Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBates 24822-26087 Relevant Correspondence 2017-06-01 - 2017-07-31From:Salinantribe To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Date:Monday, July 31, 2017 10:34:43 PM Greetings Scott, I have reviewed the proposed project and have no concerns at this time. Thanks, Patti Dunton, Tribal Administrator Sent from my iPhone 24822 From:Emily Creel To:Cox, Rebecca Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Date:Monday, July 31, 2017 4:44:12 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks, Rebecca. Let’s shoot for Wednesday 8/9 1-2. Thank you, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Cox, Rebecca [mailto:rcox@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 8:24 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Emily, Here are a few available dates for Anne and Michael: Tuesday 8/8 any time between 2:30-4 Wednesday 8/9 1-2 Thursday 8/10 8:30-9:30 Friday 8/11 between 8:30-11 or between 1-4 Let me know what works for you and I’ll pencil something in the calendar for you, or I can look into more dates if need be- Best, Rebecca Cox Supervising Administrative Assistant Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcox@slocity.org T 805.781.7171 slocity.org 24823 From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:51 PM To: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Rebecca – since I’ve got you here J – I’m hoping you can help me schedule a meeting with Anne Schneider and Michael Codron when he gets back from vacation to discuss The Sub project. Can you please let me know a few dates that work for them? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Webb, Donre [mailto:DWebb@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:33 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Shawna, Thank you for letting us know. I will be out of the office but Jessica or Rebecca will be around. Thanks! Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:46 AM 24824 To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Donre and Jessica, On Monday July 31, there will be a Froom Ranch Specific Plan meeting at 3:30 pm with Emily Creel (Consulting Planner and Project Manager for the project), Rodger Maggio, and the RRM team (applicant). I will be out of the office, and Emily will lead the meeting. I’m giving you both a heads up as this will be after 3:00 pm and Emily will need you to let her and RRM in as she does not have a code or fob for the door. If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24825 From:Lea Brooks To:Fukushima, Adam Subject:Froom Ranch Scoping Comments Date:Monday, July 31, 2017 12:09:31 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch BAC scoping comments draft.docx Hi Adam: Attached is my first draft of BAC scoping comments for review by BAC members. I'm not sure how detailed they should be. Other suggestions? Are parking, electric bike recharging stations, transportation demand plan, etc., routine requirements of EIRs? Thanks. Lea 24826 From:Hudson, Jake To:Dave Flynn; Glenn D. Marshall Cc:Schwartz, Luke Subject:Froom Ranch Traffic Study Date:Monday, July 31, 2017 8:32:05 AM Attachments:image001.png Glen & Dave, Thanks for providing comments on the Froom Ranch Traffic Scope. One of your requests was to review collisions at a few intersections, no problem adding that. Are you looking for a specific parameter to be evaluated or just a generic assessment with and without the project? Thanks, Jake Hudson Transportation Manager Public Works Transportation Planning & Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jhudson@slocity.org T 805.781.7255 C 805.431.4761 slocity.org 24827 From:Cox, Rebecca To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Date:Monday, July 31, 2017 8:24:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, Here are a few available dates for Anne and Michael: Tuesday 8/8 any time between 2:30-4 Wednesday 8/9 1-2 Thursday 8/10 8:30-9:30 Friday 8/11 between 8:30-11 or between 1-4 Let me know what works for you and I’ll pencil something in the calendar for you, or I can look into more dates if need be- Best, Rebecca Cox Supervising Administrative Assistant Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcox@slocity.org T 805.781.7171 slocity.org From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:51 PM To: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Rebecca – since I’ve got you here J – I’m hoping you can help me schedule a meeting with Anne Schneider and Michael Codron when he gets back from vacation to discuss The Sub project. Can you please let me know a few dates that work for them? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 24828 P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Webb, Donre [mailto:DWebb@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:33 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Shawna, Thank you for letting us know. I will be out of the office but Jessica or Rebecca will be around. Thanks! Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:46 AM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Donre and Jessica, On Monday July 31, there will be a Froom Ranch Specific Plan meeting at 3:30 pm with Emily Creel (Consulting Planner and Project Manager for the project), Rodger Maggio, and the RRM team (applicant). I will be out of the office, and Emily will lead the meeting. I’m giving you both a heads up as this will be after 3:00 pm and Emily will need you to let her and RRM in as she does not have a code or fob for the door. If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 24829 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24830 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - status update Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 5:49:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 5:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - status update Hi Shawna – please see attached status update for Froom Ranch SP. Thanks, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24831 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - status update Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 5:48:17 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch - Status Report 07-28-17.xlsx Hi Shawna – please see attached status update for Froom Ranch SP. Thanks, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24832 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 4:12:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Pam. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 3:26 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Shawna, It was good to see you this afternoon and get some of the documents submitted to the City. Here’s a link to the updated Specific Plan: Click to Retrieve File(s) Froom Specific Plan_7.28.17.pdf I’ll see both you and Emily on Tuesday, and Emily on Monday as well. Thanks, and have a good weekend. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 24833 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24834 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch contract amendment request Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 4:12:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Emily. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 4:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch contract amendment request Hi Shawna – attached is our contract amendment request for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project as well as a detailed breakdown of our hours. I look forward to discussing this with you further next week. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24835 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch contract amendment request Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 4:08:59 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch SP Proposal thru Public Hearings.pdf Froom Ranch SP_SWCA detailed budget.pdf Hi Shawna – attached is our contract amendment request for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project as well as a detailed breakdown of our hours. I look forward to discussing this with you further next week. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24836 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 3:26:20 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Shawna, It was good to see you this afternoon and get some of the documents submitted to the City. Here’s a link to the updated Specific Plan: Click to Retrieve File(s) Froom Specific Plan_7.28.17.pdf I’ll see both you and Emily on Tuesday, and Emily on Monday as well. Thanks, and have a good weekend. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24837 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna Subject:First Carbon Solutions (FCS) Reports July 2017 Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 1:39:36 PM Hi Shawna & Emily, Here is the link to the updated FCS reports: Click to Retrieve File(s) 50310001 Froom Ranch Cultural Resource Assessment.pdf 50310001 Froom Ranch Historic Resource Assessment.pdf The Historic Buildings Treatment Approach by Chattel, Inc. will be completed next week. They are making some refinements to the document and graphics. We will discuss this further on Tuesday when Robert Chattel is in town at our scheduled meeting at the City. Thanks, and have a good weekend. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 24838 From:Sims, Shannon To:Johnson, Derek Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Scoping (Pease/Johnson) Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 12:55:00 PM I thought you were available next Friday PM? -----Original Appointment----- From: Johnson, Derek Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:50 PM To: Sims, Shannon Subject: Declined: Froom Ranch Scoping (Pease/Johnson) When: Friday, August 04, 2017 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: Council Office 24839 From:Emily Creel To:Cox, Rebecca Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 12:51:31 PM Hi Rebecca – since I’ve got you here J – I’m hoping you can help me schedule a meeting with Anne Schneider and Michael Codron when he gets back from vacation to discuss The Sub project. Can you please let me know a few dates that work for them? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Webb, Donre [mailto:DWebb@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:33 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Shawna, Thank you for letting us know. I will be out of the office but Jessica or Rebecca will be around. Thanks! Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:46 AM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team 24840 Hi Donre and Jessica, On Monday July 31, there will be a Froom Ranch Specific Plan meeting at 3:30 pm with Emily Creel (Consulting Planner and Project Manager for the project), Rodger Maggio, and the RRM team (applicant). I will be out of the office, and Emily will lead the meeting. I’m giving you both a heads up as this will be after 3:00 pm and Emily will need you to let her and RRM in as she does not have a code or fob for the door. If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24841 From:Webb, Donre To:Scott, Shawna; Gibson, Jessica Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; Cox, Rebecca Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 12:32:00 PM Hi Shawna, Thank you for letting us know. I will be out of the office but Jessica or Rebecca will be around. Thanks! Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:46 AM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Donre and Jessica, On Monday July 31, there will be a Froom Ranch Specific Plan meeting at 3:30 pm with Emily Creel (Consulting Planner and Project Manager for the project), Rodger Maggio, and the RRM team (applicant). I will be out of the office, and Emily will lead the meeting. I’m giving you both a heads up as this will be after 3:00 pm and Emily will need you to let her and RRM in as she does not have a code or fob for the door. If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 24842 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24843 From:Johnson, Derek To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 11:49:00 AM Hi Shannon, How about next Friday in the afternoon or morning. I blocked time and want to keep it but this one can intrude on it. Thanks Derek From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:20 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Derek……….your week next week is cray cray!!! Do you think this wait until the week after? And, is half an hour good? From: Pease, Andy Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:11 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Cc: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Thank you! Andy From: Johnson, Derek Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:53 AM To: Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org> Cc: Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org>; Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Hi Andy, I am happy to meet and discuss the plan ahead and the strategy around Prado Overpass funding. I am copying Shannon so that she can set something up for us to discuss. Just to give you some background to chew on is that it is going to take a combination of impact fees, grants, tax sharing, and CFD revenues to make this heavy lift. We can talk more in detail about the path forward. Thank you! Derek 24844 From: Pease, Andy Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 8:55 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Cc: Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Derek – Regarding traffic: I would like to have a better understanding of the Prado Rd. overpass/interchange issue. Specifically, is the interchange ‘viable’? And if it turns out not to be, how does that change the assumed traffic impacts for our three big development projects? I’d be happy to have a meeting, or if there is a good summary you can point me to, that is fine too. Thanks! Andy From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre [mailto:milavu@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:26 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Cc: Harmon, Heidi <hharmon@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org>; Rivoire, Dan <DRivoire@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns To: Planning Commission - City of San Luis Obispo Cc: San Luis Obispo City Council Members Katie Lichtig - City Manager Re: Froom Ranch Development From: Mila Vujovich-La Barre Date: July 26, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ Dear Planning Commission Members - Thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions about the Froom Ranch Development. Many of my concerns were expressed during the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) meetings a few years ago and at some recent meetings, due to the 24845 rush of development in the southern part of our city. I wanted to express my concerns for your consideration and the public record. From the publicity, it is my understanding that “John Madonna plans to transform 111- acres in San Luis Obispo into a $500 million mixed-use project that caters to the city’s aging population. The proposed Froom Ranch project includes a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, 150,000- 350,000 square feet of commercial retailers for its residents, 200 apartments and around 60-100 single-family detached units.” This particular developer has long and honorable ties to our community. It is my hope that he will realistically adjust his development plans after this scoping meeting. A development of this magnitude will drastically alter the traffic and the visual attractiveness of this part of town. As you all know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background or personal financial interest in development. However, the LUCE document - which has become the blueprint for future development - did not take into consideration many realities. The minority report from the LUCE highlights this and the fact that the LUCE process did not provide for substantial public input. My concerns about the Froom Ranch Development are primarily the following: 1.Water. Where is the water for this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months and I do not see water levels increasing at the sources of our water for a development of this magnitude. John Madonna has stated that, “The project would use some existing wells on the property and draw from the city’s reservoirs to satisfy its water needs.” 2. Design 24846 The continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, will be an asset. However, the proposed 200 apartments and 60-100 single- family detached units and commercial space are not necessary. By changing this configuration, and just building the CCRC there will be no need to encroach over the 150 foot height line established in the LUCE document. 3. Traffic This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development, including the cumulative impacts of the traffic from San Luis Ranch and the traffic from the Avila Ranch development. They also deserve an authentic appraisal of parking for the Froom Ranch development. Traffic flow from the existing proposed business development should also be part of that same study. If John Madonna wants to include commercial development in the Froom Ranch development, that increased traffic also needs to be factored in. 4. Prado Road. As I wrote previously, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it a four-lane truck highway as it appears on the adopted LUCE plan. Prado Road was indeed part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for immense and dense developments. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place. Since the developers are to date solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - their “fair share” - this overpass or interchange, will substantially impact the cost of 24847 the projects being proposed. City staff continues to entertain and even approve development without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable. This is unconscionable. A transparent, public discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the Prado Road interchange and/or overpass with both the Planning Commission and City Council present as soon as possible. Real financial figures and real measurements should be included at that meeting. I have personally been on the course of the planned Prado Road with an old- fashioned tape measure and elected officials, and made the point very clear that at certain points along the route - Prado Road - as a “four lane truck highway” simply does not fit. After a public meeting City staff and elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The developer of San Luis Ranch has already received approval to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road. This was not what was guaranteed in the LUCE and in public meetings. The San Luis Ranch developer’s representative has publicly quipped, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built?” For those of us that care about “smart growth” and keeping one’s word, that statement is not comforting. The construction of Prado Road cannot be an afterthought. According to CEQA, when “a larger project is identified” - as in Prado Road from Madonna Road to Broad Street that has been on the City Master Plan since 1960- it needs to have a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and be evaluated on the merits of that study. Currently, city staff is allowing Prado Road to be “illegally segmented” or “piecemealed” which is in violation of CEQA. 24848 As was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting on San Luis Ranch, what happens when people transit in cars over Highway 101 eastbound towards Broad Street. The “four-lane truck highway” - Prado Road - will then cross South Higuera...and then what? Will traffic be funneled to two lanes through Serra Meadows? Turn North or South onto South Higuera? We deserve to have these answers now. 5. Affordable housing and Workforce Housing Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know where the workers for this CCRC will be living. Will they be making a “living wage?” Most employees in these types of developments are making $12-$18 per hour. There are only a handful of highly-paid doctors and therapists that will be employed. Let’s analyze this ratio ahead of time and discuss where the housing exists for these modestly paid workers. 6. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the proposed homes and apartments, who is to say that the residential units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 7. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people and the vehicular traffic. Currently that area has a rural atmosphere. 8. Trees and animal protection Having viewed the preliminary plan, my attention is also on the fact that construction is on environmentally sensitive areas. It is my hope that any development will be below the 150- foot line to preserve the view as established in the LUCE. Even with 24849 that, it is my hope that any development will include as many trees and preservation of the public viewshed of the foothills. 9. Access to existing commercial development and recreation Since this is a scoping meeting, I would also like to see access to walking and biking trails be apparent. I would also like to see access to public transportation for these seniors and future residents. Access to the Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the preliminary plan, I would also like to see as many Class 1 bike paths in the development to ensure the safety of residents and workers. 10.Public Input As I mentioned at the LUCE meetings, it would serve the developer well to send a notice to the neighborhoods that will be impacted and receive public feedback on the development. 11. Agricultural Land I wish that John Madonna could use a good portion of this land for grazing or crops. I mourn the demise of local agricultural land in the name of infill. I believe that it is myopic for the sake of the next generation. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 24850 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 24851 From:Sims, Shannon To:Derek Johnson Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 11:19:00 AM Derek……….your week next week is cray cray!!! Do you think this wait until the week after? And, is half an hour good? From: Pease, Andy Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:11 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Cc: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Thank you! Andy From: Johnson, Derek Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:53 AM To: Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org> Cc: Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org>; Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Hi Andy, I am happy to meet and discuss the plan ahead and the strategy around Prado Overpass funding. I am copying Shannon so that she can set something up for us to discuss. Just to give you some background to chew on is that it is going to take a combination of impact fees, grants, tax sharing, and CFD revenues to make this heavy lift. We can talk more in detail about the path forward. Thank you! Derek From: Pease, Andy Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 8:55 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Cc: Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Derek – Regarding traffic: I would like to have a better understanding of the Prado Rd. overpass/interchange issue. Specifically, is the interchange ‘viable’? And if it turns out not to be, how does that change the assumed traffic impacts for our three big development projects? I’d be happy to have a meeting, or if there is a good summary you can point me to, that is fine too. Thanks! 24852 Andy From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre [mailto:milavu@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:26 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Cc: Harmon, Heidi <hharmon@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org>; Rivoire, Dan <DRivoire@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns To: Planning Commission - City of San Luis Obispo Cc: San Luis Obispo City Council Members Katie Lichtig - City Manager Re: Froom Ranch Development From: Mila Vujovich-La Barre Date: July 26, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ Dear Planning Commission Members - Thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions about the Froom Ranch Development. Many of my concerns were expressed during the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) meetings a few years ago and at some recent meetings, due to the rush of development in the southern part of our city. I wanted to express my concerns for your consideration and the public record. From the publicity, it is my understanding that “John Madonna plans to transform 111- acres in San Luis Obispo into a $500 million mixed-use project that caters to the city’s aging population. The proposed Froom Ranch project includes a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, 150,000- 350,000 square feet of commercial retailers for its residents, 200 apartments and around 60-100 single-family detached units.” 24853 This particular developer has long and honorable ties to our community. It is my hope that he will realistically adjust his development plans after this scoping meeting. A development of this magnitude will drastically alter the traffic and the visual attractiveness of this part of town. As you all know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background or personal financial interest in development. However, the LUCE document - which has become the blueprint for future development - did not take into consideration many realities. The minority report from the LUCE highlights this and the fact that the LUCE process did not provide for substantial public input. My concerns about the Froom Ranch Development are primarily the following: 1.Water. Where is the water for this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months and I do not see water levels increasing at the sources of our water for a development of this magnitude. John Madonna has stated that, “The project would use some existing wells on the property and draw from the city’s reservoirs to satisfy its water needs.” 2. Design The continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, will be an asset. However, the proposed 200 apartments and 60-100 single- family detached units and commercial space are not necessary. By changing this configuration, and just building the CCRC there will be no need to encroach over the 150 foot height line established in the LUCE document. 3. Traffic This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development, including the 24854 cumulative impacts of the traffic from San Luis Ranch and the traffic from the Avila Ranch development. They also deserve an authentic appraisal of parking for the Froom Ranch development. Traffic flow from the existing proposed business development should also be part of that same study. If John Madonna wants to include commercial development in the Froom Ranch development, that increased traffic also needs to be factored in. 4. Prado Road. As I wrote previously, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it a four-lane truck highway as it appears on the adopted LUCE plan. Prado Road was indeed part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for immense and dense developments. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place. Since the developers are to date solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - their “fair share” - this overpass or interchange, will substantially impact the cost of the projects being proposed. City staff continues to entertain and even approve development without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable. This is unconscionable. A transparent, public discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the Prado Road interchange and/or overpass with both the Planning Commission and City Council present as soon as possible. Real financial figures and real measurements should be included at that meeting. 24855 I have personally been on the course of the planned Prado Road with an old- fashioned tape measure and elected officials, and made the point very clear that at certain points along the route - Prado Road - as a “four lane truck highway” simply does not fit. After a public meeting City staff and elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The developer of San Luis Ranch has already received approval to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road. This was not what was guaranteed in the LUCE and in public meetings. The San Luis Ranch developer’s representative has publicly quipped, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built?” For those of us that care about “smart growth” and keeping one’s word, that statement is not comforting. The construction of Prado Road cannot be an afterthought. According to CEQA, when “a larger project is identified” - as in Prado Road from Madonna Road to Broad Street that has been on the City Master Plan since 1960- it needs to have a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and be evaluated on the merits of that study. Currently, city staff is allowing Prado Road to be “illegally segmented” or “piecemealed” which is in violation of CEQA. As was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting on San Luis Ranch, what happens when people transit in cars over Highway 101 eastbound towards Broad Street. The “four-lane truck highway” - Prado Road - will then cross South Higuera...and then what? Will traffic be funneled to two lanes through Serra Meadows? Turn North or South onto South Higuera? We deserve to have these answers now. 5. Affordable housing and Workforce Housing 24856 Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know where the workers for this CCRC will be living. Will they be making a “living wage?” Most employees in these types of developments are making $12-$18 per hour. There are only a handful of highly-paid doctors and therapists that will be employed. Let’s analyze this ratio ahead of time and discuss where the housing exists for these modestly paid workers. 6. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the proposed homes and apartments, who is to say that the residential units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 7. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people and the vehicular traffic. Currently that area has a rural atmosphere. 8. Trees and animal protection Having viewed the preliminary plan, my attention is also on the fact that construction is on environmentally sensitive areas. It is my hope that any development will be below the 150- foot line to preserve the view as established in the LUCE. Even with that, it is my hope that any development will include as many trees and preservation of the public viewshed of the foothills. 9. Access to existing commercial development and recreation Since this is a scoping meeting, I would also like to see access to walking and biking trails be apparent. I would also like to see access to public transportation for these seniors and future residents. Access to the Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. 24857 Having looked at the preliminary plan, I would also like to see as many Class 1 bike paths in the development to ensure the safety of residents and workers. 10.Public Input As I mentioned at the LUCE meetings, it would serve the developer well to send a notice to the neighborhoods that will be impacted and receive public feedback on the development. 11. Agricultural Land I wish that John Madonna could use a good portion of this land for grazing or crops. I mourn the demise of local agricultural land in the name of infill. I believe that it is myopic for the sake of the next generation. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 24858 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 11:03:00 AM Hi Pam, yes, at 919 Palm, Conference Room 1. -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:01 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi, forgot to ask, will the meeting be at 919 Palm? PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:48 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Good morning, Rodger confirmed and will see you all Monday at 3:30. Have a good weekend, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: 'Ricci, Pam A.' <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> 24859 Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24860 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 11:01:09 AM Hi, forgot to ask, will the meeting be at 919 Palm? PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:48 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Good morning, Rodger confirmed and will see you all Monday at 3:30. Have a good weekend, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: 'Ricci, Pam A.' <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam 24861 PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24862 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:58:30 AM Thanks Shawna! PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:48 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Good morning, Rodger confirmed and will see you all Monday at 3:30. Have a good weekend, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: 'Ricci, Pam A.' <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam 24863 PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24864 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A.; Montgomery, Victor Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:48:00 AM Good morning, Rodger confirmed and will see you all Monday at 3:30. Have a good weekend, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: 'Ricci, Pam A.' <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, 24865 Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24866 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:46:58 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Shawna. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:46 AM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org>; Gibson, Jessica <JGibson@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Hi Donre and Jessica, On Monday July 31, there will be a Froom Ranch Specific Plan meeting at 3:30 pm with Emily Creel (Consulting Planner and Project Manager for the project), Rodger Maggio, and the RRM team (applicant). I will be out of the office, and Emily will lead the meeting. I’m giving you both a heads up as this will be after 3:00 pm and Emily will need you to let her and RRM in as she does not have a code or fob for the door. If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24867 From:Scott, Shawna To:Webb, Donre; Gibson, Jessica Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting w/ Fire, CDD Consultant, RRM team Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:45:36 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Donre and Jessica, On Monday July 31, there will be a Froom Ranch Specific Plan meeting at 3:30 pm with Emily Creel (Consulting Planner and Project Manager for the project), Rodger Maggio, and the RRM team (applicant). I will be out of the office, and Emily will lead the meeting. I’m giving you both a heads up as this will be after 3:00 pm and Emily will need you to let her and RRM in as she does not have a code or fob for the door. If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24868 From:Scott, Shawna To:Maggio, Rodger Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:42:00 AM Thank you, I appreciate it. Have a great weekend! -----Original Message----- From: Maggio, Rodger Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:39 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access yes -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:18 AM To: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Emergency Access Hi Rodger, Are you available at 3:30 on Monday (July 31) to meet with Emily (the Consulting Planner) and the RRM team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org -----Original Message----- From: Walters, Tim J. [mailto:TJWalters@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access I can make Monday at 3:30 Tim Walters Principal, Engineering 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 rrmdesign.com 24869 -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access 24870 Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24871 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:42:00 AM Good to go. Thank you! -----Original Message----- From: Maggio, Rodger Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:39 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access yes -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:18 AM To: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Emergency Access Hi Rodger, Are you available at 3:30 on Monday (July 31) to meet with Emily (the Consulting Planner) and the RRM team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org -----Original Message----- From: Walters, Tim J. [mailto:TJWalters@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access I can make Monday at 3:30 Tim Walters Principal, Engineering 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 rrmdesign.com 24872 -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access 24873 Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24874 From:Maggio, Rodger To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:38:00 AM yes -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:18 AM To: Maggio, Rodger <rmaggio@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Emergency Access Hi Rodger, Are you available at 3:30 on Monday (July 31) to meet with Emily (the Consulting Planner) and the RRM team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org -----Original Message----- From: Walters, Tim J. [mailto:TJWalters@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access I can make Monday at 3:30 Tim Walters Principal, Engineering 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 rrmdesign.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access 24875 Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24876 24877 From:Scott, Shawna To:Maggio, Rodger Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:17:00 AM Hi Rodger, Are you available at 3:30 on Monday (July 31) to meet with Emily (the Consulting Planner) and the RRM team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org -----Original Message----- From: Walters, Tim J. [mailto:TJWalters@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access I can make Monday at 3:30 Tim Walters Principal, Engineering 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 rrmdesign.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. 24878 Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24879 From:Pease, Andy To:Johnson, Derek Cc:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 10:11:06 AM Thank you! Andy From: Johnson, Derek Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:53 AM To: Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org> Cc: Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org>; Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Hi Andy, I am happy to meet and discuss the plan ahead and the strategy around Prado Overpass funding. I am copying Shannon so that she can set something up for us to discuss. Just to give you some background to chew on is that it is going to take a combination of impact fees, grants, tax sharing, and CFD revenues to make this heavy lift. We can talk more in detail about the path forward. Thank you! Derek From: Pease, Andy Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 8:55 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Cc: Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Derek – Regarding traffic: I would like to have a better understanding of the Prado Rd. overpass/interchange issue. Specifically, is the interchange ‘viable’? And if it turns out not to be, how does that change the assumed traffic impacts for our three big development projects? I’d be happy to have a meeting, or if there is a good summary you can point me to, that is fine too. Thanks! Andy From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre [mailto:milavu@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:26 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Cc: Harmon, Heidi <hharmon@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org>; Rivoire, Dan <DRivoire@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn 24880 <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns To: Planning Commission - City of San Luis Obispo Cc: San Luis Obispo City Council Members Katie Lichtig - City Manager Re: Froom Ranch Development From: Mila Vujovich-La Barre Date: July 26, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ Dear Planning Commission Members - Thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions about the Froom Ranch Development. Many of my concerns were expressed during the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) meetings a few years ago and at some recent meetings, due to the rush of development in the southern part of our city. I wanted to express my concerns for your consideration and the public record. From the publicity, it is my understanding that “John Madonna plans to transform 111- acres in San Luis Obispo into a $500 million mixed-use project that caters to the city’s aging population. The proposed Froom Ranch project includes a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, 150,000- 350,000 square feet of commercial retailers for its residents, 200 apartments and around 60-100 single-family detached units.” This particular developer has long and honorable ties to our community. It is my hope that he will realistically adjust his development plans after this scoping meeting. A development of this magnitude will drastically alter the traffic and the visual attractiveness of this part of town. 24881 As you all know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background or personal financial interest in development. However, the LUCE document - which has become the blueprint for future development - did not take into consideration many realities. The minority report from the LUCE highlights this and the fact that the LUCE process did not provide for substantial public input. My concerns about the Froom Ranch Development are primarily the following: 1.Water. Where is the water for this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months and I do not see water levels increasing at the sources of our water for a development of this magnitude. John Madonna has stated that, “The project would use some existing wells on the property and draw from the city’s reservoirs to satisfy its water needs.” 2. Design The continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, will be an asset. However, the proposed 200 apartments and 60-100 single- family detached units and commercial space are not necessary. By changing this configuration, and just building the CCRC there will be no need to encroach over the 150 foot height line established in the LUCE document. 3. Traffic This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development, including the cumulative impacts of the traffic from San Luis Ranch and the traffic from the Avila Ranch development. They also deserve an authentic appraisal of parking for the Froom Ranch development. 24882 Traffic flow from the existing proposed business development should also be part of that same study. If John Madonna wants to include commercial development in the Froom Ranch development, that increased traffic also needs to be factored in. 4. Prado Road. As I wrote previously, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it a four-lane truck highway as it appears on the adopted LUCE plan. Prado Road was indeed part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for immense and dense developments. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place. Since the developers are to date solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - their “fair share” - this overpass or interchange, will substantially impact the cost of the projects being proposed. City staff continues to entertain and even approve development without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable. This is unconscionable. A transparent, public discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the Prado Road interchange and/or overpass with both the Planning Commission and City Council present as soon as possible. Real financial figures and real measurements should be included at that meeting. I have personally been on the course of the planned Prado Road with an old- fashioned tape measure and elected officials, and made the point very clear that at certain points along the route - Prado Road - as a “four lane truck highway” simply does not fit. 24883 After a public meeting City staff and elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The developer of San Luis Ranch has already received approval to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road. This was not what was guaranteed in the LUCE and in public meetings. The San Luis Ranch developer’s representative has publicly quipped, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built?” For those of us that care about “smart growth” and keeping one’s word, that statement is not comforting. The construction of Prado Road cannot be an afterthought. According to CEQA, when “a larger project is identified” - as in Prado Road from Madonna Road to Broad Street that has been on the City Master Plan since 1960- it needs to have a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and be evaluated on the merits of that study. Currently, city staff is allowing Prado Road to be “illegally segmented” or “piecemealed” which is in violation of CEQA. As was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting on San Luis Ranch, what happens when people transit in cars over Highway 101 eastbound towards Broad Street. The “four-lane truck highway” - Prado Road - will then cross South Higuera...and then what? Will traffic be funneled to two lanes through Serra Meadows? Turn North or South onto South Higuera? We deserve to have these answers now. 5. Affordable housing and Workforce Housing Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know where the workers for this CCRC will be living. Will they be making a “living wage?” Most employees in these types of developments are making $12-$18 per hour. There are only a handful of highly-paid 24884 doctors and therapists that will be employed. Let’s analyze this ratio ahead of time and discuss where the housing exists for these modestly paid workers. 6. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the proposed homes and apartments, who is to say that the residential units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 7. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people and the vehicular traffic. Currently that area has a rural atmosphere. 8. Trees and animal protection Having viewed the preliminary plan, my attention is also on the fact that construction is on environmentally sensitive areas. It is my hope that any development will be below the 150- foot line to preserve the view as established in the LUCE. Even with that, it is my hope that any development will include as many trees and preservation of the public viewshed of the foothills. 9. Access to existing commercial development and recreation Since this is a scoping meeting, I would also like to see access to walking and biking trails be apparent. I would also like to see access to public transportation for these seniors and future residents. Access to the Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the preliminary plan, I would also like to see as many Class 1 bike paths in the development to ensure the safety of residents and workers. 10.Public Input As I mentioned at the LUCE meetings, it would serve the developer well to send a notice to the neighborhoods that will be impacted and receive public feedback on the 24885 development. 11. Agricultural Land I wish that John Madonna could use a good portion of this land for grazing or crops. I mourn the demise of local agricultural land in the name of infill. I believe that it is myopic for the sake of the next generation. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 24886 From:Johnson, Derek To:Pease, Andy Cc:Lichtig, Katie; Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 9:53:00 AM Hi Andy, I am happy to meet and discuss the plan ahead and the strategy around Prado Overpass funding. I am copying Shannon so that she can set something up for us to discuss. Just to give you some background to chew on is that it is going to take a combination of impact fees, grants, tax sharing, and CFD revenues to make this heavy lift. We can talk more in detail about the path forward. Thank you! Derek From: Pease, Andy Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 8:55 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Cc: Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Derek – Regarding traffic: I would like to have a better understanding of the Prado Rd. overpass/interchange issue. Specifically, is the interchange ‘viable’? And if it turns out not to be, how does that change the assumed traffic impacts for our three big development projects? I’d be happy to have a meeting, or if there is a good summary you can point me to, that is fine too. Thanks! Andy From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre [mailto:milavu@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:26 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Cc: Harmon, Heidi <hharmon@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org>; Rivoire, Dan <DRivoire@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns To: Planning Commission - City of San Luis Obispo Cc: San Luis Obispo City Council Members Katie Lichtig - City Manager 24887 Re: Froom Ranch Development From: Mila Vujovich-La Barre Date: July 26, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ Dear Planning Commission Members - Thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions about the Froom Ranch Development. Many of my concerns were expressed during the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) meetings a few years ago and at some recent meetings, due to the rush of development in the southern part of our city. I wanted to express my concerns for your consideration and the public record. From the publicity, it is my understanding that “John Madonna plans to transform 111- acres in San Luis Obispo into a $500 million mixed-use project that caters to the city’s aging population. The proposed Froom Ranch project includes a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, 150,000- 350,000 square feet of commercial retailers for its residents, 200 apartments and around 60-100 single-family detached units.” This particular developer has long and honorable ties to our community. It is my hope that he will realistically adjust his development plans after this scoping meeting. A development of this magnitude will drastically alter the traffic and the visual attractiveness of this part of town. As you all know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background or personal financial interest in development. However, the LUCE document - which has become the blueprint for future development - did not take into consideration many realities. The minority report from the LUCE highlights this and the fact that the LUCE process did not provide for substantial public input. 24888 My concerns about the Froom Ranch Development are primarily the following: 1.Water. Where is the water for this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months and I do not see water levels increasing at the sources of our water for a development of this magnitude. John Madonna has stated that, “The project would use some existing wells on the property and draw from the city’s reservoirs to satisfy its water needs.” 2. Design The continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, will be an asset. However, the proposed 200 apartments and 60-100 single- family detached units and commercial space are not necessary. By changing this configuration, and just building the CCRC there will be no need to encroach over the 150 foot height line established in the LUCE document. 3. Traffic This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development, including the cumulative impacts of the traffic from San Luis Ranch and the traffic from the Avila Ranch development. They also deserve an authentic appraisal of parking for the Froom Ranch development. Traffic flow from the existing proposed business development should also be part of that same study. If John Madonna wants to include commercial development in the Froom Ranch development, that increased traffic also needs to be factored in. 4. Prado Road. As I wrote previously, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years 24889 now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it a four-lane truck highway as it appears on the adopted LUCE plan. Prado Road was indeed part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for immense and dense developments. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place. Since the developers are to date solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - their “fair share” - this overpass or interchange, will substantially impact the cost of the projects being proposed. City staff continues to entertain and even approve development without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable. This is unconscionable. A transparent, public discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the Prado Road interchange and/or overpass with both the Planning Commission and City Council present as soon as possible. Real financial figures and real measurements should be included at that meeting. I have personally been on the course of the planned Prado Road with an old- fashioned tape measure and elected officials, and made the point very clear that at certain points along the route - Prado Road - as a “four lane truck highway” simply does not fit. After a public meeting City staff and elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The developer of San Luis Ranch has already received approval to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road. This was not what was guaranteed in 24890 the LUCE and in public meetings. The San Luis Ranch developer’s representative has publicly quipped, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built?” For those of us that care about “smart growth” and keeping one’s word, that statement is not comforting. The construction of Prado Road cannot be an afterthought. According to CEQA, when “a larger project is identified” - as in Prado Road from Madonna Road to Broad Street that has been on the City Master Plan since 1960- it needs to have a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and be evaluated on the merits of that study. Currently, city staff is allowing Prado Road to be “illegally segmented” or “piecemealed” which is in violation of CEQA. As was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting on San Luis Ranch, what happens when people transit in cars over Highway 101 eastbound towards Broad Street. The “four-lane truck highway” - Prado Road - will then cross South Higuera...and then what? Will traffic be funneled to two lanes through Serra Meadows? Turn North or South onto South Higuera? We deserve to have these answers now. 5. Affordable housing and Workforce Housing Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know where the workers for this CCRC will be living. Will they be making a “living wage?” Most employees in these types of developments are making $12-$18 per hour. There are only a handful of highly-paid doctors and therapists that will be employed. Let’s analyze this ratio ahead of time and discuss where the housing exists for these modestly paid workers. 6. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the proposed homes and apartments, who is to say that the residential units will not be turned into a mass of student 24891 rentals. 7. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people and the vehicular traffic. Currently that area has a rural atmosphere. 8. Trees and animal protection Having viewed the preliminary plan, my attention is also on the fact that construction is on environmentally sensitive areas. It is my hope that any development will be below the 150- foot line to preserve the view as established in the LUCE. Even with that, it is my hope that any development will include as many trees and preservation of the public viewshed of the foothills. 9. Access to existing commercial development and recreation Since this is a scoping meeting, I would also like to see access to walking and biking trails be apparent. I would also like to see access to public transportation for these seniors and future residents. Access to the Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the preliminary plan, I would also like to see as many Class 1 bike paths in the development to ensure the safety of residents and workers. 10.Public Input As I mentioned at the LUCE meetings, it would serve the developer well to send a notice to the neighborhoods that will be impacted and receive public feedback on the development. 11. Agricultural Land I wish that John Madonna could use a good portion of this land for grazing or crops. I mourn the demise of local agricultural land in the name of infill. I believe that it is myopic for the sake of the next generation. 24892 In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 24893 From:Pease, Andy To:Johnson, Derek Cc:Lichtig, Katie Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 8:54:38 AM Derek – Regarding traffic: I would like to have a better understanding of the Prado Rd. overpass/interchange issue. Specifically, is the interchange ‘viable’? And if it turns out not to be, how does that change the assumed traffic impacts for our three big development projects? I’d be happy to have a meeting, or if there is a good summary you can point me to, that is fine too. Thanks! Andy From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre [mailto:milavu@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:26 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Cc: Harmon, Heidi <hharmon@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org>; Rivoire, Dan <DRivoire@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns To: Planning Commission - City of San Luis Obispo Cc: San Luis Obispo City Council Members Katie Lichtig - City Manager Re: Froom Ranch Development From: Mila Vujovich-La Barre Date: July 26, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ Dear Planning Commission Members - Thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions about the Froom Ranch Development. Many of my concerns were expressed during the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) meetings a few years ago and at some recent meetings, due to the rush of development in the southern part of our city. 24894 I wanted to express my concerns for your consideration and the public record. From the publicity, it is my understanding that “John Madonna plans to transform 111- acres in San Luis Obispo into a $500 million mixed-use project that caters to the city’s aging population. The proposed Froom Ranch project includes a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, 150,000- 350,000 square feet of commercial retailers for its residents, 200 apartments and around 60-100 single-family detached units.” This particular developer has long and honorable ties to our community. It is my hope that he will realistically adjust his development plans after this scoping meeting. A development of this magnitude will drastically alter the traffic and the visual attractiveness of this part of town. As you all know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background or personal financial interest in development. However, the LUCE document - which has become the blueprint for future development - did not take into consideration many realities. The minority report from the LUCE highlights this and the fact that the LUCE process did not provide for substantial public input. My concerns about the Froom Ranch Development are primarily the following: 1.Water. Where is the water for this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months and I do not see water levels increasing at the sources of our water for a development of this magnitude. John Madonna has stated that, “The project would use some existing wells on the property and draw from the city’s reservoirs to satisfy its water needs.” 2. Design The continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, will be an asset. However, the proposed 200 apartments and 60-100 single- 24895 family detached units and commercial space are not necessary. By changing this configuration, and just building the CCRC there will be no need to encroach over the 150 foot height line established in the LUCE document. 3. Traffic This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development, including the cumulative impacts of the traffic from San Luis Ranch and the traffic from the Avila Ranch development. They also deserve an authentic appraisal of parking for the Froom Ranch development. Traffic flow from the existing proposed business development should also be part of that same study. If John Madonna wants to include commercial development in the Froom Ranch development, that increased traffic also needs to be factored in. 4. Prado Road. As I wrote previously, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it a four-lane truck highway as it appears on the adopted LUCE plan. Prado Road was indeed part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for immense and dense developments. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place. Since the developers are to date solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - their “fair share” - this overpass or interchange, will substantially impact the cost of the projects being proposed. 24896 City staff continues to entertain and even approve development without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable. This is unconscionable. A transparent, public discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the Prado Road interchange and/or overpass with both the Planning Commission and City Council present as soon as possible. Real financial figures and real measurements should be included at that meeting. I have personally been on the course of the planned Prado Road with an old- fashioned tape measure and elected officials, and made the point very clear that at certain points along the route - Prado Road - as a “four lane truck highway” simply does not fit. After a public meeting City staff and elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The developer of San Luis Ranch has already received approval to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road. This was not what was guaranteed in the LUCE and in public meetings. The San Luis Ranch developer’s representative has publicly quipped, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built?” For those of us that care about “smart growth” and keeping one’s word, that statement is not comforting. The construction of Prado Road cannot be an afterthought. According to CEQA, when “a larger project is identified” - as in Prado Road from Madonna Road to Broad Street that has been on the City Master Plan since 1960- it needs to have a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and be evaluated on the merits of that study. Currently, city staff is allowing Prado Road to be “illegally segmented” or “piecemealed” which is in violation of CEQA. 24897 As was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting on San Luis Ranch, what happens when people transit in cars over Highway 101 eastbound towards Broad Street. The “four-lane truck highway” - Prado Road - will then cross South Higuera...and then what? Will traffic be funneled to two lanes through Serra Meadows? Turn North or South onto South Higuera? We deserve to have these answers now. 5. Affordable housing and Workforce Housing Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know where the workers for this CCRC will be living. Will they be making a “living wage?” Most employees in these types of developments are making $12-$18 per hour. There are only a handful of highly-paid doctors and therapists that will be employed. Let’s analyze this ratio ahead of time and discuss where the housing exists for these modestly paid workers. 6. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the proposed homes and apartments, who is to say that the residential units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 7. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people and the vehicular traffic. Currently that area has a rural atmosphere. 8. Trees and animal protection Having viewed the preliminary plan, my attention is also on the fact that construction is on environmentally sensitive areas. It is my hope that any development will be below the 150- foot line to preserve the view as established in the LUCE. Even with that, it is my hope that any development will include as many trees and preservation of the public viewshed of the foothills. 24898 9. Access to existing commercial development and recreation Since this is a scoping meeting, I would also like to see access to walking and biking trails be apparent. I would also like to see access to public transportation for these seniors and future residents. Access to the Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the preliminary plan, I would also like to see as many Class 1 bike paths in the development to ensure the safety of residents and workers. 10.Public Input As I mentioned at the LUCE meetings, it would serve the developer well to send a notice to the neighborhoods that will be impacted and receive public feedback on the development. 11. Agricultural Land I wish that John Madonna could use a good portion of this land for grazing or crops. I mourn the demise of local agricultural land in the name of infill. I believe that it is myopic for the sake of the next generation. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive 24899 San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 24900 From:Pease, Andy To:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 8:50:05 AM Mila – Thank you for this feedback! Andy Andy Pease Council Member Office of the City Council 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E apease@slocity.org slocity.org From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre [mailto:milavu@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:26 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Cc: Harmon, Heidi <hharmon@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org>; Rivoire, Dan <DRivoire@slocity.org>; Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns To: Planning Commission - City of San Luis Obispo Cc: San Luis Obispo City Council Members Katie Lichtig - City Manager Re: Froom Ranch Development From: Mila Vujovich-La Barre Date: July 26, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 24901 Dear Planning Commission Members - Thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions about the Froom Ranch Development. Many of my concerns were expressed during the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) meetings a few years ago and at some recent meetings, due to the rush of development in the southern part of our city. I wanted to express my concerns for your consideration and the public record. From the publicity, it is my understanding that “John Madonna plans to transform 111- acres in San Luis Obispo into a $500 million mixed-use project that caters to the city’s aging population. The proposed Froom Ranch project includes a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, 150,000- 350,000 square feet of commercial retailers for its residents, 200 apartments and around 60-100 single-family detached units.” This particular developer has long and honorable ties to our community. It is my hope that he will realistically adjust his development plans after this scoping meeting. A development of this magnitude will drastically alter the traffic and the visual attractiveness of this part of town. As you all know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background or personal financial interest in development. However, the LUCE document - which has become the blueprint for future development - did not take into consideration many realities. The minority report from the LUCE highlights this and the fact that the LUCE process did not provide for substantial public input. My concerns about the Froom Ranch Development are primarily the following: 1.Water. Where is the water for this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months and I do not see water levels increasing at the sources of our water for a development of this magnitude. John Madonna has stated that, “The project would use some existing wells on the property and draw from the city’s reservoirs to satisfy its water needs.” 24902 2. Design The continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, will be an asset. However, the proposed 200 apartments and 60-100 single- family detached units and commercial space are not necessary. By changing this configuration, and just building the CCRC there will be no need to encroach over the 150 foot height line established in the LUCE document. 3. Traffic This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development, including the cumulative impacts of the traffic from San Luis Ranch and the traffic from the Avila Ranch development. They also deserve an authentic appraisal of parking for the Froom Ranch development. Traffic flow from the existing proposed business development should also be part of that same study. If John Madonna wants to include commercial development in the Froom Ranch development, that increased traffic also needs to be factored in. 4. Prado Road. As I wrote previously, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it a four-lane truck highway as it appears on the adopted LUCE plan. Prado Road was indeed part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for immense and dense developments. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the 24903 LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place. Since the developers are to date solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - their “fair share” - this overpass or interchange, will substantially impact the cost of the projects being proposed. City staff continues to entertain and even approve development without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable. This is unconscionable. A transparent, public discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the Prado Road interchange and/or overpass with both the Planning Commission and City Council present as soon as possible. Real financial figures and real measurements should be included at that meeting. I have personally been on the course of the planned Prado Road with an old- fashioned tape measure and elected officials, and made the point very clear that at certain points along the route - Prado Road - as a “four lane truck highway” simply does not fit. After a public meeting City staff and elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The developer of San Luis Ranch has already received approval to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road. This was not what was guaranteed in the LUCE and in public meetings. The San Luis Ranch developer’s representative has publicly quipped, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built?” For those of us that care about “smart growth” and keeping one’s word, that statement is not comforting. The construction of Prado Road cannot be an afterthought. According to 24904 CEQA, when “a larger project is identified” - as in Prado Road from Madonna Road to Broad Street that has been on the City Master Plan since 1960- it needs to have a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and be evaluated on the merits of that study. Currently, city staff is allowing Prado Road to be “illegally segmented” or “piecemealed” which is in violation of CEQA. As was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting on San Luis Ranch, what happens when people transit in cars over Highway 101 eastbound towards Broad Street. The “four-lane truck highway” - Prado Road - will then cross South Higuera...and then what? Will traffic be funneled to two lanes through Serra Meadows? Turn North or South onto South Higuera? We deserve to have these answers now. 5. Affordable housing and Workforce Housing Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know where the workers for this CCRC will be living. Will they be making a “living wage?” Most employees in these types of developments are making $12-$18 per hour. There are only a handful of highly-paid doctors and therapists that will be employed. Let’s analyze this ratio ahead of time and discuss where the housing exists for these modestly paid workers. 6. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the proposed homes and apartments, who is to say that the residential units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 7. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people and the vehicular traffic. Currently that area has a rural atmosphere. 24905 8. Trees and animal protection Having viewed the preliminary plan, my attention is also on the fact that construction is on environmentally sensitive areas. It is my hope that any development will be below the 150- foot line to preserve the view as established in the LUCE. Even with that, it is my hope that any development will include as many trees and preservation of the public viewshed of the foothills. 9. Access to existing commercial development and recreation Since this is a scoping meeting, I would also like to see access to walking and biking trails be apparent. I would also like to see access to public transportation for these seniors and future residents. Access to the Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the preliminary plan, I would also like to see as many Class 1 bike paths in the development to ensure the safety of residents and workers. 10.Public Input As I mentioned at the LUCE meetings, it would serve the developer well to send a notice to the neighborhoods that will be impacted and receive public feedback on the development. 11. Agricultural Land I wish that John Madonna could use a good portion of this land for grazing or crops. I mourn the demise of local agricultural land in the name of infill. I believe that it is myopic for the sake of the next generation. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, 24906 Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 24907 From:Walters, Tim J. To:Scott, Shawna; Ricci, Pam A.; Montgomery, Victor Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Friday, July 28, 2017 7:49:46 AM I can make Monday at 3:30 Tim Walters Principal, Engineering 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 rrmdesign.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:13 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] 24908 Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24909 From:Lea Brooks To:Fukushima, Adam Subject:Re: Froom Ranch EIR scoping Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 9:22:17 PM Great news! Thanks. My understanding is that design/environmental/engineering work is under way by Cannon now for the Prefumo segment and that there is funding for construction from Measure G, Target mitigation and a contribution from Avila Ranch. I'm unclear if you're seeking a grant as well. Is there any funding earmarked for right of way, engineering/design and construction for the LOVR-Octagon Barn segment? Lea On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Lea, It was approved without being pulled. The next step is to work with the county on right of way. Where do you see that the City’s priority is the Prefumo segment? That’s news to me. From: Lea Brooks [mailto:leabrooks332@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:38 AM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch EIR scoping Hi Adam: How did it go at the Planning Commission? Assuming the conformity report was approved, what's the next step for LOVR to Higuera, acknowledging that the city's priority is the Prefumo segment from Oceanaire to Calle Joaquin? Thanks. 24910 Lea On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Lea Brooks <leabrooks332@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Adam: I listened to the Planning Commission meeting tonight and will put together a list of issues for your review so you can send it to the other BAC members for comment. The deadline for scoping comments is Aug. 14. I'll get something to you early next week, which hopefully will be enough time. I am not going to the County Planning Commission tomorrow for the Bob Jones Trail general plan conformity. Please let me know if the commission approves the consent calendar - hopefully without comment! Thanks. Lea 24911 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Ricci, Pam A.; Walters, Tim J. Subject:Re: Froom Emergency Access Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 7:31:55 PM Absolutely, Pam will get back to you re meeting date. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 27, 2017, at 4:39 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: > > Hi Victor, > > Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? > > Thank you, > Shawna > > -----Original Message----- > From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM > To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> > Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> > Subject: Froom Emergency Access > > Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. > > This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. > > Thank you. > > Sent from my iPhone > 24912 From:Emily Creel To:Chris Bersbach; Scott, Shawna Cc:Rob Mullane Subject:RE: Frrom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR RFP Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:32:47 PM Attachments:image002.png Sorry I missed your call, Chris. We will be posting an Addendum to the RFP with responses to all questions received on the City’s website on August 1. Feel free to call me back to discuss further if you’d like. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Chris Bersbach [mailto:cbersbach@rinconconsultants.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:38 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Rob Mullane <rmullane@rinconconsultants.com> Subject: Frrom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR RFP Emily and Shawna, Thanks for including Rincon on the RFP distribution for the Froom Ranch Way Specific Plan Project EIR. We’re working to prepare a proposal that responds to the RFP and fully addresses the environmental review requirements for the project, and I wanted to check in with you about a few questions that we have. · Is the project expected to be phased? If so, will there be any differential level of detail available for earlier/later phases of planned development? (For the San Luis Ranch project we had tract map level detail for the earlier residential phases, and more conceptual plan-level information for the later commercial phases.) · We’ll be retaining a subconsultant to assist with the visual simulations and aesthetic analysis, and our plan is to recommend that the applicant provide surveyed locations for our team to erect story poles on the site, which will allow us to prepare a visibility analysis evaluating views of the site from a variety of locations throughout the City. We would use the visibility analysis to recommend appropriate viewpoints for visual simulations to the City, and determine the precise number of simulations to be prepared in coordination with the City. However, our cost estimate will include a top-line estimate for the visual simulations, based on an initial estimate for how many we think are likely to be needed. Does this approach sound like it will work well for your team? · Our visual subconsultant has also asked whether specific architectural renderings will be available as assets that they can incorporate into their visual simulations. I’ll be out of the office tomorrow, but if you’re available early next week, I’d like to have the opportunity to discuss these questions with you, in addition to some minor questions about how the City would like the overall environmental process managed, including meetings and progress check-ins. If you’re available for a call, feel free to let me know a couple days and times that would be best, and I’ll make myself available. Thanks again; I hope you both have a good weekend! Chris Bersbach Technical Services Program Manager Rincon Consultants, Inc. 805 547 0900 EXT 124 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers 24913 Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE News 24914 From:Emily Creel To:Erika Powers; Scott, Shawna Cc:Lee Sherwood Subject:RE: Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:31:37 PM Thank you, Erika. We will be posting an Addendum to the RFP with responses to all questions received on the City’s website on August 1. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Erika Powers [mailto:epowers@reconenvironmental.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:35 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; sscott@slocity.org Cc: Lee Sherwood <lsherwood@reconenvironmental.com> Subject: Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Good Afternoon Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott- RECON Environmental, Inc. would like to submit the following questions for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project: 1. Have potential off-site improvements been identified for the Specific Plan? 2. In addition to the Specific Plan Conceptual Land Use Map prepared by RRM (Exhibit B.1), will there be a concept grading plan or a detailed site plan for both the proposed Specific Plan and the Alternative Specific Plan? 3. Should the consultant’s scope of work include a Conceptual Restoration Plan for the proposed creek re-alignment? 4. Will the applicant be providing a Phase 1 ESA? 5. Will the applicant be providing a Biological Resources Technical Report for the EIR? (The 2016 Biological Inventory by Kevin Merk does not address impacts and mitigation) 6. Will additional analyses be provided by the applicant’s consultant to address compliance with the City’s Drainage Design Manual as noted in the Initial Study (page 21)? 7. Will the applicant’s consultant be providing a water quality technical report? 8. Should the structural analysis of the historic structures and the three geology studies be peer-reviewed as part of the consultant’s scope of work? 9. Will the Specific Plan include of phasing plan for the anticipated future development? Thank you, Erika Powers, CPSM Marketing Supervisor RECON Environmental, Inc. 5951 Encina Road, Suite 104 | Goleta, CA 93117 24915 P (805) 928-7907 | Toll Free (877) 399-1927 www.reconenvironmental.com An Employee-Owned Company Follow us on Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter 24916 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A.; Montgomery, Victor Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:12:00 PM Hi Pam, I am out of the office Monday, but sent an invitation to Rodger for Monday July 31 at 3:30 pm. Emily will lead the meeting. I will confirm tomorrow if Rodger can meet on that day at that time. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access 24917 Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24918 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Emergency Access Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:53:00 PM -----Original Message----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. 24919 Sent from my iPhone 24920 From:Fukushima, Adam To:Lea Brooks Subject:RE: Froom Ranch EIR scoping Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:48:00 PM Hi Lea, It was approved without being pulled. The next step is to work with the county on right of way. Where do you see that the City’s priority is the Prefumo segment? That’s news to me. From: Lea Brooks [mailto:leabrooks332@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:38 AM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch EIR scoping Hi Adam: How did it go at the Planning Commission? Assuming the conformity report was approved, what's the next step for LOVR to Higuera, acknowledging that the city's priority is the Prefumo segment from Oceanaire to Calle Joaquin? Thanks. Lea On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Lea Brooks <leabrooks332@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Adam: I listened to the Planning Commission meeting tonight and will put together a list of issues for your review so you can send it to the other BAC members for comment. The deadline for scoping comments is Aug. 14. I'll get something to you early next week, which hopefully will be enough time. I am not going to the County Planning Commission tomorrow for the Bob Jones Trail general plan conformity. Please let me know if the commission approves the consent calendar - hopefully without comment! Thanks. Lea 24921 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Cc:Walters, Tim J. Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:47:47 PM Hi Shawna, Vic is out next week Tuesday through Friday. If you could do some scheduling magic and make it happen next Monday that would be ideal. If we must go to the following week, I think that we are fairly open. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Emergency Access Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24922 From:Chris Bersbach To:ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna Cc:Rob Mullane Subject:Frrom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR RFP Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:39:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Emily and Shawna, Thanks for including Rincon on the RFP distribution for the Froom Ranch Way Specific Plan Project EIR. We’re working to prepare a proposal that responds to the RFP and fully addresses the environmental review requirements for the project, and I wanted to check in with you about a few questions that we have. · Is the project expected to be phased? If so, will there be any differential level of detail available for earlier/later phases of planned development? (For the San Luis Ranch project we had tract map level detail for the earlier residential phases, and more conceptual plan-level information for the later commercial phases.) · We’ll be retaining a subconsultant to assist with the visual simulations and aesthetic analysis, and our plan is to recommend that the applicant provide surveyed locations for our team to erect story poles on the site, which will allow us to prepare a visibility analysis evaluating views of the site from a variety of locations throughout the City. We would use the visibility analysis to recommend appropriate viewpoints for visual simulations to the City, and determine the precise number of simulations to be prepared in coordination with the City. However, our cost estimate will include a top-line estimate for the visual simulations, based on an initial estimate for how many we think are likely to be needed. Does this approach sound like it will work well for your team? · Our visual subconsultant has also asked whether specific architectural renderings will be available as assets that they can incorporate into their visual simulations. I’ll be out of the office tomorrow, but if you’re available early next week, I’d like to have the opportunity to discuss these questions with you, in addition to some minor questions about how the City would like the overall environmental process managed, including meetings and progress check-ins. If you’re available for a call, feel free to let me know a couple days and times that would be best, and I’ll make myself available. Thanks again; I hope you both have a good weekend! Chris Bersbach Technical Services Program Manager Rincon Consultants, Inc. 805 547 0900 EXT 124 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE News 24923 From:Scott, Shawna To:Montgomery, Victor Cc:Ricci, Pam A.; Walters, Tim J. Subject:RE: Froom Emergency Access Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:38:00 PM Hi Victor, Sounds good. I can coordinate with Emily to set up a meeting. Can you or Pam let me know your team's availability next week and the following week? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24924 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; Maggio, Rodger Subject:FW: Froom Emergency Access Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:37:10 PM Hi Rodger, The RRM team would like a meeting to discuss emergency access. I'll check Outlook and send you an invite. Thanks, Shawna -----Original Message----- From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Emergency Access Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24925 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Ricci, Pam A.; Walters, Tim J. Subject:Froom Emergency Access Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:22:47 PM Shawna, we would like to attend meeting w/ Roger re emergency access. This is an important aspect of project feasibility & design + we may have info about practicality of various approaches to this issue. We can bring maps etc. plus may have some creative ideas. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone 24926 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: SCH# 2017071033 Froom Ranch SP Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 2:04:35 PM Thank you. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: SCH# 2017071033 Froom Ranch SP -----Original Message----- From: noreply@nahc.ca.gov [mailto:noreply@nahc.ca.gov] On Behalf Of noreply@ Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:26 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: SCH# 2017071033 Froom Ranch SP Reply to: noreply@nahc.ca.gov <noreply@nahc.ca.gov> Device Name: Not Set Device Model: MX-4141N Location: Not Set File Format: PDF (Medium) Resolution: 200dpi x 200dpi Attached file is scanned image in PDF format. Use Acrobat(R)Reader(R) or Adobe(R)Reader(R) of Adobe Systems Incorporated to view the document. Adobe(R)Reader(R) can be downloaded from the following URL: Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat, the Adobe PDF logo, and Reader are registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and other countries. http://www.adobe.com/ 24927 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 2:02:18 PM Yes, I can do that. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:39 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Hi Emily, Can you please draft responses to these questions, in a Word document, for posting to the website on August 1 (I will post to the website), per the schedule: Consultant questions regarding RFP......... July 27, 2017 City Answers to Questions...................... August 1, 2017 Thank you, Shawna From: Erika Powers [mailto:epowers@reconenvironmental.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:35 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Lee Sherwood <lsherwood@reconenvironmental.com> Subject: Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Good Afternoon Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott- RECON Environmental, Inc. would like to submit the following questions for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project: 1. Have potential off-site improvements been identified for the Specific Plan? 2. In addition to the Specific Plan Conceptual Land Use Map prepared by RRM (Exhibit B.1), will there be a concept grading plan or a detailed site plan for both the proposed Specific Plan and the Alternative Specific Plan? 3. Should the consultant’s scope of work include a Conceptual Restoration Plan for the proposed creek re-alignment? 24928 4. Will the applicant be providing a Phase 1 ESA? 5. Will the applicant be providing a Biological Resources Technical Report for the EIR? (The 2016 Biological Inventory by Kevin Merk does not address impacts and mitigation) 6. Will additional analyses be provided by the applicant’s consultant to address compliance with the City’s Drainage Design Manual as noted in the Initial Study (page 21)? 7. Will the applicant’s consultant be providing a water quality technical report? 8. Should the structural analysis of the historic structures and the three geology studies be peer-reviewed as part of the consultant’s scope of work? 9. Will the Specific Plan include of phasing plan for the anticipated future development? Thank you, Erika Powers, CPSM Marketing Supervisor RECON Environmental, Inc. 5951 Encina Road, Suite 104 | Goleta, CA 93117 P (805) 928-7907 | Toll Free (877) 399-1927 www.reconenvironmental.com An Employee-Owned Company Follow us on Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter 24929 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: SCH# 2017071033 Froom Ranch SP Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:39:00 PM Attachments:noreply@nahc.ca.gov_20170727_112551.pdf -----Original Message----- From: noreply@nahc.ca.gov [mailto:noreply@nahc.ca.gov] On Behalf Of noreply@ Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:26 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: SCH# 2017071033 Froom Ranch SP Reply to: noreply@nahc.ca.gov <noreply@nahc.ca.gov> Device Name: Not Set Device Model: MX-4141N Location: Not Set File Format: PDF (Medium) Resolution: 200dpi x 200dpi Attached file is scanned image in PDF format. Use Acrobat(R)Reader(R) or Adobe(R)Reader(R) of Adobe Systems Incorporated to view the document. Adobe(R)Reader(R) can be downloaded from the following URL: Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat, the Adobe PDF logo, and Reader are registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and other countries. http://www.adobe.com/ 24930 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:39:00 PM Hi Emily, Can you please draft responses to these questions, in a Word document, for posting to the website on August 1 (I will post to the website), per the schedule: Consultant questions regarding RFP......... July 27, 2017 City Answers to Questions...................... August 1, 2017 Thank you, Shawna From: Erika Powers [mailto:epowers@reconenvironmental.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:35 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Lee Sherwood <lsherwood@reconenvironmental.com> Subject: Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Good Afternoon Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott- RECON Environmental, Inc. would like to submit the following questions for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project: 1. Have potential off-site improvements been identified for the Specific Plan? 2. In addition to the Specific Plan Conceptual Land Use Map prepared by RRM (Exhibit B.1), will there be a concept grading plan or a detailed site plan for both the proposed Specific Plan and the Alternative Specific Plan? 3. Should the consultant’s scope of work include a Conceptual Restoration Plan for the proposed creek re-alignment? 4. Will the applicant be providing a Phase 1 ESA? 5. Will the applicant be providing a Biological Resources Technical Report for the EIR? (The 2016 Biological Inventory by Kevin Merk does not address impacts and mitigation) 6. Will additional analyses be provided by the applicant’s consultant to address compliance with the City’s Drainage Design Manual as noted in the Initial Study (page 21)? 7. Will the applicant’s consultant be providing a water quality technical report? 8. Should the structural analysis of the historic structures and the three geology studies be peer-reviewed as part of the consultant’s scope of work? 9. Will the Specific Plan include of phasing plan for the anticipated future development? Thank you, Erika Powers, CPSM Marketing Supervisor RECON Environmental, Inc. 5951 Encina Road, Suite 104 | Goleta, CA 93117 P (805) 928-7907 | Toll Free (877) 399-1927 24931 www.reconenvironmental.com An Employee-Owned Company Follow us on Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter 24932 From:Erika Powers To:ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna Cc:Lee Sherwood Subject:Questinos for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Specification No. 0143-2017 Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:34:51 PM Good Afternoon Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott- RECON Environmental, Inc. would like to submit the following questions for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project: 1. Have potential off-site improvements been identified for the Specific Plan? 2. In addition to the Specific Plan Conceptual Land Use Map prepared by RRM (Exhibit B.1), will there be a concept grading plan or a detailed site plan for both the proposed Specific Plan and the Alternative Specific Plan? 3. Should the consultant’s scope of work include a Conceptual Restoration Plan for the proposed creek re-alignment? 4. Will the applicant be providing a Phase 1 ESA? 5. Will the applicant be providing a Biological Resources Technical Report for the EIR? (The 2016 Biological Inventory by Kevin Merk does not address impacts and mitigation) 6. Will additional analyses be provided by the applicant’s consultant to address compliance with the City’s Drainage Design Manual as noted in the Initial Study (page 21)? 7. Will the applicant’s consultant be providing a water quality technical report? 