HomeMy WebLinkAboutBates 20031-20070 Appendix K - Water Supply Assessment APPENDIX K
Water Supply Assessment
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project
Final EIR
20031
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
20032
� . - �
c
� � a
-�
�
�
-�' ..l. •�f�. _ ' C ��~ _
���� _�� " _�� _�.- - _ -
_�.�_ �_
�, { a
�——_ ��.�► -�� � ti:
_-� -- - �::�-• -• - . .. `
�� �. �
_-� ..�. :_ .:a_•. . .:.- � ' ._. . `tr:`� � , ' _ "��''.�_... w = ' -_ " .-:� _ •. .,_-.. .--• . -.
-�� �. ...::�� ��` .. �'- � '� . . . �a,�=-'-e�-=__ _ ._^ �._=r_-�_...
�4:'.r �... . -_ - .:'a..�- -- - "_'!u�--� - - -�^ ---'
���:'�w,.e"�'�`_� - .. - �s�'' _
_ -^�,.::�,.� ;�� .,�, "'v
-
-���� x :N � �-.� � k . � " �'
_Y�"— _.�-��__ . . � . _ s,,� �r _ y:.., •
F .� 4x;.r• " - - - �" j��F• ._�s-"�S•y��� rr.- ' i Y"
... _
�
, _
, wi.:.' �. _..,��-�� r�.'�, _
.a � .. .. ,' .: _ . ......- . _ _
�. '.,��"• „-ti <r �i .: .� ^i..:.a.. ..: � �� .k�:.a!!�-e's. �
K ��`"' .��r-,. � y "'�"-,-�,�w• �^"'.l�,_ ��,..
� ���.� ti� .�3fYei�.� . _. •-�- -�:N
ic�`�L�yv� a�x�... � -^ --� � . .. _ .. _ . -
y..+..x�:_ ..�-- - p�e"s r • -- " �
�.o- A::- $� .A �.a ._ . - - �}'` - _- -.r..t.- �.r � �
L i ...�' r a�a4i�_ ... " .-�' " . -.. ... -"" _rY��_�.__- -. "
�` L t.: . � �. � '
� �,�'. _ .4, - .��'�-- �:,„ - ' - - . • _ - .��,�-'���
� . .,� �- �:"l:�� �:,_ ,.- . ,� _ ._ . �., :y�-� -:-�:.�_... , ;
..� y-- �r�„ .s•".�-�?r' .:-7�`.���.�,• •-
-�- - �� �,�..'"�]r.ar �7^ c.;• . --=- .
'�' ,,.;w�..r?'i-• . . . _ •h Yy�•�O.r
.. . , � . . � .• . r.r a � '�a�e�.',�.�.+ti'�i�.'
;��'�6`: • =~� . . .- . ., . r- v:•.'� � ,�,._.y��.. -y,`�'�
. ' .,�j.: y, �. •7 y':�`•� .�.§�.,. ���{�
.ti.r:.: "1I'r: ,...�e •+A` :��r:�k�•.• .�,s�f � y ,'���s-• '4 ti-':T�'tR'h
. . � �.:..... • _:.•
��.�
�� , . ���' . . . _ . . �:b� � . ". �_..''' � � ; •:�,. :t'�h�.� ��i, ��_ .`�'
,'`-I�y1!,`;� : . . �'.x'��.. rif��. -�'.�'�•....�1' ��,d'r� .o.,,w� - ��;
� '- � • �ea!r.. T '��:, ��?i9::� ��_4 .
_ .�'.cF i. -:rFl..,�'. �� `��.�-�-.'�.��. .. ,.
' _ � '.r�::� - . -Y.r�"-Y` . ��;'�°�� "��; —'�y@; ,�`x;.����,'�„�:.:•''��t.4_`:i��r,�_ •.
,�.J- � .1',y�;:� • � .. -' �� .. , ..4 •`w'�a'••• ��'��-e;:,��;�'.
-, �, !� - ������„ . s'�a � �� �'!14 .ie t`��'�+�-': •�S-
�-Y��, a = ..} _ '.n':"''- ;�c , 6',.. �y..,N�� z" ';ti'�q;� r"��+r,.t; -�'sky.:
:��• :. . � � •��,�:r:�-`� `;� . ' ,�-;'°f�'r' . � ��."•��•' .• yf: `.���s` W�', . y..
.:�;.m F;;_r .z,:. �:�'P�• L:s •ti;. 4 �1�,'4r` ..Y
�y:.'�'r�f�• '.1r. �• � . � , • �¢�."' �'Y . •' - ..FkL�;•'� �'I�;a, . . '
�l '.� �.�' .�"�' .'[' .�'fC'. .
' � � � �'��; �_.`. �.. �►��
r . ���� ���
r � �_ .�
..,- `. ���� .R, .
, .��+��_ � $�
�•/;i w' .. �A�-: � I �Re'
:� � ` ,,'. �.�
;�,�•�� , `3.� , ���' � ��6 r��.�
•-�'" . p�, E;; ,./��y'' � 'rf� . ii, '
;:.'2Cr, � '(� � i�y�` ;d,•g���ri'�.•:y;�
. _,x _� :,;.,��
�,urt,... ,. ,
M�l�v��.' '�'�=� t �y+�. . .
�� r:� .. . �:i� � . �. � ' ;'4�.: �5 "i l
'�k• ''.a.'• ` �h: �1'�`� _j
�: y��
/ �.i�"Y r '��':i�,'�*�.' . - � '�Ml Y.hh W
�� �.:� r i ., .:'��°�`-i.. i a � v••{f'•,-
" :: � � • �`-,�':�- . •r�r' ��.��
���....• & iN • d1 — • • • • — /C �' i;.,���f , .:s { t
��:
f-
,�:,��^:•:�:� , �, � � �_; '��: v' .,
#;,T���,o,. :.��..�;r -� .� �-��tr;. '����� �:;;., . - - •- 1, ••�� ;, . . , ' p,{�r--'�l•:�r;;:�,
'� ;� �� .,l�J'1?� � ay �. ' ..y. •�'�°- . .�� ,�r:i ,� � � :`. ..
��.r'�� 4 r� �' .� ' �'' ��'.r. �„ ...r�f;`�FilYi,�� 'h.� :j:. i.,.. 1� . .ry �. .'.- , -Gy i..�'' ,.y:':.�
� � .•r�Z: ��� '� r• . � �:�� �: »■ � � .c'
���� �y� ;i:i. .�,�, `�,��;t ay�,. ^ `� ��, �i� ki:� s����;' ��, ■,:v E,
r�t:i�.�.�`�':'•a�.� [�....�•�... ..� . _ ��F..�s . �,� �9 n�'` �•�.. �.'� �'. �. �`�L�'�,j:
ENGINEER OF REDORO:
�[�pFFSSlp,�..
CREATING �``p4� A� �r,� e�'y
ENVIRONMENTS y� 4��
c�
�-� '� PEOPLE � � No. 78597 �
ENJOY�
* #
Date: 02-20-20 I 8; revised I 0-3 I-I 8; revised 0 I-I 8-I 9; revised I 0-2 I-I 9 `q c�V 11- ��'
�a��.��
Prepared by RRM Design Group
Prepared for John and Susan MadonnaTrust andVillaggio Communities QA7E:
20033
WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
Water Code §10910 et seq.
To: City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Project Title: Froom Ranch Water Supply Assessment
The following determination has been made regarding the above-described project:
� The projected water demand for the project was included in the City's most recently adopted
urban water management plan.
� Based on additional sources of information, a sufficient water supply is available for the project.
The total water supplies available to the City during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years
within a 20-year projection will meet the projected water demand under the project in addition
to the demand of existing and other planned future uses, including, but not limited to,
agricultural uses.
� A sufficient water supply is not available for the project.(Plan for acquiring and developing
sufficient supply attached. Water Code§10911 (aJ].
The foregoing determination is based on the following Water Supply Assessment(WSA) Information and
supporting information in the San Luis Obispo General Plan Update Background Report Section 5.1,Water
and 5.3 Wastewater,as well as the records of the City of San Luis Obispo. The Land Use Circulation Plan
(LUCE)WSA covers the cumulative water supply impacts, and this WSA will cover the project specific impacts.
