Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-20-2014 B2 Council Compensation Committee RegulationsCity of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number FROM: Anthony Mejia, City Clerk SUBJECT: COUNCIL COMPENSATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, setting new salaries for the Mayor and Council Members,” increasing compensation to $1,500 per month for Mayor and $1,200 per month for Council Members and providing for an option to opt out of medical, dental, and vision coverage so that the individual member will receive the opt out amount equal to City department heads, effective the first full payroll period in January 2015. 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, increasing compensation for Architectural Review Commission and Planning Commission Members” from $50 to $60 per meeting, not to exceed $240 per month, effective July 1, 2014. DISCUSSION Revised Comparison Compensation Survey and Reconsideration of Recommendation A Council Agenda Report presenting the Committee’s recommendation was submitted for April 15, 2014. It was discovered that the Compensation Comparison Survey data for the City of Santa Barbara was inaccurate and reflected a biweekly salary rather than a monthly salary. At the request of the Committee, Council continued consideration of the matter to allow the Committee to reconsider its recommendations in light of the new data. A memo dated April 17, 2014 was distributed to Committee Members with a revised Salary Comparison Survey, timetable of Council meetings, and information related to Area Median Income (Attachment 1). The Committee met on April 21, 2014 with all members present, except Marcia Nelson. The Committee discussed the revised salary data for the City of Santa Barbara and the concepts of tying compensation to a percentage of Area Median Income (AMI) or Consumer Price Index (CPI), but it was agreed that the new salary data has no impact on their recommendation and that compensation should not be tied to an index. Background The City of San Luis Obispo's Charter (Section 410) requires that a Council Compensation Committee be formed during even numbered years to review the Mayor's and Council Members' compensation. Recommended adjustments would then become effective the following January for the next two-year period. Additionally, in 2001 Council adopted Resolution No. 9189, directing a review of compensation for Architectural Review Commissioners and Planning Commissioners in conjunction with its periodic review of Council compensation, as set forth in the Council Policies and Procedures. 05/20/2014 B2 - 1 2014 Council Compensation Committee Recommendations Page 2 On November 5, 2013, Council appointed the following five members to the Council Compensation Committee: former elected official John Ewan, Personnel Board representative Marcia Nelson, and citizens-at-large Amy Kardel, Gordon Mullin, and Ken Tasseff. The 2006 Council Compensation Committee recommended the monthly compensation for the Mayor and Council Members be increased by $100 per month. No further changes were recommended at that time. Council concurred and approved the increase effective January 1, 2007, setting the Mayor’s salary at $1,200 per month and the Council Members’ at $1,000 per month. Prior to the 2007 increase, Council’s compensation had not been increased since 2000. The 2008 Council Compensation Committee concurred that it is important that small incremental increases should be made during each two-year review. Members, therefore, recommend a 3% increase per year based on the approximate 3% Consumer Price Index (CPI) over recent years, for a total increase of 6%. This equaled a $60 monthly increase for each Council Member and $72 monthly increase for the Mayor, effective January 1, 2009. On September 30, 2008, Council considered short-term actions to rebalance the Fiscal Year 2008-09 Budget and determined to rescind the Council’s prior action to increase its salary. In 2010 and 2012 Council determined to defer the entire process for appointing a Council Compensation Committee. Committee