Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6g. Approval of Federal Transit Title VI Program Update and Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) Item 6g Department: Public Works Cost Center: 621 For Agenda of: 3/21/2023 Placement: Consent Estimated Time: NA FROM: Matt Horn, Public Works Director Prepared By: Austin O’Dell, Interim Transit Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FEDERAL TRANSIT TITLE VI PROGRAM UPDATE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AGENCY SAFETY PLAN RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving Federal Transit Administration Title VI Program Update and Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan for the San Luis Obispo Transit Services”; and 2. Authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to revise and execute any required certifications, forms, and associated documents on behalf of the City to comply with the FTA requirements discussed in this report. POLICY CONTEXT The City Council is the legislative authority which sets the policies under which the City’s transit program operates. The City Council has the authority to adopt ordinances, resolutions, plans, establish policies, approve programs, establish fees, appropriate funds, adopt budgets and approve contracts. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requires that the Title VI Program Update (under Title VI of the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations) and the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) be approved by the direct or primary recipient’s board of directors or appropriate governing entity or official(s) responsible for policy decisions prior to submission to FTA. The “recipient” is SLO Transit (the City’s transit division), and the City Council is the approving board for this purpose. DISCUSSION Background The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requires the City of San Luis Obispo to maintain civil rights and safety programs in order to receive federal transit funds. The FTA has recently increased the requirements for civil rights programs to include surveys, outreach, and more analysis than previous years. Staff has conducted the required outreach, noticing, and comment period requirements for the programs. Page 113 of 399 Item 6g Title VI Program Update The purpose of the Title VI Program Update is to ensure that the level and quality of SLO Transit services are provided in a non-discriminatory manner and that the opportunity for full and fair participation is offered to SLO Transit’s riders as well as other community members. The Title VI Program Update includes: complaint procedures, noticing requirements, public participation, limited language assistance, and service standards. FTA requires the Title VI Program to be updated every three (3) years in order to receive federal transit funds. The current Title VI Program expired on November 30, 2022. To maintain eligibility for federal funds following that date, staff took steps to demonstrate compliance with FTA’s Title VI Program by preparing the document, conducting outreach, and submitted the document to FTA for review and concurrence. FTA has reviewed and concurs with the City’s Title VI Program Update with the outstanding requirement of City Council’s approval. Upon City Council’s approval of Title VI Program Update, the City will be in full compliance for the next three years. Refer to Attachment B to review the proposed program update. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AGENCY SAFETY PLAN (PTASP) The PTASP rule requires operators of public transportation systems that receive federal funds under FTA’s Urbanized Area Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. § 5307) to develop safety plans that include the processes and procedures to implement Safety Management Systems (SMS), as well as a strategic approach to carry out the Transit Asset Management (TAM) Program. SLO Transit has updated its PTASP (Attachment C) to meet requirements specified in 49 CFR Part 673. The plan meets FTA requirements and has been reviewed by San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG), as required by FTA regulations (23 CFR 450.316.) The PTASP is based on the following four (4) principles or pillars of SMS: 1). Safety Management Policy; 2). Safety Risk Management: 3). Safety Assurance; and 4). Safety Promotion. This plan includes Safety Performance Targets, which are specific numerical targets based on the Safety Performance Measures established by FTA in the National Public Transportation Safety Plan including: fatalities, injuries, safety events, system and reliability. The PTSAP is updated annually and satisfies FTA requirements. Previous Council Action The City Council approved previous Title VI Program on January 21, 2020. In addition, City Council approved the previous PTASP on November 17, 2020. Page 114 of 399 Item 6g Public Engagement Staff conducted public outreach on September 8, 2022 in the Community Room for the Title VI Program Update, the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program Update, and the Overall DBE Goal Setting Document. The public comment period for these documents was from August 23, 2022 through September 24, 202 2. No significant comment was received pertaining to DBE and/or Title VI. There is no public engagement requirement for the PTASP as this is an administrative document. CONCURRENCE The Title VI Program Update has been prepared in accordance with federal requirements. Prior concurrence from FTA is not required. The PTASP Program Update has been prepare in accordance with federal requirements. This plan has been reviewed by SLOCOG. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted: NA Budget Year: 2022-23 Funding Identified: NA Fiscal Analysis: Funding Sources Total Budget Available Current Funding Request Remaining Balance Annual Ongoing Cost General Fund $ $ $ $ State Federal Fees Other: Total $ $ $ $ There are no fiscal impacts related to Council’s resolution approval. Without Council’s approval federal funds would no longer be available for SLO Transit. Page 115 of 399 Item 6g ALTERNATIVES Council could decide not to approve the federal program documents. The action is not the recommendation because the would be ineligible to receive dedicated federal transit funds. ATTACHMENTS A - Draft Resolution approving Title VI Program Update and the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan B - Title VI Program Update C - Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) Update Page 116 of 399 R _____ RESOLUTION NO. ______ (2023 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION TITLE VI PROGRAM UPDATE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AGENCY SAFETY PLAN FOR THE SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo receives funds from Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 funds and other federal funds for capital and operating assistance funds; and WHEREAS, FTA requires transit operators to submit a Title VI Program Update every three years as a condition of receipt of FTA Section 5307 funds; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared their Title VI Program Update in accordance to FTA Circular 4702.1B; and WHEREAS, FTA requires transit operators to submit an update of their Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) as a condition of receipt of FTA Section 5307 funds; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared a PTASP update in accordance to FTA 49 CFR Part 673, and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) and has reviewed and concurs with the City’s PTASP. Page 117 of 399 Resolution No. _____ (2023 Series) Page 2 R _____ NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, as follows: 1. Approves Title VI Program Update for the San Luis Obispo Transit. 2. Authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to fulfil any related certifications, forms, associated documents and make revisions on behalf of the City to comply with the FTA. Upon motion of _______________________, seconded by _______________________, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _____________________ 2023. ________________________________ Mayor Erica A. Stewart ATTEST: ________________________ Teresa Purington City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ________________________________ Teresa Purrington City Clerk Page 118 of 399 P a g e | 1 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 TITLE VI PROGRAM UPDATE San Luis Obispo Transit (SLO Transit or SLOT), Operated by the City of San Luis Obispo, CA Effective: July 1, 2022 Revision 00 Prepared by: City of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Works, Transit Division 919 Palm Street Sa Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Tel: (805) 781-7121 URL: http://www.slocity.org Page 119 of 399 P a g e | 2 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Table of Contents SECTION ONE: Introduction/3 SLO Transit’s Commitment to Civil Rights/3 SECTION TWO: General Requirements/6 Notice to the Public/6 Discrimination Complaint Procedures/7 The Procedure/8 SECTION THREE: SLO Transit ’s Public Participation Plan/12 Key Principles/12 Early, Continuous and Meaningful/12 Goals of the Public Participation Plan/13 Objectives of the Public Participation Plan/13 SLO Transit’s Public Participation Process/15 SECTION FOUR: Language Assistance Plan/19 Improving Access for People with Limited English Proficiency/19 SECION FIVE: Outcomes/29 New tools and alerting riders of language assistance/29 SECTION SIX: Decision Making Bodies/32 City Council (Elected)/32 Mass Transportation Committee (non-elected/32 SECTION SEVEN: Service Standards and Policies/33 Vehicle Load/35 Vehicle Headway (Frequency)/35 On-Time Performance/35 Service Availability – Access to the Bus/37 Vehicle Assignment Policy/36 Transit Amenity Policy/36 Monitoring Service Standards/36 Summary of Changes/37 Construction Equity Analysis/37 SECTION EIGHT: Program Specific Requirements/38 SECTION NINE: Grants, Reviews and Certifications/39 SECTION TEN: Contact/40 SECTION ELEVEN: Resolution/41 SECTION TWELVE: Attachments/42 s S ATTACHMENT A: Proof of Public Participation /46 Page 120 of 399 P a g e | 3 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION ONE: Introduction SLO Transit’s Commitment to Civil Rights This update of San Luis Obispo Transit’s (SLO Transit or SLOT) Title VI Program has been prepared to ensure that the level and quality of SLO Transit’s fixed route service is provided in a nondiscriminatory manner and that the opportunity for full and fair participation is offered to SLO Transit’s riders and other community members. Additionally, through this program, SLO Transit has examined the need for services and materials for persons for whom English is not their primary language and who have a limited ability to read, write, speak, or understand English. While it is a matter of principle that SLO Transit is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in the receipt of any of its services on the basis of race, color or national origin, the contents of this program have been prepared in acc ordance with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order 13116 (Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency). “No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal assistance.” -Civil Rights Act of 1964 “Federal agencies are to examine the services they provide, identify any need for services to those with limited English proficiency, and develop and implement a system to provide those services so LEP persons can have meaningful access to them” -Executive Order 13166 Page 121 of 399 P a g e | 4 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as a recipient of federal funding under the programs of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) of the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT), SLO Transit has an obligation to ensure that: - The benefits of its bus services are shared equitably throughout the services area; - The level and quality of bus services are sufficient to provide equal access to all riders in its service area; - No one is precluded from participating in SLO Transit’s service planning and development process; - Decisions regarding service changes or facility locations are made without regard to race, color or national origin, and that development and urban renewal benefitting a community as a whole not be unjustifiably purchased through the disproportionate allocation of its adverse environmental and health burdens on the community’s minority population; and - A program is in place for correcting any discrimination, whether intentional or unintentional. Upon the City’s request, FTA granted a 30 da y extension to allow the City to conduct the public participation component of the program. SLO Transit has engaged the public in the development of this program. The service standards detailed in this program, along with the open house meetings were all presented and discussed at public information meetings in September 2022. To develop a system to provide services to those with limited English proficienc y, SLO Transit engaged a number of community organizations. City Council was actively involved in the program update for SLO Transit. In September 2022, the City Council reviewed and provided input to the Title VI Program Update. The content of the program was approved and adopted by the City Council (See Section Eleven). This program contains all of the elements required of a transit provider operating in an urbanized area of 200,000, or less in population, and operating less than fifty vehicles in peak service. It supersedes SLO Transit’s Title VI Program of January 24, 2020. It has been prepared using data from the most recent (Year 2010) U.S. Census. Page 122 of 399 P a g e | 5 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Tips on filing a complaint  Be sure to complete the Complaint Form. Only complete Complaint Forms will be accepted.  If the complainant is unable to write a complaint, SLO Transit’s staff will provide assistance.  Complaint Form should have following information:  Complainant's name, address, and contact information (telephone number, email address, etc.).  How, when, where, and why the complainant believes he or she was discriminated against  Location, names, and contact information of any witnesses Page 123 of 399 P a g e | 6 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION TWO: General Requirements Notice to the Public To make SLO Transit’s riders aware of its commitment to Title VI compliance, and their right to file a civil rights complaint, SLO Transit has presented the following language, in both English and Spanish, on its websiteCivil Rights | City of San Luis Obispo, CA (slocity.org), on posters website, public time schedules, and on revenue vehicles. Notifications in Buses Page 124 of 399 P a g e | 7 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Your Civil Rights SLO Transit operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with SLO Transit. For more information on SLO Transit’s civil rights program and the procedures to file a complaint, please contact (805) 781-7012, email jstanley@slocity.org or visit our administrative office at 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. For more information about SLO Transit programs and services, visit SLO Transit | City of San Luis Obispo, CA (slocity.org). If information is needed in another language, please contact (805) 781- 7012. Discrimination Complaint Procedures SLO Transit has established a process for riders to file a complaint under Title VI. Any person who believes that she or he has been discriminated against on the basis of race, color, or national origin by SLO Transit may file a Title VI complaint by completing and submitting the agency’s Title VI Complaint Form is available at our administrative offices or on our website at www.Slocity.org If a person believes he or she has been discriminated against in using the SLO Transit service, below is the procedure to file a complaint: 1. Complete the Complaint Form a. The Complaint Form is available at the SLO Transit office or www.slotransit.org. 2. Sign the completed Complaint Form 3. Submit the Complaint Form within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date of alleged discrimination. Tip on Filing a Complaint  Be sure to complete the Complaint Form. Only complete Complaint Forms will be accepted.  If the complainant is unable to write a complaint, SLO Transit will provide assistance.  Be sure to include your name, address, and contact information (telephone number, email address, etc.).  Be sure to include how, when, where, and why you believe you were discriminated against.  Be sure to include the location, names, and contact informat ion of any witnesses. Page 125 of 399 P a g e | 8 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 The Procedure Any person who believes they have been discriminated against on the basis of race color, or national origin by SLO Transit may file a Title VI complaint. The procedure is described on SLO Transit’s website at https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/public-works/slo- transit/general-service-information/civil-rights Below is the procedure for filing a complaint: 1. Get a Complaint Form. Customer acquires a Title VI Complaint Form. The Title VI Complaint Form is available in English and Spanish on the City of San Luis Obispo’s website, or by contacting the SLO Transit office at 805-781-7012. 2. Complete the Complaint Form. SLO Transit will process complaints that are complete. If the customer needs assistance in completing the Title VI Comp laint Form, customers may contact the Transit Division at 805-781-7012 for assistance. 