Signature Date Title
20034
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
Table of Contents
Page No.
1. Introduction 1
1.1: Background 1
1.2: Project Location and Description 2
2. Water Supply 2
2.1: Surface Water Supply 3
2.2: Recycled Water Supply 3
2.3: Groundwater Supply 3
3. Urban Water Management Plan Applicability 4
4. Water Resource Availability 5
5. Water Supply Reliability 6
6. Water Usage 7
6.1: Water Conservation Program 8
7. Entitlements / Regulatory Approvals 9
8. Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project 9
9. Conclusion 11
10.References 12
List of Tables:
Table 1-1:Froom Ranch Land Uses 2
Table 4-1: City Water Resource Availability 6
Table 5-1: Water Supply Reliability 7
Table 5-2:2015 City Potable Water Supply Availability 7
Table 8-1:Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Water Demand 9
Table 8-2: Cify Wafer Supply Availability and Froom Ranch Wafer Usage 11
� I P ('I ('I P
20035
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
Appendices:
Appendix 1: Froom Ranch Water Demand Calculations
Appendix 1a: Froom Ranch Water Demand Calculations Based on the LUCE EIR
Appendix 2: Irrigation Water Use Map
Appendix 3: Irrigation Recycled Water Demand Calculations
ii � ° � � ^
20036
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
1. INTRODUCTION
This Water Supply Assessment was prepared for the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan project in
the City of San Luis Obispo, pursuant to the requirements of Section I 09 I 0 of the State Water Code,
as amended by Senate Bill No. 6 I O, Chapter 643 (2001).
1.1 Background
Senate Bill No. 610, effective January I, 2002, requires a city or county, which determines that a
"project" (as defined in Water Code§ 10912) is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), to identify any public water system that may supply water for the project and to request
those public water systems to prepare a specified water supply assessment. The assessment is
required to include an identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, or water
service contracts relevant to the identified water supply for the proposed project and water received
in prior years pursuant to those entitlements, rights,and contracts.The assessment must be approved
by the governing body of the public water system supplying water to the project. If the projected
water demand associated with the project was included as part of the most recently adopted urban
water management plan, the public water system may incorporate the requested information from
the urban water management plan in the water supply assessment.
The bill requires the city or county, if it is not able to identify any public water system that may supply
water for the project, to prepare the water supply assessment after a prescribed consultation. If the
public water system concludes that water supplies are, or will be, insufficient, plans for acquiring
additional water supplies are required to be submitted to the city or county.The city or county must
include the water supply assessment in any environmental document prepared for the project
pursuant to the act. It also requires the city or county to determine whether project water supplies
will be sufficient to satisfy the demands of the project, in addition to existing and planned future uses.
A "project" under Section 10912 includes the following:
a. A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units.
b. A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than I,000
persons or having more than 500,000 square feet of floor space.
c. A proposed commercial office building employing more than I,000 persons or having
more than 250,000 square feet of floor space.
d. A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms.
e. A proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park planned
to house more than I,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having
more than 650,000 square feet of floor area.
f. A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in this
subdivision.
g. A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than,
the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project.
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan is a mixed - use project comprised of two development areas,
the first is referred to as Madonna Froom Ranch, the second is referred to as the Life Plan
1 � Page
20037
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
Community. Each of the development areas are comprised of a mix of uses and together meet
the definition of a project under Section I 0912. The two development areas are listed in the table I-
I below:
Table 1-1. Froom Ranch Land Uses
Madonna Froom Ranch Specific Plan
Land Uses Size
Multi-Family Housin 130 units
Commercial 30,000 sq. ft.
Hotel 70,000 s . ft.; 120 rooms
Trailhead Park 2.9 acres
Life Plan Community
Land Uses Size
Independent Livin 366 units
Assisted Livin Units 38 units
Memor Care 17 beds
Skilled Nursing 34 beds
Restaurants & Theaters 15,000 sq. ft.
Recreational Facility 1 1,000 sq. ft.
1.2 Project Location and Description
The proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan project is in the City of San Luis Obispo along the north
side of Highway 101, between Calle Joaquin to the south, Los Osos Valley Road to the east and the
Irish Hills Plaza to the north. The site is approximately I 10 acres. Approximately 59 acres of are
proposed to remain as open space.
2. WATER SUPPLY
Water Code Section 10910(b) requires the identification of the public water system that may serve
the project.The CityofSan Luis Obispo isthe sole water purveyor within the city limits and will provide
water to the proposed Froom Ranch Specific Plan project. The City's potable water is supplied from
multiple surface water sources. In addition, recycled water and groundwater are used to supplement
irrigation demands.
The Water and Wastewater Management Element of the General Plan, first adopted in 1987 and
most recently updated in May of 2018, specifies that the City of San Luis Obispo utilize multiple water
resources to meet its water supply needs. Having several sources of water avoids dependence on any
one source that may be impacted by drought or other water supply reduction or emergency. With
the update of the Water and Wastewater Management Element, the City Council reaffirmed the
policy for a multi-source water supply. Consistent with the multi-source water supply concept, the
City obtains water from five sources:
• Salinas Reservoir (Santa Margarita Lake) and Whale Rocl<Reservoir:Combined Safe
Annual Yield 4,910 acre-feet(AF)/year
• Nacimiento Reservoir:5,482 AF/year dependable yield/contractual limit
• Recycled water from the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF): 238
2 � Page
20038
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
AF/year 2015 Annual Usage
• Groundwater: Supplemental usage, 43 AF/year in2018
2.1 Surface Water Supply:
The Salinas Dam was built in I 942 by the War Department to supply water to Camp San Luis Obispo
and secondarily,to meet the water needs of the City of San Luis Obispo.The Salinas Reservoir(Santa
Margarita Lal<e) captures water from a I 12-square mile watershed and can store up to 23,843 AF.
Since the late 1940s, the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
has operated the Salinas Reservoir under a lease from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers.Water from
the reservoir is pumped through the one-mile long Cuesta Tunnel, and then flows by gravity to the
City's Water Treatment Plant on Stenner Creek Road.
The Whale Rock Reservoir is a 40,662 AF reservoir created by the construction of an earthen dam
on Old Creel< near the town of Cayucos. The Whale Rock Dam captures water from a 20.3 square
mile watershed and water is delivered through 17.6 miles of 30-inch pipeline and by two pumping
stations.The City of San Luis Obispo owns 55.05 percent of the water storage rights at
the reservoir. The remaining water storage rights are divided between two State agencies, with Cal
Poly owning 33.71 percent and the California Men's Colony owning I 1.24 percent.
The Nacimiento Reservoir provides flood protection and is a source of supply for groundwater
recharge for the Salinas Valley. It is owned and operated by the Monterey County Water Resources
Agency. Since I 959,the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District has
had an entitlement to 17,500 AF/year of water from the reservoir for use in San Luis Obispo County.
Approximately 1,750 AF/year have been designated for uses around the lake, leaving 15,750 AF/year
for allocation to other areas within the County of San Luis Obispo. The City's contractual supply is
5,482 AF.
2.2 Recycled Water Supply:
Recycled water has been envisioned as part of the City's overall water supply strategy since the I 980s.
In 1994, the City began a major capital improvement project at the WRRF that included addition of
tertiary treatment and other unit processes required to meet stringent effluent quality limits,set forth
by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, intended to protect and enhance the receiving waters
of San Luis Obispo Creel<.The City completed construction of the project in 2006 and recycled water
deliveries began in May that year. The main non-potable water source is the City's WRRF which has
a design flow rate of 5,700 AF/year (5.1 mgd). The City is required to release 1,807 AF/year of flow
to San Luis Creek for environmental enhancement. The recycled water usage for 2018 totaled 244
AF/year for construction and landscape uses.
2.3 Groundwater Supply:
The groundwater basin beneath the City is relatively small and recharges very quickly following normal
rainfall periods.The groundwater basin also lowers relatively quickly during periods of below-average
rainfall. Extensive use of groundwater sustained the City through most of the drought of I 986-I 991.
