HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttachment A - Revised Project Description For1-0 https://trihydrocorp.sharepoint.com/sites/Chevron-SLOTankFarm/Shared Documents/ProjectDocs/01Permitting/1 SLO CDPB/Addendum
2019/AmmendedProjectDescription/1_Text/202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx
REVISED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE
CHEVRON TANK FARM REMEDIATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR)
SCH #2009031001
May 29, 2020
Project Number: 81S-001-001
SUBMITTED BY: Trihydro Corporation
1252 Commerce Drive, Laramie, WY 82070
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1-1
2.0 PROJECT MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 Additional NHIS Export.............................................................................................. 2-1
2.2 Proposed Modified Haul Routes ............................................................................... 2-1
3.0 CONSISTENCY WITH PREVIOUS APPROVALS ............................................................... 3-1
4.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 4-1
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx
List of Tables
1.Summary of Removed and Remaining NHIS
2.Difference in NHIS Export
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx
List of Figures
1.Site Plan and Operable Units
2.Approved Haul Routes
3.Proposed Modified Haul Routes
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx
List of Attachments
A.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2013-00056
B.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND APPENDIX F
C.REVISED AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS
D.TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
E.WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx 1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project (project) is located at 276 Tank Farm Road, south of
the City of San Luis Obispo in San Luis Obispo County, California. The 332-acre property was a former tank farm
owned and operated by Union Oil until it was decommissioned in the 1990s. In 2005, the Chevron Environmental
Management Company (CEMC) purchased the property and began preparing plans for site remediation and
development.
On September 2, 2014, the City of San Luis Obispo (City), serving as the lead agency under the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) prepared by
Marine Research Specialists (MRS) for the Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project
SCH #2009031001). The County of San Luis Obispo (County), acting as a co-lead agency, approved the Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) DRC2013-00056 on October 23, 2014, authorizing the CEMC to move forward with the site
remediation and restoration component of the project.
The site remediation and restoration addresses soil and groundwater contamination by excavating the top soil and sub-
surface material to remove Non-Hazardous Impacted Soils (NHIS) affecting the project site. The FEIR evaluated the
removal of NHIS and the haul routes used between the project site and the waste disposal facility. The grading plans
prepared for the FEIR estimated that up to 196,250 cubic yards of NHIS would be transported from the project site to
the Santa Maria Regional Landfill (SMRL), resulting in approximately 13,125 truck trips (round trips). At the time of
the FEIR, the SMRL was the closest NHIS approved facility located approximately 31 miles south of the project site in
Santa Barbara County. In 2016, the Cold Canyon Landfill was approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board
RWQCB) to receive NHIS. The Cold Canyon Landfill is located approximately 6.5 miles south of the project site in
San Luis Obispo County.
Based on the current and estimated remaining volumes of exported NHIS, the project would result in the total removal
of approximately 277,250 cubic yards of NHIS, approximately 81,000 cubic yards more than what was previously
evaluated in the FEIR. CEMC is requesting authorization from the County to allow for the additional NHIS to be
exported offsite and to modify the existing approved haul routes to allow for NHIS disposal at the Cold Canyon
Landfill.
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx 2-1
2.0 PROJECT MODIFICATIONS
2.1 ADDITIONAL NHIS EXPORT
From 2017 to 2019, approximately 162,621 cubic yards of NHIS were removed from Operable Units 3 and 4, which
primarily included the North Marsh Area, as well as Reservoir 2 and 4. It is anticipated that NHIS removal will
continue until 2023, resulting in an estimated 114,629 cubic yards of remaining NHIS, totaling 277,250 cubic yards.
Remaining areas with NHIS include Reservoir 5 and 7 within Operable Unit 2, and Reservoir 3 and the pliable
petroleum surface hydrocarbon (PPSH) areas 1-8 within Operable Unit 4 (see Figure 1). Table 1 provides a summary
of the current and estimated volumes of NHIS.
The grading plans prepared for the FEIR estimated that up to 157,000 cubic yards of NHIS could be generated during
site remediation activities. A 25% contingency was included in the offsite hauling numbers to account for uncertainties
associated with estimating impacted soil volumes, increasing the volume estimate to 196,250 cubic yards. Since site
remediation began, the extent of NHIS impacted areas were determined to be greater than what was previously
estimated. Based on the current and estimated remaining volumes of NHIS export, the project would remove an
additional 81,000 cubic yards for a total of 277,250 cubic yards. Table 2 shows the difference of the original NHIS
estimates evaluated in the FEIR compared with what has currently been removed and the estimated remaining volume.
2.2 PROPOSED MODIFIED HAUL ROUTES
At the time of the FEIR, the SMRL was the closest facility approved by the RWQCB and Chevron to receive NHIS. In
2016, the Cold Canyon Landfill was permitted by the RWQCB to expand its capacity and receive NHIS. Cold Canyon
Landfill has also been recently approved by Chevron to receive NHIS. Cold Canyon Landfill is closer to the project
site, and delivery to the facility would greatly reduce the total miles traveled for NHIS export. In addition, the SMRL is
currently in the process of closing its NHIS program and is expected to stop receiving waste by 2025. Due to the
proximity and recent availability of the Cold Canyon Landfill, and in preparation of the SMRL closure, CEMC
proposes to modify the existing haul routes to include Cold Canyon Landfill as an additional NHIS disposal facility.
The FEIR analyzed the following truck route:
Westbound on Tank Farm Road
Southbound on South Higuera Street
2-2 202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx
Either westbound on Los Osos Valley Road to the U.S. Highway 101 on-ramps or continue south to the South
Higuera U.S. Highway 101 on-ramps
Southbound U.S. Highway 101, trucks would exit at Betteravia Road in Santa Maria, travel east on Betteravia
Road to Philbric Road, then north on Philbric Road to the City of Santa Maria Landfill entrance
Northbound return trips would be the same route in reverse
An alternative southbound route was also evaluated and consisted of the following:
East on Tank Farm Road
Southbound on Highway 227
Westbound on Price Canyon Road
South on Price Street to the southbound U.S. Highway 101 on-ramp. The route from U.S. Highway 101 to the City
of Santa Maria Landfill would be same
The proposed modified haul route to the Cold Canyon Landfill from the project site consists of the following:
East on Tank Farm Road
Southbound on Highway 227
Continue on Highway 227/Carpenter Canyon Road (past Price Canyon Road for approximately 1.25 miles) to Cold
Canyon Landfill entrance
Trucks are permitted to enter the facility from southbound Highway 227/Carpenter Road by taking a left turn
from the approximately 300-foot-long turn bay
Proposed northbound return trip:
North on Highway 227
West on Price Canyon Road
North on Bello Street to northbound U.S. Highway 101 on-ramp
Exit north onto South Higuera Street
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx 2-3
East Tank Farm Road
Proposed alternative northbound return trip:
North on Highway 227
West on Buckley Road
North on Vachell Lane
Northeast on Higuera Street
East on Tank Farm Road
Figure 2 shows the existing truck routes between the project site and US 101 and Figure 3 shows the proposed modified
routes between the project site and Cold Canyon Landfill.
The Cold Canyon Landfill is located approximately 6.5 miles from the project site via Highway 227/Carpenter Road.
The facility is open to the public Monday through Saturday from 8:00 am to 3:00 pm; however, the facility is allowed
to receive waste from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm. The facility is permitted to receive up to 1,650 tons and 542 vehicles per
day, with a daily average of 800 tons and 300 vehicles.
CEMC estimates that 114,629 cubic yards (approximately 146,725 tons) of NHIS will still need to be exported offsite,
which would result in an estimated 7,164 truck trips (round trip) over the next four years. CEMC proposes to transport
up to 650 tons per day to the Cold Canyon Landfill, which would result in approximately 25-30 truck trips (round trip)
per day, averaging 4 trucks per hour. Use of the Cold Canyon Landfill would reduce each roundtrip truck trip by an
average of 40 miles, which would represent up to a 15% reduction in total miles traveled for NHIS disposal. It is
anticipated that all future deliveries would occur in coordination with Cold Canyon Landfill to prevent truck queues
and to ensure daily deliveries do not exceed the facilities permitted limits.
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx 3-1
3.0 CONSISTENCY WITH PREVIOUS APPROVALS
Activities related to the removal and transport of NHIS were evaluated in the FEIR and are currently permitted by CUP
DRC2013-00056 (Attachment A). Exhibit B of the CUP outlines conditions of approval and corresponding mitigation
described in the FEIR. The project would continue to comply with all applicable mitigation measures regarding the
transport and disposal of NHIS waste and would not result in any new or more severe impacts than what was
previously evaluated in the FEIR. The proposed changes are not substantially different than what was conditionally
approved, and the project would continue to be subject to the same conditions described in the CUP. Since the
certification of the FEIR, additional resources areas have been incorporated into Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines
including energy and wildfire. While it is not anticipated that the project would result in new significant impacts related
to these resource areas, subsequent environmental review may be warranted. Potential impacts associated with the
proposed project modifications are primarily related to air quality, traffic and circulation, and public services and
utilities.
Air Quality
Mitigation measures AQ-1a, AQ-1d, and AQ-1e in the FEIR and conditions 27, 30, and 31 in the CUP require the
applicant to implement emission reduction measures and a Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) to reduce
criteria pollutants to below the San Luis Obispo’s Air Pollution Control District’s (SLOAPCD) air emissions
thresholds. The CAMP (Attachment B) prepared for the project recognized that the Cold Canyon Landfill may become
a receiving facility for NHIS in the future, which would result in a reduction of air emissions. In coordination with the
SLOAPCD and the County, CEMC has revised the air quality emissions calculations presented in Appendix F of the
CAMP (see Attachment C).
Traffic and Circulation
Mitigation measure T-1 in the FEIR and condition 59 in the CUP require the applicant to prepare a construction
management plan to address impacts to roadways in the project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy
vehicles creating an unsafe situation. The Traffic Management Plan (Attachment D) prepared for the project currently
includes a facility description and haul route for the Cold Canyon Landfill. In coordination with the County Public
Works Department, CEMC proposes to revise the Traffic Management Plan, as applicable, to be consistent with the
proposed modified haul routes.
Public Services and Utilities
3-2 202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx
Mitigation measure PS/U-4 in the FEIR and condition 76 in the CUP require the applicant to prepare a waste
management plan to address impacts related to the generation of solid waste requiring disposal at landfills. The Waste
Management Plan (Attachment E) prepared for the project identified Cold Canyon Landfill as a disposal facility
available to receive NHIS. The Cold Canyon Landfill is an approved facility to receive NHIS waste and has a
permitted capacity to receive approximately 1.1 million cubic yards of waste until 2040. In coordination with Cold
Canyon Landfill and the County, CEMC proposes to revise the Waste Management Plan, as applicable, to allow for
transport of NHIS to the Cold Canyon Landfill.
202006_SLOTF_ProjectDescription_REV_RPT.docx 4-1
4.0 SUMMARY
The FEIR prepared for the project estimated that up to 196,250 cubic yards of NHIS would be exported from the
project site. Based on the current and estimated remaining volumes of exported NHIS, the project would result in the
total removal of approximately 277,250 cubic yards of NHIS, approximately 81,000 cubic yards more than what was
previously evaluated in the FEIR. At the time of the FEIR, the SMRL was the closest facility that was available to
receive NHIS; however, the Cold Canyon Landfill has since been approved to receive NHIS. The Cold Canyon
Landfill is closer than the SMRL and use of the facility would represent a reduction in travel distance and associated air
emissions. CEMC proposes to increase the volume of NHIS export and to modify the existing haul route to allow for
delivery to the Cold Canyon Landfill. The proposed changes are consistent with what has been previously approved
and would not result in any new or more severe impacts than what was previously evaluated in the FEIR.
TABLES
TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF REMOVED AND REMAINING NHIS
CHEVRON TANK FARM REMEDIATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
SLO_TF_ProjectDescription_Table_1_REV_5.26.20.docx 1 of 1
Source Year NHIS Removed (cy) Total Tonnage Truck Trips
OU #3 -Remaining PPSH (Reservoir 4) 2017 41,984 53,933 2,268
OU #4 -Remaining PPSH (Reservoir 2) 2017 19,163 24,617 1,055
OU #4- North Marsh Area 2018 45,524 58,481 2,454
OU #4 -Remaining PPSH (Area 10) 2019 7,642 9,818 405
OU #4- North Marsh Area 2019 48,308 61,835 2,537
Total NHIS Removed -- 162,621 208,684 8,719
OU #4 -Remaining PPSH (Area 7) 2020 1,186 1,518 74
OU #4 -Remaining PPSH (Area 8) 2020 4,111 5,262 257
OU #4- Reservoir 3 2021 30,722 39,324 1,920
OU #2 -Reservoir 7 2022 40,376 51,681 2,524
OU #2 -Reservoir 5 2023 25,214 32,274 1,576
OU #4 -Remaining PPSH (Areas 1-6) 2023 13,020 16,666 814
Estimated NHIS Remaining -- 114,629 146,725 7,164
Total NHIS Removed and Remaining 277,250 355,409 15,883
NHIS = Non-hazardous hydrocarbon-impacted soil
PPSH = Pliable Petroleum Surface Hydrocarbons
Source: Entact, LLC. and EnviroManagement Inc. (November 2019), Revised by Trihydro Corporation (May 2020)
TABLE 2. DIFFERENCE IN NHIS EXPORT
CHEVRON TANK FARM REMEDIATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
SLO_TF_ProjectDescription_Table_2_REV_5.26.20.docx 1 of 1
Source Year
EIR Estimate of
NHIS (cy)
Removed and
Remaining
NHIS (cy) Difference
OU #2 -Reservoir 5 2023 15,300 25,214 9,914
OU #2 -Reservoir 7 2022 11,000 40,376 29,376
OU #4- North Marsh Area
2018-
2019 75,300 93,832 18,532
OU #4- Reservoir 3 2021 26,700 30,722 4,022
OU #4 -Remaining
PPSH
2017-
2023 28,700 87,106 58,406
Contingency (+25%) -- 39,250 -- --
Total NHIS 196,250 277,250 81,000
Source: Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project FEIR (December 2013),
Entact, LLC. and EnviroManagement Inc. (November 2019), Revised by Trihydro Corporation (May 2020)
FIGURES
RESERVOIR 3
RESERVOIR 7
RESERVOIR 5
RESERVOIR 4
RESERVOIR 2
RESERVOIR 6
NW OPERATIONS
AREA
North Marsh
OU #4
OU #3OU #1
OU #2
OU #2
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,
AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
1252 CommerceDriveLaramie, WY82070www.trihydro.com(
P) 307/745.7474 (F) 307/745.772901,000 '
Drawn By: DH Scale: Date: 5/13/20
FIGURE 1
SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM:
OPERABLE UNITS AND PPSH AR EA S
FORMER SAN LUIS OBISPO TANKFARMSANLUISOBISPOCOUNTY, CALFORNIA
Checked By: JH File: SLO_TF_OperableUnits.mxd
EXPLANATION
OPERABLE UNIT
PPSH SITES
PROJECT BOUNDARY
1 " = 1,000 '
M:\CHEVRON\SANLUISOBISPO\GIS\MAPPING\PERMITTING\SLO_CDPB\ADDENDUM_2019\SLO_TF_OPERABLEUNITS.MXDLast exported to pdf from ArcMap
by d han
kins on 11 /19 /2
019 , 1:
59:59
PM.
OU = OPERABLE UNIT
PPSH =
PLIABLE PETROLEUM
SURFACE
HYDROCARBONS Area 7
Area8
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
MANAGEMENT PLAN
SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM
REMEDIATION AND RESTORATION PROJECT
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Project No. 1301-0306
Prepared for:
Chevron Environmental Management Company
Post Office Box 1332
San Luis Obispo, California 93406
Prepared by:
Padre Associates, Inc.
369 Pacific Street
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
JULY 2016
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
i -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1
1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 SITE BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL .................................... 1-2
1.4 PROJECT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................. 1-2
1.4.1 Demolition of Buildings and Former Oil Operations ................................................ 1-2
1.4.2 Pipeline Segment Removal ..................................................................................... 1-3
1.4.3 Grading and Soil Handling ...................................................................................... 1-3
1.5 PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................ 1-13
1.6 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS ........................................................................................... 1-14
1.7 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ..................................................................................... 1-15
1.8 PLAN ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................... 1-15
2.0 AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT EMISSION REDUCTIONS (NOX AND PM10) ................. 3-1
3.1 PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULING (NOX AND PM10) ............................................................. 3-1
3.3 CONSTRUCTION WORKER TRIPS.............................................................................. 3-1
3.4 COMBUSTION EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES .............................................. 3-1
4.0 CONSTRUCTION DUST MITIGATION .............................................................................. 4-1
4.1 SOIL MANAGEMENT AND DUST CONTROL .............................................................. 4-1
4.1.1 Contingency Measures ........................................................................................... 4-3
4.1.2 Additional Dust Control Measures for NOA Areas .................................................. 4-3
4.1.3 Onsite Track-out Control Measures ........................................................................ 4-4
4.1.4 Track-Out onto Public Roads .................................................................................. 4-5
4.1.5 Offsite Transportation of NOA Containing Materials ............................................... 4-5
4.1.6 Post Construction Stabilization of Disturbed Areas ................................................ 4-6
4.2 LEAD AND ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS .................................. 4-6
5.0 SOIL SEGREGATION AND STOCKPILING ACTIVITIES ................................................. 5-1
5.1 SOIL SEGREGATION CRITERIA .................................................................................. 5-1
5.2 SOIL STOCKPILING PROCEDURES ........................................................................... 5-2
6.0 COMPLAINT RESPONSE ................................................................................................. 6-1
7.0 REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING ............................................................................. 7-1
8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 8-1
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
ii -
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1 Excavation Volumes ................................................................................................. 1-4
Table 1-2 Preliminary Project Schedule .................................................................................. 1-14
Table 2-1 2013 EIR - Estimated Peak Project Emissions ......................................................... 2-1
Table 2-2 Revised Estimated Maximum Project Emissions ...................................................... 2-2
Table 5-1 Risk Based Screening Levels ................................................................................... 5-1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Site Vicinity Map ...................................................................................................... 1-5
Figure 1-2 Site Plan .................................................................................................................. 1-7
Figure 1-3 Project Schedule by Area of Concern. .................................................................... 1-9
Figure 1-4 Trucking Route Map .............................................................................................. 1-11
Figure 1-5 Sensitive Receptors Map ....................................................................................... 1-17
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: CUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
APPENDIX B: PIPELINE DECOMMISSIONING PLAN
APPENDIX C: AIR QUALITY MONITORING PLAN
APPENDIX D: NATURALLY-OCCURRING ASBESTOS REPORTS AND
CORRESPONDENCE
APPENDIX E: NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS AIR MONITORING PLAN
APPENDIX F: AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS SPREADSHEETS
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
iii -
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ACM Asbestos Containing Material
AOC Area of Concern
AQMP Air Quality Monitoring Plan
ATC Authority to Construct
ATCM Air borne Toxic Control Measures
BACT Best Available Control Technology
bhp Brake Horse Power
CAC Certified Asbestos Consultant
CAMP Construction Activity Management Plan
CARB California Air Resources Board
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CNG Compressed Natural Gas
CSST Certified Site Surveillance Technician
CUP Conditional Use Permit
DCP Dewatering Contingency Plan
DPF Diesel Particulate Filters
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
FEIR Final Environmental Impact Report
HASP Health and Safety Plan
HEPA High Efficiency Particle Air
HRA Health Risk Assessment
LF Linear Feet
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas
mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
mph miles per hour
NESHAP National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NHIS Non-Hazardous Impacted Soil
NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
NOA Naturally-Occurring Asbestos
NOX Oxides of Nitrogen
PEL Permissible Exposure Limits
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
iv -
PERP Portable Engine Registration Permit
PM10 Particulate Matter less than 10 Microns
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
PTO Permit to Operate
RBSL Risk Based Screening Level
ROG Reactive Organic Gasses
RAP Remedial Action Plan
SLOAPCD San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District
SMRL Santa Maria Regional Landfill
TBACT Best Available Control Technology for Toxics
TMP Traffic Management Plan
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-1 -
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) has been prepared by Padre
Associates, Inc. (Padre) on behalf of Chevron Environmental Management Company (Chevron),
for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project (Project), and in
accordance with the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District’s (SLOAPCD) California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Handbook (2012). The San Luis Obispo Tank Farm
property is located at 276 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo, California (Project Site). The
location of the Project Site is presented in Figure 1-1 - Site Vicinity Map and Figure 1-2, Location
Map. Figure 1-3 presents the Project Schedule by Area of Concern. Figure 1-4 illustrates the
proposed trucking routes.
The purpose of the CAMP is to consolidate and specifically define the air-related measures
that will be implemented for the Project and to ensure all requirements are implemented
throughout Project-related construction activities. This version of the CAMP includes revisions
addressing comments from the SLOAPCD, revised Project-specific information (i.e., fleet make-
up, emissions level, and schedule) and refined Project emissions calculations corresponding to an
updated Project construction schedule. The Project details are based on anticipated
implementation and current best estimates to be refined for the purposes of determining emissions
upon which the mitigation payments are based.
Chevron plans to remediate areas within the Project Site through excavation, offsite
transport and capping techniques, and restore the future open space portion of the Project Site
approximately 250 acres). Section 1.4 provides additional details regarding these activities. The
overall project also includes future development on portions of the Project Site. The development
components of the Project have not been finalized and will be permitted separately in the future.
1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The Project Site is located immediately south of the city of San Luis Obispo, San Luis
Obispo County, California. The Project Site is divided into north and south sections by Tank Farm
Road, and is bordered by light commercial and industrial development to the east and west; the
San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport is to the east; agricultural and pastoral lands with
scattered residences are to the south. New residential subdivisions have been constructed to the
north of Prado Road, approximately 0.25-miles north of the Project Site. A mobile home park is
located within close proximity of the Project Site to the east (see Figure 1-2). The existing
buildings in the northwest part of the Project Site are used as Chevron’s local offices. The
buildings will be demolished as part of the Project.
1.2 SITE BACKGROUND
This Project Site is owned, and was originally operated, by Union Oil Company of
California (Union Oil). Chevron purchased Union Oil, including the Project Site, in August 2005.
The San Luis Obispo Tank Farm was constructed in 1910 to serve as the accumulation point for
the petroleum pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. In 1926 many of the tanks on the Project Site
were destroyed in a fire caused by a lightning strike. The San Luis Obispo Tank Farm was re-built
and operated until the 1970s. The Project Site was slowly withdrawn from operation during the
later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s it was formally decommissioned.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-2 -
1.3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This CAMP has been prepared for the purpose of complying with the Conditions of
Approval (Conditions) in the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DRC2013-00056) and the SLOAPCD
CEQA Air Quality Handbook. As needed, information and/or requirements presented in the Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), certified by the City of San Luis Obispo (Marine Research
Specialists, 2013) are relied upon to provide background information and details regarding impact
analysis and proposed mitigation. Specifically, this CAMP has been prepared to address the CUP
Conditions 27-40, 86-89, 113, 114, and 125. This CAMP also addresses soil stockpiling plan
requirements contained in Condition 107. Refer to Appendix A for the complete text of the air
quality-related CUP Conditions.
1.4 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The planned Project Site remediation and restoration activities relevant to the SLOAPCD
Authority to Construct/Permit to Operate (ATC/PTO), CAMP, and other associated plans include
demolition, grading, offsite hauling, the capping of former crude oil storage reservoirs, and the
excavation and onsite/offsite cover/reuse of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) and arsenic-
containing soils at the Project Site. The following activities will be completed as part of the
proposed Project:
Demolition of the existing buildings and the removal or decommissioning in-place of
remnants of oil operations, remaining pipelines (water lines, drain lines, leach lines,
Foamite lines, and crude oil/gasoline lines), concrete walls, removal of misc. onsite
debris piles, etc.;
Grading to remove or flatten various earthen berms including Reservoir 2, portions of
berms next to Tank Farm Road, etc.;
Removal of berms and topsoil to be used as backfill or in restoration areas;
Placement of engineered fill to cover the Northwest Operations area and Reservoir 4;
Construction of remediation caps at Reservoirs 3, 5, and 7;
Excavation and offsite disposal of areas of pliable and plastic surface hydrocarbon
expressions within the North Marsh and elsewhere at the Project Site;
Excavation of arsenic-containing soils near the Northwest Operations Area and
northeast of Reservoir 2 and placement of the material in the Northwest Operations
Area under the remediation cap; and
Grading and habitat restoration, monitoring and maintenance in the future open space.
The previously proposed blasting and crushing activities at the former quarry area (Flower
Mound) have been deleted from the proposed scope of activities covered under this CAMP. A
more detailed discussion is provided below.
1.4.1 Demolition of Buildings and Former Oil Operations
There are four buildings at the Project Site, located in the Northwest Operations Area, that
will be demolished during the course of remediation activities. Three of these buildings were
constructed to support historical operations at the Project Site. Two of these buildings have
undergone asbestos and lead paint abatement and are no longer used, and the third is used
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-3 -
primarily as office space. The fourth, a modular building installed adjacent to the northernmost
original building, was constructed within the last 18 years to provide additional office space.
Prior to demolition, recyclable or potentially reusable materials will be removed from the
buildings. It is anticipated that the buildings will be demolished using excavators. Water spray will
be utilized to control fugitive dust during the demolition procedures. Some of the buildings have
metal structural elements or siding, which will be segregated for recycling as feasible. Waste and
recyclable materials will be loaded into haul trucks for disposal. Concrete foundations will be
broken apart using a hydraulic hammer, and hauled to an approved concrete recycler.
1.4.2 Pipeline Segment Removal
The Project Site contains approximately 25,000 linear feet (LF) of crude oil pipeline, 47,000
LF of water supply line, and about 1,200 LF of miscellaneous pipelines. Chevron will either
remove or decommission in-place the pipelines remaining at the Project Site, in accordance with
the Project’s Pipeline Decommissioning Plan (Appendix B). Refer to Appendix B – Pipeline
Decommissioning Plan, for the inventory of site-wide pipelines and procedures to be following
during pipeline purging activities. All pipeline segments scheduled for removal that contain
coatings or wrap will be inspected by a Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) or Certified Site
Surveillance Technician (CSST) working under the auspices of a CAC for the presence of
asbestos-containing materials. Chevron proposes to utilize the existing PTO NO. 735 (and the
accompanying Pipeline Purging and Emission Reduction Plan) for onsite pipeline degassing and
removal activities.
1.4.3 Grading and Soil Handling
The estimated total grading volumes (excavation volumes, arsenic and TPH-containing
affected soil, fill material, etc.) removal volumes, and excavation depths for each proposed
restoration feature are presented in tabular format in Table 1-1. Each remediation feature is
illustrated on Figure 1-3. Additional details regarding each feature are provided in the Revised
Remedial Action Plan (Avocet Environmental, Inc., 2015).
