Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4e - CalPERS Actuarial Analysis Presentation - Advance DistributionCity of San Luis Obispo, Council Memorandum City of San Luis Obispo Council Agenda Correspondence DATE: May 5, 2023 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Emily Jackson, Finance Director VIA: Derek Johnson, City Manager SUBJECT: ITEM 4E – PRESENTATION OF CALPERS ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS RELATED TO ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENTS As noted in the 2023-25 Strategic Budget Direction presentation on April 18, 2023, staff engaged with Foster & Foster, an independent national actuarial consulting firm to perform a review of the City’s progress in paying down unfunded pension liabilities. This memo provides a background and summary of actions taken by the City since 2017 to pay down the unfunded pension liabilities and transmits the actuarial analysis prepared by Foster & Foster. The presentation on May 16, 2023, will be made by Foster & Foster staff and will provide an opportunity for the Council to ask questions of the consultant. Background In 2017, CalPERS made some significant policy changes to address unfunded liabilities systemwide. These policy changes significantly increased required pension contributions for member agencies. As a result, the City had to reduce ongoing expenditures by $8.9 million (across all funds) in order to address and increase its pension contributions in line with new CalPERS requirements. To provide a framework to respond to the long-term fiscal impacts of the significant increases in required pension contributions to the CalPERS retirement system, the City Council adopted a Fiscal Health Response Plan (FHRP), containing three key components, which began implementation with adoption of the FY 2018-19 Financial Plan Supplement and continued through FY 2020-21. The three components of the FHRP included: 1.New Revenues. In November 2018, voters approved a Cannabis tax, allowing the industry to legally operate within the boundaries of the City. This afford ed the City a new income source through a special business tax on all Cannabis related businesses. In addition to a Cannabis tax on sales of the product, the City also ensured compliance with existing City regulations and taxes and pursu ed enforcement as applicable including the then-emerging industry of homestay businesses. The following highlights new revenues under the FHRP: a.Code Enforcement b.Transient Occupancy Compliance of Homestay businesses c. Business license and tax compliance d.Cannabis license and business tax Page 13 of 1165 ITEM 4E – CalPERS Actuarial Analysis Related to Additional Discretionary Payments Page 2 2.Operating Reductions and New Ways of Doing Business. All City funds (general and enterprise) participated in this component to varying degrees. The plan contained a list of operating reduction options to be pursued along with new ways of doing business. These new ways of doing business focused on energy efficiency and included thoughtful reorganizations to enable the City to deliver services differently while minimizing impacts to residents and other customers. Thoughtful reorganizations were facilitated by the City’s Organization of the Future with Phase One focused on the community services group, beginning with the 2019-21 Financial Plan. The concepts were generally as follows: 3.Employee Concessions – All City Employees and All Funds. Over the three years of the FHRP, the City negotiated in good faith with its represented and unrepresented bargaining groups to achieve approximately $1.9M of ongoing employee concessions. The employee concessions aimed at a recipe of increasing the employee contribution to CalPERS (“retirement cost-sharing”) by three (3%) percent of pay and offsetting that employee burden by providing a 4% cost-of-living adjustment over a two-year period and continuing the annual City health insurance cost-sharing contribution. Ultimately, the City was able to successfully negotiate retirement cost-sharing with all groups except the San Luis Obispo City Employees Association. In addressing unfunded pension liability as it related to employee concessions, the Council adopted policies such as the Fiscal Sustainability Policy, Compensation Philosophy, and Labor Relations Objectives to provide guidance and address and implement the concept of “shared responsibility.” This concept acknowledges the responsibility of the City, and its employees, to share the burden of pension and health costs, including addressing unfunded liabilities, while recognizing that increasing the employee share of this cost may impact the City’s ability to attract and retain well-qualified employees that ultimately deliver programs and services to the community. With that in mind, employee concessions were proposed as a significant component of the FHRP. Page 14 of 1165 ITEM 4E – CalPERS Actuarial Analysis Related to Additional Discretionary Payments Page 3 To date, implementation of the concessions has resulted in employees from all bargaining groups, except members of the San Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association, paying an additional three (3%) percent of retirement cost sharing ongoing. The table below highlights the percentage of retirement cost sharing each represented and unrepresented bargaining groups has agreed to: Table 1: Retirement Cost Sharing Percentage by Bargaining Group 1 City Bargaining Group Total Retirement Cost Sharing Percentage 2 Fire Union, Local 3523 3% 3 Police Officers’ Association 6% 4 Police Staff Officers’ Association 3% 5 San Luis Obispo City Employees’ Association 0% 6 Unrepresented Confidentials 3% 7 Unrepresented Management 3% In addition, the implementation of tiered pension plans has reduced the City’s contributions to CalPERS compared to what they would have been. The City has three established retirement tiers: Classic 1: Employees hired with the City before December 2012, and provides the most generous defined benefit plan. Classic 2: Employees hired with the City with prior CalPERS experience