3. Sign the Complaint Form. Customers are required to sign the Complaint Form. 4. Submit the Complaint Form. Civil rights complaints should be filed immediately. However, SLO Transit will investigate complaints up to 180 days after the alleged incident. . Customers should submit their complaints to: City of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Works, Transit Division 919 Palm Street Email: jstanley@slocity.org Phone: (805) 781-7012 As an alternative, customers may also submit their complaints to: Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights Attention: Complaint Team East Building, 5th Floor – TCR 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Page 126 of 399 P a g e | 9 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 5. Acknowledgement. Complaints will be recorded and receive a complaint number. SLO Transit will review the complaint to determine if there was a Title VI violation(s). SLO Transit will send an acknowledgement letter informing the customer whether the complaint is a Title VI issue and will be investigated by SLO Transit. Complaint Form English Complaint Form Spanish Page 127 of 399 P a g e | 10 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 6. Investigation. SLO Transit has up to thirty (30) days to investigate the complaint. If more information is needed to resolve the case, SLO Transit may contact the complainant. The complainant has thirty (30) days from the date of the letter to send requested information to the investigator assigned to the case. If SLO Transit’s investigator (from the Transit Services Manager or his/her designee) is not contacted by the complainant or does not receive the additional information within thirty (30) days, SLO Transit can administratively close the case. Also, a case can be administratively closed if the complainant no longer wishes to pursue their case. 7. Outcome. After the investigator reviews the complaint, one (1) of the following letters will be issued to the complainant: a closure letter or a letter of finding (LOF). A closure letter summarizes the allegations and states that there was not a Title VI violation and that the case will be closed. A LOF summarizes the allegations and the interviews regardi ng the alleged incident, and explains whether any disciplinary action, additional training of the staff member, or other action will occur. If t he complainant wishes to appeal the decision, she/he has ten (10) days after the date of the closure letter or the LOF to do so. A person may also file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration, at: Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights Attention: Complaint Team East Building, 5th Floor – TCR 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Sample Acknowledgement Form Page 128 of 399 P a g e | 11 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Active Lawsuits, Complaints or Inquiries Alleging Discrimination SLO Transit will maintain a list of active investigations conducted by FTA and entities other than FTA, including lawsuits and complaints naming SLO Transit, that allege discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin. This list includes the date that the transit-related Title VI investigation, lawsuit, or complaint was filed; a summary of the allegation(s); the status of the investigation, lawsuit, or complaint; and actions taken by SLO Transit in response, or final findings related to the investigation, lawsuit, or complaint. As of the writing of this program, there is no complaint which alleges discrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or any other form of discrimination against the City of San Luis Obispo. Active Lawsuits, Complaints or Inquiries Alleging Discrimination Type (Investigation, Lawsuit, Complaint) Date Summary of Complaint Status Action(s) Taken None NA NA NA NA Page 129 of 399 P a g e | 12 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Limited English Proficient (LEP) LEP refers to persons for whom English is not their primary language and who have a limited ability to read, write, speak, or understand English. It includes people who reported to the U.S. Census that they speak English less than very well, not well, or not at all. SECTION THREE: SLO Transit’s Public Participation Plan Key Principals SLO Transit’s Public Participation Plan (PPP), has been developed to ensure that no one is precluded from participating in SLO Transit’s service planning and development process. It ensures that: - Potentially affected community members will have an appropriate oppo rtunity to participate in decisions about a proposed activity that will affect their environment and/or health; - The public’s contribution can and will influence SLO Transit’s decision making; - The concerns of all participants involved will be considered in the decision - making process; and - SLO Transit will seek out and facilitate the involvement of those potentially affected. Through an open public process, SLO Transit has developed a public participation plan, in conjunction with the City’s Public Engagement Manual, to encourage and guide public involvement efforts and enhance access to SLO Transit’s transportation decision- making process by minority and Limited English Proficient (LEP) populations. The public participation plan describes the overall goals, guiding principles , and outreach methods that SLO Transit uses to reach its riders. Early, Continuous and Meaningful The steps outlined in the public participation plan offer early (in the planning process), continuous, and meaningful opportunities for the public to be involved in the identification of social, economic, and environmental impacts of proposed transportation decisions at SLO Transit. It is a guide for how SLO Transit engages its diverse community. San Luis Obispo’s Transit’s may continue to improve its public participation methods over time based on feedback from all of its riders and community members including low-income, minority, and LEP populations as well as customer and community-based organizations. Page 130 of 399 P a g e | 13 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Goals of the Public Participation Plan The goals of SLO Transit’s PPP include:  Clarity in Potential for Influence. The process clearly identifies and communicates where and how participants can have influence and direct impact on decision making.  Consistent Commitment. San Luis Obispo Transit’s communicates regularly, develops trust with riders and our community, and builds community capacity to provide public input.  Diversity. Participants represent a range of socioeconomic, ethnic, and cultural perspectives, with representative participants including residents from low income neighborhoods, ethnic communities, and residents with LEP.  Accessibility. Every reasonable effort is made to ensure that opportunities to participate are physically, geographically, temporally, li nguistically, and culturally accessible.  Relevance. Issues are framed in such a way that the significance and potential effect is understood by participants.  Participant Satisfaction. People who take the time to participate feel it is worth the effort to join the discussion and provide feedback.  Partnerships. SLO Transit develops and maintains partnerships with communities through the methods described in its public participation plan.  Quality Input and Participation. That comments received by San Luis Obispo Transit’s are useful, relevant, and constructive, contributing to better plans, projects, strategies, and decisions. Objectives of the Public Participation Plan SLO Transit’s PPP is based on the following principles:  Flexibility. The engagement process will accommodate participation in a variety of ways and be adjusted as needed.  Inclusiveness. SLO Transit’s will proactively reach out to and engage low income, minority, and LEP populations from its service area.  Respect. All feedback will be given careful and respectful consideration.  Proactive and Timeliness. Participation methods will allow for early involvement and be ongoing.  Clear, Focused and Understandable. Participation methods will have a clear purpose and use for the input, and will be described in language that is easy to understand.  Honest and Transparent. Information provided will be accurate, trustworthy, and complete.  Responsiveness. SLO Transit will respond and incorporate appropriate public comments into transportation decisions. Page 131 of 399 P a g e | 14 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018  Accessibility. Meetings will be held in locations which are fully accessible and welcoming to all area residents, including, but not limited to, low-income and minority members of the public and in locations relevant to the topics being presented and discussed. SLO Transit will use its public participation plan when considering fare changes, modifications to routes and schedules, and other transit planning projects when:  A fare increase is being considered;  Reduction in service of 15 percent of daily revenue miles or hours or a number of indefinite service reductions in any given fiscal year that add up to more than 15 percent of daily revenue miles or hours.; or  An emergency service change is defined as a service cha nge that is to be in effect for fewer than thirty (30) days and the service change does not meet the criteria as a major service reduction. Examples include but are not limited to those due to power failure, severe weather, major construction, reconstruction, and improvement projects.  A public comment period shall be held at least forty-five (45) calendar days prior to implementation of a major service change or fare increase. . Regional Partnership/Capitol Programming For its capitol programming, SLO Tranist uses the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) adopted public participation plan dated February 2021. This plan clearly indicates that the MPO’s public participation process satisfies the SLO Transit’s public participation requirements for its Program of Projects. The notices for the involvement activities and time established for public review of and comments on the TIP will satisfy FTA’s program of projects requirements. Page 132 of 399 P a g e | 15 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SLO Transit’s Public Participation Process Outreach Efforts -- Alerting Riders and Encouraging Engagement SLO Transit’s PPP includes various mediums extending beyond the traditional approach which relies on legal notices and intermittent media coverage. While SLO Transit maintains these elements to its outreach program along with bus cards in English and Spanish, Rider Alerts, SLO Transit has availed itself of the communication methods more widely used by members of our community and riders. While there may be minor variation s in the outreach process from time-to-time, the outline below provides the general steps for engaging riders in the decision making process using a fare or service change as an example. 1. Establish a task force to develop a public draft document to present to the open house meetings for discussion. The composition of the task force is the following: Transit Manager, Transit Coordinator, Transit Assistant, and Resident Manager (Contractor). Other members may be invited to attend as appropriate. The public draft document will summarize existing conditions, the need for change(s), options, rider suggestions since previous schedule printing, and other components as necessary. The public draft document will be in English and Spanish. 2. Perform an internal review of the public draft document. This task is performed by the task force; 3. A Title VI review of the proposal is conducted; 4. Title VI issues are addressed (if any) and the service changes are finalized ; 5. Public outreach venues, dates, and times are determined with consideration of the proposed changes and their impact on specific locations/populations within the SLO Transit service area; 6. Bilingual (English and Spanish) public outreach materials and a program are developed; 7. Outreach in advance of public information sessions is released (using tool-box of mediums listed below); 8. An email and/or flyer is transmitted to SLO Transit community partners; 9. Local radio stations are notified and interviews may be conducted (if available); 10. The public comment period ends; 11. As appropriate, staff prepares a summary for the City Council to review detailing the outcome of the public participation process along with staff recommendations; 12. The final service/fare change date is set; 13. Public notification and marketing are conducted in advance of any service or fare change; 14. Bilingual system timetable and website updated in advance of the proposed change. Page 133 of 399 P a g e | 16 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Toolbox: Mediums (Bi-lingual)  Print. Newspapers and other periodicals.  Outdoor. Advertising on-board buses, bus shelters, and at the transit center.  Website. SLO Transit includes meeting notices on its website.  Web-Based Feedback. Through the City website, SLO Transit receives feedback from the public..  Email. SLO Transit receives emails from the public at slotransit@slocity.org.  Radio. SLO Transit uses widely, as appropriate.  Bus Cards, On-board Flyers. SLO Transit regularly uses bus cards and flyers to provide riders with details of service changes and schedules of public meetings and hearings.  On-Board Audio Messaging. SLO Transit will use its existing technology to provide on-board messaging.  In Terminal Public Address System and Scrolling Messages. SLO Transit incorporates digital notices on new buses with video displays.  Community Partners. SLO Transit sends notices and flyers via email and/or USPS to community partners. In the event of failed deliveries, SLO Transit will research new address and attempt hand delivery.  Public Information Sessions.  Public Hearings.  Legal Notices.  Rider Alerts/Take Ones. SLO Transit regularly uses Rider Alerts for passengers to take that detail service changes and schedules of public meetings and hearings. Selection of Meeting Locations When determining location and schedules for public meetings, SLO Transit will:  Determine the number of meetings to accommodate and attract public participation.  Schedule meeting at times and locations that are convenient and accessible for minority and LEP communities;  Employ different meeting sizes and formats including open house (town hall type) meeting formats; organizations to implement public engagement strategies that reach out specifically to members of affected minority and/or LEP communities.  Consider radio, television, or newspaper ads as well as other formats that serve LEP populations.  Provide opportunities for public participation through means other than written communication, such as one-on-one interviews or use of audio or video recording devices to capture oral comments. Page 134 of 399 P a g e | 17 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Examples of Notices Page 135 of 399 P a g e | 18 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Outreach and Public Participation SLO Transit conducted a two open house meetings on September 8, 2022 to educate the public that the City provide the same and quality service in a non-discrimattory manner and that the opportunity for full and fair participation is offered to SLO Transit riders and the community. Attachment B includes outreach efforts for the preparation of this program update and to fulfill the requirements of this program update. Addressing Comments The Incorporation of Public Comments into Decisions All comments received through the public participation plan are given careful, thoughtful consideration. Because there are a number of different ways riders or members of the community can comment on proposed service or fare changes (mail, email, social media, public meetings and others), all comments are assembled into a single document for presentation to the City Council for consideration. Identification of Stakeholders Our Community Partners Stakeholders are those who are either directly or indirectly affected by a plan, or the recommendations of that plan. Those who may be adversely affected, or who may be denied benefit of a plan’s recommendation(s), are of particular interest in the identification of specific stakeholders. Stakeholders can come from a number of groups including general citizens/residents, minority and low-income persons, public agencies, and private organizations and businesses. While stakeholders may vary based on the plan or program being considered, SLO Transit has assembled a listing of stakeholders with whom we regularly communicate through email and direct mail. A complete list of SLO Transit’s community stakeholders can be obtained by contacting SLO Transit. Stakeholder List Any community organization or person can be added to SLO Transit’s stakeholder list and receive regular communications regarding service changes by contacting the SLO Transit’s administrative office at (805) 781-7012. Local organizations and businesses can also request that a speaker from SLO Transit attend their regular meeting at the same number or through the S LO Transit’s website. Page 136 of 399 P a g e | 19 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION FOUR: LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE PLAN Improving Access for People With Limited English Proficiency In order to ensure meaningful access to programs and activities, SLO Transit uses the information obtained in a Four Factor Analysis to determine the specific language services that are appropriate. This analysis helps SLO Transit to determine if it communicates effectively with LEP persons and informs language access planning. The Four Factor Analysis is local assessment that considers: 1. The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered by SLO Transit; 2. The frequency with which LEP persons come into contact with SLO Transit services and programs; 3. The nature and importance of SLO Transit’s services and programs in people’s lives; and 4. The resources available to SLO Transit for LEP outreach, as well as the costs associated with that outreach. Factor 1 – Number of LEP Persons in Service Region The first step in determining the appropriate components of a Language Assistance Plan is understanding the proportion of LEP persons who may encounter SLO Transit’s services, their literacy skills in English and their native language, the location of their communities and neighborhoods and, more importantly, if any are underserved as a result of a language barrier. To do this, SLO Transit evaluated the level of English literacy and to what degree people in its service area speak a language other than English and what those languages are. Data for this review is derived from the United States Census Bureau using data from 2019. Refer to Table 1 for source details. Data was reviewed for SLO Transit’s service area. Page 137 of 399 P a g e | 20 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 San Luis Obispo County Overview SLO Transit’s service system encompasses an area of twenty-two square miles in the County of San Luis Obispo, California. The primary languages in the county are English and Spanish. Of the total County population (282,517). the population for five years and older is 269,611, approximately seventeen percent (17.1%) or 14,878 residents report speaking English “less than well.” The most populous groups in the category are shown below. Within the County of San Luis Obispo, about twelve percent (12.7%) or 34,232 of the sub-populatior speaks Spanish and of that number, four percent (4.3%) or 11,727 residents report speaking English “less than well.” Second to Spanish speaking residents are residents speaking Asian and Pacific Islander languages representing approximately two percent (2.1%) or 5,529 or, with less than one percent (0.70%) or 1,982 reporting speaking English “less than well.” Speak English Less than Well (County) This data reveals that at the county level, while there are numerous languages spoke n at home, there is a significant Spanish speaking population which reports speaking English less than well. Speak English “Less than Well” Population Total Spanish 11,727 4.30% Other Indo-European 810 0.30% Asian & Pacific Island 1,982 0.70% Other 359 0.10% San Luis Obispo (City) The primary languages in the City are English and Spanish. The total City population is (47,402). The City population for five years and older is 45,759, approximately four percent (4.0%) or 1,852 residents report speaking English “less than well.” Table 1 Census Data Search Criteria Table 1 Criteria Figure Table ID DP02 Survey/Program American Community Survey Vintage 2020 Dataset ACSDP5Y2020 Product ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Files API URL https://api.census.gov/data/2019/acs/acs5/subject GEOs California; San Luis Obispo County, California; San Luis Obispo city, California Web Address https://api.census.gov/data/2020/acs/acs5/profile Page 138 of 399 P a g e | 21 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 About eleven percent (11.0%) or 5,033 of the total population speaks Spanish and of that number, three percent (2.7%) or 1,242 residents report speaking English “less than well.” Second to Spanish speaking residents are residents speaking other languages represent approximately six percent (5.84%) or 2,766 or, with approximately one percent (1.3%) or 610 reporting speaking English “less than very well.” The table below summarizes SLO Transit’s service are: Area Speak Spanish Spanish Speaking English “Less than Well” Speak other Language California 10,462,968 11.1% 14.61% County of San Luis Obispo 34,232 12.7% 4.21% City of San Luis Obispo 5,033 11.0% 5.84% The Locations of the LEP Community While the need to provide language services to the Spanish speaking population in the SLO Transit service area is clearly demonstrated in the tables above; it is helpful to understand where in the service area populations of limited English proficiency reside. Several conclusions can be drawn from this review:  Twelve percent (12.7%) of residents of the County report speaking English “less than well”;  Of those reporting speaking English “less than well”, the largest population speaks Spanish at home. San Luis Obispo County City San Luis Obispo Page 139 of 399 P a g e | 22 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Additionally:  There is a need to translate documents and outreach materials into Spanish.  