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-4 -
Table 1-1 Excavation Volumes
Area
Grading
Area
acres)
Work Area
acres)
Estimated
Affected
Soil
CY)
Common
Fill
CY)
Structural
Fill
CY)
Gravel
CY)
Topsoil
CY)
OU #1 –
Northwest
Area
7.42 7.42 -- -- 26,000 -- --
OU #2 –
Reservoir 5 7.81 10.40 15,300 12,500 -- 20,100 12,600
OU #2 –
Reservoir 7 6.79 8.03 11,000 24,500 -- 39,000 11,000
OU #3
Reservoir 4* 9.76 30.33 -- -- 59,000 -- --
OU #4 –
North Marsh
Area
13.33 15.59 75,300 53,800 -- -- 21,500
OU #4 –
Reservoir 3 6.89 13.35 26,700 5,100 -- 10,500 11,100
OU#4 Arsenic
Soil -- -- 2,675 (As) 3,300 -- -- 1,650
OU #4 –
Remaining
Petroleum
Expressions
5.90 3.58 28,700 19,200 -- -- 9,500
Borrow Area
2 12.11 12.11 -- -- 57,900 -- --
Access Roads 4.70 4.70 -- -- -- 3,800 --
Nursery 2.30 2.30 -- -- -- 4,300 --
Contactor
Staging Area 4.00 4.00 -- -- -- 4,300 --
Total 29.01 26.69 159,675 118,400 142,900 82,000 67,350
Offsite Hauling With 25 percent contingency 199,594 -- -- -- --
Source: Revised Quantities provided by Avocet, 2016.
Notes:
CY – Cubic Yards
As – Arsenic soil to be re-used onsite under proposed Northwest Operations Area cap.
The previously proposed blasting and crushing activities at the former quarry area (Flower Mound) have been deleted
from the proposed scope of activities covered under this CAMP and soil volumes have been reduced accordingly.
PROPERTYSLO TANK FARMSAN LUISCITY OFOBISPOCHEVRONSan Luis Obispo, CaliforniaPROJECT NUMBER:1301-0306 DATE:May 2016ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTSENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &associates, inc.1-1FIGURESAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARMSITE VICINITY
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-6 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
FLOWERMOUND
RESERVOIR 4
RESERVOIR 5
RESERVOIR 7
RESERVOIR 6
RESERVOIR 3
RESERVOIR 2
NORTHWEST
AREA
NORTH
MARSH
TANK FARM ROAD
SITE PLAN
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &
associates, inc.1-2
FIGURE
SCALE IN FEET
0 800 1,600
N
1301-0306 May 2016
CEMC
San Luis Obispo, California
SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-8 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
TANK FARM ROAD
FLOWERMOUND
RESERVOIR 4
RESERVOIR 5
RESERVOIR 7
RESERVOIR 6
RESERVOIR 2
NORTHWEST
AREA NORTH
MARSH
NE-8
NE-3
NE-2
NE-1
NE-4 NE-5
NE-6
NE-7
NE-13
NE-10
NE-11
NE-12
NE-16 NE-17
NE-19
NE-20
NE-18
NE-14
NE-22A
NE-25
NE-24
NE-26
NE-27
TANK FARM ROAD
NE-22B
NE-35
NE-34
NE-36
NE-37
RESERVOIR 3
OPERABLE UNIT #4
OPERABLE UNIT #3
OPERABLE UNIT #2
OPERABLE UNIT #2
OPERABLE UNIT #1
CEMC
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1301-0306
DATE:
May 2016
SCALE IN FEET
0 500 1,000
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &
associates, inc.1-3
FIGURE
TANK FARM PROJECT SITE PROJECT SCHEDULE
NN
BY AREA OF CONCERN
BIRD NETTING ENCLOSURE
LEGEND
NE-26
WORK AREA BOUNDARY
REMEDIATION SCHEDULE BY YEAR
2016
2017
2018
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
OPERABLE UNIT BOUNDARY (OU)
AREA OF CONCERN (AOC)
2019
2020
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-10 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
101101227101TRUCKING ROUTE MAPPROJECT NAME:PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTSENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &associates, inc.1-4FIGUREAPPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET06,00012,0001301-0306 May 2016CEMCSan Luis Obispo, CaliforniaSAN
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-12 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-13 -
Most of the affected material to be removed is visually apparent (i.e. – pliable and plastic
surface hydrocarbons) and removal extents will be determined by visual observation. For areas
where the targeted contaminant is not visually apparent (such as arsenic), sampling may be
conducted to verify that the remedial goals have been met. Excavated soil considered suitable for
reuse as backfill will be segregated and stockpiled. It will be sampled prior to reuse to ensure that
it meets the screening criteria as presented in Section 5.
Two areas within the proposed open space portions of the Project Site were identified with
shallow soil arsenic concentrations equaling or exceeding the Project Site-specific background
inflection point of 6.9 milligrams per kilogram wet weight (mg/kg). The proposed remedial actions
at these locations include the removal of the upper one to three feet of soils (an estimated total of
2675 cubic yards) and placement of the excavated soils within the proposed soil cap at the
adjacent Northwest Operations Area.
Following the completion of remedial excavation activities, the areas will be backfilled with
clean soil and graded to match the surrounding surfaces. Petroleum hydrocarbon-containing soil
will be removed from the Project Site to the Santa Maria Regional Landfill (SMRL) or another
approved landfill facility, and clean soil will be either generated from an onsite source or imported
to the Project Site for use in backfilling the excavations.
The Project is planned to excavate affected soils above the groundwater. However, as
required by CUP Condition 62, a Dewatering Contingency Plan (Padre, 2016a) has been prepared
in the event that groundwater is encountered during excavation. The contingency plan provides
for groundwater to be transferred to temporary closed-top storage tanks via either dewatering
wells or sump pump(s) installed at the bottom of the excavation. The stored water will either be
treated and disposed of onsite via a RWQCB authorization, or will be hauled and disposed of
offsite, in accordance with the Project’s Dewatering Contingency Plan. Fugitive emissions control
and monitoring will be conducted during water storage and treatment as discussed in Section 2.6
of the Air Quality Monitoring Plan (AQMP) included as Appendix C.
1.5 PROJECT SCHEDULE
The Project construction schedule will be subject to change due to field conditions at the
time of implementation (weather, habitat/species in work area, etc.) but is currently projected to
require ten years to complete. A summary of the ten-year Project schedule for the primary
remediation tasks is shown below. Figure 1-3 provides an illustration of the proposed construction
schedule by Areas of Concern. Appendix F provides additional detail and the complete Project
construction schedule providing the basis for the emission estimates.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-14 -
Table 1-2 Preliminary Project Schedule
Activity Start Finish
TPH-
Containing
Soil Export
cy)*
Reservoir 2 3Q16 4Q16 1,250
Reservoir 4 cap placement 2Q17 4Q17 --**
Staging Area and Miscellaneous Cleanup 2Q18 4Q18 --
Building demolition 2Q19 2Q19 --
Northwest Operations Area (OU#1) cap
placement
3Q19 4Q19 --
Pipeline removal and decommissioning 2Q20 3Q20 --
Tank Farm Creek and East Fork SLO Creek
restoration
2Q20 4Q20 --
Reservoir 5 cap construction 2Q21 4Q21 19,125
Reservoir 7 cap construction 2Q22 4Q22 13,750
Site-wide Surface Petroleum Removal 2Q23 4Q23 35,875
North Marsh remedial excavation 2Q24 3Q24 94,125
Reservoir 3 cap construction 1Q25 2Q25 33,375
Includes 25% contingency factor spread across all remediation areas.
Volume of surface expressions included in overall petroleum surface expression volumes.
1.6 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
The nearest sensitive receptor is a single-family residence located at 305 Tank Farm Road
from the Northwest Operations Area. Additional sensitive receptors are residents of the Hidden
Hills Mobile Home Park, located at 650 Tank Farm Road east of the Project Site, residences along
Prado Road, residences south of the Project Site, and surrounding businesses. Additionally, new
housing is also being constructed to the north of the Project Site along Prado Road. Refer to
Figure 1-5 – Sensitive Receptors Map for the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the
Project Site. The proposed Project will minimize impacts to existing offsite receptors with
implementation of all measures in this CAMP.
The affected soil will be taken to an appropriately permitted landfill for beneficial reuse as
Non-Hazardous Impacted Soils (NHIS). Currently, the Santa Maria Regional Landfill is the only
nearby facility with an appropriately permitted NHIS program. The primary route for trucks
transporting affected soil offsite to the Santa Maria Regional Landfill includes trucks traveling
westbound on Tank Farm Road to South Higuera Street with trucking entering southbound U.S.
Highway 101 at the South Higuera Street on-ramp. Returning trucks will utilize the same primary
route. A secondary route has been identified for use if the primary route is unavailable. The
secondary route includes trucks traveling eastbound on Tank Farm Road to Broad Street (State
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-15 -
Route 227), then south on State Route 227 to Price Canyon Road, then westbound on Price
Canyon Road to the U.S. Highway 101 southbound on-ramp at Price Street in Pismo Beach.
Cold Canyon Landfill has recently received updated permits from the RWQCB that include
provisions to accept NHIS. Chevron is working with Cold Canyon Landfill on necessary approvals
to become a receiving facility for Chevron’s NHIS. If Cold Canyon Landfill becomes a Chevron-
approved receiving facility, Chevron will process a modification to add it to the County CUP as a
Project-designated NHIS disposal facility. Trucks going to the Cold Canyon Landfill would travel
eastbound on Tank Farm Road to Broad Street (State Route 227), then south on State Route 227
to the Landfill; the route would be reversed for returning trucks. The distance for a trip to the Cold
Canyon Landfill is 20 miles shorter than one to the Santa Maria Landfill, so emissions from hauling
operations would be reduced from the calculations included in Appendix F. The air quality
emissions calculations presented in Appendix F would be revised and submitted to SLOAPCD if
Cold Canyon Landfill is added as a Project-designated disposal facility.
The designated truck routes were selected to avoid sensitive receptors to the extent
feasible. The designated truck route was included in the FEIR, certified by the City of San Luis
Obispo in 2014. One private school is located within 1,000 feet of designated SMRL truck route –
the Montessori Children’s School located at 4200 South Higuera Street. Los Ranchos School is
located 100 feet from State Route 227 alternative southbound route. The designated truck route
would not pass within 1,000 feet of any parks/playgrounds, hospitals, or nursing homes.
1.7 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
The following supporting documents and plans have been prepared under separate cover:
Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR – Marine Research Specialists, 2013);
San Luis Obispo County Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DRC2013-00056);
Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (Avocet, 2015);
Remediation Construction Drawings, (Avocet, 2016);
Dewatering Contingency Plan (DCP) (Padre, 2016a); and
Traffic Management Plan (TMP) (Padre, 2016b).
1.8 PLAN ORGANIZATION
This CAMP is organized as follows: Section 2 presents a summary of the air quality
impact analysis; Section 3 provides an overview of the construction equipment emissions
reduction measures; Section 4 presents an overview of the dust mitigation plan; Section 5
provides measures for soil segregation and stockpiling; Section 6 presents the complaint response
procedures; and Section 7 provides a summary of recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Attached to this CAMP are the following appendices:
Appendix A – County Conditions of Approval;
Appendix B – Naturally-Occurring Asbestos Reports and Correspondence;
Appendix C – Pipeline Decommissioning Plan;
Appendix D - Air Quality Monitoring Plan (AQMP); and
Appendix E – Air Quality Emissions Spreadsheets.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-16 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
RECEPTORS MAP
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &
associates, inc.1-5
FIGURE
SCALE IN FEET
0 1,600 3,200
1301-0306 May 2016
CEMC
San Luis Obispo, California
SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM
N
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
BASEMAP IMAGE: GOOGLE EARTH PRO; DATE:8-23-2013
AS PER HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
TRACER SCS, 2015)
SENSITIVE
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1-18 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
2-1 -
2.0 AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS
The emission estimate spreadsheets are provided in Appendix F. The primary sources of
pollutant emissions for the Project would result from the use of internal combustion engines during
construction activities and soil disturbance. Specifically, conventional construction equipment such
as excavators, backhoes, loaders, compactors and trucks will be utilized during excavation and
other activities. Additional sources of air pollutant emissions include emissions from on-road
motor vehicles used to transport materials and personnel, and fugitive dust emissions from
activities involving soil disturbances.
Criteria pollutant emissions for heavy construction equipment during the remediation
activities were estimated using established emission factors from the California Air Resources
Board’s (CARB) CalEEMod model. Emissions associated with worker travel to and from the
Project Site and haul-truck traffic were estimated using the CARB’s EMFAC 2014 model. A
tabulation of assumptions, references, and calculations for the Project emission estimates are
provided in Appendix F.
Table 2-1 lists the maximum daily and quarterly estimated Project emissions presented in
the FEIR (MRS, 2013). Revised maximum daily Project emissions estimates were calculated
assuming implementation of mitigation measure and a more refined equipment inventory and
schedule, with the results presented below in Table 2-2. Use of the Cold Canyon Landfill for the
disposal of NHIS would result in lower Project emissions and, in this case, revised emissions
spreadsheets would be provided to SLOAPCD.
Table 2-1 2013 EIR - Estimated Peak Project Emissions
Peak Emissions
ROG + NOx Diesel Particulate
Matter
Fugitive
Dust
Daily (lbs) Quarterly
tons) Daily (lbs) Quarterly
tons)
Quarterly
tons)
SLO County - Unmitigated 1092.3 33.1 30.5 0.9 19.5
SLO County – Mitigated 552.3 17.4 5.7 0.2 6.3
APCD Thresholds for Short
Term Emissions*(Tier I/Tier
II)
137 2.5/6.3 7 0.13/0.32 2.5/--
Threshold Exceeded? Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Source: MRS, 2013
Notes:
ROG – Reactive organic gasses
NOx – Oxides of nitrogen
SLOAPCD, CEQA Handbook, 2012, Table 2-1.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
2-2 -
Table 2-2 Revised Estimated Maximum Project Emissions
Peak Emissions
ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive
Dust
Daily (lbs) Quarterly
tons) Daily (lbs) Quarterly
tons)
Quarterly
tons)
SLO County – Mitigated 329.30 10.83 7.29 0.24 6.3
APCD Thresholds for Short
Term Emissions* (Tier I/Tier
II)
137 2.5/6.3 7 0.13/0.32 2.5/--
Threshold Exceeded? Yes Yes/Yes Yes Yes/No Yes
Notes:
ROG – Reactive organic gasses
NOx – Oxides of nitrogen
SLOAPCD, CEQA Handbook, 2012, Table 2-1.
The air quality emissions model included in Appendix F provides a break-down of offsite
trucking expected to occur as a result of the Project. Offsite trucking will include the import of
equipment, gravel, and geo-textile materials to the Project Site, as well as commuter trips. Export
transportation will include NHIS soil, demolition debris, and scrap metal from the Project Site to
the designated disposal locations. The designated disposal locations utilized in the model include
Santa Maria Regional Landfill for 100% of NHIS soil and demolition debris. The timing of import
and export trucking activities are linked in the model to the timing of remediation activities, the ten
year project construction schedule summarized in Table 1-1, and the estimated waste volumes
listed in Table 1-2. The daily average trips for each specific activity were calculated by dividing
the total number of truck trips by the duration of a specific activity. Peak day trips for a specific
activity were calculated by rounding up the average per day trips to the nearest integer. Refer to
the Peak Offsite Emissions, Offsite, and Schedule sheets of the air quality model included as
Appendix F.
The Project will exceed SLOAPCD’s threshold for requiring Best Available Control
Technology (BACT). Refer to the following sections for a list of proposed emissions reduction
measures. The Project will also exceed SLOAPCD’s Tier II threshold for offsite mitigation
requirements (6.3 tons/quarter), which requires funding or implementation of ROG+NOx reducing
projects within San Luis Obispo County (known as the Moyer value). Appendix F (Peak Offsite
Emissions Sheet) presents the estimated total payments due over the course of the Project,
estimated to be $636,229.38. Chevron has submitted an initial payment to SLOAPCD for offset
mitigation funding. Additional payments will be made on an annual basis and will be paid by
Chevron ahead of the actual air quality impact occurrence. Please note that the Project schedule
is subject to change due to factors including changes in equipment model, engine year, schedule,
and yearly adjustments to the Moyer value. Chevron will provide the SLOAPCD with quarterly
reports on the actual air quality impacts resulting from Project construction equipment emissions
and will make future off-set mitigation payments accordingly.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
3-1 -
3.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT EMISSION REDUCTIONS (NOX AND PM10)
The following standard combustion emissions reduction and BACT measures will be
implemented during the Project. Equipment scheduling measures are also presented in this
section.
3.1 PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
Chevron will submit an ATC/PTO application to SLOAPCD for the remediation and
restoration activities, such as pipeline decommissioning activities and affected soil management
activities. As feasible, work on each of the former reservoir areas will be conducted sequentially
to keep emissions under quarterly thresholds. An Air Quality Monitoring Plan has also been
developed for these activities and is included as Appendix C. A Human Health Risk Assessment
HRA) to evaluate impacts from Project activities to potential receptors has been prepared and
submitted to SLOAPCD separately.
The following list is provided as a guide to equipment and operations that could reasonably
be anticipated at the Project Site and may have permitting requirements through the state-wide
Portable Engine Registration Permit (PERP). If an onsite water treatment system for dewatering
becomes necessary, it will utilize electric pumps with electricity supplied from a nearby overhead
electrical drop, if feasible. A list of portable engines anticipated to be utilized at the Project Site is
presented below:
Power screens, conveyors, welding machines; and
Portable generators and equipment with 50-horsepower or greater engines.
3.2 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULING (NOX AND PM10)
As discussed above, the Project work will be scheduled for sequential work on each
reservoir area as feasible. Construction-related highway traffic will be governed by a Traffic
Management Plan, which includes restricted truck travel during daily peak hours (Padre, 2016b).
3.3 CONSTRUCTION WORKER TRIPS
The Project-specific Traffic Management Plan addresses the CUP required for a park and
ride program to reduce the number of single occupant vehicle trips going to the Project Site.
3.4 COMBUSTION EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES
Chevron will implement the following nitrogen oxide (NOx) and reactive organic gasses
ROG) reduction measures in accordance with the County CUP Conditions of Approval (refer to
Appendix A). Additionally, Chevron has included the following additional measures to reduce
construction related emissions:
All equipment will utilize Tier IV engines (or equivalent), if feasible;
Additional Best Available Control Technology for Toxics (TBACT) measures as
required by the HRA; and
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
3-2 -
Overhead electrical service will be utilized to supply electrical power to the following
equipment, if feasible: water treatment system pumps and controls, job shacks, and
plant growing facility.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-1 -
4.0 CONSTRUCTION DUST MITIGATION
Chevron plans to disturb approximately 112 acres of the Project Site during the course of
the Project. A geologic evaluation completed at the Project Site did not indicate the presence of
asbestos above the analytical detection limit of 0.25% in any of the rock or soil samples analyzed
by California Air Resources Board Method 435. However, microscopic analyses indicated that
several rock core samples contained trace concentrations of chrysotile asbestos which could not
be quantified due to the method quantification criteria (Padre, 2012). Recent sampling and
analysis completed by Padre indicates that the quarry area materials did not contain detectable
asbestos concentrations with a laboratory analytical detection limit of 0.1%. Refer to Appendix D
for copies of the naturally-occurring asbestos (NOA) sampling reports and correspondence.
NOA may be encountered during soil excavation and screening activities at the Project
Site. Perimeter air monitoring and personal exposure air monitoring will be completed during the
disturbance of soils at the Flower Mound and other areas (if NOA is identified) in accordance with
the attached NOA Air Monitoring Plan (Appendix D). If monitoring results indicate that the trigger
levels are exceeded, then additional asbestos dust control measures presented in the CAMP will
be implemented until adequate asbestos dust emissions control is achieved.
This section describes soil monitoring activities to be completed during ground disturbance
activities and the dust control measures that will be used to minimize the emissions of dust
generated during construction activities, including the potential for asbestos-containing dust. For
each type of construction activity, several control measures are described. Additional measures
are included for areas with NOA.
4.1 SOIL MANAGEMENT AND DUST CONTROL
The generation of dust during the remedial activities at the Project Site will be minimized
and controlled by the application of dust control measures. Activities such as stockpiling soil,
construction vehicle traffic, and wind blowing over disturbed soil may generate dust and particulate
matter when the exposed soil surfaces are dry.
The following measures will be utilized for soil stockpile management:
Cover excavations with plastic sheeting at the end of each work day. Chevron also
proposes to alternatively use a soil tackifier as an alternative to plastic sheeting to meet
this requirement;
Contaminated soil will be covered with an impermeable material such as plastic
sheeting or sprayed with an encapsulating material such as Soil Sement. No
headspace will be allowed by the covering where vapors could accumulate;
Covers on storage piles will be maintained in place at all times in areas not actively
involved in soil addition or removal;
Covered piles will be designed in such a way to eliminate erosion due to water or public
nuisance;
During soil excavation, odors will not be evident to such a degree as to cause a public
nuisance; and
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-2 -
Clean soil will be segregated from contaminated soil.
The following dust control measures will be utilized throughout the Project activities:
Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible;
Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust
from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind
speeds exceed 15 miles per hour (mph). Reclaimed (non-potable) water will be used
when practical;
All dirt stock pile areas will be sprayed daily as needed;
Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved Project revegetation and
landscape plans will be implemented as soon as possible, following completion of any
soil disturbing activities;
Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one
month after initial grading will be either sprayed with soil binders or sown with a fast
germinating, non-invasive, grass seed and watered until vegetation is established;
All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation will be stabilized using approved
chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the
SLOAPCD;
All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved will be completed as soon as
possible. In addition, building pads will be laid as soon as possible after grading unless
seeding or soil binders are used;
Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles will not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved
surface at the construction site;
All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or will
maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load
and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114;
Install rumble strips where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash
off trucks and equipment leaving the site;
Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent
paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water will be used where feasible;
All PM10 mitigation measures required will be shown on grading and building plans;
and,
The contractor or builder will designate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust
emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize
dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 10% opacity, and to prevent transport
of dust offsite. Their duties will include availability on holidays and weekend periods
when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons
will be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading,
earthwork or demolition.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-3 -
4.1.1 Contingency Measures
In the event that the Project produces nuisance complaints from the neighbors or the
general public, contingency measures will be taken to eliminate the nuisance potential. These
measures include:
Increase watering to reduce dust emissions;
Use of alternate soil management. This will allow for flexibility for which site will be
used depending on wind direction and intensity; or
Suspended stockpiling activities and immediate covering of active stockpiles with
plastic sheeting.
4.1.2 Additional Dust Control Measures for NOA Areas
NOA may occur at the former quarry area of the Project Site. Therefore, overburden
removal within the former quarry area and other areas with the potential to contain NOA must
proceed initially as if it contains NOA and must utilize dust control measures that are described
below. Additionally, a Professional Geologist (or his designee) will visually monitor the work to
determine whether serpentine or NOA are potentially present with the work area. Refer to the
NOA Air Monitoring Plan for more information on NOA monitoring activities. Activities that could
generate dust emissions containing asbestos include clearing and grubbing, blasting, earthmoving
activities, such as stripping top soil, excavation, stockpiling, and placing soil material.
Basic construction and grading operations control measures will include:
1. Prior to any ground disturbance, work areas will be kept adequately wet to minimize
visible emissions from crossing the limits of work. The "perimeter" monitoring
boundary is defined as the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm property boundary or work
area boundary when outside of Chevron property.
2. Areas to be graded or excavated will be kept adequately wet to prevent visible
emissions from crossing the perimeter monitoring line. Adequately wet areas will
produce no visible dust emissions as determined by the onsite Chevron representative.
3. As needed, the regulated and non-regulated work areas will be restricted to only
authorized, trained and protected personnel, as needed. Regulated work areas are
those work areas where airborne asbestos fiber concentrations exceed or may exceed
the Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). A list of authorized personal (include names,
addresses and local telephone numbers) will be established and posted prior to the
commencement of work activities and maintained throughout the duration of the work.
The name and contact information of the Contractor Foreman and the Asbestos
Competent Person will be included on this list.
4. Warning signs and barrier tape designating regulated work areas are to be installed,
maintained, checked and repaired or replaced as necessary to maintain proper
warnings at all work areas. Other health and safety issues will be appropriately
addressed in the project-specific health and safety plan (HASP).
5. A worker decontamination area will be designated adjacent to each regulated
construction activity work area. If non-contiguous to the construction activity work area,
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-4 -
the decontamination area will be located so that workers are not required to use public
streets or sidewalks to cross-occupied or privately owned property to access the
decontamination area.
6. Active storage piles will be kept adequately wet or treated with a chemical dust
suppressant, or covered when material is not being added to or removed from the pile.
Covers, when used, will be physically secure and maintained throughout their use.
7. Non-active storage piles and other disturbed surface areas that will remain inactive for
more than seven days will be maintained as described in Section 5.4 of the AQMP.
8. Haul roads within the former quarry area will be kept adequately wet while in use.
9. Construction vehicle speed in areas containing NOA will be limited to 15 mph or less.
Vehicles hauling NOA-containing materials outside of NOA-containing areas will be
wetted and/or covered such that no visible emissions are generated during hauling and
will also be limited to a speed limit of 15 mph. Under no circumstances will haul trucks
be allowed to transport NOA-containing materials in a manner that allows visible
emissions from either the wheels or the load of the truck.
10. The Asbestos Competent Person will conduct a visual clearance inspection of the
construction activity work areas twice daily. The inspections will take place at the
beginning and at the end of each shift to confirm that all asbestos containing soil is
property contained. The inspections will also assure that the barrier tapes, posting,
decontamination systems and all other work area components and equipment are
intact and in good working order. The Contractor will maintain inspections of the
regulated work areas until a written report of Project Site clearance has been obtained
from the Asbestos Competent Person.
11. If worn, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) will comply with 8 CCR 1509-1527 (as
applicable), 5144, 5208, and 1529.10.2. If worn, full-body disposable protective
clothing will include head, body, and foot coverings and consist of material resistant to
penetration by asbestos fibers. If protective clothing is required, it will be provided to all
workers in sizes large enough to allow movement without tearing. The following criteria
regarding PPE at the Project Site is required:
Workers and authorized visitor entering and working in the regulated work area
must wear respiratory protection, if required;
If worn, respiratory protection must be National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) approved; and
Respirator cartridges must protect against all air borne particulate (P-100) and may
need to protect against organic vapors.
