HomeMy WebLinkAboutc62014-15transportationgrantfunding
FROM: Daryl Grigsby, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Jake Hudson, Traffic Operations Manager
SUBJECT: 2014/15 TRANSPORTATION GRANT FUNDING
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept and appropriate $365,000 in Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) grant
funding for a Park & Ride facility on Calle Joaquin.
2. Accept and appropriate $1,670,000 in Regional State Highway Account (RSHA) grant funding
for RR crossing upgrades at Foothill & California, RailRoad Safety Trail (Taft to Pepper), and
an augmentation of the LOVR interchange budget.
3. Accept and appropriate $360,100 in Urban State Highway Account (USHA) grant funding for
various intersection and corridor operational improvements.
4. Accept and appropriate $448,800 in Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant
funding and appropriate $49,900 of traffic operations funding for the local match to widen and
install a two-way left turn lane at 50 Higuera Street.
5. Adopt a resolution committing the necessary local match funds and stating the assurance to
complete SLOCOG regional discretionary funded projects.
DISCUSSION
Background
On December 4th, 2013 the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments approved the 2014 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) providing a total of $27 million in new transportation
funding to the San Luis Obispo region over the next three fiscal years. In addition, city staff has
pursued grant funding for an unfunded safety project at 50 Higuera Street for the last 5 years.
Funding for this project was recently approved by the State Department of Transportation. The
purpose of this staff report is to accept the City of San Luis Obispo’s apportionment of
approximately $2.5 million for various RTIP transportation projects and approximately $450,000
for the safety project at 50 Higuera Street. These are all existing projects that have been either
unfunded or underfunded carry over projects from prior years.
Projects
1. Calle Joaquin Park & Ride Facility
As part of recent development in the vicinity of the US 101/LOVR Interchange project, the City
worked with area developers to establish right of way (ROW) needs for the interchange. As a result,
the City was able to secure additional ROW to be held for potential future interchange improvement
including possible relocation of the southbound (SB) ramps. The area for this Park & Ride has been
Meeting Date
Item Number 2-18-2014
C
C6 - 1
acquired in fee and currently unused except for temporary draining for the Hampton Inn Hotel. This
project was also identified as a regional transportation need in the 2013 SLOCOG Park & Ride
Study for the County. This project will provide a public Park & Ride Facility with approximately 30
parking spaces. No additional funding is required for the local match, as the City’s prior acquisition
of the land satisfies the local match requirements.
2. California & Foothill Railroad Crossing
Upgrades
The Railroad Safety Trail project included
intersection improvements and widening at
California & Foothill Blvd. In addition, the
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has
required that the City upgrade the antiquated
Railroad Gate Arm Systems to new compliant gating
and warning systems for vehicles as well as bicycles
and pedestrians. No additional funding is required
for the local match as the local match is satisfied by
the City’s USHA grant fund allocation.
3. Railroad Safety Trail (Taft to Pepper)
In November of 2000 the Council adopted the
preliminary alignment plan for the Railroad Safety
Trail. Since that time the City has continued to pursue grants and work with Union Pacific Railroad
to receive approval and construct sections of the trail in phases. The most recent section, Hathway
to Taft, was completed in October of 2013. The next phase (Taft to Pepper) is currently
underfunded by approximately $2.3 million. This new allocation augments available finding by
$300,000. Staff will continue to pursue additional funding sources. No additional funding is
required for the local match as the local match is satisfied by prior work on the rail road safety trail.
4. Los Osos Valley Road Interchange
The Los Osos Valley Road Interchange project is currently on schedule to begin construction in
2014/15. This project includes widening the bridge, modifying on and off ramps, and improving
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. An additional $1 million in State Highway Account (SHA) grant
funding has been awarded to funded project increases resulting from new state department of
transportation requirements established in the 100% Caltrans project study and engineering process.
No additional funding is required for the local match as the local match is satisfied by prior work on
the interchange.
5. Various Traffic Safety & Operational Improvements
Over the last several years, the City has implemented vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian operational
improvements and maintenance activities utilizing USHA grant funding to augment local funding.
Improvements typically funded with this grant include smaller traffic signal upgrades, ITS facilities,
roadway signing and striping improvements, and other small scale traffic safety and operational
improvements. There is no local match required for this funding.
C6 - 2
6. Widening & Two-Way Left Turn Lane at 50 Higuera
This segment of Higuera has been identified as a top ranking collision location since the 2008
Annual Traffic Safety Report. Collisions are primarily attributed to vehicles stopping in the thru
lane to turn left onto Bridge Street or private driveways. This project will widen Higuera along the
frontage of 50 Higuera St. and add a two-way left turn lane so that vehicles no longer have to stop
in the thru lane to turn left. This project was identified as a high priority project for grant funding
when a source became available. Staff has continued to pursue grant opportunities and has now
successfully secured an HSIP grant as the funding source. The required local match for this grant is
$49,900, and staff is proposing to fund the local match out of the Traffic Operations account.
CONCURRENCES
The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments has adopted the 2014 regional transportation plan
allocating this CMAQ, RSHA, & USHA funding for the projects identified in this report.
The State Department of Transportation has selected the widening and installation of a two-way left
turn lane at 50 Higuera to be funded for implementation as part of the Highway Safety
Improvement (HSIP) Program Cycle 6. CalTrans, the property owner and occupant of 50 Higuera,
has coordinated with the city and support widening at this location.
FISCAL IMPACT
The CMAQ, RHSA, & USHA funded projects require no additional financial commitment from the
City as the local matches have already been satisfied or none are required. The HSIP funded project
does require a 10% local match. Staff is proposing to fund this local match from the Traffic Safety
Program which currently has a budget of $51,400, after this expenditure the traffic safety program
will have a balance of $1,500.
Projects by Grant Source & Local Match
Grant TypeAccountProject Grant Funds Local Match Source Local Match
CMAQ 401.XXXX(TBD)Calle Joaquin Park & Ride Facility $365,000 Property Acq. In Fee Satisfied
Total CMAQ:$365,000 Total CMAQ Local Match:$0
RSHA 401.XXXX(TBD)RailRoad Safety Trail (Taft to Pepper)$300,000 Completed RRST Work Satisfied
RSHA 401.XXXX(TBD)Foothill & Calfornia RR X-ing $370,000 14/15 USHA Satisfied
RSHA 401.XXXX(TBD)LOVR Interchange Augment $1,000,000 Completed LOVR IC Work Satisfied
Total RSHA:$1,670,000 Total RSHA Local Match:$0
USHA 401.XXXX(TBD)14/15 Various Traffic Safety & Ops. Imp.$360,100 None None
Total USHA:$360,100 Total USHA Local Match:$0
HSIP 401.XXXX(TBD)50 Higuera Widening & TWLT $448,800 Traffic Safety Prog. (90558|90398)$49,900
Total HSIP:$448,800 Total HSIP Local Match:$49,900
ALTERNATIVES
1. Deny acceptance of 2014 Regional Transportation Grant Funding. The Council may choose not
to appropriate these grant funds. Staff does not recommend this alternative as these grants
represent approximately $2.5 million in funds available to the City of San Luis Obispo for these
transportation projects. Without these funds, the projects will not have the necessary financial
support to continue. Projects may need to be differed until alternative funding can be identified.
C6 - 3
2. Deny acceptance of HSIP grant funding and allocation of the local match. The Council may
chose not to appropriate this grant funding and commit the local match. Staff does not
recommend this alternative as this is one of the top rated collision locations within the City,
without this funding the collision patterns will likely continue.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2014 Regional Transportation Plan
2. Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Award Letter
3. Council Resolution
T:\Council Agenda Reports\2014\2014-02-18\Transportation Grant Funding (Grigsby-Hudson)\Transportation Grant Funding.docx
C6 - 4
TABLE 8 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP)
In October, staff provided a status of all STIP funded and STIP eligible highway projects. The Board
reviewed the status of Caltrans inter-regionally funded STIP projects as well as the proposed funding
request for additional inter-regional STIP funding for the 46 Corridor Widening improvement project. Table
8 provides SLOCOG’s STIP project funding recommendations.
• Support Caltrans inter-regional STIP funding request: State Route 46 Corridor Widening project is
ready to initiate design and right-of-way acquisition for Phase IV and V. The two projects, referred
to as the Cholame Segment (Phase IV) and the Wye Segment (Phase V) require approximately
$33M and $19M respectively to finalize design and acquire the necessary right-of-way.
• Caltrans STIP inter-regional projects (ITIP) are transmitted to the CTC by Caltrans. No SLOCOG
regional STIP funds have been requested by Caltrans this programming cycle because of
SLOCOG’s commitment to focus investments along the US 101 mainline
• Projects funded in the STIP (regional) must be transmitted to the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) by December 15, 2013 for CTC review and approval.
• Funding recommendations identified in Tables 2 and 5 note the need to collaborate with Caltrans
with respect to the DSMP and other related implementation issues. Those projects identified in
Table 2 and Table 5 that have STIP funding recommended are included in Table 8.