8. Should the structural analysis of the historic structures and the three geology studies be peer-reviewed as part of the consultant’s scope of work? 9. Will the Specific Plan include of phasing plan for the anticipated future development? Thank you, Erika Powers, CPSM Marketing Supervisor RECON Environmental, Inc. 5951 Encina Road, Suite 104 | Goleta, CA 93117 P (805) 928-7907 | Toll Free (877) 399-1927 www.reconenvironmental.com An Employee-Owned Company Follow us on Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter 24933 From:noreply@nahc.ca.gov on behalf of noreply@ To:Scott, Shawna Subject:SCH# 2017071033 Froom Ranch SP Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:21:19 PM Attachments:noreply@nahc.ca.gov_20170727_112551.pdf Reply to: noreply@nahc.ca.gov <noreply@nahc.ca.gov> Device Name: Not Set Device Model: MX-4141N Location: Not Set File Format: PDF (Medium) Resolution: 200dpi x 200dpi Attached file is scanned image in PDF format. Use Acrobat(R)Reader(R) or Adobe(R)Reader(R) of Adobe Systems Incorporated to view the document. Adobe(R)Reader(R) can be downloaded from the following URL: Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat, the Adobe PDF logo, and Reader are registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and other countries. http://www.adobe.com/ 24934 From:Lea Brooks To:Fukushima, Adam Subject:Re: Froom Ranch EIR scoping Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:37:43 AM Hi Adam: How did it go at the Planning Commission? Assuming the conformity report was approved, what's the next step for LOVR to Higuera, acknowledging that the city's priority is the Prefumo segment from Oceanaire to Calle Joaquin? Thanks. Lea On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Lea Brooks <leabrooks332@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Adam: I listened to the Planning Commission meeting tonight and will put together a list of issues for your review so you can send it to the other BAC members for comment. The deadline for scoping comments is Aug. 14. I'll get something to you early next week, which hopefully will be enough time. I am not going to the County Planning Commission tomorrow for the Bob Jones Trail general plan conformity. Please let me know if the commission approves the consent calendar - hopefully without comment! Thanks. Lea 24935 From:Bergman, Katelin To:Davidson, Doug Cc:Codron, Michael; Corey, Tyler Bcc:Charles Stevenson; Hemalata Dandekar; John Fowler; Kim Bisheff; Nicholas Osterbur (nick.osterbur_slocitypc@yahoo.com); Ronald Malak; Scott Mann Subject:RE: Planning Commission General Correspondence Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:36:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff: Linked below is Planning Commission Correspondence on the Froom Ranch project, received post-meeting for PC 07-26-2017: Comment Received 07-27-2017 - Froom Ranch ‎(post-meeting)‎ ‎(Smith)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/doc/67022/Page1.aspx BCC: Planning Commissioners Best, Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 10:06 AM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Planning Commission General Correspondence Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff: Linked below is Planning Commission General Correspondence: Comment Received 07-26-2017 - Avila Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(HEAL SLO)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/1,1,1,1,1,1/doc/66967/Page1.aspx BCC: Planning Commissioners Best, 24936 Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 9:41 AM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Planning Commission General Correspondence Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff: Linked below is Planning Commission General Correspondence: Comment Received 07-24-2017 - Avila Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(McKenzie)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/1,1,1,1,1,1/doc/66929/Page1.aspx BCC: Planning Commissioners Best, Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:02 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> 24937 Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Planning Commission General Correspondence Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff: Linked below is Planning Commission General Correspondence: Comment Received 07-20-2017 - San Luis Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(Zehnder)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/1,1,1,1,1/doc/66895/Page1.aspx BCC: Planning Commissioners Best, Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:29 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Planning Commission General Correspondence Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff: Linked below is Planning Commission General Correspondence: Comment Received 07-17-2017 - Avila Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(Geil)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/doc/66818/Page1.aspx Comment Received 07-17-2017 - Avila Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(Kissinger)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/doc/66819/Page1.aspx BCC: Planning Commissioners Best, 24938 Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 12:43 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Planning Commission General Correspondence Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff: Linked below is Planning Commission General Correspondence: Comment Received 07-17-2017 - Avila Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(Galliani)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/doc/66815/Page1.aspx Comment Received 07-17-2017 - Avila Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(Serpa)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/doc/66816/Page1.aspx BCC: Planning Commissioners Best, Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org 24939 From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 4:02 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission General Correspondence Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff: Linked below is Planning Commission General Correspondence: Annexation into the City ‎(Wimer)‎ - received 07-13-2017: http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/1/doc/66736/Page1.aspx Comment Received 07-12-2017 - Avila Ranch ‎(General)‎ ‎(Geil)‎: http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/1/doc/66735/Page1.aspx BCC: Planning Commissioners Best, Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org 24940 From:Timothy Cleath To:Barcenas, Miguel Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Wells Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 8:19:15 AM Attachments:image001.png Miguel Friday afternoon is available, I have a meeting in the morning. Tim On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 5:08 PM, "Barcenas, Miguel" <MBarcenas@slocity.org> wrote: Tim are you available sometime next Friday 8-4-17 to do the job walk of that southwest groundwater basin? Miguel Barcenas, P.E. Utilities Engineer Public Utilities 879 Morro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2710 E MBarcenas@slocity.org T 805.781.7507 slocity.org 24941 From:Dropbox To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Emily made changes in your shared folders Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 7:38:45 AM HERE’S WHAT HAPPENED IN YOUR SHARED FOLDERS LAST WEEK Emily Creel Froom Ranch_NOP Scoping_PC_working.pptx Added by Emily Wednesday 7/26/2017 Good things happen when your stuff lives here Files in shared folders are automatically updated whenever anyone makes a change. Learn more. Don’t want these weekly digests? Unsubscribe. © 2017 Dropbox, PO Box 77767, San Francisco, CA 94107 24942 From:Furukawa, Dean To:Barcenas, Miguel; Timothy Cleath Cc:Floyd, Aaron Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Wells Date:Thursday, July 27, 2017 6:17:44 AM Attachments:image001.png Miguel and Tim, Although I am not critical for this site walk and am off that day, I am available in the first half of the morning if it works for you guys. I will need to leave that site by 10 for my next appointment though. Dean From: Barcenas, Miguel Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 5:08 PM To: Timothy Cleath <timothycleath@sbcglobal.net> Cc: Furukawa, Dean <dfurukawa@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Wells Tim are you available sometime next Friday 8-4-17 to do the job walk of that southwest groundwater basin? Miguel Barcenas, P.E. Utilities Engineer Public Utilities 879 Morro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2710 E MBarcenas@slocity.org T 805.781.7507 slocity.org 24943 From:Lea Brooks To:Fukushima, Adam Subject:Froom Ranch EIR scoping Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 7:37:09 PM Hi Adam: I listened to the Planning Commission meeting tonight and will put together a list of issues for your review so you can send it to the other BAC members for comment. The deadline for scoping comments is Aug. 14. I'll get something to you early next week, which hopefully will be enough time. I am not going to the County Planning Commission tomorrow for the Bob Jones Trail general plan conformity. Please let me know if the commission approves the consent calendar - hopefully without comment! Thanks. Lea 24944 From:Barcenas, Miguel To:Timothy Cleath Cc:Furukawa, Dean; Floyd, Aaron Subject:Froom Ranch Wells Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 5:08:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Tim are you available sometime next Friday 8-4-17 to do the job walk of that southwest groundwater basin? Miguel Barcenas, P.E. Utilities Engineer Public Utilities 879 Morro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2710 E MBarcenas@slocity.org T 805.781.7507 slocity.org   24945 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom scoping meeting Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:49:44 PM Attachments:image002.png Thanks.   PAM RICCI     From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org]  Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:48 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom scoping meeting   Hi Pam, We are scheduled for 2:30 tomorrow, conference room 1. I am confirming if Jake or Luke can attend, as well. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com]  Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:41 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom scoping meeting   Thanks; see you tonight.   Let me know when we have a confirmed meeting time and place to discuss the alternative site plan tomorrow afternoon (at 2:00?).   PAM RICCI     From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com]  Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:31 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom scoping meeting   I received both of your messages and it sounds like we are all on the same page.   Shawna – I am making the final revisions we discussed and will send the final presentation to you in 24946 an hour or so. I will also bring a backup flash drive with me tonight.   See you both soon.   Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367       Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com   24947 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A.; Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom scoping meeting Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:48:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Pam, We are scheduled for 2:30 tomorrow, conference room 1. I am confirming if Jake or Luke can attend, as well. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:41 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom scoping meeting Thanks; see you tonight. Let me know when we have a confirmed meeting time and place to discuss the alternative site plan tomorrow afternoon (at 2:00?). PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:31 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom scoping meeting I received both of your messages and it sounds like we are all on the same page. Shawna – I am making the final revisions we discussed and will send the final presentation to you in an hour or so. I will also bring a backup flash drive with me tonight. See you both soon. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 24948 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24949 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom scoping meeting Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:41:13 PM Attachments:image003.png Thanks; see you tonight. Let me know when we have a confirmed meeting time and place to discuss the alternative site plan tomorrow afternoon (at 2:00?). PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:31 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom scoping meeting I received both of your messages and it sounds like we are all on the same page. Shawna – I am making the final revisions we discussed and will send the final presentation to you in an hour or so. I will also bring a backup flash drive with me tonight. See you both soon. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24950 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna; Ricci, Pam A. Subject:Froom scoping meeting Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:31:16 PM Attachments:image001.png I received both of your messages and it sounds like we are all on the same page. Shawna – I am making the final revisions we discussed and will send the final presentation to you in an hour or so. I will also bring a backup flash drive with me tonight. See you both soon. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24951 From:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre To:Advisory Bodies; E-mail Council Website; Lichtig, Katie Cc:Harmon, Heidi; Pease, Andy; Gomez, Aaron; Rivoire, Dan; Christianson, Carlyn Subject:Froom Ranch Scoping Meeting Concerns Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:26:27 PM To: Planning Commission - City of San Luis Obispo Cc: San Luis Obispo City Council Members Katie Lichtig - City Manager Re: Froom Ranch Development From: Mila Vujovich-La Barre Date: July 26, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ Dear Planning Commission Members - Thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions about the Froom Ranch Development. Many of my concerns were expressed during the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) meetings a few years ago and at some recent meetings, due to the rush of development in the southern part of our city. I wanted to express my concerns for your consideration and the public record. From the publicity, it is my understanding that “John Madonna plans to transform 111- acres in San Luis Obispo into a $500 million mixed-use project that caters to the city’s aging population. The proposed Froom Ranch project includes a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, 150,000- 350,000 square feet of commercial retailers for its residents, 200 apartments and around 60-100 single-family detached units.” This particular developer has long and honorable ties to our community. It is my hope that he will realistically adjust his development plans after this scoping meeting. A development of this magnitude will drastically alter the traffic and the visual attractiveness of this part of town. As you all know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background or personal financial interest in development. However, the LUCE document - which has become the blueprint for future development - did not take into consideration many realities. The minority report from the LUCE highlights this and the fact that the LUCE process did not provide for substantial public input. My concerns about the Froom Ranch Development are primarily the following: 24952 1.Water. Where is the water for this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months and I do not see water levels increasing at the sources of our water for a development of this magnitude. John Madonna has stated that, “The project would use some existing wells on the property and draw from the city’s reservoirs to satisfy its water needs.” 2. Design The continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that offers 350 residential units for seniors, will be an asset. However, the proposed 200 apartments and 60-100 single- family detached units and commercial space are not necessary. By changing this configuration, and just building the CCRC there will be no need to encroach over the 150 foot height line established in the LUCE document. 3. Traffic This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development, including the cumulative impacts of the traffic from San Luis Ranch and the traffic from the Avila Ranch development. They also deserve an authentic appraisal of parking for the Froom Ranch development. Traffic flow from the existing proposed business development should also be part of that same study. If John Madonna wants to include commercial development in the Froom Ranch development, that increased traffic also needs to be factored in. 4. Prado Road. As I wrote previously, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it a four-lane truck highway as it appears on the adopted LUCE plan. Prado Road was indeed part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for immense and dense developments. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the 24953 LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place. Since the developers are to date solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - their “fair share” - this overpass or interchange, will substantially impact the cost of the projects being proposed. City staff continues to entertain and even approve development without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable. This is unconscionable. A transparent, public discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the Prado Road interchange and/or overpass with both the Planning Commission and City Council present as soon as possible. Real financial figures and real measurements should be included at that meeting. I have personally been on the course of the planned Prado Road with an old- fashioned tape measure and elected officials, and made the point very clear that at certain points along the route - Prado Road - as a “four lane truck highway” simply does not fit. After a public meeting City staff and elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The developer of San Luis Ranch has already received approval to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road. This was not what was guaranteed in the LUCE and in public meetings. The San Luis Ranch developer’s representative has publicly quipped, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built?” For those of us that care about “smart growth” and keeping one’s word, that statement is not comforting. The construction of Prado Road cannot be an afterthought. According to CEQA, when “a larger project is identified” - as in Prado Road from Madonna Road to Broad Street that has been on the City Master Plan since 1960- it needs to have a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and be evaluated on the merits of that study. Currently, city staff is allowing Prado Road to be “illegally segmented” or “piecemealed” which is in violation of CEQA. As was mentioned in the previous Planning Commission meeting on San Luis Ranch, 24954 what happens when people transit in cars over Highway 101 eastbound towards Broad Street. The “four-lane truck highway” - Prado Road - will then cross South Higuera...and then what? Will traffic be funneled to two lanes through Serra Meadows? Turn North or South onto South Higuera? We deserve to have these answers now. 5. Affordable housing and Workforce Housing Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know where the workers for this CCRC will be living. Will they be making a “living wage?” Most employees in these types of developments are making $12-$18 per hour. There are only a handful of highly-paid doctors and therapists that will be employed. Let’s analyze this ratio ahead of time and discuss where the housing exists for these modestly paid workers. 6. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the proposed homes and apartments, who is to say that the residential units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 7. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people and the vehicular traffic. Currently that area has a rural atmosphere. 8. Trees and animal protection Having viewed the preliminary plan, my attention is also on the fact that construction is on environmentally sensitive areas. It is my hope that any development will be below the 150- foot line to preserve the view as established in the LUCE. Even with that, it is my hope that any development will include as many trees and preservation of the public viewshed of the foothills. 9. Access to existing commercial development and recreation Since this is a scoping meeting, I would also like to see access to walking and biking trails be apparent. I would also like to see access to public transportation for these seniors and future residents. Access to the Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the preliminary plan, I would also like to see as many Class 1 bike 24955 paths in the development to ensure the safety of residents and workers. 10.Public Input As I mentioned at the LUCE meetings, it would serve the developer well to send a notice to the neighborhoods that will be impacted and receive public feedback on the development. 11. Agricultural Land I wish that John Madonna could use a good portion of this land for grazing or crops. I mourn the demise of local agricultural land in the name of infill. I believe that it is myopic for the sake of the next generation. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 24956 From:Friedman, Harrison To:Hill, Robert Cc:Christina M Castellon Subject:Froom ranch development Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:17:28 PM Hi Bob- Just got a letter from the city of SLO for comments on development at Froom Ranch off of los osos valley road and the 101. I can't think of any BLM concerns... but anything that we should be aware of? Otherwise... was wondering if you were able to ultimately acquire that Waddell ranch? Saw connector trail through that area on a map recently, had wondered if project was successful! All the best, Harrison Friedman Outdoor Recreation Planner Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield Field Office 3801 Pegasus Drive Bakersfield, CA 93308 661-391-6186 (o) 661-440-1866 (c) 24957 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Scott, Shawna Cc:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:04:45 AM Attachments:image002.png I am only available after 1. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 10:34 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Emily and Shawna, Would it be possible to get a meeting together tomorrow afternoon, before 4:00 p.m. preferably, to disucss the alternative site plan as well as the potential bike path connection? We would like to discuss the plan with staff before finalizing our submittal. Let me know. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 5:29 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam – One thing I would like to follow up with you on is the bike path extension through to Calle Joaquin. The City considers this an ideal connection and, as you know, has requested that it be included in the Specific Plan. I met with Bob Hill, Jake Hudson, and Luke Schwartz, and everyone agreed that an extension through the existing wetland area could be challenging. However, the consensus was that we would at least like to see it analyzed in the EIR to get a better understanding of the potential impacts and/or benefits. 24958 Please let me know if you’d like to meet to discuss this further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24959 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel; Scott, Shawna Cc:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 10:33:42 AM Attachments:image003.png Hi Emily and Shawna, Would it be possible to get a meeting together tomorrow afternoon, before 4:00 p.m. preferably, to disucss the alternative site plan as well as the potential bike path connection? We would like to discuss the plan with staff before finalizing our submittal. Let me know. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 5:29 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam – One thing I would like to follow up with you on is the bike path extension through to Calle Joaquin. The City considers this an ideal connection and, as you know, has requested that it be included in the Specific Plan. I met with Bob Hill, Jake Hudson, and Luke Schwartz, and everyone agreed that an extension through the existing wetland area could be challenging. However, the consensus was that we would at least like to see it analyzed in the EIR to get a better understanding of the potential impacts and/or benefits. Please let me know if you’d like to meet to discuss this further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> 24960 Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24961 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom - presentation ETA Date:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 10:09:12 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shawna – we are waiting on one more graphic from Kevin to drop into the PowerPoint (the 150- foot elevation over the Site Plan for the GPA slide). He is out this morning so I anticipate getting the presentation finished and over to you mid-afternoon today. Thanks, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24962 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Comments on Froom Ranch NOP Date:Tuesday, July 25, 2017 5:35:15 PM Thanks.   Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367   From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org]  Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 5:30 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Comments on Froom Ranch NOP   From: Santa Lucia Chapter of the Sierra Club [mailto:sierraclub8@gmail.com]  Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 3:33 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Comments on Froom Ranch NOP   July 25, 2017 Shawna Scott, Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm St., San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Dear Ms. Scott, We are in receipt of your July 10 letter requesting comment on the Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project. The Sierra Club has three primary concerns with this project: Its proposed development beyond the Urban Reserve Line, the definition of Project objectives, and the inclusion of a full analysis of the Project’s potential cumulative impacts in the EIR. We appreciate that the City has shown awareness of the first concern in the NOP’s discussion of the potential impacts of the request by the applicant for a General Plan Amendment to allow for hillside development above the 150-foot level, and the City’s stated intent to include a project alternative that locates all development below the 150-foot elevation line. Second, as we pointed out in our comments on the San Luis Ranch Project, when a Specific Plan/General Plan amendment is proposed, the Project objectives should be stated in terms of development options within the range of intensity of the residential and commercial development called out in the Land Use Element, not just the high end of that range. The California Environmental Quality Act does not require analysis of only the project design that will assure the maximum level of residential and commercial development allowed in the General Plan and dismissal of any alternative of reduced scale as infeasible solely because the scale is reduced. We urge the City not to take the position that Project objectives serve as a bar to the analysis of scaled-back alternatives, nor maintain that a Project alternative may not be considered unless it meets all of the Project objectives. Third, per CEQA Guidelines, the EIR must evaluate “past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects,” 24963 which “when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts.” As of July 20, the City’s website listed the following reasonably foreseeable future projects: Projects Currently Posted on SLO City Web Site            Name ResidentialUnits Sq. Feet of Commercial/Office Hotel Open Space Other San Luis Ranch 500 350,000 200 5.8   Avila Ranch 720 20,000       Froom Ranch 130 30,000 120 2.9 398 Senior Units 1101 Monterey  27,079       Marsh & Carmel 8 1,100       Madonna Plaza  56,257       San Luis Square 62 19,792 36     Monterey Place 29 12,255 3     Vesper Hotel at the Creamery  6,698 47     Twin Creeks 102 6,566       Broad St. Collection 10  6     1185 Monterey 13 2,464       Bridge Street  21,000       71 Palomar Av 33        Wes Creek Development 172        Ferrini Apartments 5        22 North Chorro 27 2,000       Imel Ranch Subdivision 18        Olive Mixed Use 17 3,500       Wingate Homes 142 5,000       Righetti Ranch Subdivision 304        Digital West  775,000       Towne Place Suites   114     French Hospital Expansion         Motel Inn   55   13 RV spaces and 10 Airstream spaces The Junction 69 3,000       Long Bonetti Public Market  47,000       Jones Subdivision 65 15,000       Granada Hotel Expansion   22     Ellsworth Tract       35 Commercial Lots Aerovista Place  37,000       South Town 18 18 70       Discovery SLO Bowling  245,000     Reusing existing space McCarthy Steel  9,840       The Yard 43        Bishop Street Studios 34        Caudill Mixed Use 36 5,500       Perry Ford  7,895       Laurel Lane Mixed Use 18 2,500       Poly Performance  30,000       Tank Farm Commerce Park  29,000       Broad Street Mixed Use 11 3,000       Shell Station Development  10,000       Higuera Brew  15,500     Reusing existing space 24964 Iron Works 46 4,400       Monterey Hotel   102     Homeless Service Center  20,000       Toscano Moresco 161        BMW Dealership  23,945       625 Toro 14        Serra Meadows 247        Aerovista Office  37,000       Hotel Serra 8 25,000 64     Brownstones 8        Chinatown Hotel 30 25,000 78     Direct Injectors  6,200       Airport Business Center  75,000       SLO Brew Production  31,290       Avinvo Townhomes 161        Pacific Courtyards 9 8,000       Fxlini Tract 13        Bridge Street 26        Boysen Apartments 6        Total 3315 2,054,851 847 8.7                              Compiled by David Blakely We urge the City to insure that in addition to analyzing and considering mitigations for potential impacts on traffic, greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, biological resources, land use/planning and all other areas identified in the Initial Study as requiring evaluation, the EIR fully analyzes and mitigates the cumulative impacts likely to arise in those categories from all of the above projects and any others that are likely to be developed within the approximate timeframe of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Thank you for inviting us to comment, Andrew Christie, Director Santa Lucia Chapter of the Sierra Club P.O. Box 15755 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 (805) 543-8717   24965 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Comments on Froom Ranch NOP Date:Tuesday, July 25, 2017 5:30:00 PM From: Santa Lucia Chapter of the Sierra Club [mailto:sierraclub8@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 3:33 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Comments on Froom Ranch NOP July 25, 2017 Shawna Scott, Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm St., San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Dear Ms. Scott, We are in receipt of your July 10 letter requesting comment on the Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project. The Sierra Club has three primary concerns with this project: Its proposed development beyond the Urban Reserve Line, the definition of Project objectives, and the inclusion of a full analysis of the Project’s potential cumulative impacts in the EIR. We appreciate that the City has shown awareness of the first concern in the NOP’s discussion of the potential impacts of the request by the applicant for a General Plan Amendment to allow for hillside development above the 150-foot level, and the City’s stated intent to include a project alternative that locates all development below the 150-foot elevation line. Second, as we pointed out in our comments on the San Luis Ranch Project, when a Specific Plan/General Plan amendment is proposed, the Project objectives should be stated in terms of development options within the range of intensity of the residential and commercial development called out in the Land Use Element, not just the high end of that range. The California Environmental Quality Act does not require analysis of only the project design that will assure the maximum level of residential and commercial development allowed in the General Plan and dismissal of any alternative of reduced scale as infeasible solely because the scale is reduced. We urge the City not to take the position that Project objectives serve as a bar to the analysis of scaled-back alternatives, nor maintain that a Project alternative may not be considered unless it meets all of the Project objectives. Third, per CEQA Guidelines, the EIR must evaluate “past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects,” which “when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts.” As of July 20, the City’s website listed the following reasonably foreseeable future projects: Projects Currently Posted on SLO City Web Site Name ResidentialUnits Sq. Feet of Commercial/Office Hotel Open Space Other San Luis Ranch 500 350,000 200 5.8 Avila Ranch 720 20,000 Froom Ranch 130 30,000 120 2.9 398 Senior Units 1101 Monterey 27,079 24966 Marsh & Carmel 8 1,100 Madonna Plaza 56,257 San Luis Square 62 19,792 36 Monterey Place 29 12,255 3 Vesper Hotel at the Creamery 6,698 47 Twin Creeks 102 6,566 Broad St. Collection 10 6 1185 Monterey 13 2,464 Bridge Street 21,000 71 Palomar Av 33 Wes Creek Development 172 Ferrini Apartments 5 22 North Chorro 27 2,000 Imel Ranch Subdivision 18 Olive Mixed Use 17 3,500 Wingate Homes 142 5,000 Righetti Ranch Subdivision 304 Digital West 775,000 Towne Place Suites 114 French Hospital Expansion Motel Inn 55 13 RV spaces and 10 Airstream spaces The Junction 69 3,000 Long Bonetti Public Market 47,000 Jones Subdivision 65 15,000 Granada Hotel Expansion 22 Ellsworth Tract 35 Commercial Lots Aerovista Place 37,000 South Town 18 18 70 Discovery SLO Bowling 245,000 Reusing existing space McCarthy Steel 9,840 The Yard 43 Bishop Street Studios 34 Caudill Mixed Use 36 5,500 Perry Ford 7,895 Laurel Lane Mixed Use 18 2,500 Poly Performance 30,000 Tank Farm Commerce Park 29,000 Broad Street Mixed Use 11 3,000 Shell Station Development 10,000 Higuera Brew 15,500 Reusing existing space Iron Works 46 4,400 Monterey Hotel 102 Homeless Service Center 20,000 Toscano Moresco 161 BMW Dealership 23,945 625 Toro 14 Serra Meadows 247 Aerovista Office 37,000 Hotel Serra 8 25,000 64 Brownstones 8 Chinatown Hotel 30 25,000 78 Direct Injectors 6,200 Airport Business Center 75,000 SLO Brew Production 31,290 24967 Avinvo Townhomes 161 Pacific Courtyards 9 8,000 Fxlini Tract 13 Bridge Street 26 Boysen Apartments 6 Total 3315 2,054,851 847 8.7 Compiled by David Blakely We urge the City to insure that in addition to analyzing and considering mitigations for potential impacts on traffic, greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, biological resources, land use/planning and all other areas identified in the Initial Study as requiring evaluation, the EIR fully analyzes and mitigates the cumulative impacts likely to arise in those categories from all of the above projects and any others that are likely to be developed within the approximate timeframe of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Thank you for inviting us to comment, Andrew Christie, Director Santa Lucia Chapter of the Sierra Club P.O. Box 15755 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 (805) 543-8717 24968 From:Santa Lucia Chapter of the Sierra Club To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Comments on Froom Ranch NOP Date:Tuesday, July 25, 2017 3:33:16 PM July 25, 2017 Shawna Scott, Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm St., San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Dear Ms. Scott, We are in receipt of your July 10 letter requesting comment on the Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project. The Sierra Club has three primary concerns with this project: Its proposed development beyond the Urban Reserve Line, the definition of Project objectives, and the inclusion of a full analysis of the Project’s potential cumulative impacts in the EIR. We appreciate that the City has shown awareness of the first concern in the NOP’s discussion of the potential impacts of the request by the applicant for a General Plan Amendment to allow for hillside development above the 150-foot level, and the City’s stated intent to include a project alternative that locates all development below the 150-foot elevation line. Second, as we pointed out in our comments on the San Luis Ranch Project, when a Specific Plan/General Plan amendment is proposed, the Project objectives should be stated in terms of development options within the range of intensity of the residential and commercial development called out in the Land Use Element, not just the high end of that range. The California Environmental Quality Act does not require analysis of only the project design that will assure the maximum level of residential and commercial development allowed in the General Plan and dismissal of any alternative of reduced scale as infeasible solely because the scale is reduced. We urge the City not to take the position that Project objectives serve as a bar to the analysis of scaled-back alternatives, nor maintain that a Project alternative may not be considered unless it meets all of the Project objectives. Third, per CEQA Guidelines, the EIR must evaluate “past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects,” which “when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts.” As of July 20, the City’s website listed the following reasonably foreseeable future projects: Projects Currently Posted on SLO City Web Site            Name ResidentialUnits Sq. Feet of Commercial/Office Hotel Open Space Other San Luis Ranch 500 350,000 200 5.8   Avila Ranch 720 20,000       Froom Ranch 130 30,000 120 2.9 398 Senior Units 1101 Monterey  27,079       Marsh & Carmel 8 1,100       Madonna Plaza  56,257       San Luis Square 62 19,792 36     Monterey Place 29 12,255 3     Vesper Hotel at the Creamery  6,698 47     Twin Creeks 102 6,566       Broad St. Collection 10  6     24969 1185 Monterey 13 2,464       Bridge Street  21,000       71 Palomar Av 33        Wes Creek Development 172        Ferrini Apartments 5        22 North Chorro 27 2,000       Imel Ranch Subdivision 18        Olive Mixed Use 17 3,500       Wingate Homes 142 5,000       Righetti Ranch Subdivision 304        Digital West  775,000       Towne Place Suites   114     French Hospital Expansion         Motel Inn   55   13 RV spaces and 10 Airstream spaces The Junction 69 3,000       Long Bonetti Public Market  47,000       Jones Subdivision 65 15,000       Granada Hotel Expansion   22     Ellsworth Tract       35 Commercial Lots Aerovista Place  37,000       South Town 18 18 70       Discovery SLO Bowling  245,000     Reusing existing space McCarthy Steel  9,840       The Yard 43        Bishop Street Studios 34        Caudill Mixed Use 36 5,500       Perry Ford  7,895       Laurel Lane Mixed Use 18 2,500       Poly Performance  30,000       Tank Farm Commerce Park  29,000       Broad Street Mixed Use 11 3,000       Shell Station Development  10,000       Higuera Brew  15,500     Reusing existing space Iron Works 46 4,400       Monterey Hotel   102     Homeless Service Center  20,000       Toscano Moresco 161        BMW Dealership  23,945       625 Toro 14        Serra Meadows 247        Aerovista Office  37,000       Hotel Serra 8 25,000 64     Brownstones 8        Chinatown Hotel 30 25,000 78     Direct Injectors  6,200       Airport Business Center  75,000       SLO Brew Production  31,290       Avinvo Townhomes 161        Pacific Courtyards 9 8,000       Fxlini Tract 13        Bridge Street 26        Boysen Apartments 6        Total 3315 2,054,851 847 8.7          24970                     Compiled by David Blakely We urge the City to insure that in addition to analyzing and considering mitigations for potential impacts on traffic, greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, biological resources, land use/planning and all other areas identified in the Initial Study as requiring evaluation, the EIR fully analyzes and mitigates the cumulative impacts likely to arise in those categories from all of the above projects and any others that are likely to be developed within the approximate timeframe of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Thank you for inviting us to comment, Andrew Christie, Director Santa Lucia Chapter of the Sierra Club P.O. Box 15755 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 (805) 543-8717   24971 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Discussion Date:Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:35:46 AM Thanks Shawna. PAM RICCI -----Original Appointment----- From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:35 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. Subject: Accepted: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Discussion When: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Palm Street Thank you, Pam. We will be in conference room 2. 24972 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Cc:Robert Chattel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:57:04 AM HI Shawna & Emily, Yes, that time works for Robert and me. Thanks for the follow-up. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:51 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Good morning, Would 1:00 work for all? I can reserve a room for an hour if we need it (1:00 – 2:00); our weekly staff meetings start at 2:00 pm. Thank you, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:41 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan That works for me, Pam. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan 24973 Hi Shawna & Emily, Would the two of you be available to meet with Robert Chattel and I on Tuesday, August 1st after lunch, say 1:30? I realize that Brian will be on vacation, and so will Vic Montgomery, but I still feel that it would be beneficial to meet while Robert is passing through the area. Let me know if this might work. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI 24974 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel; Ricci, Pam A. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:50:00 AM Attachments:image002.png Good morning, Would 1:00 work for all? I can reserve a room for an hour if we need it (1:00 – 2:00); our weekly staff meetings start at 2:00 pm. Thank you, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:41 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan That works for me, Pam. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna & Emily, Would the two of you be available to meet with Robert Chattel and I on Tuesday, August 1st after lunch, say 1:30? I realize that Brian will be on vacation, and so will Vic Montgomery, but I still feel that it would be beneficial to meet while Robert is passing through the area. Let me know if this might work. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] 24975 Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:28 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, I saw the invitation for the Froom Ranch historic structures meeting, and wanted to let you know that Brian is out on vacation through August 2. I also have a meeting that morning (8:30 am – 10:00 am). Is there any option to move the meeting to later in the week? Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Thanks, and perfect timing! Have a good weekend. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM 24976 To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24977 From:Cantrell, Deanna To:Codron, Michael Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 8:38:32 PM Attachments:image001.png Does the security plan fit into this? D From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:43 PM To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org> Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Department Heads, I want to make sure everyone was aware that we have issued the RFP for a consultant and are moving forward with a public scoping meeting with the Planning Commission on 7/26. A brief project description is attached. If your department has any issues that should be addressed as part of the environmental review for the project, please be in touch with Shawna. It is important that we get everything on the table that we can at this early stage so that the EIR scope covers all of our related issues and areas of concern. Thank you! -Michael From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:41 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Hi Michael, A PDF of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information. The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 The NOP Scoping Meeting will be held during the Planning Commission’s meeting on July 26. Please share/distribute to the Mayor and City Council as you see fit. Thank you, Shawna Scott 24978 Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24979 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 5:32:20 PM Attachments:image002.png Thanks, Pam. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:10 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Emily, We have an internal team meeting tomorrow morning and will be discussing the options to evaluate the requested bike path extension. I’ll be back in touch about this. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 5:29 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam – One thing I would like to follow up with you on is the bike path extension through to Calle Joaquin. The City considers this an ideal connection and, as you know, has requested that it be included in the Specific Plan. I met with Bob Hill, Jake Hudson, and Luke Schwartz, and everyone agreed that an extension through the existing wetland area could be challenging. However, the consensus was that we would at least like to see it analyzed in the EIR to get a better understanding of the potential impacts and/or benefits. 24980 Please let me know if you’d like to meet to discuss this further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24981 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 5:09:45 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Emily, We have an internal team meeting tomorrow morning and will be discussing the options to evaluate the requested bike path extension. I’ll be back in touch about this. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 5:29 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam – One thing I would like to follow up with you on is the bike path extension through to Calle Joaquin. The City considers this an ideal connection and, as you know, has requested that it be included in the Specific Plan. I met with Bob Hill, Jake Hudson, and Luke Schwartz, and everyone agreed that an extension through the existing wetland area could be challenging. However, the consensus was that we would at least like to see it analyzed in the EIR to get a better understanding of the potential impacts and/or benefits. Please let me know if you’d like to meet to discuss this further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> 24982 Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 24983 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Scott, Shawna Cc:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 3:15:26 PM Attachments:image003.png Thank you, Shawna. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:19 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Thanks Shawna; that’s great news. We are still looking into the reason that Emily couldn’t open the files. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:17 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Good afternoon, The reports are now uploaded, in addition to the amended constraints map. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:01 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map 24984 Did Shawna receive the Hydrology and Structural reports that I sent last week okay? I noticed that they weren’t posted on the technical studies link yet. I also see that the old constraints map with the archaeological sites is still posted there. I’m guessing that is the reason for your current request. I’ve sent our IT team an email to troubleshoot this. I’ll let you know when it gets figured out. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:42 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map FYI… this happened with the last link you sent me, too (with the latest tech studies). Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Okay, I just tried it and it worked. It’s a big file and does take a while to load. 24985 I’ll check with IT and see if they can figure out the problem. I’ll then resend it. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:37 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map The link’s not working on my end…??? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map 24986 Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24987 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Cc:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 2:18:54 PM Attachments:image003.png Thanks Shawna; that’s great news. We are still looking into the reason that Emily couldn’t open the files. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:17 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Good afternoon, The reports are now uploaded, in addition to the amended constraints map. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:01 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Did Shawna receive the Hydrology and Structural reports that I sent last week okay? I noticed that they weren’t posted on the technical studies link yet. I also see that the old constraints map with the archaeological sites is still posted there. I’m guessing that is the reason for your current request. I’ve sent our IT team an email to troubleshoot this. I’ll let you know when it gets figured out. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:42 PM 24988 To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map FYI… this happened with the last link you sent me, too (with the latest tech studies). Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Okay, I just tried it and it worked. It’s a big file and does take a while to load. I’ll check with IT and see if they can figure out the problem. I’ll then resend it. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:37 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map The link’s not working on my end…??? 24989 Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 24990 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24991 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A.; Emily Creel Cc:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 2:17:00 PM Attachments:image003.png Good afternoon, The reports are now uploaded, in addition to the amended constraints map. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:01 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Did Shawna receive the Hydrology and Structural reports that I sent last week okay? I noticed that they weren’t posted on the technical studies link yet. I also see that the old constraints map with the archaeological sites is still posted there. I’m guessing that is the reason for your current request. I’ve sent our IT team an email to troubleshoot this. I’ll let you know when it gets figured out. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:42 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map FYI… this happened with the last link you sent me, too (with the latest tech studies). 24992 Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Okay, I just tried it and it worked. It’s a big file and does take a while to load. I’ll check with IT and see if they can figure out the problem. I’ll then resend it. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:37 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map The link’s not working on my end…??? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 24993 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24994 24995 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 2:01:14 PM Attachments:image004.png Did Shawna receive the Hydrology and Structural reports that I sent last week okay? I noticed that they weren’t posted on the technical studies link yet. I also see that the old constraints map with the archaeological sites is still posted there. I’m guessing that is the reason for your current request. I’ve sent our IT team an email to troubleshoot this. I’ll let you know when it gets figured out. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:42 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map FYI… this happened with the last link you sent me, too (with the latest tech studies). Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] 24996 Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Okay, I just tried it and it worked. It’s a big file and does take a while to load. I’ll check with IT and see if they can figure out the problem. I’ll then resend it. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:37 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map The link’s not working on my end…??? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI 24997 From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 24998 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 1:41:59 PM Attachments:image005.png FYI… this happened with the last link you sent me, too (with the latest tech studies). Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Okay, I just tried it and it worked. It’s a big file and does take a while to load. I’ll check with IT and see if they can figure out the problem. I’ll then resend it. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:37 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map 24999 The link’s not working on my end…??? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 25000 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25001 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 1:40:50 PM Attachments:image002.png That works for me, Pam. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna & Emily, Would the two of you be available to meet with Robert Chattel and I on Tuesday, August 1st after lunch, say 1:30? I realize that Brian will be on vacation, and so will Vic Montgomery, but I still feel that it would be beneficial to meet while Robert is passing through the area. Let me know if this might work. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:28 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, I saw the invitation for the Froom Ranch historic structures meeting, and wanted to let you know that Brian is out on vacation through August 2. I also have a meeting that morning (8:30 am – 10:00 am). Is there any option to move the meeting to later in the week? Thank you, Shawna 25002 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Thanks, and perfect timing! Have a good weekend. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, 25003 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25004 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 1:40:18 PM Attachments:image002.png Okay, I just tried it and it worked. It’s a big file and does take a while to load. I’ll check with IT and see if they can figure out the problem. I’ll then resend it. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 1:37 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map The link’s not working on my end…??? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI 25005 From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25006 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 1:36:55 PM Attachments:image002.png The link’s not working on my end…??? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, 25007 Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25008 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 12:56:21 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Emily, I believe that this version of the constraints map is what you are seeking. Let me know if it isn’t. Click to Retrieve File(s) Site Plan_ Constraints.jpg Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25009 25010 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Leveille, Brian Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 12:53:06 PM Yes, just got back from a quick trip to Tahoe early this morning. Super crowded, but beautiful. PAM RICCI From: Leveille, Brian [mailto:bleveille@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:38 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Thanks Pam. I hope your summer is going well. Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:46 AM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Hi Brian, enjoy your vacation! We’ll talk when your back in the office. PAM RICCI -----Original Appointment----- From: Leveille, Brian [mailto:bleveille@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:46 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. Subject: Declined: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings When: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). 25011 Where: 919 Palm ? Sorry. Out on vacation. 25012 From:Leveille, Brian To:Ricci, Pam A. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 12:38:20 PM Thanks Pam. I hope your summer is going well. Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:46 AM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Hi Brian, enjoy your vacation! We’ll talk when your back in the office. PAM RICCI -----Original Appointment----- From: Leveille, Brian [mailto:bleveille@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:46 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. Subject: Declined: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings When: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Palm ? Sorry. Out on vacation. 25013 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Leveille, Brian Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 11:46:34 AM Hi Brian, enjoy your vacation! We’ll talk when your back in the office. PAM RICCI -----Original Appointment----- From: Leveille, Brian [mailto:bleveille@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:46 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. Subject: Declined: Froom Ranch - Historic Buildings When: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Palm ? Sorry. Out on vacation. 25014 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 11:44:09 AM Attachments:image002.png Hi Shawna & Emily, Would the two of you be available to meet with Robert Chattel and I on Tuesday, August 1st after lunch, say 1:30? I realize that Brian will be on vacation, and so will Vic Montgomery, but I still feel that it would be beneficial to meet while Robert is passing through the area. Let me know if this might work. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:28 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, I saw the invitation for the Froom Ranch historic structures meeting, and wanted to let you know that Brian is out on vacation through August 2. I also have a meeting that morning (8:30 am – 10:00 am). Is there any option to move the meeting to later in the week? Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Thanks, and perfect timing! Have a good weekend. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42 AM 25015 To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25016 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Emily Creel; Hill, Robert; Scott, Shawna Cc:John Madonna; Robert Richmond; Walters, Tim J.; Ricci, Pam A.; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 11:42:52 AM Attachments:image001.png Yes, RRM can setup a conference call and Skype connection to get everyone on line and looking at the same materials. Probably work best if folks that are local can come to RRM, other can call in and Skype. VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:09 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Thanks, Vic. We agree – now is a good time for another meeting. We will reach out to the agency folks, confirm contact information, and see what their availability is like. I’ll look at dates after 8/4 to accommodate Bob’s schedule and get back to you with options. I agree that a conference call with materials provided ahead of time is a good approach. Some type of screen-sharing capability may also be helpful so that we are all looking at the same thing. Is this something RRM can set up? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Hill, Robert [mailto:rhill@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:04 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; 25017 Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Hi Victor, Thanks for this. I will be on family vacation 7/21-8/4 and will not be able to attend a meeting until after that. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up 25018 back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25019 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Hill, Robert; Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Cc:John Madonna; Robert Richmond; Walters, Tim J.; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 11:25:50 AM Attachments:image002.png Perfect. Thanks, Pam. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:19 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Hi Emily, Yes, we can set up the logistics of the meeting once I have the needed information. We can use one of our RRM conference rooms for those available to meet in person in SLO, and then use GoToMeeting or similar software, to have other persons on a conference line and able to view materials on a screen. Just let me know what date and time works best for most of the attendees, and their emails, and I can send out the meeting request. Glad to have you back. Looking forward to hearing about Alaska. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:09 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond 25020 <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Thanks, Vic. We agree – now is a good time for another meeting. We will reach out to the agency folks, confirm contact information, and see what their availability is like. I’ll look at dates after 8/4 to accommodate Bob’s schedule and get back to you with options. I agree that a conference call with materials provided ahead of time is a good approach. Some type of screen-sharing capability may also be helpful so that we are all looking at the same thing. Is this something RRM can set up? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Hill, Robert [mailto:rhill@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:04 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Hi Victor, Thanks for this. I will be on family vacation 7/21-8/4 and will not be able to attend a meeting until after that. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager 25021 City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25022 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel; Hill, Robert; Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Cc:John Madonna; Robert Richmond; Walters, Tim J.; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 11:19:13 AM Attachments:image004.png Hi Emily, Yes, we can set up the logistics of the meeting once I have the needed information. We can use one of our RRM conference rooms for those available to meet in person in SLO, and then use GoToMeeting or similar software, to have other persons on a conference line and able to view materials on a screen. Just let me know what date and time works best for most of the attendees, and their emails, and I can send out the meeting request. Glad to have you back. Looking forward to hearing about Alaska. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:09 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Thanks, Vic. We agree – now is a good time for another meeting. We will reach out to the agency folks, confirm contact information, and see what their availability is like. I’ll look at dates after 8/4 to accommodate Bob’s schedule and get back to you with options. I agree that a conference call with materials provided ahead of time is a good approach. Some type of screen-sharing capability may also be helpful so that we are all looking at the same thing. Is this something RRM can set up? Thanks, Emily Creel 25023 Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Hill, Robert [mailto:rhill@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:04 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Hi Victor, Thanks for this. I will be on family vacation 7/21-8/4 and will not be able to attend a meeting until after that. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration 25024 All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25025 From:Emily Creel To:Hill, Robert; Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Cc:John Madonna; Robert Richmond; Walters, Tim J.; Ricci, Pam A.; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 11:09:08 AM Attachments:image001.png Thanks, Vic. We agree – now is a good time for another meeting. We will reach out to the agency folks, confirm contact information, and see what their availability is like. I’ll look at dates after 8/4 to accommodate Bob’s schedule and get back to you with options. I agree that a conference call with materials provided ahead of time is a good approach. Some type of screen-sharing capability may also be helpful so that we are all looking at the same thing. Is this something RRM can set up? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Hill, Robert [mailto:rhill@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:04 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Hi Victor, Thanks for this. I will be on family vacation 7/21-8/4 and will not be able to attend a meeting until after that. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager 25026 City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25027 25028 From:Medina, Kelly To:Eriksson, Kristin Cc:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Corrected RFP Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 10:56:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi, Addendum has been posted. Best, Kelly Medina Administrative Assistant III Finance 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E KMedina@slocity.org T 805.781.7521 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 10:36 AM To: Medina, Kelly <KMedina@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Corrected RFP Hi, Kelly. Please post this addendum for RFP 0143-2017. Please make sure you update the date on the addendum. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi Kristin, Please find attached Draft Addendum #1 to the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project (Specification 0143-2017); this same draft document is also available in the Purchasing/RFP/CDD folder. One this is approved by Finance, I will send it out to the RFP 25029 distribution list. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Thank you, I can work with this. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:49 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. Unfortunately, we don’t have a template, but I have attached a prior RFP which includes an addendum for your reference. I only have a pdf, but hopefully it is helpful as far as form. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:30 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Good morning, Do you have a RFP Addendum template that I should use? Thank you, 25030 Shawna From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: Corrected RFP Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Lorraine Colleran Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25031 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Cc:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Corrected RFP Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 10:51:52 AM Attachments:image001.png Great, thank you! From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. The addendum looks fine. We’ll adjust the date and post it on the City website today. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi Kristin, Please find attached Draft Addendum #1 to the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project (Specification 0143-2017); this same draft document is also available in the Purchasing/RFP/CDD folder. One this is approved by Finance, I will send it out to the RFP distribution list. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25032 From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Thank you, I can work with this. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:49 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. Unfortunately, we don’t have a template, but I have attached a prior RFP which includes an addendum for your reference. I only have a pdf, but hopefully it is helpful as far as form. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:30 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Good morning, Do you have a RFP Addendum template that I should use? Thank you, Shawna From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: Corrected RFP Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Lorraine Colleran 25033 Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25034 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Medina, Kelly Subject:FW: Corrected RFP Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 10:35:50 AM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch EIR RFP_Addendum_DRAFT1.docx Hi, Kelly. Please post this addendum for RFP 0143-2017. Please make sure you update the date on the addendum. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi Kristin, Please find attached Draft Addendum #1 to the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project (Specification 0143-2017); this same draft document is also available in the Purchasing/RFP/CDD folder. One this is approved by Finance, I will send it out to the RFP distribution list. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP 25035 Thank you, I can work with this. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:49 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. Unfortunately, we don’t have a template, but I have attached a prior RFP which includes an addendum for your reference. I only have a pdf, but hopefully it is helpful as far as form. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:30 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Good morning, Do you have a RFP Addendum template that I should use? Thank you, Shawna From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: Corrected RFP Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Lorraine Colleran Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 25036 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25037 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Corrected RFP Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 10:35:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi, Shawna. The addendum looks fine. We’ll adjust the date and post it on the City website today. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi Kristin, Please find attached Draft Addendum #1 to the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project (Specification 0143-2017); this same draft document is also available in the Purchasing/RFP/CDD folder. One this is approved by Finance, I will send it out to the RFP distribution list. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Thank you, I can work with this. 25038 From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:49 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. Unfortunately, we don’t have a template, but I have attached a prior RFP which includes an addendum for your reference. I only have a pdf, but hopefully it is helpful as far as form. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:30 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Good morning, Do you have a RFP Addendum template that I should use? Thank you, Shawna From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: Corrected RFP Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Lorraine Colleran Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 25039 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25040 From:Scott, Shawna To:David Church Cc:ecreel@swca.com Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 10:15:00 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png Hi David, Yes, the applicant proposes to maintain the same acreage within the general area as the existing easement, but modified to accommodate the proposed development footprint. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: David Church [mailto:dchurch@slolafco.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 8:42 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: ecreel@swca.com Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Good to hear from you! Looks like 7.1 acres will remain in an open space/ag easement in a similar area. Am I reading the maps correctly? Thanks for your help. David Church Executive Officer San Luis Obispo LAFCO 805-788-2096 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:19 PM 25041 To: dchurch@slolafco.com Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi David, Please see below, noting these are draft graphics currently under review by the City, and it is my understanding that any requested amendment to the easement discussed below would require LAFCO review and approval. This supplemental information may further your understanding of the applicant’s request, and LAFCO’s review and response to the Notice of Preparation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Very helpful. Thanks, Shawna. I understand they are draft graphics and I'm wondering if it is ok to share with David Church from LAFCO? We have discussed this recently since it was originally a LAFCO condition. Lynda 25042 From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:24 PM To: Lynda Auchinachie Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Lynda, Good to hear from you. Please see below, noting these are draft figures currently under review and may change. The figure on the left (with aerial base) delineates the existing easement, and the second graphic on the right delineates the proposed easement (currently under review). 25043 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25044 From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specitic Plan Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25045 From:David Church To:Scott, Shawna Cc:ecreel@swca.com Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 8:42:29 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png Hi Shawna, Good to hear from you! Looks like 7.1 acres will remain in an open space/ag easement in a similar area. Am I reading the maps correctly? Thanks for your help. David Church Executive Officer San Luis Obispo LAFCO 805-788-2096 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:19 PM To: dchurch@slolafco.com Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi David, Please see below, noting these are draft graphics currently under review by the City, and it is my understanding that any requested amendment to the easement discussed below would require LAFCO review and approval. This supplemental information may further your understanding of the applicant’s request, and LAFCO’s review and response to the Notice of Preparation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25046 From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Very helpful. Thanks, Shawna. I understand they are draft graphics and I'm wondering if it is ok to share with David Church from LAFCO? We have discussed this recently since it was originally a LAFCO condition. Lynda From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:24 PM To: Lynda Auchinachie Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Lynda, Good to hear from you. Please see below, noting these are draft figures currently under review and may change. The figure on the left (with aerial base) delineates the existing easement, and the second graphic on the right delineates the proposed easement (currently under review). 25047 25048 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25049 From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specitic Plan Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25050 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 7:51:00 AM Hi Emily, Yes, go ahead and reach out to the agencies to set up the meeting. You can likely get all the contact information from the Multi-agency meeting folder on the server. Bob Hill is out on vacation, but you can let me know how the days and times of availability line up and I can check his schedule in Outlook. Thank you, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 9:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Hi Shawna – we discussed this previously and agreed the time for another “agency” meeting is right now that the RFP and NOP are out. I’m thinking Vic is right and the City may have better luck setting this meeting up? Let me know what you think and I’ll respond to Vic. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20 AM To: Bob Hill <bhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those 25051 in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25052 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 7:48:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch EIR RFP_Addendum_DRAFT1.docx image002.png image003.png image005.png Hi Emily, I drafted the Addendum and sent to Finance for approval (see attached draft). Minor clarifications including some additional language from Finance (which needed to be amended in the RFP after I had mailed it) and the clarification in response to Christine’s question. Finance should approve this today, and I’ll get it mailed out (they will post on the Bids website). Thank you for catching the map – I had checked the key on the electronic version, which doesn’t specifically state archaeological resources, and didn’t notice the points and numbers on the actual map. I don’t think it’s clear that those are archaeological sites, but agree we should switch out the map. Thank you, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:04 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Do we need to coordinate on the Addendum? Is it only needed to address Christine’s question below? Also, I noticed that the Constraints Map and Site Plan on the project website includes archaeo resource locations. If we can get another one from RRM with those removed, we should swap it out. I agree that a prelim site plan is necessary. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Christine Carter [mailto:ccarter@rinconconsultants.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:25 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> 25053 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Hi Shawna, Thank you Shawna for your response and time. Christine Carter Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24 PM To: Christine Carter; ecreel@swca.com Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Hi Christine, We will be following up in an Addendum to the RFP, but wanted to let you know to please provide qualifications, hourly rates, and estimated hours for your subconsultant(s). The proposal response is not required to include forms or references for your team’s subconsultant(s). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Christine Carter [mailto:ccarter@rinconconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:15 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question 25054 Importance: High Dear Emily and Shawna, Our firm will be submitting a proposal in response to the City’s Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP. We plan on utilizing a subconsultant for visual simulations. Do we need to submit the required forms and qualifications for our proposed subconsultant, or just their hourly rates and estimate hours to do the work? Thank you for your help and time. We are looking forward to responding. Christine Carter Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New 25055 From:Ansolabehere, Jon To:Scott Mann Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Date:Monday, July 24, 2017 6:58:05 AM Yes, I have a meeting between 8:30 and 9 but am available before or after. Direct line is 781-7141 -----Original Message----- From: Scott Mann [mailto:scott@studio-2g.com] Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 9:28 AM To: Ansolabehere, Jon <JAnsolabehere@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Hi Jon, I'm meeting with the Froom Ranch applicant this Monday morning at 11am. Do you have time to chat before that meeting? Thank you, -Scott Sent from my iPad 25056 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Montgomery, Victor Cc:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - Constraints Map Date:Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:06:04 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam/Vic, Can you please provide us with another copy of the Constraints Map with prelim Site Plan that does not include the location of sensitive archaeological resources for posting on the City’s project website? Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25057 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Date:Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:04:27 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image005.png Do we need to coordinate on the Addendum? Is it only needed to address Christine’s question below? Also, I noticed that the Constraints Map and Site Plan on the project website includes archaeo resource locations. If we can get another one from RRM with those removed, we should swap it out. I agree that a prelim site plan is necessary. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Christine Carter [mailto:ccarter@rinconconsultants.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:25 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Hi Shawna, Thank you Shawna for your response and time. Christine Carter Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24 PM To: Christine Carter; ecreel@swca.com Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question 25058 Hi Christine, We will be following up in an Addendum to the RFP, but wanted to let you know to please provide qualifications, hourly rates, and estimated hours for your subconsultant(s). The proposal response is not required to include forms or references for your team’s subconsultant(s). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Christine Carter [mailto:ccarter@rinconconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:15 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Importance: High Dear Emily and Shawna, Our firm will be submitting a proposal in response to the City’s Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP. We plan on utilizing a subconsultant for visual simulations. Do we need to submit the required forms and qualifications for our proposed subconsultant, or just their hourly rates and estimate hours to do the work? Thank you for your help and time. We are looking forward to responding. Christine Carter Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New 25059 25060 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Saturday, July 22, 2017 9:40:27 PM Hi Shawna – we discussed this previously and agreed the time for another “agency” meeting is right now that the RFP and NOP are out. I’m thinking Vic is right and the City may have better luck setting this meeting up? Let me know what you think and I’ll respond to Vic. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20 AM To: Bob Hill <bhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting 25061 scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25062 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna; Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Saturday, July 22, 2017 5:28:58 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam – One thing I would like to follow up with you on is the bike path extension through to Calle Joaquin. The City considers this an ideal connection and, as you know, has requested that it be included in the Specific Plan. I met with Bob Hill, Jake Hudson, and Luke Schwartz, and everyone agreed that an extension through the existing wetland area could be challenging. However, the consensus was that we would at least like to see it analyzed in the EIR to get a better understanding of the potential impacts and/or benefits. Please let me know if you’d like to meet to discuss this further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 25063 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25064 From:Scott Mann To:Ansolabehere, Jon Subject:Froom Ranch Date:Saturday, July 22, 2017 9:27:58 AM Hi Jon, I'm meeting with the Froom Ranch applicant this Monday morning at 11am. Do you have time to chat before that meeting? Thank you, -Scott Sent from my iPad 25065 From:Scott, Shawna To:Colleran, Lorraine; Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Corrected RFP Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 3:54:55 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Lorraine. Have a great weekend! From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:35 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Shawna, I will have Kristin review this, she is out today, and will be back Monday. The ad went in the paper went out on July 14th. See attached. Lorraine From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi Kristin, Please find attached Draft Addendum #1 to the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project (Specification 0143-2017); this same draft document is also available in the Purchasing/RFP/CDD folder. One this is approved by Finance, I will send it out to the RFP distribution list. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25066 From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Thank you, I can work with this. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:49 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. Unfortunately, we don’t have a template, but I have attached a prior RFP which includes an addendum for your reference. I only have a pdf, but hopefully it is helpful as far as form. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:30 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Good morning, Do you have a RFP Addendum template that I should use? Thank you, Shawna From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: Corrected RFP Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, 25067 Lorraine Colleran Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25068 From:Colleran, Lorraine To:Scott, Shawna; Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Corrected RFP Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 3:34:00 PM Attachments:image001.png SLOUNIFLOW_990 Finance Copyroom iRC5250 Color_0433_001.pdf Shawna, I will have Kristin review this, she is out today, and will be back Monday. The ad went in the paper went out on July 14th. See attached. Lorraine From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi Kristin, Please find attached Draft Addendum #1 to the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project (Specification 0143-2017); this same draft document is also available in the Purchasing/RFP/CDD folder. One this is approved by Finance, I will send it out to the RFP distribution list. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP 25069 Thank you, I can work with this. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:49 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. Unfortunately, we don’t have a template, but I have attached a prior RFP which includes an addendum for your reference. I only have a pdf, but hopefully it is helpful as far as form. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:30 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Good morning, Do you have a RFP Addendum template that I should use? Thank you, Shawna From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: Corrected RFP Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Lorraine Colleran Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 25070 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25071 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Cc:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Corrected RFP Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 3:18:02 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch EIR RFP_Addendum_DRAFT1.docx Hi Kristin, Please find attached Draft Addendum #1 to the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project (Specification 0143-2017); this same draft document is also available in the Purchasing/RFP/CDD folder. One this is approved by Finance, I will send it out to the RFP distribution list. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:24 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Thank you, I can work with this. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:49 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Hi, Shawna. Unfortunately, we don’t have a template, but I have attached a prior RFP which includes an addendum for your reference. I only have a pdf, but hopefully it is helpful as far as form. Kristin 25072 From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:30 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Corrected RFP Good morning, Do you have a RFP Addendum template that I should use? Thank you, Shawna From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: Corrected RFP Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Lorraine Colleran Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25073 From:Christine Carter To:Scott, Shawna; ecreel@swca.com Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 2:25:21 PM Attachments:image002.png image004.png image005.png image006.png Hi Shawna, Thank you Shawna for your response and time. Christine Carter Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24 PM To: Christine Carter; ecreel@swca.com Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Hi Christine, We will be following up in an Addendum to the RFP, but wanted to let you know to please provide qualifications, hourly rates, and estimated hours for your subconsultant(s). The proposal response is not required to include forms or references for your team’s subconsultant(s). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25074 From: Christine Carter [mailto:ccarter@rinconconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:15 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Importance: High Dear Emily and Shawna, Our firm will be submitting a proposal in response to the City’s Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP. We plan on utilizing a subconsultant for visual simulations. Do we need to submit the required forms and qualifications for our proposed subconsultant, or just their hourly rates and estimate hours to do the work? Thank you for your help and time. We are looking forward to responding. Christine Carter Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New 25075 From:Scott, Shawna To:Christine Carter; ecreel@swca.com Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24:00 PM Attachments:image003.png image004.png image001.png Hi Christine, We will be following up in an Addendum to the RFP, but wanted to let you know to please provide qualifications, hourly rates, and estimated hours for your subconsultant(s). The proposal response is not required to include forms or references for your team’s subconsultant(s). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Christine Carter [mailto:ccarter@rinconconsultants.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:15 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Importance: High Dear Emily and Shawna, Our firm will be submitting a proposal in response to the City’s Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP. We plan on utilizing a subconsultant for visual simulations. Do we need to submit the required forms and qualifications for our proposed subconsultant, or just their hourly rates and estimate hours to do the work? Thank you for your help and time. We are looking forward to responding. Christine Carter 25076 Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New 25077 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: EIR for Froom Ranch response from KSBY-TV Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 2:17:00 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch EIR KSBY.pdf From: Choal, Kathleen [mailto:kchoal@ksby.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:19 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: EIR for Froom Ranch response from KSBY-TV Hi Shawna, I received the EIR for the Froom Ranch Project. Attached is my response. I am neither for or against the project, I just have a couple of concerns that I would like to be addressed in the EIR. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kathleen Choal Kathleen Choal KSBY-TV, President & General Manager 1772 Calle Joaquin San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 805-541-6666 ext. 450 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information accompanying this email transmission contains confidential information that is intended only for the use of the individual or company named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you. 25078 From:Scott, Shawna To:Choal, Kathleen Subject:RE: EIR for Froom Ranch response from KSBY-TV Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 2:16:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Kathleen. Have a good weekend, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Choal, Kathleen [mailto:kchoal@ksby.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:19 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: EIR for Froom Ranch response from KSBY-TV Hi Shawna, I received the EIR for the Froom Ranch Project. Attached is my response. I am neither for or against the project, I just have a couple of concerns that I would like to be addressed in the EIR. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kathleen Choal Kathleen Choal KSBY-TV, President & General Manager 1772 Calle Joaquin San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 805-541-6666 ext. 450 25079 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information accompanying this email transmission contains confidential information that is intended only for the use of the individual or company named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you. 25080 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 1:23:30 PM Any time Tuesday morning works for me. Do you mind just sending a calendar invite for what works for you? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:53 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Also, thank you for your phone message yesterday. My Monday is also packed with meetings and a public hearing, so Tuesday should be fine. Is there a time on Tuesday, preferably sometime in the morning, that you can meet up? From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:51 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Great – thank you. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 25081 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 12:27:23 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Shawna, I was attempting to accommodate Robert Chattel's schedule. I'll check back with him on Monday to see what options are available. Thanks. Pam Sent from my iPhone On Jul 21, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Pam, I saw the invitation for the Froom Ranch historic structures meeting, and wanted to let you know that Brian is out on vacation through August 2. I also have a meeting that morning (8:30 am – 10:00 am). Is there any option to move the meeting to later in the week? Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Thanks, and perfect timing! Have a good weekend. <image001.jpg>PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM 25082 To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? <image001.jpg>PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25083 From:Roberts, Andrea To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (Villaggio) Link Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 11:54:02 AM Attachments:image002.png image003.png Thanks so much! Andie Roberts JLL Valuation & Advisory Services 700 E. Campbell Road, Suite 265 Richardson, Texas, 75081 Direct: +1 214 396 5453 Main: +1 972 960 1222 x123 Fax +1 972 960 2922 Andrea.Roberts@am.jll.com www.us.jll.com   From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org]  Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 1:26 PM To: Roberts, Andrea <Andrea.Roberts@am.jll.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (Villaggio) Link   Hi Andie: The link to the information available online is: http://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 I am not aware of any additional new senior housing developments at this time, but if I hear anything further I will let you know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25084 This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in the future then please respond to the sender to this effect. 25085 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 11:28:00 AM Attachments:image002.png Hi Pam, I saw the invitation for the Froom Ranch historic structures meeting, and wanted to let you know that Brian is out on vacation through August 2. I also have a meeting that morning (8:30 am – 10:00 am). Is there any option to move the meeting to later in the week? Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Thanks, and perfect timing! Have a good weekend. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] 25086 Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25087 From:Scott, Shawna To:andrea.roberts@am.jll.com Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan (Villaggio) Link Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 11:25:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Andie: The link to the information available online is: http://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 I am not aware of any additional new senior housing developments at this time, but if I hear anything further I will let you know. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25088 From:City of San Luis Obispo, CA To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Proposed Senior Housing Developments Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 10:55:29 AM Message submitted from the <City of San Luis Obispo, CA> website. Site Visitor Name: Andie Roberts Site Visitor Email: andrea.roberts@am.jll.com Good morning! I left you a voicemail yesterday, but thought I would follow up with an email. We are doing some market research in the area on senior housing facilities (specifically independent living, assisted living and memory care). I was curious if you were aware of any in the City that are in the planning stages or under construction? I found a little information regarding one - The Villagio - and I wanted to see if this was still moving forward. Thanks for any information you could provide. 25089 From:Scott, Shawna To:eva@historycenterslo.org Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 10:26:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi Eva, The City of San Luis Obispo sent a hard copy of the attached Notice of Preparation to the County Historical Society; however, we had an outdated mailing address in our environmental notice mailing list. I have now corrected your address in our system. Please find attached an electronic copy of the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department- directory/community-development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder- 1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25090 From:Scott, Shawna To:dominic@downtownslo.com Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 10:22:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi Dominic, The City of San Luis Obispo sent a hard copy of the attached Notice of Preparation to the Downtown Association; however, we had an outdated mailing address in our environmental notice mailing list. I have now corrected your address in our system. Please find attached an electronic copy of the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department- directory/community-development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder- 1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25091 From:Lynda Auchinachie To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 10:20:26 AM Attachments:image006.png image003.png image007.png Thanks, Shawna. la From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:18 AM To: Lynda Auchinachie Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Lynda, I meant to copy you on this email yesterday: From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:19 PM To: 'dchurch@slolafco.com' <dchurch@slolafco.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi David, Please see below, noting these are draft graphics currently under review by the City, and it is my understanding that any requested amendment to the easement discussed below would require LAFCO review and approval. This supplemental information may further your understanding of the applicant’s request, and LAFCO’s review and response to the Notice of Preparation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 25092 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Very helpful. Thanks, Shawna. I understand they are draft graphics and I'm wondering if it is ok to share with David Church from LAFCO? We have discussed this recently since it was originally a LAFCO condition. Lynda From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:24 PM To: Lynda Auchinachie Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Lynda, Good to hear from you. Please see below, noting these are draft figures currently under review and may change. The figure on the left (with aerial base) delineates the existing easement, and the second graphic on the right delineates the proposed easement (currently under review). 25093 25094 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> 25095 Subject: Froom Ranch Specitic Plan Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25096 From:Scott, Shawna To:Lynda Auchinachie Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 10:18:00 AM Attachments:image006.png image003.png image007.png Hi Lynda, I meant to copy you on this email yesterday: From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:19 PM To: 'dchurch@slolafco.com' <dchurch@slolafco.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi David, Please see below, noting these are draft graphics currently under review by the City, and it is my understanding that any requested amendment to the easement discussed below would require LAFCO review and approval. This supplemental information may further your understanding of the applicant’s request, and LAFCO’s review and response to the Notice of Preparation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan 25097 Very helpful. Thanks, Shawna. I understand they are draft graphics and I'm wondering if it is ok to share with David Church from LAFCO? We have discussed this recently since it was originally a LAFCO condition. Lynda From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:24 PM To: Lynda Auchinachie Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Lynda, Good to hear from you. Please see below, noting these are draft figures currently under review and may change. The figure on the left (with aerial base) delineates the existing easement, and the second graphic on the right delineates the proposed easement (currently under review). 25098 25099 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25100 From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specitic Plan Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25101 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43:00 AM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Pam, you too! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Thanks, and perfect timing! Have a good weekend. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, 25102 Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25103 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42:46 AM Attachments:image002.png Thanks, and perfect timing! Have a good weekend. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:42 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, 25104 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25105 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 9:41:00 AM Attachments:image002.png Yes it is. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25106 25107 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 9:23:01 AM Attachments:image003.png Hi Shawna, Is Scott’s email scott@studio-2g.com ? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25108 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 8:53:00 AM Also, thank you for your phone message yesterday. My Monday is also packed with meetings and a public hearing, so Tuesday should be fine. Is there a time on Tuesday, preferably sometime in the morning, that you can meet up? From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:51 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Great – thank you. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 25109 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 8:50:44 AM Attachments:image001.png Great – thank you. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 7:50 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, I am going to forward this email to Doug, as he is the PC liaison. Either Doug or I will respond to Commissioner Mann. Thanks, Shawna From: Scott Mann [mailto:scott@studio-2g.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 6:41 AM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Good Morning Emily & Shawna, I have been going through the agenda report on scoping the EIR for the Froom Ranch project. Would the applicant like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share their vision of development for the property? Thank you, Planning Commissioner Mann 25110 From:Leveille, Brian To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 8:14:41 AM Hi Shawna, I think that would work. I will be out the 25th-Aug 2nd, but that would leave us some time to discuss before getting into the details of the staff report. With this late delivery of information though, we may want to be careful to not fully commit to the meeting. Thanks Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:09 AM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Brian, I talked with Pam this week, and they anticipate that the submittal of reports and materials for the August 28 CHC meeting will be delayed to Tuesday July 25 (we had an initial request to have this information in this week). Does that leave enough time for you to review the materials after you return from vacation? I think it would be helpful to review the materials with you before Emily starts the CHC staff report. Thank you, Shawna From: Leveille, Brian Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Shawna and Emily, 25111 I don’t see any issues with having the review on the 28th. Thanks for checking in. I look forward to working with you both on this. Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:57 AM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Brian, We are looking ahead to schedule the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conceptual Review item at the CHC – would August 28 work for you and the CHC? Emily is going to work with Pam to make sure we have the concept plan well before the notice is due (aiming to request RRM’s submittal of the concept plan by the week of July 17th to allow for our internal review). Let us know if you have any conflicts or concerns regarding this potential date. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25112 From:Scott, Shawna To:Leveille, Brian Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 8:09:00 AM Hi Brian, I talked with Pam this week, and they anticipate that the submittal of reports and materials for the August 28 CHC meeting will be delayed to Tuesday July 25 (we had an initial request to have this information in this week). Does that leave enough time for you to review the materials after you return from vacation? I think it would be helpful to review the materials with you before Emily starts the CHC staff report. Thank you, Shawna From: Leveille, Brian Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Shawna and Emily, I don’t see any issues with having the review on the 28th. Thanks for checking in. I look forward to working with you both on this. Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:57 AM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Brian, We are looking ahead to schedule the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conceptual Review item 25113 at the CHC – would August 28 work for you and the CHC? Emily is going to work with Pam to make sure we have the concept plan well before the notice is due (aiming to request RRM’s submittal of the concept plan by the week of July 17th to allow for our internal review). Let us know if you have any conflicts or concerns regarding this potential date. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25114 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 8:03:54 AM Attachments:image003.png Great; thanks for letting me know. I’ll get in touch with him. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25115 From:Scott Mann To:Scott, Shawna Cc:ecreel@swca.com; Davidson, Doug Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 8:01:02 AM Shawna, Thank you for your help. -Scott On Jul 21, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, Commissioner Mann, I will reach out to the applicant’s representative, Pam Ricci with RRM, and let them know you (and perhaps other Commissioners, individually) may be interested in a site visit. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Scott Mann [mailto:scott@studio-2g.com]  Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 6:41 AM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Good Morning Emily & Shawna, I have been going through the agenda report on scoping the EIR for the Froom Ranch project. Would the applicant like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share their vision of development for the property? Thank you, Planning Commissioner Mann <image001.png> 25116 25117 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 8:00:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam, Commissioner Mann asked if your team would like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share your vision of development for the property. I let him know that I would share this with you, and please feel free to contact the Commissioners individually. You can conduct meetings with each Commissioner individually (I know you are already familiar with the protocol). Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25118 From:Scott, Shawna To:Scott Mann; ecreel@swca.com Cc:Davidson, Doug Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 7:57:15 AM Attachments:image001.png Good morning, Commissioner Mann, I will reach out to the applicant’s representative, Pam Ricci with RRM, and let them know you (and perhaps other Commissioners, individually) may be interested in a site visit. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Scott Mann [mailto:scott@studio-2g.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 6:41 AM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Good Morning Emily & Shawna, I have been going through the agenda report on scoping the EIR for the Froom Ranch project. Would the applicant like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share their vision of development for the property? Thank you, Planning Commissioner Mann 25119 From:Scott, Shawna To:Davidson, Doug Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 7:52:54 AM Attachments:image001.png From: Scott Mann [mailto:scott@studio-2g.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 6:41 AM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Good Morning Emily & Shawna, I have been going through the agenda report on scoping the EIR for the Froom Ranch project. Would the applicant like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share their vision of development for the property? Thank you, Planning Commissioner Mann 25120 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 7:50:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, I am going to forward this email to Doug, as he is the PC liaison. Either Doug or I will respond to Commissioner Mann. Thanks, Shawna From: Scott Mann [mailto:scott@studio-2g.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 6:41 AM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Good Morning Emily & Shawna, I have been going through the agenda report on scoping the EIR for the Froom Ranch project. Would the applicant like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share their vision of development for the property? Thank you, Planning Commissioner Mann 25121 From:Scott Mann To:ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 21, 2017 6:41:26 AM Attachments:image001.png Good Morning Emily & Shawna, I have been going through the agenda report on scoping the EIR for the Froom Ranch project. Would the applicant like to meet at the site before Wednesday’s meeting to share their vision of development for the property? Thank you, Planning Commissioner Mann 25122 From:Scott, Shawna To:dchurch@slolafco.com Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:19:00 PM Attachments:image006.png image003.png image007.png Hi David, Please see below, noting these are draft graphics currently under review by the City, and it is my understanding that any requested amendment to the easement discussed below would require LAFCO review and approval. This supplemental information may further your understanding of the applicant’s request, and LAFCO’s review and response to the Notice of Preparation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Very helpful. Thanks, Shawna. I understand they are draft graphics and I'm wondering if it is ok to share with David Church from LAFCO? We have discussed this recently since it was originally a LAFCO condition. 25123 Lynda From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:24 PM To: Lynda Auchinachie Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Lynda, Good to hear from you. Please see below, noting these are draft figures currently under review and may change. The figure on the left (with aerial base) delineates the existing easement, and the second graphic on the right delineates the proposed easement (currently under review). 25124 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25125 From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specitic Plan Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25126 From:Lynda Auchinachie To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:28:19 PM Attachments:image006.png image003.png image007.png Very helpful. Thanks, Shawna. I understand they are draft graphics and I'm wondering if it is ok to share with David Church from LAFCO? We have discussed this recently since it was originally a LAFCO condition. Lynda From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:24 PM To: Lynda Auchinachie Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Lynda, Good to hear from you. Please see below, noting these are draft figures currently under review and may change. The figure on the left (with aerial base) delineates the existing easement, and the second graphic on the right delineates the proposed easement (currently under review). 25127 25128 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specitic Plan 25129 Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25130 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:25:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, Tuesday works for me, and we should aim for the morning. What time works for you? Thank you, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Shawna – an updated interested parties list is attached for your reference. I’m still getting through my emails, but I will get the NOP PowerPoint revised and back to you by next Tuesday. Are you available that day to meet and go over the presentation/scoping meeting? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 4:02 PM To: John McKenzie <johnnimac@earthlink.net>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi John, Thank you for your comments. We have added you to the interested parties list. Have a good weekend, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25131 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: John McKenzie [mailto:johnnimac@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 3:46 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Dear Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott, The City of San Luis Obispo needs an off-leash dog park. It currently does not have one. Based on nationwide averages and local city census and household data (see assumptions at the end),the City has over 10,000 dogs. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan (FRSP) will add 540 new residences which will add almost 300 dogs to this total. Further, all of the residential lots appear they will be very small with little or no backyard, increasing the need for a place to take these 300 dogs for a run. The San Luis Ranch on Madonna Road (likely to be approved later this month) will be adding 580 units and a commensurate amount of dogs. The proposed 2.9 acre neighborhood park for FRSP could accommodate a dog park (they usually require between 1 and 1.5 acres), but would displace other recreational uses better suited for this development. In 2001, the City approved their Parks and Recreation Element (General Plan, Chapter 7, Section 3.12), which identified 10 major unmet needs, including ‘Specialty facilities, such as disc golf, dog parks, BMX parks’. Since the City does not seem to have a definition, Wikipedia provides the following definition for a ‘dog park’: A dog park is a park for dogs to exercise and play off-leash in a controlled environment under the supervision of their owners. These parks have varying features, although they typically offer a 4' to 6' fence, separate double-gated entry and exit points, adequate drainage, benches for humans, shade for hot days, parking close to the site, water, tools to pick up and dispose of animal waste in covered trash cans, and regular maintenance and cleaning of the grounds. Dog parks may also offer wheel-chair access, a pond for swimming and a separate enclosure for small dogs. The Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council over the last 16 years have passed over meeting this community need as specified in the Parks and Recreation Element. Simply making the developer pay an in-lieu fee into the general recreation coffers will not meet this unmet demand for our canine companions. An efficient solution to this issue would be to look to Laguna Lake Park which includes large areas of under-developed land, and the only ‘unleashed dog area’ (which is a decades old 'pilot’ program that never received any follow-up or formalizing) in the City. However, as defined above, this ‘dog area’ does not meet the definition of a dog park. Being unfenced with limited amenities, there are many dogs and dog owners who will not use this under-improved area (e.g. small dog owners not wanting big dogs 25132 around; water dog owners that do not want their dogs to play in the water/mud ponds; owners with ‘wandering’ dogs; dog owners with physical disabilities; etc.). The limited mobility aspect (and making the Dog Park ADA accessible) would be very relevant to the target group for FRSP. For many reasons, Laguna Lake Park is well suited to be the first park to establish a fenced off-leash dog park. An important first step would be the preparation of a Dog Park Plan. Such a Plan would be able to identify where and what improvements are needed, including more parking areas (existing parking lot is usually full and overflowing and is not large enough for existing use). Once the specific improvements are identified in this Plan, and the associated costs are known, as money becomes available, the improvements can be prioritized and then completed in phases. Funding of these improvements could then be secured in phases through private donations/fundraisers, grants, project exactions, or through yearly City budgeting. The Recreation section of the EIR should include a discussion of this issue. While there is an existing deficiency with this unmet need, these large new projects with residential development will be adding substantially to this problem. Unless the applicant is interested in building a dog park into this development, it would seem that a reasonable mitigation or condition to address FRSP impacts would be to direct the project to prepare the Dog Park Plan, with funding from other sources to complete their fair share of improvements, as specified in an approved Dog Park Plan. Having a Plan prepared/approved will also have the following benefits: 1. It will eliminate the hodge-podge ‘improvements’ that have been made over the years, or that are currently being installed which would reduce wasteful spending. For example, the replacement fence just installed follows the existing fence line, and portions will have to be removed if there will be any expansion of the existing parking area along the existing road. Another example is the perimeter boulders – these do nothing to help control the off-leash dogs, especially if the dogs are water lovers (owners of such dogs have little ability to control such dogs when they race to the water/mud ponds beyond the boulders). The boulders just show where the ranger can issue the $500 ticket once the dog runs past the boulders. 2. It could be used to amend the Quimby fee as an added recreational capital improvement; and/or 3. It could be used as a part of updating the Parks and Recreation Element relating to dog parks. A mitigation/ condition could look like the following: REC-1. Parkland In-lieu Fees. The project applicant shall pay parkland in-lieu fees in accordance with the City’s parkland in-lieu fee program. The project’s specific fee shall be determined by the City at the time of project approval, after accounting for parkland provided within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The in-lieu fees collected from the project shall be directed to new projects or improvements to existing parks and recreation facilities within the City of San Luis Obispo parks system. Furthermore, a portion of these funds will be set aside to prepare a Dog Park Plan for Laguna Lake Park. The applicant will work with the City Parks and Recreation Department to define and complete this Plan. The Plan shall be completed prior to __. Elements of the Plan may include but not necessarily be limited to: Identify Off-leash Dog Park boundaries (include separated small and large dog areas); identify human and dog amenity needs; identify additional parking needs; identify costs associated with all proposed improvements, define maintenance needs, etc. If a Dog Park Plan has already been prepared by others, a comparable amount of funding shall be applied towards Dog Park improvements at Laguna Lake Park. Please include this item in the EIR analysis, and as you work with the applicant, consider adding a dog park to the project or directing a fair share towards getting a dog park. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Given that 16 years have passed with no serious attention being given to our faithful friends, now is the time to address this issue in this and all large projects with residential 25133 elements until we have at least one real dog park in this town (and catch up with the other six, smaller communities in our county that already have off leash dog parks). Please add me to the Draft EIR notification list. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea St., SLO, CA 93401 10,000 dogs – Assumptions/Facts City of SLO pop – 47,339 (2015 census) Per national 2012 estimate, over 1/3 of households (35.6%) own 1-2 dogs (1.6 average/household). Based on the 2010 census for SLO there are 2.2 people per household; and if this is applied to the 2015 City pop., there are about 21,518 households. Based on these stats there are over 7,000 households with dogs, and when the 1.6 dog average is applied there would be over 10,000 dogs within the City of San Luis Obispo. 25134 From:Scott, Shawna To:Lynda Auchinachie Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:24:00 PM Attachments:image006.png image003.png image007.png Hi Lynda, Good to hear from you. Please see below, noting these are draft figures currently under review and may change. The figure on the left (with aerial base) delineates the existing easement, and the second graphic on the right delineates the proposed easement (currently under review). 25135 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Lynda Auchinachie [mailto:lauchinachie@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specitic Plan 25136 Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25137 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 2:43:18 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom SP_Interested Parties_07.20.17.docx Hi Shawna – an updated interested parties list is attached for your reference. I’m still getting through my emails, but I will get the NOP PowerPoint revised and back to you by next Tuesday. Are you available that day to meet and go over the presentation/scoping meeting? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 4:02 PM To: John McKenzie <johnnimac@earthlink.net>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi John, Thank you for your comments. We have added you to the interested parties list. Have a good weekend, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: John McKenzie [mailto:johnnimac@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 3:46 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> 25138 Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Dear Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott, The City of San Luis Obispo needs an off-leash dog park. It currently does not have one. Based on nationwide averages and local city census and household data (see assumptions at the end),the City has over 10,000 dogs. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan (FRSP) will add 540 new residences which will add almost 300 dogs to this total. Further, all of the residential lots appear they will be very small with little or no backyard, increasing the need for a place to take these 300 dogs for a run. The San Luis Ranch on Madonna Road (likely to be approved later this month) will be adding 580 units and a commensurate amount of dogs. The proposed 2.9 acre neighborhood park for FRSP could accommodate a dog park (they usually require between 1 and 1.5 acres), but would displace other recreational uses better suited for this development. In 2001, the City approved their Parks and Recreation Element (General Plan, Chapter 7, Section 3.12), which identified 10 major unmet needs, including ‘Specialty facilities, such as disc golf, dog parks, BMX parks’. Since the City does not seem to have a definition, Wikipedia provides the following definition for a ‘dog park’: A dog park is a park for dogs to exercise and play off-leash in a controlled environment under the supervision of their owners. These parks have varying features, although they typically offer a 4' to 6' fence, separate double-gated entry and exit points, adequate drainage, benches for humans, shade for hot days, parking close to the site, water, tools to pick up and dispose of animal waste in covered trash cans, and regular maintenance and cleaning of the grounds. Dog parks may also offer wheel-chair access, a pond for swimming and a separate enclosure for small dogs. The Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council over the last 16 years have passed over meeting this community need as specified in the Parks and Recreation Element. Simply making the developer pay an in-lieu fee into the general recreation coffers will not meet this unmet demand for our canine companions. An efficient solution to this issue would be to look to Laguna Lake Park which includes large areas of under-developed land, and the only ‘unleashed dog area’ (which is a decades old 'pilot’ program that never received any follow-up or formalizing) in the City. However, as defined above, this ‘dog area’ does not meet the definition of a dog park. Being unfenced with limited amenities, there are many dogs and dog owners who will not use this under-improved area (e.g. small dog owners not wanting big dogs around; water dog owners that do not want their dogs to play in the water/mud ponds; owners with ‘wandering’ dogs; dog owners with physical disabilities; etc.). The limited mobility aspect (and making the Dog Park ADA accessible) would be very relevant to the target group for FRSP. For many reasons, Laguna Lake Park is well suited to be the first park to establish a fenced off-leash dog park. An important first step would be the preparation of a Dog Park Plan. Such a Plan would be able to identify where and what improvements are needed, including more parking areas (existing parking lot is usually full and overflowing and is not large enough for existing use). Once the specific improvements are identified in this Plan, and the associated costs are known, as money becomes available, the improvements can be prioritized and then completed in phases. Funding of these improvements could then be secured in phases through private donations/fundraisers, grants, project exactions, or through yearly City budgeting. The Recreation section of the EIR should include a discussion of this issue. While there is an existing deficiency with this unmet need, these large new projects with residential development will be adding substantially to this problem. Unless the applicant is interested in building a dog park into this development, it would seem that a reasonable mitigation or condition to address FRSP impacts would be to direct the project to prepare the Dog Park Plan, with funding from other sources to complete their fair share of improvements, as specified in an approved Dog Park Plan. 25139 Having a Plan prepared/approved will also have the following benefits: 1. It will eliminate the hodge-podge ‘improvements’ that have been made over the years, or that are currently being installed which would reduce wasteful spending. For example, the replacement fence just installed follows the existing fence line, and portions will have to be removed if there will be any expansion of the existing parking area along the existing road. Another example is the perimeter boulders – these do nothing to help control the off-leash dogs, especially if the dogs are water lovers (owners of such dogs have little ability to control such dogs when they race to the water/mud ponds beyond the boulders). The boulders just show where the ranger can issue the $500 ticket once the dog runs past the boulders. 2. It could be used to amend the Quimby fee as an added recreational capital improvement; and/or 3. It could be used as a part of updating the Parks and Recreation Element relating to dog parks. A mitigation/ condition could look like the following: REC-1. Parkland In-lieu Fees. The project applicant shall pay parkland in-lieu fees in accordance with the City’s parkland in-lieu fee program. The project’s specific fee shall be determined by the City at the time of project approval, after accounting for parkland provided within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The in-lieu fees collected from the project shall be directed to new projects or improvements to existing parks and recreation facilities within the City of San Luis Obispo parks system. Furthermore, a portion of these funds will be set aside to prepare a Dog Park Plan for Laguna Lake Park. The applicant will work with the City Parks and Recreation Department to define and complete this Plan. The Plan shall be completed prior to __. Elements of the Plan may include but not necessarily be limited to: Identify Off-leash Dog Park boundaries (include separated small and large dog areas); identify human and dog amenity needs; identify additional parking needs; identify costs associated with all proposed improvements, define maintenance needs, etc. If a Dog Park Plan has already been prepared by others, a comparable amount of funding shall be applied towards Dog Park improvements at Laguna Lake Park. Please include this item in the EIR analysis, and as you work with the applicant, consider adding a dog park to the project or directing a fair share towards getting a dog park. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Given that 16 years have passed with no serious attention being given to our faithful friends, now is the time to address this issue in this and all large projects with residential elements until we have at least one real dog park in this town (and catch up with the other six, smaller communities in our county that already have off leash dog parks). Please add me to the Draft EIR notification list. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea St., SLO, CA 93401 10,000 dogs – Assumptions/Facts City of SLO pop – 47,339 (2015 census) Per national 2012 estimate, over 1/3 of households (35.6%) own 1-2 dogs (1.6 25140 average/household). Based on the 2010 census for SLO there are 2.2 people per household; and if this is applied to the 2015 City pop., there are about 21,518 households. Based on these stats there are over 7,000 households with dogs, and when the 1.6 dog average is applied there would be over 10,000 dogs within the City of San Luis Obispo. 25141 From:Lynda Auchinachie To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch Specitic Plan Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:05:19 AM Hi Shawna, I'm looking for a map or site plan that identifies proposed development relative to the existing ag easement. I have found the constraints map...but the development isn't very clear and the ag easement doesn't appear to be identified as a constraint. Thanks, Lynda 25142 From:Scott, Shawna To:mcas@morrocoastaudubon.org Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 8:51:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Greetings, The City of San Luis Obispo sent a hard copy of the attached Notice of Preparation to the Morro Bay Audubon Society; however, we had an outdated mailing address. I have now corrected your address in our system. Please find attached an electronic copy of the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department- directory/community-development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder- 1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25143 From:Scott, Shawna To:chris@centralcoastsalmon.com Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Thursday, July 20, 2017 8:48:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi Christopher, The City sent a hard copy of the attached Notice of Preparation to Central Coast Salmon Enhancement; however, we had an outdated mailing address. I have now corrected your address in our system. Please find attached an electronic copy of the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department- directory/community-development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder- 1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25144 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Hudson, Jake Cc:Rice, Jennifer Subject:Action Items Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 6:08:17 PM Attachments:image001.png A few updates/action items for while I’m out on vacation: 1. Froom Ranch SP Jake, I left a copy of our draft scope for the TIS, a list of the recommended additions per Caltrans & County comments, and the latest copy of a preliminary traffic assessment that CCTC did for the applicant. Feel free to call my cell during the meeting with Caltrans tomorrow if you need any input on Froom. 2. Broad Street Bike Blvd I’ve drafted the CAR and the routing needs to start by end of this week. Can you, Jen and Adam please review and make any edits as needed. 2 of 3 attachments are included in MinuteTraq. We still need to include the attachment with all the survey comments. If you need to edit any attachments, the files are here We’ll need to update a few items after the BAC meeting and at the end of the month when the online survey is closed to reflect BAC recommendation and the final survey tallies/comments. Good luck tomorrow night! Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25145 From:Choal, Kathleen To:Scott, Shawna Subject:EIR for Froom Ranch response from KSBY-TV Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:18:53 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch EIR KSBY.pdf Hi Shawna, I received the EIR for the Froom Ranch Project. Attached is my response. I am neither for or against the project, I just have a couple of concerns that I would like to be addressed in the EIR. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kathleen Choal Kathleen Choal KSBY-TV, President & General Manager 1772 Calle Joaquin San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 805-541-6666 ext. 450 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information accompanying this email transmission contains confidential information that is intended only for the use of the individual or company named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you. 25146 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Dia Hurd Subject:Re: san luis ranch, avila ranch and froom ranch Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 2:46:41 PM It will be on the record. Our Council meeting started at 2pm yesterday. Have a good day Dia. Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Dia Hurd <magoo282@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 2:33:27 PM To: Gomez, Aaron Subject: Re: san luis ranch, avila ranch and froom ranch thank you for telling me this. i thought i sent them early enough to allow consideration. personal reasons caused my delay in even writing. i basically know the project (s) will be/ were approved but just want my comments on record. dia From: "Gomez, Aaron" <agomez@slocity.org> To: Dia Hurd <magoo282@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 1:02 PM Subject: Re: san luis ranch, avila ranch and froom ranch Hello Dia, Thank you for your comments. Unfortunately sending these comments during our Council meeting as opposed to prior to our meeting makes it quite difficult to discuss your perspective. For future correspondence I would recommend sending your emails prior to a meeting. Sincerely, Aaron Gomez Council Member 25147 Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Dia Hurd <magoo282@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:45:39 PM To: Harmon, Heidi; Christianson, Carlyn; Pease, Andy; Gomez, Aaron; Rivoire, Dan Subject: san luis ranch, avila ranch and froom ranch I have read most of the documents concerning the many pitfalls and outright degradation that will come to current city residents with the approval of these projects. The current plans do NOT address our serious infrastructure deficiencies. The City, particularly the Manager and the Planning Department have clearly put the cart before the horse, and the onus on the taxpayers to fulfill the needs they are allowing the developer to ignore in allowing any of these projects to proceed before requiring the developer to actually provide the basic infrastructure of adequate roadways for extreme amounts of traffic increase. In addition WHERE IS THE WATER? Do any of you council members have a notion where hundreds of homes in these new developments will find an adequate source for sustainable water supply for their use? The answer is obviously NO. It stuns the imagination that you intelligent individuals appear to be forgetting how short of water we were just a few months ago. Not to mention the extreme price of water and sewer increases we citizens have had to endure these many years while planning for these huge developments that ARE in No way affordable housing, continues unabated. Another consideration that has been cast aside is the traffic problems which will immediately occur when even ground breaking begins. Traffic on Tank Farm road was nearly paralyzed for a couple of months while remediation was occurring at the old Chevron site. Imagine when the ground is broken. I travel different routes daily and can say for a fact that exiting the 101 northbound at LOVR is a disaster between 7-9 AM. The cars are just STOPPED. It is a miracle the daily crash isnt occurring when motorists who do not always pay attention to the traffic in front of them on the offramp just blindly continue at just below freeway speeds up that off ramp seemingly unaware there are a dozen or more autos/trucks stopped, literally stopped up the ramp and at the top, stopped until the lights clear the intersection going eastbound from the offramp. It can take quite a few minutes for that to clear. And the autos continue to pile up on the freeway, LOVR and lower Higuera which receives insane amounts of cars during the morning rush hour and tries to move the commuters along up to Tank Farm. It is a zoo of autos and looks more like a parking lot. In addition I have read a few letters to the City/County from the State Department of Roads asking WHY no recent traffic studies have been done at many of these off ramps so that the State can adequately address the additional traffic requirement for changes to the proposed developments to allow the traffic to flow. apparently, they have written these letters and the studies are still not done. For all of our sakes, we need these studies done. We citizens really want all of the infrastructure to be accomplished prior to any final approval of these 25148 3 or more significant projects. Why are you so personally opposed to these requests? We out here just don't understand your reluctance to complete your due diligence in making certain these projects are acceptable according to LUCE policies like not using prime agriculture land for houses. No one except the developer is holding your feet to the fire to build these projects. I just don't understand why you feel the way you do. It makes no sense. I know you will roundfile this email the second you see the from line. I urge you to recognize that I am an equal footing citizen with legitimate concerns which are not being addressed. I think you need to consider not treating citizens like pariahs ...we support this town and we have rights to our thoughts and opinions. dia hurd 25149 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Dia Hurd Subject:Re: san luis ranch, avila ranch and froom ranch Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 1:02:00 PM Hello Dia, Thank you for your comments. Unfortunately sending these comments during our Council meeting as opposed to prior to our meeting makes it quite difficult to discuss your perspective. For future correspondence I would recommend sending your emails prior to a meeting. Sincerely, Aaron Gomez Council Member Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Dia Hurd <magoo282@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:45:39 PM To: Harmon, Heidi; Christianson, Carlyn; Pease, Andy; Gomez, Aaron; Rivoire, Dan Subject: san luis ranch, avila ranch and froom ranch I have read most of the documents concerning the many pitfalls and outright degradation that will come to current city residents with the approval of these projects. The current plans do NOT address our serious infrastructure deficiencies. The City, particularly the Manager and the Planning Department have clearly put the cart before the horse, and the onus on the taxpayers to fulfill the needs they are allowing the developer to ignore in allowing any of these projects to proceed before requiring the developer to actually provide the basic infrastructure of adequate roadways for extreme amounts of traffic increase. In addition WHERE IS THE WATER? Do any of you council members have a notion where hundreds of homes in these new developments will find an adequate source for sustainable water supply for their use? The answer is obviously NO. It stuns the imagination that you intelligent individuals appear to be forgetting how short of water we were just a few months ago. Not to mention the extreme price of water and sewer increases we citizens have had to endure these many years while planning for these huge developments that ARE in No way affordable housing, continues unabated. Another consideration that has been cast aside is the traffic problems which will immediately occur when even ground breaking begins. Traffic on Tank Farm road was nearly paralyzed for a couple of months while remediation was occurring at the old Chevron site. Imagine when the ground is 25150 broken. I travel different routes daily and can say for a fact that exiting the 101 northbound at LOVR is a disaster between 7-9 AM. The cars are just STOPPED. It is a miracle the daily crash isnt occurring when motorists who do not always pay attention to the traffic in front of them on the offramp just blindly continue at just below freeway speeds up that off ramp seemingly unaware there are a dozen or more autos/trucks stopped, literally stopped up the ramp and at the top, stopped until the lights clear the intersection going eastbound from the offramp. It can take quite a few minutes for that to clear. And the autos continue to pile up on the freeway, LOVR and lower Higuera which receives insane amounts of cars during the morning rush hour and tries to move the commuters along up to Tank Farm. It is a zoo of autos and looks more like a parking lot. In addition I have read a few letters to the City/County from the State Department of Roads asking WHY no recent traffic studies have been done at many of these off ramps so that the State can adequately address the additional traffic requirement for changes to the proposed developments to allow the traffic to flow. apparently, they have written these letters and the studies are still not done. For all of our sakes, we need these studies done. We citizens really want all of the infrastructure to be accomplished prior to any final approval of these 3 or more significant projects. Why are you so personally opposed to these requests? We out here just don't understand your reluctance to complete your due diligence in making certain these projects are acceptable according to LUCE policies like not using prime agriculture land for houses. No one except the developer is holding your feet to the fire to build these projects. I just don't understand why you feel the way you do. It makes no sense. I know you will roundfile this email the second you see the from line. I urge you to recognize that I am an equal footing citizen with legitimate concerns which are not being addressed. I think you need to consider not treating citizens like pariahs ...we support this town and we have rights to our thoughts and opinions. dia hurd 25151 From:Christine Carter To:ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP - Question Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:15:05 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png Dear Emily and Shawna, Our firm will be submitting a proposal in response to the City’s Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR, Specification No. 0143-2017 RFP. We plan on utilizing a subconsultant for visual simulations. Do we need to submit the required forms and qualifications for our proposed subconsultant, or just their hourly rates and estimate hours to do the work? Thank you for your help and time. We are looking forward to responding. Christine Carter Marketing Coordinator Rincon Consultants, Inc. 916 706 1374 EXT 253 MOBILE 916 540 0101 www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Ranked “#1 Best Firm to Work For” – CE New 25152 From:Hill, Robert To:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Cc:John Madonna; Robert Richmond; Walters, Tim J.; Ricci, Pam A.; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:03:55 AM Attachments:image002.png Hi Victor, Thanks for this. I will be on family vacation 7/21-8/4 and will not be able to attend a meeting until after that. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Robert Richmond <brichmond@villaggiocommunities.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com> Subject: Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and 25153 approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25154 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Hill, Robert; Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Cc:John Madonna; Robert Richmond; Walters, Tim J.; Ricci, Pam A.; kmerk@kevinmerkassociates.com; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Subject:Froom Ranch - Froom Creek Restoration Date:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:20:16 AM All, we are almost complete with submittal of the Technical Studies for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. We’re are waiting for the last final reports – Archaeology and Historic. We hope to have those in the next couple of days. The RFP for environmental consultants is “on the street”. We have submitted the Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydrology Calculations report (including Geomorphology) to the City. The conceptual project site plan is complete and submitted. I’m thinking that perhaps we should start working on a meeting with “the agencies” to get them up back to speed on where we are in the process and to review the preliminary information and approach to restoration of Froom Creek – a follow-up to our initial discussions with them. Bob/Shawna/Kevin/Emily, I’m not certain if the players are still the same will you please send names for who you think the appropriate person(s) would be from City, USACE, RWQCB, NOAA, CDFW, ACOE (others) and we will begin trying to get the meeting together. Alternatively, Bob/Shawna/Emily you may have better results requesting and getting a meeting scheduled with them (could be a conference call with materials submitted to them in advance) – what do you think? Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25155 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A.; "Emily Creel" Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:54:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Pam. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:25 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily & Shawna, I just realized that I picked the wrong Emily from my email list. Sorry for the oversight. PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 2:40 PM To: emily@oasisassoc.com; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily & Shawna, Included in the following link are two of the technical studies not previously submitted: Click to Retrieve File(s) Froom Ranch - SWA Structural Report 07.12.17 [NO COST ESTM].pdf Froom-Ranch-SP-Hydrology-Combined PDF.pdf The two reports are highlighted green in the list below and are the Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, and the Structural Analysis of the Historic Structures. If you would like hard copies of these reports, please let me know how many you need. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI 25156 From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) 25157 Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25158 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A.; emily@oasisassoc.com Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Walters, Tim J. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:52:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Pam. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 2:40 PM To: emily@oasisassoc.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily & Shawna, Included in the following link are two of the technical studies not previously submitted: Click to Retrieve File(s) Froom Ranch - SWA Structural Report 07.12.17 [NO COST ESTM].pdf Froom-Ranch-SP-Hydrology-Combined PDF.pdf The two reports are highlighted green in the list below and are the Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, and the Structural Analysis of the Historic Structures. If you would like hard copies of these reports, please let me know how many you need. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. Let me know if you have questions. 25159 Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) 25160 Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25161 From:Dia Hurd To:Harmon, Heidi; Christianson, Carlyn; Pease, Andy; Gomez, Aaron; Rivoire, Dan Subject:san luis ranch, avila ranch and froom ranch Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:46:34 PM I have read most of the documents concerning the many pitfalls and outright degradation that will come to current city residents with the approval of these projects. The current plans do NOT address our serious infrastructure deficiencies. The City, particularly the Manager and the Planning Department have clearly put the cart before the horse, and the onus on the taxpayers to fulfill the needs they are allowing the developer to ignore in allowing any of these projects to proceed before requiring the developer to actually provide the basic infrastructure of adequate roadways for extreme amounts of traffic increase. In addition WHERE IS THE WATER? Do any of you council members have a notion where hundreds of homes in these new developments will find an adequate source for sustainable water supply for their use? The answer is obviously NO. It stuns the imagination that you intelligent individuals appear to be forgetting how short of water we were just a few months ago. Not to mention the extreme price of water and sewer increases we citizens have had to endure these many years while planning for these huge developments that ARE in No way affordable housing, continues unabated. Another consideration that has been cast aside is the traffic problems which will immediately occur when even ground breaking begins. Traffic on Tank Farm road was nearly paralyzed for a couple of months while remediation was occurring at the old Chevron site. Imagine when the ground is broken. I travel different routes daily and can say for a fact that exiting the 101 northbound at LOVR is a disaster between 7-9 AM. The cars are just STOPPED. It is a miracle the daily crash isnt occurring when motorists who do not always pay attention to the traffic in front of them on the offramp just blindly continue at just below freeway speeds up that off ramp seemingly unaware there are a dozen or more autos/trucks stopped, literally stopped up the ramp and at the top, stopped until the lights clear the intersection going eastbound from the offramp. It can take quite a few minutes for that to clear. And the autos continue to pile up on the freeway, LOVR and lower Higuera which receives insane amounts of cars during the morning rush hour and tries to move the commuters along up to Tank Farm. It is a zoo of autos and looks more like a parking lot. In addition I have read a few letters to the City/County from the State Department of Roads asking WHY no recent traffic studies have been done at many of these off ramps so that the State can adequately address the additional traffic requirement for changes to the proposed developments to allow the traffic to flow. apparently, they have written these letters and the studies are still not done. For all of our sakes, we need these studies done. We citizens really want all of the infrastructure to be accomplished prior to any final approval of these 3 or more significant projects. Why are you so personally opposed to these requests? We out here just don't understand your reluctance to complete your due diligence in making certain these projects are acceptable according to LUCE policies like not using prime agriculture land for houses. No one except the developer is holding your feet to the fire to build these projects. I just don't understand why you feel the way you do. It makes no sense. I know you will roundfile this email the second you see the from line. I urge you to recognize that I am an equal footing citizen with legitimate concerns which are not being addressed. I think you need to consider not treating citizens like pariahs ...we support this town and we have rights to our thoughts and opinions. dia hurd 25162 25163 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna; "Emily Creel" Subject:FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:25:25 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Emily & Shawna, I just realized that I picked the wrong Emily from my email list. Sorry for the oversight. PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 2:40 PM To: emily@oasisassoc.com; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily & Shawna, Included in the following link are two of the technical studies not previously submitted: Click to Retrieve File(s) Froom Ranch - SWA Structural Report 07.12.17 [NO COST ESTM].pdf Froom-Ranch-SP-Hydrology-Combined PDF.pdf The two reports are highlighted green in the list below and are the Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, and the Structural Analysis of the Historic Structures. If you would like hard copies of these reports, please let me know how many you need. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies 25164 Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) 25165 Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25166 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:emily@oasisassoc.com; Scott, Shawna Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Walters, Tim J. Subject:FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 2:39:55 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Emily & Shawna, Included in the following link are two of the technical studies not previously submitted: Click to Retrieve File(s) Froom Ranch - SWA Structural Report 07.12.17 [NO COST ESTM].pdf Froom-Ranch-SP-Hydrology-Combined PDF.pdf The two reports are highlighted green in the list below and are the Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, and the Structural Analysis of the Historic Structures. If you would like hard copies of these reports, please let me know how many you need. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> 25167 Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) 25168 Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25169 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Copies Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:17:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam, Can we please have seven hard copies and one electronic version (PDF is fine via FTP or similar)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25170 From:Hill, Robert To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Notice of Preparation Hearing Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:17:49 PM We leave this Friday 7/21 and get back to town 8/5. It should be a fun road trip and we are very much looking forward to it! Thanks for keeping me in the loop. Bob _____________________________________________ From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:16 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Notice of Preparation Hearing Sounds amazing – I would love to hear about your trip sometime. When do you head out? I’ll forward you any agency comments we receive on the NOP, in addition to any public comments and correspondence from the hearing and NOP process. -----Original Appointment----- From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:12 PM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Declined: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Notice of Preparation Hearing When: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 6:00 PM-9:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: Planning Commission Hi Shawna, I will be on vacation – we’ll be camping at Crater Lake that night! Of course, I will be very interested to hear what kinds of comments come out. Thanks, Bob 25171 From:Scott, Shawna To:Hill, Robert Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Notice of Preparation Hearing Date:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:15:39 PM Sounds amazing – I would love to hear about your trip sometime. When do you head out? I’ll forward you any agency comments we receive on the NOP, in addition to any public comments and correspondence from the hearing and NOP process. -----Original Appointment----- From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:12 PM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Declined: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Notice of Preparation Hearing When: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 6:00 PM-9:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: Planning Commission Hi Shawna, I will be on vacation – we’ll be camping at Crater Lake that night! Of course, I will be very interested to hear what kinds of comments come out. Thanks, Bob 25172 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Draft PC Presentation Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 3:00:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, I hope you had a great vacation, and that Alaska was amazing. Thank you for the draft presentation. Can you please add the following: Describe the Specific Plan / project description further so that the PC and public understand what is proposed – you can provide a summary and note that the applicant will be expanding further on their project and vision Provide some background information including Planning Commission review/initiation, Council review/initiation, and CHC and PRC pre-application review (you can add dates and summarize what was discussed – please refer to past agenda reports with background information) Energy (add bullet to one of the slides) Alternatives (one slide should suffice) In addition, please expand upon some of the key issues areas, based on the previous and new information/reports provided by the applicant, including: Aesthetics (should have its own slide) Include graphic showing 150-foot elevation line Show visual simulations (pick one or two – talk to Pam as I am sure they will want to run through all of the sims so you won’t need to) Biological Resources (should have its own slide) Perhaps add graphic showing project constraints? Note resources above 150-foot elevation – unique ecology of area Note special-status species potentially affected by project Add exhibit showing proposed re-alignment of Froom Creek, note multi-agency coordination Cultural Resources (should have its own slide) Note archaeological resources present Summarize concept, identify that project subject to Historic Preservation Ordinance Note SOI standards Hydrology and Water Quality (should have its own slide) Transportation and Circulation (should have its own slide) Tribal Cultural Resources Add bullet that SB18 and AB52 required Utilities and Service Systems 25173 Note studies required to evaluate/determine water demand, demand on water/sewer service You may be able to pull information from the previous presentations – let me know if you don’t see them in the SWCA project folder. Also, the past hearing reports are all online now, at the current project website here: http://www.slocity.org/government/department- directory/community-development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/- folder-1911 When you are settled back in, give me a ring and we can discuss further. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25174 From:Scott, Shawna To:Davidson, Doug Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan PC Agenda Report Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 2:00:33 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you! From: Davidson, Doug Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 1:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan PC Agenda Report Done. From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 1:35 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan PC Agenda Report Hi Doug, When you have a moment, would you please add your initials to the final report, available here? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25175 From:Davidson, Doug To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan PC Agenda Report Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 1:40:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Done. From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 1:35 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan PC Agenda Report Hi Doug, When you have a moment, would you please add your initials to the final report, available here? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25176 From:Scott, Shawna To:Davidson, Doug Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan PC Agenda Report Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 1:35:04 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Doug, When you have a moment, would you please add your initials to the final report, available here? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25177 From:Joe WEILAND To:Schwartz, Luke Cc:Wheeler, Bryan Subject:RE: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 12:29:57 PM Attachments:IMAGE.png IMAGE.png IMAGE.png IMAGE.png Thanks Luke. Much appreciated and we will look for the RFP in August. Joe >>> "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> 7/17/2017 12:24 PM >>> Joe, You are correct, we will be issuing an RFP for the traffic study through our transportation planning/engineering on-call, separate from the EIR procurement. We are refining the scope for the traffic study right now with Caltrans and the county and plan issue the RFP to our on-call list in August. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Wheeler, Bryan Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 11:26 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Get Outlook for Android From: Joe WEILAND <jweiland@omnimeans.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 10:22:33 AM To: Wheeler, Bryan Cc: Doug Ries; Kamesh Vedula; Marty INOUYE Subject: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project 25178 Good morning Bryan. An IMS notification regarding the above referenced project came across by desk late last week. I contacted Rich Daulton at Rincon to see if they would need our support. He indicated that the City will be handling traffic like you did for San Luis Ranch with the traffic study handled through a separate contract directly with the City. If this is true, when do you expect to release the RFP specific to the traffic study? We look forward to receiving a copy and providing you with our proposal. Thanks and take care. Joe Joseph W. Weiland, P. E. Office Manager p. 805.242.0461 | ext.1105 669 Pacific Street, Ste. A | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 omnimeans.com | roundabouts.omnimeans.com 25179 From:Schwartz, Luke To:jweiland@omnimeans.com Cc:Wheeler, Bryan Subject:RE: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 12:24:33 PM Attachments:image003.png image004.png image005.png image001.png Joe, You are correct, we will be issuing an RFP for the traffic study through our transportation planning/engineering on-call, separate from the EIR procurement. We are refining the scope for the traffic study right now with Caltrans and the county and plan issue the RFP to our on-call list in August. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Wheeler, Bryan Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 11:26 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Get Outlook for Android From: Joe WEILAND <jweiland@omnimeans.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 10:22:33 AM To: Wheeler, Bryan Cc: Doug Ries; Kamesh Vedula; Marty INOUYE Subject: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Good morning Bryan. An IMS notification regarding the above referenced project came across by desk late last week. I contacted Rich Daulton at Rincon to see if they would need our support. He indicated that the City will 25180 be handling traffic like you did for San Luis Ranch with the traffic study handled through a separate contract directly with the City. If this is true, when do you expect to release the RFP specific to the traffic study? We look forward to receiving a copy and providing you with our proposal. Thanks and take care. Joe Joseph W. Weiland, P. E. Office Manager p. 805.242.0461 | ext.1105 669 Pacific Street, Ste. A | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 omnimeans.com | roundabouts.omnimeans.com 25181 From:Wheeler, Bryan To:Schwartz, Luke Subject:Fwd: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 11:25:54 AM Attachments:IMAGE.BMP IMAGE.BMP IMAGE.BMP Get Outlook for Android From: Joe WEILAND <jweiland@omnimeans.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 10:22:33 AM To: Wheeler, Bryan Cc: Doug Ries; Kamesh Vedula; Marty INOUYE Subject: EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Good morning Bryan. An IMS notification regarding the above referenced project came across by desk late last week. I contacted Rich Daulton at Rincon to see if they would need our support. He indicated that the City will be handling traffic like you did for San Luis Ranch with the traffic study handled through a separate contract directly with the City. If this is true, when do you expect to release the RFP specific to the traffic study? We look forward to receiving a copy and providing you with our proposal. Thanks and take care. Joe Joseph W. Weiland, P. E. Office Manager p. 805.242.0461 | ext.1105 669 Pacific Street, Ste. A | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 omnimeans.com | roundabouts.omnimeans.com 25182 From:Joe WEILAND To:Wheeler, Bryan Cc:Doug Ries; Kamesh Vedula; Marty INOUYE Subject:EIR for Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Date:Monday, July 17, 2017 10:22:44 AM Attachments:IMAGE.BMP IMAGE.BMP IMAGE.BMP Good morning Bryan. An IMS notification regarding the above referenced project came across by desk late last week. I contacted Rich Daulton at Rincon to see if they would need our support. He indicated that the City will be handling traffic like you did for San Luis Ranch with the traffic study handled through a separate contract directly with the City. If this is true, when do you expect to release the RFP specific to the traffic study? We look forward to receiving a copy and providing you with our proposal. Thanks and take care. Joe Joseph W. Weiland, P. E. Office Manager p. 805.242.0461 | ext.1105 669 Pacific Street, Ste. A | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 omnimeans.com | roundabouts.omnimeans.com 25183 From:Mudgett, Melissa To:Stanwyck, Shelly (sstanwyck@slocity.org) Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 4:16:00 PM Shelly, Just FYI Good gosh this guy doesn’t quit! Thanks, Mel Melissa C. Mudgett PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT From: John McKenzie [mailto:johnnimac@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 3:04 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Mudgett, Melissa <mmudgett@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Hi Shawna, Thanks for the notification and links. Per my letter previously sent, my focus is trying to encourage the City to focus on getting their first adequately sized, fully functional dog park. The following discussion relates to the Recreation as well as the land use consistency sections of the IS/EIR. The City does not have an off leash, fenced dog park. The current Parks and Recreation Element, approved in 2001, identifies dog parks as one of the City’s unmet needs. The City has about 12,000 dogs currently, with about 1,000 more dogs on the way when this project is added to San Luis and Avila Ranch projects. Very little has been done over the last 16 years to meet this identified need. The existing informal ‘dog area’ at Laguna Lake Park does not meet the definition of a dog park. While this is a good central location for such a park, many amenities are needed for this to become a full-fledged dog park. If the project cannot provide some assurances that progress will be made to provide for a full-fledged dog park in the City, the project should be found inconsistent with this provision of the Parks and Recreation Element. Another current trend that will push dog owners to off leash dog parks, is lot size, and the lack of backyards or areas for dogs to run. All the current 'Ranches', including Froom, propose most of their lots as being very small with no room for (big) backyards. In reviewing the IS, I found no specific details about the project proposing a dog park. However, in reviewing the PRC minutes for the Specific Plan, a dog park was mentioned, and the report’s graphic showed a very small and inadequate dog park (appears to be about ¼ acre in size). As the EIR is prepared, it would seem appropriate to recognize this as one of the uses within the park, and that it does not meet the current standards for dog park size. At a minimum, dog park sizes start at ½ acre and go up from there. For local reference, the El 25184 Chorro dog park is about one acre in size. In taking my dog there, who likes to fetch, I cannot envision a dog park being less than this size (one acre) to allow enough room to throw a ball or frisbee, multiplied by 2 or 3 other dogs/owners with similar interests at the same time (it is often best to have enough area to allow these to be occurring at the same time but in different sections of the dog park). If this project cannot at least bump up the on-site dog park acreage to ½ acre, it will not function well, and should be eliminated as one of the park uses. Size of the dog park will determine its success or failure. I would strongly suggest that there be a conversation with P&R staff to determine a minimally acceptable size as projects consider proposing dog parks, and then hold to that minimum. If it is too small and confining, as proposed, two ball-obsessive dogs together playing fetch may have issues. Another relevant element, especially with the senior housing focus, is providing accessibility for those with some disabilities. The dog park should be mostly on relatively flat ground and provide all-weather internal walkways that meet ADA requirements. It looked like the on-site dog park was being proposed between a creek and the bottom of one of the hills. It was unclear how flat the area is. Back to the Laguna Lake Park dog area. This is really a great first place to get a dog park established. Unless Froom Ranch can step up to provide the additional acreage (and maybe a better, flatter location) for a dog park, it would seem as an alternative that a nexus could be made for a fair share contribution specifically to the Laguna Lake Park ‘dog area’ with the intent to make it a full-fledged dog park. A first step to this end would be the preparation of a Dog Park Plan. This effort would first work with the public and stakeholders to identify the specific location and desired amenities. Once established, the details of the Plan would be completed, including improvement costs, and then approved by the Council. Improvements could then be installed in phases as money becomes available. For this project, maybe a fair share portion would be for the project to prepare the Dog Park Plan. If only the standard, non-specific in-lieu fee language is used to condition the project for recreation impacts, we will get what we have been getting for the last 16 years to meet our unmet dog park need – which is nothing. However, had specific language been included in the other two large pending developments (San Luis and Avila Ranches) to provide dog park development funds to Laguna Lake Park, along with this one, the City would likely have in very short order at least one nice dog park for all to enjoy. I hope this discussion will assist the City and/or EIR preparer that some additional efforts should be made with this project so our faithful canine companions can eventually also consider this one of the happier places to live. Sincerely, John McKenzie -----Original Message----- From: "Scott, Shawna" Sent: Jul 14, 2017 10:34 AM To: John McKenzie Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report 25185 Hi John, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25186 From:John McKenzie To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Mudgett, Melissa Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 3:04:23 PM Hi Shawna, Thanks for the notification and links. Per my letter previously sent, my focus is trying to encourage the City to focus on getting their first adequately sized, fully functional dog park. The following discussion relates to the Recreation as well as the land use consistency sections of the IS/EIR. The City does not have an off leash, fenced dog park. The current Parks and Recreation Element, approved in 2001, identifies dog parks as one of the City’s unmet needs. The City has about 12,000 dogs currently, with about 1,000 more dogs on the way when this project is added to San Luis and Avila Ranch projects. Very little has been done over the last 16 years to meet this identified need. The existing informal ‘dog area’ at Laguna Lake Park does not meet the definition of a dog park. While this is a good central location for such a park, many amenities are needed for this to become a full-fledged dog park. If the project cannot provide some assurances that progress will be made to provide for a full-fledged dog park in the City, the project should be found inconsistent with this provision of the Parks and Recreation Element. Another current trend that will push dog owners to off leash dog parks, is lot size, and the lack of backyards or areas for dogs to run. All the current 'Ranches', including Froom, propose most of their lots as being very small with no room for (big) backyards. In reviewing the IS, I found no specific details about the project proposing a dog park. However, in reviewing the PRC minutes for the Specific Plan, a dog park was mentioned, and the report’s graphic showed a very small and inadequate dog park (appears to be about ¼ acre in size). As the EIR is prepared, it would seem appropriate to recognize this as one of the uses within the park, and that it does not meet the current standards for dog park size. At a minimum, dog park sizes start at ½ acre and go up from there. For local reference, the El Chorro dog park is about one acre in size. In taking my dog there, who likes to fetch, I cannot envision a dog park being less than this size (one acre) to allow enough room to throw a ball or frisbee, multiplied by 2 or 3 other dogs/owners with similar interests at the same time (it is often best to have enough area to allow these to be occurring at the same time but in different sections of the dog park). If this project cannot at least bump up the on-site dog park acreage to ½ acre, it will not function well, and should be eliminated as one of the park uses. Size of the dog park will determine its success or failure. I would strongly suggest that there be a conversation with P&R staff to determine a minimally acceptable size as projects consider proposing dog parks, and then hold to that minimum. If it is too small and confining, as proposed, two ball-obsessive dogs together playing fetch may have issues. 25187 Another relevant element, especially with the senior housing focus, is providing accessibility for those with some disabilities. The dog park should be mostly on relatively flat ground and provide all-weather internal walkways that meet ADA requirements. It looked like the on-site dog park was being proposed between a creek and the bottom of one of the hills. It was unclear how flat the area is. Back to the Laguna Lake Park dog area. This is really a great first place to get a dog park established. Unless Froom Ranch can step up to provide the additional acreage (and maybe a better, flatter location) for a dog park, it would seem as an alternative that a nexus could be made for a fair share contribution specifically to the Laguna Lake Park ‘dog area’ with the intent to make it a full-fledged dog park. A first step to this end would be the preparation of a Dog Park Plan. This effort would first work with the public and stakeholders to identify the specific location and desired amenities. Once established, the details of the Plan would be completed, including improvement costs, and then approved by the Council. Improvements could then be installed in phases as money becomes available. For this project, maybe a fair share portion would be for the project to prepare the Dog Park Plan. If only the standard, non-specific in-lieu fee language is used to condition the project for recreation impacts, we will get what we have been getting for the last 16 years to meet our unmet dog park need – which is nothing. However, had specific language been included in the other two large pending developments (San Luis and Avila Ranches) to provide dog park development funds to Laguna Lake Park, along with this one, the City would likely have in very short order at least one nice dog park for all to enjoy. I hope this discussion will assist the City and/or EIR preparer that some additional efforts should be made with this project so our faithful canine companions can eventually also consider this one of the happier places to live. Sincerely, John McKenzie -----Original Message----- From: "Scott, Shawna" Sent: Jul 14, 2017 10:34 AM To: John McKenzie Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Hi John, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- 25188 development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25189 From:Scott, Shawna To:cbcntribalchair@gmail.com Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 10:36:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi Mia Lopez, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25190 From:Scott, Shawna To:John McKenzie Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 10:34:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi John, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25191 From:Scott, Shawna To:tim@rileyrealestate.com Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 10:33:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi Tim, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25192 From:Scott, Shawna To:victorpickering20@yahoo.com Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 10:33:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi Victor, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25193 From:Scott, Shawna To:James Lopes (jameslopes@charter.net) Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 10:32:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi James, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25194 From:Scott, Shawna To:Dia Hurd (magoo282@yahoo.com) Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report Date:Friday, July 14, 2017 10:31:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.pdf image001.png Hi Dia, Please find attached the Notice of Preparation and Preliminary Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. Additional background information is available on the City’s website: < www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 >. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25195 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Streder, Melissa@DOT Cc:Michelle Matson; Marshall, Glenn@CO.SLO; Hudson, Jake; Olejnik, John@DOT; Persons, Terri@DOT; Boyle, Frank@DOT; Yu, Bing Y@DOT; Mcclintic, Paul@DOT Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:33:00 PM Attachments:image002.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image001.png Thank you for the comments Melissa. We’ll review and let you know if any questions arise. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Streder, Melissa@DOT [mailto:melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; Marshall, Glenn@CO.SLO <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Olejnik, John@DOT <john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov>; Persons, Terri@DOT <Terri.Persons@dot.ca.gov>; Boyle, Frank@DOT <frank.boyle@dot.ca.gov>; Yu, Bing Y@DOT <bing.yu@dot.ca.gov>; Mcclintic, Paul@DOT <paul.mcclintic@dot.ca.gov> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Good Afternoon Luke, Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the notice requesting proposals for the Multimodal Transportation Impact Study (TIS) for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Caltrans believes that in order to disclose all transportation impacts, the proposal should also include analysis of the US 101/South Higuera Street interchange and the US 101/Madonna Street interchange. Also, for the US 101 freeway study segments between Madonna Road and South Higuera Street, the TIS should include freeway weave (Leisch Method), and merge/diverge analysis. Caltrans requests that the cumulative conditions of the TIS reflect the current Prado Road interchange project scope that includes an overcrossing with northbound ramps (not as “full-access” 25196 assuming northbound and southbound ramps). Caltrans supports the City’s intent to develop the TIS in consideration of the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, but would like to clarify that criteria presented in this guide is not intended to supersede Caltrans’ staff ultimate engineering judgement and recommendations pertaining to project specific impact analysis of the State Highway System. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the comments provided or regarding interpretation of the Caltrans guide in light of Caltrans’ staff recommendations provided in this email. Best Regards, Melissa Streder Associate Transportation Planner California Department of Transportation (805) 549-3800 (Mon-Thurs) From: Michelle Matson [mailto:mmatson@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:08 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Britton, Mike@CO.SLO <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us>; Marshall, Glenn@CO.SLO <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, I agree with Glenn and would also suggest adding Higuera Street and Vachell Lane to the list of study intersections. Sincerely, Michelle Matson Traffic Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map 25197 From: Glenn D. Marshall Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:58 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, For County Public Works purposes, please consider including intersection study of LOVR at Foothill Blvd.; and roadway segment analysis of Higuera St from the City limits southerly to US 101, and of Tank Farm Rd between Higuera St and SR 227. Also consider requiring the report address: 1. A roadway/intersection collision evaluation for each study intersection and roadway segment in the County (and City if so desired). 2. Recommended mitigation measures for identified project impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City’s RFP. -Glenn Glenn D Marshall Development Services Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-1596 | An APWA Accredited Agency 
Website | Twitter | Map From: "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Melissa Streder <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>, "Glenn D. Marshall" <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see 25198 attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25199 From:Fukushima, Adam To:Streder, Melissa@DOT Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:14:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image003.png image004.png image005.png Ok, thanks Melissa. From: Streder, Melissa@DOT [mailto:melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:05 PM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review FYI since Jake is out of the office. We are meeting with him next week though so we can speak with him if he has any questions. Melissa Streder Associate Transportation Planner California Department of Transportation (805) 549-3800 (Mon-Thurs) From: Streder, Melissa@DOT Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:03 PM To: 'LSchwartz@slocity.org' <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: 'Michelle Matson' <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; 'Glenn D. Marshall' <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us>; 'Hudson, Jake' <jhudson@slocity.org>; Olejnik, John@DOT <john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov>; Persons, Terri@DOT <Terri.Persons@dot.ca.gov>; Boyle, Frank@DOT <frank.boyle@dot.ca.gov>; Yu, Bing Y@DOT <bing.yu@dot.ca.gov>; Mcclintic, Paul@DOT <paul.mcclintic@dot.ca.gov> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Good Afternoon Luke, Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the notice requesting proposals for the Multimodal Transportation Impact Study (TIS) for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Caltrans believes that in order to disclose all transportation impacts, the proposal should also include analysis of the US 101/South Higuera Street interchange and the US 101/Madonna Street interchange. Also, for the US 101 freeway study segments between Madonna Road and South Higuera Street, the TIS should include freeway weave (Leisch Method), and merge/diverge analysis. Caltrans requests that the cumulative conditions of the TIS reflect the current Prado Road interchange project scope that includes an overcrossing with northbound ramps (not as “full-access” assuming northbound and southbound ramps). 25200 Caltrans supports the City’s intent to develop the TIS in consideration of the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, but would like to clarify that criteria presented in this guide is not intended to supersede Caltrans’ staff ultimate engineering judgement and recommendations pertaining to project specific impact analysis of the State Highway System. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the comments provided or regarding interpretation of the Caltrans guide in light of Caltrans’ staff recommendations provided in this email. Best Regards, Melissa Streder Associate Transportation Planner California Department of Transportation (805) 549-3800 (Mon-Thurs) From: Michelle Matson [mailto:mmatson@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:08 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Britton, Mike@CO.SLO <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us>; Marshall, Glenn@CO.SLO <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, I agree with Glenn and would also suggest adding Higuera Street and Vachell Lane to the list of study intersections. Sincerely, Michelle Matson Traffic Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map From: Glenn D. Marshall 25201 Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:58 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, For County Public Works purposes, please consider including intersection study of LOVR at Foothill Blvd.; and roadway segment analysis of Higuera St from the City limits southerly to US 101, and of Tank Farm Rd between Higuera St and SR 227. Also consider requiring the report address: 1. A roadway/intersection collision evaluation for each study intersection and roadway segment in the County (and City if so desired). 2. Recommended mitigation measures for identified project impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City’s RFP. -Glenn Glenn D Marshall Development Services Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-1596 | An APWA Accredited Agency 
Website | Twitter | Map From: "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Melissa Streder <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>, "Glenn D. Marshall" <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. 25202 If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25203 From:Streder, Melissa@DOT To:Fukushima, Adam Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:05:05 PM Attachments:image004.png image006.png image007.png image008.png FYI since Jake is out of the office. We are meeting with him next week though so we can speak with him if he has any questions. Melissa Streder Associate Transportation Planner California Department of Transportation (805) 549-3800 (Mon-Thurs) From: Streder, Melissa@DOT Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:03 PM To: 'LSchwartz@slocity.org' <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: 'Michelle Matson' <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; 'Glenn D. Marshall' <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us>; 'Hudson, Jake' <jhudson@slocity.org>; Olejnik, John@DOT <john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov>; Persons, Terri@DOT <Terri.Persons@dot.ca.gov>; Boyle, Frank@DOT <frank.boyle@dot.ca.gov>; Yu, Bing Y@DOT <bing.yu@dot.ca.gov>; Mcclintic, Paul@DOT <paul.mcclintic@dot.ca.gov> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Good Afternoon Luke, Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the notice requesting proposals for the Multimodal Transportation Impact Study (TIS) for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Caltrans believes that in order to disclose all transportation impacts, the proposal should also include analysis of the US 101/South Higuera Street interchange and the US 101/Madonna Street interchange. Also, for the US 101 freeway study segments between Madonna Road and South Higuera Street, the TIS should include freeway weave (Leisch Method), and merge/diverge analysis. Caltrans requests that the cumulative conditions of the TIS reflect the current Prado Road interchange project scope that includes an overcrossing with northbound ramps (not as “full-access” assuming northbound and southbound ramps). Caltrans supports the City’s intent to develop the TIS in consideration of the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, but would like to clarify that criteria presented in this guide is not intended to supersede Caltrans’ staff ultimate engineering judgement and recommendations pertaining to project specific impact analysis of the State Highway System. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the comments provided or regarding interpretation of the Caltrans guide in light of Caltrans’ staff recommendations provided in this 25204 email. Best Regards, Melissa Streder Associate Transportation Planner California Department of Transportation (805) 549-3800 (Mon-Thurs) From: Michelle Matson [mailto:mmatson@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:08 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Britton, Mike@CO.SLO <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us>; Marshall, Glenn@CO.SLO <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, I agree with Glenn and would also suggest adding Higuera Street and Vachell Lane to the list of study intersections. Sincerely, Michelle Matson Traffic Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map From: Glenn D. Marshall Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:58 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review 25205 Luke, For County Public Works purposes, please consider including intersection study of LOVR at Foothill Blvd.; and roadway segment analysis of Higuera St from the City limits southerly to US 101, and of Tank Farm Rd between Higuera St and SR 227. Also consider requiring the report address: 1. A roadway/intersection collision evaluation for each study intersection and roadway segment in the County (and City if so desired). 2. Recommended mitigation measures for identified project impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City’s RFP. -Glenn Glenn D Marshall Development Services Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-1596 | An APWA Accredited Agency 
Website | Twitter | Map From: "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Melissa Streder <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>, "Glenn D. Marshall" <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III 25206 Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25207 From:Streder, Melissa@DOT To:Schwartz, Luke Cc:Michelle Matson; Marshall, Glenn@CO.SLO; Hudson, Jake; Olejnik, John@DOT; Persons, Terri@DOT; Boyle, Frank@DOT; Yu, Bing Y@DOT; Mcclintic, Paul@DOT Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:03:06 PM Attachments:image004.png image006.png image007.png image008.png Good Afternoon Luke, Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the notice requesting proposals for the Multimodal Transportation Impact Study (TIS) for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Caltrans believes that in order to disclose all transportation impacts, the proposal should also include analysis of the US 101/South Higuera Street interchange and the US 101/Madonna Street interchange. Also, for the US 101 freeway study segments between Madonna Road and South Higuera Street, the TIS should include freeway weave (Leisch Method), and merge/diverge analysis. Caltrans requests that the cumulative conditions of the TIS reflect the current Prado Road interchange project scope that includes an overcrossing with northbound ramps (not as “full-access” assuming northbound and southbound ramps). Caltrans supports the City’s intent to develop the TIS in consideration of the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, but would like to clarify that criteria presented in this guide is not intended to supersede Caltrans’ staff ultimate engineering judgement and recommendations pertaining to project specific impact analysis of the State Highway System. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the comments provided or regarding interpretation of the Caltrans guide in light of Caltrans’ staff recommendations provided in this email. Best Regards, Melissa Streder Associate Transportation Planner California Department of Transportation (805) 549-3800 (Mon-Thurs) From: Michelle Matson [mailto:mmatson@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:08 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Britton, Mike@CO.SLO <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us>; Marshall, Glenn@CO.SLO <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review 25208 Luke, I agree with Glenn and would also suggest adding Higuera Street and Vachell Lane to the list of study intersections. Sincerely, Michelle Matson Traffic Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map From: Glenn D. Marshall Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:58 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, For County Public Works purposes, please consider including intersection study of LOVR at Foothill Blvd.; and roadway segment analysis of Higuera St from the City limits southerly to US 101, and of Tank Farm Rd between Higuera St and SR 227. Also consider requiring the report address: 1. A roadway/intersection collision evaluation for each study intersection and roadway segment in the County (and City if so desired). 2. Recommended mitigation measures for identified project impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City’s RFP. -Glenn Glenn D Marshall 25209 Development Services Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-1596 | An APWA Accredited Agency 