The City's two largest producing wells were shut down in I 992 and I 993 when elevated nitrate levels
were detected. The City stopped utilizing the Pacific Beach well in April 2015.
The City envisions groundwater playing an important role in ensuring continued resiliency in its water
supply portfolio. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) is a statewide law that
requires local agencies to adopt groundwater management plans that relate to the needs and
3 � Page
20039
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
resources of their communities. In 2017,the City became a Groundwater Sustainability Agency(GSA)
over the area of the San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin, designated by the California
Department of Water Resources as a Medium Priority Basin, that lies beneath and within its
jurisdictional boundaries. The San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin "eligible entities" (City,
County, Golden State Water Company, Edna Ranch Mutual Water Company-East, Varian Ranch
Mutual Water Company, and Edna Valley Growers Mutual Water Company) are all working
collaboratively to comply with SGMA requirements for the entire groundwater basin. The GSA
structure includes a Groundwater Sustainability Commission which is an advisory body to the City
Council and the Board of Supervisors. The Commission consists of one member from the City
Council, one County Supervisor and a representative of each of the identified water companies. The
City, County, and eligible entities are required by SGMA to worl< together to create Groundwater
Sustainability Plans by January 31, 2022.
Private wells are in use in the City, such as the well operated by San Luis Coastal Unified School
District at San Luis Obispo High School. The City's Laguna Lake Golf Course also has two wells that
meet a portion of the irrigation demand for the course. The remainder of the irrigation demand for
the golf course is met using recycled water from the City's Water Resource Recovery Facility. The
project contains several wells shown in Figure 2-3 (Cleath-Harris Groundwater Report 2018). The
domestic well will continue to operate at its current domestic use. The artesian well and the
Hollingsworth well are to remain and are not affected by project construction.The existing irrigation
well is to remain and provide construction water and agricultural water during construction and after
completion.
3. URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICABILITY
Water Code Section I 0910(c)(I) requires a determination of whether a project was included as part
of the most recently adopted Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). The City's most recently
adopted UWMP was adopted on June 14, 2016, and provides a description of the City's service area,
demographics, multi-source water supply, treatment, and conveyance/distribution facilities. The
UWMP also includes historical and future water demand to serve the buildout of the City consistent
with the General Plan which includes the Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project.
Since I 987,the City's General Plan has included a Water and Wastewater Management Element.The
water section of the Element includes policies related to present water demand and overall projected
water demand. The Element also addresses water conservation, water resource availability,
accounting for siltation, multi-source water supply, and recycled water.
The 2014 LUCE update included a Water Supply Assessment for the areas within the City's Urban
Reserve Line (URL). This WSA was for undeveloped and developed lands to be developed pursuant
to the LUCE.
4 � Page
20040
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
4. WATER RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
As described in the Water Supply Section 2, the City of San Luis Obispo has five water resources to
meet current and future City water demands: Salinas Reservoir (Santa Margarita Lake), Whale Rock
Reservoir, Nacimiento Reservoir, recycled water from the City's WRRF,and groundwater.To ensure
water supply reliability, the City determined the amount of water available from these water
resources on an annual basis. The method to determine the available yield from each resource varies
based on water right, contractual agreement, or the amount of water supplied.
�,'• ;•''. �;," -�,�,r�'.:.�.;
..�. ,k� '',� �`� ` �,,,�• .�. ���, t i .
'�;, .� ���
� F, sm�m�&sm�u;•rHai " •.'�, ,.+�,
' r } �:��:;
�� 'Irish Hills TH:1 ''���� ' �. �!,.•'S' _ t'�
� ��x�_ ' �, 51`
* `, r�' '+ �'f• :y '•.1 �
� .� , ■� , . �'��
•� , � ��,,�:- ��;..
.. " ' .• , . , �f�
.. � ' � • � ,�" _
. �i� j"�� f� �ldtlonna�mnUc LVell •,�� .. � .
�'i:. ��-`� � . -��. �, .
�►. r�. �°r ..- �'f•'�+1'��• h'
.....+ • ,�
.r! �Q �' ri`� �'��r
� �.
' � � � tlJ• ti���.• `�. .
. 4Lan�h �/_ •, .
-. �/� � IlrxJquarlers ��4'. ,. ..
I 1
�' n�/�Q
� ��� *.
� '��'r.�1'��`t�."-- F-nmha�Brtiin +� '*'r
' Frqvm['rcck '' e'�
�1 Madonna imgatlpn Well
n ; . CJ (1 � ' f�.
�' ' �r� �" � �� � 1 ,�
t .�� �_.�
,� . ..r�.. f_ _� •Y..
Y
� �� ' '�. � a:.
� � V
� L]ctentian Eiasin :' ��.:i �
�� L �,�'�I �'�"� :
`.• .. ^�'` . ;y
1�� " . r S.. . .
•� �
Cf .
.�w � � � � 'r,esia�'Jdeli
.�• , M�� :7 .,c.� ,
_�' - �.,., �:�,��
.�' _ t•� :�
,:�a ,;;r•' �s� �.
,.' p� ' ��• . w�:�1
•�' �� .��. � ,
,'� .- _ . � . � --�'�l •
��� � ••Y� HobinGswarth Well� �� � ��.
\ .�iF�•'"` �r .:�s • , -
. �; • �� ,� , '
�;. � � .,�
.. R ' � Y=�.,.� � ~ 4
�
�. '� � ``� ' , AY. . � ,�
-,,� ' �� ' w r:..
�+��'in�lard r, .'.r•i.7� . ,'��^ :j� ��J ..�
�� ,so �Ew �,���� ,r :`� " � .��r ,
. c:fiurch `•.''�1�'•„
} .
f'ru��ertp �« � •w.E�'�� '
Figure 2-3. Site Map and Well Location
For Salinas and Whale Rock Reservoirs the term "safe annual yield" is used to define the annual
amount of water available from these two resources. The two reservoirs are operated in a
coordinated manner to increase the available water. In contrast, the "dependable yield" from
Nacimiento Reservoir is the contractual amount of water to which the City has rights. Since
S � Page
20041
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
Nacimiento Reservoir is operated as a water supply project for Monterey County, the concept of
safe annual yield is not used for the City's contractual water supply from this source. For recycled
water, the annual amount delivered is counted in the water availability calculation. Though
groundwater is part of the City's water portfolio, due to the limitations on its use, the City will not
consider this supply in estimating available water resources to meet community needs.
Table 4-I is a summary of the City's available water resources.
Table 4-1. Cify Wafer Resource Availability
Salinas and Whale Rock Reservoir 4,910 AF Safe Annual Yield
Nacimiento Reservoir 5,482 AF Contractual Limit
Siltation to 2060 (500 AF) Policy A 4.2.2
Recycled Water Use 238 AF 2017 Annual Usage
TOTAL I 0,I 30 AF
*Source: 2018 Water and Wastewater Management Element of the General Plan
5. WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY
The water supply and reliability analysis provided by the 2015 UWMP uses historical information since
1941 for evaluation of water supply availability and safe annual yield for the Salinas and Whale Rock
Reservoirs. The analysis of water supply availability is based on the controlled drought period of the
two reservoirs, which occurred between I 987 and 1991. Table 5-I below summarizes the results of
that analysis and indicates the City's water resources are reliable during extended drought periods.
Through the coordinated operation of Salinas and Whale Rock Reservoirs and the ability to use other
available water supplies (Nacimiento, recycled water, and limited groundwater), climatic conditions
such as prolonged drought do not impact the City's water supply.
As required by Section 5 of the City's Water and Wastewater Management Element, the City
accounts for water supplies necessary to meet three specific community needs, including primary
water supply, secondary water supply, and reliability reserve, see Table 5-2.The primary water supply
is defined as the amount of water needed to serve the build-out population of the city as identified in
the Land Use Element of the General Plan.The quantity of water needed for the primary water supply
is calculated using the maximum allowed per capita water use under Senate Bill X7-7 and the city's
build-out population. The maximum allowed per capita water use is I 17 gallons per capita per day
(gpcd). The proposed Land Use Element build-out population is estimated to be 57,200; the primary
water supply is estimated to be 7,496 AF in the 2018 Water Resources Status Report.