• SLOCOG staff to transmit all STIP program funding recommendations in the format of a regional
transportation improvement program consistent with the 2014 STIP guidelines; including finance
plans in the form of Project Programming Request Forms.
Remaining UnProgrammed Discretionary Funding for Future Consideration
• State Transportation Improvement Program - $4,700,000
• Regional Surface Transportation Program - $1,369,000
• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program - $1,030,000
Total $7,089,000
As stated earlier, it is SLOCOG’s intent to leave funding “on the table” for purposes of programming in
2015. It is expected at that time a number of improvements will be queuing up for programming
consideration; in addition to leaving ample opportunity for the findings of the US 101 Mobility Plan to define
priority needs of the region. SLOCOG will coordinate closely with member agencies, as well as Caltrans
regarding the findings of the 101 Mobility Plan and determine if project initiation documents, beyond those
identified in the report, should commence before 2015. This assessment will occur as early as April 2014.
Distribution of Regional Discretionary Funding – 2014 Programming Cycle
Grover Beach 16%
Arroyo Grande 11%
Pismo Beach 2%
San Luis Obispo 13%
Atascadero 3%
Morro Bay 6%
Paso Robles 8%
County of SLO 26%
RTA 10%
COG 6%
Harbors/CSDs 1%
A-2-7
C6 - 5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
S
C
O
R
E
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%m
a
t
c
h
$
A
M
T
P
H
A
S
E
PROGRAMCOMMENT
TA
B
L
E
2
$
6
,
8
9
9
,
8
0
0
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
,
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
,
A
N
D
R
O
A
D
S
HS
R
1
PR
1
Un
i
o
n
R
d
W
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
Bi
kel
a
n
e
s
-
P
h
1
12
2
.
2
In
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
,
f
r
o
m
K
l
e
c
k
t
o
M
o
n
t
e
b
e
l
l
o
,
w
i
d
e
n
t
o
f
u
l
l
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
a
n
d
pr
o
vi
d
e
C
l
a
s
s
I
I
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
/
p
a
r
a
l
l
e
l
r
o
u
t
e
;
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
C
C
S
S
an
d
C
i
t
y
C
i
r
c
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
Co
n
s
t
.
8
7
6
,
5
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
2,
1
2
3
,
5
0
0
24
2
%
87
6
,
5
0
0
Co
n
s
t
CMAQEvaluate implementation with HSR12 (Union Rd Phase 2)
HS
R
2
MB
2
SR
4
1
/
S
R
1
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Op
e
ra
t
i
o
n
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
11
8
In
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
,
u
p
d
a
t
e
2
0
0
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
u
d
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
2
0
0
2
D
r
a
f
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Re
p
or
t
t
o
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
&
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
P
u
r
s
u
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
e
.
g
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
)
,
R
a
m
p
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
3,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
30
0
,
0
0
0
PA
E
D
/
P
S
E
CMAQEnviro. Determination to be refreshed. $600k needed for design. RECOMMEND: 50/50 split for PE. $113k in SHA already programmed for Enviro refresh.
HS
R
3
GB
2
Oa
k
P
a
r
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Re
c
on
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
11
3
.
4
In
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
,
a
l
s
o
a
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g
A
G
a
n
d
P
B
,
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
,
r
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
co
n
du
c
t
m
a
j
o
r
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
n
O
a
k
P
a
r
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
E
l
C
a
m
i
n
o
Re
a
l
a
n
d
W
e
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
R
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
o
r
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
o
r
n
e
r
ra
m
p
.
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
1,
7
4
7
,
0
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
5
3
,
0
0
0
3%
1,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
RSTPConstruction shortfall of $250k to be pursued using local funds. SLOCOG to pursue cooperative local match funds with GB, AG, and PB.
HS
R
4
CO
3
Hi
g
u
e
r
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
Le
f
t
T
u
r
n
L
a
n
e
a
t
t
h
e
Oc
t
a
g
o
n
B
a
r
n
11
1
.
4
Ru
r
a
l
s
o
u
t
h
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
,
w
i
d
e
n
H
i
g
u
e
r
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
l
e
f
t
tu
r
n
l
a
n
e
i
n
t
o
O
c
t
a
g
o
n
b
a
r
n
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
Co
n
s
t
.
46
1
,
8
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
10
5
,
2
0
0
23
%
46
1
,
8
0
0
Co
n
s
t
CMAQParallel route to US 101; improvement for improved circulation to Bob Jones Staging at Octagon Barn.
HS
R
5
AG
2
Fa
i
r
O
a
k
s
a
n
d
O
r
c
h
a
r
d
Av
e
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
11
1
.
2
In
A
r
r
o
y
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
,
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
th
e
U
S
-
1
0
1
s
o
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
o
f
f
-
r
a
m
p
/
F
a
i
r
O
a
k
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
/
O
r
c
h
a
r
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
;
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
Co
n
s
t
.
3,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
95
0
,
0
0
0
26
%
35
0
,
0
0
0
PA
E
D
,
P
S
E
CMAQProject is within focus segment of 101 Mobility Plan; Match funding at 50/50 basis for PID, PAED, and Design. Not to exceed 350k
HS
R
6
SL
O
2
Si
g
n
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
ro
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
10
8
In
S
L
O
r
e
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
e
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
n
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
r
o
u
t
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Ci
t
y;
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
I
T
S
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
v
i
d
e
o
d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
,
mi
s
c
.
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
;
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
o
f
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
R
d
/
U
P
R
R
si
g
n
a
l
f
o
r
p
e
d
n
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
s
.
Co
n
s
t
.
3
7
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t.
3
6
4
,
6
0
0
99
%
37
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
RSTPMatch at 50/50 for series of improvements on FAU eligible streets; with regional funds directed toward Foothill Rd./UPRR signal upgrade
HS
R
7
PR
3
SR
4
6
/
U
n
i
o
n
R
d
.
In
t
er
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
10
6
.
4
In
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
,
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
(
P
A
E
D
)
p
h
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
U
n
i
o
n
R
o
a
d
/
Hi
g
hw
a
y
4
6
E
a
s
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
p
e
r
t
h
e
P
S
R
-
P
D
S
.
En
v
i
r
o
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
i
ro
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
11
%
45
0
,
0
0
0
PA
E
D
STIPPAED to be funded at 50/50 local/regional funds. PAED estimate $900k. City to agree on $450k local match funds b/4 programmed in STIP
HS
R
8
CO
1
7
Pr
i
c
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
Wi
d
en
i
n
g
a
n
d
Bi
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
-
P
h
2
10
5
.
4
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
P
i
s
m
o
a
n
d
S
L
O
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
8
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
o
n
P
r
i
c
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
Ro
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
C
o
r
r
a
l
D
e
P
i
e
d
r
a
R
o
a
d
w
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
t
o
O
r
m
o
n
d
e
R
o
a
d
.
T
i
e
i
n
t
o
Ph
a
s
e
1
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
C
o
r
r
a
l
D
e
P
i
e
d
r
a
R
o
a
d
.
T
h
i
s
i
s
a
pr
e
v
i
s
o
u
l
y
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
f
u
n
d
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
50
0
,
0
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
5,
9
4
2
,
0
0
0
11
8
8
%
50
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
STIPCurrently programmed project; underfunded by $500k. Modify financial plan to incorporate CMAQ in lieu of STIP
HS
R
9
CO
1
Av
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
a
t
S
a
n
Lu
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
C
r
e
e
k
B
r
i
d
g
e
Re
t
r
o
f
i
t
10
2
.
4
In
A
v
i
l
a
,
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
r
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
b
r
i
d
g
e
o
v
e
r
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
C
r
e
e
k
o
n
A
v
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
.
Pr
o
je
c
t
t
o
b
e
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
r
k
s
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
b
r
i
d
g
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
f
o
r
b
i
k
e
/
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
t
r
a
i
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
o
r
t
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
H
a
r
b
o
r
.
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
43
5
,
0
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
,
R
/
W
,
Co
n
s
t
.
3,
6
1
5
,
0
0
0
83
1
%
43
5
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
RSTPFunding shortfall. Project design and construction not to preclude class 1 facility.
HS
R
1
0
CO
7
Av
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
a
t
U
S
10
1
S
B
R
a
m
p
s
a
t
S
h
e
l
l
Be
a
c
h
R
d
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
s
.
10
2
.
2
Ne
a
r
A
v
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
a
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
S
h
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
ov
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
A
v
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
,
U
S
1
0
1
S
B
R
a
m
p
s
a
n
d
S
h
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
Ro
a
d
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
Co
n
s
t
.
1,
2
0
8
,
3
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
60
0
,
0
0
0
50
%
30
0
,
0
0
0
PA
E
D
,
P
S
E
CMAQRecommend 50/50 Local/Regional for Enviro and Design (PAED/PSE) not to exceed $200k. Expand scope for PnR design
HS
R
1
1
GB
1
SR
1
a
n
d
W
e
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
Av
e
nu
e
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
10
2
.
2
In
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
,
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
ro
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
t
h
e
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
1
/
W
e
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
1
8
4
,
0
0
0
De
s
ig
n
4
6
,
0
0
0
25
%
50
,
0
0
0
PI
D
RSTPRecommend 50/50 local/regional funds for PID; not to exceed $50k regional funds for PID.