Website | Twitter | Map From: "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Melissa Streder <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>, "Glenn D. Marshall" <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25210 From:neilhavlik@aol.com To:Hill, Robert Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Thursday, July 13, 2017 9:14:16 AM Attachments:image001.png image001.png Hey Bob, thanks for this map. It looks like they are responding to some of the criticisms without admitting it. Also, I see that the basins are gone, presumably downstream to the Mountainbrook property. Now if we can just get them to have the park in the current storage area where it should be..... Looking forward to tomorrow. See you at lunchtime. Neil -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 13, 2017 8:52 am Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Hi Neil, Good question. It looks like the intent is to move forward while the Specific Plan is still is preparation, as stated on page 2 of the NOP at the bottom of the page. From the link the email, below, one can get to a constraints map that show the site plan with all of the various environmental constraints. Here is a quick link to that page: http://www.slocity.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=16349 Bob From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:08 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Bob, thanks. Where's the plan? N. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Jul 12, 2017 4:09 pm Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP 25211 Hi Neil, This just in… See you Friday. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:43 PM To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org> Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Department Heads, I want to make sure everyone was aware that we have issued the RFP for a consultant and are moving forward with a public scoping meeting with the Planning Commission on 7/26. A brief project description is attached. If your department has any issues that should be addressed as part of the environmental review for the project, please be in touch with Shawna. It is important that we get everything on the table that we can at this early stage so that the EIR scope covers all of our related issues and areas of concern. Thank you! -Michael From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:41 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Hi Michael, A PDF of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information. 25212 The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 The NOP Scoping Meeting will be held during the Planning Commission’s meeting on July 26. Please share/distribute to the Mayor and City Council as you see fit. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25213 From:Hill, Robert To:neilhavlik@aol.com Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Thursday, July 13, 2017 8:52:46 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Neil, Good question. It looks like the intent is to move forward while the Specific Plan is still is preparation, as stated on page 2 of the NOP at the bottom of the page. From the link the email, below, one can get to a constraints map that show the site plan with all of the various environmental constraints. Here is a quick link to that page: http://www.slocity.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=16349 Bob From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:08 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Bob, thanks. Where's the plan? N. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Jul 12, 2017 4:09 pm Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Hi Neil, This just in… See you Friday. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration 25214 Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:43 PM To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org> Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Department Heads, I want to make sure everyone was aware that we have issued the RFP for a consultant and are moving forward with a public scoping meeting with the Planning Commission on 7/26. A brief project description is attached. If your department has any issues that should be addressed as part of the environmental review for the project, please be in touch with Shawna. It is important that we get everything on the table that we can at this early stage so that the EIR scope covers all of our related issues and areas of concern. Thank you! -Michael From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:41 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Hi Michael, A PDF of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information. The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 The NOP Scoping Meeting will be held during the Planning Commission’s meeting on July 26. Please share/distribute to the Mayor and City Council as you see fit. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25215 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25216 From:neilhavlik@aol.com To:Hill, Robert Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:07:39 PM Attachments:image001.png image001.png Bob, thanks. Where's the plan? N. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Jul 12, 2017 4:09 pm Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Hi Neil,   This just in…   See you Friday.   Bob   Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org     From: Codron, Michael  Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:43 PM To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org> Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP   Department Heads, I want to make sure everyone was aware that we have issued the RFP 25217 for a consultant and are moving forward with a public scoping meeting with the Planning Commission on 7/26. A brief project description is attached. If your department has any issues that should be addressed as part of the environmental review for the project, please be in touch with Shawna. It is important that we get everything on the table that we can at this early stage so that the EIR scope covers all of our related issues and areas of concern. Thank you! -Michael   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:41 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP   Hi Michael,   A PDF of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information.   The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911   The NOP Scoping Meeting will be held during the Planning Commission’s meeting on July 26.   Please share/distribute to the Mayor and City Council as you see fit.   Thank you,   Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25218 From:Hill, Robert To:neilhavlik Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 4:09:21 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf image001.png Hi Neil, This just in… See you Friday. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:43 PM To: Department Heads <DepartmentHeads@slocity.org> Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Department Heads, I want to make sure everyone was aware that we have issued the RFP for a consultant and are moving forward with a public scoping meeting with the Planning Commission on 7/26. A brief project description is attached. If your department has any issues that should be addressed as part of the environmental review for the project, please be in touch with Shawna. It is important that we get everything on the table that we can at this early stage so that the EIR scope covers all of our related issues and areas of concern. Thank you! -Michael From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:41 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP 25219 Hi Michael, A PDF of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information. The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 The NOP Scoping Meeting will be held during the Planning Commission’s meeting on July 26. Please share/distribute to the Mayor and City Council as you see fit. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25220 From:Bill Henry To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Jaimie Jones; Emily Creel; Judi Young Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP and RFP Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:44:04 PM Attachments:image002.png image003.png Hi Shawna, Thanks for the alert and we’ll do that for sure. I’ll be out tomorrow and Friday so I’ve alerted Judi (our new office admin) to make sure to forward the caller to you. Thanks for birthday wishes (it was great!). Bill Bill Henry, AICP Director SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey St., Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 P 805.543.7095, ext. 6804 | M 805.459.0111 Visit Our New Website! From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:40 AM To: Bill Henry <bhenry@swca.com> Cc: Jaimie Jones <jmjones@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP and RFP Hi Bill, The Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP and NOP are both going out this week, and the documents list me and Emily as contacts. If any calls come in for Emily, feel free to have them contact me while she is out on her well-deserved vacation. And – happy belated birthday! I hope it was great. Thank you, 25221 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25222 From:Codron, Michael To:Department Heads Cc:Johnson, Derek; Hill, Robert; Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:42:40 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf image001.png Department Heads, I want to make sure everyone was aware that we have issued the RFP for a consultant and are moving forward with a public scoping meeting with the Planning Commission on 7/26. A brief project description is attached. If your department has any issues that should be addressed as part of the environmental review for the project, please be in touch with Shawna. It is important that we get everything on the table that we can at this early stage so that the EIR scope covers all of our related issues and areas of concern. Thank you! -Michael From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:41 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Hi Michael, A PDF of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information. The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 The NOP Scoping Meeting will be held during the Planning Commission’s meeting on July 26. Please share/distribute to the Mayor and City Council as you see fit. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25223 From:Scott, Shawna To:Hooper, Jennifer Subject:RE: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:45:49 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you. From: Hooper, Jennifer Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:17 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Great, I’ve made a postcard for the interested party (attached). I will send this out with the batch. Thanks! Jennifer From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:48 AM To: Hooper, Jennifer <jhooper@slocity.org> Subject: RE: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Hi Jennifer, Can you please add the following interested party to the postcard mailing list: John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 The postcards look good, thanks! Thank you, Shawna From: Hooper, Jennifer Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Hi there Shawna, Could you please verify that the attached PC Postcards for Froom Ranch (12165 and 12393 LOVR/SPEC-0143-2017) are correct? Thanks so much! 25224 Jennifer Jennifer Hooper Planning Intern Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jhooper@slocity.org slocity.org 25225 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Project Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:33:58 AM Thanks!   PAM RICCI     From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org]  Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:10 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Project   Sure thing, see attached. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com]  Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:09 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Project   Thanks, that’s good news. Can you email me a copy of the NOP when you get a chance?   PAM RICCI     From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org]  Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Project   Hi Pam, Yes, we are all set for the July 26 NOP Scoping meeting, and the NOP is being mailed out today. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com]  Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:55 AM 25226 To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Project   Hi Shawna,   I saw that the RFP was now posted online, including the following schedule:   Issue RFP........................................................... July 11, 2017 Consultant questions regarding RFP ................. July 27, 2017 City Answers to Questions .............................. August 1, 2017 Receive proposals ......................................... August 10, 2017 Complete proposal evaluation/interviews ... Late August 2017 Consultant Selection ..................................... September 2017   Are we still on the agenda for July 26th at the Planning Commission for the scoping hearing?   Please let me know.   Thanks. Pam   PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com     25227 From:Hooper, Jennifer To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:16:47 AM Attachments:image001.png PC Postcard Interested Parties Froom Ranch.pub Great, I’ve made a postcard for the interested party (attached). I will send this out with the batch. Thanks! Jennifer From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:48 AM To: Hooper, Jennifer <jhooper@slocity.org> Subject: RE: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Hi Jennifer, Can you please add the following interested party to the postcard mailing list: John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 The postcards look good, thanks! Thank you, Shawna From: Hooper, Jennifer Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Hi there Shawna, Could you please verify that the attached PC Postcards for Froom Ranch (12165 and 12393 LOVR/SPEC-0143-2017) are correct? Thanks so much! Jennifer Jennifer Hooper Planning Intern 25228 Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jhooper@slocity.org slocity.org 25229 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:"Emily Creel"; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Project Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:10:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.PDF Sure thing, see attached. From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:09 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Project Thanks, that’s good news. Can you email me a copy of the NOP when you get a chance? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Project Hi Pam, Yes, we are all set for the July 26 NOP Scoping meeting, and the NOP is being mailed out today. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:55 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Project Hi Shawna, I saw that the RFP was now posted online, including the following schedule: Issue RFP........................................................... July 11, 2017 Consultant questions regarding RFP ................. July 27, 2017 25230 City Answers to Questions .............................. August 1, 2017 Receive proposals ......................................... August 10, 2017 Complete proposal evaluation/interviews ... Late August 2017 Consultant Selection ..................................... September 2017 Are we still on the agenda for July 26th at the Planning Commission for the scoping hearing? Please let me know. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25231 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:"Emily Creel"; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Project Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:09:12 AM Thanks, that’s good news. Can you email me a copy of the NOP when you get a chance? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:00 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Project Hi Pam, Yes, we are all set for the July 26 NOP Scoping meeting, and the NOP is being mailed out today. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:55 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Project Hi Shawna, I saw that the RFP was now posted online, including the following schedule: Issue RFP........................................................... July 11, 2017 Consultant questions regarding RFP ................. July 27, 2017 City Answers to Questions .............................. August 1, 2017 Receive proposals ......................................... August 10, 2017 Complete proposal evaluation/interviews ... Late August 2017 Consultant Selection ..................................... September 2017 Are we still on the agenda for July 26th at the Planning Commission for the scoping hearing? Please let me know. 25232 Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25233 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:"Emily Creel"; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Project Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:59:00 AM Hi Pam, Yes, we are all set for the July 26 NOP Scoping meeting, and the NOP is being mailed out today. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:55 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Project Hi Shawna, I saw that the RFP was now posted online, including the following schedule: Issue RFP........................................................... July 11, 2017 Consultant questions regarding RFP ................. July 27, 2017 City Answers to Questions .............................. August 1, 2017 Receive proposals ......................................... August 10, 2017 Complete proposal evaluation/interviews ... Late August 2017 Consultant Selection ..................................... September 2017 Are we still on the agenda for July 26th at the Planning Commission for the scoping hearing? Please let me know. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25234 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:"Emily Creel"; Montgomery, Victor Subject:Froom Ranch Project Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:55:38 AM Hi Shawna, I saw that the RFP was now posted online, including the following schedule: Issue RFP........................................................... July 11, 2017 Consultant questions regarding RFP ................. July 27, 2017 City Answers to Questions .............................. August 1, 2017 Receive proposals ......................................... August 10, 2017 Complete proposal evaluation/interviews ... Late August 2017 Consultant Selection ..................................... September 2017 Are we still on the agenda for July 26th at the Planning Commission for the scoping hearing? Please let me know. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25235 From:Scott, Shawna To:Bill Henry (bhenry@swca.com) Cc:Jaimie Jones Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP and RFP Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:39:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Bill, The Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP and NOP are both going out this week, and the documents list me and Emily as contacts. If any calls come in for Emily, feel free to have them contact me while she is out on her well-deserved vacation. And – happy belated birthday! I hope it was great. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25236 From:Scott, Shawna To:Codron, Michael Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:41:26 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf image001.png Hi Michael, A PDF of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information. The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 The NOP Scoping Meeting will be held during the Planning Commission’s meeting on July 26. Please share/distribute to the Mayor and City Council as you see fit. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25237 From:Johnson, Lee To:Rebecca Gruett Subject:RE: Reminder: You are invited. Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:32:45 AM I will not be attending. Thanks, Lee Lee Johnson Economic Development Manager City of San Luis Obispo T: 805.781.7164 M: 805.710.1824 From: Rebecca Gruett [mailto:RGruett@villaggioslo.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:36 PM To: Johnson, Lee <ljohnson@slocity.org> Subject: Reminder: You are invited. A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com 25238 Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to ljohnson@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25239 From:Scott, Shawna To:Davidson, Doug Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:25:21 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_FIN.pdf image001.png Hi Doug, A PDF of the NOP is attached, which includes the link to the Initial Study and additional background information. The link is: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/documents-online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25240 From:Scott, Shawna To:Hooper, Jennifer Subject:RE: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Date:Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:48:29 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Jennifer, Can you please add the following interested party to the postcard mailing list: John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 The postcards look good, thanks! Thank you, Shawna From: Hooper, Jennifer Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Hi there Shawna, Could you please verify that the attached PC Postcards for Froom Ranch (12165 and 12393 LOVR/SPEC-0143-2017) are correct? Thanks so much! Jennifer Jennifer Hooper Planning Intern Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jhooper@slocity.org slocity.org 25241 From:Scott, Shawna To:Jaimie Jones Cc:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 5:36:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Jaimie, received! From: Jaimie Jones [mailto:jmjones@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 5:14 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation Hi Shawna, Attached is the PowerPoint presentation for the Froom Ranch NOP Scoping Meeting on July 26, 2017. Feel free to send any comments back to me in Emily’s absence, if need be. Please confirm that you received this email, due to file size. Thanks, and have a great evening! J --jaimie ___________________________________________ Jaimie Jones | Proposal Coordinator / Technical Editor SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 x6815 | F 805.543.2367 | C 310.748.4115 E jmjones@swca.com From: Emily Creel Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 7:03 AM To: Scott, Shawna Cc: Jaimie Jones Subject: Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation Hi Shawna – I have drafted a rough PowerPoint presentation for the Froom Ranch NOP Scoping Meeting at PC on 7-26-17. Jaimie is formatting it, waiting on a graphic from Kevin, and will then send it over to you once it’s finished (next week probably). This will probably need some tweaking when I return. Please feel free to email me or reach out to Jaimie if you have any questions in the meantime. Thanks, talk to you soon. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead 25242 SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25243 From:Jaimie Jones To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 5:15:20 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch_NOP Scoping_PC_072617.pptx Hi Shawna, Attached is the PowerPoint presentation for the Froom Ranch NOP Scoping Meeting on July 26, 2017. Feel free to send any comments back to me in Emily’s absence, if need be. Please confirm that you received this email, due to file size. Thanks, and have a great evening! J --jaimie ___________________________________________ Jaimie Jones | Proposal Coordinator / Technical Editor SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 x6815 | F 805.543.2367 | C 310.748.4115 E jmjones@swca.com From: Emily Creel Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 7:03 AM To: Scott, Shawna Cc: Jaimie Jones Subject: Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation   Hi Shawna –   I have drafted a rough PowerPoint presentation for the Froom Ranch NOP Scoping Meeting at PC on 7-26-17. Jaimie is formatting it, waiting on a graphic from Kevin, and will then send it over to you once it’s finished (next week probably). This will probably need some tweaking when I return.   Please feel free to email me or reach out to Jaimie if you have any questions in the meantime.   Thanks, talk to you soon.   Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367     25244   Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com   25245 From:Hooper, Jennifer To:Scott, Shawna Subject:PC Postcards for Froom Ranch Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:42:27 PM Attachments:image001.png PC Postcard Froom Ranch (SPEC-0143-2017).pub Hi there Shawna, Could you please verify that the attached PC Postcards for Froom Ranch (12165 and 12393 LOVR/SPEC-0143-2017) are correct? Thanks so much! Jennifer Jennifer Hooper Planning Intern Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jhooper@slocity.org slocity.org 25246 From:Colleran, Lorraine To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:Corrected RFP Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:14:00 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal to Prepare EIR_FIN.docx image001.png Hello, Here is a copy of the Corrected RFP that is saved under purchasing T drive. Please review and contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Lorraine Colleran Accounting Assistant Finance Finance Operations 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E lcolleran@slocity.org T 805.781.7435 slocity.org 25247 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Cc:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:55:15 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Kristin, We’ve already printed and put the RFP envelopes in the mail – can we issue an addendum with the new information? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:53 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. We are setting up the website posting and legal ad now. We are changing the location to send proposals to Finance at 990 Palm, since we are trying to have consistency in the City’s RFPs to avoid address confusion (as has happened a few times). We are also going to reserve a room for the public opening (on the RFP no location was set) and will add the location to the advertisement. I will let you know which room the public opening will be scheduled in. Thanks, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> 25248 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in 25249 the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand 25250 within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25251 Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed 25252 and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25253 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:53:30 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi, Shawna. We are setting up the website posting and legal ad now. We are changing the location to send proposals to Finance at 990 Palm, since we are trying to have consistency in the City’s RFPs to avoid address confusion (as has happened a few times). We are also going to reserve a room for the public opening (on the RFP no location was set) and will add the location to the advertisement. I will let you know which room the public opening will be scheduled in. Thanks, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, 25254 A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25255 Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, 25256 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, 25257 Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 25258 slocity.org 25259 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:51:26 PM Attachments:image001.png Yep   From: Colleran, Lorraine  Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:43 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   This is for Froom Ranch? From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:51 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Yes – I already made the necessary changes.  Please end to the trib and post on the website today.  It is on in the T:Purchasing/RFPs/CDD folder.   Thank you.   Kristin   From: Colleran, Lorraine  Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:50 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Is this ready to go? Do you approve? I can send it to the tribune, is it on the T drive under purchasing I hope. From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Great.  Thank you.  We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link.   Kristin 25260   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates.  We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail.   Let me know if you have any other questions.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   25261 Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Great.  I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers.  See my proposed timeline here.  I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi, Shawna.  The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 25262 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines).   I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs.  It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted.   Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here).  This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services.   Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline.  We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP.   Thank you,   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM 25263 To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc.  Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper.  Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD).  Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there.   Thank you,   Kristin   From: Ryan, Cori  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   FYI From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   25264 Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25265 From:Colleran, Lorraine To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:42:00 PM Attachments:image001.png This is for Froom Ranch? From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:51 AM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes – I already made the necessary changes. Please end to the trib and post on the website today. It is on in the T:Purchasing/RFPs/CDD folder. Thank you. Kristin From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:50 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Is this ready to go? Do you approve? I can send it to the tribune, is it on the T drive under purchasing I hope. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. Thank you. We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). 25266 Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! 25267 Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. 25268 Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin 25269 From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. 25270 Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25271 From:Dietrick, Christine To:RGruett@villaggioslo.com Subject:Villagio Grand Opening Event Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 11:04:48 AM Attachments:Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14.msg image001.png Bcc: CC Dear Ms. Gruett: Please see the attached email sent to your colleague regarding this event and the Council’s inability to attend in their official roles. Thanks. Best regards, Christine Christine Dietrick City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 25272 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:51:17 AM Attachments:image001.png Yes – I already made the necessary changes. Please end to the trib and post on the website today. It is on in the T:Purchasing/RFPs/CDD folder. Thank you. Kristin From: Colleran, Lorraine Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:50 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Is this ready to go? Do you approve? I can send it to the tribune, is it on the T drive under purchasing I hope. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. Thank you. We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25273 Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25274 Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. 25275 Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will 25276 load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually 25277 regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25278 From:Colleran, Lorraine To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:50:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Is this ready to go? Do you approve? I can send it to the tribune, is it on the T drive under purchasing I hope. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. Thank you. We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> 25279 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM 25280 To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, 25281 as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. 25282 Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 25283 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25284 From:neilhavlik To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR Public Scoping Meeting Date:Tuesday, July 11, 2017 7:54:39 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you Shawna. Neil Havlik Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Scott, Shawna" <sscott@slocity.org> Date: 07/10/2017 3:40 PM (GMT-08:00) To: "Neil Havlik (neilhavlik@aol.com)" <neilhavlik@aol.com> Cc: "Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>" <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR Public Scoping Meeting Hi Neil, I wanted to give you a heads up that the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) public scoping meeting is scheduled for the Planning Commission’s July 26 meeting, 6:00 PM. The Notice of Preparation of an EIR will be going out this week, and once it is available online I will send you a link. The staff report for the July 26 meeting will be available online by July 19, and I will send you a link at that time, as well. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 25285 slocity.org 25286 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ryan, Cori Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 5:15:38 PM Attachments:image001.png Ultimately, it’s pretty straight-forward now that I understand the process! Your email last week made me laugh, though! From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 5:13 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great! Hope you didn’t have to jump through to many hoops. From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:46 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Cori, just an FYI. I’m good to go! From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. Thank you. We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> 25287 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> 25288 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. 25289 Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, 25290 so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would 25291 like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25292 From:Ryan, Cori To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 5:12:50 PM Attachments:image001.png Great! Hope you didn’t have to jump through to many hoops. From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:46 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Cori, just an FYI. I’m good to go! From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. Thank you. We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. 25293 Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. 25294 Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> 25295 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25296 Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25297 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25298 From:Ryan, Cori To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 5:12:47 PM Attachments:image001.png Great! Hope you didn’t have to jump through to many hoops. From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:46 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Cori, just an FYI. I’m good to go! From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. Thank you. We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. 25299 Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. 25300 Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> 25301 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25302 Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25303 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25304 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ryan, Cori Subject:FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 4:45:56 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Cori, just an FYI. I’m good to go! From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. Thank you. We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25305 Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review 25306 Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. 25307 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, 25308 Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org 25309 T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25310 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 4:44:26 PM Attachments:image001.png Great.  Thank you.  We will get it posted tomorrow and will send you the link.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates.  We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail.   Let me know if you have any other questions.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? 25311 Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Great.  I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers.  See my proposed timeline here.  I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna 25312 From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi, Shawna.  The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines).   I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs.  It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted.   Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here).  This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services.   Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline.  We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP.   Thank you,   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 25313 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc.  Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper.  Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD).  Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there.   Thank you,   Kristin   From: Ryan, Cori  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   25314 FYI From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25315 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 4:40:15 PM Attachments:image001.png The RFP has been finalized and saved in the folder (provided both .doc and .pdf versions). Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, 25316 I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want 25317 to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> 25318 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, 25319 In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25320 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 4:14:59 PM Attachments:image001.png Yes, please finalize the RFP in the shared folder with your adjusted dates. We will have a link once the final RFP is posted to the website tomorrow and you can then send it out to specified vendors via mail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna 25321 From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. 25322 Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> 25323 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. 25324 I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25325 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 4:09:03 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Kristin, A few follow-up questions to make sure I’m not missing something: Do you need me to finalize the RFP and save to the Purchasing folder? Do you have a link for the RFP yet? Once the tracked changes are accepted and cleaned up, can I print and mail this out on Tuesday (July 11)? Thank you for all your help, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin 25326 From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, 25327 The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the 25328 web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25329 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25330 From:Scott, Shawna To:Neil Havlik (neilhavlik@aol.com) Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR Public Scoping Meeting Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 3:40:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Neil, I wanted to give you a heads up that the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) public scoping meeting is scheduled for the Planning Commission’s July 26 meeting, 6:00 PM. The Notice of Preparation of an EIR will be going out this week, and once it is available online I will send you a link. The staff report for the July 26 meeting will be available online by July 19, and I will send you a link at that time, as well. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25331 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Odile Ayral Subject:Re: Housing (Item 1) Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:55:42 PM Hello Odile. You and I have gone back and forth about Cal Poly. I think you are fairly well versed on my opinions as they pertain to the complexities of housing the student population. I didn't find it necessary to expand upon the conversations that have already taken place. I don't believe there is anything that scares the Council about Cal Poly. I just don't see that there is much support for a lawsuit against the school as a solution. And everyone, yourself more than others, were well aware of my perspectives on Cal Poly during my campaign. I'm not quite sure what your expectation of the Council is. Have a pleasant day Odile. Sincerely, Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org _____________________________ From: Odile Ayral <oayral@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:00 PM Subject: Re: Housing (Item 1) To: Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org> Thanks, Aaron, for answering so quickly. Like you, I admire HASLO and what they do. I grew up in a "project" in France--my dad was killed in an accident and we had no money--and my family was given a decent low income apartment, so I appreciate this type of effort. However HASLO deals with a limited group of people, those who particularly need help. The average family is the one that's falling through the cracks. I was also surprised that you don't even acknowledge the elephant in the room--Cal Poly--and this was the main point of my letter. What is it about Cal Poly that scares our councils? Santa Cruz got what they wanted, why aren't you willing to try it? You have to realize that the north part of the city is really really fed up (at least, the few of us that are left.) We had hope when Heidi promised she would deal with Cal Poly. I do hope she keeps her promise. All the best, Odile On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Gomez, Aaron <agomez@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Odile, Thank you for your remarks. I cannot speak for the entire Council, but I would venture to say we are all very aware that the issue of outside investors/college population on our housing market. We have had many emails back and forth about this subject. The solutions seem to be where opinions differ. I have to disagree that building to date has "not done one iota" to solve the affordability gap. I happen to 25332 know those that live in the great projects that HASLO has completed in recent years are very grateful for those projects. Those projects are built utilizing inclusionary housing funds. Without other developments, those do not have a funding mechanism. I also know several people that live in Serra Meadows. Those were all market rate homes that I certainly could not afford, but that is a neighborhood in which many young families now live. I think we need to be careful in identifying which lens we are looking at the cities housing issues. You are very correct that we need to figure out some mechanisms to limit outside investment. But claiming that new development does nothing to address those issues just isn't true. Until a larger city wide policy is created new development is the only way that we can address keeping outside investors out of the market. At least for those properties. I encourage you to look at San Luis Ranch and the owner obligations that they are proposing. The following is taken directly from their proposal. Programs: • Developer Buy-Back/No Flip Policy for All Phases: right of 1st refusal, ½ profit penalty • City of San Luis Obispo Equity Share • Private Bank Equity Share, 5-year depreciation equity • Local Heroes discount & financing for public safety, hospital workers, teachers • Lottery Events - open to: 1) Current City of SLO workers and residents 2) Current SLO County workers and residents 6 | Page San Luis Ranch Affordable Housing http://www.sanluisranch.com/wp-content/uploads/San_Luis_Ranch_Vision.pdf SAN LUIS RANCH fulfills and implements the City of San ... www.sanluisranch.com 1 | Page San Luis Ranch Vision San Luis Ranch honors the legacy of our past and builds upon a strong foundation to house the citizens of SLO, nurture its growth and ... City staff was directed to work these in to the Development Agreement in order to hold them to such promises. As much as we want every development to solve all of our traffic issues, housing issues, rental issues, wage gap issues etc. We know that is not a reality. All we can do is take evolutionary steps that fit within the legal framework of government. It is very easy to identify problems, it is much more difficult to come up with achievable solutions. But I believe we as a community are getting there. I think as a community we need to look at what we are doing right and not just always focus on the negative. It is easy to lose sight of all the amazing things that are happening in SLO when we always focus on the negative. I interact on a fairly regular basis with people who are just plain angry at life and take it out on every one they come in contact with. City government cannot solve that issue. I am certainly not putting you in that category. I just wanted to make a community observation. Perspective is everything in life. We all see the world through out own filters. I think we could all benefit from expanding those filters. Myself included. Thanks for the chat Odile. 25333 Sincerely Aaron Gomez Council Member Office of the City Council Eagomez@slocity.org T(805) 540-9053 slocity.org From:odileayral@gmail.com <odileayral@gmail.com> on behalf of Odile Ayral <oayral@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:16:33 AM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Housing (Item 1) Mayor Harmon and Council members, A couple weeks ago, on my street in the Foothill neighborhood, a 1200-square-foot ordinary house with weeds for yard sold for $700,000 to an investor from San Francisco. Immediately, without doing any improvement to the property, the investor put the house for rent for $3,500 a month. Of course, families can't and won't pay this amount of money to receive so little, therefore students will rent the place. This scenario has been going on for several decades, and now my neighborhood, previously known for its affordable houses that attracted new Cal Poly faculty and staff, has become a web of student rentals. New faculty have to look for housing in surrounding cities because you don't go far on an assistant professor salary. It is fashionable these days to speak of "affordable housing" and "workforce housing," but the building that has taken place until now has not done one iota to improve the situation. New two-bedroom apartments close to Cal Poly rent for $4,000 a month, condos on Sacramento Drive sell for at least $700,000, and I expect that--with the exception of the handful of units affordable by design--most residences in San Luis Ranch, Avila Ranch and Froom Ranch will reach similar prices once the hidden costs are accounted for. One good thing about Avila Ranch is the condition that owners have to live for 5 years in the residence they buy. This will at least keep investors at bay for five years. But then, the 25334 uphill cycle will start again. Like the Councils that came before you, you are overlooking the elephant in the room: Cal Poly. As long as you are not willing to confront this topic, you will never solve the housing problem in SLO because student pressure is what is pushing prices up, and families out of the city. None of you witnesses this daily assault because you don't live on the north side, but the result is the same for everyone. Five students can afford to pay high rent but a family can't, and investors can buy an overpriced house but a family can't. And when outside investors buy here, rents go up and home prices go up whether you live in the north or the south. These investors suck money out and barely put any in, so the city loses on all counts. In the last avalanche of mail you received regarding San Luis Ranch, a resident wrote: "We must compete with an obscene number of college students, who are quickly outnumbering locals." Competition is the key. Eliminate one (competition from the students) and we could return to the days when rents and house prices were more reasonable. However students did not create this situation, Cal Poly administrators did. They dragged their feet on building dorms, accepted more and more students, and were surprised to discover the adverse impact it had upon their workforce. Their solution? Build high density faculty housing on campus right in the face of a once lovely neighborhood (!) But the Trustees are equally at fault. SLO is far from their minds. If Long Beach and Sacramento had the same ratio of students, Long Beach would have 215,000 students and Sacramento 217,000. I am sure the Trustees would never let things deteriorate to this point in their cities. Finally, the various City Councils of the last 30 years bear a huge responsibility because they did not lift a finger to alleviate the situation. I hope you don't intend to join their ranks. So please, follow Santa Cruz footsteps. Go to Long Beach and confront the Trustees, explain our plight, demand not just more dorms, but especially, a reasonable ratio of students versus residents. If you can obtain this much, rents and house prices will go down, investors will look elsewhere to exploit people, and local residents will be eternally grateful. Sincerely, Odile Ayral 25335 From:Ryan, Cori To:Scott, Shawna; Cox, Rebecca; Bergman, Katelin; Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:36:16 PM Attachments:image001.png Awesome! Thank you everyone! One thing to keep in mind while working on this is that the Environmental Review process is definitely a process that could use some more definition and possible efficiency improvements, so if you encounter anything that is out of date, doesn’t make sense or lessons learned let’s make a note of it for further discussion. Thanks again! Cori From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:30 PM To: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation I’d like to get the legal ad in this week, and if it needs to run Saturday that should be just fine. Donre has reached out to me to coordinate the mailings, so I will get the NOP printed and will work with Donre on the certified and other mailings to go out perhaps tomorrow or Wednesday. Thanks, all! From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:03 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Sure thing- I’ll help out where I can. Is there a timeline on the mailings or when the legal ad needs to be published? From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:57 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation I’m not sure of the due dates for all days of the week on the legal ad, but I do know they can run it on Saturday if we get it in by noon Wednesday. As far as the mailings go, we typically utilize the interns and Donre assists with certified mailings or shipping. County docs for posting are hand delivered (there are some ancient 25336 routing labels in the file cabinet behind Rebecca’s desk) but mailings are sent via snail mail. Rebecca, do you have time to please coordinate mailing efforts with interns and send the legal ad to the Tribune? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 25337 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25338 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:33:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Pam, I appreciate the update, and I think prospective proposers will have enough time to review the report. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:58 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Shawna, From an internal discussion this morning, it now looks like the hydrology report won’t be finalized until the end of this week. The bulk of it is completed, but there are still a few components that need further editing. I apologize for stating that it would be done today. I hope that this does not pose too much of an issue for potential EIR proposers. Thank you. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:50 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Thank you, Pam. No problem regarding the hydrology report submittal. Have a great weekend! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:48 PM 25339 To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Great; I’m glad that you received it. After I sent it, I worried that the file size may have been too large. The hydrology report was promised today, but it is likely to be Monday before we finish up the remaining edits. I hope that is okay. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:43 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Thank you! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:01 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Shawna, Yes, it is attached. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:28 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Pam, Do you have an electronic copy of the Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions 2016)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25340 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25341 From:Scott, Shawna To:Cox, Rebecca; Ryan, Cori; Bergman, Katelin; Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:30:01 PM Attachments:image001.png I’d like to get the legal ad in this week, and if it needs to run Saturday that should be just fine. Donre has reached out to me to coordinate the mailings, so I will get the NOP printed and will work with Donre on the certified and other mailings to go out perhaps tomorrow or Wednesday. Thanks, all! From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:03 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Sure thing- I’ll help out where I can. Is there a timeline on the mailings or when the legal ad needs to be published? From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:57 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation I’m not sure of the due dates for all days of the week on the legal ad, but I do know they can run it on Saturday if we get it in by noon Wednesday. As far as the mailings go, we typically utilize the interns and Donre assists with certified mailings or shipping. County docs for posting are hand delivered (there are some ancient routing labels in the file cabinet behind Rebecca’s desk) but mailings are sent via snail mail. Rebecca, do you have time to please coordinate mailing efforts with interns and send the legal ad to the Tribune? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also 25342 available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25343 From:Scott, Shawna To:Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:25:04 PM Attachments:NOP contact list_final updated 071017.xlsx image001.png Hi Donre, On the contact list the first sheet titled “Agencies – require cert. mail” includes all the agencies that need to be sent the NOP via certified mail. The second sheet titled “No cert. mail” only require standard mailings. I was glad the consultant split up the addresses on two separate sheets, which will hopefully make things easier. Is it possible to mail these out tomorrow or Wednesday, including the mailing to the State Clearinghouse? Let’s do certified mail for the State Clearinghouse, as well (USPS). I just need to confirm the legal ad posting date so that I can date the NOP, then I will print away. Thank you, Shawna From: Webb, Donre Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:19 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Shawna, Yes, thank you it would be helpful if you can print out all the copies of the NOP. Which contacts need to be certified and which are regular mailings? Also when do these need to go out? When does the copy need to be delivered to the State? I usually use UPS for that package if that is ok? Thank you for your assistance! Donre From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:00 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Donre, updated contact list for you (see below and attached). 25344 From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:22 PM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi there, Please see below; and as a follow-up I needed to make some corrections to the NOP Contact list; see attached and it is also available here. We now have 46 certified mailings and 29 regular mailings, and I will have five emails to send. Let me know how I can best assist. I can print out all the copies of the NOP, and upload the NOP to the project website page. I can help fill out certification forms, etc. – just let me know. Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) 25345 Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25346 From:Webb, Donre To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:18:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shawna, Yes, thank you it would be helpful if you can print out all the copies of the NOP. Which contacts need to be certified and which are regular mailings? Also when do these need to go out? When does the copy need to be delivered to the State? I usually use UPS for that package if that is ok? Thank you for your assistance! Donre From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:00 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Donre, updated contact list for you (see below and attached). From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:22 PM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi there, Please see below; and as a follow-up I needed to make some corrections to the NOP Contact list; see attached and it is also available here. We now have 46 certified mailings and 29 regular mailings, and I will have five emails to send. Let me know how I can best assist. I can print out all the copies of the NOP, and upload the NOP to the project website page. I can help fill out certification forms, etc. – just let me know. Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM 25347 To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25348 From:Bergman, Katelin To:Cox, Rebecca Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:07:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Great—that sounds like a plan! J Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:05 PM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Thanks! I’m trying to collect the details as we speak (timelines and such) and will circle up with you when I have more direction. J From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:04 PM To: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Becca! I can handle a majority of this, I believe. I may have some questions on the particulars, but we can work through that as it comes! Sorry that it’s taken me a bit to answer this. I saw Cori’s response—I can tag-team with you on that legal ad if you want! Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 25349 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:03 PM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Katelin, Are you able to handle this? Please let me know if you have any questions or need a hand to help get these tasks completed. J Rebecca From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? 25350 If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25351 From:Cox, Rebecca To:Bergman, Katelin Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:05:23 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks! I’m trying to collect the details as we speak (timelines and such) and will circle up with you when I have more direction. J From: Bergman, Katelin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:04 PM To: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Becca! I can handle a majority of this, I believe. I may have some questions on the particulars, but we can work through that as it comes! Sorry that it’s taken me a bit to answer this. I saw Cori’s response—I can tag-team with you on that legal ad if you want! Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:03 PM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Katelin, Are you able to handle this? Please let me know if you have any questions or need a hand to help get these tasks completed. J Rebecca From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM 25352 To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25353 From:Bergman, Katelin To:Cox, Rebecca Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:04:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Becca! I can handle a majority of this, I believe. I may have some questions on the particulars, but we can work through that as it comes! Sorry that it’s taken me a bit to answer this. I saw Cori’s response—I can tag-team with you on that legal ad if you want! Katelin Bergman Administrative Assistant I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kbergman@slocity.org T 805.783.7850 slocity.org From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:03 PM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Katelin, Are you able to handle this? Please let me know if you have any questions or need a hand to help get these tasks completed. J Rebecca From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): 25354 Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25355 From:Cox, Rebecca To:Ryan, Cori; Scott, Shawna; Bergman, Katelin; Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:02:53 PM Attachments:image001.png Sure thing- I’ll help out where I can. Is there a timeline on the mailings or when the legal ad needs to be published? From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:57 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation I’m not sure of the due dates for all days of the week on the legal ad, but I do know they can run it on Saturday if we get it in by noon Wednesday. As far as the mailings go, we typically utilize the interns and Donre assists with certified mailings or shipping. County docs for posting are hand delivered (there are some ancient routing labels in the file cabinet behind Rebecca’s desk) but mailings are sent via snail mail. Rebecca, do you have time to please coordinate mailing efforts with interns and send the legal ad to the Tribune? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) 25356 Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25357 From:Scott, Shawna To:Webb, Donre Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 2:00:01 PM Attachments:image001.png NOP contact list_final updated 071017.xlsx Hi Donre, updated contact list for you (see below and attached). From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:22 PM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi there, Please see below; and as a follow-up I needed to make some corrections to the NOP Contact list; see attached and it is also available here. We now have 46 certified mailings and 29 regular mailings, and I will have five emails to send. Let me know how I can best assist. I can print out all the copies of the NOP, and upload the NOP to the project website page. I can help fill out certification forms, etc. – just let me know. Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? 25358 Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25359 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 1:57:52 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Shawna, From an internal discussion this morning, it now looks like the hydrology report won’t be finalized until the end of this week. The bulk of it is completed, but there are still a few components that need further editing. I apologize for stating that it would be done today. I hope that this does not pose too much of an issue for potential EIR proposers. Thank you. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:50 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Thank you, Pam. No problem regarding the hydrology report submittal. Have a great weekend! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Great; I’m glad that you received it. After I sent it, I worried that the file size may have been too large. The hydrology report was promised today, but it is likely to be Monday before we finish up the remaining edits. I hope that is okay. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:43 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report 25360 Thank you! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:01 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Shawna, Yes, it is attached. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:28 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Pam, Do you have an electronic copy of the Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions 2016)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25361 From:Ryan, Cori To:Scott, Shawna; Bergman, Katelin; Cox, Rebecca; Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 1:56:57 PM Attachments:image001.png I’m not sure of the due dates for all days of the week on the legal ad, but I do know they can run it on Saturday if we get it in by noon Wednesday. As far as the mailings go, we typically utilize the interns and Donre assists with certified mailings or shipping. County docs for posting are hand delivered (there are some ancient routing labels in the file cabinet behind Rebecca’s desk) but mailings are sent via snail mail. Rebecca, do you have time to please coordinate mailing efforts with interns and send the legal ad to the Tribune? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. 25362 Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25363 From:Scott, Shawna To:Cox, Rebecca Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 1:25:21 PM Attachments:image002.png image003.png From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:02 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Oops I meant to send that Katelin! From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:02 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Katelin, Are you able to handle this? Please let me know if you have any questions or need a hand to help get these tasks completed. J Rebecca From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) 25364 Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25365 From:Scott, Shawna To:Bergman, Katelin; Cox, Rebecca Cc:Ryan, Cori Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 1:21:46 PM Attachments:image001.png NOP contact list_final updated 071017.xlsx Hi there, Please see below; and as a follow-up I needed to make some corrections to the NOP Contact list; see attached and it is also available here. We now have 46 certified mailings and 29 regular mailings, and I will have five emails to send. Let me know how I can best assist. I can print out all the copies of the NOP, and upload the NOP to the project website page. I can help fill out certification forms, etc. – just let me know. Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) 25366 News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25367 From:Cox, Rebecca To:Bergman, Katelin Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 1:02:49 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Katelin, Are you able to handle this? Please let me know if you have any questions or need a hand to help get these tasks completed. J Rebecca From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! 25368 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25369 From:Cox, Rebecca To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 1:02:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Oops I meant to send that Katelin! From: Cox, Rebecca Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:02 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Hi Katelin, Are you able to handle this? Please let me know if you have any questions or need a hand to help get these tasks completed. J Rebecca From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) 25370 Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25371 From:Cox, Rebecca To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 1:01:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Katelin, Are you able to handle this? Please let me know if you have any questions or need a hand to help get these tasks completed. J Rebecca From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16 AM To: Bergman, Katelin <kbergman@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Cc: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! 25372 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25373 From:Rebecca Gruett To:Rivoire, Dan Subject:Reminder: You are invited. Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 12:51:59 PM A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com 25374 Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to drivoire@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25375 From:Rebecca Gruett To:Harmon, Heidi Subject:Reminder: You are invited. Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 12:51:55 PM A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com 25376 Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to hharmon@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25377 From:Rebecca Gruett To:Johnson, Lee Subject:Reminder: You are invited. Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 12:36:44 PM A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com 25378 Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to ljohnson@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25379 From:Rebecca Gruett To:Hannula, Hal Subject:Reminder: You are invited. Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 12:36:41 PM A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com 25380 Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to hhannula@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25381 From:Rebecca Gruett To:Lichtig, Katie Subject:Reminder: You are invited. Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 12:36:37 PM A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com 25382 Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to klichtig@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25383 From:Rebecca Gruett To:Codron, Michael Subject:Reminder: You are invited. Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 12:36:34 PM A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com 25384 Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to mcodron@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25385 From:Rebecca Gruett To:Davidson, Doug Subject:Reminder: You are invited. Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 12:36:31 PM A friendly reminder - You're invited. We sent you an invitation, but did not receive the pleasure of your response. We hope you will be able to join us this Friday for our ribbon cutting celebration at Villaggio! Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Unveiling and Ribbon Cutting Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and ribbon-cutting ceremony. Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required: Call: 805-457-4200 Email: rgruett@villaggioslo.com Rebecca Gruett Director of Community Enrichment Villaggio at San Luis Obispo 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo CA, 93405 Office: 805-457-4200│Direct: 805-457-4204│Fax: 805-457-4212 Email: rgruett@vilaggioslo.com │Website: www.villaggioslo.com 25386 Villaggio_Logo_FullColor CONIFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission is intended for the use of the named addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e-mail so our address record can be corrected This email was sent to ddavidson@slocity.org why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Villaggio Communities · 1503 Froom Ranch Way, · San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 · USA 25387 From:Scott, Shawna To:Bergman, Katelin; Cox, Rebecca Cc:Ryan, Cori Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Notice of Preparation Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 11:16:10 AM Attachments:NOP contact list_final.xlsx image001.png Good morning, I need to mail out the Notice of Preparation (NOP) to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and will need some assistance with the following (see attached contact list, also available here): Public Notice in Tribune this week (see attached draft legal ad, also available here) Mailing the NOP to the State Clearinghouse using certified mail Mailing to federal, state, and local agencies using certified mail (56 mailings, including County Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Are County mailings typically hand delivered? Mailing to interested parties/non-agency groups and individuals (not required to be sent via certified mail) (26 mailings, not including City Departments) (will include printed NOP; the Initial Study is posted online and a link is provided in the NOP) Posting at County Clerk’s Office (I can do this) Posting at Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo County Libraries (I can do this) Provide copy for front counter (I can do this) Post NOP online (I can do this) News Item (I will prepare and sent to Tyler for review and approval) Can you please let me know what day the ad will run? If you need anything further from me, aside from the printed copies of the NOP and associated forms to mail, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25388 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Odile Ayral Subject:Re: Housing (Item 1) Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27:29 AM Hello Odile, Thank you for your remarks. I cannot speak for the entire Council, but I would venture to say we are all very aware that the issue of outside investors/college population on our housing market. We have had many emails back and forth about this subject. The solutions seem to be where opinions differ. I have to disagree that building to date has "not done one iota" to solve the affordability gap. I happen to know those that live in the great projects that HASLO has completed in recent years are very grateful for those projects. Those projects are built utilizing inclusionary housing funds. Without other developments, those do not have a funding mechanism. I also know several people that live in Serra Meadows. Those were all market rate homes that I certainly could not afford, but that is a neighborhood in which many young families now live. I think we need to be careful in identifying which lens we are looking at the cities housing issues. You are very correct that we need to figure out some mechanisms to limit outside investment. But claiming that new development does nothing to address those issues just isn't true. Until a larger city wide policy is created new development is the only way that we can address keeping outside investors out of the market. At least for those properties. I encourage you to look at San Luis Ranch and the owner obligations that they are proposing. The following is taken directly from their proposal. Programs: • Developer Buy-Back/No Flip Policy for All Phases: right of 1st refusal, ½ profit penalty • City of San Luis Obispo Equity Share • Private Bank Equity Share, 5-year depreciation equity • Local Heroes discount & financing for public safety, hospital workers, teachers • Lottery Events - open to: 1) Current City of SLO workers and residents 2) Current SLO County workers and residents 6 | Page San Luis Ranch Affordable Housing http://www.sanluisranch.com/wp-content/uploads/San_Luis_Ranch_Vision.pdf City staff was directed to work these in to the Development Agreement in order to hold them to such promises. As much as we want every development to solve all of our traffic issues, housing issues, rental issues, wage gap issues etc. We know that is not a reality. All we can do is take evolutionary steps that fit within the legal framework of government. It is very easy to identify problems, it is much more difficult to come up with achievable solutions. But I believe we as a community are getting there. I think as a community we need to look at what we are doing right and not just always focus on the negative. It is easy to lose sight of all the amazing things that are happening in SLO when we always focus on the negative. I interact on a fairly regular basis with people who are just plain angry at life and take it out on SAN LUIS RANCH fulfills and implements the City of San ... www.sanluisranch.com 1 | Page San Luis Ranch Vision San Luis Ranch honors the legacy of our past and builds upon a strong foundation to house the citizens of SLO, nurture its growth and ... 25389 every one they come in contact with. City government cannot solve that issue. I am certainly not putting you in that category. I just wanted to make a community observation. Perspective is everything in life. We all see the world through out own filters. I think we could all benefit from expanding those filters. Myself included. Thanks for the chat Odile. Sincerely Aaron Gomez Council Member Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: odileayral@gmail.com <odileayral@gmail.com> on behalf of Odile Ayral <oayral@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:16:33 AM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Housing (Item 1) Mayor Harmon and Council members, A couple weeks ago, on my street in the Foothill neighborhood, a 1200-square-foot ordinary house with weeds for yard sold for $700,000 to an investor from San Francisco. Immediately, without doing any improvement to the property, the investor put the house for rent for $3,500 a month. Of course, families can't and won't pay this amount of money to receive so little, therefore students will rent the place. This scenario has been going on for several decades, and now my neighborhood, previously known for its affordable houses that attracted new Cal Poly faculty and staff, has become a web of student rentals. New faculty have to look for housing in surrounding cities because you don't go far on an assistant professor salary. It is fashionable these days to speak of "affordable housing" and "workforce housing," but the building that has taken place until now has not done one iota to improve the situation. New two-bedroom apartments close to Cal Poly rent for $4,000 a month, condos on Sacramento Drive sell for at least $700,000, and I expect that--with the exception of the handful of units affordable by design--most residences in San Luis Ranch, Avila Ranch and Froom Ranch will reach similar prices once the hidden costs are accounted for. One good thing about Avila Ranch is the condition that owners have to live for 5 years in the residence they buy. This will at least keep investors at bay for five years. But then, the 25390 uphill cycle will start again. Like the Councils that came before you, you are overlooking the elephant in the room: Cal Poly. As long as you are not willing to confront this topic, you will never solve the housing problem in SLO because student pressure is what is pushing prices up, and families out of the city. None of you witnesses this daily assault because you don't live on the north side, but the result is the same for everyone. Five students can afford to pay high rent but a family can't, and investors can buy an overpriced house but a family can't. And when outside investors buy here, rents go up and home prices go up whether you live in the north or the south. These investors suck money out and barely put any in, so the city loses on all counts. In the last avalanche of mail you received regarding San Luis Ranch, a resident wrote: "We must compete with an obscene number of college students, who are quickly outnumbering locals." Competition is the key. Eliminate one (competition from the students) and we could return to the days when rents and house prices were more reasonable. However students did not create this situation, Cal Poly administrators did. They dragged their feet on building dorms, accepted more and more students, and were surprised to discover the adverse impact it had upon their workforce. Their solution? Build high density faculty housing on campus right in the face of a once lovely neighborhood (!) But the Trustees are equally at fault. SLO is far from their minds. If Long Beach and Sacramento had the same ratio of students, Long Beach would have 215,000 students and Sacramento 217,000. I am sure the Trustees would never let things deteriorate to this point in their cities. Finally, the various City Councils of the last 30 years bear a huge responsibility because they did not lift a finger to alleviate the situation. I hope you don't intend to join their ranks. So please, follow Santa Cruz footsteps. Go to Long Beach and confront the Trustees, explain our plight, demand not just more dorms, but especially, a reasonable ratio of students versus residents. If you can obtain this much, rents and house prices will go down, investors will look elsewhere to exploit people, and local residents will be eternally grateful. Sincerely, Odile Ayral 25391 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 9:27:14 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Kristin, I like the addition, and modified the dates by a day because we have a scoping meeting on July 26 and consultants may have questions following the meeting (I saved the change in the same file, did not re-name). I think we may be good to go! Thank you, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:21 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Great. I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers. See my proposed timeline here. I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin 25392 Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25393 From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM 25394 To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25395 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 9:20:47 AM Attachments:image001.png Great.  I think I would move up the date to submit questions to allow time after questions for you to develop answers and for proposers to adapt their proposals to address those answers.  See my proposed timeline here.  I also added a deadline for your answers to the questions that allows for a week and a half for vendors to adjust proposals – you can change that date if you feel you may need additional time to answer, or we can wait and see and issue an addendum if additional time is needed.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05 AM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi, Shawna.  The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines).   I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs.  It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted.   Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here).  This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services.   25396 Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline.  We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP.   Thank you,   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna.   Kristin   From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> 25397 Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin  Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc.  Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper.  Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD).  Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there.   Thank you,   Kristin   From: Ryan, Cori  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   FYI From: Scott, Shawna  Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review   Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. 25398 I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25399 From:Sims, Shannon To:Jennifer Whittle Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 8:50:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Correct, none of them will be attending. Thanks! -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:43 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks and I did receive a note from the City Attorney. Assume from this correspondence that means that the Mayor will not be attending either? Do you know about the Vice Mayor? Thank you, Jenifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:41 AM To: Jennifer Whittle <jwhittle@lavidge.com> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Jennifer, You may have been contacted directly but to my knowledge no Council will be in attendance. Additionally the Mayor will not be making remarks. You are welcome to contact them directly with questions. Thank you! Shannon Sims Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ssims@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org 25400 From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:55 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Thank you, Shannon. The ribbon cutting is at 4:30 next Friday and specifically when we would want the Mayor there to make a few remarks and be part of the photo. Best, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:51 PM To: Jennifer Whittle <jwhittle@lavidge.com> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Received. I will get back to you as soon as I receive the responses. Thanks, Jennifer. -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25401 25402 25403 From:Jennifer Whittle To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 8:43:11 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shannon, Thanks and I did receive a note from the City Attorney. Assume from this correspondence that means that the Mayor will not be attending either? Do you know about the Vice Mayor? Thank you, Jenifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:41 AM To: Jennifer Whittle <jwhittle@lavidge.com> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Jennifer, You may have been contacted directly but to my knowledge no Council will be in attendance. Additionally the Mayor will not be making remarks. You are welcome to contact them directly with questions. Thank you! Shannon Sims Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ssims@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:55 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Thank you, Shannon. The ribbon cutting is at 4:30 next Friday and specifically when we would want the Mayor there to make a few remarks and be part of the photo. Best, Jennifer 25404 Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:51 PM To: Jennifer Whittle <jwhittle@lavidge.com> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Received. I will get back to you as soon as I receive the responses. Thanks, Jennifer. -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25405 25406 25407 From:Sims, Shannon To:Jennifer Whittle Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 8:41:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Jennifer, You may have been contacted directly but to my knowledge no Council will be in attendance. Additionally the Mayor will not be making remarks. You are welcome to contact them directly with questions. Thank you! Shannon Sims Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ssims@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:55 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Thank you, Shannon. The ribbon cutting is at 4:30 next Friday and specifically when we would want the Mayor there to make a few remarks and be part of the photo. Best, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:51 PM To: Jennifer Whittle <jwhittle@lavidge.com> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Received. I will get back to you as soon as I receive the responses. Thanks, Jennifer. -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> 25408 Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25409 25410 25411 From:Sims, Shannon To:Pease, Andy Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 8:36:00 AM Understood. Got it! From: Pease, Andy Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2017 10:21 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 No, thanks. Andy From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:51 PM Subject: FW: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Mayor and Council, Please see e-mail below. Jennifer asked if I could let her know who will be in attendance. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25412 25413 25414 From:odileayral@gmail.com on behalf of Odile Ayral To:E-mail Council Website Subject:Housing (Item 1) Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 8:16:42 AM Mayor Harmon and Council members, A couple weeks ago, on my street in the Foothill neighborhood, a 1200-square-foot ordinary house with weeds for yard sold for $700,000 to an investor from San Francisco. Immediately, without doing any improvement to the property, the investor put the house for rent for $3,500 a month. Of course, families can't and won't pay this amount of money to receive so little, therefore students will rent the place. This scenario has been going on for several decades, and now my neighborhood, previously known for its affordable houses that attracted new Cal Poly faculty and staff, has become a web of student rentals. New faculty have to look for housing in surrounding cities because you don't go far on an assistant professor salary. It is fashionable these days to speak of "affordable housing" and "workforce housing," but the building that has taken place until now has not done one iota to improve the situation. New two-bedroom apartments close to Cal Poly rent for $4,000 a month, condos on Sacramento Drive sell for at least $700,000, and I expect that--with the exception of the handful of units affordable by design--most residences in San Luis Ranch, Avila Ranch and Froom Ranch will reach similar prices once the hidden costs are accounted for. One good thing about Avila Ranch is the condition that owners have to live for 5 years in the residence they buy. This will at least keep investors at bay for five years. But then, the uphill cycle will start again. Like the Councils that came before you, you are overlooking the elephant in the room: Cal Poly. As long as you are not willing to confront this topic, you will never solve the housing problem in SLO because student pressure is what is pushing prices up, and families out of the city. None of you witnesses this daily assault because you don't live on the north side, but the result is the same for everyone. Five students can afford to pay high rent but a family can't, and investors can buy an overpriced house but a family can't. And when outside investors buy here, rents go up and home prices go up whether you live in the north or the south. These investors suck money out and barely put any in, so the city loses on all counts. In the last avalanche of mail you received regarding San Luis Ranch, a resident wrote: "We must compete with an obscene number of college students, who are quickly outnumbering locals." Competition is the key. Eliminate one (competition from the students) and we could return to the days when rents and house prices were more reasonable. However students did not create this situation, Cal Poly administrators did. They dragged their feet on building dorms, accepted more and more students, and were surprised to discover the adverse impact it had upon their workforce. Their solution? Build high density faculty housing on campus right in the face of a once lovely neighborhood (!) But the Trustees are equally at fault. SLO is far from their minds. If Long Beach and Sacramento had the same ratio of students, Long Beach would have 215,000 students and Sacramento 217,000. I am sure the Trustees would never let 25415 things deteriorate to this point in their cities. Finally, the various City Councils of the last 30 years bear a huge responsibility because they did not lift a finger to alleviate the situation. I hope you don't intend to join their ranks. So please, follow Santa Cruz footsteps. Go to Long Beach and confront the Trustees, explain our plight, demand not just more dorms, but especially, a reasonable ratio of students versus residents. If you can obtain this much, rents and house prices will go down, investors will look elsewhere to exploit people, and local residents will be eternally grateful. Sincerely, Odile Ayral 25416 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 8:05:07 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Kristin, I think the additional contract language (termination for convenience clause) looks fine, and I like your suggestion for a timeframe for questions. I will added the Q&A into the timeline and saved in the same folder here. Thank you for your assistance, Shawna From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, 25417 The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the 25418 web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25419 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25420 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Monday, July 10, 2017 7:49:37 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi, Shawna. The RFP looks good and we have requested posting of the legal ad (this generally takes 3 days to post, but that is well within the required timelines). I do have one question: do you want to add some time between the issuance of the RFP and proposal due date for questions to be submitted and answered? This can often be helpful to clear up anything vendors do not understand within the scope of work or to clarify desired specs. It wouldn’t have to extend the timeline, but can be placed in the time already allotted. Also, I would suggest adding a termination for convenience clause in the terms (see the proposed revised version here). This provides the City with greater flexibility should we, for any reason, want to discontinue services. Let me know if you are ok with the proposed change and whether you’d like to add a Q&A into the timeline. We can post the final version to the City website tomorrow, as listed on the proposed timeline on the RFP. Thank you, Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 25421 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna 25422 Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25423 From:Pease, Andy To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Sunday, July 9, 2017 10:21:01 PM No, thanks. Andy From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:51 PM Subject: FW: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Mayor and Council, Please see e-mail below. Jennifer asked if I could let her know who will be in attendance. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25424 25425 25426 From:John McKenzie To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 4:32:41 PM Thanks Shawna - you too! Hope you have a cool spot to take refuge! -----Original Message----- From: "Scott, Shawna" Sent: Jul 7, 2017 4:02 PM To: John McKenzie , "ecreel@swca.com" Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi John, Thank you for your comments. We have added you to the interested parties list. Have a good weekend, Shawna Scott Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: John McKenzie [mailto:johnnimac@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 3:46 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Dear Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott, The City of San Luis Obispo needs an off-leash dog park. It currently does not have one. Based on nationwide averages and local city census and household data (see assumptions at the end),the City has over 10,000 dogs. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan (FRSP) will add 540 new residences which will add almost 300 dogs to this total. Further, all of the residential lots appear they will be very small with little or no backyard, increasing the need for a place to take these 300 dogs for a run. The San Luis Ranch on Madonna Road (likely to be approved later this month) will be adding 580 units and a commensurate amount of dogs. The proposed 2.9 acre neighborhood park for FRSP could accommodate a dog park (they usually require between 1 and 1.5 acres), but would displace other recreational uses better suited for this development. 25427 In 2001, the City approved their Parks and Recreation Element (General Plan, Chapter 7, Section 3.12), which identified 10 major unmet needs, including ‘Specialty facilities, such as disc golf, dog parks, BMX parks’. Since the City does not seem to have a definition, Wikipedia provides the following definition for a ‘dog park’: A dog park is a park for dogs to exercise and play off-leash in a controlled environment under the supervision of their owners. These parks have varying features, although they typically offer a 4' to 6' fence, separate double-gated entry and exit points, adequate drainage, benches for humans, shade for hot days, parking close to the site, water, tools to pick up and dispose of animal waste in covered trash cans, and regular maintenance and cleaning of the grounds. Dog parks may also offer wheel-chair access, a pond for swimming and a separate enclosure for small dogs. The Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council over the last 16 years have passed over meeting this community need as specified in the Parks and Recreation Element. Simply making the developer pay an in-lieu fee into the general recreation coffers will not meet this unmet demand for our canine companions. An efficient solution to this issue would be to look to Laguna Lake Park which includes large areas of under-developed land, and the only ‘unleashed dog area’ (which is a decades old 'pilot’ program that never received any follow-up or formalizing) in the City. However, as defined above, this ‘dog area’ does not meet the definition of a dog park. Being unfenced with limited amenities, there are many dogs and dog owners who will not use this under-improved area (e.g. small dog owners not wanting big dogs around; water dog owners that do not want their dogs to play in the water/mud ponds; owners with ‘wandering’ dogs; dog owners with physical disabilities; etc.). The limited mobility aspect (and making the Dog Park ADA accessible) would be very relevant to the target group for FRSP. For many reasons, Laguna Lake Park is well suited to be the first park to establish a fenced off- leash dog park. An important first step would be the preparation of a Dog Park Plan. Such a Plan would be able to identify where and what improvements are needed, including more parking areas (existing parking lot is usually full and overflowing and is not large enough for existing use). Once the specific improvements are identified in this Plan, and the associated costs are known, as money becomes available, the improvements can be prioritized and then completed in phases. Funding of these improvements could then be secured in phases through private donations/fundraisers, grants, project exactions, or through yearly City budgeting. The Recreation section of the EIR should include a discussion of this issue. While there is an existing deficiency with this unmet need, these large new projects with residential development will be adding substantially to this problem. Unless the applicant is interested in building a dog park into this development, it would seem that a reasonable mitigation or condition to address FRSP impacts would be to direct the project to prepare the Dog Park Plan, with funding from other sources to complete their fair share of improvements, as specified in an approved Dog Park Plan. Having a Plan prepared/approved will also have the following benefits: 1. It will eliminate the hodge-podge ‘improvements’ that have been made over the years, or that are currently being installed which would reduce wasteful spending. For example, the replacement fence just installed follows the existing fence line, and portions will have to be removed if there will be any expansion of the existing parking area along the existing road. Another example is the perimeter boulders – these do nothing to help control the off-leash dogs, especially if the dogs are water lovers (owners of such dogs have little ability to control such dogs when they race to the water/mud ponds beyond the boulders). The boulders just show where the ranger can issue the $500 ticket once the dog runs past the 25428 boulders. 2. It could be used to amend the Quimby fee as an added recreational capital improvement; and/or 3. It could be used as a part of updating the Parks and Recreation Element relating to dog parks. A mitigation/ condition could look like the following: REC-1. Parkland In-lieu Fees. The project applicant shall pay parkland in-lieu fees in accordance with the City’s parkland in-lieu fee program. The project’s specific fee shall be determined by the City at the time of project approval, after accounting for parkland provided within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The in-lieu fees collected from the project shall be directed to new projects or improvements to existing parks and recreation facilities within the City of San Luis Obispo parks system. Furthermore, a portion of these funds will be set aside to prepare a Dog Park Plan for Laguna Lake Park. The applicant will work with the City Parks and Recreation Department to define and complete this Plan. The Plan shall be completed prior to __. Elements of the Plan may include but not necessarily be limited to: Identify Off-leash Dog Park boundaries (include separated small and large dog areas); identify human and dog amenity needs; identify additional parking needs; identify costs associated with all proposed improvements, define maintenance needs, etc. If a Dog Park Plan has already been prepared by others, a comparable amount of funding shall be applied towards Dog Park improvements at Laguna Lake Park. Please include this item in the EIR analysis, and as you work with the applicant, consider adding a dog park to the project or directing a fair share towards getting a dog park. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Given that 16 years have passed with no serious attention being given to our faithful friends, now is the time to address this issue in this and all large projects with residential elements until we have at least one real dog park in this town (and catch up with the other six, smaller communities in our county that already have off leash dog parks). Please add me to the Draft EIR notification list. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea St., SLO, CA 93401 10,000 dogs – Assumptions/Facts City of SLO pop – 47,339 (2015 census) Per national 2012 estimate, over 1/3 of households (35.6%) own 1-2 dogs (1.6 average/household). Based on the 2010 census for SLO there are 2.2 people per household; and if this is applied to the 2015 City pop., there are about 21,518 households. Based on these stats there are over 7,000 households with dogs, and when the 1.6 dog average is applied there would be over 10,000 dogs within the City of San Luis Obispo. 25429 25430 From:Dietrick, Christine To:jwhittle@lavidge.com Subject:Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 4:23:00 PM Attachments:image003.png Dear Ms. Whittle: Thank you for extending an invitation to participate in this event to the City Council. Because a development review application for this project is currently pending before the City and the City Council will be making the decision whether or not to approve the project, I have recommended to the Council that they not participate in the event in their formal roles as City representatives, in order to maintain both the perception and reality of the City’s neutrality in its regulatory review role. Thank you, Christine Christine Dietrick City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto: ] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer 25431 Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25432 25433 From:Scott, Shawna To:John McKenzie; ecreel@swca.com Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 4:02:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi John, Thank you for your comments. We have added you to the interested parties list. Have a good weekend, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: John McKenzie [mailto:johnnimac@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 3:46 PM To: ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Dear Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott, The City of San Luis Obispo needs an off-leash dog park. It currently does not have one. Based on nationwide averages and local city census and household data (see assumptions at the end),the City has over 10,000 dogs. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan (FRSP) will add 540 new residences which will add almost 300 dogs to this total. Further, all of the residential lots appear they will be very small with little or no backyard, increasing the need for a place to take these 300 dogs for a run. The San Luis Ranch on Madonna Road (likely to be approved later this month) will be adding 580 units and a commensurate amount of dogs. The proposed 2.9 acre neighborhood park for FRSP could accommodate a dog park (they usually require between 1 and 1.5 acres), but would displace other recreational uses better suited for this development. In 2001, the City approved their Parks and Recreation Element (General Plan, Chapter 7, Section 3.12), which identified 10 major unmet needs, including ‘Specialty facilities, such as disc golf, dog parks, BMX parks’. Since the City does not seem to have a definition, Wikipedia provides the following definition for a ‘dog park’: A dog park is a park for dogs to exercise and play off-leash in a controlled environment under the 25434 supervision of their owners. These parks have varying features, although they typically offer a 4' to 6' fence, separate double-gated entry and exit points, adequate drainage, benches for humans, shade for hot days, parking close to the site, water, tools to pick up and dispose of animal waste in covered trash cans, and regular maintenance and cleaning of the grounds. Dog parks may also offer wheel-chair access, a pond for swimming and a separate enclosure for small dogs. The Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council over the last 16 years have passed over meeting this community need as specified in the Parks and Recreation Element. Simply making the developer pay an in-lieu fee into the general recreation coffers will not meet this unmet demand for our canine companions. An efficient solution to this issue would be to look to Laguna Lake Park which includes large areas of under-developed land, and the only ‘unleashed dog area’ (which is a decades old 'pilot’ program that never received any follow-up or formalizing) in the City. However, as defined above, this ‘dog area’ does not meet the definition of a dog park. Being unfenced with limited amenities, there are many dogs and dog owners who will not use this under-improved area (e.g. small dog owners not wanting big dogs around; water dog owners that do not want their dogs to play in the water/mud ponds; owners with ‘wandering’ dogs; dog owners with physical disabilities; etc.). The limited mobility aspect (and making the Dog Park ADA accessible) would be very relevant to the target group for FRSP. For many reasons, Laguna Lake Park is well suited to be the first park to establish a fenced off-leash dog park. An important first step would be the preparation of a Dog Park Plan. Such a Plan would be able to identify where and what improvements are needed, including more parking areas (existing parking lot is usually full and overflowing and is not large enough for existing use). Once the specific improvements are identified in this Plan, and the associated costs are known, as money becomes available, the improvements can be prioritized and then completed in phases. Funding of these improvements could then be secured in phases through private donations/fundraisers, grants, project exactions, or through yearly City budgeting. The Recreation section of the EIR should include a discussion of this issue. While there is an existing deficiency with this unmet need, these large new projects with residential development will be adding substantially to this problem. Unless the applicant is interested in building a dog park into this development, it would seem that a reasonable mitigation or condition to address FRSP impacts would be to direct the project to prepare the Dog Park Plan, with funding from other sources to complete their fair share of improvements, as specified in an approved Dog Park Plan. Having a Plan prepared/approved will also have the following benefits: 1. It will eliminate the hodge-podge ‘improvements’ that have been made over the years, or that are currently being installed which would reduce wasteful spending. For example, the replacement fence just installed follows the existing fence line, and portions will have to be removed if there will be any expansion of the existing parking area along the existing road. Another example is the perimeter boulders – these do nothing to help control the off-leash dogs, especially if the dogs are water lovers (owners of such dogs have little ability to control such dogs when they race to the water/mud ponds beyond the boulders). The boulders just show where the ranger can issue the $500 ticket once the dog runs past the boulders. 2. It could be used to amend the Quimby fee as an added recreational capital improvement; and/or 3. It could be used as a part of updating the Parks and Recreation Element relating to dog parks. A mitigation/ condition could look like the following: REC-1. Parkland In-lieu Fees. The project applicant shall pay parkland in-lieu fees in accordance with the City’s parkland in-lieu fee program. The project’s specific fee shall be determined by the City at the time of project approval, after accounting for parkland provided within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The in-lieu fees collected from the project shall be directed to new projects or improvements to existing parks and recreation facilities within the City of San Luis Obispo parks 25435 system. Furthermore, a portion of these funds will be set aside to prepare a Dog Park Plan for Laguna Lake Park. The applicant will work with the City Parks and Recreation Department to define and complete this Plan. The Plan shall be completed prior to __. Elements of the Plan may include but not necessarily be limited to: Identify Off-leash Dog Park boundaries (include separated small and large dog areas); identify human and dog amenity needs; identify additional parking needs; identify costs associated with all proposed improvements, define maintenance needs, etc. If a Dog Park Plan has already been prepared by others, a comparable amount of funding shall be applied towards Dog Park improvements at Laguna Lake Park. Please include this item in the EIR analysis, and as you work with the applicant, consider adding a dog park to the project or directing a fair share towards getting a dog park. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Given that 16 years have passed with no serious attention being given to our faithful friends, now is the time to address this issue in this and all large projects with residential elements until we have at least one real dog park in this town (and catch up with the other six, smaller communities in our county that already have off leash dog parks). Please add me to the Draft EIR notification list. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea St., SLO, CA 93401 10,000 dogs – Assumptions/Facts City of SLO pop – 47,339 (2015 census) Per national 2012 estimate, over 1/3 of households (35.6%) own 1-2 dogs (1.6 average/household). Based on the 2010 census for SLO there are 2.2 people per household; and if this is applied to the 2015 City pop., there are about 21,518 households. Based on these stats there are over 7,000 households with dogs, and when the 1.6 dog average is applied there would be over 10,000 dogs within the City of San Luis Obispo. 25436 From:John McKenzie To:ecreel@swca.com; Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 3:46:15 PM Dear Ms. Creel and Ms. Scott, The City of San Luis Obispo needs an off-leash dog park. It currently does not have one. Based on nationwide averages and local city census and household data (see assumptions at the end),the City has over 10,000 dogs. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan (FRSP) will add 540 new residences which will add almost 300 dogs to this total. Further, all of the residential lots appear they will be very small with little or no backyard, increasing the need for a place to take these 300 dogs for a run. The San Luis Ranch on Madonna Road (likely to be approved later this month) will be adding 580 units and a commensurate amount of dogs. The proposed 2.9 acre neighborhood park for FRSP could accommodate a dog park (they usually require between 1 and 1.5 acres), but would displace other recreational uses better suited for this development. In 2001, the City approved their Parks and Recreation Element (General Plan, Chapter 7, Section 3.12), which identified 10 major unmet needs, including ‘Specialty facilities, such as disc golf, dog parks, BMX parks’. Since the City does not seem to have a definition, Wikipedia provides the following definition for a ‘dog park’: A dog park is a park for dogs to exercise and play off-leash in a controlled environment under the supervision of their owners. These parks have varying features, although they typically offer a 4' to 6' fence, separate double-gated entry and exit points, adequate drainage, benches for humans, shade for hot days, parking close to the site, water, tools to pick up and dispose of animal waste in covered trash cans, and regular maintenance and cleaning of the grounds. Dog parks may also offer wheel-chair access, a pond for swimming and a separate enclosure for small dogs. The Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council over the last 16 years have passed over meeting this community need as specified in the Parks and Recreation Element. Simply making the developer pay an in-lieu fee into the general recreation coffers will not meet this unmet demand for our canine companions. An efficient solution to this issue would be to look to Laguna Lake Park which includes large areas of under-developed land, and the only ‘unleashed dog area’ (which is a decades old 'pilot’ program that never received any follow-up or formalizing) in the City. However, as defined above, this ‘dog area’ does not meet the definition of a dog park. Being unfenced with limited amenities, there are many dogs and dog owners who will not use this under-improved area (e.g. small dog owners not wanting big dogs around; water dog owners that do not want their dogs to play in the water/mud ponds; owners with ‘wandering’ dogs; dog owners with physical disabilities; etc.). The limited mobility aspect (and making the Dog Park ADA accessible) would be very relevant to the target group for FRSP. For many reasons, Laguna Lake Park is well suited to be the first park to establish a fenced off-leash dog park. An important first step would be the preparation of a Dog Park Plan. Such a Plan would be able to identify where and what improvements are needed, including more parking areas (existing parking lot is usually full and overflowing and is not large enough for existing use). Once the specific improvements are identified in this Plan, and the associated costs are known, as money becomes available, the improvements can be prioritized and then completed in phases. Funding of these improvements could then be secured in phases through private donations/fundraisers, grants, project exactions, or through yearly City budgeting. The Recreation section of the EIR should include a discussion of this issue. While there is an existing deficiency with this unmet need, these large new projects with residential development will be adding 25437 substantially to this problem. Unless the applicant is interested in building a dog park into this development, it would seem that a reasonable mitigation or condition to address FRSP impacts would be to direct the project to prepare the Dog Park Plan, with funding from other sources to complete their fair share of improvements, as specified in an approved Dog Park Plan. Having a Plan prepared/approved will also have the following benefits: 1. It will eliminate the hodge-podge ‘improvements’ that have been made over the years, or that are currently being installed which would reduce wasteful spending. For example, the replacement fence just installed follows the existing fence line, and portions will have to be removed if there will be any expansion of the existing parking area along the existing road. Another example is the perimeter boulders – these do nothing to help control the off-leash dogs, especially if the dogs are water lovers (owners of such dogs have little ability to control such dogs when they race to the water/mud ponds beyond the boulders). The boulders just show where the ranger can issue the $500 ticket once the dog runs past the boulders. 2. It could be used to amend the Quimby fee as an added recreational capital improvement; and/or 3. It could be used as a part of updating the Parks and Recreation Element relating to dog parks. A mitigation/ condition could look like the following: REC-1. Parkland In-lieu Fees. The project applicant shall pay parkland in-lieu fees in accordance with the City’s parkland in-lieu fee program. The project’s specific fee shall be determined by the City at the time of project approval, after accounting for parkland provided within the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Area. The in-lieu fees collected from the project shall be directed to new projects or improvements to existing parks and recreation facilities within the City of San Luis Obispo parks system. Furthermore, a portion of these funds will be set aside to prepare a Dog Park Plan for Laguna Lake Park. The applicant will work with the City Parks and Recreation Department to define and complete this Plan. The Plan shall be completed prior to __. Elements of the Plan may include but not necessarily be limited to: Identify Off-leash Dog Park boundaries (include separated small and large dog areas); identify human and dog amenity needs; identify additional parking needs; identify costs associated with all proposed improvements, define maintenance needs, etc. If a Dog Park Plan has already been prepared by others, a comparable amount of funding shall be applied towards Dog Park improvements at Laguna Lake Park. Please include this item in the EIR analysis, and as you work with the applicant, consider adding a dog park to the project or directing a fair share towards getting a dog park. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Given that 16 years have passed with no serious attention being given to our faithful friends, now is the time to address this issue in this and all large projects with residential elements until we have at least one real dog park in this town (and catch up with the other six, smaller communities in our county that already have off leash dog parks). Please add me to the Draft EIR notification list. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John McKenzie 813 Bougainvillea St., SLO, CA 93401 10,000 dogs – Assumptions/Facts City of SLO pop – 47,339 (2015 census) 25438 Per national 2012 estimate, over 1/3 of households (35.6%) own 1-2 dogs (1.6 average/household). Based on the 2010 census for SLO there are 2.2 people per household; and if this is applied to the 2015 City pop., there are about 21,518 households. Based on these stats there are over 7,000 households with dogs, and when the 1.6 dog average is applied there would be over 10,000 dogs within the City of San Luis Obispo. 25439 From:Scott, Shawna To:Corey, Tyler Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 3:18:38 PM Hi Tyler, Would you like to review the Froom Ranch Specific Plan NOP? It is available here: T:\Froom Ranch Specific Plan\NOP\Froom Ranch NOP_062017.doc Thanks, Shawna 25440 From:Sims, Shannon To:Gomez, Aaron Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 2:54:00 PM Done! From: Gomez, Aaron Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:56 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 I would like to attend. Can you calendar it for me? Thank you! Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:50:38 PM Subject: FW: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Mayor and Council, Please see e-mail below. Jennifer asked if I could let her know who will be in attendance. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25441 25442 25443 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Preliminary Transportation Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 2:51:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks Shawna. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 2:46 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Preliminary Transportation Report Hi Luke, Just an FYI – the applicant submitted a preliminary transportation report (see attached). This report is saved in the project folder on the T Drive. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25444 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Preliminary Transportation Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 2:50:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks Shawna. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 2:46 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Preliminary Transportation Report Hi Luke, Just an FYI – the applicant submitted a preliminary transportation report (see attached). This report is saved in the project folder on the T Drive. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25445 From:Scott, Shawna To:Schwartz, Luke Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Preliminary Transportation Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 2:45:48 PM Attachments:Prelim Transportation Analysis CCTC 2017.pdf image001.png Hi Luke, Just an FYI – the applicant submitted a preliminary transportation report (see attached). This report is saved in the project folder on the T Drive. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25446 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 1:49:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Pam. No problem regarding the hydrology report submittal. Have a great weekend! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:48 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Great; I’m glad that you received it. After I sent it, I worried that the file size may have been too large. The hydrology report was promised today, but it is likely to be Monday before we finish up the remaining edits. I hope that is okay. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:43 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Thank you! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:01 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Shawna, Yes, it is attached. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:28 PM 25447 To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Pam, Do you have an electronic copy of the Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions 2016)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25448 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 1:48:38 PM Attachments:image002.png Great; I’m glad that you received it. After I sent it, I worried that the file size may have been too large. The hydrology report was promised today, but it is likely to be Monday before we finish up the remaining edits. I hope that is okay. PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:43 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Thank you! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:01 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Shawna, Yes, it is attached. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:28 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Pam, Do you have an electronic copy of the Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions 2016)? Thank you, 25449 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25450 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 1:42:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you! From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 1:01 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Shawna, Yes, it is attached. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:28 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Pam, Do you have an electronic copy of the Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions 2016)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25451 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 1:02:10 PM Attachments:image003.png SL09734-1 Froom El Villaggio Soils Engineering Report.pdf Hi Shawna, Yes, it is attached. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:28 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Hi Pam, Do you have an electronic copy of the Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions 2016)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25452 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 12:49:50 PM I'm at Concerts in the Plaza volunteering, no can do! Plus we haven't even come close to approving this project as a city, I'm not going to go to Grand Openings, it's really slime-y of them to even invite us. This is nothing but propagandizing, and not appropriate for Council members, IMHO. I have these sent to my junk mail so I don't get them, FYI, so I will never be RSVPing on my own and you can assume I will never go. Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:50:38 PM Subject: FW: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Mayor and Council, Please see e-mail below. Jennifer asked if I could let her know who will be in attendance. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25453 25454 25455 From:Scott, Shawna To:paricci@rrmdesign.com Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Soils Engineering Report Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 12:27:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam, Do you have an electronic copy of the Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions 2016)? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25456 From:Colleran, Lorraine To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 8:13:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Sure we are well within the 10 day notification time line. I will ask to have the ad run asap which is around three days. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 5:26 PM To: Colleran, Lorraine <lcolleran@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Lorraine. Can you please check on the timeline for a legal ad for this and then check to make sure they left enough time in for bid opening after the next feasible advertisement date? Thanks, Kristin Get Outlook for iOS From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21:08 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25457 From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> 25458 Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25459 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 7:38:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, have a GREAT vacation! Enjoy the wildlands of Alaska! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 7:03 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Jaimie Jones <jmjones@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation Hi Shawna – I have drafted a rough PowerPoint presentation for the Froom Ranch NOP Scoping Meeting at PC on 7-26-17. Jaimie is formatting it, waiting on a graphic from Kevin, and will then send it over to you once it’s finished (next week probably). This will probably need some tweaking when I return. Please feel free to email me or reach out to Jaimie if you have any questions in the meantime. Thanks, talk to you soon. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25460 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Jaimie Jones Subject:Froom Ranch PC NOP presentation Date:Friday, July 7, 2017 7:03:06 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shawna – I have drafted a rough PowerPoint presentation for the Froom Ranch NOP Scoping Meeting at PC on 7-26-17. Jaimie is formatting it, waiting on a graphic from Kevin, and will then send it over to you once it’s finished (next week probably). This will probably need some tweaking when I return. Please feel free to email me or reach out to Jaimie if you have any questions in the meantime. Thanks, talk to you soon. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25461 From:Harmon, Heidi To:Lichtig, Katie Subject:Fw: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 7:13:44 PM Is it appropriate for me to say a few words at this? From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:50 PM Subject: FW: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Mayor and Council, Please see e-mail below. Jennifer asked if I could let her know who will be in attendance. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25462 25463 25464 From:neilhavlik To:Hill, Robert Subject:RE: Last night Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 6:21:32 PM And I did figure a development plan would come along eventually. I didn't want to wait to get the trails going. N Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Hill, Robert" <rhill@slocity.org> Date: 07/06/2017 7:14 PM (GMT-06:00) To: neilhavlik@aol.com Subject: RE: Last night Indeed! Is it true what he wrote: “The City specifically chose not to purchase the area on the Froom Ranch property above the 150-foot elevation as part of the Irish Hills Natural Preserve when they had the opportunity”? I don’t remember this. Although I can imagine how we might of left this part out anticipating that it would someday be dedicated! I also recall we had to hold a bake sale to purchase what we did, so guessing you may have felt it was beyond our financial means at the time, too. Talk soon… Bob From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:51 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Last night 25465 Interesting email from Vic M. I see he didn't actually deny anything I said. N. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 6, 2017 2:09 pm Subject: RE: Last night Sounds good, Neil. Thanks! From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:06 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Last night Back on Monday, talk to you then. Thanks. Neil -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 6, 2017 1:19 pm Subject: RE: Last night Continued to 7/18. It was an hour of presentations and an hour and a half or more of public comments; we got out of there at 11PM as it was. When are you back in SLO? 25466 From: neilhavlik [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 12:04 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Last night Thanks Bob. How about Dalidio? . Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Hill, Robert" <rhill@slocity.org> Date: 07/06/2017 12:02 PM (GMT-06:00) To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Subject: RE: Last night Hi Neil, Bill Waycott made public comments on behalf of CNPS. Carlyn Christianson pulled the item from consent to see if her colleagues would be interested in limiting the scope of work of the EIR to preclude the 150’ area from consideration, citing her concerns and the idea of why have the applicants spend time and money on it? Michael Codron and Shawna Scott took the two seats in front of the dais and reviewed the resolution authorizing the project initiation and its very specific information requirements. Michael was also clear that there are no implied promises or expectations that staff will support the applicant’s preferred project, and that the EIR is clearly scoped to include “actionable” alternatives that do not involve the area above 150’. Christine Dietrick opined that it would be advisable for Council to have staff come back at a later date for Council to make a partial recision of the prior resolution in order to make a different decision about moving forward at this point. Vic Montgomery expectantly approached the dais as though he should have an opportunity to speak, even though not called. John Madonna et al were all in the audience. Andy Pease was recused and the other three stated they’d like to have the EIR go forward as proposed so that they can evaluate the impacts. It’s worth checking out the video if you have a chance. I am attaching the resolution and Vic Montgomery’s email of earlier in the afternoon. 25467 In other meeting news, a group of organized residents approached Council for items not on the agenda and requested consideration of establishing an off-leash open space area or trail somewhere. Pease was clearly interested in this and suggested adding it the nighttime use evaluation and Mayor Harmon was also interested, but Rivoire, Christianson, and Gomez all declined to have staff do anything other than issue a memo. That said, I am sure this issue will come up again with the forthcoming Parks Element Update. I’d appreciate the chance to sit down with you sometime when you’re back in town and talk about some of these issues. I could benefit from your advice and prior experience! Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: neilhavlik [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 9:37 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Last night Hi Bob what happened last night at council? 25468 Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 25469 From:neilhavlik To:Hill, Robert Subject:RE: Last night Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 6:08:07 PM Absolutely. Keep this to yourself but we looked at buying the plateau but it added $1 million to the purchase price. We couldn't afford it. Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Hill, Robert" <rhill@slocity.org> Date: 07/06/2017 7:14 PM (GMT-06:00) To: neilhavlik@aol.com Subject: RE: Last night Indeed! Is it true what he wrote: “The City specifically chose not to purchase the area on the Froom Ranch property above the 150-foot elevation as part of the Irish Hills Natural Preserve when they had the opportunity”? I don’t remember this. Although I can imagine how we might of left this part out anticipating that it would someday be dedicated! I also recall we had to hold a bake sale to purchase what we did, so guessing you may have felt it was beyond our financial means at the time, too. Talk soon… Bob From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:51 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Last night 25470 Interesting email from Vic M. I see he didn't actually deny anything I said. N. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 6, 2017 2:09 pm Subject: RE: Last night Sounds good, Neil. Thanks! From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:06 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Last night Back on Monday, talk to you then. Thanks. Neil -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 6, 2017 1:19 pm Subject: RE: Last night Continued to 7/18. It was an hour of presentations and an hour and a half or more of public comments; we got out of there at 11PM as it was. When are you back in SLO? 25471 From: neilhavlik [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 12:04 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Last night Thanks Bob. How about Dalidio? . Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Hill, Robert" <rhill@slocity.org> Date: 07/06/2017 12:02 PM (GMT-06:00) To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Subject: RE: Last night Hi Neil, Bill Waycott made public comments on behalf of CNPS. Carlyn Christianson pulled the item from consent to see if her colleagues would be interested in limiting the scope of work of the EIR to preclude the 150’ area from consideration, citing her concerns and the idea of why have the applicants spend time and money on it? Michael Codron and Shawna Scott took the two seats in front of the dais and reviewed the resolution authorizing the project initiation and its very specific information requirements. Michael was also clear that there are no implied promises or expectations that staff will support the applicant’s preferred project, and that the EIR is clearly scoped to include “actionable” alternatives that do not involve the area above 150’. Christine Dietrick opined that it would be advisable for Council to have staff come back at a later date for Council to make a partial recision of the prior resolution in order to make a different decision about moving forward at this point. Vic Montgomery expectantly approached the dais as though he should have an opportunity to speak, even though not called. John Madonna et al were all in the audience. Andy Pease was recused and the other three stated they’d like to have the EIR go forward as proposed so that they can evaluate the impacts. It’s worth checking out the video if you have a chance. I am attaching the resolution and Vic Montgomery’s email of earlier in the afternoon. 25472 In other meeting news, a group of organized residents approached Council for items not on the agenda and requested consideration of establishing an off-leash open space area or trail somewhere. Pease was clearly interested in this and suggested adding it the nighttime use evaluation and Mayor Harmon was also interested, but Rivoire, Christianson, and Gomez all declined to have staff do anything other than issue a memo. That said, I am sure this issue will come up again with the forthcoming Parks Element Update. I’d appreciate the chance to sit down with you sometime when you’re back in town and talk about some of these issues. I could benefit from your advice and prior experience! Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: neilhavlik [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 9:37 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Last night Hi Bob what happened last night at council? 25473 Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 25474 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Colleran, Lorraine Subject:Fwd: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:26:13 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi, Lorraine. Can you please check on the timeline for a legal ad for this and then check to make sure they left enough time in for bid opening after the next feasible advertisement date? Thanks, Kristin Get Outlook for iOS From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21:08 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. 25475 Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. 25476 Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25477 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:21:10 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Kristin, The RFP is in the folder. I included dates, and if there are any timeline issues let’s discuss, as I can change dates if needed. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:40 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM 25478 To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, 25479 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25480 From:Hill, Robert To:neilhavlik@aol.com Subject:RE: Last night Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 5:14:02 PM Indeed! Is it true what he wrote: “The City specifically chose not to purchase the area on the Froom Ranch property above the 150-foot elevation as part of the Irish Hills Natural Preserve when they had the opportunity”? I don’t remember this. Although I can imagine how we might of left this part out anticipating that it would someday be dedicated! I also recall we had to hold a bake sale to purchase what we did, so guessing you may have felt it was beyond our financial means at the time, too. Talk soon… Bob From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:51 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Last night Interesting email from Vic M. I see he didn't actually deny anything I said. N. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 6, 2017 2:09 pm Subject: RE: Last night Sounds good, Neil. Thanks! From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:06 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Last night Back on Monday, talk to you then. Thanks. Neil -----Original Message----- 25481 From: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Thu, Jul 6, 2017 1:19 pm Subject: RE: Last night Continued to 7/18. It was an hour of presentations and an hour and a half or more of public comments; we got out of there at 11PM as it was. When are you back in SLO? From: neilhavlik [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 12:04 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Last night Thanks Bob. How about Dalidio? . Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Hill, Robert" <rhill@slocity.org> Date: 07/06/2017 12:02 PM (GMT-06:00) To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Subject: RE: Last night Hi Neil, Bill Waycott made public comments on behalf of CNPS. Carlyn Christianson pulled the item from consent to see if her colleagues would be interested in limiting the scope of work of the EIR to preclude the 150’ area from consideration, citing her concerns and the idea of why have the applicants spend time and money on it? Michael Codron and Shawna Scott took the two seats in front of the dais and reviewed the resolution authorizing the project initiation and its very specific information requirements. Michael was also clear that there are no implied promises or expectations that staff will support the applicant’s preferred project, and that the EIR is clearly scoped to include “actionable” alternatives that do not involve the area above 150’. Christine Dietrick opined that it would be advisable for Council to have staff come back at a later date for Council to make a partial recision of the prior resolution in order to make a different decision about moving forward at this point. Vic Montgomery expectantly approached the dais as though he should have an opportunity to speak, even though not called. John Madonna et al were all in the audience. Andy Pease was recused and the other three stated they’d like to have the EIR go forward as proposed so that they can evaluate the impacts. It’s worth checking out the video if you have a chance. I am attaching the resolution and Vic Montgomery’s email of earlier in the afternoon. 25482 In other meeting news, a group of organized residents approached Council for items not on the agenda and requested consideration of establishing an off-leash open space area or trail somewhere. Pease was clearly interested in this and suggested adding it the nighttime use evaluation and Mayor Harmon was also interested, but Rivoire, Christianson, and Gomez all declined to have staff do anything other than issue a memo. That said, I am sure this issue will come up again with the forthcoming Parks Element Update. I’d appreciate the chance to sit down with you sometime when you’re back in town and talk about some of these issues. I could benefit from your advice and prior experience! Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: neilhavlik [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 9:37 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: Last night Hi Bob what happened last night at council? Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 25483 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:55:36 PM I would like to attend. Can you calendar it for me? Thank you! Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:50:38 PM Subject: FW: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Mayor and Council, Please see e-mail below. Jennifer asked if I could let her know who will be in attendance. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25484 25485 25486 From:Jennifer Whittle To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:55:33 PM Thank you, Shannon. The ribbon cutting is at 4:30 next Friday and specifically when we would want the Mayor there to make a few remarks and be part of the photo. Best, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:51 PM To: Jennifer Whittle <jwhittle@lavidge.com> Subject: RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Received. I will get back to you as soon as I receive the responses. Thanks, Jennifer. -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25487 25488 25489 From:Sims, Shannon To:Jennifer Whittle Subject:RE: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:51:00 PM Received. I will get back to you as soon as I receive the responses. Thanks, Jennifer. -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25490 25491 25492 From:Sims, Shannon Subject:FW: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:50:40 PM Mayor and Council, Please see e-mail below. Jennifer asked if I could let her know who will be in attendance. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Jennifer Whittle [mailto:jwhittle@lavidge.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 12:01 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25493 25494 25495 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:40:06 PM Attachments:image001.png Ok. No problem – I just don’t want to cause any delay, if possible. Thank you, Shawna. Kristin From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:39 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> 25496 Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25497 From:Scott, Shawna To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:38:41 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Kristin – I had sent the email before reading Cori’s forward of the RFP process, so I will follow your timeline moving forward. I have a couple touch-ups to the RFP and will load it shortly, and will let you know when it is in the folder. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:34 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA 25498 is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25499 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:34:03 PM Attachments:EIR RFP Consultants list-updated addresses.doc image001.png Hi, Shawna. If you are planning to put this out on Monday, we’ll need a copy of the RFP ASAP to make sure the timelines are feasible with legal advertising rules, etc. Also, there should be some review before it is sent to vendors so there isn’t one version sent to them and another posted to the web and newspaper. Last I checked, there is still nothing in the folder (T:\Purchasing\RFPs\CDD). Please let me know as soon as it is saved in there. Thank you, Kristin From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. 25500 If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25501 From:Ryan, Cori To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:27:13 PM Attachments:image001.png Looks like it. From: Eriksson, Kristin Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:26 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Thank you. She’s planning to send this out Monday? From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. 25502 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25503 From:Eriksson, Kristin To:Ryan, Cori Subject:RE: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:25:49 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you. She’s planning to send this out Monday? From: Ryan, Cori Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:18 PM To: Eriksson, Kristin <keriksso@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25504 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25505 From:Ryan, Cori To:Eriksson, Kristin Subject:FW: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:17:54 PM Attachments:EIR RFP Consultants list-updated addresses.doc image001.png FYI From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:02 PM To: Ryan, Cori <cryan@slocity.org>; Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25506 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:57:50 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Pam! I couldn’t think of anything else we needed to touch base on today. Please just make sure to copy Shawna on the link to the hydro study tomorrow as well, so she can get that one uploaded with the others. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 1:47 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, Included in the link below are two of the three remaining items (noise study & photo simulations) that I said we would submit this week: Click to Retrieve File(s) 2017-Views_reduced.pdf FroomVillagioFinalReportRevA.PDF I plan to transmit the hydrologic study tomorrow. Let me know if there is anything else that we should discuss this afternoon. If not, have a good vacation. Alaska will be an amazing experience for you and your family. Bon voyage! Pam PAM RICCI 25507 From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:42 PM To: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Just an update, I left the word “resource” out of the prehistoric report title in the list below. PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. 25508 Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 25509 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25510 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:56:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Emily. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 1:18 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies FYI… I noticed you weren’t copied. Also, like we discussed, I agreed to remove the “LP” zoning reference from the RFP and IS/NOP, but otherwise leave Table 1 as is for now. Thanks, Shawna. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM 25511 To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) 25512 Prehistoric Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25513 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:"Emily Creel" Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:46:42 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Emily, Included in the link below are two of the three remaining items (noise study & photo simulations) that I said we would submit this week: Click to Retrieve File(s) 2017-Views_reduced.pdf FroomVillagioFinalReportRevA.PDF I plan to transmit the hydrologic study tomorrow. Let me know if there is anything else that we should discuss this afternoon. If not, have a good vacation. Alaska will be an amazing experience for you and your family. Bon voyage! Pam PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:42 PM To: 'Emily Creel' <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Just an update, I left the word “resource” out of the prehistoric report title in the list below. PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. 25514 Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) 25515 Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25516 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:18:12 PM Attachments:image003.png FYI… I noticed you weren’t copied. Also, like we discussed, I agreed to remove the “LP” zoning reference from the RFP and IS/NOP, but otherwise leave Table 1 as is for now. Thanks, Shawna. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Emily, My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being 25517 available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead 25518 SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25519 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:17:13 PM Attachments:image002.png FYI…   Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367   From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com]  Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:42 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies   Just an update, I left the word “resource” out of the prehistoric report title in the list below.   PAM RICCI     From: Ricci, Pam A.  Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies   Hi Emily,   My minor edits are below with additions highlighted, and deletions with strikethrough text.   Let me know if you have questions.   Thanks. Pam   PAM RICCI     From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com]  Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:33 AM 25520 To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies   Hi Pam,   Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized.   Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks.   Available Supporting Documents   The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at:   www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911   Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20156) Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 20175) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) Updated Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017)   In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City:   Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) Prehistoric Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) Historic Resource Assessment (First Carbon Solutions) 25521 Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) Water Supply Assessment (RRM) Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM)     Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367       Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com   25522 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ryan, Cori; Cox, Rebecca; Corey, Tyler Cc:Davidson, Doug Subject:Updated EIR Consultant List for Review Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 1:01:41 PM Attachments:EIR RFP Consultants list-updated addresses.doc image001.png Good afternoon, In preparation for sending out the RFP for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan EIR, I reviewed and updated the City’s 2012 EIR Consultants list (see attached) for your review. I updated addresses based on company website info, as applicable. Please note all the contacts highlighted in yellow should be removed from the list as these companies are either no longer active or have been acquired by larger companies. SWCA is highlighted in blue as they should remain on the list but they will not get the RFP, as they are the City’s consulting planner/PM for Froom Ranch. I also looked at other resources to find contact information for additional firms; these firms are shown in red text. If for any reason the list cannot be expanded to include these additional firms, or if you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. I would like to have the mailings go out on Monday July 10 and will coordinate with folks individually regarding the notice and mailings. If all looks good, I’ll clean this up and save to the server as a general list for future use. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25523 From:Jennifer Whittle To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Thursday, July 6, 2017 12:01:34 PM Hi Shannon, Thanks for your time on the phone. Please see below the invitation to the Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center grand opening event next Friday, July 14 from 4-7 p.m. This was sent to Mayor Harmon, Vice Mayor Rivoire and council members. Would like to know who can attend and if Mayor Harmon would be so kind to make a few remarks and take part in the ribbon cutting. Thank you, Jennifer Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600 C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 25524 25525 25526 From:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre To:E-mail Council Website Subject:Fw: San Luis Ranch Concerns Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 3:19:46 PM From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre <milavu@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:11 PM To: emailcitycouncil@slocity.org; hharmon@slocity.org; agomez@slocity.org; apease@slocity.org; cchristi@slocity.org; dan rivoire; advisorybodies@slocity.org Cc: katie lichtig Subject: San Luis Ranch Concerns July 5, 2017 Mayor Harmon and San Luis Obispo City Council Members City Hall 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Dear Mayor Harmon and San Luis Obispo City Council Members, The current development plan for San Luis Ranch is flawed for many reasons. It is my hope that you will take the opportunity this evening to seek resolutions to concerns that many residents share. Although this property is still located in the County of San Luis Obispo, the developer and his team have worked feverishly scheduling multiple City meetings and meeting with groups to move his proposal forward. Interestingly enough after multiple meetings with groups and advisory bodies seeking allegedly input, there have been few changes to his development plan. For public safety from the local airport, he had to reposition some of the intended residential units. Aside from that change, there are few answers provided to existing concerns. A development of this magnitude may provide more housing, but at a significant cost to residents. In addition, it is not just San Luis Ranch that people are concerned with - it is the cumulative impacts of San Luis Ranch - former Dalidio Property - a project of 580 25527 homes plus 350,000 square feet of commercial/office and a 200 room hotel; Avila Ranch - at the corner of Vachell and Buckley Roads- a project of 720 homes plus 20,000 square feet of commercial; and Froom Ranch - adjacent to Home Depot - a senior living complex, 120 room hotel, 30,000 square feet commercial, plus 250 housing units. As you know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) that allowed for these developments to proceed was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE members who had a background in development, and some who may personally profit from the developments. However, it did not take into consideration many realities, some of which I have enumerated before and will again discuss below. The LUCE process did not provide for substantial public awareness and input. This was highlighted in the LUCE Minority Report. My concerns about the San Luis Ranch proposal are primarily the following: 1. Water. Where is the water of this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months. Given climate change, is the drought truly over? Do we as a community have enough water for current residents and the aforementioned large projects being proposed? 2. Traffic The number of proposed 550 residential units, in addition to the proposed office and commercial space will produce a minimum of 1,000-2,000 vehicles making anywhere from 2-4 trips daily. This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking, and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development. They also deserve a realistic appraisal of parking for the proposed development. Traffic flow from the proposed business development should also be part of that same study. Streets in the development appear to be narrow with little room for bike lanes. One -way streets in the development should be considered. There does not appear to be enough parking for the new townhomes. In the preliminary conceptual plan there was a new traffic light in between 25528 Dalidio Drive and Oceanaire. It was not clear to me whether there is one or not in this new plan. If there is one, it is going to be problematic. Currently, all the traffic from these homes will enter and exit Madonna Road and Los Osos Valley Road via an extension of Froom. This is not what was discussed at multiple LUCE meetings that I attended. It was stated over and over again that any development on this property would require the construction of an overpass or an interchange at Prado Road. 3. Prado Road. As I have written and stated on multiple occasions, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it is a “four-lane truck highway” as it appears on the LUCE plans. As you may know, this road has been in City documents since 1960. Prado Road also was part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for this immense and dense San Luis Ranch development. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place in the first phase of the development. Since the developer is solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - his “fair share” - this overpass or interchange will substantially impact the cost of the residential units that are being proposed there. For you to entertain any development on the San Luis Ranch - formerly known as the Dalidio property - without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable is unconscionable. A transparent discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the interchange and/or overpass as soon as possible. City elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The current plan to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel 25529 all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road or onto Madonna Road is simply not fair to the public. At past meetings, the developer’s representative quipped with a smile, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built.” That is not funny to me. This factor should not be an afterthought. This should be discussed now to avoid extreme congestion on Los Osos Valley Road. Everyone needs to remember that the other aforementioned developments of Avila Ranch and Froom Ranch will increase the traffic. The cumulative impacts must be addressed. The traffic will become unbearable. It is also very wrong for Prado Road to be segmented or piecemealed. According to CEQA, when a large project is identified, it should be analyzed with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in that fashion. Prado Road, from Madonna Road to Broad Street has never undergone a comprehensive EIR. It has been “looked at” and “analyzed” but no one has ever had the courage to say, “What can we do with the traffic, East to West, along that route?” In the recent Planning Commission meeting commissioners demonstrated an increased awareness of what I am concerned about. One of the commissioners stated, “Okay, if there is indeed just an overpass, and people are in their cars at Higuera and Prado Road, coming from San Luis Ranch, then what? I also need to point out that the developer in Serra Meadows was allowed to build and just make Prado Road adjacent to the construction two lanes with roundabouts, instead of the four lanes that are in the LUCE Master Plan. This is the type of piecemealing that is a recipe for disaster. 4. Affordable housing. Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know this obligation beforehand. For the common person to look at the simple equation of 500 homes x $400,000= $200,000,000, it gives a citizen an idea of the profit that Gary Grossman and his team stand to make. Even if the cost of the land at roughly $20,000,000 and the overpass or intersection at an estimated $60,000,000 is factored in that is still a gross profit of $120,000,000. The construction cost of the residential construction. 25530 will be roughly half that number. That is still a handsome profit. Also, a majority of the homes will be priced at $550,000 or greater - not $400,000 that I just used in this example. Again there is minimal affordable housing in this project. In the first phase, of the 224 units, only 12 are “affordable.” In the entire project, of 580 units, only 34 are “affordable.” 5. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the property who is to say that the units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 6. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people, the vehicular traffic, and air travel. What is not in the preliminary plans is the anticipated noise from the four- lane truck highway known as Prado Road and the extension of Froom Road that will connect with Los Osos Valley Road. On the preliminary plan, Froom Road appears that it is a line of trees, when in reality it will be a road. It should be made more clear on the plans. Also, the proposed elevation of the units on the plan are two and three stories tall - 35 feet and 50 feet respectively. The residents will be negatively affected by the fumes and the noise of vehicular traffic from both Froom and Madonna. Studies should also factor in the noise from Prado Road when it is finished. 7. Airport Viability and Safety My other concern is safety from air travel. The proposed development is at the actual site of a plane crash. I was not a proponent of the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) override vote that was supported by a majority of the last City Council, due to concerns for the safety of residents on the ground and pilots and passengers in the sky. No one to date has been able to answer the question, “When a crash occurs on the development, who will be held legally responsible?” Is it the City? The developer? The airport? And/or the taxpayers? 25531 I also believe in keeping our airport viable for industry and job growth. 8. Trees Having viewed the San Luis Ranch plan, it shows the construction of three- story structures on Madonna Road. The row of eucalyptus trees will need to be eliminated. I question that loss of mature trees. I also think that it should be in the plans for a row of trees to be planted to the east of the development near the proposed agricultural land so that the view from Highway 101 is one of trees with a foreground of agricultural land and not a cluster of dense homes. From the residents point of view, it seems that they also would appreciate a view of trees rather than one of Highway 101. 9. Animal Protection A parts of the property is home to some environmentally sensitive animals, specifically herons. Please address how those animals will be protected during and after construction. 10. Access to Laguna Lake Access to the adjacent Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the plan, there should be an above road, pedestrian access to Laguna Lake Park facilitated for future residents. There is an insufficient amount of park land in the actual development. The yards on the proposed properties are small and/or non-existent. This safe public access would allow people who bike or walk an opportunity to cross Madonna Road without having to halt traffic. 11.Public Input The developer has taken inordinate amounts of time to meet with groups of elected officials, members of advisory bodies, Dwellforward and the U40 group. It would serve the developer - Gary Grossman and his development team including members of the architectural firm RRM - well to send a notice to the neighborhoods and receive public feedback on the development. I believe only one meeting was held at a local Italian restaurant approximately 18 months ago. Residents and business owners have not had an opportunity to voice their concerns since then. Having this important meeting tonight during the summer, the day after the 4th of July holiday, on a Wednesday is an example of how the public feels marginalized. 25532 12. Class 1 Agricultural Land The citizens of the City of San Luis Obispo have the right to determine if they want this Class 1 agricultural land to be annexed into the City and used for residential housing and commercial office space. Also, it is important for everyone to realize that the current plan provides for the removal of 1-4 feet of topsoil to build up the construction site. How will that leave the remaining agricultural land? What will the resulting viable crop be...rice? 13. Access to the Agricultural Land The developer and his poised, glib representatives extol the glories of how San Luis Ranch residents will walk over to the working farm. This does not make sense. It does not seem that the crops will benefit from residents walking around the fields. It does not make sense that residents are going to cross the extension of Froom Ranch where there will be cars and commercial trucks. This is not a commune. It is being billed as a commercial farm with a washing station. Plans for the development show people of all ages walking around with bags of vegetables, graced with butterflies flying nearby and blossoming fruit trees. This does not appear to be reality. 14. The Transit Center The transit center proposed for part of the commercial development is an idea worth exploring. A full service transit center for commuters, complete with a parking structure for overflow parking from residents and for commuters would be an asset to the community. Also, once the new City homeless shelter is completed at 40 Prado Road, there will most likely be lots of individuals that may need to access a bus daily. The overpass at Prado Road will make it easier for people of all backgrounds to utilize transportation services. 15. Other options Alternatives to this current development plan have not been fully considered. Members of the public have offered some suggestions for you in their current correspondence. My best alternative and brainstorm was the one explained here in the letter below that was submitted to both Gary Grossman and Cal Poly President Jeffrey Armstrong. This alternative would and still can create a “win-win-win” for everyone. In short, the alternative for this project would be for Gary Grossman to complete and “old-fashioned land swap” with Cal Poly. Cal Poly still has plenty of acreage to build everything that Grossman desires. The 25533 agricultural land could be a Cal Poly working farm for decades to come. A ranch-style dorm house could be constructed on the Grossman property by Cal Poly for agriculture students who work the land. In turn, Grossman could build an array of housing on Cal Poly land in a public - private partnership that would allow for students and staff to have affordable housing. Grossman’s hotel and conference center could give students employment and real life hospitality experience. This proposal would save Grossman the cost of the interchange, it would protect the agricultural land, and decrease the amount of traffic substantially. I still believe that this is an alternative that should be explored before this precious agricultural land is built on. The second alternative which some people may think that I suggested in jest, also follows. It is simply short-sighted to build on this Class 1 agricultural land for the next generation. This is one of 100 parcels in our entire County with land of this quality. There are better places for homes. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 milavu@hotmail.com ________________________________________________________ (Alternative #1) January 19, 2015 Dr. Jeff Armstrong – President California Polytechnic University San Luis Obispo, California 25534 Mr. Gary Grossman Central Coast Builders Pismo Beach, California Dear Dr. Armstrong and Mr. Grossman, In the spirit of Martin Luther King, I have a dream. This dream can become a reality with a few simple steps and make San Luis Obispo the best it can be. Although you are both hard-working modest men, I also think that people would think you were absolute saviors if you are able to follow through on what I am about to propose. Mr. Grossman, you as the new owner of the 131-acres of land- previously known as the “Dalidio property” - now called San Luis Ranch. The name change has not changed the sentiments of many locals about that prime agricultural land that is positioned above the City’s emergency water supply. Many residents and tourists are also enamored with the view shed that it provides from Highway 101, with the fertile crops and the background of our beautiful mountains. Dr. Armstrong, under your leadership, California Polytechnic University (Cal Poly) has continued to receive awards for its academic rigor and the livability of the campus. My vision, gentlemen, is for a true, old-fashioned land swap. Mr. Grossman, you can deed the 131-acres of prime agriculture land to Cal Poly. Dr. Armstrong, Cal Poly will give, in turn 131-acres of buildable land to Mr. Grossman. The land on the Cal Poly land would be the future site of residential housing that could be sold for the competitive market rates to the general public. Currently Mr. Grossman, of your 131-acres of prime agricultural land, the City of San Luis Obispo will receive roughly 50% of it as open space. The remaining land would have to be the site of the residential and commercial projects that you envision as well as the road infrastructure. A deal with Cal Poly may not place those restrictions on you or your development team. 25535 Mr. Grossman, as with any development project, you would be responsible for the cost of the road infrastructure at the Cal Poly site, however I imagine that it could be offset by the assistance of students in the various divisions of that support both Engineering and Architecture Departments. Mr. Grossman, you could also build a state-of-the- art hotel there if you and your team desire to be truly extraordinary. The hotel, with conference capabilities, could be a landmark public-private enterprise. Mr. Grossman you could opt to could build a sustainable hotel – similar to the one on Boulder, Colorado that is near zero waste. With the help of the award winning architecture department and the assistance of the professionals at RRM, it could not only have great guest rooms with rural views but a conference center as well. The restaurant at the hotel could be open to the public and could feature a “farm to table” theme with Cal Poly or local meat, fish and of course fruits and vegetables. With its proximity to Cal Poly there would never be a shortage of individuals for near minimum wage employment to serve in various jobs that the hospitality industry affords. With the assistance of Cal Poly’s Transportation/ Traffic Engineering department, the new homes and hotel would have access to campus, town and Highway 1 via pedestrian paths, bikes paths, light rail or cars. Mr. Grossman, the genius of this idea if we can get it to work is that you would no longer have to pay for the cost of the contentious Prado Road overpass or interchange that may cost you as much as $70 million by today’s estimates. As you know, Caltrans has stated numerous times that a safe interchange at Prado Road and Highway 101 would be very difficult to construct given the proximity of Madonna Road and Los Osos Valley Road. If eliminated, the interchange and/or overpass will not infringe upon the integrity of the new Homeless Service Shelter at 40 Prado Road. You would no longer have to worry about the scrutiny of 25536 the Airport Land Use Commission and the factors that may prohibit you from building the size of development that you desire. You would no longer have to be concerned about whether any local landowners would sell you land for the off-site mitigation your design team has discussed. Dr. Armstrong, Cal Poly would benefit by maintaining the showcase to the agrarian based county in perpetuity. The Cal Poly staff and students will be able to farm 131-acres of land already adjacent to San Luis Obispo City farm. In my mind, I picture the original farmhouse on the property being refurbished to serve as a visitor center/farmer’s market stand where local products from both Cal Poly and native entrepreneurs could be sold – from cheese to wine to fruits and vegetables. Although not mandatory, there could be an eight- person student dorm on site, and housing for a staff member. The site could even have a small venue for entertainment overlooking the fields, and perhaps a venue for intimate ceremonies 50 people or less. Maintaining the land for these uses would allow the row of beloved eucalyptus trees to stay in place. In addition, the Laguna Lake residents will be overjoyed with this proposal. The idea of having homes at up to 500 homes and the commercial space on that location already has voters talking to me about organizing a referendum. Gentlemen, I have been involved in City politics as a concerned citizen for over 16 years. This is simply a fabulous idea and I do hope that you will give it full and immediate consideration. Dr. Armstrong, the residential component on what is now Cal Poly land could house professionals that work in our community or students. The 25537 concept would be well-received by many voters who have been so concerned about options for housing. Mr. Grossman, you have told me on more than one occasion that you are prepared to build something tasteful that you could personally be proud of. I seriously think that this is it! Please feel free if you would like to meet with me personally to further discuss this concept that would be a proverbial “win” for both of you and for the entire community as a whole. As a public school teacher, I am generally limited to the hours before 7:30am or after 3:00pm. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 ______________________________ (Alternative #2) June 19, 2017 Gary Grossman Coastal Community Builders 330 James Way Pismo Beach, California 93448 Dear Gary Grossman - It is high time for another great idea! As you may recall, two years ago I creatively suggested that you build all of your homes and commercial development on Cal Poly land. In return, Cal Poly would have been able to use the 131- acres of Class 1 agricultural land that you currently own to farm and work for eternity. That was a “win-win-win” idea that would have saved the agricultural land for the public and students. It would have provided housing, jobs, a hotel, and event center on Cal Poly land. That idea would have also have saved you the cost of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. Although that awesome public/private partnership idea made sense to a lot of community members, it did not blossom. I am now offering another suggestion! Since Proposition 64, which provides for the legalization of cannabis, had not been passed when you initially started planning for San Luis Ranch, I think that there is another viable alternative for the 131- acres of prime agricultural land that you may not have ever 25538 considered. As you may remember from our previous conversations, this novel idea is coming from me, a person who has spent over 34 years in public education, teaching United States History and Spanish. I have also consistently worked to combat the negative effects of alcohol and other drugs within the student population through prevention and intervention programs. Marijuana, for as insidious and detrimental as I believe that it is for developing teenage bodies and brains, has been embraced by a majority of California voters for both medicinal and recreational use. So, have you considered the enormous profit that you would gain from a legal, agricultural operation planted in marijuana? The San Luis Ranch - formerly known as the Dalidio land - could be preserved as agricultural land. There are plenty of people, including college aged students, who would be interested in working at the location to learn how to cultivate, grow, and market marijuana. There are also people in our community who are doing formal experiments with both the CBD and the THC produced from the drug. A crop at that location could potentially be grown pesticide free. The other benefit of having a farm at that location is that the crop could be easily protected. There is a freeway on one side, the SLO City Farm on another, and Madonna Road. It would be easy to install a security system and fencing. In addition, the commercial grow would be great for tourism. It could be called “Grossman’s Green Acres.” There could be an innovative small commercial retail center on site with parking along Madonna Road. There could be a variety of products for sale, including ones that do not include cannabis - Cal Poly cheeses and chocolates, local breads and wines, fresh fruits and vegetables and even a petting zoo! The “Forever 21” building could be transformed into a store called “Forever 420” by a budding entrepreneur. The store could carry a wide variety of marijuana and hemp based products. I also think that a pro-cannabis area, such as the farm and retail outlet, would do wonders for the profits of the surrounding restaurants. Neighbors in the immediate area may find the odor from the crop offensive, however as most people know the prevailing winds are from the ocean, across town, west to east. The odor would blow over the freeway to the sewer treatment plant, the drive-in and the new Homeless Shelter at 40 Prado. The farm could utilize forms of alternative power for the 2030 design buildout of industrial buildings, taking full advantage of solar and wind power. Why would this proposal be more favorable than the current one? Most people realize that the homes currently proposed for this site are not “affordable.” At maximum buildout, there will only be 34 homes for truly low- income people. As a developer, you will sell a home once. The marijuana crop would be a renewable, continued source of income. 25539 The Prado Road overpass and/or interchange is not going to happen anytime soon both due to funding and Caltrans restrictions. However, the immense profits from this marijuana farm would help to pay for that overpass eventually and help with our City's debt. So, maybe you could examine the long term profitability of growing marijuana vs. selling a few homes and having to grapple with the fickle retail/commercial market for the remaining land. The profits from this cannabis grow could potentially also help to build a secondary transit center and provide the infrastructure of Class 1 bike lanes in that part of town. Preserving agriculture at this site would be well-received by the Airport Land Use Commissioners. In addition,the current San Luis Obispo City Council members appear to be very open to marijuana legalization, promoting a “farm to pipe” ideology, and protecting the rights of citizens to grow and use cannabis. A large commercial grow on your site would stifle many smaller growing operations throughout town and on the fringes of our City limits. Having a grow confined to one large area like this would make most residents happy. The processing of this marijuana could occur on the other side of the freeway along Buckley Road where the controversial Avila Ranch homes are being proposed. That area is perfect for industrial manufacturing and processing. Since I was President of Save San Luis Obispo in 2005 when City voters stopped the previous development desired by the previous owner Ernie Dalidio, I am again hearing from a wide variety of residents who vehemently oppose your current development plan for San Luis Ranch.They do not see the proposed homes as affordable, they are concerned about the horrible traffic that will be created on Los Osos Valley Road, Froom Ranch Road and Madonna Road, they object to the chopping down of the trees along Madonna Road, they are concerned about damage to the current vista from Highway 101 to the west, and the severe impact this development will have on the surrounding neighborhood character. Why not at least consider the idea outlined here? It will save you a significant amount of money now and make you more money in the long term. Then, if you give the marijuana cultivation business a chance and it works, you will have preserved this precious piece of agricultural land for the next generation! If it does not, well then you can build homes, an overpass, and the additional traffic infrastructure. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss this idea further. Sincerely, 25540 Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, California 93405 milavu@hotmail.com Cell: 805-441-5818 25541 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Item #7: Background Information Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 3:04:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Item 7 Background Info.pdf FYI From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 2:21 PM To: Agenda Correspondence Routing <AgendaCorrR@slocity.org> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org>; Fowler, Xzandrea <XFowler@slocity.org> Subject: Item #7: Background Information Mayor and Council, The attached agenda correspondence includes Resolution No. 10704, approved by the City Council when it initiated the Specific Plan and General Plan Amendments for Froom Ranch. It is being provided to you now in the event it is discussed during tonight’s meeting. Thank you, BCC: City Council Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25542 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Scott, Shawna; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - check in Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:48:47 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Emily, We discussed most of the upcoming technical report submittals on the phone and with follow-up emails. Our plan is to submit the updated Specific Plan document along with some of the associated historic reports by the middle of July in anticipation of being scheduled for conceptual CHC review on August 28, 2017. Submittals will also include the conceptual park plan. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 1:59 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - check in Hi Pam – I just wanted to confirm that you are still planning on submitting the conceptual park plan and approach to treatment of historic resources by the week of July 17 to facilitate CHC conceptual review on August 28? Do you submitting the revised Specific Plan at the same time? I also wanted to let you know that I will be out on vacation July 7-19. Please copy Shawna on all correspondence so she can assist with any urgent needs. Please also continue to copy me as well. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 25543 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25544 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Montgomery, Victor Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan request for EIR proposals - authorization for Request for Proposals - 7-05-2017 Consent Agenda Item #7 Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:41:58 PM Thank you for your comments Victor. Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:29:15 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan request for EIR proposals - authorization for Request for Proposals - 7- 05-2017 Consent Agenda Item #7 Councilmembers, you recently received a letter from Neil Havlik regarding this authorization to proceed with issuance of an RFP for preparation of an EIR on the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. His letter essentially asks you to make decisions and impose conditions on the project that will be the subject of the EIR – before the EIR is prepared. He also accuses the Council of failing to “defend” City General Plan policies. The specific policy he references reads as follows; “6.4.7.H. The Irish Hills area should secure permanent open space with no building sites above the 150-foot elevation, in conjunction with any subdivision of development of the lower areas. (emphasis added)” The City Council at the 4/5/2016 authorization hearing for the Specific Plan considered this issue and by resolution adopted the following language to guide preparation of the Specific Plan (and EIR evaluation) with regard to the specific issue raised by Mr. Havlik. 25545 Regarding the 7 items listed in Mr. Havlik’s letter our responses are as follows: 1. The purpose of the EIR is to analyze potential impacts. 2. The City specifically chose not to purchase the area on the Froom Ranch property above the 150-foot elevation as part of the Irish Hills Natural Preserve when they had the opportunity. 3. The City has preliminarily determined that a recycled water tank on this site likely will not be required (subject to further detailed analysis). 4. The restoration of Froom Creek to reflect its historic alignment is designed to avoid significant impacts to jurisdictional wetlands identified adjacent to Calle Joaquin. 5. In addition to studies already performed by the applicant and reviewed by City staff, traffic impacts will be analyzed as part of the EIR analysis. 6. A public, Trailhead Park consistent with City parkland standards for annexation areas is included in the Froom Ranch Specific plan proposal. 7. The applicants have listened to the comments of the PRC and CHC and are responding. An Architectural Historian with experience in San Luis Obispo has been retained to provide guidance on the incorporation of historically significant buildings into the Froom Ranch Trailhead Park. The revised proposal is scheduled to go back to the CHC for conceptual review on 8/28/2017. We encourage the Council not to preempt the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Environmental Review Processes from moving forward, and approve the RFP for EIR proposals at tonight’s meeting. 25546 Thank you. VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25547 From:Montgomery, Victor To:E-mail Council Website Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan request for EIR proposals - authorization for Request for Proposals - 7-05-2017 Consent Agenda Item #7 Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:29:23 PM Councilmembers, you recently received a letter from Neil Havlik regarding this authorization to proceed with issuance of an RFP for preparation of an EIR on the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. His letter essentially asks you to make decisions and impose conditions on the project that will be the subject of the EIR – before the EIR is prepared. He also accuses the Council of failing to “defend” City General Plan policies. The specific policy he references reads as follows; “6.4.7.H. The Irish Hills area should secure permanent open space with no building sites above the 150-foot elevation, in conjunction with any subdivision of development of the lower areas. (emphasis added)” The City Council at the 4/5/2016 authorization hearing for the Specific Plan considered this issue and by resolution adopted the following language to guide preparation of the Specific Plan (and EIR evaluation) with regard to the specific issue raised by Mr. Havlik. Regarding the 7 items listed in Mr. Havlik’s letter our responses are as follows: 1. The purpose of the EIR is to analyze potential impacts. 2. The City specifically chose not to purchase the area on the Froom Ranch property above the 150-foot 25548 elevation as part of the Irish Hills Natural Preserve when they had the opportunity. 3. The City has preliminarily determined that a recycled water tank on this site likely will not be required (subject to further detailed analysis). 4. The restoration of Froom Creek to reflect its historic alignment is designed to avoid significant impacts to jurisdictional wetlands identified adjacent to Calle Joaquin. 5. In addition to studies already performed by the applicant and reviewed by City staff, traffic impacts will be analyzed as part of the EIR analysis. 6. A public, Trailhead Park consistent with City parkland standards for annexation areas is included in the Froom Ranch Specific plan proposal. 7. The applicants have listened to the comments of the PRC and CHC and are responding. An Architectural Historian with experience in San Luis Obispo has been retained to provide guidance on the incorporation of historically significant buildings into the Froom Ranch Trailhead Park. The revised proposal is scheduled to go back to the CHC for conceptual review on 8/28/2017. We encourage the Council not to preempt the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Environmental Review Processes from moving forward, and approve the RFP for EIR proposals at tonight’s meeting. Thank you. VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25549 From:Codron, Michael To:Agenda Correspondence Routing Cc:Scott, Shawna; Davidson, Doug; Fowler, Xzandrea Subject:Item #7: Background Information Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:21:14 PM Attachments:image001.png Item 7 Background Info.pdf Mayor and Council, The attached agenda correspondence includes Resolution No. 10704, approved by the City Council when it initiated the Specific Plan and General Plan Amendments for Froom Ranch. It is being provided to you now in the event it is discussed during tonight’s meeting. Thank you, BCC: City Council Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25550 From:Hill, Robert To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Cc:Codron, Michael (mcodron@slocity.org); Dietrick, Christine (cdietrick@slocity.org); Johnson, Derek (djohnson@slocity.org) Subject:RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:13:07 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shawna, Thanks for the head’s up! I definitely agree that planning / processing questions related to the 150’ GPA should be addressed by CDD. If Council is interested in understanding more about the environmental constraints and possibilities for mitigation, I am happy to address that. As you know, the meeting minutes from the hearing when project initiation for the GPA and Specific Plan was authorized clearly reflect that Council was willing to consider some level of encroachment into the area above 150’. If a majority is now interested in precluding it from consideration altogether that would be a departure from the prior Council’s action, and given that the noticed agenda item tonight is to authorize a RFP for EIR consultants, it seems that one way to do that would be to remove this aspect of project evaluation from the EIR scope of work. It’s awkward timing, although I also note that the project submittals to-date are not yet deemed complete. See you all in there, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello, 25551 I have heard from Michael that one of the Councilmembers will likely be pulling the item for discussion, particularly related to concerns about the proposed 150-foot elevation GPA. Michael and I will be able to address questions related to this, but I wanted to give you both a heads up (Emily, I also left you a voicemail). I’ll generally be at my desk until it is time for Council. Thanks, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:12 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Thanks to you both. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:06 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Bob, Thank you, I did see the agenda correspondence. If the item is pulled for discussion and there are questions about the correspondence, I will be referencing the agenda report (packet page 88), which notes the EIR will include a complete and feasible alternative showing development below the 150-foot elevation, and the RFP (packet pages 97 and 98) which discusses the requirement for actionable alternatives including development below the 150-foot elevation and an alternative that would retain and restore Froom Creek in its existing location. I appreciate your email – I don’t think there’s anything new to discuss, but if anything comes up I will give you a ring. Thank you, Shawna From: Hill, Robert Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> 25552 Subject: FW: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Shawna and Emily, I wanted to make sure you saw this before this evening’s consent calendar. Let me know if you want to discuss, I’ll be at my desk most of today. Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Christian, Kevin Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:46 PM Subject: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello all, Linked below is correspondence for the 07/05/2017 City Council meeting, item 7. http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=66361 Kevin Christian Administrative Assistant City Administration City Clerk's Office 25553 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kchristian@slocity.org T 805.781.7104 slocity.org Bcc: Agenda Correspondence Group 25554 From:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre To:emailcitycouncil@slocity.org; Harmon, Heidi; Gomez, Aaron; Pease, Andy; Christianson, Carlyn; Rivoire, Dan; Advisory Bodies Cc:Lichtig, Katie Subject:San Luis Ranch Concerns Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:11:35 PM July 5, 2017 Mayor Harmon and San Luis Obispo City Council Members City Hall 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Dear Mayor Harmon and San Luis Obispo City Council Members, The current development plan for San Luis Ranch is flawed for many reasons. It is my hope that you will take the opportunity this evening to seek resolutions to concerns that many residents share. Although this property is still located in the County of San Luis Obispo, the developer and his team have worked feverishly scheduling multiple City meetings and meeting with groups to move his proposal forward. Interestingly enough after multiple meetings with groups and advisory bodies seeking allegedly input, there have been few changes to his development plan. For public safety from the local airport, he had to reposition some of the intended residential units. Aside from that change, there are few answers provided to existing concerns. A development of this magnitude may provide more housing, but at a significant cost to residents. In addition, it is not just San Luis Ranch that people are concerned with - it is the cumulative impacts of San Luis Ranch - former Dalidio Property - a project of 580 homes plus 350,000 square feet of commercial/office and a 200 room hotel; Avila Ranch - at the corner of Vachell and Buckley Roads- a project of 720 homes plus 20,000 square feet of commercial; and Froom Ranch - adjacent to Home Depot - a senior living complex, 120 room hotel, 30,000 square feet commercial, plus 250 housing units. As you know, the Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) that allowed for these developments to proceed was funded by a state grant that maximized development in San Luis Obispo. It may have been good in theory for the majority of the LUCE 25555 members who had a background in development, and some who may personally profit from the developments. However, it did not take into consideration many realities, some of which I have enumerated before and will again discuss below. The LUCE process did not provide for substantial public awareness and input. This was highlighted in the LUCE Minority Report. My concerns about the San Luis Ranch proposal are primarily the following: 1. Water. Where is the water of this development? City and County residents have been asked to conserve for months. Given climate change, is the drought truly over? Do we as a community have enough water for current residents and the aforementioned large projects being proposed? 2. Traffic The number of proposed 550 residential units, in addition to the proposed office and commercial space will produce a minimum of 1,000-2,000 vehicles making anywhere from 2-4 trips daily. This upcoming generation may focus on walking, biking, and bus travel out of respect for climate change, however most people will still utilize a car. People in the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses of Laguna Lake deserve an authentic study of what traffic will look like with this proposed development. They also deserve a realistic appraisal of parking for the proposed development. Traffic flow from the proposed business development should also be part of that same study. Streets in the development appear to be narrow with little room for bike lanes. One -way streets in the development should be considered. There does not appear to be enough parking for the new townhomes. In the preliminary conceptual plan there was a new traffic light in between Dalidio Drive and Oceanaire. It was not clear to me whether there is one or not in this new plan. If there is one, it is going to be problematic. Currently, all the traffic from these homes will enter and exit Madonna Road and Los Osos Valley Road via an extension of Froom. This is not what was discussed at multiple LUCE meetings that I attended. It was stated over and over again that any development on this property would require the construction of an overpass or an interchange at Prado Road. 25556 3. Prado Road. As I have written and stated on multiple occasions, the proverbial “elephant in the room” is Prado Road. For years now, people have been asking whether Prado Road is going to be an interchange or an overpass. They have been asking whether or not it is a “four-lane truck highway” as it appears on the LUCE plans. As you may know, this road has been in City documents since 1960. Prado Road also was part of the updated Land Use Circulation Element (LUCE) Plan. Also, the LUCE plan is cited in meetings as the rationale for this immense and dense San Luis Ranch development. Prado Road is also part of the traffic circulation plan for Avila Ranch. The public deserves to see the entire plan and the inclusion of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. One cannot “cherry pick” the LUCE plan and provide for just the parts that are “easy” and/or profitable. All of the support system should be in place in the first phase of the development. Since the developer is solely responsible for traffic/road improvements - his “fair share” - this overpass or interchange will substantially impact the cost of the residential units that are being proposed there. For you to entertain any development on the San Luis Ranch - formerly known as the Dalidio property - without getting a clear answer on whether or not the overpass or interchange is even viable is unconscionable. A transparent discussion should occur with CALTRANS about the interchange and/or overpass as soon as possible. City elected officials should insist that the traffic infrastructure - out of the pocket of the developer - be completed either at the same time the development is being constructed or prior to it. The current plan to build homes in the first phase in back of Target and funnel all of the resulting traffic onto Froom Ranch Road and then onto Los Osos Valley Road or onto Madonna Road is simply not fair to the public. At past meetings, the developer’s representative quipped with a smile, “Who knows when the Prado Road overpass will ever be built.” That is not funny to me. This factor should not be an afterthought. This should be discussed now to avoid extreme congestion on Los Osos Valley Road. Everyone needs to remember that the other aforementioned developments of Avila Ranch and 25557 Froom Ranch will increase the traffic. The cumulative impacts must be addressed. The traffic will become unbearable. It is also very wrong for Prado Road to be segmented or piecemealed. According to CEQA, when a large project is identified, it should be analyzed with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in that fashion. Prado Road, from Madonna Road to Broad Street has never undergone a comprehensive EIR. It has been “looked at” and “analyzed” but no one has ever had the courage to say, “What can we do with the traffic, East to West, along that route?” In the recent Planning Commission meeting commissioners demonstrated an increased awareness of what I am concerned about. One of the commissioners stated, “Okay, if there is indeed just an overpass, and people are in their cars at Higuera and Prado Road, coming from San Luis Ranch, then what? I also need to point out that the developer in Serra Meadows was allowed to build and just make Prado Road adjacent to the construction two lanes with roundabouts, instead of the four lanes that are in the LUCE Master Plan. This is the type of piecemealing that is a recipe for disaster. 4. Affordable housing. Affordable housing is proposed and the question is, “At what price?” The cost of road improvements needs to be factored into the purchase price so that the developer can make a profit. It would be good business sense to know this obligation beforehand. For the common person to look at the simple equation of 500 homes x $400,000= $200,000,000, it gives a citizen an idea of the profit that Gary Grossman and his team stand to make. Even if the cost of the land at roughly $20,000,000 and the overpass or intersection at an estimated $60,000,000 is factored in that is still a gross profit of $120,000,000. The construction cost of the residential construction. will be roughly half that number. That is still a handsome profit. Also, a majority of the homes will be priced at $550,000 or greater - not $400,000 that I just used in this example. Again there is minimal affordable housing in this project. In the first phase, of the 224 units, only 12 are “affordable.” In the entire project, of 580 units, only 34 are “affordable.” 25558 5. Affordable housing vs. Student rentals. Unless there is an opportunity for deed restrictions and/or strict “Conditions, Covenants and Restraints” (CC and R’s) on the property who is to say that the units will not be turned into a mass of student rentals. 6. Noise The noise from this development will need to be mitigated. The noise will be from the people, the vehicular traffic, and air travel. What is not in the preliminary plans is the anticipated noise from the four- lane truck highway known as Prado Road and the extension of Froom Road that will connect with Los Osos Valley Road. On the preliminary plan, Froom Road appears that it is a line of trees, when in reality it will be a road. It should be made more clear on the plans. Also, the proposed elevation of the units on the plan are two and three stories tall - 35 feet and 50 feet respectively. The residents will be negatively affected by the fumes and the noise of vehicular traffic from both Froom and Madonna. Studies should also factor in the noise from Prado Road when it is finished. 7. Airport Viability and Safety My other concern is safety from air travel. The proposed development is at the actual site of a plane crash. I was not a proponent of the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) override vote that was supported by a majority of the last City Council, due to concerns for the safety of residents on the ground and pilots and passengers in the sky. No one to date has been able to answer the question, “When a crash occurs on the development, who will be held legally responsible?” Is it the City? The developer? The airport? And/or the taxpayers? I also believe in keeping our airport viable for industry and job growth. 8. Trees Having viewed the San Luis Ranch plan, it shows the construction of three- story structures on Madonna Road. The row of eucalyptus trees will need to be eliminated. I question that loss of mature trees. I also think that it should be in the plans for a row of trees to be planted to the east of the development near the proposed agricultural land so that the view from Highway 101 is one of trees with a foreground of agricultural land and not a cluster of dense homes. From the residents point of view, it seems that they also would appreciate a 25559 view of trees rather than one of Highway 101. 9. Animal Protection A parts of the property is home to some environmentally sensitive animals, specifically herons. Please address how those animals will be protected during and after construction. 10. Access to Laguna Lake Access to the adjacent Laguna Lake recreational area has not been given the attention that it deserves. Having looked at the plan, there should be an above road, pedestrian access to Laguna Lake Park facilitated for future residents. There is an insufficient amount of park land in the actual development. The yards on the proposed properties are small and/or non-existent. This safe public access would allow people who bike or walk an opportunity to cross Madonna Road without having to halt traffic. 11.Public Input The developer has taken inordinate amounts of time to meet with groups of elected officials, members of advisory bodies, Dwellforward and the U40 group. It would serve the developer - Gary Grossman and his development team including members of the architectural firm RRM - well to send a notice to the neighborhoods and receive public feedback on the development. I believe only one meeting was held at a local Italian restaurant approximately 18 months ago. Residents and business owners have not had an opportunity to voice their concerns since then. Having this important meeting tonight during the summer, the day after the 4th of July holiday, on a Wednesday is an example of how the public feels marginalized. 