The reliability reserve provides a buffer for future unforeseen or unpredicted long-term impacts to
the City's available water supply. The quantity of water for the reliability reserve is established using
twenty percent of the ten-year average of current per capita water use and the City's current
population (46,548 in 2018). The reliability reserve provides a reserve above and beyond the existing
needs of the community and may not be used for future development. In 2018, the reliability reserve
is 1,220AF.
The secondary water supply is the amount of water remaining from the City's available water
resources above those needed to meet the primary water supply and reliability reserve. The
6 � Page
20042
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
secondary supply is intended to meet peak water demand periods or short-term loss of City water
supply sources.
Table 5-I. Water Su I Reliabilit
Average/Normal Single Dry Multiple Dry Water Years
Water Year Water Year
(acre feet) (acre feet) Year I Year 2 Year 3
I 2,622 I 2,622 I 2,622 I 2,622 I 2,622
Percent of
Average/Normal I 00% I 00% I 00% I 00%
Year
Source:2015 Urban Water Management Plan
Table 5-2. 2018 City Potable Water Supply Accountin
, . . - . . .
. . . . : . - - . - . .
- - - - - - . - - -
10,130 5,225 7,496 1,220 1,414
'Source:2018 Water Resources Status Report
6. WATER USAGE
Water use in the city includes single-family, multi-family, commercial (including institutional and
industrial), and irrigation customers. No agricultural uses are supplied by City water and the City
does not sell water to other agencies. The City does not have additional water demands such as
water use for saline barriers, groundwater recharge, etc. As reported in the 2018 Water Resources
Status Report, the total water demand for the city in 2018 was 5,225 AF, and total demand in 2015
was 4,990 AF (during drought conditions).
7 � Page
20043
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
The City's water use factors for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project land use categories are listed
below:
. . - . - . . . .
Madonna Froom Ranch
Housing (R-3 attached 130 Dwellings 0.3
townhomes)
Apartments (R-4 multi- 44 Apartments 0.18
family/affordable
Commercial — Retail 30,000 1,000 Square 0.06
Feet
Hotel (with restaurant) 120 Rooms 0.43
Life Plan Community
Independent Living
(standalone residential 61 Dwellings 0.3
units
Garden, Village Suite and 305 Apartments 0.1
Standard A artment Units
Assisted Living Units 38 Apartments 0.1
senior apartments
Memory Care and Skilled 51 Occupants 0.08
Nursin beds
Commercial — Mixed-Use 1,000 Square
Occu anc 51,500 Feet 0.06
Maintenance Office 5,300 1,000 Square 0.032
Feet
Restaurants 8,000 1,OOOSquare � 32
Feet
Fitness Facility with pool 13,000 1,000 Square 0.26
Feet
6.1 Water Conservation Program:
Water conservation was first referenced as a part of the City's water management policy in 1973. In
I 985,the City adopted the Annual Water Operational Plan policy, establishing water conservation as
a means of extending water supplies during projected water shortages. Since I 985,many technological
and philosophical changes have occurred which are proving water conservation to be both a short-
term corrective measure for immediate water supply shortages and a long-term solution to water
supply reliability.
The City developed a Water Shortage Contingency Plan to deal with water shortage conditions that
could occur dueto drought,earthquake, infrastructurefailure,or other emergencies.The Plan provides
the foundation for a staged response to worsening water shortage conditions. The City uses a water
projection model to analyze current water storage at the reservoirs and to predict how long the
water supplies are available to determine the necessary level of response. There are six stages of the
8 � Page
20044
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
Plan: Monitor, Watch, Warning, Severe, Extreme, and Critical. Each stage provides different levels of
response for a water shortage event ranging from a ten percent supply deficiency up to a 50 percent
or greater deficiency. The Plan is also a required component of the City's UWMP which is updated
every five years per State Water Code. The City also recognizes the importance of long-term water
efficiency by supporting programs that will enhance water supply reliability and comply with any
current and/or future state mandates in water use reductions.
In 2009, Senate Bill X7-7 was passed requiring water agencies to reduce per capita water use by 25
percent by the year 2020. The City's target per capita water use would be I 17 gpcd. In 2013,the City
already met that target with a use of I I 6 gpcd. In 2014, the City's use was estimated to be 95.8 gpcd.
In terms of water supply reliability, the City was one of the original signatories to the Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) Regarding Urban Water Conservation and has actively pursued the
implementation of the water efficiency best management practices (BMPs) prescribed in the MOU.The
MOU was a negotiated agreement between water purveyors statewide and environmental
organizations on how best to utilize the State's water resources by incorporating conservation into
their water management practices.The BMPs have been developed over the years by water purveyors,
environmental groups, and industry stal<eholders. They represent the best available water
conservation practices based on research and experience and include:
• Water conservation pricing and rate structures,
• Technical assistance for water customers,
• Incentives for indoor and outdoor water saving technologies,
• Public information and outreach, and
• Wateraudits.
7. ENTITLEMENTS/REGULATORY APPROVALS
Water Code Section 10910(d)(2) requires the identification of existing water supply entitlements,
water rights, or water service contracts,federal,state,and local permits for construction of necessary
infrastructure,and any regulatory approvals required to be able to deliver the water supply.The City's
entitlements are described above in the section describing water supply.
8. FROOM RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
The Froom Ranch Specific Plan site is proposed to be developed into multi-family dwelling units, a
Life Plan Community, commercial properties including retail, and hotel space, parks, and open space.
Table 8-I was developed to project Froom Ranch Specific Plan's water demand using the City's water
use factors. Using these water demand factors shows that the total water use of Froom Ranch Specific
Plan would be 207.8 AF/year.
9 � Page
20045
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
Table 8-1. Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project Water Demand
. - � - . .
Water Use Total Water Indoor
Land Use Category Quantity Unit Factor* Demand Water
Demand
(ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) qc-ft/yr
Froom Ranch
Housing (R-3 attached 130 Dwellings 0.3 39.0 39.0
townhomes
Apartments (R-4 multi- 44 Apartments 0.18 7.9 4.8
family/affordable
Commercial - Retail 30,000 �-000 Square 0.06 1.8 1.3
Feet
Hotel (with restaurant) 120 Rooms 0.43 51.6 36.1
Basin planting 2.8 Acres n/a** n/a** n/a**
Parks, Trails, Parkways
and Open Space 1 1.3 Acres n/a** n/a** n/a**
(including creek
planting)
Subtotal 81.1
Villaggio - Life Plan Communify
Independent Living
(standalone residential 61 Dwellings 0.3 18.3 18.3
units)
Garden, Village Suite
and Standard Apartment 305 Apartments 0.1 30.5 18.3
Units Senior
Assisted Living Units 38 Apartments 0.1 3.8 2.3
senior a artments
Memory Care and Skilled 51 Occupants 0.08 4.08 2.45
Nursin beds
Commercial - mixed use 51,500 �-000 Square 0.06 3.09 2.16
occupancy Feet
Maintenance Office 5,300 1,000 Square 0.032 0.17 0.12
Feet
Restaurants 8,000 1,000 Square 1.32 10.56 7.39
Feet
Fitness Facility with pool 13,000 �-000 Square 0.26 3.38 2.37
Feet
Common Area 15.6 Acres n/a** n/a** n/a**
Landscapin
Subtotal 53.4
Project Totals 134.5
* Water use factors from the 1999 City of San Luis Obispo Water Use Factors
** n/a values indicate a recycled water use separate from potable water use
10 � Page
20046
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
Table 8-I shows a summary of the project water demands under each land use area of the proposed
site, included in Appendix I.Appendix I a shows the anticipated project demands as part of the LUCE
Final EIR. The irrigation water use zones are mapped and shown in Appendix 2 and the irrigation
recycled water demands were calculated and presented in Appendix 3 and total 62.25-acre feet. The
indoor domestic demands were calculated using the City of San Luis Obispo, water use factors
percentage of indoor water use to determine the domestic water use since landscape water is
proposed to be irrigated with recycled water for all uses.