Additional language services would benefit other LEP populations, although the likely encounters with the service are significantly lower than the Spanish speaking group. Factor 2 – Frequency of LEP Use There are a large number of places where SLO Transit riders and members of the LEP population can come into contact with the City’s bus service including the use of fixed route buses, calls to customer service representatives, and outreach materials. An important part of the development of SLO Transit’s Language Access Plan is the assessment of major points of contact, including:  The use of the bus service (on-board signage, announcements, and driver language skills);  Communication with SLO Transit’s customer service staff;  Bus pass sales;  Printed outreach materials;  Web-based outreach materials;  Public meetings;  Local news media (print and radio);  Automatic, service related audio announcements on-board buses; and  Service related posters at SLO Transit’s Downtown Transit Center. To better understand the frequency with which LEP riders come into contact with SLO Transit services, SLO Transit conducted internal surveys of customer service staff, administrative staff, and both fixed route drivers. The survey tool was aimed at determining what language skills already exist among SLO Transit employees and the number and nature of encounters with riders or other community members where language has been a barrier. The Transit Division distributed a language survey to division employees and to it’s purchased transportation contractor (First Transit). The objective of the survey was to evaluate the needs of SLO Transit customers who are not able to communicate in English. The first question asked employees was if they could communicate in a language other than English, and if so, what language or languages. Although varying degrees of fluency were indicated, 6 of the 32 respondents could speak one or more languages other than English. Page 140 of 399 P a g e | 23 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018  6 speak Spanish with one respondent speaking Spanish and other language. Next, the survey asked if, in the previous year, employees had encountered customers who were unable to communicate in English and how often they heard or did not hear one of ten languages. LEP Customer Encounters Not at All Rarely Occasionally Sometimes Very Often Frequently Spanish 9 6 7 8 1 1 French 31 1 Italian 31 1 Portuguese 32 German 30 1 1 Greek 32 Persian 32 Hindi 30 1 1 Chinese 29 2 1 Japanese 31 1 Any Other Language 32 The next survey question asked what type of needs or requests for assistance had employees received from LEP customers. Those responses included: Reason Responses Percentage Help with route information 24 31 Help with directions 19 24 Help with bus schedule times 18 23 Help with translation 3 4 Help with ADA information 5 6 No response 9 12 The information obtained through this survey indicates a moderate number of SLO Transit staff members responding to the survey (19%) speak one or more languages other than English, many speaking Spanish. Additionally, riders speaking Spanish are among the most frequently encountered LEP populations. Community Partners As part of this assessment, SLO Transit also canvassed its community partners to assess the extent to which they come into contact with LEP populations. SLO Transit asked the partner agencies to estimate the percent of clients they interact with who would have limited English proficiency using the following questionnaire: Page 141 of 399 P a g e | 24 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 1. Do you encounter non-English speaking/reading people who need your services? o Of the five respondents, four (4) (80%) noted that they did encounter clients with limited English proficiency. 2. If so, what are the top three (3) languages that you encounter? o The four (4) respondents noted the following languages; Spanish, German, and French. 3. How do you address language barriers? o Respondents have bi-lingual staff to address language barriers. 4. Do you find language to be a barrier in preventing you from providing service? o All respondents indicated that language was not a barrier from providing their services. Community Partners  Chamber of Commerce  SLO Coastal Unified  Cal Poly  Ride-On Transportation  Pathpoint  Ride-On Transportation Page 142 of 399 P a g e | 25 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Consulting Directly with the LEP Population In addition to the census data, internal survey of employees and outreach to community partners, SLO Transit conducted a survey on August 11-14. 2022 to its riders. Below are the questions and responses to the surveys. 1. Languages spoken at home? Language Reponses Percent Spanish & English 8 20 Spanish Only 4 10 English Only 29 71 Other Language 0 0 2. Is language a barrier to accessing SLO Transit services? Reponses Percent Yes 0 0 No 41 100 3. Is language a barrier to accessing SLO Transit outreach materials? Reponses Percent Yes 0 0 No 41 100 4. Is language a barrier to access SLO Transit customer service? Reponses Percent Yes 1 2 No 39 95 No Response 1 2 Page 143 of 399 P a g e | 26 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 5. Reasons for using bus service? Language Reponses Percent Save Gas & Money 1 2 Only Transportation or No Car 17 41 School 10 24 Work 2 5 Doctor Appointments 0 0 Do Not Know How to Drive 3 7 Leisure 2 5 Other 6 15 Riders surveys were supplied at the Downtown Transit Centerand on-board the buses. Page 144 of 399 P a g e | 27 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Factor 3: The Importance of SLO Transit Service to People’s Lives Access to the service provided by SLO Transit is critical to the lives of many in SLO Transit’s service area. Many depend on SLO Transit’s fixed route services for access to jobs and for access to essential community services like schools, shopping , and medical appointments. Because of the essential nature of the services and the importance of these programs in the lives of many of the region’s residents, there is a need to ensure that language is not a barrier to access. Per the US Census (Table: 2020 ACS 5 -Year Data Profiles (DP03)), the data indicates that 523 respondents (2.1%) use public transportation for their commuteBased on the current Short Range Transit Plan (2016), riders were asked: “For what purpose do you use the bus?” Forty-seven percent (47%) of the riders responding reported that they use the bus more than several times a week with purposes ranging from fifteen percent (15%) for work, six percent (6%) for shopping, and sixty-four percent (64%) for school – all essential trip purposes. Based on the survey from the bus riders limited English is not a barrier to using these services. Critical information from SLO Transit which can affect access includes:  Route and schedule information  Fare and payment information  Information regarding making the best use of the system (How To)  Service announcements  Safety and security announcements  Complaint and comment forms  Outreach related to opportunity for public comments  Information about demand response services under the ADA and other special programs  What to do in an emergency (where to look for service change announcements)  Access to customer service Page 145 of 399 P a g e | 28 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Example: SLO Transit Interior Signage SLO TRANSIT We want your ride with us to be safe, clean, on-time and friendly. Queremos que viaje con nosotros en un ambiente seguro, limpio y agradable, y llegue punctual a su destino Factor 4: Resources and Costs for LEP Outreach SLO Transit has committed resources to improving access to its services and programs for LEP persons. Today, bilingual information (English/Spanish) is distributed in an extensive number of mediums including:  A bilingual English/Spanish website  A complete bilingual English/Spanish system timetable  A complete bilingual English/Spanish Rider’s Guide to demand response services (ADA paratransit)  Bilingual English/Spanish outreach materials (bus cards and rider alerts)  Bilingual English/Spanish representation at public meetings  Bilingual English/Spanish customer service representatives  Bilingual English/Spanish on-board signage To date, the costs associated with these efforts fit within the SLO Transit’s marketing and outreach budget. Costs are predominantly associated with translation services and material production. If we are not meeting your expectations you can tell us by calling (805) 781-7012 Si no estamos cumpliendo con sus expectativas usted puede llamarnos al (805) 781-7012. Page 146 of 399 P a g e | 29 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION FIVE: Findings and Outcomes Findings from Surveys From the Employee Survey, the findings are:  There are employees who are bilingual in Spanish.  Spanish is the more most frequent non-English language employees’ encounter.  Route information, directions, and bus schedule times are the highest request from customers. From the Community Partner Survey, the findings are:  All community partners encounter clients who are non-English speaking or cannot read the English language.  Spanish is the most prevalent non-English speaking language.  Having bilingual staff is the most prevalent strategy.  Language is not a barrier to providing services. From the Bus Rider Survey, the findings are:  Ten percent speak only speak Spanish.  Twenty percent speak Spanish and English.  Language is not a barrier to riding SLO Transit, customer service, and outreach materials.  Primary reason for riding the bus is to attend school and no other transportation option. New tools and alerting riders of language assistance Following the “Four Factor Analysis”, SLO Transit concluded that, while there is currently extensive outreach and materials for the Spanish speaking LEP population of the service area and language is not currently a barrier to accessing the City buses services, no new tools have been identified to provide language assistance at this time. As the City implements new technology to bus riders (i.e. real time schedule information, alerts), the City will ensure that language is not a barrier to benefit from these improvements. Additional recommendations learned from the internal staff survey include: 1. Explore strategies to reduce barriers. This can be included in the next short - range transit plan. Page 147 of 399 P a g e | 30 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SLO Transit is either evaluating strategies l or has implemented new strategies. Oversight Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Language Assistance Plan and Public Participation Process. SLO Transit’s Transit Assistant is responsible for public engagement and outreach. Their responsibilities includeimproving community engagement to ensure compliance with SLO Transit’s Title VI Plan, Public Participation Program, Language Assistance Plan, and other community outreach efforts. The monitoring of the Language Assistance Plan will include:  Annual reviews of regional census data for changing patterns of LEP populations;  Ongoing collaboration with regional partners;  Ongoing review of translation requests at SLO Transit’s website and other material; and  Post Event Assessments (PEA). Post-Event Assessments Following service changes, fare increases and planning projects, the Transit Assistant will assess the effectiveness of public involvement against the goals established in this plan. This assessment will ask the questions: 1. Did the public know there was an opportunity to participate? 2. Was the purpose of the participation clearly articulated to the public? 3. Did the public have access to appropriate resources and information to allow for meaningful participation? 4. Did the decision making process allow for consideration and incorporation of public input? 5. Were there complaints about the public engagement process? 6. Were the public engagement efforts cost effective? 7. What additional methods could have been employed to improve the process? 8. Should the Public Participation Process or Language Assistance Plan be amended? Training Employees The purchased transportation contractor retains the existing staff from the incumbent transit contractor if a new contractor is awarded a new contract. Currently, office staff are significally bilingual. Dispatch and customer service are bilingual or they will have Page 148 of 399 P a g e | 31 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 bilingual staff readily available. The purchased transportation contractor utilizes translation applications (i.e. Google Translate) to assist in communation with customers who have limited English proficiency as needed. Drivers have basic knowledge of common words and phrases used by the Spanish speaking community when riding the bus. Drivers have “Language Card” that consists of basic Spanish words and phrases that drivers may encounter. If needed, drivers can contact dispatch for translation assistance. Translation of Vital Documents SLO Transit has translated many vital documents into Spanish and is in the process of translating others. Document Translation Status Civil Rights Complaint Form Done Service change announcements Done, On-Going On-board notices Done, On-Going Notification of free language services SLO Transit currently will orally assist Spanish speaking riders on transit documents Printed Media Done Service Complaint Forms Done Page 149 of 399 P a g e | 32 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION SIX: Decision Making Bodies City Council (Elected Members) Decisions regarding policy, service changes, fares, capital programming, and facility locations are made by City Council. The City Council is composed of four (4) elected City Council members, and one (1) elected Mayor. The City encourages all residents, minorities, women, and, persons with disabilities who live in the City of San Luis Obispo to serve on committees and boards. Mass Transportation (Non-Elected Members) The Mass Transportation Committee (MTC) consists of residents that are appointed by the City Council. The MTC meets quarter. Staff provides operational updates, presents service and fare changes. Body Caucasian Latino African American Asian American Native American Refused to Specify City Council 3 1 1 Mass Transportation Committee 3 2 0 1 0 1 Page 150 of 399 P a g e | 33 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION SEVEN: Service Standards and Policies SLO Transit has developed a set of quantifiable service standards and policies. These service standards were updated in 2022 through a public participation process, approved by SLO Transit City Council and with the input of SLO Transit’s Mass Transportation Committee. These service standards and policies include:  Vehicle Load  Headways (Frequencies)  On-time Performance (Schedule Adherence)  Service Availability  Vehicle Assignment Policy  Transit Amenity Policy SLO Transit advertised and held a public informat ion session to receive comments on the proposed standards. During the session, SLO Transit staff presented and overview of the components of SLO Transit public participation process as well as the various policies and standards. A copy of the presentatio n is available by contacting SLO Transit. The City encourages all residents, minorities, women, and, persons with disabilities to participate in the service design stage for the City’s public transportation services. The City relies on early, continuous, and meaningful input from the community when changing and designing new service. This requires outreach to the community to insure that staff can receive input, review and analyze input, and schedule follow-up meetings to share the revised service design to the community. Outreach meetings are scheduled at staggered times to accommodate various schedules. Notification of the workshops include Spanish speaking newspapers, local papers, bus cards in buses, and public service announcements. The informatio n is presented in English and Spanish. A Spanish translator is also in attendance. Based on this approach, service design is not discriminatory. Page 151 of 399 P a g e | 34 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Example: Public Meeting Announcements Page 152 of 399 P a g e | 35 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Vehicle Load Vehicle load is expressed as the ratio of passengers to the total number of seats on a vehicle. Vehicle Type Seated Capacity Standing Capacity Total Capacity Preferred Average Load Maximum Load Gillig 40’ 41 42 83 1 0.65 1.00 Gillig BRT40’ 41 42 83 1 0.65 1.00 Gillig 35’ 36 45 82 1 .25 1.00 Dennis40’ DD 86 50 136 1 0.44 1.00 El Dorado 35’ 19 19 15 1 0.38 1.00 Vehicle Headway (Frequency) Vehicle headway is the amount of time between two (2) buses traveling in the same direction on a given route. SLO Transit buses are scheduled with a variety of frequencies based generally on demand. SLO Transit’s routes are scheduled in 45 and 60 minute headways with routes operating in counter directions. This design allows riders to reduce their travel time to their destinations. Policy Headways and Periods of Operation Service Weekday Weekday Evening Saturday Saturday Off Peak Sunday Peak Sunday Off Peak Route Level 45-60 45-60 45-60 45-60 45-60 45-60 On-Time Performance Among the most important service standard for riders is on-time performance or adherence to published schedules.  A vehicle is considered on-time if it departs a scheduled time point no more than two minutes early and no more than five (5) minutes late.  SLO Transit ’s on-time performance objective is 95% or greater. Page 153 of 399 P a g e | 36 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Service Availability – Access to the Bus SLO Transit currently provides transit service so that ninety-five (95%) of all residents of the City of Sa Luis Obispo are within a quarter of a mile (1/4 mile) walk of bus service. Consideration is given to new markets as demand warrants and as resources become available. Vehicle Assignment Policy The length of buses are assigned to routes based on ridership. Routes with higher ridership demand are assigned larger buses to accommodate higher passenger loads. Also, routes with lower ridership are assigned with smaller vehicles. Transit Amenity Maintenance SLO Transit’s has over 237 stops in the service area – many located and installed more than 30 years ago. Stops, shelters, and benches will be placed according to industry standards with consideration of permitting and for local special needs. The installation of new bus amenities can be requested through the customer service office, through the City’s website, or at public meetings. When the annual cost of repairs to any amenity (beyond the cost of normal cleaning) is greater than the cost of the structure, SLO Transit reserves the right to permanently remove the amenity. Monitoring Service Standards For the on-going monitoring and measurement of service standards and policies, SLO Transit uses the following schedule and methods: Service Standard/Policy Sample Schedule Methodology Vehicle Load All Routes Bi-Annually On-Board Surveys on Fixed Route Buses Vehicle Headways Assessed Annually as Part of Service Planning Service Review On-Time Performance Assessed Monthly Ride Checks Service Accessibility Assessed Annually as Part of Service Planning Service Review Vehicle Assignment Policy Assessed Annually Service Review Page 154 of 399 37 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Summary of Changes Service Changes Since 2016 Prior Title VI Plan Since SLO Transit previous Title VI Plan Submission there have been no changes to SLO Transit’s fare structure and service. SLO Transit has less than fifty fixed route buses is not subject to the fare equity analysis (FTA Circular 4702.1B). SLO Transit transit has been providing limited service due to the global COVI-19 pandemic and is working towards restoring service to pre-pandemic levels. SLO Transit will be preparing a joint Short Range Transit with San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA) in CY 2023. Construction Equity Analysis SLO Transit has not constructed a facility since the previous Title VI Update. There has been no construction . When SLO Transit considers and/or plans to construct a new maintenance facility, transit hub, or operation center, the City will include a copy of the Environmental Justice Analysis conducted during the planning stage with regard to the location of the facility. The following principles will be applied in the analysis. 