HS
R
1
2
PR
2
Un
i
o
n
R
d
W
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
Bi
k
el
a
n
e
s
-
P
h
2
10
1
.
8
In
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
,
w
i
d
e
n
U
n
i
o
n
R
d
f
r
o
m
G
o
l
d
e
n
H
i
l
l
t
o
S
R
4
6
t
o
f
u
l
l
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
,
an
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
C
l
a
s
s
I
I
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
.
Co
n
s
t
.
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
50
0
,
0
0
0
63
%
-
Co
n
s
t
RSTPEquity issue. No funding recommended (consider local fund swap with HSR 1 for more efficient implementation of Ph1 and 2)
HS
R
1
3
CO
4
Wi
l
l
o
w
R
o
a
d
S
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
Po
m
er
o
y
R
o
a
d
10
0
.
2
In
N
i
p
o
m
o
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
W
i
l
l
o
w
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
P
o
m
e
r
o
y
Ro
a
d.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
Co
n
s
t
.
18
6
,
4
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
20
0
,
0
0
0
10
7
%
18
6
,
4
0
0
AL
L
CMAQMatch as requested in application; not to exceed $187k
HS
R
1
4
CO
1
5
No
r
t
h
T
h
o
m
p
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Si
g
na
l
a
t
N
i
p
o
m
o
H
.
S
.
92
.
6
In
N
i
p
o
m
o
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
N
o
r
t
h
T
h
o
m
p
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
a
t
th
e
m
o
s
t
n
o
r
t
h
e
r
l
y
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
N
i
p
o
m
o
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
14
7
,
9
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
13
0
,
0
0
0
88
%
-
No funding recommended. Equity for other projects considered.
HS
R
1
5
CO
9
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
t
U
S
1
0
1
In
t
er
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
A
&
E
D
92
.
2
In
T
e
m
p
l
e
t
o
n
,
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
/
U
S
1
0
1
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
PS
R
/
P
A
E
D
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
PS
R
/
PA
E
D
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
25
0
,
0
0
0
PI
D
RSTPPSR & PAED will define improvement strategy for I/C and assist in defining costs for development to construct improvements. High Co. Priority
HS
R
1
6
CO
6
El
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
C
e
n
t
e
r
Le
f
t
T
u
r
n
L
a
n
e
a
t
S
a
n
t
a
Cl
a
r
a
s
/
o
A
t
a
s
87
.
2
So
u
t
h
o
f
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
o
n
E
l
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
a
t
Sa
n
ta
C
l
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
E
l
C
a
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
a
t
V
i
e
j
o
C
a
m
i
n
o
.
Co
n
s
t
.
5
2
0
,
1
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
38
,
9
0
0
7%
52
0
,
1
0
0
Co
n
s
t
CMAQPID, ENV, Design, RW complete. Consider as CMAQ. High Co. Priority
A
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
RE
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
Ag
e
n
c
y
m
a
t
c
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
am
o
u
n
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
A-2-8
C6 - 6
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
S
C
O
R
E
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%m
a
t
c
h
$
A
M
T
P
H
A
S
E
PROGRAMCOMMENT
A
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
RE
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
Ag
e
n
c
y
m
a
t
c
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
am
o
u
n
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
HS
R
1
7
AT
A
S
2
Ro
s
a
r
i
o
R
a
m
p
a
n
d
S
a
n
An
s
e
l
m
o
I
m
p
s
87
.
2
In
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
,
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
o
f
R
o
s
a
r
i
o
A
v
e
h
o
o
k
r
a
m
p
o
n
t
o
U
S
1
0
1
a
n
d
co
r
re
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
m
i
t
i
g
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
S
a
n
A
n
s
e
l
m
o
R
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
E
l
Ca
m
i
n
o
R
e
a
l
a
n
d
t
h
e
S
B
o
n
/
o
f
f
r
a
m
p
s
.
De
s
i
g
n
,
R
W
,
Co
n
s
t.
1,
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
25
0
,
0
0
0
24
%
15
0
,
0
0
0
PA
E
D
/
P
S
E
RSTPRecommend 50/50 local/regional split for PAED and Design. Regional funding not to exceed $150k
HS
R
1
8
AT
A
S
3
Sa
n
t
a
R
o
s
a
/
U
S
1
0
1
I
m
p
s
80
.
4
In
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
,
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
R
o
s
a
R
d
/
U
S
1
0
1
In
t
er
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
r
a
n
t
a
g
e
r
o
a
d
s
a
t
r
a
m
p
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
s
,
an
d
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
E
C
R
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
Co
n
s
t
.
1,
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
35
0
,
0
0
0
30
%
-
Re-evaluate in 2015 program cycle post 101 Mobility Plan
HS
R
1
9
CO
1
2
Na
c
i
m
i
e
n
t
o
L
a
k
e
D
r
i
v
e
Ce
nte
r
L
e
f
t
T
u
r
n
L
a
n
e
a
t
Ad
e
l
a
i
d
e
D
r
i
v
e
79
.
2
We
s
t
o
f
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Na
c
im
i
e
n
t
o
L
a
k
e
D
r
i
v
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
P
l
a
n
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
,
a
l
l
e
v
i
a
t
e
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
d
e
l
a
y
s
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
i
n
c
i
d
e
n
c
e
o
f
r
e
a
r
e
n
d
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
26
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
23
0
,
0
0
0
88
%
-
Does not provide signficant regional value
HS
R
2
0
SL
O
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
u
d
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
SR
1
/U
S
1
0
1
74
.
4
In
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
,
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
u
d
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
r
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
U
S
1
0
1
/
SR
1
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
En
v
i
r
o
60
,
00
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
-
Re-evaluate after 101 Mobility Plan (April) and assess investment based on priority needs as defined in the Plan. Request local dollar match.
HS
R
2
1
CO
1
4
US
1
0
1
a
n
d
S
R
2
2
7
Ch
a
ng
e
a
b
l
e
M
e
s
s
a
g
e
Si
g
n
s
73
.
6
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
t
o
t
h
e
F
i
v
e
C
i
t
i
e
s
(
A
l
t
R
o
u
t
e
)
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
C
M
S
o
n
NB
US
1
0
1
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
o
f
f
-
r
a
m
p
,
a
n
d
o
n
S
R
2
2
7
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
P
r
i
c
e
Ca
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
22
1
,
9
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
-
See Table 6 (1)
HS
R
2
2
MB
3
So
u
t
h
B
a
y
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Re
h
ab
73
In
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
,
r
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
S
o
u
t
h
B
a
y
B
l
v
d
f
r
o
m
Q
u
i
n
t
a
n
a
R
d
t
o
T
e
r
e
s
a
R
d
(c
o
nn
e
c
t
i
n
g
L
o
s
O
s
o
s
a
n
d
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
;
a
l
s
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
w
o
S
t
a
t
e
Pa
r
k
s
)
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
27
5
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
-
See Table 6 (2)
HS
R
2
3
AT
A
S
4
Co
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
t
u
d
y
S
R
4
1
69
.
2
In
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
,
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
t
u
d
y
a
n
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
Hi
g
hw
a
y
4
1
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
1
0
1
a
n
d
S
a
n
G
a
b
r
i
e
l
R
d
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
a
l
an
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
P
o
r
t
o
l
a
R
d
f
r
o
n
t
i
n
g
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
L
a
k
e
Pa
r
k
.
(
R
o
a
d
D
i
e
t
)
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
1,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
29
0
,
0
0
0
15
%
20
0
,
0
0
0
PI
D
RSTPDevelopment improvement strategy considering all modes of transportation for the 41 corridor through west Atascadero.
HS
R
2
4
SB
C
A
G
2
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
1
6
6
/
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
3
3
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
O
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
66
.
2
Ru
r
a
l
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
S
L
O
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
a
f
e
t
y
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
e
in
t
er
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
1
6
6
a
n
d
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
3
3
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
75
0
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
-
Does not provide signficant regional value and no SBCAG funds matching project.
HS
R
2
CO
G
Ro
u
t
e
2
2
7
W
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
In
R
u
r
a
l
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
i
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
S
R
2
2
7
be
t
we
e
n
S
L
O
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
L
o
s
R
a
n
c
h
o
R
d
.
PA
E
D
Evauate in April pending US 101 Mobility to determine priority of improvement.
A-2-9
C6 - 7
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
S
C
O
R
E
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%m
a
t
c
h
$
A
M
T
P
H
A
S
E
PROGRAMCOMMENT
A
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
RE
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
Ag
e
n
c
y
m
a
t
c
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
am
o
u
n
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
TA
B
L
E
3
$
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
MS
E
1
CO
G
1
Re
g
i
o
n
w
i
d
e
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
Ri
d
e
L
o
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
13
4
.
6
Re
g
i
o
n
w
i
d
e
,
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
ma
i
n
te
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
R
i
d
e
l
o
t
s
,
r
e
n
e
w
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
e
a
s
e
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
e
a
s
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Co
n
s
t
.