Table 8-2 compares the City of San Luis Obispo available potable water with the Froom Ranch Specific
Plan projected use.
Table 8-2. City Water Supply Availability and Froom Ranch Water Usage
Froom Ranch Specific
City Water City Water City Water Plan Use (calculated by
Supply Usage Available use factors
7,496 AF/yr 4,908 AF/yr 2,588 AF/yr I 34.5 AF/yr
9. CONCLUSION
The water supply demand for the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project was included in the City's Land
Use and Circulation Element Update Water Supply Assessment. A sufficient water supply is available
to serve the project.
Using the City's land use water factors,the Froom Ranch Specific Plan project's potable water demand
is I 34.5 AF/year. Based on these water demand projections, there is a sufficient supply of water to
meet the project's needs.
This conclusion was determined based on this Water Supply Assessment and supporting information
in the records of the City of San Luis Obispo.
11 � ' age
20047
Froom Ranch
Wafer Supply Assessment
10. REFERENCES
San Luis Obispo, City of. General Plan - Chapter 8 Water and Wastewater Management Element.
Adopted February 24, 1987, Revised May I 5, 2018.
San Luis Obispo, City of. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Adopted June 14, 2016.
San Luis Obispo, City of. Land Use and Circulation Element Update Water Supply Assessment.
Adopted June 2014.
San Luis Obispo, City of. 2018 Water Resources Status Report.
Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California.Amended
September 17, 2014.
City of San Luis Obispo Water Use Factors — September I999.
12 � Page
20048
APPENDIX 1: FROOM RANCH WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS
Permanent
Water Use Total Water Indoor Water Total Recycled Recycled Water
Factor Demand Demand Water Demand Demand
Land Use Category Quantity Unit (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.)
Froom Ranch
Housing (R-3 attached townhomes) 130 Dwellings 0.3 39.00 39.00 n/a n/a
Apartments (R-4 multi-family/affordable) 44 Apartments 0.18 7.92 4.75 1.0 1.0
Commercial- Retail 30,000 1000 Square Feet 0.06 1.80 1.26 0.7 0.7
Hotel (with restaurant) 120 Rooms 0.43 51.60 36.12 1.2 1.2
Basin planting 2.8 Acres n/a n/a n/a 7.5 3.8
Parks,Trails, Parkways and Open Space
(including creek planting) 1 1.3 Acres n/a n/a n/a 26.6 18.9
Subtotal 81.1 36.9 25.4
Villaggio - Life Plan Community
Independent Living (standalone residential
units) 61 Dwellings 0.3 18.30 18.30 n/a n/a
Garden,Village Suite and Standard
Apartment Units (senior apartments) 305 Apartments 0.1 30.50 18.30 n/a n/a
Assisted Living Units (senior apartments) 38 Apartments 0.1 3.80 2.28 n/a n/a
Memory Care and Skilled Nursing (beds) 51 Occupants 0.08 4.08 2.45 n/a n/a
Commercial-mixed use occupancy 51,500 1000 Square Feet 0.06 3.09 2.16 n/a n/a
Maintenance Office 5,300 1000 Square Feet 0.032 0.17 0.12 n/a n/a
Restaurants 8,000 1000 Square Feet 1.32 10.56 7.39 n/a n/a
Fitness Facility with pool 13,000 1000 Square Feet 0.26 3.38 2.37 n/a n/a
Common Area Landscaping 15.6 Acres n/a n/a n/a 22.0 22.0
Subtotal 53.4 22.0 22.0
Project Totals 134.5 58.9 47.4
Notes:
1.Water Use factors:City of San Luis Obsipo,September 1999
2.Total water demand shown for reference based on City water duty factors,water demand based on indoor use since landscape components utilize recycled water.
3.Housing in R-3 zone is assumed to use potable water for private landscaping.
4.Recyded water demand calculated using LandFX software(recycled water utilized for all landscape components except R-3).
5."Basin planting"wetland enhancement areas will be temporarily irrigated to establishment(assumes 50%of total)
6."Parks,Trails,Parkways,and Open Space"wetland enhancement areas and channel bottoms will be temporarily irrigated to establishment(assumes 29%of total)
20049
APPENDIX la: FROOM RANCH WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS BASED ON LUCE FINAL EIR
Water Use Total Water Indoor Water Total Recycled Permanent Recycled
Factor Demand Demand Water Demand Water Demand
Land Use Category Quantity Unit (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.) (ac-ft/yr.)
Froom Ranch
Housing (R-3 attached townhomes) 1 15 Dwellings 0.3 34.5 34.5 n/a n/a
Commercial- Retail, (Big box retail outlets) 238,000 1000 Square Feet 0.06 14.3 10.0 4.3 4.3
Commercial-mixed use occupancy 30,000 1000 Square Feet 0.06 1.8 1.3 0.5 0.5
Restaurants 8,000 1000 Square Feet 1.32 10.6 7.4 3.2 3.2
Hotel (70,000 sf includes restaurant) 120 Rooms 0.43 51.b 36.1 15.5 15.5
Basin planting 2.8 Acres n/a n/a n/a 7.5 3.8
Parks,Trails, Parkways and Open Space
(including creek planting) 1 1.3 Acres n/a n/a n/a 26.6 18.9
Project Total 89.3 57.4 46.1
Notes:
1.Water Use factors:City of San Luis Obsipo,September 1999
2.Total water demand shown for reference based on City water duty factors,water demand based on indoor use sin�e landscape components utilize recycled water.
3.Housing in R-3 zone is assumed to use potable water for private landscaping.
4.Recyded water demand calculated using LandEfx software(recycled water utilized for all landscape components except R-3).
20050
�
0
� o
(n N
J �
.�` � f N � N
� �� �� j � �
a �
� ��� � � �
y� ' �� � � �
� �o °ti � � � �y �� ���`, 3 0 �
S
L O- �7 � �•�� �� �� � J � 2
'�. C.�3 �O r �!�. O \�� T T T
� '_ '_ '_
� �.�3 �O J I i..� O � O \��� / � � �
C3 �} "y � � � � V� � � a` a`
� �' �,.. ..�; o ��� � ° O a`� ����
� � ������' �s �� � % � � ��'�� ��
J ,� .�� �- �
r-
° � o ��` � �(� � �
� _ � � � � 1 ,�.1 � �A\
w � /
m"° „ ,. �,� , L 1 r �
.<
, ' _ -, s� . ����JJ'� �� � � ���0
� �-� , , �.,�., � � _ �
� ... �� � � � A�
_ � ' �
\ � ��. �b Q 0 � � � �� � � ;,` ` .- ` - Q \' �°�
�' V� � � �J C� ' � ����
� \�, I� �o �� ; : QCa o � . � oQO , ,�°
�;��\� �B �� �' �� ���� ' O �' �`��
����< �6 0 �� � � ���
� � � , 0 O
O �
�� ���` � ��' � - �O � - ��
�
�l� � � _ — = = _ ^
o , . � ��
; _
�`� � � ; - 0 � � �`��
� $
��� . � _ - �. �
� .. } � , - � � , � �� ,
� ' O � O � O O � ,� .
€ � �
��� � �
� �� , r O�� �-� � � � �-- �� �� �� � � � ,
� ,��� � �. �' � �� ���
� ,• 0 U . ��
,.