Additional safety equipment, as necessary, will be provided to all workers and authorized
visitors. This equipment may include, but not be limited to, rubber work boots, work gloves, safety
glasses, orange reflective vests, and hard-hats.
4.1.3 Onsite Track-out Control Measures
Generally, construction vehicles will exit a NOA-containing area and travel on non NOA-
containing gravel roads within the limits of work. For example, trucks may collect material from an
excavation area and take the material to a disposal area, using an access road made of non NOA-
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-5 -
containing material. To prevent track out of NOA, the following Air borne Toxic Control Measures
ATCM) requirements will be followed for onsite roads:
1. A maximum vehicle speed limit of 15 mph or less; and
2. One or more of the following:
i. Watering every two hours of active operations or sufficiently often to keep the area
adequately wetted;
ii. Applying chemical dust suppressants consistent with manufacturer's directions;
iii. Maintaining a gravel cover with a silt content that is less than five percent and
asbestos content that is less than 0.25 percent, as determined using an approved
asbestos bulk test method, to a depth of three inches on the surface being used for
travel; or
iv. Any other measure as effective as the measures listed above.
4.1.4 Track-Out onto Public Roads
It will be necessary for trucks and other equipment to leave the Project Site and travel on
public roads. In the event vehicles will exit the Project Site to a public paved road from a NOA-
containing area, a system will be utilized to prevent offsite migration of soil. Track-out prevention
and control measures will include:
1. Removal of any visible track-out from a paved public road at any location where
vehicles exit the Project Site; this will be accomplished using wet sweeping or a high
efficiency particle air (HEPA) filter or equivalent particulate filter equipped vacuum
device at the end of the work day or at least one time per day, and
2. Installation of one or more of the following track-out prevention measures:
i. A gravel pad or rumble strips designed using good engineering practices to clean
the tires of exiting vehicles;
ii. A tire shaker;
iii. A wheel wash system;
iv. Pavement extending for not less than fifty consecutive feet from the intersection
with the paved public road; or
v. Any other measure as effective as the measures listed above.
Soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons will be excavated and removed for offsite
disposal. Some of this soil may contain NOA, meaning NOA-containing soil may be removed from
the Project Site for offsite disposal at a designated landfill.
4.1.5 Offsite Transportation of NOA Containing Materials
The offsite transport of NOA-containing materials as NHIS material is not anticipated, but
could occur. The Contractor will implement the ACTM requirements for loading and transporting
NOA material, as stated below:
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-6 -
1. Trucks are maintained such that no spillage can occur from holes or other openings in
cargo compartments; and
2. Loads are adequately wetted and either:
i. Covered with tarps; or
ii. Loaded such that the material does not touch the front, back, or sides of the cargo
compartment at any point less than six inches from the top and that no point of the
load extends above the top of the cargo compartment.
4.1.6 Post Construction Stabilization of Disturbed Areas
The ATCM requires post construction stabilization of disturbed surfaces of NOA-containing
materials greater than 0.25 percent asbestos using one or more of the following methods:
1. Establishment of a vegetative cover;
2. Placement of at least three inches of non-asbestos-containing material;
3. Paving in areas that will not be inundated with storm water or reservoir water; and
4. Any other measure deemed sufficient to prevent wind speeds of 10 mph or greater
from causing visible dust emissions.
4.2 LEAD AND ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS
There are four buildings at the Project Site, located in the Northwest Operations Area, that
will be demolished during the course of remediation activities. Given the age of the three older
buildings, Chevron surveyed these buildings for lead-containing and asbestos-containing materials
and found that they are present (West Coast Safety Consultants, 2008). Asbestos abatement
activities were completed on the southern two buildings in 2009. Additional asbestos and lead
abatement will be needed prior to physical demolition of the buildings. In 2015, Padre completed
an asbestos survey of concrete structures, footings and debris at the Project Site. Padre identified
asbestos-containing materials in transite and gasket material identified during the course of the
survey. None of the concrete structures or foundations were identified with asbestos
concentrations in excess of the laboratory detection limit of 0.25 percent (Padre, 2015a).
Prior to abatement, a National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
demolition notification form, asbestos survey report, and an asbestos abatement work plan will be
submitted to the SLOAPCD. Asbestos-containing materials will be abated in accordance with
local, state, and federal regulations. Any suspect material found during abatement and not
previously identified will be presumed asbestos-containing materials unless contradicted by
specific laboratory data. Asbestos-containing materials will be properly wrapped, placed in
covered roll-off bins, and disposed of at a licensed disposal facility in accordance with the
Project’s Waste Management Plan (Padre, 2015c).
During building demolition and concrete debris removal, water spray will be actively
applied to the work area. Loose or flaking lead-based paint will be scraped by a licensed and
trained contractor prior to demolition of the buildings. Intact lead-based painted materials will be
sprayed with an encapsulating material prior to demolition. Paint chips dislodged during
demolition activities will be collected and properly disposed.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-7 -
All pipeline segments scheduled for removal that contain coatings or wrap will be inspected
by a CAC or CSST working under the auspices of a CAC for the presence of asbestos-containing
materials. Asbestos-containing material will be removed by properly trained personnel. Pipe with
somastic coating and pipe fittings containing asbestos-containing flange gaskets will be disposed
of as asbestos waste. Should friable material, or material that could become friable, be
discovered during the course of Project activities, Chevron will stop work and an asbestos
abatement work plan will be submitted to SLOAPCD for review and approval. All asbestos
containing material (ACM) waste will be wrapped in plastic sheeting and taped to prevent the
disturbance or release of somastic material. Any flanges containing ACM gaskets will be placed in
plastic bags and sealed. All asbestos waste will be placed in designated asbestos waste roll-off
bins which are labeled as containing asbestos waste. As the work progresses, to prevent
exceeding available storage capacity onsite, sealed and labeled containers of asbestos containing
waste shall be removed and transported to the prearranged disposal location. Disposal shall
occur at an authorized site in accordance with regulatory requirements of NESHAP and applicable
State and local guidelines and regulations.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4-8 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
5-1 -
5.0 SOIL SEGREGATION AND STOCKPILING ACTIVITIES
5.1 SOIL SEGREGATION CRITERIA
Dr. Charles Lambert of Intrinsik, the project toxicologist and risk assessor, has prepared
risk based screening levels (RBSLs) to be utilized for soil borrow materials to be utilized onsite in
either open space or development areas. Table 5-1 will be followed for the re-use or import of
materials within the open space and development areas of the Project Site within the upper-most
levels (upper two-feet for open space or four-feet for development areas). Materials not meeting
the criteria provided below will be either utilized in selected deeper fill areas or transported offsite
for disposal at a licensed facility. The primary fill areas include the former Northwest Operations
area and Reservoir 4. It should be noted that RBSLs do not apply to asphaltic material that is
inseparably embedded in the soil matrix at designated borrow source locations at the Project Site.
This material does not warrant remediation and may be utilized as fill material in accordance with
the RAP.
Table 5-1 Risk Based Screening Levels
Constituent
Maximum
Concentration –
Open Space
Topsoil (2 foot)
mg/kg,
dry weight)1
Maximum
Concentration –
Development Area
Upper 4 feet
mg/kg, dry weight)2
Basis
Arsenic 6.9 (wet weight) 6.9 (wet weight) Background inflection point (England
Geosystem 2003).
Lead 180 320 uHHRA/CHHSL or equivalent (MDL 2013).
TPH (C4-C40) 7,619 41,281 Risk-based screening levels based on
uHHRA exposure parameters and Site-
specific TPH fractions; recreator user
ADAFs applied only to mutagens. PAHs
RBSL for recreator based on Northern
California background BaP Equivalent
Value.
Benzene 4.0 1.8
Toluene 7,900 5,907
Ethylbenzene 60 31
Total Xylenes 21,750 18,420
PAHs (Total) 0.93 1.8
Notes:
1 Based on recreator exposure scenario
2 Based on intrusive construction worker scenario.
3 Northern California Background 95th Percentile BaP Equivalent Value as per DTSC Guidance (2009)
Source: Intrinsik, Human-Health Risk Management Summary, (Inrinsik, 2015).
mg/kg – milligrams per kilogram
PAHs – polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
uHHRA – Updated Human Health Risk Assessment (McDaniel-Lambert, 2013)
CHHSLs – California Human Health Screening Level
ADAFs - Age-Dependent Adjustment Factor
BaP – Benzo(a)pyrene
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
5-2 -
5.2 SOIL STOCKPILING PROCEDURES
Impacted soil not directly loaded into trucks for disposal will be stockpiled in designated
staging areas or within the foot print of impacted areas. Non-saturated impacted soils may be
stockpiled directly on paved surfaces in the Northwest Operations Area, Former Recycling Area or
laydown area south of Tank Farm Road. Impacted soils shall not be stockpiled on undisturbed
topsoil unless placed on an engineer-approved barrier (plastic, geotextile, etc.)
Contractors shall comply with all applicable measures and/or requirements for impacted
soil stockpiles included in the CUP, AQMP, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, and applicable
permit conditions during the course of remediation and restoration activities at the Project Site.
These requirements include monitoring of odor observations and VOC measurements, erosion
control measures, Visqueen covers or applications of soil binders, and limited stockpiling holding
time.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
6-1 -
6.0 COMPLAINT RESPONSE
Prior to starting construction activities, the Project representative will appoint one primary
and at least one secondary contact for complaints. These appointed contacts will be either
Chevron employees or Chevron designated representatives. Chevron will provide the name,
company and title, phone numbers and physical address of the selected individuals in the
notification letter sent to the SLOAPCD prior to commencement of any construction activities. A
telephone number for submittal of complaints will be posted at the entrance of the Project Site
prior to the start of blasting and crushing activities.
Complaints about odors or dust will be directed to the onsite Chevron representative. All
complaints and breakdowns will be reported to the SLOAPCD within four hours of receipt or event.
Equipment or process breakdowns, including the process of minimizing fugitive emissions from
soil excavations or stockpiles, and upsets at the water treatment plant, will be reported in writing to
the SLOAPCD according to the criteria required under the SLOAPCD Rule 107.
The following point of contact will be available to respond to complaints received by either
Chevron or the APCD:
Primary Contact:
Jerry Conable, Construction Representative
Chevron Environmental Management Co.
276 Tank Farm Road
P.O. Box 1332
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Office: (805) 546-6912
Mobile: (805) 999-0201
e-mail: jconable@chevron.com
Secondary Contact:
Andy Smith, Project Manager
Chevron Environmental Management Co.
276 Tank Farm Road
P.O. Box 1332
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Office: (805) 546-6915
Mobile: (805) 540-9812
e-mail: smith.andy@chevron.com
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
6-2 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
7-1 -
7.0 REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING
Reporting. Chevron will provide the SLOAPCD with quarterly reports on the actual air
quality impacts resulting from construction equipment emissions and will make future off-set
mitigation payments accordingly.
Pipeline purging activities will be reported according to the measures included in PTO No.
735.
Recordkeeping. The onsite Chevron representative or designee will record the following:
1. The results of any air monitoring conducted at the request of the SLOAPCD;
2. The documentation for any geologic evaluation conducted on the Project Site for the
purpose of obtaining an exemption, except the archive of collected samples which may
be discarded at the expiration of the exemption or one year after the exemption is
granted, whichever is less; and
3. The results of any asbestos bulk sampling that meets any of the following conditions:
a. The asbestos bulk sampling was conducted by Chevron to document the
applicability of or compliance with this AQMP; or
b. The asbestos bulk sampling was done at the request of the SLOAPCD.
Chevron will maintain all of the following records for at least seven years after the
completion of the Project.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
7-2 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
8-1 -
8.0 REFERENCES
Avocet Environmental, Inc., 2015. Revised Remedial Action Plan, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm,
276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California, prepared for Chevron Environmental
Management Company, March.
CARB. 2002. Air Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying and Surface
Mining Operations. California Air Resources Board, July 29.
Intrinsik, 2015. Human Health Risk Summary, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, prepared for Chevron
EMC, June 29.
Marine Research Specialists, Inc., 2013. Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development
Project, Final Environmental Impact Report, prepared for the City of San Luis Obispo and
the County of San Luis Obispo, December.
Padre Associates, Inc., 2009. Lead-Based Paint Survey Report, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm
Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management
Company. January 16.
Padre Associates, Inc., 2012. Report of Findings, Geologic Evaluation of Naturally Occurring
Asbestos and Materials Durability Assessment, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276
Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, prepared for
Chevron Environmental Management Company, December 3.
Padre, 2015a. Asbestos-Containing Material Survey Report, Concrete Features and Structures,
San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, Remediation and Restoration Project, 276 Tank Farm Road,
San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, prepared for Chevron EMC, June
25.
Padre, 2015b. Report of Findings, Supplemental Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, Flower
Mound, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project, 276 Tank Farm
Road, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, prepared for Chevron EMC,
July 20.
Padre, 2015c. Waste Management Plan, Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and
Restoration Project, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County,
California, prepared for Chevron EMC, December.
Padre, 2016a. Dewatering Contingency Plan, Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation,
Restoration, and Development Project, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California,
prepared for Chevron EMC, May.
Padre, 2016b. Traffic Management Plan, Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation,
Restoration, and Development Project, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California,
prepared for Chevron EMC, May.
West Coast Safety Consultants, 2009. Asbestos Building Inspection – 276 Tank Farm Road, San
Luis Obispo, California. Prepared for Padre Associates. January 2.
SLOAPCD, 2012. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. April.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
8-2 -
PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Construction Activity Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
APPENDIX F
AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS SPREADSHEETS
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm
Remediation and Restoration Project
Air Quality Emissions Model
Revised May 24,2016
Prepared By:
Padre Associates,Inc.
Sheet Title
1 Revision Log
2 Peak Emissions Onsite
3 Peak Emissions Offsite
4 Offsite Emissions Calculations
5 Onsite Emissions Calculations
6 Fugitive Dust Emissions Calculations
7 Project Schedule
8 Emissions Factors Used
9 Mitigation Measures Applied
10 EMFAC 2014 v1.0.7)Emission Rates
11 EMFAC 2014 Vehicle Descriptions
12 CalEEMOD Appendix D Descriptions
13 Restoration and Construction Quantities
14 Material Densities
15 Emissions Formulas
1.Revision Log
Revised May 24,2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Changed the Equipment trucking route to Quinn Rental in Northern Santa Maria.
Updated the restoration and construction quanities based on Avocet's 10 Year Restoration Plan.
Fixed a VLOOKUP function error in the Peak Calc Onsite"spreadsheet.
Revised the Schedule"to correct VLOOKUP function errors.
Revised the Peak Calcs Onsite",Peak Calcs Offsite",Offsite,Onsite",Fugitive Dust",Schedule"
and Emission Factors"spreadsheets for printing to PDF.
Added a formula explanation text box to Peak Calcs Onsite",Peak Calcs Offsite",Offsite and
Onsite"spreadsheets.
Updated the schedule based on the Avocet Schedule Overview."
Renamed the Activities Nursery"to Nursery Staging Area."
Added month/years to Peak Calcs Onsite",Peak Calcs Offsite"and Schedule"spreadsheets.
Changed the Quarterly Tier 2 construction significance threshold of 6.5 tons to 6.3 tons in the
following equation IF(E94<TSF,"0.00",((E94 TSF)*(Moyer Value))/1000)".This change was
requested by the SLOAPCD in their comments letter dated March 31,2016.
Changed the Moyer value from 16,000 to 18,260 the following equation
IF(E94<TSF,"0.00",((E94 TSF)*(Moyer Value))/1000)".This change was requested by Gary
Arcemont with the SLOAPCD in an Email dated April 26,2016.
Revised the Offsite"spread sheet to calculate separate emissions for waste loads,fill loads,
equipment loads.
Added toggle switch for Crushing,Blasting and Landfill,respectively.
Fixed a summation error in the Onsite",Offsite"and Peak Calc Onsite spreadsheets."
12.CalEEMOD Appendix D Descriptions
Equipment Type Year Low HP High HP ROG CO NOX SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4
Aerial Lifts 2015 6 15 0.661 3.47 4.146 0.008 0.166 0.166 568.299 0.059
Aerial Lifts 2015 16 25 0.799 2.513 4.669 0.007 0.235 0.235 568.299 0.072
Aerial Lifts 2015 26 50 1.358 4.71 4.899 0.007 0.366 0.366 568.299 0.122
Aerial Lifts 2015 51 120 0.673 3.539 4.827 0.006 0.36 0.36 568.299 0.06
Aerial Lifts 2015 251 500 0.269 1.13 3.262 0.005 0.096 0.096 568.299 0.024
Aerial Lifts 2015 501 750 0.278 1.13 3.38 0.005 0.098 0.098 568.299 0.025
Air Compressors 2015 6 15 0.84 3.658 5.196 0.008 0.311 0.311 568.299 0.075
Air Compressors 2015 16 25 0.894 2.666 4.89 0.007 0.27 0.27 568.299 0.08
Air Compressors 2015 26 50 1.868 5.968 5.223 0.007 0.459 0.459 568.299 0.168
Air Compressors 2015 51 120 0.821 3.84 5.19 0.006 0.446 0.446 568.299 0.074
Air Compressors 2015 121 175 0.571 3.218 4.504 0.006 0.245 0.245 568.299 0.051
Air Compressors 2015 176 250 0.381 1.207 3.967 0.006 0.121 0.121 568.299 0.034
Air Compressors 2015 251 500 0.354 1.198 3.455 0.005 0.113 0.113 568.3 0.032
Air Compressors 2015 501 750 0.358 1.198 3.586 0.005 0.116 0.116 568.299 0.032
Air Compressors 2015 751 1000 0.409 1.37 5.157 0.005 0.142 0.142 568.299 0.036
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 6 15 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.334 0.007 0.166 0.166 568.299 0.061
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 26 50 0.428 4.092 4.101 0.007 0.137 0.137 568.299 0.038
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 51 120 0.276 3.445 2.752 0.006 0.118 0.118 568.299 0.024
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 121 175 0.248 3.037 2.16 0.006 0.079 0.079 568.299 0.022
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 176 250 0.205 1.034 1.48 0.006 0.043 0.043 568.299 0.018
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 251 500 0.204 1.005 1.404 0.005 0.043 0.043 568.299 0.018
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 501 750 0.204 1.005 1.413 0.005 0.043 0.043 568.299 0.018
Bore/Drill Rigs 2015 751 1000 0.218 1.011 3.043 0.005 0.073 0.073 568.3 0.019
Cement and Mortar Mixers 2015 6 15 0.663 3.469 4.168 0.008 0.171 0.171 568.3 0.059
Cement and Mortar Mixers 2015 16 25 0.811 2.531 4.712 0.007 0.24 0.24 568.299 0.073
Concrete/Industrial Saws 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.332 0.007 0.162 0.162 568.299 0.061
Concrete/Industrial Saws 2015 26 50 1.47 5.165 4.989 0.007 0.386 0.386 568.299 0.132
Concrete/Industrial Saws 2015 51 120 0.683 3.647 4.789 0.006 0.372 0.372 568.3 0.061
Concrete/Industrial Saws 2015 121 175 0.475 3.077 4.112 0.006 0.207 0.207 568.299 0.042
Cranes 2015 26 50 2.091 6.689 5.476 0.007 0.496 0.496 568.3 0.188
Cranes 2015 51 120 0.907 4.033 5.464 0.006 0.47 0.47 568.299 0.081
Cranes 2015 121 175 0.65 3.39 4.728 0.006 0.267 0.267 568.299 0.058
Cranes 2015 176 250 0.468 1.374 4.197 0.006 0.145 0.145 568.299 0.042
Cranes 2015 251 500 0.439 1.471 3.727 0.005 0.134 0.134 568.299 0.039
Cranes 2015 501 750 0.442 1.47 3.833 0.005 0.136 0.136 568.299 0.039
Cranes 2015 1001 9999 0.508 1.695 5.426 0.005 0.162 0.162 568.299 0.045
Crawler Tractors 2015 26 50 2.322 7.052 5.628 0.007 0.531 0.531 568.299 0.209
Crawler Tractors 2015 51 120 0.987 4.122 5.885 0.006 0.5 0.5 568.299 0.089
Crawler Tractors 2015 121 175 0.707 3.462 5.136 0.006 0.288 0.288 568.299 0.063
Crawler Tractors 2015 176 250 0.541 1.578 4.628 0.006 0.175 0.175 568.299 0.048
Crawler Tractors 2015 251 500 0.504 1.83 4.162 0.005 0.16 0.16 568.3 0.045
Crawler Tractors 2015 501 750 0.506 1.829 4.254 0.005 0.162 0.162 568.299 0.045
Crawler Tractors 2015 751 1000 0.542 2.045 5.744 0.005 0.179 0.179 568.299 0.048
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 2015 26 50 1.796 5.996 5.195 0.007 0.446 0.446 568.299 0.162
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 2015 51 120 0.797 3.859 5.04 0.006 0.43 0.43 568.299 0.071
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 2015 121 175 0.562 3.247 4.343 0.006 0.237 0.237 568.299 0.05
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 2015 176 250 0.382 1.201 3.801 0.006 0.117 0.117 568.299 0.034
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 2015 251 500 0.358 1.184 3.304 0.005 0.109 0.109 568.299 0.032
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 2015 501 750 0.358 1.176 3.422 0.005 0.111 0.111 568.299 0.032
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 2015 1001 9999 0.422 1.343 5.019 0.005 0.14 0.14 568.299 0.038
Dumpers/Tenders 2015 16 25 0.696 2.35 4.402 0.007 0.187 0.187 568.299 0.062
Excavators 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.332 0.007 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.061
Excavators 2015 26 50 1.475 6.095 5.125 0.007 0.379 0.379 568.299 0.133
Excavators 2015 51 120 0.704 3.938 4.467 0.006 0.351 0.351 568.299 0.063
Excavators 2015 121 175 0.532 3.369 3.751 0.006 0.204 0.204 568.299 0.048
Excavators 2015 176 250 0.4 1.228 3.2 0.006 0.106 0.106 568.299 0.036
