources.A site visit on May 4,2018 with John Madonna,Dana DiPietro,and Robert Chattel informed this
conclusion.
Chattel authored the"Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review"report dated December 14,2017�2017 Chattel
report).The 2017 Chattel report concluded that approximately 2.9 acres of the SPA is eligible for listing as a potential
National Register of Historic Places(National Register),California Register of Historical Resources(California Register)and
City Master List historic district known as the Froom Ranch complex.The Froom Ranch complex consists of a grouping of
seven former dairy farm buildings:Main Residence,Creamery,Dairy Barn,Granary,Shed,Bunkhouse,and Old Barn
(contributors�.
The Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s,and as detailed in the 2017
Chattel report,extant buildings date to as early as 1900.Therefore,the Froom Ranch complex period of significance is
1900-1950s. For a potential resource within the SPA to be considered a historical resource,it would need to have been
constructed or used within the 1900 to 1959 timeframe and be clearly associated with dairy farming.To determine
whether the linear rock features are historical resources,it is necessary to determine if they date from the period of
significance and/or were used in dairy farming.
While some rocks may have been intentionally placed,it is unclear for what purpose.In contrast,some rocks appear to be
natural outcroppings and thus,not intentionally placed.In addition to appearing to be either intentionally placed or
naturally occurring,two of the linear rock features are paired(12 and 13,and 70 and 71�,each with two parallel or
convergent lines.
None of the linear rock features appear to be have been used as building foundations.There is evidence,that the rocks
were used originally or later to secure wooden and/or metal channel stakes of a barbed wire fence.While possible,there
is no evidence the rocks or the fence was used to corral dairy cows.The parallel linear rock features may be collapsed rock
walls.
Regardless of whether the rocks were intentionally placed or natural outcroppings,the linear rock features are at such a
great distance from the concentration of contributors in the Froom Ranch complex so as to not be associated with dairy
farm operations.Therefore,as there is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex,dairy
farm operations,or its period of significance,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72 should not be considered a historical
resource.As such,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 72 is not eligible for the California Register(Status Code:6C).
L10. Form Prepared by:(Name,affiliation,and address)
Caroline Raftery
Chattel,Inc.
13417 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks,CA 91423
L11. Date:July 6,2018
16880
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L1. Historic and/or Common Name: Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88
L2a. Portion Described: ❑x Entire Resource ❑ Segment _ Point Observation Designation:6C
b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates,decimal degrees,legal description,and any other useful
locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map.)
UTM:Zone 10;T:31S R:12E Sec;3,10
Assessor's Parcel No.:067-241-031
L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide
plans/sections as appropriate.)
Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88 is composed of above grade and subterranean rocks.See L9 for more description,
and L8a Images 1 and 2.
L4. DimensiOns:(In feet for historic features and meters for prehistoric features)
a. Top Width 6-8'
b. Bottom Width 6-8'
c. Height or Depth 1-2'
d. Length of Segment 254'
L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section(include scale) Facing: n/a
As excavation was not completed,an accurate section cannot be developed.
Refer to L8a Image 2.
L5. Associated Resources:
FirstCarbon Solutions,and Chattel, Inc. Froom Ranch Specific P/an Historic Resource Assessment. February 20,2015,
Revised July 21,2017.
Chattel,Inc.Froom Ranch Specific P/an Conformance Review.December 14,2017.
L6. Setting:(Describe natural features,landscape characteristics,slope,etc.,as appropriate.):
Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 88 is in an area primarily composed of natural grasses and low vegetation. The
northernmost point of Froom Ranch - Linear Rock Feature 88 is approximately 20 feet north, up-grade at a higher
elevation from the southernmost point.See L8a Image 2 for photograph of setting.
L7. Integrity Considerations:
n/a
16881
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 2 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8a. Photograph,Map or Drawing
� �
. �� �•
'.=:::�.�'�:
� .�'�''' �
s �
�„ ............��� _1 ���
,,. 88
.^-;'
r''� �
��
f►"� �� ,�'�.
� ��" ' .� �
�r
.�� �
��.
��
�
Image 1.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88,denoted in red(RRM Design Group)
�,�••i.
- ::�,°` 'f" �`�' . �`n �'.-
' ...��'ty.�'� ��., .� ���:.�..�.,d����r-.
-.-.���;,r•.�=���•�yi�� - _ `-"��
�,` �S`� �#i 88 -
�'�-�.:... .._ - _ -
�•.- -��_ �_ _ _ . �: `. _
- .;:�-== --•-�-: - :�'���-'--';r- ..
-� ��=�'._ _ . _ :'_ _ - -
_ :� �:_::.- �.