1
5
5
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
15
5
,
0
0
0
CO
N
S
T
RSTPImprovements to be made based on needs as defined in 2013 PnR study
MS
E
2
SL
O
1
Ca
l
l
e
J
o
a
q
u
i
n
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
Lo
t
128
.
4
In
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
/
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
r
i
d
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
i
n
pu
b
li
c
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
(
f
u
t
u
r
e
U
S
1
0
1
S
B
R
a
m
p
s
)
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t.
36
5
,
0
0
0
RO
W
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
47
%
36
5
,
0
0
0
AL
L
CMAQIdentified as priority improvement in 2013 PnR Study
MS
E
3
CO
1
8
K
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
Ex
p
an
s
i
o
n
-
P
h
a
s
e
3
12
8
In
S
a
n
M
i
g
u
e
l
,
e
x
p
a
n
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
l
o
t
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
o
n
N
S
t
.
i
n
S
a
n
Mi
g
ue
l
b
y
1
2
s
p
a
c
e
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
a
c
k
s
f
o
r
1
0
b
i
k
e
s
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
;
a
d
d
t
r
e
e
s
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
63
,
9
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
63
,
9
0
0
AL
L
RSTPIdentified as priority improvement in 2013 PnR Study; add trees
MS
E
4
CO
5
On
t
a
r
i
o
R
o
a
d
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
Ex
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
11
9
.
8
Ne
a
r
A
v
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
U
S
1
0
1
,
e
x
p
a
n
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
an
d
B
o
b
J
o
n
e
s
s
t
a
g
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
b
y
_
_
s
p
a
c
e
s
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
Co
n
s
t
.
11
6
,
6
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
11
6
,
6
0
0
AL
L
RSTPIdentified as priority improvement in 2013 PnR Study
MS
E
4
CO
8
Av
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
a
t
U
S
10
1
S
B
R
a
m
p
a
t
S
h
e
l
l
Be
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
11
3
.
6
Ne
a
r
A
v
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
4
0
s
p
a
c
e
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
i
n
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
ro
u
nd
a
b
o
u
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
t
t
h
e
A
v
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
D
r
i
v
e
/
U
S
1
0
1
S
B
R
a
m
p
a
t
S
h
e
l
l
Be
a
c
h
R
d
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
Co
n
s
t
.
19
5
,
1
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
-
AL
L
-Expand scope of PID, PAED, and PSE for Avila Beach I/C improvement (HSR 10) to consider PnR
MS
E
5
CO
G
4
Va
n
p
o
o
l
S
u
b
s
i
d
y
Pr
o
gr
a
m
97
.
6
Re
g
i
o
n
w
i
d
e
,
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
/
y
e
a
r
v
a
n
p
o
o
l
s
u
b
s
i
d
y
t
o
b
e
pr
o
vi
d
e
d
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
t
o
v
a
n
p
o
o
l
u
s
e
r
s
f
o
r
3
y
e
a
r
s
Ad
m
i
n
,
Su
p
p
o
r
t
50
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
15
0
,
0
0
0
AL
L
CMAQSLOCOG Board approved vanpool subsidy concept in October 2013 for implementation (3 years)
MS
E
6
CO
G
3
Em
p
l
o
y
e
r
C
o
m
m
u
t
e
-
TD
M
(
R
i
d
e
s
h
a
r
e
)
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
o
r
84
.
8
Re
g
i
o
n
w
i
d
e
,
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
a
f
u
l
l
t
i
m
e
s
t
a
f
f
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
pu
r
el
y
t
o
m
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
S
L
O
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
R
i
d
e
s
h
a
r
e
’
s
r
e
g
i
o
n
w
i
d
e
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
co
m
m
u
t
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
b
u
d
g
e
t
.
Ad
m
i
n
,
Su
p
p
o
r
t
15
0
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
30
0
,
0
0
0
AL
L
CMAQSLOCOG Board approved set aside funding for a employer commute program. ($150k/year)
MS
E
7
CO
1
6
Te
f
f
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
t
C
a
b
r
i
l
l
o
St
r
ee
t
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
R
i
d
e
67
.
8
In
N
i
p
o
m
o
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
P
a
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
L
o
t
o
n
C
a
r
r
i
l
l
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
T
e
f
f
t
St
r
ee
t
.
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
4
2
,
5
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
12
0
,
0
0
0
28
2
%
-
Project already funded.
TA
B
L
E
4
$
2
,
4
9
9
,
0
0
0
PT
1
RT
A
2
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
3
5
7
p
a
s
s
e
n
g
e
r
co
ach
e
s
15
1
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
r
e
e
5
7
p
a
s
s
e
n
g
e
r
O
v
e
r
t
h
e
R
o
a
d
C
o
a
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
op
e
ra
t
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
e
w
f
a
s
t
e
r
p
r
e
m
i
u
m
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
l
o
n
g
1
0
1
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
o
n
R
T
A
R
o
u
t
e
s
9
&
1
0
d
u
r
i
n
g
A
M
a
n
d
P
M
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
h
o
u
r
s
f
o
r
th
r
e
e
y
e
a
r
s
.
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
pu
r
c
h
a
se
2,
0
4
0
,
0
0
0
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
ac
q
u
i
t
i
o
n
s
51
0
,
0
0
0
25
%
1,
4
2
4
,
0
0
0
AL
L
CMAQ$160k/yr needed for operations (3yrs); $650/vehicle (2 vehicles)- Total: 1.8M. 20% local match required
PT
2
RT
A
1
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
3
3
7
P
a
s
s
e
n
g
e
r
Co
a
ch
e
s
14
9
.
8
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
r
e
e
3
7
-
p
a
s
s
e
n
g
e
r
4
0
’
L
o
w
-
F
l
o
o
r
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
o
a
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
e
w
f
a
s
t
e
r
p
r
e
m
i
u
m
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
1
0
1
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
o
n
R
T
A
R
o
u
t
e
s
9
&
1
0
d
u
r
i
n
g
A
M
a
n
d
P
M
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
h
o
u
r
s
f
o
r
th
r
e
e
y
e
a
r
s
.
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
pu
r
c
h
a
se
1,
6
3
2
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
25
%
-
-
-Funding alternate plan. See recommendation above.
PT
3
CO
G
2
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
D
r
.
/
U
S
1
0
1
Ex
p
re
s
s
B
u
s
S
t
o
p
12
1
.
2
In
P
i
s
m
o
B
e
a
c
h
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
(
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
B
R
T
S
t
u
d
y
re
c
om
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
o
n
t
h
e
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
o
n
r
a
m
p
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
2
P
&
R
l
o
t
s
p
a
c
e
s
.
N
o
t
e
:
C
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
c
o
o
r
i
d
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
an
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
M
U
S
T
o
c
c
u
r
.
PI
D
,
E
n
v
,
De
s
ig
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
1,
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
75
,
0
0
0
PI
D
RSTPCooridinate closely with Caltrans. Initiate for detailed assement though formal Project Initiation Document
PT
4
GB
4
Gr
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
T
r
a
i
n
St
a
ti
o
n
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
12
0
.
2
In
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
b
u
s
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
,
4
0
-
4
5
n
e
w
pa
r
ki
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
,
a
n
d
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
1
De
s
i
g
n
,
R
/
W
,
Co
n
s
t.
,
Su
p
p
o
r
t
1,
6
9
7
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
1
6
6
,
4
5
4
10
%
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
CO
N
S
T
CMAQFund between 1M and 1.6M
PT
5
SB
C
A
G
1
St
a
t
e
R
o
u
t
e
1
6
6
C
u
y
a
m
a
Bu
s
S
t
o
p
s
96
.
2
Ne
a
r
C
u
y
a
m
a
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
4
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
t
u
r
n
o
u
t
s
,
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
si
g
n
a
g
e
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
r
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
b
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
d
e
-
b
o
a
r
d
sc
h
o
o
l
b
u
s
e
s
.
T
w
o
o
f
t
h
e
t
u
r
n
o
u
t
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
S
a
n
t
a
B
a
r
b
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
an
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
u
n
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
A
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
a
n
t
a
B
a
r
b
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
’
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
)
Co
n
s
t
.
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
27
0
,
0
0
0
18
0
%
-
-
-See Table 5 (3)
M
A
X
I
M
I
Z
I
N
G
S
Y
S
T
E
M
E
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
C
Y
(
T
D
M
,
I
T
S
,
T
S
M
)
P
U
B
L
I
C
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
A-2-10
C6 - 8
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
S
C
O
R
E
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%m
a
t
c
h
$
A
M
T
P
H
A
S
E
PROGRAMCOMMENT
A
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
RE
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
Ag
e
n
c
y
m
a
t
c
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
am
o
u
n
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
TA
B
L
E
5
$
1
,
6
7
0
,
4
0
0
NM
1
SL
O
1
B
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
T
r
a
i
l
-
Ta
f
t
t
o
P
e
p
p
e
r
14
7
.
6
In
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
a
l
o
n
g
a
n
d
ad
ja
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
U
P
R
R
t
r
a
i
n
t
r
a
c
k
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
U
S
1
0
1
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
(T
a
f
t
S
t
)
t
o
P
e
p
p
e
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
Co
n
s
t
.