on or after December 6, 2012, for miscellaneous and police safety or on or after August 30, 2012, for fire safety. Employees in this plan have a lesser defined benefit when compared to Classic 1 employees, but greater than PEPRA employees. PEPRA: The California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) was approved and took effect on January 1, 2013, which provides uniformity in pension benefits for all member agencies. PEPRA limits the retirement benefits offered to new CalPERS members hired after January 2013 and requires that employees pay 50% of the total normal cost of retirement. Over the last decade, most Classic 1 employees have retired from the City and the majority of employees hired since are in the PEPRA tier. Table 2 outlines the count and percentage of employees in each retirement tier and benefits formula (miscellaneous “misc.”, police safety, and fire safety). Only a quarter of employees makeup the Classic 1 tier, and 64% of the workforce are in the PEPRA tier. This demographic shift has helped the City contain pension costs. Page 15 of 1165 ITEM 4E – CalPERS Actuarial Analysis Related to Additional Discretionary Payments Page 4 Table 2: Count and Percentage of City Employees at Each CalPERS Retirement Tier and Benefit Formula 1 Employee Retirement Tier & Benefit Formula Total Count Percentage 2 Classic 1 Total 117 26% 3 Retirement Fire Safety Classic 1 (3% @ 50) 17 4% 4 Retirement Misc. Classic 1 (2.7% @ 55) 80 18% 5 Retirement Police Safety Classic 1 (3% @ 50) 20 4% 6 Classic 2 Total 44 10% 7 Retirement Fire Safety Classic 2 (3% @ 55) 11 2% 8 Retirement Misc. Classic 2 (2% @ 60) 25 6% 9 Retirement Police Safety Classic 2 (2% @ 50) 8 2% 10 PEPRA Total 292 64% 11 Retirement Fire Safety PEPRA (2.7% @ 57) 21 5% 12 Retirement Misc. PEPRA (2% @ 62) 247 55% 13 Retirement Police Safety PEPRA (2.7% @ 57) 24 5% 14 Grand Total 453 100% Implementation of the components noted above have contributed to the City’s ability to address increased CalPERS contributions and make a total of $16.6 million in additional discretionary payments in order to paydown its pension liability. Current Status Based on the Foster & Foster actuarial report (Attachment A), the City’s commitment to paying down its pension debt by making additional discretionary payments (ADPs) has helped to make progress on improving the plan’s overall funded status. Unfortuna tely, the 2022 investment losses experienced by CalPERS have significantly impacted the City’s funded status (as well as that of other PERS agencies throughout California). Table 3 shows the funded status of the City’s pension plans each year back to 2015 and compares it to what had been projected in 2017, and what it would look like without the additional discretionary payments. Page 16 of 1165 ITEM 4E – CalPERS Actuarial Analysis Related to Additional Discretionary Payments Page 5 As shown in Table 3, the ADPs that the City has made have helped to make progress in paying down the unfunded pension liabilities. As of 2021, the funded status of the City’s pension had reached 70.1%, a significant improvement compared to 64.4% in 2015. Absent the ADPs, the funded status in 2021 would have been 68.5%. Unfortunately, the CalPERS -7.5% investment return in FY 2021-22 significantly impacted the City’s funded status (as well as that of other PERS agencies). Based on these losses, the estimated funded status for 2022 is 64.3%. Absent the ADPs, the -7.5% return would have decreased the City’s funded status to 60.4%. Despite the ADPs and factoring in the -7.5% CalPERS investment return, the City’s current UFL is approximately $180 million. This UFL is addressed through ongoing regular payments to CalPERS and paydown is expedited by the City’s ability t o make ADPs. Actuarial Analysis Feedback provided by the City’s independent Actuary is that the City is taking appropriate action to make progress in paying down the unfunded pension liabilities, but that market conditions impacting CalPERS investments hinder progress. The impact of the -7.5% investment return in FY 2021-22 provides a good reminder that the City’s ability to address unfunded liabilities is heavily impacted by factors outside of the City’s control. 64.4%60.6%62.6%61.5%62.2%61.7% 70.1% 64.3% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 (ESTIMATED) Table 3: Historical Funded Status -City of San Luis Obispo CalPERS Pension Plans Projected Funded Status From 2017 Study based on 6/30/15 Actuarial Valuation From Current study based on 6/30/21 Actuarial Valuation From Current study based on 6/30/21 Actuarial Valuation - WITHOUT ADPs (Extra Payments to CalPERS) Page 17 of 1165 ITEM 4E – CalPERS Actuarial Analysis Related to Additional Discretionary Payments Page 6 The full actuarial analysis provided by Foster & Foster is included as Attachment A to this report and contains a lot of information. The key pieces of the report relate to the City’s funded level, the amount of unfunded liabilities, and expected future contributions. The following slides include information related to these items: Slides 18 and 48 show the unfunded liability for the miscellaneous plan (slide 18) and safety plan (slide 48) and show the impact that the -7.5% CalPERS investment return on the amount of unfunded liability. Slides 22 and 51 compare the historical actuarial accrued liability (AAL) fo r the miscellaneous plan (slide 22) and safety plan (slide 51) versus the market asset value. Slides 28 and 58 show the impact of the -7.5% investment return on future contributions for the miscellaneous plan (slide 28) and safety plan (slide 58). Slides 42 and 72 show contribution projections for the miscellaneous plan (slide 42) and safety plan (slide 72). Slides 43 and 73 show the projected funded status for the miscellaneous plan (slide 43) and safety plan (slide 73) assuming continuation of employee cost sharing and payment of future ADPs. Slide 75 shows the total projected CalPERS contribution highlight ing the committed future ADPs. Slide 91 summarizes the savings that would be realized if the City were to make the $1,584,187 ADP in April 2024. Pension