_ -_ '_ . -_; . -�� -�i;.,. '.'"^����'
�� �� -- ��., .s:,.- �''�-:'=:�.�::' �Y�-�'-
�...::�„�_� ,,;,,.#.,�:-R�'1�' - . � „�"��_.
rq.n r .�:
�'.r r%�-:,:.�,;,.��.�:�i.;. .: -.•�. �.•.���T�''`. :`.;:.
• r� `��� �.�.:..�.. :.�;.•;`. ,;:;
�'g!'�;��r'w �;',. N ��`.:.'�p�n „°.s.,��.,���y:r � ,
.�r . • ��,l�'f" "S�v
�F �v (:�- � '
",.A''.��'�F. ' .. .:��.� .�;. ^�....r'
� .i-L :.�:,.
��^ ''f SF„I .-._ N•.
' �:. "��-' � .
..�'" H�•v .f ' �•'. '�Ty`.4..�.':.� �.
..y.<.
,�:. �' a• ��:,
Image 2.Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88,setting,view northwest(FirstCarbon Solutions)
16882
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
State of California a Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial
Page 3 of 3 Resource Name or#:(Assigned by recorder)
L8b. Description of Photo,Map,or Drawing(View,scale,etc.)
Image 1 denotes Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88 in red,and location of feature within Froom Ranch Specific Plan area.
Image 2 shows the setting of Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88,view northwest.
L9. Remarks:
This Linear Rock Feature DPR 523E form (Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88)serves as a continuation of Primary Record
DPR 523A(Resource Name:Froom Ranch Complex).
Six linear rock features(Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Features 12,13,88,70,71,and 72)exist within the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan area(SPA),an approximately 109.7-acre development site composed of a mix of land uses including residential,
commercial,and open space located within the County of San Luis Obispo.Revised in 2077,FirstCarbon Solutions,with
Chattel,Inc.(Chattel),prepared a historic resource assessment(HRA)of the SPA.As documented in DPR 523E forms for
each linear rock feature,none of the linear rock features,including Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88,are eligible as
historical resources.A site visit on May 4,2018 with John Madonna,Dana DiPietro,and Robert Chattel informed this
conclusion.
Chattel authored the"Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conformance Review"report dated December 14,2017(2017 Chattel
report).The 2017 Chattel report concluded that approximately 2.9 acres of the SPA is eligible for listing as a potential
National Register of Historic Places(National Register�,California Register of Historical Resources(California Register)and
City Master List historic district known as the Froom Ranch complex.The Froom Ranch complex consists of a grouping of
seven former dairy farm buildings:Main Residence,Creamery,Dairy Barn,Granary,Shed,Bunkhouse,and Old Barn
(contributors).
The Froom Ranch complex operated as a dairy farm from approximately 1883 to the 1950s,and as detailed in the 2017
Chattel report,extant buildings date to as early as 1900.Therefore,the Froom Ranch complex period of significance is
1900-1950s. For a potential resource within the SPA to be considered a historical resource,it would need to have been
constructed or used within the 1900 to 1959 timeframe and be clearly associated with dairy farming.To determine
whether the linear rock features are historical resources,it is necessary to determine if they date from the period of
significance and/or were used in dairy farming.
While some rocks may have been intentionally placed,it is unclear for what purpose.In contrast,some rocks appear to be
natural outcroppings and thus,not intentionally placed.In addition to appearing to be either intentionally placed or
naturally occurring,two of the linear rock features are paired(72 and 13,and 70 and 71►,each with two parallel or
convergent lines.
None of the linear rock features appear to be have been used as building foundations.There is evidence,that the rocks
were used originally or later to secure wooden and/or metal channel stakes of a barbed wire fence.While possible,there
is no evidence the rocks or the fence was used to corral dairy cows.The parallel linear rock features may be collapsed rock
walls.
Regardless of whether the rocks were intentionally placed or natural outcroppings,the linear rock features are at such a
great distance from the concentration of contributors in the Froom Ranch complex so as to not be associated with dairy
farm operations.Therefore,as there is no evidence associating the linear rock features to the Froom Ranch complex,dairy
farm operations,or its period of significance,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88 should not be considered a historical
resource.As such,Froom Ranch-Linear Rock Feature 88 is not eligible for the California Register(Status Code:6C).
L10. Form Prepared by:(Name,affiliation,and address)
Caroline Raftery
Chattel,Inc.
73477 Ventura Blvd
Sherman Oaks,CA 97423
L11. Date:July 6,2078
16883
DPR 523E (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
APPENDIX F.9
Assembly Bill 52 Native American Consultation Letters
16884
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16885
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians
Eleanor Arrellanes
P.O. Box 5687
Ventura, CA 93005
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Eleanor:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16886
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16887
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians
Julie Lynn Tumamait-Stennslie, Chair
365 North Poli Avenue
Ojai, CA 93023
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Julie Lynn:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16888
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16889
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians
Raudel Joe Banuelos, Jr.