1. To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations; 2. To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process; and 3. To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt o f benefits by minority and low-income populations. SLO Transit will follow federal guidance provided in FT A Circular 4703.1 (August 2012). Page 155 of 399 38 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION EIGHT: Program Specific Requirements Title VI Monitoring The City developed monitoring procedures to insure that the City’s subrecipients’ comply to the Federal Transit Administration’s requirements for receipt of federal funds. These monitoring procedures include Title VI requirements. Subrecipient Compliance SLO Transit does not have subrecipients nor have subrecipient oversight responsibilities. Equity Analysis for Facility During the past three (3) years, SLO Transit has not constructed a vehicle storage, operations, or center of maintenance facility. Demographic Service Profile Because SLO Transit operates fewer than 50 buses in peak service, a demographic service profile was not prepared for this plan update. Page 156 of 399 39 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION NINE: Grants, Reviews and Certifications Pending Applications for Financial Assistance SLO Transit has no pending applications for financial assistance from any federal agency other than the FTA. Pending FTA Grants The following grants are pending (as of 8/10/2022) and under US Department of Labor certification review: CA-2022-162 CA-2022-163 Open FTA Grants CA-2021-056-00 Electric Vehicle Infrastructure CA-2021-172-00 Bus Replacement Civil Rights Compliance Reviews in the Past Three (3) Years SLO Transit has not been the subject of any such reviews. Recent Annual Certifications and Assurances SLO Transit executed its most recent Certification and Assurances to the FTA for 2022. The City is current. Previous Triennial Review Findings SLO Transit’s Triennial Review resulted in one finding with respect to its Title IV Plan/activities. SLO Transit did not upload their Title VI Program in TrAMS. SLO Transit corrected this finding on January 24, 2020 by uploading the document in TrAMS. Page 157 of 399 40 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION TEN: Contact For additional information on the San Luis Obispo Transit’s, or its efforts to comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or Executive Order 13166 Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, please contact: Austin O’Dell, Interim Transit Manager City of San Luis Obispo (d.b.a. SLO Transit) 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Tel: (805) 781-7121 E-Mail: aodell@slocity.org Page 158 of 399 41 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION ELEVEN: Resolution REPLACE WITH CURRENT RESOLUTION AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL Page 159 of 399 42 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 SECTION TWELVE: Attachments A. Major Service Change and Fare Increase Policy B. Outreach Presentation C. City of San Luis Obispo Public Engagement Manual D. Potential Meeting Locations Page 160 of 399 43 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 ATTACHMENT A: Major Service Reduction & Fare Increase Policy [See following pages] Page 161 of 399 44 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 City of San Luis Obispo Transit – SLO Transit Service Reduction & Fare Increase Policy I. Purpose 49 USC Chapter 53, Section 5307(d)(1)(I) provides that urban grant recipient shall have: “a locally developed process to solicit and consider public comment before raising a fare or carrying out a major reduction of transportation.” The City of San Luis Obispo’s fixed-route SLO Transit system is a recipient of Federal Transit funding and therefore must establish an acceptable public meeting procedure with respect to fare increase and major service reductions as required by Federal law. II. Definitions a. Major Service Reduction: i. An indefinite reduction of more than 15 percent of daily revenue miles or hours; or ii. A number of indefinite service reductions in any given fiscal year that add up to more than 15 percent of daily revenue miles or hours. b. Fare Increase: i. Any increase to a fare price per unit of service. c. Emergency Service Change: i. Service change that is to be in effect for fewer than thirty (30) days; and ii. Service change does not meet the criteria of Section II.A. Examples of emergency service changes include, but are not limited to; those due to power failure, severe weather, major construction, reconstruction, and improvement projects. III. Procedure Page 162 of 399 45 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 a. If a Major Service Reduction or Fare Increase is determined to be necessary by SLO Transit staff, a recommendation and supporting materials will be submitted to the City of San Luis Obispo City Council (Council) for consideration. b. If the Council determines that a Major Service Reduction or Fare Increase may be necessary based on staff’s recommendation and supporting documentation, staff will schedule and advertise a no less than two public meetings to be conducted in accordance with City’s most recently adopted Public Engagement Manual. One said meeting will be held during typical work day hours (before 5 p.m.) and the other after work day hours (after 5 p.m.). At a minimum, public notices for public meetings will be posted at or electronically sent to the following locations, in both English and Spanish: i. City Hall (990 Palm St.) ii. Transit Center iii. On board fixed-route vehicles iv. County/City Public Library v. Local Access TV Channel 21 vi. SLO Transit website with email link for comments vii. City of San Luis Obispo website with email link for comments viii. Social Media (e.g. Facebook) ix. Paid and legal notices in local print periodicals x. Press Releases to local media outlets c. A public meeting on the Major Service Reduction or Fare Increase will be held in a convenient, accessible and diverse location. i. The location selected will be along bus routes whenever possible; ii. The public meeting will be held under the supervision of SLO Transit Manager; iii. The public comments will be recorded and filed; and iv. The public meeting may be held at a regular Mass Transit Advisory Committee meeting. v. Spanish speaking assistance availability d. After the public meeting is closed, staff will give a recommendation for consideration by the Council e. If Council adopts a plan for a Major Service Reduction or Fare Increase, the SLO Transit Manager shall be authorized and directed to implement the action according to the approved transit schedule. The schedule shall provide a minimum of 45 (calendar) days public notice of the service or fare changes prior to their implementation. Page 163 of 399 46 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 IV. Exemptions The following criteria establish certain instances which are exempt from the requirement to solicit public comment: a. Standard seasonal variations; b. Special Events (e.g. marathon, triathlon, etc.) c. Changes imposed and under the control of private organizations (e.g. CalPoly) d. An Emergency Service Change; e. Experimental service changes for a period of 180 days or less, unless the changes extend beyond 180 days and meet the criteria of a Major Service Reduction as defined in Section II.A; f. Any fare, ticket or pass rate changes that do not result in increased fares per unit of service; g. Increases in service; or h. Decreases in fares. Page 164 of 399 47 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 ATTACHMENT B: Supplemental: Title VI Outreach Presentation [See following pages] INSERT OUTREACH PRESENTATION, SIGNING, AND COMMENTS AFTER OUTREACH MEETINGS Page 165 of 399 48 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 AGENDA SLO TRANSIT TITLE VI PROGRAM UPDATE OUTREACH City/County Library, Community Room 995 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 September 8, 2022 Select one 1:45 PM 5:45 PM Please Sign-In 1. Introductions 2. Review VI Program 3. Complaint Procedures 4. Public Participation Plan 5. Limit English Proficiency Population 6. Service Standards 7. Questions & Answers 8. Adjourn Page 166 of 399 49 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 PUBLIC COMMENT FORM FOR SLO TRANSIT TITLE VI PROGRAM UPDATE OUTREACH City/County Library, Community Room 995 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 September 8, 2022 Select one 1:45 PM 5:45 PM GENERAL Name: ______________________________________________________________________ Address:_______________________________________________________________ Home Phone:________________ Office:__________________ Extension: ________ COMMENTS ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Page 167 of 399 50 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 168 of 399 51 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 169 of 399 52 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 170 of 399 53 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 171 of 399 54 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 172 of 399 55 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 173 of 399 56 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 174 of 399 57 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 175 of 399 58 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 176 of 399 59 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 177 of 399 60 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 178 of 399 61 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 179 of 399 62 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 180 of 399 63 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 181 of 399 64 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 182 of 399 65 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 183 of 399 66 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 184 of 399 67 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 185 of 399 68 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 186 of 399 69 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 Page 187 of 399 70 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 ATTACHMENT C: Public Engagement Manual [See following pages] Page 188 of 399 71 SLO TRANSIT Title VI Program August 1, 2018 NOVEMBER 2015 2.1 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND NOTICING MANUAL Page 189 of 399 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................2 HOW TO USE THE TOOLKIT .........................................4 TOOLKIT ......................................................................5 Action Plan Matrix .................................................................. 5 Outreach Tools ...................................................................... 6 Audience .................................................................................... 7 Media Contacts List ......................................................... 9 COMMUNITY EVENT ........................................................ 11 Workshop .................................................................................... 11 Neighborhood Meetings ...................................................... 12 Open House .......................................................................... 13 Open City Hall .......................................................................... 14 GLOSSARY ................................................................. 15 TEMPLATES .................................................................... 19 E-Notification................................................................. 20 Fact Sheet ................................................................................ 21 Flyer .................................................................................. 22 Paid Ad ............................................................................. 23 Postcard ............................................................................ 24 Signage ........................................................................ 25 Survey ........................................................................... 26 VENUES .................................................................. 27 Page 190 of 399 2 2 INTRODUCTION Communities work best when residents, organizations and institutions are engaged and working together for the good of all. San Luis Obispo is no exception. The people who live, work and play here take enormous pride in this city and care deeply about keeping it healthy and vibrant. Our city wants to accommodate different perspectives and encourage more residents to be informed and involved in shaping decisions. The pages that follow describe simple steps to take for broadening public outreach. We outline programs that encourage active and diverse citizen participation. We call it a toolkit; tools to be used for building community participation and adding new voices to the mix. Note that marketing of city services is generally managed department by department. Parks and Recreation enrolls residents in classes; Utilities Conservation educates on water conservation and SLO Fire Department follows up EMS calls with satisfaction surveys. While there are elements of marketing in all communication outreach, we’re talking about something different here: improving communication efforts so people get involved in decisions on topics that affect them. Assuring residents know what’s going on and getting them involved in the process will help generate consensus decisions. Use this guide to better understand the target audience, type of outreach and timing needed for various city issues and actions. Keep in mind this is a broad stroke approach that is intended to guide thinking, not define it. With 11 city departments and thousands of touch points every day, one size will definitely not fit all. THE CHALL ENG E It’s not easy to determine the communication/outreach plan needed for individual projects, services and other items that make their way through the City decision-making process. Who needs to know? How do we tell them? That’s where this toolkit comes in. AT T H E S TART I N G L IN E Begin by asking seven questions about your item. The following questions also accompany the project plan template. 1. What is the action/program/project you need to communicate? 2. Who makes the final decision on the item, is this a staff decision? Subject to advisory body review? Will City Council ultimately receive the item for action? Page 191 of 399 3 3 3. What type of community interaction is desired? • You may need to inform residents about a decision already made; a city action that needs to be understood (i.e., change in bus routes; increase in parking meter fees) • You may need to consult the community or special interest group members over proposed changes / new initiatives (i.e., options for new playground equipment; proposed ordinance regarding mandatory water conservation). • You may need to collaborate with the community to develop ideas /plans /programs on large scale future items (land use and circulation element, city budget) 4. Who needs to/wants to be informed? This question is critically important and calls for some consideration. The focus of engagement is to involve the community. In San Luis Obispo, that community has many faces: residents at large (along with individual neighborhoods); interest groups ranging from cycling enthusiasts to business; arts to education; seniors, children and so on. There is a large government sector in SLO that may need to be included. The point is that it is imperative to try to outreach to anyone who may be connected to the item, and specifically to find the key people affected by a decision (i.e., a change in the hours at the pool may not be a large scale issue, but is of keen interest to swimmers). Determining the outreach targets calls for thought, some digging and your own good judgment. 5. When does the outreach need to happen? The City’s review process can have many steps and take time to unfold. Some steps are defined by municipal code; others call for personal discretion. Give citizens adequate time to be informed, educated and involved. No one likes to be caught unprepared and on short notice. Start early and keep in touch. 6. What needs to be done? This guide outlines a series of recommended plans to use as reference for best practices on communicating your item. 7. What does success look like? Whether you’d like to see more people attend your community outreach event, to increase diversity of feedback, to introduce new ideas, or keep in touch with residents & stakeholders, setting a goal for your community engagement efforts will provide a benchmark for future efforts. Keep note of what worked, what didn’t, and any valuable feedback from the public. Consider issuing a survey to assess public satisfaction with outreach efforts following community outreach events or neighborhood meetings. Page 192 of 399 4 4 HOW TO USE THE TOO LKIT The toolkit is organized into three sections. Follow the three steps below to develop your engagement plan. 1. Action Plan Matrix Use this section to identify the level of complexity and communication objective of your item. Once you’ve identified your communication objective, review the corresponding Outreach Tools. 2. Outreach Tools This section notes various elements that can be of use to you in communicating with the public (city website posting, e-notification, Open City Hall, community meetings, etc.) Each element is described in the glossary, and hyperlinked tools have corresponding templates, checklists and instruction on best practices for outreach events. 3. Audience Move to page 8 to determine your target audience(s). How significantly will this item affect people, and with that in mind, who should be notified and possibly involved? Consider if your item affects the entire city, or use the lists provided to review specific neighborhoods and/or certain special interest groups that may be affected. Determine whether media should be notified. The toolkit only works when you add your judgment to the process. Nothing is simply black and white when it comes to outreach and engagement. It’s all about communication. Communicate with your colleagues; communicate with stakeholders (they can often be the best help) and work from a plan that may need adjusting as time goes on. Page 193 of 399 5 5 ACTION PLAN MATRIX Follow the steps below to find your outreach tool plan. Yes Maybe Not Required COMMUNICATION OBJECTIVE • INFORM One way communication – outreach to citizens. Provide public with balanced and objective project/issue information to increase awareness and/or understanding of problems, alternatives and solutions. • • CONSULT Get ideas on finite number of options / limited time discussion. Take public feedback on project or other issue proposal. • • • • COLLABORATE Interactive process that incorporates recommendations as much as possible. Partner with the public to develop alternatives and identify preferred solutions. May be open ended. 