Meetings and Review This committee met on November 21, December 16, February 24, March 17, and April 21, 2014 and said meeting minutes are Attachment 1. Members reviewed the full Council compensation package including salary, benefits, expense reimbursement, professional development allowances and other compensation provided. In addition, the Committee compared the Council's compensation package with that of Mayors and Council Members in nine other cities (Charter and General Law). As part of the review, the Committee also examined survey results of what the same cities are paying their Planning Commission and Architectural (or Design) Review Committees, if applicable. In addition, the Committee developed and considered a questionnaire for past members of City Council, Architectural Review Commission, and Planning Commission (Attachment 2). Planning Commissioners and Architectural Review Commissioners The compensation for Architectural Review Commissioners and Planning Commissioners was increased in 2001 from $25 to $50 per meeting, with a maximum not to exceed $200 per month. The surveys conducted in 2004, 2006, and 2008 indicated that the stipends paid by the City had remained competitive and the Council Compensation Committee did not recommend an increase at that time. The 2014 Council Compensation Committee has recommended that Architectural Review Commission and Planning Commission compensation be increased from $50 to $60, not to exceed $240 per month, in recognition of the time commitment and dedication required to serve on said committees. B2 - 2 2014 Council Compensation Committee Recommendations Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT The monthly salaries of the Mayor and Council Members would be increased from $1,200 to $1,500 and $1,000 to $1,200 per month, respectively. This increase to salaries will increase the Council’s annual budget for Fiscal Year 2014-15 by $6,600 and $13,200 annually thereafter. The opt out option for medical, dental, and vision would result in a net saving, as opt out compensation is lower than cafeteria plan contributions. The compensation package for expenses and professional development would remain unchanged. The increase to compensation for the Architectural Review Commission and Planning Commission from $50 to $60 per meeting, not to exceed $240 per month, would result in an increase not to exceed $3,360 annually. The 2014-15 Financial Plan Supplement and subsequent budgets will reflect these changes. ATTACHMENTS 1. Memorandum dated April 17, 2014 2. Minutes of the Council Compensation Committee 3. Compensation Questionnaire 4. Resolution related to Mayor and Council Salaries 5. Resolution related to Architectural Review and Planning Commission Compensation t:\council agenda reports\2014\2014-05-20\council compensation committee recommendation (mejia)\council compensation committee - car.docx B2 - 3 City of San Luis Obispo, City Administration, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3249, 805.781.7114, slocity.org DATE: April 17, 2014 TO: Council Compensation Committee FROM: Anthony Mejia, City Clerk SUBJECT: Revised Compensation Comparison Survey and Timetable for Council Meetings In response to a Council inquiry, staff discovered the salary data contained in the Council Compensation Comparison Survey for the City of Santa Barbara reflects a bi-monthly amount, unlike all of the other comparison cities which reflected a monthly amount. The previous survey stated that the Mayor’s monthly salary is $1,912 and Council’s monthly salary is $1,551. The correct amount for the City of Santa Barbara’s Mayor is $4,142 and Council is $3,313. In addition, Santa Barbara has a unique Charter provision which ties the Mayor and Council compensation to $100 and 80%, respectively, of the Area Median Income (AMI) for a one-person household which automatically adjust annually on April 1. This provision was adopted by voters in November 2004. We have contacted all of the comparison cities and confirmed that no other cities utilize AMI to calculate Mayor or Council salaries. We