Costs in the Long-Term Forecast Given the results of the actuarial analysis, the long-term forecast will need to be revised in order to factor in the expected increased pension costs in the out years. Staff is not recommending a change to the forecast at this time, as the amounts forecasted for the 2023-25 Financial Plan period align closely enough to the projections provided by Foster & Foster. The City will have some budgetary issues to work through in the coming years, but the general economic uncertainty related to timing of reimbursement for storm-related costs, CalPERS decision-making inflationary factors and concerns about a recession makes it difficult to pin down the long-term forecast at this time. Fortunately, the increased cost will incrementally impact the forecast in a meaningful way in FY 2025-26, which provides an onramp for determining how to best address these increased costs in the long-term. ATTACHMENT A – Foster & Foster CalPERS Review- 6/30/21 Valuation Preliminary Results Page 18 of 1165 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CALPERS MISCELLANEOUS & SAFETY PLANS CalPERS Review – 6/30/21 Valuation Mary Elizabeth Redding, FSA, EA, MAAA Bianca Lin, FSA, EA, MAAA Matthew Childs Foster & Foster, Inc. May 4, 2023 Contents l:\sanluisobispocity\calpers\6-30-21\f&f_sanluisobispocity_23-05-04_calpers_misc_safety_21.docx Topic Page Background 1 Miscellaneous Plan: Historical Information 15 Projections 25 Safety Plan: Historical Information 45 Projections 55 Combined Miscellaneous and Safety 75 Leaving CalPERS 77 PEPRA Cost Sharing 79 Paying Down the Unfunded Liability 82 Additional Discretionary Payment Analysis 91 Actuarial Certification 99 Page 19 of 1165 May 4, 2023 1 DEFINITIONS  PVB - Present Value of all Projected Benefits:  The value now of amounts due to be paid in the future  Discounted value (at valuation date - 6/30/21), of all future expected benefit payments based on various (actuarial) assumptions  Current Normal Cost (NC):  Portion of PVB allocated to (or “earned” during) current year  Value of employee and employer current service benefit  Actuarial Liability (AAL):  Discounted value (at valuation date) of benefits earned through valuation date [value of past service benefit]  Portion of PVB “earned” at measurement May 4, 2023 2 DEFINITIONS  Target- Have money in the bank to cover Actuarial Liability (past service)  Unfunded Liability (UAAL or UAL) - Money short of target at valuation date  If all actuarial assumptions were always exactly met, then the plan assets would always equal AAL  Any difference is the unfunded (or overfunded) AAL  Every year, the actuary calculates the difference between the expected UAAL and Actual UAAL. This is a new layer or amortization base  Each new layer gets amortized (paid off) over a period of time as part of the contribution [rate] Page 20 of 1165 May 4, 2023 3 HOW WE GOT HERE  Investment Losses  CalPERS Contribution Policy  Enhanced Benefits  Demographics May 4, 2023 4 HOW WE GOT HERE – INVESTMENT RETURN Returns (after 2001) shown are gross returns, unreduced for administrative expenses, from CalPERS valuation reports, when available. The discount rate is based on expected returns net of administrative expenses. 20-Year and 30-Year average return rates on 6/30/22 are 6.8% and 7.6%, respectively Page 21 of 1165 May 4, 2023 5 HOW WE GOT HERE – OLD CONTRIBUTION POLICY  Effective with 2003 valuations:  Slow (15 year) recognition of investment losses into funded status  Rolling 30 year amortization of all (primarily investment) losses  Designed to:  First smooth rates and  Second pay off UAL  Mitigated contribution volatility May 4, 2023 6 HOW WE GOT HERE – ENHANCED BENEFITS  At CalPERS, Enhanced Benefits implemented using all (future & prior) service  Typically not negotiated with cost sharing  City of San Luis Obispo Tier 1 Tier 2 PEPRA  Miscellaneous 2.7%@55 FAE1 2%@60 FAE3 2%@62 FAE3  Police Safety 3%@50 FAE1 2%@50 FAE3 2.7%@57 FAE3  Fire Safety 3%@50 FAE1 3%@55 FAE3 2.7%@57 FAE3  Note:  FAE1 is highest one year (typically final) average earnings  FAE3 is highest three years (typically final three) average earnings  PEPRA tier implemented for new employees hired after 1/1/13  Employee pays half of total normal cost  2023 Compensation limit  Social Security participants: $146,042  Non-Social Security participants: $175,250 Page 22 of 1165 May 4, 2023 7 HOW WE GOT HERE – ENHANCED BENEFITS  Available CalPERS Benefit formulas. City’s formulas shown in blue (Tier 1), green (Tier 2) and red (PEPRA).  For any retirement age, chart shows benefit multiplier (% FAE per year of service) Retirement Age Benefit Multiplier May 4, 2023 8 HOW WE GOT HERE – ENHANCED BENEFITS Benefit Multiplier Retirement Age Page 23 of 1165 May 4, 2023 9 HOW WE GOT HERE – DEMOGRAPHIC  Around the State  Large retiree liability compared to actives  State-wide public agency average percentage of liability belonging to retirees: 59% for Miscellaneous, 67% for Safety  Declining active population and increasing number of retirees  Higher percentage of retiree liability increases contribution volatility  City of San Luis Obispo percentage of liability belonging to retirees:  Miscellaneous 69%  Safety 74% May 4, 2023 10 CALPERS CHANGES  April 2013: CalPERS adopted new contribution policy  No asset smoothing or rolling amortization  February 2018: New amortization policy for 2021/22 contributions  Fixed dollar (level) 20-year amortization rather than % pay (escalating)  5-year ramp up (not down) for investment gains and losses  CalPERS Board changed the discount rate to 7%, still phasing in to rates: Rate Initial Impact Full Impact  6/30/16 valuation 7.375% 18/19 22/23  6/30/17 valuation 7.25% 19/20 23/24  6/30/18 valuation 7.00% 20/21 24/25  In the November 2021 meeting, CalPERS Board adopted new  Discount rate and investment allocation  Discount rate: 6.8% for 6/30/2021. UAL impact matches investment gain amortization (5-year ramp-up). Initial impact in 23/24 and full impact in 27/28.  