Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-04-2012 b1 historic resources inventory additions•Counci lagenda nepont C I T Y O F S A N L U I S O B I S P O FROM : Derek Johnson, Community Development Directo r Prepared By : Phil Dunsmore, Senior Planne r SUBJECT : Addition of properties to the City's list of Contributing Historic Resources a s part of an update to the City's Historic Resource Inventor y RECOMMENDATIO N Adopt a resolution endorsing the Cultural Heritage Committee's nomination of 53 properties t o the City's list of Contributing Historic Resources I . DISCUSSIO N Backgroun d •One of the goals the Council identified for the 2011- 2013 Financial Plan was to "Continue t o promote historic resource preservation opportunities and to update the Historic Resources Inventory" as resources permit . Over the past 18 months, staff and the CHC have been workin g together to update the inventory . With limited resources, the CHC determined that this effor t would only be possible in small increments, focusing on specific neighborhoods . Following a careful evaluation of the most critical areas in the City, the CHC selected an area outside of th e existing historic districts adjacent to Johnson Avenue between Higuera and Buchon Street s (Attachment 1). This eight block area was selected because of an apparent concentration o f architecturally significant properties that are currently unlisted . The last area-wide review of historic properties was undertaken in 2006-2007 when City staf f reviewed two neighborhoods known as the East Railroad and the Monterey Heights areas . That survey resulted in the addition of 25 properties to the City's list of Contributing Histori c Resources within the East Railroad area and seven properties within Monterey Heights . At this time, there are 53 properties that the CHC has determined qualify for nomination to th e City's list of Historic Resources (Attachment 2). The CHC selected these properties from a n initial list of 75 properties and ultimately nominated the 53 properties at their May and July 201 2 hearings . The nomination list is ready for the Council's approval which would add thes e properties to the City's list of Contributing Historic Resources . •I As defined in the Historic Preservation Ordinance :"A contributing resource is a designation that may be applie d to buildings at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, an d contribute either by themselves or in conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of aneighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole . They need not be located in a historic district ." Meeting Data December 4th, 2012 B1-1 Council Agenda Repor t Historic Resource Inventory Page 2 Policy Direction • The General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) provides policy direction fo r Historic Preservation efforts . COSE Policy 3 .3 .1 states : "...significant historic and architectural resources should be identified, preserved an d rehabilitated." The implementing program 3 .6 .1 states : "The City's Cultural Heritage Committee will : Help identify, and advise suitabl e treatment for archaeological and historical resources ." The State Office of Historic Preservation recommends that a historical resource survey b e updated every five years . The inventory update project is consistent with City Goals and Policie s and is consistent with the City's responsibilities as a Certified Local Government (CLG). As a CLG, the City is encouraged to directly participate in preservation planning by activel y identifying, registering, and assisting with the preservation of historic properties that are withi n our jurisdiction . Inventory Project History The inventory process involved a series of 13 public hearings, and a variety of outreac h opportunities . This process began in early 2011, when the CHC discussed various locations in • the City that would benefit from a review of historic character and discussed specifi c neighborhoods that might be appropriate for a work effort . By reviewing a series of maps an d historical data, the CHC identified the survey area in June and July of 2011 . At that time, it wa s determined that the eight block area identified in Attachment 1 contained a large number o f properties that appeared to be eligible for listing based on adopted architectural criteria in th e Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines . Based on early subdivision maps, field surveys and early building permit data, the survey are a was outlined and a sub-committee consisting of CHC members and staff was formed to take o n the survey work . The sub-committee was responsible for identifying and photographin g resources in the field and performing background research on the properties . Letters were maile d to property owners and tenants within the entire survey area to inform them of the survey wor k and to alert them to the opportunity for involvement in the process . Additionally, staff utilized area wide newsletters, website updates and e-mail notifications to help residents understand th e survey process . Inventory Project Methodolog y In accordance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the CHC is responsible for reviewin g the eligibility criteria for historic listing and making a recommendation to the City Council . In order to be eligible for designation, a resource must exhibit a high level of integrity, be at leas t 50 years old, and satisfy significance criteria in categories of Architecture or History . Thi s survey focused on Architectural significance . All of the properties proposed for nomination ar e greater than 50 years old and meet criteria for architectural significance as described in th e Historic Preservation Ordinance (MC 14 .01 .070): • B1-2 Council Agenda Report Historic Resource Inventory Page 3 •A . Architectural Criteria: Embodies