HomeMy WebLinkAboutBates 20071-20078 Appendix L - Agricultural Resouces APPENDIX L
Agricultural Resources
Froom Ranch Specific Plan Project
Final EIR
20071
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
20072
Land Evaluation Worksheet Site Assessment Worksheet 1
Land Capability Classification Project Size Score
(LCC)
and Storie Index Scores
A B C D E F G H I J K
Soil Map Project Proportion LCC LCC LCC Storie Storie LCC LCC Class LCC Class
Unit Acres of Rating Score Index Index Class III IV - VIII
Project Area Score I - II
127 43.9 38.24% Ils 80 30.59 60 22.94 43.9
130 16 13.94% Ille 70 9.76 60 8.36 16
131 7.3 6.36% IVe 50 3.18 40 2.54 7.3
162 1.8 1.57% Ille 70 1.1 80 1.26 1.8
164 14.5 12.63% Vle 20 2.53 60 7.58 14.5
183 21.8 18.99% Vlle 10 1.9 20 3.8 21.8
197 3.7 3.22% I 100 3.22 100 3.22 3.7
221 2.9 2.53% VIII 0 0 0 0 2.9
300 2.9 2.53% Vle 20 .51 60 1.52 2.9
Totals 114.8 �Must Sum to Tota 52.79 Storie Inde 51.22 Total Acres 47.6 17.8 49.4
1.0) Score Total Score
Project Size $0 10 20
Scores
Highest
Project Score 80
Size
20073
Site Assessment Worksheet 2. —Water Resources Availability
A B C D E
Water Weighted
Project Water Proportion of Availability Availability
Proportion Source Project Area Score Score
(C x D)
1 Groundwater or recycled water 1 25 25
2
3
4
5
6
(Must Sum to Total Wate
1.0) Resource 25
Score
20074
Site Assessment Worksheet 3.
Surrounding Agricultural Land and Surrounding Protected Resource Land
A B C D E F G
Zone of Influence
Surrounding
Total Acres Acres in Acres of Percent in Percent Surrounding Protected
Agriculture Protected Agriculture Protected Agricultural Resource
Resource Land (A/B) Resource Land Land Score Land Score
A/C From Table From Table
15% 60-64% 0 50
20075
LESA Worksheet(cont.) Final LESA Score Sheet
Calculation of the Final LESA Score:
(1) Multiply each factor score by the factor weight to determine the weighted score and enter Factor
Scores column.
(2) Sum the weighted factor scores for the LE factors to determine the total LE score for the project.
(3) Sum the weighted factor scores for the SA factors to determine the total SA score for the project.
NOTES 4 Sum the total LE and SA scores to determine the Final LESA Score for the ro'ect.
Factor Factor Weighted
Scores Weight Factor
Scores
LE Factors
Land Capability `�' 52.79 25% 13.2
Classification
Storie `2' 51.22 25% 12.81
Index
LE
Subtotal 50% 26.01
SA Factors
Project `3' 80 15% 12
Size
Water Resource `4' 25 15% 3.75
Availability
Surrounding `5' 0 15% 0
Agricultural Land
Protected `6' 50 5% 2.5
Resource Land
SA
Subtotal 50% 18.25
Final LESA 44.26
Score
For further information on the scoring thresholds under the California Agricultural LESA Model, consult Section 4 of the Instruction
Manual.
20076
California LESA Model Scoring Thresholds
Total LESA Score Scoring Decision
0 to 39 points Not considered significant
40 to 59 points Considered significant onlv if LE and SA subscores are each rg eater than
or equal to 20 points
60 to 79 points Considered significant unless either LE or SA subscore is less than 20
points
80 to 100 points Considered significant
20077
.�� • i-�-�=:r i��.�y�,'�F��`:_�_7y...�i� ' . � �.� � �� •
,. r �.ti, � .'�
�:j��:'- v�:..; .R• ' ,
�:�, .5���``�` "�� l.`� .
''c�,y .��'.'��i. �^,:,,��. , '
(�b �,�:�,-�,-`� r� ,;' � �� .
� � ���, � -
o . � `���:��, � '_
`�� _ .�-�:� :s:�����.
�_� .�,,
. .:"" rS��� ' ��,"�t=-
•���� • '`��'°r:;��l+=
•."`�}''-a""-,�%i��XS::.'� `�iT�:;�
-------------------------
� � �
� � �
I ., .,�� ,. �
� �
� �
I �--------------------- --------� I
� � � �
�
i
� �
� � � �
� ' � �
i
� � � �
� �
� ; , �
� i � ._�Li:'�f�-�r�:, ��(�.. _ .
I ' I ~�� '' �
�
� ,
=,� �
I � ' I
�
� � � � -�_
�
I � � � _.�-; .
�
� -
� ,
I � � I .�'
� , ! _
i � � i _. _
� ,
� �---- ------------------------� � '
��
I I = - - - -
► i
I I
I I
I i
�-------------------------�
� Project Boundary
Zone Of Influence
;____; Smallest Bounding Rectangle
L_� Quarter-Mile Rectangle
I SLO County Parcels
Feet N
0 500 1,000 2,000
W �
S
Zone of Influence Map
Basemap by County of San Luis Obispo,2014. 1:20,000
20078