� _-- - . �
��
_ �
..�'' �, � �� � � ���
� .•� �• ��� �� �.�.��'�`�O� � , ���� � ���
�,,�� � � c� �,- � � ,_ ��
s�r' — � ' ��;�� '�� �����:�� �� � ���
- - - — , =- -
-- - �o° ��� �� . , �- � o �, ��,�� ,� ��_,; �� - � � ��,
— — � ��� � � ' �
--
�o -��-_-� z o�° � , �O �b� `� C'% -�
�� ^ �
�� --
� � 0 7 s ` ��n
�
- zso g 1 � 0 ���� ��
230 �� � O �
p
, ���O �,�
zgo � , � �i l J ,�.0 O O ,, ` . \\\\
�,
� o� 0 � �,
� ° O y-;r;- ����
__��� �� o A
�� =_ , �; ) �
/ � � \\, � � ; � ,_ ,� � ;, � � .���
��� �
_ , �
� �� � ��' , � ; =` �� ; ��" _�i � � , • �
�
2 � �� i,
� � � i� ;�� � ���_!� ��'�!' %� ��
� �
�
� O
, , ����, � ;,; �
� ��i�lli,ll,y, ,,.�,� �,,, ,,�� � � ;/
__ �i''"'; �;���;���iI,I'/� ,,�`-' ��I�I(� i, '� 1 f �t � ,l- �� �■
i��. I . /I I `3`-��� � � ,,,, �,���.� ��I��l� � ���Ir I!I . I } F}
�, // � � � , +�;' �� 0 ��
— � — - / O ,i � ^f � �
� ,� �� ���i ����� � , ���; , � � � C � �� �
� � \ I����'�h � n�,�II ��i �� � I�i-� , i � � i � �
;� � J'�I���I� ��I�ii '��',li �� �, -..,. � ��' •�� � � �� i�__�r �� �;-'i� � ) � � ■
__�� VA �) i;�;i,�;II'li I ��Ij IIII�I�l;;;i�i �F ..�� )�' � �- � � ��' I,' �� 'I� �1 a� �
� � �� � ill'�I��i I �I' il������I� ♦� � �_-�", � � C� E3
\ � � �o��'„�,�� ; i '
_ _ . �, � ,.�
�� ���� ����� ���,� ��� :�
, � ; -� � a�
� '�'JJ9 �'�%� ''`� ' . �J
� �� � � J� ��I�u �,
� � � ���� �u% ��������; �� y 0�� • ,:;�� � � e� �
/ �/����� ����, �,, ,� � �� s� �;; �a
� o
'�� �1 � ��_\ � ./•• � ' i �� ��' '�
�� ��\ ����\ � ,. � �m_ �� ,��, � � : � , � � � /
. � � , .
- - '�
�, >,� )� � I I�ui� �, �/.• � '�_ � �� • , �%�� ���I
Ra , � ���� . �� � -
�
%�% � �,� �'
,,
O �
� ��_ ����� �- ' � ��
. � � �
\��«� � - � � � �
,
',. -� _� ,�' � , ��' �'f�
� � .
. �`� -� ��I! �O ' ' `'�
I� I � � ,�J O - I O r���'• `�} FF�
II � � �;
, =�� � � �
_ r
�. v e�
�
, o �
z ��� ., �r O r' °"�' �
I�'r ; ; � =�J � � � ,,
�� ,�. - �
� � �� �
, ,, � �
� � �
���� � �� o _- _ � -- c� �:� �
� ��� � � .,��'
�< • _— �--� O �, �
� ■ ��'��� � , - f ' il ����'�� „
\ � - �` � �', ,!�Id �, �
� ...�, ,:
� . �.eoa�'�
• 1 ,C`�
=��_ �� _ � v
�o . O � � '�1. _ _ �,.xa'�'d}pYci.R I � CJ i✓ � � Gi
��M �j' O r;�0,� � 1 % \` <, <3 ;3
•• '�� '� O �� � O� ��� ��.��'� �� � � � � �--
��' l l "' S'�\� - \� t • t �F-�; � ���� !is {� ��?
�'�i � a
� ��� /; ^M � O � . ;�
� �-- f �
, .. . , �. ��i�.�{�' F 2� / � ��\ ... � t�'`�}
�
� ` •
r
;/: J`' �� O I J�� � \\\\\\ C �
� _
i k
�� /,��� ��� F,-,� � ✓ • / ��\\\�\\� ��. ..` �-.�.J� i�
' '!� O 0 �� � � �� �\����,�° , �.� f- �
� � O '`�" ������� _ .
��. �� 0� \ ,: ,-� _ ...
• ' ' �� '�
�z� _ "-�-� � ;� %� oo a �\`\`� I
, ,
��-� � , O � ✓ a � � o O -�,
• ���,.� �0�� � � � o° � ��, O
O *'` ` _ � "��
• `� \����
� a
Y o e � ;,
�- -� O � i �/j///�� l � � Q � �.
� »_- - o� / � ; � �
O � °
� �
• ���- \\ • - :>o 0 8"� / � � �
� O - �
���� � � � ,, �° ° � � � �
� �� a �� � � �
� \ % / J`� /` �i t
� �� � G� rt� ♦� �� �
� ��� ♦ i �
,� c�G j / O � � � t s
} ♦ ���, � ♦ _ p� ��� `�` {f�
``�,.,�-.,v/ ♦ � . � .. ���� c° � ., . � � � f� � �
�� � � 1
� � ��� � ����� �� ���� � �
�� � �� � � o�� ���� � f �
� �� �« L-��
�
t �
♦
e %"
. � �� ��' �
. • ;�'11 I ��`���3 c �' �� � �
M 1 0 �
�
�����\� '�� � ._E t`�� f�? {�
Froom Ranch Estimated Water Use Summary
Madonna R-3 Madonna R-4 Madonna Retail Madonna Hotel Madonna Park Madonna Roads II Villaggio Creek/Trails Basin TOTAL PROJECT Percent of Totals
Total Landsape Areas 136,313 32,414 22,954 40,602 97,496 30,996 679,652 396,133 120,963 1,557,524
Low Water 122,417 28,473 20,603 36,422 87,597 27,601 551,508 205,252 60,426 1,140,298 73%
Moderate Water 13,896 3,941 2,350 4,180 9,690 3,395 108,821 80,229 15,344 241,846 16%
High Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 19324 110653 45193 175169 15%
MAWA(gallons) 2,293,930 1,438,084 948,116 1,677,117 4,027,173 1,221,031 30,153,207 17,574,698 5,366,602 64,699,958
MAWA(units) 3,067 1,923 1,268 2,242 5,384 1,632 40,312 23,496 7,175 86,497
ETWU (gallons) 1,131,426 308,338 213,584 378,052 906,305 285,206 7,165,172 7,452,484 2,443,662 20,284,229 31%
ETWU (units) 1,513 412 286 505 1,212 381 9,579 9,963 3,267 27,118
Acre FeeU Year 3.47 0.95 0.66 1.16 2.78 0.88 21.99 22.87 7.50 62.25
Percent Temporary 29% 50%
� � i � i �
(1) Landscape Concepts MAWA-Maximum Applied Water Allowance(Gallons/Year)
Approximate landscape areas based on conceptual site plan... ETWA-Estimated Total Water Use(Gallons/Year)
Project will use primarily-drought tolerant Mediterranean and California native species,with moderate species used as accent plants and shade tolerant species
* Water Calculations take a conservative approach to the amount of moderate water plants and higher water turf, and this is considered a worst case scenario
' Water Calculations assume the project will primarily be irrigated with recycled water, but potable water used for lots and parkways within the R3 area. Recycled water apply"Special Landscape Area"factor.
* Water Calculations include the areas of temporary irrigation, but do not include recirculating ponds or fountains.
' Water Calculations assume 20 sf per all tree bubblers
(2) Water Usage Assumptions
For Madonna R3 areas, 5%was excluded for walkways that are not shown on plans
*Shrub areas assumed 90% low water and 10%moderate water
'Tree areas assumed 65% low water and 35% moderate water
*Calculations assume potable water will be used for irrigation
For Madonna R4, Retail, Hotel,and Park areas,5%was excluded for walkways that are not shown on plans
"Shrub areas assumed 90% low water and 10%moderate water
�Tree areas assumed 65% low water and 35% moderate water
For Madonna Roads,they project assumes primarily using recycled water but parkways in front of the R3 sites will use potable water.
�Shrub areas assumed 90% low water and 10%moderate water
"Tree areas assumed 65% low water and 35% moderate water
For II Villaggio site, 10%was excluded for walkways, parking areas and driveways that are not shown on plans
�Shrub areas assumed 90% low water and 10% moderate water
�Tree areas assumed 65% low water and 35% moderate water
For Creek areas, project proposes setback areas, channel banks,channel bottom,and adjacent wetland enhancement areas
�Setback shrub area assumes 100% low water and utilizing drip irrigation
�Channel Bank shrub area assumes 25%high water, 50% moderate,and 25% low water. Banks will utilize spray irrigation.