Asset allocation has higher investment risk than current portfolio  Experience study (Demographic assumptions) Page 24 of 1165 May 4, 2023 11 CALPERS CHANGES  Risk Mitigation Strategy  Move to more conservative investments over time to reduce volatility  Only when investment return is better than expected  Lower discount rate in concert  Essentially use ≈50% of investment gains to pay for cost increases  Likely get to 6.0% discount rate over 20+ years  Risk mitigation suspended from 6/30/16 to 6/30/18 valuation  Did not trigger for 6/30/19 or 6/30/20 valuations  First triggered for 6/30/21 valuation – 6.8% discount rate May 4, 2023 12 CALPERS CHANGES Page 25 of 1165 May 4, 2023 13 CALPERS CHANGES Capital Market Assumptions Asset Class Asset Segment Near-Term Return (5-year) Long-Term Return (20-year) Volatility (20-year) Growth Global Equity – Cap Weighted 6.8% 6.8% 17.0% Global Equity – Non-Cap Weighted 5.1% 6.1% 13.5% Private Equity 8.9% 9.6% 30.1% Income Long U.S. Treasuries 0.1% 2.6% 12.4% Mortgage-Backed Securities 1.2% 2.8% 3.1% Investment Grade Corporates 0.1% 3.9% 8.5% Spread Product – High Yield 2.2% 4.7% 9.2% Spread Product – Sovereigns 3.2% 4.5% 10.4% High Yield Segment 2.2% 4.6% 9.0% Real Assets Real Estate 5.3% 5.5% 12.2% Liquidity Liquidity 0.3% 1.7% 0.8% Other Private Debt 6.8% 5.9% 9.9% Emerging Market Debt 2.7% 4.8% 10.3% May 4, 2023 14 CALPERS CHANGES Portfolio Target Allocations Prior Portfolio 11/17/21 Portfolio Asset Classification Liquidity 1% - Real Assets 13% 15% Private Debt - 5% EM Sov Bonds 1% 5% High Yield 4% 5% Investment Grade Corp. 6% 10% Mtge-backed Securities 7% 5% Treasury 10% 5% Private Equity 8% 13% Global Equity1 50% 42% Leverage - (5)% Total 100% 100% Standard Deviation 11.2% 12.0% 1 Cap and non-cap weighted combined for this table; actual portfolios have specific allocations for each classification. Page 26 of 1165 May 4, 2023 15 SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION - MISCELLANEOUS 2001 2011 2020 2021 Actives  Counts 265 291 319 324  Average  Age 45 46 42 41  City Service 11 10 8 8  PERSable Wages $ 49,000 $ 68,500 $ 72,600 $ 73,800  Total PERSable Wages 13,000,000 19,900,000 23,200,000 23,900,000 Inactive Members  Counts  Transferred 62 110 150 148  Separated 86 146 248 263  Retired  Service 103 231 391 409  Disability 19 21 22 22  Beneficiaries 15 20 29 31  Total 137 272 442 462  Average Annual City Provided Benefit for Service Retirees2 11,500 26,200 31,300 32,000 2 Average City-provided pensions are based on City service & City benefit formula, and are not representative of benefits for long-service employees. May 4, 2023 16 SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION - MISCELLANEOUS Page 27 of 1165 May 4, 2023 17 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - MISCELLANEOUS June 30, 2020 June 30, 2021  Actuarial Accrued Liability  Active $ 60,800,000 $ 62,500,000  Retiree 165,100,000 176,500,000  Inactive 15,000,000 16,700,000  Total 240,900,000 255,700,000  Assets 147,800,000 177,800,000  Unfunded Liability 93,100,000 77,900,000  Funded Ratio 61.4% 69.5%  Average funded ratio for CalPERS Public Agency Miscellaneous Plans 72.3% 83.7% May 4, 2023 18 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - MISCELLANEOUS City CalPERS Assets and Actuarial Liability ($Millions)3 3 Projected 2022 assets reflects -7.5% CalPERS investment return for 2021/22. Page 28 of 1165 May 4, 2023 19 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - MISCELLANEOUS Discount Rate Sensitivity June 30, 2021 Discount Rate 6.80% 6.30%4 5.80% AAL $ 255,700,000 $ 272,200,000 $ 288,600,000 Assets 177,800,000 177,800,000 177,800,000 Unfunded Liability 77,900,000 94,400,000 110,800,000 Funded Ratio 69.5% 65.3% 61.6% 4 Estimated by Foster & Foster. May 4, 2023 20 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - MISCELLANEOUS Unfunded Accrued Liability Changes  Unfunded Accrued Liability on 6/30/20 $ 93,100,000  Expected 6/30/21 Unfunded Accrued Liability 93,400,000  Changes  Assumption Change (demographics) 1,200,000  Discount Rate 7% to 6.8% 5,700,000  Asset Loss (Gain) (21.3% return for FY 2021) (23,000,000)  Contribution & Experience Loss (Gain) 600,000  Total (15,500,000)  Unfunded Accrued Liability on 6/30/21 77,900,000  Projected Unfunded Accrued Liability on 6/30/225 94,600,000 5 Projected 2022 assets reflects -7.5% CalPERS investment return for 2021/22. Page 29 of 1165 May 4, 2023 21 FUNDED RATIO - MISCELLANEOUS 6/30/22 funded status estimated May 4, 2023 22 FUNDED STATUS (MILLIONS) - MISCELLANEOUS 6/30/22 funded status estimated Page 30 of 1165 May 4, 2023 23 CONTRIBUTION RATES - MISCELLANEOUS Benefit Improvement 2%@55 Lower discount rates PEPRA impact Benefit Improvement 2.7%@55 May 4, 2023 24 CONTRIBUTION RATES - MISCELLANEOUS 6/30/20 6/30/21 2022/2023 2023/2024  Total Normal Cost 17.1% 18.2%  Employee Normal Cost 7.5% 7.7%  Employer Normal Cost 9.6% 10.5%  Amortization Payments 29.2% 26.7%6  Total Employer Contribution Rate 38.8% 37.2%  2022/23 Employer Contribution Rate 38.8%  Payroll greater than expected (0.2%)  6/30/17 Discount rate & inflation (5th Year) 0.3%  6/30/18 Discount rate change (4th Year) 0.7%  6/30/21 Demog. Assumption change (1st Year, no ramp) 1.7%  6/30/21 Risk mitigation (6.8%) (Normal Cost change) 0.8%  4/1/22 ADP $7,533,0217 (2.1%)  Other (gains)/losses mainly net investment gain (2.7%)  2023/24 Employer Contribution Rate 37.2% 6 Equivalent to 10.4% of UAL. One year, 6.8% interest on the UAL is 17.4% of payroll. 2023/24 amortization payment exceeds interest on the UAL, so there is no “negative amortization.” 7 Does not include impact of $1,914,274ADP to be paid April 2023. Page 31 of 1165 May 4, 2023 25 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS  Investment returns:  June 30, 2022 (7.5%)8  Future returns based on stochastic analysis using 1,000 trials  Single year returns9 with current investment mix, no risk mitigation: Percentile 25th 50th 75th First 10 years -1.8% 6.0% 14.7% After 10 years -0.7% 7.5% 16.4%  Assumes investment returns will generally be lower over the next 10 years and higher beyond that.  