1 STAFF LEVEL Normal procedures, existing program, services delivery 2 DEPARTMENT HEADS, CITY MANAG ER New program, expansion of existing program 3 ADVISORY BODIES (i.e., land use issues, development projects) 4 CITY COUNCIL New laws, major pl ans, significant issues (i.e. drought strategy) 1 Cross tab the level of complexity with communication objective 2.1 DECISIONMAKING: LEVEL OF COMPLEXITY Page 194 of 399 6 6 OUT REACH TOOLS Refer to glossary for tools descriptions *Bold indicates detailed descriptions available on page 11. COLLABORATE EXPECTATION ADDITONAL All of the “Inform” and “Consult” expectations listed above Open City Hall (web based) Community Outreach Event (workshop, open house, neighborhood meeting, etc.) Utilities billing insert – survey Mailed survey Telephone survey Study session Focus group Special events with opportunities for interaction Awareness walk Committee formation CONSULT EXPECTATION ADDITIONAL All of the “Inform” expectations listed above Hearing (if legally required) Social media (if applicable and available) Utilities billing insert – survey Mailed survey Telephone survey Study session Focus group Special events with opportunities for interaction Awareness walk Open City Hall (web based) Neighborhood meetings INFORM EXPECTATION Official notice (if legally required) • Legal ad in newspaper • Postcards to neighboring owners/tenants • On-site signage E-notification (including affected neighbors) Website posting Applicable advisory bodies Key contacts, liaisons ADDITIONAL Social media (if applicable and available) Utilities billing insert – flyer Community Calendar Signage Paid media (newspaper, radio, TV, social media, digital, outdoor/transit) Informational materials (should also be available digitally on website, e.g. flyer, fact sheet, PowerPoint, postcard, door hanger, banner, poster) City website posting Awareness Walk Press release/Media notification Neighborhood meetings Page 195 of 399 7 7 AUDIENCE One of the most important aspects of community engagement is thinking through the “who.” Who will be interested in/affected by the topic under consideration? Who are the stakeholders? Begin by understanding the range of interest groups and organizations that care about San Luis Obispo. There are literally hundreds in the city alone. The category list that follows is provided to get you thinking. It does not include every potential outreach contact, but it is a framework for thinking about it. The City maintains many different interest databases and the 2015-launched City of SLO website offers an ideal way for citizens to add themselves to lists of people interested in being notified about different matters. Examples of lists include: • Airport area • Bicycle • Council notes • Economic development • General plan updates • Housing • Measure G • Neighborhood wellness • Planning and building • Skate park • Stormwater • Utility billing • Water • Youth services • Water conservation • Aquatics • Climate action plan • Downtown • Emergency preparedness • Historic preservation • Hot topics • Housing element • Natural resources • Parking • Public projects • Special events • Sports • Transit • Waste water And remember; the contacts themselves can be a great resource for determining who else should be asked. Page 196 of 399 8 8 ORGA N IZ A TIONS /INTEREST AREAS TO CONSIDER The following are samples only and lists are not all-inclusive. ARTS/CULTURE ORGANIZATIONS. ArtsObispo, Foundation for the Performing Arts Center, Little Theatre, SLO Symphony, dance groups, art museum BUSINESS / COMMERCE ORGANIZATIONS. SLO Chamber of Commerce, SLO County Economic Vitality Corporation, SLO Downtown Association, Farmers Market Association, real estate associations, merchant groups, tourism interests, Developers Roundtable, local American Institute of Architects chapter CHILDREN. Children’s Museum, parent-child groups, PTA’s EDUCATION. San Luis Coastal Unified School District, Cal Poly, Cuesta College, private schools ENVIRONMENTAL. EcoSLO, Sierra Club, The Land Conservancy ETHNIC ORGANIZATIONS, CHURCH GROUPS GOVERNMENT. City advisory bodies, Mayor’s Roundtable PROPERTY OWNERS MEDIA. Key contacts list follows. RESIDENT/ NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS. Neighborhood wellness groups/other city- identified neighborhood areas, Old Town Neighborhood Association, Slack Street Neighborhood, Los Verdes Park, mobile home parks, Homeowners Associations (owners & renters), Residents for Qualitiy Neighborhoods, Save our Downtown, Alta Vista, Neighborhoods North of Foothill. SPORTS/OUTDOOR ENTHUSIASTS. Runners, hikers, cyclists, skateboarders, swimmers, recreational sports teams, tennis players, youth sports groups including American Youth Soccer Organization, Cal Ripken Baseball, SLO Girls Softball Association SENIORS. Senior Center, Retired Active Mens Group SERVICE CLUBS. Rotary, Rotaract, Kiwanis SOCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS. CAP SLO, health and human service organizations STUDENTS. Student Community Liason Committee TRANSPORTATION. SLO Bike Coalition, bus riders, Ride-On, Rideshare MISCELLANEOUS. Library users, SLO History Center, Young Professionals Networking Group Page 197 of 399 9 9 ME D IA K E Y C O N TACT S L I S T The following contacts list is general and may change over time, so be sure to keep your own records up to date. PRINT/ONLINE Tribune General inquiries, newsroom@thetribunenews.com Calendar items, calendar@thetribunenews.com General phone, (805) 781-7800 New Times Camillia Lanham, Editor, clanham@newtimesslo.com Calendar items, calendar@newtimesslo.com General phone, (805) 546-8208 Mustang Daily News, news@mustangnews.net General, editor@mustangnews.net Advertising, advertising@mustangnews.net General phone, (805) 756-1796 Journal Plus General inquiries, slojournal@fix.net General phone, (805) 546-0609 SLO Life Magazine General inquiries, info@slolifemagazine.com General phone, (805) 543-8600 SLO City News (Tolosa Press) General inquiries/publisher, Bret Colhouer, bret@tolosapress.com General phone, (805) 543-6397 TELEVISION KSBY – NBC Assignment desk, news@ksby.com Newsroom phone, 597-8400 x6 Page 198 of 399 10 10 KCOY (CBS) /KKFX (FOX) / KEYT (ABC) – Newschannel 3 Santa Barbara newsroom keyt.assignmentdesk@keyt.com (805) 882-3930 Santa Maria newsroom news12@kcoy.com (805) 928-4748 RADIO KVEC 920 AM Studio line, (805) 543-8830 Business line, (805) 545-0101 KCBX 90.1 FM General phone, (805) 549-8855 Newsroom, news@kcbx.org Community Calendar, calendareditor@kcbx.org American General Media General phone, (805) 781-2750 KZOZ 93.3 FM (American General Media or AGM) General phone, (805) 543-3693 KKJG 98.1 FM (AGM) General phone, (805) 543-3693 KIQO 104.5 FM (AGM) General phone, (805) 783-1045 KKAL 92.5 FM (AGM) No phone number, use AGM general line (805) 781-2750 Page 199 of 399 11 11 BEST PRACTICES FOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH EVENTS The following community outreach events are meant to expand involvement opportunities for community members by giving them a chance to speak directly to an issue or have direct involvement in the decision-making process. Workshops, open houses, road shows and open city hall should encourage participation, and every effort should be made to make the public feel welcome and heard. • All community events should be preceded by outreach noted in the “Inform” section of your matrix. A well attended event is key. • Incorporating outreach tools from the “Additional” column of your matrix will attract a larger audience which results in diverse representation and feedback. • Advertising these community events well ahead of their date with ongoing reminders is essential. • Plan for enough space to accommodate the audience. Page 27 includes a list of possible meeting space venues. • Choose an effective facilitator to lead the gathering. Facilitators are there to shepherd the conversation rather than provide input or influence opinion. He/she should be neutral in the discussion. • If a resident wants to provide input or feedback outside of the particular outreach event, make key project contact information available and/or offer a meeting with staff. WORKSHOP Workshops allow the public to hear a presentation on a particular item from city staff and/or consultants, then work in smaller groups to develop ideas and alternatives that directly affect the planning process. Following small group discussion, the groups reconvene to share their ideas with the larger group, and workshop outcomes are then passed on to decision-makers. Workshops should include an even balance of staff presentation and group discussion. When do I have a workshop? Workshops are an effective tool for collaboration and should take place early in the planning process so feedback can be incorporated down the line. In order to keep group discussion focused, workshops should not take place until a project has a determined set of options and/or ideas to explore. What should be included? Discussion groups should represent various parts of a plan where the public actually has an opportunity to weigh in on options and/or develop alternatives and solutions. Groups should COMMUNIT Y OUTREA CH E V ENTS : TOOLS FOR TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION Page 200 of 399 12 12 be facilitated by city staff and/or consultants, and these facilitators should lead and promote public discussion. Always let the public know what happens next in the process, so that they understand what will happen with their feedback. Be sure to provide appropriate contact information so anyone who felt they were not heard has an opportunity to follow up. Essentials checklist: Space large enough to comfortably accommodate the expected audience (consider seating capacity as well) Water. Other refreshments and snacks are optional Sign-in sheets for names, email address, phone numbers and physical addresses (where applicable) so staff can follow up with attendees Visual or informational aid(s) of some sort to be included in the presentation and/ or stations (PowerPoint, video, photos, plans, maps, graphics, etc.) Large format paper and thick pens for notes that the public can see Facilitators for all small group discussions Comment cards Name tags for city staff Contact information “What’s Next” explanation NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Neighborhood meetings are similar to workshops in that they involve staff presentation and public discussion. Neighborhood meetings mean staff bring their presentations directly to their intended audience, which could include a special interest group or a specific neighborhood. When do I have a neighborhood meeting? Neighborhood meetings should occur early in the planning process so feedback can be incorporated down the line. Staff should schedule a neighborhood meetings during hours when most people in the affected group will be available, typically after- work hours. What should be included? Neighborhood meetings benefit from creativity and content/style directed at the audience. Neighborhood meetings should include equal parts staff presentation and public discussion. Always let the public know what happens next in the process, so that they understand what will happen with their feedback. Comment cards should also be provided for people who do not feel comfortable speaking up. Page 201 of 399 13 13 Essentials checklist: Space large enough to comfortably accommodate the expected audience (consider seating capacity as well) Water. Other refreshments and snacks are optional Sign-in sheets for names, email address, phone numbers and physical addresses (where applicable) so staff can follow up with attendees Visual or informational aid(s) of some sort to be included in the presentation (PowerPoint, video, photos, plans, maps, graphics, etc.) Large format paper and thick pens for notes that the public can see Facilitators for all small group discussions (see Best Practices page 11) Comment cards Name tags for city staff Contact information “What’s Next” explanation OPEN HOU S E An Open House typically features various informational stations rather than a formal presentation. The public is encouraged to engage in open dialogue with the facilitator at each station, including asking questions and providing feedback. Notes are taken on large format paper so people can see their comments have been noted. When do I hold an Open House? An Open House should be held in the middle of the planning process once drafts and conceptual plans are available. Open Houses should take place during hours where most of the public/affected audience will be able to participate, typically after-work hours. What should be included? The public should have a clear understanding of the distinction between an open house and workshop ahead of the event. Stations should be clearly labeled, feature visual representations or aids, and should incorporate a place where comments can be written down and seen by everyone. Staff should also consider comment cards, as some people are more comfortable speaking up than others. Be sure to provide appropriate contact information so anyone who felt they were not heard has an opportunity to follow up. Page 202 of 399 14 14 Essentials checklist: Space large enough to comfortably accommodate the expected audience and stations (consider seating options for people who can’t stand for extended periods of time) Water. Other refreshments and snacks are optional Sign-in sheets for names, email address, phone numbers and physical addresses (where applicable) so staff can follow up with attendees Visual or informational aid(s) of some sort to be included at each stations (PowerPoint, video, photos, plans, maps, graphics, information boards, etc.) Large format paper and thick pens for notes that the public can see Facilitators for all stations Comment cards Name tags for city staff Contact information “What’s Next” explanation OPEN CITY HALL (WEB BASED) Open City Hall is an online tool for community engagement. Open City Hall can be used as an online alternative to in-person community outreach events like Workshops, Road Shows and Open Houses. Use of this tool allows those who can’t attend meetings to receive the same information and provide feedback. To see how it works, visit http://www.slocity.org/ opencityhall. When do I use Open City Hall? Open City Hall is encouraged to be used any time that the City hosts an in-person consultation or collaboration based community outreach event. In addition, Open City Hall can be on its own when it may not be feasible to host a traditional community outreach event. Open City Hall has the ability to pose questions in different ways, collect ideas, conduct polls, develop priority lists, comment on maps and more. What should be included? The experience of using Open City Hall online should mirror that of an in-person outreach event and can use many of the same materials. Open City Hall topics can contain graphics, videos and slide presentations (including narration). Please consult with the Administration Department to get started using Open Cit y Hall. Page 203 of 399 15 15 GLOSSARY *Hyperlinked items have corresponding templates ADVISORY BODIES. Voluntary citizen groups appointed by the SLO City Council to provide input on key city issues and activities. (See list on Audience page). AWARENESS WALK. Neighborhood guided tour by staff or consultants to provide in-person details and answer questions about specific issues and activities. CITY WEBSITE POSTING. Share project news, meeting announcements, calendar items, progress reports, agenda packets and more. COMMITTEE FORMATION. For purposes of collaboration, consider forming a committee or subcommittee for regular contact/check-ins regarding a certain topic/project. This committee should be made up of a representative group of stakeholders or advisory body members, with the understanding that they will be called upon often over the course of the project/issue for their input and expertise. COMMUNITY CALENDAR. No-cost method of announcing event details through online, print, television and radio calendar postings. Most community calendar notices can be easily posted by the interested party using online resources. DIRECT MAIL. Postcard, letter, flyer, fact sheet and other items sent using U.S. Mail. Larger mailings can qualify for reduced postage costs by using bulk mail rates (bulk mail permit required). Bulk mail requires zip code sorting and other special handling and permits. Note: Only items handled by the U.S. Postal Service can be placed in residential or commercial mail boxes. It is illegal to use mailboxes for door to door flyers, notices, etc. that have not been mailed. Flyers under doormats and door hangers are often used to share neighborhood information without violating postal regulations. E-N OTIFICATION. Slocity.org enables users to self-subscribe to information lists based on their interests. While not required, some users also give their address, which gives you access to geographically targeted lists. Refer to interest lists/neighborhoods in the Audience section that may pertain to your particular project/issue and outreach to these groups via e-notification. FACT SHEET. Brief one-page description of a proposed project or activity. Fact sheets typically utilize bulleted format, to convey information succinctly. Fact sheet should always include contacts for further information (i.e., phone number, web address, email). FLY ER. Graphically compelling print pieces circulated in specific areas to generate attendance at public meetings and activities. Typically 8.5 x 11” in size, but can use irregular sizes for cost efficiency and/or to gain additional attention. Can be used as billing inserts, or posted in willing businesses and other commercial locations. INTEREST GROUP. Citizens with shared interests who are often united in expressing their concerns and opinions about various project proposals; also called special interest group, i.e., seniors, cycling enthusiasts, homeless services advocates, etc. Page 204 of 399 16 16 GLOSSARY KEY CONTACTS/LIAISONS/NEIGHBORHOOD CHAMPIONS. Some neighborhoods/special interest groups have key contacts or liaisons who will be essential in disseminating information to the larger group. See Audience section for details. NEIGHBORHOOD/ESTABLISHED NETWORK EMAIL TREE. Organized communication tool used by residents to communicate with each other about issues and activities of shared interest; typically applies to specific geographic areas, i.e., Old Town SLO, Los Verdes Park, etc. May be created using database management products like My Neighbors, in which specialized outreach groups are created by neighborhoods. The NextDoor app is a popular version of this community tool. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS. Staff takes information “on the road” for face-to-face communication with residents, interest groups and others. Neighborhood meetings can range from special interest group presentations (chamber of commerce committee meeting) and speeches to large bodies; to targeted outreach (playground equipment preferences asked of park users), to ice cream truck neighborhood events. Neighborhood meetings efforts mean staff “goes to them,” rather than citizens coming to City Hall and other venues. See Best Practices section for more information. NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY. Surveys can be conducted online via the city website, or conducted by hand via door-to-door contact. Surveys can also be mailed and emailed. See Best Practices section for more details. NOTIFY MEDIA. Can include but does not require a formal news release. A formal release offers the “who, what, where, why, and how” of a particular issue or activity and is circulated via email by staff to local media for publication. See Audience section for a list of key local contacts. OPEN CITY HALL. Effective online program for generating citizen interest, knowledge and participation in city decisions. OPEN HOUSE. Informal public gathering to introduce a project, service proposal or other idea using information centers and materials; on site staff to answer questions, hear comments, etc. No formal staff presentation. See Best Practices section for more information. PAID ADVERTISING. Print ads, television and radio commercials, online advertising, bus and bench advertising, billboards and other paid media that have associated costs for design, copywriting, media placement. Media outlets are contacted for information on costs, deadlines, production needs. Typical print ads include: • Legal ad. Appears in a specific section of the newspaper. Typically contains text only. • Display ad. Advertisement appears alongside regular editorial content. Can contain text, photos, logos, maps, graphics. Page 205 of 399 17 17 GLOSSARY POSTCARD. Printed piece used to provide brief, to-the-point information for citizens and sent via U.S. Mail. Postcards can range from traditional travel postcard size to “sumo” oversized postcards, with all requiring the same per piece postage. Lack of envelope may help assure the piece is viewed by recipient. POSTER. Graphic print communication promoting meetings, open houses, workshops and special events or services; generally 11x17” in size or larger. Post in willing local businesses and other commercial locations. PRINTED MATERIAL. Print announcements (flyer, postcard, door hanger, banner, poster) creatively designed to generate attention about issues and activities in specific neighborhoods. Printed materials should highlight pertinent information and/or direct people to additional information about a particular topic. PUBLIC ACCESS CHANNEL. Gavel-to-gavel webcast and televised public access to SLO government meetings. Carried on Charter Cable; also accessible live online via slocity.org. Channel 20 also carries informational on-screen fliers, announcements, etc. posted when meetings are not being telecast. REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE Required by municipal code for most development projects. Timely posting in a newspaper of record about a project, rate increase, ordinance or other activity. These notices are required by law and are typically made through the City Clerk. Legal notices may also be physically posted on project sites, residential properties, etc. to alert neighbors and others of pending action, proposed changes, etc. on land use matters and to notice hearing dates for comment can be received. Council-approved notification standards for development projects detail who, where, and what needs legal noticing. SIGNAGE. Consider temporary signage (banner, stake sign, etc.) at the site of a project to keep neighbors and passersby apprised of project status and key contacts/websites for additional information. SOCIAL MEDIA. Apps, websites and other platforms that enable users to outreach to broad audiences and engage with those audiences in discussion on a daily basis. Users of social media have an expectation that communication is two-way and if your department chooses to engage in social media, you should expect and respond to discussion. Examples of platforms currently being used by city departments include Facebook and Twitter. Paid promotion of your department’s Facebook page or important posts should be considered in order to reach the appropriate audience type and size. A sponsored Facebook post, as it’s called, is a relatively inexpensive advertising method to utilize in order to expand viewer reach. SPECIAL EVENTS. Certain events should be leveraged as outreach opportunities when the demographic is appropriate. i.e., Saturday morning farmers’ market to inform/consult local residents regarding general interest projects/issues; local sporting events such as Damon- Garcia soccer games to inform/consult local residents regarding parks and