2
,
2
8
4
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
96
6
,
0
0
0
42
%
30
0
,
0
0
0
CO
N
S
T
RSTPReady to go. Project to compete in first round ATP. Potential ATP grant funded with SLOCOG Match of$300K.
NM
2
CO
1
0
Mo
r
r
o
B
a
y
t
o
C
a
y
u
c
o
s
Bi
ke
w
a
y
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
14
1
.
4
Be
t
w
e
e
n
M
B
a
n
d
C
a
y
u
c
o
s
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
o
f
f
-
h
i
g
h
w
a
y
co
nn
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
w
o
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
s
h
e
l
f
e
a
d
y
p
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
t
o
f
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
R
O
W
i
s
s
u
e
s
f
o
r
fu
t
u
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
De
s
g
i
n
,
R
/
W
4
5
3
,
6
0
0
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R
/
W
1
1
3
,
4
0
0
25
%
20
0
,
0
0
0
PS
E
RSTPComplete design and R/W; prepare project for future Round 2 ATP for construction funding.
NM
3
MB
1
Mo
r
r
o
C
r
e
e
k
B
r
i
d
g
e
13
1
.
4
In
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
m
u
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
(
b
i
k
e
&
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
)
t
r
a
i
l
&
b
r
i
d
g
e
f
o
r
Em
b
a
rc
a
d
e
r
o
R
d
o
v
e
r
M
o
r
r
o
C
r
e
e
k
4
4
0
f
t
.
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
f
a
l
l
.
Co
n
s
t
.
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
No
ne
-
0
%
30
0
,
0
0
0
CO
N
S
T
STIP/RSTPShortfall of $700K. Pursue STIP increase on existing STIP-TE project ($100k); provide RSTP ($200k). Local funds needed to close gap $400k gap.
NM
4
SL
O
3
B
Bo
b
J
o
n
e
s
T
r
a
i
l
-
E
x
t
e
n
d
LO
V
R
I
C
t
o
O
c
t
a
g
o
n
B
a
r
n
12
8
.
8
In
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
,
e
x
t
e
n
d
t
h
e
B
o
b
J
o
n
e
s
t
r
a
i
l
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
L
O
V
R
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
to
O
c
t
a
g
o
n
a
l
B
a
r
n
.
En
v
i
r
o
,
De
si
g
n
,
R
/
W
,
Co
n
s
t
.
3,
1
3
5
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
-
0
%
.
-
-Consider Match for Round 2 "Local " ATP program. Add to SLOCOG candidate ATP list list for future consideration
NM
5
CO
1
1
Te
m
p
l
e
t
o
n
t
o
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
Bi
ke
w
a
y
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
12
8
Be
t
w
e
e
n
T
e
m
p
l
e
t
o
n
a
n
d
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
t
r
a
i
l
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
di
re
c
t
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
tw
o
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
a
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
J
u
a
n
B
a
u
t
i
s
t
a
de
A
n
z
a
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
T
r
a
i
l
a
n
d
t
h
e
S
a
l
i
n
a
s
R
i
v
e
r
T
r
a
i
l
.
De
s
g
i
n
,
R
/
W
3
2
0
,
0
0
0
D
e
s
g
i
n
,
R
/
W
8
0
,
0
0
0
25
%
24
0
,
0
0
0
PS
E
CMAQComplete design and R/W; prepare project for future Round 2 ATP for construction funding.
NM
6
GB
5
We
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
Ph
as
e
4
,
5
t
h
t
o
8
t
h
St
r
e
e
t
s
12
7
.
4
In
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
,
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
cr
os
s
i
n
g
s
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
.
W
e
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
5t
h
a
n
d
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
.
Co
n
s
t
.
,
Su
p
p
o
rt
1,
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
,
Su
p
p
o
r
t
23
2
,
2
0
0
14
%
-
-
-Equity issue. No funding recommended
NM
7
GB
3
We
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
Ph
as
e
5
,
S
t
a
t
e
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
1
to
1
1
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
11
9
.
2
In
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
,
t
r
e
e
g
r
a
t
e
s
,
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
sc
al
e
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
.
O
n
W
e
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
St
a
t
e
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
1
a
n
d
1
1
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
.
Co
n
s
t
.
,
Su
p
p
o
rt
78
0
,
8
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
,
Su
p
p
o
r
t
19
5
,
0
0
0
25
%
-
-
-Equity issue. No funding recommended
NM
8
SL
O
2
B
Cl
a
s
s
1
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
-
C
a
l
l
e
Jo
a
q
u
i
n
t
o
O
c
e
a
n
a
i
r
e
D
r
.
11
5
.
6
In
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
C
l
a
s
s
I
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
t
r
a
i
l
co
nn
e
c
t
i
n
g
C
a
l
l
e
J
o
a
q
u
i
n
(
L
O
V
R
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
)
t
o
O
c
e
a
n
a
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
a
l
o
n
g
Pr
e
f
u
m
o
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
ns
t
.
97
2
,
8
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
24
3
,
2
0
0
25
%
-
-
-Bob Jones Gap Closure. Consider Match for Round 2 "Local " ATP program. Add to SLOCOG candidate ATP list list for future consideration
NM
9
PB
1
Sh
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
–Ph
as
e
2
11
4
.
4
In
P
i
s
m
o
B
e
a
c
h
,
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
1
8
-
b
l
o
c
k
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
h
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
i
n
do
wn
t
o
w
n
S
h
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
C
l
i
f
f
A
v
e
n
u
e
(
D
i
n
o
s
a
u
r
C
a
v
e
s
P
a
r
k
)
a
n
d
Te
r
r
a
c
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
(
S
h
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
)
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
an
d
l
i
v
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
y
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
,
a
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
8
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
m
u
l
t
i
-
u
s
e
p
a
t
h
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
s
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
2,
5
5
8
,
5
1
7
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
33
1
,
4
8
3
13
%
24
0
,
0
0
0
CO
N
S
T
STIPPhase 1 STIP TE project to be modifed; Scope expanded to capture additional components of Phase 2. Add to SLOCOG candidate ATP llist to leverage State ATP
NM
1
0
AG
1
E
a
s
t
B
r
a
n
c
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
Maso
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
e
a
s
t
o
f
Pa
u
l
d
i
n
g
C
i
r
c
l
e
11
4
In
A
r
r
o
y
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
,
P
H
1
:
O
n
E
a
s
t
B
r
a
n
c
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
M
a
s
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
e
a
s
t
o
f
Pa
ul
d
i
n
g
C
i
r
c
l
e
:
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
f
i
n
a
l
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
b
y
in
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
b
u
l
b
o
u
t
s
,
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
n
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
fu
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
,
a
n
d
A
D
A
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
a
m
p
s
.
Co
n
s
t
.
3
9
0
,
4
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
14
2
,
6
0
0
37
%
39
0
,
4
0
0
CO
N
S
T
RSTPProject provides extension of downtown streetscape west toward Paulding Middle School.
NM
1
1
AG
1
Ea
s
t
B
r
a
n
c
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
e
a
s
t
of
P
a
u
l
d
i
n
g
C
i
r
c
l
e
t
o
Hu
a
s
n
a
R
o
a
d
11
4
I
n
A
r
r
o
y
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
,
P
h
2
:
O
n
E
a
s
t
B
r
a
n
c
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
e
a
s
t
o
f
P
a
u
l
d
i
n
g
C
i
r
c
l
e
t
o
Hu
as
n
a
R
o
a
d
:
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
f
i
l
l
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
A
D
A
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
ra
m
p
s
Co
n
s
t
.
3
5
2
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
14
3
,
0
0
0
41
%
-
-
-Add to SLOCOG candidate ATP list list for future consideration for Round 2 ATP.
NM
1
2
AG
1
We
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
E
l
m
St
re
e
t
t
o
H
a
l
c
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
:
11
4
I
n
A
r
r
o
y
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
,
P
h
3
:
O
n
W
e
s
t
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
E
l
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
H
a
l
c
y
o
n
Ro
ad
:
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
,
b
u
l
b
o
u
t
s
a
n
d
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
en
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
n
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
a
n
d
A
D
A
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
a
m
p
s
.
Co
n
s
t
.
2
5
6
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
.
99
,
0
0
0
39
%
-
-
-Project not in the RTP-preSCS. Consider for inclusion in to 2014 RTP-SCS
NM
1
3
CO
2
Oc
e
a
n
o
F
r
o
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
(
S
R
1)
R
e
v
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
h
a
s
e
1
11
2
.
6
In
O
c
e
a
n
o
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
F
r
o
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
3
t
h
S
t
an
d
1
5
t
h
S
t
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
s
i
g
h
t
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
61
7
,
2
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
90
,
0
0
0
15
%
-
-
-See Table 6 (4)
NM
1
4
AT
A
S
1
At
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
C
r
e
e
k
B
r
i
d
g
e
(B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
B
r
i
d
g
e
)
11
2
In
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
w
a
l
k
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
b
r
i
d
g
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
co
lo
n
y
s
q
u
a
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
a
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
c
r
e
e
k
t
r
a
i
l
,
a
n
d
s
u
n
k
e
n
ga
r
d
e
n
s
p
a
r
k
a
t
E
a
s
t
M
a
l
l
R
d
.