Discount Rate decreases due to Risk Mitigation policy – Ultimate rate 6.0%  No Other: Gains/Losses, Method/Assumption Changes, Benefit Improvements  Different from CalPERS projection  Impact of Risk Mitigation Policy:  Net impact of investment gain and discount rate change amortized over 20 years with 5 year ramp up  Same amortization method for all future years 8 Gross return based on June 30, 2022 CalPERS Annual Financial Comprehensive Report issued in November 2022. 9 Nth percentile means N percentage of our trials result in returns lower than the indicated rates. May 4, 2023 26 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS  New hire assumptions:  All new hires assumed PEPRA members and none are Classic members  6/30/21 employee distribution: Benefit Tier Count % of Total 20/21 Payroll % of Total  2.7%@55 FAE1 (Classic) 103 31.8% $ 9,731,400 40.7%  2%@60 FAE3 (Classic Tier 2) 22 6.8% 1,773,500 7.4%  2%@62 FAE3 (PEPRA) 199 61.4% 12,400,500 51.9%  Total 324 100% 23,905,400 100%  Projections include 2022/23 through 2028/29 ADP’s of $1,914,274 each year:  Assume City will make the payment on 4/1 paying down 2013, 2015, and 2016 loss bases  First impact 2023/24 contribution rates Page 32 of 1165 May 4, 2023 27 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS  EE Cost-Sharing: Miscellaneous Employee Group Employee Cost Sharing Group As a % of Total Miscellaneous Payroll  SLOCEA 0% 51%  Management 3% 38%  Confidential 3% 2%  Fire Union 3% 1%  Police Union Classic 6% 4%  Police Union PEPRA 3% 3%  Police Management 3% 1% May 4, 2023 28 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Impact of 21/22 Investment Return Page 33 of 1165 May 4, 2023 29 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 30 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS This page intentionally blank Page 34 of 1165 May 4, 2023 31 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 32 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Page 35 of 1165 May 4, 2023 33 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 34 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Page 36 of 1165 May 4, 2023 35 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 36 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Page 37 of 1165 May 4, 2023 37 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 38 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Page 38 of 1165 May 4, 2023 39 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 40 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Page 39 of 1165 May 4, 2023 41 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 42 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Page 40 of 1165 May 4, 2023 43 FUNDED STATUS - MISCELLANEOUS May 4, 2023 44 FUNDED STATUS - MISCELLANEOUS This page intentionally blank Page 41 of 1165 May 4, 2023 45 SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION - SAFETY 2001 2011 2020 2021 Actives  Counts 106 97 106 95  Average Age 42 n/a 40 41  Average Service 14 n/a 10 11  Average PERSable Wages $ 66,300 $ 112,700 $ 109,100 $ 115,000  Total PERSable Wages 7,000,000 10,900,000 11,600,000 10,900,000 Inactive Members  Counts  Transferred 29 14 15 20  Separated 10 8 12 13  Receiving Payments 90 175 208 211 May 4, 2023 46 SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION - SAFETY Page 42 of 1165 May 4, 2023 47 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - SAFETY June 30, 2020 June 30, 2021  Actuarial Accrued Liability  Active $ 50,100,000 $ 53,700,000  Retiree 163,000,000 169,500,000  Inactive 2,700,000 5,500,000  Total 215,800,000 228,700,000  Assets 133,800,000 161,600,000  Unfunded Liability 82,000,000 67,100,000  Funded Ratio 62.0% 70.7%  Average funded ratio for CalPERS Public Agency Safety Plans 69.2% 80.9% May 4, 2023 48 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - SAFETY City CalPERS Assets and Actuarial Liability ($Millions)10 10 Projected 2022 assets reflects -7.5% CalPERS investment return for 2021/22. Page 43 of 1165 May 4, 2023 49 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - SAFETY Discount Rate Sensitivity June 30, 2021 Discount Rate 6.80% 6.30%11 5.80% AAL $ 228,700,000 $ 243,900,000 $ 259,000,000 Assets 161,600,000 161,600,000 161,600,000 Unfunded Liability 67,100,000 82,300,000 97,400,000 Funded Ratio 70.7% 66.3% 62.4% 11 Estimated by Foster & Foster. May 4, 2023 50 FUNDED RATIO - SAFETY 6/30/22 funded status estimated Page 44 of 1165 May 4, 2023 51 FUNDED STATUS (MILLIONS) - SAFETY 6/30/22 funded status estimated May 4, 2023 52 CONTRIBUTION RATES - SAFETY Benefit Improvement 3%@50 Lower discount rates PEPRA impact Page 45 of 1165 May 4, 2023 53 CONTRIBUTION RATES - SAFETY 6/30/21 Valuation 2023/2024 Contribution Rates Total12 Tier 1 Tier 2 PEPRA 3%@50 3%@55 & 2%@50 2.7%@57  Base Total Normal Cost 32.1% 34.6% 30.8% 27.3%  Class 1 Benefits  Final One Year Compensation 0.8% 1.5% - -  Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance 1.9% 2.0% 1.9% 1.7%  Total Normal Cost 34.8% 38.1% 32.7% 29.0%  Expected Employee Contr. Rate 10.3% 9.0% 9.0% 14.5%  Employer Normal Cost 24.4% 29.1% 23.7% 14.5%  Amortization Payment 39.1% 70.3% - -  Amortization of Side Fund 14.5% 26.1% - -  Total Employer (ER) Contribution 78.0% 125.4% 23.7% 14.5%  Employee counts 95 47 19 29  Employee payroll (in 000’s) $ 11,870 $ 6,600 $ 2,348 $ 2,922  Total ER Contribution $ (in 000’s) $ 9,260 $ 8,279 $ 557 $ 424 12 Weighting of total contribution based on projected classic and PEPRA payrolls May 4, 2023 54 CONTRIBUTION RATES - SAFETY 6/30/20 6/30/21 2022/2023 2023/2024  Total Normal Cost 32.1% 34.8%  Employee Normal Cost 10.1% 10.3%  Employer Normal Cost 22.0% 24.4%  Amortization Payments 54.1% 53.6%13  Total Employer Contribution Rate 76.1% 78.0%  2022/23 Employer Contribution Rate 76.1%  Payroll lower than expected 4.3%  6/30/17 Discount rate & inflation (5th Year) 0.7%  6/30/18 Discount rate change (4th Year) 1.1%  6/30/21 Demog. assumption change (1st Year, no ramp) 2.3%  6/30/21 Risk Mitigation (Normal Cost change) 1.2%  4/1/22 ADP $4,896,00014 (2.5%)  Other (gains)/losses mainly net investment gain (5.2%)  2023/24 Employer contribution rate 78.0% 13 Equivalent to 11.0% of UAL. One year, 6.8% interest on the UAL is 33.3% of payroll. 