331 Mira Flores Court
Camarillo, CA 93012
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Raudel Joe:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16890
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16891
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation
Mia Lopez, Chairperson
cbcntribalchair(c�gmail.com
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Mia:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Description of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC)known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16892
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16893
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Northern Chumash Tribal Council
Fred Collins, Spokesperson
67 South Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Fred:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16894
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16895
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Northern Chumash Tribal Council
Fred Collins, Spokesperson
P.O. Box 6533
Los Osos, CA 93412
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Fred:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16896
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16897
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Salinan Tribe of San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and San Benito Counties
Patti Dunton, Tribal Administrator
7070 Morro Road, Suite A
Atascadero, CA 93422
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Patti:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16898
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16899
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Salinan Tribe of San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and San Benito Counties
Fred Segobia, MLD Lead
46451 Little Creek Court
King City, CA 93930-9781
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Fred:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16900
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16901
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians
Kenneth Kahn, Chairperson
PO Box 517
Santa Ynez, CA 93460
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Kenneth:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Description of the Proposed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16902
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16903
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians
Michael Mirelez, Cultural Resource Coordinator
P.O. Box 1160
Thermal, CA 92274
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Michael:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16904
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16905
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Xolon-Salinan Tribe
Karen White, Council Chairperson
P.O. Box 7045
Spreckles, CA 93962
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Karen:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16906
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16907
�
`- .,,;, Cammunity De�elapment
• � :.. ;. .i -
11' ;�19 Palm 5treet,San Luis Opispo,CA 9340� 3218
�� ;a5J81.7170
�u�iiy.org
December 22, 2017
Yak Tityu Tityu—Northern Chumash Tribe
Mona Olivas Tucker, Chairwoman
660 Camino Del Rey
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
FROM: Shawna Scott, Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo
RE: Tribal Cultural Resources under the California Environmental Quality Act, AB 52
(Gatto, 2014). Formal Notification of determination that a Project Application is
Complete or Decision to Undertake a Project, and Notification of Consultation
Opportunity,pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (hereafter PRC).
Dear Mona:
The City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a project application is complete for the Froom
Ranch Specific Plan.
Below please find a description of the proposed project, a map showing the project location, and
the name of our project point of contact, pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (d).
Descri�tion of the Pro�osed Project:
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area consists of two parcels totaling approximately 110 acres within
unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, and adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo city limits.
The site is located immediately west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish
Hills Plaza. The project will be primarily residential with some commercial development in the
northeast portion of the site closest to Los Osos Valley Road and adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A
major component of the planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community (LPC) known as
Villaggio. Villaggio would provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior
housing as well as access to higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and
Skilled Nursing, when needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will
be multiple-family. As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site
must be designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as
Open Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the
Irish Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16908
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Tribal Cultural Resources (AB 52)
Page 2
Project Location:
�.:
'o
IIUG�IuJ'vnhll�ry4�^�I.�
��
.s�...,s, 1 01
�'�.'.�'.:� , ..� .. ,.s� ., . �
�
�
�.
;{"
Lead A_�ency Point of Contact:
Shawna Scott, Associate Planner, City of San Luis Obispo
Pursuant to PRC § 21080.3.1 (b), you have 30 days from the receipt of this letter to request
consultation, in writing, with the City of San Luis Obispo.
Very Respectfully,
�w. �v�,�
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
- CI''E`Y�F
���' ���.L�L�S�B�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott�,slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
.r. ,�
16909
APPENDIX F. 10
Senate Bill 18 Native American Consultation Letters
16910
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
16911
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians
Julie Lynn Tumamait-Stennslie, Chair
365 North Poli Avenue
Ojai, CA 93023
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Julie Lynn Tumamait-Stennslie:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16912
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16913
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16914
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians
Raudel Joe Banuelos, Jr.