also issued a City Clerk listserv inquiry as to whether any cities, other than Santa Barbara, use AMI and no affirmative response was received. The median household income in the City of San Luis Obispo is $53,900. In response to another Council inquiry, staff prepared the attached spreadsheet which lists the number of and duration of Council meetings held in Fiscal Year 2012-13 and 2013-14. Meeting times were rounded to the nearest quarter hour. Attachment 1 – Revised Compensation Comparison Survey Attachment 2 – Council Meeting Timetable Attachment 1 B2 - 4 Co m p a r i s o n  Ci t y  De m o g r a p h i c s  an d  Mi s c .  In f o r m a t i o n Compensation for other *T h e  ci t i e s  be l o w  we r e  us e d  in  th e  20 0 7  Be n c h m a r k  Co m p e n s a t i o n  St u d y Commissions or Advisory Bodies CI T Y GE N E R A L /   CH A R T E R   LA W  CI T Y PO P U L A T I O N   (C e n s u s  20 1 2   Es t ) ME D I A N   HO U S E H O L D   IN C O M E   (C e n s u s  20 0 8 ‐ 12 ) YE A R  20 1 3   ME D I A N   HO M E  SA L E S   PR I C E   (D a t a  Qu i c k ) AN N U A L  CI T Y   BU D G E T  (A l l  Ci t y   Fu n d s ) MA Y O R  ‐   EL E C T E D   OR   RO T A T E D TI M E S  PE R   MO N T H   CI T Y   CO U N C I L   ME E T S HO U R S  PE R   WE E K  CI T Y   CO U N C I L   WO R K S PA Y  FO R  PL A N N I N G   CO M M I S S I O N PAY FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMMITTEEPAY FOR OTHER ADVISORY BODIES Ch i c o Ch a r t e r                      87 , 7 1 4   $4 1 , 6 3 2 $ 2 5 4 , 5 0 0 $ 1 0 5 , 4 3 5 , 1 6 9 E l e c t e d 2 V a r i e s $ 3 0 / m t g . N o N o Da v i s   Ge n e r a l                          65 , 9 9 3   $6 1 , 1 8 2 $ 4 5 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 8 , 2 3 3 , 2 8 2 R o t a t e d 2  to  41 5 ‐20   No NoNo Mo n t e r e y   Ch a r t e r                      29 , 0 0 3   $6 2 , 7 2 0 $ 5 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 5 , 4 2 3 , 1 6 9 E l e c t e d 4 2 0 $2 5 / m t g . ,   $7 5 / m o .  ma x $25/mtg., $75/mo. max$25/mtg., $75/mo. max Na p a   Ch a r t e r                      78 , 3 4 0   $6 2 , 6 4 2 $ 4 2 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 8 1 , 7 3 4 , 0 0 0 E l e c t e d 2 V a r i e s N o NoHousing Authority: $50/mtg. Pa s o  Ro b l e s   Ge n e r a l                      30 , 5 5 6   $5 7 , 9 2 7 $ 3 5 8 , 0 0 0 $ 5 3 , 5 5 1 , 5 0 0 E l e c t e d 2 + V a r i e s N o NoNo Sa n t a  Ba r b a r a Ch a r t e r                      89 , 6 3 9   $6 3 , 4 0 1 $ 8 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 6 8 , 3 9 1 , 3 2 1 E l e c t e d 4 Va r i e s  ‐   es t .  10 ‐15   no t   in c l u d i n g   co u n c i l   me e t i n g s $5 0 / m t g . Full mtg.: $50; Consent mtg.: $25Historic Landmarks Commission ‐ $50 per mtg, $25 for Consent Calendar mtg.; Housing Authority Commission ‐ $50 per mtg.Metropolitan Transit District Board ‐ $60 per mtg, not to exceed $180 in any calendar month; Mosquito & Vector Management District – trustees receive $100 per mtg. attended.  Trustees are reimbursed for any District business related expenses.Single Family Design Board ‐ $50 for each board mtg., $25 for Consent Calendar mtg. Sa n t a  Cr u z Ch a r t e r                      62 , 0 4 1   $6 3 , 1 1 0 $6 1 0 , 0 0 0 $1 9 3 , 2 0 4 , 0 0 6 Ro t a t e d 2  to  3 M 20 ‐30 C 5‐20 No NoNo Sa n t a  Ma r i a   Ch a r t e r                  10 1 , 4 5 9   $5 1 , 6 6 4 $ 2 6 3 , 5 0 0 $ 1 7 5 , 1 7 9 , 3 5 0 E l e c t e d 2 V a r i e s $7 5 / m t g . ,   $4 5 0 / m o .  maxNoRec. and Parks: $75/mtg., $75/mo. Max Ve n t u r a Ch a r t e r                  10 7 , 7 3 4   $6 6 , 2 2 6 $ 4 1 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 2 2 , 3 9 2 , 4 4 3 R o t a t e d 2 V a r i e s N o NoNo AV E R A G E N / A                      72 , 4 9 8   $5 8 , 9 4 5 $ 4 6 3 , 7 2 2 $ 1 7 2 , 6 1 6 , 0 2 7 N / A 3 2 0 $4 5 $38$58 ME D I A N N / A                      78 , 3 4 0   $6 2 , 6 4 2 $ 4 2 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 8 1 , 7 3 4 , 0 0 0 N / A 2 2 0 $4 0 $38$50 Sa n  Lu i s  Ob i s p o C h a r t e r                      45 , 8 7 8   $4 2 , 5 2 8 $ 5 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 8 2 , 4 6 2 , 8 0 0 E l e c t e d 2 + V a r i e s $5 0 / m t g .   $2 0 0 / m o .  ma x $50/mtg. $200/ mo. maxNo PAGE 1 Co u n c i l  Co m p e n s a t i o n  Su r v e y  20 1 4 :  Ma y o r  an d  Ci t y  Co u n c i l  Co m p e n s a t i o n  and BenefitsAttachment 1 B2 - 5 CI T Y   GE N E R A L /   CH A R T E R   LA W  CI T Y MA Y O R   SA L A R Y /   MO N T H CI T Y  CO U N C I L   SA L A R Y /  MO N T H CA F E T E R I A   CO N T R I B U T I O N /   MO N T H   CA F E T E R I A  PL A N   OP T  OU T RE T I R E M E N T  FO R M U L A E P M C  %  LI F E   IN S U R A N C E AM O U N T  RE I M B U R S E D   FO R  CI T Y  BU S I N E S S  / YEARMILEAGE ALLOWANCE (Current IRS = $0.56 per mile)OTHER ALLOWANCESDATE CITY COUNCIL COMPENSATION UPDATED Ch i c o   Ch a r t e r $ 7 2 0 $ 6 0 0 ra t e s  va r y  on  th e   pl a n  se l e c t e d .    $0 N/ A N/ A N / A N/ A N/ACell phone $75 per month2007 Da v i s   Ge n e r a l    $1 , 1 3 8 $ 1 , 1 3 8 u p  to  $1 8 7 8 . 5 If  op t  ou t ,  Ci t y  wi l l   pa y  $5 0 0  to w a r d s  a  De f e r r e d  Co m p  Pl a n   of  ch o i c e 1s t  Ti e r :  2. 5 %  @ 55 PE P R A :    2%  @ 62 0% $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 N/ A N/ACell phone $65 per month9/2013 & 6/2014 Mo n t e r e y   Ch a r t e r $6 7 6 $4 3 0 $6 5 0 ‐$1 6 1 6 up  to  $6 5 0 1s t  Ti e r :  2. 7 %  @ 55 PE P R A :  2%  @ 62 *i f  el e c t  to  par t i c i pat e 8% $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 R e a s o n a b l e  ex p e n s e s 5 6  cents per mileNo7/1/2013 Na p a   Ch a r t e r $ 2 , 4 8 0 $ 1 , 2 4 0 Me d i c a l  & De n t a l : Em p  On l y :  $6 2 8 . 1 5 Em p  +1 :  $1 2 4 2 . 2 6 Fa m i l y :  $1 6 6 9 . 4 0 $5 0 0  ‐   wi t h  pr o o f  of   co v e r a g e 1s t  Ti e r :  2. 7 %  @ 55 2n d  Ti e r :  2% @ 6 0  (a f t e r   12 / 2 0 / 1 2 ) PE P R A :  2%  @ 62   8% $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 M ‐   $6 , 6 0 0 C ‐   $5 , 4 0 0 56 cents per mileDefered comp: $300 per month; Car: $475 per monthDec. 2012 Pa s o   Ro b l e s   Ge n e r a l $8 0 0 $6 0 0 Em p  on l y :  $7 2 1 . 8 7 Em p  +1 :  $1 4 9 5 . 5 8 Fa m i l y: $2 0 7 6 . 6 0 $0 N/ A N/ A N / A N/ A 56 cents per milesN/A2007 Sa n t a   Ba r b a r a   Ch a r t e r $ 4 , 1 4 2 $ 3 , 3 1 3 $0 $0 1s t  Ti e r :    2. 7 %  @ 55 PE P R A :  2%  @ 62 1s t  Ti e r :   0. 1 7 1 % ;   PE P R A :  0% $5 0 , 0 0 0 N/ A Mayor: $875/month; Council member: $605/monthN/AAnnually on April 1st (last time 4/1/13) Sa n t a                        Cr u z    Ch a r t e r $ 3 , 1 0 3 $ 1 , 5 5 1 Em p  On l y :  $7 5 2 . 9 3 Em p  +1 :  $1 5 0 5 . 8 6 Fa m i l y :  $1 9 5 7 . 6 2 $0 1s t  Ti e r :  2%  @ 55 PE P R A :  2%  @ 62 0% $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 M ‐   $1 , 2 7 5 C ‐   $5 1 0 Vehicle allowance: $350/mo.N/A2009 Sa n t a                        Ma r i a   Ch a r t e r $1 , 3 0 0 $1 , 0 5 0 Em p  On l y :  $6 6 4 . 2 6 Em p  +1 :  $1 0 7 7 . 0 9   Fa m i l y :  $1 2 6 3 . 4 5 $5 1 8 1s t  Ti e r :    2. 7 %  @ 55 2n d  Ti e r :  2% @ 5 5  (a f t e r   7/ 1 / 1 1  ) PE P R A :  2%  @ 62 0% $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 R e a s o n a b l e  ex p e n s e s Mayor: $476/month; Council $280/per monthInternet: $50/month; Cell: $50/month2008 Ve n t u r a   Ch a r t e r $ 7 0 0 $6 0 0 ma y  pa r t i c i p a t e  at   ow n  ex p e n s e $0 1s t  Ti e r :  2% @ 5 5 PE P R A  2% @ 6 2 .    *S o m e  pa y  in t o  So c i a l   Se c u r i t y in s t e a d  of  PE R S 0% N / A M ‐   $3 , 6 0 0 C ‐   $2 , 4 0 0 $100/month upon request, the City will loan a cell phone, laptop and printer for official city business2012 AV E R A G E N/ A $1 , 6 7 3 $ 1 , 1 6 9 $ 1 , 7 4 3 . 6 0  fa m i l y  $5 4 2  (i f  gi v e n )   1s t  Ti e r :  2. 5 % @ 5 5 2 % $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 M‐  $3 , 8 2 5 C‐  $1 , 1 9 0   M‐ $1,701 C‐ $1,235$1692010 ME D I A N N/ A $1 , 1 3 8 $ 1 , 0 5 0 $ 1 , 7 7 3 . 9 5  fa m i l y  $5 0 9  (i f  gi v e n )   1s t  Ti e r  2. 