Co
n
s
t
.
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
23
%
-
-
-See Table 6 (5)
NM
1
5
PB
3
Cy
p
r
e
s
s
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
an
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
c
c
e
s
s
11
1
.
6
Pe
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
2
0
1
3
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
T
h
e
s
t
u
d
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
Cy
p
r
e
s
s
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
s
a
c
l
a
s
s
I
I
I
b
i
k
e
r
o
u
t
e
a
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
z
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
y
p
r
e
s
s
St
r
e
e
t
B
r
i
d
g
e
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
P
i
s
m
o
C
r
e
e
k
t
o
g
i
v
e
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
a
c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
b
r
i
d
g
e
a
t
D
o
l
l
i
v
e
r
w
h
i
l
e
l
i
n
k
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
s
an
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
t
o
P
i
s
m
o
B
e
a
c
h
’
s
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
r
e
w
i
t
h
m
u
c
h
le
s
s
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Co
n
s
t
.
6
4
0
,
0
0
0
-
0
%
-
-
-No funding recommended at this time. Assess in next RTP
A
C
T
I
V
E
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
(
B
I
K
E
&
P E
D
)
C6 - 9
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
S
C
O
R
E
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%m
a
t
c
h
$
A
M
T
P
H
A
S
E
PROGRAMCOMMENT
A
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
RE
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
Ag
e
n
c
y
m
a
t
c
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
am
o
u
n
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
NM
1
6
CO
1
3
Or
c
u
t
t
R
o
a
d
B
i
k
e
L
a
n
e
s
11
0
.
4
Ea
s
t
o
f
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
,
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
o
n
O
r
c
u
t
t
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Ri
gh
e
t
t
i
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
B
i
d
d
l
e
R
a
n
c
h
R
o
a
d
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
38
1
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
88
5
,
0
0
0
23
2
%
-
-
-No funding recommended at this time. Assess in next RTP
NM
1
7
PB
2
Bi
k
e
S
h
a
r
e
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Stud
y
99
.
6
In
P
i
s
m
o
B
e
a
c
h
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
b
i
k
e
s
h
a
r
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
Co
n
s
t
.
1
4
2
,
5
0
0
Co
ns
t
.
1
4
2
,
5
0
0
10
0
%
-
-
-No funding recommended at this time. Assess in next RTP
NM
1
8
PB
2
Bi
k
e
S
h
a
r
e
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Stud
y
99
.
6
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
t
o
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
c
o
s
t
a
n
d
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
o
f
a
b
i
k
e
s
h
a
r
e
pr
og
r
a
m
f
o
r
C
i
t
y
o
f
P
B
.
St
u
d
y
8,
50
0
St
u
d
y
8
,
5
0
0
1
0
0
%
-
-
-See Table 6 (6)C6 - 10
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
S
C
O
R
E
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%m
a
t
c
h
$
A
M
T
P
H
A
S
E
PROGRAMCOMMENT
A
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
RE
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
Ag
e
n
c
y
m
a
t
c
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
am
o
u
n
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
TA
B
L
E
6
$
1
,
1
6
4
,
4
0
0
O
T
H
E
R
F
U
N
D
I
N
G
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
S
1
CO
1
4
US
1
0
1
a
n
d
S
R
2
2
7
Chan
g
e
a
b
l
e
M
e
s
s
a
g
e
Si
g
n
s
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
t
o
t
h
e
F
i
v
e
C
i
t
i
e
s
(
A
l
t
R
o
u
t
e
)
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
C
M
S
o
n
NB
U
S
1
0
1
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
o
f
f
‐
r
a
m
p
,
a
n
d
o
n
S
R
2
2
7
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
P
r
i
c
e
Ca
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
R/
W
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
22
1
,
9
0
0
No
n
e
‐
0
%
22
1
,
9
0
0
Co
n
s
t
RSTPCMS sign to benefit parallel route to US 101. Seek match.
2
MB
3
So
u
t
h
B
a
y
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Re
ha
b
In
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
,
r
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
S
o
u
t
h
B
a
y
B
l
v
d
f
r
o
m
Q
u
i
n
t
a
n
a
R
d
t
o
T
e
r
e
s
a
R
d
(c
on
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
L
o
s
O
s
o
s
a
n
d
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
;
a
l
s
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
w
o
S
t
a
t
e
Pa
r
k
s
)
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
ns
t
.
27
5
,
0
0
0
No
n
e
‐
0
%
27
5
,
0
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
st
RSTPInter‐community connector (MB and Los Osos). Pavement condition extremely degraded.
3
SB
C
A
G
1
St
a
t
e
R
o
u
t
e
1
6
6
C
u
y
a
m
a
Bu
s
S
t
o
p
s
si
g
n
a
g
e
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
r
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
b
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
d
e
‐
b
o
a
r
d
sc
ho
o
l
b
u
s
e
s
.
T
w
o
o
f
t
h
e
t
u
r
n
o
u
t
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
S
a
n
t
a
B
a
r
b
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
an
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
u
n
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
A
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
a
n
t
a
B
a
r
b
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
’
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
)
Co
n
s
t
.
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
Co
n
s
t
27
0
,
0
0
0
18
0
%
15
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
RSTPEquity for rural southeastern SLO County. Leverage SBCAG funds
4
CO
2
Oc
e
a
n
o
F
r
o
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
(
S
R
1)
R
e
v
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
‐
P
h
a
s
e
1
In
O
c
e
a
n
o
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
F
r
o
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
3
t
h
S
t
an
d
1
5
t
h
S
t
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
s
i
g
h
t
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
61
7
,
2
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
RW
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
90
,
0
0
0
15
%
13
4
,
0
0
0
PA
E
D
,
De
s
ig
n
RSTPInitiate environmental and design for commuity of Oceano; leverage Caltrans funds for ADA improvements
5
AT
A
S
1
At
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
C
r
e
e
k
B
r
i
d
g
e
(B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
B
r
i
d
g
e
)
In
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
w
a
l
k
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
b
r
i
d
g
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
co
lo
n
y
s
q
u
a
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
a
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
c
r
e
e
k
t
r
a
i
l
,
a
n
d
s
u
n
k
e
n
ga
r
d
e
n
s
p
a
r
k
a
t
E
a
s
t
M
a
l
l
R
d
.
Co
n
s
t
.
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
,
D
e
s
i
g
n
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
23
%
15
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
RSTPLeverage state ATP program with SLOCOG funding. Project is ready to go and can compete for Round 1 ATP
6
PB
2
Bi
k
e
S
h
a
r
e
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
St
ud
y
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
t
o
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
c
o
s
t
a
n
d
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
o
f
a
b
i
k
e
s
h
a
r
e
pr
og
r
a
m
f
o
r
C
i
t
y
o
f
P
B
.
St
u
d
y
8,
50
0
St
u
d
y
8
,
5
0
0
1
0
0
%
8,
5
0
0
PA
E
D
,
De
s
ig
n
RSTPDevelop pilot study for bike share program using coastal tourist community as example.
7
CC
S
D
Sa
n
S
i
m
e
o
n
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
Ac
ce
s
s
Co
a
s
t
a
l
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
b
y
w
a
y
f
u
n
d
s
c
o
s
t
l
y
t
o
a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
e
r
.
Se
ek
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
e
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
R
S
T
P
f
u
n
d
s
t
o
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
i
m
e
l
y
a
n
d
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
l
y
.
Co
n
s
t
.
50
,0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
6
,
0
0
0
1
2
%
50
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
RSTPSan Simeon CSD unable to manage federal aid project. Swap Byway funds with RSTP.
8
PS
L
H
D
Tr
av
e
l
H
o
i
s
t
P
i
e
r
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
De
s
i
g
n
o
f
a
6
0
’
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
i
e
r
s
s
o
h
o
i
s
t
i
s
i
n
d
e
e
p
e
r
w
a
t
e
r
s
o
t
h
a
t
la
r
g
e
r
b
o
a
t
s
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
b
e
h
a
u
l
e
d
o
u
t
,
r
e
p
a
i
r
e
d
/
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
bo
a
t
y
a
r
d
a
n
d
r
e
t
u
r
n
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
b
a
y
.
De
s
i
g
n
50
,
0
0
0
C
o
n
s
t
25
,
0
0
0
De
s
i
g
n
RSTPSupports RTP Harbor policies; providing for enhanced commerce at the PSLHD.
9
PS
L
H
D
Pi
e
r
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Proj
e
c
t
At
P
o
r
t
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
,
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
i
e
r
.
Co
n
s
t
.
15
0,
0
0
0
-
-Curently programmed undefunded project
10
CO
Wi
ld
C
h
e
r
r
y
C
a
n
y
o
n
Ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
Fu
l
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
n
o
t
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
.
C
o
u
n
t
y
o
f
S
L
O
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
$3
0
0
k
f
r
o
m
S
L
O
C
O
G
.