Excavators 2015 251 500 0.383 1.207 2.825 0.005 0.1 0.1 568.299 0.034
Excavators 2015 501 750 0.385 1.206 2.914 0.005 0.102 0.102 568.299 0.034
Forklifts 2015 26 50 1.235 5.863 5.109 0.007 0.35 0.35 568.3 0.111
Forklifts 2015 51 120 0.62 3.893 4.198 0.006 0.312 0.312 568.299 0.056
Forklifts 2015 121 175 0.487 3.357 3.456 0.006 0.188 0.188 568.299 0.044
Forklifts 2015 176 250 0.378 1.163 2.938 0.006 0.096 0.096 568.299 0.034
Forklifts 2015 251 500 0.367 1.106 2.614 0.005 0.093 0.093 568.299 0.033
Generator Sets 2015 6 15 0.747 3.658 5.141 0.008 0.28 0.28 568.299 0.067
Generator Sets 2015 16 25 0.793 2.666 4.89 0.007 0.256 0.256 568.299 0.071
Generator Sets 2015 26 50 1.281 4.538 4.858 0.007 0.353 0.353 568.299 0.115
Generator Sets 2015 51 120 0.651 3.499 4.769 0.006 0.347 0.347 568.299 0.058
Generator Sets 2015 121 175 0.44 2.938 4.138 0.006 0.191 0.191 568.299 0.039
Generator Sets 2015 176 250 0.287 1.104 3.633 0.006 0.1 0.1 568.3 0.025
Generator Sets 2015 251 500 0.258 1.114 3.231 0.005 0.094 0.094 568.299 0.023
Generator Sets 2015 501 750 0.267 1.114 3.347 0.005 0.096 0.096 568.299 0.024
Generator Sets 2015 1001 9999 0.351 1.269 4.822 0.005 0.124 0.124 568.299 0.031
Graders 2015 26 50 1.851 6.359 5.301 0.007 0.447 0.447 568.299 0.167
Graders 2015 51 120 0.819 3.965 5.099 0.006 0.42 0.42 568.299 0.073
Graders 2015 121 175 0.595 3.356 4.372 0.006 0.241 0.241 568.299 0.053
Graders 2015 176 250 0.437 1.335 3.829 0.006 0.132 0.132 568.299 0.039
Graders 2015 251 500 0.412 1.421 3.407 0.005 0.122 0.122 568.299 0.037
Graders 2015 501 750 0.414 1.42 3.501 0.005 0.124 0.124 568.299 0.037
Off-Highway Tractors 2015 51 120 1.154 4.274 6.765 0.006 0.577 0.577 568.299 0.104
Off-Highway Tractors 2015 121 175 0.814 3.58 5.971 0.006 0.336 0.336 568.299 0.073
Off-Highway Tractors 2015 176 250 0.648 1.882 5.509 0.006 0.226 0.226 568.299 0.058
Off-Highway Tractors 2015 501 750 0.597 2.523 5.083 0.005 0.204 0.204 568.299 0.053
Off-Highway Tractors 2015 751 1000 0.629 2.755 6.424 0.005 0.213 0.213 568.299 0.056
Off-Highway Trucks 2015 121 175 0.571 3.434 3.905 0.006 0.216 0.216 568.299 0.051
Off-Highway Trucks 2015 176 250 0.427 1.263 3.35 0.006 0.111 0.111 568.299 0.038
Off-Highway Trucks 2015 251 500 0.408 1.241 2.956 0.005 0.105 0.105 568.299 0.036
Off-Highway Trucks 2015 501 750 0.411 1.241 3.05 0.005 0.107 0.107 568.299 0.037
Off-Highway Trucks 2015 751 1000 0.443 1.347 4.745 0.005 0.136 0.136 568.299 0.039
Other Construction Equipment 2015 6 15 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059
Other Construction Equipment 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.334 0.007 0.166 0.166 568.3 0.061
Other Construction Equipment 2015 26 50 1.211 5.088 4.809 0.007 0.329 0.329 568.299 0.109
Other Construction Equipment 2015 51 120 0.581 3.656 4.225 0.006 0.31 0.31 568.299 0.052
Other Construction Equipment 2015 121 175 0.424 3.128 3.54 0.006 0.176 0.176 568.299 0.038
Other Construction Equipment 2015 251 500 0.292 1.109 2.652 0.005 0.088 0.088 568.299 0.026
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 6 15 0.589 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.053
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.332 0.007 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.061
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 26 50 2.01 6.562 5.404 0.007 0.49 0.49 568.299 0.181
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 51 120 0.889 4.007 5.308 0.006 0.469 0.469 568.299 0.08
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 121 175 0.631 3.362 4.596 0.006 0.26 0.26 568.299 0.057
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 176 250 0.435 1.257 4.046 0.006 0.128 0.128 568.299 0.039
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 251 500 0.409 1.236 3.518 0.005 0.119 0.119 568.299 0.036
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 501 750 0.412 1.236 3.651 0.005 0.122 0.122 568.299 0.037
Other General Industrial Equipment 2015 751 1000 0.456 1.409 5.272 0.005 0.151 0.151 568.299 0.041
Other Material Handling Equipment 2015 26 50 1.999 6.502 5.384 0.007 0.488 0.488 568.299 0.18
Other Material Handling Equipment 2015 51 120 0.882 3.99 5.3 0.006 0.468 0.468 568.299 0.079
Other Material Handling Equipment 2015 121 175 0.625 3.347 4.589 0.006 0.259 0.259 568.299 0.056
Other Material Handling Equipment 2015 176 250 0.429 1.251 4.041 0.006 0.127 0.127 568.299 0.038
Other Material Handling Equipment 2015 251 500 0.403 1.232 3.513 0.005 0.119 0.119 568.299 0.036
Other Material Handling Equipment 2015 1001 9999 0.469 1.405 5.263 0.005 0.15 0.15 568.299 0.042
Pavers 2015 16 25 0.711 2.376 4.439 0.007 0.199 0.199 568.299 0.064
Pavers 2015 26 50 2.432 6.945 5.635 0.007 0.549 0.549 568.3 0.219
Pavers 2015 51 120 1.014 4.08 6.141 0.006 0.522 0.522 568.299 0.091
Pavers 2015 121 175 0.712 3.414 5.385 0.006 0.297 0.297 568.299 0.064
Pavers 2015 176 250 0.543 1.632 4.896 0.006 0.187 0.187 568.299 0.049
Pavers 2015 251 500 0.501 1.976 4.409 0.005 0.169 0.169 568.299 0.045
Paving Equipment 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.334 0.007 0.166 0.166 568.299 0.061
Paving Equipment 2015 26 50 2.429 6.889 5.622 0.007 0.549 0.549 568.299 0.219
Paving Equipment 2015 51 120 1.01 4.057 6.125 0.006 0.524 0.524 568.299 0.091
Paving Equipment 2015 121 175 0.705 3.389 5.372 0.006 0.297 0.297 568.299 0.063
Paving Equipment 2015 176 250 0.529 1.599 4.878 0.006 0.183 0.183 568.299 0.047
Plate Compactors 2015 6 15 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059
Pressure Washers 2015 6 15 0.747 3.657 5.141 0.008 0.28 0.28 568.299 0.067
Pressure Washers 2015 16 25 0.793 2.666 4.89 0.007 0.256 0.256 568.299 0.071
Pressure Washers 2015 26 50 0.976 3.833 4.685 0.007 0.3 0.3 568.299 0.088
Pressure Washers 2015 51 120 0.567 3.336 4.551 0.006 0.297 0.297 568.299 0.051
Pressure Washers 2015 121 175 0.427 2.917 4.115 0.006 0.187 0.187 568.299 0.038
Pressure Washers 2015 176 250 0.121 0.986 0.69 0.006 0.01 0.01 568.299 0.01
Pumps 2015 6 15 0.84 3.658 5.196 0.008 0.311 0.311 568.299 0.075
Pumps 2015 16 25 0.894 2.666 4.89 0.007 0.27 0.27 568.299 0.08
Pumps 2015 26 50 1.384 4.775 4.916 0.007 0.371 0.371 568.3 0.124
Pumps 2015 51 120 0.679 3.554 4.842 0.006 0.364 0.364 568.3 0.061
Pumps 2015 121 175 0.461 2.983 4.202 0.006 0.2 0.2 568.299 0.041
Pumps 2015 176 250 0.302 1.122 3.693 0.006 0.104 0.104 568.299 0.027
Pumps 2015 251 500 0.273 1.134 3.272 0.005 0.097 0.097 568.299 0.024
Pumps 2015 501 750 0.281 1.134 3.389 0.005 0.099 0.099 568.299 0.025
Pumps 2015 1001 9999 0.363 1.293 4.878 0.005 0.127 0.127 568.299 0.032
Rollers 2015 6 15 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059
Rollers 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.334 0.007 0.166 0.166 568.299 0.061
Rollers 2015 26 50 1.905 6.023 5.26 0.007 0.456 0.456 568.299 0.171
Rollers 2015 51 120 0.825 3.853 5.296 0.006 0.437 0.437 568.3 0.074
Rollers 2015 121 175 0.58 3.24 4.588 0.006 0.247 0.247 568.299 0.052
Rollers 2015 176 250 0.41 1.327 4.064 0.006 0.136 0.136 568.299 0.037
Rollers 2015 251 500 0.38 1.451 3.62 0.005 0.126 0.126 568.299 0.034
Rough Terrain Forklifts 2015 26 50 1.582 5.96 5.145 0.007 0.407 0.407 568.299 0.142
Rough Terrain Forklifts 2015 51 120 0.728 3.876 4.699 0.006 0.382 0.382 568.299 0.065
Rough Terrain Forklifts 2015 121 175 0.532 3.294 3.98 0.006 0.217 0.217 568.299 0.048
Rough Terrain Forklifts 2015 176 250 0.388 1.214 3.455 0.006 0.112 0.112 568.299 0.035
Rough Terrain Forklifts 2015 251 500 0.369 1.182 3.021 0.005 0.105 0.105 568.3 0.033
Rubber Tired Dozers 2015 121 175 0.852 3.657 6.12 0.006 0.346 0.346 568.299 0.076
Rubber Tired Dozers 2015 176 250 0.684 1.952 5.659 0.006 0.236 0.236 568.299 0.061
Rubber Tired Dozers 2015 251 500 0.628 2.672 5.138 0.005 0.211 0.211 568.299 0.056
Rubber Tired Dozers 2015 501 750 0.63 2.669 5.225 0.005 0.213 0.213 568.299 0.056
Rubber Tired Dozers 2015 751 1000 0.661 2.901 6.556 0.005 0.222 0.222 568.299 0.059
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.332 0.007 0.162 0.162 568.299 0.061
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 26 50 1.811 6.272 5.269 0.007 0.44 0.44 568.299 0.163
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 51 120 0.805 3.945 5.041 0.006 0.415 0.415 568.299 0.072
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 121 175 0.584 3.341 4.317 0.006 0.237 0.237 568.3 0.052
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 176 250 0.426 1.313 3.773 0.006 0.128 0.128 568.299 0.038
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 251 500 0.402 1.394 3.352 0.005 0.119 0.119 568.299 0.036
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 501 750 0.404 1.394 3.447 0.005 0.121 0.121 568.299 0.036
Rubber Tired Loaders 2015 751 1000 0.445 1.572 5.063 0.005 0.148 0.148 568.299 0.04
Scrapers 2015 51 120 1.007 4.131 6 0.006 0.512 0.512 568.299 0.09
Scrapers 2015 121 175 0.718 3.465 5.241 0.006 0.293 0.293 568.299 0.064
Scrapers 2015 176 250 0.548 1.602 4.74 0.006 0.18 0.18 568.299 0.049
Scrapers 2015 251 500 0.509 1.889 4.261 0.005 0.164 0.164 568.299 0.045
Scrapers 2015 501 750 0.511 1.888 4.354 0.005 0.166 0.166 568.299 0.046
Signal Boards 2015 6 15 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059
Signal Boards 2015 26 50 1.461 5.068 4.943 0.007 0.382 0.382 568.299 0.131
Signal Boards 2015 51 120 0.687 3.624 4.791 0.006 0.371 0.371 568.299 0.062
Signal Boards 2015 121 175 0.474 3.052 4.136 0.006 0.205 0.205 568.299 0.042
Signal Boards 2015 176 250 0.38 1.371 4.365 0.007 0.127 0.127 686.695 0.034
Skid Steer Loaders 2015 16 25 0.778 2.477 4.634 0.007 0.231 0.231 568.299 0.07
Skid Steer Loaders 2015 26 50 0.842 4.761 4.57 0.007 0.252 0.252 568.299 0.076
Skid Steer Loaders 2015 51 120 0.444 3.601 3.586 0.006 0.225 0.225 568.299 0.04
Surfacing Equipment 2015 26 50 1.643 5.369 5.089 0.007 0.407 0.407 568.299 0.148
Surfacing Equipment 2015 51 120 0.748 3.699 5.13 0.006 0.391 0.391 568.299 0.067
Surfacing Equipment 2015 121 175 0.521 3.117 4.443 0.006 0.221 0.221 568.299 0.047
Surfacing Equipment 2015 176 250 0.375 1.313 3.935 0.006 0.13 0.13 568.299 0.033
Surfacing Equipment 2015 251 500 0.344 1.479 3.547 0.005 0.12 0.12 568.299 0.031
Surfacing Equipment 2015 501 750 0.349 1.478 3.637 0.005 0.121 0.121 568.299 0.031
Sweepers/Scrubbers 2015 6 15 0.589 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.053
Sweepers/Scrubbers 2015 16 25 0.685 2.339 4.332 0.007 0.162 0.162 568.299 0.061
Sweepers/Scrubbers 2015 26 50 1.384 5.702 5.074 0.007 0.374 0.374 568.299 0.124
Sweepers/Scrubbers 2015 51 120 0.656 3.82 4.424 0.006 0.347 0.347 568.299 0.059
Sweepers/Scrubbers 2015 121 175 0.481 3.266 3.663 0.006 0.196 0.196 568.3 0.043
Sweepers/Scrubbers 2015 176 250 0.357 1.149 3.148 0.006 0.099 0.099 568.299 0.032
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2015 16 25 0.688 2.339 4.374 0.007 0.175 0.175 568.299 0.062
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2015 26 50 1.314 5.655 4.955 0.007 0.348 0.348 568.3 0.118
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2015 51 120 0.633 3.823 4.252 0.006 0.322 0.322 568.299 0.057
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2015 121 175 0.478 3.28 3.549 0.006 0.187 0.187 568.299 0.043
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2015 176 250 0.358 1.18 2.994 0.006 0.097 0.097 568.299 0.032
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2015 251 500 0.343 1.168 2.648 0.006 0.092 0.092 568.299 0.031
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2015 501 750 0.345 1.168 2.729 0.006 0.093 0.093 568.299 0.031
Trenchers 2015 6 15 0.661 3.469 4.142 0.008 0.161 0.161 568.299 0.059
Trenchers 2015 16 25 0.685 2.34 4.332 0.007 0.162 0.162 568.3 0.061
Trenchers 2015 26 50 2.4 6.734 5.584 0.007 0.54 0.54 568.299 0.216
Trenchers 2015 51 120 1.002 4.027 6.182 0.006 0.516 0.516 568.299 0.09
Trenchers 2015 121 175 0.698 3.37 5.437 0.006 0.295 0.295 568.299 0.063
Trenchers 2015 176 250 0.536 1.659 4.96 0.006 0.191 0.191 568.299 0.048
Trenchers 2015 251 500 0.491 2.071 4.483 0.005 0.172 0.172 568.299 0.044
Trenchers 2015 501 750 0.494 2.07 4.572 0.005 0.174 0.174 568.3 0.044
Welders 2015 6 15 0.84 3.658 5.196 0.008 0.311 0.311 568.299 0.075
Welders 2015 16 25 0.894 2.666 4.89 0.007 0.27 0.27 568.299 0.08
Welders 2015 26 50 1.715 5.562 5.113 0.007 0.43 0.43 568.3 0.154
Welders 2015 51 120 0.772 3.738 5.077 0.006 0.419 0.419 568.299 0.069
Welders 2015 121 175 0.532 3.133 4.408 0.006 0.23 0.23 568.299 0.048
Welders 2015 176 250 0.352 1.178 3.88 0.006 0.116 0.116 568.299 0.031
Welders 2015 251 500 0.324 1.176 3.398 0.005 0.108 0.108 568.299 0.029
Chevron Tank Farm San Luis Obispo,Ca
14.Material Densities
Revised May 18,2016
Material p/cf p/cy ton/cy cy/truck
cy/truck
20%**
SLOTF Soil 121.99 3293.69 1.65 12.75 15.30
Gravel 120 3240.00 1.62 12.96 N/A
Sand 120 3240.00 1.62 12.96 15.56
Clay 110 2970.00 1.49 14.14 16.97
Top Soil 83.83189 2263.46 1.13 18.56 22.27
Notes:
20 added for fluff factor
Gravel,Sand and Clay densities from Hand Book of Mathematical,Scientific,
and Engineering,Research and Education Association,1984.
Top Soil density from Soil Bulk Density Moisture Aeration,NRCS,USDA,
May 2014)
Data from the 1/14/2014 Geotechnical Laboratory Test Conducted by
Fugro
APPENDIX C
REVISED AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FOR
THE SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PROJECT
PREPARED BY NUZZO ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
MAY 29,2020
Onsite-Offsite Emissions Summary
Option A
Onsite
lbs/day)
Offsite
lbs/day)
Onsite +
Offsite
lbs/day)
APCD CEQA
Threshold
lbs/day)
Onsite
tons/qtr)
Offsite
tons/qtr)
Onsite +
Offsite
tons/qtr)
APCD CEQA
Threshold
Tier 1
tons/qtr)
APCD CEQA
Threshold
Tier 2
tons/qtr)
ROG+NOx 83 7 90 137 2.0 0.23 2.26 2.5 6.3
Diesel Particulate Matter (PM2.5)0.9 0.1 1.0 7 0.02 0.005 0.02 0.13 0.32
Fug Particulate Matter (PM10) Dust 31 20 51 1.2 0.69 1.85 2.5
GHG CO2e 33088 2508 35596 778 79 857
Option B
ROG+NOx 83 8 92 137 2.0 0.28 2.31 2.5 6.3
Diesel Particulate Matter (PM2.5)0.9 0.2 1.0 7 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.13 0.32
Fug Particulate Matter (PM10) Dust 31 25 56 1.2 0.85 2.01 2.5
GHG CO2e 33088 2982 36070 778 94 873
Option C
ROG+NOx 83 16 99 137 2.0 0.53 2.56 2.5 6.3
Diesel Particulate Matter (PM2.5)0.9 0.3 1.2 7 0.020 0.01 0.03 0.13 0.32
Fug Particulate Matter (PM10) Dust 31 46 77 1.2 1.56 2.72 2.5
GHG CO2e 33088 5178 38266 778 162 940
Option D
ROG+NOx 83 21 104 137 2.0 0.72 2.75 2.5 6.3
Diesel Particulate Matter (PM2.5)0.9 0.4 1.3 7 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.13 0.32
Fug Particulate Matter (PM10) Dust 31 61 92 1.2 2.12 3.28 2.5
GHG CO2e 33088 6723 39812 778 235 1013
Offsite Mobile Emissions - Peak Daily and Peak Quarterly
OPTION A -Route: SLOTF to Cold Canyon via 227 - Cold Canyon to SLOTF via Buckley. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 N2O NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 (MT)CH4 (MT)N2O (MT)
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 17 29 75 14.3 4.824 0.144 0.580 0.014 0.107 0.102 1436.433 0.007 0.226 1.81E-01 5.39E-03 2.18E-02 5.09E-04 4.01E-03 3.83E-03 4.89E+01 2.27E-04 7.68E-03
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 0.662 0.020 0.080 0.002 0.015 0.014 197.040 0.001 0.031 2.48E-02 7.39E-04 2.99E-03 6.98E-05 5.50E-04 5.26E-04 7.39E+00 3.43E-05 1.16E-03
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 0.602 0.018 0.072 0.002 0.013 0.013 179.127 0.001 0.028 6.02E-03 1.79E-04 7.24E-04 1.69E-05 1.33E-04 1.27E-04 1.79E+00 8.32E-06 2.82E-04
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 29 12 14.3 0.287 0.009 0.034 0.001 0.006 0.006 85.384 0.000 0.013 1.72E-03 5.12E-05 2.07E-04 4.84E-06 3.81E-05 3.65E-05 5.12E-01 2.38E-06 8.05E-05
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 0.213 0.032 1.630 0.005 0.002 0.002 516.366 0.007 0.015 7.98E-03 1.19E-03 6.11E-02 1.92E-04 7.24E-05 6.66E-05 1.76E+01 2.45E-04 4.98E-04
6.59 0.22 2.40 0.02 0.14 0.14 2,414.4 0.02 0.31 2.21E-01 7.54E-03 8.68E-02 7.92E-04 4.80E-03 4.59E-03 7.61E+01 5.17E-04 9.70E-03
ROG+NOx 6.81 ROG+NOx 0.23
OPTION B -Route: SLOTF to Cold Canyon via 227 - Cold Canyon to SLOTF via Price Canyon. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 N2O NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 (MT)CH4 (MT)N2O (MT)
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 17 37 75 18.6 6.258 0.186 0.753 0.018 0.139 0.133 1863.345 0.009 0.293 2.35E-01 6.99E-03 2.82E-02 6.60E-04 5.20E-03 4.97E-03 6.34E+01 2.94E-04 9.96E-03
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 0.662 0.020 0.080 0.002 0.015 0.014 197.040 0.001 0.031 2.48E-02 7.39E-04 2.99E-03 6.98E-05 5.50E-04 5.26E-04 7.39E+00 3.43E-05 1.16E-03
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 0.602 0.018 0.072 0.002 0.013 0.013 179.127 0.001 0.028 6.02E-03 1.79E-04 7.24E-04 1.69E-05 1.33E-04 1.27E-04 1.79E+00 8.32E-06 2.82E-04
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 37 12 18.6 0.372 0.011 0.045 0.001 0.008 0.008 110.760 0.001 0.017 2.23E-03 6.65E-05 2.68E-04 6.28E-06 4.94E-05 4.73E-05 6.65E-01 3.09E-06 1.04E-04
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 0.213 0.032 1.630 0.005 0.002 0.002 516.366 0.007 0.015 7.98E-03 1.19E-03 6.11E-02 1.92E-04 7.24E-05 6.66E-05 1.76E+01 2.45E-04 4.98E-04
8.11 0.27 2.58 0.03 0.18 0.17 2,866.6 0.02 0.38 2.76E-01 9.16E-03 9.33E-02 9.45E-04 6.00E-03 5.74E-03 9.08E+01 5.86E-04 1.20E-02
ROG+NOx 8.37 ROG+NOx 0.28
OPTION C -Route: SLOTF to SMLF - SMLF to SLOTF. NHIS Volume: As Approved in 2016
NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 N2O NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 (MT)CH4 (MT)N2O (MT)
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 10 124 75 62.0 12.432 0.370 1.496 0.035 0.275 0.263 3701.966 0.017 0.582 4.66E-01 1.39E-02 5.61E-02 1.31E-03 1.03E-02 9.88E-03 1.26E+02 5.85E-04 1.98E-02
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 0.662 0.020 0.080 0.002 0.015 0.014 197.040 0.001 0.031 2.48E-02 7.39E-04 2.99E-03 6.98E-05 5.50E-04 5.26E-04 7.39E+00 3.43E-05 1.16E-03
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 0.602 0.018 0.072 0.002 0.013 0.013 179.127 0.001 0.028 6.02E-03 1.79E-04 7.24E-04 1.69E-05 1.33E-04 1.27E-04 1.79E+00 8.32E-06 2.82E-04
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 124 12 62 1.243 0.037 0.150 0.003 0.028 0.026 370.197 0.002 0.058 7.46E-03 2.22E-04 8.97E-04 2.10E-05 1.65E-04 1.58E-04 2.22E+00 1.03E-05 3.49E-04
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 0.213 0.032 1.630 0.005 0.002 0.002 516.366 0.007 0.015 7.98E-03 1.19E-03 6.11E-02 1.92E-04 7.24E-05 6.66E-05 1.76E+01 2.45E-04 4.98E-04
15.15 0.48 3.43 0.05 0.33 0.32 4,964.7 0.03 0.71 5.12E-01 1.62E-02 1.22E-01 1.61E-03 1.12E-02 1.08E-02 1.55E+02 8.83E-04 2.21E-02
ROG+NOx 15.63 ROG+NOx 0.53
OPTION D -Route: SLOTF to SMLF - SMLF to SLOTF. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 N2O NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 (MT)CH4 (MT)N2O (MT)
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 14 124 75 62.0 17.405 0.518 2.094 0.049 0.385 0.369 5182.752 0.024 0.815 6.53E-01 1.94E-02 7.85E-02 1.84E-03 1.45E-02 1.38E-02 1.94E+02 9.03E-04 3.05E-02
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 0.662 0.020 0.080 0.002 0.015 0.014 197.040 0.001 0.031 2.48E-02 7.39E-04 2.99E-03 6.98E-05 5.50E-04 5.26E-04 7.39E+00 3.43E-05 1.16E-03
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 0.602 0.018 0.072 0.002 0.013 0.013 179.127 0.001 0.028 6.02E-03 1.79E-04 7.24E-04 1.69E-05 1.33E-04 1.27E-04 1.79E+00 8.32E-06 2.82E-04
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 124 12 62.0 1.243 0.037 0.150 0.003 0.028 0.026 370.197 0.002 0.058 7.46E-03 2.22E-04 8.97E-04 2.10E-05 1.65E-04 1.58E-04 2.22E+00 1.03E-05 3.49E-04
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 0.211 0.031 1.614 0.005 0.002 0.002 511.203 0.007 0.014 7.90E-03 1.18E-03 6.05E-02 1.90E-04 7.17E-05 6.59E-05 1.92E+01 2.68E-04 5.43E-04
20.12 0.62 4.01 0.06 0.44 0.42 6440.32 0.03 0.95 6.99E-01 2.18E-02 1.44E-01 2.13E-03 1.54E-02 1.47E-02 2.25E+02 1.22E-03 3.29E-02
ROG+NOx 20.75 ROG+NOx 0.72
Mobile Emission Factors, Calendar Year 2017 grams/lb = 453.59
NOx ROC CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 N2O
Tractor/trailer T7 tractor construction Diesel 1.00E-02 2.99E-04 1.21E-03 2.82E-05 2.22E-04 2.12E-04 2.99E+00 1.39E-05 4.69E-04
Passenger Vehicle LDT2 Gasoline 3.19E-04 4.75E-05 2.44E-03 7.66E-06 2.90E-06 2.66E-06 7.75E-01 1.08E-05 2.20E-05
1. Emission factors from EMFAC2017; Region: SLOAPCD; Calendar Year: 2020; Season: Annual; Model Year: Aggregated; Speed: 55 mph
Total Worker Commute Miles assumed to be 200,000 per year based on 2019 actual commute miles.
50000 miles/quarter
20 worker commute vehicles
2500 miles/quarter/worker commute vehicle
75 worker commute days/quarter
33 worker commute miles/day
17 worker commute miles/one way trip
Assume Peak Daily Emissions occur during Peak Quarter, Q3, 2022
20,188 CY Impacted Soil moved in Q3, 2022
75 days/quarter
269 CY per day
16 CY/Truckload
17 Truckloads/day
14.3 Option A mileage one way
18.55 Option B mileage one way
62.0 Option C mileage one way
62.0 Option D mileage one way
Equipment
Total
Quarterly Emissions (ton/quarter)Daily Emissions (lb/day)Description
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicle
Day/QTR
Avg Distance
miles one
way)
Max
Vehicles/Day
Daily Emissions (lb/day)Quarterly Emissions (ton/quarter)
Total
Total
Equipment Description
Max
Vehicles/Day
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicle
Day/QTR
Avg Distance
miles one
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicle
Day/QTR
Avg Distance
miles one
Daily Emissions (lb/day)Quarterly Emissions (ton/quarter)
Daily Emissions (lb/day)Quarterly Emissions (ton/quarter)
Total
Equipment EMFAC2011 Vehicle Type Fuel Type
Equipment Description
Max
Vehicles/Day
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicle
Day/QTR
Avg Distance
miles one
Emission Factors (lb/mi)1
Equipment Description
Max
Vehicles/Day
Offsite Fugitive Dust Emissions - Peak Daily and Peak Quarterly
OPTION A -Route: SLOTF to Cold Canyon via 227 - Cold Canyon to SLOTF via Buckley. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
Daily Emissions
lb/day)
Quarterly
Emissions
ton/quarter)
Fug PM10 Fug PM10
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 17 29 75 14.3 14.434 0.54
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 1.980 0.07
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 1.800 0.02
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 29 12 14.3 0.858 0.01
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 1.333 0.05
20.41 0.69
OPTION B -Route: SLOTF to Cold Canyon via 227 - Cold Canyon to SLOTF via Price Canyon. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
Daily Emissions
lb/day)
Quarterly
Emissions
ton/quarter)
Fug PM10 Fug PM10
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 17 37 75 18.6 18.724 0.70
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 1.980 0.07
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 1.800 0.02
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 37 12 18.55 1.113 0.01
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 1.333 0.05
24.95 0.85
OPTION C -Route: SLOTF to SMLF - SMLF to SLOTF. NHIS Volume: As Approved in 2016
Daily Emissions
lb/day)
Quarterly
Emissions
ton/quarter)
Fug PM10 Fug PM10
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 10 124 75 62.0 37.200 1.40
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 1.980 0.07
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 1.800 0.02
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 124 12 62 3.720 0.02
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 1.333 0.05
46.03 1.56
OPTION D -Route: SLOTF to SMLF - SMLF to SLOTF. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
Daily Emissions
lb/day)
Quarterly
Emissions
ton/quarter)
Fug PM10 Fug PM10
Heavy Truck Impacted Soil Hauling 14 124 75 62.0 52.080 1.95
Heavy Truck Deliveries - Fill material, bins, supplies 1 66 75 33 1.980 0.07
Heavy Truck Equip Mobilization/Demobilization 1 60 20 30 1.800 0.02
Heavy Truck Waste Management 1 124 12 62.0 3.720 0.02
Light Duty Truck Worker Commuting 20 33 75 17 1.333 0.05
60.91 2.12
Fug PM10
Tractor/trailer T7 tractor construction Diesel 3.00E-02
Passenger Vehicle LDT2 Gasoline 2.00E-03
1. Emission factors calculated per EPA AP-42, Chapter 13.2.2, Equation 1a
2. Surface material silt content is 24%
Total Worker Commute Miles assumed to be 200,000 per year based on 2019 actual commute miles.