331 Mira Flores Court
Camarillo, CA 93012
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Raudel Joe Banuelos:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16915
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16916
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16917
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians
Eleanor Arrellanes
P.O. Box 5687
Ventura, CA 93005
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Eleanor Arrellanes:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16918
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16919
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16920
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation
Mia Lopez, Chairperson
cbcntribalchair(a�gmail.com
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Mia Lopez:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16921
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16922
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16923
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Northern Chumash Tribal Council
Fred Collins, Spokesperson
P.O. Box 6533
Los Osos, CA 93412
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Fred Collins:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16924
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16925
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16926
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Salinan Tribe of Monterey, San Luis Obispo Counties
Patti Dunton, Tribal Administrator
7070 Morro Road, Suite A
Atascadero, CA 93422
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Patti Dunton:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16927
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16928
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16929
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians
Kenneth Kahn, Chairperson
P.O. Box 517
Santa Ynez, CA 93460
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Kenneth Kahn:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16930
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16931
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16932
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Xolon-Salinan Tribe
Karen White, Council Chairperson
P.O. Box 7045
Spreckles, CA 93962
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Karen White:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16933
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16934
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16935
�
- �,;, � - Cammunity Development
_ 919 Palm 5treet,San Luis OGispo,CA 93401-32�8
� 805.781.7170
;iu�:;:y.org
December 26, 2017
Yak tityu tityu—Northern Chumash Tribe
Mona Olivas Tucker, Chairwoman
660 Camino Del Rey
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
RE: Invitation for Tribal Consultation; GC 65352.3
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area (Application #: SPEC-0143-2017)
Dear Mona Olivas Tucker:
I am contacting you on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo concerning an invitation for
Tribal Consultation pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65352.3. As you know, you have up
to 90 days to respond to this request,but we hope by reaching out to you early,we could invite
your participation at your earliest convenience.
We are including a Project Description, a vicinity map and a copy of our request to NAHC to
identify all tribes with traditional lands or cultural places within this portion of San Luis
Obispo. Based on past interactions with your Tribe, we are also contacting you directly to
inquire if you would like to meet and discuss these applications.
Project Descri�tion: The City of San Luis Obispo is preparing a Specific Plan that would allow
for the development of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Area consists of two parcels located at 12165 Los Osos Valley Road, totaling approximately
110 acres (ANP 067-241-030 and 067-241-031) within unincorporated San Luis Obispo
County, and adjacent to City of San Luis Obispo city limits. The site is located immediately
west of Los Osos Valley Road between U.S. 101 and the Irish Hills Plaza. The project will be
primarily residential with some commercial development in the northeast portion of the site
closest to Los Osos Valley Road and the adjacent Irish Hills Plaza. A major component of the
planned residential uses is a Life Plan Community(LPC)known as Villaggio.Villaggio would
provide a variety of different unit types for independent senior housing as well as access to
higher levels of care such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Skilled Nursing, when
needed. Additional residential uses in the northern portion of the site will be multiple-family.
As required by the Land Use Element, a minimum of 50% of the project site must be
designated Open Space; the current Plan designates approximately 51% of the site as Open
Space. The Specific Plan also includes a Neighborhood Trailhead Park to connect to the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve, which may incorporate onsite historic structures.
16936
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 2
You can contact me directly at (805) 781-7176, or via email at sscott(a�slocit. .��org.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
�� ��
Shawna Scott
Associate Planner
� . GI'�`Y��`
- �'� ., S�fi�.L�L�S OB�SP(}
Community Development
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E sscott@slocity.org
T 805.781.7176
Enclosures:
Attachment 1: Project Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: NAHC contact list
16937
Froom Ranch Specific Plan
SB 18
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Boudaries
� � wa � � ��F : �:� �
F yy.. M1..'
ys. �'` �� .. . ' � . �. . , . 74�.p` � .. �.. ..i}
C � � �y � �� ��� �.w..:�+�.
�qi[{� {�� Y���}' A t
e�}. � � _`i..� � �i�+,�{•�3" ay�'��-'i � � I�i. _
F 3�3.
�: �E.
� �sy�. 1�' �. _ J� . .
� �4 A� � ���,,� �i �^".�,�y,A'
. �` ,p d.._ f�• b����{5y - ,�Y' a�.
dL
.. �'., ' � � ..
I� N � a, 4,is- ... '� y . a ,b.,«.� . .
� k� '.€' � v.. .
� . p�. � .. ��'•�Y.
I - �� -
� ��� �� . �'.: .:.
t _ _ - • ,o,� -
y _ _
�� � n��,
.. � . - ,� 4 . '�.
_�. -�:�o-�' 4 . �:- -
. i
�,k.�. .�,t . � ��., _
} p
� !�.'"s.__ . . .
-, o
a � •1
" '`f� �4#�� .
� ��
t
� ��� ��?
,_} '� E �
.;
,
e. �., :,::; � z` + ' ,
_ Fl .
�.
/\ ;
� �u �
�'' � �� :„u;,•
\\� � �
\
�=: z�.,
����
� �.
s k ya .�a. ` .. H'� � �_1; ,
;'� �' �.[ �'� � - •- . \
;,, � �r�r � —'�9+ � 1
a•� - � ?�
4Y �"� �C� a _`f�,���,t�
�: � � �� � , �
'` r�` C
Y�; �� � � q:«-
,6� ' .rr�:.-
i �e.
t x� ,y^�5���t 8�,.
•�'+.` +°��"� �Y���y`�'� �i'
Image of the City of San Luis Obispo(City limits outlined in black).The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is
outlined in red.
16938