F
u
n
d
s
a
r
e
i
n
a
n
e
s
c
r
o
w
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
w
i
t
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
.
Co
u
n
t
y
t
o
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
w
h
e
r
e
t
o
r
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
f
u
n
d
s
.
O
p
t
i
o
n
:
P
i
s
m
o
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
,
Sa
n
M
i
g
u
e
l
R
o
a
d
/
P
a
r
k
I
m
p
.
Co
n
s
t
.
30
0
,
0
0
0
30
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
o
r
R
/
W
RSTPEncourage County to use funds for similar type of open space project (e.g. Pismo Preserve). Assess with CIP in February. $300k already in County escrow account. No NEW SLOCOG funding recommended.C6 - 11
TA
B
L
E
7
$
3
,
7
3
1
,
6
3
3
R
S
T
P
U
R
B
A
N
A
P
P
O
R
T
I
O
N
M
E
N
T
(
3
Y
E
A
R
S
)
To
t
a
l
3
y
r
U
r
b
a
n
a
n
d
R
u
r
a
l
A
p
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
m
e
n
t
(
$
2
.
4
M
<
u
r
b
a
n
>
+
$
1
.
3
M
<
r
u
r
a
l
>
=
$
3
.
7
M
3,
7
3
1
,
6
3
3
$
S
H
A
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
U
r
b
a
n
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(2
0
1
0
C
e
n
s
u
s
)
6
"
I
m
a
g
e
r
y
C
o
s
t
A
p
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
m
e
n
t
%
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
S
h
a
r
e
A
e
r
i
a
l
P
h
o
t
o
S
h
a
r
e
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
S
h
a
r
e
s
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
C
i
t
i
e
s
A
r
r
o
y
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
1
7
,
2
5
2
4
.
2
%
2
0
9
,
1
0
0
2
,
6
1
5
2
0
6
,
4
8
5
A
t
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
o
2
8
,
3
1
0
8
.
5
%
3
4
3
,
2
0
0
5
,
3
3
4
3
3
7
,
8
6
6
G
r
o
v
e
r
B
e
a
c
h
1
3
,
1
5
6
2
.
8
%
1
5
9
,
6
0
0
1
,
7
3
0
1
5
7
,
8
7
0
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
1
0
,
2
3
4
3
.
0
%
1
2
4
,
2
0
0
1
,
8
8
4
1
2
2
,
3
1
6
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
2
9
,
7
9
3
8
.
2
%
3
6
1
,
2
0
0
5
,
0
9
5
3
5
6
,
1
0
5
P
i
s
m
o
B
e
a
c
h
7
,
6
5
5
2
.
5
%
9
5
,
7
0
0
1
,
5
4
4
9
4
,
1
5
6
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
C
i
t
y
4
5
,
1
1
9
1
0
.
8
%
5
4
6
,
9
0
0
6
,
7
4
9
5
4
0
,
1
5
1
1
5
1
,
5
1
9
3
9
.
9
%
$
1
,
8
3
9
,
9
0
0
$
2
4
,
9
5
2
$
1
,
8
1
4
,
9
4
8
C
o
u
n
t
y
o
f
S
L
O
-
U
r
b
a
n
A
r
e
a
s
$
1
,
8
1
4
,
9
4
8
C
a
m
b
r
i
a
6
,
0
3
2
2
.
5
%
7
3
,
2
0
0
1
,
5
7
0
7
1
,
6
3
0
O
c
e
a
n
o
7
,
2
8
6
2
.
9
%
8
8
,
2
0
0
1
,
8
4
0
8
6
,
3
6
0
L
o
s
O
s
o
s
1
4
,
2
7
6
5
.
9
%
1
7
3
,
1
0
0
3
,
6
8
1
1
6
9
,
4
1
9
N
i
p
o
m
o
1
6
,
7
1
4
6
.
8
%
2
0
2
,
5
0
0
4
,
2
7
6
1
9
8
,
2
2
4
T
e
m
p
l
e
t
o
n
7
,
6
7
4
3
.
1
%
9
3
,
0
0
0
1
,
9
4
9
9
1
,
0
5
1
5
1
,
9
8
2
2
1
.
3
%
$
6
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
,
3
1
5
$
6
1
6
,
6
8
5
2
0
3
,
5
0
1
3
8
.
8
%
$
2
4
,
2
3
3
1
0
0
.
0
%
$
2
,
4
6
9
,
9
0
0
$
6
2
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
4
3
1
,
6
3
3
C
o
u
n
t
y
o
f
S
L
O
:
R
u
r
a
l
,
u
n
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
6
6
,
1
3
6
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
s
a
d
i
r
e
c
t
R
S
T
P
a
p
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
m
n
t
o
f
$
5
7
8
k
/
y
r
S
L
O
C
O
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
H
A
-
O
t
h
e
r
C
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
S
H
A
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
s
h
a
r
e
d
6
"
A
e
r
i
a
l
P
h
o
t
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
C
o
s
t
s
A-2-14
C6 - 12
PP
N
O
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
T
I
P
Fu
n
d
s
ST
I
P
F
u
n
d
s
Re
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
S
T
I
P
O
N
L
Y
F
U
N
D
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
Ne
a
r
S
h
a
n
d
o
n
,
f
r
o
m
0
.
2
m
i
l
e
s
w
e
s
t
o
f
S
h
a
n
d
o
n
S
a
f
e
t
y
R
o
a
d
s
i
d
e
Re
s
t
A
r
e
a
t
o
0
.
5
m
i
l
e
e
a
s
t
o
f
J
a
c
k
R
a
n
c
h
C
a
f
é
.
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
t
o
a
4
l
a
n
e
ex
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
.
-
95
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ne
a
r
C
h
o
l
a
m
e
f
r
o
m
0
.
7
m
i
l
e
s
w
e
s
t
o
f
D
a
v
i
s
R
o
a
d
t
o
0
.
5
m
i
l
e
s
w
e
s
t
of
A
n
t
e
l
o
p
e
R
o
a
d
.
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
t
o
a
4
l
a
n
e
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
.
-
1
9
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
CA
L
T
R
A
N
S
I
T
I
P
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
Ne
a
r
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
,
f
r
o
m
w
e
s
t
o
f
G
e
n
e
s
e
o
R
o
a
d
t
o
e
a
s
t
o
f
A
l
m
o
n
d
Dr
i
v
e
.
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
o
r
e
-
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
d
i
s
t
u
r
b
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
l
o
s
s
o
f
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
s
pe
r
t
e
r
m
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
(
D
F
G
,
A
C
O
E
,
RW
Q
C
B
)
f
o
r
p
a
r
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
;
W
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
4
6
a
t
W
h
i
t
l
e
y
1
.
1,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
(5
0
,
0
0
0
)
Co
n
s
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
8
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
P
r
i
c
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Co
r
r
a
l
D
e
P
i
e
d
r
a
R
o
a
d
w
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
t
o
O
r
m
o
n
d
e
R
o
a
d
f
o
r
m
o
t
o
r
i
s
t
sa
f
e
t
y
,
f
u
l
l
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
,
a
n
d
c
l
a
s
s
I
I
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
.
5,
1
6
4
,
0
0
0
(1
,
8
3
4
,
0
0
0
)
De
s
i
g
n
,
C
o
n
s
t
.
In
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
o
f
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
,
a
l
o
n
g
L
o
s
O
s
o
s
V
a
l
l
e
y
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Au
t
o
P
a
r
k
W
a
y
a
n
d
S
o
u
t
h
H
i
g
u
e
r
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
w
i
d
e
n
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
,
m
o
d
i
f
y
on
a
n
d
o
f
f
r
a
m
p
s
.
15
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
In
A
r
r
o
y
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
,
o
n
R
o
u
t
e
1
0
1
,
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
.
a
n
d
C
a
m
i
n
o
M
e
r
c
a
d
o
,
a
t
t
h
e
3
i
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
,
on
W
.
B
r
a
n
c
h
,
a
t
t
h
e
B
r
i
s
c
o
R
o
a
d
u
n
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
u
x
i
l
i
a
r
y
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
P
n
R
l
o
t
.
5,
6
2
4
,
0
0
0
1,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
In
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
,
R
e
a
l
i
g
n
S
o
u
t
h
V
i
n
e
S
t
.
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
t
o
n
e
w
l
y
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
e
d
Th
e
a
t
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
r
o
a
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
o
c
c
u
r
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
o
f
ro
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
r
a
m
p
s
.
1,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
In
P
a
s
o
R
o
b
l
e
s
,
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
(
P
A
E
D
)
p
h
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
U
n
i
o
n
Ro
a
d
/
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
4
6
E
a
s
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
p
e
r
t
h
e
P
S
R
-
P
D
S
.
N
E
W
T
O
S
T
I
P
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
En
v
i
r
o
Be
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
O
b
i
s
p
o
t
o
A
v
i
l
a
B
e
a
c
h
,
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Oc
t
a
g
o
n
b
a
r
n
t
o
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
S
o
u
t
h
H
i
g
u
e
r
a
a
n
d
H
w
y
1
0
1
N
o
r
t
h
bo
u
n
d
o
n
-
r
a
m
p
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
m
u
l
t
i
-
u
s
e
b
i
k
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
t
r
a
i
l
.