the distinctive characteristics ofa type, period, region, o r method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values . (1) Style: Describes the form of a building, such as size, structural shape and detail s within that form (e .g. arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc .). Buildin g style will be evaluated as a measure of a.The relative purity ofa traditional style; b.Rarity of existence at any time in the locale ; and/or current rarity although th e structure reflects a once popular style ; c.Traditional, vernacular and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular socia l milieu and period of the community ; and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and ho w these styles are put together. (2) Design : Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts . Reflects how well a particular style or combination ofstyles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the designer (e.g., carpenter-builder) accurately interpreted an d conveyed the style(s). Building design will be evaluated as a measure of a.Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its artistic merit, details and craftsmanship (even if not necessarily unique); b.An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders , although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior . •Staff and the CHC have reviewed each of the properties proposed for nomination with th e criteria noted above . At the January, February and March 2012 CHC hearings, photos , historical Sanborn insurance maps that document building footprints from the early 20 th century, and other background information were evaluated for each of the properties to assis t with the recommendation . The properties surveyed express relative purity of traditional style and represent traditional , vernacular or eclectic influences that represent the era from approximately 1900 t o approximately 1925 . This was the era that followed the introduction of the railroad an d immediately followed the fire that led to the loss of the Ramona Hotel that occupied the bloc k between Higuera and Marsh Streets at Johnson Avenue . The style of residences involved in the survey area include Craftsman Bungalow, Neoclassi c Rowhouse, and a mixture of the two styles which has been commonly referred to as Railroad Vernacular . Based on this information, the CHC has recommended that the Council take fina l action to add the properties to the List of Contributing Historic Resources . Property Owner and Neighborhood Testimon y Information from property owners and residents can be very important in determining whether a property has the integrity to qualify for listing . Staff received several phone calls and e-mail s supporting the historic resource inventory and received one phone call and e-mail from a property owner objecting to listing (1310 Marsh). However, the property owner from 131 0 •Marsh has not provided testimony at any of the CHC hearings during the review and nominatio n process . The property at 1310 Marsh is a very well maintained and preserved original residenc e with good integrity that has been relatively unchanged since it was originally constructed . I t B1-3 Council Agenda Repor t Historic Resource Inventory Page 4 clearly qualifies for the contributing list . Owners often have historical and background information for a property that cannot be obtaine d from other survey methods . Determining if a property qualifies for listing is based upon th e listing criteria adopted within the Historic Preservation Ordinance . If a property clearly qualifie s for listing, the CHC is responsible for making such a recommendation to the City Council . The City Council takes the final action on listing and may consider the CHC action, City policy an d public input, including that of the property owner . On November 4 `h ,staff sent a letter to the property owners of each of the nominated properties . The letter described the historic resource inventory process and notified property owners of th e December 4th City Council hearing . This letter was the third such formal notification sent to eac h of the property owners in addition to postcard notifications that were sent to all tenants withi n the survey area . A copy of the notification letter is included in the Council reading file . Contributing List or Master Lis t Although the properties proposed for nomination appear to have retained their essential feature s (integrity) and display architectural character representative of the period, the properties do no t appear to have unique characteristics, rarity or known historical association which would mak e them eligible for inclusion on the City's Master List of Historic Resources (Master List). The Master list is a designation that is reserved for the most unique and important historic resource s in the City . What's Next? With such a significant concentration of properties that qualify for listing, the CHC discusse d whether it is appropriate to recommend adjustment of the adjacent historic district boundaries t o include this area . This survey area is the first of several surveys that need to be performe d outside of the boundaries of the historic districts . After consideration, the CHC determined that consideration of historic district boundaries shoul d occur after a more comprehensive survey effort has been completed . Following completion of a historic context statement and additional surveys, the CHC will be in a much better position t o evaluate where and if the boundaries of the historic districts should be adjusted . Future phases of survey work will continue evaluating areas outside of the historic districts a s resources are available . Prior to conducting future survey work, development of a histori c context statement needs to be developed and approved . The historic context statemen t development