50000 miles/quarter
20 worker commute vehicles
2500 miles/quarter/worker commute vehicle
75 worker commute days/quarter
33 worker commute miles/day
17 worker commute miles/one way trip
Assume Peak Daily Emissions occur during Peak Quarter, Q3, 2022
20,188 CY Impacted Soil moved in Q3, 2022
75 days/quarter
269 CY per day
16 CY/Truckload
17 Truckloads/day
14.3 Option A mileage one way
18.55 Option B mileage one way
62.0 Option C mileage one way
62.0 Option D mileage one way
Avg Distance
miles one
way)
Emission Factors (lb/mi)1,2
Equipment Description
Max
Vehicles/Da
y
Day
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicl
e
Day/QTR
Total
Equipment Description
Max
Vehicles/Da
y
Day
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicl
e
Day/QTR
Avg Distance
miles one
way)
Total
Equipment Description
Max
Vehicles/Da
y
Day
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicl
e
Day/QTR
Avg Distance
miles one
way)
Total
Equipment EMFAC2011 Vehicle Type Fuel Type
Total
Equipment Description
Max
Vehicles/Da
y
Daily Trip
Miles/Vehicl
e
Day/QTR
Avg Distance
miles one
way)
Onsite Emissions - Peak Daily and Peak Quarterly
Northwest Operations Area (2020)
BHP Load Factor Total Days ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2 ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2
Backhoe 8 1 60 8 65 0.38 60 0.120 3.524 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.151 478.245 0.052 1.535 1.194 0.0022 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.066 208.341
Bulldozer 8 1 60 8 177 0.38 60 0.060 1.604 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 483.449 0.071 1.903 0.308 0.0059 0.009 0.009 0.005 0.181 573.501
Excavator 8 2 60 16 308 0.38 60 0.080 1.114 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 481.236 0.330 4.597 5.326 0.0206 0.033 0.033 0.017 0.628 1986.777
Generators 8 2 60 16 50 0.74 60 0.613 3.905 3.916 0.007 0.165 0.165 0.004 0.055 568.300 0.800 5.097 5.111 0.0091 0.215 0.215 0.005 0.072 741.713
Loader 8 2 60 16 248 0.38 60 0.060 1.302 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 480.100 0.199 4.330 0.864 0.0166 0.027 0.027 0.014 0.505 1595.964
Offroad Truck 8 3 60 24 489 0.38 60 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 0.787 14.585 12.683 0.0492 0.079 0.079 0.041 1.514 4772.270
Rollers 8 1 60 8 157 0.38 60 0.060 2.933 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.453 0.063 3.086 0.274 0.0053 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.161 507.651
Skip and Drag- Loader 8 1 60 8 68 0.38 60 0.060 3.277 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.384 0.027 1.494 0.118 0.0023 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.070 219.843
Water Truck 8 1 60 8 350 0.38 60 0.120 0.967 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.026 1709.008 0.281 2.268 6.427 0.0117 0.019 0.019 0.010 0.061 4008.873
Contractor Transport
Truck
2 4 60
8 375 0.38 60 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 0.201 3.728 3.242 0.0126 0.020 0.020 0.011 0.387 1219.905
Contaminated Soils Offgas 0 0 0
0 0 0.024 lb/CY 0.716
TOTAL 3.529 42.623 35.548 0.136 0.418 0.418 0.111 3.645 15834.837
OU#4 Reservoir 3 (2021)
BHP Load Factor Total Days ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2 ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2
Backhoe 8 1 30 8 65 0.38 30 0.120 3.524 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.151 478.245 0.052 1.535 1.194 0.0022 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.066 208.341
Bulldozer 8 1 100 8 177 0.38 100 0.060 1.604 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 483.449 0.071 1.903 0.308 0.0059 0.009 0.009 0.005 0.181 573.501
Excavator 8 2 80 16 308 0.38 80 0.080 1.114 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 481.236 0.330 4.597 5.326 0.0206 0.033 0.033 0.017 0.628 1986.777
Generators 8 2 100 16 50 0.74 100 0.613 3.905 3.916 0.007 0.165 0.165 0.004 0.055 568.300 0.800 5.097 5.111 0.0091 0.215 0.215 0.005 0.072 741.713
Loader 8 2 150 16 248 0.38 150 0.060 1.302 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 480.100 0.199 4.330 0.864 0.0166 0.027 0.027 0.014 0.505 1595.964
Offroad Truck 8 3 80 24 489 0.38 80 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 0.787 14.585 12.683 0.0492 0.079 0.079 0.041 1.514 4772.270
Rollers 8 1 80 8 157 0.38 80 0.060 2.933 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.453 0.063 3.086 0.274 0.0053 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.161 507.651
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 80 8 68 0.38 80 0.060 3.277 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.384 0.027 1.494 0.118 0.0023 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.070 219.843
Water Truck 8 1 150 8 350 0.38 150 0.120 0.967 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.026 1709.008 0.281 2.268 6.427 0.0117 0.019 0.019 0.010 0.061 4008.873
Contractor Transport
Truck
2 4 60
8 375 0.38 60 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 0.201 3.728 3.242 0.0126 0.020 0.020 0.011 0.387 1219.905
Contaminated Soils Offgas 8 1 80
8 80 0.024 lb/CY 2.770
5.583 42.623 35.548 0.136 0.418 0.418 0.111 3.645 15834.837
OU#2 Reservoir 7 (2022)Creek Realignment (2022)
BHP Load Factor Total Days ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2 ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2 ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2
Backhoe 8 1 75 Backhoe 0 0 0 8 65 0.38 75 0.120 3.524 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.151 478.245 0.052 1.535 1.194 0.0022 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.066 208 0.058 0.045 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 8
Bulldozer 8 2 75 Bulldozer 8 2 25 32 177 0.38 100 0.060 1.604 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 483.449 0.285 7.613 1.234 0.0237 0.038 0.038 0.020 0.726 2294 0.007 0.191 0.031 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.018 57
Excavator 8 2 75 Excavator 8 2 25 32 308 0.38 100 0.080 1.114 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 481.236 0.661 9.194 10.651 0.0413 0.066 0.066 0.035 1.255 3974 0.017 0.230 0.267 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.031 99
Generators 8 2 75 Generators 8 2 25 32 50 0.74 100 0.613 3.905 3.916 0.007 0.165 0.165 0.004 0.055 568.300 1.600 10.193 10.222 0.0183 0.431 0.431 0.010 0.144 1483 0.040 0.255 0.256 0.000 0.011 0.011 0.000 0.004 37
Loader 8 2 75 Loader 8 2 25 32 248 0.38 100 0.060 1.302 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 480.100 0.399 8.660 1.729 0.0332 0.053 0.053 0.028 1.011 3192 0.010 0.217 0.043 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.025 80
Offroad Truck 8 4 50 Offroad Truck 8 2 25 48 489 0.38 75 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 1.573 29.171 25.366 0.0983 0.157 0.157 0.083 3.028 9545 0.033 0.608 0.529 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.063 199
Rollers 8 1 40 Rollers 8 1 15 16 157 0.38 55 0.060 2.933 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.453 0.126 6.171 0.547 0.0105 0.017 0.017 0.009 0.322 1015 0.002 0.085 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.004 14
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 75 Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 15 16 68 0.38 90 0.060 3.277 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.384 0.055 2.987 0.237 0.0046 0.007 0.007 0.004 0.139 440 0.001 0.067 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 10
Water Truck 8 1 75 Water Truck 8 1 40 16 350 0.38 115 0.120 0.967 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.026 1709.008 0.563 4.535 12.855 0.0235 0.038 0.038 0.020 0.122 8018 0.016 0.131 0.370 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.004 231
Contractor Transport
Truck
2 4 30
Contractor Transport
Truck
2 4 30
16 375 0.38 60 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 0.402 7.457 6.484 0.0251 0.040 0.040 0.021 0.774 2440 0.006 0.112 0.098 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.012 37
Contaminated Soils Offgas 8 1 40
Contaminated Soils Offga
s
0 0 0
8 40 0.024 lb/CY Soil ROG 6.552 0.246
2022 TOTAL 12.268 87.517 70.519 0.281 0.851 0.851 0.231 7.587 32608 0.377 1.954 1.651 0.006 0.020 0.020 0.005 0.167 772
ROG+NOx 82.787 ROG+NOx 2.029
OU#2 Reservoir 5 (2023)OU#4 Remaining PPSH (2023)
BHP Load Factor Total Days ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2 ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2
Backhoe 8 1 100 Backhoe 0 0 0 8 65 0.38 100 0.120 3.524 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.151 478.245 0.052 1.535 1.194 0.0022 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.066 208.341
Bulldozer 8 2 100 Bulldozer 8 1 30 24 177 0.38 130 0.060 1.604 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 483.449 0.214 5.710 0.925 0.0178 0.028 0.028 0.015 0.544 1720.502
Excavator 8 2 100 Excavator 8 2 30 32 308 0.38 130 0.080 1.114 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 481.236 0.661 9.194 10.651 0.0413 0.066 0.066 0.035 1.255 3973.553
Generators 8 2 100 Generators 8 2 30 32 50 0.74 130 0.613 3.905 3.916 0.007 0.165 0.165 0.004 0.055 568.300 1.600 10.193 10.222 0.0183 0.431 0.431 0.010 0.144 1483.426
Loader 8 2 80 Loader 8 1 30 24 248 0.38 110 0.060 1.302 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 480.100 0.299 6.495 1.296 0.0249 0.040 0.040 0.021 0.758 2393.947
Offroad Truck 8 4 80 Offroad Truck 8 3 30 56 489 0.38 110 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 1.835 34.032 29.594 0.1147 0.184 0.184 0.096 3.533 11135.296
Rollers 8 1 80 Rollers 8 1 20 16 157 0.38 100 0.060 2.933 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.453 0.126 6.171 0.547 0.0105 0.017 0.017 0.009 0.322 1015.301
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 150 Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 30 16 68 0.38 180 0.060 3.277 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.384 0.055 2.987 0.237 0.0046 0.007 0.007 0.004 0.139 439.686
Water Truck 8 1 80 Water Truck 8 1 30 16 350 0.38 110 0.120 0.967 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.026 1709.008 0.563 4.535 12.855 0.0235 0.038 0.038 0.020 0.122 8017.746
Contractor Transport
Truck
2 4 60
Contractor Transport
Truck
2 4 60
16 375 0.38 120 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.383 0.402 7.457 6.484 0.0251 0.040 0.040 0.021 0.774 2439.811
Contaminated Soils Offgas 8 1 80
Contaminated Soils Offga
s
8 1 30
16 110 0.024 lb/CY Soil ROG 3.447
2023 TOTAL 9.254 88.310 74.006 0.283 0.854 0.854 0.233 7.657 32827.608
OPT A B D 114,629 CY TOTAL ROG+NOx 83.260
OPT C 33,629 CY TOTAL
Contaminated Soil Offgas EF Assumptions
From Table 7. Summary of Soil Analytica Results - Waste Characterization
Volatile Organic Compounds and Semivolatile Organic Compounds for Location ID NMRSH-STK-WC5 (highest results of all stockpiles)
Sample Date: 9/20/19
TOTAL mg VOC/kg Soil 8.3 mg/kg
conversion 2.2 lb/kg
Soil Density (average)1.74 g/cm3
conversion 1000 g/kg
conversion 764555 cm3/CY
conversion 453592.37 mg/lb
Soil Offgas Emission Factor 0.02434279 lb ROG/CY soil
2022 Emissions Tons/Quarter
Equipment Hours per Day Number Days 2021 Peak Equipment
hours/day
Equipment
Hours per
day
Number Q3 Days Equipment
Equipment
Hours per
Day
Number Days Emission Factors g/bhp-hr2020PeakEquipment
hours/day
Equipment
Hours per
day
Number Days Equipment Emission Factors g/bhp-hr
2020 Emissions lbs/day
2022 Emissions lbs/day
2023 Emissions lbs/day
Emission Factors g/bhp-hr 2021 Emissions lbs/day
2022 Peak
equipment
hours/day
2023 Peak
equipment
hours/day
Q3 Days
Hours per
day
Number Days
Hours per
day
Number Emission Factors g/bhp-hr
2022 Quarter Breakdown
OU#2 Reservoir 7 (2022)
Backhoe 8 1 45 75 30 150
Bulldozer 8 2 45 75 30 150
Excavator 8 2 45 75 30 150
Generators 8 2 45 75 30 150
Loader 8 2 45 75 30 150
Offroad Truck 8 4 30 50 20 100
Rollers 8 1 24 40 16 80
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 45 75 30 150
Water Truck 8 1 45 75 30 150
Contractor Transport Truck 2 4 18 30 12 60
Contaminated Soils Offgas 8 1 24 40 16 80
Creek Realignment (2022)
Backhoe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bulldozer 8 2 15 25 10 50
Excavator 8 2 15 25 10 50
Generators 8 2 15 25 10 50
Loader 8 2 15 25 10 50
Offroad Truck 8 2 15 25 10 50
Rollers 8 1 9 15 6 30
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 9 15 6 30
Water Truck 8 1 24 40 16 80
Contractor Transport Truck 2 4 18 30 12 60
Contaminated Soils Offgas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number
2022 Total
DaysQ2Days
Q1 Days Q2 Days Q3 Days Q4 Days
Q1 Days Q3 Days Q4DaysHoursper
day
Equipment
Hours per
day
Number
2022 Total
Days
Equipment
Onsite Fugitive Dust Emissions - Peak Daily and Peak Quarterly
Onsite Activity
Emission
Factor Units Max Activity Units
Onsite PM10
lb/day)
days/max
quarter
Onsite PM10
tons/qtr)
Site Grading 0.429 lb PM10-acre/day 2 acres/day 0.9 75 0.03
Truck Loading/Dumping 0.000172 lb/ton soil 5000 tons soil/day 0.9 75 0.03
Unpaved Road Travel 1.17 lb/vehicle mile 25 veh miles/day 29.3 75 1.10
TOTAL 31.0 1.2
Emission Factors taken from Trihydro's APCD Quarterly Emissions Reporting.
Emission Factors do include some dust mitigation measures.
EMFAC2017 (v1.0.2) Emission Rates
Region Type: Air District
Region: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY APCD
Calendar Year: 2020
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for VMT, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW. Note 'day' in the unit is operation day.g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile
Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel VMT NOx_RUNEX PM2.5_RUNEX PM10_RUNEX CO2_RUNEX CH4_RUNEX N2O_RUNEX ROG_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY APCD 2020 T7 tractor construction Aggregated 55 DSL 450.195572 4.547702701 0.096361741 0.100718791 1354.17318 0.006291257 0.212857166 0.135449034 0.154198415 0.54705782 0.012793557
NOx_RUNEX PM2.5_RUNEX PM10_RUNEX CO2_RUNEX CH4_RUNEX N2O_RUNEX ROG_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX
lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile
0.010026021 0.000212442 0.000222048 2.985456425 1.38699E-05 0.000469272 0.000298616 0.000339951 0.001206062 2.82051E-05
g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile g/mile
Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel VMT NOx_RUNEX PM2.5_RUNEX PM10_RUNEX CO2_RUNEX CH4_RUNEX N2O_RUNEX ROG_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY APCD 2020 LDT2 Aggregated 55 GAS 283350.981 0.144709687 0.00120828 0.001313987 351.3278712 0.004906428 0.009959072 0.021545388 0.031403522 1.108910052 0.003476674
NOx_RUNEX PM2.5_RUNEX PM10_RUNEX CO2_RUNEX CH4_RUNEX N2O_RUNEX ROG_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX
lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile lb/mile
0.000319032 2.66381E-06 2.89686E-06 0.77454942 1.08169E-05 2.19561E-05 4.74997E-05 6.92333E-05 0.002444741 7.66479E-06
Onsite Emissions Factors
Load Factor ROG CO NOx SOX PM10 PM2.5 N2O CH4 CO2
Articulating Truck-A1 375 0.38 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.4
Articulating Truck-B1 489 0.38 0.080 1.483 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.4
Articulating Truck-C1 443 0.38 0.060 1.483 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.154 485.4
Bull Dozer 177 0.43 0.060 1.604 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 483.4
Compactor 157 0.38 0.060 2.933 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.5
Excavator Large-A1 308 0.38 0.080 1.114 1.290 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 481.2
Excavator Large-B1 264 0.38 0.060 3.082 2.150 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.7
Loader-A1 130 0.38 0.060 3.082 2.150 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.7
Loader-A2 248.1 0.36 0.060 1.302 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.152 480.1
Mini Excavator-A2 65 0.38 0.120 3.524 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.151 478.2
Skidsteer Loader-A1 110 0.37 0.120 3.277 2.740 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 506.3
Skip Loader 68 0.37 0.060 3.277 0.260 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.153 482.4
Water Truck 350 0.38 0.120 0.967 2.740 0.000 0.008 0.008 0.004 0.026 1709.0
CalEEMod 2016 Engine Year
From Quarterly Reports 2019
Equipment BHP
g/bhp-hr
EQUIPMENT LIST BY OPERATIONAL UNIT AND YEAR
Northwest Operations Area (2020)
Equipment Hours per day Number Total Days Description Model Engine HP Engine Tier
Asphalt Fug 8 0 0
Backhoe 8 1 60 Backhoe Case 580N 55 4f
Bulldozer 8 1 60 CAT D6N Dozer CAT D6N 166 4f
Crushing Plant - Crushers 8 0 0
Crushing Plant - Screening 8 0 0
Excavator 8 2 60 CAT 336 EL Excavator CAT336 EL 308 T4I
Generators 8 2 60 3500 Watt Generator Honda EM4000SX < 50 N/A
Grader 8 0 0
Loader 8 2 60 CAT 962 Loader CAT 962 248.1 T4F
Offroad Truck 8 3 60 CAT 740 Hauler CAT740 489 4i
Paving Machine 8 0 0
Rollers 8 1 60 Vibratory Compactor CAT CP56 157 4f
Skip and Drag- Loader 8 1 60 CAT Skip Loader CAT 415F2 68 4F
Contaminated Soils Offgass 0
Water Truck 8 1 60 4k Water Truck Freightliner M2 350 3
OU#4 Reservoir 3 andPPSH Areas 7 and 8 (2020-2021)
Equipment Hours per day Number Total Days Description Model Engine HP Engine Tier
Asphalt Fug 8 0 0
Backhoe 8 1 30 Backhoe Case 580N 55 4f
Bulldozer 8 1 100 CAT D6N Dozer CAT D6N 166 4f
Crushing Plant - Crushers 8 0 0
Crushing Plant - Screening 8 0 0
Excavator 8 2 80 CAT 336 EL Excavator CAT336 EL 308 T4I
Generators 8 2 100 3500 Watt Generator Honda EM4000SX < 50 N/A
Grader 8 0 0
Loader 8 1 150 CAT 962 Loader CAT 962 248.1 T4F
Loader 8 1 100 CAT 962 Loader CAT 962 248.1 T4F
Offroad Truck 8 3 80 CAT 740 Hauler CAT740 489 4i
Paving Machine 8 0 0
Rollers 8 1 80 Vibratory Compactor CAT CP56 157 4f
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 80 CAT Skip Loader CAT 415F2 68 4F
Contaminated Soils Offgass 80
Water Truck 8 1 150 4k Water Truck Freightliner M2 350 3
EQUIPMENT LIST BY OPERATIONAL UNIT AND YEAR
OU#2 Reservoir 7 (2022)
Equipment Hours per day Number Total Days Description Model Engine HP Engine Tier
Asphalt Fug 8 0 0
Backhoe 8 1 150 Backhoe Case 580N 55 4f
Bulldozer 8 2 150 CAT D6N Dozer CAT D6N 166 4f
Crushing Plant - Crushers 8 0 0
Crushing Plant - Screening 8 0 0
Excavator 8 2 150 CAT 336 EL Excavator CAT336 EL 308 T4I
Generators 8 2 150 3500 Watt Generator Honda EM4000SX < 50 N/A
Grader 8 0 0
Loader 8 2 150 CAT 962 Loader CAT 962 248.1 T4F
Offroad Truck 8 4 100 CAT 740 Hauler CAT740 489 4i
Paving Machine 8 0 0
Rollers 8 1 80 Vibratory Compactor CAT CP56 157 4f
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 150 CAT Skip Loader CAT 415F2 68 4F
Contaminated Soils Offgass 80
Water Truck 8 1 150 4k Water Truck Freightliner M2 350 3
Creek Realignment (2022)
Equipment Hours per day Number Total Days Description Model Engine HP Engine Tier
Asphalt Fug 8 0 0
Backhoe 8 0 0
Bulldozer 8 2 50 CAT D6N Dozer CAT D6N 166 4f
Crushing Plant - Crushers 8 0 0
Crushing Plant - Screening 8 0 0
Excavator 8 2 50 CAT 336 EL Excavator CAT336 EL 308 T4I
Generators 8 2 50 3500 Watt Generator Honda EM4000SX < 50 N/A
Grader 8 0 0
Loader 8 2 50 CAT 962 Loader CAT 962 248.1 T4F
Offroad Truck 8 2 50 CAT 740 Hauler CAT740 489 4i
Paving Machine 8 0 0
Rollers 8 1 30 Vibratory Compactor CAT CP56 157 4f
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 30 CAT Skip Loader CAT 415F2 68 4F
Contaminated Soils Offgass 0
Water Truck 8 1 80 4k Water Truck Freightliner M2 350 3
EQUIPMENT LIST BY OPERATIONAL UNIT AND YEAR
OU#2 Reservoir 5 (2023)
Equipment Hours per day Number Total Days Description Model Engine HP Engine Tier
Asphalt Fug 8 0 0
Backhoe 8 1 100 Backhoe Case 580N 55 4f
Bulldozer 8 2 100 CAT D6N Dozer CAT D6N 166 4f
Crushing Plant - Crushers 8 0 0
Crushing Plant - Screening 8 0 0
Excavator 8 2 100 CAT 336 EL Excavator CAT336 EL 308 T4I
Generators 8 2 100 3500 Watt Generator Honda EM4000SX < 50 N/A
Grader 8 0 0
Loader 8 2 80 CAT 962 Loader CAT 962 248.1 T4F
Offroad Truck 8 4 80 CAT 740 Hauler CAT740 489 4i
Paving Machine 8 0 80
Rollers 8 1 80 Vibratory Compactor CAT CP56 157 4f
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 150 CAT Skip Loader CAT 415F2 68 4F
Contaminated Soils Offgass 80
Water Truck 8 1 80 4k Water Truck Freightliner M2 350 3
OU#4 Remaining PPSH (2023)
Equipment Hours per day Number Total Days Description Model Engine HP Engine Tier
Asphalt Fug 8 0 0
Backhoe 8 0 0 Backhoe Case 580N 55 4f
Bulldozer 8 1 30 CAT D6N Dozer CAT D6N 166 4f
Crushing Plant - Crushers 8 0 0
Crushing Plant - Screening 8 0 0
Excavator 8 2 30 CAT 336 EL Excavator CAT336 EL 308 T4I
Generators 8 2 30 3500 Watt Generator Honda EM4000SX < 50 N/A
Grader 8 0 0
Loader 8 1 30 CAT 962 Loader CAT 962 248.1 T4F
Offroad Truck 8 3 30 CAT 740 Hauler CAT740 489 4i
Paving Machine 8 0 0
Rollers 8 1 20 Vibratory Compactor CAT CP56 157 4f
Skip and Drag Loader 8 1 30 CAT Skip Loader CAT 415F2 68 4F
Contaminated Soils Offgass 30
Water Truck 8 1 30 4k Water Truck Freightliner M2 350 3
IMPACTED SOIL HAUL ROUTE AND TRIP SCENARIOS
Assumptions
Round Trip Distances
Cold Canyon to SLOTF via Buckley:14.3 miles
Cold Canyon to SLOTF via Price Canyon:22.8 miles
SMLF to SLOTF:62.0 miles
Soil Volumes
Proposed Additional Volume 81,000 CY
Original Volume 196,250 CY
Total Removed Volume 162,621 CY *Estimated Current Trips to date 8,719
Total Volume Remaining 114,629 CY *Estimated Current Miles to Date 540,578
Option A Option B
Route: SLOTF to Cold Canyon via 227 - Cold Canyon to
SLOTF via Buckley. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
Route: SLOTF to Cold Canyon via 227 - Cold Canyon to
SLOTF via Price Canyon. NHIS Volume: Increased CY
Total Volume Soil:114,629 CY Total Volume Soil:114,629 CY
Max Volume in Truck 16 CY Max Volume in Truck 16 CY
Total Trips 7,164 Trips Total Trips 7,164 Trips
Total Miles:102,450 miles Total Miles:163,346 miles
Option C Option D
Route: SLOTF to SMLF - SMLF to SLOTF. NHIS Volume: As
Approved in 2016
Route: SLOTF to SMLF - SMLF to SLOTF. NHIS Volume:
Increased CY
Total Volume Soil:33,629 CY Total Volume Soil:114,629 CY
Max Volume in Truck 16 CY Max Volume in Truck 16 CY
Total Trips 2,102 Trips Total Trips 7,164 Trips
Total Miles:130,312 miles Total Miles:444,187 miles
APPENDIX D
i
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 SITE BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 1
1.3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ....................................... 2
1.4 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................... 6
1.5 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS .......................................................................................... 6
1.6 PLAN ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................... 6
2.0 WASTE CLASSIFICATION AND RECEIVING FACILITIES ................................................. 7
2.1 SANTA MARIA REGIONAL LANDFILL-NHIS PROGRAM ............................................... 7
2.2 COLD CANYON LANDFILL .............................................................................................. 7
2.3 BUTTONWILLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY ....................................................... 7
2.4 KETTLEMAN HILLS HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY .................................................... 7
3.0 TRANSPORTATION PLAN .................................................................................................. 8
3.1 MOBILIZATION OF EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES ......................................................... 8
3.2 HAULING IMPORT AND EXPORT MATERIAL ................................................................ 8
3.3 TRAFFIC CONTROL ........................................................................................................ 8
3.4 OVERSIZED OR OVERWEIGHT REQUIREMENTS ...................................................... 10
3.5 EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN ................................................................................... 10
3.6 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ................................................................................. 10
4.0 HAUL ROUTES ................................................................................................................... 11
4.1 SANTA MARIA REGIONAL LANDFILL (HIGHWAY 101 ROUTE) ................................. 11
4.2 SANTA MARIA REGIONAL LANDFILL (HIGHWAY 227 ROUTE) ................................. 11
4.3 COLD CANYON LANDFILL (HIGHWAY 227 ROUTE) ................................................... 11
4.4 COLD CANYON LANDFILL (BUCKLEY ROAD ROUTE) ............................................... 12
4.5 BUTTONWILLOW ROUTE ............................................................................................. 12
4.6 KETTLEMAN HILLS ROUTE .......................................................................................... 12
5.0 PAVEMENT MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................................. 14
5.1 COUNTY ROADS ........................................................................................................... 14
5.2 CITY ROADS .................................................................................................................. 15
6.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 16
ii
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Designated Legal Holidays ............................................................................................ 9
Table 2. Emergency Contact Information .................................................................................. 10
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Site Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................... 3
Figure 1-2 Site Plan ..................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 1-3 Proposed Work Areas ................................................................................................ 5
Figure 4-1 Project Haul Routes .................................................................................................. 13
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Traffic Control Plans
Appendix B: Haul Permit
1
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre), on behalf of Chevron Environmental Management
Company (Chevron) has prepared this Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for the remediation and
restoration activities planned at the former Union Oil San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site (Project
Site). This TMP identifies and addresses off-site project-related traffic requirements for the San
Luis Obispo (SLO) Tank Farm Restoration and Remediation Project planned at the Project Site.