7 % @ 5 5 0 % $ 5 7 , 5 0 0 M‐  $3 7 1 3 C‐  $9 2 5   M‐ $476 C‐ $350$702012 Sa n  Lu i s   Ob i s p o   Ch a r t e r $ 1 , 2 0 0 $1 , 0 0 0 *C o u n c i l  ca n  op t  ou t   to  le s s e n  th e i r   co m pen s a t i o n Pa y s  fo r  th e  pr i c e   of  th e  pl a n  el e c t e d $0 1s t  Ti e r :    2. 7 %  @ 55 2n d  Ti e r :  2%  @6 0   (a f t e r  12 / 6 / 1 2 ) 3r d / PE P R A  Ti e r :  2%  @ 62 0% $ 1 0 4 , 0 0 0 M ‐   $3 , 2 0 0 C ‐   $2 , 9 0 0 M ‐ $150/mo.C ‐ $100/mo.$50/month home internet and data plan.  City cell phone provided2012 PAGE 2 Co u n c i l  Co m p e n s a t i o n  Su r v e y  20 1 4 :  Ma y o r  an d  Ci t y  Co u n c i l  Co m p e n s a t i o n  an d  Be n e f i t s Attachment 1 B2 - 6 Meeting DateStart TimeEnd TimeHours 07/10/125:00 PM11:15 PM6:15 07/17/126:00 PM10:45 PM4:45 08/07/123:00 PM12:10 AM9:10 09/04/124:30 PM8:45 PM4:15 09/18/124:00 PM9:00 PM5:00 09/24/123:00 PM4:30 PM1:30 09/25/124:30 PM11:45 PM7:15 10/02/126:00 PM10:00 PM4:00 10/16/124:00 PM10:45 PM6:45 11/07/126:00 PM9:45 PM3:45 11/13/126:00 PM7:45 PM1:45 11/20/126:00 PM10:30 PM4:30 12/03/123:00 PM3:30 PM0:30 12/04/126:00 PM9:00 PM3:00 12/10/124:00 PM4:45 PM0:45 12/18/125:30 PM10:45 PM5:15 01/08/136:00 PM9:00 PM3:00 01/12/139:30 AM1:15 PM3:45 01/22/135:00 PM8:15 PM3:15 01/26/139:30 AM 4:30 PM7:00 02/05/136:00 PM9:45 PM3:45 02/19/134:00 PM9:45 PM5:45 02/20/139:00 AM9:18 AM0:18 03/05/135:30 PM10:00 PM4:30 03/19/135:30 PM11:15 PM5:45 04/02/136:00 PM8:15 PM2:15 04/09/136:00 PM11:00 PM5:00 04/16/135:00 PM8:45 PM3:45 05/07/136:00 PM8:30 PM2:30 05/21/136:00 PM10:00 PM4:00 06/10/135:00 PM9:45 PM4:45 06/11/135:00 PM10:30 PM5:30 06/12/135:00 PM10:15 PM5:15 06/17/136:00 PM10:15 PM4:15 07/02/134:30 PM10:15 PM5:45 07/16/135:30 PM8:45 PM3:15 08/20/135:00 PM10:30 PM5:30 09/03/135:00 PM9:30 PM4:30 09/17/135:00 PM9:30 PM4:30 10/01/146:00 PM10:30 PM 4:30 10/15/135:30 PM12:45 AM7:15 11/05/136:00 PM8:30 PM2:30 11/12/136:00 PM9:45 PM3:45 11/19/134:30 PM9:45 PM5:15 12/03/136:00 PM9:15 PM3:15 12/10/136:00 PM8:00 PM2:00 01/07/144:30 PM10:00 PM5:30 01/14/145:00 PM11:05 PM6:05 01/21/144:00 PM9:45 PM5:45 02/04/145:00 PM10:45 PM5:45 02/18/144:00 PM10:30 PM6:30 02/25/143:00 PM6:15 PM3:15 03/04/145:00 PM12:00 AM7:00 03/10/149:00 AM10:30 AM1:30 03/18/143:30 PM9:15 PM5:45 03/25/146:00 PM8:24 PM2:24 Average Meeting Time ‐>4:17 Total Number of Meetings for FY 2012/1334 Total Number of Meetings for Partial FY 2013/14 22 COUNCIL MEETINGS Attachment 1 B2 - 7 Attachment 2 B2 - 8 Attachment 2 B2 - 9 Attachment 2 B2 - 10 Attachment 2 B2 - 11 Attachment 2 B2 - 12 Attachment 2 B2 - 13 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MINUTES Monday, March 17, 2014 4:30 PM Human Resource Conference Room 2nd Floor, 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Council Compensation Committee was called to order on Monday, March 17, 2014 at 4:30 p.m. in the Human Resource Conference Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Ewan. ROLL CALL Committee Members Present: John Ewan, Amy Kardel, Gordon Mullin, Marcia Nelson, and Ken Tasseff Committee Member Absent: None Staff Present: Nickole Sutter, Human Resource Analyst, Anthony Mejia, City Clerk, and Heather Goodwin, Deputy City Clerk PUBLIC COMMENT There were no members of the public desiring to speak. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER KARDEL, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER MULLIN CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Council Compensation Committee Minutes of February 24, 2014. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS The Committee evaluated and discussed the City Council, Planning Commission and Architectural Review Commission’s compensation and benefits data from the Council Compensation Survey 2014: Mayor and City Council Compensation and Benefits survey. Attachment 2 B2 - 14 Council Compensation Committee Minutes – March 17, 2014 Page 2 Council Compensation Committee discussion ensued relative to: 1) whether Council should be compensated equivalent to a Full-Time Employee (FTE) position; 2) whether increased compensation would provide greater opportunity for the ‘average’ citizen to participate on the Council; 3) whether providing an opt out option for medical coverage would create more equitability among members; and 4) whether there is a correlation between increasing compensation and achieving compensation philosophy objectives (e.g. does increasing compensation result in better outcomes for the community). Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER NELSON, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER KARDEL, CARRIED 4-1, (COMMITTEE MEMBER MULLIN VOTING NO), to increase the monthly salary for Mayor to $1500 per month and Council to $1200 per month. MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER NELSON, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER KARDEL, CARRIED 5-0, to provide an option to opt out of medical, dental, and vision coverage so that the individual member will receive the opt out amount equal to City department heads. Architectural Review Commission and Planning Commission Committee discussion ensued relative to: 1) whether commission compensation should be increased due to median compensation being comparable to other cities; 2) whether commissioners should be compensated for serving on other advisory committees such as the Land Use and Circulation Element Task Force and Tree Committee; and 3) whether increasing commission compensation would incentivize the calling of special meetings. MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER KARDEL, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER MULLIN, CARRIED 5-0, to increase the compensation for the Planning Commission to $60 per meeting with a maximum of $240 per month. MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER KARDEL, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER NELSON, CARRIED 5-0, to increase the compensation for the Architectural Review Commission to $60 per meeting with a maximum of $240 per month. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:58 p.m. Heather Goodwin Deputy City Clerk Attachment 2 B2 - 15 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MINUTES Monday, April 21, 2014 Human Resource Conference Room 2nd Floor, 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Council Compensation Committee was called to order on Monday, April 21, 2014 at 4:15 p.m. in the Human Resource Conference Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Ewan. ROLL CALL Committee Members Present: John Ewan, Amy Kardel, Gordon Mullin, and Ken Tasseff Committee Member Absent: Marcia Nelson Staff Present: Nickole Sutter, Human Resource Analyst, Anthony Mejia, City Clerk, and Heather Goodwin, Deputy City Clerk PUBLIC COMMENT There were no members of the public desiring to speak. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS The Committee received a memorandum from City Clerk Mejia, dated April 17, 2014, concerning revised Mayor and Council salary data for the City of Santa Barbara, timetable of Council meetings, and Area Median Income. During the course of discussion, it was agreed that Council compensation should not be tied to economic indexes such as Area Median Income or Consumer Price Index, pointing out that formulaic increases are not a best practice for compensation setting whether for Council or labor organizations. The Committee considered the revised salary data for the City of Santa Barbara and concurred with its original recommendation. B2 - 16 Council Compensation Committee Minutes – April 21, 2014 Page 2 MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER TASSEFF, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER KARDEL CARRIED 3-1 (COMMITTEE MEMBER MULLIN VOTING NO), to resubmit to Council the same recommendation that was approved at the March 17, 2014 Council Compensation meeting in its entirety. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 4:26 p.m. Heather Goodwin Deputy City Clerk B2 - 17 Attachment 3 B2 - 18 Attachment 3 B2 - 19 Attachment 3 B2 - 20 Attachment 3 B2 - 21 Attachment 3 B2 - 22 Attachment 3 B2 - 23 Attachment 3 B2 - 24 Attachment 3 B2 - 25 Attachment 3 B2 - 26 Attachment 3 B2 - 27 Attachment 3 B2 - 28 Attachment 3 B2 - 29 Attachment 3 B2 - 30 Attachment 3 B2 - 31 Attachment 3 B2 - 32 Attachment 3 B2 - 33 Attachment 3 B2 - 34 Attachment 3 B2 - 35 Attachment 3 B2 - 36 Attachment 3 B2 - 37 Attachment 3 B2 - 38 Attachment 3 B2 - 39 RESOLUTION NO. (2014 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, SETTING NEW SALARIES FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS WHEREAS, Charter Section 410 provides for compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the Mayor and Council Members and establishes a procedure for a biennial review by a five-member Council Compensation Committee; and WHEREAS, a five-member Council Compensation Committee was appointed and has met and reviewed Mayor and Council Member compensation in accordance with the procedure provided by the Charter; and WHEREAS, the Council Compensation Committee has determined that the present criteria for compensation remain valid. However, an adjustment is now appropriate particularly in light of the significant demands associated with the official duties of the Mayor and Council Members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: Section 1, Chapter 2.1 of the Council Policies and Procedures shall be amended to read as follows: Effective the first full payroll period in January 2015, compensation for services rendered in an official capacity shall be provided as follows: Mayor and Members of the City Council shall receive a monthly salary of $1,500 per month for the Mayor and $1,200 per month for the Council Members. Section 2, Chapter 2.2 of the Council Policies and Procedures shall be amended to read as follows: The Mayor and Council Members shall be entitled to City-funded participation in P.E.R.S. retirement. The City shall contribute an amount equivalent to that received by City department heads monthly towards the Mayor and Council Members participation in PEMCHA, dental, vision and life insurance. Any unexpended amount shall not be distributed to the Mayor and Council Members in cash. If the Mayor and Council Members elect to opt out of medical, dental, and vision that individual member will receive the opt out amount equal to City department heads. On motion of , seconded by , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: B2 - 40 Resolution No. (2014 Series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 2014. Mayor Jan Marx ATTEST: Anthony J. Mejia, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney B2 - 41 RESOLUTION NO. (2014 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING COMPENSATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS WHEREAS, Council Policies and Procedures Section 2.6 establishes a procedure for the biennial review of Mayor and City Council, Architectural Review Commission, and Planning Commission members compensation by a five-member Council Compensation Committee; and WHEREAS, a five-member Council Compensation Committee was appointed and has met and reviewed Mayor and City Council, Architectural Review Commission, and Planning Commission members compensation in accordance with the procedure provided by the Council Policies and Procedures; and WHEREAS, compensation for Architectural Review Commission and Planning Commission members has not changed since June 5, 2001 (Resolution No. 9189); and WHEREAS, the Council Compensation Committee has determined that the present criteria for compensation remain valid. However, an adjustment is now appropriate for the Architectural Review Commission and Planning Commission members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: Section 1. Effective July 1, 2014, compensation for Architectural Review Commission and Planning Commission members is hereby increased from $50.00 to $60.00 per meeting, not to exceed $240.00 monthly. On motion of , seconded by , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: B2 - 42 Resolution No. (2014 Series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 2014. Mayor Jan Marx ATTEST: Anthony J. Mejia, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney B2 - 43 Page intentionally left blank. B2 - 44