effort is anticipated to begin this December and be completed by October 2013 . Staff recently hired a consultant to assist with this effort as part of a successful CLG grant . Based on the adoption of the 2013-2015 CHC goals, it will be determined if there are sufficien t resources to continue focused survey efforts . FISCAL IMPACTS • • • B1-4 Council Agenda Repor t Historic Resource Inventory Page 5 • There are no fiscal impacts associated with adding the 53 properties to the Contributing List o f Historic Resources . As an active CLG, the City is encouraged to continue with histori c preservation activities through the use of knowledge sharing, grants and other state and federa l assistance . ALTERNATIVE S 1.The Council may continue the listing request and ask staff to return with additiona l information 2.The Council may choose not to list specific properties, as may be requested by a propert y owner . 3.The Council may determine that particular properties are eligible for placement on th e Master List of Historic Resources . If this alternative is chosen, direction should b e provided to staff so that proper notification to property owners and additional researc h can be accomplished or the Council may choose this designation based on informatio n provided at the Council hearing . ATTACHMENT S Attachment 1 : Survey Boundary Map Attachment 2 : CHC resolutions nominating propertie s Attachment 3 : City Council resolution to add contributing propertie s Council Reading File : Historic Preservation Program Guideline s Historic Preservation Ordinanc e Architectural worksheets (DPR Forms) with photos of each residenc e November 4th notification letter T :\Council Agenda Reports\2012\2012-12-04\Historic Resou r ces Inventory Additions (Johnson-Dunsmore ) • • Attachment 1 Phase One Historic Resources Evaluation 2011 • Area 1 : Enrica Costell o Area 2 : Jamie Hil l Area 3 : Anu Dhaliwal CHC Survey Subcommitte e Area 4 : Ali Zike Area 5 : Phil Dunsmore • Attachment 2 CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTE E • RESOLUTION NO . XXXX-1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTE ERECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADD THE PROPERTIES LOCATE DAT1331, 1327, 1325, 1326, 1336, 1338, 1344 AND 1371 PACIFIC STREET ; 131 8JOHNSON AVENUE ; 1303, 1311, 1339, 1361, 1368 HIGUERA STREET ; AND 1302 ,1310, 1320, 1339, 1343, 1350, 1356, 1359, 1360 MARSH STREET TO TH ECONTRIBUTING LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES ,CHC 26-1 2 WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee is performing an update to th eHistoric Resources Inventory as directed by the Conservation and Open Space Elemen tof the General Plan and the State Office of Historic Preservation ; an d WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee has identified that the above liste dproperties are eligible for listing on the City's Historic Resources Inventory based o nadopted criteria within the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance ; an d WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee of the City of San Luis Obisp oconducted public hearings in the Council Meeting Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street ,San Luis Obispo, California, on, June 27, 2011, July 25, 2011, August 22, 2011 ,October 24, 2011, November 28, 2011, December 19, 2011, February 27, 2012, Marc h•26, 2012 and May 29, 2012, for the purpose of considering adding the above liste dproperties to the Contributing List of Historic Resources ; an d WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in th emanner required by law ; an d WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee has duly considered all evidence ,including the testimony of the applicants, interested parties, and the evaluation an drecommendations by staff, presented at said hearing . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cultural Heritage Committee o fthe City of San Luis Obispo as follows : Section 1 . Findings . Based upon all the evidence, the Cultural Heritage Committe emakes the following findings : Findings 1.The primary structures on the properties listed above are eligible for th eContributing List of Historic Resources because they meet Historic Preservatio nOrdinance Historic Significance criteria for Architectural Criteria — Style . Th eproperties contain good examples of the Craftsman Bungalow, Neoclassi c• Rowhouse, and Railroad Vernacular style homes ; these properties illustrat eintegrity; purity of style ; and, effectively contribute to the historic character of thei rsurroundings. 2 . The properties are eligible for the Contributing List of Historic Resource s B1-7 Resolution No . [] Page 2 Attachment 2 •because they meet Historic Preservation Ordinance Historic Significance criteri a for Architectural Criteria — Design . The structures exhibit notable attractivenes s with aesthetic appeal because of artistic merit, details and craftsmanship . 3 . Historic listing is exempt from environmental review (CEQA Guidelines Sectio n 15308 (Resource Protection). Section 2 . Action .The Cultural Heritage Committee does hereby recommend th e City Council add the properties located at 1331, 1327, 1325, 1326, 1336, 1338, 134 4 and 1371 Pacific Street ; 1318 Johnson Avenue ; 1303, 1311, 1339, 1361, 136 8 Higuera Street ; and 1302, 1310, 1320, 1339, 1343, 1350, 1356, 1359, 1360 Mars h Street to the Contributing List of Historic Resources . On motion by Committee Member , seconded by Committee Membe r and on the following roll call vot e AYES : NOES : REFRAIN : ABSENT : The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 29`h day of May, 2012 . Kim Murry, Deputy Directo r Community Development Department • • Attachment 2 CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTE ERESOLUTION NO . XXXX-1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTE ERECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADD THE PROPERTIES LOCATE DAT 1129, 1135, 1153, 1154, 1159, 1160, 1170, 1184 ISLAY STREET ; 1159, 1160, 116 9LEFF STREET ; 1424, 1432, 1519 TORO STREET ; 1203, 1216, 1227, 1256, 126 2BUCHON STREET ; 1203, 1208, 1211, 1218, 1221, 1241, 1253, 1263, 1267, 1335, 1337 ,1362 PISMO STREET ; AND 1318, 1405, 1436 JOHNSON AVENUE TO TH ECONTRIBUTING LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES ,CHC 48-1 1 WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee is performing an update to th eHistoric Resources Inventory as directed by the Conservation and Open Space Elemen tof the General Plan and the State Office of Historic Preservation ; an d WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee has identified that the above liste dproperties are eligible for listing on the City's Historic Resources Inventory based o nadopted criteria within the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance ; an d WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee of the City of San Luis Obisp oconducted public hearings in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street ,• San Luis Obispo, California, on, June 27, 2011, July 25, 2011, August 22, 2011 ,October 24, 2011, November 28, 2011, December 19, 2011, February 27, 2012, Marc h26, 2012 and July 23, 2012, for the purpose of considering adding the above liste dproperties to the Contributing List of Historic Resources ; an d WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in th emanner required by law ; an d WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee has duly considered all evidence ,including the testimony of the applicants, interested parties, and the evaluation an drecommendations by staff, presented at said hearing . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cultural Heritage Committee o fthe City of San Luis Obispo as follows : Section 1 . Findings . Based upon all the evidence, the Cultural Heritage Committe emakes the following findings : Findinq s 1 . The primary structures on the properties listed above are eligible for th eContributing List of Historic Resources because they meet Historic Preservatio n• Ordinance Historic Significance criteria for Architectural Criteria — Style . Th eproperties contain good examples of the Craftsman Bungalow, Neoclassi cRowhouse, and Railroad Vernacular style homes ; these properties illustrat eintegrity; purity of style ; and, effectively contribute to the historic character of thei rsurroundings. B1-9 Resolution No . [] Page 2 Attachment 2 •2.The properties are eligible for the Contributing List of Historic Resource s because they meet Historic Preservation Ordinance Historic Significance criteri a for Architectural Criteria — Design . The structures exhibit notable attractivenes s with aesthetic appeal because of artistic merit, details and craftsmanship . 3.Historic listing is exempt from environmental review (CEQA Guidelines Sectio n 15308 (Resource Protection). Section 2 . Action .The Cultural Heritage Committee does hereby recommend th e City Council add the properties located at 1129, 1135, 1153, 1154, 1159, 1160, 1170 , 1184 Islay Street ; 1159, 1160, 1169 Leff Street ; 1424, 1432, 1519 Toro Street ; 1203 , 1216, 1227, 1256, 1262 Buchon Street ; 1203, 1208, 1211, 1218, 1221, 1241, 1253 , 1263, 1267, 1335, 1337, 1362 Pismo Street ; and 1318, 1405, 1436 Johnson Avenue t o the Contributing List of Historic Resources . On motion by Committee Member , seconded by Committee Membe r and on the following roll call vot e AYES : NOES : REFRAIN : ABSENT : The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 23 'd day of July, 2012 . Kim Murry, Deputy Directo r Community Development Department B1-10 • • Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NO . (2012 SERIES ) • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING MULTIPL E PROPERTIES TO THE CONTRIBUTING LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES AS PAR T OF AN AREA WIDE UPDATE TO THE HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY, CHC 48-1 1 WHEREAS,the Cultural Heritage Committee is performing an update to the Histori c Resources Inventory as directed by the Conservation and Open Space Element of the Genera l Plan and the State Office of Historic Preservation ; and WHEREAS,the Cultural Heritage Committee has identified that the properties listed i n Exhibit A are eligible for listing on the City's Historic Resources Inventory based on adopte d Architectural criteria within the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance ; and WHEREAS,the Cultural Heritage Committee of the City of San Luis Obispo conducte d public hearings in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo , California, on, June 27, 2011, July 25, 2011, August 22, 2011, October 24, 2011, November 28 , 2011, December 19, 2011, February 27, 2012, March 26, 2012 and July 23, 2012, for the purpos e of considering adding the above listed properties to the Contributing List of Historic Resources ; and WHEREAS,the City Council conducted a public hearing on November 6, 2012 for th e purpose of considering the CHC's recommended nominations to add the properties to th e Contributing List of Historic Resources ; and • WHEREAS,notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manne r required by law ; and WHEREAS,the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimon y of the applicants, interested parties, the records of the Cultural Heritage Committee hearing, an d the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Lui s Obispo as follows : SECTION 1 .Findings .The Council makes the following findings of consistency with th e Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Historic Preservation Ordinance : Findings 1 . The primary structures on the properties listed in exhibit A are eligible for th e Contributing List of Historic Resources because they meet Historic Preservatio n Ordinance Historic Significance criteria for Architectural Criteria — Style . The propertie s contain good examples of the Craftsman Bungalow, Neoclassic Rowhouse, and Railroa d Vernacular style homes ; these properties illustrate integrity ; purity of style ; and , effectively contribute to the historic character of their surroundings . • 2 . The properties are eligible for the Contributing List of Historic Resources because the y meet Historic Preservation Ordinance Historic Significance criteria for Architectura l Criteria — Design . The structures exhibit notable attractiveness with aesthetic appea l B1-11 Attachment 3 Resolution No . [ 1 (2012 Series ) Page 2 Historic Resource Inventor y because of artistic merit, details and craftsmanship . 