recreation project/issues; etc. Page 206 of 399 18 18 GLOSSARY STAKEHOLDER MEETING. Should be considered during the consult phase as a group meeting comprised of issue/project stakeholders. SURVEY. Early outreach opportunity to collect opinions at the start of a project. Multiple- choice questions generate better response than open-ended questions. TRANSIT MESSAGING. Outreach using posters on city buses and at bus stops; city reader boards; street light and overhead banners on downtown streets. UTILITY BILLING INSERT. Printed material added to utility bills mailed to customers by the City. Billing inserts (also called billing mailers) require approval of the city manager and Utilities Department and often require generous lead time for handling by a mail house. WORKSHOP. Communit y gathering, generally on a citywide mat ter, used for presenting information, and then facilitating public engagement using small group exercises and discussion questions. See Best Practices section for more information. Page 207 of 399 19 19 TEM PLATES The following templates are simply guidelines to ensure city messaging is clear, consistent, branded, and encourages diverse public participation. Things to consider when designing and/or writing outreach materials: • Always refer to the San Luis Obispo City Style Guide and Brand Standards manual to ensure proper emblems, colors and typefaces are used. • Avoid government jargon and keep descriptions short. • Include all relevant contact information, including key contact names, phone numbers, email addresses and web addresses. • If noticing a meeting or community event, be sure to include pertinent information such as date, place, time, topic, description of community event and format, alternate ways to participate (if applicable), and directions and/or a map if necessary. • While unlikely, staff may experience language barriers when outreaching to specific groups. Be sure to include translation on all applicable materials. • Consider using attention grabbing words and phrases that evoke emotion, e.g. you, free, sale, guaranteed, new, now, announcing, tell us, etc. Also, a picture is worth a thousand words, so try to use imagery where appropriate. Page 208 of 399 20 20 E-NOTIFICATION Standard template exists in the website content management system. Website news posting should accompany e-notification. NEWS POSTING TEMPLATES Page 209 of 399 21 21 tt FACT SHEET For editable word document template, click here. Foothill Boulevard Road Repairs Fact sheet date: 6/10/15 Public Works will be conducting road repairs on Foothill Boulevard beginning July 10. One-way traffic controls will be in place between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and the road will be closed to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Please plan alternate route. Project details:  Project detail Project detail Project detail  Project detail Project detail Project detail  Project detail Project detail Project detail  Project detail Project detail Project detail  Project detail Project detail Project detail  Project detail Project detail Project detail  Project detail Project detail Project detail For more information, visit the Public Works page on the city website, http://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/public-works. You can also email info@slocity.org or call (805) 888-8888. Page 210 of 399 22 22 t FLYER For editable word document template, click here. *Poster content replicates flyer content, but is usually larger in size. Consider using 11x17 paper for posters, or larger if not printing in house. ATTENTION FOOTHILL COMMUTERS Foothill Boulevard Road Repairs The Foothill Boulevard Road Repairs project will affect vehicle and pedestrian traffic from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday-Friday, 7/10-7/20/2015 Public Works will be conducting road repairs on Foothill Boulevard beginning July 10. One-way traffic controls will be in place between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and the road will be closed to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Please plan alternate route. For more information, visit the Public Works page on the city website, http://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/public-works. You can also email info@slocity.org or call (805) 888-8888. Page 211 of 399 23 23 PAID AD For editable word document template, click here. ATTENTION FOOTHILL BLVD. COMMUTERS & RESIDENTS Foothill Boulevard Road Repairs begin July 10, 2015. Commuters should expect delays, as one-way traffic will be in effect. The road will be closed to pedestrians and commuters. Detour information can be found at http://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/public-works. Foothill Blvd. Road Repairs July 10-July 20, 2015 Crews will work from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. For more information, visit the website listed above. Questions or concerns? Call (805) 888-8888 or email info@slocity.org. Page 212 of 399 24 24 POSTCARD For editable word document template, click here. YOUR ROUTE COULD BE AFFECTED Foothill Blvd. Road Repairs July 10-20 Public Works will be conducting road repairs on Foothill Boulevard beginning July 10. One-way traffic controls will be in place between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and the road will be closed to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Please plan alternate route. Questions or concerns? Call (805) 888-8888, email info@slocity.org or visit http://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/public- works. City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo Public Works Department 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Page 213 of 399 25 25 SIGNAGE FOOTHILL BLVD. ROAD REPAIRS Expect delays July 10-20 between 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. while crews work to repair your streets. Visit slocity.org or call (805)888-8888 for more information. Page 214 of 399 26 26 planner@slocity.org SURVEY For editable word document template, click here. There is also an online survey template available in the website management system. YOUR OPINION MATTERS: RENTAL HOUSING INSPECTION A proactive rental inspection program provides a system to inspect rental units on a periodic basis to ensure that they are safe and habitable. The city included the exploration of a rental inspection program as part of the Neighborhood Wellness Major City Goal. The city council was presented a set of options for this program several months ago, and has directed staff to seek additional public feedback to determine if the program is necessary. City staff would like public feedback on elements of the plan to ensure the program meets the needs of tenants and landlords alike. Elements include: Inspections conducted every three years Applies to single-family residences and duplexes Includes interior and exterior inspections Provides incentives for well-maintained rentals Fees estimated at $100 annually per rental unit The city appreciates your input. 1. Are you currently a tenant or landlord? a. Yes b. No 2. If you are a landlord, do you inspect your residence on a regular basis to ensure it is safe and habitable, and if so, how often? a. Not inspected b. Only inspected when there is a complaint c. Inspected when new tenants move in or out d. Inspected annually e. Other/NA 3. What are your thoughts about the rental inspection program? a. Don’t care b. It’s necessary c. It’s necessary but I don’t agree with some elements (please list elements and concerns) d. It’s unnecessary e. Other (please describe) 4. Please list any additional comments, questions or concerns below. Questions or comments? Email planner@slocity.org or call (805)888-8888. Page 215 of 399 27 27 VENUES Meetings should be held in an easily accessible location with available parking. Some possible meeting venues in San Luis Obispo include, but are not limited to: LUDWICK COMMUNITY CENTER 864 Santa Rosa Street (805)781-7222 Capacity: 100+ ELKS LODGE 222 Elks Lane (805)543-0322 office@bpoelso322.com Capacity: 50-300 EMBASSY SUITES 333 Madonna Road (805)547-6407 Embassysanluisobispo.sales@wcghotels.com Capacity: 2-500+ MADONNA INN 100 Madonna Road (805)543-3000 Expo Center: Capacity: 2,600+ Balcony Room: Capacity: 40 Round Room: Capacity: 60+ SLO CITY/COUNTY LIBRARY 995 Palm Street (805)781-7222 Reserve online: https://apm.activecommunities.com/sloparksandrec/facility_search? Capacity: 100+ SLO SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 1400 Osos Street (805)781-7222 Reserve online: https://apm.activecommunities.com/sloparksandrec/facility_search? Capacity: 100+ Page 216 of 399 28 28 2.1 Page 217 of 399 29 29 Page 218 of 399 30 30 ATTACHMENT D: Potential Meeting Locations Below is a list, but not limited to, of meeting locations:  City Hall, 990 Palm Street  City/County Public Library, 995 Palm Street  On-board fixed-route transit vehicles  Government Access Channel 20  Ludwick Communitiy Center  Elks Lodge  SLO Senior Center  Cal Poly Student Union Page 219 of 399 Page 220 of 399 City of San Luis Obispo Transit SLO Transit 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) Pending Adoption March 21, 2023 _____________________________________ ______________ Signature of Accountable Executive Date Shelly Stanwyck Assistant City Manager, Community Services Page 221 of 399 Page 222 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 3 of 30 Contents Definitions..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Section 1 Transit Agency Information .......................................................................................................... 6 Subsection 1.1 Accountable Executive ......................................................................................................... 7 Subsection 1.2 Chief Safety Officer ............................................................................................................. 7 Section 2 Plan Development, Approval, and Updates .................................................................................. 7 Subsection 2.1 Drafting the Plan................................................................................................................... 7 Subsection 2.2 Signature by the Accountable Executive and Approval by the Board ................................. 8 Subsection 2.3 Certification of Compliance ................................................................................................. 8 Subsection 2.4 Plan Review and Updates ..................................................................................................... 8 Section 3 Safety Performance Targets (SPTs) .............................................................................................. 9 Subsection 3.1 Target Development ............................................................................................................. 9 Section 4 Overview of the Agency’s Safety Management Systems (SMS) ............................................... 10 Section 5 Safety Management Policy ......................................................................................................... 10 Subsection 5.1 Safety Management Policy Statement ................................................................................ 11 Subsection 5.2 Safety Management Policy Communication ...................................................................... 11 Subsection 5.3 Employee Safety Reporting Program ................................................................................. 12 Subsection 5.4 SMS Authorities, Accountabilities, and Responsibilities ................................................... 13 Subsection 5.4.1 Accountable Executive .................................................................................................... 13 Subsection 5.4.2 Chief Safety Officer ........................................................................................................ 14 Subsection 5.4.3 Agency Leadership and Executive Management ............................................................ 14 Subsection 5.4.4 Key Staff .......................................................................................................................... 15 Section 6 Safety Risk Management (SRM) ................................................................................................ 15 Subsection 6.1 Safety Hazard Identification ............................................................................................... 15 Subsection 6.2 Safety Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................... 17 Subsection 6.3 Safety Risk Mitigation ........................................................................................................ 18 Section 7 Safety Assurance ......................................................................................................................... 19 Subsection 7.1 Safety Performance Monitoring and Measurement ............................................................ 19 Section 8 Safety Promotion ........................................................................................................................ 20 Subsection 8.1 Safety Communication ....................................................................................................... 21 Section 9 Strategies to Minimize Exposure to Infectious Diseases ............................................................ 22 Page 223 of 399 Section 10 Documentation .......................................................................................................................... 24 Page 224 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 5 of 30 Definitions Accident means an Event that involves any of the following: a loss of life; a report of a serious injury to a person; a collision of public transportation vehicles; an evacuation for life safety reasons. Accountable Executive means the single, identifiable person who has ultimate responsibility for carrying out the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan of the Agency; responsibility for carrying out the Agency’s Transit Asset Management Plan; and control or direction over the human and capital resources needed to develop and maintain both the Agency’s Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 5329(d), and the Agency’s Transit Asset Management Plan in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 5326. Agency or Transit Agency means the City of San Luis Obispo Transit (SLO Transit). San Luis Obispo City Council means governing body of SLO Transit. Caltrans means the California Department of Transportation Chief Safety Officer means the adequately trained individual who has responsibility for safety and reports directly to the Transit Agency’s chief executive officer. CFR means Code of Federal Regulations. Event means any Accident, Incident, or Occurrence. FTA means the Federal Transit Administration, an operating administration within the United States Department of Transportation. Hazard means any real or potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or death, damage to or loss of the facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infrastructure of the system, or damage to the environment. Incident means an Event that involves any of the following: a personal injury that is not a serious injury, one or more injuries requiring medical transport, or damage to facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infrastructure that disrupts the operations of the Transit Agency. Investigation means the process of determining the causal and contributing factors of an accident, incident, or hazard, for the purpose of preventing recurrence and mitigating risk. National Public Transportation Safety Plan means the plan to improve the safety of all public transportation systems that receive federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. Occurrence means an Event without any personal injury in which any damage to facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infrastructure does not disrupt the operations of the Transit Agency. Part 673 means 49 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 673. Performance Measure means an expression based on a quantifiable indicator of performance or condition that is used to establish targets and to assess progress toward meeting the established targets. Page 225 of 399 Performance target means a quantifiable level of performance or condition, expressed as a value for the measure, to be achieved within a time period required by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Risk means the composite of predicted severity and likelihood of the potential effect of a hazard. Risk mitigation means a method or methods to eliminate or reduce the effects of hazards. Safety Assurance means processes within the Transit Agency’s Safety Management Systems that function to ensure the implementation and effectiveness of safety risk mitigation, and to ensure that the Transit Agency meets or exceeds its safety objectives through the collection, analysis, and assessment of information. Safety Management Policy means the Transit Agency’s documented commitment to safety, which defines the Transit Agency’s safety objectives and the accountabilities and responsibilities of its employees in regard to safety. Safety Management Systems (SMS) means the formal, top-down, organization-wide approach to managing safety risk and assuring the effectiveness of a Transit Agency’s safety risk mitigation. SMS includes systematic procedures, practices, and policies for managing risks and hazards. Safety Performance Target (SPT) means a Performance Target related to safety management activities. Safety Promotion means a combination of training and communication of safety information to support SMS as applied to the Transit Agency’s public transportation system. Safety Risk Assessment (SRA) means the formal activity whereby the Transit Agency determines Safety Risk Management priorities by establishing the significance or value of its safety risks. Safety Risk Management (SRM) means a process within the Transit Agency’s Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan for identifying hazards and analyzing, assessing, and mitigating safety risk. Serious injury means any injury which: (1) requires hospitalization for more than 48 hours, commencing within seven days from the date the injury was received, (2) results in a fracture of any bone (except simple fractures of fingers, toes, or noses), (3) causes severe hemorrhages, nerve, muscle, or tendon damage; (4) involves any internal organ, or (5) involves second or third-degree burns, or any burns affecting more than five percent of the body surface. State of Good Repair (SGR) means the condition in which a capital asset is able to operate at a full level of performance. Transit Asset Management Plan means the strategic and systematic practice of procuring, operating, inspecting, maintaining, rehabilitating, and replacing transit capital assets to manage their performance, risks, and costs over their life cycles, for the purpose of providing safe, cost-effective, and reliable public transportation, as required by 49 U.S.C. 5326 and 49 CFR part 625. U.S.C. means United States Code. Section 1 Transit Agency Information The City of San Luis Obispo Transit (SLO Transit), a program of the City’s Public Works Department, is the local fixed-route public transit operation within the city limits of San Luis Obispo and California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly). Service operations and vehicle Page 226 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 7 of 30 maintenance are provided by a third-party contractor (First Transit, Inc.). SLO Transit is a recipient of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 funds and does not provide transportation services on behalf of another entity. Subsection 1.1 Accountable Executive SLO Transit’s Accountable Executive is the Assistant City Manager, Community Services Group. The Assistant City Manager has direct communication with the City Manager and direct coordination with the City Transit Manager. Accordingly, the Assistant City Manager is the single, identifiable person who has ultimate responsibility for carrying out this Agency Safety Plan and the Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan, and control or direction over the human and capital resources needed to develop and maintain both this Plan and the TAM Plan. The Assistant City Manager is accountable for ensuring that the Agency’s Safety Management Systems (SMS) is effectively implemented throughout the Agency’s public transportation system. The Assistant City Manager is accountable for ensuring action is taken, as necessary, to