�Channel Bottom and Wetland Enhancement shrub area assumes 75%high and 25% moderate water. Channel Bottom and Wetland Enhancement will utilize temporary spray irrigation.
"Creek trees assumed 50% low water and 50% moderate water
For Basin areas,assumed only graded slopes and disturbed areas will be planted
"Shrub around the basin areas assumed 100% low water,and irrigated with drip irrigation
*Shrub areas north of the basin are assumed to be wetland enhancement and are 75% high and 25% moderate water.Wetland Enhancement will utilize temporary spray irrigation.
'Tree areas assumed 50% low water and 50% moderate water
*Basin areas are assumed to be tempoarily irrigated
20052
r�` �= aesign
DATE: April 13,2017 � g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna R3 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA- Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance Landscape Area 136,313
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration SpecialLandscape 0
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAF for SLA = Additional ET Adjustment Factor for SLA(1.0-0.7=0.3)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF = ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 49.35 X 0.55 X 136,313 X 0.62 = 2,293,930
MAWA(SLA) 49.35 X 0.9 X 0 X 0.62 = 0
MAWA(Gallons/Year)- 2,293,930
ProjectType = residential
20053
�� a�5�gn
DATE: April 13,2017 �r�U�
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna R3 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Usage
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETWU _ ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numerator Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 49.35 0.62 0.2 121728 744903 O.SS 0 876,356
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 13525 206917 0.85 0 243,432
3 TURF ROTARY H 49.35 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
4 BUBBLER L 49.35 0.62 0.2 689 4216 0.85 0 4,960
5 BUBBLER M 49.35 0.62 0.5 371 5676 0.85 0 6,677
Total ETWU 1,131,426 Gal/Year
TOTAL LOW WATER 122417
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 13896
TOTALHIGHWATERTURF 0
TOTALLANDSCAPEAREAS 136313
20054
r�` �= aesign
DATE: April 13,2017 � g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna R4 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA- Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance Landscape Area 32,414
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration SpecialLandscape 32,414
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAF for SLA = Additional ET Adjustment Factor for SLA(1.0-0.7=0.3)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF = ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 49.35 X 0.55 X 32,414 X 0.62 = 545,480
MAWA(SLA) 49.35 X 0.9 X 32,414 X 0.62 = 892,604
MAWA(Gallons/Year)- 1,438,084
ProjectType = residential
20055
�� a�5�gn
DATE: April 13,2017 �r�U�
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna R4 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Usage
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETWU _ ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numerator Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 49.35 0.62 0.2 26652.915 163100 O.SS 26652.915 218,535
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 2961.435 45306 0.85 2961.435 56,262
3 TURF ROTARY H 49.35 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
4 BUBBLER L 49.35 0.62 0.2 1820 11137 0.85 1820 14,923
5 BUBBLER M 49.35 0.62 0.5 980 14993 0.85 980 18,618
Total ETWU 308,338 Gal/Year
TOTAL LOW WATER 28472.915
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 3941.435
TOTALHIGHWATERTURF 0
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREAS 3241435
20056
r�` �= aesign
DATE: April 13,2017 � g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Retail 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA- Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance Landscape Area 22,954
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration SpecialLandscape 22,954
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAF for SLA = Additional ET Adjustment Factor for SLA(1.0-0.7=0.3)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF = ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 49.35 X 0.45 X 22,954 X 0.62 = 316,039
MAWA(SLA) 49.35 X 0.9 X 22,954 X 0.62 = 632,077
MAWA(Gallons/Year)- 948,116
ProjectType = non residential
20057
�� a�5�gn
DATE: April 13,2017 �r�U�
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Retail 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Usage
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETWU _ ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numerator Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 49.35 0.62 0.2 20460 125204 O.SS 20460.15 167,759
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 2273 34779 0.85 227335 43,190
3 TURF ROTARY H 49.35 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
4 BUBBLER L 49.35 0.62 0.2 143 875 0.85 143 1,172
5 BUBBLER M 4935 0.62 0.5 77 1178 0.85 77 1,463
Total ETWU 213,584 Gal/Year
TOTAL LOW WATER 20603
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 2350
TOTALHIGHWATERTURF 0
TOTALLANDSCAPEAREAS 22954
20058
�� a���gn
DATE: April 13,2017 " L,�r�U�
�:a 1—
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Hotel 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA- Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = MaximumAppliedWaterAllowance LandscapeArea 40,602
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration SpecialLandscape 40,602
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAFforSLA = AdditionalETAdjustmentFactorforSLA(1.0-0.7=03)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF - ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 49.35 X 0.45 X 40,602 X 0.62 = 559,039
MAWA(SLA) 4935 X 0.9 X 40,602 X 0.62 = 1,118,078
MAWA(Gallons/Year)= 1,677,117
ProjectType = nonresidential
20059
r� d��ign
DATE: April 13,2017 �' �rO U�
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Hotel 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLEN6E: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Usage
ETO - Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 - Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = Plant Factorfrom WUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETW U = ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numerator Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 4935 0.62 0.2 36110 220972 0.85 36110.07 296,077
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 4012 61381 0.85 4012.23 76,225
3 TURF ROTARY H 4935 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
4 BUBBLER L 4935 0.62 0.2 312 1909 0.85 312 2,558
5 BUBBLER M 4935 0.62 0.5 168 2570 0.85 168 3,192
TotaIETWU 378,052 Gal/Year
TOTALLOW WATER 36422
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 4180
TOTALHIGH WATERTURF 0
TOTALLANDSCAPE AREAS 40602
20060
�� a���gn
DATE: April 13,2017 " L,�r�U�
�:a 1—
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Park 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA- Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = MaximumAppliedWaterAllowance LandscapeArea 97,496
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration SpecialLandscape 97,496
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAFforSLA = AdditionalETAdjustmentFactorforSLA(1.0-0.7=03)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF - ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 49.35 X 0.45 X 97,496 X 0.62 = 1,342,391
MAWA(SLA) 4935 X 0.9 X 97,496 X 0.62 = 2,684,782
MAWA(Gallons/Year)= 4,027,173
ProjectType = nonresidential
20061
r� d��ign
DATE: April 13,2017 �' �rO U�
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Park 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLEN6E: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Usage
ETO - Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 - Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = Plant Factorfrom WUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETW U = ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numerator Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 4935 0.62 0.2 87207 533652 0.85 87206.58 715,032
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 9690 145237 0.85 9689.62 184,086
3 TURF ROTARY H 4935 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
4 BUBBLER L 4935 0.62 0.2 390 2387 0.85 390 3,198
5 BUBBLER M 4935 0.62 0.5 210 3213 0.85 210 3,990
Total ETWU 906,305 Gal/Year
TOTALLOW WATER 87597
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 9900
TOTALHIGH WATERTURF 0
TOTALLANDSCAPE AREAS 97496
20062
rr� design
DATE: April 13,2017 '� g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Roads 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA-Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance Landscape Area 30,996
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration Special Landscape 25,399