2023/24 amortization payment exceeds interest on the UAL, so there is no “negative amortization.” 14 Does not include impact of $522,937ADP to be paid April 2023. Page 46 of 1165 May 4, 2023 55 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY  Investment returns:  June 30, 2022 (7.5%)15  Future returns based on stochastic analysis using 1,000 trials  Single year returns16 with current investment mix, no risk mitigation: Percentile 25th 50th 75th First 10 years -1.8% 6.0% 14.7% After 10 years -0.7% 7.5% 16.4%  Assumes investment returns will generally be lower over the next 10 years and higher beyond that.  Discount Rate decreases due to Risk Mitigation policy – Ultimate rate 6.0%  No Other: Gains/Losses, Method/Assumption Changes, Benefit Improvements  Different from CalPERS projection  Impact of Risk Mitigation Policy:  Net impact of investment gain and discount rate change amortized over 20 years with 5 year ramp up  Same amortization method for all future years 15 Gross return based on June 30, 2022 CalPERS Annual Financial Comprehensive Report issued in November 2022. 16 Nth percentile means N percentage of our trials result in returns lower than the indicated rates. May 4, 2023 56 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY  New hire assumptions:  All new hires assumed PEPRA members and none are Classic members  6/30/21 employee distribution: Benefit Tier Count % of Total 20/21 Payroll % of Total  3%@50 FAE1 Fire & Police 47 49.5% $6,075,600 55.6%  3%@55 FAE3 Fire 12 12.6% 1,395,900 12.8%  2%@50 FAE3 Police 7 7.4% 765,900 7.0%  2.7%@57 FAE3 (PEPRA) Fire 6 6.3% 485,800 4.4%  2.7%@57 FAE3 (PEPRA) Police 23 24.2% 2,203,500 20.2%  Total 95 100.0% 10,926,700 100.0%  Projections Include 2022/23 through 2028/29 ADP’s of $522,937 each year:  Assume City will make the payment on 4/1 paying down the 2016 investment loss base  First impact 2023/24 contribution rates Page 47 of 1165 May 4, 2023 57 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY  EE Cost-Sharing: Safety Employee Group Employee Cost Sharing Group As a % of Total Safety Payroll  Fire 3% 42%  Police  Police Management 3% 21%  Police Union Classic 6% 17%  Police Union PEPRA 3% 20%  Total 100% May 4, 2023 58 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Impact of 21/22 Investment Return Page 48 of 1165 May 4, 2023 59 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 4, 2023 60 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY This page intentionally blank Page 49 of 1165 May 4, 2023 61 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 4, 2023 62 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Page 50 of 1165 May 4, 2023 63 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 4, 2023 64 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Page 51 of 1165 May 4, 2023 65 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 4, 2023 66 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Page 52 of 1165 May 4, 2023 67 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 4, 2023 68 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Page 53 of 1165 May 4, 2023 69 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 4, 2023 70 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Page 54 of 1165 May 4, 2023 71 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 4, 2023 72 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Page 55 of 1165 May 4, 2023 73 FUNDED STATUS - SAFETY May 4, 2023 74 FUNDED STATUS - SAFETY This page intentionally blank Page 56 of 1165 May 4, 2023 75 COMBINED MISCELLANEOUS AND SAFETY May 4, 2023 76 COMBINED MISCELLANEOUS AND SAFETY Funded Status Summary on June 30, 2021 (Amounts in $Millions) Miscellaneous Safety Total  Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) $ 255.7 $ 228.7 $ 484.4  Assets 177.8 161.6 339.4  Unfunded AAL 77.9 67.1 145.0  Funded Ratio 69.5% 70.7% 70.1% Projected Funded Status Summary on June 30, 202217 (Amounts in $Millions) Miscellaneous Safety Total  Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) $ 263.2 $ 235.2 $ 498.4  Assets 168.6 151.1 319.7  Unfunded AAL 94.6 84.1 178.7  Funded Ratio 64.1% 64.2% 64.1% 17 Projected 2022 assets reflects -7.5% CalPERS investment return for 2021/22. Page 57 of 1165 May 4, 2023 77 LEAVING CALPERS  Participation in CalPERS is governed by State law and CalPERS rules  The following are considered “withdrawing” from CalPERS:  Exclude new hires from CalPERS & giving them a different pension  Stop accruing benefits for current employees  “Withdrawal” from CalPERS:  Treated as plan termination  Liability increased for conservative investments  Liability increased for future demographic fluctuations  Liability must be funded immediately by withdrawing agency  Otherwise, retiree benefits are cut May 4, 2023 78 LEAVING CALPERS CalPERS Termination Estimates on June 30, 2021 (Amounts in Millions) Ongoing Plan Termination Basis Discount Rate 6.80% 1.00% 2.25% Miscellaneous Actuarial Accrued Liability $ 255.7 $ 552.2 $ 459.2 Assets 177.8 177.8 177.8 Unfunded AAL (UAAL) 77.9 374.4 281.4 Safety Actuarial Accrued Liability $ 228.7 $ 530.1 $ 436.4 Assets 161.6 161.6 161.6 Unfunded AAL (UAAL) 67.1 368.5 274.8 Total Unfunded AAL (UAAL) $145.0 $742.9 $556.2 Funded Ratio 70.1% 31.4% 37.9% Page 58 of 1165 May 4, 2023 79 PEPRA COST SHARING  Target of 50% of total normal cost paid by all employees  PEPRA members must pay greater of 50% of total normal cost or bargained amount if higher  Employer cannot pay any part of PEPRA member required employee contributions  Employer may impose current employees pay 50% of total normal cost (limited to 8% of pay for Miscellaneous and 12% for Safety) if not agreed through collective bargaining  Miscellaneous Plan 2023/24 before negotiated cost sharing: Classic Members New Members Tier 1 2.7%@55 FAE1 Tier 2 2%@60 FAE3 PEPRA 2%@62 FAE3  Employer Normal Cost 14.3% 12.3% 7.36%  Member Normal Cost 8.0% 7.0% 7.50%  Total Normal Cost 22.3% 19.3% 14.86%  50% Target 11.2% 9.7% 7.43% May 4, 2023 80 PEPRA COST SHARING  Fire Safety Plan 2023/24 before negotiated cost sharing: Classic Members New Members Tier 1 3%@50 FAE1 Tier 2 3%@55 FAE3 PEPRA 2.7%@57 FAE3  Employer Normal Cost 29.1% 24.8% 14.50%  Member Normal Cost 9.0% 9.0% 14.50%  Total Normal Cost 38.1% 33.8% 29.00%  50% Target 19.1% 16.9% 14.50%  Police Safety Plan 2023/24 before negotiated cost sharing: Classic Members New Members Tier 1 3%@50 FAE1 Tier 2 2%@50 FAE3 PEPRA 2.7%@57 FAE3  Employer Normal Cost 29.1% 21.8% 14.50%  Member Normal Cost 9.0% 9.0% 14.50%  Total Normal Cost 38.1% 30.7% 29.00%  50% Target 19.1% 15.4% 14.50% Page 59 of 1165 May 4, 2023 81 PEPRA COST SHARING  PEPRA Member Contributions: 2022/23 2023/24 Group Total NC (Basis) Member Rate Total Normal Cost Change Member Rate Method Miscellaneous 13.76% 7.00% 14.86% 1.11% 7.50% PEPRA Members Fire Safety 27.63% 13.75% 29.00% 1.37% 14.50% PEPRA Members Police Safety 27.63% 13.75% 29.00% 1.37% 14.50% PEPRA Members May 4, 2023 82 PAYING DOWN THE UAL & RATE STABILIZATION  Where do you get the money from?  