The location of the Project Site is presented as Figure 1-1 - Site Vicinity Map, and Figure 1-2 –
Site Plan. Figure 1-3 provides an illustration of the proposed work areas.
Items discussed in this TMP includes local traffic control measures, haul routes, peak
hour and route restrictions, and road monitoring program. Emergency response procedures are
provided in separate plans.
Traffic to and from the Project Site will primarily consist of trips by site workers,
deliveries of equipment and materials, and transportation for beneficial re-use of non-hazardous
hydrocarbon impacted soil (NHIS) from the Project Site.
An estimated 160,000 cubic yards of affected material will be transported off-site during
the duration of this project. Given the uncertainties of remediation projects, the Final EIR
evaluated the impacts for off-site transport of 196,250 cubic yards of affected material (the
estimated 160,000 cubic yards plus a 25% contingency). Up to 60 truck round trips maximum
are anticipated, with an average of approximately 20 round trips anticipated during an active day
of steady hauling. The Final EIR evaluated a very conservative case of 177 truck round trips
per day, which assumed that three large excavation and hauling projects would be implemented
concurrently. Additionally, up to 87,000 cubic yards of gravel will be imported to the Project Site.
Approximately 20 auto daily round trips are expected for employees on the Project Site during
this time.
1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The Project Site is located immediately south of the city of San Luis Obispo, San Luis
Obispo County, California. The address of the Project Site is 276 Tank Farm Road. The Project
Site is divided into north and south sections by Tank Farm Road, and is bordered by light
commercial and industrial development to the west; the San Luis Obispo County Regional
Airport to the southeast; agricultural and pastoral lands with scattered residences to the south;
and a mobile home park to the east. The existing buildings in the northwest part of the Project
Site are used as Chevron’s local offices. The buildings are proposed for demolition as part of
the Project.
1.2 SITE BACKGROUND
This Project Site was originally owned and operated by Union Oil of California (Union
Oil). Chevron purchased Union, including the Project Site, in August 2005. The San Luis Obispo
Tank Farm was constructed in 1910 to serve as the accumulation point for the petroleum
pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. In 1926 many of the tanks on the Project Site were
destroyed in a fire caused by a lightning strike. The San Luis Obispo Tank Farm was re-built
and operated until the 1970s. The Project Site was slowly withdrawn from operation during the
later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s it was formally decommissioned.
2
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
The Project Site now exists as a primarily vacant land that is effectively surrounded by the urban
development within the City of San Luis Obispo and the San Luis Obispo County Regional
Airport area.
1.3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This Plan has been prepared for the purpose of complying with the Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) (DRC2013-00056) and to support information and/or requirements presented in
the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), certified by the City of San Luis Obispo (Marine
Research Specialists, 2013). Specifically, this Plan has been prepared following Conditions 59
and 103 of the San Luis Obispo County CUP (DRC2013-00056), Conditions of Approval, Exhibit
B. Conditions 59 and 130 are as follows:
59 T-1: Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the applicant shall develop a
construction traffic management plan for review and approval by the County Public
Works department in consultation with City Public Works and Caltrans. The plan shall
include at least the following items:
a. Identification of haul routes for materials hauling and equipment deliveries. This
section shall include a Haul Permit from Santa Barbara County Public Works.
b. Monitoring program for street surface conditions so that damage or debris resulting
from construction or remediation of the Project can be identified and corrected by the
applicant.
c. A traffic control plan showing proposed temporary traffic control measures, including
lane closure procedures, accommodation for pedestrians and cyclists, and removal
procedures for the temporary traffic control devices and added lanes.
d. A scheduling plan showing hours of operation to minimize traffic congestion during
peak hours and special events.
e. The use of electronic message signs providing the traveling public with current
construction information and the availability of alternate travel routes.
f. A park and ride program to reduce the number of worker single occupant vehicle trips
going to the site.
g. PS/U-1 The applicant shall incorporate the following in the construction traffic
management plan for review and approval by the City and County Public Works
departments:
i. Advance notification of emergency response providers near the project site of
exact construction locations, potential lane closure schedules, and potential alternate
routes.
ii. In order to avoid disruption to fire protection services’ access through the area,
traffic safety procedures, including, but not limited to, flagmen and signs controlling
traffic crossing Tank Farm Road.
103 T-1 The applicant shall comply with the approved construction traffic management plan.
PROPERTYSLO TANK FARMSAN LUISCITY OFOBISPOCHEVRONSan Luis Obispo, CaliforniaPROJECT NUMBER:1301-0306 DATE:August 2016ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTSENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &associates, inc.1-1FIGURESAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARMSITE
FLOWERMOUND
RESERVOIR 4
RESERVOIR 5
RESERVOIR 7
RESERVOIR 6
RESERVOIR 3
RESERVOIR 2
NORTHWEST
AREA
NORTH
MARSH
TANK FARM ROAD
SITE PLAN
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &
associates, inc.1-2
FIGURE
SCALE IN FEET
0 800 1,600
1301-0306 August 2016
CEMC
San Luis Obispo, California
SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
N
Reservoir 6
Reservoir 7
Reservoir 2
Reservoir 5
Reservoir 4
Reservoir 3
Northwest
Operations
Area North Marsh
TANK FARM ROAD
East Fork
Tank Farm Creek
1
2
3
PROPOSED WORK AREAS
AND SITE ACCESSLOCATIONSSource: Esri Online Basemap (2014) Image, Avocet2016CoordinateSystem: NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405FeetNotes: This map was created for informational and display purposes only.
Z:\Kristin\GIS
Maps\
MapProject\SLO
Tank
Farm\Proposed
Work Areas and Site Access.
mxd khart 8/3/
20160 250 500 FEET August
20161301-0306 FIGURE
1-3
SAN
LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM REMEDIATION AND RESTORATION PROJECT SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CA PROJECT NUMBER:DATE:PROJECT NAME:LEGEND:
Project Site Boundary ")Site Access Location
Proposed
6
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
1.4 OBJECTIVES
The objective of this TMP is to provide the measures to be implemented in accordance
with Conditions of Approval 59 and 103 of the CUP DRC2013-00056.
1.5 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
The TMP presents off-site project-related traffic requirements and is based on
information and/or requirements presented in the following supporting documents and plans,
which have been prepared under separate cover:
Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR – Marine Research Specialists, 2013);
San Luis Obispo County Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (DRC2013-00056);
Remedial Action Plan (RAP) and Remediation Construction Drawings, (Avocet,
2015); and
Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) (Padre 2016).
1.6 PLAN ORGANIZATION
This TMP is organized as follows: Section 2.0 presents the procedures for waste
classifications and designated waste facilities; Section 3.0 presents the transportation plan;
Section 4.0 presents the project haul routes; Section 5.0 provides a summary of the road
monitoring program; and Section 6.0 presents citations for the referenced documents.
7
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
2.0 WASTE CLASSIFICATION AND RECEIVING FACILITIES
The recyclable construction concrete debris generated from the building demolition
activities as well as the existing concrete debris stockpile in the northwest portion of the Project
Site will be hauled to Cayucos for subsequent crushing and processing.
The soil material to be hauled off-site is primarily classified as NHIS and will be hauled to
the Santa Maria Regional Landfill-NHIS facility or, upon addition to the CUP, Cold Canyon
Landfill. The material has been profiled and meets the acceptance criteria for the Santa Maria
Regional Landfill (NHIS program). Limited amounts of soil and waste may also be shipped to
the Buttonwillow Hazardous Waste Facility, and the Kettleman Hills Hazardous Waste Facility.
Cold Canyon Landfill has been identified as a possible alternative soil and non-hazardous waste
disposal location.
Demolition debris and other non-hazardous waste will be shipped to the Cold Canyon
Landfill or the Santa Maria Regional Landfill. Additional facilities will be utilized on a limited
basis as needed for recyclable or waste shipments. The following are the locations and contact
information for the identified facilities:
2.1 SANTA MARIA REGIONAL LANDFILL-NHIS PROGRAM
2065 E. Main St.
Santa Maria, California 93455
805-925-0951 Office
Contact: Joe Parker 805-680-1274
2.2 COLD CANYON LANDFILL
2268 Carpenter Canyon Road
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
805-549-8332 Office
Contact: Justin Fellhauer, 661-388-3013
2.3 BUTTONWILLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY
2500 W. Lokern Rd.
Buttonwillow, California 93206
661-762-6200 Office
Contact: Mark Atkinson 805-208-8518
2.4 KETTLEMAN HILLS HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY
35251 Skyline Rd
Kettleman City, California 93239
559-309-7688 Office
Contact: Michael Parrent, 661-397-5360
8
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
3.0 TRANSPORTATION PLAN
3.1 MOBILIZATION OF EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
Highway class vehicles will transport equipment to and from the Project Site. Equipment
delivered to the Project Site will primarily consist of construction equipment.
Materials delivered to the Project Site will include gravel, general construction supplies,
materials, and fuel for vehicles. Vehicles transporting construction materials will generally follow
the same circulation pattern as shown on Figure 4-1.
3.2 HAULING IMPORT AND EXPORT MATERIAL
An estimated 160,000 cubic yards of affected material will be transported off-site during
the duration of this Project. Additionally, up to 87,000 cubic yards of gravel will be imported to
the Project Site. Assuming a typical capacity of 15 cubic yards per truck, this corresponds to
10,667 round trips for materials export and 5,800 round trips for materials import.
Up to 60 truck round trips maximum are anticipated, with an average of approximately
20 round trips anticipated during an active day of steady hauling. These trips are expected to
occur over a ten-year period. Prior to leaving the Project Site, trucks exporting NHIS material
will be securely tarped and issued a non-hazardous waste manifest. Chevron has received a
haul permit from the City of Santa Maria and Santa Barbara County (attached as Appendix B).
3.3 TRAFFIC CONTROL
Traffic control measures will be conducted in accordance with Caltrans specifications.
An encroachment permit will be obtained from San Luis Obispo County Public Works
Department for the construction of shoulder areas and driveway approaches at the Project Site
entrances. Berms in the southern edge of Tank Farm Road will also be removed to provide
shoulder areas and improve site distance. The shoulder areas will allow trucks to pull out of the
traffic lanes while turning to enter the Project Site. The south entrance gate will be moved back
approximately 100 feet from Tank Farm Road to provide space for the trucks to park at the gate
without blocking traffic using Tank Farm Road.
Portable electronic message signs will be placed on each end of the Project Site along
Tank Farm Road during times when project activities will impact Tank Farm Road to the extent
that traffic control is needed. The electronic message signs will provide the traveling public with
current construction information and the availability of alternate travel routes. Refer to Appendix
A for the proposed message sign locations and messages. Traffic control devices (barricades,
signs) will be placed as to not interfere with bicyclists or pedestrians traveling on Tank Farm
Road.
Traffic control plans have been developed for the construction of the shoulders and
driveway approaches and for controlling traffic along Tank Farm Road at three points of access
to the Project Site both before and after the shoulders and driveway approaches are
constructed. Refer to Appendix A – Traffic Control Plans.
Temporary traffic stops to allow haul vehicles to leave the Project site will occur at
only one location at any one time. Traffic stops shall be of short duration to minimize
disruption of Tank Farm Road traffic and to reduce “platooning” of haul trucks.
9
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
Lane closure activities on Tank Farm Road are restricted to between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m. in accordance with Appendix E3 of the County of San Luis Obispo 2014 Public
Improvement Standards. Caltrans has also requested that soil hauling occur on its roads
between 8:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., and that no soil hauling activities occur on holidays as
presented in Table 1 – Designated Legal Holidays or on the day before a Designated Legal
Holiday. If a Designated Legal Holiday is on a weekend or Monday, no hauling will occur on the
Friday before the holiday. Deliveries and export of material will be scheduled to avoid peak
traffic hours and special events.
Table 1. Designated Legal Holidays
Holiday Date
New Year’s Day January 1
Martin Luther King Jr. Day Third Monday in January
Washington’s Birthday Third Monday in February
Memorial Day Last Monday in May
Independence Day July 4
Labor Day First Monday in September
Veteran’s Day November 11
Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday and Friday in November
Christmas Day December 25
Note: When a designated legal holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be a designated legal
holiday. When November 11th falls on a Saturday, Friday November 10th shall be a designated legal holiday.
10
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
3.4 OVERSIZED OR OVERWEIGHT REQUIREMENTS
A Caltrans Transportation Permit will be obtained prior to the shipment of any oversized or over-
weight loads during the course of the Project activities.
http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/permits/).
3.5 EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN
In accordance with the County’s Conditions of Approval, Chevron will implement a park
and ride program to reduce the number of worker single occupant vehicle trips going to the
Project Site. The goals of a park and ride program include decreasing the number of vehicle
trips, decreasing the air pollution associated with transportation, and decreasing traffic
congestion near the Project Site.
Applicable requirements in additional agency-required plans intended to reduce dust and
emissions (e.g., dust control, emissions reduction measures) will also be followed. Refer to the
Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) (Padre, 2016) for more information on these air
quality-related measures.
3.6 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
Advance notification will be provided to emergency response providers near the Project
Site with construction locations, potential lane closure schedules, and potential alternate routes
in order to avoid disruption to fire protection services' access through the area. The prepared
notification will be submitted to local emergency providers listed in Table 2:
Table 2. Emergency Contact Information
Agency/Provider Contact Information
California Highway Patrol 805-593-3300
San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Office 805-781-4550
City of San Luis Obispo Police Dept. 805-781-7317
SLO County Fire/Cal-Fire, Station 21 805-544-5105
San Luis Obispo City Fire Dept. 805-781-7380
San Luis Ambulance 805-543-2626
11
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
4.0 HAUL ROUTES
The Project has two approved haul routes to the Santa Maria Landfill, including use of
South Higuera Street to U.S. Highway 101 and the use of Highway 227 and Price Canyon Road
to U.S. Highway 101.
The Project has two routes to Cold Canyon Landfill, including use of Tank Farm Road to
southbound Highway 227, and use of South Higuera Street to Vachell Lane/Buckley Road to
Highway 227.
At this time, haul trucks will not utilize the U.S. Highway 101/Los Osos Valley Road
interchange based on input received from the City of San Luis Obispo. The sections below
describe the designated haul routes for each facility. Refer to Figure 4-1 – Haul Route Map.
4.1 SANTA MARIA REGIONAL LANDFILL (HIGHWAY 101 ROUTE)
1. Exit jobsite and turn west onto Tank Farm Road.
2. Turn south onto South Higuera Street.
3. Continue south to the South Higuera U.S. Highway 101 on-ramp.
4. Continue south on U.S. Highway 101 and exit at Betteravia Road in Santa Maria.
5. Travel east on Betteravia Road to Philbric Road.
6. Turn north onto Philbric Road to the City of Santa Maria Landfill entrance.
7. At the landfill entrance, turn east.
8. After unloading at the landfill, return to the jobsite by utilizing one of the approved
routes.
4.2 SANTA MARIA REGIONAL LANDFILL (HIGHWAY 227 ROUTE)
1. Exit jobsite and turn east onto Tank Farm Road.
2. Turn south onto Highway 227 (Broad Street).
3. Turn west onto Price Canyon Road.
4. Turn south onto Price Street to the southbound U.S. Highway 101 on-ramp.
5. Continue south on U.S. Highway 101 and exit at Betteravia Road in Santa Maria.
6. Travel east on Betteravia Road to Philbric Road.
7. Turn north onto Philbric Road to the City of Santa Maria Landfill entrance.
8. At the landfill entrance, turn east.
9. After unloading at the landfill, the trucks will return to the jobsite by utilizing one of
the approved routes.
4.3 COLD CANYON LANDFILL (HIGHWAY 227 ROUTE)
1. Exit jobsite and turn east onto Tank Farm Road.
12
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
2. Turn south onto Highway 227 (Broad Street).
3. At the landfill entrance, turn east (left).
4. After unloading at the landfill, the trucks will return to the jobsite by utilizing one of
the approved routes.
4.4 COLD CANYON LANDFILL (BUCKLEY ROAD ROUTE)
1. Exit jobsite and turn west onto Tank Farm Road.
2. Turn south onto South Higuera Street.
3. Turn southwest onto Vachell Lane (Vachell Lane then turns into Buckley Road).
4. Turn south on Highway 227 (Broad Street).
5. At the landfill entrance, turn east (left).
6. After unloading at the landfill, the trucks will return to the jobsite by utilizing one of
the approved routes.
4.5 BUTTONWILLOW ROUTE
1. Exit jobsite and turn west onto Tank Farm Road.
2. Turn north onto South Higuera Street to access northbound U.S. Highway 101 via
Prado Road.
3. Continue north on U.S. Highway 101 and travel east on Highway 46.
4. Turn south onto Highway 33.
5. Travel east on Lokern Road to the landfill entrance.
4.6 KETTLEMAN HILLS ROUTE
1. Exit jobsite and turn west onto Tank Farm Road.
2. Turn north onto South Higuera Street to access northbound U.S. Highway 101 via
Prado Road.
3. Continue north on U.S. Highway 101 and travel east on Highway 46.
4. Travel northeast on Highway 41 to the landfill entrance.
101101227101TRUCKING ROUTE MAPPROJECT NAME:PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTSENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS &associates, inc.4-1FIGUREAPPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET06,00012,0001301-0306August 2016CEMCSan Luis Obispo, CaliforniaSAN LUIS
14
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
5.0 PAVEMENT MONITORING PROGRAM
Figure 1-3 illustrates the location of City and County maintained sections of Tank Farm
Road. The pavement monitoring program for each jurisdiction is outlined below.
5.1 COUNTY ROADS
A Chevron representative will monitor pavement conditions on roadways used for
Project-related hauling activities. According to a County roadway condition report provided by
Glenn Marshall, Tank Farm Road within County jurisdiction currently has a pavement condition
index of 80, as measured on September 10, 2013. Roadway damage or debris on County
roads resulting from the Remediation Project will be addressed immediately and corrected in
consultation with the County Public Works departments or, if appropriate, Caltrans.
The following lists the planned elements of the Pavement Monitoring Program for the
County-maintained portion of Tank Farm Road to be used for project-related hauling:
1. Pre-construction inspection and marking of pre-existing road damage with white
spray paint (if safe and appropriate to do so). The location, width, and length of
damaged roadways will be recorded and a tabulation of existing roadway damages
will be submitted to the County Planning and Building Department Project Manager
and the County Public Works Department.
2. Pre-construction videotaping using a video camera attached to a moving vehicle and
traveling at low speed. The pre-construction video recording of each segment will be
completed within two weeks prior to the start of hauling activities for each year of
project-related construction activities.
3. Daily monitoring for debris track-out and removal of such material in accordance with
Best Management Practices (Caltrans SC-7 or CASQA SE-7).
4. Bi-weekly monitoring of pavement condition via visual inspection. Videotaping may
also be done intermittently at Chevron’s discretion.
5. Post-construction inspection and videotaping completed within two weeks after the
end of project-related hauling activities each year to identify and document damage
related to hauling activities. The location, width, and length of roadway area(s)
potentially damaged by project-related hauling will be recorded and a comparison of
pre- versus post-construction roadway damages will be submitted to the County
Planning and Building Department Project Manager and the County Public Works
Department.
6. Chevron will repair damage resulting from its project-related hauling activities. As
needed, pavement will be repaired with “cold patches” within 24-hours of discovery
by Chevron or notification by the County or its representatives. Repair work will be
conducted under the County’s existing encroachment permit and, a) will be done in
accordance with applicable County standards and specification, Chapter 5.5 of
Division 2 of the California Streets and Highways code, Division 15 of the California
Vehicle Code, and with Encroachment Permit; b) will be performed by an
appropriately licensed and bonded contractor; and c) will be undertaken with
15
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
appropriate traffic control per the latest California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices. If Chevron is not able to complete the repairs within 24 hours, it may
arrange to pay the County’s cost to perform the work.
7. Complaints should be directed to:
Jerry Conable, Field Construction Representative, Chevron Environmental
Management Company
Office phone - (805) 546-6912
Cell phone – (925) 999-0201
Email - JConable@chevron.com
Andy Smith, Project Manager, Chevron Environmental Management Company
Office phone - (805) 546-6915
Cell phone – (805) 540-9812
Email - smith.andy@chevron.com
5.2 CITY ROADS
The City of San Luis Obispo has established a fee-based road program for roads under
its jurisdiction, including its portions of Tank Farm Road. The fee will be paid in lieu of
inspections, monitoring and repairs by Chevron on any City-maintained roads.
During the permit processing for each upcoming area of work, Chevron will determine
the cubic yards of soils to be hauled offsite and gravel to be imported and will estimate the
associated number of truck round trips. Prior to issuance of the construction permit by the
County, Chevron will pay the City a fee of $1.50 per round trip.
16
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
6.0 REFERENCES
Avocet Environmental, Inc., 2015. Revised Remedial Action Plan, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm,
276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California, prepared for Chevron Environmental
Management Company, March.
Marine Research Specialists, Inc., 2013. Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development
Project, Final Environmental Impact Report, prepared for the City of San Luis Obispo
and the County of San Luis Obispo, December.
Padre, 2016. Construction Activity Management Plan, Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm
Remediation, Restoration, and Development Project, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis
Obispo, California, prepared for Chevron EMC, May.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
APPENDIX A
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
ROAD WORK AHEADEXPECT
ROAD
WORKAHEADROADWORKAHEADBEPREPARED
TOSTOPBEPREPAREDTO
STOPSLOWSLOWMINIMUM
660'
SPACINGMINIMUM
660' SPACINGMINIMUM
660'
SPACINGMINIMUM
660' SPACINGMINIMUM660'
SPACINGMINIMUM 660' SPACINGDate:
ROAD
WORKAHEADROADWORKAHEADBEPREPARED
TOSTOPBEPREPAREDTOSTOPSLOWSLOWLOCATION2
MINIMUM 660'
SPACINGMINIMUM
660'
SPACINGMINIMUM
660'
SPACINGMINIMUM 660'
SPACINGMINIMUM
660' SPACING MINIMUM
ROAD
WORKAHEADROADWORKAHEADBEPREPARED
TOSTOPBE
PREPAREDTO STOPSLOWSLOWLOCATION
3MINIMUM
660'
SPACINGMINIMUM
660'
SPACINGMINIMUM
660' SPACINGMINIMUM
660'
SPACINGMINIMUM 660' SPACINGMINIMUM
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Traffic Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0306
APPENDIX B
HAUL PERMIT
APPENDIX E
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
CHEVRON SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM
REMEDIATION AND RESTORATION PROJECT
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PROJECT NO. 1301-0304
Prepared for:
Chevron Environmental Management Company
Post Office Box 1332
San Luis Obispo, California 93406
Prepared by:
Padre Associates, Inc.
369 Pacific Street
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Version 1.1
DECEMBER 2015
i -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ACCEPTANCE
Reviewed and Approved by:
Andy Smith Date
CEMC Project Manager
Prepared by:
Eric Snelling Date
Padre Principal
Dan Zimmerman Date
Padre Waste Coordinator
ii -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
REVISIONS AND APPROVALS
Version Changes Made Made
by: Date Accepted by (CEMC):
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 REGULATORY AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ................................................................ 4
3.0 PROJECT SITE WASTE HANDLERS ................................................................................. 5
3.1 TRAINING REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 8
3.2 HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................... 9
4.0 WASTE CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................................... 10
4.1 HAZARDOUS WASTE ..................................................................................................11
4.2 NON HAZARDOUS WASTE .........................................................................................14
4.3 UNIVERSAL WASTE ....................................................................................................14
4.4 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL .........................................................................15
4.5 LEAD WASTE ...............................................................................................................16
4.6 RECYCLABLE MATERIAL ............................................................................................16
4.7 MUNICIPAL WASTE .....................................................................................................17
5.0 WASTE IDENTIFICATION AND PROFILE PREPARATION ............................................. 18
5.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION ................................................................................................18
5.1.1 Sample Location .....................................................................................................18
5.1.2 Sample Containers .................................................................................................18
5.1.3 Sample Labels ........................................................................................................19
5.1.4 Chain of Custody ....................................................................................................19
5.2 ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................19
5.3 DATA REVIEW/VALIDATION ........................................................................................20
5.4 WASTE PROFILES .......................................................................................................20
6.0 WASTE STORAGE PROCEDURES ................................................................................. 21
6.1 WASTE STORAGE LOCATION ....................................................................................21
6.2 SIGNAGE ......................................................................................................................22
6.3 CONTAINERS ...............................................................................................................22
6.4 CONTAINER LABELS ...................................................................................................22
6.5 ACCUMULATION TIME .................................................................................................24
6.6 SPILL PREVENTION PROCEDURES...........................................................................24
6.7 INSPECTIONS ..............................................................................................................25
7.0 WASTE TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................ 26
7.1 APPROVED WASTE TRANSPORTERS .......................................................................26
7.2 MANIFEST AND BILL OF LADING ...............................................................................26
7.3 VEHICLE INSPECTION ................................................................................................27
8.0 WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING............................................................................. 28
8.1 APPROVED DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING FACILITIES ..............................................28
8.2 SCHEDULING AND WORK ORDERS ..........................................................................28
9.0 DOCUMENTATION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING ............................................ 30
i -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
9.1 WASTE TRACKING AND REPORTING ........................................................................30
9.2 MANIFESTS, BILLS OF LADING, AND LDRS ..............................................................30
9.3 WASTE PROFILES .......................................................................................................31
9.4 TRAINING RECORDS ..................................................................................................31
9.5 INSPECTION LOGS ......................................................................................................31
10.0CONTINGENCY SPILL RESPONSE AND REPORTING ................................................... 32
11.0WASTE MINIMIZATION .................................................................................................... 33
11.1 WASTE MINIMIZATION TECHNIQUES ........................................................................33
11.2 GOOD OPERATING PRACTICES ................................................................................33
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 Statutes, Regulations, Permits, and Plans.................................................................. 4
Table 3-1 Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................................... 5
Table 3-2 Waste Management Roster ........................................................................................ 8
Table 3-3 Waste Handler Training Requirements ....................................................................... 8
Table 4-1 Waste Management Inventory Program, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis
Obispo, California, Waste Assessment Criteria .........................................................10
Table 5-1 USEPA Test Method Identification ............................................................................19
Table 7-1 Waste Transportation ................................................................................................26
Table 8-1 Waste Disposal and Recycling Facilities ...................................................................28
Table 10-1 Contingency Spill Contact Information .....................................................................32
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1. Site Vicinity Map ...................................................................................................... 2
Figure 1-2. Site Plan .................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 4-1. Designated Storage Location ..................................................................................13
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Storage Facility Inspection Record Form
Appendix B – Transporter Inspection Form
Appendix C – Non-Hazardous and Hazardous Waste Container Tracking Log
Appendix D – Non Hazardous Waste Container Storage Site Entry and Waste Placement Log
Appendix E – Hazardous Waste Container Storage Site Entry and Waste Placement Log
Appendix F – Recycled Material Container Storage Site Entry and Waste Placement Log
1 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Waste Management Plan (WMP) has been prepared for the San Luis Obispo Tank
Farm (Project Site), operated by Chevron Environmental Management Company (CEMC), and
located in San Luis Obispo, California (refer to Plates 1 and 2). The objective of this WMP is to
assist Project Site personnel in the onsite management and offsite transportation and disposal of
waste streams generated at the Project Site in accordance with applicable regulatory and project
specific permit requirements. Specific goals of this WMP are to:
Outline regulatory, permit, and CEMC/Refining Business Unit (RBU) requirements
associated with waste management;
Provide Project Site personnel information and guidance needed to properly handle,
manage, and dispose of previously identified hazardous and non hazardous waste;
Provide Project Site personnel information and guidance needed to identify,
characterize, manage, and dispose of newly identified hazardous and non hazardous
waste;
Describe documentation and recordkeeping associated with waste management
activities; and
Provide guidance to minimize waste generation and enhance re use and recycling.