3 . Historic listing is exempt from environmental review (CEQA Guidelines Section 1530 8 (Resource Protection). SECTION 2 .Environmental Determination .The City Council has determined that the action are exempt from environmental review as defined by Section 15308 of the California Environmenta l Quality Act . SECTION 3 .City Council hereby designates the properties listed in Exhibit A as contributin g historic resources . Upon motion by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and on the following vote : AYES : NOES : REFRAIN : ABSENT : The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of, 2012 . Mayor Jan Marx ATTEST: Maeve Grime s City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM : J . Christine Dietric k City Attorney • • • •Historic Rerce Surve y Nomination List Exhibit A • Address APN Sub-area Listing Criteria October2012 Nomination Statu s 1129 ISLAY 003-555-025 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1135 SLAY 003-555-007 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1159 LEFF 003-556-013 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1160 LEFF 003-555-020 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1169 LEFF 003-556-017 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1519 TORO 003-546-024 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1153 SLAY 003-555-009 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1154 SLAY 003-546-018 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1159 SLAY 003-555-019 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1160 SLAY 003-546-019 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1170 SLAY 003-546-020 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1184 SLAY 003-546-034 1 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1203 BUCHON 002-452-011 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1216 BUCHON 002-451-011 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1227 BUCHON 002-452-003 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1256 BUCHON 002-451-015 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1262 BUCHON 002-451-016 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1203 PISMO 002-451-001 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1208 PISMO 002-341-003 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1211 PISMO 002-451-002 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1218 PISMO 002-341-014 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1221 PISMO 002-451-003 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1241 PISMO 002-451-005 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1253 PISMO 002-451-006 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1263 PISMO 002-451-007 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1267 PISMO & 140 5 JOHNSON 002-451-008 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1424 TORO 002-451-017 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1432 TORO 002-451-010 2 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1362 PISMO 002-343-016 3 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1335 & 1337 PISMO 002-454-004 3 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List Historic Resource Surve y Nomination List 1436 JOHNSON 002-454-008 3 Architectural Si g nific vN®ber2012 qualifies for Contributing List 1331 PACIFIC 002-343-035 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1327 PACIFIC 002-343-004 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1325 PACIFIC 002-343-003 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1326 PACIFIC 002-342-011 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1336 & 1338 PACIFIC 002-342-012 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1344 PACIFIC 002-342-025 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1371 PACIFIC 002-343-025 4 Architectural Signficance qualifies for listing (Potentially eligible fo r Master List- Bertando Rpt ) 1318 JOHNSON 002-343-026 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1339 MARSH 002-342-004 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1343 MARSH 002-342-005 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1359 MARSH 002-342-006 4 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1303 HIGUERA 002-334-020 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1311 HIGUERA 002-334-002 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1339 HIGUERA 002-334-004 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1361 HIGUERA 002-334-008 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1368 HIGUERA 002-333-013 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1302 MARSH 002-334-021 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1310 MARSH 002-334-011 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1320 MARSH 002-334-012 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1350 MARSH 002-334-015 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1356 MARSH 002-334-016 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List 1360 MARSH 002-334-017 5 Architectural Significance qualifies for Contributing List ••B .