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAFforSLA = AdditionalETAdjustmentFactorforSLA�1.0-0.7=0.3)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF - ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 4935 X 0.55 X 30,996 X 0.62 = 521,612
MAWA(SLA) 49.35 X 0.9 X 25,399 X 0.62 - 699,420
MAWA(Gallons/Year)= 1,221,031
ProjectType = residential
20063
�r�A design
DATE: April 13,2017 `, g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Madonna Roads 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Usage
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = PlantFactorfromWUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETWU _ ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numerator Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 4935 0.62 0.2 22139 135478 0.85 22139.1 181,525 recycled
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 4935 0.62 0.5 2460 37633 0.85 2459.9 46,734
3 TURF ROTARY H 4935 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
4 BUBBLER L 49.35 0.62 0.2 520 3182 0.85 520 4,264
5 BUBBLER M 4935 0.62 0.5 280 4284 0.85 280 5,320
6 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 49.35 0.62 0.2 4695 28732 O.SS 0 33,803 potable
7 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 4935 0.62 0.5 522 7981 0.85 0 9,390
8 TURF ROTARY H 49.35 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
9 BUBBLER L 4935 0.62 0.2 247 1511 0.85 0 1,778
10 BUBBLER M 49.35 0.62 0.5 133 2035 0.85 0 2,394
Total ETWU 285,206 Gal/Year
RECYCLED POTABLE TOTAL
LOW WATER 22659 LOW WATER 4942 LOW WATER 27601
MODERATE WATER 2740 MODERATE WATER 655 MODERATE WATER 3395
HIGH WATER 0 HIGH WATER 0 HIGH WATER 0
TOTALRECYCLED 25399 TOTALPOTABLE 5597 TOTALLANDSCAPE AREAS 30996
20064
r� design
DATE: April 13,2017 " g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-II Villaggio 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805�.543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA- Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance Landscape Area 679,652
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration SpecialLandscape 679,652
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAF for SLA = Additional ET Adjustment Factor for SLA(1.0-0.7=0.3)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF = ETAdjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 4935 X 0.55 X 679,652 X 0.62 = ll,437,423
MAWA(SLA) 49.35 X 0.9 X 679,652 X 0.62 = 18,715,784
MAWA(Gallons/Year)= 30,153,207
ProjectType = residential
20065
�� _ design
DATE: April 13,2017 '�� g ra u p
JOB No.: April 7,4676
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-II Villaggio 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLEN6E: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Usage
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = PlantFactorfromWUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Por[ion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETWU = ETOx0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numeretor Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 49.35 0.62 0.2 531418 3251956 0.85 531417.51 4,357,248
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 4935 0.62 0.5 59046 903321 0.85 5904639 1,121,777
3 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 49.35 0.62 0.2 15826.05 96846 0.85 15826.05 129,762
4 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 47478.15 726344 0.85 47478.15 902,001
S TURF ROTARY H 49.35 0.62 0.8 19324 473005 0.85 19324 575,801
6 BUBBLER L 49.35 0.62 0.2 4264 26093 0.85 4264 34,962
7 BUBBLER M 49.35 0.62 0.5 2296 35125 0.85 2296 43,620
TotaIETWU 7,165,172 Gal/Year
TOTALLOW WATER 551508
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 108821
TOTAL HIGH WATER TURF 19324
TOTALLANDSCAPE AREAS 679652
20066
r�� design
DATE: April 13,2017 '� 1J��J��
�J 1`
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Creeks/Trails 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(SOS).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA-Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = Maximum Applied WaterAllowance Landscape Area 396,133
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration SpecialLandscape 396,133
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAF for SLA = Additional ET Adjustment Factor for SLA(1.0-0.7=0.3)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF - ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 49.35 X 0.55 X 396,133 X 0.62 = 6,666,265
MAWA(SLA) 49.35 X 0.9 X 396,133 X 0.62 = 10,908,433
MAWA�Gallons/Year�= 17,574,698
ProjectType = residential
20067
��+� d�sign
DATE April 13,20ll �f C�rO U l ,
JOB No.: 1014012 ~J �Y
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Creeks/Trails 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San W is Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: De66ieJewell Ph:(805)543-ll94 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLENGE: Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = EstimatedTotalWaterUsage
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = PlantFactorfromWUCOLS
HA = HydrozoneArea
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETWU = ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numera[or Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numeretor IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 4935 0.62 02 llS297 1091071 0.85 ll8297 1,461,910 setbacks
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 0 0 0.85 0 0
3 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS H 4935 0.62 0.8 0 0 0.85 0 0
4 SPRAY L 4935 Ob2 0.2 25770 157695 0.71 25769J5 247,876 banks
5 SPRAY M 4935 Ob2 0.5 51540 788477 0.71 51539.5 1,162,071
6 SPRAY H 49.35 0.62 0.8 25770 630782 0.71 25769.75 914,195
7 SPRAY L 49.35 0.62 0.2 0 0 0.71 0 0 bottom
8 SPRAY M 49.35 0.62 0.5 28294 432860 0.71 28294.25 637,956 &wetlands
9 SPRAY H 49.35 0.62 0.8 84883 2077726 0.71 84882.75 3,011,257
4 BUBBLER L 49.35 0.62 0.2 1185 7251 0.85 1185 9,716 trees
S BUBBLER M 49.35 0.62 0.5 395 6043 0.85 395 7,504
Total ETWU 7,452,484 Gal/Year
PERMANENT TEMPORARY TOTAL
TOTALLOW WATER 205252 TOTALLOW WATER 0 TOTALLOW WATER 205252
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 51935 TOTAL MODERATE WATER 28294 TOTAL MODERATE WATER 50229
TOTAL HIGH WATER 25770 TOTAL HIGH WATER 84583 TOTAL HIGH WATER 110653
TOTALPERMANENT 282956 TOTALTEMPORARY 113177 29% TOTALLANDSCAPE AREAS 396133
20068
�� design
DATE: April 13,2017 " g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Basins 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
MAWA-Maximum Annual Water Allowance
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE(MAWA)
CHALLENGE Determine the Maximum Allowable Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY TLA(Total Landscape Area
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance Landscape Area 120,963
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration Special Landscape 120,963
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
ETAF = 0.55 for Residential Projects
ETAF = 0.45 for Non-Residential Projects
LA = Landscaped Area
ETAF for SLA = Additional ET Adjustment Factor for SLA(1.0-0.7=0.3)
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETAF - ET Adjustment Factor(ETAF)
SAMPLE FORMULA:
Calculate for MAWA
ETO x ETAF x AREA(sf) x CONVERSION = MAWA
MAWA(LA) 4935 X 0.55 X 120,963 X 0.62 = 2,035,608
MAWA(SLA) 4935 X 0.9 X 120,963 X 0.62 = 3,330,994
MAWA(Gallons/Year)= 5,366,602
Project Type = residential
20069
r� d�sign
DATE: April 13,2017 " g ro u p
JOB No.: 1014012
JOB NM: Froom Ranch-Basins 3765 South Higuera Street,Suite 102/San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
CALC BY: Debbie Jewell Ph:(805)543-1794 Fax:(805).543.4609 email:www.rrmdesign.com
ETWU: Estimated Total Water Usage
ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE(ETWU)
CHALLENGE Determine the Estimated Volume of Water(Acre Feet)used for projected site improvements
TERMINOLOGY
ETWU = EstimatedTotalWaterUsage
ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration
0.62 = Conversion factor(to gallons per square foot)
PF = Flant Factorfrom WUCOLS
HA = Hydrozone Area
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
SLA = Portion of Landscape Area identified as Special Landscape Area
ETWU = ETO x 0.62(PFxHA) +SLA
IE
Numerator Denominator + SLA ETWU
Plant Water
Hydrozone Irrigation Method Use Type Ref ET Conversion PF HA Numerator IE SLA
1 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS L 4935 0.62 0.2 60146 368057 0.85 60146 493,155
2 AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS M 49.35 0.62 0.5 0 0 0.85 0 0
3 SPRAY L 4935 0.62 0.2 0 0 0.71 0 0
4 SPRAY M 4935 0.62 0.5 15064 230460 0.71 15064.25 339,656
5 SPRAY H 4935 0.62 0.8 45193 1106210 0.71 45192.75 1,603,235
6 BUBBLER L 4935 0.62 0.2 280 1713 0.85 280 2,296
7 BUBBLER M 4935 0.62 0.5 280 4284 0.85 2S0 5,320
Total ETWU 2,443,662 Gal/Year
PERMANENT TEMPORARY TOTAL
TOTALLOW WATER 60426 TOTALLOW WATER 0 TOTALLOW WATER 60426
TOTAL MODERATE WATER 280 TOTAL MODERATE WATER 15064 TOTAL MODERATE WATER 15344
TOTALHIGH WATER 0 TOTALHIGH WATER 45193 TOTALHIGH WATER 45193
TOTALPERMANENT 60706 TOTALTEMPORARY 60257 50% TOTALLANDSCAPEAREAS 120963
20070