80
0
,
0
0
0
80
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
In
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
P
i
s
m
o
B
e
a
c
h
,
o
n
S
h
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
f
r
o
m
D
i
n
o
s
a
u
r
ca
v
e
s
p
a
r
k
t
o
S
h
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
8
-
fo
o
t
w
i
d
e
m
u
l
t
i
u
s
e
p
a
t
h
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
60
0
,
0
0
0
84
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
I
n
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
o
f
M
o
r
r
o
B
a
y
,
f
r
o
m
R
o
u
t
e
4
1
t
o
M
o
r
r
o
R
o
c
k
;
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
t
h
a
n
d
b
r
i
d
g
e
.
52
8
,
0
0
0
10
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
SH
I
F
T
S
T
I
P
F
U
N
D
S
F
R
O
M
P
H
A
S
E
2
T
O
P
H
A
S
E
3
.
S
h
i
f
t
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
o
f
S
o
u
t
h
V
i
n
e
S
t
(
D
e
s
i
g
n
f
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
S
L
O
C
O
G
an
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
)
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
h
a
s
e
f
o
r
P
h
3
(
W
e
s
t
S
i
d
e
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
)
.
O
b
t
a
i
n
n
e
w
P
P
N
O
f
r
o
m
C
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
. Initiate a reassement
of
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
i
t
h
C
T
a
n
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
p
l
i
t
w
i
t
h
S
L
O
C
o
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
P
R
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
F
Y
1
4
/
1
5
O
W
P
w
o
r
k
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
SU
P
P
O
R
T
F
U
N
D
I
N
G
P
A
E
D
I
N
S
T
I
P
.
Th
e
P
I
D
(
P
S
R
-
P
D
S
)
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
a
h
i
g
h
e
r
c
o
s
t
"
i
n
t
e
r
i
m
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
"
.
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
f
o
r
P
A
E
D
i
s
$9
0
0
k
.
S
L
O
C
O
G
t
o
s
h
a
r
e
c
o
s
t
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
a
t
5
0
/
5
0
.
P
r
i
o
r
S
L
O
C
O
G
f
u
n
d
s
t
o
b
e
r
e
t
u
r
n
e
d
t
o
S
H
A
t
r
u
s
t
f
u
n
d
.
O
b
t
a
i
n
P
P
N
O
f
r
o
m
Ca
l
t
r
a
n
s
MO
D
I
F
Y
S
C
O
P
E
A
N
D
R
E
P
O
R
G
R
A
M
.
De
l
a
y
s
w
i
t
h
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
.
A
l
l
o
w
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
"
l
a
p
s
e
"
a
n
d
r
e
-
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
M
o
d
i
f
y
so
c
p
e
a
n
d
f
i
n
a
c
e
p
l
a
n
t
o
h
a
v
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
l
s
o
c
o
m
p
e
t
e
s
t
a
t
e
-
w
i
d
e
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
MO
D
I
F
Y
S
C
O
P
E
A
N
D
R
E
P
O
R
G
R
A
M
.
S
e
q
u
e
n
c
i
n
g
o
f
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
.
Un
a
b
l
e
t
o
p
u
r
s
u
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
.
A
l
l
o
w
f
u
n
d
s
t
o
"
l
a
p
s
e
"
a
n
d
r
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
p
r
o
e
j
c
t
.
M
o
d
i
f
y
s
c
o
p
e
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
S
T
I
P
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
t
o
ca
p
t
u
r
e
e
x
p
a
n
d
e
d
s
c
o
p
e
c
o
s
t
.
SU
P
P
O
R
T
C
A
L
T
R
A
N
S
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
:
$
3
9
M
(
R
/
W
a
n
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
)
;
$
5
5
M
(
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
)
-
N
o
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
T
I
P
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
re
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
f
o
r
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
1
b
e
l
o
w
)
.
SU
P
P
O
R
T
C
A
L
T
R
A
N
S
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
:
$
1
9
M
(
R
/
W
a
n
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
)
-
N
o
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
T
I
P
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
f
o
r
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
1
b
e
l
o
w
)
MO
D
I
F
Y
F
I
N
A
N
C
E
P
L
A
N
A
N
D
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
I
N
B
U
D
G
E
T
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
h
a
s
$
5
0
0
k
c
o
s
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
.
M
o
d
i
f
y
f
i
n
a
n
c
e
p
l
a
n
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
ST
I
P
s
h
a
r
e
s
b
y
o
n
e
y
e
a
r
C
M
A
Q
a
p
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
m
e
n
t
s
(
$
2
.
3
M
)
.
S
T
I
P
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
b
y
$
1
.
8
M
.
(
S
T
I
P
$
3
.
8
M
;
C
M
A
Q
$
2
.
3
M
)
SU
P
P
O
R
T
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
.
C
u
r
r
e
n
l
t
y
$
9
M
i
n
l
o
c
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
w
a
r
d
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
I
.
SU
P
P
O
R
T
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
.
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
$
7
.
8
M
i
n
l
o
c
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
.
TA
B
L
E
8
A
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
Up
d
a
t
e
C
o
n
s
t
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
;
n
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
.
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
S
L
O
C
O
G
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
T
I
P
f
u
n
d
s
b
y
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
.
Rt
4
6
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
Ch
o
l
a
m
e
Rt
4
6
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
W
Y
E
Wh
i
t
l
e
y
1
-
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
c
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
W
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
-
P
h
2
23
7
4
11
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Rt
1
0
1
/
R
t
4
6
W
I
/
C
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
h
2 SR
4
6
/
U
n
i
o
n
R
d
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Bo
b
J
o
n
e
s
b
i
k
e
/
p
e
d
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
,
P
H
2
Sh
e
l
l
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
M
u
l
t
i
u
s
e
,
P
h
1
Rt
1
-
1
/
L
o
s
O
s
o
s
V
a
l
l
e
y
R
d
in
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
,
p
h
a
s
e
3
Rt
1
0
1
/
B
r
i
s
c
o
R
d
I
/
C
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
A
u
x
L
a
n
e
a
n
d
P
n
R
l
o
t
2,
3
0
6
,
0
0
0
SL
O
C
O
G
R
I
P
R
E
Q
U
E
S
T
RE
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
NO
T
E
1
:
S
L
O
C
O
G
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
$
5
M
i
n
2
0
1
2
S
T
I
P
t
o
w
a
r
d
4
6
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
W
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
SU
P
P
O
R
T
C
O
S
T
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
y
e
a
r
S
T
I
P
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
M
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
s
c
o
p
e
u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d
.
S
L
O
C
O
G
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
5
0
%
o
f
th
e
c
o
s
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
(
$
1
0
0
k
S
T
I
P
,
a
n
d
$
2
0
0
k
R
S
T
P
-
(
s
e
e
T
a
b
l
e
6
)
.
M
o
r
r
o
C
r
e
e
k
M
u
l
i
t
-
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
a
n
d
Br
i
d
g
e
02
2
6
F
02
2
6
J
02
2
6
K
20
7
1
73
0
0
48
5
6
B
23
6
9
-
11
2
9
A
23
0
2
A-2-15
C6 - 13
C6 - 14
C6 - 15
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (20xx Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMITTING THE
NECESSARY LOCAL MATCH AND STATING THE ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE
SLOCOG REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDED PROJECTS
WHEREAS, The City of San Luis Obispo (herein referred to as City) has submitted an
application to the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) for $2.1 million for
regional discretional federal transportation funding for the Park & Ride Facility at Calle Joqauin,
RR Crossing Upgrades at Foothill & California, RailRoad Safety Trail (Taft to Pepper), LOVR
Interchange, and intersection & corridor operational improvements (herein referred to as
projects); and
WHEREAS, The City has the financial capacity to complete, operate and maintain the
projects, and;
WHEREAS, The City will ensure that funds required from other sources will be
reasonably expected to be available in the time frame needed to carry out the projects, and;
WHEREAS, The City is authorized to execute and file a SLOCOG regional discretional
funding application for the projects under the 2014 SLOCOG Programming Cycle, and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that by adopting this resolution, does hereby state:
SECTION 1. The City will commit the necessary local matching funds; and
SECTION 2. The City understands that the SLOCOG funding for the projects are fixed
at the approved programmed amount, and that any cost increases must be funded by the City of
San Luis Obispo from other funds, and that the City does not expect any cost increases to be
funded with additional SLOCOG regional discretionary funding; and
SECTION 3. The City understands the funding deadlines associated with these funds
and will comply with the program implementation procedures set by both Caltrans Local
Assistance and SLOCOG; and
SECTION 4. Projects will be implemented as described in the complete application and
in this resolution and, if approved, for the amount programmed in the FTIP; and
SECTION 5. The City and the Projects will comply with the requirements as set forth in
the program
ATTACHMENT 3
C6 - 16
Upon motion of _______________________, seconded by _______________________,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _____________________ 20xx.
____________________________________
Mayor Jan Marx
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Anthony J. Mejia
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
C6 - 17
Page intentionally left
blank.
C6 - 18