address substandard performance in the Agency’s SMS. The Assistant City Manager may delegate specific responsibilities, but the ultimate accountability for the Transit Agency’s safety performance cannot be delegated and always rests with the Assistant City Manager. Subsection 1.2 Chief Safety Officer As a small public transportation provider, SLO Transit’s designated Chief Safety Officer is the contracting General Manager who has the authority and responsibility for day-to-day implementation and operation of the Agency’s SMS. The Chief Safety Officer has a strong working relationship with the operations and asset management functions at SLO Transit. Section 2 Plan Development, Approval, and Updates Caltrans developed the contents of this SLO Transit plan to meet requirements specified in 49 CFR Part 673 and comply with Part 673.11(d) regarding Caltrans’ responsibility to develop an ASP for any small public transportation provider that is located in California. This Plan is based on the four (4) principles or pillars of the Safety Management Systems (SMS). SMS is defined as the formal, top-down, organization-wide, data-driven approach to managing safety risk and assuring the effectiveness of safety mitigations. It includes systematic policies, procedures, and practices for the management of safety risk. The four principles or pillars of SMS are: (1) Safety Management Policy; (2) Safety Risk Management; (3) Safety Assurance; and (4) Safety Promotion. Subsection 2.1 Drafting the Plan Caltrans drafted this Plan, thus meeting the requirements of 49 CFR Part 673.11(d). FTA will oversee compliance with the requirements of Part 673 through the existing Triennial Review processes. Page 227 of 399 Should SLO Transit no longer meet the definition of a small public transportation provider or choose to opt-out of the Caltrans Agency Safety Plan, within one year from the date of notifying the State of either development SLO Transit will draft and certify its own Agency Safety Plan. If SLO Transit operates more than 100 vehicles SLO Transit must fulfill requirements of systems operating more than 100 vehicles. Subsection 2.2 Signature by the Accountable Executive and Approval by the Board Pursuant to 49 CFR Part 673.11 (a)(1), this Agency Safety Plan and subsequent updates must be signed by the Accountable Executive and approved by SLO Transit’s Board. Documentation of Board approval is found in Appendix A. Subsection 2.3 Certification of Compliance Pursuant to 49 CFR Parts 673.13(a) and 673.13(b), Caltrans certifies that it has established this Agency Safety Plan, meeting the requirements of 49 CFR Part 673 by July 20, 2020 and will certify its compliance with 49 CFR Part 673. FTA published a Notice of Enforcement Discretion on April 22, 2020 effectively extending the PTASP compliance deadline from July 20, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Transit operators must certify they have a safety plan in place meeting the requirements of the rule by December 31, 2020. The plan must be updated and certified by the transit agency annually. After Caltrans initial certification, and on an annual basis SLO Transit must update this Agency Safety Plan. All Agency Safety Plan updates shall be signed by the Accountable Executive and approved by SLO Transit’s Board. FTA does not require this plan to be submitted to FTA. Instead, Caltrans will certify that it has established this Safety Plan, which fulfills the requirements under Part 673. FTA annually amends and issues the list of Certifications and Assurances. Caltrans will review such guidance for incorporation into the safety program as necessary. Subsection 2.4 Plan Review and Updates SLO Transit updates this Safety Plan when information, processes or activities change within the Agency and/or when Part 673 undergoes significant changes, or annually, whichever comes sooner. As SLO Transit collects data through its Safety Risk Management and Safety Assurance processes, shared with Caltrans and the local Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) as described in subsection 3.1 below, the MPO and Caltrans will evaluate SLO Transit’s safety performance targets (SPTs) to determine whether they need to be changed, as well. This Plan will be jointly reviewed and updated by the City Transit Coordinator, with the assistance of subject matter experts, annually. The Accountable Executive will approve any changes, then forward on to the Board for approval. This Plan may need to be reviewed and updated more frequently based on the following:  We determine our approach to mitigating safety deficiencies is ineffective; Page 228 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 9 of 30  We make significant changes to service delivery;  We introduce new processes or procedures that may impact safety;  We change or re-prioritize resources available to support SMS;  We significantly change our organizational structure. Version Number and Updates Record the complete history of successive versions of this plan. Version Number Section/Pages Affected Reason for Change Date Issued 1.0 All Original Plan 11/17/2020 2.0 Various Plan Update 3/2023 Section 3 Safety Performance Targets (SPTs) Subsection 3.1 Target Development SLO Transit includes SPTs in this Safety Plan. These targets are specific numerical targets set by SLO Transit and based on the safety Performance Measures established by FTA in the National Public Transportation Safety Plan. In the most recent version, the 2017 NSP3, FTA adopted four initial safety Performance Measures: (1) Fatalities, (2) Injuries, (3) Safety Events, and (4) System Reliability. SLO Transit developed safety performance targets that it will review and update annually. The specific safety performance targets are based on the safety performance measures established under the National Public Transportation Safety Plan and the safety performance goals set by Caltrans based on the past three (3) fiscal years of data. The Safety Performance Targets for SLO Transit for the Fiscal Year 2020-21 is expected to stay within 1% +/- of previous three years data pertaining to fatalities, injuries, safety events, and system reliability. SLO Transit established safety performance targets for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, based on safety performance measures established under the National Public Transportation Safety Plan. Safety Performance Targets Based on the safety performance measures established under the National Public Transportation Safety Plan. Page 229 of 399 Mode of Transit Service Fatalities (total) Injuries (total) Safety Events (total) System Reliability (VRM / failures) Fixed Route Integer Target 0 0 0 4,211 Fixed Route Target per Vehicle Revenue Mile 0 0 0 0.01 Safety Performance Target Coordination Targets Transmitted to the Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Planning Organization Name Date Targets Transmitted San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) 3/2023 Section 4 Overview of the Agency’s Safety Management Systems (SMS) SMS is a comprehensive, collaborative approach that brings management and labor together to build on the transit industry’s existing safety foundation to control risk better, detect and correct safety problems earlier, share and analyze safety data more effectively, and measure safety performance more carefully. SLO Transit’s SMS focuses on applying resources to risk and is based on ensuring that SLO Transit has the organizational infrastructure to support decision- making at all levels regarding the assignment of resources. Some key parts of SLO Transit’s SMS include:  Defined roles and responsibilities;  Strong executive safety leadership;  Formal safety accountabilities and communication;  Effective policies and procedures; and  Active employee involvement Furthermore, SLO Transit’s SMS have four distinct components, which are discussed in subsequent sections to this Safety Plan:  Safety Policy  Safety Risk Management  Safety Assurance  Safety Promotion Section 5 Safety Management Policy The first component of SLO Transit’s SMS is the Safety Management Policy, which is the foundation of SLO Transit’s safety management system. It clearly states the organization’s safety objectives and sets forth the policies, procedures, and organizational structures necessary to accomplish the safety objectives. The Safety Management Policy clearly defines management and employee responsibilities for safety throughout the organization. It also ensures that Page 230 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 11 of 30 management is actively engaged in the oversight of the system’s safety performance by requiring regular review of the Safety Management Policy, budget and program by the designated Accountable Executive. Subsection 5.1 Safety Management Policy Statement Safety is a core value at SLO Transit, and managing safety is a core business function. SLO Transit will develop, implement, maintain, and continuously improve processes to ensure the safety of our customers, employees, and the public. SLO Transit’s overall safety objective is to proactively manage safety hazards and their associated safety risk, with the intent to eliminate unacceptable safety risk in our transit operations. SLO Transit will:  Clearly, and continuously explain to all staff that everyone working within SLO Transit must take part and be responsible and accountable for the development and operation of the Safety Management System (SMS).  Work continuously to minimize safety risks. Work to comply with and, wherever possible, exceed legislative and regulatory requirements and standards for passengers and employees.  Work to ensure that all employees are provided appropriate safety information and training, are competent in safety matters, and assigned tasks commensurate with duties and skills.  Reaffirm that responsibility for making our operations safer for everyone lies with all employees – from executive management to frontline employees. Each manager is responsible for implementing the SMS in their area of responsibility and will be held accountable to ensure that all reasonable steps are taken to perform activities established through the SMS. Caltrans established safety performance targets to help measure the overall effectiveness of our processes and ensure we meet our safety objectives. SLO Transit will keep employees informed about safety performance goals and objectives to ensure continuous safety improvement. Subsection 5.2 Safety Management Policy Communication The Safety Management Policy is communicated throughout the Agency, to all employees, managers, and executives, as well as contractors, and to the Board. This is accomplished through various processes such as:  Review Sessions – Conducted by City Management and Transit staff. Once this Plan or any update to this Plan has been signed by the Accountable Executive and approved by the Board it will become standard practice in perpetuity for the Chief Safety Officer to conduct safety meetings to review safety program with all staff. Page 231 of 399  New Hire Safety Orientation – The Chief Safety Officer will oversee that all new employees regardless of their classifications will be trained about their roles and responsibilities pertaining to PTASP and the principles of SMS.  Safety bulletins, email safety newsletter blasts to staff, and monthly safety meetings Subsection 5.3 Employee Safety Reporting Program SLO Transit implemented a process that allows employees and contracted employees to report safety conditions to senior management, protections for employees who report safety conditions to senior management. The purpose, description and protections for employees to report unsafe conditions and hazards are described in the Employee Safety Reporting Program as below: Purpose: a) To establish a system for SLO Transit employees to identify unsafe conditions or hazards at work and report them to their department management without fear of reprisal. However, disciplinary action could result if the condition reported reveals the employee willfully participated in or conducted an illegal act, gross negligence or deliberate or willful disregard of regulations or procedures, including reporting to work under the influence of controlled substances, physical assault of a coworker or passenger, theft of agency property, unreported safety events, unreported collisions, and unreported passenger injuries or fatalities. b) To provide guidelines for facilitating the timely correction of unsafe conditions or hazards by SLO Transit management. Description: a) This program provides a method for SLO Transit management to identify, evaluate, and correct or avoid unsafe conditions or hazards, procedural deficiencies, design inadequacies, equipment failures, or near misses that adversely affect the safety of employees. Examples of voluntary safety reports include:  Safety hazards in the operating environment (for example, county or city road conditions),  Policies and procedures that are not working as intended (for example, insufficient time to complete pre-trip inspection),  Events that senior managers might not otherwise know about (for example, near misses), and  Information about why a safety event occurred (for example, radio communication challenges). b) The program also involves recommending corrective actions and resolutions of identified unsafe conditions or hazards and/or near miss. Page 232 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 13 of 30 c) All employees have the obligation to report immediately any unsafe conditions or hazards and near miss to their immediate supervisor /department manager and may do so without fear of reprisal. d) Unsafe conditions or hazards may also be identified as a result of occupational injury or illness investigations and/or by accident investigation. e) Other means by which hazards may be identified are inspections/audits or observations made by the supervisors/management staff as referenced in agency’s Safety Inspection Program. f) Findings will be published immediately following mitigation actions. If employee identification is available, direct feedback regarding mitigation will be provided. Subsection 5.4 SMS Authorities, Accountabilities, and Responsibilities This Plan has assigned specific SMS authorities, accountabilities, and responsibilities to the designated Accountable Executive; Chief Safety Officer; Agency’s Leadership/Executive Management; and Key Staff/Employees as described below and displayed in Appendix B: Subsection 5.4.1 Accountable Executive SLO Transit’s Accountable Executive is the Assistant City Manager, Community Services. The Assistant City Manager is accountable for ensuring that the Agency’s SMS is effectively implemented throughout the Agency’s public transportation system. The Assistant City Manager has direct communication with the City Manager and direct coordination with the City Transit Manager. The Assistant City Manager is accountable for ensuring action is taken, as necessary, to address substandard performance in the Agency’s SMS. The Assistant City Manager may delegate specific responsibilities, but the ultimate accountability for SLO Transit’s safety performance cannot be delegated and always rests with the Assistant City Manager. The Assistant City Manager is accountable for ensuring that the Agency’s SMS is effectively implemented, and that action is taken, as necessary, to address substandard performance in the Agency’s SMS. The Accountable Executive may delegate specific responsibilities, but not accountability for SLO Transit’s safety performance. The Assistant City Manager’s roles include, but are not limited to:  Decision-making about resources (e.g. people and funds) to support asset management, SMS activities, and capital investments;  Signing SMS implementation planning documents;  Endorsing SMS implementation team membership; and  Ensuring safety concerns are considered and addressed in the agency’s ongoing budget planning process. Page 233 of 399  Ensuring transparency in safety priorities: for the Board and for the employees.  Establishing guidance on the level of safety risk acceptable to the agency.  Assuring safety policy is appropriately communicated throughout the agency.  Other duties as assigned/necessary. Subsection 5.4.2 Chief Safety Officer The Chief Safety Officer is the City’s Contracting General Manager and has the authority and responsibility for day-to-day implementation and operation of SLO Transit’s SMS. Chief Safety Officer’s Roles include:  Decision-making about resources (e.g., people and funds) to support asset management, SMS activities, and capital investments;  Overseeing the safety risk management program by facilitating hazard identification, safety risk assessment, and the development and implementation of safety risk mitigations.  Monitoring safety risk mitigation activities;  Providing periodic reports on safety performance;  Briefing the Accountable Executive on SMS implementation progress;  Planning safety management training; and  Developing and organizing annual audits/reviews of SMS processes and the Agency Safety Plan to ensure compliance with 49 CFR Part 673 requirements.  Maintaining safety documentation.  Other duties as assigned/necessary. Subsection 5.4.3 Agency Leadership and Executive Management The contracting General Manager, Operations Manager, Safety Manager, and Maintenance Manager comprise Agency Leadership. Some of their responsibilities include:  Day-to-day implementation of the Agency’s SMS throughout their department and the organization.  Communicating safety accountability and responsibility from the frontline employees to the top of the organization.  Ensuring employees are following their working rules and procedures, safety rules and regulations in performing their jobs, and their specific roles and responsibilities in the implementation of this Agency Safety Plan and the Agency’s SMS.  Ensuring that employees comply with the safety reporting program and are reporting unsafe conditions and hazards to their department management; and making sure reported unsafe conditions and hazards are addressed in a timely manner.  Ensuring that resources are sufficient to carry out employee training/certification and re- training as required by their job classifications. Page 234 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 15 of 30 Subsection 5.4.4 Key Staff The agency Key Staff/Employees may include managers, supervisors, specialists, analysts, database administrators, and other key employees who are performing highly technical work and overseeing employees performing critical tasks and providing support in the implementation of this Agency Safety Plan and SMS principles in various departments throughout the agency. SLO Transit’s Key Staff/Employees responsibilities include:  Ensuring that employees are complying with the safety reporting program.  Ensuring supervisors are conducting their toolbox safety meetings  Promoting safety in employee’s respective area of responsibilities – That means: zero accidents; absence of any safety concerns; perfect employee performance; and compliance with agency rules and procedures and regulatory requirements.  Ensuring safety of passengers, employees, and the public.  Responding to customer complaints and expectations for frequency, reliability, and convenience of service.  Replacing and maintaining aging facilities, equipment, and infrastructure.  Meeting increasing demands for fixed route, commuter service and paratransit service.  Developing and maintaining programs to gather pertinent data elements to develop safety performance reports and conduct useful statistical analyses to identify trends and system performance targets.  Establishing clear lines of safety communication and holding accountability for safety performance.  