12. Class 1 Agricultural Land The citizens of the City of San Luis Obispo have the right to determine if they want this Class 1 agricultural land to be annexed into the City and used for residential housing and commercial office space. Also, it is important for everyone to realize that the current plan provides for the removal of 1-4 feet of topsoil to build up the construction site. How will that leave the remaining agricultural land? What will the resulting viable crop be...rice? 25560 13. Access to the Agricultural Land The developer and his poised, glib representatives extol the glories of how San Luis Ranch residents will walk over to the working farm. This does not make sense. It does not seem that the crops will benefit from residents walking around the fields. It does not make sense that residents are going to cross the extension of Froom Ranch where there will be cars and commercial trucks. This is not a commune. It is being billed as a commercial farm with a washing station. Plans for the development show people of all ages walking around with bags of vegetables, graced with butterflies flying nearby and blossoming fruit trees. This does not appear to be reality. 14. The Transit Center The transit center proposed for part of the commercial development is an idea worth exploring. A full service transit center for commuters, complete with a parking structure for overflow parking from residents and for commuters would be an asset to the community. Also, once the new City homeless shelter is completed at 40 Prado Road, there will most likely be lots of individuals that may need to access a bus daily. The overpass at Prado Road will make it easier for people of all backgrounds to utilize transportation services. 15. Other options Alternatives to this current development plan have not been fully considered. Members of the public have offered some suggestions for you in their current correspondence. My best alternative and brainstorm was the one explained here in the letter below that was submitted to both Gary Grossman and Cal Poly President Jeffrey Armstrong. This alternative would and still can create a “win-win-win” for everyone. In short, the alternative for this project would be for Gary Grossman to complete and “old-fashioned land swap” with Cal Poly. Cal Poly still has plenty of acreage to build everything that Grossman desires. The agricultural land could be a Cal Poly working farm for decades to come. A ranch-style dorm house could be constructed on the Grossman property by Cal Poly for agriculture students who work the land. In turn, Grossman could build an array of housing on Cal Poly land in a public - private partnership that would allow for students and staff to have affordable housing. Grossman’s hotel and conference center could give students employment and real life hospitality experience. This proposal would save Grossman the cost of the interchange, it would protect the agricultural land, and decrease the amount of traffic substantially. 25561 I still believe that this is an alternative that should be explored before this precious agricultural land is built on. The second alternative which some people may think that I suggested in jest, also follows. It is simply short-sighted to build on this Class 1 agricultural land for the next generation. This is one of 100 parcels in our entire County with land of this quality. There are better places for homes. In closing, thank you for the opportunity to enumerate concerns now so that they can be addressed in the near future. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 milavu@hotmail.com ________________________________________________________ (Alternative #1) January 19, 2015 Dr. Jeff Armstrong – President California Polytechnic University San Luis Obispo, California Mr. Gary Grossman Central Coast Builders Pismo Beach, California Dear Dr. Armstrong and Mr. Grossman, In the spirit of Martin Luther King, I have a dream. This dream can become a reality with a few simple steps and make San Luis Obispo the best it can be. Although you are both hard-working modest men, I also think that people would think you were absolute saviors if you are able to follow through on what I am about to propose. 25562 Mr. Grossman, you as the new owner of the 131-acres of land- previously known as the “Dalidio property” - now called San Luis Ranch. The name change has not changed the sentiments of many locals about that prime agricultural land that is positioned above the City’s emergency water supply. Many residents and tourists are also enamored with the view shed that it provides from Highway 101, with the fertile crops and the background of our beautiful mountains. Dr. Armstrong, under your leadership, California Polytechnic University (Cal Poly) has continued to receive awards for its academic rigor and the livability of the campus. My vision, gentlemen, is for a true, old-fashioned land swap. Mr. Grossman, you can deed the 131-acres of prime agriculture land to Cal Poly. Dr. Armstrong, Cal Poly will give, in turn 131-acres of buildable land to Mr. Grossman. The land on the Cal Poly land would be the future site of residential housing that could be sold for the competitive market rates to the general public. Currently Mr. Grossman, of your 131-acres of prime agricultural land, the City of San Luis Obispo will receive roughly 50% of it as open space. The remaining land would have to be the site of the residential and commercial projects that you envision as well as the road infrastructure. A deal with Cal Poly may not place those restrictions on you or your development team. Mr. Grossman, as with any development project, you would be responsible for the cost of the road infrastructure at the Cal Poly site, however I imagine that it could be offset by the assistance of students in the various divisions of that support both Engineering and Architecture Departments. Mr. Grossman, you could also build a state-of-the- art hotel there if you and your team desire to be truly extraordinary. The hotel, with conference capabilities, could be a landmark public-private enterprise. Mr. Grossman you could opt to could build a sustainable hotel – similar 25563 to the one on Boulder, Colorado that is near zero waste. With the help of the award winning architecture department and the assistance of the professionals at RRM, it could not only have great guest rooms with rural views but a conference center as well. The restaurant at the hotel could be open to the public and could feature a “farm to table” theme with Cal Poly or local meat, fish and of course fruits and vegetables. With its proximity to Cal Poly there would never be a shortage of individuals for near minimum wage employment to serve in various jobs that the hospitality industry affords. With the assistance of Cal Poly’s Transportation/ Traffic Engineering department, the new homes and hotel would have access to campus, town and Highway 1 via pedestrian paths, bikes paths, light rail or cars. Mr. Grossman, the genius of this idea if we can get it to work is that you would no longer have to pay for the cost of the contentious Prado Road overpass or interchange that may cost you as much as $70 million by today’s estimates. As you know, Caltrans has stated numerous times that a safe interchange at Prado Road and Highway 101 would be very difficult to construct given the proximity of Madonna Road and Los Osos Valley Road. If eliminated, the interchange and/or overpass will not infringe upon the integrity of the new Homeless Service Shelter at 40 Prado Road. You would no longer have to worry about the scrutiny of the Airport Land Use Commission and the factors that may prohibit you from building the size of development that you desire. You would no longer have to be concerned about whether any local landowners would sell you land for the off-site mitigation your design team has discussed. Dr. Armstrong, Cal Poly would benefit by maintaining the showcase to the agrarian based county in perpetuity. The Cal Poly staff and students will be able to farm 131-acres of land already adjacent to San Luis Obispo City farm. In my mind, I picture the original farmhouse on the 25564 property being refurbished to serve as a visitor center/farmer’s market stand where local products from both Cal Poly and native entrepreneurs could be sold – from cheese to wine to fruits and vegetables. Although not mandatory, there could be an eight- person student dorm on site, and housing for a staff member. The site could even have a small venue for entertainment overlooking the fields, and perhaps a venue for intimate ceremonies 50 people or less. Maintaining the land for these uses would allow the row of beloved eucalyptus trees to stay in place. In addition, the Laguna Lake residents will be overjoyed with this proposal. The idea of having homes at up to 500 homes and the commercial space on that location already has voters talking to me about organizing a referendum. Gentlemen, I have been involved in City politics as a concerned citizen for over 16 years. This is simply a fabulous idea and I do hope that you will give it full and immediate consideration. Dr. Armstrong, the residential component on what is now Cal Poly land could house professionals that work in our community or students. The concept would be well-received by many voters who have been so concerned about options for housing. Mr. Grossman, you have told me on more than one occasion that you are prepared to build something tasteful that you could personally be proud of. I seriously think that this is it! Please feel free if you would like to meet with me personally to further discuss this concept that would be a proverbial “win” for both of you and for the entire community as a whole. As a public school teacher, I am generally limited to the hours before 7:30am or after 3:00pm. 25565 Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 ______________________________ (Alternative #2) June 19, 2017 Gary Grossman Coastal Community Builders 330 James Way Pismo Beach, California 93448 Dear Gary Grossman - It is high time for another great idea! As you may recall, two years ago I creatively suggested that you build all of your homes and commercial development on Cal Poly land. In return, Cal Poly would have been able to use the 131- acres of Class 1 agricultural land that you currently own to farm and work for eternity. That was a “win-win-win” idea that would have saved the agricultural land for the public and students. It would have provided housing, jobs, a hotel, and event center on Cal Poly land. That idea would have also have saved you the cost of the Prado Road overpass or interchange. Although that awesome public/private partnership idea made sense to a lot of community members, it did not blossom. I am now offering another suggestion! Since Proposition 64, which provides for the legalization of cannabis, had not been passed when you initially started planning for San Luis Ranch, I think that there is another viable alternative for the 131- acres of prime agricultural land that you may not have ever considered. As you may remember from our previous conversations, this novel idea is coming from me, a person who has spent over 34 years in public education, teaching United States History and Spanish. I have also consistently worked to combat the negative effects of alcohol and other drugs within the student population through prevention and intervention programs. Marijuana, for as insidious and detrimental as I believe that it is for developing teenage bodies and brains, has been embraced by a majority of California voters for both medicinal and recreational use. So, have you considered the enormous profit that you would gain from a legal, agricultural operation planted in marijuana? The San Luis Ranch - formerly known as the Dalidio land - could be preserved as agricultural land. There are plenty of people, including college aged students, who would be interested in working at the location to learn how to cultivate, grow, 25566 and market marijuana. There are also people in our community who are doing formal experiments with both the CBD and the THC produced from the drug. A crop at that location could potentially be grown pesticide free. The other benefit of having a farm at that location is that the crop could be easily protected. There is a freeway on one side, the SLO City Farm on another, and Madonna Road. It would be easy to install a security system and fencing. In addition, the commercial grow would be great for tourism. It could be called “Grossman’s Green Acres.” There could be an innovative small commercial retail center on site with parking along Madonna Road. There could be a variety of products for sale, including ones that do not include cannabis - Cal Poly cheeses and chocolates, local breads and wines, fresh fruits and vegetables and even a petting zoo! The “Forever 21” building could be transformed into a store called “Forever 420” by a budding entrepreneur. The store could carry a wide variety of marijuana and hemp based products. I also think that a pro-cannabis area, such as the farm and retail outlet, would do wonders for the profits of the surrounding restaurants. Neighbors in the immediate area may find the odor from the crop offensive, however as most people know the prevailing winds are from the ocean, across town, west to east. The odor would blow over the freeway to the sewer treatment plant, the drive-in and the new Homeless Shelter at 40 Prado. The farm could utilize forms of alternative power for the 2030 design buildout of industrial buildings, taking full advantage of solar and wind power. Why would this proposal be more favorable than the current one? Most people realize that the homes currently proposed for this site are not “affordable.” At maximum buildout, there will only be 34 homes for truly low- income people. As a developer, you will sell a home once. The marijuana crop would be a renewable, continued source of income. The Prado Road overpass and/or interchange is not going to happen anytime soon both due to funding and Caltrans restrictions. However, the immense profits from this marijuana farm would help to pay for that overpass eventually and help with our City's debt. So, maybe you could examine the long term profitability of growing marijuana vs. selling a few homes and having to grapple with the fickle retail/commercial market for the remaining land. The profits from this cannabis grow could potentially also help to build a secondary transit center and provide the infrastructure of Class 1 bike lanes in that part of town. Preserving agriculture at this site would be well-received by the Airport Land Use Commissioners. In addition,the current San Luis Obispo City Council members appear to 25567 be very open to marijuana legalization, promoting a “farm to pipe” ideology, and protecting the rights of citizens to grow and use cannabis. A large commercial grow on your site would stifle many smaller growing operations throughout town and on the fringes of our City limits. Having a grow confined to one large area like this would make most residents happy. The processing of this marijuana could occur on the other side of the freeway along Buckley Road where the controversial Avila Ranch homes are being proposed. That area is perfect for industrial manufacturing and processing. Since I was President of Save San Luis Obispo in 2005 when City voters stopped the previous development desired by the previous owner Ernie Dalidio, I am again hearing from a wide variety of residents who vehemently oppose your current development plan for San Luis Ranch.They do not see the proposed homes as affordable, they are concerned about the horrible traffic that will be created on Los Osos Valley Road, Froom Ranch Road and Madonna Road, they object to the chopping down of the trees along Madonna Road, they are concerned about damage to the current vista from Highway 101 to the west, and the severe impact this development will have on the surrounding neighborhood character. Why not at least consider the idea outlined here? It will save you a significant amount of money now and make you more money in the long term. Then, if you give the marijuana cultivation business a chance and it works, you will have preserved this precious piece of agricultural land for the next generation! If it does not, well then you can build homes, an overpass, and the additional traffic infrastructure. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss this idea further. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre 650 Skyline Drive San Luis Obispo, California 93405 milavu@hotmail.com Cell: 805-441-5818 25568 From:Fowler, Xzandrea To:Codron, Michael Subject:RE: froom consent item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:53:52 PM Attachments:image001.png I’m available anytime this afternoon if you need me. Xzandrea Fowler Deputy Director Community Development Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 E XFowler@slocity.org T 805.781.7274 slocity.org From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:03 AM To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Fowler, Xzandrea <XFowler@slocity.org>; Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: froom consent item Fyi – will follow up with you all after lunch. From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:00 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: froom consent item Hi Michael and Katie, After finally actually reading the Consent item that Mr. Havlik is writing about, I will probably pull the item from Consent and try to get the General Plan Amendment-related item (the 150-foot height limit) deleted from the RFP. I don't expect to be successful, but staff might want to be prepared to deal with this--don't know if you consider it "minor" or "major" under the alternatives, and so on. :~) Thanks, 25569 Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25570 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:49:54 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks, Shawna. I have a 2:00 call and will get back with you after that. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 1:40 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello, I have heard from Michael that one of the Councilmembers will likely be pulling the item for discussion, particularly related to concerns about the proposed 150-foot elevation GPA. Michael and I will be able to address questions related to this, but I wanted to give you both a heads up (Emily, I also left you a voicemail). I’ll generally be at my desk until it is time for Council. Thanks, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:12 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Thanks to you both. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:06 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik 25571 Hi Bob, Thank you, I did see the agenda correspondence. If the item is pulled for discussion and there are questions about the correspondence, I will be referencing the agenda report (packet page 88), which notes the EIR will include a complete and feasible alternative showing development below the 150-foot elevation, and the RFP (packet pages 97 and 98) which discusses the requirement for actionable alternatives including development below the 150-foot elevation and an alternative that would retain and restore Froom Creek in its existing location. I appreciate your email – I don’t think there’s anything new to discuss, but if anything comes up I will give you a ring. Thank you, Shawna From: Hill, Robert Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Shawna and Emily, I wanted to make sure you saw this before this evening’s consent calendar. Let me know if you want to discuss, I’ll be at my desk most of today. Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Christian, Kevin Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:46 PM 25572 Subject: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello all, Linked below is correspondence for the 07/05/2017 City Council meeting, item 7. http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=66361 Kevin Christian Administrative Assistant City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kchristian@slocity.org T 805.781.7104 slocity.org Bcc: Agenda Correspondence Group 25573 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel; Hill, Robert Subject:RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:40:15 PM Attachments:image001.png Hello, I have heard from Michael that one of the Councilmembers will likely be pulling the item for discussion, particularly related to concerns about the proposed 150-foot elevation GPA. Michael and I will be able to address questions related to this, but I wanted to give you both a heads up (Emily, I also left you a voicemail). I’ll generally be at my desk until it is time for Council. Thanks, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:12 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Thanks to you both. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:06 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Bob, Thank you, I did see the agenda correspondence. If the item is pulled for discussion and there are questions about the correspondence, I will be referencing the agenda report (packet page 88), which notes the EIR will include a complete and feasible alternative showing development below the 150-foot elevation, and the RFP (packet pages 97 and 98) which discusses the requirement for actionable alternatives including development below the 150-foot elevation and an alternative that would retain and restore Froom Creek in its existing location. I appreciate your email – I don’t think there’s anything new to discuss, but if anything comes up I will give you a ring. 25574 Thank you, Shawna From: Hill, Robert Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Shawna and Emily, I wanted to make sure you saw this before this evening’s consent calendar. Let me know if you want to discuss, I’ll be at my desk most of today. Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Christian, Kevin Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:46 PM Subject: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello all, Linked below is correspondence for the 07/05/2017 City Council meeting, item 7. http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=66361 Kevin Christian Administrative Assistant 25575 City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kchristian@slocity.org T 805.781.7104 slocity.org Bcc: Agenda Correspondence Group 25576 From:Hudson, Jake To:Olejnik, John@DOT; Bochum, Tim Cc:Streder, Melissa@DOT Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 12:36:20 PM Attachments:San Luis Ranch EIR & Prado PSR 7-5-17.pdf John, Here you go. Thank you again for working with us on this. From: Olejnik, John@DOT [mailto:john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:39 AM To: Bochum, Tim <tbochum@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org> Cc: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov> Subject: Froom Ranch - Hello. Just checking in about previewing the response to our comments we talked about.. Also…, came across Froom Ranch. Another large development with similar impacts, and definitely highlighting the need for LOVR on/off improvements. We now have a “trifecta” happening. Any thoughts on strategy? Thanks, John ---------------------------------------------------------- John Olejnik Planning Management Liaison California Dept of Transportation 50 Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 542-4751 john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov 25577 From:Hudson, Jake To:Olejnik, John@DOT; Bochum, Tim Cc:Streder, Melissa@DOT Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 12:24:13 PM John, Thanks for checking in, the response letter is routing for review and should be coming your way shortly. It includes identifying where the analysis is that was requested, some trip gen data for phase 1 showing that it’s not anticipated to affect merge, diverge, & weave LOS prior to the interchange coming on-line, and the phase 1 monitoring project condition with option to advance ramp metering or auxiliary lanes to phase one if necessary. In regards to Froom starting on the heels of San Luis Ranch We are feeling the ”trifecta” effect as well. Fortunately the landuse from Avila, San Luis Ranch, and Froom were all studied together at a programmatic level as part of our recent general plan update and the land use from all three are also assumed in each individual traffic impact study in the near term and cumulative scenarios. We sent over the draft scope of work for the Froom Traffic Study to Melissa last week…because that scope is still in development we can easily expand it to accommodate any addition as long as its reasonably tied to the Froom Project. Please provide that feedback in repose to that draft scope we sent over. As we did with San Luis Ranch and Melissa’s predecessors (Larry & Adam) we will also invite Melissa to review the consultant proposals and participate in the selection as well as participate in the study progress meetings and review early draft work. If there are any other ways you would like to be involved or other strategies we are more than happy to accommodate, just let us know. Thanks, Jake Hudson Transportation Manager City of San Luis Obispo Public Works Transportation Planning & Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jhudson@slocity.org T 805.781.7255 C 805.431.4761 slocity.org From: Olejnik, John@DOT [mailto:john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:39 AM 25578 To: Bochum, Tim <tbochum@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org> Cc: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov> Subject: Froom Ranch - Hello. Just checking in about previewing the response to our comments we talked about.. Also…, came across Froom Ranch. Another large development with similar impacts, and definitely highlighting the need for LOVR on/off improvements. We now have a “trifecta” happening. Any thoughts on strategy? Thanks, John ---------------------------------------------------------- John Olejnik Planning Management Liaison California Dept of Transportation 50 Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 542-4751 john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov 25579 From:Scott, Shawna To:Codron, Michael Subject:RE: Re: froom consent item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 12:23:46 PM Attachments:R-10704 - Authorizing initiation of application for Madonna on LOVR Specifi.pdf Thank you – for your reference, the April 5, 2016 Council Resolution authorizing initiation of the Specific Plan is attached, and a hard copy is on your desk. The resolution specifically identifies the 150-foot elevation GPA request. From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 11:51 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Re: froom consent item Get Outlook for Android From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:13:55 AM To: Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek Subject: Re: froom consent item Yes, that's my intent. I will argue that the above-150' portion of the project is *not* contemplated in the LUCE and goes against long-standing and important city policy (to the point of actually needing a General Plan amendment) and creates a very bad precedent, so why have an applicant spend the money to analyze it? I don't expect to be successful, but I want to at least articulate that thought out loud and put the applicant on notice that there is a major concern there. I wasn't going to argue about it now but after reading the invitation from the staff report "alternatives" section, I thought why not? This is a major if not the key aspect of the project and we might as well get it out in the open from the get-go. Any discussion will help to do that, even if the end result is staff's original recommendation. Thanks, Carlyn 25580 Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:07:02 AM To: Christianson, Carlyn; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek Subject: RE: froom consent item Just to clarify – is the intent to ask the Council if the majority wants to confine the project to the site area below 150’ elevation now, and therefore not evaluate that alternative under the EIR? Thanks, -Michael From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:00 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: froom consent item Hi Michael and Katie, After finally actually reading the Consent item that Mr. Havlik is writing about, I will probably pull the item from Consent and try to get the General Plan Amendment-related item (the 150-foot height limit) deleted from the RFP. I don't expect to be successful, but staff might want to be prepared to deal with this--don't know if you consider it "minor" or "major" under the alternatives, and so on. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member 25581 City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25582 From:Codron, Michael To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Fwd: Re: froom consent item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:51:25 AM Get Outlook for Android From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:13:55 AM To: Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek Subject: Re: froom consent item Yes, that's my intent. I will argue that the above-150' portion of the project is *not* contemplated in the LUCE and goes against long-standing and important city policy (to the point of actually needing a General Plan amendment) and creates a very bad precedent, so why have an applicant spend the money to analyze it? I don't expect to be successful, but I want to at least articulate that thought out loud and put the applicant on notice that there is a major concern there. I wasn't going to argue about it now but after reading the invitation from the staff report "alternatives" section, I thought why not? This is a major if not the key aspect of the project and we might as well get it out in the open from the get-go. Any discussion will help to do that, even if the end result is staff's original recommendation. Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:07:02 AM To: Christianson, Carlyn; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek Subject: RE: froom consent item 25583 Just to clarify – is the intent to ask the Council if the majority wants to confine the project to the site area below 150’ elevation now, and therefore not evaluate that alternative under the EIR? Thanks, -Michael From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:00 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: froom consent item Hi Michael and Katie, After finally actually reading the Consent item that Mr. Havlik is writing about, I will probably pull the item from Consent and try to get the General Plan Amendment-related item (the 150-foot height limit) deleted from the RFP. I don't expect to be successful, but staff might want to be prepared to deal with this--don't know if you consider it "minor" or "major" under the alternatives, and so on. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25584 From:Olejnik, John@DOT To:Bochum, Tim; Hudson, Jake Cc:Streder, Melissa@DOT Subject:Froom Ranch - Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:39:28 AM Attachments:RFP Froom Ranch TIS 201704111.docx Hello.  Just checking in about previewing the response to our comments we talked about..   Also…, came across Froom Ranch.  Another large development with similar impacts, and definitely highlighting the need for LOVR on/off improvements.  We now have a “trifecta” happening.  Any thoughts on strategy?   Thanks, John   ---------------------------------------------------------- John Olejnik Planning Management Liaison California Dept of Transportation 50 Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 542-4751 john.olejnik@dot.ca.gov   25585 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - updated list of technical studies Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:33:09 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam, Thanks for the call. As we discussed, this is the updated list of technical studies we anticipate being available by the end of this week when the RFP goes out. I believe we still need copies of (1) the Acoustics Assessment; (2) updated visual simulations; and (3) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations, when those are finalized. Please let me know if you see the need for any revisions to this list. Thanks. Available Supporting Documents The following technical studies have been prepared to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project and are available online at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/documents- online/environmental-review-documents/-folder-1911 · Preliminary Exhibits (RRM 2016) · Preliminary Initial Study of Froom Ranch Specific Plan (City of San Luis Obispo) · Section 106 Prehistoric Report (FirstCarbon Solutions 2015) – please contact Emily Creel directly to review this confidential report · Biological Resources Inventory (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2016) · Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California (Kevin Merk Associates, LLC 2015) · Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2016) · Preliminary Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2015) · Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2017) · Preliminary Soils Engineering Report (GeoSolutions, Inc. 2016) · Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment (45dB Acoustics 2017) · Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map (John Kammer 2017) · Updated Transportation Analysis (Central Coast Transportation Consulting 2017) · Visual Simulations (RRM 2017) · Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations (RRM 2017) In addition, the applicant is in the process of completing the following additional studies to support the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These will be made available to the EIR preparers upon their completion and submittal to the City: · Froom Ranch Specific Plan (RRM) · Structural Analysis of Historic Structures (Stork, Wolfe & Associates) · Historic Buildings Treatment Approach (Chattel, Inc.) 25586 · Water Supply Assessment (RRM) · Water Demand and Sewer Flows Analysis (RRM) Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25587 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek Subject:Re: froom consent item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:13:56 AM Yes, that's my intent. I will argue that the above-150' portion of the project is *not* contemplated in the LUCE and goes against long-standing and important city policy (to the point of actually needing a General Plan amendment) and creates a very bad precedent, so why have an applicant spend the money to analyze it? I don't expect to be successful, but I want to at least articulate that thought out loud and put the applicant on notice that there is a major concern there. I wasn't going to argue about it now but after reading the invitation from the staff report "alternatives" section, I thought why not? This is a major if not the key aspect of the project and we might as well get it out in the open from the get-go. Any discussion will help to do that, even if the end result is staff's original recommendation. Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Codron, Michael Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:07:02 AM To: Christianson, Carlyn; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek Subject: RE: froom consent item Just to clarify – is the intent to ask the Council if the majority wants to confine the project to the site area below 150’ elevation now, and therefore not evaluate that alternative under the EIR? Thanks, -Michael From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:00 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: froom consent item 25588 Hi Michael and Katie, After finally actually reading the Consent item that Mr. Havlik is writing about, I will probably pull the item from Consent and try to get the General Plan Amendment-related item (the 150-foot height limit) deleted from the RFP. I don't expect to be successful, but staff might want to be prepared to deal with this--don't know if you consider it "minor" or "major" under the alternatives, and so on. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25589 From:Codron, Michael To:Christianson, Carlyn; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek Subject:RE: froom consent item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:07:03 AM Just to clarify – is the intent to ask the Council if the majority wants to confine the project to the site area below 150’ elevation now, and therefore not evaluate that alternative under the EIR? Thanks, -Michael From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:00 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: froom consent item Hi Michael and Katie, After finally actually reading the Consent item that Mr. Havlik is writing about, I will probably pull the item from Consent and try to get the General Plan Amendment-related item (the 150-foot height limit) deleted from the RFP. I don't expect to be successful, but staff might want to be prepared to deal with this--don't know if you consider it "minor" or "major" under the alternatives, and so on. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25590 From:Scott, Shawna To:Hill, Robert; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Shape Files Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:04:51 AM Attachments:image001.png Good morning, I’ll be touching base with Emily later today to get back up to speed, and wanted to let you know I’ve saved the shape files provided by RRM to the T Drive folder: T:\Froom Ranch Specific Plan\Shape Files_070517 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25591 From:Codron, Michael To:Johnson, Derek; Fowler, Xzandrea; Davidson, Doug; Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: froom consent item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:03:03 AM Fyi – will follow up with you all after lunch. From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:00 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: froom consent item Hi Michael and Katie, After finally actually reading the Consent item that Mr. Havlik is writing about, I will probably pull the item from Consent and try to get the General Plan Amendment-related item (the 150-foot height limit) deleted from the RFP. I don't expect to be successful, but staff might want to be prepared to deal with this--don't know if you consider it "minor" or "major" under the alternatives, and so on. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25592 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie Subject:froom consent item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:00:14 AM Hi Michael and Katie, After finally actually reading the Consent item that Mr. Havlik is writing about, I will probably pull the item from Consent and try to get the General Plan Amendment-related item (the 150-foot height limit) deleted from the RFP. I don't expect to be successful, but staff might want to be prepared to deal with this--don't know if you consider it "minor" or "major" under the alternatives, and so on. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25593 We're looking forward to seeing you. View this email in your browser Website Facebook Email Be the first to experience the brand new Information Center for Villaggio, the first Life Plan Community proposed for San Luis Obispo. From:Villaggio at San Luis Obispo To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Your Invited: Villaggio Ribbon Cutting and Grand Opening Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:58:14 AM 25594 Guests will experience some of what Villaggio has to offer: great food, fun company, designs of the future community, and a special ribbon- cutting ceremony! Date: Friday, July 14th Open House: 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Ribbon-cutting starts at 4:30 pm Location: Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Reservations are required. RSVP: Call 805-457-4200 Email rgruett@villaggioslo.com Click the button below Website Facebook Email RSVP 25595 An application for a Permit to Accept Deposits and Certificate of Authority has been submitted to the Department of Social Services, pursuant to H&SC section 1772.2(b)(1). Copyright © 2017 Villaggio Communities, All rights reserved. As a local business you are invited Our mailing address is: Villaggio Communities 1503 Froom Ranch Way, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list 25596 25597 From:Codron, Michael To:Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Consent Agenda Item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:26:13 AM Here is the e-mail chain we discussed. -mc From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:07 AM To: neilhavlik@aol.com Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Consent Agenda Item Thanks again, Neil, for your comments. I think that the reason you haven't heard much about it is that the project is only just now coming to the city in any formal way, and so it is just at the very beginning of the development process. It hasn't hit any of the Advisory bodies yet, or of course, gone through any environmental review or impact analysis. I'm sure Mr. Codron can give you a better idea of the timeline when he has a moment. Thanks again, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 7:37:00 AM To: Christianson, Carlyn Cc: Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie Subject: Re: Consent Agenda Item Hello Carlyn, and thank you for your response. I am sorry but I stand by my opinion. I went away from the April 2016 meeting feeling that our statements had been completely ignored; only you and Jan expressed "the hope" that the development could stay below 150 feet, when the Council could have easily just said forget it. I remember you said Council wasn't approving anything, which was literally true, but Council missed its best opportunity to change direction. I know that the elevation matter remains an issue, but the City is being pushed hard to allow that change (using Mountainbrook as the justification), and the longer you wait the harder it will be to say no. Likewise for the creek realignment; in my opinion 25598 that is a disaster. It has to be engineered and no engineer will do anything less than their E&O insurance will allow. That means a flood control channel with plenty of capacity and that means a big ugly levee that covers over the wetland, which by the way is the lowest elevation on the property. So Froom Creek will have to be made to not run uphill for those last couple of hundred yards. Very clever. From your e-mail it appears that you are ready to go ahead, and I am sorry to hear that. Perhaps there might at least be a requirement for some kind of public presentations at suitable points along the way. Except for the two presentations last year I referred to (which didn't go well for the project sponsors), there has been no real publicity or opportunity to comment on or even find out what was going on. There may have been some changes I am not aware of, but it sure seemed like the project sponsors had their plan and were going to push it as hard as they could, and I have seen nothing to make me change that opinion. Sincerely, Neil -----Original Message----- From: Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Sent: Mon, Jul 3, 2017 12:16 pm Subject: Re: Consent Agenda Item Thanks, Neil, for your input. Respectfully, I would not characterize the Council's previous conceptual feedback (not action) to the applicants the way you do, but I understand the gist of your concerns. I personally do not see the problem with actually getting a full environmental analysis of the proposal; I think it would only bolster your concerns, a number of which I continue to share and as I expressed during the previous Council hearing. I do know that staff has continued to hear from me, at least, the great concern regarding the city's 150-foot height limit, and has continued to pass these types of concerns to the applicant, who can choose at this stage to keep all options open or not, as the case may be. Thanks again for taking the time to write, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 25599 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11:46 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25600 From:Hill, Robert To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel Subject:RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:17:20 AM Attachments:image001.png Thanks, Shawna. Yes, I think we are on the same page. I will be there, too, as I have to attend the SL Ranch hearing and we are expecting some testimony about off-leash dogs, too. So you both know where I am coming from, I strongly agree with Neil and others about the 150’ elevation issue, but at this point I am remain open to seeing how the realigned creek and reconnection with the floodplain / wetland could work out, both aesthetically and in terms of functional values. Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:06 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Bob, Thank you, I did see the agenda correspondence. If the item is pulled for discussion and there are questions about the correspondence, I will be referencing the agenda report (packet page 88), which notes the EIR will include a complete and feasible alternative showing development below the 150-foot elevation, and the RFP (packet pages 97 and 98) which discusses the requirement for actionable alternatives including development below the 150-foot elevation and an alternative that would retain and restore Froom Creek in its existing location. I appreciate your email – I don’t think there’s anything new to discuss, but if anything comes up I will give you a ring. 25601 Thank you, Shawna From: Hill, Robert Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Shawna and Emily, I wanted to make sure you saw this before this evening’s consent calendar. Let me know if you want to discuss, I’ll be at my desk most of today. Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Christian, Kevin Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:46 PM Subject: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello all, Linked below is correspondence for the 07/05/2017 City Council meeting, item 7. http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=66361 Kevin Christian 25602 Administrative Assistant City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kchristian@slocity.org T 805.781.7104 slocity.org Bcc: Agenda Correspondence Group 25603 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna; Hill, Robert Subject:RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:12:34 AM Attachments:image001.png Thanks to you both. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:06 AM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Bob, Thank you, I did see the agenda correspondence. If the item is pulled for discussion and there are questions about the correspondence, I will be referencing the agenda report (packet page 88), which notes the EIR will include a complete and feasible alternative showing development below the 150-foot elevation, and the RFP (packet pages 97 and 98) which discusses the requirement for actionable alternatives including development below the 150-foot elevation and an alternative that would retain and restore Froom Creek in its existing location. I appreciate your email – I don’t think there’s anything new to discuss, but if anything comes up I will give you a ring. Thank you, Shawna From: Hill, Robert Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Shawna and Emily, I wanted to make sure you saw this before this evening’s consent calendar. Let me know if you want to discuss, I’ll be at my desk most of today. Thanks, 25604 Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Christian, Kevin Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:46 PM Subject: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello all, Linked below is correspondence for the 07/05/2017 City Council meeting, item 7. http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=66361 Kevin Christian Administrative Assistant City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kchristian@slocity.org T 805.781.7104 slocity.org Bcc: Agenda Correspondence Group 25605 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Michelle Matson Cc:melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov; Dave Flynn; Michael Britton; Edward Reading; Glenn D. Marshall Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:10:00 AM Attachments:image002.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image001.png Thank you for the comments. We’ll review in more detail and refine the scope of work, as appropriate. Best, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Michelle Matson [mailto:mmatson@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:08 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us>; Glenn D. Marshall <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, I agree with Glenn and would also suggest adding Higuera Street and Vachell Lane to the list of study intersections. Sincerely, Michelle Matson Traffic Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo 25606 Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map From: Glenn D. Marshall Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:58 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, For County Public Works purposes, please consider including intersection study of LOVR at Foothill Blvd.; and roadway segment analysis of Higuera St from the City limits southerly to US 101, and of Tank Farm Rd between Higuera St and SR 227. Also consider requiring the report address: 1. A roadway/intersection collision evaluation for each study intersection and roadway segment in the County (and City if so desired). 2. Recommended mitigation measures for identified project impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City’s RFP. -Glenn Glenn D Marshall Development Services Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-1596 | An APWA Accredited Agency 
Website | Twitter | Map From: "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Melissa Streder <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>, "Glenn D. Marshall" <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review 25607 Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25608 From:Michelle Matson To:Schwartz, Luke Cc:melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov; Dave Flynn; Michael Britton; Edward Reading; Glenn D. Marshall Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:07:44 AM Attachments:image004.png image006.png image007.png image008.png Luke,     I agree with Glenn and would also suggest adding Higuera Street and Vachell Lane to the list of study intersections.   Sincerely,       Michelle Matson   Traffic Engineer   Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map         From: Glenn D. Marshall  Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:58 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; Dave Flynn <dflynn@co.slo.ca.us>; Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us>; Michael Britton <mbritton@co.slo.ca.us>; Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review   Luke,   For County Public Works purposes, please consider including intersection study of LOVR at Foothill Blvd.; and roadway segment analysis of Higuera St from the City limits southerly to US 101, and of Tank Farm Rd between Higuera St and SR 227.   Also consider requiring the report address: 1. A roadway/intersection collision evaluation for each study intersection and roadway segment in the County (and City if so desired). 2. Recommended mitigation measures for identified project impacts. 25609   Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City’s RFP.   -Glenn   Glenn D Marshall Development Services Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-1596 | An APWA Accredited Agency 
Website | Twitter | Map     From: "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Melissa Streder <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>, "Glenn D. Marshall" <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25610 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:neilhavlik@aol.com Cc:Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie Subject:Re: Consent Agenda Item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:07:00 AM Thanks again, Neil, for your comments. I think that the reason you haven't heard much about it is that the project is only just now coming to the city in any formal way, and so it is just at the very beginning of the development process. It hasn't hit any of the Advisory bodies yet, or of course, gone through any environmental review or impact analysis. I'm sure Mr. Codron can give you a better idea of the timeline when he has a moment. Thanks again, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 7:37:00 AM To: Christianson, Carlyn Cc: Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie Subject: Re: Consent Agenda Item Hello Carlyn, and thank you for your response. I am sorry but I stand by my opinion. I went away from the April 2016 meeting feeling that our statements had been completely ignored; only you and Jan expressed "the hope" that the development could stay below 150 feet, when the Council could have easily just said forget it. I remember you said Council wasn't approving anything, which was literally true, but Council missed its best opportunity to change direction. I know that the elevation matter remains an issue, but the City is being pushed hard to allow that change (using Mountainbrook as the justification), and the longer you wait the harder it will be to say no. Likewise for the creek realignment; in my opinion that is a disaster. It has to be engineered and no engineer will do anything less than their E&O insurance will allow. That means a flood control channel with plenty of capacity and that means a big ugly levee that covers over the wetland, which by the way is the lowest elevation on the property. So Froom Creek will have to be made to not run uphill for those last couple of hundred yards. Very clever. From your e-mail it appears that you are ready to go ahead, and I am sorry to hear that. Perhaps there might at least be a requirement for some kind of public presentations at suitable points along the way. Except for the two presentations last year I referred to (which didn't go well for the project sponsors), there has been no real publicity or opportunity to comment on or even find out what was going on. There may have been some 25611 changes I am not aware of, but it sure seemed like the project sponsors had their plan and were going to push it as hard as they could, and I have seen nothing to make me change that opinion. Sincerely, Neil -----Original Message----- From: Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Sent: Mon, Jul 3, 2017 12:16 pm Subject: Re: Consent Agenda Item Thanks, Neil, for your input. Respectfully, I would not characterize the Council's previous conceptual feedback (not action) to the applicants the way you do, but I understand the gist of your concerns. I personally do not see the problem with actually getting a full environmental analysis of the proposal; I think it would only bolster your concerns, a number of which I continue to share and as I expressed during the previous Council hearing. I do know that staff has continued to hear from me, at least, the great concern regarding the city's 150-foot height limit, and has continued to pass these types of concerns to the applicant, who can choose at this stage to keep all options open or not, as the case may be. Thanks again for taking the time to write, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11:46 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: 25612 Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25613 From:Scott, Shawna To:Hill, Robert; Emily Creel Subject:RE: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:05:55 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Bob, Thank you, I did see the agenda correspondence. If the item is pulled for discussion and there are questions about the correspondence, I will be referencing the agenda report (packet page 88), which notes the EIR will include a complete and feasible alternative showing development below the 150-foot elevation, and the RFP (packet pages 97 and 98) which discusses the requirement for actionable alternatives including development below the 150-foot elevation and an alternative that would retain and restore Froom Creek in its existing location. I appreciate your email – I don’t think there’s anything new to discuss, but if anything comes up I will give you a ring. Thank you, Shawna From: Hill, Robert Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:44 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hi Shawna and Emily, I wanted to make sure you saw this before this evening’s consent calendar. Let me know if you want to discuss, I’ll be at my desk most of today. Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org 25614 From: Christian, Kevin Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:46 PM Subject: ac 07/05/2017 Item 7, Havlik Hello all, Linked below is correspondence for the 07/05/2017 City Council meeting, item 7. http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=66361 Kevin Christian Administrative Assistant City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E kchristian@slocity.org T 805.781.7104 slocity.org Bcc: Agenda Correspondence Group 25615 From:Sims, Shannon To:Harmon, Heidi Subject:RE: Consent Agenda Item Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 8:24:00 AM Printed From: Harmon, Heidi Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2017 7:28 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Consent Agenda Item Please print From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25616 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - status report Date:Wednesday, July 5, 2017 8:10:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, I am back in the office, and appreciate all the emails and updates. I will give you a call a little bit later this morning. Thank you, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 1:54 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - status report Hi Shawna – the latest status report for Froom Ranch is attached. I highlighted a few items on the 2nd sheet for us to keep an eye on before I leave for vacation. I’m still working on the NOP PC presentation and our change order request and will have those to you in the next couple of days. Hope you had a nice relaxing vacation! Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25617 From:Pease, Andy To:neilhavlik@aol.com Subject:RE: Consent Agenda Item Date:Tuesday, July 4, 2017 8:30:35 PM Neil – Thank you so much for your comments – I really appreciate hearing your opinion on this matter. Andy Andy Pease Council Member Office of the City Council 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E apease@slocity.org slocity.org From: neilhavlik@aol.com [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:12 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25618 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - check in Date:Tuesday, July 4, 2017 1:59:36 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam – I just wanted to confirm that you are still planning on submitting the conceptual park plan and approach to treatment of historic resources by the week of July 17 to facilitate CHC conceptual review on August 28? Do you submitting the revised Specific Plan at the same time? I also wanted to let you know that I will be out on vacation July 7-19. Please copy Shawna on all correspondence so she can assist with any urgent needs. Please also continue to copy me as well. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25619 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - status report Date:Tuesday, July 4, 2017 1:53:53 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch - Status Report 07-04-17.xlsx Hi Shawna – the latest status report for Froom Ranch is attached. I highlighted a few items on the 2nd sheet for us to keep an eye on before I leave for vacation. I’m still working on the NOP PC presentation and our change order request and will have those to you in the next couple of days. Hope you had a nice relaxing vacation! Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25620 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Date:Tuesday, July 4, 2017 1:17:02 PM Attachments:NOP contact list_EC.xlsx Attachment actually attached this time… Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Emily Creel Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 1:16 PM To: 'Scott, Shawna' <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Hi Shawna – I thought this looked good. I made 2 additions: 1. The only other individuals we might want to send it to are those on our “Interested Parties” list. I have added them to the 2nd sheet under a new column for Individuals. 2. I added the CA Dept. of Parks and Rec. to the 1st sheet and highlighted it in green. I was talking to Gary Ruggerone recently about the need to notice them more often to consider 6(f) issues, which also apply to non-transportation projects. Do you have contact information for them? Let me know if you want to talk about these further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:57 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Hi Emily, Please find attached the draft NOP contact list for your review. Please check this out and 25621 let me know if you have any suggested additions or deletions. It may be simple enough to highlight additions and deletions in different colors. Thank you, Shawna 25622 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Date:Tuesday, July 4, 2017 1:16:03 PM Hi Shawna – I thought this looked good. I made 2 additions: 1. The only other individuals we might want to send it to are those on our “Interested Parties” list. I have added them to the 2nd sheet under a new column for Individuals. 2. I added the CA Dept. of Parks and Rec. to the 1st sheet and highlighted it in green. I was talking to Gary Ruggerone recently about the need to notice them more often to consider 6(f) issues, which also apply to non-transportation projects. Do you have contact information for them? Let me know if you want to talk about these further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:57 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Hi Emily, Please find attached the draft NOP contact list for your review. Please check this out and let me know if you have any suggested additions or deletions. It may be simple enough to highlight additions and deletions in different colors. Thank you, Shawna 25623 From:neilhavlik@aol.com To:Christianson, Carlyn Cc:Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie Subject:Re: Consent Agenda Item Date:Tuesday, July 4, 2017 7:37:07 AM Hello Carlyn, and thank you for your response. I am sorry but I stand by my opinion. I went away from the April 2016 meeting feeling that our statements had been completely ignored; only you and Jan expressed "the hope" that the development could stay below 150 feet, when the Council could have easily just said forget it. I remember you said Council wasn't approving anything, which was literally true, but Council missed its best opportunity to change direction. I know that the elevation matter remains an issue, but the City is being pushed hard to allow that change (using Mountainbrook as the justification), and the longer you wait the harder it will be to say no. Likewise for the creek realignment; in my opinion that is a disaster. It has to be engineered and no engineer will do anything less than their E&O insurance will allow. That means a flood control channel with plenty of capacity and that means a big ugly levee that covers over the wetland, which by the way is the lowest elevation on the property. So Froom Creek will have to be made to not run uphill for those last couple of hundred yards. Very clever. From your e-mail it appears that you are ready to go ahead, and I am sorry to hear that. Perhaps there might at least be a requirement for some kind of public presentations at suitable points along the way. Except for the two presentations last year I referred to (which didn't go well for the project sponsors), there has been no real publicity or opportunity to comment on or even find out what was going on. There may have been some changes I am not aware of, but it sure seemed like the project sponsors had their plan and were going to push it as hard as they could, and I have seen nothing to make me change that opinion. Sincerely, Neil -----Original Message----- From: Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> To: neilhavlik <neilhavlik@aol.com> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Lichtig, Katie <klichtig@slocity.org> Sent: Mon, Jul 3, 2017 12:16 pm Subject: Re: Consent Agenda Item Thanks, Neil, for your input. Respectfully, I would not characterize the Council's previous conceptual feedback (not action) to the applicants the way you do, but I understand the gist of your concerns. I personally do not see the problem with actually getting a full environmental analysis of the proposal; I think it would only bolster your concerns, a number of which I continue to share and as I expressed during the previous Council hearing. I do know that staff has continued to hear from me, at least, the great concern regarding the city's 150-foot height limit, and has continued to pass these types of concerns to the applicant, who can choose at this stage to keep all options open or not, as the case may be. Thanks again for taking the time to write, Carlyn 25624 Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11:46 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25625 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:neilhavlik@aol.com Cc:Codron, Michael; Lichtig, Katie Subject:Re: Consent Agenda Item Date:Monday, July 3, 2017 12:16:36 PM Thanks, Neil, for your input. Respectfully, I would not characterize the Council's previous conceptual feedback (not action) to the applicants the way you do, but I understand the gist of your concerns. I personally do not see the problem with actually getting a full environmental analysis of the proposal; I think it would only bolster your concerns, a number of which I continue to share and as I expressed during the previous Council hearing. I do know that staff has continued to hear from me, at least, the great concern regarding the city's 150-foot height limit, and has continued to pass these types of concerns to the applicant, who can choose at this stage to keep all options open or not, as the case may be. Thanks again for taking the time to write, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11:46 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25626 From:Grigsby, Daryl To:Nelson, Brian Cc:Hudson, Jake; Fukushima, Adam Subject:RE: froom ranch and LOVR Date:Monday, July 3, 2017 11:39:25 AM Attachments:image001.png Oh – and – are we saying we will have 10’ vehicle lanes, 5’ bike w a 2’ buffer? Revolutionary!! From: Nelson, Brian Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:48 AM To: Grigsby, Daryl <dgrigsby@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: RE: froom ranch and LOVR Hi Daryl, We will have 5’ bike lanes with 2-3’ bike lane buffers in both directions on along LOVR including the Froom Ranch area. In heavier vehicle/bike conflict areas we are installing green bike lanes, such as the bike lanes leading up to the LOVR & Madonna intersection. Brian Nelson, PE Engineer II Public Works 805.781.7113 slocity.org From: Grigsby, Daryl Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00 PM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org> Subject: froom ranch and LOVR So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 25627 E dgrigsby@slocity.org T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25628 From:Grigsby, Daryl To:Nelson, Brian Cc:Hudson, Jake; Fukushima, Adam Subject:RE: froom ranch and LOVR Date:Monday, July 3, 2017 11:38:40 AM Attachments:image001.png Thanks very helpful From: Nelson, Brian Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:48 AM To: Grigsby, Daryl <dgrigsby@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: RE: froom ranch and LOVR Hi Daryl, We will have 5’ bike lanes with 2-3’ bike lane buffers in both directions on along LOVR including the Froom Ranch area. In heavier vehicle/bike conflict areas we are installing green bike lanes, such as the bike lanes leading up to the LOVR & Madonna intersection. Brian Nelson, PE Engineer II Public Works 805.781.7113 slocity.org From: Grigsby, Daryl Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00 PM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org> Subject: froom ranch and LOVR So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E dgrigsby@slocity.org 25629 T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25630 From:Grigsby, Daryl To:Hudson, Jake; Nelson, Brian Cc:Fukushima, Adam Subject:RE: froom ranch and LOVR Date:Monday, July 3, 2017 11:35:53 AM Attachments:image001.png Jake is the motion he refers to something he would make at the SLR july 5 meeting? From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:56 AM To: Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org>; Grigsby, Daryl <dgrigsby@slocity.org> Cc: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: RE: froom ranch and LOVR Beyond the paving project the San Luis Ranch Development Project has mitigation to complete class I connections up to this intersection both on the Froom and Madonna Approaches…also I met with Dan Rivoire and he is planning on making a motion to have the intersection designed with bicycle protection which I would support. http://www.protectedintersection.com/ From: Nelson, Brian Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:48 AM To: Grigsby, Daryl <dgrigsby@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: RE: froom ranch and LOVR Hi Daryl, We will have 5’ bike lanes with 2-3’ bike lane buffers in both directions on along LOVR including the Froom Ranch area. In heavier vehicle/bike conflict areas we are installing green bike lanes, such as the bike lanes leading up to the LOVR & Madonna intersection. Brian Nelson, PE Engineer II Public Works 805.781.7113 slocity.org From: Grigsby, Daryl Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00 PM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org> Subject: froom ranch and LOVR So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear 25631 about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E dgrigsby@slocity.org T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25632 From:Harmon, Heidi To:neilhavlik@aol.com Subject:Re: Consent Agenda Item Date:Sunday, July 2, 2017 7:28:52 PM Thank you for this Neil. You have given me much to think about. I appreciate you reaching out. From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11:46 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25633 From:Harmon, Heidi To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Fw: Consent Agenda Item Date:Sunday, July 2, 2017 7:27:44 PM Attachments:Froom letter.doc Please print From: neilhavlik@aol.com <neilhavlik@aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11 PM To: E-mail Council Website Subject: Consent Agenda Item Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25634 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan & Technical Studies Date:Saturday, July 1, 2017 2:34:56 PM Attachments:RE_ Froom Ranch Technical Studies List.pdf Hi Shawna - see the link below for the updated set of Froom Ranch technical studies. I believe we agreed to update the list in the RFP and upload the studies to the City’s website before circulating the RFP on July 6th. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:56 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan & Technical Studies Hi Emily, Here is a link to three of the technical studies that are highlighted in the attached PDF: Click the following link to download your file(s). Click to Retrieve File(s) 2017_06_12 Froom Transportation Report.pdf 2017_06_28 Froom Transportation Appendices.pdf SL09734-1 REVISED APRIL 2017 Froom Eng Geo.pdf SL09734-2 Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map Madonna Froom.pdf Most of the remainder of the technical studies that you have not received before should be completed within the next week. We are also working with First Carbon Solutions on some updates to the pre-historic and historic reports. Because these reports will be updated, we do not want the 2015 versions to be placed online for consultants to review and create confusion. Similarly, the Engineering Geology Report has been updated so the attached version is the correct one to post. We are also working on updates to the Specific Plan to respond to the City’s last list of completeness items and hope to submit it to you soon. I will be out of the office on Monday, but will be back on Wednesday. Let’s touch base on Wednesday before the Council meeting. 25635 Thanks, and have a good weekend. Happy Fourth of July! Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25636 From:Jennifer Whittle To:Rivoire, Dan Subject:Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Friday, June 30, 2017 3:56:07 PM   25637     Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600  C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016   25638 From:neilhavlik@aol.com To:E-mail Council Website Subject:Consent Agenda Item Date:Friday, June 30, 2017 2:11:54 PM Attachments:Froom letter.doc Greetings Councilmembers: Please include the attached correspondence in your deliberations on the matter of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP. Thank you. Neil Havlik 25639 From:Jennifer Whittle To:Harmon, Heidi Subject:Villaggio Information Center Grand Opening Event July 14 Date:Friday, June 30, 2017 1:56:10 PM 25640     Jennifer Whittle Associate Director, Public Relations LAVIDGE  P 480 998 2600  C 480 236 2761 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016   25641 From:Glenn D. Marshall To:Schwartz, Luke Cc:melissa.streder_dot.ca.gov; Dave Flynn; Michelle Matson; Michael Britton; Edward Reading Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:58:50 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png RFP Froom Ranch TIS 20170411[1].docx Luke,   For County Public Works purposes, please consider including intersection study of LOVR at Foothill Blvd.; and roadway segment analysis of Higuera St from the City limits southerly to US 101, and of Tank Farm Rd between Higuera St and SR 227.   Also consider requiring the report address: 1. A roadway/intersection collision evaluation for each study intersection and roadway segment in the County (and City if so desired). 2. Recommended mitigation measures for identified project impacts.   Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City’s RFP.   -Glenn   Glenn D Marshall Development Services Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo
Tel: (805) 781-1596 | An APWA Accredited Agency 
Website | Twitter | Map     From: "Schwartz, Luke" <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Melissa Streder <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>, "Glenn D. Marshall" <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. 25642 If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25643 From:Hill, Robert To:Emily Creel; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Hannula, Hal; Hudson, Jake Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - follow up Date:Thursday, June 29, 2017 5:05:34 PM Attachments:image001.png image003.png Thanks, Emily. Yes, I’ll throw together some overlays for us to look at tomorrow. Till then, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 4:05 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Bob – I think you mentioned that you could pull these shape files up on your computer, so I am forwarding the link Pam sent. See you all tomorrow. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 25644 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:26 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Emily, Here is the link to the shape files that your previously requested: Click the following link to download your file(s). Click to Retrieve File(s) I’ll be in touch soon with additional links to new and updated technical reports. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:48 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Pam – One item I forgot to mention in our meeting today… We are setting up an internal meeting to further discuss Public Works (Transportation)’s interest in extending the bike path through to Calle Joaquin. As discussed at our meeting, they understand this may not be feasible due to challenges at the site, but they consider it an ideal connection and want to explore potential options before dropping the idea all together. Can you please provide shape files / GIS data of the site constraints and proposed site plan to facilitate this discussion as discussed at our Completeness Review #2 meeting? Thank you. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 25645 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25646 From:Hill, Robert To:Emily Creel; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Hannula, Hal; Hudson, Jake Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - follow up Date:Thursday, June 29, 2017 5:05:29 PM Attachments:image001.png image003.png Thanks, Emily. Yes, I’ll throw together some overlays for us to look at tomorrow. Till then, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 4:05 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Bob – I think you mentioned that you could pull these shape files up on your computer, so I am forwarding the link Pam sent. See you all tomorrow. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 25647 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:26 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Emily, Here is the link to the shape files that your previously requested: Click the following link to download your file(s). Click to Retrieve File(s) I’ll be in touch soon with additional links to new and updated technical reports. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:48 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Pam – One item I forgot to mention in our meeting today… We are setting up an internal meeting to further discuss Public Works (Transportation)’s interest in extending the bike path through to Calle Joaquin. As discussed at our meeting, they understand this may not be feasible due to challenges at the site, but they consider it an ideal connection and want to explore potential options before dropping the idea all together. Can you please provide shape files / GIS data of the site constraints and proposed site plan to facilitate this discussion as discussed at our Completeness Review #2 meeting? Thank you. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 25648 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25649 From:Emily Creel To:Hill, Robert; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Hannula, Hal; Hudson, Jake Subject:FW: Froom Ranch - follow up Date:Thursday, June 29, 2017 4:05:12 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Bob – I think you mentioned that you could pull these shape files up on your computer, so I am forwarding the link Pam sent. See you all tomorrow. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:26 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Emily, Here is the link to the shape files that your previously requested: Click the following link to download your file(s). Click to Retrieve File(s) I’ll be in touch soon with additional links to new and updated technical reports. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:48 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - follow up 25650 Hi Pam – One item I forgot to mention in our meeting today… We are setting up an internal meeting to further discuss Public Works (Transportation)’s interest in extending the bike path through to Calle Joaquin. As discussed at our meeting, they understand this may not be feasible due to challenges at the site, but they consider it an ideal connection and want to explore potential options before dropping the idea all together. Can you please provide shape files / GIS data of the site constraints and proposed site plan to facilitate this discussion as discussed at our Completeness Review #2 meeting? Thank you. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25651 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - follow up Date:Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:26:15 PM Attachments:image003.png Hi Emily, Here is the link to the shape files that your previously requested: Click the following link to download your file(s). Click to Retrieve File(s) I’ll be in touch soon with additional links to new and updated technical reports. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:48 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - follow up Hi Pam – One item I forgot to mention in our meeting today… We are setting up an internal meeting to further discuss Public Works (Transportation)’s interest in extending the bike path through to Calle Joaquin. As discussed at our meeting, they understand this may not be feasible due to challenges at the site, but they consider it an ideal connection and want to explore potential options before dropping the idea all together. Can you please provide shape files / GIS data of the site constraints and proposed site plan to facilitate this discussion as discussed at our Completeness Review #2 meeting? Thank you. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 25652 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25653 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Michelle Matson Cc:Edward Reading Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:46:00 AM Attachments:RFP Froom Ranch TIS 20170411.docx image002.png image001.png Attached. Thank you Michelle. Let me know if you have any questions. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Michelle Matson [mailto:mmatson@co.slo.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:23 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Luke, I can comment in Glenn’s absence. Please forward the original attachment which did not make it when forwarding the email. Sincerely, Michelle Matson Traffic Engineer Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map 25654 From: Edward Reading Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:05 AM To: Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us> Cc: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Hi Michelle, Can you take a look at this for Luke? Thanks, Ed Edward M. Reading, PLS County Surveyor San Luis Obispo County Public Works Department Phone: (805) 781-5265 From: Schwartz, Luke [mailto:LSchwartz@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:38 PM To: Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Ed, I got a kick-back from Glenn Marshall’s email. See message below directed to him and let me know if someone else is able to review. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:35 PM To: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; 'gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us' 25655 <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25656 From:Michelle Matson To:Schwartz, Luke Cc:Edward Reading Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:23:04 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png Luke,   I can comment in Glenn’s absence. Please forward the original attachment which did not make it when forwarding the email.     Sincerely,     Michelle Matson   Traffic Engineer   Public Works, County of San Luis Obispo Tel: (805) 788-2830 | An APWA Accredited Agency Website | Twitter | Map         From: Edward Reading  Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:05 AM To: Michelle Matson <mmatson@co.slo.ca.us> Cc: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review   Hi Michelle, Can you take a look at this for Luke? Thanks, Ed Edward M. Reading, PLS County Surveyor San Luis Obispo County Public Works Department Phone: (805) 781-5265     From: Schwartz, Luke [mailto:LSchwartz@slocity.org]  Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:38 PM To: Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> 25657 Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review   Ed, I got a kick-back from Glenn Marshall’s email. See message below directed to him and let me know if someone else is able to review. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke  Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:35 PM To: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; 'gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us' <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review   Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III 25658 Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25659 From:Hudson, Jake To:Nelson, Brian; Grigsby, Daryl Cc:Fukushima, Adam Subject:RE: froom ranch and LOVR Date:Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:55:49 AM Attachments:image001.png Beyond the paving project the San Luis Ranch Development Project has mitigation to complete class I connections up to this intersection both on the Froom and Madonna Approaches…also I met with Dan Rivoire and he is planning on making a motion to have the intersection designed with bicycle protection which I would support. http://www.protectedintersection.com/ From: Nelson, Brian Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:48 AM To: Grigsby, Daryl <dgrigsby@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: RE: froom ranch and LOVR Hi Daryl, We will have 5’ bike lanes with 2-3’ bike lane buffers in both directions on along LOVR including the Froom Ranch area. In heavier vehicle/bike conflict areas we are installing green bike lanes, such as the bike lanes leading up to the LOVR & Madonna intersection. Brian Nelson, PE Engineer II Public Works 805.781.7113 slocity.org From: Grigsby, Daryl Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00 PM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org> Subject: froom ranch and LOVR So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works 25660 Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E dgrigsby@slocity.org T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25661 From:Hudson, Jake To:Nelson, Brian; Grigsby, Daryl Cc:Fukushima, Adam Subject:RE: froom ranch and LOVR Date:Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:55:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Beyond the paving project the San Luis Ranch Development Project has mitigation to complete class I connections up to this intersection both on the Froom and Madonna Approaches…also I met with Dan Rivoire and he is planning on making a motion to have the intersection designed with bicycle protection which I would support. http://www.protectedintersection.com/ From: Nelson, Brian Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:48 AM To: Grigsby, Daryl <dgrigsby@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Subject: RE: froom ranch and LOVR Hi Daryl, We will have 5’ bike lanes with 2-3’ bike lane buffers in both directions on along LOVR including the Froom Ranch area. In heavier vehicle/bike conflict areas we are installing green bike lanes, such as the bike lanes leading up to the LOVR & Madonna intersection. Brian Nelson, PE Engineer II Public Works 805.781.7113 slocity.org From: Grigsby, Daryl Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00 PM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org> Subject: froom ranch and LOVR So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works 25662 Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E dgrigsby@slocity.org T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25663 From:Nelson, Brian To:Grigsby, Daryl Cc:Hudson, Jake; Fukushima, Adam Subject:RE: froom ranch and LOVR Date:Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:48:02 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Daryl, We will have 5’ bike lanes with 2-3’ bike lane buffers in both directions on along LOVR including the Froom Ranch area. In heavier vehicle/bike conflict areas we are installing green bike lanes, such as the bike lanes leading up to the LOVR & Madonna intersection. Brian Nelson, PE Engineer II Public Works 805.781.7113 slocity.org From: Grigsby, Daryl Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00 PM To: Fukushima, Adam <AFukushima@slocity.org> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Nelson, Brian <BNelson@slocity.org> Subject: froom ranch and LOVR So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E dgrigsby@slocity.org T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25664 From:Edward Reading To:Michelle Matson Cc:Schwartz, Luke Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:05:08 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Michelle, Can you take a look at this for Luke? Thanks, Ed Edward M. Reading, PLS County Surveyor San Luis Obispo County Public Works Department Phone: (805) 781-5265 From: Schwartz, Luke [mailto:LSchwartz@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:38 PM To: Edward Reading <ereading@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Ed, I got a kick-back from Glenn Marshall’s email. See message below directed to him and let me know if someone else is able to review. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:35 PM To: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; 'gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us' <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review 25665 Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25666 From:Schwartz, Luke To:ereading@co.slo.ca.us Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:37:00 PM Attachments:RFP Froom Ranch TIS 20170411.docx image001.png Ed, I got a kick-back from Glenn Marshall’s email. See message below directed to him and let me know if someone else is able to review. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:35 PM To: Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov>; 'gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us' <gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz 25667 Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25668 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Streder, Melissa@DOT; gdmarshall@co.slo.ca.us Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Scope Review Date:Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:35:00 PM Attachments:RFP Froom Ranch TIS 20170411.docx image001.png Melissa & Glenn, We are preparing to release an RFP to procure a consultant to prepare a Transportation Impact Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, which will propose development of the area west of Los Osos Valley Road and north of Calle Joaquin in The City of SLO. We hope to have a consultant selected in August to begin work alongside the project EIR consultant team this fall. Before releasing the RFP, I’d like to give the County and Caltrans the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope of work for the traffic study (see attached). Please feel free to forward to others in your organizations for review, as appropriate. If you have any questions or would like to submit formal comments/edits to the scope of work, I ask that you please send them to me by Monday, July 17th. Regards, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org 25669 From:Grigsby, Daryl To:Fukushima, Adam Cc:Hudson, Jake; Nelson, Brian Subject:froom ranch and LOVR Date:Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00:31 PM Attachments:image001.png So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E dgrigsby@slocity.org T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25670 From:Grigsby, Daryl To:Fukushima, Adam Cc:Hudson, Jake; Nelson, Brian Subject:froom ranch and LOVR Date:Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:00:11 PM Attachments:image001.png So last time I was in a coffee shop (a rare occurrence) I ran into the bike slo county and the slo bike club leaders conspiring over coffee. We had a nice chat and they were glad to hear about the bike improvements planned for lovr/Madonna paving project. They did ask if anything special was contemplated for froom ranch and lovr intersection as they saw that as a problem area. Any plans u guys had for that intersection? Daryl Grigsby Director of Public Works Public Works 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E dgrigsby@slocity.org T 805.781.7207 C 805.431.2733 slocity.org 25671 From:Webb, Donre To:Purrington, Teresa Subject:RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 3:19:00 PM You got it J. Thanks! Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:46 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Yes please and thank you. From: Webb, Donre Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:24 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi again, Do you need this in color? Is it going in a Council report? Thank you, Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org 25672 From: Davidson, Doug Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:09 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Please follow up on request from Clerk’s office. The April 5th highlighted meeting is a Council Agenda report and the minutes associated with that item. Thanks From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi, Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington 25673 Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25674 From:Purrington, Teresa To:Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 2:46:30 PM Yes please and thank you. From: Webb, Donre Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:24 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi again, Do you need this in color? Is it going in a Council report? Thank you, Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Davidson, Doug Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:09 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Please follow up on request from Clerk’s office. The April 5th highlighted meeting is a Council Agenda report and the minutes associated with that item. Thanks From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi, 25675 Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25676 From:Cox, Rebecca To:Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 2:23:32 PM Great- thank you for following up on that! From: Webb, Donre Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:18 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch I just spoke with Teresa, and I will be printing the document from the website to provide them a hard copy by tomorrow. Thank you, Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Davidson, Doug Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:09 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Please follow up on request from Clerk’s office. The April 5th highlighted meeting is a Council Agenda report and the minutes associated with that item. Thanks From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi, 25677 Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25678 From:Webb, Donre To:Purrington, Teresa Subject:FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 2:23:00 PM Hi again, Do you need this in color? Is it going in a Council report? Thank you, Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Davidson, Doug Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:09 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Please follow up on request from Clerk’s office. The April 5th highlighted meeting is a Council Agenda report and the minutes associated with that item. Thanks From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi, Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online 25679 AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25680 From:Davidson, Doug To:Webb, Donre Subject:RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 2:18:12 PM Thanks From: Webb, Donre Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:18 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch I just spoke with Teresa, and I will be printing the document from the website to provide them a hard copy by tomorrow. Thank you, Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Davidson, Doug Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:09 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Please follow up on request from Clerk’s office. The April 5th highlighted meeting is a Council Agenda report and the minutes associated with that item. Thanks From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi, 25681 Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25682 From:Webb, Donre To:Davidson, Doug Cc:Cox, Rebecca Subject:RE: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 2:17:00 PM I just spoke with Teresa, and I will be printing the document from the website to provide them a hard copy by tomorrow. Thank you, Donre Webb Administrative Assistant II Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org From: Davidson, Doug Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:09 PM To: Webb, Donre <DWebb@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Please follow up on request from Clerk’s office. The April 5th highlighted meeting is a Council Agenda report and the minutes associated with that item. Thanks From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi, Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online 25683 AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25684 From:Davidson, Doug To:Webb, Donre Cc:Cox, Rebecca Subject:FW: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 2:09:23 PM Attachments:image001.png Please follow up on request from Clerk’s office. The April 5th highlighted meeting is a Council Agenda report and the minutes associated with that item. Thanks From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06 PM To: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Cc: Cox, Rebecca <rcox@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Hi, Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington 25685 Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25686 From:Purrington, Teresa To:Davidson, Doug Cc:Cox, Rebecca Subject:Consent 1714 - FROOM Ranch Date:Monday, June 26, 2017 2:06:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi, Since Shawna is out of the office can someone from your office please print the highlighted document below and provide to the Clerk’s office. Thanks Click here to Review online AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE PROPOSED FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ENTITLEMENTS (SPEC-0143-2017; 12165 AND 12393 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 INFORMATION Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: 07/05/2017 04:30 PM - City Council - Regular Meeting Teresa Purrington Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org 25687 T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 25688 From:Emily Creel To:Purrington, Teresa Subject:RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 1:15:27 PM Attachments:image001.png Ok, great. Thank you! Have a great weekend! Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 1:13 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan That worked. I just finished reviewing it for the clerk’s office. Thank you for doing such a great job on the report. I didn’t have to make a single edit. Have a great weekend. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:39 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Ok – I am out entirely. Sorry for the confusion. Let me know if I can help. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:38 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan 25689 It looked like you have done everything right on our end but the report is still locked. If you can just make sure you are out of the program completely. We will figure it out on our end. Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:34 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan No – I’ve saved and approved it (I’m signed in as Shawna). Am I missing a step? Do I need to close it or something? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:32 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, Minute Trak is showing that the report is locked by Shawna. Are you still working on the report? Thanks, Teresa From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:26 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 9:06 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Gallagher, Carrie <CGallagher@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan 25690 Stage #5 of this Consent has been Reviewed by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: City Clerk. Comment: Approved by Emily Creel, Contract Planner. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25691 From:Purrington, Teresa To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 1:12:00 PM Attachments:image001.png That worked. I just finished reviewing it for the clerk’s office. Thank you for doing such a great job on the report. I didn’t have to make a single edit. Have a great weekend. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:39 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Ok – I am out entirely. Sorry for the confusion. Let me know if I can help. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:38 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan It looked like you have done everything right on our end but the report is still locked. If you can just make sure you are out of the program completely. We will figure it out on our end. Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:34 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan No – I’ve saved and approved it (I’m signed in as Shawna). Am I missing a step? Do I need to close it or something? Emily Creel 25692 Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:32 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, Minute Trak is showing that the report is locked by Shawna. Are you still working on the report? Thanks, Teresa From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:26 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 9:06 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Gallagher, Carrie <CGallagher@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Stage #5 of this Consent has been Reviewed by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: City Clerk. Comment: Approved by Emily Creel, Contract Planner. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development 25693 Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25694 From:Emily Creel To:Purrington, Teresa Subject:RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 12:39:25 PM Attachments:image001.png Ok – I am out entirely. Sorry for the confusion. Let me know if I can help. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:38 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan It looked like you have done everything right on our end but the report is still locked. If you can just make sure you are out of the program completely. We will figure it out on our end. Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:34 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan No – I’ve saved and approved it (I’m signed in as Shawna). Am I missing a step? Do I need to close it or something? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:32 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan 25695 Hi Emily, Minute Trak is showing that the report is locked by Shawna. Are you still working on the report? Thanks, Teresa From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:26 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 9:06 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Gallagher, Carrie <CGallagher@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Stage #5 of this Consent has been Reviewed by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: City Clerk. Comment: Approved by Emily Creel, Contract Planner. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 25696 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25697 From:Purrington, Teresa To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 12:37:00 PM Attachments:image001.png It looked like you have done everything right on our end but the report is still locked. If you can just make sure you are out of the program completely. We will figure it out on our end. Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:34 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan No – I’ve saved and approved it (I’m signed in as Shawna). Am I missing a step? Do I need to close it or something? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:32 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, Minute Trak is showing that the report is locked by Shawna. Are you still working on the report? Thanks, Teresa From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:26 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 9:06 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Gallagher, 25698 Carrie <CGallagher@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Stage #5 of this Consent has been Reviewed by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: City Clerk. Comment: Approved by Emily Creel, Contract Planner. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25699 From:Emily Creel To:Purrington, Teresa Subject:RE: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 12:34:31 PM Attachments:image001.png No – I’ve saved and approved it (I’m signed in as Shawna). Am I missing a step? Do I need to close it or something? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Purrington, Teresa [mailto:TPurrington@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:32 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, Minute Trak is showing that the report is locked by Shawna. Are you still working on the report? Thanks, Teresa From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:26 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 9:06 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Gallagher, Carrie <CGallagher@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Stage #5 of this Consent has been Reviewed by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: City Clerk. Comment: Approved by Emily Creel, Contract Planner. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) 25700 ATTACHMENTS c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25701 From:Purrington, Teresa To:ECreel@swca.com Subject:FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 12:31:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, Minute Trak is showing that the report is locked by Shawna. Are you still working on the report? Thanks, Teresa From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:26 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurrington@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 9:06 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Gallagher, Carrie <CGallagher@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Stage #5 of this Consent has been Reviewed by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: City Clerk. Comment: Approved by Emily Creel, Contract Planner. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council 25702 Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25703 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Interested Parties Notice Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 9:33:06 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Consent Agenda Item.msg Hi Shawna – just confirming that 5 of these emails went out this morning to: · Neil Havlik · Dia Hurd · James Lopes · Tim Riley · Victor Pickering An example is attached. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 7:46 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Interested Parties Notice Hi Emily, I simplified this notice a bit (see below), as this will be on the consent agenda (Tyler wanted to make sure folks were not confused). Also, we did not end up mailing postcards; the City Attorney confirmed that postcard notices are not required for consent agenda items. The legal ad will be posted in the Tribune June 23. Thanks, Shawna Hi Emily, On June 23 can you please email the interested parties who only provided an email address? For your information, and if persons ask, the agenda report will be posted on June 27 on the City’s website: http://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-and- 25704 minutes The email body can include the following: ************************************* CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: City Council Meeting Notice – CONSENT AGENDA ITEM What: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis. Address of Application: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road (SPEC-0143-2017). Where: City Hall Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California When: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at ecreel@swca.com or (805) 543-7095 extension 6814. 25705 From:Emily Creel To:Davidson, Doug Cc:Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 23, 2017 9:17:54 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Doug – Finance and Katie Lichtig reviewed the Froom Ranch RFP consent item this morning and had no comments. I have approved it in Minute Traq and sent the following notification email. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: [mailto:/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=85358751409b417a84fe349623a26141-Emily Creel] On Behalf Of Emily Creel Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 9:06 AM To: 'HGoodwin@slocity.org' <HGoodwin@slocity.org>; 'KChristian@slocity.org' <KChristian@slocity.org>; 'CGallagher@slocity.org' <CGallagher@slocity.org> Cc: 'MCodron@slocity.org' <MCodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent 1714 was Reviewed : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Stage #5 of this Consent has been Reviewed by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: City Clerk. Comment: Approved by Emily Creel, Contract Planner. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS c - Council Reading File - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION 25706 Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25707 From:Hill, Robert To:neilhavlik Subject:RE: El Villagio Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 5:28:25 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Neil, Although we have yet to deem the application complete, Planning Staff is asking Council for authorization to issue a RFP for an EIR consultant as a consent item on the 7/5 agenda (which should go live next Tuesday). As part of that RFP package there is a rough draft Initial Study – the idea is that proposing consultants will have sense for the minimum expected. Obviously the Notice of Preparation process etc will follow once the EIR folks are actually on board. Let me know if you want to chat or meet… Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: neilhavlik [mailto:neilhavlik@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 4:51 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: El Villagio Hey Bob hope all is well. Do you have any new information on El Villagio? Especially about the creek realignment? Thanks. Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 25708 From:Rivoire, Dan To:Brett Cross Subject:Re: Thank you for your time today Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 5:04:55 PM Brett, Thank you too. I really appreciated hearing your point of view. The mode shift question about those intersections is a good one. I'll check in with staff about that when I talk to them tomorrow. Have a great Friday and enjoy your weekend. Sincerely, Sincerely, Dan Rivoire Vice Mayor From: Brett Cross Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 10:06 PM Subject: Thank you for your time today To: Rivoire, Dan Cc: E-mail Council Website Dan, A huge thanks for meeting with me today. The conversation was very interesting and productive. Something I just thought about and maybe you can find out because it would be interesting to know. What would the modal split need to be in order to achieve a Level of Service C or D at the effected intersections that are analyzed in the EIR for San Luis Ranch project and cumulative impacts with Avila Ranch and Froom Ranch. Thanks again for meeting to discuss the project. Brett 25709 From:neilhavlik To:Hill, Robert Subject:El Villagio Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 4:51:37 PM Hey Bob hope all is well. Do you have any new information on El Villagio? Especially about the creek realignment? Thanks. Neil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone 25710 From:Sims, Shannon To:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:56:00 PM No, I have not heard back. At this point I would suggest you reach out to Mayor Harmon and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Link to their contact information below: http://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council Thank you! -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:36 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Any word from other Council members? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:15 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Okay. Also, there is one more slight change. Andy Pease is not available to meet with you until after 8/2 because she is recused. With this, is it okay to combine Carlyn and Aaron into the 9:30am meeting (and cancel the 9:00am)? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:14 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Yes please – keep meetings VICTOR MONTGOMERY 25711 Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:07 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, No, I’m sorry. This being, said, did you want to keep the meetings on 7/11? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:52 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, I heard back from some of the Council. We are looking at the week of 7/10. Would the following schedule work? Tuesday, 7/11 (City Hall, Council Office) 9:00 am – Carlyn Christianson and Andy Pease 9:30 am – Aaron Gomez I’m going to suggest you reach out to the Mayor and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Thank you! -Shannon 25712 From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25713 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:36:16 PM Any word from other Council members? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:15 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Okay. Also, there is one more slight change. Andy Pease is not available to meet with you until after 8/2 because she is recused. With this, is it okay to combine Carlyn and Aaron into the 9:30am meeting (and cancel the 9:00am)? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:14 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Yes please – keep meetings VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:07 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, No, I’m sorry. This being, said, did you want to keep the meetings on 7/11? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM 25714 To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:52 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, I heard back from some of the Council. We are looking at the week of 7/10. Would the following schedule work? Tuesday, 7/11 (City Hall, Council Office) 9:00 am – Carlyn Christianson and Andy Pease 9:30 am – Aaron Gomez I’m going to suggest you reach out to the Mayor and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Thank you! -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. 25715 Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25716 From:Sims, Shannon To:Christianson, Carlyn Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 12:14:00 PM Thank you! From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:45 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Poor Andy! Bummer. Anyway, yes I can make it at 9:30 instead, no problem. thx, c. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:16:58 AM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Can we please adjust this slightly and have you meet with Aaron at 9:30am instead? Just found out Andy is recused and therefore not meeting. From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:08 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Let’s put you with Andy at 9:00am here in the Council Office. It’ll only be a half an hour. From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:05 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request 25717 Either one is just fine, let me know, C. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:57:48 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Can you make either 9 or 9:30 on Tuesday, 7/11? From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org 25718 From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25719 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:44:37 AM Poor Andy! Bummer. Anyway, yes I can make it at 9:30 instead, no problem. thx, c. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:16:58 AM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Can we please adjust this slightly and have you meet with Aaron at 9:30am instead? Just found out Andy is recused and therefore not meeting. From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:08 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Let’s put you with Andy at 9:00am here in the Council Office. It’ll only be a half an hour. From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:05 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Either one is just fine, let me know, C. Carlyn Christianson Council Member 25720 City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:57:48 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Can you make either 9 or 9:30 on Tuesday, 7/11? From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request 25721 Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25722 From:Sims, Shannon To:Christianson, Carlyn Subject:FW: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:16:00 AM Can we please adjust this slightly and have you meet with Aaron at 9:30am instead? Just found out Andy is recused and therefore not meeting. From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:08 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn <cchristianson@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Let’s put you with Andy at 9:00am here in the Council Office. It’ll only be a half an hour. From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:05 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Either one is just fine, let me know, C. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:57:48 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Can you make either 9 or 9:30 on Tuesday, 7/11? From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request 25723 Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress 25724 We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25725 From:Sims, Shannon To:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:15:00 AM Okay. Also, there is one more slight change. Andy Pease is not available to meet with you until after 8/2 because she is recused. With this, is it okay to combine Carlyn and Aaron into the 9:30am meeting (and cancel the 9:00am)? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:14 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Yes please – keep meetings VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:07 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, No, I’m sorry. This being, said, did you want to keep the meetings on 7/11? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:52 PM 25726 To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, I heard back from some of the Council. We are looking at the week of 7/10. Would the following schedule work? Tuesday, 7/11 (City Hall, Council Office) 9:00 am – Carlyn Christianson and Andy Pease 9:30 am – Aaron Gomez I’m going to suggest you reach out to the Mayor and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Thank you! -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25727 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:14:28 AM Yes please – keep meetings VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:07 AM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, No, I’m sorry. This being, said, did you want to keep the meetings on 7/11? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:52 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, I heard back from some of the Council. We are looking at the week of 7/10. Would the following schedule work? Tuesday, 7/11 (City Hall, Council Office) 9:00 am – Carlyn Christianson and Andy Pease 25728 9:30 am – Aaron Gomez I’m going to suggest you reach out to the Mayor and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Thank you! -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25729 From:Sims, Shannon To:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:06:00 AM Hi Victor, No, I’m sorry. This being, said, did you want to keep the meetings on 7/11? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:52 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, I heard back from some of the Council. We are looking at the week of 7/10. Would the following schedule work? Tuesday, 7/11 (City Hall, Council Office) 9:00 am – Carlyn Christianson and Andy Pease 9:30 am – Aaron Gomez I’m going to suggest you reach out to the Mayor and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Thank you! -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> 25730 Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25731 From:Brett Cross To:Rivoire, Dan Cc:E-mail Council Website Subject:Thank you for your time today Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 10:06:32 PM Dan, A huge thanks for meeting with me today. The conversation was very interesting and productive. Something I just thought about and maybe you can find out because it would be interesting to know. What would the modal split need to be in order to achieve a Level of Service C or D at the effected intersections that are analyzed in the EIR for San Luis Ranch project and cumulative impacts with Avila Ranch and Froom Ranch. Thanks again for meeting to discuss the project. Brett 25732 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 5:52:27 PM No that schedule is fine with me. Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 5:09:04 PM To: Gomez, Aaron Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Aaron, Carlyn wanted to wait until after 7/5 because of how busy things are so I set these up 7/11. I tried to schedule these 2-2-1 meetings for convenience for RRM by having them consecutive and since they didn’t mention a deadline. Are you interested in working them into your schedule next week instead? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request 25733 Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25734 From:Sims, Shannon To:Gomez, Aaron Subject:FW: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 5:09:00 PM Hi Aaron, Carlyn wanted to wait until after 7/5 because of how busy things are so I set these up 7/11. I tried to schedule these 2-2-1 meetings for convenience for RRM by having them consecutive and since they didn’t mention a deadline. Are you interested in working them into your schedule next week instead? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipal 25735 P: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25736 From:Sims, Shannon To:Pease, Andy Subject:FW: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 5:06:00 PM Hi Andy, Katie had a question about this. Could you please check in with her? Carlyn wanted to wait until after 7/5 because of how busy things are. I tried to schedule these 2-2-1 meetings for convenience for RRM by having them consecutive and since they didn’t mention a deadline. Are you interested in working them into your schedule next week instead? -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you 25737 VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25738 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:37:30 PM No chance for meetings prior to 7/5/2017? VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:52 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, I heard back from some of the Council. We are looking at the week of 7/10. Would the following schedule work? Tuesday, 7/11 (City Hall, Council Office) 9:00 am – Carlyn Christianson and Andy Pease 9:30 am – Aaron Gomez I’m going to suggest you reach out to the Mayor and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Thank you! -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work 25739 for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25740 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Park Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:06:40 PM Attachments:image003.png Thanks Emily; I’ll look this over and probably have some follow-up questions. PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 3:52 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Park Pam, Here is the information I mentioned in our meeting regarding the security plan that will be needed for Froom Ranch. I have also attached the background info (email chain) and examples provided by Michael Codron. Please let me know if you want to discuss this issue further. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Okay, one item we are going to need for the environmental review is a security plan based on CPTED standards. This is something that has come up late in the game for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The Chief is interested in having the City adopt city-wide standards, but at least have supportive policies and programs in the specific plans. Let me know if you need more background or want to discuss. thx From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] 25741 Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:09 PM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Thanks, Michael. I am meeting with the applicant’s team tomorrow afternoon to review completeness comments and the latest revisions to the Park plan to incorporate feedback from the meetings with you and Brian and Shelly. I’ll update you all afterwards. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:17 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Park Just FYI From: Stanwyck, Shelly Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! 25742 Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25743 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Froom Park Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 3:52:22 PM Attachments:image001.png FW Security Plan for Avila Ranch.msg Pam,   Here is the information I mentioned in our meeting regarding the security plan that will be needed for Froom Ranch. I have also attached the background info (email chain) and examples provided by Michael Codron.   Please let me know if you want to discuss this issue further.   Thanks,     Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367   From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org]  Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park   Okay, one item we are going to need for the environmental review is a security plan based on CPTED standards. This is something that has come up late in the game for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The Chief is interested in having the City adopt city-wide standards, but at least have supportive policies and programs in the specific plans. Let me know if you need more background or want to discuss. thx From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com]  Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:09 PM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park   Thanks, Michael. I am meeting with the applicant’s team tomorrow afternoon to review completeness comments and the latest revisions to the Park plan to incorporate feedback from the meetings with you and Brian and Shelly. I’ll update you all afterwards.   Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 25744 P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367   From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org]  Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:17 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Park   Just FYI From: Stanwyck, Shelly  Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park   Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael  Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park   Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 25745 slocity.org 25746 From:Emily Creel To:Schwartz, Luke Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:08:43 AM Attachments:image001.png Here are the updated windows of availability: Monday 10:30-1:30 Thursday 9-10 and 4-5 Friday 1-5 Thanks, Luke! Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Emily Creel Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:09 AM To: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Jake – it looks like we are down to these windows. Are you available during any of these times? Monday 10:30-1:30 Thursday 9-10 and 4-5 Friday 1-5 Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Schwartz, Luke [mailto:LSchwartz@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:02 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25747 Availability noted below. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:59 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi all – Thanks for kicking this off. I have requested shape files / GIS data from Pam. Can you please let me know your availability next week for a meeting on the following days/times? Monday: 8:30 – 1:30 or 3:30 – 5:00 YES Wednesday: 8:30 – 5:00 UNAVAILABLE 1PM-2PM Thursday: 8:30 – 5:00 UNAVAILABLE 11AM-12PM Friday: 8:30 – 11:00 or 1:00 – 5:00 UNAVAILABLE 9AM-12PM Thank you, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:27 PM To: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> 25748 Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Good afternoon, Emily will coordinate with Bob and Luke to set up an internal meeting to discuss this issue, and if anyone else would like to join that discussion, please let Emily know. We do not have the GIS data yet from RRM - Emily will follow-up with Pam. I appreciate the collective input, thanks everyone! Thank you, Shawna From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:32 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill 25749 Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25750 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding 25751 trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25752 Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone 25753 else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25754 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Emily Creel Cc:Hannula, Hal; Scott, Shawna; Hudson, Jake; Hill, Robert Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:02:20 AM Attachments:image001.png Availability noted below. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:59 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi all – Thanks for kicking this off. I have requested shape files / GIS data from Pam. Can you please let me know your availability next week for a meeting on the following days/times? Monday: 8:30 – 1:30 or 3:30 – 5:00 YES Wednesday: 8:30 – 5:00 UNAVAILABLE 1PM-2PM Thursday: 8:30 – 5:00 UNAVAILABLE 11AM-12PM Friday: 8:30 – 11:00 or 1:00 – 5:00 UNAVAILABLE 9AM-12PM Thank you, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 25755 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:27 PM To: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Good afternoon, Emily will coordinate with Bob and Luke to set up an internal meeting to discuss this issue, and if anyone else would like to join that discussion, please let Emily know. We do not have the GIS data yet from RRM - Emily will follow-up with Pam. I appreciate the collective input, thanks everyone! Thank you, Shawna From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:32 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. 25756 Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org 25757 T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM 25758 To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] 25759 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25760 Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25761 From:Hill, Robert To:Emily Creel; Scott, Shawna; Hudson, Jake; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Hannula, Hal Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Wednesday, June 21, 2017 8:36:47 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, I have open at present: Monday 10:30-1:30 Thursday 9-10 and 4-5 Friday all day. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:59 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi all – Thanks for kicking this off. I have requested shape files / GIS data from Pam. Can you please let me know your availability next week for a meeting on the following days/times? Monday: 8:30 – 1:30 or 3:30 – 5:00 Wednesday: 8:30 – 5:00 25762 Thursday: 8:30 – 5:00 Friday: 8:30 – 11:00 or 1:00 – 5:00 Thank you, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:27 PM To: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Good afternoon, Emily will coordinate with Bob and Luke to set up an internal meeting to discuss this issue, and if anyone else would like to join that discussion, please let Emily know. We do not have the GIS data yet from RRM - Emily will follow-up with Pam. I appreciate the collective input, thanks everyone! Thank you, Shawna From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:32 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel 25763 <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz 25764 Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III 25765 Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna 25766 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25767 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25768 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna; Hudson, Jake; Hill, Robert; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Hannula, Hal Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:59:03 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi all – Thanks for kicking this off. I have requested shape files / GIS data from Pam. Can you please let me know your availability next week for a meeting on the following days/times? Monday: 8:30 – 1:30 or 3:30 – 5:00 Wednesday: 8:30 – 5:00 Thursday: 8:30 – 5:00 Friday: 8:30 – 11:00 or 1:00 – 5:00 Thank you, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:27 PM To: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Good afternoon, Emily will coordinate with Bob and Luke to set up an internal meeting to discuss this issue, and if anyone else would like to join that discussion, please let Emily know. We do not have the GIS data yet from RRM - Emily will follow-up with Pam. I appreciate the collective input, thanks everyone! Thank you, Shawna From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:32 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25769 Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25770 Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org 25771 From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz 25772 Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25773 Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25774 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - follow up Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:47:45 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam – One item I forgot to mention in our meeting today… We are setting up an internal meeting to further discuss Public Works (Transportation)’s interest in extending the bike path through to Calle Joaquin. As discussed at our meeting, they understand this may not be feasible due to challenges at the site, but they consider it an ideal connection and want to explore potential options before dropping the idea all together. Can you please provide shape files / GIS data of the site constraints and proposed site plan to facilitate this discussion as discussed at our Completeness Review #2 meeting? Thank you. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25775 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna; Leveille, Brian; Codron, Michael Cc:Stanwyck, Shelly Subject:Froom Ranch meeting to discuss Park concept - debrief Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:38:27 PM Attachments:image001.png Hello – As promised to you all today, I wanted to provide a quick debrief on my meeting with Pam Ricci and Vic Montgomery this afternoon regarding the current park plan/proposal for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. These are the highlights: · They have prepared preliminary designs for 2 alternatives park configuration and are in the process of preparing more complete plans and photo simulations of both alternatives. · Alternative 1 is similar to the concept discussed at recent meetings (5/22/17 with Brian and Michael and 6/5/17 with Shelly and Shawna) and would include relocating and retaining what they have identified as the 3 “key” structures in the historic district (Main Residence, Creamery, and Dairy [Round Nose] Barn). o Existing spacing between the buildings would be maintained at the new location; elevation changes between the buildings would be reduced by approximately 50% to address ADA requirements, but would remain proportionate to existing elevation separation between buildings. o Access/parking has been revised per Shelly’s input to avoid surrounding the park with pavement/access roads. Access would be from the rear of the park (between the park and adjacent residential uses) and would terminate at a cul-de-sac. o The location of the Old Barn would be represented with a footprint or surface paving, but no vertical construction is proposed. o The 3 remaining contributing structures (Bunkhouse, Granary, and Shed Building) and non-contributing structures (Outhouse, Storage Building) would be demolished. · Alternative 2 proposes the same relocation and treatment of historic structures; however, the Main Residence would be zoned and repurposed for commercial use, consistent with adjacent proposed commercial areas. Gennaro’s Italian Restaurant on Marsh Street was given as an example. o This alternative would consolidate park features behind the commercial area, rather than including the separate Main Residence in the corner of the park site; however, the historic view corridor from LOVR and the entryway would be lost. o Additional park area would be gained at the south end (adjacent to proposed residential uses) to achieve the same park acreage. · The applicant is planning on bringing both alternatives back to the CHC for conceptual review on August 28. They are on board to submit plans for both alternatives by July 17 for internal City review in anticipation of the August CHC hearing date. · I briefed them on my conversation with Brian regarding the proposed treatment of the Old Barn and the CHC’s perspective. o Similar to San Luis Ranch, we may be able to address policy consistency of the Specific Plan as a whole, rather than on a specific structure-by-structure basis. This will 25776 provide some flexibility. o However, Froom Ranch has both similarities and differences when compared to San Luis Ranch, and they should not take the approach used in approving San Luis Ranch as a firm indication that a similar approach would be suitable/approvable at Froom Ranch. · The applicant again stated that their goal (and the #1 goal of Robert Chattle, the architectural historian they are working with) is to avoid Class 1 significant impacts. I stated again that this may not be possible, but we agreed it was a worthy goal to strive for. Please let me know if you have any questions on these items or want to discuss them any further. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25777 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Planning Commission Report Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:19:16 PM Attachments:image001.png Lucky you! Getting so many action item boxes checked!! J Thanks for all the afternoon emails. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:01 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Planning Commission Report Hi Emily, I love these cancelled meetings – please find attached my edits on the PC staff report. Nothing major, nothing for you to address. I will forward to Doug early to give him a head start on review if he’d like. Thank you for the good work! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25778 From:Scott, Shawna To:Davidson, Doug Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan PC Agenda Report for review Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:12:08 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Doug, If you wanted to get an early start on review of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Planning Commission Agenda Report (scheduled for July 26), the draft agenda report and Notice of Preparation are available here: T:\Froom Ranch Specific Plan\Public Hearings\PC - NOP Scoping I had Emily use SLR and Avila Ranch reports as examples. I don’t need your comments until July 13 or 14, so feel free to ignore this and I’ll send you the draft again after the Council meeting on July 5th. Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25779 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Planning Commission Report Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:00:00 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch - PC072617_SS.docx image001.png Hi Emily, I love these cancelled meetings – please find attached my edits on the PC staff report. Nothing major, nothing for you to address. I will forward to Doug early to give him a head start on review if he’d like. Thank you for the good work! Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25780 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 3:19:00 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch NOP_062017.doc image001.png Hi Emily, Our afternoon staff meeting was cancelled, so I tinkered a bit with the NOP to add some additional information from the RFP. I thought the additional alternatives information may be helpful for reviewing agencies (see attached). I am just sending this so that you have a copy, no further action needed on your part. Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25781 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 3:05:00 PM Attachments:a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal.docx b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study.docx image001.png Hi Emily, Here are the word docs if I haven’t sent them to you already (these are the same versions as the PDFs in Minute Traq). Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25782 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:30:38 PM Lovely, it'll be fun to be with Andy. :~) Thanks, C. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:08:27 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Let’s put you with Andy at 9:00am here in the Council Office. It’ll only be a half an hour. From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:05 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Either one is just fine, let me know, C. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon 25783 Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:57:48 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Can you make either 9 or 9:30 on Tuesday, 7/11? From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] 25784 Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25785 From:Sims, Shannon To:Christianson, Carlyn Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:08:00 PM Let’s put you with Andy at 9:00am here in the Council Office. It’ll only be a half an hour. From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:05 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Either one is just fine, let me know, C. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:57:48 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Can you make either 9 or 9:30 on Tuesday, 7/11? From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson 25786 Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794 25787 rrmdesign.com 25788 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:04:50 PM Either one is just fine, let me know, C. Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:57:48 PM To: Christianson, Carlyn Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Can you make either 9 or 9:30 on Tuesday, 7/11? From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 25789 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25790 From:Sims, Shannon To:Christianson, Carlyn Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:57:00 PM Can you make either 9 or 9:30 on Tuesday, 7/11? From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] 25791 Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25792 From:Sims, Shannon To:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:51:00 PM Hi Victor, I heard back from some of the Council. We are looking at the week of 7/10. Would the following schedule work? Tuesday, 7/11 (City Hall, Council Office) · 9:00 am – Carlyn Christianson and Andy Pease · 9:30 am – Aaron Gomez I’m going to suggest you reach out to the Mayor and Vice Mayor Rivoire directly. Thank you! -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25793 From:Wiseman, Jenny To:Victor Pickering Subject:RE: RE: Froom Ranch Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:34:26 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Vic, yes that project known as “Froom Ranch” is still moving forward. They are in early planning phases and will be going to the City Council in July to initiate the environmental review process. I would estimate this project has about 12-18 months left before it is approved with another few years after that to begin construction. A life care/retirement housing development is still included in that project with other residential units being built closer to Home Depot. It doesn’t appear the project has an interest list or website yet, I would check back in about 6 months as they move closer to receiving approvals. If you have specific questions on the timeframe, the project planner Shawna Scott can be reached at sscott@slocity.org. Thanks, Jenny Wiseman Acting Housing Programs Manager Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jwiseman@slocity.org T 805.781.7010 slocity.org From: Victor Pickering [mailto:victorpickering20@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 5:40 PM To: Wiseman, Jenny <jwiseman@slocity.org> Subject: Re: RE: Froom Ranch Jenny I am not sure this is the project I was writing about. The one I am interested in is close to the Home Depot on LOVR and was reported to have senior/life care housing as part of the design. Is this one still going on? Thanks, Vic 25794 On Monday, June 19, 2017, 3:55:01 PM PDT, Wiseman, Jenny <jwiseman@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Vic, Thanks for your email. I believe you are referring to the San Luis Ranch project near Madonna Plaza. That project is still under planning review, and is scheduled to appear before the City Council for approval later this summer. The City is not the developer of this project and therefore does not maintain an interest list; you will need to reach out to the developer to see if they have a waiting/interest list. Their information can be found on their website linked below: http://www.sanluisranch.com/ Thank you! Jenny Wiseman Acting Housing Programs Manager Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jwiseman@slocity.org T 805.781.7010 slocity.org From: Victor Pickering [mailto:victorpickering20@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:12 PM To: Wiseman, Jenny <jwiseman@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch 25795 Ms. Wiseman: Some time ago I contacted you regarding the proposed Madonna development south of town. You indicated you would add my name and e- m to the information listing, but I have not received any updates. If you could follow up on that and be sure that I receive information and can be kept in the loop, I would appreciated that. My address is victorpickering20@yahoo.com. Is the the development proceeding? Thank you, Vic Pickering 239-1096 25796 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Hannula, Hal; Hudson, Jake; Hill, Robert Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:31:50 PM Attachments:image001.png Sounds great. Please include Jake Hudson on the invite and add Hal Hanula and Adam Fukushima as optional attendees. Thasnk, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:27 PM To: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Good afternoon, Emily will coordinate with Bob and Luke to set up an internal meeting to discuss this issue, and if anyone else would like to join that discussion, please let Emily know. We do not have the GIS data yet from RRM - Emily will follow-up with Pam. I appreciate the collective input, thanks everyone! Thank you, Shawna From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:32 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25797 Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25798 All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke 25799 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III 25800 Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25801 Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25802 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Hannula, Hal; Hudson, Jake; Hill, Robert Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:31:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Sounds great. Please include Jake Hudson on the invite and add Hal Hanula and Adam Fukushima as optional attendees. Thasnk, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:27 PM To: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Good afternoon, Emily will coordinate with Bob and Luke to set up an internal meeting to discuss this issue, and if anyone else would like to join that discussion, please let Emily know. We do not have the GIS data yet from RRM - Emily will follow-up with Pam. I appreciate the collective input, thanks everyone! Thank you, Shawna From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:32 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25803 Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25804 All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke 25805 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III 25806 Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25807 Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25808 From:Scott, Shawna To:Hudson, Jake; Hill, Robert; Schwartz, Luke; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Hannula, Hal Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:27:07 PM Attachments:image001.png Good afternoon, Emily will coordinate with Bob and Luke to set up an internal meeting to discuss this issue, and if anyone else would like to join that discussion, please let Emily know. We do not have the GIS data yet from RRM - Emily will follow-up with Pam. I appreciate the collective input, thanks everyone! Thank you, Shawna From: Hudson, Jake Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:32 PM To: Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! 25809 Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert 25810 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25811 How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25812 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, 25813 I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25814 From:Hudson, Jake To:Hill, Robert; Schwartz, Luke; Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Hannula, Hal Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:31:32 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks for working on this folks. On transportation’s side we understand that this may not be feasible due to the challenges, many of which I’m sure we are not aware of. However, a good bike/ped connection between the hotels and the SP area would be ideal so we want to explore potential options at a very high level before dropping the idea all together. Thanks, Jake From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke 25815 Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org 25816 T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, 25817 Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> 25818 Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org 25819 T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25820 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch w/ comments for your file Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:04:00 AM Attachments:1714 Discussion_062017.doc image001.png Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25821 From:Hill, Robert To:Schwartz, Luke; Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Hudson, Jake; Hannula, Hal Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:45:45 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Luke, Yes, I’d like the opportunity to meet. I am all for trails and making connections, but there are also some real challenges (both physical and political) with this site. I have ArcView on my machine and can overlay the GIS data as needed. Thanks! Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Hudson, Jake <jhudson@slocity.org>; Hannula, Hal <hhannula@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, 25822 Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III 25823 Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna 25824 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25825 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25826 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Hudson, Jake; Hannula, Hal; Hill, Robert Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:34:46 AM Attachments:image001.png All, Should we schedule an internal meeting to follow up on some of the outstanding items from the FRSP completeness review last week? Particularly, I’d like to discuss the feasibility of extending the pubic path connection through the south end of the plan area to connect with the adjacent street/bike network. The applicant was supposed to share their GIS mapping of the wetlands constraints, correct? It would be helpful to have that available to guide the discussion. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:11 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org 25827 T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, 25828 Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> 25829 Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org 25830 T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25831 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Interested Parties Notice Date:Tuesday, June 20, 2017 7:46:00 AM Hi Emily, I simplified this notice a bit (see below), as this will be on the consent agenda (Tyler wanted to make sure folks were not confused). Also, we did not end up mailing postcards; the City Attorney confirmed that postcard notices are not required for consent agenda items. The legal ad will be posted in the Tribune June 23. Thanks, Shawna   Hi Emily,   On June 23 can you please email the interested parties who only provided an email address?    For your information, and if persons ask, the agenda report will be posted on June 27 on the City’s website:  http://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-and- minutes     The email body can include the following:   ************************************* CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: City Council Meeting Notice – CONSENT AGENDA ITEM What: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis.                   Address of Application: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road (SPEC-0143-2017). Where: City Hall Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California When:    Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 6:00 p.m.   If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at ecreel@swca.com or (805) 543-7095 extension 6814.   25832 From:Pease, Andy To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 9:39:04 PM Happy to meet, thanks. Andy Andy Pease Council Member City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E apease@slocity.org slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. 25833 Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25834 From:Victor Pickering To:Wiseman, Jenny Subject:Re: RE: Froom Ranch Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 5:43:41 PM Attachments:image001.png Jenny I am not sure this is the project I was writing about. The one I am interested in is close to the Home Depot on LOVR and was reported to have senior/life care housing as part of the design. Is this one still going on? Thanks, Vic On Monday, June 19, 2017, 3:55:01 PM PDT, Wiseman, Jenny <jwiseman@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Vic, Thanks for your email. I believe you are referring to the San Luis Ranch project near Madonna Plaza. That project is still under planning review, and is scheduled to appear before the City Council for approval later this summer. The City is not the developer of this project and therefore does not maintain an interest list; you will need to reach out to the developer to see if they have a waiting/interest list. Their information can be found on their website linked below: http://www.sanluisranch.com/ Thank you! Jenny Wiseman Acting Housing Programs Manager Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jwiseman@slocity.org 25835 T 805.781.7010 slocity.org From: Victor Pickering [mailto:victorpickering20@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:12 PM To: Wiseman, Jenny <jwiseman@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Ms. Wiseman: Some time ago I contacted you regarding the proposed Madonna development south of town. You indicated you would add my name and e- m to the information listing, but I have not received any updates. If you could follow up on that and be sure that I receive information and can be kept in the loop, I would appreciated that. My address is victorpickering20@yahoo.com. Is the the development proceeding? Thank you, Vic Pickering 239-1096 25836 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 4:43:16 PM Attachments:image001.png Great – thanks, Shawna. Assuming there would be a similar requirement for the privately-maintained LPC portion of the site, it seems like two plans could be necessary and/or the plan would have to address the two areas separately. I agree that NOP circulation would be a good time to follow up on this issue. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:26 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan FYI – and I removed the attachment for this forward (it was the recent specific plan document). From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 12:28 PM To: Cantrell, Deanna <DCantrell@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Dear Chief Cantrell: I am the CDD project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. In brief, this specific plan area is located adjacent to Los Osos Valley Road and the Home Depot/Costco shopping center. This area is identified as Specific Plan Area 3 (Madonna on LOVR) in the City’s Land Use Element, and consists of approximately 110 acres within the City’s Sphere of Influence, which the General Plan anticipates would be annexed in to the City following several entitlement reviews and completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process. The applicant, John Madonna, has submitted an administrative draft specific plan prepared by RRM Design Group for City review (please see the attached document). The application 25837 has not yet been deemed complete, and the request for proposals to prepare an EIR initiation request will be considered by the City Council in July 5, 2017. As described in the attached document, anticipated development generally includes: · Villaggio Life Plan Community, including independent living, assisted living, memory care/skilled nursing beds, recreational facility, restaurants, and theaters (this community would be private and gated); · Multi-family housing; · Commercial retail uses; · 120-room hotel; and · Neighborhood/trailhead park with connections to the Irish Hills Natural Area. CDD discussions with the City Fire Department (Rodger Maggio) included topics such as the types and frequency of emergency service calls to Life Plan/Continuing Care Communities. In addition, if the project is approved and the site is annexed into the City, it may result in a population increase within the City limits. At this stage in the process, a Security Plan has not been developed, although the Villaggio representative has discussed the security requirements for these types of facilities (gated entrance, private facility). I would be glad to talk with you more regarding this project, and any issues or concerns that your department may have. I can also set up a meeting with the applicant’s team; let me know what would best facilitate your review and understanding of the project. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25838 From:Sims, Shannon To:Gomez, Aaron Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 4:05:00 PM Okay……..thanks! From: Gomez, Aaron Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:59 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request I'm interested in a meeting. Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress 25839 We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25840 From:Wiseman, Jenny To:Victor Pickering Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 3:54:52 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Vic, Thanks for your email. I believe you are referring to the San Luis Ranch project near Madonna Plaza. That project is still under planning review, and is scheduled to appear before the City Council for approval later this summer. The City is not the developer of this project and therefore does not maintain an interest list; you will need to reach out to the developer to see if they have a waiting/interest list. Their information can be found on their website linked below: http://www.sanluisranch.com/ Thank you! Jenny Wiseman Acting Housing Programs Manager Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jwiseman@slocity.org T 805.781.7010 slocity.org From: Victor Pickering [mailto:victorpickering20@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:12 PM To: Wiseman, Jenny <jwiseman@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Ms. Wiseman: Some time ago I contacted you regarding the proposed Madonna development south of town. You indicated you would add my name and e- m to the information listing, but I have not received any updates. If you could follow up on that and be sure that I receive information and can be kept in the loop, I would appreciated that. My address is victorpickering20@yahoo.com. Is the the development proceeding? 25841 Thank you, Vic Pickering 239-1096 25842 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel; Codron, Michael Subject:RE: Froom Park Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 3:29:28 PM Attachments:image001.png Michael, I sent Chief Cantrell a copy of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan on June 1, and let her know that I can set up a meeting to discuss the project, internally or with the applicant. I have not yet heard anything back (understanding how busy she is). We will also send the Police Department the Notice of Preparation in July, which I am thinking will be a good time to get into the details of what is needed for the securities plan. Thank you for sending us examples of what these plans look like. Thank you, Shawna From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:20 PM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Okay – thanks for the head’s up on this issue. I’ll mention this to the applicant tomorrow and do some research to try and get up to speed. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Okay, one item we are going to need for the environmental review is a security plan based on CPTED standards. This is something that has come up late in the game for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The Chief is interested in having the City adopt city-wide standards, but at least have supportive policies and programs in the specific plans. Let me know if you need more background or want to discuss. thx From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:09 PM 25843 To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Thanks, Michael. I am meeting with the applicant’s team tomorrow afternoon to review completeness comments and the latest revisions to the Park plan to incorporate feedback from the meetings with you and Brian and Shelly. I’ll update you all afterwards. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:17 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Park Just FYI From: Stanwyck, Shelly Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! 25844 Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25845 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 3:26:00 PM Attachments:image001.png FYI – and I removed the attachment for this forward (it was the recent specific plan document). From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 12:28 PM To: Cantrell, Deanna <DCantrell@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Dear Chief Cantrell: I am the CDD project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. In brief, this specific plan area is located adjacent to Los Osos Valley Road and the Home Depot/Costco shopping center. This area is identified as Specific Plan Area 3 (Madonna on LOVR) in the City’s Land Use Element, and consists of approximately 110 acres within the City’s Sphere of Influence, which the General Plan anticipates would be annexed in to the City following several entitlement reviews and completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process. The applicant, John Madonna, has submitted an administrative draft specific plan prepared by RRM Design Group for City review (please see the attached document). The application has not yet been deemed complete, and the request for proposals to prepare an EIR initiation request will be considered by the City Council in July 5, 2017. As described in the attached document, anticipated development generally includes: · Villaggio Life Plan Community, including independent living, assisted living, memory care/skilled nursing beds, recreational facility, restaurants, and theaters (this community would be private and gated); · Multi-family housing; · Commercial retail uses; · 120-room hotel; and · Neighborhood/trailhead park with connections to the Irish Hills Natural Area. CDD discussions with the City Fire Department (Rodger Maggio) included topics such as the types and frequency of emergency service calls to Life Plan/Continuing Care Communities. In addition, if the project is approved and the site is annexed into the City, it may result in a population increase within the City limits. At this stage in the process, a Security Plan has not been developed, although the Villaggio representative has discussed the security requirements for these types of facilities (gated entrance, private facility). I would be glad to talk with you more regarding this project, and any issues or concerns that your department may have. I can also set up a meeting with the applicant’s team; let me know what would best facilitate your review and understanding of the project. 25846 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25847 From:Emily Creel To:Codron, Michael; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Park Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 3:20:12 PM Attachments:image001.png Okay – thanks for the head’s up on this issue. I’ll mention this to the applicant tomorrow and do some research to try and get up to speed. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Okay, one item we are going to need for the environmental review is a security plan based on CPTED standards. This is something that has come up late in the game for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The Chief is interested in having the City adopt city-wide standards, but at least have supportive policies and programs in the specific plans. Let me know if you need more background or want to discuss. thx From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:09 PM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Thanks, Michael. I am meeting with the applicant’s team tomorrow afternoon to review completeness comments and the latest revisions to the Park plan to incorporate feedback from the meetings with you and Brian and Shelly. I’ll update you all afterwards. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:17 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> 25848 Subject: FW: Froom Park Just FYI From: Stanwyck, Shelly Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25849 From:Victor Pickering To:Wiseman, Jenny Subject:Froom Ranch Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 3:16:36 PM Ms. Wiseman: Some time ago I contacted you regarding the proposed Madonna development south of town. You indicated you would add my name and e-m to the information listing, but I have not received any updates. If you could follow up on that and be sure that I receive information and can be kept in the loop, I would appreciated that. My address is victorpickering20@yahoo.com. Is the the development proceeding? Thank you, Vic Pickering 239-1096 25850 From:Codron, Michael To:Emily Creel; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Park Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14:18 PM Attachments:image001.png Okay, one item we are going to need for the environmental review is a security plan based on CPTED standards. This is something that has come up late in the game for San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. The Chief is interested in having the City adopt city-wide standards, but at least have supportive policies and programs in the specific plans. Let me know if you need more background or want to discuss. thx From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:09 PM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Thanks, Michael. I am meeting with the applicant’s team tomorrow afternoon to review completeness comments and the latest revisions to the Park plan to incorporate feedback from the meetings with you and Brian and Shelly. I’ll update you all afterwards. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:17 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Park Just FYI From: Stanwyck, Shelly Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael 25851 Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25852 From:Emily Creel To:Codron, Michael; Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Park Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 3:09:20 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks, Michael. I am meeting with the applicant’s team tomorrow afternoon to review completeness comments and the latest revisions to the Park plan to incorporate feedback from the meetings with you and Brian and Shelly. I’ll update you all afterwards. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Codron, Michael [mailto:mcodron@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:17 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Park Just FYI From: Stanwyck, Shelly Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. 25853 Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25854 From:Sims, Shannon To:Christianson, Carlyn Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 1:57:00 PM Got it! From: Christianson, Carlyn Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23 PM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Council Member Meeting Request Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] 25855 Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25856 From:Codron, Michael To:Cantrell, Deanna; Johnson, Derek Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 1:35:52 PM Attachments:image001.png I don’t think so. We are just at the beginning of the process so we can actually include this in the scope of the environmental review and require the applicant to prepare a more robust security plan. From: Cantrell, Deanna Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 1:08 PM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan I have not looked at this one yet. Do we need to have Bruce look at this one also? D From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 12:29 PM To: Cantrell, Deanna <DCantrell@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Dear Chief Cantrell: I am the CDD project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. In brief, this specific plan area is located adjacent to Los Osos Valley Road and the Home Depot/Costco shopping center. This area is identified as Specific Plan Area 3 (Madonna on LOVR) in the City’s Land Use Element, and consists of approximately 110 acres within the City’s Sphere of Influence, which the General Plan anticipates would be annexed in to the City following several entitlement reviews and completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process. The applicant, John Madonna, has submitted an administrative draft specific plan prepared by RRM Design Group for City review (please see the attached document). The application has not yet been deemed complete, and the request for proposals to prepare an EIR initiation request will be considered by the City Council in July 5, 2017. As described in the attached document, anticipated development generally includes: · Villaggio Life Plan Community, including independent living, assisted living, memory care/skilled nursing beds, recreational facility, restaurants, and theaters (this community would be private and gated); · Multi-family housing; · Commercial retail uses; · 120-room hotel; and · Neighborhood/trailhead park with connections to the Irish Hills Natural Area. 25857 CDD discussions with the City Fire Department (Rodger Maggio) included topics such as the types and frequency of emergency service calls to Life Plan/Continuing Care Communities. In addition, if the project is approved and the site is annexed into the City, it may result in a population increase within the City limits. At this stage in the process, a Security Plan has not been developed, although the Villaggio representative has discussed the security requirements for these types of facilities (gated entrance, private facility). I would be glad to talk with you more regarding this project, and any issues or concerns that your department may have. I can also set up a meeting with the applicant’s team; let me know what would best facilitate your review and understanding of the project. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25858 From:Scott, Shawna To:Cohen, Rachel Subject:Cannon Map (revised ALUP safety zones, not officially adopted) Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 1:34:52 PM Attachments:image001.png Pages from Froom Ranch ALUC letter-4-5-17.pdf Please see attached – I forgot it’s only one of the updated maps so this may not help you any. Perhaps Cannon can provide the full set? Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25859 From:Christianson, Carlyn To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 1:23:21 PM Can't meet before July 5, happy to do so after. Week of July 10 is fabulous, basically wide open and my boss is out of town so work will be light too. :~) Thanks, Carlyn Carlyn Christianson Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cchristianson@slocity.org T 805.781.7122 C 805.550.9320 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 25860 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25861 From:Cantrell, Deanna To:Codron, Michael; Johnson, Derek Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 1:09:06 PM Attachments:froom+ranch+specific+plan_5.10.17.pdf image001.png I have not looked at this one yet. Do we need to have Bruce look at this one also? D From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 12:29 PM To: Cantrell, Deanna <DCantrell@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Dear Chief Cantrell: I am the CDD project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. In brief, this specific plan area is located adjacent to Los Osos Valley Road and the Home Depot/Costco shopping center. This area is identified as Specific Plan Area 3 (Madonna on LOVR) in the City’s Land Use Element, and consists of approximately 110 acres within the City’s Sphere of Influence, which the General Plan anticipates would be annexed in to the City following several entitlement reviews and completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process. The applicant, John Madonna, has submitted an administrative draft specific plan prepared by RRM Design Group for City review (please see the attached document). The application has not yet been deemed complete, and the request for proposals to prepare an EIR initiation request will be considered by the City Council in July 5, 2017. As described in the attached document, anticipated development generally includes: · Villaggio Life Plan Community, including independent living, assisted living, memory care/skilled nursing beds, recreational facility, restaurants, and theaters (this community would be private and gated); · Multi-family housing; · Commercial retail uses; · 120-room hotel; and · Neighborhood/trailhead park with connections to the Irish Hills Natural Area. CDD discussions with the City Fire Department (Rodger Maggio) included topics such as the types and frequency of emergency service calls to Life Plan/Continuing Care Communities. In addition, if the project is approved and the site is annexed into the City, it may result in a population increase within the City limits. At this stage in the process, a Security Plan has not been developed, although the Villaggio representative has discussed the security requirements for these types of facilities (gated entrance, private facility). I would be glad to talk with you more regarding this project, and any issues or concerns that your department may have. I can also set up a meeting with the applicant’s team; let me know what would best facilitate your review and understanding of the project. 25862 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25863 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Sims, Shannon Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 1:03:08 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY Principal From: Sims, Shannon [mailto:ssims@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 12:56 PM To: Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Council Member Meeting Request Hi Victor, I have reached out to Council. I will get back to you once I receive responses. Thank you! Shannon Sims Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ssims@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress 25864 We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25865 From:Sims, Shannon To:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 12:56:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Victor, I have reached out to Council. I will get back to you once I receive responses. Thank you! Shannon Sims Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ssims@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25866 25867 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Re: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 11:59:09 AM I'm interested in a meeting. Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Sims, Shannon Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:02 AM Subject: FW: Council Member Meeting Request Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you 25868 VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25869 From:Sims, Shannon Subject:FW: Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 11:58:05 AM Mayor and Council, Below is a request to meet. Please let me know if you are interested in having me schedule. Thank you! Bcc: Council – All -Shannon From: Montgomery, Victor [mailto:VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27 AM To: Sims, Shannon <ssims@slocity.org> Subject: Council Member Meeting Request Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25870 From:Codron, Michael To:Emily Creel; Scott, Shawna Subject:FW: Froom Park Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 11:16:46 AM Attachments:image001.png Just FYI From: Stanwyck, Shelly Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Park Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25871 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 11:02:49 AM Ok – I’ll call Pam and send an invite for tomorrow morning. Thanks, Shawna. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:01 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Importance: High Hi Emily, I am booked tomorrow afternoon, so you can handle this one. Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:24 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Importance: High Hi Emily, Could we meet to discuss the Planning comments that we did not get to cover Thursday morning? We would also like to discuss the park plan. Would you and Shawna possibly be available Tuesday afternoon? I could reserve a meeting room here at RRM if that is convenient. Please let me know. Thanks. Pam 25872 PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Thank you, Pam. I look forward to talking to you on Monday. Have a great weekend. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:50 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Hi Emily, Here is the updated technical studies list. Prehistoric & Historic Reports by FirstCarbon Solutions dated 2-20-15 (new updates pending) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach by Chattel, Inc. (in progress) Preliminary Department of the Army Jurisdictional Determination letter dated 9-24-15 by Erin Hanlon Froom Ranch Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated August 2015 Biological Resources Inventory prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated January 2016 Froom/Il Villaggio Specific Plan Preliminary Transportation Analysis by Central Coast Transportation Consulting dated June 2017 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 4-14-17 (updated; will 25873 provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 6-28-16 Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map prepared by John Kammer dated 4- 15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures prepared by Stork, Wolfe & Associates (will provide by 6-30- 17) Updated Visual Simulations by Chris Dufour (RRM) (will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations by RRM Design Group dated 6-15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17; report includes geomorphology and preliminary planting concepts and plant list) Water demand & Sewer flows analysis (will provide by 6-30-17) Any new or updated reports not previously sent to you will be provided by June 30, 2017. There may be some lag time with the historical reports, but they will be completed soon after the RFP proposals are mailed out. I am out of the office tomorrow, but back on Monday. Let’s talk then about the Planning comments related to the Specific plan and any questions regarding the technical studies list. Thanks, and have a great weekend. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25874 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 11:01:00 AM Hi Emily, I am booked tomorrow afternoon, so you can handle this one. Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:24 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Importance: High Hi Emily, Could we meet to discuss the Planning comments that we did not get to cover Thursday morning? We would also like to discuss the park plan. Would you and Shawna possibly be available Tuesday afternoon? I could reserve a meeting room here at RRM if that is convenient. Please let me know. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Thank you, Pam. I look forward to talking to you on Monday. Have a great weekend. 25875 Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:50 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Hi Emily, Here is the updated technical studies list. Prehistoric & Historic Reports by FirstCarbon Solutions dated 2-20-15 (new updates pending) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach by Chattel, Inc. (in progress) Preliminary Department of the Army Jurisdictional Determination letter dated 9-24-15 by Erin Hanlon Froom Ranch Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated August 2015 Biological Resources Inventory prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated January 2016 Froom/Il Villaggio Specific Plan Preliminary Transportation Analysis by Central Coast Transportation Consulting dated June 2017 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 4-14-17 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 6-28-16 Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map prepared by John Kammer dated 4- 15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures prepared by Stork, Wolfe & Associates (will provide by 6-30- 17) Updated Visual Simulations by Chris Dufour (RRM) (will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations by RRM Design Group dated 6-15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17; report includes geomorphology and preliminary planting concepts and plant list) Water demand & Sewer flows analysis (will provide by 6-30-17) Any new or updated reports not previously sent to you will be provided by June 30, 2017. There may be some lag time with the historical reports, but they will be completed soon after the RFP proposals are mailed out. I am out of the office tomorrow, but back on Monday. Let’s talk then about the Planning comments related to the Specific plan and any questions regarding the technical studies list. 25876 Thanks, and have a great weekend. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25877 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR for July 5, 2017 Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 11:00:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Sure thing, I don’t have any meetings from 9:00 – 12:00 tomorrow morning. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:50 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR for July 5, 2017 Hi Shawna – are you available to touch base on Froom before you leave? I want to make sure I have all the details in order/on my radar. Would a call tomorrow morning work? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 9:22 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Mattingly, Carrie <cmattingly@slocity.org>; Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR for July 5, 2017 Good morning, I wanted to give you a heads up that I will be out of the office starting June 21 and returning July 5. Emily Creel is the City’s contract project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, and will be addressing comments and finalizing the Council Agenda Report for the July 5 Council meeting. If you have any questions, or if any issues need immediate attention while I am out of the office, please contact Emily directly: Emily Creel Planning Team Lead 25878 SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Email: ecreel@swca.com Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25879 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR for July 5, 2017 Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 10:49:37 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shawna – are you available to touch base on Froom before you leave? I want to make sure I have all the details in order/on my radar. Would a call tomorrow morning work? Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 9:22 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Mattingly, Carrie <cmattingly@slocity.org>; Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR for July 5, 2017 Good morning, I wanted to give you a heads up that I will be out of the office starting June 21 and returning July 5. Emily Creel is the City’s contract project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, and will be addressing comments and finalizing the Council Agenda Report for the July 5 Council meeting. If you have any questions, or if any issues need immediate attention while I am out of the office, please contact Emily directly: Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Email: ecreel@swca.com Thank you, 25880 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25881 From:Stanwyck, Shelly To:Codron, Michael Subject:RE: Froom Park Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 10:44:30 AM Attachments:image001.png Sounds like a plan. The historic plan made sense to me, I suggested that they get that settled before programming/finalling the park plan. The house on a corner separated from the park as part of the park didn’t make the best sense for park requirements. . . . . we can talk more. Thanks. From: Codron, Michael Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 4:18 PM To: Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Park Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25882 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Council Member Meeting Request Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 10:27:16 AM Shannon, we would like to schedule brief meetings with each of the City Council members. The purpose of these meetings is to: 1. Briefly update the Council on the progress of the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project 2. Update the Council on current activities related the Villaggio Life Plan Community and its progress We would appreciate your help arranging these meetings. 30 minutes should be adequate and meeting with 2 council members concurrently is acceptable. Any days other than 6/21 & 6/22 work for us. Thank you VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25883 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna; Jewell, Debbie J. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 10:24:16 AM Hi Emily, Could we meet to discuss the Planning comments that we did not get to cover Thursday morning? We would also like to discuss the park plan. Would you and Shawna possibly be available Tuesday afternoon? I could reserve a meeting room here at RRM if that is convenient. Please let me know. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Thank you, Pam. I look forward to talking to you on Monday. Have a great weekend. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:50 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List 25884 Hi Emily, Here is the updated technical studies list. Prehistoric & Historic Reports by FirstCarbon Solutions dated 2-20-15 (new updates pending) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach by Chattel, Inc. (in progress) Preliminary Department of the Army Jurisdictional Determination letter dated 9-24-15 by Erin Hanlon Froom Ranch Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated August 2015 Biological Resources Inventory prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated January 2016 Froom/Il Villaggio Specific Plan Preliminary Transportation Analysis by Central Coast Transportation Consulting dated June 2017 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 4-14-17 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 6-28-16 Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map prepared by John Kammer dated 4- 15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures prepared by Stork, Wolfe & Associates (will provide by 6-30- 17) Updated Visual Simulations by Chris Dufour (RRM) (will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations by RRM Design Group dated 6-15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17; report includes geomorphology and preliminary planting concepts and plant list) Water demand & Sewer flows analysis (will provide by 6-30-17) Any new or updated reports not previously sent to you will be provided by June 30, 2017. There may be some lag time with the historical reports, but they will be completed soon after the RFP proposals are mailed out. I am out of the office tomorrow, but back on Monday. Let’s talk then about the Planning comments related to the Specific plan and any questions regarding the technical studies list. Thanks, and have a great weekend. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25885 From:Scott, Shawna To:Johnson, Derek; Ansolabehere, Jon Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; Davidson, Doug Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR for July 5, 2017 Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 9:21:43 AM Attachments:image001.png Good morning, I wanted to give you a heads up that I will be out of the office starting June 21 and returning July 5. It looks like Michael and Heather have reviewed the report thus far. Emily Creel is the City’s contract project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, and will be addressing comments and finalizing the Council Agenda Report for the July 5 Council meeting. If you have any questions, or if any issues need immediate attention regarding this project while I am out of the office, please contact Emily directly: Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Email: ecreel@swca.com I am unsure about my cell phone coverage (we’ll be up in the mountains for the most part), but just so you have it, my cell number is 805-748-3498. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25886 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Postcards Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 8:05:42 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Heather, I apologize for the additional effort, but I’ve confirmed with the attorney’s office that this item will NOT need postcards. The legal ad will suffice. I did drop off the postcards on Friday, so I can come pick them up this morning. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25887 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - status report Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 5:42:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, you too! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 5:36 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - status report Hi Shawna – please see attached. Have a great weekend. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25888 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - status report Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 5:36:22 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch - Status Report 06-16-17.xlsx Hi Shawna – please see attached. Have a great weekend. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25889 From:Codron, Michael To:Stanwyck, Shelly Subject:Froom Park Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 4:17:53 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shelly, I wanted to follow up with you regarding your meeting with the applicant regarding the park. I had attended a previous meeting with their historical consultant and I think they have a good concept with respect to the location and orientation of buildings. We didn’t discuss the use of those buildings at all, which I understand was the focus of your meeting. Let’s chat after Agenda Review on Tuesday. Thanks! Michael Codron Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mcodron@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 C 805.540.0767 slocity.org 25890 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Interested Parties Notice Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 11:08:21 AM Sure – thank you, Shawna. I’ll copy you. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 8:07 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Interested Parties Notice Hi Emily, On June 23 can you please email the interested parties who only provided an email address? For your information, and if persons ask, the agenda report will be posted on June 27 on the City’s website: http://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-and- minutes The email body can include the following: ************************************* CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: City Council meeting Notice The San Luis Obispo City Council invites all interested persons to attend a public meeting, relative to the following: What: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis. Address of Application: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road (SPEC-0143-2017). Where: City Hall Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California When: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. Written comments are encouraged. If you challenge the above proposed action in court, you may be 25891 limited to raising those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to the public hearing. The Agenda and Reports for this meeting are available in the City Clerk’s office and online at www.slocity.org/cityclerk. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at ecreel@swca.com or (805) 543-7095 extension 6814. 25892 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather; Christian, Kevin; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Mattingly, Carrie; Davidson, Doug Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR for July 5, 2017 Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 9:21:37 AM Attachments:image001.png Good morning, I wanted to give you a heads up that I will be out of the office starting June 21 and returning July 5. Emily Creel is the City’s contract project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, and will be addressing comments and finalizing the Council Agenda Report for the July 5 Council meeting. If you have any questions, or if any issues need immediate attention while I am out of the office, please contact Emily directly: Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Email: ecreel@swca.com Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25893 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 9:16:28 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Heather, We took care of the postage, and I will drop off the postcards and notice list later this morning. Happy Friday, Shawna From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Thanks! From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:02 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) I will send you the final version, either today or tomorrow. Thanks, Shawna From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:54 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Can you send me a revised version so I can have it for the record? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:53 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Thank you, will do! From: Goodwin, Heather 25894 Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. 25895 Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a 25896 mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25897 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Interested Parties Notice Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 8:07:00 AM Hi Emily, On June 23 can you please email the interested parties who only provided an email address? For your information, and if persons ask, the agenda report will be posted on June 27 on the City’s website: http://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-and- minutes The email body can include the following: ************************************* CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: City Council meeting Notice The San Luis Obispo City Council invites all interested persons to attend a public meeting, relative to the following: What: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis. Address of Application: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road (SPEC-0143-2017). Where: City Hall Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California When: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. Written comments are encouraged. If you challenge the above proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to the public hearing. The Agenda and Reports for this meeting are available in the City Clerk’s office and online at www.slocity.org/cityclerk. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at ecreel@swca.com or (805) 543-7095 extension 6814. 25898 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 8:07:00 AM Attachments:GIS Map.jpg Froom Ranch CC Postcard.pub Noticing Recipients.pdf Noticing Recipients.xlsx image001.png Hi Emily, Please see attached noticing documents for your files. I will deliver the hard-copy postcards to the City Clerk today. Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:30 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Please see attached for your files. I will find out about the postage assistance tomorrow morning. Thank you, Shawna From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:54 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Can you send me a revised version so I can have it for the record? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:53 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Thank you, will do! From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) 25899 Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott 25900 Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 25901 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25902 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:30:23 PM Attachments:GIS Map.jpg CC Noticing Details.xlsx Froom Ranch CC Postcard.pub Noticing Recipients.pdf Noticing Recipients.xlsx image001.png Hi Heather, Please see attached for your files. I will find out about the postage assistance tomorrow morning. Thank you, Shawna From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:54 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Can you send me a revised version so I can have it for the record? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:53 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Thank you, will do! From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk 25903 City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25904 From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, 25905 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25906 From:Goodwin, Heather To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:05:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks! From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:02 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) I will send you the final version, either today or tomorrow. Thanks, Shawna From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:54 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Can you send me a revised version so I can have it for the record? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:53 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Thank you, will do! From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk 25907 City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25908 From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, 25909 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25910 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:02:05 PM Attachments:image001.png I will send you the final version, either today or tomorrow. Thanks, Shawna From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:54 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Can you send me a revised version so I can have it for the record? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:53 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Thank you, will do! From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org 25911 T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25912 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 25913 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25914 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:01:34 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch - Map.jpg image001.png Hi Heather, here is a .jpg of the map. Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25915 From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25916 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25917 From:Goodwin, Heather To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:54:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Can you send me a revised version so I can have it for the record? From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:53 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Thank you, will do! From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, 25918 Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, 25919 Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25920 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:52:45 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, will do! From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:43 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna 25921 Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> 25922 Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25923 From:Goodwin, Heather To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:42:00 PM Attachments:SLOUNIFLOW_990 Clerk Copier iRC5250 Color_1797_001.pdf image001.png Shawna, See attached revision…..then you are good to go! Thanks! Heather Goodwin, CMC Deputy City Clerk City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E hgoodwin@slocity.org T 805.781.7103 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46 PM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have 25924 the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, 25925 and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25926 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna; Jewell, Debbie J. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:07:14 PM Thank you, Pam. I look forward to talking to you on Monday. Have a great weekend. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:50 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Hi Emily, Here is the updated technical studies list. Prehistoric & Historic Reports by FirstCarbon Solutions dated 2-20-15 (new updates pending) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach by Chattel, Inc. (in progress) Preliminary Department of the Army Jurisdictional Determination letter dated 9-24-15 by Erin Hanlon Froom Ranch Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated August 2015 Biological Resources Inventory prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated January 2016 Froom/Il Villaggio Specific Plan Preliminary Transportation Analysis by Central Coast Transportation Consulting dated June 2017 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 4-14-17 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 6-28-16 Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map prepared by John Kammer dated 4- 15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures prepared by Stork, Wolfe & Associates (will provide by 6-30- 17) Updated Visual Simulations by Chris Dufour (RRM) (will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations by RRM Design Group dated 6-15-17 (will provide 25927 by 6-30-17; report includes geomorphology and preliminary planting concepts and plant list) Water demand & Sewer flows analysis (will provide by 6-30-17) Any new or updated reports not previously sent to you will be provided by June 30, 2017. There may be some lag time with the historical reports, but they will be completed soon after the RFP proposals are mailed out. I am out of the office tomorrow, but back on Monday. Let’s talk then about the Planning comments related to the Specific plan and any questions regarding the technical studies list. Thanks, and have a great weekend. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25928 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:"Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>" Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna; Jewell, Debbie J. Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:55:30 PM P.S. Another report completed: Froom Ranch Acoustics Assessment by 45dB Acoustics dated 6-7-17 PAM RICCI From: Ricci, Pam A. Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:50 PM To: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Cc: Walters, Tim J. <TJWalters@rrmdesign.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com>; Shawna Scott (sscott@slocity.org) <sscott@slocity.org>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Hi Emily, Here is the updated technical studies list. Prehistoric & Historic Reports by FirstCarbon Solutions dated 2-20-15 (new updates pending) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach by Chattel, Inc. (in progress) Preliminary Department of the Army Jurisdictional Determination letter dated 9-24-15 by Erin Hanlon Froom Ranch Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated August 2015 Biological Resources Inventory prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated January 2016 Froom/Il Villaggio Specific Plan Preliminary Transportation Analysis by Central Coast Transportation Consulting dated June 2017 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 4-14-17 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 6-28-16 Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map prepared by John Kammer dated 4- 15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures prepared by Stork, Wolfe & Associates (will provide by 6-30- 17) Updated Visual Simulations by Chris Dufour (RRM) (will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations by RRM Design Group dated 6-15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17; report includes geomorphology and preliminary planting concepts and plant list) 25929 Water demand & Sewer flows analysis (will provide by 6-30-17) Any new or updated reports not previously sent to you will be provided by June 30, 2017. There may be some lag time with the historical reports, but they will be completed soon after the RFP proposals are mailed out. I am out of the office tomorrow, but back on Monday. Let’s talk then about the Planning comments related to the Specific plan and any questions regarding the technical studies list. Thanks, and have a great weekend. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25930 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Cc:Walters, Tim J.; Montgomery, Victor; Scott, Shawna; Jewell, Debbie J. Subject:Froom Ranch Technical Studies List Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:50:29 PM Hi Emily, Here is the updated technical studies list. Prehistoric & Historic Reports by FirstCarbon Solutions dated 2-20-15 (new updates pending) Historic Buildings Treatment Approach by Chattel, Inc. (in progress) Preliminary Department of the Army Jurisdictional Determination letter dated 9-24-15 by Erin Hanlon Froom Ranch Delineation of Waters of the United States and State of California prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated August 2015 Biological Resources Inventory prepared by Kevin Merk Associates, LLC dated January 2016 Froom/Il Villaggio Specific Plan Preliminary Transportation Analysis by Central Coast Transportation Consulting dated June 2017 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Engineering Geology Investigation by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 4-14-17 (updated; will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Soils Engineering Report by GeoSolutions, Inc. dated 6-28-16 Subsurface Fault Investigation and Development Setback Map prepared by John Kammer dated 4- 15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17) Structural Analysis of Historic Structures prepared by Stork, Wolfe & Associates (will provide by 6-30- 17) Updated Visual Simulations by Chris Dufour (RRM) (will provide by 6-30-17) Preliminary Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations by RRM Design Group dated 6-15-17 (will provide by 6-30-17; report includes geomorphology and preliminary planting concepts and plant list) Water demand & Sewer flows analysis (will provide by 6-30-17) Any new or updated reports not previously sent to you will be provided by June 30, 2017. There may be some lag time with the historical reports, but they will be completed soon after the RFP proposals are mailed out. I am out of the office tomorrow, but back on Monday. Let’s talk then about the Planning comments related to the Specific plan and any questions regarding the technical studies list. Thanks, and have a great weekend. Pam PAM RICCI, AICP Principal Planner 3765 S. Higuera Suite 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-1794 ext 278 rrmdesign.com 25931 25932 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:46:13 PM Attachments:image001.png Noticing Recipients.pdf Noticing Recipients.xlsx Froom Ranch - CC Postcard.pub Hi Heather, Do you have any comments on the postcards? Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:55 AM To: Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Christian, Kevin <kchristian@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard 25933 Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 25934 slocity.org 25935 From:Emily Creel To:Leveille, Brian Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 11:51:45 AM Thanks, Brian. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Leveille, Brian [mailto:bleveille@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:43 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Shawna and Emily, I don’t see any issues with having the review on the 28th. Thanks for checking in. I look forward to working with you both on this. Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:57 AM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Brian, We are looking ahead to schedule the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conceptual Review item at the CHC – would August 28 work for you and the CHC? Emily is going to work with Pam to make sure we have the concept plan well before the notice is due (aiming to request 25936 RRM’s submittal of the concept plan by the week of July 17th to allow for our internal review). Let us know if you have any conflicts or concerns regarding this potential date. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25937 From:Leveille, Brian To:Scott, Shawna; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:43:30 AM Hi Shawna and Emily, I don’t see any issues with having the review on the 28th. Thanks for checking in. I look forward to working with you both on this. Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:57 AM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Hi Brian, We are looking ahead to schedule the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conceptual Review item at the CHC – would August 28 work for you and the CHC? Emily is going to work with Pam to make sure we have the concept plan well before the notice is due (aiming to request RRM’s submittal of the concept plan by the week of July 17th to allow for our internal review). Let us know if you have any conflicts or concerns regarding this potential date. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org 25938 T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25939 From:Scott, Shawna To:Leveille, Brian; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:56:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Brian, We are looking ahead to schedule the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Conceptual Review item at the CHC – would August 28 work for you and the CHC? Emily is going to work with Pam to make sure we have the concept plan well before the notice is due (aiming to request RRM’s submittal of the concept plan by the week of July 17th to allow for our internal review). Let us know if you have any conflicts or concerns regarding this potential date. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25940 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan, Tentative Option for CHC Meeting Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:52:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, I need to confirm with Brian (he is the CHC liaison), but there is a CHC meeting on August 28, which requires the notice to be drafted by August 10, and the draft report due to Brian by August 14. I’m thinking that if Pam can ensure that they will submit revised plans for conceptual review by the week of July 17, that should give us enough time to review, and for you to prepare the CHC staff report. How does that sound on your end? If you could please note this timeframe in your follow-up with Pam and find out if they can meet that internal deadline, then I can confirm this date would work for Brian and the CHC. Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25941 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - PC Agenda Report Date:Wednesday, June 14, 2017 4:49:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Emily. Have a good evening! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 4:47 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - PC Agenda Report Hi Shawna – please see attached. Thank you for the additional time to pull this together. There are a few minor comments in there for your attention that I’m hoping we can discuss further. See you in the morning. Thanks. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25942 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - PC Agenda Report Date:Wednesday, June 14, 2017 4:47:07 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch - PC072617.docx Hi Shawna – please see attached. Thank you for the additional time to pull this together. There are a few minor comments in there for your attention that I’m hoping we can discuss further. See you in the morning. Thanks. Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25943 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Scott, Shawna Cc:Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:24:09 PM Attachments:image002.png Thank you, Shawna, for coordinating this meeting. This should work for me as well. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:15 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, Yes, that works well for me. I will also invite Tim Walters, Vic, John Madonna and Connie. Thanks for coordinating this meeting. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m working through some schedule constraints, but I think it will work out if we start the meeting at 8:00 to discuss Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke will join us at 8:30 to discuss trail and Transportation comments. Will that work for you? Thank you, Shawna 25944 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> 25945 Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25946 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:15:11 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Shawna, Yes, that works well for me. I will also invite Tim Walters, Vic, John Madonna and Connie. Thanks for coordinating this meeting. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m working through some schedule constraints, but I think it will work out if we start the meeting at 8:00 to discuss Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke will join us at 8:30 to discuss trail and Transportation comments. Will that work for you? Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam 25947 PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25948 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25949 From:Hill, Robert To:Schwartz, Luke; Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:10:35 PM Attachments:image001.png See you all then (8am for me). Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:09 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25950 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> 25951 Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, 25952 I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25953 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Scott, Shawna; Hill, Robert Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:08:45 PM Attachments:image001.png Works for me – thanks. Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III 25954 Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting 25955 Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25956 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:06:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Pam, I’m working through some schedule constraints, but I think it will work out if we start the meeting at 8:00 to discuss Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke will join us at 8:30 to discuss trail and Transportation comments. Will that work for you? Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM 25957 To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25958 From:Scott, Shawna To:Schwartz, Luke; Hill, Robert Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 5:03:26 PM Attachments:image001.png How about this – we can start at 8:00 with Planning and Natural Resource comments, then Luke can join around 8:30 for Transportation comments. There will be an overlap regarding trails when Luke joins us. Thanks to you both for fitting this in, and accommodating these schedule changes. From: Schwartz, Luke Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna 25959 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> 25960 Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25961 From:Schwartz, Luke To:Scott, Shawna; Hill, Robert Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:22:45 PM Attachments:image002.png I drop my daughter off in the mornings and typically can’t get in until 8:30. I might be able to swap drop-off with my wife, but if there’s any chance we can start at 8:30 that would be preferred. Thanks, Luke Schwartz Transportation Planner/Engineer III Public Works Transportation Planning/Engineering 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E LSchwartz@slocity.org T 805.781.7190 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. 25962 Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, 25963 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25964 From:Scott, Shawna To:Hill, Robert; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:21:54 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Bob – I will make sure there is a fresh pot in the 919 kitchen! Luke, is this do-able? Thank you, Shawna From: Hill, Robert Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:20 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, Is RRM bringing coffee? Just kidding, I can make that work. Please confirm when you can. Emily, I owe you a call back and will do so today… Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25965 Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? 25966 PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25967 From:Hill, Robert To:Scott, Shawna; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:20:06 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Shawna, Is RRM bringing coffee? Just kidding, I can make that work. Please confirm when you can. Emily, I owe you a call back and will do so today… Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25968 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, 25969 I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25970 From:Hill, Robert To:Scott, Shawna; Schwartz, Luke Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:20:02 PM Attachments:image002.png Hi Shawna, Is RRM bringing coffee? Just kidding, I can make that work. Please confirm when you can. Emily, I owe you a call back and will do so today… Thanks, Bob Robert Hill Natural Resources Manager City Administration Natural Resources 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E rhill@slocity.org T 805.781.7211 slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:00 PM To: Schwartz, Luke <LSchwartz@slocity.org>; Hill, Robert <rhill@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25971 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, 25972 I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25973 From:Scott, Shawna To:Schwartz, Luke; Hill, Robert Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:59:52 AM Attachments:image002.png Hello, Are you two up for an 8:00 am meeting this Thursday June 15 (instead of 4:00 pm)? Thanks, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25974 Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25975 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:56:19 AM Attachments:image002.png Hi Shawna, I appreciate your help in setting this meeting up. I can make the 8:00 time work. Let me know if this meeting is confirmed. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> 25976 Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25977 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:38:00 AM Attachments:image002.png Thanks, we’ll see what Pam says. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:25 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting I’ll need to check with Trevor, but I think so as long as his trial finishes before then. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:15 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Emily, If we end up moving the meeting to 8:00 a.m. would that work for you? Thanks, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: 'Ricci, Pam A.' <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] 25978 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25979 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:25:35 AM Attachments:image002.png I’ll need to check with Trevor, but I think so as long as his trial finishes before then. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:15 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Emily, If we end up moving the meeting to 8:00 a.m. would that work for you? Thanks, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: 'Ricci, Pam A.' <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? 25980 PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25981 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:14:00 AM Attachments:image002.png Hi Emily, If we end up moving the meeting to 8:00 a.m. would that work for you? Thanks, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:49 AM To: 'Ricci, Pam A.' <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone 25982 else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25983 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:48:00 AM Attachments:image002.png Hi Pam, I would need to confirm with Bob and Luke, but 8:00 am is available on Thursday. Thank you, Shawna From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:46 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 25984 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25985 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:45:52 AM Attachments:image003.png Is there any possibility of a meeting earlier on Thursday? PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25986 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch SP - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 7:38:59 PM Sounds good – thanks. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 6:29 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Re: Froom Ranch SP - Completeness Review Meeting Sounds good, and I can cover if needed. Have a good night! From: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 5:27:58 PM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Re: Froom Ranch SP - Completeness Review Meeting Most likely, yes. Trevor is in trial this week, so I'm on kid pick-up duty at 3:00 and 5:00 in Atascadero. But he anticipates being done by Thursday, so most likely, yes. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 12, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Emily, Are you available Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25987 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:Re: Froom Ranch SP - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 6:29:09 PM Sounds good, and I can cover if needed. Have a good night! From: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 5:27:58 PM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Re: Froom Ranch SP - Completeness Review Meeting Most likely, yes. Trevor is in trial this week, so I'm on kid pick-up duty at 3:00 and 5:00 in Atascadero. But he anticipates being done by Thursday, so most likely, yes. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 12, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Emily, Are you available Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25988 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Froom Ranch SP - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 5:28:05 PM Attachments:image001.png Most likely, yes. Trevor is in trial this week, so I'm on kid pick-up duty at 3:00 and 5:00 in Atascadero. But he anticipates being done by Thursday, so most likely, yes. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 12, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Emily, Are you available Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25989 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch SP - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 4:59:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, Are you available Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25990 From:Montgomery, Victor To:Davidson, Doug Cc:Ricci, Pam A.; Walters, Tim J. Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 4:47:37 PM Hi Doug. Question, are there any Landscape and Lighting Districts formed within the City of SLO? We are considering way to assure maintenance of “common areas” within the Froom Ranch SP area particularly the LID features that are now required for RWQCB standards compliance and Froom Creek, especially during the establishment period. Rather than having each property owner maintain them in their own fashion (or not maintain them?) we are looking at a district to assess the properties and assure the funds for maintenance are collected and that the maintenance actually gets done. We are a bit concerned about the administrative cost incurred by the City but wondering if the administration can be contracted out just like the physical work is typically contracted out. We’re not sure what experience the City may have with L&L Districts. Just a thought at this point. Would appreciate feedback. Thanks VICTOR MONTGOMERY, AIAPrincipalP: (805) 543-1794rrmdesign.com 25991 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review Meeting Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 4:46:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Pam, I’m looking into options for a completeness review meeting. I was intending to invite Luke and Bob, as they are the remaining commenters (in addition to Planning). Is there anyone else you’d like to attend? How does Thursday June 15 from 4:00 – 5:00 work for your team? Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25992 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Consent Modified: 1714 : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 12:04:00 PM Attachments:image001.png For your information, the reading file is uploaded so that the public and Council can see them, but it will not be printed out in the hard copy of the agenda packet (to save paper and resources). From: Goodwin, Heather Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 11:56 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Subject: Consent Modified: 1714 : Froom Ranch Specific Plan The Consent has been modified for: Minor Change Shawna – I reordered the attachments so they were in a,b,c order and made I made attachment “C” a Council Reading File as it is 281 pages. That is a very large attachment for the agenda packet. Anything over let’s say over 50 pages should be a Council Reading File. If you would like an attachment to be a Council Reading File, please upload them like you would an attachment, go to the “options” tab and select “linked” then ok. Please label them for example: a – Council Reading File – Specific Plan. I named it for you already. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Title: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Wednesday, July 5, 2017 4:30 PM 25993 From:Goodwin, Heather To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Codron, Michael Subject:Consent Modified: 1714 : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 11:55:00 AM Attachments:image001.png The Consent has been modified for: Minor Change Shawna – I reordered the attachments so they were in a,b,c order and made I made attachment “C” a Council Reading File as it is 281 pages. That is a very large attachment for the agenda packet. Anything over let’s say over 50 pages should be a Council Reading File. If you would like an attachment to be a Council Reading File, please upload them like you would an attachment, go to the “options” tab and select “linked” then ok. Please label them for example: a – Council Reading File – Specific Plan. I named it for you already. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Title: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Department: Community Development Category: Council Agenda Report Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Wednesday, July 5, 2017 4:30 PM 25994 From:Scott, Shawna To:Goodwin, Heather; Christian, Kevin Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard (CC Consent Agenda July 5, 2017) Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 8:54:47 AM Attachments:image001.png Noticing Recipients.pdf Noticing Recipients.xlsx Froom Ranch - CC Postcard.pub Good morning, Please see attached postcard and notice list for your review. Once approved, I will have the interns print the postcards and deliver them to your office. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna 25995 Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25996 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review #2 Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 6:22:26 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Emily. From: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 5:03:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A.; Montgomery, Victor; John Madonna; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Cc: Scott, Shawna Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review #2 Hello – please find attached the City’s completeness review comments on the May 11, 2017 Froom Ranch Specific Plan submittal. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 25997 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 5:53:54 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch - Status Report 06-09-17.xlsx Thanks, Shawna. J Attached is this week’s progress report. Please let me know if you have any questions. Have a great weekend. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 2:31 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, I wanted to add this regarding the PC report – focus on getting the application completeness letter out today, and we can touch base on the PC report early next week. No need to try to get that report to me by 8am Monday – can you aim for a Wednesday draft submittal of the PC report? Good luck in Pismo! Thanks, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 2:27 PM To: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, The 30-day application review period ends today, so we will need to either accept the application as complete or deem the application incomplete at this stage. Please go ahead and send Pam the completeness review letter today, and if there are issues that you need to expand upon, you can generalize the review comment and follow up with more detail on Monday/early next week. 25998 Is that do-able? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 25999 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Montgomery, Victor; John Madonna; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) Cc:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Completeness Review #2 Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 5:03:23 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch Completeness Review 2_060917.pdf Hello – please find attached the City’s completeness review comments on the May 11, 2017 Froom Ranch Specific Plan submittal. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 26000 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 2:43:07 PM Yes. Absolutely. I'm only looking for minor edits at this point and can send it as-is with no real concerns in mind. I checked all of your previous comments and they have either been addressed or I have retained them. Thanks for confirming this "hard" deadline. I'll copy you. Emily Sent from my iPhone On Jun 9, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Emily, The 30-day application review period ends today, so we will need to either accept the application as complete or deem the application incomplete at this stage. Please go ahead and send Pam the completeness review letter today, and if there are issues that you need to expand upon, you can generalize the review comment and follow up with more detail on Monday/early next week. Is that do-able? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26001 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 2:31:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, I wanted to add this regarding the PC report – focus on getting the application completeness letter out today, and we can touch base on the PC report early next week. No need to try to get that report to me by 8am Monday – can you aim for a Wednesday draft submittal of the PC report? Good luck in Pismo! Thanks, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 2:27 PM To: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan Hi Emily, The 30-day application review period ends today, so we will need to either accept the application as complete or deem the application incomplete at this stage. Please go ahead and send Pam the completeness review letter today, and if there are issues that you need to expand upon, you can generalize the review comment and follow up with more detail on Monday/early next week. Is that do-able? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26002 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 2:26:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, The 30-day application review period ends today, so we will need to either accept the application as complete or deem the application incomplete at this stage. Please go ahead and send Pam the completeness review letter today, and if there are issues that you need to expand upon, you can generalize the review comment and follow up with more detail on Monday/early next week. Is that do-able? Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26003 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Consent 1714 was Submitted : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 1:32:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you for catching that. We will likely post the Specific Plan Draft online at the time the RFP and NOP are released, but we’ll have RRM remove that information from the exhibits. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 1:23 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Consent 1714 was Submitted : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Thanks, Shawna. I just noticed that the 2nd Draft SP includes the location of archaeological resources on one graphic. I’m adding a comment to our completeness review letter to remove those, but also wanted to point that out as a good reason not to include the Draft SP as an attachment to the RFP or NOP/IS. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 11:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org>; Schneider, Anne <ASchneider@slocity.org>; Fowler, Xzandrea <XFowler@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Consent 1714 was Submitted : Froom Ranch Specific Plan The Consent has been Submitted by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: Michael Codron. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal c - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 26004 b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26005 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Consent 1714 was Submitted : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 1:23:14 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks, Shawna. I just noticed that the 2nd Draft SP includes the location of archaeological resources on one graphic. I’m adding a comment to our completeness review letter to remove those, but also wanted to point that out as a good reason not to include the Draft SP as an attachment to the RFP or NOP/IS. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 11:45 AM To: Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org>; Goodwin, Heather <hgoodwin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org>; Schneider, Anne <ASchneider@slocity.org>; Fowler, Xzandrea <XFowler@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Consent 1714 was Submitted : Froom Ranch Specific Plan The Consent has been Submitted by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: Michael Codron. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal c - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council 26006 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26007 From:Pease, Andy To:Alyssa Hayes Subject:RE: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 1:22:16 PM Thanks for the update. I’m surprised by the ‘luxury lifestyle’ and ‘rich amenities’ language. I thought these were going to be affordable to local retirees. Andy Andy Pease Council Member Office of the City Council 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E apease@slocity.org slocity.org From: Alyssa Hayes [mailto:ahayes@lavidge.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:45 PM To: Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org> Subject: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Good afternoon Mr. Pease, 26008 SAVE THE DATE Villaggio at San Luis Obispo VIP Grand Opening Event July 14, 2017, 4-7 p.m. 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo, California 93405 Villaggio at San Luis Obispo, an upscale Life Plan Community currently under planning and development in California’s world-renowned Central Coast, is celebrating the opening of its 2,250-square-foot Information Center located at the main entrance of Irish Hills Plaza. The new Villaggio Information Center will allow future residents to see first-hand a sampling of distinctive design components of the Mediterranean Village-designed Life Plan Community, its luxury lifestyle and rich amenities. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 5525 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 26009 From:Scott, Shawna To:Codron, Michael; Goodwin, Heather; Corey, Tyler; Davidson, Doug; Schneider, Anne; Fowler, Xzandrea Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Consent 1714 was Submitted : Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Friday, June 9, 2017 11:44:52 AM Attachments:image001.png The Consent has been Submitted by Shawna Scott and now needs to be reviewed by: Michael Codron. Click here to Review online (For City Clerk's Office Only) ATTACHMENTS a - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal c - Specific Plan Initiation Agenda Minutes and Agenda Reports April 5, 2016 b - Froom Ranch Specific Plan Initial Study INFORMATION Department:Community Development Category:Council Agenda Report Meeting:Jul 5, 2017 4:30 PM - City Council Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26010 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Date:Thursday, June 8, 2017 4:54:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thank you. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 4:51 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Hi Shawna – clean CAR is attached. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 10:47 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Hi Emily, Please see attached edits – you did follow the example I provided, thank you. My edits include additional information/clarification that I think the Council will need to consider the RFP authorization. Please feel free to edit for readability, as you see fit. You can just send this back in a clean version, and I will dig up the attachments and send to you for your file. Happy Friday! Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 26011 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26012 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Date:Thursday, June 8, 2017 4:51:15 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch SP - Council Agenda Report - RFP_070517.doc Hi Shawna – clean CAR is attached. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 10:47 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Hi Emily, Please see attached edits – you did follow the example I provided, thank you. My edits include additional information/clarification that I think the Council will need to consider the RFP authorization. Please feel free to edit for readability, as you see fit. You can just send this back in a clean version, and I will dig up the attachments and send to you for your file. Happy Friday! Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26013 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Alyssa Hayes Subject:Re: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Date:Thursday, June 8, 2017 10:46:59 AM Sounds good! Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Alyssa Hayes <ahayes@lavidge.com> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 9:02:19 AM To: Gomez, Aaron Subject: RE: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Absolutely! We hope you can make it to the grand opening! I’ll send you more information about the event as it gets closer to the date. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 5525 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 From: Gomez, Aaron [mailto:agomez@slocity.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 11:36 PM To: Alyssa Hayes <ahayes@lavidge.com> Subject: Re: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Thank you for the email Alyssa! Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Alyssa Hayes <ahayes@lavidge.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:44:26 PM To: Gomez, Aaron 26014 Subject: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Good afternoon Mr. Gomez, SAVE THE DATE Villaggio at San Luis Obispo VIP Grand Opening Event July 14, 2017, 4-7 p.m. 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo, California 93405 Villaggio at San Luis Obispo, an upscale Life Plan Community currently under planning and development in California’s world-renowned Central Coast, is celebrating the opening of its 2,250-square-foot Information Center located at the main entrance of Irish Hills Plaza. The new Villaggio Information Center will allow future residents to see first-hand a sampling of distinctive design components of the Mediterranean Village-designed Life Plan Community, its luxury lifestyle and rich amenities. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 5525 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 26015 From:Gomez, Aaron To:Alyssa Hayes Subject:Re: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2017 11:36:06 PM Thank you for the email Alyssa! Aaron Gomez Council Member City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council E agomez@slocity.org T (805) 540-9053 slocity.org From: Alyssa Hayes <ahayes@lavidge.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:44:26 PM To: Gomez, Aaron Subject: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Good afternoon Mr. Gomez, SAVE THE DATE Villaggio at San Luis Obispo VIP Grand Opening Event July 14, 2017, 4-7 p.m. 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo, California 93405 26016 Villaggio at San Luis Obispo, an upscale Life Plan Community currently under planning and development in California’s world-renowned Central Coast, is celebrating the opening of its 2,250-square-foot Information Center located at the main entrance of Irish Hills Plaza. The new Villaggio Information Center will allow future residents to see first-hand a sampling of distinctive design components of the Mediterranean Village-designed Life Plan Community, its luxury lifestyle and rich amenities. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 55252777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 26017 From:Harmon, Heidi To:Sims, Shannon Subject:Fw: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2017 8:14:16 PM From: Alyssa Hayes <ahayes@lavidge.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:39 PM To: Harmon, Heidi Subject: Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Good afternoon Mayor Harmon, SAVE THE DATE Villaggio at San Luis Obispo VIP Grand Opening Event July 14, 2017, 4-7 p.m. 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo, California 93405 Villaggio at San Luis Obispo, an upscale Life Plan Community currently under planning and development in California’s world-renowned Central Coast, is celebrating the opening of its 2,250-square-foot Information Center located at the main entrance of Irish Hills Plaza. The 26018 new Villaggio Information Center will allow future residents to see first-hand a sampling of distinctive design components of the Mediterranean Village-designed Life Plan Community, its luxury lifestyle and rich amenities. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 55252777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 26019 From:Alyssa Hayes To:Johnson, Lee Subject:Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:46:03 PM Good afternoon Lee, SAVE THE DATE Villaggio at San Luis Obispo VIP Grand Opening Event July 14, 2017, 4-7 p.m. 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo, California 93405 Villaggio at San Luis Obispo, an upscale Life Plan Community currently under planning and development in California’s world-renowned Central Coast, is celebrating the opening of its 2,250-square-foot Information Center located at the main entrance of Irish Hills Plaza. The new Villaggio Information Center will allow future residents to see first-hand a sampling of distinctive design components of the Mediterranean Village-designed Life Plan Community, its luxury lifestyle and rich amenities. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 5525 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 26020 26021 From:Alyssa Hayes To:Rivoire, Dan Subject:Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:42:41 PM Good afternoon Mr. Rivoire, SAVE THE DATE Villaggio at San Luis Obispo VIP Grand Opening Event July 14, 2017, 4-7 p.m. 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo, California 93405 Villaggio at San Luis Obispo, an upscale Life Plan Community currently under planning and development in California’s world-renowned Central Coast, is celebrating the opening of its 2,250-square-foot Information Center located at the main entrance of Irish Hills Plaza. The new Villaggio Information Center will allow future residents to see first-hand a sampling of distinctive design components of the Mediterranean Village-designed Life Plan Community, its luxury lifestyle and rich amenities. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 5525 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 26022 26023 From:Alyssa Hayes To:Harmon, Heidi Subject:Save the Date - Villaggio at San Luis Obispo Grand Opening Event Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:39:55 PM Good afternoon Mayor Harmon, SAVE THE DATE Villaggio at San Luis Obispo VIP Grand Opening Event July 14, 2017, 4-7 p.m. 1503 Froom Ranch Way San Luis Obispo, California 93405 Villaggio at San Luis Obispo, an upscale Life Plan Community currently under planning and development in California’s world-renowned Central Coast, is celebrating the opening of its 2,250-square-foot Information Center located at the main entrance of Irish Hills Plaza. The new Villaggio Information Center will allow future residents to see first-hand a sampling of distinctive design components of the Mediterranean Village-designed Life Plan Community, its luxury lifestyle and rich amenities. Alyssa Hayes Public Relations Account Coordinator LAVIDGEP 480 998 2600 F 480 998 5525 2777 E Camelback Rd, Ste 300, Phoenix, AZ 85016 26024 26025 From:Scott, Shawna To:Davidson, Doug Cc:Corey, Tyler Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Draft CAR, RFP and IS Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2017 12:56:33 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Doug, If you’d like to review the draft CAR, Request for Proposal, and Initial Study for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan, the documents are available here. These documents will be saved on MinuteTraq on June 12 per the City Council Agenda Report Schedule. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26026 From:Scott, Shawna To:Peth, Aaron Cc:Vereschagin, Cara; Corey, Tyler; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2017 8:27:35 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Aaron. This looks good – I will let you know if the Clerk’s office requests any edits prior to printing. From: Peth, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the 26027 City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26028 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 4:26:44 PM Thank you, Shawna. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:57 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Hi Emily, Please find attached the draft NOP contact list for your review. Please check this out and let me know if you have any suggested additions or deletions. It may be simple enough to highlight additions and deletions in different colors. Thank you, Shawna 26029 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 1:11:41 PM Attachments:image001.png Not sure I understand the dots on the map, but everything else looks fine to me. Thanks for the copy. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Peth, Aaron [mailto:apeth@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a 26030 mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26031 From:Peth, Aaron To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Vereschagin, Cara; Corey, Tyler; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 12:40:58 PM Attachments:image001.png Noticing Recipients.pdf Noticing Recipients.xlsx Froom Ranch - CC Postcard.pub Hi Shawna, I have attached the postcards for Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Please let me know of any changes you would like. I have also attached the mailing list (with interested parties added) and the map of who will be notified. Thanks, Aaron From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:57 AM To: Peth, Aaron <apeth@slocity.org> Cc: Vereschagin, Cara <CVereschagin@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 26032 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26033 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:59:17 AM Ah yes, of course. I didn’t see Word docs in there, so I wasn’t sure we (you) prepared them. But they are in the Old Versions folder. Thank you! Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:22 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) It may be easier to use one of the Froom Ranch PC reports from the initiation hearings – it will already have the basic info and graphic inset on the front page. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:16 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Thank you very much for the examples. Yes, I should still be on track for submittal on the 9th. I may call you this afternoon to discuss everything and make sure we’re on the same page. I’ll plan on using one of your Calle Joaquin PC agenda reports as a template, unless you prefer otherwise. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:51 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) 26034 Hi Emily, I located the Planning Commission agenda reports for both the San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch NOP Scoping meetings, and uploaded them to dropbox so that you have these examples for Froom Ranch. Link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kz0xot5tsrh39tk/AABsUdVrcePXpWBDOFGpmV3xa?dl=0 You can use this folder to upload documents to me, as well. Please feel free to tailor your report to the Froom Ranch project, and incorporate any improvements as you see fit. You can also check out the past agenda reports for the Froom Ranch project for additional background information, as needed, and could re-use some of the summary information from the recent draft Council Agenda Report. Are you still on track for an early submittal to me on June 9th? Thank you for working on getting this package wrapped up before our vacations. I still owe you the NOP distribution list and RFP distribution list to review (we will not be including the distribution list in the Council or PC agenda packages, but I wanted to make sure you have a chance to review and offer any edits or suggestions) Thank you, Shawna 26035 From:Scott, Shawna To:Peth, Aaron Cc:Vereschagin, Cara; Corey, Tyler; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Language for Postcard Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:56:54 AM Attachments:Froom SP_Interested Parties_03.20.17.docx image001.png Hi Aaron, Thank you for working on the postcard notices. Please include a 500-foot notice range, and add interested parties with mailing addresses to the mailing list (see attached). Emily and I will handle the email notices for interested persons who did not provide a mailing/physical address. Please use the following language: 12165 and 12393 Los Osos Valley Road. SPEC-0143-2017: Request to 1) authorize a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan and related entitlements; and 2) authorize the City Manager to award a consultant services agreement with the consultant that best responds to the RFP in terms of qualifications, cost, and approach to the project analysis; Land Use Element designated Specific Plan Area SP-3 (Madonna on LOVR); John Madonna, applicant. (Emily Creel) Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26036 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:22:00 AM It may be easier to use one of the Froom Ranch PC reports from the initiation hearings – it will already have the basic info and graphic inset on the front page. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:16 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Thank you very much for the examples. Yes, I should still be on track for submittal on the 9th. I may call you this afternoon to discuss everything and make sure we’re on the same page. I’ll plan on using one of your Calle Joaquin PC agenda reports as a template, unless you prefer otherwise. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:51 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Hi Emily, I located the Planning Commission agenda reports for both the San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch NOP Scoping meetings, and uploaded them to dropbox so that you have these examples for Froom Ranch. Link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kz0xot5tsrh39tk/AABsUdVrcePXpWBDOFGpmV3xa?dl=0 You can use this folder to upload documents to me, as well. Please feel free to tailor your report to the Froom Ranch project, and incorporate any improvements as you see fit. You can also check out the past agenda reports for the Froom Ranch project for additional background information, as needed, and could re-use some of the summary information from the recent draft Council Agenda Report. Are you still on track for an early submittal to me on June 9th? Thank you for working on getting this package wrapped up before our vacations. I still owe you the NOP distribution list and RFP distribution list to review (we will not be including the distribution list in the 26037 Council or PC agenda packages, but I wanted to make sure you have a chance to review and offer any edits or suggestions) Thank you, Shawna 26038 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:15:46 AM Thank you very much for the examples. Yes, I should still be on track for submittal on the 9th. I may call you this afternoon to discuss everything and make sure we’re on the same page. I’ll plan on using one of your Calle Joaquin PC agenda reports as a template, unless you prefer otherwise. Thanks, Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:51 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Hi Emily, I located the Planning Commission agenda reports for both the San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch NOP Scoping meetings, and uploaded them to dropbox so that you have these examples for Froom Ranch. Link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kz0xot5tsrh39tk/AABsUdVrcePXpWBDOFGpmV3xa?dl=0 You can use this folder to upload documents to me, as well. Please feel free to tailor your report to the Froom Ranch project, and incorporate any improvements as you see fit. You can also check out the past agenda reports for the Froom Ranch project for additional background information, as needed, and could re-use some of the summary information from the recent draft Council Agenda Report. Are you still on track for an early submittal to me on June 9th? Thank you for working on getting this package wrapped up before our vacations. I still owe you the NOP distribution list and RFP distribution list to review (we will not be including the distribution list in the Council or PC agenda packages, but I wanted to make sure you have a chance to review and offer any edits or suggestions) Thank you, Shawna 26039 From:Hooper, Jennifer To:Peth, Aaron Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 10:43:00 AM Attachments:image001.png From: Vereschagin, Cara Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 10:23 AM To: Hooper, Jennifer <jhooper@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Cara Vereschagin Planning Intern City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E CVereschagin@slocity.org slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 8:17 AM To: Vereschagin, Cara Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Hi Cara, I will need postcards for the July 5 City Council meeting (Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal Initiation Request). SPEC-0143-2017 APNs 067-241-030 and 067-241-031 I will need to check the draft postcards by June 7th and the final postcards (printed) are due no later than June 18th (deliver to Clerk by 10:00 am, June 19th). If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you for your help, 26040 Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26041 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ryan, Cori; Corey, Tyler; Leveille, Brian Subject:RFP - EIR Consultant Distribution List Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 10:11:37 AM Attachments:EIR RFP Consultants list.doc image001.png Good morning, I am getting ready for the upcoming July release of the RFP to prepare an EIR for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project, and found this EIR consultant list on the G drive (see attached). I wanted to confirm that this is the current list, and if there should be any additions or removals from this list (aside from removal of the Morro Group [now SWCA], the firm managing this project as a City Consultant). The City Council will consider authorizing release of the RFP at the July 5th meeting. If authorized, are there any additional steps or preparations aside from: · Arranging for reproduction of the RFP and standard mailing to contacts identified on the EIR RFP Consultants list (as approved) · Posting background/additional information on the City website · Planning ahead for consultant interviews · Obtaining any necessary insurance and W-2 forms from the selected consultant prior to finalization of the contract Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26042 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - NOP distribution list Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:57:00 AM Attachments:NOP contact list.xlsx Hi Emily, Please find attached the draft NOP contact list for your review. Please check this out and let me know if you have any suggested additions or deletions. It may be simple enough to highlight additions and deletions in different colors. Thank you, Shawna   26043 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - PC Agenda Report (NOP Scoping Meeting) Date:Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:50:00 AM Hi Emily, I located the Planning Commission agenda reports for both the San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch NOP Scoping meetings, and uploaded them to dropbox so that you have these examples for Froom Ranch. Link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kz0xot5tsrh39tk/AABsUdVrcePXpWBDOFGpmV3xa?dl=0 You can use this folder to upload documents to me, as well. Please feel free to tailor your report to the Froom Ranch project, and incorporate any improvements as you see fit. You can also check out the past agenda reports for the Froom Ranch project for additional background information, as needed, and could re-use some of the summary information from the recent draft Council Agenda Report. Are you still on track for an early submittal to me on June 9th? Thank you for working on getting this package wrapped up before our vacations. I still owe you the NOP distribution list and RFP distribution list to review (we will not be including the distribution list in the Council or PC agenda packages, but I wanted to make sure you have a chance to review and offer any edits or suggestions) Thank you, Shawna 26044 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Date:Monday, June 5, 2017 3:53:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, When we meet up to discuss completeness review items, let’s also talk about project phasing and the City’s Growth Management cap. Thanks, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26045 From:Scott, Shawna To:Patrick Wilkinson Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Plan Date:Monday, June 5, 2017 1:37:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Patrick, The Specific Plan is in for review, and will require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prior to consideration by the City Council (and other advisory bodies). I imagine it may be about 8-12 months to get to decision hearings. The City Council is scheduled to consider authorization of the Request for Proposals to prepare an EIR on July 5th. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org From: Patrick Wilkinson [mailto:patrick@centralcommercialgroup.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:01 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Plan Shawna, I wanted to reach out and get an update on the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Has it been approved yet and if not when is the next hearing? If not approved how far along are the developers in process of getting approvals? I am a commercial broker and have a client interested in part of the project. Thanks! Feel free to call, text or email me anytime. All the Best, Patrick Wilkinson, Associate Cell: 805-234-3722 26046 BRE# 01999527 Central Commercial Group 3450 Broad Street, Suite 101 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.centralcommercialgroup.com 26047 From:Vereschagin, Cara To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Date:Monday, June 5, 2017 11:46:24 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shawna, We are on it! Jennifer is coming in today and I might pop in tomorrow, so between the two of us it will get done! Happy Monday, Cara Vereschagin Planning Intern City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E CVereschagin@slocity.org slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 8:17:30 AM To: Vereschagin, Cara Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Hi Cara, I will need postcards for the July 5 City Council meeting (Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal Initiation Request). SPEC-0143-2017 APNs 067-241-030 and 067-241-031 I will need to check the draft postcards by June 7th and the final postcards (printed) are due no later than June 18th (deliver to Clerk by 10:00 am, June 19th). If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you for your help, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 26048 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26049 From:Patrick Wilkinson To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch Plan Date:Monday, June 5, 2017 11:01:18 AM Shawna, I wanted to reach out and get an update on the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. Has it been approved yet and if not when is the next hearing? If not approved how far along are the developers in process of getting approvals? I am a commercial broker and have a client interested in part of the project. Thanks! Feel free to call, text or email me anytime. All the Best, Patrick Wilkinson, Associate Cell: 805-234-3722 BRE# 01999527 Central Commercial Group 3450 Broad Street, Suite 101 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www.centralcommercialgroup.com 26050 From:Vereschagin, Cara To:Hooper, Jennifer Subject:Fw: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Date:Monday, June 5, 2017 10:23:19 AM Attachments:image001.png Cara Vereschagin Planning Intern City of San Luis Obispo Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E CVereschagin@slocity.org slocity.org From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 8:17 AM To: Vereschagin, Cara Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Hi Cara, I will need postcards for the July 5 City Council meeting (Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal Initiation Request). SPEC-0143-2017 APNs 067-241-030 and 067-241-031 I will need to check the draft postcards by June 7th and the final postcards (printed) are due no later than June 18th (deliver to Clerk by 10:00 am, June 19th). If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you for your help, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 26051 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26052 From:Scott, Shawna To:Stanwyck, Shelly; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; Ricci, Pam A.; Gibson, Jessica Cc:Cabral, Darin J.; John Madonna; Connie Walter Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Date:Monday, June 5, 2017 9:45:00 AM Good morning, I needed to move this meeting to Conference Room 2 (still at 919 Palm). See you soon. Thank you, Shawna -----Original Appointment----- From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 11:10 AM To: Scott, Shawna; Stanwyck, Shelly; Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; Ricci, Pam A. Cc: Cabral, Darin J.; John Madonna; Connie Walter Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan When: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:30 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Conference Room 2, Interior Staff 26053 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - status report Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 4:49:19 PM Attachments:image001.png Okay, perfect. I’ll tackle the last remaining issue with Bob on Monday and get back with you. Have a great weekend. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:47 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - status report Hi Emily, thank you for the reminder. Public Works and Utilities cleared this as complete, so no completeness review items from them. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:38 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - status report You’re welcome! I forgot to follow up with Bob Hill this week re: the trail issue. I will do that on Monday. Did you ever hear from Utilities? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:36 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - status report 26054 Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:35 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - status report Hi Shawna – please see this week’s status report. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 26055 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - status report Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 4:47:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Hi Emily, thank you for the reminder. Public Works and Utilities cleared this as complete, so no completeness review items from them. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:38 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - status report You’re welcome! I forgot to follow up with Bob Hill this week re: the trail issue. I will do that on Monday. Did you ever hear from Utilities? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:36 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - status report Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:35 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - status report Hi Shawna – please see this week’s status report. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 26056 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 26057 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - status report Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 4:37:42 PM Attachments:image001.png You’re welcome! I forgot to follow up with Bob Hill this week re: the trail issue. I will do that on Monday. Did you ever hear from Utilities? Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:36 PM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch - status report Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:35 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - status report Hi Shawna – please see this week’s status report. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 26058 26059 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 4:36:00 PM Thank you, Emily. From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:26 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Leveille, Brian <bleveille@slocity.org>; Codron, Michael <mcodron@slocity.org> Cc: John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org>; Cabral, Darin J. <DJCabral@rrmdesign.com>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com>; Robert Chattel <robert@chattel.us>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Thank you, Pam. Attached please also find draft minutes from the May 22nd meeting to discuss the preliminary concept for treatment of the historic structures within the Froom Ranch Historic District. Please let me know if you have any questions/corrections/additions you would like me to make. I have also attached a brief agenda for Monday’s meeting to discuss the preliminary park concept from a Parks and Recreation perspective. Thanks, have a great weekend everyone. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 2:47 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com>; Shelly Stanwyck <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Cabral, Darin J. <DJCabral@rrmdesign.com>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com>; Robert Chattel <robert@chattel.us>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Hi Shawna, Attached is an updated site plan showing the current draft proposal for the park area. It shows 26060 retention and adaptive reuse of the three most significant historic resources, which are: the round- nosed dairy barn, the Creamery, and the main house. The buildings are shifted from their existing locations, but retain their relative spacing with one another. In addition, grading in the area will provide vertical "steps" between footprints to mimic the vertical relationships between buildings. We will be prepared on Monday to discuss each structure and available spaces within them to accommodate City park uses. We are looking forward to getting the City’s feedback on the draft proposal. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 5:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Hi Pam, If you have a concept/site plan or any other information that I can send to Shelly prior to the meeting, can you please email me, Emily, and Shelly? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Appointment----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:16 AM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Accepted: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan When: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:30 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Conference Room 1, Main Lobby Thanks Shawna! 26061 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel Subject:RE: Froom Ranch - status report Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 4:36:00 PM Attachments:image001.png Thanks! From: Emily Creel [mailto:ECreel@swca.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:35 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch - status report Hi Shawna – please see this week’s status report. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 26062 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Froom Ranch - status report Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 4:35:38 PM Attachments:image001.png Froom Ranch - Status Report 06-02-17.xlsx Hi Shawna – please see this week’s status report. Thank you, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 26063 From:Emily Creel To:Ricci, Pam A.; Scott, Shawna; Leveille, Brian; Codron, Michael Cc:John Madonna; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com); Stanwyck, Shelly; Cabral, Darin J.; Jewell, Debbie J.; Robert Chattel; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 4:25:46 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch - Historic Structures Meeting Minutes 053017 - draft.docx Froom Ranch - Park Concept Meeting Agenda 052217.docx Thank you, Pam. Attached please also find draft minutes from the May 22nd meeting to discuss the preliminary concept for treatment of the historic structures within the Froom Ranch Historic District. Please let me know if you have any questions/corrections/additions you would like me to make. I have also attached a brief agenda for Monday’s meeting to discuss the preliminary park concept from a Parks and Recreation perspective. Thanks, have a great weekend everyone. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 2:47 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com>; John Madonna <John@jmadonna.com>; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com) <Connie@jmadonna.com>; Shelly Stanwyck <sstanwyc@slocity.org>; Cabral, Darin J. <DJCabral@rrmdesign.com>; Jewell, Debbie J. <DJJewell@rrmdesign.com>; Robert Chattel <robert@chattel.us>; Montgomery, Victor <VMontgomery@rrmdesign.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Hi Shawna, Attached is an updated site plan showing the current draft proposal for the park area. It shows retention and adaptive reuse of the three most significant historic resources, which are: the round- nosed dairy barn, the Creamery, and the main house. The buildings are shifted from their existing locations, but retain their relative spacing with one another. In addition, grading in the area will provide vertical "steps" between footprints to mimic the vertical relationships between buildings. We will be prepared on Monday to discuss each structure and available spaces within them to accommodate City park uses. We are looking forward to getting the City’s feedback on the draft proposal. 26064 Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 5:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Hi Pam, If you have a concept/site plan or any other information that I can send to Shelly prior to the meeting, can you please email me, Emily, and Shelly? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Appointment----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:16 AM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Accepted: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan When: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:30 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Conference Room 1, Main Lobby Thanks Shawna! 26065 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>; John Madonna; Connie Walter (Connie@jmadonna.com); Stanwyck, Shelly; Cabral, Darin J.; Jewell, Debbie J.; Robert Chattel; Montgomery, Victor Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 2:47:28 PM Attachments:Historic Building Sketch_060217.REDUCED.pdf Hi Shawna, Attached is an updated site plan showing the current draft proposal for the park area. It shows retention and adaptive reuse of the three most significant historic resources, which are: the round- nosed dairy barn, the Creamery, and the main house. The buildings are shifted from their existing locations, but retain their relative spacing with one another. In addition, grading in the area will provide vertical "steps" between footprints to mimic the vertical relationships between buildings. We will be prepared on Monday to discuss each structure and available spaces within them to accommodate City park uses. We are looking forward to getting the City’s feedback on the draft proposal. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 5:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Hi Pam, If you have a concept/site plan or any other information that I can send to Shelly prior to the meeting, can you please email me, Emily, and Shelly? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Appointment----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:16 AM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Accepted: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan When: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:30 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Conference Room 1, Main Lobby 26066 Thanks Shawna! 26067 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 10:48:45 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you, Shawna. J Have a great weekend. Emily Creel Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants P 805.543.7095 ex. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 10:47 AM To: Emily Creel <ECreel@swca.com> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Hi Emily, Please see attached edits – you did follow the example I provided, thank you. My edits include additional information/clarification that I think the Council will need to consider the RFP authorization. Please feel free to edit for readability, as you see fit. You can just send this back in a clean version, and I will dig up the attachments and send to you for your file. Happy Friday! Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26068 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - CAR Review Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 10:46:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch SP - Council Agenda Report - RFP_070517_SS.doc image001.png Hi Emily, Please see attached edits – you did follow the example I provided, thank you. My edits include additional information/clarification that I think the Council will need to consider the RFP authorization. Please feel free to edit for readability, as you see fit. You can just send this back in a clean version, and I will dig up the attachments and send to you for your file. Happy Friday! Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26069 From:Ricci, Pam A. To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Date:Friday, June 2, 2017 10:14:57 AM Hi Shawna, I will send you a site plan this afternoon. Thanks. Pam PAM RICCI From: Scott, Shawna [mailto:sscott@slocity.org] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 5:07 PM To: Ricci, Pam A. <paricci@rrmdesign.com> Cc: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Hi Pam, If you have a concept/site plan or any other information that I can send to Shelly prior to the meeting, can you please email me, Emily, and Shelly? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Appointment----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:16 AM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Accepted: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan When: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:30 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Conference Room 1, Main Lobby Thanks Shawna! 26070 From:Scott, Shawna To:Ricci, Pam A. Cc:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 5:07:00 PM Hi Pam, If you have a concept/site plan or any other information that I can send to Shelly prior to the meeting, can you please email me, Emily, and Shelly? Thank you, Shawna -----Original Appointment----- From: Ricci, Pam A. [mailto:paricci@rrmdesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:16 AM To: Scott, Shawna Subject: Accepted: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Meeting with Applicant to Discuss Park Plan When: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:30 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: 919 Conference Room 1, Main Lobby Thanks Shawna! 26071 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:44:00 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP_052317_redlined_SS_TC.docx Froom Ranch Specific Plan IS_05-23-17_redlined_SS_TC.docx From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:01 AM To: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Emily, Great work on the RFP and IS. Tyler did not have any comments that you need to address. He did have a question about the proposed new zoning overlay for the LPC (see attached) – Tyler and I discussed his comment and I will add a brief clarification that the applicant’s proposed zoning designations will continue to be reviewed (or something similar). So, I do not need any further edits from you on the RFP or IS at this time. I hope to have the CAR back to you by the end of the day with any comments. Have a great day! Thank you, Shawna From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review I have reviewed the documents and have just a couple of questions. Let’s discuss when you have a moment. Overall, the IS and RFP are excellent. Tyler From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:30 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Tyler, The Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP and Initial Study are available here for your review. Do you think you’ll be able to review with any edits/comments by Thursday June 1? Thank you, Shawna 26072 26073 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 3:30:00 PM Attachments:Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP_052317_redlined_SS_TC.docx Froom Ranch Specific Plan IS_05-23-17_redlined_SS_TC.docx From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:01 AM To: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Emily, Great work on the RFP and IS. Tyler did not have any comments that you need to address. He did have a question about the proposed new zoning overlay for the LPC (see attached) – Tyler and I discussed his comment and I will add a brief clarification that the applicant’s proposed zoning designations will continue to be reviewed (or something similar). So, I do not need any further edits from you on the RFP or IS at this time. I hope to have the CAR back to you by the end of the day with any comments. Have a great day! Thank you, Shawna From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review I have reviewed the documents and have just a couple of questions. Let’s discuss when you have a moment. Overall, the IS and RFP are excellent. Tyler From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:30 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Tyler, The Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP and Initial Study are available here for your review. Do you think you’ll be able to review with any edits/comments by Thursday June 1? Thank you, Shawna 26074 26075 From:Scott, Shawna To:Bell, Kyle Subject:RE: Current Development Projects in Process Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 2:05:31 PM Attachments:image001.png 1185 Monterey_revised.jpg Hi Kyle, Updates for you: 1. The Froom Ranch Specific Plan has been amended, so please modify the following numbers in the table and on the website: · 120-room hotel 2. 1185 Monterey: Scheduled for ARC on June 5, 2017 a. Updated graphic for website, attached. 3. Towneplace Suites: Building Permit under review Thank you for putting this together! Shawna From: Bell, Kyle Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:23 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocitycloud.onmicrosoft.com>; Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org>; Van Leeuwen, Kyle <KVanLeeuwen@slocity.org>; Morais, Kip <KMorais@slocity.org>; Saptono, Januar <jsaptono@slocity.org> Cc: Davidson, Doug <ddavidson@slocity.org> Subject: Current Development Projects in Process Importance: High Please review the draft Development Projects in Process List and let me know if there are any projects that need to be updated, please also review the City website and make sure all projects are showing accurate images and descriptions for your projects. Development Projects List T:\Community Development\KBELL\Development Projects in Process status sheet\Draft Current Major Projects 6.June 2017.pdf Development Projects Webpage http://www.slocity.org/doing-business/doing-business-in-slo/what-development-is- happening-in-the-city *Please provide updates no later than June 2nd. 26076 Kyle Bell CDD Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E KBell@slocity.org T 805.781.7524 slocity.org 26077 From:Scott, Shawna To:Cantrell, Deanna Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Administrative Draft Specific Plan Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 12:28:00 PM Attachments:froom+ranch+specific+plan_5.10.17.pdf image001.png Dear Chief Cantrell: I am the CDD project manager for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan. In brief, this specific plan area is located adjacent to Los Osos Valley Road and the Home Depot/Costco shopping center. This area is identified as Specific Plan Area 3 (Madonna on LOVR) in the City’s Land Use Element, and consists of approximately 110 acres within the City’s Sphere of Influence, which the General Plan anticipates would be annexed in to the City following several entitlement reviews and completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process. The applicant, John Madonna, has submitted an administrative draft specific plan prepared by RRM Design Group for City review (please see the attached document). The application has not yet been deemed complete, and the request for proposals to prepare an EIR initiation request will be considered by the City Council in July 5, 2017. As described in the attached document, anticipated development generally includes: · Villaggio Life Plan Community, including independent living, assisted living, memory care/skilled nursing beds, recreational facility, restaurants, and theaters (this community would be private and gated); · Multi-family housing; · Commercial retail uses; · 120-room hotel; and · Neighborhood/trailhead park with connections to the Irish Hills Natural Area. CDD discussions with the City Fire Department (Rodger Maggio) included topics such as the types and frequency of emergency service calls to Life Plan/Continuing Care Communities. In addition, if the project is approved and the site is annexed into the City, it may result in a population increase within the City limits. At this stage in the process, a Security Plan has not been developed, although the Villaggio representative has discussed the security requirements for these types of facilities (gated entrance, private facility). I would be glad to talk with you more regarding this project, and any issues or concerns that your department may have. I can also set up a meeting with the applicant’s team; let me know what would best facilitate your review and understanding of the project. Thank you, Shawna Scott Associate Planner 26078 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26079 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:48:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP_052317_redlined_SS_TC.docx Froom Ranch Specific Plan IS_05-23-17_redlined_SS_TC.docx From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:01 AM To: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Emily, Great work on the RFP and IS. Tyler did not have any comments that you need to address. He did have a question about the proposed new zoning overlay for the LPC (see attached) – Tyler and I discussed his comment and I will add a brief clarification that the applicant’s proposed zoning designations will continue to be reviewed (or something similar). So, I do not need any further edits from you on the RFP or IS at this time. I hope to have the CAR back to you by the end of the day with any comments. Have a great day! Thank you, Shawna From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review I have reviewed the documents and have just a couple of questions. Let’s discuss when you have a moment. Overall, the IS and RFP are excellent. Tyler From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:30 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Tyler, The Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP and Initial Study are available here for your review. Do you think you’ll be able to review with any edits/comments by Thursday June 1? Thank you, Shawna 26080 26081 From:Scott, ShawnaTo:shawna.scott76@gmail.comSubject:FW: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your ReviewDate:Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:25:00 AM From: Microsoft Outlook Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 11:10 AMTo: Scott, Shawna Subject: Undeliverable: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> (ecreel@swca.com)Your message wasn't delivered because the recipient's email provider rejected it. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: MWHPR09MB1406.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ecreel@swca.comRemote Server returned '550 5.7.501 Access denied, spam abuse detected. For more information please go to http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=526653' Original message headers: Authentication-Results: swca.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;swca.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=slocitycloud.onmicrosoft.com;Received: from MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.172.51.19) by MWHPR09MB1406.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.172.51.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1124.9; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:10:17 +0000Received: from MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.51.19]) by MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.172.51.19]) with mapi id 15.01.1124.020; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:10:17 +0000Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat"Content-Transfer-Encoding: binaryFrom: "Scott, Shawna" <sscott@slocitycloud.onmicrosoft.com>To: "Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com>" <ecreel@swca.com>Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your ReviewThread-Topic: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your ReviewThread-Index: AdLVncozLMoU+zFyRNK4tzZ2DcuRHQEh9yhAADBAotAABuiOQA==Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:10:16 +0000Message-ID: <MWHPR09MB1405F67312EF6BDDBEF95818E4F60@MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>References: <MWHPR09MB1405B911F75D05DE3A37AB70D5FF0@MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <BY2PR09MB0264DA58B8F56C4B4BB3DEEDCFF10@BY2PR09MB0264.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <MWHPR09MB140555E1B297D359CFCB0FE8E4F60@MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>In-Reply-To: <MWHPR09MB140555E1B297D359CFCB0FE8E4F60@MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>Accept-Language: en-USContent-Language: en-USX-MS-Has-Attach: yesX-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <MWHPR09MB1405F67312EF6BDDBEF95818E4F60@MWHPR09MB1405.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>MIME-Version: 1.0X-Originating-IP: [104.129.198.96]X-MS-PublicTrafficType: EmailX-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;MWHPR09MB1405;35:/Puvu5K7uNHN+DOghoJowhYrqRyJHZsMN5YgKi4ieGRpGRPADQVd45vCKDL+ri5eegjFvHP3Zg6GojTrtX9cfnjqmYLVAE65yG4pAQC1irjHh1pWuv+e0A0yd/iIp9RsReturn-Path: sscott@slocitycloud.onmicrosoft.comX-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MWHPR09MB1406:X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 43ca6201-13f7-482a-2d9d-08d4a9197522X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075);SRVR:MWHPR09MB1406;X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;MWHPR09MB1406;3:n9LrtU9In70++6Ua7zUSCZBEkNj+NfSN8EnhLILSErTtckcHAXfH+6Y2OoWtljtEIRYXDe+tllfq6gvg+rKw3/wDhupLOL8zjkavNC/jDXSMa6qyHKV1mael/zu/SS7hR+ijQTZhgqy19Nnw3GSLle2z4UMLkcEGVnXqFG/r89sRdieHhNgcha9c5pLWBIxmp/Chgrv2jdXOZfR0tFewc3Q/TQvdxrJaQrI6Kb2MmNbYWrBjNxYzqcZIAN/Pww4+6aDi3muVtJCKNSlZktknzQKaLZfayrgkptOA2Fy9kpNbk7z5dWeDRMJt0rdJALkjRwKhOpDBzTz8uh/rY/dciEBq4gtLxQ6901Xr0DixGRhKuH2Dd+iSXLFFGScqpjU/wtjTHsGFt/a+VqlNyfZXzg==;25: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X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;MWHPR09MB1406;31:8g8uyxuUKv7N3e6llgUhvzta5J3klen3x8KTM0pmrNxad95cbzjaD/GZQFzaFvG/+Vj0oTY/qcK88Z1KPyIG7TrX7Il5Nw2toxDdv4dUz2Jfs2a7BQttHO0yOwfAKem1rcKSmG8F9r68jNsJiQqKdFKxVRyiQnDio/PhjWKjH/o75Z73+jxP6la+7xqwuVbIZFXyPn6YlxOOngDfj5JOR6FtbBs+HOM0OFVKBd3ZwsC8663EgzL1WhUJRbARuYjUB9wNPAUjSH5cIkAsOacPSR9HgzLcmSi4wyu/VOoLyMfUbs2oiADzSdZA3olCFJGG;20: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-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <MWHPR09MB1406FA16E6F53D11F1BD4B88E4F60@MWHPR09MB1406.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:(21748063052155);X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(102415395)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6000006)(6002118)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095);SRVR:MWHPR09MB1406;X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: =?us-ascii?Q?1;MWHPR09MB1406;4:KqoPsc0SJbd0XfM1YwuaMJ+UO1z9E10VHsLSQW/eK7?= =?us-ascii?Q?35bWnNRaPIzZwi4IUAhNQAONwAtB56UHbbYt22P7NZmt2CS0muquBr8kV/LI?= =?us-ascii?Q?3J00L1RlKkWCC5MWsT6ddcoxY7AMIiNlWkT3Uk+C4Ff9BHJ9RMzsTMzME7UH?= =?us-ascii?Q?IXujUsPa1e5Gbk8go2OVJqJrGvuaYExOUhEMnRgl97bp+RCJEOXgxrXyH1J5?= =?us-ascii?Q?JdchyMAt+bSsqdWEYZwf+vMKYktFFq9Z0kH88E20EQrMz1vTyYfOprGuP1Fz?= =?us-ascii?Q?jsJ3+yrrbGkcXkb5ZaY+hUHhs6GYH/ZWgny3jTHzz1dLYxwFf2GCl3INks5d?= =?us-ascii?Q?XGs0Gf9PluiW0W5Yyru8N9L+w9hMILNxQCHp+MNpJFi4IZRoNmoBB50JEKsk?= =?us-ascii?Q?rPe14EzT6OViiNFDzOWI3+lAe0xroPHIIiBLY+RJU6YuSmiqmlSltYDy90fl?= =?us-ascii?Q?gaORbUqSuXTfztvNIfRZ2VAafvg5HhbLYTMpyijSfWn132PoYWElLbxoA9/p?= =?us-ascii?Q?clhbkV5aXFI5UZIVYAihbfsdzFEwoVxi8EPCvPL1qd2GV/D6PgXZ/JkLAA5k?= =?us-ascii?Q?NRpyMdp8pjKUEjwyhJfJL6QeUEX3KpPXYOtOKfhBW77h10ewMBvpDynVcSDU?= =?us-ascii?Q?voYHsRcEhnE66XSrVn/LwzvGBN6Aqr9HIWEnzUNioc86fvRRTvV2c6Yh8Viu?= =?us-ascii?Q?JkH/C3jIeqtjccrgVDBoJgx+4dlHyZyTC7iIW0cV51XOn15PXSdV5EviP6qr?= =?us-ascii?Q?oRcSkZoP8KBU7T7Gy9j3xIPaHYWYXeCrdzgijp9N6cw0eG2nvbaTgH3K59CS?= =?us-ascii?Q?pJJg+eCx7cMHXdSKQktTBKaYk6r49+cnG6N/V55Aa5Nzbx6e0hYnn7D0+aPJ?= =?us-ascii?Q?aW5JGuJ4Sg9UiHSYofXR2Nw+cZTQQSdgGj7tcEAD3iQPBJ9ckuzxMWdiDU4w?= =?us-ascii?Q?CQD470lrcSCOgwhjmS2eOjIxr2NCeLbw8vY4HU8OEQ91ReoR8OS8Nf47bpqe?= =?us-ascii?Q?MoYchu2m1gRG5upI9VVdh+m0lCAfUFzCllZrjMys56SZWVKZtTSLzF/U/NZI?= =?us-ascii?Q?RbDkqP/3S/OXuX5P4StDaPjBodKwzZM6zowc6YH5pVIIRTiIcnaiaz9n1D/9?= =?us-ascii?Q?GfwwTvL74GScDY5mjDJQkUzIO0n0o4GnCc9cxNtV5QxXVZr2B2DvYCdqAF/0?= =?us-ascii?Q?Cx0jqEK/pC7PeXwykuK0gW0liGo+Ed+HfA1qi6+SGb/8ZECWHMwdjNPdgdOn?= =?us-ascii?Q?KZWWfvEi5q48WPaqk=3D?=X-Forefront-PRVS: 0325F6C77BX-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;MWHPR09MB1406;23:hkrguc5GFyGFFuZof7Tpo3i8QLcDIGZ1r862T/VNk0vUOGLoMF0gefEx6504ucspLPCG5Tdu18XnufbUXqzzKvzhUrOuav/hcpttC7mKdNnv9Mdo2U61vVAdpIUh5ah2wa3kOXrHCQ0DZ2rNnPmUtRryh044SbGzEkPXqEG6iLwtJv4wPS2tFvd8ZoKIF6s16DCMG5j8REO4vzHFRm+VLGAcgmnka//uiUueDN8e2vp3YZchfa6D1b6Tn3govlLQF/44CbaFAOZlN4zMosSv5A1VV07RZsAcxBbEbfi8x7LK8ghftNJ/8nCdhSEv9mlR;6:0QPD1UBQ9Xzz81NF5/JEAuUmAKugdW8CuB6c/IUCWrU4+PbGEZwqvYbYNxaH3FWNmx/mj1gMdO7bqG4j9A8Jtbg4sMNo0s/NPEXgn/MYMTtCI69ecayl9IJZKNP5sRbGZRddW67/wWiZKh6B35bOcLFs2OBxUt8GVrAlN7TXzdOBCaSuHNTKgAxRfIuoKh3wbg2jGzvoypc7vKoZRV8Xk/QB6hmls5dYicTedicj20aTmoAe6NwStJXTu/MSc+LDJeEuwUjsiQtMhMNFXtggOc29y17Ac/xphRa+NCK4og7L1k+L7+kgOtbsS2mft5uofcGyIUzDxVAR8+ldMSKPffzOiEOg+RmHqs4pUk5Utjq5HirZfLKz3GNCC7uxfBk7sVzim4XSErZBW7nZSdRjPg== 26082 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:10:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP_052317_redlined_SS_TC.docx Froom Ranch Specific Plan IS_05-23-17_redlined_SS_TC.docx From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:01 AM To: Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> <ecreel@swca.com> Subject: FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Emily, Great work on the RFP and IS. Tyler did not have any comments that you need to address. He did have a question about the proposed new zoning overlay for the LPC (see attached) – Tyler and I discussed his comment and I will add a brief clarification that the applicant’s proposed zoning designations will continue to be reviewed (or something similar). So, I do not need any further edits from you on the RFP or IS at this time. I hope to have the CAR back to you by the end of the day with any comments. Have a great day! Thank you, Shawna From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review I have reviewed the documents and have just a couple of questions. Let’s discuss when you have a moment. Overall, the IS and RFP are excellent. Tyler From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:30 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Tyler, The Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP and Initial Study are available here for your review. Do you think you’ll be able to review with any edits/comments by Thursday June 1? Thank you, Shawna 26083 26084 From:Emily Creel To:Scott, Shawna Subject:message - Froom Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 9:43:29 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Shawna – thank you for following up your email with a voicemail. I’ll check out the email issue you mentioned. If your email doesn’t come through, I’ll make sure and get those doc versions from you another way. Thanks, Emily Creel, J.D. Planning Team Lead SWCA Environmental Consultants 1422 Monterey Street, Suite C200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2945 P 805.543.7095 ext. 6814 | F 805.543.2367 Visit Our Website: http://www.swca.com 26085 From:Scott, Shawna To:Vereschagin, Cara Subject:Froom Ranch Specific Plan - Council Notice Postcards Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 8:17:31 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Cara, I will need postcards for the July 5 City Council meeting (Froom Ranch Specific Plan Request for Proposal Initiation Request). SPEC-0143-2017 APNs 067-241-030 and 067-241-031 I will need to check the draft postcards by June 7th and the final postcards (printed) are due no later than June 18th (deliver to Clerk by 10:00 am, June 19th). If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you for your help, Shawna Scott Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7176 slocity.org 26086 From:Scott, Shawna To:Emily Creel <ecreel@swca.com> Subject:FW: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Date:Thursday, June 1, 2017 8:00:00 AM Attachments:Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP_052317_redlined_SS_TC.docx Froom Ranch Specific Plan IS_05-23-17_redlined_SS_TC.docx Hi Emily, Great work on the RFP and IS. Tyler did not have any comments that you need to address. He did have a question about the proposed new zoning overlay for the LPC (see attached) – Tyler and I discussed his comment and I will add a brief clarification that the applicant’s proposed zoning designations will continue to be reviewed (or something similar). So, I do not need any further edits from you on the RFP or IS at this time. I hope to have the CAR back to you by the end of the day with any comments. Have a great day! Thank you, Shawna From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review I have reviewed the documents and have just a couple of questions. Let’s discuss when you have a moment. Overall, the IS and RFP are excellent. Tyler From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:30 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Froom Ranch Specific Plan - RFP and Initial Study for your Review Hi Tyler, The Froom Ranch Specific Plan RFP and Initial Study are available here for your review. Do you think you’ll be able to review with any edits/comments by Thursday June 1? Thank you, Shawna 26087