Using guidance provided in this plan will allow Project Site field personnel to effectively
manage wastes generated by their operations. However, this guidance is not intended to hamper
communications between the Project Site field personnel and Project Site Waste Coordinator
Group and site management. When questions arise, compliance and/or management groups
should be contacted to ensure compliance. In addition, this document can be amended in the
field, as necessary. All revisions and amendments must be documented in the Revision and
Approval section of this WMP (page ii) and approved by the Waste Management Coordinator and
the CEMC Project Manager or their designee.
The information, content, and guidance presented in this WMP have been prepared to
address local, state, and federal statutes and regulations as well as project specific permits, plans,
and CEMC requirements. These statutes and regulations, project specific requirements, and
interpretations may change; therefore, this document may be revised and updated as necessary.
2 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Figure 1-1. Site Vicinity Map
3 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Figure 1-2. Site Plan
4 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
2.0 REGULATORY AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
This WMP had been prepared in accordance with the following statutes and regulations;
and project specific permits, plans and requirements. These documents are applicable to waste
management activities that occur at the Project Site and should be taken into consideration during
waste management activities. The Project Site Waste Coordinator and CEMC/RBU
Environmental Specialist should be contacted if there are questions or uncertainties about the
proper management of waste and the applicability of these documents.
Table 2-1 Statues, Regulations, Permits, and Plans
Regulation/Permit/Plan Description
40 CFR Part 261 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
40 CFR Part 262 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
40 CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management
40 CFR Part 268 Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR)
CCR Title 22, Chapter 11 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
CCR Title 22, Chapter 12 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
CCR Title 22, Chapter 23 Standards for Universal Waste Management
CCR Title 22, Chapter 18 Land Disposal Restrictions
CHSC Division 20 Chapter 6.5 Hazardous Waste Control Law
29 CFR Part 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
49 CFR Part 172 Hazardous Material Communications, Emergency Response, Training
Requirements and Security Plans
CIWMB 690 Waste Tire Disposal
Asbestos Management Plan Project Specific procedures to be followed during asbestos abatement
Recycling/Solid Waste Management Plan Procedures to minimize the amount of material requiring disposal
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Project Specific procedures to be followed during disposal of
groundwater
CCR – Code of California Regulations
CFR – Code of Federal Regulations
CHSC – California Health and Safety Code
CIWMB – California Integrated Waste
Management Board
5 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
3.0 PROJECT SITE WASTE HANDLERS
For the purposes of this WMP, personnel involved in waste management activities
including preparation of plans and procedures; interpretation of regulatory, permit, and plan
requirement; onsite waste handling, identification, sampling, characterization, storage, and
labeling; waste profile preparation; hazardous and non hazardous manifest/bill of lading
preparation; documentation and recordkeeping; and offsite transportation and disposal will be
referred to as waste handlers. Table 3-1 summarizes roles and responsibilities of the various
Project Site waste handlers. Table 3-2 provides the waste management roster.
Table 3-1 Roles and Responsibilities
Role Responsibility
CEMC/RBU
Environmental Specialist or
Designee
Establish and implement CEMC/RBU waste management policies
Approve hazardous and non hazardous waste disposal facility and
transportation vendors
Act as resource for questions from the Project Site Waste Management Team
Advise the CEMC Project Manager on potential improvements to waste
management and specific disposal options
Anticipate and communicate potential incorrect waste management
circumstances and support the Project Site waste management team to
correct in a timely manner
Work with the Waste Management Coordinator and Compliance Coordinator
to schedule and conduct field audits of waste management procedures,
storage, and effectiveness of implementation of this plan (minimum of once
per year)
Advise on proper sampling and analysis procedures
Advise on proper waste labeling and description
Advise on comparison of analytical data and classification criteria
CEMC Project Manager • Review and approve this WMP
Assign personnel to waste management roles
Periodic review of adequacy of this WMP
Review and approve Management of Changes associated with implementation
of this WMP
Sign Bill of Lading appropriate training
Sign recycle agreement with recycling company
Approve offsite disposal or recycling of scrap metal or other items of value
owned by CEMC and sign appropriate shipping documents prior to removal
from site
CEMC Construction
Representative
Prior to sending a recyclable bin offsite, contents must be reviewed and
categorized by the CEMC Project Manager or designee Sign Bill of Lading for
CEMC with appropriate training and authorizations
Inspect and reinforce proper waste management procedures by suppliers in
the field
6 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Ensure Project Site waste management planning and field activities are
performed in compliance with project specific permits, plans, and requirements
Periodic review of adequacy of this WMP
Project Site Waste
Coordinator
Undergo required training (and with appropriate authorization) and be well
versed in applicable statutes and regulations, project specific permits, plans
and requirements, and CEMC/RBU waste management policies
Ensure field personnel are properly trained for waste management procedures
Inspect waste storage locations on a weekly basis (at a minimum)
Arrange for corrections of any incorrect containerization or labeling in the field
Control and limit access to the waste storage area and containers
Anticipate formation of new wastes and work with Waste Management
Coordinator to plan for timely removal from the Project Site prior to waste
formation
Support Waste Management Coordinator to be effective in their role
Identify and implement waste reduction and minimization strategies
Provide information to CEMC Environmental Specialist to assist them in
tracking waste types and quantities
Inspect waste storage location on a weekly basis (at a minimum) and before
the transport of waste offsite
Keep a log of all weekly inspection forms to be filed in the appropriate field
binder
Implement the Project Site Waste Management Program and procedures as
outlined in this plan
Provide training and guidance to field personnel to aid in proper management
of waste generated as part of their daily operations
Oversee waste management activities performed by Project Site field
personnel including onsite waste handling, source identification, and storage
Facilitate arrangements for bin and other waste container deliveries, pick ups,
scheduling, inspections
Facilitate timely removal of wastes from Project Site with proactive scheduling
of all precursors to removal
Provide proper placards and paperwork for vehicles prior to transport offsite
Track waste storage times and types to ensure compliance with
containerization and storage time requirements
Coordinate waste characterization for new and/or not previously identified
waste including sample collection, laboratory analysis, and
interpretation/validation of analytical results
Coordinate with CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist during preparation of
waste profile documents, and hazardous waste manifests, and nonhazardous
manifests/Bills of Lading
Coordinate with appropriate approved disposal/recycling facility and
transportation vendors to schedule offsite transportation and disposal of waste
material
Maintain waste related documentation and records (waste profiles, approvals,
waste manifests/bill of ladings, personnel training records)
7 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
In addition to the CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist use of the Waste
Management System (WAM), maintain or oversee waste related databases
used to track onsite roll off bins, and hazardous and non hazardous waste
generated at the Project Site
Track and document movement of bulk waste onsite (affected material) and
when transported offsite for disposal
Inspect vehicles transporting waste material prior to exiting the site to ensure
proper placards, paperwork, and document the condition of the vehicle
Lead waste management team – schedule and lead monthly meetings with
waste management team to review status of waste stored in field, removal
plans, and improvement opportunities
Recommend changes and updates to this WMP to CEMC Project Manager
Serve as primary liaison with CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialists
Prepare and approve waste profile sheets/documents,
Prepare and, if necessary, sign hazardous waste manifests, nonhazardous
waste manifests, Bill of Ladings, Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) forms and
waste profile sheets/documents or approve designees to sign on behalf of
Chevron as authorized signatory
Update the Chevron Essential Suite (ESS) database with waste profile and
manifest data as necessary
Project Site Field Personnel
Trained in Waste Handling
Undergo required training and be well versed in the Project Site Waste
Management Program including this WMP
Manage waste generated as part of their daily operations inclusive of
identifying the source of the waste stream generated and determine if it is a
previously identified or new/unidentified waste
For previously identified waste, properly containerize, place container in
appropriate storage location, and notify the Project Site Waste Coordinator
when waste is placed in the appropriate section of the storage location. For
new/unidentified waste, place in the appropriate section of the storage location
and notify the Project Site Waste Coordinator when waste is encountered or
generated to begin the waste identification and profile process
Assist the Project Site Waste Coordinator in waste sampling events as
directed
After training, inspect waste storage locations on a routine basis to ensure
proper container storage and labeling, accumulation dates, and condition of
containers
8 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Table 3-2 Waste Management Roster
Role Responsible Person(s)
CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist
Designated Backup
1. TBD
2. TBD
CEMC Project Manager 1. Andy Smith
CEMC Construction Representative 1. Jerry Conable
Project Site Waste Coordinator
Designated Backup(s)
1. Dan Zimmerman
2. Scott Santala
3. Joe Stanley
Project Site Field Personnel Trained in Waste Handling 1. Joe Stanley
2. Mark Wagoner
3.1 TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
There are specific training requirements for some of the roles described in Section 3.1.
Training should be verified complete prior to performing waste management tasks. The Project
Site Waste Coordinator will track and document training records for Project Site field personnel.
Table 3-3 summarizes the training required for each waste handler and cites the applicable
regulation, permit, or policy.
Table 3-3 Waste Handler Training Requirements
Role Regulation/Permit/Policy Description
CEMC Construction
Representative
Waste Module Training EMC Essential Suite training for waste tracking.
Project Site Waste
Coordinator and Site
Personnel Trained in Waste
Handling
49 CFR 172.704 DOT Hazardous Materials Transportation Training
40 CFR 262.34 RCRA Hazardous Waste Generator Training
Waste Coordinator Only)
29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response
Project Site Waste Management
Program
Project Site WMP and general waste program
training
CCR – California Code of
Regulations
DOT – Department of
Transportation
DTSC – Department of Toxic Substances
RCRA – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
9 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
In addition to the training requirements listed above, any new personnel will be given an
orientation to the Project Site waste management protocols and manifesting requirements by the
Waste Management Coordinator, as necessary. The introduction should include, at the least, an
overview of waste manifesting procedures, requirements, and key contacts.
3.2 HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
All Project Site waste handlers must be familiar with and implement the following health
and safety procedures during waste management activities particularly during identification,
packaging, sampling, or similar activities where exposure is likely.
Review Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for chemicals suspected to be in the waste;
Refer to health and safety requirements specific to field operations and the task being
performed, and don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE);
Drums or totes containing waste should never be lifted by hand; use proper waste
handling equipment;
Follow confined space entry standard in enclosed areas if necessary to access waste;
If unsafe conditions or items needing repair are noted, contact the Project Site Waste
Coordinator or immediate supervisor and take appropriate corrective action; and
Contact the Project Site Waste Coordinator or immediate supervisor if uncertainties
exist.
10 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
4.0 WASTE CLASSIFICATION
Waste classification begins when a waste is generated and should be consistent with
applicable federal and state regulations including 40 CFR 261 and Title 22 CCR Chapter 11.
Waste material generated at the Project Site may be classified as hazardous waste, “California”
hazardous waste, non hazardous waste, Universal Waste, recyclable materials, or municipal
waste as described in the following sections.
Hazardous or non hazardous classifications are determined by the type and amount
of hazardous components of the waste. This determination is accomplished through sampling and
analytical testing to evaluate the concentration of suspected contaminants. Analytical testing is
required if previous testing was not performed, test results are inadequate or outdated, or
other information sources such as SDSs do not provide sufficient data to determine proper
disposal. Waste classification information also determines applicable waste codes, proper
storage procedures, DOT shipping and labeling requirements, and the data necessary for
acceptance at disposal/recycling facilities.
The following sections describe the various waste classifications and lists specific waste
that are routinely generated at the Project Site in each classification. Table 4-1 summarizes
various waste streams that may be generated, onsite storage and handling requirements and
approved offsite disposal facilities.
Table 4-1 Waste Management Inventory Program, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis
Obispo, California, Waste Assessment Criteria
TYPE OF WASTE ANALYSIS AND
PROFILE
REQUIRED
FINAL DISPOSITION
Wood debris with lead-based
paint
Title 22 Waste Profile
Analyses for Disposal at
Clean Harbors or
Chemical Waste
Management Facility
Contain in roll-off bin(s) pending profile acceptance.
Sample, obtain profile and work order number from
approved disposal facility. Transport and dispose at
appropriately licensed landfill.
Treated Wood Waste (TWW) Arsenic, chromium,
copper, creosote,
pentachlorophenol
Santa Maria Regional Landfill disposal site with proper
labeling and notification to landfill.
Asbestos Asbestos Content by
Polarized Light
Microscopy
Asbestos-containing waste will be disposed at Clean
Harbors Buttonwillow Hazardous Waste Landfill. Need to
obtain profile and work order number from Clean Harbors.
Wastewater Title 22 Waste Profile
Analyses
Contain in 500-BBL frac tank(s), pending profile
acceptance. Wastewater will be transported under
manifest to appropriate Clean Harbors facility. Liquids
with pH between 2 and 12 can be transported to
Buttonwillow, CA. Liquids with pH outside of that range
must be transported to Grassy Mountain, UT.
Miscellaneous Oily Waste Title 22 Place in 20-CY closed-top roll-off bin(s) or 55-gallon
drums pending transport to Clean Harbors Buttonwillow
Hazardous Waste Landfill or Chemical Waste
11 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
TYPE OF WASTE ANALYSIS AND
PROFILE
REQUIRED
FINAL DISPOSITION
Management Kettleman Hills Facility. Need to obtain
profile and work order number from Clean Harbors or
Waste Management, respectively.
Soils with TPH Use NHIS analytical suite
and Title 22
Stockpile per Soil Segregation and Stockpiling Plan and
profile for shipment to either Santa Maria Regional
Landfill, Cold Canyon Landfill, or Clean Harbors
Buttonwillow Landfill.
Concrete/ Asphalt None Store concrete and asphalt in staging area. Transport to
Negranti Quarry in Cayucos or RoXsand in Nipomo, CA.
Metal debris and rebar None After obtaining operational approval, transport to recycling
facility as scrap. Store in 20-CY closed-top roll-off bin
pending transport offsite. All loads need to have BOL.
Non-Hazardous Trash/Solid
Waste/Recyclables
None Bag and dispose as municipal waste in closed-top roll-off
bin near the Main Office for shipment and disposal at Cold
Canyon Landfill.
Investigation Derived Waste
soil, water, and disposable
PPE)
Title 22 Dispose of at Clean Harbors as Non-Hazardous waste,
depending on analytical results. Review work order and
profile from Clean Harbors and ensure still valid.
Universal Waste None Place in 5-gallon buckets, 55-gallon drums, or necessary
size container and transport to Clean Harbors or local
municipal recycling facility.
4.1 HAZARDOUS WASTE
Waste is considered characteristically hazardous if it exceeds the federal and/or state
regulatory levels for ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity characteristics as defined in 40
CFR 261 Subpart B and Title 22 CCR, Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Article 3. A waste may be
identified as characteristically hazardous by laboratory analysis or generator knowledge. In
addition, certain wastes have been determined to be hazardous by the federal and state agencies
based on concentration of chemicals that would render it hazardous and the process or industry
that created the waste, and have been “listed” as such in 40 CFR 261 Subpart C and Title 22
CCR, Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Article 4. Listed waste may be from a non specific source (not
industry specific), a specific source, or may be discarded commercial chemical products, off
specification species and spill residue. According to the “Listed Mixture Rule”, any waste mixture
that includes a listed hazardous waste is automatically a listed hazardous waste and will carry
the listing.
Material deemed to be hazardous waste must be placed in the designated storage
location (refer to Figure 4-1); properly labeled; and disposed of at a Chevron-approved
treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) authorized for hazardous waste disposal (Class
I) accompanied by a hazardous waste manifest and LDR form (when applicable). The date
hazardous material is placed in the storage location must be clearly marked on the label to
ensure it is stored onsite for 180 days or less. Examples of waste generated at the Project Site
12 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
that may be considered hazardous include the following. Refer to Table 4-1 for additional waste
and specific handling requirements.
Soil containing heavy metals or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in concentrations
greater than the regulatory toxicity characteristics thresholds;
Polychlorinated Biphenyls;
Lead based paints; and
Discarded commercial chemical products.
13 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Figure 4-1. Designated Storage Location
14 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
4.2 NON HAZARDOUS WASTE
The majority of waste generated at the Project Site is considered non hazardous waste.
Unless otherwise stated in project specific plans, non-hazardous waste will be disposed of at a
Chevron-approved TSDF authorized for hazardous waste disposal (Class I) accompanied by a
non-hazardous waste manifest. Non-hazardous waste can also be disposed of in non hazardous
landfills (Class II) accompanied by a non hazardous waste manifest. Non hazardous waste
should be placed in the appropriate section of the designated storage locations. Non liquid waste
may be placed in non hazardous waste bins to be located in the waste accumulation area. A
placard listing acceptable non hazardous waste that can be placed in the bin will be affixed to
the side of the bin. Liquid waste will be properly containerized (drums, tanks) and placed in the
designated portion of the waste accumulation area. Examples of waste generated at the Project
Site that may be considered non hazardous include the following. Refer to Table 4-1 for
additional waste and specific handling requirements:
Non hazardous impacted soils (NHIS);
Groundwater sampling equipment and supplies;
Absorbent pads and booms;
Spent personal protective equipment (PPE);
Empty cans and buckets (Per Title 22 CCR 66261.7, a container is considered empty
when all pourable waste no longer pours when the container is inverted, and all non
pourable wastes are scraped or otherwise removed);
High density polyethylene (HDPE) liner;
Punctured aerosol cans;
Cement and asphalt; and
Miscellaneous material contaminated with crude oil, diesel, and lube oil (i.e. concrete,
pipe, oily debris).
4.3 UNIVERSAL WASTE
Universal Wastes are considered hazardous wastes upon disposal but pose a lower risk to
people and the environment. They are exempted from traditional hazardous waste management
requirements, provided that management procedures ensure safe handling, recycling, or disposal.
In general, Universal Waste should be handled in a manner that prevents the release of the
hazard component to the environment and must be recycled or disposed of at a Universal Waste
destination facility (facility with a permit to treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste).
Universal Waste cannot be managed with municipal waste. Universal Waste should be
properly packaged and clearly marked/labeled based on waste type. Universal Waste should
not be stored onsite longer than one year from the date of generation. Examples of waste
generated at the Project Site that may be considered Universal Waste include the following.
Refer to Table 4-1 for additional waste and specific handling requirements.
Batteries (rechargeable Ni Cd batteries, small sealed lead acid batteries, mercury
batteries, alkaline batteries);
15 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Lamps (fluorescent tubes and bulbs, sodium vapor lamps); cathode ray tubes (CRT)
television and computer monitors);
Electronic devices (e waste). E waste may include electronic equipment without CRT
such as cell phones, telephones, computer central processing units (CPUs), laptop
and desktop monitors with liquid crystal displays (LCD);
Non empty aerosol containers (if they contain an ignitable or toxic propellant or
contents that exhibit hazardous waste characteristics); and
Mercury containing waste (switches, thermostats, switches, thermometers,
dilators/tubing, gas flow regulators).
4.4 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL
Asbestos containing material (ACM) is considered hazardous if it is friable and contains
1.0 percent or more asbestos. Friable waste is one that can be reduced to powder or dust
under hand pressure when dry.
Although the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) does not
regulate asbestos as hazardous waste under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
it is considered a “non RCRA” or “California only” hazardous waste and is regulated under CCR
Title 22, Chapter 11. Non friable ACM is not considered hazardous regardless of asbestos
content and is therefore not subject to state regulation.
If ACM or suspected ACM is discovered onsite the location should be flagged or staked,
and the Project Site Waste Coordinator should be notified for evaluation. Field personnel should
not handle or move ACM until it is evaluated by the Project Site Waste Coordinator. Only qualified
licensed asbestos abatement contractors will abate and manage ACM in accordance with federal
and state regulations and a Project Site Asbestos Management Plan, if necessary. Removed
friable ACM waste must be properly contained on leak tight, sealed containers with a caution label
affixed to the outside of the container in accordance with CCR Title 8, Section 5208. ACM must
be disposed of in a landfill that is authorized to accept asbestos waste. Examples of waste
generated at the Project Site that may be considered ACM (friable and non friable) include the
following. Refer to Table 4-1 for additional waste and specific handling requirements.
Gaskets;
Transite pipe;
Concrete;
Thermal system insulation; and
Mastic adhesives (wrapping found around pipes, floor tiles and windows).
16 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
4.5 LEAD WASTE
Lead containing waste is regulated by both the USEPA under RCRA and California
under CCR Title 22, Chapter 11. Lead containing waste is considered RCRA hazardous if by
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) the waste contains 5.0 milligrams per liter
mg/L) or greater lead by volume. Lead containing waste may also be considered “California
only” hazardous if by chemical analysis either the Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC)
and/or Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) meets or exceeds 1,000 milligrams per
kilograms (mg/kg) or 5.0 mg/L by volume, respectively.
If lead containing waste or suspected lead containing waste is discovered onsite, the
location or material should be flagged or staked and the Project Site Waste Coordinator should
be notified for evaluation. Lead containing waste should be handled so that the disturbance of the
material does not cause leaded material to become airborne or spread onto soil. Any suspected
lead containing waste should be placed onto plastic sheeting and covered pending analysis and
disposal. Lead containing waste must be disposed of at an appropriate facility taking into
consideration the concentrations of lead. Refer to Table 4-1 for additional waste and specific
handling requirements.
Paint;
Piping;
Batteries;
Fluorescent lamps; and
Electrical switches.
4.6 RECYCLABLE MATERIAL
A recyclable waste is a material or substance that can no longer be used for its original
purpose without reclaiming or remanufacturing. Prior to activities requiring waste disposal, the
Project Site Waste Coordinator will identify opportunities to recycle and salvage waste
generated during remediation and decommissioning activities, and if necessary, develop a
Recycling/Solid Waste Handling Plan; thereby minimizing the amount of material requiring
disposal. Examples of waste generated at the Project Site that may be considered recyclable
material include the following. Refer to Table 4-1 for additional waste and specific handling
requirements.
Used Tires (regulated by the California Department of Resources Recycling and
Recovery (CalRecycle))
Asphaltic concrete (AC);
Metal (pipes, drums, sheet pile, etc.);
Clean concrete;
Office waste (paper, plastic, glass); and
Certain waste oils.
17 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
The following steps must be followed as part of CEMC’s Scrap Metal Procedures when
shipping scrap metal or any other items of value owned by Chevron to a recycler if the item has
monetary value.
Prior to sending a recyclable bin off site, contents must be reviewed and categorized
by a CEMC Project Manager or the CEMC Construction Representative;
CEMC Project Manager seeks operational approval via email based on CEMC’s Asset
Guidelines;
CEMC Construction Representative or CEMC Supplier Employee contacts the North
American Waste Desk to order the Bill of Ladings (BOL). The four copies of each
individual BOL ticket is utilized to track scrap metal transportation;
CEMC Construction Representative or CEMC Supplier completes the Generator’s
Section of the BOL, obtains signatures and retains BOL copy #4 prior to scrap departing
from the Project Site;
Transporter driver retains BOL copies #1, #2 and #3 and is released for departure from
the Project Site;
Driver provides copy #1 and #2 of the BOL ticket to the recycler along with a copy of
the sales agreement;
CEMC Construction Representative or CEMC Supplier obtains scrap receipt, weight
ticket, funds, BOL copies #1 and #2 from the recycler;
CEMC Construction Representative or CEMC Supplier issues an Ariba Credit Memo
and uploads BOL #2, weight ticket and receipt;
CEMC Project Manager receives Credit Memo in Ariba and approves. Upon approval
from Financial Shared Services, a CEMC Financial Analyst will reconcile BOL copy #2;
and
CEMC Construction Representative or CEMC Supplier enters the BOL information into
E-Suites.
4.7 MUNICIPAL WASTE
Municipal waste is typically generated in the offices during the course of the work day.
Municipal waste is placed in the appropriate “trash” bins and disposed of at a municipal landfill.
Recyclable municipal waste, such as paper, plastic and glass are collected in the blue
recyclable” bins placed in each office location and handled with the recyclable materials. As
mentioned in section 4.3, Universal Waste should not be placed in municipal waste containers.
18 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
5.0 WASTE IDENTIFICATION AND PROFILE PREPARATION
Most routine wastes generated at the Project Site have been characterized, profiled,
managed, and disposed of as non hazardous waste. Ongoing laboratory analysis of routine
waste is required for disposal purposes to indicate that the waste has remained consistent
and that no regulatory thresholds are exceeded. The frequency and type of laboratory analysis
for routine waste streams is dictated by the disposal facility. Disposal and recycling facilities may
also require a sample be provided to conduct their own analysis and/or an independent analysis
report.
If a new waste stream is identified or no current disposal permit is in place for a particular
waste stream, sampling and analysis will be necessary to characterize and profile the waste prior
to making any disposal arrangements. The following sections outline procedures, equipment, and
materials necessary to collect and analyze waste samples in accordance with USEPA protocol
Chapter 9, “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods”, SW 846, 3rd
Edition USEPA, 1986), and to prepare waste profile sheets for acceptance into a disposal facility.
All new waste profiles or re certifications must be reviewed and signed by the CEMC/RBU
Environmental Specialist, or designated person, prior to be being submitted to a Chevron
approved facility.
5.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION
The Project Site Waste Coordinator will perform sample collection or closely coordinate
sample collection if done by field personnel. Procedures for sample collection, preservation, and
analytical requirements will be developed by the Project Site Waste Coordinator based on the
following information:
Knowledge about waste stream – previous analysis, SDS
Origin of waste – tanks, sumps, drums, bulk or soils
Waste stream matrix – liquid, solid, multi phase
Disposal facility waste profile and approval requirements
5.1.1 Sample Location
The goal of any waste sampling event is to obtain representative samples that allow
measurements of the physical and chemical properties of the waste that are both accurate and
precise. Samples may be collected as grab samples (discrete sample) or composite samples
multiple discrete samples combined into a single sample) based on the disposal facility’s
requirements. Sample collection locations and methods will be considered by the Project Site
Waste Coordinator during the sample planning phase.