Assisting as subject matter experts in safety risk assessment and safety risk mitigation processes. Section 6 Safety Risk Management (SRM) The second component of SLO Transit’s SMS is Safety Risk Management, which includes processes and procedures to provide an understanding of the Agency’s operations and vehicle maintenance to allow individuals to identify hazards associated with those activities. SLO Transit has implemented a Safety Risk Management process for all elements of its transportation system. The Safety Risk Management process includes the following activities: safety hazard identification, safety risk assessment, and safety risk mitigation. Subsection 6.1 Safety Hazard Identification Hazard identification is the first step in the Safety Risk Management process and a key component. It involves these fundamental safety-related activities: Identifying safety hazards and their consequences; assessing the risks associated with the consequences of the hazards; and developing mitigations to reduce the potential consequences of the identified hazards. Page 235 of 399 The following is SLO Transit’s methods and processes to identify hazards. The Agency considers, as a source for hazard identification, data and information provided by an oversight authority and the FTA. Hazards are identified through a variety of sources, including:  Employee safety reporting,  Review of vehicle camera footage,  Review of monthly performance data and safety performance targets,  Observations from supervisors,  Maintenance reports,  Comments from customers, passengers, and third parties,  Safety committee, driver and all-staff meetings,  Results of audits and inspections of vehicles and facilities,  Results of training assessments  Investigations into safety events, incidents and occurrences, and  Information from FTA and oversight authorities. When a hazard has been identified, whatever the source, it is reported to the SLO Transit Chief Safety Officer, who enters it into the Hazard Log. The Chief Safety Officer also may enter hazards into this log based on reviews of operations and maintenance activities and procedures. The Chief Safety Officer will investigate hazards to collect information and determine if hazards need to be entered into the safety risk assessment process. In following up on identified hazards, the Chief Safety Officer may:  Reach out to the reporting party, if available, to gather all known information about the reported hazard,  Conduct a walkthrough of the affected area, assessing the possible hazardous condition, generating visual documentation (photographs and/or video), and taking any measurements deemed necessary,  Conduct interviews with employees in the area to gather potentially relevant information on the reported hazard,  Review any documentation associated with the hazard (records, reports, procedures, inspections, technical documents, etc.),  Contact other departments that may have association with or technical knowledge relevant to the reported hazard,  Review any past reported hazards of a similar nature, and  Evaluate tasks and/or processes associated with the reported hazard. Any identified hazard that poses an immediate risk to transit operations, the health and safety of employees or the public, or equipment must immediately be brought to the attention of the Accountable Executive and placed through the Safety Risk Management process for safety risk assessment and mitigation. Otherwise, hazards will be prioritized for further Safety Risk Management activity. Page 236 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 17 of 30 Subsection 6.2 Safety Risk Assessment Safety risk assessment defines the level or degree of the safety risk by assessing the likelihood and severity of the consequences of hazards and prioritizes hazards based on the safety risk. The Chief Safety Officer, with assistance from key staff subject matter experts, is responsible for assessing identified hazards and ratings using the safety risk matrix below. Prioritizing safety risk provides the Accountable Executive with the information needed to make decisions about resource application. The following matrix, adopted from the TSI Participation Guide – SMS Principles for Transit, facilitates the ranking of hazards based on their probability of occurrence and severity of their outcome. Probability Levels Description Level Specific Individual Item Fleet Inventory Frequent A Likely to occur often in the life of an item. Continuously experienced. Probable B Will occur several times in the life of an item. Will occur frequently. Occasional C Likely to occur sometime in the life of an item. Will occur several times. Remote D Unlikely, but possible to occur in the life of an item. Unlikely, but can reasonably be expected to occur. Improbable E So unlikely, it can be assumed occurrence man not be experienced in the life of an item. Unlikely to occur, but possible. Eliminated F Incapable of occurrence. This level is used when potential hazards are identified and later eliminated. Incapable of occurrence. This level is used when potential hazards are identified and later eliminated. The measuring goes from A to F with A being frequent or likely to occur frequently and E being improbable or expected that this event will most likely never occur. The designation F is used when potential hazards are identified and later eliminated. Severity Levels Description Level Mishap Result Criteria Catastrophic 1 Could Result in one or more of the following: death, permanent total disability, irreversible significant environmental impact, or monetary loss equal to or exceeding $10M Critical 2 Could result in one or more of the following: permanent partial disability, injuries or occupational illness that may result in hospitalization of at least three personnel, reversible significant environmental impact, or monetary loss equal to or exceeding $1M but less than $10M Page 237 of 399 Severity Levels Marginal 3 Could result in one or more of the following: injuries or occupational illness resulting in one or more lost work day(s), reversible moderate environmental impact, or monetary loss equal to or exceeding $100k but less than $1M Negligible 4 Could result in one or more of the following: injuries or occupational illness not resulting in lost work day, minimum environmental impact. Or monetary loss less than $100k. The Safety Risk Severity Table presents a typical safety risk. It includes four categories to denote the level of severity of the occurrence of a consequence, the meaning of each category, and the assignment of a value to each category using numbers. In this table, 1 is considered catastrophic meaning possible deaths and equipment destroyed and 4 is considered negligible or of little consequence with two levels in between. Safety Risk Probability and Safety Risk Severity are combined into the Safety Risk Index Ranking to help prioritize safety risks according to the table below. Safety Risk Assessment Matrix Severity  Probability  Catastrophic 1 Critical 2 Marginal 3 Negligible 4 A-Frequent 1A 2A 3A 4A B- Probable 1B 2B 3B 4B C-Occasional 1C 2C 3C 4C D- Remote 1D 2D 3D 4D E- Improbable 1E 2E 3E 4E F- Eliminated Safety Risk Index Ranking 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B High Unacceptable 1D, 2C, 3A, 3B Serious Undesirable - With management decision required 1E, 2D, 2E, 3C, 3D, 3E, 4A, 4B, Medium Acceptable - with review by management 4C, 4D, 4E Low Acceptable - without review The Chief Safety Officer documents recommendations regarding hazard rating and mitigation options and reports this information to the Accountable Executive. Subsection 6.3 Safety Risk Mitigation The Chief Safety Officer, assisted by Key Staff subject matter experts, reviews current safety risk mitigations and establish procedures to 1) eliminate; 2) mitigate; 3) accept specific risks. Prioritization of safety remediation measures is based on risk anal ysis and a course of action acceptable to SLO Transit management. The safety risk must be mitigated if ranked as Unacceptable (High- Red). Those safety risks that have been mitigated, even those mitigated risks shown as Acceptable status (Low -Green) undergo regular and consistent monitoring to ensure the mitigation strategy is effective. Page 238 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 19 of 30 Key strategies to minimize the types of risks that potentially exist include:  Development and deployment of policies and procedures that address known hazards and risks,  Discussion of other actions, strategies and procedures that might help safeguard against unknown/unforeseen risks,  Training of drivers and other agency staff on all safety policies and procedures,  Training of drivers and other agency staff on methodologies for handling emergencies, and  Training of drivers and staff on proper and effective use of emergency equipment and communication technologies and protocol. Safety risk mitigations are tracked and updated in the Hazard Log by the Chief Safety Officer. Section 7 Safety Assurance The third component of the Agency’s SMS is Safety Assurance, which ensures the performance and effectiveness of safety risk controls established under safety risk management. Safety assurance also helps ensure that the organization meets or exceeds its safety objectives through the collection, analysis, and assessment of data regarding the organization's performance. Safety assurance includes inspection activities to support oversight and performance monitoring. SLO Transit monitors its operations and maintenance protocols and procedures, and any safety risk mitigations to ensure that it is implementing them as planned. Furthermore, the Agency investigates safety events (as defined in Appendix C) and any reports of non-compliance with applicable regulations, standards, and legal authority. Finally, the Agency continually monitors information reported to it through any internal safety reporting programs, including the employee safety reporting program. Some of the key elements of SLO Transit’s Safety Performance Monitoring and Measurement are shown below in subsection 7.1: Subsection 7.1 Safety Performance Monitoring and Measurement As part of the Safety Assurance Process, SLO Transit:  Monitors the system for compliance with, and sufficiency of, the Agency’s procedures for operations and maintenance through: o Safety audits, o Informal inspections, o Regular review of on-board camera footage to assess drivers and specific incidents, o Safety surveys, o Employee safety reporting program, Page 239 of 399 o Investigation of safety occurrences, o Safety review prior to the launch or modification of any facet of service, o Daily data gathering and monitoring of data relating to the delivery of service, o Regular vehicle inspections and preventative maintenance, and o Continuous feedback loop between leadership and all levels of the agency.  Monitors its operations to identify any safety risk mitigations that may be ineffective, inappropriate, or were not implemented as intended through: o Reviewing results from accident, incident, and occurrence investigations, o Monitoring employee safety reporting, o Reviewing results of internal safety audits and inspections, and o Analyzing operational and safety data to identify emerging safety concerns.  Conducts investigations of safety events to identify causal factors; and  Monitors information reported through any internal safety reporting programs. o The Chief Safety Officer routinely reviews safety data captured in employee safety reports, safety meeting minutes, customer complaints, and other safety communication channels. When necessary, the Chief Safety Officer ensures that the issues and concerns are investigated or analyzed through the safety risk assessment process. o The Chief Safety Officer also reviews the results of internal and external reviews, including audits and assessments, with findings affecting safety performance, compliance with operations and maintenance procedures, or the effectiveness of safety risk mitigations. The Chief Safety Officer discusses relevant safety issues and concerns with the Accountable Executive and executive management and documents the results of these reviews in the Hazard Log. In the event of a fatality, SLO Transit complies with all FTA drug and alcohol requirements. In California, every driver involved in an accident that results in death, injury, or property damage over $1000, effective January 1, 2017, must report the accident on a Report of Traffic Accident Occurring in California (SR 1) form to DMV. The report forms are available at www.dmv.ca.gov, by calling 1-800-777-0133, and at CHP and DMV offices. Also, under California Vehicle Code §16002(b) the driver of a vehicle that is owned or operated by a publicly owned or operated transit system, or that is operated under contract with a publicly owned or operated transit system, and that is used to provide regularly scheduled transportation to the general public or for other official business of the system shall, within 10 days of the occurrence of the accident, report to the transit system any accident of a type otherwise required to be reported pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 16000 . SLO Transit requires driver notification to SLO Transit immediately and maintains records of any report filed pursuant to this paragraph. Section 8 Safety Promotion The fourth component of the Agency’s SMS is Safety Promotion, which includes a combination of training and communication of safety information to employees to enhance the Agency’s Page 240 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 21 of 30 safety performance. Safety Promotion sets the tone for the SMS and helps SLO Transit to establish and maintain a robust safety culture. Safety Promotion has two-components: (1) Safety Communication; and (2) Competencies and Training. Subsection 8.1 Safety Communication SLO Transit communicates safety and safety performance information throughout the organization that, at a minimum, conveys information on hazards and safety risks relevant to employees’ roles and responsibilities and informs employees of safety actions taken in response to reports submitted through an employee safety reporting program. Ongoing safety communication is critical and SLO Transit ensures communication occurs up, down, and across all levels of the organization. Any lessons learned are communicated to all concerned. Management commitment to address safety concerns and hazards is communicated on a regular basis. Management encourages and motivates employees to communicate openly, authentically, and without concern for reprisal; ensures employees are aware of SMS principles and understand their safety-related roles and responsibilities; conveys safety critical information such as accident data, injuries, and reported safety concerns and hazards and their resolutions to employees. SLO Transit’s tools to support safety communication include:  Safety bulletins  Safety notices  Posters  CDs or Thumb drives or online safety video access  Newsletters  Briefings or Toolbox talks  Seminars and workshops  New employee training and refresher training  Intranet or social media  Monthly Safety Meetings Competencies and Training: Executive Management ensures that all employees attend the training provided to understand their specific roles and responsibilities for the implementation of SMS. SLO Transit provides SMS training in the following areas: All Employees:  Understanding of Safety Performance Targets  Understanding of fundamental principles of SMS  Understanding of Safety Reporting Program – Reporting unsafe conditions and hazards/near misses  Understanding of their individual roles and responsibilities under SMS Managers and Supervisors Page 241 of 399  Understanding of Safety Risk Management  Understanding of Safety Assurance  Understanding of Safety Promotion  Understanding of their individual roles and responsibilities for SMS Executive Management:  Understanding of management commitment to and support of all SMS activities. All employees are required to acquire the competencies and knowledge for the consistent application of their skills as they relate to safety performance objectives. SLO Transit dedicates resources to conduct effective safety-related skill training. The scope of the safety training is appropriate to each employee’s individual safety-related job responsibilities and their role in SMS. Components of SLO Transit’s skill-related training include:  Conducting training needs analyses to ensure that the right information is being taught to the right employees using the most efficient training methods.  Communicating purpose, objectives, and outcome.  Ensuring relevant content by directly linking training to the trainee’s job experiences so trainees are more motivated to learn.  Using active hands-on demonstrations and practice to demonstrate skills that are being taught and provide opportunities for trainees to practice skills.  Providing regular feedback during hands-on practice and exercises.  Reinforcing training concepts in the post-training work environment by giving employees opportunities to perform what they’ve learned. Section 9 Strategies to Minimize Exposure to Infectious Diseases Pursuant to the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, SLO Transit takes precautions to reduce risks of infectious diseases consistent with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. SLO Transit monitors transit service levels and adjusts as necessary to continue providing basic lifeline services for the public and allow for services that help promote social distancing and other individual risk minimization recommendations. Page 242 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 23 of 30 Precautionary Steps:  SLO Transit has enhanced its cleaning efforts to include disinfecting vehicles every 24 hours along with individual spot cleaning during daily routes. The cleaning agents used in this effort are deemed effective for these purposes and contain antiviral components such as bleach/water mixes and disinfectant sprays. As an extra level of precaution, SLO Transit has implemented an enhanced cleaning process, focusing more attention on areas and surfaces which are touched most frequently, including: bus doors, door handles, handrails, Token Transit Validator, farebox, handles, interior windows and window frames, pull cords, seats and interior walls.  SLO Transit encourages the use of onboard hand sanitizer stations when entering the vehicle.  SLO Transit encourages riders to refrain from using cash for fare and instead purchase a physical or digital bus pass.  Although face coverings are no longer required on public buses and at transportation hubs, SLO Transit is encouraging riders to wear a face covering over their nose and mouth while riding the bus, especially if they are feeling sick, have been recently exposed to someone who had COVID-19, or are unvaccinated. Wearing a mask is a courtesy to other riders.  When possible, SLO Transit riders are asked to maintain a minimum of six feet distance from fellow riders. SLO Transit follows the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) best practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and advises employees and riders to do the same. Best Practices and Recommendations for Employees and Riders:  Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth.  Avoid close contact with people who are sick.  Wash hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, especially after using the bathroom; before eating; and after blowing your nose, coughing or sneezing.  Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces such as cell phones, keyboards, door handles, etc.  Cover your cough or sneeze with a tissue, then dispose of tissue in trash.  Please stay home when you are feeling sick. SLO Transit encourages riders to be socially conscious and maintain responsible hygiene. If someone is feeling sick and showing signs of illness or has been near someone with symptoms and signs of illness, SLO Transit asks that they keep their fellow passengers mind and kindly refrain from using the transit system. Page 243 of 399 Section 10 Documentation Pursuant to 49 CFR Part 673.31, SLO Transit maintains records related to this Safety Plan and SMS implementation for a minimum of three years. These documents include but are not limited to the results from SMS processes and activities. SLO Transit will make these documents available to FTA Region 9, Caltrans, and other Federal and state agencies upon request. Appendices A – Council Resolution – SLO Transit Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) B – Organizational Chart (FY 2022-23) C – Examples of Safety Event Investigation (First Transit) Page 244 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 25 of 30 Appendix A – Board Approval – Signed Council Resolution Signed Council resolution to be included following Board approval. Page 245 of 399 Appendix B - Organizational Chart FY 2022-23 Approving Board San Luis Obispo City Council Accountable Executive Assistant City Manager Chief Safety Officer Contracting General Manager Key Staff Contracting Safety Manager Key Staff Contracting Operations Manager Key Staff Contracting Maintenance Manager Supporting Review Team City Transit Manager & Transit Coordinator Page 246 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 27 of 30 Appendix C – Examples of Safety Event Investigation (First Transit, Inc.) Report of Unusual Incident Page 247 of 399 Near Miss and Hazard Report Page 248 of 399 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Regulation (49 CFR Part 673) Page 29 of 30 Root Cause Analysis Page 249 of 399 Page 250 of 399