How do you use the money? Page 60 of 1165 May 4, 2023 83 WHERE DO YOU GET THE MONEY FROM?  POB:  Usually thought of as interest arbitrage between expected earnings and rate paid on POB  No guaranteed savings  PEPRA prevents contributions from dropping below normal cost  Savings offset when investment return is good  GFOA Advisory  Borrow from General Fund similar to State  One time payments  Governing body resolution to use a portion of one time money, e.g.  1/3 to one time projects  1/3 to replenish reserves and  1/3 to pay down unfunded liability May 4, 2023 84 ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS TO CALPERS  Internal Service Fund  Typically used for rate stabilization  Restricted investments:  Likely low (0.5%-1.0%) investment returns  Short term/high quality, designed for preservation of principal  Assets can be used by governing body for other purposes  Does not reduce Unfunded Liability Page 61 of 1165 May 4, 2023 85 ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS TO CALPERS Make payments directly to CalPERS:  Likely best long-term investment return  Must be considered an irrevocable decision  Extra payments cannot be used as future “credit”  PEPRA prevents contributions from dropping below normal cost  Option #1: Request shorter amortization period (Fresh Start):  Higher short term payments  Less interest and lower long term payments  Likely cannot revert to old amortization schedule  Savings offset when investment return is good (PEPRA) May 4, 2023 86 ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS TO CALPERS  Make payments directly to CalPERS (continued):  Option #2: Target specific amortization bases with an Additional Discretionary Payment “ADP” :  Extra contribution’s impact muted by reduced future contributions  CalPERS can’t track the “would have been” contribution  No guaranteed savings  Larger asset pool means larger loss (or gain) opportunity  Paying off shorter amortization bases: larger contribution savings over shorter period:  e.g. 10 year base reduces contribution 13.7¢ for $1  Less interest savings vs paying off longer amortization bases  Paying off longer amortization bases: smaller contribution savings over longer period:  e.g. 25 year base reduces contribution 8.2¢ for $1  More interest savings vs paying off shorter amortization bases  Maintaining the current payment schedule – not letting payments reduce due to extra payment – gives the greatest long-term savings Page 62 of 1165 May 4, 2023 87 IRREVOCABLE SUPPLEMENTAL (§115) PENSION TRUST  Can only be used to:  Reimburse City for CalPERS contributions  Make payments directly to CalPERS  Investments significantly less restricted than City investment funds  Fiduciary rules govern Trust investments  Usually, designed for long term returns  Assets don’t count for GASB accounting  Are considered Employer assets  Over 100 trusts established, mostly since 2015  Trust providers: PARS, PFM, Keenan  California Employers’ Pension Prefunding Trust (CEPPT) effective July 2019  Strategy 1: 48% stocks / 52% bonds  Strategy 2: 22% stocks / 78% bonds May 4, 2023 88 IRREVOCABLE SUPPLEMENTAL (§115) PENSION TRUST  More flexibility than paying CalPERS directly  City decides if and when and how much money to put into Trust  City decides if and when and how much to withdraw to pay CalPERS or reimburse Agency  Funding strategies typically focus on:  Reducing the unfunded liability  Fund enough to make total CalPERS UAL = 0  Make PEPRA required payments from Trust when overfunded  Stabilizing contribution rates  Mitigate expected contribution rates to better manage budget  Combination  Use funds for rate stabilization/budget predictability  Target increasing fund balance to pay off UAL sooner Page 63 of 1165 May 4, 2023 89 IRREVOCABLE SUPPLEMENTAL (§115) PENSION TRUST  Consider:  How much can you put into Trust?  Initial seed money?  Additional amounts in future years?  When do you take money out?  Target budget rate?  Year target budget rate kicks in?  Before or after CalPERS rate exceeds budgeted rate? May 4, 2023 90 COMPARISON OF OPTIONS  Supplemental Trust  CalPERS  Flexible  Locked In  Likely lower long-term return  Likely higher long-term return  Investment strategy choice  No investment choice  Does not reduce net pension liability for GASB reporting  Reduces net pension liability for GASB reporting  More visible  More restricted Page 64 of 1165 May 4, 2023 91 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS Direct Payment to CalPERS (ADP)  Following illustrates additional $1,584,187 ($823,777 to Miscellaneous & $760,410 to Safety) contribution (ADP) to CalPERS on April 1, 2024: Miscellaneous amortization base paid down  Longest outstanding amortization base: 2015 Gain/Loss (23 years left)  Safety amortization base paid down  Longest outstanding amortization base: 2016 Investment Gain/Loss (24 years left)  Estimated Savings Pay Off Longest Bases Miscellaneous Safety $823,777 $760,410 $ Savings (reduction in future required contributions minus amount of ADP) $698,000 $577,000 Present value of savings @ 3% 305,000 260,000 May 4, 2023 92 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS This page intentionally blank Page 65 of 