5.1.2 Sample Containers
Each laboratory analytical method requires a specific volume of sample material,
container type, and in some cases a preservative. Sample bottles can usually be obtained
from the laboratory that will be performing the analysis. The laboratory will include the
appropriate preservatives in sample bottles as needed based on the parameters being analyzed.
The laboratory should be contacted a few days prior to sample collection to allow timely delivery
of the proper sample bottles.
19 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
5.1.3 Sample Labels
Properly completed labels must be affixed to each sample bottle to allow for accurate
sample identification and analysis at the laboratory. The labels must be filled out completely,
using a water proof pen. At a minimum, information recorded on the sample labels should
include sample location (vessel, container, or specific location where the sample was
collected), date and time of sample collection, sample type (grab or composite), sample matrix
water, soil), sample identification number (unique number for sample tracking purposes),
required analysis (list USEPA Method number), and initials of sample collector. Sample labels
can usually be obtained from the laboratory that will be performing the analysis.
5.1.4 Chain of Custody
A properly completed chain of custody (COC) form must accompany all samples from
the Project Site through delivery to the laboratory.
At a minimum, the COC form must identify each sample bottle by sample identification
number, the sample collector, date and time of sample collection, sample matrix, sample location,
preservative (if any), and required analysis.
The COC form should be signed by the sampler and every other individual who takes
possession of the samples until they are received by laboratory personnel. The person
delivering the samples to the laboratory should get a copy of the completed COC form and
return it to the Project Site Waste Coordinator for recordkeeping.
5.2 ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS
Analytical requirements are based on the waste type, matrix, and the disposal facility’s
waste approval requirements. Laboratory test methods are assigned a unique USEPA method
identification number. To accurately communicate analytical requirements to the laboratory, the
proper USEPA Test Method number must be referenced on the COC which must accompany
each sample or group of samples. Test Method identification numbers should be reviewed
annually at a minimum to ensure the most current method is referenced. Typical USEPA Test
Methods required for waste characterization and the corresponding analyte are included in Table
5-1. Please note additional waste characterization analysis may be performed as required by
the disposal facility. The Project Site Waste Coordinator will finalize analytical requirements during
the sampling planning phase.
Table 5-1 USEPA Test Method Identification
USEPA Test Method Identification Number Analyte
6000 and 7000 Series Total Metals and Hexavalent Chromium
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds
8270C Semi volatile Organic Compounds
8082 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
8081A Organo chlorinated Pesticides
SW 846/1010 Ignitability
9040 (Soil), 150.1 (aqueous) Corrosivity
20 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
USEPA Test Method Identification Number Analyte
9045D pH
SW 7.3.3.2 Cyanide
SW 7.3.4.2 Reactive Sulfides
California F&G/DHS 1988 Fathead Minnow Fish Bioassay
5.3 DATA REVIEW/VALIDATION
Laboratory report data will be reviewed by the Project Site Waste Coordinator to evaluate
validity of results and to determine if the waste sampled exceeds the regulatory thresholds for
characteristics waste (ignitability, reactivity, corrosivity, toxicity) as defined in CCR Title 22,
Chapter 11. Questionable data will be discussed with laboratory Quality Control personnel to
determine if sampling and/or laboratory errors have occurred and to determine the proper course
of action to rectify discrepancies.
5.4 WASTE PROFILES
Each waste stream generated at the Project Site will have a specific waste profile sheet
prepared as part of the disposal facility’s approval process. Waste profile sheets will be
prepared and signed by the CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist or Designee. The waste
profile sheet is typically provided by the disposal facility destined to receive the waste.
Information to be included on the waste profile sheet varies based on the disposal facility’s
requirements but typically includes information about the waste generator and waste stream,
a description of how the waste is generated, physical and chemical properties of the waste,
regulatory status (hazardous, non hazardous, California hazardous), DOT shipping
requirements, and applicable LDRs. A copy of the laboratory analytical report is typically
included with the waste profile sheet. Once the disposal facility approves the waste profile sheet
and analytical data, a waste profile number is assigned to the waste and must be referenced
once transport of the waste to the disposal facility begins.
Waste profile sheets and disposal facility acceptance are valid for a specific time frame
dictated by the disposal facility. Waste profile sheets must be revised and renewed to remain
current and in the event there is a change in the waste stream or generation process. The
CEMC Construction Representative will be responsible for tracking existing waste profile sheets
and approvals as well as updating, renewing, and revising existing waste profile sheets as needed
to keep approvals current and valid.
21 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
6.0 WASTE STORAGE PROCEDURES
Waste storage begins when waste is generated and ends at transportation of the waste
offsite for recycling, disposal, or treatment. Storage requirements and location are based on waste
characterization. All wastes should be stored and handled in a safe and secure manner that
prevents the creation of nuisances (odor, spills, dust, etc.). Before or shortly after placing waste
in any storage location or bin, the Project Site Waste Coordinator should be notified. In the event
it is not clear where or how waste should be stored, contact the Project Site Waste Coordinator
for guidance. The following sections describe specific waste storage procedures and protocols.
6.1 WASTE STORAGE LOCATION
Waste storage locations established at the Project Site have been designed according to
the type of waste it will contain and whether the waste is bulk or containerized.
Bulk waste includes NHIS which is staged in stockpiles prior to loading into transport
trucks for offsite disposal. NHIS stockpiles will be placed in a designated stockpile areas (refer to
Figure 4-1) constructed in accordance with project specific plans approved by San Luis Obispo
County Planning and Building Department and Environmental Health Services, in addition to other
applicable agencies with regulatory oversight. Non-hazardous waste such as liquids will be stored
in 55-gallon drums (e.g. groundwater), frac tanks, or portable tanks located in the contractor
staging area (refer to Figure 4-1). Any tanks will be monitored in accordance with the applicable
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District regulations. Other non-hazardous materials
will be stored in the designated waste storage areas within the contractor staging area (refer to
Figure 4-1).
The bin and containerized waste storage location for hazardous waste is located in the
contractor staging area outside of the Runway Protection Zone . Other hazardous wastes such
as lead and asbestos containing materials will be stored in designated areas within the contractor
staging area (refer to Figure 4-1) or as determined by project specific plans. Lead and asbestos
will be sampled and handled by qualified personnel. The Project Site is secured with a locked
chain link fence to prevent unauthorized access.
Universal waste will be stored in designated bins or drums within the main office or
warehouse of the contractor staging area (refer to Figure 4-1). Universal waste will be separated
by its classification and the storage bins will be labeled according to the type of waste. Bins will
be emptied on a yearly basis, or as needed.
Recyclable materials such as scrap pipe, concrete, and asphalt will be stored in
designated areas within the contractor staging area (refer to Figure 4-1). Office waste and
recyclables will be placed in the designated waste bin located in the buildings. Waste and
recyclables will be transferred to the outdoor waste and recycle bins located in the contractor
staging area on a regular basis (refer to Figure 4-1).
22 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
6.2 SIGNAGE
Caution Unauthorized Personnel Keep Out” and “No Smoking” signs will be prominently
posted on at the hazardous waste storage location. Signs will be used to designate areas for
Universal Waste” and “Non Hazardous Waste” storage locations. Magnetized placards or other
signs will be placed on each non hazardous waste bin and recyclable bin to indicate specific
waste types that are allowed to be placed in the bins.
6.3 CONTAINERS
Waste storage containers may include bulk liquid storage tanks (DT 398, TB 1001, Baker
tanks, totes), DOT approved roll off bins, DOT approved drums, plastic totes or tubs, and 5-gallon
buckets. Containerized waste (drums, totes, buckets) will be placed in the storage location within
the concrete pad area. Roll off bins for non liquid waste will be staged within the designated area
in accordance with project plans. After placing containers in the appropriate staging area, the
Waste Bin Storage Log (Appendix C and appropriate Storage Site Entry and Waste Placement
Log (refer to Appendices D though F) will be filled out. The following procedures should be
followed when placing and managing containers in the waste storage location:
Containerized waste should be placed in the properly designated area within the
storage location;
Incompatible waste (ignitable, reactive) should be segregated;
Incompatibility will be determined based on waste characterization analysis, SDS, or
as directed by the Project Site Waste Coordinator;
There should be sufficient space between containers and bins to allow adequate
access for inspections;
Containers and bins should remain closed during storage except when necessary to
add or remove waste;
Drums should be placed on pallets or metal grate; and
Fill out the proper Storage Site Entry and Waste Placement Log.
6.4 CONTAINER LABELS
A properly completed label must be affixed to all containers and bins placed in the
storage location. Depending upon the type of the waste stored in the container or bin, the
following labels should be used. All container labels must be filled out completely using a
water proof pen. Bin labels may be preprinted on magnetized placards.
Waste Pending Analysis” – These labels will be affixed to containers of wastes that
are awaiting laboratory analysis to determine waste classification. The label will be
changed accordingly once the analysis and characterization is complete. The date of
sample collection should be noted on the label.
Hazardous Waste” – These labels will be affixed to containers of wastes that are
known to be hazardous or determined to be hazardous through laboratory analysis.
23 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Hazardous waste labels will be completed in accordance with federal and state
regulations.
Non hazardous Waste” – These labels will be affixed to containers or bins of wastes
that are known to be non hazardous or determined to be non hazardous through
laboratory analysis.
Universal Waste” – These labels will be affixed to containers, drums or totes for
batteries, lamps, electronic devices, and mercury waste. The label should indicate
the specific Universal Waste that has been placed in the container.
ACM Waste” – Packages or containers holding friable asbestos must have caution
labels affixed to the outside in a conspicuous location with the following warning:
Danger, Contains Asbestos Fibers, Avoid Creating Dust, Cancer and Lung Disease
Hazard”. Once labeled, these containers should be placed in the portion of the
storage area designated for hazardous material storage.
Recyclable Material” – These labels should be affixed to containers and bins that
hold recyclable material.
24 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Empty” – These labels should be affixed to containers that are empty and free of
materials.
Other means of identification (such as temporary signs) may be acceptable when storing
waste in bins or tanks. Additional labels may be required for DOT, or other regulatory compliance.
6.5 ACCUMULATION TIME
The allowable waste accumulation time is dependent on the waste characterization and
the amount of waste generated in a month. There is no accumulation time limit for non hazardous
waste, recyclable material, or municipal waste. Universal Waste should not accumulate or be
stored onsite longer than one year from the date of generation. The time limit for hazardous waste
storage is 90 days if the site produces more than a 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds) per month for
all hazardous waste generated onsite (Title 22 CCR 66262.34), or 180 days if the site produces
more than 100 kilograms (220 pounds) and less than 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds) per month
for all hazardous waste generated onsite. The 90- or 180-day storage/accumulation clock begins
the first day that accumulation begins in the container. Therefore, the date which the period of
accumulation begins must be clearly marked on the storage container or entered on the hazard
waste label (see above section) affixed to the container holding hazardous waste or Universal
Waste. Although not a regulatory requirement, the date that non hazardous waste is placed in
storage should also be noted on the non hazardous waste label. Weekly inspections and records
must be completed by the Project Site Waste Coordinator or designee while hazardous waste
and Universal Waste is in storage to ensure applicable storage time limits are not exceeded.
6.6 SPILL PREVENTION PROCEDURES
Waste material will be stored in a manner that will minimize the potential for spills or
releases. Bulk and containerized liquid waste will be stored in areas with secondary containment
to capture and contain potential spills or leaks. Bulk and containerized solid waste will be covered
when not being added to or actively managed. The areas will be routinely inspected for evidence
of spills or releases.
The following spill control equipment will be available in or near the waste storage
locations, as needed, for quick access and response to potential spills or releases:
Sorbent pads and booms;
Oil drip pans;
Spill kits; and
Over pack drums.
In addition, a fire extinguisher, eyewash station, and first aid kit will be located near waste
storage areas. Equipment will be inspected on a monthly basis, at a minimum. Inspections,
maintenance, and corrective actions will be documented on an inspection sheet.
25 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
6.7 INSPECTIONS
The Project Site Waste Coordinator or trained Project Site field personnel will routinely
inspect waste storage locations. Tanks and NHIS stockpile areas are routinely inspected as
part of the daily Project Site operations. The waste storage location will be inspected weekly
and documented on a Waste Storage Area Container Inspection Record Form included as
Appendix A. The Inspection Record Form will be filed and maintained by the Project Site Waste
Coordinator or designee. At a minimum, the waste storage location inspections should include
the following:
Note condition of containers and bins (leaks, spills, corrosion);
Ensure containers and bins are closed;
Ensure proper and complete labels are affixed to each container and bin; and
Ensure accumulation dates are noted on hazardous waste labels and that the
accumulation time limits have not been exceeded.
Any issues noted on the Inspection Report Form should be immediately reported to the
Project Site Waste Coordinator (if not conducting the inspection) and remedied in a timely manner
which ensures that the problem does not lead to an environmental or human health hazard. Where
a hazard is imminent or has already occurred, remedial action must be taken immediately.
26 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
7.0 WASTE TRANSPORTATION
Transportation of hazardous, non hazardous, and recyclable waste will only be
performed by Chevron approved transporters. Hazardous waste must be transported by a
California Registered Hazardous Waste Hauler. Proper paperwork required to accompany each
shipment of waste will be completed by the CEMC Construction Representative and signed by
the CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist or Designee.
7.1 APPROVED WASTE TRANSPORTERS
Table 7-1 identifies transporters that are approved to haul waste from the Project Site.
Table 7-1 Waste Transportation
Transporter USEPA ID # Material/Containers Transported
Remedial Transportation
Services (RTS)
CAL920426434 Non hazardous waste (NHIS, non hazardous waste bins,
recyclable material bins, municipal waste bins) and hazardous
waste (asphalt and oil spray, oil well returns, ACM containing
material, lead containing waste, corrosive liquids)
Pacific Petroleum of California
PPC)
CAD981164312 Non hazardous waste (NHIS, non hazardous waste bins,
recyclable material bins, municipal waste bins) and hazardous
waste (asphalt and oil spray, oil well returns, ACM containing
material, lead containing waste, corrosive liquids)
Rockin CJ CAL000385814 Non hazardous waste (NHIS, non hazardous waste bins,
recyclable material bins, municipal waste bins) and hazardous
waste (asphalt and oil spray, oil well returns, ACM containing
material, lead containing waste, corrosive liquids)
7.2 MANIFEST AND BILL OF LADING
All shipments of hazardous, non hazardous, and recyclable waste that leave the Project
Site will be accompanied by required documentation to track material from the point of generation
to the disposal or recycling facility. An approved signature for any manifest or Bill of Lading will
be completed prior to the start of any applicable waste management task. The type of
documentation required will include the following:
Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest – accompanies all hazardous waste loads and will
be prepared and distributed in accordance with CCR Title 22 66262.20. The Uniform
Hazard Waste Manifests are obtained from the State (USEPA Form 8700 22). The
CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist or an authorized designee will prepare and sign
the manifest. The manifest must be signed by the transporter upon pickup, the disposal
facility upon receipt, and returned to the generator (Project Site) as proof of delivery.
27 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Land Disposal Restriction Form – accompanies all hazardous waste to indicate if a
waste requires treatment prior to land disposal to meet LDR thresholds.
Non hazardous Waste Manifest – accompanies all non hazardous waste loads. The
Non hazardous Waste Manifest may be provided by CEMC/RBU or the disposal facility
receiving the waste. Examples of waste requiring a Non hazardous Waste Manifest
include; NHIS, Universal Waste, material in non hazardous bins.
Bill of Lading – accompanies all recyclable loads. The Bill of Lading may be provided
by CEMC/RBU or CEMC Construction Representative. Examples of waste requiring a
Bill of Lading include concrete and asphalt.
Bill of Lading – is required when shipping scrap metal or any other items of value owned
by Chevron to a recycler if the item has monetary value in accordance with CEMC’s
Scrap Sale Procedures.
7.3 VEHICLE INSPECTION
The Project Site Waste Coordinator or trained field personnel will inspect all vehicles
transporting waste material from the Project Site prior to the vehicle exiting the site. The inspection
will be documented on the Transporter Inspection Form included as Appendix B. The form will
record transporter information (name, truck number, trailer number, DOT number, California
number, placard number, driver’s name), the name of the destination disposal/recycling facility,
and the manifest or Bill of Lading that accompanies the waste material. The vehicle will also be
inspected for leaks, tire lug nuts, and to ensure it is properly covered and secured. The
Transporter Inspection Form will be filed and maintained by the Project Site Waste Coordinator.
28 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
8.0 WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING
All waste must be disposed of, or recycled, at a Chevron approved Select for Use
facility. Hazardous waste must be disposed of in approved Class I permitted disposal facilities.
Non hazardous waste must be disposed of in approved Class I or Class II permitted disposal
facilities. Municipal waste can be disposed of in an approved Class III permitted disposal facility.
8.1 APPROVED DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING FACILITIES
Table 8-1 identifies disposal and recycling facilities that are approved for use for
disposal/recycling of waste generated at the Project Site. Additional facilities may be added
following a selected-for-use by Chevron.
Table 8-1 Waste Disposal and Recycling Facilities
Facility Waste Type
Santa Maria Regional Landfill,
Santa Maria, CA
Cold Canyon Landfill
San Luis Obispo, CA
NHIS, tank bottoms, pond sludge, municipal waste, treated wood waste, power
poles
Clean Harbors Buttonwillow,
Buttonwillow, CA
Chemical Waste Management,
Kettleman Hills, CA
Material in non hazardous waste bins, affected concrete, affected liner material,
ACM waste (packaged by asbestos abatement contractor), transformer carcasses,
mercury switches (Universal Waste)
Negranti Quarry, Cayucos, CA Recyclable concrete and asphalt
Troesch, Nipomo, CA Recyclable concrete
Bedford Enterprises, Santa Maria,
CA
Material in metal recycling bins (pipes, sheet pile, empty drums)
Clean Harbors Grassy Mountain
Facility, Utah
Material in hazardous waste bins, affected concrete, affected liner material, ACM
waste (packaged by asbestos abatement contractor), transformer carcasses,
mercury switches (Universal Waste)
SA Recycling, Santa Maria, CA Material in metal recycling bins (pipes, sheet pile, empty drums),
RoXsand, Nipomo, CA Unaffected concrete and asphalt
8.2 SCHEDULING AND WORK ORDERS
Waste transportation may be on going (NHIS), triggered by the allowable accumulation
time deadline (hazardous waste, Universal Waste), or when tanks, bins, or storage areas are
full and require waste removal.
The Project Site Waste Coordinator will schedule and coordinate the offsite transportation
and disposal, or recycling, of all waste generated at the Project Site with the exception of bulk
NHIS. Ongoing transportation of bulk NHIS is scheduled and coordinated by the approved
transporter (TBD), and the disposal facility. The Project Site Waste Coordinator responsibilities
29 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
related to bulk NHIS transportation and disposal include ensuring the waste profile remains
current, manifest tracking, and tracking tons and/or yards of NHIS transported offsite.
When remaining waste streams require removal, the Project Site Waste Coordinator will
be notified in a timely manner to allow scheduling with the appropriate transporter, disposal, or
recycling facility and time to prepare required paperwork and documentation. Work orders may
be used to provide information related to the type of waste to be transported offsite, time frame
and reason for removal.
30 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
9.0 DOCUMENTATION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
Documentation, recordkeeping, and reporting are a critical part of waste management
activities and required to fulfill various regulatory requirements and permit condition. The
CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist or designee will have overall responsibility for tracking and
maintaining documents and reports pertaining to waste management activities. All documents
related to the characterization and disposal of wastes generated at the Project Site will be
reviewed and approved by the CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist or designee prior to
submission to the designated disposal facility or any regulatory agency. The Project Site Waste
Compliance Group may also be responsible for some recordkeeping and reporting that may be
related to permit conditions. The following sections summarize waste management related
documentation, recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
9.1 WASTE TRACKING AND REPORTING
The Project Site Waste Coordinator will maintain a hazardous/non hazardous waste
tracking log to track information related to each type of waste generated and stored onsite. At a
minimum, information on the waste tracking log will include the following:
Storage location of each bin, tank, or container;
Bin, tank, or container number (if applicable), size, and content;
Accumulation start date (as shown on the container label);
Disposal date;
Waste analysis completed and available (yes or no);
Labeling information;
Waste profile number; and
Manifest/Bill of Lading number when material is transported offsite.
In addition to above items, the excavation, storage, loading, and offsite transportation and
disposal of bulk NHIS is also tracked by the Project Site Waste Coordinator in conjunction with
the Project Site Waste Compliance Group and Project Site field personnel (Operations and
Maintenance and Construction Groups).
The Project Site filed personnel will track the onsite management of bulk NHIS, and the
Project Site Waste Coordinator will track offsite transportation and disposal.
9.2 MANIFESTS, BILLS OF LADING, AND LDRS
The Project Site Waste Coordinator will track each manifest (hazardous and non
hazardous), LDR, and Bill of Lading that is generated. The manifest must be signed by the
transporter upon pickup, the disposal facility upon receipt, and returned to the generator (Project
Site) as proof of delivery. The Project Site Waste Coordinator will be responsible for cross
checking the returned copies and the originals to ensure proof of delivery to the destination facility.
Manifests and LDRs will be retained onsite for a minimum of 3 years and 5 years respectively.
31 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
Once the final weight tickets or manifests have been received from the landfill, the Project
Site Waste Coordinator will be responsible for entering the manifest information into CEMC’s ESS
database. The ESS database is used by CEMC to track waste profiles and shipments and
quantities for reporting purposes.
9.3 WASTE PROFILES
Each waste stream generated at the Project Site will have a waste specific profile sheet
prepared as part of the disposal facility’s approval process. Waste profile sheets will be prepared
by the CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist or designee. Waste profile sheets and disposal
facility acceptance are valid for a specific time frame dictated by the disposal facility and must be
revised and renewed to remain current and in the event the there is a change in the waste stream
or generation process. The CEMC/RBU Environmental Specialist or designee will be responsible
for tracking existing waste profile sheets and approvals as well as updating, renewing, and
revising existing waste profile sheets as needed to keep approvals current and valid. Waste
profiles and corresponding analytical reports must be retained onsite for a minimum of 3 years.
9.4 TRAINING RECORDS
Records of training required for waste handlers will be maintained onsite. The Project Site
Waste Coordinator will ensure training records are current and valid for each waste handler. The
Project Site Waste Coordinator will also schedule training sessions in the event additional training
is required to accommodate new waste handlers and/or to ensure required training frequencies
are met.
9.5 INSPECTION LOGS
Results of inspections will be filed and maintained onsite. At a minimum, inspections forms
will include the Waste Storage Inspection Record and the Transporter Inspection Form.
32 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
10.0 CONTINGENCY SPILL RESPONSE AND REPORTING
In the event a waste material is spilled or a waste container leaks, the incident will be
promptly reported to the following personnel and cleanup of the spilled material will be performed
immediately.
Table 10-1 Contingency Spill Contact Information
Name Day Phone Cell Phone
Andy Smith (805) 546-6915 (805) 540-9812
Eric Snelling (805) 786-2650 (805) 878-6479
Dan Zimmerman (805) 786-2650 (805) 235-2984
Scott Santala 805) 786-2650 (805) 701-1624
In the event of an oil spill or release at the Project Site, procedures in the
contractor/business partner’s health and safety plan should be followed.
33 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
11.0 WASTE MINIMIZATION
A principal goal in waste management is the minimization, reduction of volume and/or
reduction of the toxicity of the waste generated. This goal is required by federal law under RCRA
and is financially beneficial. Waste minimization also benefits human health, the environment,
future liability and public relations.
11.1 WASTE MINIMIZATION TECHNIQUES
Waste minimization can be achieved through a wide array of processes that range from
simple changes in “housekeeping” practices to the total replacement of production technology.
The various types of waste reduction can be ranked in a hierarchy of performance for reducing
chemical risk. These include:
Chemical substitution (a hazardous chemical substituted by a less hazardous
chemical);
Product substitution (producing less toxic products or products that are less hazardous
to produce);
Chemical process changes (changes in production that result in less chemical use or
safer chemicals used);
Improving production management (through a reduction of spills, leaks, vaporization,
etc.);
Reclaiming, recycling and reusing chemicals;
Point of generation treatment and detoxification;
Improving waste management (including improved storage and treatment); and
Improve purchasing habits which can reduce non used off spec chemical and paints.
Much of the planning necessary to reduce waste requires:
Management commitment;
Increased awareness and attention to toxic chemicals;
Increased motivation to change existing patterns;
Knowledge of potential options for change;
Willingness to experiment and change;
Resources to implement changes; and
Willingness to follow through, evaluate and learn from such changes.
11.2 GOOD OPERATING PRACTICES
One of the best means of reducing wastes is through better operating or housekeeping
practices. Increasing the efficiency of a process can effectively reduce the amounts of waste
generated. Better operating practices include finding a more efficient way to handle a particular
34 -
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
waste to a fundamental change in the way we think about waste management. Better operating
practices are specific to each waste generating process, but general themes include the following:
Personnel Practices Heightened awareness by employees of the need for waste
minimization is essential. Training programs, for example, are ways to generate ideas
and establish employees’ commitment.
Waste Segregation Many wastes are actually mixtures of hazardous and non
hazardous waste. Much of their content may even be water. By segregating key toxic
constituents, isolating liquid fractions, or keeping hazardous streams from non
hazardous waste, can sometimes save substantial amounts of money on disposal or
explore opportunities for recycling and reuse.
Better Standard Procedures Large quantities of hazardous waste may be generated
through spills, improper storage practices, inefficient production start up or shutdown, scheduling
problems, lack of emergency procedures and preventive maintenance, or poorly calibrated
pollution control devices. New standard procedures manuals, better inventory control and routine
training and retraining sessions can help eliminate this inadvertent waste generation and provide
significant company wide source reduction benefits.
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
APPENDIX A
STORAGE FACILITY INSPECTION RECORD FORM
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
APPENDIX B
TRANSPORTER INSPECTION FORM
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
APPENDIX C
NON-HAZARDOUS AND HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER TRACKING LOG
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
APPENDIX D
NON HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER STORAGE SITE ENTRY AND WASTE
PLACEMENT LOG
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
APPENDIX E
HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER STORAGE SITE ENTRY AND WASTE
PLACEMENT LOG
Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Restoration Project
Waste Management Plan
Project No. 1301-0304
APPENDIX F
RECYCLED MATERIAL CONTAINER STORAGE SITE ENTRY AND WASTE
PLACEMENT LOG