1165 May 4, 2023 93 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS Direct Payment (ADP) of $823,777 to CalPERS Miscellaneous May 4, 2023 94 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS Direct Payment (ADP) of $823,777 to CalPERS Miscellaneous Page 66 of 1165 May 4, 2023 95 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS Direct Payment (ADP) of $760,410 to CalPERS Safety May 4, 2023 96 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS Direct Payment (ADP) of $760,410 to CalPERS Safety Page 67 of 1165 May 4, 2023 97 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS Direct Payment (ADP) of $823,777 to CalPERS Miscellaneous May 4, 2023 98 ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY PAYMENT ANALYSIS Direct Payment (ADP) of $760,410 to CalPERS Safety Page 68 of 1165 May 4, 2023 99 ACTUARIAL CERTIFICATION This report presents analysis of the City of San Luis Obispo’s CalPERS pension plans. The purpose of this report is to provide the City:  Historical perspective on the plan investment returns, assets, funded status and contributions.  Projections of likely future contributions and the impact of investment volatility The calculations and projections in this report are based on information contained in the City’s June 30, 2021 and earlier CalPERS actuarial valuation reports. We reviewed this information for reasonableness, but do not make any representation on the accuracy of the CalPERS reports. Future investment returns and volatility are based on Foster & Foster’s Capital Market model which results in long term returns summarized on pages 25 and 55. Future results may differ from our projections due to differences in actual experience as well as changes in plan provisions, CalPERS actuarial assumptions or methodology. Other than variations in investment return, this study does not analyze these. To the best of our knowledge, this report is complete and accurate and has been conducted using generally accepted actuarial principles and practices. As members of the American Academy of Actuaries meeting the Academy Qualification Standards, we certify the actuarial results and opinions herein. Respectfully submitted, Mary Elizabeth Redding, FSA, EA, MAAA Foster & Foster, Inc. May 4, 2023 Bianca Lin, FSA, EA, MAAA Foster & Foster, Inc. May 4, 2023 Page 69 of 1165 Page 70 of 1165 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CALPERS MISCELLANEOUS & SAFETY PLANS CalPERS Review Based on the 6/30/21 Valuation Mary Elizabeth Redding, FSA, EA, MAAA Bianca Lin, FSA, EA, MAAA Matthew Childs Foster & Foster, Inc. May 16, 2023 May 16, 2023 2 ABOUT CALPERS  Largest US pension fund, $456B assets at 5/12/23  Administered by an appointed/elected Board in accordance with State laws  CalPERS:  Calculates & pays retiree benefits  Invests funds  Following Board policies, calculates required employer contributions  The City has always paid the required contributions, plus  Extra contributions called Additional Discretionary Payments (ADP)  Defined benefit pension plan  Annuity calculated by a formula based on a percent, service, and final pay  Benefits increase for limited Cost-of-living after retirement  Employees are required to pay a share of the cost  Employers pay all of the remainder of the cost of benefits  Target: CalPERS assets equal value of benefits earned to date May 16, 2023 3 HISTORICAL FUNDED STATUS AND ADPS May 16, 2023 4 FUNDED RATIO - MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous CalPERS Assets and Actuarial Liability ($Millions)1 1 Projected 2022 assets reflects -7.5% CalPERS investment return for 2021/22. May 16, 2023 5 FUNDED STATUS (MILLIONS) - MISCELLANEOUS 6/30/22 funded status estimated Historical Actuarial Accrued Liability and Assets May 16, 2023 6 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS Impact of 21/22 Investment Return May 16, 2023 7 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS May 16, 2023 8 FUNDED STATUS - MISCELLANEOUS May 16, 2023 9 PLAN FUNDED STATUS - SAFETY Safety CalPERS Assets and Actuarial Liability ($Millions)2 2 Projected 2022 assets reflects -7.5% CalPERS investment return for 2021/22. May 16, 2023 10 FUNDED STATUS (MILLIONS) - SAFETY 6/30/22 funded status estimated Historical Actuarial Accrued Liability and Assets May 16, 2023 11 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY Impact of 21/22 Investment Return May 16, 2023 12 CONTRIBUTION PROJECTION - SAFETY May 16, 2023 13 FUNDED STATUS - SAFETY May 16, 2023 14 COMBINED MISCELLANEOUS AND SAFETY May 16, 2023 15 QUESTIONS ? May 16, 2023 16 COMBINED MISCELLANEOUS AND SAFETY Funded Status Summary on June 30, 2021 (Amounts in $Millions) Miscellaneous Safety Total  Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) $ 255.7 $ 228.7 $ 484.4  Assets 177.8 161.6 339.4  Unfunded AAL 77.9 67.1 145.0  Funded Ratio 69.5% 70.7% 70.1% Projected Funded Status Summary on June 30, 20223 (Amounts in $Millions) Miscellaneous Safety Total  Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) $ 263.2 $ 235.2 $ 498.4  Assets 168.6 151.1 319.7  Unfunded AAL 94.6 84.1 178.7  Funded Ratio 64.1% 64.2% 64.1% 3 Projected 2022 assets reflects -7.5% CalPERS investment return for 2021/22. May 16, 2023 17 VALUE OF ADDITIONAL ADP Direct Payment to CalPERS (ADP)  Following illustrates additional $1,584,187 ($823,777 to Miscellaneous & $760,410 to Safety) contribution (ADP) to CalPERS on April 1, 2024: Miscellaneous amortization base paid down  Longest outstanding amortization base: 2015 Gain/Loss (23 years left)  Safety amortization base paid down  Longest outstanding amortization base: 2016 Investment Gain/Loss (24 years left)  Estimated Savings Pay Off Longest Bases Miscellaneous Safety $823,777 $760,410 $ Savings (reduction in future required contributions minus amount of ADP) $698,000 $577,000 Present value of savings @ 3% 305,000 260,000 May 16, 2023 18 HISTORICAL CALPERS INVESTMENT RETURN Returns (after 2001) shown are gross returns, unreduced for administrative expenses, from CalPERS valuation reports, when available. The discount rate is based on expected returns net of administrative expenses.